Selected quad for the lemma: kingdom_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
kingdom_n	church_n	heaven_n	peter_n	4,199	5	7.9041	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A80756	The royal prerogative vindicated in the converted recusant convinced by Scripture, reasons, fathers, and councils, that the oath of abjuration (compared with those of allegiance, and supremacy) containeth nothing, but what may be lawfully taken by every pious Christian, and loyal subject; and that the known doctrine, and discipline of the Church of England, in opposition to Popery on the one hand, and all sects, and schisms on the other, is the safest way to peace and loyalty here, and salvation hereafter. To which is annexed The King's supremacy in all causes, ecclesiastical, and civil, asserted in a sermon preached at the assises at Monmouth before Sir Robert Hide, one of his Majestie's judges, March 30. 1661. / By John Cragge, M.A.	Cragge, John, M.A.	1661 (1661)	Wing C6790; Wing C6786; Thomason E2261_1; Thomason E2261_2; ESTC R210148	173,676	266

whole Church Minist You gather Conclusions without Premises as erroneously though not as imperiously as did your Pope Boniface (i) Declaramus dicimus definimus pronunciamus omnino esse de necessitate salutis omni humanae Creaturae subesse Romano Pontifici De Majoritate obedientia who declared said defined determined and pronounced that it was of undoubted necessitie of Salvation for every humane Creature to be subject to the Bishop of Rome but it was from his not right understanding of those Texts whence as Saint Hierom (k) Hierom. in Matthaeum cap. 16. lib. 3. said of others Aliquid sibi de Pharisaeorum assumpsit supercilio He assumed something of the Luciferian Pride of the Pharisees For the Primitive Fathers who lived nearest the Fountain judged it no less then Blasphemie to interpret any mortal man as Peter was but onely Christ the onely Son of God to be this Rock So Gregory Nyssen (l) Gregorius Nyss●●● Testimoniis 〈…〉 ex Veteri Te 〈…〉 saith Tu es Petrus c. Thou art Peter and upon this Rock I will build my Church he meaneth the confession of Christ for he had said before Thou art Christ the Son of the living God Saint Hilarie saith (m) Haec est una felix fidei petra quam Petrus ore suo confessus est Hilar. De Trinitate lib. 2. cap. 6. This is the onely-blessed Rock of Faith which Peter confessed with his mouth and upon this Rock of Peter 's Confession is the building of the Church Where you see Peter and the Rock are two distinct things Cyril saith (n) Petra nihil aliud est quàm firma inconcussa Discipuli fides Cyrillus De Trinitate The Rock is nothing else but the strong and impregnable faith of the Disciple Saint Chrysostome (o) Supra hanc petram id est in hac fide confessione aedificabo Chrysost in Matthaeum Homil 55. goes on in the same Equipage Vpon this Rock that is to say upon this Faith and this Confession I will build my Church Saint Augustine speaks home (p) Augustinus De verbis Domini secundum Matthaeum Serm. 13. Petra erat Christus supra quod fundamentum etiam aedificatus fuit Petrus Christ was the Rock upon which foundation even Peter himself was builded And lest he should leave any in the Clouds he adds further in the person of Christ Non me aedificabo super te sed te aedificabo super me I will not build my self upon thee but I will build thee upon me And that no man might conceive that Peter was in any sence singularly this Rock or that he had the monopoly of the Keys which were first promised to him but performed in a Juncto with the rest of the Apostles Origen who lived nearer the Original tells us (q) Petra est quicunque est Discipulus Christi supra talem petram constituitur omnis Ecclesiastica Doctrina August ibidem He is the Rock whosoever is the Disciple of Christ and upon such a Rock all Ecclesiastical Learning is built (r) Quòd si supra unum illum Perrum existimas aedificari totam Ecclesiam quid dicturus es de Johanne filio Tonitrui Apostolorum unoquoque nū audebimus dicere quòd adversus Petrum unum non praevaliturae sunt portae Inferorum an soli Petro dantur claves regni coelorum Orig. in Matthaeum Tract 1. If thou think that the whole Church is built onely upon Peter what wilt thou say of John the Son of Thunder and of every of the Apostles Shall we dare to say that the Gates of Hell shall not prevail onely against Peter or are the Keys of the Kingdom of heaven given onely unto Peter Seeing Saint Cyprian (s) Cyprian De simplicitate Praelatorum avers Hoc erant alii quod Petrus pari consortio praediti honoris potestatis The rest of the Apostles were the same that Peter was all endowed with the like fellowship both of honour and power That Saint Ambrose balancing them in Scripture-scales is at a stand Inter Petrum Paulum quis cui praeponatur of Peter and Paul whether of the two should be preferred before the other And if Gregory (t) Gregorius lib. 4. Epistol 32. who was a Bishop of Rome himself may be believed Petrus universalis Apostolus nonvocatur Peter is not called an Universal Apostle And for your Criticism that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are Synonomous Budaeus (u) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Budaeus in Lexico denies it unless in a Dialect the Gospel owns not Whether our Saviour used the Hebrew or Syriak word Cephas is uncertain (x) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Aristoteles lib. 1. De Coelo cap. 11. text 110. and more certain if he did it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and concludes nothing amounting but to a fallacia aequivocationis in the one Language to a Paronomasia or collusion of words in the other And Christ's promise of the Keys to Peteter inferrs no more then Saint Augustine gathers from it Petrus pro omnibus dixit cum omnibus accepit Peter was the mouth and spake for the rest of the Apostles and received the promise with all the rest Now to concenter all these lines in one point If by the Rock be meant principally either Faith confessing and relying upon Christ the Rock himself or instrumentally the Apostles who were all Equal and by a joynt Commission received the Keys it comes far short of proving the Supremacie of Peter over the rest of the Apostles and the whole Church Gent. I have not what further to reply in that being mistaken in the Fathers which I see are unanimous against us yet before I surrender this Hold (y) Ajacis Clypeus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in which our Side most confides let me hear what you can say to the other Scripture whereby Christ commissioned Peter to Feed that is rule his Sheep and feed his Lambs and that thrice repeated in presence of the rest of the Apostles whence our Pope Boniface concludes (z) Dominus dixit generaliter Pasce oves meas non singulariter has aut illas ergo commisisse intelligitur universas De Majoritate obedienti● The Lord said generally unto Peter Feed my flock he said not specially Feed these or these therefore we must understand he committed all his flock to him Minist Your Premises are weak and Boniface his Conclusion consequentleess What can be more ridiculous then this Inference Christ said to Peter Feed my Sheep he said it thrice he said it in the Presence of the Apostles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies also to rule Therefore he gave him Supremacy over the Apostles It 's my Sheep indefinitely Therefore he gave him Power over the whole Flock or Vniversal Church Prince and People To answer St. Augustine (a) Augustin supra locum and the Primitive Fathers gave other reasons

Christ said to Peter thrice Feed my Flock in relation to his threefold Denyal that he that abjured him thrice might be adjured to Fidelity in his Pastoral Charge by this Advice repeated thrice He said it in the Presence of the Apostles that they that were scandalized with his fall might be confirmed by his Establishment and make use of the Instruction which also concerned themselves (b) Haec velut ad Petrū dicta sunt omnium communia Orig. in Matthaeum Tract 1. These words being spoken as it were unto Peter are common to all the Apostles saith Origen 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not onely in St. Matthew and Homer but in Plato (c) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Plato lib. 1. De Legibus who also useth the same words signifieth to rule but is as Budeus saith Pastorum more gubernare curare gregem To rule and take care of the Flock Pastour-like As the Father of Hippo emblazons it (d) Non te pascere cogita sed oves meas sicut meas pasce non sicut tuas gloriam meam in illis quaere non tuam Dominium meum non tuum lucra mea non tua August in Johannem Tract 123. Think not to feed thy self feed my Sheep feed them as my Sheep not as thine own seek mine Honour in them seek not thine seek my Dominion and not thine seek my Gains and not thine own No man ever denyed this Feeding this ruling of the Flock to St. Peter nor did Peter himself ever deny it to any other Pastour but said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Feed or if you will for it is the same word rule the Flock of God which is among you 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 (e) 1. Pet. v. 2 3. taking the Oversight thereof not by constraint but willingly not for filthy Lucre but of a ready mind neither as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 over-ruling or being Popes over God's Heritage but being Ensamples to the Flock Where you see St. Peter yields that to every Pastor which Christ yields to him But says Boniface Christ said to St. Peter Feed my Sheep Therefore he committed all his Flock to him What sequel more then in this Peter said to all Pastours Feed the Flock Therefore he committed the whole Flock to all Pastours Bishop Jewel (f) Defence of the Apologic of the Church of England page 92. Bishop Jewel challenges the Romanists to produce the Authority of one antient learned Father that ever made this Collection but ne 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quidem yet we deny not but St. Peter had Commission to feed and rule the whole Church but it was a joint Commission with the rest of the Apostles upon whom Christ breathed alike saying (g) John xx 22. 23. Receive the Holy Ghost whose Sins ye remit they are remitted and whose Sins ye retain they are retained gave them mission and commission alike in the same extent and latitude (h) Matthew xxviii 19. Go teach all Nations c. Whereupon St. Hierom (i) Hierom. Contra Jovinianum lib. 1. saith All the Apostles received the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven and the Stability of the Church was built equally upon them all Gent. But though I should be forced to relinquish my hold from these Texts and the antient Commentaries and Glosses thereupon yet it is undeniable that the Fathers give St. Peter Primacy over the rest of the Apostles for St. Chrysostom (k) Chrysost in Matthaeum Homil. 83. Homil 87. Homil. 55. calls him Verticem Apostolorum the Head of the Apostles the Head and Pastour of the Church the Master of the World Ruler over all the World Minist So doth the same St. Chrysostom (l) Chrysost ad Rom. Homil. 18. call Elias Caput Prophetarum the Head of the Prophets yet had not Elias Primacy over Moses and all his Collegues He gives Paul (m) Nullus Paulum antecedit de ea re nemo omnium dubitat Chrysost de laudibus Pauli Chrysost in Genesin Homil. 7. in Genesin Homil. 11. Preheminence over all the rest over the World Paulus Magister Orbis Paul the Master of the World And from Generalities condescends to induction of particulars (n) Paulo tribuitur cura omnium Ecclesiarum non unius vel duarum vel trium sed omnium quae sunt in toto orbe Chrysost in Johan Homil. 11. in Act. 53. Paulo tribuitur cura omnium Ecclesiarum non unius vel duarum vel trium Vnto Paul the charge of all Churches is given not of one or two or three Churches but of all the Churches that be in the world Gregory (o) Gregor 1 Reg. lib. 1. cap. 4. a Roman Prelate himself stiles Paul caput Nationum the Head of Nations Eleutherius (p) Epistola Eleutherii ad Episcopos Galliae Stow Chronic. another Bishop of Rome writing to the Bishops of France says Vniversalis a Christo vobis commissa est Ecclesia The Vniversal Church is committed to you by Christ Chrysostom (q) Chrysost in Epist ad Phil. Homil. 13. calls the Women of Philippi caput Ecclesiae the Head of the Church and salutes Theodosius the Emperour (r) Chrysost ad populum Antiochen Homil. 2. with this Encomium Summitas caput omnium supra terram hominum the Height and Head of all men upon Earth Yet neither had St. Paul nor the Gaulish Bishops nor the Women of Philippi nor Theodosius the Emperour Primacy over the Apostles or Superintendency over the whole Church Gent. But St. Ambrose saith (s) Ambros in locum cap. 24. Christus Petrum amoris sui veluti Vicarium reliquit Christ left St. Peter as the Vicar of his love which Attribute and Elogy is not given to any of the Apostles Minist He saith not expressly his Vicar but as his Vicar which Tertullian being Judge is the Holy Ghost's peculiar who speaking of Christ saith (t) Misit vicariam vim Spiritus Sancti qui credentes agat Tertull. De praescriptione adversùs Haereticos He sitting at the Right Hand of God the Father instead of himself sent the power of the Holy Ghost as his Vicar to direct them that believe But if St. Peter in a borrowed Sence may be termed Christ's Vicar the Stile is but the same Eleutherius of Rome gave Lucius first King of Britain And that Eusebius gives not onely the Apostles but all Ministers saying (u) Eusebius Episcopus Romanus Epist 3. 2. Cor. 5. Caput Ecclesiae Christus est Christi autem Vicarii Sacerdotes sunt qui vice Christi legatione funguntur in Ecclesia Christ is the Head of the Church and his Vicars are the Priests that do their Embassage in the Church in place of Christ Now the Collection would be wilde Eleutherius stiles King Lucius and Eusebius calls all Priests Christ's Vicars Therefore Lucius had and all Priests have Supremacy over the whole Church But I beseech you if it should be granted that Peter was Christ's Vicar in some peculiar

one Head to be constituted over the Catholick Church if you mean militant Christ the triumphant Head is sufficient for all your Canonists blaspheamy who say (s) Non videretur Dominus discretus fuisse ut cū reverentia ejus loquar nisi unicum post se talem Vicarium reliquisset qui haec omnia posset De majoritate obedientia unam sanctam in Glossa Christ our Lord should not have seemed to have dealt discreetly to speak it with reverence unless he had left one such Vicar behind him that could do all these things that is regulate the whole Church For neither is it possible for one man to take cognizance of the whole Church unless he were omniscient as of all Europe Asia Africk China and Prester John's Dominions Peru Mexico with Magellanica and the rest of the Americans no Civil Prince had ever the fourth part of it under his Scepter much less an Ecclesiastick neither could the Church possibly if this were granted be preserved from ruin A Pope himself hath delivered it e Cathedra and that is Gregory the Great who said of John Bishop of Constantinople who first claymed to himself this universal power (t) Si hanc causam aequanimiter portamus totius Ecclesiae fidem corrumpimus corruit universa Ecclesia de statu suo si is qui Vniversalis dicitur cadit Gregor lib. 4. Epist 34. 38. Epist 78. If we patiently suffer this matter thus to proceed that one man shall be universal Bishop we seek not waies to preserve unitie but we overthrow the faith of the whole Church if he that is said to be Universal Bishop happen to fall the whole Church falleth from her state And relating to this Question Saint Augustine saith (u) Augustinus De ve●ae religione cap 45. Habet superbia appetitum quendam unitatis omnipotentiae Pride it self hath a certain desire of Vnitie and universal power though the tendence thereof be to ruine In conformitie to this Saint Paul expresseth the lasting Politie Christ setled in his Church who (x) Ephes iv 12 13. when he ascended far above any heavens gave not one Vniversal Pope to rule the whole but some Apostles some Prophets and some Evangelists and some Pastours and Teachers for the perfecting of the Saints for the working of the ministery for the edifying of the body of Christ Whereupon Saint Cyprian descanting saith (y) Vnus est Episcopatus cujus à singulis in solidum pars tenetur Cyprianus De simplicitate Praela●o●ū Vnus est Episcopatus c. There is but one Bishoprick part whereof is holden of several Bishops in whole And again (z) Ideo plures sunt in Ecclesia Sacerdotes ut uno Haeresin faciente caeteri subveniant Cypr. lib. 3. Epist 13. Therefore there are many Priests or Bishops in the Church not one over all the Church that if one fall into Heresie the rest may help As Paul reproved Peter and Irenaeus Pope Victor Upon that place of Hosea The children of Israel and the children of Judea shall be gathered together and appoint them one Head Saint Hierom Paraphrases thus (a) Haec omnia fient quia magnus est dies s●minis Dei qui interpretatur Christus Hierom. in Hoseae cap 1. vers 12. All these things shall come to pass because it is the great day of the seed of God which seed is interpreted not an Vniversal Bishop but Christ Lyra harps upon the same string (b) Congregabuntur filiae Judae id est Apostoli filii Israel id est Gentiles conversi pariter id est una Ecclesia ponent sibi caput unum id est Christum Nicol. Lyra in Hoseae cap. 1. There shall assemble together saith he the children of Judah that is the Apostles and Children of Israel that is the Gentiles converted together that is in one Church and shall appoint unto themselves one Head that is not one Vniversal Bishop but one Christ Saint Augustine is of the same consort saying (c) Recolatur lapis ille angularis duo illi parietes unus ex Judaeis alter ex Gentibus Augustin De Civitate Dei lib. 18. cap. 28. Let us remember that Corner-stone Christ not any Prelate and the Walls the one of the Jews the other of the Gentiles Dionysius (d) In Opere Tripartito lib. 2. cap. 5. deciphering purposely the Politie of the Church and comparing the same with the glorious Hierarchie of the Angels and Powers in Heaven yet never dropped one word of the universal government by one Prelate So that we may safely conclude with that Appendage of the Council of Lateran In caelesti Hierarchia tota congregatio Angelorum non habet caput unum praeter solum Deum ergo a simili in Ecclesiastica Hierarchia hominum non debet esse unum caput praeter solum Deum That is In the Celestial Hierarchie the whole Chore of Angels hath no other head but onely God therefore by like proportion in the Ecclesiastical Hierarchie of men there ought not to be any one Head but God That is Christ God-man Gent. I should easily grant by virtue of those Premises that there is no apparent necessitie of a visible Head over the whole Church Christ and his Spirit can easilie supply that defect And it is congruous enough to reason that no one Prelate Atlas-like can bear the axle-tree of the whole Church upon his Shoulders yet methinks there are clear Evidences in Scriptures and Fathers that Saint Peter had supremacie over the rest of the Apostles and the whole flock of Christ Minist This is your Second Position which for all your confidence will vanish into Ashes like Sodom's Apples But I beseech you tell me these Evidences out of Scriptures and Fathers Gent. Of Scriptures these two places are pregnant the one (e) Matth. xvi 18 19. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Thou art Peter and upon this Rock I will build my Church (f) Hart against Rainolds Though in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may seem in the Greek to be a difference in termination and an Enallage of Genders the Hebrew or Syriak Word Cephas which our Saviour used signifies both Peter and a Rock whence I gather that Peter was that rock upon which Christ builded his universal Church as appears by his further promise that he would give unto him the keys of the Kingdom of heaven c. The other place is (g) John xxi 16. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Feed my Sheep 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies as well to rule and govern as to feed Out of thee shall come saith Micah (h) Micah v. 2. Matth. ii 6. of Beth-lehem 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Governour 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that shall rule my people Israel Homer stiles Agamemnon the Grecian General 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Ruler of the people Hence I gather that Christ appointed Peter the Ruler or Governour of the

60. None of the Roman Bishops my Predecessours assumed to himself the name of Universal Bishop and if any man else assume the same I say it is a swelling of arrogancy a proud novel pompous perverse temerarious superstitious profane and impious Title a name of singularity a title of error a word of vanity and blasphemy and whosoever taketh upon him or desireth this arrogant title by this exalting himself he is a fore-runner of Antichrist and if he be permitted to usurp the same it will prove the bane of the faith of the universal Church Thus far Gregory Gent. This zealous acknowledgement of so learned so pious a Pope is very prejudicial to their cause but let me hear Scriptures Minist When the Kingdom and Priest-hood were divided in Moses and Aaron Moses the civil Magistrate exercised a supremacy over Aaren the High Priest not onely in causes Civil but Ecclesiastical whom he reproved Exod. xxxii 21. for making the golden Calf and in his time the breach of the Sabbath by gathering of sticks was punished by the civil Sword Numb xv 31. Joshua a Prince no Priest succeeded Moses in his charge and by this Commission Joshua v. 2. he circumcised the Sons of Israel erected an Altar of Stone Jos viii 30. Read the Law Jos viii 32 34. did execution on him that concealed things dedicated to Idols Jos vii 24 25. caused the people to put away strange Gods and renued the Covenant between God and the people Jos xxiv 23 25. David's whole study was well for causes Ecclesiastical as Civil after he had freed Israel from all enemies then did he compose (l) 1 Paral. xvi 7. Psalms to be sung by Asaph and his Brethren then did he set (m) 1 Paral. xxiii orders in the Temple appointed (n) 1 Paral. xxiv Priests Levites (o) 1 Paral. xxv Singers and other (p) 1 Paral. xxvi inferiour Servitours and assigned to them their (q) 1 Paral. xxvii dignities courses and offices Solomon by this commission built the (r) 1 Kings vi Temple and (s) 1 Kings viii dedicated it deposed (t) 1 Kings ii 35. Abiathar the High-Priest and placed Sadock in his room I hope this is matter and argument of express Supremacy Asa took away (u) 2 Paral. xiv 3 4 c. altars of strange Gods the High-places and groves He put down his (x) 2 Paral. xv 8 12 13 14 15. Mother because she had made an Idol He took an (y) 2 Paral. xv 13. Oath of Judah and Benjamin which may be paralleled with this Oath that whosoever would not serve the LORD and abjure Idolatry should be slain Jehoshaphat sent his (z) 2 Paral. xvii 6 7. Princes to reform Religion in the cities of Judah and with them Priests and Levites himself went from (a) 2 Paral. xix 4. Beer-sheba to Mount Ephraim and brought the people again to the God of their Fathers He (b) 2 Paral. xix 8. set of the Priests and Levites and chief of the families of Israel for the Judgment and causes of the LORD (c) 2 Paral. xxix 3. 4 5. Ezechias his execution of supremacy even over the High-Priest in this kinde is famous he opened the doors of the House of the LORD and brought the Priests and Levites in He (d) 2 Paral. xxix 30. commanded them to sanctify themselves and offer burnt-offerings which they did according to the (e) 2 Paral. xxx 1 6 12. King's commandment Here Priests are obedient to the King's Injunction even in their own Duties and Charge He commanded the Levites to praise God with the words of David There he enjoyned a Liturgy He commanded all Judah and Israel to keep the Pass-over Here is as Saint Augustine saith omnia cum imperio all for the civil power He (f) 2 Paral. xxxi 2. appointed the course of Priests and Levites by turns He (g) 2 Paral. xxxi 1. took away the high-places broke down the Images and brake the (h) 2 Kings xviii 4. Brasen-Serpent made by Moses because the people burned Incense unto it Manasses that had set up Altars Groves and Images before his captivity after his (i) 2 Paral. xxxiv 3 4 19 30 31 32 33. repentance he took away the strange Gods and the Image that he had put in the house of the Lord and restoring the worship of God commanded Judah to serve the Lord. The last instance I will produce is that of Josias who purged Judah and Jerusalem from (k) 2 Paral. xxxv 1 2 3 10 18. high-places Groves and Images he gathered all Israel read the Law renued the Covenant compelled them to serve the Lord kept the famous Pass-over and reduced the Priests and Levites to their courses set by David and Solomon I suprasede the allegation of any further evidence of this kinde seeing the Jesuite Salmeron confesses that (l) In Veteri Testamento sub lege naturae vel Mosis summi Sacerdotes Regibus subdebantur Salemron in Tractatu 63. De potestate Ecclesiastica Saeculari In the Old Testament under the Law of Nature or Moses the High-Priests were subject to Kings Gent. But I have known others of our (m) Allen. Defens Angl Cathol cap. 8. Catholick Doctours preferring the High-Priest's Crosiar before the King's Scepter and for their warrant alledged these examples out of Scripture (n) 2 Paral. xxvi first of Azarias the High-Priest who accompanied with fourscore other Priests magnanimously assaulted King Vzziah smit with leprosy because he had burned Incense to the Lord drave him out of the Temple according to the (o) Levit. xiii Levitical Law sent him out of the City and deposed him from his Kingly authority (p) Bellarm. lib. 5. De Roman Pontif. cap. 8. The other example is of Jehoiada who whilest he was executing the Priest's office commanded Queen Athaliah to be slain because she countenanced the worship of Baal and substituted Joash King in her place These are Presidents of High-Priests or Papal authority over Princes Minist These two Histories being truly understood make nothing for advancement of Papal above Civil power but rather give it a deadly blow for first the Scripture saith not that Azariah assaulted Vzziah the King or that he violently forced him out of the Temple for he was forced by the hand of God when the leprosy arose in his forehead And whereas Azariah the High-Priest ' with the rest of the Priests is said 2 Paral xxvi 20. festinato illum templo expulisse to have thrust and also hastened him to go out Josephus (q) Joseph Antiq. Judaic lib. 9. cap. 11. quem sequitur Cajetanus in 2. Paral. xxvi Visa lepra Sacerdotes Regem leprosū ad festinè egrediendum monent interprets it a perswasion onely by words not any compulsion by deeds whereof Chrysostome gives the reason saying (r) Sacerdotis est tantum arguere liberámque praestare admonitionem non movere arma non

administrated but government cannot be duely administrated unless Princes have a power in reformation of the Church to be exercised even over the Clergy which was wholly obstructed while the Pope dispenced his exorbitant and apocryphal jurisdiction till the Supreme Magistrates by the consent of the three orders of the Kingdom were necessitated to reassume that s (t) Cajetanus De potestate Papae cap. 27. tyrannidi resistendi potestatem quam jure naturali gentium habent etiam in rebus Ecclesiasticis power of resisting Tyranny which Cajetan confesseth they have even in Ecclesiastical affairs both by the Law of Nature and Law of Nations Gent. Seeing then in your sense the Bishop of Rome is an Vsurper tell me what you conceive he holds by divine right what canonically or by humane indulgence lawfully conferred what by tyranny and usurpation for this discussion will give great light to the point in hand Minist I will digest this into Propositions which are all or the most of them demonstrated in the foregoing discourse First That all the Apostles were equal according to that saying of Saint Cyprian (u) Hoc erant caetari Apostoli quod fuit Petrus pari consortio praediti bonoris potestatis Cyprian De simplicitate Praelatorum The rest of the Apostles were the same that Saint Peter was all endowed with the same fellowship and power Secondly It cannot be proved by Scripture that Peter was ever at Rome Thirdly The Bishop of Rome succeeded neither Peter nor any of the Twelve in the Apostolick Charge Fourthly The Bishop of Rome was primatively but equal with other Bishops Fifthly Bishops are essentially distinguished from Presbyters but at the most in original power to ordain and exercise of spiritual Jurisdiction indeterminately which is Saint Hierom's determination (x) In divinis instituendis quid potest Episcopus facere quod non Presbyter excepta ordinatione Hieron What can a Bishop do in divinis instituendis in instituting or executing of divine things which a Presbyter may not do except (y) Otherwise in distinction of order and Jurisdiction Irenaeus justly calls Episcopacy Traditionem Apostolicam toti mundo manifestam Ordination Sixthly The Bishop of Rome's Jurisdiction at the first was indefinitely over Christians in or about Rome Seventhly It was by the Indulgence of Constantine that the Romane Diocess was further extended which St. Hierom at the least meant in that Curb (z) Noverint Episcopi se magis consuetudine quàm dispositionis Dominicae veritate Presbyteris esse majores Hieron in Epist ad Titum Let Bishops understand that they be greater then Presbyters more by Custom and prescription then by verity of divine Ordinance Eightly (a) More by custom extensivè not denying Superiority of order and jurisdiction intensivé It was humane Councils not any divine Authority that distinguished the Church into Patriarchates conferring that of the West upon the Bishop of Rome which Aeneas Sylvius afterwards Pope confesseth (b) Ante Concilium Nicenum quisque sibi vivebat parvus respectus habebatur ad Ecclesiam Romanam Aeneas Sylvius Epist 188. little respect was had to Rome before the Council of Nice Ninthly It was by humane Institution that for Vnity and Peace sake the Bishop of Rome had Priority of Order in General Councils Tenthly His claim of universal Jurisdiction was usurped and unlawful So St. Hierom (c) Si authoritas quaeritur orbis major est urbe ubicunque fuerit Episcopus sive Romae sive Eugubii sive Constantinopoli sive Rhegii ejusdem est meriti ejusdem Sacerdotii Hieron ad Euagrium If we seek for authority the world is bigger then the City of Rome wheresoever there is a Bishop whether he be at Rome or at Eugubium or at Constantinople or at Rhegium he is of like worth of like Priesthood Gregory the First disclaimed the Title of Vniversal Bishop in himself saying (d) Nemo praedecessorum meorum hoc profano vocabulo usus est Greg. lib. 4. Epist 38. None of his Predecessours used such a profane Term and checks the Bishop of Constantinople for it saying (e) Quid tu Christo universalis Ecclesiae capiti in extremi judicii dicturus es examine qui cuncta ejus membra tibimet conaris Vniversalis appellatione supponere Gregor lib. 4. Epist 38. What answer wilt thou make unto Christ who is indeed the Head of the Vniversal Church at the trial of the last judgment that thou goest about under the Name of Vniversal Bishop to subdue all his Members unto thee Eleventhly The Pope had no jurisdiction in this Nation for the first six Centuries Twelfthly Austin and his fellow-Monks were the first Seminaries of it who introduced it by blood and superstition Lastly (f) Bonifacius Tertius magna contentione obtinuit à Phaca Caesare ut sanciretur Romanus Pontifex Oecumenicus summus Episcopus totius Ecclesiae Christinae Ab eo tempore nunquam desierunt Romani Pontifices conari pro dignitate potentia sua augenda Carion Chron. pag. 161. It is justly excluded out of these Nations as inconsistent with civil Government and destructive to the peace of Church and State Gent. All this seems to be probable and you have given such evident Demonstration of the particulars that I know not what to reply Minist Then I may safely conclude That which hath no ground in Scriptures Fathers or antient Councils was not known for six hundred years after the Incarnation was introduced with blood and superstition and maintained with Tyranny and is inconsistent with civil Government and destructive to peace of Church and State ought to be abjured But such is the Pope's pretended jurisdiction in these Nations Therefore it ought to be abjured The Eleventh Article And all Doctrines in affirmation of the said Points I do abjure and renounce without Equivocation mental reservation or secret evasion whatsoever taking the words by me spoken according to the common and usual meaning of them Gent. WHat new matter presents it self to be abjured in this Article all Doctrines in affirmation of the Points in question were renounced before Minist The ten former Articles as was premised in the beginning comprised the rem or matter to be sworn or abjured The two last contain the modum or manner of abjuration being undistinguishably the same with that of the Oath of Supremacy which concluded thus (a) Haec omnia planè ac sincerè agnosco juro juxta expressa verba pera me hic prolata juxta planum communem sensum intellectum eorundem verborum absque ulla aequivocatione aut mentali evasione aut tacita reservatione quacunque Andreros I acknowledge and swear all these things plainly and sincerely according to the express words by me here uttered and according to the plain and common meaning and understanding of the same words without any equivocation or mental reservation or secret evasion whatsoever Gent. I beseech you therefore give me