Selected quad for the lemma: king_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
king_n witness_n world_n young_a 35 3 6.0386 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A01080 A learned commendation of the politique lawes of Englande vvherin by moste pitthy reasons & euident demonstrations they are plainelye proued farre to excell aswell the ciuile lawes of the Empiere, as also all other lawes of the world, with a large discourse of the difference betwene the. ii. gouernements of kingdomes: whereof the one is onely regall, and the other consisteth of regall and polityque administration conioyned. written in latine aboue an hundred yeares past, by the learned and right honorable maister Fortescue knight ... And newly translated into Englishe by Robert Mulcaster.; De laudibus legum Angliae. English and Latin Fortescue, John, Sir, 1394?-1476?; Mulcaster, Robert. 16th Century 1567 (1567) STC 11194; ESTC S102454 98,618 567

There are 3 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

in casibus vbi ipsae dissentiunt prestantioris legis preconia digna pensatione refulgent Quare casus huiusmodi aliquos iam in medium proferemus vt quae legum illarum eos iustius meliusque diffiniat equa lance valeas ponderare et primo ex casibꝰ maximi pōderis exēpla preponamus ¶ The first case wherin the Ciuile lawes and the lawes of England do differ Ca. 20 IF they that haue a matter of cōtrouersie depending before a Iuge cōe to y e cōtestation of the suite vpon the matter of y e deed which y e lawyers of England call y e issu of y e plea the truth of such an issue by the ciuile lawes must be tryed by the deposition of witnesses wherein .ii. allowable witnesses are sufficiēt But by y e lawes of England the truthe of the matter cannot appier euident to the Iuge w tout y e othes of xii men neighbours to the place where such a dede is supposed to be done Nowe therefore the questiō is whether of these two so dyuers procedinges ought to be esteemed more reasonable effectual for the opening of the trueth which thus is sought for For the law y t can more certeinly better shewe the truthe is in this behalfe of more excellency than y e other y t is of lesse efficacy force wherfore in the searche of this matter thus we proceede SIcoram Iudice cōtendētes ad litis ꝑueniant contestationē suꝑ materia facti quā legis Angliae periti exitū pl’iti appell ’ Exitus hm̄oi veritas ꝑ leges Ciuiles testiū depositionē ꝓbari debet ī qua duo testes idonei sufficiunt Sed per leges Angliae veritas illa nō nisi .xij. hominū de vicineto vbi factū huiusmodi suponitur sacramēto Iudici constari poterit Queritur igitur quis horū duorū ꝓcessuū tā diuersorū rationabilior censeri debeat efficatior ad veritatē quae sic queriturreuelādā Quia lex q̄ eā certiꝰ meliusque ostēdere potest prestantior in hoc est lege altera quae nō tātae efficatiae est et virtutis quare in huius rei indagine sic ꝓcedimus ¶ Here are set ●urth the inconueniences proceding of the law which no otherwise then by witnesses admitteth trials Cap. 21. BY the Ciuile lawes y e party which in y e issue holdethe the affirmatiue must brīg furth witnessez which he himselfe at hys own pleasure shall name But the negatiue cannot be proued directli though indirectly it may For the hability of him is thought to be very smal weake and his witte much lesse which among al the men that he knoweth is not able to fynde ii so voide of conscience trueth which for dreade loue or profit will not bee readye to gainesaye all truthe Suche then maye he produce for witnesses on hys syde And if the other partye would obiect any thinge against them or their saienges it chanceth not euer y t they their condicions doinges are knowē to y e contrarie partye so y t by reason of theire foule lifes vicious behauiour such witnesses might bee reprooued And while their saienges cōteine the affirmatiue it shal be very harde to reproue them by circūstances or any other indirect meanz who then shal be hable to liue in suertie of his goodes or of himselfe vnder suche a law y e ministreth such aid to euery busy body y t lusteth to trouble another And what ii wicked men are so vnwarie vncircūspect which touching the deede wherof they shal be examined in iudgement will not beefore they are called furth for witnesses secreatly imagine and deuise a fourme fassiō therof frame thereunto all circumstances euen suche as must needes haue ben so if y e thing had ben true in dede For y e children of this world saith y e lorde are wiser then y e children of light So y e most wicked Iesabel brought furth ii witnesses of y e children of Beliall in iudgement agaīst Nabot wherby he lost his life king Achab her husbande obtayned the possession of y e vyneyarde So the most chaste matrone Susāna should haue dyed for aduoutrye by the wytnes of twoe olde dotardes being iudges if the lorde hadde not meruelouslye deliuered her by a wonderfull feate of prudence which of nature the yong child hadde not being yet vnder age And though y e same child by theire altering doubling in their depositions did cōuict them to be false wretches yet whoe saue only the lord could haue knowen that in their saienges they woulde thus haue disagreed Seeinge there was no lawe y e did moue thē to haue in remēbrance what kind of tree it was wherunder y e fact was supposed to be done For the witnesses of euerye wicked deede are not thought to consider al circūstaunces apperteining to y e same beīg such as do nothīg help to y e aggrauatiō detectiō of y e faulte But while those wycked iudges willinglye swearing did alter touching y e kindes of the trees theire owne wordes proued thē to be false verlets Wherfore thei worthely suffred the same punishemēt thēselues You also most gratious prīce do know how y t lately maister I. Fring after y t he had continued three yeares in the order of pristehoode was compelled by the deposition of twoe wicked persones whiche witnessed that he had before he was made prieste betrouthed hymselfe to a certeine yonge woman to forsake the holye order of priestehoode and to marrye the same womanne Wythe whome when hee hadde lyued fourtene yeares and hadde beegotten .vii ▪ children of her at y e laste beeinge conuicted of treason conspired againste your highnes hee confessed before all the people euen at the very point of deathe that those witnesses were hiered and that theire depositions were false And thus manye tymes are iudgemētz peruerted by the meane of false witnesses yea that vnder the verye best Iudges as vnto you it is not vnhearde nor to the worlde vnknowen while this wickednes the more is the pitie is often committed PEr leges ciuiles pars quae in litis contestatione affirmatiuā dicit testes ꝓducere debet quos ipsemet ad libitū suū nominabit Negatiua autē ꝓbari nō potest vz directè licet possit ꝑ obliquū Exilis quippe credit ’ esse potētiae minoris quoque industriae qui de omnibus quos noscit hoībꝰ duos repire nequit ita cōsciētia veritate vacuos vt timore amore vel comod ’ oī velint cōtraire verit ’ Hos potest tūc ipse ī testim̄ ꝓ ducere ī causa sua et 〈◊〉 contra eos pars altera dicere velit vel cōtra eorum dicta nō sēꝑ cōtinget eos eorū quoque mores aut facta apud cōtradicere volentē agnosci vt ex eorū feditate et viciis testes illi possīt reꝓbari Et dū eorū dicta affirmatiuā cōtineāt nō facile poterūt
¶ A learned commendation of the politique lawes of Englande vvherin by moste pitthy reasons euident demonstrations they are plainelye proued farre to excell aswell the Ciuile lawes of the Empiere as also all other lawes of the world with a large discourse of the difference betwene the .ii. gouernements of kingdomes whereof the one is onely regall and the other consisteth of regall and polityque administration conioyned Written in latine aboue an hundred yeares past by the learned and right honorable maister Fortescue knight lorde Chauncellour of Englād in y e time of Kinge Henrye the .vi. And newly translated into Englishe by Robert Mulcaster Pio lectori IStius non minus pij quá eruditi opusculi exemplar nactus quū antiquitatem venerandam vna cum eruditione ac pietate coniunxcrim Non potui optime lector aut patrie tam ingratus aut antiquitatis tam in officiosus cultor esse vt te illius lectione diutius fraudarem Continet enim in se vt cetera taceam politicarum et ciuilium nostre Anglie legum quibus preclara et florentissima hec respublica sub illustrissimo et nūquam satis laudato principe nostro Rege Henrico octauo eiusque progenitoribus regibus Anglie hactenus felicissime fuerit erecta instituta gubernata doctissimum encomion Vnde easdem nostras leges non solum romanorum Cesarum sed et omnium aliarum nationum constitutiones multis parasangis prudentia iustitia equitate precellere facile prespici●s Eme ergo lege et fruere ac labores nostros boni consule Vale. To the right woorshipfull Ihon VValshe Esquier one of the Queene her learned Iusticers of her highnes Court of Commen plees Robert Mulcaster wisheth long lyfe and health IT happened mee of late right woorshipfull syr to light vpon this little Treatise whiche I incontinent desired to renne ouer because yt semed to discourse vpon some poyntes of the lawes of our Countrye wherof I my selfe then was nowe am a Student When I had ouer ronne it my desire to read it became nothing counteruailable with the gladnes that I hadde reade it for my desire to reade it came vpon hope to fynd some profitable lessons for my study but my gladnes after reading sprang of y e excellency of thargumēt wheron I did not dreame neither to fynd so riche a Treasure in so simple an habite And because I wished all menne to haue parte of my delight me thought it good to translate it into Englishe forth of Lattine in whiche toung it was fyrste written The aucthour of the book was one maister Fortescue knight Seriaunt at the law and for his Skill and vertues preferred by kinge Henry the .vi. to be Chauncellour of this realme The entrie of the booke it selfe sheweth where and vppon what occasion it was written It was written in Berry in Fraunce where Prince Edwarde sonne to Henry the vi afterward slaine at Tewkesbury by Edward the .iiii. dyd then remayne with his mother Queene Margaret in the house of Renate her father duke of Angeow and king of Cicile during the tyme that Edward the fourth reigned in this Realme and Henry the .vi. was fledd into Scotland The occasyon was this The Chauncellour beīg fledde into Fraunce with the yong Prince perceiuing his delight to be all bent to Chyualrye as a thing of greatest neede consydering he ment by force the restituciō of his father and thereby his own to the kingdome of England tooke occasion for that his hope was to see the Prince reigne heare to moue him to a diuision of his affaires as he armed him selfe against y e enemy so to adourne him selfe againste his being kinge with skill of lawes whiche doe preserue eche state so in peace that it maye if neede be warre and so garde it in warre that it may haue peace in eie Th argument is this that the skill of the Countrie lawes is neadefull for the Prince althoughe not so deepe as the purposed professours yet so full as to their honour may ought to fall in Princes And for that the Prince should think y e thing to be a Princely knowledge he taketh occasiō by comparing the gouernement of this Realme w t others and the lawes of this lande with the Ciuill with whome it is of all men lightly compared and the betternesse of poyntes wherein they bothe trauayle and prouisions by the one wiselyer foreseene then by the other to proue the singularitie of this state whiche it behoued the Prince to learne seyng hee was lyke to succeade hys father and to vnderstād the lawes whiche maketh the state to bee so singuler The particularies I referre to the booke wherof thus much I doe and no lesse coulde well saye Why I dyd choose your woorship to be protectour of my laboures I shall not neede tedyously to touche it shal be suffycient to saye that in choise of manye I pycked you alone not doubting your lyking in allowynge seeing myne eleccion in dedycatynge and so commyttinge to thalmightye the good preseruacion of your worship I humblye take my leaue this xii of October Robert Mulcaster The introduction into the matter DVring y e cruell rage of y e late mortall warrez w tin the royalme of Englāde whē the most vertuous and godly king Henry the sixt w t Queene Margaret his wife y e kīgz daughter of Iherusalem and Scicile their onely sonne Edwarde prince of Wales were forced to fly the land the kīg himself afterward in the same ciuil tumult falling into the blody hands of his deadly enemies his own subiectz was of them cōmitted to prisō wher he a lōg tyme remained in straite captiuitie the queene y e prīce her sonne thus banished out of their countrey making their abode in y e duchy of Berry a dominion of y e foresaid kīg of Ierus The Prince shortlye after growing to mannes state applied him selfe wholy to the feates of armes muche delytinge to ryde vpon wilde and vnbroken horses not sparing w t spurres to break their fiercenes He practysed also sometymes w t the pyke sometimes w t y e sworde other warlyke weapons after the maner guyse of warriors accordinge to the vse of martial discipline to assaile strike his companiōs I mean y e yong mē y e attended vpō hys ꝑson Which thing whē a certein aūciēt knight being chaūcellour to y e forsaide kīg of Englād saw who also in y e miserable tyme did there remain in exile hee spake thus to y e prīce SEuiēte dudū in regno Anglie nephandissima rabie illa qua piissimus ibidem rex H. sextus cum Margareta Regina consorte sua filia regis Iherusalem et Scicilie ac eorum vnigenito Edwardo principe Wallie inde propulsi sūt sub qua et demum rex ipse H. a subditis suis deprehēsus carceris diutinū passus est horrorem dū regina ipsa cum sobole patria sic extorrens in ducatu Berren̄
most worthie prince thoughe they in maters of doubte do somewhat otherwyse boult out y e trouthe The lawe of the generall coūcell wherī it is prouided that Cardinalles shall not be cōuicted of crimīal offenses otherwise then by the deposition of xii witnesses is it any hynderaunce to the testimonie of ii men Yf the testimonie of ii men be true of more force must the testimonie of xii men be iudged true acordynge to a rule of the law that sayethe The more euer conteyneth in it that whiche is lesse The īholder was promised to be rewarded with an ouerplus if he bestowed vpon the cure of the wounded mā more then the ii pense which he receaued A man that laboreth to proue that he was absent at the tyme of the offense wherewith he is charged shal it not be nedefull for him to brynge furthe mo then ii or iii witnesses when his aduersarie hathe proued or is readie to proue the same by ii or iii. wytnesses And so he that trauaylethe to conuince witnesses of periurie must of necessite bringe furthe many mo then they were so that the testimonie of ii or iii. men shall not euer be iudged true But that lawe must thus be vnderstanded that by a lesser number of witnesses then ii the truthe in matters doubtfull ought not to be searched for as appeareth by Bernard assignynge dyuers cases wherin by the lawes mo then iii. wytnesses must needes be produced As in some of them v and in and in some vii Nor yett the lawes of Englande be not against it but that the truethe may be proued by ii witnesses whē it can no otherwyse be tried For if thinges be done vppō the sea without the bodye of any countye of that royalme which afterward be brought in plea before the lord admirall the same thynges by the decrees of y e lawes of england must be proued by wytnesses In lyke maner it hathe bene accustomed to be done before the Cōstable Marshall of England touchynge a facte that was done in an other royalme so that the hearīge thereof appertaīeth to the Constables courte Moreouer in the courtes of certein liberties in Englād where matters proceede by lawe merchaunt contractes or bargaynes made amōge merchaūtz in an other royalme are proued by witnesses And this cōmeth to passe because that in these cases there be no neighbours founde by whose othes Iuries of xii men may be made as in contractes and other cases ariesynge within the royalme of Englande is accustomed to be dōe Likewyse if a deede wherin witnesses are named be brought into the kynges courte then processe shal be made agaynst those witnesses and they together withe xii Iurers shall by their othes recognise whether the same be his deede or no whose it is supposed to be Wherefore the lawe of Englād reproueth not that lawe whiche by wytnesses tryeth out the trueth specially whē necessitie so requirethe For so do y e lawes of Englande too not onely in the cases now mencioned but also in certein other cases wherof here to make rehersall it shall not be material Howbeit this lawe neuer determineth a cōtrouersie by witnesses onely that maie be determined by a Iurie of xii men forsomuche as this waye is muche more aualeable and effectuall for the triall of the trueth then is the fourme of any other lawes of the world and further from the daūger of corruption and subornation Nor this fourm̄ of proceedinge cānot in any cause faille for wante of witnesses nor the testimonies of witnesses if anye be can not choose but come to their due ende and effect Neither cā suche xii men be forsworne but that for their offēse they must suffer most sharpe punishement and neuerthelesse the partie by their depositions greeued shall obteie due remedie And these thīges shall not be dōe by y e will saīges of straunge or vnknowne men but by the othes of good of worshipfull and of credible mē neighbours to the parties in whome the same parties haue no cause of challenge or mistrust touchīg their verdit O howe horryble and detestable daūgers happen mani times throughe the fourme of proceedinge by wytnesses Yf a mā make a priuie contract of matrimonie afterward before wytnesses do betrouthe or assure himself to another woman shall he not in the contentious courte be cōpelled to marye her also after that in y e penitenciall courte be iudged to lye with the first if he be duely required and to do penaūce as ofte as by his owne mociō and procurement he liethe with the seconde thoughe in bothe courtes the iudge be one and the selfe same man In this case as it is wryten in Iob are not y e synewes of Leuyathan perplexed and intricat Fie for shame they are ītricate in deede For this man can carnally companie with neither of these ii women nor with any other without punishement either by the contentious courte or by the penitenciall courte Such a mischiefe inconuenience or daunger can neuer happen in any case by the waye of proceedīg by the lawe of England no not though Leuiathā himselfe would labour to procure the same Do ye not now see most noble prince that the more you obiect agaynst the lawes of England the more worthie they appere CAncellarius non his quibꝰ turbaris princeps contrariantur leges Angliae licet a liter quodamodo ipsae in dubiis eliciant veritatem Quid duorū hominū testimonio obest lex illa generalis cōsilii qua cauetur vt non nisi duodecē testium depositione cardinales de criminibus conuincantur Si verum est duorum testimonium a fortiori testimoniū duodecim verum iudicari debet dicēte iuris regula Plus semper in se continet quod est minus Super erogationis meritum promittebatur stabulario si plꝰ quā duos quos recepit denarios ipse in vuln̄rati cura ero gasset Nōne plusquā duos aut tres testes producere oportebit quēpiā qui absen●ē se fuisse probare nititur tēpore criminis sibi impositi quod ꝑ duos aut tres testes adūsariꝰ eiꝰ ꝓbauit vel probare paratꝰ ē Sic et qui testes de ꝑiurio cōuīcere satagit multo illis plures ꝓducere necesse habet quo nō sēꝑ duorū vel triū ho●m testimoniū verū esse iudicabitur sed intelligēda est lex illa qd minore testiū numero quam duorū veritas in dubiis non debet exquiri vt patet per Bernardū ex tra de testi ca. licet ī glosa or dinaria vbi ip̄e assignat diūsos casꝰ ī q̄bꝰ ꝑ leges plures quātres oportet ꝓducere testes Videlicet ī aliq̄bꝰ eorū quinque et in aliquibꝰ septē per duos etiam testes veritatē ꝓbari posse cū non aliter ip̄a pateret vtique leges Angliae affirmāt Nā si quae supra altum mare extra corpus cuiuslibet comitatus regni illius fiant quae postmodū in placito