have their origination from God we Introduction have already in its proper place asserted And that these Kingdoms thus created by God have periods alterations and conversions set by him which cannot be foreseen or prevented by man is certainly as cleer and evident as the former and often owned by God himself in Sacred Writ as well over his own people as others But that therefore any man or men should therefore endeavour to make alterations in Kingdoms is like to a man who becaufe all men naturally die thinks he may kill any man and father the fact upon God And if God even over his own peculiar people did for the sins of the Kings and people especially the Israelites so often convert the line of the Kings then can it not in reason be expected in this Iron and much more sinful Age that God should every where continue a fixt and certain succession of Kings according to the ordinary course of Nature viz. Primogeniture But that therefore the Pope or any other creature may arrogate to themselves a right or power superior to the Law of Nature is no less absurd then that a Son may kill his Father because all Fathers have periods set by Nature which they cannot pass And that all Subjects do by birth owe a natural subjection to rightful Princes in whose dominion they were born which relations can never be dissolved but by God himself we have in their proper places demonstrated Yet may the exercise of this power be suspended so long as such Subjects come into the power of other Princes whether it be by conquest or otherwise and do owe them a temporary obedience so long as they continue there and their posterity born in their dominions owe such Princes a natural obedience which can never be dissolved And also that since there is no other Judge under Heaven to decide the controversie of Princes but their swords which can never be alledged by any Subjects who have Laws to decide their differences such decision is good as to the exercise of any Princes power over all them who fall under ir and all Subjects born in such exercise of power or dominion become natural Subjects to any Prince who by conquest acquires the dominion of another we have also demonstrated in its proper place Yet whether it were of old that Popes did arrogate to themselves this right of deposing Temporal Princes or debarring them of their right which about this time was frequently asserted by and practised by the Popes and which Pope Alexander was pleased to confer upon the Conqueror against all Right and Law to the manifest prejudice of Eadgar Athelin let us see the Epistle of S. Eleutherius to King Lucius as it is cited in chap. 17. of S. Edovards Laws In the year from the passion of Christ 169. or 156. our Lord Eleutherius the Pope wrote to Lucius King of Britain at the Petition of the King and Peers of the Kingdom of Britain You have required of us that the Roman Laws and of Cesar be transmitted to you which you would use in the Kingdom of Britain We can always reprove the Roman Laws and those of Cesar but not at all the Law of God For ye have by Gods mercy of late received into your Kingdom of Britain the Law and Faith of Christ you have of your self in your Kingdom sufficient Authority from whence through Gods grace by the advice of your Kingdom to make a Law and by it through Gods patience you shall rule the Kingdom of Britain And you are the Vicar of God in your Kingdom according to the Kingly Prophet The earth is the Lords and the fulness of all the world and all who inhabit therein And again according to the Kingly Prophet Thou hast loved Justice and hated iniquity and therefore thy God hath anointed thee with oyl of gladness above thy fellows And again according to the Kingly Prophet God is thy Judgement c. Therefore neither the Judgement nor Justice of Cesar for they are sons of the King Christian Nations and people of the Kingdom who live under your Protection and Peace and Reign and are according to the Gospel Even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings c. But they are Nations and your People of the Kingdom of Britain and who divided you ought to congregate recall nourish hold with your hand protect and rule into one for concord and peace and to the Faith and to the Law of Christ and his holy Church and always to defend it from evil doers and malitious men and its enemies Wo to the Kingdom whose King is a boy and whose Princes eat together in the morning I Do not call a King because of his small and tender age but because of his folly and iniquity and rage according to the Prophet King Men of blood and deceitful shall not live out half their days c. By eating we understand the Pallat by the Pallat Luxury by Luxury all things filthy and evil according to King Solomon Wisdom shall not enter into the soul of the evil doer nor shall dwell in a body subject to sins Rex dicitur à Regendo non à Regno A King thou shalt be so long as thou rulest well which thing if thou wilt not do the name of King shall not remain in thee and thou shalt lose the name of King which God forbid God Almighty grant to you so to Rule your Kingdom of Britain that you may Reign with him for ever whose Vicar you are in the Kingdom aforesaid who with the Father and Son c. Of the Right and Ecclesiastical freedom of Asylum's Cap. 1. That is to say Peace to the holy Church Of whatsoever forfeiture any one is guilty this time and he can come to the holy Church let him have peace of life and member and if any one hath set his hand against that which the Mother-Church shall require whether it be an Abby or Church of Religion let him restore that which he hath taken out and one hundred shillings for forfeiture and concerning the Mother-Parish-Church twenty shillings and concerning a Chappel ten shillings And according to the peace of the King in the Laws of the Mercians he shall make amends with En perchenâ—laâ— one hundred shillings accordingly as of Heinefare and prepensed lying in wait Of Peter-pence or Romescot Cap. 18. A Freeman who hath Field-Beasts valued at thirty pence shall pay a Peter-peny For four pence which the Lord shall give all his Borderers and his Boner and his Servants be quit A Burger who hath of his proper goods so much as shall be esteemed half a Mark let him pay a Peter-peny He who in the Law of the Danes is a Free-man and hath field-cattel which are valued worth half a Mark in silver ought to give a peny to St. Peter and for that peny shall all be quit who reside in his Demains Of them who do not pay the Roman
Monarchy Aristocracy Democracy I answer that God hath made Man upright but he hath sought out many inventions Therefore let Aristocracies Democracies answer for themselves anciently there was no Government in the world but Monarchy nor does God ever command obedience to others and the very Athenians for above 800 years could find a Government under Kings hereditarily before any footsteps of Aristocracy or Democracy was ever heard of in the world nor did they ever transgress the bounds of Europe unless in the Carthaginian State and when the Magi usurped in Persia It was Pride in the Romans and Grecians who not only esteemed all the world barbarous besides themselves and all Kings to be of the kinde of ravenous beasts but were the first inventers of these Aristocracies and Democracies and made all Power in Government to be Artificial and Political not only in the exercise which is true but also in the cause This Jus Politicum was of a more large extent with the Grecians then the Jus Civile was with the Romans For the Grecians esteemed that to be Jus Politicum which is common to all Men conjoyned with any society the Romans called that Jus Civile which is proper to any City So to buy and sell was by the Grecians called Politick the Romans called not those things Civil unless to sell by such a measure and at such a time the Romans called the Cloaks and other habits of vestments used by themselves and other people civil But let any Man judge whether these Men Mr. Hobbs White and Grotius being Christians and two of them very learned Men do reasonably not only to reject all precepts and examples of Sacred writ and all Testimonies of the consent of the present World and Testimonies of all most antient Histories from the examples of those most unreasonable Men besides the case between them is as unlike as can be For though they agree that this Jus Politicum or Civile is so as well in the cause as exercise and all power to be originally with the people yet by the people did neither Romans nor Grecians understand a company of Men in a rout or promiscuous parity but they who were Civitate donati nor did ever the People of Athens or Rome acquire their Dominion from the people subject to them by do or dedi and not dabo or faciam as these men feign all power to be originally deduced but by rapine extorting it from their rightful Kings in whom it undubitably was If it be questioned how originally this power came into the world if not Annot 3 by the Pacts of Men or consent of Families I answer Rem teneo modum nescio for the manner of it how it came originally I am not bound to give an account where the Scriptures and most antient Historians do not confirm it it is enough that I having proved it to be natural and Gods Ordinance it was never otherwise especially having the practice of the present world and the Records of all prophane and sacred History 14. It is true indeed that the Humane Laws and the exercise of Regal Not only Kings but Kingdoms have their being from God and by the Law of Natore Power is Politick Voluntary and Artificial but that these Laws are received and exercised in those places where they ought to be which makes Kingdoms is expresly said by the Prophet Dan. cap. 4. in three places The most Highest ruleth in the kingdoms of men and giveth it to whom it pleaseth him ver 7. And it was Nebuchad-nezzars punishment for his pride that he should have his dwelling with the beasts of the field untill he knew that the most Highest ruleth in the kingdoms of Men and giveth it to whomsoever he will ver 25 and 32. So that it is evident not only Kings but Kingdoms not only their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 their Right but also Government is from God immediately and that this is a Declaration of the Law of Nature not only long before God by the Prophet Daniel speaks this were Kingdoms upon the earth but also no Kingdom or King which at the time that this was spoken that did receive or believe Gods Revelation of himself in the Scriptures Kingdoms therefore or the exercise of Regal Power is Gods Ordinance as well where the Scriptures are received as not and due by the Law of Nature and by consequence the obstinate resistance of Kings in their Government by their subjects is a violence upon the Law of Nature 15. Sir Francis Bacon in his life of Henry 7. relates that Perkin Warbeck How many waies Regality comes to pass by the often affirming himself to be Richard Duke of York second son of Ed. 4. did at last believe himself to be so indeed The violent and frequent usurpations of usurpers in this Island and some other Northern and European Region hath invested such a habit in Men that renouncing reason as well as all faith and belief of God in the Scriptures they with much confidence affirm nothing but possession or possession and submission of Subjects to be requisite with Kings Both which do no more make a rightful King then a Mans Deseisin Abetting or Intruding into the signiory of another and the Tenants attorning to him does make him rightful Lord of the Mannor But neither humane Laws nor Man nor any thing under Heaven can endue any Creature with a power over anothers life and fortune who is of the same kind with himself and without which there can be no supreme power and by consequence no society among Men. There are but four waies by which Regality can happen First When it is immediately and expresly given by God as it was to Saul David Solomon Hazael Cyrus c. Or Secondly derived from him who had Regality truly vested in him but this derivation must not be from the Election Adoption or the will of him who was invested with the Regal Power which at highest cannot amount higher then a humane Law which by the 3 para of this chap. cannot create Regal Power It must therefore be derived by Primegeniture which is derived from a higher cause then humane Laws for jura sanguinis nullo jure civili dirimi possint Or Thirdly by Lot which we have shewed to be by the Law of Nature Or Lastly Jure Primi Occupantis if its Occupant be capable thereof for Man being a sociable creature by Nature and society according to Aristotle being contained in many divided parts therefore in the society of Men there must be unum quid quod imparet alterum Lib. 1. cap. 5. Pol. quod pareat But whether Aristocracy and Democracy be unum quid that may jure imperare to me is a question neither of them being any Institution of God or from the Law of Nature but brought in by unjust usurpation and violence and against the universal consent and practice of the world for above Three
Third within less then three years after the death of S. Gregory did assume the title of Universal Bishop and Head of the Church but rather by the donation of Phocas who had no more right to give it then the Parliament had to give Henry the Eighth the Head of the Church of England nor had Phocas any colour of title to the Empire and have continued it ever since 4. S. Gregory in his 76. Epistle to the Emperor Maurice says Nunquid Neither S. Gregory nor his predecessors did claim superiority over Temporal Princes ego in hac re piissime Domine propriam causam defendo Do I herein defend mine own cause O gracious Lord And Dominus meus fuisti quando adhuc Dominus omnium non eras ecce per me servum ultimum suum vestrum respondebit Christus You were then my Lord when you were not Lord of all viz. the Empire behold Christ himself shall answer by me who am his and your meanest servant And when the Emperor Maurice had made a law That no Soldier should turn Monk until his warfare were ended Gâ—eg ad Manâ— Aug. lib 3. eâ— 61. Gregory disliked the law and gave the Emperor this sense of it Ego quidem missioni subjectus eandem legem per diversas terrarum partes transmitto quia lex ipsa omnipotenti Dec minime concordat ecce per suggestionis meae paginam dominis nunciavi utrobique ergo quae debui exolvi qui Imperatori obedientiam praebui pro Deo quid sensi minime tacui I being subject to your command have transmitted your Law to be published through divers parts 〈◊〉 2. ep 61. of the world And because the Law it self is not pleasing to Almighty God I have represented my opinion thereof to my Lords whereforee I have performed my duty on both sides in yielding obedience to the Emperor and not concealing what I thought for God And Boniface the First sent an humble supplication to Honorius desiring him by his authority to provide some remedy against the ambitious contention of the Clergy concerning the Bishoprick of Rome The Emperor Honorius at his request established Dist 92. cap. Eccle. cap. Victor a law That none should be made Bishop of Rome through ambition charging all Ecclesiastical Ministers to cease from ambition appointing moreover that if two were elected neither of them should be taken but the election to proceed further to another to be chosen by a full consent of voices as it is expressed dist 79. cap. Si duo If then S. Gregory himself were so zealous an opposer of Universal Bishop and Head of the Church and to that purpose introduced that sentence of Servus servorum Dei to deter all subsequent Bishops of Rome from such arrogance And if S. Gregory did acknowledge himself so humble a Subject to Maurice and that Boniface the First did petition Honorius by his authority to provide against the irregularities in the very election of the Bishop of Rome there was no such thing in these days as Cardinals and the Election of the Pope in the Conclave then sure in the days of S. Gregory and before neither did the Popes assume this title of Head of the Church nor a power of disposing and transferring Kingdoms at their pleasure But affirmanti incumbit probatio and let any man that affirms either prove either 5. That above one half of what is now called Britain did retain the Though S. Cregory were the first yet was he not the onely Converter of the English Saxons Christian faith notwithstanding the persecution of the Saxons is sufficiently evident if we consider Scotland and Wales which always retained Christianity since it was first planted Nor were the very Saxons themselves utterly destitute of Christianity For Berta the wife of Ethelbert King of Kent and daughter to the French King was tolerated to observe the rites of Christian religion with Bishop Luidhard and this was before that S. Gregory was excited or inspired to undertake to preach to the English Saxons It is true that Ethelbert after his own conversion did endeavor to Seld. Anae Anglo Brit. lib. 2. cap. 2. pag. 62. have planted the Christian faith both in the Kingdoms of Northumberland and the East-Angles with fair hopes of good success for a season but it took not effect for within a short time both Kings and Kingdoms forsook their Religion and apostated from Christ The Kingdoms of the West-Saxons and of the South-Saxons under Kingils their King who did unite the Heptarchy into a Monarchy were converted by the preaching Speed in the Kings of the West-Saxons an 611. Beda lib. 3. cap. 4 5. Idem lib. 3. cap 21. Speed in the Kings of the East-Angles an 636. of Berinus an Italian by the perswasions of Oswald King of Northumberland Oswald King of Northumberland was baptized in Scotland and Religion luckily planted in that Kingdom by Aidan a Scotish Bishop Penda King of Mercia was converted and Christened by Finanus Successor of Aidan by means of a Marriage with a Christian Princess of the Royal family of Northumberland Sigibert King of the East-Angles in whose days and by whose means Religion took root among the East-Saxons was converted and Christened in France 6. No sooner was the name of Christ preached but the English presently The zeal of our Ancestors upon their conversion with such fervent devotion and zeale consecrated themselves unto Christ that they took incredible pains in propagating Christianity in celebrating Divine service performing all functions and duties of piety building Churches and endowing them with rich livings so that there was not another Region in Christendom that could make reckoning of more Monasteries richly endowed yea and divers Kings there were that preferred a religious and Monastical life before their Crown and Kingdom So that many holy men also this Land brought forth which for their firm profession of Christian Religion constant perseverance therein and sincere piety were canonized Saints that it gave place to no Christian Province in this behalf And like as Britain was called by Porphyry a plenteous province of Tyrants so England may be truly named a most fruitful Island of Saints Camb. Brit tit Angl. Sax. 7. The Bishop of Derry in his book of the Just vindication of the Church The Popes universal power was not received under the English Saxon Kings before the Conquest of England pag. 57. does affirm that not any of the petite Saxon Kings or their Subjects though some of them indebted to S. Gregory for their Conversion and all of them much weakened by their sevenfold division for at first there was of seven Kings but only one who was a Christian namely the King of Kent neither was it any of his progeny who afterward did unite the Heptarchy into a Monarchy much less that any of the succeeding Kings of England or of Great Britain did ever make any solemn formal or obliging acknowledgment of
often gone out of the Church and Priests houses having restored the thing taken away let him abjure the Province and not return and if by chance he shall return let no man presume to entertain him unless he have leave from the King Of breaking the Peace of the Church If any one shall violently infringe the Peace of the Church the Justice Cap. 7. belongs to the Bishops but if one guilty in avoiding their Judgement or arrogantly contemning it shall despise it let the complaint thereof be brought to the King within forty days and let the Kings Justice make him give Security and Pledges if he can get them until he first give God afterward the Church satisfaction But if within one and thirty days either by his friends or acquaintance or by the Justice of the King he cannot be found out the King shall Outlaw him by the word of his own mouth i. e. he shall be excluded out of all protection of the King But if after he shall be found and can be retained let him be restored alive to the King or his head if he shall defend himself Lupinum enim gerit caput which in English is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This is the common and general Law concerning all men Outlawed Of the Tithes to be restored to the Church of Sheep and Hoggs 8. The tenth sheaf of all kinde of corn is due to God and therefore to be restored to God And if any one hath a company of Mares let him restore the tenth colt to God he who hath but one or two for every single colt one single peny In like maner who hath many Cowes the tenth calf who hath but one or two for every calf one single halfpeny and who make Cheese give to God the tenth but if he make none milk the tenth day In like maner the tenth Lamb the tenth Fleece the tenth Cheese the tenth Butter and the tenth Hogg Of Bees In like maner the tenth of the profit of Bees as also of under-Wood In some these two Chapters are joyned of Meadow and Waters and Mills Parks Warrens Fishponds tender Sprouts and Gardens and Merchandize and all other things which God shall give the tenth part is to be restored to him who gave the nine parts together with the tenth who shall have detained it let him be compelled to restitution by the Justice of the Bishop and King if need be For these things St. Augustine hath Preached and are granted by the King Barons and People but afterwards by the instinct of the Devil many have detained it and Priests careless of growing rich did not care to take pains to get them because they had sufficient means of living For in many places now there are three or four Churches where then there was but onely one and so they began to be diminished Of them who are judged to be brought to Judgment or Water by the Cap. 9. Justice of the King In that day wherein Judgment ought to be done let the Minister of the Bishop and his Clerks come thither and in like manner the Justice of the King with Legal men of that Province who may see and hear that all things be rightly done and whom the Lord by his mercy will save let them be quit and freely depart and whom the iniquity of the fault the Lord shall not condemn let the Justice of the King do justice upon them But the Barons who have their jurisdiction of their men let them see that they do so concerning them as they incur not displeasure with God and offend not the King And if a Suit does arise concerning men of other Baronies in their Courts let the Justice of the King be present because without it the Suit cannot be determined If any of the Barons hath not Justice in the Hundred where the Plea shall be holden it shall be determined at the next Church where the Judgment of the King shall be saving the Right of those Barons Of Romescot 10. Every one who shall have Thirty pence of current money in his house of his own property by the Law of England shall pay a Peter penny and by the Law of the Danes half a Mark But that penny ought to be summoned upon the Feasts of the Apostles Peter and Paul and collected at the Feast which is called To the Bonds so that it be not detained beyond that day If any one shall longer detain it let complaint be brought to the justice of the King because this penny is the Alms of the King and it is justice he cause this penny to be restored and the forfeiture of the Bishop and King But if a man hath more houses let him restore the Peter-penny for that wherein he resides upon the feast of Peter and Paul the Apostles Of the Office of the King and of the Right and Appendixes of the 17. Crown of the Kingdom of Britain And the King because he is the Vicar of the highest King and to this purpose ordained that he may both govern and rule the terrene kingdom and people of the Lord and above all things the holy Church and that he defend the same from wrong-doers and destroy and root out workers of mischief Besides these Sir Ed. Coke in Cawdries Case instances in King Kenulph for that King Kenulph by his Letters Patents with the consent and councel of his Bishops and Senators of his Kingdom did give to the Monastery of Abingdon in the County of Berks and to one Ruchnius then Abbot of the said Monastery c. a certain portion of his Country c. and that the said Ruchnius c. should be ever free from Ecclesiastical right or jurisdiction and that the Inhabiters of it from thenceforth be kept under the yoke of no Bishop or their Officials but in all events of things and discussions of causes they be subject to the Decree of the Abbot of the Monastery aforesaid And that this Charter was above * * Counting to the time Sir Ed. Coke wrote 850 years since which was in the year 755. and after confirmed by Edwin of Britain King and Monarch of Englishmen and this Grant did continue until the dissolution of the Abby by Henry the 8. So that the Kings of this Nation have not only of antient time been Nursing fathers to Gods Church and have exercised their Regal power over the persons of all their Subjects in all cases but have even dispensed with and conferred Episcopal jurisdiction But this was only matter of fact and done but only in one place nor was it ever established by a Law before the Statute of Lollard and by Henry the Eight and the First of Eliz. Yet it was afterward as shall appear in the next Chap. used by divers Kings and often adjudged by the Judges before Henry the Eighth CHAP. III. Ecclesiastical Laws made by William the First who began to reign in the year of Christ 1067. THat Nations and Kingdoms
with the Opinion of Learned men That the marriage with his Brothers wife was contrary to the Law of God and void The King not expecting the Popes sentence anno 1533. marries his beloved Anne but such love is usually too hot to hold for about two years after he cut off her head yet the King did not wholly renounce the Papacy but still expecting the Popes sentence The Pope for the reasons aforesaid not desiring to end the business The slow proceedings of the Pope but to expect advantage from time reduces the matter into several points or heads which he would have particularly disputed and at the time of the Kings marriage with Anne was not got further then the article of Attentates in which the Pope gave sentence against the King that it was not lawful for him to put away his wife by his own authority without the Ecclesiastical Judge For which cause the King in the beginning of 1534. denied the Pope his obedience commanding his Subjects not to pay any money to Rome nor to pay the ordinary Peter-pence This infinitely troubled the Court of Rome and they daily consulted of a remedy Some thought to proceed against the King with censures and to interdict all Christian nations all commerce with England But the moderate counsel pleased best to temporise with him and to mediate a composition by the French King K. Francis accepted the charge and sent the Bishop of Paris to Rome to negotiate a Pacification with the Pope where they still proceeded in the cause gently and with resolution not to come to censures if the Emperor did not proceed first or at the same time with his forces They had divided the cause into twenty three articles and then they handled whether Prince Arthur had had carnal conjunction with Queen Katherine in this they spent time till Midlent was past when the 19. of March news came that a Libel was published in England against the Pope and the whole Court of Rome and besides a Comedy had been made in presence of the King and Court to the great disgrace and shame of the Pope and every Cardinal in particular For which cause all being inflamed with choler ran headlong to give sentence which was pronounced in the Consistory the 24. of the same month That the marriage between Henry and Katherine was good that he was bound to take her to wife and that in case he did not he should be excommunicated But the Pope was soon displeased with this precipitation For six days His rash censure repented of after the French Kings letters came That the King was content to accept the sentence concerning Attentates and to render obedience upon condition that the Cardinals whom he mistrusted should not meddle in the business and that persons not suspected should be sent to Cambray to take information â—and and the King had sent his Proctors before to assist in the Cause at Rome Wherefore the Pope went about to devise some pretence to suspend the precipitate sentence and again to set the cause on its feet But the King so soon as he had seen it said It was no matter for the Utterly loses the obedience of England Pope should be Bishop of Rome and himself sole Lord of his Kingdom And that he would do according to the antient manner of the Eastern church not leaving to be a good Christian nor suffering the Lutheran Heresie or any other to be brought into his Kingdom From that time forward Henry the Eighth of a zealous Assertor of the No anger lost between the King Pope Papacy both by pen and purse became the first and greatest Opposer of it of all the Western Christian Princes for the Eastern Christian Princes except sometimes the Emperors of Greece and the Kings of Holy Land did seldom or never submit to the Papacy in her Spirituals yet did he afterwards seed to be reconciled to the Pope even by means of his Nephew Charls the Fifth Nor were the Popes much behind hand with him For besides Clement's petty Excommunication Paul the Third Anno 1538. thundred out such a terrible Excommunication against him as the like was never heard of which deprived him of his kingdom and his adherents of whatsoever they possessed commanding his Subjects to deny him obedience and Strangers to have no commerce in the kingdom and all to take arms against and persecute both him and his followers granting them their states and goods for their prey and their persons for slaves But the Popes anger ended in words whereas the Kings deeds took place against the Pope But what there was in all the Kings reign which might be called Reformation What was the Kings Reformation I do not understand For whatsoever the King took from the Pope except Peter-pence he ascribed to himself If the Pope would be Head of the Catholique Church the King would be Head of the Church of England If the Pope challenged Annates and First-fruits of the Bishops and Clergy the King would do no less If the Pope did give Abbots and Priors power being Ecclesiastical persons to make divers Impropriations to their benefit the King will take a power to take them all away and convert them into Lay-fees and incorporate them so into particular mens estates that they shall never return to the Church more Nor had he any love or desire of Reformation of the Church but only to the Church-lands for all the Rites Ceremonies and Religion of the Church of Rome was continued and that with such bloody cruelty that a Stranger going over Smithfield one day and seeing two men there executed one for denying the Kings Headship of the Church and another for subscribing to the Six Articles cryed out Bone Deus quomodo hic agunt vivi hic suspenduntur Papistae ibi comburuntur Antipapistae And so zealous did he continue herein that Pope Paul the Third after he had fulminated so dreadfully against him Hist Conc-Trid fol. 90 proposed him for an Example to be imitated by Charls the Fifth Although such was the temper of this Prince that he never spared man The exclusion of the Papai jurisdiction was an act of the King Kingdom and Church of England in his rage woman in his lust nor any thing which might be called sacred in his avarice yet so absolute was he that his Divorce was attested by both the Universities at home besides that at Paris abroad his freeing himself and the Nation from the jurisdiction of the Pope was not only assented to by a Synod and Convocation of all the Clergy of England but the English and Irish Nobility did make their submissions by an Indenture to Sir Anthony Sellinger then chief Governor of Ireland wherein they did acknowledge King Henry to be their lawful Soveraign and confessed the Kings Supremacy Bram. Vind. of the Church of England p. 43. in all causes and utterly renounced the Pope But Divorce banishing the Papal authority
Dissolution of Abbies and all were easily passed and assented to in Parliament But whatsoever the King were otherwise yet sure the Popes passion The Pope was more unjust in his censures then the King was in excluding the Papal jurisdiction against him carried them to greater extravagancies and exorbitancies then were on his part against them For suppose that the Pope had de facto the Investitures of Bishops Peter-pence Annates and First-fruits paid them and did exercise a jurisdiction over all the Church and Clergy yet no question all these things were by the grants and permission of precedent Kings and if Kings may grant and permit these things then what hinders but that they may recall them for Cujus est velle ejus est nolle Besides we have already shewed that although there were not that bitter personal spite between the Kings of England and and the Popes formerly as was between Henry 8. and Clement 7. and Paul 3. yet did many of them ascribe as little to the Pope as Henry did But for a Pope to deprive a Christian Prince of his kingdom over whom he had no manner of right his Adherents of whatsoever they possessed to command his Subjects to deny their obedience to their Soveraign and Strangers not to have any commerce in the kingdom and all to take arms against him and his followers granting them their estates and goods for a prey and their persons for slaves is so unlike to the example and precept of S. Peter whom they pretend to succeed who not only suffered death under Temporal power but inspired by God does command so expresly obedience to Kings not as subordinate to himself 1 Pet. 2. 13. but as supreme And of our Saviour himself who both suffered himself under Temporal power and paid tribute to Caesar and took not away but fulfilled the Moral Law which commands obedience to Princes and Higher powers and whose kingdom was not of this world that sure no Turk or Infidel was so much an enemy to Christians or indeed rather to mankind as to have desired it The state of the Church and of the Ecclesiastical Laws made by Edward the sixth THe time of this Kings reign being a Child and therefore woful and of his Father were perillous days The Father in his Laws scarce ever took advice but from his passion lust or avarice the Son although a Prince of infinite hope and goodness yet wanting the authority and reputation requisite in a Soveraign was either not able to restrain or else perswaded it was beneficial to give reins to a company of Sacrilegious Harpies and Courtiers to make a total prey not only upon all Colledges Free-Chappels Chantries and all their Lands except them of the Universities and some few other which by the Statute of 1 Ed. 6. cap. 14. were given to Camb. pref Eliz. Reg. Life of Ed. 6. the King upon specious pretences but the Lands of the Bishops generally became a prey unto them So much worse is it for every thing to be lawful then that any thing should be Law It was enacted That if any man spake irreverently or contemptuously An. 1. Ed. 6. c. 6. of the Sacrament of the Altar he should be imprisoned and fined at the Kings will and pleasure and that Justices of Peace might enquire of offenders Yet should not the person offending be arraigned or tryed unless the Bishop of the Diocese or his Chancellor or Deputy learned were required to be at the Quarter-Sessions to which purpose a new Writ was made Rex c. Episc L. salutem Praecipimus tibi quod tu Cancellarius tuus vel alius deputatus tuus sufficienter eruditus sitis cum Justiciariis nostris ad pacem in com nostro B. conservand assignat apud D. tali die ad sessionem nostram tunc ibidem tenend ad dand consilium advisament eisdem Justitiariis nostris ad pacem super arraiment deliberationem offendet contra Formam statuti concernend sacrosanctum Sacramentum Altaris And by this Satute it was Enacted that the Sacrament should be delivered to the people under both Kindes viz. of Bread and Wine From thenceforth no Conge deslier shall be granted nor any Election An. 1 Ed. 6. Cap. 2. shall be made of any Archbishop or Bishop by the Dean and Chapter but when any Archbishoprick or Bishoprick shall be voided the King by his Letters Patents may confer the same to any person whom he shall think meet c All summons citations and other proces Ecclesiastical shall be made in the name and with the stile of the King as in the Writs of the common Law and the test thereof shall be in the name of the Archbishop or Bishop c. All persons that have the exercise of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction shall have in their Seals of Office the Kings Arms with certain characters under them for the knowledge of their dioces but the Archbishop of Canterbury shall use his own Seal and his own name in all faculties and dispensations A man speaking against the Kings Headship of the Church shall being An. 1 Ed. 6. Cap. 12. thereof attaint or convict forfeit all his Goods and Chattels to the King and suffer imprisonment during the Kings will and pleasure for the first offence and for the second offence forfeit to the King the whole issues and profits of all his Lands and all his Goods and Chattels and suffer perpetual imprisonment and for the third offence shall be adjudged a Traytor and suffer death and forfeit all his Goods and Chattels Lands and Tenements as in cases of High Treason And it shall be deemed Treason for any by Printing Writing or Deed to affirm the King not to be Head of the Church An Act for uniformity of Service and administration of Sacraments being An. 2 3 Ed. 6 Cap. 1. before divers and different viz. of Sarum of York of Bangor and of Lincoln and divers and sundry forms and fashions were used in Cathedrals and Parish-Churches of England and Wales as well concerning Mattens or Morning Prayer and the Evening Song as also concerning the holy Communion commonly called the Mass with divers and sundry rites and ceremonies concerning the same and in the administration of the Sacraments of the Church The Statute does inflict upon every Parson Vicar or other whatsoever Minister that ought or should say or sing the said Common Prayer mentioned in the said Book Entituled the Book of Common Prayer and Administration of the Sacraments and other rites and ceremonies of the Church after the use of the Church of England and shall refuse it or use any other form or shall Preach Declare or speak any thing in derogation of the said Book or any thing contained therein and be thereof lawfully convict by a Jury of twelve men or by confession shall forfeit to the King for the first offence the profit of all his Spiritual benefices and promotions arising in a whole year and
after them Gunthramn Clowis Carloman and Pepin at Masscon first and second at Chalons That which is called Francia and that which is in Vernis Twenty of them at least in France In Spain by ten several Kings in two Councels at Braccara and in ten at Tolledo by the space of three hundred years together And how under what terms Peruse the Councel themselves their very acts spake Ex praecepto Imperio Jussu Sanctione Nutu Decreto Ex evocatione Dispositione Regis One saith Potestas permissa est nobis another facultas data est nobis a third Injunctu est nobis á rege and this for about eight hundred years after Christ Then arose another Empire here in the West under Charls the Great and he called six several Councils at Frankfort Arles Tours Chalons Mentz and Rhemes And what says he in them In that at Rhemes In conventu mere priscorum Imperatorum congregato à piissimo Domino nostro Carolo That he called that Convention by no other right then as the manner of the antient Emperors had been to do After him Ludovicus Pius Lotharius Ludovicus Balbus Carolus Calvus Carolus Crassus and Arnulphus at the several Councils of Aken Mentz Melden Wormes Colen and Tribur and so held it nine hundred years after Christ for about that year a year or two over or under was holden the Council at Tribur in Germany by the Emperors decree and himself President in it Nor are the Kings of England less absolute then either Emperors Kings of Spain or France And see B. Bramhalls Just Vindication of the Church of England cap. 7. how the Emperors Kings of France Spain and Portugal have by their own authority convened National and Provincial Councils which have not only determined without the Papal authority but very often in contradiction to it Nor are either the English or British Churches or ever were less free then the Gallicane the liberties whereof in the Chapter aforesaid are set down viz. 1. The Pope cannot command or ordain any thing directly or indirectly concerning any Temporal affairs within the Dominions of the King of France 2. The Spiritual authority and power of the Pope is not absolute in The priviledges of the Gallican Church France but limited and restrained to the canons and rules of the antient Councils of the Church and received in that Kingdom 3. No command whatsoever of the Pope can free the French Clergy from their obligation to obey the commands of their Soveraign 4. The most Christian King hath had power at all times according to the occurrence and exigence of affairs to assemble or cause to be assembled Synods Provincial or National and therein to treat not only of such things as concern the conservation of the Civil estate but also of such things as concern Ecclesiastical order and discipline in his own dominions and therein to make Rules Chapters Laws Ordinances and Pragmatique Sanctions in his own name and by his own authority Many of which have been received among the Decrees of the Catholique Church and some of them approved by General Councils 5. The Pope cannot send a Legate à latere into France with power to reform judge collate dispence or do such things accustomed to be specified in the autoritative Bull of his Legation except it be upon the desire or with the approbation of the most Christian King Neither can the said Legate execute his charge until he hath promised to the King in writing under his oath upon his holy Orders not to make use of his Legantine power in the Kings dominions longer then it shall please the King and that so soon as he shall be admonished of the Kings pleasure to forbid it he shall give it over And that whilst he doth use it shall be exercised conformable to the Kings will without attempting any thing to the prejudice of the Decrees of General Councils or the Liberties and Priviledges of the Gallicane Church and the Universities of France 6. The Commissions and Bulls of the Popes Legate are to be seen examined and approved by the Court of Parliament and to be registred and published with such cautions and modifications as that Court shall judge expedient for the good of the Kingdom and to be executed according to the said cautions and not otherwise 7. The Prelates of the French Church although commanded by the Pope for what cause soever it be may not depart out of the Kingdom without the Kings commandment or licence 8. The Pope cannot by himself or his delegates judge any thing which concerns the state preheminence or priviledges of the Crown of France nor any thing pertaining to it nor can there be any question or process about the state or pretensions of the King but in his Courts 9. Papal Bulls Citations Excommunications c. are not to be executed in France without the Kings command or permission and after permission only by the authority of the King and not by authority of the Pope to shun mixture and confusion of Jurisdictions 10. Neither the King nor his Realm nor his Officers can be excommunicated or interdicted by the Pope nor his Subjects absolved from their Oath of Allegiance 11. The Pope cannot impose Pensions in France upon any Benefices having cure of souls nor upon any others but according to the canons according to the express condition of resignation or ad redimendum vexationem 12. All Bulls and Missives which come from Rome to France are to be seen and visited to try if there be nothing in them prejudicial in any manner to the estate and liberties of the Church of France or to the Royal authority 13. It is lawful to appeal from the Pope to a future Council 14. Ecclefiastical persons may be convented judged and sentenced before a Secular Judge for the first grievous or enormous crime or for lesser offences after a Relapse which renders them incorrigible in the eye of the Law 15. All places of France are obliged to swear fealty to the King and to receive from him investitures for their fees and manors 16. The Courts of Parliament in case of Appeals as from abuse have right and power to declare null void and to revoke the Popes Bull and Excommunications and to forbid the execution of them when they are found contrary to Sacred Decrees the liberty of the French Church or the Prerogative Royal. 17. General Councils are above the Pope and may depose him and put another in his place and take cognisance of Appeals from the Pope 18. All Bishops have their power immediately from Christ not from the Pope and are equally successors of S. Peter and of the other Apostles and Vicars of Christ 19. Provisions Reservations Expective graces c. have no place in France 20. The Pope cannot exempt any Church Monastery or Ecclesiastical body from the jurisdiction of the Ordinary nor erect Bishopricks into Archbishopricks nor unite them nor divide them without the Kings licence 21. All those are not Hereticks
it be that when God shall have called thee to his Kingdom which alone is better then thine thou maist confidently say I have received this sword from thee for defence of Justice this sword I return to thee pure and undefiled rashly guilty of no bloodshed Observ So that if he saies true that Lewis the 13. had his sword of Justice from God then does he say false here and in twenty places more that all Power of Governing is from the wills of the people Well but let us suppose a King made by the People which is the party governing and which is the party governed all Government being in the predicament of Relation where there is any one to govern or command there must be another to be governed and commanded Well then here are two the People and the King made by the People the one to govern the other to be governed Say now which is the party governing the King or the People it cannot be that the King should be the governing party for he is but a Creature and a thing made by the People and the Creator cannot be ruled and governed by the Creature the People then must be the party governing and the King must be the party governed the King therefore of France whom he so much flatters and all other Kings whatsoever from this determination of Grotius are the governed party and the People their Subjects are the governing party If therefore it be impossible to serve two Masters who by equal right command I would fain know how it is possible for a King to obey above Ten hundred thousand every one of his Subjects having as much right to command him as another and it is very like indeed to be a very well ordered Government and much conducing to the benefit and safety of the People where there is many Hundred thousands commanding and one individual person obeying But good Man he is very careful that though the People give Kings all their Regal Power that they part not with too much nay though they make Kings yet if you beleeve him they part with nothing at all for otherwhere he saies Imperium quod per Reges exercetur non desinit impeperium Lib. 2. cap. 16. Para. 16. populi Is not here a pretty play of a King and no King a King without Power and a People with all Power So that at the same time that he flatters Lewis the 13. by telling him neither King nor People are Judges of his succession he had before given the People of France a power of altering the right of succession without doing any wrong to his Son Lewis the 14 who now rules for he was res non existens when he wrote this book De jure belli pacis Sometime neither as Hogan Mogan nor stipendary to Lewis the 13 Lib. 2. cap. 7. Para. 25. directly where he saies In alienable Kingdoms the King may disinherit his heir Observ Who gave him his Fee to say this We cannot think it was Lewis he denies all his Grounds to pleasure him yet latet anguis in herba it may be because Henry the First was younger Son to Robert and Robert disposessed his eldest Son who bare his name and made his younger Son King from whom Lewis derives himself But how then can this stand with the 27 Para. that neither King nor People are Judges in succession or if Power which is exercised by a King does not cease the Power of the People then cannot Lib. 2. cap. 16 Para. 16. Kings give away their Kingdoms nor disinherit their Heirs for delegata potestas non potest participari Observ Well let us see his reason for this He says Such a Kingdom is like other alienable goods Here the right of the alienation of a Kingdom is well proved viz. I may give a poor man a penny and therefore a King may disinherit his Heir or give his Kingdom to whom he pleases And so he says Jacob did disinherit Ruben Observ What Kingdom was then given by any people to Jacob to which Ruben was Heir Besides for ought he knows or can find by Cicero Tacitus Demosthenes Cleon or any tale told by any Poet the time when Jacob lived and died was then when all things were common and undivided and how then could Jacob disinherit Ruben Observ Another Instance for the right of Alienation is of Davids disinheriting Grotius Adonijah Whether this be true read 1 Chron. cap. 28. v. 5 6 7. And of all my sons for the Lord hath given me many sons he hath chosen Solomon my son to sit upon the throne of the kingdom of the Lord over Israel And he said unto me Solomon thy son he shall build my house and my courts for I have chosen him to be my son and I will be his father Moreover I will establish his kingdom for ever if he be constant to do my commandments and my judgments as at this day Nor was it for any crime Adonijah did not reign after David for David had sworne Solomon should reign before Adonijah's usurpation 1 King 1. 13. Mr. Hobbs makes no doubt but a Monarch may choose his Successor and Cap. 7. art 15. Cap. 9. art 12. by his will dispose of the Supreme power of the City And in the next Article he gives him leave to give it or sell it to whom he will Observ King James was observed to make his Honors vile because he exposed them to sale and so conferred them upon unworthy men not as they deserved them but they were able to pay for them thereby to satisfie his hungry Countrimen who were daily begging boons of him How vile would this man make Majesty how light the ligeance which is due not only by nature but by oath from all Subjects to their rightful Soveraigns And The Crown of England has been so free at all times that it hath no earthly St. 16. Ric. 2. cap. 5. subjection but immediately subject to God touching the regality of the same Crown and to no other And it is declared by the Lords and Commons in Parliament upon demand made by the King That they could not assent to any thing in Parliament that tended to the disinherison of the King and his Sir Ed. Coke Inst 4. par p. 15. Crown whereto they are sworne How this can be consistent with this mans Sale of Crowns I do not understand Our Author is so in love with his Supreme and Absolute Trustee that let him but do what he list and he may say with Tiberius Caesar 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 When I am dead let the earth be mingled with fire Bodin in the last Chapter of his Republique because neither from Plato's nor Xenophon's opinion he can find Justice to consist in Geometrical nor Arithmetical proportion will therefore have it to consist in Harmonical he not understanding harmonical proportion For he makes it consist in four terms viz. 4. 6. 8. 12. and what proportion
pretended Salique Law 30. Delegata potestas non potest participari No man can participate No Prince can give sell or transfer his power much less alien the power which he is intrusted with But supreme power is delegate from God to every Prince and therefore no Prince can give sell or bequeath his power to any other The King is Gods Lieutenant upon earth Coke 3 par Inst cap. Deodands fol 57. 31. It may be the Electors are the Instruments by which the Elected Elective Monarchy King or Monarch receives his power but I do not understand how such a King can be a Supreme Prince Yet this by the way Neither now nor heretofore was ever such Prince chosen either by the people in general or by the Masters in families nor the Electors chosen by them 32. Aristocracy is when a company of men met in Councel ascribe Aristocracy to themselves whatsoever power is due to any rightful Monarch not being chosen by the people in general but have places either by birth or as they are chosen by the Council such is the state of Venice such were the Roman Senate and Ephori of Lacedemon 33. Democracy is when they who being free of the City do meet at a Democracy time and place appointed where they choose Ministers and Officers make and alter laws and do whatsoever they think good or what shall appear good to them as represented to them by popular Orators But because business might so fall out that there might be a necessity of making War or Peace raising mony for defence of the Commonwealth c. besides the times and places appointed the Athenian Archon and Tribunes of the Roman people had liberty given them to assemble the people when they thought fit I think no man can well tell whether the Roman Government before Caesars dictatorship were Democratical or Aristocratical For though men might appeale from the Consuls to the Tribunes yet by an Act of the Senate after the suppressing of the Gracchi the Consuls might provide that the Common-wealth should receive no detriment which is as general and high a power as can be given No wonder then if Marius pretending the power of the Common wealth and Sylla the authority of the Senate should reduce both Rome and Senate to so lamentable a condition and that Julius Cesar assisted by Lucius Antonius and Quintus Curio the Tribunes of the people and Pompey by the Senate should raise such War and commotion every where to the utter subversion of the absolute power as they called it both of Senate and people CHAP. IV. Of the three Species of Government viz. Monarchy Aristocracy and Democracy 1. IMperium est duplex solutum legibus and astrictum legibus this is There are but 3 species of Government and all compounded Government is either supervacantous or destructive to the Governors and Governed Empire restrained to the Laws and is of Magistrates who although they command private men yet they themselves are bound by the laws and command of their superiors which is the power of our Judges Justices c. That is Majesty an Empire which is the Arbitrator Moderator Controuler and maker of all laws and who justly has it is accountable only to God and this Empire is so essential to all Government that without it there can be no Kingdom or Commonwealth there cannot be any property any meum or tuum but what this Empire gives no man has any security of his life or estate but as he is preserved and protected by this power or command And though government do differ as it hath been and yet is in many places of the world in specie viz. Monarchy Aristocracy and Democracy yet in all of them this power or command is the same and equal viz. Supreme And this power or command must be in one thing viz. in one man in one court in one people but if it be divided into two or more it is either supervacaneous or destructive for those two or more in whom this divided Empire does consist must either agree or disagree in the same thing if they agree to will or nill the same then it is supervacaneous for it had been all one if but one part had willed it and frustra fit per plura c. but if they disagree in willing or nilling the same thing it is destructive for it is impossible for the Subject to obey because the Law it self is a contradiction and if the Subject obeys one he disobeys the other and to obey neither brings Anarchy and confusion upon all the governed What is left then but the Subject to be divided aswell as the power and a Kingdom divided in it self cannot stand St. Mar. 3. 24. Neither are the Governors in whom this divided power or command does consist in any better case then the Subject for Nulla fides regni sociis omnisque potestas Lucan Impatiens consortis erit It were infinite to enumerate the sad consequences which division of Kingdoms have brought upon those Kingdoms where they were made Let any man look upon the Estate of the Roman Empire when it was divided by Constantine the Great among his three sons Constantinus Constantius Constans Nor did ever the Empire retain the name and dignity after the division made by Theodosius to his sons Arcadius and Honorius Nor was the Western Empire ever raised again to near the greatness it had in Charlemaines time after the division made by Lotharius Lewis and Charles sons of Lodovicus Pius and what horrible confusions followed upon the divisions is easie to be imagined whenas in the first Battel between the brethren was slain the greatest part of the Nobility of France and more men died in it then in any other battle that hapned in France since that fought between Ecius and Attila King of the Huns in the fields of Catalonia But that we may not go so far and yet find examples neerer home Rodry Maure or Rodry the great King of Wales Son of Mersyn Frith had issue three Sons Mervin Anarawd and Cadelh In the yeare when he dyed viz. anno dom 877. King Alfred alias Alured then reigning in England this Great Rodry divided his Kingdome of Wales into three Principalities The First he called Guyneth the English Northwales the Latinist Venedotia The Second Principality was called Powisland in Latine Powisia of some Westwales bordering upon England The Third he called Deherborth the English Southwales in Latine Demetia The First Principality some say he gave to Mervin others to Anarawd The Second to Anarawd some say to Cadelh The Third to Cadelh some say to Mervin The First was the best because it was quietest The Second often invaded and troubled by the English Into the Third often incursions were made by the English the Norman and Fleming The division of this Kingdom however it was wrought in process of time such a division between these Princes as it was never quiet untill it
peace of the Realm that they which be indicted of such offences by solemn Inquest of lawful men in the Kings Court in no manner shall be delivered without due purgation so that the King shall not need to proide any other remedy therein The Statute of Circumspectè agatis made 13 Ed. 1. 1285. Certain Cases wherein the Kings Prohibition doth not lie Cap. 1. The King to his Judges sendeth greeting Use your selves circumspectly in all matters concerning the Bishop of Norwich and his Clergy not punishing them if they hold plea in Court Christian of such things as be meerly Spiritual that is to wit of Penance injoined by Prelates for deadly sin of Fornication Avowtry and such like for the which sometimes corporal penance and sometime pecuniary is enjoined specially if a Freeman be convict of such things As also Prelates do punish for leaving the Church-yard unclosed or for that the Church is uncovered or not conveniently decked in which cases none other penance can be enjoined but pecuniary Item If a Parson demand of his Parishioners Oblations or Tithes due and accustomed or if any Parson do sue against another Parson for Tithes greater or smaller so that the fourth part of the value of the benefits be not demanded Item If a Parson demand Mortuaries in places where a Mortuary hath been used to be given Item If a Prelate of a Church or a Patron demand of a Parson a Pension due to him All such demands are to be made in a Spiritual Court And for laying violent hands on a Clerk and in case of Defamation it hath been granted already that it shall be tryed in a Spiritual Court when money is not demanded but a thing done for punishment of sin and likewise for the breaking of an Oath In all cases afore-rehearsed the Spiritual Judge shall have power to take knowledge notwithstanding the Kings Prohibition Statutum de asportatis Religiosorum made Anno 35. Ed. 1. 1307. Cap. 1 Of late it came to the knowledge of our Lord the King by the grievous complaint of the Honorable persons Lords and other Noblemen of his Realm That whereas Monasteries Priories and other Religious Houses were founded to the honor and glory of God and the advancement of the Holy Church by the King and his Progenitors and by the said Noblemen and their Ancestors and a very great portion of Lands and Tenements have been given by them to the said Monasteries Priories and Houses and the Religious men serving God in them to the intent that Clerks and Laymen might be admitted in such Monasteries Priories and Religious Houses according to their sufficient ability and that sick and feeble men might be maintained Hospitality Alms-giving and other charitable deeds might be done and that in them prayers might be said for the souls of the said Founders and their heirs The Abbots Priors and Governors of the said Houses and certain Aliens their Superiors as the Abbots and Priors of Cistercienses and Promonstratenses and of the Order of S. Augustine and S. Benedict and many more of other Religion and Order have at their own pleasures set divers insupportable tallages payments and impositions uyon every of the said Monasteries and Houses in subjection unto them in England Ireland Scotland and Wales without the privity of our Lord the King and his Nobility contrary to the laws and customs of the said Realm and thereby the number of the said Religious persons and other servants in the said Houses and Religious places being oppressed by such tallages payments and impositions the service of God is diminished Alms be not given to the poor the sick and feeble the healths of the living and the souls of the dead be miserably defrauded Hospitality almsgiving and other godly deeds do cease And so that which in times past was charitably given to godly uses and to the increase of the service of God is now converted to an evil end by permission whereof there grows great scandal to the people and infinite losses and disheritances are like to ensue to the Founders of the said Houses and their Heirs unless speedy and sufficient remedy be provided to redress so many and grievous detriments Wherefore our Lord the King considering that it would be very prejudicial to him and his people if he should any longer suffer so great losses and injuries to be winked at And therefore being willing to maintain and defend the Monasteries Priories and other Religious houses erected in his Kingdom and in all Lands subject to his dominion and from henceforth to provide sufficient remedy to reform such oppressions as he is bound By the counsel of his Earls Barons Great men and other Nobles of his Kingdom in his Parliament holden at Westminster in the 35. year of his reign hath ordained and enacted Religious persons shall send nothing to their Superiors beyond the Sea Cap. 2 That no Abbot Prior Master Warden or any other Religious person of whatsoever condition state or religion he be being under the Kings power or jurisdiction shall by himself or by merchants or others secretly or openly by any device or means carry or send or by any other means cause to be sent any Tax imposed by the Abbots Priors Masters or Wardens of Religious houses their Superiors or assessed amongst themselves out of the kingdom and his dominion under the name of a rent tallage or any kind of imposition or otherwise by way of exchange mutual sale or other contract however it may be termed Neither shall depart into any other country for visitation or upon any other colour by that means to carry the goods of their Monasteries and Houses out of the Kingdom and Dominion aforesaid And if any will presume to offend this present Statute he shall be grievously punished according to the quality of his offence and according to his contempt of the Kings prohibition No Impositions shall be taxed by Priors Aliens Moreover our Lord the King doth inhibit all and singular Abbots Priors Masters and Governors of Religious houses and places being Aliens to whose authority subjection and obedience the Houses of the same Orders in his kingdom and domion be subject that they do not at any time hereafter impose or by any means assess any tallages payments charges or other burdens whatsoever upon the Monasseries Priories or other Religious houses in subjection to them as is aforesaid and that upon pain of all they have or may forfeit By whom the Common Seal of an Abbey shall be kept and how used And further our Lord the King hath ordained and established that the Abbots of the Orders of Cisterciensis and Promonstratensis and other Religious Orders whose Seal hath heretofore been used to remain only in the custody of the Abbot and not of the Covent shall hereafter have a Common Seal and that shall remain in the custody of the Prior of the Monastery or House and four of the most worthy and discreet men of the Covent of the same House to
excommunicated or damned who differ in some things from the doctrine of the Pope who appeal from his decrees and hinder the execution of the ordinances of him or his Legates Although the Sesession of the Church King and Kingdom of England The reformation of King 1 d. was not Schismatical from the Papacy were an Act of Schism yet being done in the Reign of H. 8. one of the greatest favorers of the Papacy that ever was King of England and to his death as great an assertor of the Rites Ceremonies and Religion of it and in such a state independent from the Church of Rome was the Church and Kingdom at the time of Edwards Reformation whatsoever therefore his Reformation was yet could it not be Schismatical Whatever the Romanists pretend to unity and peace in their Church yet The rites and ceremonies of Edwards reformation were more uniform then before it is most manifest that in the Realm of England and Dominion of Wales in several places were used divers forms of Prayer commonly called the Service of the Church viz. that of Sarum of York of Bangor and Lincoln but also of late divers and sundry forms and fashions were used in the Cathedral and Parishes Church of England and Wales as well concerning the mattens or morning prayer and evening song as also concerning the holy Communion commonly called the Mass with divers and sundry rites and ceremonies concerning the same and in the administration of other Sacraments of See preamble to the Statute of 2 3. Ed. 6. Cap. 1. That the Scriptures Lords Prayer and Creed should be read in the English tongue is no new thing in England the Church whereas the service enjoyned in the Reign of Ed. 6 was uniform in all places of England and Wales as well in Parish Churches as Cathedrals In the Reign of King Ethelbald in the year of our Saviors incarnation 748. in a convocation held in the Prouince of Canterbury Cuthbert the Archbishop of his Clergy did Enact that the sacred Scriptures should be read in their monasteries the Lords Prayer and Creed taught in the English tongue Speed in the Reign of Ethelbald para 4. page 343. and how much it was against the Word of God and the custom of the ancient Church to use a tongue unknown to the people in common prayer and administration of Sacraments see the conference at Westminster an primo Eliz. which were never yet answered that I know of If any thing Heretical had been contained in the common Prayer administration Edwards reformation was not Heretical of Sacraments c. made in the Reign of Ed. 6. it would have been sufficiently shot at having so many adversaries at home and abroad but no such crime was ever that I ever heard of imputed to it if there be let the adversaries of it yet shew it affirmanti incumbit probatio If then not onely the Kings and supreme powers always under the old Covenant King Edwards Reformation was warrant-able materially and formally had this right of invoking the high Priest and other Priests and if God always punished the Kings of Judah and Israel for suffering the people to commit Idolatry and if God himself so often commends the zeal and reformation of Jehoshaphat Hezekiah Asa Josiah c. and if ever since Christianity the Bishops by that Divine Canon to Timothy have always had in 1 Tim. cap 2. their particular Churches right of composing publick Liturgies and in national Synods a right of composing publick and national Liturgies And the Liturgy of Edward being composed and received by the Bishops of the Church of England to that end convened and assembly by the King this Liturgy being neither schismattical nor containing any thing heretical is both for matter and form warrantable Object If the Sacriledge and extention of the civil Jurisdiction in giving the civil Magistrate licence to take cognizance of the publique Liturgy and administration of the Sacraments be objected The answer is easie Let the Courtiers and Parliament answer for it the Church was patient not agent in them The Church of Rome having robbed the poor laity of one half of the institution of the Sacrament of the Lords Supper and kept the people in such The King and Church had great reason to make Reformation in Religion stupid ignorance that in the publick worship and service of God they should neither use their reason nor understanding by imposing it upon them in an unknown tongue as if in the publick worship and service of God he were not to be served by intellectual and rational creatures and had filled the Mass with more prayers to the Virgin Mary and Saints which could no ways relieve them and so at best super fluous and vain there was great reason in the King and Church to a make a reformation of the Religion and publick Worship and Service of God Of Queen Maries Ecclesiastical Laws Although King Ed. were a Prince of transcendent Vertue and Learning far above his years yet doubtless his youth was not onely much abused in his Reign where a man might have seen all the woes pronounced by God upon that Nation where the King is a childe or where a company of men in Parliament arrogate to themselves the Politick capacity of a King abstracted from his person but also at his very death caused not without suspicion of poyson was he deluded upon specious pretences by his whole Councel but principally by the Duke of Northumberland to make way for the Lady Jane Gray in the time of his sickness married to his fourth son Guilford Dudley to declare the said Lady Jane the rightful heir and successor to the English Monarchy to the manifest wrong and injury not onely of Queen Mary and Elizabeth afterward Queens of England but also of Mary Queen of Scots heir to Margaret the eldest daughter of Henry the seventh whereas the Lady Janes Title was descended from Mary the younger daughter of H. 7. yet it so pleased God that this unjust Will should onely bring destruction both to the Lady Jane and her husband whereas the Ladies Mary and Elizabeth and the Posterity of Mary Queen of Scots did all succeed and enjoy the possession of the English Diadem of which they were debarred by this Will of King Edward That the Title of Head of the Church was continued by Queen Mary appears by the Parliament begun and holden at Westminster the fifth of October in the first year of her Reign in the first and second session of it where she is stiled our Gracious Soveraign Lady Mary by the Grace of God Queen of England France and Ireland Defender of the Faith and in Earth Supreme Head of the Church of England and Ireland but in the second Parliament of her Reign being holden at Westminster the second of April the first year of her Reign the Title of Supreme Head of the Church of England and Ireland is not mentioned Declares
came under one Monarch or King again for the Royal dignity of a Monarch or King from whence all subordinate dignities tanquam lumen de lumine are derived without any diminution will suffer no division Regia dignitas est indivisibilis quaelibet alia derivativa dignitas est similiter indivisibilis The most woful event that fell out in this Kingdome when Gordobug divided this Kingdom between his two Suns Ferrex and Porrex and what heavy event came to pass untill it was reduced again under one Monarch let our Histories tell you and letting pass others I cannot overpass the miserable estate within this Kingdom under the Heptarchy untill all was reunited under one Soveraign and this is the reason that in England Scotland and Ireland the Royal dignity is descendible to the eldest daughter or sister Sir E. Coke Inst 4. 243. c. Regia dignitas est indivisibilis 2. Of these Governments Monarchy is the best as appears by reason by How many ways Monarchy is the best Government the consent of the world by the institution of God and his commanding obedience only to this Government and by woful experience 3. Monarchy in reason is the best Government for the dignity and Monarchy is the best Government in reason majesty of one man is more easie to be maintained then of many The ills that follow from bad Monarchs are no worse than what do and alwaies did happen from the best of humane Laws viz. mischiefs to particular men Nor can the mischiefs which happened to Silus Sabinus Sillanus c. who not well brooking the powers of Tiberius and Caligula Emperors as bad as who were worst had been over lavish of their tongues in vilifying the power of the Caesars and magnifying that of the Senate and probably had they been able would have advanced the power of the Senate to the abdication of Caesars be compared with the inconveniences which came upon the Senate and people of Rome in those times of Silla and Marius of Caesar and Pompey Besides factious and discontented persons cannot hope for that encouragement in their designs where the supreme power is in one individual person as where it is compounded of many The freedome and liberty of the Subject is more under one then more for it is easier to obey one then many The common people of Rome never enjoyed so much liberty as under the Emperors and therefore when after the death of Caligula the Senate endeavored to restore Rome to her antient liberty as they Sueton. in vita Claud. cap. 10. called it and extinguish the name and power of the Caesars and to that end had seised upon the Capitol they aided by the Preterian coherts continued the power of their Emperors in Claudius and the day and night wherein the Senate would not receive him was the cause of much trouble which Josephus notes l. 19. c. 30. 4. By the consent of the world for every where in the known world By the consent of the world before 1641. either in Europe Asia Africa or America over Christians Mahumetans and Infidels except the State of Venice the usurped power of the Cantons in Switzerland the State of the Neatherlands the Hans-towns Genoa and Geneva who seek protection of the Emperor and Kings of France this Government is established 5. By God himself for he never instituted any Government either in By Gods owning it only Priesthood Judges or Kings but only this nor commands obedience to any other Can a man touch the Lords anointed and be guiltless 1 Sam. 26 9. And submit your yelves to every ordinance of man for the Lords sake whether it be to the King as supreame c. St. Pet. 2. 13. Feare God honor the King And I counsel thee to keep the Kings commandments and that in regard of the oath of God And therefore what thing an Unite is in numbers the Minde in the faculties of the soule a Centre in a circle the same is God the most omnipotent King in the world simple in unity indivisible in nature most holy in purity placed by an infinite interval far remote above the fabrick of the highest Heaven joyning this perspirable region with the celestial and intelligible keepes and preserves from ruine as by a secure care the whole universe framed and compounded in such admirable order and harmony to whose great example ought every good King who is the Unite the minde and centre of his kingdome that hopes to govern and preserve his subjects not only safe but honest and happy wholly to betake himself 6. By woful experience I do not find any mans life except the destitute and deposed Princes Arthur Ed. 2. Rich. 2. Hen. 6. and his sonne By wofull experience Ed. 5. and his brother herein and in many other things doubtless more unhappy then private men and the Duke of Clarence after conviction and attainder thought by the consent of Ed. 4. to be drowned in a Butt of Malmsey and Cromwell Earle of Essex condemned and executed unheard in Parliament see a remarkable passage herein by Sir Ed. Co. Insti 4. fo 37. 38. Queen Katherine fifth wife to H. 8. Mary Queen of Scots and the Earl of Strafford or estate taken away by any of the Kings of England for these last 500 years in an extraordinary and extrajudicial manner If the dissolution of the Abbies by Hen 8. be objected I answer it was usual in Parliament to alter many things in the Common law as the statute de donis conditionalibus made a great alteration in the Common law for before all estates which were not for life and under were either in fee absolute or conditional and so the Statutes which gave power of entry where before no remedy was to be had by Common law but by a Cui in vita And to Jointenants to compell others to sue a Writ of partition c. In case of life the ordinary way of trial was by Peers the Nobility by the Nobility and the Commons by the Commons but a Parliament being a body compounded of heterogenial and dissimilary parts viz. King Lords and Commons could not be Peers to any man which was the usual way of Trial with us neither were the Estates so taken from Abbots c. but that they enjoyed them or a full value in lieu of them during their lives so that by this act no wrong was done to any man living Yet it is true which Sir Ed. Co. saies in his Comment upon Magna charta chap. 1. Quod datum est Ecclesiae datum est Deo what was given to the Church was given to God which by the Law of God Numb 16 37 38. is unalterable nor can be be employed to any profane or common use So that I am confident I may safely affirm that the Subject in seaven years under the Long Parliament suffered extraordinarily and extrajudicially five hundred times more then all their Ancestors in 500 years before did