It s true they may say he plays the Tyrant in that but yet God hath given him the onely supreme power both to inquire saith Mr. H. and judge of Professions and Religions which is true and ought to be maintained which is false and ought to be rejected And if so the many godly who fled from Old England to New England because of Prelatical Tyranny of conscience did believe that the late King Charles had power as a King to judge the Service book and Ceremonies imposed upon the godly in England yea and upon Scotland also was the onely true Religion and had power given him of God as supreme Magistrate to command all the three Kingdoms to be of the Kings Religion or then let them all be banished out of his Dominions But is not this to make the King a Pope and the onely carver and Lord of the Faith and Religion of his Subjects and so the King by his Office is the Messenger of the Lord of Hosts and a Royal Prophetical Teacher who watches for the souls of all his people What Scripture puts the King in such an Office 2. Did not the godly and sound condemn such an Headship in the Oath of Supremacy and in the Kings Proclamation in which he as King commands all to receive such a Religion as he thinks fit even the substantials of the Mass and no Prayers but book-prayers the other Prayers being fancies And this command is equal to a pastoral or Synodical Decree 1. Because it comes from the King having no act of the Church but onely having taken the counsel of his Clergie and so by civil power peculiar to his power Royal and place as Mr. H. speaks p. 56. 2. Because its the onely form of worship he thinks fit 3. Because he commands it to all Ecclesiastick persons Arch-bishops Bishops c. as the onely Spiritual Pastor of Pastors on earth Hence if Christ hath given such power it s not lawful without breach of the fifth Command to embrace or profess any Religion in a Christian Kingdom except it be first instamped by or with the Authority of the King the Head as the Chaplain calls him of the Churches by his Royal Authority Yea our Book of Canons say that Christian Kings now have the same power in causes Ecclesiastical that the godly Kings among the Iews had And are they not then Prophets by office and may write Canonick Scripture as David and Solomon did and so we must not without Rebellion profess the Faith or the Christian Religion but when and where such as the King commands us contrary to Mat. 10. 32. or we are to confess Christ before men but not except the King teach and command a confession and such a confessor 3. Paul must have told us Eph 4. 11 12. of the King as well as of the Apostle given to edifie the Body and gather the Church if so be that he is the onely supreme Iudge of true and false Religions And he must be some spiritual officer and one who chooseth a God and a Religion to his Subjects and he must be â—he holiest Subject who can say The Kings God is my God When I read this I was sad to see Mr. Tho Hooker speak and write like the Royalist Mr. Rich. Hooker 4. The Magistrate supreme and inferiour except Mr. H. be an Erastian is a member of the Church and under the Scepter of Christ in the preached Gospel and to be edified by the Word Seals Rebukes and Censures for otherwise He that despiseth you despiseth me and if he hear not the Church let him be as a heathen and Faith comes by hearing must suffer a strange exception in the person of the King he may despise pastors and the Church without guiltiness for he is above the pastors and carves their Religion and prescribes as our cited Proclamation saith the causes why Bishops should excommunicate and censure to wit if they refuse the Kings Religion and Mr. H. warrants him by a power peculiar and supreme so to do 5. We reade not that the Kings of Israel and Iudah prescibed what was true and false Religion but were subject to the Priests and Prophets who spake the word of the Lord and the Prophets rebuked Kings as Ieroboam and others for intruding themselves in that office Moses Samuel David Solomon were Prophets 2 Chron. 36. 16. Isa. 50. 19. 6. The Magistrate is the Minister of God and bears the Sword to take order with evil doers and is Custos vindex utriusque tabulae and the Religion is supposed to be before the Ruler 7. It s somewhat heathenish like Numa Lycurgus who to procure obedience and authority to themselves gave out that they prescribed what Religion was true and that they conversed much with God 8. All questions and controversies of Religion in the Nation must be determined all cases of conscience resolved by this Pope who onely can determine what is true and what is false Religion and the King must be the Oracle and Priest with whom onely the Urim and the Thummim must be 9. All fallings against Religion must be Treason against the King whereas Kings and people are rebuked because they hearkened not to the voice of the Prophets not because disobedient to the word of the Lord in the mouth of the King Either this is to take both the Swords from the Pope and to give them to the King or it is nothing for without controversie the King bears the Sword to take vengeance of him that doth evil Rom. 13. 4. 1 Pet. 2. 14. and whosoever determineth by his supreme power what is true and false Religion to all the Subjects must bear the other Sword 10. M. H. makes out his Assertion thus Kings could not provide for their Subjects to live in godliness and honesty except they had power to inquire and judge of true and false Religions Now this is spoken of Nero and of heathen Kings 1 Tim. 2. 1 2. But out of doubt God never made heathens that are enemies to true Religion supreme determiners of true and false Religion And if this agree to Rulers as Rulers as M. H. saith it is peculiar to their power and place then all Rulers Heathen Christian high and low sound in the faith and corrupt and heretical should be carvers of so many sundry Gods and Religions But the next Reason is ill and worse if because the King is a Nurse-father to the Church he must be father and a begetter both of Religion and of the Church because he protects and defends the true Church then true Religion must be before him As also when Mr. H. saith that the Prince is a Nurse father to the Church he means the Independent Church onely so that he owes no protection to Presbyterians nor justice to them And if the Nurse-fathers care be that there should be a right opinion and worship openly professed within his Territories the Magistrate is to do this no other wayes but
some spirituall operation from Christ as a head therefore such onely are members of a Church Answ. No man seems more to study to darken the matter then the reverend arguer 1. He omits all along the word visible which is mainly in question 2. He himself is forced to distinguish a two fold headship of Christ for Christ is head to the visible Church either politick according to the politick government and guidance he lends to it or according to the influence of saving grace life the members of Christs body according to the politick external government are fit alone to be members of a true Church visible or truly visible such as Magus Demas and many gifted men are the proposition is true and granted But onely visible Saints who according to the rules of reasonable charity may be conceived to have some special good or which is all one to be reall believers are onely members of Christs body according to politick and external government the assumption is false and never proved a meer begging of the question for not onely such as are conceived in charity to to be real converts such as Magus Iudas c. but also Peter Iohn and such as prosess subjection to the Gospel and withall do really believe 〈◊〉 members of the true visible Church and the Lords visible confederates whether they be conceived to have some special good of conversion and saving grace in them or not nor does the formality of a visible member or a visible confederate depend upon the judgment of men And it is most false which is said in the probation that onely conceived and so judged visible Saints have the politick influence of some spiritual operation from Christ the head for godly professors whether they be conceived and judged or not conceived or judged godly professors have both real and internal in foro Dei and also external and ecclesiastick right to the ordâ—…ces of Christ should all the world say the contrary And by our brethrens nay workers of iniquity and these that are never known nor chosen of God but are exactly gâ—lded hypocrites and never receive any power or trial at all in their kind from their head Christ as may be proved from Matth. 7. 22 23. Matth. 22. 11 1â— Matth. 13. 47. 48. Matth. 25. 3. 2 Tim. 3. 3. are visible Saints not because they are so but because they are falsely so esteemed by men to be such Hence 1. our brethrens way makes not a whit a cleaner visible Church then our way 2. The politick influence of Christ the head upon such painted tombs can be none at all before their membership How then can they have virtual influence of some spiritual operation from the head supposed influence is no influence at all And not any of these texâ—s say that the Church 1 Cor. 12. 12. and Ethes 4. 12 13. is not the body of Christ visible except men conceive it to be his visible body such new divinity is unknown to Scripture If the other part of the distinction be applied to the argument both the propositions shall be false so the members of Christs body by the influence of saving grace are fit alone to be members of the true visible Church nothing is more false for then the true visible Church should be made up of only true and real converts glad shall Anabaptists and Familists be of this doctrine and except the propositions be so taken M. H. but paints us a false Church 3. The places 1 Cor. 12. 12. Eph. 4. 12 13 speak nothing of Mr Hookers single congregation but of the Catholick visible Church which shall meet all in the unity of faith and in which the Lord hath set Apostles 1 Cor. 12. 28. and 4. 14 15. and that is not a single congregation 4. Though the places speak of the visible Church yet do not these places say that the visible Church as visible but as the real mystical body of Christ which shall be glorified with Christ is called Christ Ephes. 4. 13. 〈◊〉 Cor. 12. 12 13. and the body of Christ by the influence of saving grace CHAP. III. Other arguments of M. Hookers for the constitution of the Church of his visible Saints MAster Hookers two reasons These are â—is to be members of Christs Church that are subjects of Christs kingdome The Church is the visible kingdome in which Christ reigns by the scepter of his word ordinances and discipine he is our king he is our Law-giver they who are in professed rebellion are traytors not subjects the members of the body are under the motion and guidance of the head Wolves are contrary to it But visible Saints as formerly described are onely subjects of this kingdome Christ is the king of Saints not of Dâ—unkards Atheists they alone Saints proclaim subjection in their practice Answ. The terme onely is wanting in the proposition which is in the assumption and conclusion contrary to right Logick 2. These are fit to be members of Christs Church visible that are subjects by an influence of grace to wit from their head and king calling effectually Acts 15. 14 15. Isai. 55. 4. 5. and giving them repentance and forgiveness of sins Acts 5. 31. of the kingdome of Christ visible or invisible the proposition is true but that such visible Saints as Magus and Iudas the traytor which are the visible Saints M. H. defines in terminis part 1. cap. 2. pag. 15. conclus 2. are subjects and onely subjects of this kingdome as his assumption sayes in express termes is most false now that the argument must mean of the subjects of Christs kingdome real and of members by the influence of saving grace from Christ their head and king I prove from the argument that M. H. brings from Isaâ— 33 22. for M. H. his visible Saints Magus and Iudas cannot 〈◊〉 Say the Lord is our Law-giver the Lord is our Iudge the Lord is our king and he will save us if Sorcerers and Traytors should say so they should lie Isaiah speaks of real converts and the true Sion whose stakes and cords shall never be removed so as the gates of hell saith Marlorat on the place shall not prevail against them He speaketh as yet saith Piscator to the godly Iews so that saith Calvin God is in the miast of her therefore she shall not be moved for saith Musculus my sheep shall no man pluck out of my hand 2. He speaketh of these not of such as Iudas and Magus who shall be protected and saved by the Lord vers 21 22. he speaks of the true Church which acknowledges God her Law giver and King so Calvin the Church saith Bullinger is so armed with the grace of God that she yields not to evils nor is broken but remains ever sure 3. He speaks of that kingdome and people whose inhabitants shall not say I am sick the people that dwell therein their iniquity shall be forgiven them vers 24. onely the citizens
of the Church saith Calvin are adorned with this priviledge pardon of sins and it pertaines saith Gualter to the Church onely and hâ—…r citizens because saith Luther the gâ—dly people hath a God gracious therefore their sins are forgiven So Buâ—inger Oecolampadius Diodati English Divine Zwinglius and the popish interpreters Carthusianus Vatablus Arias Montanur Corn. à Lipide Gasp. Sanâ—lius Lyranus never man before pious M. Hooker expounâ—…d the place of such visible Saints as have room in this house to wit Witches and Traytors 2. To Siâ—n a single congregation as if the gates of hell could not prevail against such cypâ—ers And 3. he must not be Kâ—ng and Law-giver by this way to godly visible believers when their congregation is broken dissipated by persecution death of officers O poor comfort But these are fit to be members in Christs Church that are subjects in Christs kingd me by influence of politick guidance and common gifts the proposition in that sense is neither proved by Isaiah 33. 22. or any reason but the just contrary conclusion to wit that believing and really pardoned Sion vers 22. 23 24. must be the persons that make up the kingdome of Christ nor does it conclude any thing but contrary to M. H. and the way of the congregation to wit Ergo onely such as are visible Saints according to the politick influence and common gifts are fit to be members of the visible Church which is a most false conclusion for also true believers sincerely professing the faith and who are subjects of Christ according to the influence of saving grace remission and pardon v. 22 23 24. are fiâ— to be and really are members of the visible Church except the argument conclude that onely hypocrites appearing to be believers real are fit to be members of the visible Church which is most false by the grant of adversaries and by the truth it self 3. M. H. suppresseth the conclusion and proves the proposition that reall believers are fit to be members of the mystical and true Church which neither we nor he deny and the terme in rationall charity directed by the word which should be in both propositions is neither mentioned in the Argument not in the Scriptures and Proofs an unknown way of arguing and for the assumption But visible Saints that is Saints in the judgement of charity ruled by the word are onely subjects of his kingdome M. H. never so much as touches nor labours to prove nor is there a Scripture in old or new Testament to prove that men cannot be the subjects of Christs visible Kingdome except Apostles or some visible society declare and passe a judiciall sentence that they are subjects of his visible kingdome 4. The probation is fan toto coelo from the conclusion to be proven They saith he who carry themselves in professed rebellion they are traitors not subjects and Christ is the King of Saints not of drunkards Atheists c. It s true he is no visible king to visible Pagans nor are they as visible professed Atheists subjects of his visible kingdome And who teaches any such thing and against whom doth M. Hooker dispute if there be any such members in our Church not censured and if obstinate not casten out it is the sinfull and abused practise of men and we professe we desire to be humbled before the Lord that our Ministers and assemblies received into our Church men guilty of perjury drunkennesse shedding of the blood of the people of God in the defence of the cause and sworne reformation and that our Ministers and Elders ah to many of them are scandalous baters and mockers of piety though our Church was in as fair way of purging the house of God but now by the present stroke we are deprived of liberty so to do but that is nothing concludent against the right government of Christ Christ is not the head and king of professed rebells true nor is he head and king in a saving way of latent rebells or of your visible Saints such as Magus and Iudas ergo he is head and king to none as visible members but to men onely judged in charity led by the word to be reall converts no logick can prove the consequence But our mind is that Christ is visible head by influence of gifts ordinances and externall guidance to all to whom he sayes I will be your God and who professe subjection to him whether the Church shall judge them reall converts or not judge them so M. H. arg 3. pag. 17. If visible Saints be not members Then non-visible Saints may be members The latter is absurd then these who in the judgement of charity are members of the devil may be conceived members of Christ in the same judgement of charity charity then must pluck out her eyes Answ. 1. here is as good a contradiction if any goodnesse there be in these If such as are onely visibly Saints Magus Iudas be no members but rotten ones Then such as are non-visibly Saints such as Peter Paul who are really justified and chosen are fit visible members Let M. H. choose him by his own contradiction which he saith divides the breadth of being though this phancied contradiction divide neither the breadth nor the sixteenth part thereof If onely visibly justified and chosen Saints who are such really are not visible members Then none visibly justified and chosen Saints are fit members visible The antecedent is true and Simon Magus is not a visible member to M. Hooker by this account and the latter is contradicent to M. Hookers way for then one who is to the eye of charity visibly justified and chosen and that really by M. H. metaphysick which so divides the breadth of being as Peter visibly believing and thereby really blessed Matth. 16. 16 17. shall be to the same eye of charity not visibly justified and chosen but in the miscarrying judgement of charity shall be no visible member according to the reality thereof as Simon Magus and therefore the definition of a visible member cannot agree both to Peter visibly believing and to Magus visibly believing for there is a reall contradiction between Peter his believing reall and Magus his believing reall as good Logick demonstrates but the latter is absurd for both Peter and Magus are visible Saints Let any man help M. H. in his metaphysick here 2. Aristotle long agoe taught us that there is no contradiction when the contradiction is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 now there is a mids betwixt a visible Saint as M. Hooker meanes and a no visible Saint for his visible Saint is one who by the Church is judged a reall convert and his no visible Saint is one who is judged no reall convert example of the former is Peter or Magus an example of the latter is an unbaptized Pagan so judged now the mids to us Simon Magus when he is baptized and we teach that Philip and the Church of Samaria neither
2 Cor. 11. 28. command Schismatick Churches 2 Cor. 10. 8. plant and lay the foundation of Churches as wise Master-builders Acts 16. 12. 13 14 15 16. 18. 7 8 9 10 1 Cor. 3. 6. 11. appoint new offices in the Church Acts 6. 6. Now if God have seated the Apostles in such a way in every congregation as ordinary Teachers are then the Apostles proper place must be onely to water and confirm visible converts and members of a fixed and framed congregation where then are the Apostles Letters Patents to build to plant to lay the foundation 3. When it s said as it must be or it comes not home the King hath placed in England the whole integral body of the Kingdom of England the Lord Keeper the Lord chief Justice the Constable as he hath placed in the Church Apostles and Teachers in the whole integral Church These extraordinary and ordinary officers it cannot be meant the King hath placed a Lord Keeper and a Lord chief Justice in every Town and City of England so neither hath the Lord placed an Apostle in every congregation upon the same account and he who is an Apostle in one congregation can no more be an Apostle in another than a Major of one City can be a Major in another and it must run so The State hath placed a General Colonels Captains in their Armies i. e. in every particular society of the Armies and so every company must have a General therefore hath the State set Generals Colonels Captains in their Armies in the plural number Now the State hath set but one General over all the Army as the Church is but one 4. If the Argument run thus As the Major of Norwich may not rule as Major of York so neither may a pastor in one congregation teach rule as a pastor in another congregation This is utterly false and it s an Argument like this As God hath confined Rulers to one society onely in the civil State so hath he confined the officers of his Sons House one word of Scripture to prove this should silence Mr. R. It s not lawful to devise parallels between the Civil State and Christs Kingdome Suppose all the Majors Rulers Citizens of all the Cities and Towns in England had the same divine right to command in all the Cities and Towns in England and that these Majors were Rulers equally and in common to all those Towns and that it were a matter of providential Order not of Divine Jurisdiction that A. B. should be fixed Major of Norwich and C. D. fixed Major of York and so forth then if C. D. by providence should be at Norwich he might rule as a Major at Norwich or any Town or City of England as well as at York and so is here the matter a called pastor is a pastor and may act pastorally and dispense the Seal of the Lords Supper to those of another congregation say our Brethren and so to another whole congregation for there is the same reason in both So all visible professors have the same divine Church-right to the same Christ the Head 2. To the same Gospel and Covenant of grace for dâ—stinct Church-covenants are mens lawless inventions as used by our Brethren 3. To the same Lords Supper 1 Cor. 10. 17. 4. To the same eternal life So Mr. H. shall gain nothing by this but lose for there is no such right civil common to civil Rulers and civil Citizens One Town hath City priviledges that no other Town in the Kingdom hath Mr. H. Right of Iurisdiction flowing from office-call a Pastor hath not save in his own congregation Ans. There must be one call or other for a Pastor to exercise his office but a new office or new right of jurisdiction other then pastoral which he received in ordination is not requisite for a pastor to act as a pastor Yea he sins against his office-charge and talent if in all congregations he do not preach the word be instant in season and out of season not at Ephesus only for an Evangelist such as Timothy was not an ordinary fixed Teacher if he do not reprove rebuke and exhort with all long-suffering 2 Tim. 4. 1 2. The danger of perishing of souls or the absence or removal of the Pastors by death is a fit call of God though the greater part of Sardis love not to be rebuked Mr. H. God hath set in his Church i. e. in the congregation existing in its particulars Apostles c. and therefore all congregations are here intended Ans. 1. By this God hath set Apostles Miracles in the single congregation whether as Apostles or as Pastors if the former speaking with Tongues working of Miracles which are for unbeleevers and heathen 1 Cor. 14. 22. shall be officers or gifts ordained for visible Saints converted By what Scripture 2. Though the Church exclude not the congregations but in some respects include them yet it is a body called Christ mystical v. 12. to which Christ is head by influence of his spirit and brings no small consolation to us as Beza Calvin Pet. Martyr who make this the Catholick Church 3. Whereas Mr. H. his single congregation of Magus and Iudas can hardly stand under the weight of that denomination Nor 4 can it well be said that great Apostles Prophets workers of Miracles such as speak with Tongues are eyes and ears fixed in single congregations for this is such an organical body v. 12 13 14 15 16 17. Never Interpreter neither Occumenius nor Augustine nor Beza Calvin Martyr Pareus nor judicious Papists Victorinus Carthusian Estius Cajetanus expound it as Mr. H. of a single congregation but of the Catholick Church saith Martyr of men of all nations saith Pareus though they dwell in divers places of the earth saith Pareus this is the mystical body saith Estius membra autem omnes fideles the members are all the faithful He proves saith Cajetanus omnes Christianos esse unum corpus Christi all Christians behold the Catholick Church to be the one body of Christ because they are all begotten into one Spirit by Baptism 4. The Church here is the Church all baptized into one body whether Iews or Gentiles whether Bond or Free which all drink the same drink in the Lords Supper Mr. H. In all these congregations are comprehended both Iewes and Gentiles for the whole nature of the General is comprehended in the Particulars Well and the Spirit that is in all the body must be one Genere and the drink in the Lords Supper must be one Genere and so must the Christ of which we partake be one Genere Hence there being many species and kinds of congregations different in nature there must be many Christs different in nature many Spirits many Bodies many Lords Suppers different in species and nature of which we partake Who ever heard in the Church of Christ many Christs many Baptismes Yet Mr. H. makes many congregations so
pastoral care of Apostles for vacant Charges for planting of new Churches relief of the poor removing divisions c. Act. 1. 6 4. 35. 11. 1 2. 15 22 23 24 c. 1 Cor. 11. 28. Act. 8. 14. 21. 18. 20. 38. 13. 1 2 3. were temporary and Apostolick stirringâ— not pastoral duties now but such as died with the Apostles which is contrary to the wisdome of Christ. Mr. H. If government by Independent congregations be insufficient because it authorizeth not persons to be pastors over pagans government by Synods is sick of the same disease Ans. We judge the essence of a pastor not to stand in the call and choice of those to whom they are pastors for it makes Paul Barnabas and the Apostles to be no pastors to the Gentiles and to the heathen to whom they preach and maketh the Apostles as Apostles to be no pastors 2. Synods from Act. 15. and Act. 13. may lend men authorized with pastoral power to heathens to spread the Gospel and private men as no pastors but as private men are intruders authorized by Mr. H. for they have no promise such as pastors have by Mat. 28. 19 20. Mark 16. 15 17. Ier. 1. 6 17 18. to plant Churches among the heathens nor is there a warrant to say that Evangelists are ordinary officers left by Christ to plant Churches If Richard Hooker have any ground from Eusebius or Scripture for Evangelists now or in Trajans time he must shew that they have the gift of Tongues for how could Evangelists be fellow-helpers to preach the Gospel to the Churches planted by the Apostles if they were not an extraordinary office onely See those Divines in the margin and my learned and dear Brother M. George Gillespy Miscel. quest c. 7. If the Church should send any to the heathen any way ripâ— for the Gospel these could be no other than ordinary pastors to them I omitted that of Mr. H. There is nothing Act. 1. but any one might have done Ans. If he mean that any one private man might have chosen Apostles he speaks wonders if he mean Peter might have called Matthias to be an Apostle 1. It s without practise that Apostles could call Apostles 2. It follows not therefore it was not a Synod Paul did more in writing Scripture than if alone he had penned the decrees Acts 15. 16. 4. But Mr. Cotton and all his Brethren will deny M. H. his Consequence Ergo there is no Synod at all Act. 15. Mr. H. If the Apostles by extraordinary power cared for the poor Acts 4. Ergo there was a Synod Ans. The Antecedent is not mine but false 2. There was no doubt but ordinary pastors might oversee the Poors goods of many Churches CHAP. XI Of the National Church and the lawfulness of a National Covenant MR. H. The greater authority of the politick whole body saith Mr. R. should help the weaker parts 1 Cor. 12. 23 26. Ans. It s true but there is no National Church under the New Testament to help the congregational Church nor are Churches Christian now in Worse â—ase than the Church of the Iews for they had a High-priest and a National Worship at which they were to meet three times in the year Ans. That there is an integral Church Catholick which is more than National is proved 2. Our Brethren allow the association of many Churches for help of counsel and the Proposition that is granted by M. H. is as true for Church help as is said associated Churches could not yield for union in peace and truth except they made one visible body united Natura conjugatorum hoc â—vincit 3. Visible and professed covenanting with God makes a visible Church Gen 17. 7. Deut. 7. 6. For thou art a holy people unto the Lord thy God Deut. 10 15. Onely the Lord had a delight in thy fathers Abraham Isaac as a covenanted seed and Church Gen. 12 1 2 3. 17 6 7 8 9. to love them and their seed after them Now the seed of Abraham visible covenanted by M. H. his confession was a visible Church before they had an High-priest or a Temple or a National Worship in Abrahams house Ergo the High Priesthood and National Worship was accidental to the visible Jewish Church If it be said Yeâ— but they were in Abrahams time a congregational Church It s answered Yet then Priesthood Temple and National Worship differenced not the Church of the Jews from the Church of the Gentiles Our Brethrens Argument in this is of the same stamp with that of the Murtherers of Steven Acts 7. Steven all along in his Apologie refutes them and â—aith the Jews were a true Church in Egypt when they had no Temple no Ceremonies no National Worship but by faith onely rested upon the promises So Calvin Gualther Bullinger Brentius Marloratus Beza contend that Steven his Apologie had been impertinent if this had not been his scope 2. They were a visible Church in Egypt multiplied above an hundred congregations Exod. 1. 9 11 15. more in number than the Egyptians and the Lords covenanted Church Exod. 3. 6 7 8. 6. 7. 8. obliged to sacrifice to God Exod. 8. 29. and did eat the Passover and were circumcised in Egypt Exod. 4. 24 25 26 12. 1 2 3 c. when as yet Aaron was not consecrated High-priest and there was no Temple nor any National Temple-worship thrice a year at that time in the world 3. When Priesthood Temple-National-worship thrice a year sacrificing are removed Iudah remained in the Babylonish captivity the visibly covenanted people of God obliged to pray to him with their faces toward the Temple 1 King 8. 35. Dan. 6 10 11. and this is no more one National worship than the hearing of the Word and receiving the Seals of the N T. are one National worship to all the Protestant Church-members in Scotland 4. That which is common to Gods people of the Jews and to Egypt and Assyria and the people of God in the Gentiles is no distinguishing character differencing the Jewish Church as National from the Christian Church as not National Quae sunt communia â—a non distingunnt But to profess say and swear by the Lord and give him publick Church-worship agree to Egypt and Assyria and to Kingdoms and Nations of the New Testament as to the Jewish Nation as Isa. 2. 2. It shall come to pass in the last dayes under the New Testament v. 3. that many people shall go and say Come ye and let us go up to the Mountain of the Lord to the house of the God of Iacob and he will teach us of â—ù wayes c. So Isa. 19. 25. God shall bless thus saying Blessed be Egypt my people and Assyria the work of my hand and Israel my inheritance Which the seventh Angel declares to be fulfilled in the New Testament Rev. 11. 15. The Kingdoms of this
all Gospel-vows to be unnecessary and will worship under the New Testament Whereas Papists tell us in the Mass they make a general vow of obedience to God See Durantus and Gab. Biel. Mr. H. For if the Magistrate were bound to follow the judgement of the Churches and Ministry if they should judge a toleration of all Religions lawful or judge the false to be true he then were bound to nurse the false Religion and false Churches Ans. 1. No shadow of consequence is here for neither Magistrate nor people can be bound to follow the judgement of the Churches or Ministry farther then they follow the Rule of the Word they follow their judgement conditionally not absolutely and simply and it is a great calumny of Mr. Burton and our Brethren that we lay bands on the consciences of Prince and people to follow the acts and determinations of the Church be they true or false and that there is no place left to appeal to the next or a better informed Synod and to the consciences of the collective Church of the godly judicious professors and to protest and deny obedience to erring Assemblies If it be said but where is there a Iudge to determine whether this or another well informed Synod or the conscience of the collective body of the godly be right This argument falls with equal weight upon all Judicatures all Judges Parliament Prince and Councellors with him upon all Assemblies for what they determine be it toleration of all blasphemies or a strictest uniformity in Worship and Religion it hath no power to bind the conscientious and moral practices of Prince or people more then to bind their conscience by this for the Fraternity and whole Church is tyed to follow the dogmatick determination of officers in preaching or in sentencing delinquents without gain-saying what the officers decree saith Mr. H. it is to all as the word of God But Mr. H. must answer us Churches and Ministry are bound either absolutely or conditionally to follow the Judgement of the King who judgeth popery is the only true Religion to which he can tender protection If the former what Tyranny are we under who must submit to the Religion of the Prince or be denuded of all protection and exposed to fire and sword If the latter be said to wit that Churches and Ministry are only conditionally to follow the judgment of the King so they find it agreeable to the Word otherwise not then it must be false which Mr. H. said that the Prince is the only supreme Judge of all true and false Religions to say they must either obey or suffer saith that Christ exposed all to Martyrdom Mr. H. If it be in the Magistrates power lawfully to forbid and hinder then it is not in the power of the Churches to do lawfullye for then the same thing should be in the same regard both lawful and unlawfulâ—… and the rules of providence shall be opposite one to another but the supreme Magistrate may hinder any of another Nation to come into his Kingdom or his own subjects to go out otherwise he should want power to oppose them who come to lay waste the State and should not have power to require homage of his own people Ans. 1. The probation of the proposition is most false for the power of the Magistrate is not to forbid or command what he pleaseth but according to the rule of the Word and the Churches power is the same if both the powers be lawful their objects cannot be contradictory for God hath not given to two lawful powers any lawful liberty that the one may command what is lawful and the other what is unlawful for then he should give a power to command unlawful things and the command of a created power should make it lawful which is blasphemous this argument falls with weight upon the Independent way There is a Iezabel in the Independent Church of Thyatira and another Iezabel in the Church of Pergamus each Church say our Brethren hath an immediate Independent Church-power to excommunicate Thyatira useth their power and excommunicates Iezabel which is under them Pergamus absolves and defends their Iezabel Both powers are highest and immediate and countable to no juridical power on earth both are lawful powers Then must it follow if it be in the power of the one Church to wiâ— of Pergamus lawfully to forbid and hinder the excommunication of their equally guilty Iezabel and the câ—…ning of her blasphemous Doctrine for Pergamus absolves their â—…l and commends and defends her Doctrine as soâ—…d and â—…g then it shall not be in the power of Tâ—… lawfully to excommunicate their Iezabel and condemn heâ— plasphemous Doctrine for it shall follow that the same Doctrine must be in the same regard both lawful and sound and edifying saith the lawful power of Pergamus and 〈◊〉 unlawful and unsound and destructive to souls saith the lawful power of Thyatira 2. The probation is feeble and wacery the King hath sufficient power to oppose wasters of his Kingdom and to require homage of his subjects Suppose he have not an unlimited power to forbid these of other Nations and Churches and his own to go to a Synod within or without his Nation for the setling of the Churches in necessary peace and truth if the Churches must seek liberty and counsel for their soules good and edification nor hath he any lawful power from God to hinder his own subjects to send Commissioners to sound and godly Synods for counsel and synodical light more then Ieroboam could lawfully forbid the people to go and worship at Ierusalem upon pretence that they might be perswaded to cleave to Rehoboam their lawful Prince and waste his new Kingdom nor hath the Prince an unlimited and absolute power to exact such absolute homage of his people nor such a power over their moving from place for so the Church Independent of Ierusalem confisting of ten thousand if not more should have no intrinsecal power to meet for the publick worship of God but the Prince must have a lawful power to hinder their meeting or then the Church cannot have a lawful power to meet for the convening of ten thousands if abused is as dangerous for wasting of a Kingdom in its own way as the convening of a national Synod is or may be destructive to peace Mr. H. To appoint such solemn publick Assemblies is an act meerly civil Ergo the Prince may do it A civil act belongs not to an Ecclesiastick power A right opinion rectus de Deo sensus cultus of God and a right worship of God is a meerly civil act Ans. There is nothing here sound but evil and worse Christ â—…h given an Ecclesiastick intrinsecal power to his Church to meet it being a part of his free Kingdom and he himself a free King Suppose the Princes of the earth oppose Ps. 2. 1 2 3 4 5 6. Ps. 110. 1 2 3.