as disjoynted from Scotland and Wales but upon reduction of Wales by Henry the 8th and by the happy Union with Scotland by King James the Kings Title hath been more general viz. Rex Magnae Britanniae comprehending England Scotland and Wales but not to be so understood in our Parliamentary Writs for they are applicable only to England and Wales and not to Scotland though Scotland be mentioned in the Writs and it may be observed that this distinction of England and Scotland were united under the Name of Britain by King Egbert Anno 819 but after that they were again disjoynted and though both did continue so disjoynted neere 800 years yet now the Ancient Name of Britain is restor'd being bound by one Ocean and Govern'd by one King as it was 800 years before and though it is now thus intire yet England hath a distinct Parliament for its Laws and Scotland a distinct Parliament for its Laws and both distinctly consisting of 3 Estates under one King so as in all Writs for Summoning an English Parliament though Scotland be mentioned yet the operation of the Writs can only be applyed to England The addition of Scotland in the Title of our Parliament Writs Scotland did begin with King James who happily united both Kingdoms as I said under one King and so wrot himself Rex Angliae Scotiae c. But they never send any Representative to our Parliaments nor we to theirs yet the King of Scots before the union had a Chair allotted for him in the House of Lords but never sat there yet he was sometimes Summon'd as Earl of Huntington and so by vertue of that English Title might have sat there but not by his Regal Title untill the said union Although we had several inlets to France by Normandy France Anjoy Poictors Tourny Mayne c. yet the addition of King of France to the Title of English Kings was not till Edward the 3ds time who had a Just Title to it and there upon did Quarter the Armies of France But Hen. the 6th was actually Crown'd King of France in Paris and from these two the Title and right hath continued ever since though dispossest and as I shall shew in the second Part of this Treatise that Callis did send Burgesses to our English Parliaments for many years till it was Lost by Qu. Mary Ireland The Title of Rex Hiberniae was as Ancient as our King Hen. the 2d who created his Son John the King thereof yet for what reason of State otherwise then what I shall mention in the 7th Chapter that Title of the King of Ireland was never annext to the regal Title of the Kings of England till the 33d of Hen. the 8th and then to his other Titles he added Rex Hiberniae before it was only Dominus and their Parliaments are fram'd like our English Parliaments yet Subject to the Kings pleasure in confirming of their Laws here in England See more of this in Chap. 7th As to this part of the Kings Title viz. Defender Defender of the Faith I shall speak more fully of it in the 7th Chapter Or c. id est other Titles which were formerly and may still be added as you may Read also in the 7th Chapter c. Section the 11 and 12. Thus having past through the General words of the Kings Titles in his Warrants and Writs now in observance to Sr. Edward Coke I shall make a Summary of the particular Titles of our several Kings from William the first Inclusive to this time shewing what words were added or withdrawn When the Normans entred William the first stil'd himself sometimes Willielmus Rex and sometimes Rex Angliae Anglorum as other former Kings Omitting Dei Gratia as the Institutor saith though I am not satisfied therein and not adding Primus William surnamed Rufus had the same Title yet sometimes adding Dei Gratia not adding Secundus Henry stil'd himself Rex Anglorum and sometimes Dei Gratia Rex not adding Primus Stephen did the like Henry did the like but Omitted Dei Gratia as Sr. Edward Coke saith but in the Coins which Mr. Speed Exhibits to us his stile was Dei Gratia Rex Angliae Dux Normaniae Aquitaniae Comes Andegaviae not adding Secundus Richard not adding primus us'd the same sometimes Changing the Declension and the singular Number into the plural viz. Dei Gratia Rex Anglorum Dux Normanorum Aquitaniarum Comes Andegaviarum John us'd the same with Addition of Dominus Hiberniae John Henry stil'd himself like his Father King John till the 44 of his Reign and then he left out Normaniae Andegaviae and writ only Dei Gratia Rex Angliae Dominus Hiberniae Dux Aquitaniae not adding tertius Edward the 1st and Edward the 2d stil'd themselves like Henry the 3d. Edward us'd also the same stile till the 13 of his Reign Edward and then having and Challenging a Just Title to all France he left out the parts of it before mention'd and stil'd himself Dei Gratia Rex Angliae Franciae Dominus Hiberniae not adding Tertius Richard and Henry not adding Secundus or Quartus stil'd themselves like Edward the 3d. from the 13 of his Reign Henry not adding Quintus us'd the same stile till the 8th of his Reign and then writ himself Dei Gratia Haeres regens Franciae Dominus Hiberniae Henry not adding Sextus being Crown'd King of France in Paris wrote Dei Gratia Rex Angliae Franciae Dominus Hiberniae Edward Richard and Henry not adding Quartus Tertius vel Septimus stile themselves Dei Gratia Rex Angliae Franciae Dominus Hiberniae Henry writ also the same till the 10th of his Reign as I said and then and not before he added a Numeral word to his Title and so made it Henricus Octavus Dei Gratia Rex Angliae Franciae Dominus Hiberniae Now as to the Additional Titles to Henry the 8th after his 10 years they Consisted of so many varieties that I shall refer them to the 7th Chapter of this Treatise Section the 11 As also the Titles of Ed. the 6th Q. Mary Q. Elizabeth K. James and K. Charles the first In which Chapter and Section I conclude with the Title of our present King Charles the 2d viz. Carolus Secundus Dei Gratia Rex Angliae Scotiae Franciae Hiberniae Fidei Defensor viz. as in the Warrant And so having shown how the ten Names of our Kings from the Normans have been dignified by Kings Emperours c. Especially the Name of Charles by its Priority which is the more remarkable because that by Transposition only of its Letters it doth Anagrammatise and render it O CLARUS Anagram CAROLUS Anagram This Anagram may be applyd generally to all of that Royal Name and it may be one reason why so many Kings in Europe do at this day own that Name and possibly another reason of assuming it may be
Decree made in the Star-Chamber which is Printed in Poltons Abridgment he is Stiled Defensor Fidei in terra Ecclesiae Anglicanae Hiberniae Supremum Caput which was 5 years before the Supremum Caput was settled by Act of Parliament but as a preparative to it in the 22 of his Reign he is stiled Praepotentissimus Metuendissimus Angliae Franciae Rex and only Fidei Defensor is added and no mention of Supremum Caput Then in the 30 year of his Reign he is Stiled Defender of the Faith and Lord of Ireland and on Earth Supream Head immediately under Christ of the Church of England In the 32. year he left out the word immediately and the next year the words under Christ So that in the 33 of his Reign the Title was Hen. by the Grace of God King of England France and Ireland Defender of the Faith and of the Church of England and also of Ireland on Earth Supream Head And thus by making himself King of Ireland he disobeyed the Pope in placing Defender after Ireland and this Title continued thus all his Life and the Circumscription on his Great Seal wrot accordingly and so did his Son Edward the sixth on His Great Seal and in Publick Acts. And the like did Queen Mary in the first year of her Reign but upon her Marriage with King Philip in the second year of her Reign and first of both their Title was King and Queen of England and France Naples Jerusalem and Ireland Defenders of the Faith Princes of Spain and Cicily Arch-Dukes of Austria Duke of Milan Burgundy and Brabant Countess of Hasburgh Flanders and Tyroll quite jostling out Supream Head during their Reigns When Queen Elizabeth came to the Crown the Circumscription of her Great Seal was Elizabetha Dei gratiâ Angliae Franciae Hiberniae Regina Fidei Defensor yet she maintained both Titles of Defensor and Supream during her Reign When King James came to the Crown the Circumscription of his Broad Seal was also Jacobus Dei gratiâ Angliae Scotiae Franciae Hiberniae Rex Fidei Defensor and no more yet he maintained the other Point both in his Government and Writings as may be read in his Praemonition to all Christian Monarchs and his Declaration against Vorstius and his Defence of the Right of Kings against Cardinal Perrone and in several of his Speeches in Parliament leaving men at liberty as Queen Elizabeth did to use the Title of Supream Head in their Pulpits and Evidences as they thought fit so as the learned Cambden in his Dedication of his Britannia to King James instead of Defensor writes him Propugnator Fidei When King Charles the First came to his Crown the Circumscription of his Great Seal was Carolus Dei gratiâ Rex Angliae Scotiae Franciae Hiberniae Fidei Defensor and no more yet to justifie both Titles in the seventeenth year of his Reign he caused the 39 Articles which were agreed on in the fourth of Queen Elizabeth to be reprinted and in the Front did publish his own Declaration in these words Being by God's Ordinance according to our just Titles Defender of the Faith and Supream Governour of the Church within these Our Dominions He therein declares That the Articles of the Church of England allowed and authorized heretofore do contain the Doctrine of the Church of England and requires his Subjects to continue in the uniform profession thereof And then as to the Discipline he further declares himself Supream Governor of the Church of England and that if any difference arise about the external Policy concerning Injunctions Cannons or other Constitutions whatsoever thereunto belonging the Clergy in their Convocations is to order and settle them having first obtained leave under his Majesties Broad Seal so to do and he approving their said Ordinances and Constitutions So here the word Supream Head is changed into Supream Governour When King Charles the Second came to the Crown the Circumscription of his Broad Seal was Carolus Secundus Dei gratiâ Angliae Scotiae Franciae Hiberniae Rex Fidei Defensor and no more yet to justifie both Titles the very same year of his Return Anno 1660. he publish'd a Declaration to all his loving Subjects well worth the reading concerning Ecclesiastical Affairs which shews both his Christian condescention to his Subjects and Justifications to those two Titles for which he is styl'd by Writers Supream Moderator Now though in all Parliament-Writs which have come to my view and in other publick Acts and Writings since the first of Queen Elizabeth to this time after the words Defender of the Faith except in their Broad Seals there is added only one c. which I conceive was done for brevity and must be understood in relation to the Act of 36 Hen. 8. never yet repealed and every man had then and hath still liberty in their Deeds or Pulpits to mention the full Titles but by degrees about the year 1640. it began to cease in Pulpits and soon after in Pens contenting themselves with the c. These and other matters seeming trivial though proving dangerous in the consequences were yielded to as condescentions to gratifie a dissenting party in England who very probably were incited thereunto by underworking Papal Contrivers being excellent Artists in spurring on the least humour of Schism in this Church and so dealing in little things till greater were ripen'd in which latter they often made Attempts as may be read in Queen Elizabeth King James King Charles the First and this present King's time yet without success except in the Assassination of King Charles the first which was manag'd with such dexterity that it was made difficult to judge whether some of the English Dissenters in those times or the Romish Incensors were the chief Actors And after that it was carried on by a subtil way of redeeming their credits in this King's Preservation at Worcester yet still underhand endeavouring to subvert the whole Fabrick of this Kingdom as was discovered about the end of this Parliament 1678. which determin'd my publick Employments and therefore shall leave that Subject to other Pens Thus the new Empire of Rome and the old Empire of England have strugled through many Ages for Supremacy It is the Interest of England to be quiet within its own liquid Arms and so increase it self with other Kingdoms and States by a real mutual Traffick and Commerce But it is the Interest of Rome to be troublesome and increase it self in all Kingdoms and States without any real commutation or advantage to any but it self Yet it is difficult to make the Dissenters to the Church of England believe that the way which they take in opposing Rome will in time be destructive to their own Designs and Opinions Some of the Dissenters to the Church of England see and know this yet are so inveigled by such Dissenters to the Court of Rome who pretend to be for that Church but not for
is remarkable that this William Lord Pawlet Marquess of Winchester was Exemplar in all the Parliament Pawns which are extant in the Pettibag from the first of Edw. the Sixth to the first of King James inclusive which is 55. years and was in that time Lord Treasurer 22. years which was longer than any of his Predecessors continued in that Office except Cicil who continued 27. years 1 Car. 1. Georgio Duci Buckingham for one Parliament Sir Thomas Coventry being then Lord Keeper and had a distinct Writ and Sir Richard Weston Treasurer who was then in Scotland 15 Car. 1. Johanni Marchioni Winchester for one Parliament Sir John Finch being then Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and had a distinct Writ also Will. Bishop of London was Lord Treasurer and had his Writ 13 Car. 2. Thomae Comiti Southampton for this Parliament Sir Edward Hyde being then Lord Chancellor and had his distinct Writ this Earl was Grandchild to that Wriotheslly mentioned in the 36. of Hen. 8. and died without Issue Anno. 166 So from the 36. of H. 8. to this Parliament of the 13. of Car. 2. there were three Exemplars to Three Barons Two of them being Chancellors and one Lord Keeper and to Two Marquesses to one Duke and to one Earl and all these not of the Blood Now as to the three Barons having Exemplars which Degree had not any before the 36. H. 8. it may be presumed that the Exemplars were given them in relation to their Offices as Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper or President of the Kings Council And as to the two Marquesses having Exemplars who had not any till the 6. of Edw. 6. one was as he was Treasurer and the other in the 15. of Car. 1. only as Marquess because there was no Duke Summon'd to that Parliament and Sir John Finch was then Lord Keeper and William Bishop of London Lord Treasurer and both had distinct Writs so there was none of the three great Officers of State remaining to be Exemplars except Henry Earl of Manchester then Lord Privy-Seal who according to the fore-mentioned Act of Precedency is placed in the Lords House before all Dukes Marquesses c. not of the Blood but I suppose because there was no President wherein the Lord Privy-Seal had been Exemplar since its first Institution in the 11. of Hen. 4. and being not called Lord Privy-Seal nor that place in the Lords House allotted to him till the 31. H. 8. possibly for those reasons it was not given to the Lord Privy-Seal but to the Marquess singly or else it was an omission in not minding the Act of Precedency These latter Writs from the 36. of Hen. 8. did seem to break the method of the former for before that Pawn of that year no Dukes or Marquesses were made Consimilars where an Earl was made Exemplar but in the Exemplar of the 36. H. 8. Wriothesly Earl of Southampton was made Exemplar and the Duke of Norfolk then Lord Treasurer of England and Charles Duke of Suffolk the Great Master of the Kings Houshold and President of the Council were besides the Marquess of Dorchester and Thirteen Earls and Twenty eight Barons made his Consimilars so as the precedency of his Exemplarity must be ascribed to his Chancellorship which according to the Act of Precedency was to be before all Dukes c. not of the Blood and upon the same reason Pawlet Lord St. John in the first Edw. 6. being then Lord Keeper had the Exemplar Writ and the Duke of Somerset though the Kings Uncle Governor of the Kings Person and Protector of England as also the Marquess of Dorchester and Marquess of Northampton and Thirteen Earls and Thirty Barons were his Consimilars which is the only President which I know of where the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper had the Exemplar to a Duke of the Bloud and upon the like reason as I conceive in the 6 of Ed. the 6. William Marquess of Winchester being Lord Treasurer the next in Precedency to the Lord Chancellor by the Act of 31. H. 8. had the Exemplar to two Dukes one Marquess Fourteen Earls One Viscount and Thirty one Barons all which were his Consimilars and it is probable the reason why this Exemplar was given to the Treasurer and not to the Chancellor was because Thomas Goodrick Bishop of Ely was then Lord Chancellor and so it was not proper for that Bishop to be Exemplar for the reasons before alledged Now in the first Car. primi Thomas Coventry being Lord Keeper and having a distinct Writ the Duke of Buckingham had the Exemplar who had one Marquess Thirty seven Earls Eleven Viscounts and Fourty seven Barons to his Consimilars Also in the 15. Car. 1. John Marquess of Winchester Son to the former Marquess of Winchester was made Exemplar Sir John Finch being Lord Keeper who had a distinct Writ and William Bishop of London being in Scotland but he had no Duke or other Marquess but Fifty eight Earls Five Viscounts and Forty four Barons his Consimilars and so reduced the proper Consimilars to its former method But the 14. Car. 2. Thomas Wriothesly Earl of Southampton Lord Treasurer Grandchild to the former Earl of Southampton altered it again there being now also a distinct Writ to Sir Edward Hyde Lord Chancellor for this Earl had three Dukes one being General Four Marquesses Fifty five Earls Eight Viscounts and Sixty eight Barons his Consimilars I conceive as Lord Treasurer for according to ancient Practice as I have shewn an Earl had not any Dukes entred as his Consimilars The number of all the Exemplar Writs extant from the 15. of Edw. the 2d in An. 1322. to the 13. of Car. 2di An. 1661. are but Twenty and but Fourteen Kings from whom they were granted The number of the Parliaments in which the Nobles did Sit to whom such Exemplars were issued were 107. and these 107. Parliaments were in the space of 341. Years As concerning the years when these Exemplars were first issued to the respective degrees of Nobles before mentioned they are in this order of time 15 Edw. 2. This first Exemplar Writ as I have shewn was to an Earl and 〈◊〉 was of the Bloud viz. to Edward 〈◊〉 of Chester Eldest Son to Edw. 2. and â—â—â—ter King Edw. the 3d. for there was then no Duke in England 3 Edw. 3. The first Exemplar Writ to a Prince of the Bloud was to the same Earl being then made Prince of Wales 37 Edw. 3. The first Exemplar Writ to a Duke of the Blood was not till this year though the first Duke in England distinct from that of Earl as Mr. Selden saith was the Eleventh of Edw. 3d. and then Edward the Kings Eldest Son was in Parliament created Duke of Cornwall yet Speed in his Chronicle of Edw. 3d. makes this Creation in the 3d of Edw. 3d. when saith he he was created Prince of Wales Duke of Aquitain and Cornwall which agrees with the Records of the Tower and
THE CONSTITUTION OF Parliaments IN ENGLAND Deduced from the time of King Edward the Second Illustrated by King Charles the Second In His Parliament Summon'd the 18 of February 1660 1. And Dissolved the 24 of January 1678 9. with an Appendix of its Sessions Observed by Sr. John Pettus of Suffolk Knight LONDON Printed for the Author and are to be sold by Tho. Basset at the George in Fleetstreet 1680. The Epistle To the Generous READER HAving the Honor of Consanguinity to some of the House of Lords and free access to most of the Rest who make up the Harmony of that Noble Judicature I thought it not convenient as well to prevent exceptions as dissatisfactions to dedicate this to any one of their particular Lordships well knowing that to offer any addition to their Universal Intuitions had been needless But I devote it in General to such whose Youth or diversions by other Imployments have made them unknowing or less knowing in this Subject which I have brancht out into 16 parts whereof 12 consist of Precognita or things fit to be known or done after Summons and before the sitting of any Parliament the 13.14 and 15. are of matters to be known or done only during the sitting of a Parliament the 16th hath a relation and is a Supplement of such matters as could not well be Inserted to the foregoing 15 Parts T is true this subject of Parliaments hath been treated on by many Learned writers but because none of them have proceeded in such a due Series as they might have done for they were more for the Modus tenendi than Inchoandi I have partly from them and partly from my own observations having been a member of the House of Commons about 12 years and thereby had intercourse with the House of Lords and partly by the help of some worthy Friends digested this Constitution into as clear a Method as my lesser abilities could perform First I shew the Gradations and Progresses to a Parliament from the Fountain viz. the Kings Warrant to the Lord Chancellor Impowering him to Summon it in Generals by Writs Next I shew his Lordships Warrant to the Clerks of the Pettibag for framing according to former Precedents Writs of Summons in Particulars Thirdly I shew that these Clerks did Anciently and do still use a Method therein which Method being fairly ingrost on one large Parchment is called a Parliament Pawn I doe not find that any writers before me have made any mention of these Pawns nor doe I put any weight on them but in their Method whereby they are compos'd because I find that the Clerks not conferring with the Heraulds have committed many mistakes in Christian and Surnames in Titles and Orthography However the Method therein hath continued for many Ages as will be shewn and though I have tried many ways to frame this Treatise yet none pleased me so well as the Method used in the framing of a Pawn which I have herein pursued The Writs which are contain'd and Methodiz'd in all Pawns have two Appellations viz. Exemplars and Consimilars and from those do arise the Method of this Treatise But as the Pawn doth only recite one Writ of one sort as an Example for Consimilar Writs of the same sort to be issued yet are not therein mentioned So I by that Method do take occasion only to Treat of the Exemplars except in some few places for to Treat of all the Consimilars had been too great a task by which means I have here only five Writs which gives me opportunity to treat of the Blood Royal of the Lords Spiritual of the State Officers of the Lords Temporal and of the most Eminent Togati as the Assistants in that noble House the other seven concerning the House of Commons I shall treat of in a distinct Part. And though my design is wholly to treat of what concerns that noble House in this part yet I could not avoid the Intermixtures of some necessary hints of what properly concerns the House of Commons which I intend afvente Deo to publish by it self It was scarce possible that a Subject which spreads it self into such varieties should be so collected as not to have Omissions some of which were purposely done First that I might not injure the Reader nor my Method by two long diversions and yet satisfy him in conclusion 2ly I have been as careful as I could to prevent mistakes but some will be yet those which are necessary to be corrected viz. my own oversights or the Printers I have added them to the end of this Epistle but as for the Printers Omissions of Marginal Authorities and distinctions of Sections and observations which were in my Copy and for his not putting some words into Italick Letters and for want of Comma's Points c. the Ingenious Reader may Easily pardon them I have so order'd this Impression that you have a System or the Contents of an Introduction and of 20 subsequent Chapters Sections and Observations which I thought fit to exhibit that those who have not the Leisure to read all the Chapters may turn to such parts as most suit with their Genius I begin the proper matter of this Treatise with the Kings Warrant in Feb. 1660 1 for Summoning that Parliament and I shall End all with His Proclamation for its Dissolution in 1678 9. In these discourses I take the liberty to look back into former Ages but not forward beyond the Dissolution of that Parliament Only as an Appendix I shall speak of some things that are to be done with Records Leidger Books c. and Allowances to Knights Citizens and Burgesses after any one Parliament is ended Corrigenda Pag. 20 l. 25 d. are read or P. 79 l. 23 after Seal read till of Late years P. 100 l. 17 r. Hertford P. 124 l. 16. r. forgeting the Title of Knight P. 129 fill up the blanck thus L. 15 Ric. 3 11 38 Â 0 38 Â L. 16 Hen. 7 10 42 Â 1 29 Â L. 17 Hen. 8 37 45 Â 1 36 dele 28 44 P. 137 d. son r. Heir to Blanch the Wife of John P. 139 l. 6 d. and 6. P. 383 l. 7 read by this The Reader may also take notice that after the Contents there are observations Printed concerning the Names and Titles of our English Kings especially of the Name Carolus or Charles with some Prophetick Interpretations of it which should have been plac'd next the 14 Page of this Treatise but being omitted by an Accident he is desir'd to read them after that Page if he please THE CONTENTS of this TREATIS The Introduction SHewing the Original of Councils and the several Names of Councils in other Nations and in this Kingdom How and when the Name of Parliament began Of its Etymology and Definition That a Parliament is the Abstract yet includes the whole Constitution and Fabrick of the Government of this Kingdom That it Consists of a King and three Estates and of three
Proxies double vote when Proxie made sometimes before and sometimes in time of Parliament and how many allow'd the Antient way to be Licenced upon any petition to the King Of the Licence where to be entred Of Tacit Licences Of the form of Licences at this day for a Lord Spiritual as also for a Lord Temporal how to be return'd Of the Titles which intitle Proxors and Proxes to be such The difference of Proxe Writs before the siting of a Parliament and after Prorogations How long they continue Of their places in the Lords House CHAP. XIII Of Assistants in the Lords House The Assistants are generally professors of the Laws the vertues arising from that Profession it is the path to wisdom How call'd Laws The antient way of distributing them The benefit of good Laws in any State The Revenues Honors Profits Places and other Rewards given to the Professors of them Intituled Justices and Judges c. Divided into 3 Orbs or degrees The several sorts of Laws in which they are to be conversant of the Titles of the chief professors 1st Of the Chief Justice of the Kings Bench with general observations on his Writ of Summons to Parliaments Of his Patent and Jurisdiction 2ly Of the Master of the Rolls with observations on his Patent and Writ and Office Of the chief Justice of the Common Pleas with observations on his Patent Writ and Jurisdiction 4ly Of the Lord chief Baron with observations on his Patent Writ Jurisdiction 5ly Of the 3 other Justices of the Kings Bench 6ly Of the 3 other Justices of the Common Pleas 7ly Of the 3 other Barons of the Exchequer with observations on their Writs Patents and Jurisdictions 8ly Of the Kings Sergent at Law with observations on their Writs Patents and Imployments 9ly Of the Kings Atturney General of his Writ Patent and Imployment 10ly Of the Kings Solicitor General of his Writ Patent and Imployment 11ly Of the Kings Principal Secretaries of State of their Writ Signet Precedencies Imployments and Influence CHAP. XIV Of Accidental Writs of Summons Of Antient Writs to Justices of North-Wales Treasurers of Wales Arch-Deacons Eschetors c. and of late to several Officers of the Kings Court and to the Lord Chief Justice to supply the Lord Chancellors or Lord Keepers place in case of sickness c. CHAP. XV. Of Returns of Writs Of the manner of returning all the forementioned Writs different from the return of Writs concerning the House of Commons CHAP. XVI Of Masters of Chancery That they sit in the Lords House without Writ or Summons How they were Imploy'd antiently and how in latter times of the word Magister and how apply'd CHAP. XVII Of the Clerks of the Lords House Some by Patent sit there but none by Writ others neither by Patent or Writ but ex Officio Of the several sorts of Clerks Imploy'd in the House of Lords and in Trials of Peers c. CHAP. XVIII Of the Gentleman Usher of the Black-Rod When and how Instituted and how Imploy'd CHAP. XIX Of the Kings Sergeant at Arms. Of their Antiquity how different from Sergeant at Law or other Sergeants of their Number and nature of their Imployments both in time of Parliament and out of it CHAP. XX. A Corollary to this first part of the Constitution of Parliaments Shewing what is intended to be spoken of in the following parts of this Treatize Observations on the Names and Titles of our English Kings THe Learned Mr. Selden having bestowed an Excellent Addition to Libraries by his book of the Titles of Honour and Sr. Edward Cook thinking it a necessary part of his Institutes for a Student to be well vers'd in the several Titles of our Kings and knowing that the substance flowing from those Titles are the chief Subjects which are handled in Parliaments I think fit to give a light touch by way of Preface to the seueral words of the Title in the Kings Warrant as also in the Title of his Latin Writs which are mentioned so often in the following discourses viz. Charles the Second by the Grace of God King of England Scotland France and Ireland Defender of the Faith c. Carolus Secundus Dei Gratia Rex Angliae Scotiae Franciae Hiberniae Defensor Fidei c. First It may be observed that all our Kings before and since the coming in of the Normans have been Usher'd into that Regal Dignity by their Christian Names whereof from that time we have Ten several Appellations viz. One Stephen 1 John 1 Mary 1 Elizabeth 1 James 2 Williams 3 Richards 6 Edwards 8 Henrys 2 Charles but of all these Ten Names Charles must have the Honour of Priority given to it To prove this I shall trace their Progresses through Empires Kingdoms Principalities and States under Secular Governours not medling with Ecclesiastical and first of the Name Carolus or Charles Concerning which I shall not goe so far back as Charellus Prince of Lacedemon but since Christianity was first Charles I find that the Name Charles or Carolus for they are agreed to be the same had its first splendor from Charles Surnam'd Martill a French King in Anno 714. who was the first that had the Title of Most Christian King and from whom came Caroloman and Charlemain in Anno 778 and after viz. in Anno 800 the Name of Charles went into the Empire and in Anno 1119 into Flanders In Anno 1150 into Swethland In Anno 1263 into Naples and Sicily In Anno 1310 into Hungary In Anno 1346 into Bohemia In Anno 1601 into Scotland King Charles the first being there Born And in Anno 1625 into England the same Charles being then King so as our Present King Charles the 2d Immediate Heir to Charles the 1st is the Second King of that Name in England and Scotland and that Name of Charles is the first of any of the aforesaid Ten Names affixt to any Diadem in Europe Edwardus or Edward Edward began but in the time of Edward the Elder who was the 24th King of the Saxon Race and 25th Monarch of England And he in Anno 901 gave the first reputation to it In Anno 1332 it went into Scotland And in Anno 1334 Carried into France by our Edward the third who laid Claim to that Crown And in Anno 1433 it went into Portugal continuing still in England with some interpositions of other Names till Queen Mary came to the Crown in Anno 1553. Henricus or Henry began in the Empire of the East Henry Anno 919 and in Anno 1101 came into England from thence Anno 1192 it went into Bohemia thence Anno 1206 to the Emperour then at Constantinople in Greece In Anno 1214 to the Kingdoms of Leo and Castile In Anno 1271 to the Kingdom of Navarr In Anno 1422 carried into France by our Henry the 6th who was then Crown'd in Paris King of France And in Anno 1573 it went into Poland so as this Regal Name of
Henry continued in England from Anno 1100 with some interpositions till Edward the 6th Anno 1546. Stephanus or Stephen the 1st that made his Name famous was Stephen a Martyr for Christianity Stepten but it was not annext to any Regal Title till Anno 997 in Hungary and thence in Anno 1135 it came into England yet never fixt there but on one King And in Anno 1576 it went into Poland Guilielmus or William began first as a Regal Title in Sicily and Naples William Anno 1023 and thence and in Anno 1066 it came into England where it never fixt but on two Kings Johannes or John John the first who made this Name famous was John the Baptist and John the Evangelist but it was not a Regal Title till Anno 1118 and then the Emperour of the East assum'd it And in Anno 1199 it came into England determining in one King from thence in Anno 1222 it went to the Emperour at Adrianople And thence in Anno 1303 into Scotland In Anno 1310 into Bohemia In Auno 1350 into France In Anno 1379 Into Leon and Castile In Anno 1383 into Arragon In Anno 1387 into Portugal In Anno 1405 into Flanders In Anno 1418 to Navarr In Anno 1478 to Denmark and way In Anno 1492 to Poland And in Anno 1597 to Hungary Note that there were 23 Popes of this Name John and 10 Stephens but I here speak only of the Regal Names of Secular not Ecclesiastick Princes and it may be observed that none of the Popes have taken on them any of our 10 Regal Names Except John and Stephen Richardus or Richard Richard was not a Regal Title till Anno 1189 and then it came first into England and continued with some interpositions till Anno 1485 when Hen. the 7th came to the Crown nor was the Name of Richard either before or after those years fixt to any Regal Title in Europe unless Ricarodos in Spanish do signifie Richard in English Jacobus or James James not medling with Jacob the father of the Twelve Patriarchs or James the Apostle but upon a Regal account it was not fixt to any King till Anno 1213 then it began with the King of Arragon Thence in Anno 1286 into Sicily and Naples In Anno 1423 to Scotland In Anno 1603 to England given a Title to that happy Union of England and Scotland by King James Maria or Mary Mary had the suprem Honour to be Mother of our Saviour but it was not annext to any other Regal Title till Anno 1310 in Hungary and from thence Anno 1476 to Flanders Then in Anno 1542 to Scotland And in Anno 1553 to England Elizabetha or Elizabeth Elizabeth had the Honour to be Mother to John the Baptist but was not annext to any Regall Title till Anno 1438 in Hungary and from thence Anno 1538 it came into England Thus having trac'd the Perambulation of their Ten Names through most parts of Europe I shall pass to the next Epithet in the Kings Title viz. Secundus or Second Second and see when a Numeral Appellation was first made Titular to our Kings and here it may be observed that our Kings had Anciently Adjuncts to their Christian Names to distinguish them from others of the same Name as Edward the Elder Edward the Confessor in the Saxons time and in the Normans William the Conquerour and William Rufus and after him other Titles signifying their tempers but not Numeral till Henry who was the 8th of that Regal Name in England and he in the 10th year of his Reign did first begin to write himself Numerally Henricus Octavus And after him Edward his Son did write himself Edwardus Sextus and ever since in our Histories and Records where there hath been since William the first two or more Kings of the same Christian Names the Numeral Appellation is added and there upon our present King Stiles himself in all Writs and Warrants as well Parliamentary as otherwise Carolus Secundus or Charles the Second Gratia Dei by the Grace of God Grace of God Neither the Letters D. G. denoting Dei Gratia nor the words Dei Gratia or the Grace of God were used as Adjuncts to our Kings Titles till William Rufus his time and after that there were some intermixtures as Sr. Edward Coke saith but according to Mr. Speeds Medals and some others the Letters D. G. and the words Dei Gratia were first us'd by Edward the Confessor King and constantly after William Rufus by every succeeding King without omission King or Cuning according to the British or Saxon Dialect signifying the same with Rex and is not us'd in any Parliamentary Writs nor in any Circumscription of our Coins but Rex being a word as Ancient as the Latine Tongue is us'd in all our Writs as well Parliamentary as Judicial and may be traced in our Coines from the begining of our Saxon Kings to the Danes with addition only of the Christian Name and then also Canutus the first of the Danes here Stil'd himself only Canutus Rex and others who succeeded him and Edward the Confessor the fourth Danish King and 37 Monarchs of England sometimes wrot Edwardus Rex sometimes Edwardus Anglorum Rex and sometimes Edwardus Anglorum Basilicus according to the Greek word for King so as the word Rex did goe along from the Britains to the Romans Saxons and Danes Herald the last of that Race and those before him writing only Rex with their Names and so when the Normans Entred William the first Stiled himself only Willielmus Rex and so did the succeeding Kings seldom using the word Basilicus till King James time As to the Etymologies and Originalls of these and other words in this Title I shall leave them to my Annotations England but sometime our Kings wrote Rex Angliae and some times Rex Anglorum ever from Edw. the Confessors time Now what Anglia or England contains every Geographer tels us that it is surrounded by the sea Except towards Scotland and as to the diversity of Names several Chronologers tell us that it was Anciently call'd Albion by the Greeks Iniswen by the Welch Poets Insula Caeruly Insula Florum by other Poets and Britannia by the Greeks and Romans Romania Valentia only by the Romans Angleand England and Britain by the Saxons but when the Saxon Heptarchy was United under King Egbert he by his Edict Anno 819 ordain'd it more solemnly to be call'd Britain containing England Scotland and Wales yet notwithstanding this Edict it was sometimes call'd Albion sometimes Britain and sometimes England and these various Appellations were us'd as appears by History under Ten successive Kings after that Edict and then King Canutus the 10th King from Egbert and the first of the Danish Race fixt the Name of England that Name hath continued ever since according to the English dialect and Anglia according to the Latine considered
of God King of England Scotland France and Ireland Defender of the Faith c. To Our right Trusty and well beloved Counsellor Sir Edward Hide Knight Chancellour of England Greeting Whereas We by our Council for certain great and urgent Causes concerning Vs the good Estate and Common-wealth of this our Realm and of the Church of England and for the good Order and Continuance of the same have appointed and ordain'd a Parliament to be holden at our City of Westminster the eighth day of May next ensuing In which Case divers and sundry Writs are to be directed forth under our Great Seal of England as well for the Nobility of this our Realm as also for the Election of Knights Citizens and Burgesses of the several Counties Cities and Burrough Towns of the same to be present at the said Parliament at the Day and Place aforesaid Wherefore We Will and Command you forthwith upon receipt hereof and by Warrant of the same to cause such and so many Writs to be made and sealed under our great Seal for accomplishment of the same as in like Cases have been heretofore used and accustomed And this Bill signed with our Hand shall be as well to you as to every Clerk or Clerks as shall make or pass the same a sufficient Warrant in that behalf Given at Our Palace at White-hall this Eighteenth Day of February in the Twelfth Year of Our Reign and in the Year of our Lord One Thousand Six Hundred Sixty and One. Observations and Proceedings on this Warrant THe King of England by his undoubted Prerogative hath and his Predecessors ever had in himself the Power of Summoning as also to appoint the times of beginning continuing discontinuing or dissolving of Parliaments This Summoning for I shall speak of the rest in order or Uniting the chiefest Parts of his Kingdom into a Parliament or Representation of the Kingdom in a less Body than it self is performed by the King's Warrant in his Name and by his Authority only as Supreme not only of his Kingdom but of its Representation and from this Warrant all Writs of Summons for a Parliament are deriv'd The Warrant is in English Sign'd by the King 's own Hand and Seal'd with his Privy Seal or Signet but the Writs are always in Latin or anciently some few in French and are Seal'd with the King 's Great Seal in his Name with a Teste of his Approbation though not manually Sign'd or Seal'd by him The Warrant is General viz. for summoning the Nobility as also for Elections of Knights Citizens and Burgesses but the Writs deriv'd from those Warrants are to particular persons of particular degrees as will be shewn The Form of this Warrant is ancient and hath had little or no variation except in the leaving out of Abbots and Priors ever since the 36 of Henry the 8th and except in leaving out Prelates and Bishops in this very Warrant whereby the Bishops had no particular Writs before the sitting of this Parliament but within three Months after for which Omission Reasons will be given in the 7th Chapter Before this Warrant was issued the King and so former Kings did advise with their Privy Council which is manifested by the Words of the Warrant viz. Whereas We by our Council yet if these words had been omitted at any time and not inserted in the Warrant the Warrant was held good and sufficient for due Summons However for publick satisfaction the words of every Writ are always Quia de advizamento assensu Concilij nostri and this Council is call'd the King's Privy or Private Council of which I shall speak more and is the King 's constant or standing Council as well in time of Parliament as when there is none sitting so as before this Magnum Concilium or Parliament is summon'd this Privy Council consults and deliberates concerning the Motives and Reasons for calling it and after such deliberations and results doth advise the King to send out a Warrant And therefore I conceive it useful to set down the Names of such as were of the King 's Privy Council when the calling of this Parliament was advis'd and resolv'd upon At the Court of White-hall Feb. 1660 1. The KING Present His Royal Highness the Duke of York His Highness Prince Rupert William Lord Arch-Bishop of Canterbury Juxon Edward Earl of Clarendon Lord Chancellor of England Hide Thomas Earl of Southampton Lord Treasurer of England Wriothesley John Lord Roberts Lord Privy-Seal Baron of Truro John Duke of Latherdale Maitland Earl of Guilford James Duke of Ormond Lord Steward of the King's House Butler George Duke of Albemarle Monk Henry Marquess of Dorchester Pierpoint Montague Earl of Lindsey Lord great Camberlain Bertie Edward Earl of Manchester the King's Chamberlain Montague Aldjernoone Earl of Northumberland Piercy Robert Earl of Leicester Sydny Charles Earl of Berkshire Howard Thomas Earl of Cleveland Wentworth George Earl of Norwich Goring Henry Earl of St. Albans Jermin Edward Earl of Sandwich Montague Arthur Earl of Anglesey Annesly Charles Earl of Carlile Howard William Viscount Say and Seal Fiennes Francis Lord Seymour Baron of Troubridge Frederick Lord Cornwallis Baron of Ai. Anthony Lord Ashley Cooper Charles Berkley Knight and Baronet Sir George Carteret Knight Vice-Chamberlain Sir Edw. Nicholas Knights Secretaries of State Sir Will. Morrice Knights Secretaries of State After the Warrant is sign'd and seal'd by the King it is sent from the Signet-Office to the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper and Directions are given to the Heralds to make Proclamation at the Court-gate and Capital City of London of the King's Resolutions of which I shall speak more in the Chapter of Proclamations The Lord Chancellor c. upon the receipt of this Warrant doth issue out his Warrant also to the Master of the Rolls as the chief Clerk of the Pettibag-Office in this Form YOu are hereby requir'd forthwith to prepare for the great Seal of England the several Writs of Summons for the Lords Temporal As also for the Judges and others to appear at the Parliament to be holden the 8th of May next together with the several Writs of Election of the several Knights Citizens and Burgesses of the several Counties Cities Towns and Burroughs within the Kingdom of England Dominion of Wales and Town of Berwick upon Tweed as also of the several Barons of the Cinque-Ports to serve in the said Parliament in such Method and Form and directed to such persons as are and have been usual in such Cases all which said Writs are to bear date this present eighteenth of February 1661. and for the so doing this shall be your Warrant Dated c. Upon receipt of the Lord Chancellor's Warrant the Clerks of the Pettibag by the assistance of the former Precedents of Writs and anciently by help of the Masters of Chancery and by advice with the Heralds as to Titles and true Names of Persons do fix a Schedule or digest or Forms of Writs to be issued
but of the Majores now in their Order which consist of 5 Degrees besides those of the Stem Royal of which I have spoke and first of Dukes SECT II. Of Dukes BEfore I proceed to the Writs of Summons to the Individuals of these Degrees Obs I. I shall give a brief description of the nature of them and first as for the word Duke it is the same with Dux in Latin from Duco to lead for they were antiently Leaders of Armies and thereby gain'd that Title as might be shewn from Histories and were it not for hindering my other intentions I might recite most of the Learned Seldens Authorities which he hath rendred from other Authors concerning Dukes but in short he tels us that Comes i. e. a Count or Earl was esteemed of an higher quality than Duke and that Earl was chief in Matters Civil and Duke in Matters Military but in process of time the Sword got the upper hand and prioritie of Earl and further saith that both Dukes and Earls from Substitutes to their Princes in certain dependent Territories became afterwards Soveraigns as the great Duke of Tuscany c. and the Earl of Flanders c. still owning the Titles of Dukes or Earls though they had gain'd an intire and independent Soveraignty 2. The diversity of Names attributed to Dukes both in sacred prophane and modern stories were according to the humour of the region where they sway'd for in some Nations he was call'd Princeps Magnus Illustrissimus Robustus Millenarius that is a Duke or Leader of a Thousand Men in other Countries Grave Waiward and Despot and still the words Duke and Earl promiscuously us'd to one and the same Person but whatever they were or are in foreign parts Dukes are now in England accounted the chief and most honourable Subjects and first Degree of Nobility except Princes or Dukes of the Blood-Royal and as a distinction from the rest is call'd Grace given to no other Spiritual Lord but the Arch-Bishops of Canterbury and York and to no other Temporal Lord except to the Lord High Steward pro hac vice upon tryal of Peers for the Princes and Dukes of the Blood are intituled Highness and all the other Temporal Lords Right Honourable but any of those being Admiral or General Excellence 3. The Title of Duke was very probably us'd here in England before Edward the Third's time for History tells us of Asclepiodolus Duke of Cornwal in Anno Christi 232. which was in the time of our old Britains and well might he be call'd Duke for disgarrisoning of all the Roman Holds Prideaux Introduct to Hist and for his quick Marches to London and killing the Governour thereof and for many other Heroick Actions in freeing his Country from their Servitude However there were many Dukes Created in Germany about that time But our History tells us That none was Created a Duke in England Selden Speed 's Acts. till 11 Edw. 3. An. Christi 1344. when the King in Parliament Created his eldest Son Edward being first made Earl of Chester then Duke of Cornwal and from thence that County was erected to a Dutchy or Dukedom and many more Dukes both in that King's time and almost in every Kings Reign since that time have been Created to that Title 4. The Dukes of England are of two sorts first those of the Blood Royal i. e. such as have a possibility to inherit the Crown upon a legal succession 2dly Those not of the Blood Royal i. e. such as are not related to the Succession of the Crown or at least so remote that it is not visible to meer probability and these two sorts have sat in former and in this Parliament as will be shewn 5. As they are distinguish'd in their Titles so they are also in their Coronets Robes and Habits c. with which they are invested before they enter the House of Lords which will be in the third Part of this Treatise represented in Figures 6. Here I must not pass over one observable That to this Parliament of 13 Car. 2. there were three Dukes summon'd by Writ viz. George Duke of Buckingham Charles Duke of Richmond and George Duke of Albemarle the Duke of Buckingham was then Master of the Horse the Duke of Richmond of the Blood Royal by the Scotish Line yet neither of those two appendant Titles were mention'd in their Writs but George Duke of Albemarle in his Writ is intituled Generalis exercituum suorum and is plac'd the third in that Record and the reason may be because there was no provision for that great Office in the Act of Precedency whereby to preceed all of the same degree as other degrees do being a Title not mention'd in the Act though on some occasions he preceeds by vertue of his Office the other grand Officers and so being not in the Act he is named in this Pawn the last of the three Dukes without respect to his Office of Generalship Nor do I find in any Clause Roll or Pawn the Title of General annext in any Parliament Writ to any one of the Degrees except this though History does plentifully furnish us with several persons of those several Degrees who were Generals when Parliaments were summon'd and yet as I said there is no provision in this Act for the Place or Precedency of this great Officer as there is for the Marshal Admiral c. although his great merits might well have deserv'd an additional Clause to that Act for his precedency 7. Three Dukes were summon'd 18 Feb. 1661. as in the Pawn vide cap. 2. The next Degree to Dukes are Marquesses SECT III. Of Marquesses THe third Degree of the Hereditary and fixt Nobility is intituled Marquio Obs I. and Marquess in English which began in Germany Anno Christi 925. when Henry Emperour of Germany and the first of that Name in that Empire Created Sigefred then Earl of Kinglesheim Marquess of Brandenburgh who after in the Year 1525. having the addition of Duke of Prussia did exchange the Title of Marquess to be call'd Duke of Brandenburgh However he was the first Marquess of that Empire and probably the Emperour did fix this Title between the Dukes and Earls that there might be no more disputes concerning them for the two Titles of Duke and Earl were promiscuously us'd till this Title of Marquess was interpos'd and the same reason might also occasion Philip the Fair King of France 425 years after viz. Anno Christi 1350. to insert into John Duke of Britain's Patent Vt ne posset saith the Patent in dubium revocari Ducem ipsum qui Comes fuit aliquando c. ut Ducem in posterum deberet vocari c. and the reason is therein given Selden Quod Comitatus ejus potius debet duci esse Ducatus quam Comitatus quoniam sub se habet decem ultra Comitatus and 56 years after viz. Anno Christi 1386. This might occasion also our Richard
any of the Bloud Royal only to other Lords Temporal as will be shewn in its proper place but in the 21. of King James Exemplar 16. 21 Jacob. An Exemplar Writ was to Charles Prince of Wales Duke of York for that one Parliament who was afterwards King Charles the First 17. 15 Car. 1. To Charles Prince of Wales who had an Exemplar Writ for one Parliament and after was King Charles the Second 18. 13 Car. 2. To James Duke of York who sat by vertue of the aforementioned Writ in the Parliament begun the 8th of May 1661. to the end thereof SECT IV. Observations on the Title of York THere were other Dukes of York besides these which are mention'd in this Collection viz. Edward the Son of Edmund Duke of York and upon Edwards Death his Brother Richard was created Duke of York and Henry the son of King Henry the 7th was created Duke of York who after was stiled King Henry the 8th but these 3 Dukes of York being not mention'd in any Clause Rolls to have Exemplar Writs I have omitted them in the Register of Exemplars 2. The City of York was dignified with the Title of an Arch-Bishoprick in the year 180 as some say but all agree that Taurus was Arch-Bishop there in the year 610. and also with the Title of a Dukedom in the 10th year of Ric. the 2d whereas London the Metropolitan of England hath onely a Bishoprick but no Dukedom Earldom or Marquesate appropriate to it and in Anno the Civil Government of the City was honour'd with the Title of a Lord Mayor as it was at London but how far the equivalency of that Title extends to those two Cities will be further discourst when I speak of London in its proper place and in my Annotations 3. Whilst the quarrel continued between the Dukes of York and Lancaster which lasted for many Ages York had the Title of White-rose the House of Lancaster call'd the Red-rose till both were inoculated into one Stock of Hen. 7th 4. The Title of this James Duke of York and Albany in Scotland is the same which was given by King James to Prince Charles afterwards call'd King Charles the First being first created Duke of Albany c. and at 4 Years of age Duke of York SECT V. Of Consimilar Writs to the Royal Exemplars NOw I should proceed to the Consimilars of these Exemplars but in respect that they consist of a very great number and it were too great a labour to treat of all Consimilars I shall forbear to recite them Especially being in hopes that my Learned Friend Sir William Dugdale will publish a particular Treatise of them and ease me of that labour so as I shall only take notice here of the Writ for this Parliament to Prince Rupert the Sisters Son to King Charles the First and this is Consimilar in all parts to the Duke of Yorks Exemplar except in the Title so I need not set it down at large but by abbreviation shall thus render it viz. Carolus c. Rex c. Praecharissimo Consanguinco Duci Cumbriae Salutem and so Verbatim with the Dukes Exemplar Duke of Cumberland being his English Title SECT VI. Observations on these Consimilars 1. FIrst in most of the Clause-Rolls and Pawns from the 15. of Edw. the 2. to this time after the Exemplar Writs are set down these words following are in the Clause-Rolls and Pawns viz. Consimilia Brevia diriguntur Subscriptis and in some Consimiles Literae instead of Brevia directae Subscriptis and in some Consimiles Literae directae Conscriptis thereby seeming to retain the ancient words of Patres Conscripti which the Romans did usually apply to their Elected Senators But here it is only Consimile Breve in the singular Dirigitur praecharissimo c. Ruperto there being no other of the Bloud in England 2. Princes of the Bloud have been Consimilars when Princes of the Bloud have been Exemplars as in the 25 Edw. 3d. Edward Prince of Wales was Consimilar to Henry Earl of Lancaster his Uncle of the Bloud but not where any were Exemplars who were not of the Bloud and so many more might be cited which may be seen in Cottons Collections of the Tower Records 3. In this Consimilar Writ Prince Ruperts Foraign Titles are omitted because none of the Peers do sit in the Lords House but in respect of their English Titles yet in the Proxy-writs which they allow to others their Foraign Titles are recited without scruple as will be shewn in the 10th Section of the 12th Chapter 4. I cannot but take notice here that till the Union with Scotland there was a Chair plac'd in the Lords House on the right hand of the Kings Chair for the King of Scots and call'd the King of Scots Chair Yet I cannot find by any Records of the House of Lords or elsewhere that the King of Scots did ever sit there or was Summon'd or had any proxy to sit there for him by vertue of any Exemplar or Consimilar Writ And now I shall proceed to the Exemlar for Bishops CHAP. VII The second Exemplar viz. To the Archbishop of Canterbury Section I THe Examplar for Bishops of which I am now to speak is not entred into this Pawn in the Pettibag which I have recited verbatim as all the other Exemplars are but it is entred in the Chancery Crown-Office an Office of Record also as I have shewn being issued after the Parliament was sitting nor would I have entred it here in respect my design in this first part is to write only of such Writs as were previous to the sitting of this Parliament had not I found that the Exemplar for Bishops is constantly entred in all the Clause-Rolls extant from the 15 of Edw. 2d and in all Pawns extant from the 21 of Hen. 8. except in this of the 13. Car. 2d which omission proceeding from the reasons which will be given in the following Chapter was upon the first sitting of this Parliament rectified and therefore I thought fit rather a little to deviate from my method than to defer or puzzle the Reader with the discourse of it at too great a distance from all the other Writs of Summons of which I intend to treat according to the order of the Pawn and so I crave leave as most suiting to all former precedents to treat of this Exemplar in the second place especially having the Act of Precedency unrepeal'd also to justifie my proceedings 2. Before I proceed to discourse of Archbishops or Bishops it is convenient to look back to the several Titles which were given to those who were Managers of the Religion practis'd in this Island before the name of Bishop was here known This Religion was by the Jews call'd Paganism and the Professors thereof Pagans Panims Ethnicks Gentiles Heathens and Infidels which Titles are all of the same nature The word Pagan comprehending the other five only the word Infidel was not
tells us That about this time the Abbots Bishops c. which were placed here by the Pope were so numerous that it was proposed to him by the Commons that he would please with their Revenues to make 150 Earls 1500 Knights 6200 Esquires and Erect 200 Hospitals for maintaining of maimed Soldiers c. But it seems he had not that Courage which Henry the Eighth did after assume and it was needless for one or two to oppose his Power However H. 4. Henry the Fourth went on and in the Second and Seventh Years of his Reign made Acts against Purchasing of Bulls from the Pope for Exemptions or Benefices Also Henry the Fifth H. 5. Anno 5. cap. 4. made Acts against Provisors from the Pope and all these subject to a Praemunire In Henry the Sixth's time H. 6. the Bishop of Winchester being made Cardinal was admitted of the King's Council with this Protestation That he should absent himself in all Affairs and Councils wherein the Pope or See of Rome were concerned which he assented to and also he Enacted That no Alien should be a Broker That Priories and Aliens Lands should be seiz'd in time of War That no Advowson Presentation Collation or Induction be made to any Alien of any Benefice or Ecclesiastick Dignity That Aliens attending the Queen or King be removed and banished except those allowed by the Council That Aliens should lodge only in Englishmens Houses and to serve in War if able That no Priors be Collectors of Disms He also confirmed the Statutes against Provisions by the See of Rome In Edward the Fourth Ed. 4. R. 3. H. 7. Richard the Third and Henry the Seventh's time there was a Calm to that See none of the Laws repealed but so slenderly used that they made no great impression at Rome and though these and former Kings did strive to make their respective Supremacies in Ecclesiastick Matters within their Dominions and to lessen the Pope's Power and Profit yet none could substantially effect it till Henry the 8th who seeing there was no other remedy and that all Laws against the Roman See were evaded and other Essays fruitless he fell to 't with right down Blows which is the only way to master a good Fencer as will appear in this next Section 8. Henry the Eighth did so contrive his matters H. 8. that he did first ingratiate himself with the Pope by writing in defence of the Church of Rome a Book against Luther which so affected the Pope that he immediately sent him a Bull which is in the same nature of a Patent with us and therein gave him the Title of Defensor Fidei Anno 12. which he accepted and for three years Anno 21 22 23. viz. in the 21 22 and 23 years of his Reign went plausibly on by making several Acts about Wills and Testaments Mortuaries and against Pluralities and Sanctuaries and Deeds to Churches but in the 24th he began to discover his Opinion Anno 24. that though he was for the Doctrine of the Church of Rome against Luther yet he had no mind to suffer his Kingdom to be exhausted for the Support of the Court of Rome whereupon an Act of Parliament was made against all Appeals to Rome Anno 25. and the next year Anno 25. That no First Fruits should be paid as formerly out of this Kingdom to Rome And in another Act That not any Imposition should be laid on his Subjects by colour of any Power from the Pope and then to secure himself and rivet his Subjects to him an Act was made declaring his Title and his Successor's to the Crown That being done an Act of Parliament was made Anno 26. to intitle him Supream Head of the Church of England and in the same year a positive Act Anno 26. That no First Fruits or Tenths should be paid out of any Promotions in England to the Pope of Rome In this time the King makes Archbishops Bishops Anno 27. and Suffragans and in the 27th year chuseth sixteen Spiritual and 16 Temporal Lords to settle the Canons for the Church of England and erect an Office of Augmentation so as having gained the two points of his Supremacy in opposition to the Church and Court of Rome viz. Defensor Fidei Supremum Caput one from the Pope himself the other from the Parliament and setled an Office for his purpose In the same year all Monasteries c. under 200 l. per Annum and all the Ornaments Goods and Jewels belonging to those Houses were setled on him and his Heirs by Acts of Parliament And four years after viz. 31 H. 8. it was Enacted Anno 31. That the King and his Heirs should have all Monasteries Abbies Priories and other Religious Houses dissolved or to be dissolved with their Mannors Lands c. And yet it is observable That in this very Parliament of 31 H. 8. there were twenty Roman Bishops twenty four Abbots and two Priors in all forty six and but forty four Temporal Lords the Act for Precedency in the House of Lords made the same year being not as I conceive altogether for regulating Precedencies but for purging the Abbots c. by that Act of Parliament so as doubtless they lost their Interest more by the King's resolution for expunging them than by Vote of Parliament 9. However the Abbots Priors c. being thus dissolved their Baronies by which they did formerly there sit being disposed of to other persons they had no foundation to sit in the Lords House which caus'd the first great Alteration in the Method of the following Writs for such as were to sit there as will be further shewn And in this great Alteration doubtless there was also a Divine Hand for as Pope Boniface the Third before mentioned did put out all the English Bishops and placed Foreigners his creatures in their rooms and made many more Bishopricks than he found so now by the Lex Talionis Like for Like Henry the Eighth did put out all the Pope's dependents and placed such Bishops in their rooms as would justifie the King's Supremacy here and renounce the Pope's And accordingly Bishop Bonner Cranmer Gardiner and others who wrote against the Pope's Supremacy were made one an Archbishop and the others Bishops And he also did erect six new Bishopricks viz. Chester Gloucester Peterborough Bristol Oxford and Westminster which last after one Bishop 〈◊〉 was turned to a Deanary as now 〈…〉 such of the Nobility and Gentry tha◠〈◊〉 to his Resolutions wanted not Lands and Mannors to gratifie them So that now he had the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in Parliament and the Kingdom it self on his side and even the Nobility and Gentry of England who formerly were almost entire for the Popes Authority their Judgments were now split in two some for the Court and some for the Church of Rome and so even the King and many of his Council did live
and Recesses so he gives the second Fiat to its Dissolution he hath also an appartment near the Lords House as will be shewn for himself to retire to and for his Serjeant at Arms and others of his Attendants Thus having considered the Lord Bishops and Lord Chancellors Writs I must observe how exquisitely and harmoniously these two Degrees are interpos'd both in their sitting in the Lords House and in the method of their Writs in Pawns and in the Act of Precedency being placed in all of them between the first and second Rank of the Lords Temporal as it were to shew that the Lords Temporal are always to embrace and maintain Religion and Equity as the two chief Supporters of a Parliament I have spoken of the first Supporters to Religion and Equity viz. Princes of the Bloud and now I shall speak of the other Supporters viz. the Nobles not of the Bloud distinctly five Titles viz. Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons but more especially of their Writs which Summon them to sit in Parliament which will guide me into several observations CHAP. IX Of the Fourth Exemplar Writ to the Nobles not of the Bloud-Royal To the Lord-Treasurer c. IN the Eighth Chapter I shewed the Exemplar Writs to Princes Dukes and Earls of the Bloud-Royal I am now according to the method of this Pawn to shew the Exemplar Writs to Dukes Marquesses Earls and Barons not of the Bloud I shall begin with that in Anno 1661. being agreeable to that Exemplar before recited to the Dukes of the Bloud from the word Salutem to the end of the Writ but the Preambles to that word do afford variety almost in all Writs and therefore before I make the Observation upon it I shall give a view of the Writ at large being only abbreviated in the Pawn CArolus Secundus Dei Gratia Angliae Scotiae Franciae Hiberniae Rex fidei defensor c. Praecharissimo Consanguineo suo Thomae Comiti Southampton Thesaurario Angliae Salutem Quia de Advisamento assensu Concilii nostri pro quibusdam arduis urgentibus negotiis nos statum defensionem regni nostri Angliae Ecclesiae ' Anglicanae concernen ' Quoddam Parliamentum nostrum apud Civitatem nostram Westm ' 8. die Maii prox futur ' teneri ordinavimus ac ibidem vobiscum ac cum Magnatibus Proceribus dicti Regni nostri Colloquium habere tractatum vobis sub fide ligeantia quibus nobis tenemini firmiter injungendo mandamus Quod consideratis dictorum negotiorum arduitate periculis imminentibus cessante excusatione quacunque dictis die loco personaliter intersitis nobiscum ac cum Magnatibus Proceribus praedictis supra dictis negotiis tractatur ' vestrumque Concilium impensur ' Et hoc sicut Nos honorem nostrum ac Salvationem defensionem Regni Ecclesiae praedictae expeditionem dictorum negotiorum diligitis nullatenus omittatis Teste Rege apud Westm ' 18. die Febr. Anno Regni nostri 13. SECT II. Observations 1. ALl Parliamentary Exemplar Writs of this nature which are extant from the 15. of Edward the Second to the 21. of Henry the Eighth if they were not directed to some one of the Heirs of the Crown or to Princes Dukes or Earls of the Bloud were still directed to an Earl not of the Bloud except Three to Three Dukes in Henry the Sixths and Edward the Fourths time it being evident from what hath been said That Earls called in Latin Comites was a more ancient Title in this Kingdom than Dukes Richard the Eldest Son to Edw. the Third being the first that was so created but Earls long before and though Edward the Third did create many Dukes more than his Son which were of the Bloud yet still to keep the old Title of Earl and in veneration thereof as may be supposed he in the Fourty Seventh of his Reign did think sit as the King usually appoints the Sword to such a Person as he directs to carry it before him to grant the Exemplar Writ to an Earl not of the Bloud for the Parliament to be holden that year and so did his Successor as may be seen in this following Table viz. 47. Edw. 3. Richardo Comiti Arundel who sat one Parliament 18. Rich. 2. Henrico Comiti Darby who sat one Parliament 3. Hen. 5. Radulpho Nevile Comiti Westmerland and the like Writ in the same year so he sat two Prrliaments 7. Hen. 5. Henrico Percey Comiti Northumbr and the like in the same year and in the Eighth and Ninth of this King and Twelfth of Hen. 6. so he sat five Parliaments note that the Christian names and Sirnames of Nevile and Percey are in this Writ which is not usual to Earls only the Christian names The three Exemplars to Dukes not of the Bloud are in time subsequent to Earls for the first Exemplar to a Duke was not till 28 H. 6. Gulielmo Duci Suffolciae who sat one Parliament 38 H. 6. Henrico Duci Oxoniae who sat one Parliament 1 Edw. 4. The third Johanni Norfolciae and the like in the same year so he sat two Parliaments And then after these Three Dukes again to an Earl viz. 3 Edw. 4. Richardo Comiti Warwick who sat one Parliament so from the 47. of Edw. 3. to Rich. the 3. there was Eight not of the Bloud viz. Five Earls and Three Dukes who had Exemplars From Richard the Third to the 21. of Hen. 8. there is as I have shewn a want of Records in the Tower so as the first Exemplar that appears to us in the Pettibag of such as had Exemplar Writs being not of the Bloud do begin at the 36. of H. 8. viz. 36 Hen. 8. Thomae Wriothsley Militi Domino Wriothsley Cancellario he sat one Parliament and was the year before made Baron of Titchfield and in the first of Edw. 6. Earl of Southampton 1 Edw. 6. Gulielmo Pawlet Militi Domino Senescallo magni hospitii nostri ac Praesidenti Concilii nec non Custodi magni Sigilli He was then Lord St. John of Bazing and afterwards created Marquess of Wincester 6 Edw. 6. Gulielmo Marchioni Winchester Thesaurario Angliae Thomas Goodrick Bishop of Ely being Chancellor and had his distinct Writ this Marquess had his several Writs viz. in the 6 of Edw. 6. and 7 of Edw. 6. and 1 Mariae and 1 M. 1. and 2 Phil. and M. and 2 and 3 P. and M. and 4 and 5 P. and M. in which time the Bishops of Ely Winchester and Archbishop of York were Lord Chancellors and had distinct Writs it being not proper for them being Lords Spiritual to be Exemplars to the Lords Temporal besides he was Exemplar in the 28. 30. 35. 39. and 43. of Eliz. and Primo Jacobi in which time Sir Thomas Bromley and Sir Christopher Hatton were Lord Chancellors and Sir John Puckering and Sir Thomas Egerton LordKeepers and each of them had distinct Writs so as it
Abbots c. in their time were Pares inter seipsos and both of those Degrees were also Pares upon a Baronial account so the Dukes and Marquesses being Earls or Barons before they were created Dukes or Marquesses in respect of their Earldoms or Baronies were Peers to the Earls and Barons and the Viscounts also most of them being Barons before they were created Viscounts in respect of their Baronies were Peers also to the Barons so also upon a Baronial account they were Pares pari gradu Baroniali Till Patents of Creation did more exactly distinguish them without relation to Baronies so as now to speak properly each Degree are Pares or Prees to their distinct Degrees 9. I must here again make use of my former observation viz. That in the Writs to Dukes they were Summon'd to be present in Parliament Cum Magnatibus Proceribus and so are the Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons yet the Pattents to the Dukes do place them inter Proceres Magnates putting Proceres or Peers before Magnates or Lords and in the Pattents to Marquesses they are placed inter alios Marchiones and the Earls inter alios Comites and the Viscounts inter alios Vicecomites and the Barons inter alios Barones But none of the Lords Patentees except the Dukes in relation to their places do take any notice of the position of the words inter Proceres Magnates for the Earls and Barons Patents have reference only to their own Degrees and not to the three other Degrees so as Proceres or Peers is applied only to the Dukes in their Patents of Creation 10. This is all that I can satisfie my self in concerning the use of the words Lords and Peers Praelati Magnates Proceres and that this may be the more satisfactory to others I shall recite the words of the learned Selden in his Titles of Honour whose lasting Credit is beyond exception saith he Though there be a distinction of Degrees in our Nobility yet in all publick actions they are Peers or Equals as in the Tryals of Noblemen c. in which the Spiritual Lords never did or do concern themselves Personally because it is against their Canons to act in any matters which relate to Blood yet whatever Acts pass these words are inserted viz. We the Lords Spiritual and Temporal c. with the Kings Assent c. for though the Lords Spiritual consist of Archbishops and Bishops and the Lords Temporal of Princes of the Blood Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons yet they are all included as Peers in the words Lords Spiritual and Temporal and so in many cases the word Peers is also generally applied so that as the words Lords and Peers have been of latter times intermixedly used we cannot well make a difference between them otherwise than is before exprest 11. That the words Lords and Peers have been used promiscuously in relation to the five Degrees of the Lords Temporal is evident from the Commissions issued for the Trials of the Earl of Strafford 1640. the Lord Morley Anno 1665. the Lord Cornwallis Anno 1676. the Earl of Pembroke Anno 1678. wherein the words are Damus autem Vniversis singulis Ducibus Marchionibus Comitibus Vicecomitibus Baronibus c. without mentioning Praelatis for reasons before mentioned and though the Earl of Strafford and Earl of Pembroke were Earls yet by the Commission they were triable per Barones Viceomites Comites Marchiones Duces and not by Earls only and so though the Lord Morley and Lord Cornwallis were only Barons yet they were triable by Dukes Marquesses Earls and Viscounts and not by Barons only whereby the word Peers seems to be a word of eminency giving no real distinction to those five Degrees of Nobility so as all the Degrees of the Temporal Lords are Peers and the Peers Lords to confirm this I shall cite one passage more from Mr. Selden who saith That though we borrowed the word Peers from the twelve Peers in France yet here we apply it to all the Lords in Parliament and not to any set number of them because saith he the number of our Nobles may be more or less as the King pleaseth and as Marquesses and Viscounts were as I said interpos'd to Dukes Earls and Barons so he may abstract less or add more as he thinks most fit for the support of Nobility for he is Dominus Nobilitatis Honoris or the Fountain of Honour and that this Prerogative may be more fully seen herein in the 21. of Jacobi it being needless to quote former precedents five several Writs were issued after the Pawn was setled yet entred in the Margent of the Pawn for that year to five several persons viz. to the Lord Grandison Sir Robert Chichester Sir John Sucklin Knight Comptroler of the Kings House to Sir Thomas Edmunds Knight Treasurer of the Kings Houshold and to Sir Richard Weston Knight Chancellor of the Exchequer to summon and impower them to sit in the Lords House who otherwise had no right of Tenure Prescription or Creation So in the first of Caroli primi six several Writs were issued and also entred in the Margent of the Pawn for that year viz. to Oliver Lord St. John and again to Sir Thomas Edmunds Sir John Sucklin Sir Richard Weston and to Sir Robert Nanton Knight one of the Kings Privy-Council and to Sir Humphry May Chancellor of the Dutchy of Lancaster and so in 15 Car. primi two Writs were issued and also entred in the Margent of the Pawn for that year viz. to Charles Viscount Wilmot of the Kings Privy-Council and to Edward Newburgh Knight then Chancellor of the Dutchy of Lancaster and also of the Kings Privy-Council 12. To sum up all I apprehend That those Lords Spiritual which are summon'd by Writ to sit in Parliament are Vital Peers and the Lords Temporal so summon'd are hereditary Peers for there are other English Lords which may be but are not summon'd and thereby are no Parliament Peers yet are Lords and upon an hereditary account also for the King as I said can summon or not summon any of them when he thinks fit unless any Lord claims a right by Patent of Creation or otherwise and then upon that right he demands his Writ and it is seldom denied if the grounds of their demands be right if dubious the Case is debated in the Lords House as in the Case of the Lord Abergaveny c. Some are of opinion That the Lords Temporal are only to be accounted Peers and not the Lords Spiritual first Because they sit there rather by their Writs of Summons than Tenures as anciently they did secondly Their Titles of Lord is but vital at most thirdly In case of Treason or Felony committed by a Spiritual Lord or Lord Temporal the manner of trying them upon Indictment and Judgment upon Conviction are clearly different as will be shewn in the Chapter of Trial by Peers 13. Notwithstanding these
when Created Of two sorts of Dukes how distinguisht A Duke as Generall is not provided for in the Act of Precedency as other degrees of officiall honors are SECT III. Of Marquesses When begun in the Empire and in France When in England the reason of placing him between Duke and Earl From whence the Title is suppos'd to come Noble Actions caus'd Noble Titles and by some Hereditary SECT IV. Of Earls Of the word Comes or Count signifying Earl 6. sorts of Counts according to Selden 22. sorts according to Cassiadore 3. sorts in England Of the incongruity of the words Comes and Earl and from whence the word Earl is derived when first given in England Titutarly and upon what occasion when by Creation Of the Tachygraphy of the word Earl Of the Antient Titular and Created Earls little difference Of Local and Personal Earls here in England SECT V. Of Viscounts Sometimes considered as Equal sometimes of a lesier degree then an Earl Two sorts in England why the Hereditary Viscount interpos'd to Earl and Baron Of the first Created Viscount in England of the Parliamentary dignity of the one and Official Dignity of the other SECT VI. Of a Baron Of the word Baron the Baronial Tenures were the foundation of the Superior Tenures and Degrees Of Contributions to the King from Barons Spiritual Barons how Exempted from Contributions Of several other sorts of Barons The advantages of Created Barons CHAP. VI. Of the Writ to Princes of the Blood Royal. Of the Writ to Edward Earl of Chester Eldest Son to King Edward the 2d Anno 15. Ed. 2. And the Writ to James Duke of York 13. Car. 2. Compar'd Observations on both Writs A Recital or Numeration of the Exemplars of Earls Princes and Dukes of the Blood from Edward the 2d to this Parliament 1661. Observations on the Title of York the Consimilar to the Duke of York Observations on the Consimilars CHAP. VII Of the Writ to the Arch-Bishop and Bishops with Observations Reasons for incerting this Exemplar in this Place shewing that the Idolatrous Jews brought in Paganism into Britain manag'd by Druids and Bards after by Arch-Flamins and Flamins which were Pagan Priests Afterwards Christ Himself or his Apostles or Disciples or some of them brought in Christianity into Britain Bishops had Eleven several Titles according to several Regions given to the first managers of Christian Religion All included in the Word Bishop as Inspector or Father Of the Antiquity of the word Bishop Aristobulus the first Bishop of Britain who were his Successors Of King Lucius his message to Pope Eleutherius and the Popes answer about the first ordering of Christian affairs in Britain Of Linus the first Bishop of Rome and his Successors till the time of Lucius and Eleutherius all subsequent to Aristobulus The Amity between the Bishop of Britain and the Bishop of Rome in that time without any discord about Supremacy Afterwards the Bishop of Rome assum'd the Title of Pope and also a Supremacy to Britain and planted their Dependents there some small Endeavours to oppose it but Fruitless Of several Laws made to lessen the Power and Revenue of the Pope in Britain from the 9th of Hen. the 3. to the 5th of Hen. the 5th Of other wayes us'd by Hen. the 8th from the 9th of his Raign till his death in support of his Supremacy What Countermines were us'd by the Pope Historical passages from Hen. the 8ths Death to the dissolution of this Parliament Anno 1678. against and for the Papal Interest Of the the Titles of Defensor Fidei Supremum Caput how Vs'd disus'd and alter'd from the 12. of Hen. the 8th to the 13. Car. 2d Of Writs to Bishops before and in Edward the 2ds time having both the same and a greater Extention of Power than what is given in the Writs to the Lords Temporal and so to the 31. and 36. of Hen. the 8th and the 13. of Car. the 2d how they continued and alter'd some Observations on the old Writs Of the first Writ in the first Pawn of the 21. Pawns now remaining in the Pettibag Observations on that Pawn Of the 2d Pawn there Of the 3d. Pawn there Of the Pawn of this Parliament begun the 8th of May 1661. wherein Bishops were Omitted though entred in all former Pawns and the reasons of that Omission Of their Writ of Restitution in the same year Aug. 1661. and where Recorded Of their Consimilar Writs Fifteen Observations on their Writs and Temporal Employments CHAP. VIII Of the Writ to the Lord Chancellor Of the Original of the Office of Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper and of the Discription of them Antiently distinct but now Vnited Of their different Seals Of their eminent Imployments Seates and Stations in the Lords Houss Of his single Writ of Summons as Assistant and of his other Writ if otherwise dignified The Office antiently dispos'd of to Ecclessiasticks and of later years wholly to Laicks Of some difference between the Warrant and Writ to Sr. Edw. Hide The form of the Writ Observations on this Writ and the nature of the Office CHAP. IX Of the Writ to the Earl of Southampton Lord Treasurer of England and to the Nobles not of the Blood Of the form of the Writ to the Lords Temporal Observations upon it that the Degrees of Nobles viz. Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons and Titles of the Officers of State are still intermixt in the Writs with some of those fiue Degrees Which of these Degrees are usually made Exemplars Of the Antiquity of the method us'd herein Of their Consimilars Observations concerning the various applications of the Titles Chevaleer Dominus Miles Eques Auratus Bannerettus CHAP. X. Of Patents of Creation enabling the Lords Patentees to sit in Parliament The difference between Writs and Patents and advantages of Patents what the word signifies Patents of 3. sorts viz. of Confirming Reviving and Creating that is given where none was before The form of those 3. sort of Patents Their ellegant preambles The Patents consisting of 4. parts Of the distinct form of the Patents to Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons impowring them to sit in Parliaments Of the Confies of Antient Patents Of Creation money Of the difference in the former and late value of moneys CHAP. XI Of Lords and Peers Of the words Dominus Pares or Lords and Peers what the words signifie When Peers us'd in France and of their number there when in England and of their number there Of the words Praelates Magnates Proceres how to be appy'd Who properly called Peers how placed in the Lords House the words Generally applyed and promiscuously us'd the number increase or decrease according to the pleasure of the King a Corrollary on the Subject CHAP. XII Of Proxies in the Lords House Of the word Procurator Proxie Proctor considered as distinct appellation Proxie only proper in the Lords House Licenced by the King and to whom and sometimes denied A
to amuse the World about Grebners Prophecy viz. that Carolus E stirpe Caroli Erit Carolo Magno Major but none can pretend to a greater interest in that Prophecy then our present King Charles the 2d being so punctually and Signally ex stirpe Caroli How ever I am sure nothing can be more particularly Prognostical and Applycable to any Regal Charles then this following Anagram to him being made when he was born Prince of Wales which I have ever since kept safe by me CHARLES PRINCE OF WALES Anagram AL FRAVNCE CRIES O HELP VS As to the uses which shall be made on these regal Names their Progresses and Anagrams being not the proper Subject of this place I shall refer them to my Annotations and proceed to Observations on the Warrant of another Nature THE INTRODUCTION Shewing how a Parliament CONSISTS Section I WHen Families increast into Villages Towns Cities large Countreys Kingdoms and Empires under one Father or Conductor for all other Governments are collateral to Paternal and Monarchical there was a necessity to Constitute a Supream Council of the chiefest and wisest men selected from the multitude as might keep such extended Dominions in a perfect Unity and Obedience to their Original Father or Monarch The end of this Constitution was both for Conservation of the Original Family or Potentate who did thus Constitute them or for his own ease in managing the common interest of Safety and Plenty That their proceedings in their Councils might have the more solemn Effects and Veneration several Nations in imitation have since given distinct names to their Supream Council erected as distinctions to those which were more Subordinate Thus the Jews from whom we derive our most credible Memoires of Antiquity had their Supream Council called the Sanhedrim consisting of secular Persons viz. One Prince as their chief Head besides Seventy others of mixt natures they had also another great Council altogether Ecclesiastical called a Synagogue and other lesser in the nature of our Convocations and sometimes all did meet at the great Sanhedrim which was only kept in Jerusalem and this was the Supream Council as may be seen in the 26th ch of Jeremiah v. 8. who was condemned by the Ecclesiastical Consistory of Priests and absolved by the Temporal or great Sanhedrim of Princes or chief Council as may be more fully seen in that Chapter and in the Jew's Antiquities And to pass the Ariopagus among the Athenians we read that the Old Romans also had their Great Council called a Senate consisting of 300. Laicks chosen out of the Nobiles Majores Minores and their Consistoriani where their Senate did sit and their Comites and Consistoriani as Members thereof did somewhat resemble the Constitution of a Parliament they had also a Pontifical Colledge consisting of Ecclesiasticks but the name of Senate at Rome hath been long since drown'd since the fall of that old Roman Empire for at Rome the name of Senate is now altered into that of Consistory and in the vacancy of the Pope or See of new Rome it is called a Conclave and now the Empire of Germany which did arise from the ashes of the old Roman Empire being shiver'd into several Proprietors lest it should grow again too great was brought to a Dyet for so the chief Council of that Empire is called Yet the old State of Venice still keeps the name of Senate for her great Council and the chief Council in France is called an Assembly of States But here in England we have the name of our chief Council from Romans Saxons Normans and lastly from the French for it hath been called by those Senatus Curia altissima Michel Synoth Assisa Generalis and many more names some of which I think fit to render in English viz. Senate the great Synod or meeting of the King and of the Wise-men the highest Judicatory the General Pleas the Great Court the Common Council of the Kingdom and the General Assize At last in the time of Henry the Third or Edward the Second all these Names were reduced to the word Parliament which was then borrowed from the Language and Name of the chief Councils in France in many of which Provinces and Parliaments our Kings had then a considerable interest I do here mention that the Original of this Name did begin with us in Henry the Third or Edward the Second's time but Sir Edward Coke in his Institutes is pleas'd to cite one Precedent before the Conquest When saith he the word Parliament was here us'd but it seems it did not continue a fix'd name of Parliament from thence for at the great Council held by Henry the First at Salisbury consisting of the three Estates viz. Lords Spiritual Lords Temporal and Commons it is called by the Name of Council and not Parliament as some other Writers have mistaken However it was not us'd again till once in Henry the Third's time as some say but we are certain that it was us'd in the 15th of Edward the Second as I shall shew from safe Records and after Edward the Third was Crowned King of France then and ever since this great Council of the whole Kingdom hath without variation gone by the Name of Parliament And though as that learned Institutor observes That the French Parliaments were lesser Courts subject to the Assembly of Estates yet that Assembly of Estates was but originally a grand Parliament constituted of those lesser Estates or Parliaments and those did anciently consist of Lords Temporal Commons and Clergy for in that rank they are cited by Comines Comines p. 226. an approved Author However since the 15th of Edward the Second we have not altered its name only a little in Orthography which hath made work for that learned Institutor and other grave Writers on this Subject about its Etymology so by Example of those Worthies I may venture to cull out one intending to speak of the rest in my Annotations viz. Parliament i. e. a Parly of minds and to this Etymology I may add this definition That our Parliament consists of a certain number of Men of certain Degrees and Qualities Summoned by Writs from the King to meet together in some place appointed by those Writs to parly or confer their minds to each other for the good of the Publick This Definition will be more fully proved in this following Treatise yet before I confirm it at large I think fit to give a brief and intelligible Explanation of it in relation to a Parliament here in England To that end I shall first set down the Nature of our Monarchical Government and then we shall more easily understand the Constitution of our Parliaments It is generally held That the frame of this Monarchy consists of a King and of three Estates subordinate to him The first Estate mentioned in all our Acts of Parliament is Spiritual and Ecclesiastical govern'd by the Lords Spiritual and this Estate hath Jurisdiction over the whole Kingdom not only considering
Rewards in store which they conferr'd proportionably to their Services and such Rewards were purposely reserv'd for such as had either given good Counsel or followed it by venturing their Lives and Fortunes for preservation of the Empire and some such Orders were made in our Edw. the 3ds time and confirmed by many Successive Councils as may be read in Sir Edw. Coke and Judge Dodridge 12. There are also other lesser Councils besides what I mentioned before as the Common Council of London and the like though not for number in other Cities which relate only to the Government of those Cities and Counsellors at Law and the meeting of such degrees as are qualified for that purpose are called in some of the Inns of Court Parliaments which relate only to matters of Law and Government of their Societies and Councils of War and Trade and many of these are great Assistants and often imploy'd both in the Privy and publick Council of the Kingdom 13. I have been the longer on this subject because all the Degrees hereafter mentioned are Members either of the Kings Privy Council or the Parliament or both yet their Writs of Summons are not singly Conciliario but by annexation to those Degrees which are capacitated to be Counsellors but the Degrees mentioned in the Act of whom I treat next are constantly of the Privy Council or Parliament but there are only some of the Parliament which are of the Privy Council by which means matters are more easily manag'd between the King the Privy Council and the Parliament the one constantly Sitting the other Summon'd only upon Emergencies of State which latter being thus Constituted it may well be call'd Magnum Concilium Animarum or a Council of Souls rather than Bodies so as the King may say with Cicero Conscientia conciliorum meorum me Consolatur i. e. The knowledge and Conscientious concurrence of minds or Souls for so Conscientia sometimes siguifies and integrity of my Counsellors are my Consolation 14. In the first Chapter I have shewn the List of the Privy Council who gave their Advice as t is said in the Warrant for Summoning the Parliament to begin the 8th of May 1661. and all but one of them had Summons and did sit in the Lords House or were Elected for the Commons House yet it may be observed that Prince Rupert was Summon'd as Duke of Cumberland The Duke of Laderdale being a Scotch Lord was not Summon'd till he was made Earl of Gilford some years after The Duke of Ormond was Summon'd as Earl of Brecknock in Wales the Lord Anthony Ashly Cooper was chosen a Burgess of Dorsetshire for the House of Commons but his Writ was time enough to sit in the Lords House Sir Charles Berkley Knt. was chosen a Burgess in Somersetshire and soon after made Lord Fitz Harding an Irish Title and so continued in the House of Commons to his death Sir George Cartret Knt. and Bar. was chosen Burgess for Portsmouth and continued in the Commons House to the end of that Parliament Sir Edward Nicholas Knt. was Summon'd to the Lords House but Sir William Morrice was chosen Burgess for Plymouth and continued with the Commons to his death Now I proceed with the chief of such as are for the most part of the Kings Privy Council mention'd in the Act and do with others of lesser Degreees Constitute both the Privatum and Magnum concilium or Parliament SECT III. Of the Princes of the Bloud IN this Act the King by vertue of his Kingly Office for so is the word in the Act and Prerogative Obs I. having power to give such Honors Places and Reputation to his Counsellors and other his Subjects as shall seem best to his most Excellent Wisdom especially to his Council or Parliament gives the Priority of all Places and Precedings to these following seven Degrees of the Bloud-Royal viz. 1. to the Kings Son first entituled Prince of Wales in the 11. Edw. the 3d. 2. to the Kings Children 3. to the Kings Brother 4. to the Kings Uncle 5. to the Kings Nephew 6. to the Kings Brothers Son 7. to the Kings Sisters Son all of these have Title of Earls or Dukes and any one of these where others in priority are wanting are to be accounted the first in their own seven Degrees and are Prior to the 5 following Degrees which comprehend all the Lords Temporal and these as they happen to be more or less have their distinct Writs as also their proceedings to all or any other Degrees either Spiritual or Temporal Official or Hereditary of whom I shall speak more in the following Sections and Chapters but if there be a failour of any of these or that they are absent from Parliaments in respect of Minority or otherwise then some of the Lords Spiritual have precedency to the Lords Temporal as will be shewn All that were Summon'd of this Degree to this Parliament were only the Duke of York the Kings Brother and Prince Rupert his Sisters Son Sect. Cap. 2. Fig. 1. and 2. SECT IIII. Of the Kings Vice-Gerent or Vicar-General Obs THe words of the Act are That forasmuch as the Kings Majesty is justly and lawfully Supream Head on Earth under God of the Church of England and for the good Exercise of that most Royal Dignity and Office viz. of Supream Head of the Church hath made Thomas Lord Cromwel who was not only Lord Privy Seal as in the Act is exprest but Master of the Kings Jewel-House Baron of Okham Knight of the Garter Earl of Essex and Lord Great Chamberlain 2. His Vice-Gerent for the good and due administration of Justice to be had in all Causes and Cases touching the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and for the Godly Reformation of all Errors Heresies and Abuses in the said Church so as he injoy'd Dignities and Offices of a mixt nature Ecclesiastical and Civil and thereby was placed above all the Lords Spiritual and above all the Lords Temporal of the following Degrees and not only in respect of his Temporal Dignities but as Vice-Gerent in Ecclesiasticals had power given him and to his Successors in that Office to sit above those Degrees in Parliament and to have a Voice and Liberty to assent or dissent as other Lords 3. But there hath been none imploy'd in this Office since that time as needless I conceive for the Archbishops of Canterbury and York in their Provinces and the Bishops in their Diocesses have ever since in a manner suppli'd the Duty of that Office under their own Titles and by their own Jurisdictions especially the Archbishop of Canterbury who is rankt in the next place in this Act and in all Pawns except this where some of the Bloud Royal are not exemplars SECT V. Of the Arch-Bishops and Bishops Obs I THE Title of Bishop is more ancient than the Title of Christian as I shall shew in the seventh Chapter however it became more general after Christianity spread it self The word comes from the
Person to adjust their Parliamentary expences Westminster being anciently the Kings Court and still within its Verge and his Lordships Jurisdiction 4. His place is appointed by the Act of Precedency in this order not but that he was Summon'd to Parliaments before that Act as may be seen in several Clause-Rolls of Rich. the 2d c. but after the said Act viz. 36. H. 8. Charles Duke of Suffolk was Summon'd and his Writs directed Magno Magistro Hospitij sui but after that as in this very Parliament 1661. the Writ to the Duke of Ormond was Jacobo D'no Brecon being his English Title by which he sits in Parliament Vid. Cap. 2. Senescallo Hospitij Magnus Magister Senescallus being still the same Officer though varying in Title SECT XV. Of the Lord Chamberlain of the Kings Houshold THat High-Chamberlain before mentioned is called Magnus Camerarius Obs I. but this hath not that Epethite of Magnus and yet his authority is very great within the Verge of the Kings Court so that though there is some Subordination yet in many great Regalios he hath an intire command and even in some things which concern the conveniency of a Parliament and its places of Addresses to the King that the furniture of the Rooms may be sutable to the Majesty and Grandure of such as are imployed there 2. He hath been anciently summon'd to sit there as may be seen in the Clause-Rolls of the 25. and 27. and 28. of Edw. the 3d. in the Summons of Sir Bartholomew Bergehurst Camerario Hospitij he being also Guarden of the Cinqueports and in 1. H. 4. to Sir Tho. Erpingham Baneret Camerario Hospitij he being also Guarden of the Cinqueports and so the 10. H. 6. to Radulpho Cromwel Chevalier or Baron Camerario Hospitij I might instance many others but I shall skip as the Records do to the Act of Precedency 31. H. 8. where he is call'd the Kings Chamberlain and in the Pawns of the 36. H. 8. the Writ was Carolo Duci Suff. Magno Magistro Hospitij sui Praesidenti Consilii sui and in the same Pawn which may be observable the Office of great Chamberlain of England was supplied by Edward Earl of Hereford of a lesser Degree than a Duke in the 6. and 7. Edw. 6. the Writ was Tho. D'no Darcy Chevaleer Camerario Hospitij sui and in the 43. Eliz. to Tho. Cary Lord Hunsden Camerario Hospitij and continues in the same Office he was Summon'd again primo Jacobi and in the 15. Car. 1. Philip Earl of Penbrook was Summon'd Camerario Hospiti sui and to this Parliament first Edward Earl of Manchester Camerario Hospitij then Henry Earl of St. Albans Camerario Hospitij and after him Hen. Earl of Arlington Camerario Hospitij who continued his place and precedency in this Parliament to the Dissolution of it 3. Edward Earl of Manchester Lord Chamberlain of the Kings Houshold was Summon'd so by Writ 18. Feb. 1661. Vid. Cap. 2. SECT XVI Of the Principal Secretary of State HE brings up the Honourable Rere to all the 12. Officers of State both in this Act of Precedency and in the Pawns and therefore I may the more justifiably defer my Discourse of him till I come to his Writ of Summons and past the method of the Pawn as I have done the method us'd in the Act of Precedency and so conclude these Sections with some few Observations Observations WHen the Act of 31. H. 8. was made Obs I. the State Officers though now but 9 in use were then 12. a Number as I shall shew agreeable to the 12 Judges 12 Masters of Chancery 12 Constituting a Jury and much more of the efficacy of that number cited by the Learned Institutor and Petrus Bongus de Sacris Numeris and this number is thus used by us as t is thought in veneration either to the 12 Tribes of the Jews or 12 Tables Sacred among the Old Romans or to to the 12 Apostles of the Christian Religion or 12 Signs in the Zodiack reverenct in Astrology 2. That if the Writs to any of these Officers be to any of the Lords Spiritual or such Officers as have usually consisted of the Clergy as the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper the Lord Treasurer Lord Privy Seal then the Writs were like the Assistants Writs to the Judges of which I shall speak in order but if any of these Offices be executed by any of the Temporal Lords then the Writ is the same as to that noble Person to whom the Office is anext or if any be Summon'd meerly virtute Officij without annexation to the Degree of some Lord Spiritual or Temporal Lord then the Writ is only as an Assistant Writ and they sit in the Lords House but as Assistants without Vote c. as will be shewn 3. Sir Edward Nicholas Knight was summon'd by Writ dat 18. Feb. 1661. Vid. Cap. 2. and now I proceed to the fixt Nobility call'd Lords Temporal CHAP. V. SECT I. Of the Degrees of Nobles Obs I Have given a short Character of the Grand Officers and Ministers of State and now according to the Act of Precedency I shall speak of the fixt Nobility as they are consider'd in Distinct Degrees and these are not mention'd distinctly in the Kings Warrant for Summoning a Parliament but referr'd therein to the Lord Chancellor to distinguish them by their Writs 1. As for the Nobility in general most Authors derive the word Nobiles or Nobles in the Plural from Noscibiles viz. Viri Nobiles or Persons indu'd with great knowledge than other men and so conceive it may admit of another Etymology viz. Nobilis quasi Non-bilis i. e. men of such debonair and complacent tempers and so much Masters of their passions that they are not in respect of their better Education subject to choler wrath or fierceness for so the word Bilis is Englisht but of even and serene tempers which dispositions are fittest for Affairs relating to Government but to pass these niceties the Question is amongst some 2. How far the Degrees of Nobility do extend which is partly resolv'd by Sir Tho. Smith in his Republica who saith there be two sorts of Nobles viz. Majores and Minores and this was according to the Old Romans the Majores he calls the fixt Hereditary Nobles diversifide into 6 Degrees viz. Princes of the Bloud of whom I have spoken in Cap. the 4th Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons not of the Bloud and descend no lower and these are capacitated by such Creations and Writs to sit in the Lords House The Minores he begins at Knights for he wrote before Baronets were known Esquires and Gentlemen and descended no lower and out of these the Knights Citizens and Burgesses for Parliaments are Elected and Compos'd and thereby capacitated to sit therein as the Representatives of the Commons of England but of these Nobiles Minores I shall speak more in the second part of this Treatise
dilecto fratri Jacobo Duci Eborum Albaniae magno Admirallo suo Angliae Salt'm Quia de Advisamento assensu Consilii nostri pro quibasdam arduis urgentibus negotiis nos statum defensionem Regni nostri Angliae Ecclesiae nostrae concernentibus Quoddam Parliamentum nostrum apud Civitatem nostram Westm ' octavo die Maii prox ' futur ' teneri ordinavimus ibidem nobiscum ac cum magnatibus proceribus dicti Regni nostri colloquium habere tractatum Vobis Mandamus in fide ligeantia quibus nobis tenemini firmiter injungentes quod consideratis dictorum negotiorum arduitate periculis imminentibus cessante excusatione quacunque Dictis die loco personaliter intersitis nobiscum ac cum magnatibus proceribus predictis super predictis negotiis tractatur ' vestrumque consilium impensur ' Et hoc Sicut nos honorem nostrum ac Salvationem defensionem Regni Ecclesiae predictae expeditionemque dictorum negotiorum diligitis nullatenus omittatis Teste me ipso apud Westm ' decimo octavo die Februarii Anno Regni nostri Decimo tertio SECT II. Observations IN An. 12. Hen. 8. the words fidei Defensor were then added before Salutem instead of Super diversis causis The latter Writs are Quia de advisamento assensu concilii nostri pro quibusdam causis yet I find the word Quia us'd in the great Councils or Parliament Writs before Edw. 2ds time and probably the words assensu Concilii nostri is added to shew the distinction of his Privy-Council and his Publick Council or Parliament 2. Instead of Specialiter tangentibus the latter Writs are concernentibus quoddam 3. Instead of habere proponimus the latter Writ is teneri ordinavimus and habere is put in between Colloquium and Tractatum 4. Ligeantia is put in the latter Writs instead of Dilectione this word Dilectione being for many Ages particularly apply'd to the Episcopal Writs 5. The latter Writs do contain all that are in the more Ancient except the Insertions of some Causes of Summons and some inlargements added upon Emergent occasions viz. quod consideratis dictorum negotiorum arduitate periculis imminentibus cessante Excusatione quacunque 6. And also those words are added near the end of the latter Writ viz. Sicut nos honorem nostrum ac Salvationem Defensionem Regni Ecclesiae predicte expeditionemque dictorum negotiorum diligitis which additions are only more full Expressions to oblige the Attendances of the Grandees Thus having shewn the Exemplar Writs to the Bloud Royal Ancient and Modern I shall set down such Earls Dukes or Princes of the Bloud Royal to whom this Exemplar Writ was directed even to this time according as they are either in the Clause Rolls in the Tower or in the Pawns in the Pettibag-Office which I shall recite in English though the Writs are in Latin SECT III. THe Exemplar Writ was then to Edward Earl of Chester Exemplar 15 Edw. 2. Eldest Son to King Edw. 2d and by vertue of this Writ this Prince had his Exemplar Writ but for this one Parliament and was soon after King Edw. 3d. 2. 3 Edw. 3. To Edward Prince of Wales and Earl of Chester Eldest Son to Edw. 3d. and this Prince had Exemplar Writs for 9 Parliaments viz. 3 Edw. 3. 4. Edw. 3. and 4. Edw. 3. 5. Edw. 3. 25. Edw. 3. 27. Edw. 3. 28. Edw. 3. 29. Edw. 3. 42. Edw. 3. 3. To Thomas Earl of Norfolk 4 Edw. 3. soon after created Duke Marshal of England great Uncle to Edw. 3. who had his Exemplar Writ but for this one Parliament 4. To Henry Earl of Lancaster 14 Edw. 3. soon after created Duke Son to John the 4. Son of Edw. 3. who had Exemplar Writs in this Kings and Richard 2. and H. 4ths time for 7 Parliaments viz. 14. Edw. 3. 17. Edw. 3. 18. Edw. 3. 22. Edw. 3. 25. Edw. 3. 23. Rich. 2. 1 Hen. 4. as Duke of Lancaster 5. To John Duke of Lancaster 37 Edw. 3. who then was King of Castile and Duke of Acquitane the 4th Son to Edw. the 3. as aforesaid and Uncle to Rich. the 2. who had Exemplar Writs for 17. Parliaments in this and Rich. the 2ds time viz. 37 Edw. 3. 38. Edw. 3. 1 R. 2. 3 R. 2. 4 R. 2. 7 R. 2. 7 R. 2. 8 R. 2. and 8 R. 2. 9 R. 2. 13 R. 2. 14 R. 2. 15 R. 2. 17 R. 2. 20 R. 2. and 20 R. 2. 21 R. 2. Exemplar 6. 50 Edw. 3. To Richard Prince of Wales Duke of Cornwall and Earl of Chester Grand-child to Edw. the 3d. and Son to Edw. the former Prince of Wales and afterwards King Richard the 2d who had an Exemplar Writ but for this Parliament and at the opening thereof he did sit in the Kings Chair 7. 10 Ric. 2. To Edmund Earl of Cambridge Duke of Clarence and first Duke of York the 5. Son of Edw. the 3d. who had Exemplar Writs for 3 Parliaments viz. the 10.11.12 of Rich. 2. as Duke of York 8. 11 Ric. 2. To Thomas Duke of Glocester Uncle to the King who had one Exemplar for one Parliament 9. 1 Hen. 4. To Henry Prince of Wales and Duke of Cornwall who had his Exemplar Writs for 9. Parliaments in his Fathers life time and was after King Hen. the 5th viz. 1 H. 4. 2 H. 4. 3 H. 4. 6 H. 4. 7 H. 4. and 7 H. 4. 9 H. 4. 11 H. 4. and 13 H. 4. 10. To Thomas the 2d Son of Hen. the 4th Duke of Clarence and Earl of Albemarl had Exemplar Writs for 7 Parliaments in this and Hen. 6ths Reign viz. Exemplar 1 Hen. 5. 1 H. 5.3.4.5 of Hen. the 5th and in the 1st and 6. and 3 H. 6. 11. To John Duke of Bedford 3. 8 Hen. 5. Son to Hen. 4th who had Exemplar Writs for 5 Parliaments in this and Hen. 6th Reign viz. 8 H. 5.4 and 4.11.14 H. 6. 12. To Humphrey Duke of Glocester 2 Hen. 6. the 4th Son of Hen. 4. he had Exemplar Writs for 10 Successive Parliaments viz. 4.6.9.10.15.18.20.21.25 and 25 H. 6. 13. To Rich. Duke of York 27 Hen. 6. Grand-child to Hen. 4. and Eldest Son to Edw. the 4. when Duke of York who had Exemplar Writs for 4 Parliaments viz. 27.29.31.33 H. 6. 14. To George Duke of Clarence 3d. 7 Edw. 4. Brother to Edward the 4th who had Exemplar Writs for 3 Parliaments viz. 7.9.12 Edw. 4. 15. To Edward Prince of Wales 22 Edw. 4. Eldest Son to Edward the 4th who had Exemplar Writs for Two Parliaments and after was King Edward the 5th viz. 22. and 23. Edw. 4. Note That from this time to the 21. of Hen. the 8th we are disappointed of the knowledge of any Exemplars and from thence to the 21. of King James there are no Exemplar Writs to
particular names who were called both Disciples and Apostles but the Selected 12. were of an higher nature for some of them were also called Evangelists and none of the Disciples had that Title except St. Luke one of the 4. nor any call'd an Apostle except those 12. but St. Paul Gal. 1. v. 1. And these 12 Apostles were of so eminent a Degree that it is said in the Revelations Cap. 21. and 14. that the names of the Twelve Apostles were writ on the 12 Foundations of the Heavenly Jerusalem After these 12. Christ did Constitute 70. other Disciples of a lesser Degree but the names of these 70. are no where certainly to be found however we have the Scripture to justifie the number of Seventy and there were also those who were called Presbyteri also Deacons of which Deacons the Ecclesiastical Stories tell us of 7. by name but no number of the names of the Presbyteri however these remaining Apostles Disciples Presbyters and Deacons were soon reduced into the Title of Bishops in all places not by ordinary Institution but by an higher and a more extraordinary Function and these Bishops among themselves had also several eminent Titles of distinction within few years after Christs death according as their charge of Souls did extend viz. Episcopus Patriarcha Archiepiscopus Papa Presbyter Inspector Pastor Curator Observator Minister Custos animarum which 7 last Titles being but descriptions of the Office of the 4 chiefest viz. Bishops Patriarchs Archbishops and Popes I shall speak first of these 4. 5. It is evident that the first eminent Title in the Ecclesiastical affairs of Christianity was the Title of Bishop the Presbyteri still submitting to the Bishop whenever he was placed over them This Title of Bishop as I said was placed on some of the Original Apostles and Disciples as St. James St. Mark c. for the word Episcopus doth properly signifie one that doth Inspect or Circumspect all the concerns of Christian Religion so as those who live under him may be instructed to a Good and Pious Life sutable to the Rules of Christianity whose duty is more particularly exprest in St. Pauls First Epistle to Tim. Cap. 3. so that the word Episcopus as the Superior Order was more generally used than any other Title wherever Christianity was practised Yet other Titles were also used in several parts of the World as they did agree with the Idiom of their native Language viz. The Hebrews called their Bishop Princeps Sacerdos Patriarcha Patriarcha was also apply'd to the Fathers or chief of every one of the 12 Tribes as upon a Civil account so also upon the Ecclesiastick The Syrians Presbyter Pastor Minister and Curator animarum The Arabians Pastor and Observator animarum The Aethiopians Papa Pastor and Custos animarum The Graecians Patriarcha Archiepiscopus Pastor animarum all which are thus so rendred into Latine by Dr. Walton's Polyglotta from the Oriental tongues so as the 4 chief Titles and the others having but one signification and those Titles dispersed into several Regions every one using what they thought fit in their own Territories I shall only betake my self to Episcopus and Papa as having been used not only in Brittain and Rome but more universally in most parts of the World unless we admit Presbyter from Presbyter-Johns Country to be an Ecclesiastical Title So having shewn the meaning of the word Bishop in general the Antiquity of it is not to be past over The Jewish Graecians did use it in their Old-Testament for in Psal the 109.28 they read Episcopatum ejus accipiet alter which very Text St. Luke cites in the First of the Acts v. 20. upon the Election of Matthias to be an Apostle instead of Judas viz. Let another take his Bishoprick which shew that the word was in use among the Graecians before Christs time and was no new imposed word upon the Christians but a compliance with Jewish Titles to win the circumciz'd Jews in Greece and this may be said that though Rome did change the name from Bishop to Patriarck Archbishop and Pope which signifies no more than Father or chief Father yet Brittain hath been very constant to the name of Bishop and did not take upon it Archbishop till the Emperor Constantius Chlorus or the Pope thought it worthy of that Title 6. In this Section I place Brittain before Rome because our Histories tell us that Aristobulus was ordained Bishop of Brittain and Joseph of Arimathea there with him 5 years before Linus the first Bishop of Rome was made Bishop of Rome and so now I shall take a short view of the Priority and Successions in both places relating to the subject of this Treatise Aristobulus is affirmed as I said to be the first Bishop of Brittain and some few years before any Bishop was Constituted at Rome but what the names were of such Bishops as succeeded him is uncertain for the reasons before given but the Story relates That about an 100. years after Christ one Lucius was King of Brittain and was the first King of this Island who embraced the Christian Religion Whereupon he sent Damianus and Fugatius to Eleutherius then Pope of Rome so it is very probable they were Bishops and Successors to Aristobulus and Instruments of the Kings Conversion for none else could be supposed to make attempts on the King but such whose eminent Titles and Employments did give them the more opportune admission and doubtless these were very considerable Persons especially Damianus whose very name continues at Rome even to this day in great renown for we find that at one time a Bishop was of that name and at another time a Bishop Cardinal and a Church is still in Rome dedicated Sancto Cosmo and Damiano belonging to one of the 14 Deacon-Cardinals These two Bishops or at least eminent Persons were sent to Eleutherius to confer about the ordering of the Church-Affairs and it seems they did acquaint the Pope as appears by that Letter that King Lucius had the Old Testament and the Writings of the Apostles called the New Testament so that the Christian Doctrine being fixt here there seemed nothing more to be done than to settle the Discipline and the means for its support wherein it may be justly collected that the King desired such concurrence with the Pope of Rome as might not disoblige him or the Roman Emperour Commodus to whom he was a Tributary and with whom in all Civil matters this King stood then more fair and quiet than his Predecessors had done before him 7. I have given a brief account of the Managers of the Christian Religion in Brittain from Aristobulus to Damianus and Fugatius in the time of King Lucius I will now see what was done at Rome in that time concerning which their Histories tell us that Linus was the first Bishop who according to computation was 5 years after Aristobulus was Bishop of Brittain but St. Jerome is as zealous to have
St. Peter the first Bishop of Rome before Linus as Ireneus to have Linus the First two great Fathers of that Church so that if St. Peter be first then we must account 13 to Eleutherius before named if Linus then Eleutherius is the 12th and with this computation of Ireneus most Histories do agree The first Eight of these Twelve had no other Title than Bishop till Eugenius the Ninth of that See took upon him the name of Papa or Pope and afterwards Hildebrand call'd Gregory the 7th challenged it as his sole right to be called Pope and so Eleutherius being the 4th Pope from Eugenius and the 9th in Succession from Linus did return a kind Answer to King Lucius by two eminent Persons which the Pope also sent viz. Helvanus and Meduanus and with them a Letter which may be read at large wherein in the Pope takes notice that the Old and New Testament were then in Brittain and in that Letter leaving the ordering of Ecclesiastical affairs in Brittain to the King declared him to be Christs Vicar in his own Kingdom which made King Lucius go cheerfully on and as History tells us that whereas the Archflamins had been the chief Managers of the Pagan Religion in this Isle each having one Province the King reduced those Three Provinces to Two and placed Two Archbishops therein and instead of the Flamins did constitute Bishops and so there was an amity between the Archbishops and Bishops of Brittain and the Archbishops or Popes of Rome neither of them strugling for Priority but still carrying on the work of Christianity But the Emperours of Rome declining in their power and the Pope still taking advantage of their declinations grew at last so considerable with the Emperours that they could not safely deny them any thing so that whereas the Emperors of Rome formerly had the disposal of their Popes and the Kings of Brittain of their Bishops and so other Princes in their Territories the Popes by degrees did take the power to themselves to make what Bishops they pleased to summon Councils make Decrees distribute them and enjoyned obedience to their Universal Jurisdiction that the name of Pope might be the more authentick It was used in many parts of the World besides Rome for it is said that about 300. years after Christ Nestorius the Heretick had 6000. Bishops appeared against him which were under the Government of several Popes and this was above 300. years before Boniface the 3d. Popes increasing as well as Bishops who obtained of Phocas then Emperor of Rome that none should be called Pope but the Pope of Rome and though Gregory the first his immediate Predecessor but one declared against it and many Popes before him yet Boniface having obtained this Supremacy what he did in other Kingdoms I shall omit in Brittain to make sure that none should be placed there but such as should be dependent on Rome he confirm'd Augustin a Monk the Archbishop of Canterbury being made so by his said Predecessor Gregory and soon after he and 4 succeeding Bonifaces filled up all the rest of the Bishopricks with such Foraigners or others as had a clear dependance on Rome by Promotions Stipends or Forraign Interests amongst the rest Faelix a Burgundian was made Bishop of Dunwich in Suffolk the fifth Bishoprick then in rank of which I shall speak more and so in a few years after all the Bishopricks which were then and soon after added were filled up with his dependents as also all Abbies Priories Monasteries c. and so continued to be supplied according to his appointment from Rome without any material opposition by the Kings of this Island but such as hereafter mentioned And having this Power it was no hard matter to fix themselves into all Councils within this Kingdom for in all Histories we find them as Actors therein and in respect of their Ecclesiastical Interests one of the Estates and when the name of Parliament was given to our chief Council they were methodically fix'd in the second rank of the Pawns and so in the Clause Rolls and this place in Parliament was never denied them whilst they continued here But the Pope's Power and Supremacy over this Island was ever disgusted by our successive Kings yet being back'd by so great a Temporal Prince as the Pope of Rome joyned with the Interest which by long continuance they had gained from the Emperours the Kings of this Island had little success in their struglings For wâ— see King John tried it to his coâ—â— by single oppositions without the Kingdom 's unanimous Conjunctures Aftewards Henry the Third began again and other succeeding Kings did try what Parliamentary or Municipal Laws could effect and to that end these following Laws were Enacted 7. H. 3. Henry the Third Anno 9. cap. 33. being part of the great Charter that Parliament did grant That all Patrons of Abbies which have the Kings Charters of England of Advowson or have old Tenure or possession of the same shall have the custody of them when they fell void as it hath been accustomed and as it is before declared See Coke Inst 2. Henry the Third Anno 9. cap. 36. being also part of the great Charter the Parliament did grant That if any Man should hereafter give Lands to a Religious House the Grant shall be void and the Land forfeit to the Lord of the Fee and in corroboration and Inlarging of this Statute many other Laws were made 7 Ed. 1. and by 18 Ed. 3. 15 R. 2. and 23 H. 4. called the Statute of Mortmain Edward the First Ed. 1. Anno 35. cap. 1. made the Statute de Asportatis Religiosorum wherein it is declared That the Monasteries Priories and Religious Houses in this Realm were founded by the King and his Progenitors and by the Noblemen and their Ancestors and that no Abbot c. shall lay any Tax on any Religious House to send the same beyond Sea or carry any Goods with them out of the Kingdom and that no Abbots being Aliens shall impose any Tax c. Edward the Second Anno 9. Enacted Edw. 2. That the King by his Letters may absolve Excommunications where they were made in prejudice of his Liberty or Prerogative to shew the King's Power above Ecclesiastick Censures of the Pope and this may be of great Use Edward the Third Anno 25. Edw. 3. That the King went on further by Act of Parliament forbidding under a Praemunire all applications to Rome for obtaining any Ecclesiastick Preferments or in Suing to the Court of Rome for Reversing any Judgments Richard the Second did back this Statute with several other Statutes Rich. 2. viz. in Anno 3. cap. 3. and Anno 7. cap. 12. 15. and Anno 13. cap. 2 3. and Anno 16. cap. 2 5. and in these same Parliaments the Archbishop protested against the Pope's Authority in England And good reason for it as Sir Richard Baker in his History
and die in that Persuasion But he did not think himself safe in carrying on so great an opposition as was like to be well knowing how the Papal Interest was dispers'd in all Kingdoms and States of Europe till he had incouraged the off-spring of the Waldenses and other opposers of Rome in France Germany and in other Kingdoms and States to revive their Doctrines as also to imbrace the Lutherans Centum Gravamina and the Calvinian Institutions and others less remarkable yet all serving to his purpose whereby in a few years after almost all Christendom was brought into a Papal and Antipapal Ballance or rather consisted of Professors of the Roman Religion and Protestors against both the Court and Church of Rome as Usurping and Antichristian 10. But on the other side the Pope seeing that he could not by forcible ways withstand this almost universal desertion of him he made his Applications to several Kings and Princes for his assistance And at last by a more plausible way he did obtain a Council of Trent wherein it is observable That he did not think fit to move in his Point of Supremacy till after eighteen years that That Council had been sitting by Adjournments and Prorogations and then the Question was That Episcopus Locum principalem teneret à Pontifice Romano dependentem to which the opposers did so far comply that they allowed principalem Locum sub Romano Pontisice but not dependentem so after that Council had sate nineteen years in the sixth of Queen Elizabeth it was dissolved by 4 Legats 20 Cardinals 3 Patriarchs 25 Archbishops 168 Bishops 7 Abbots 39 Proctors and 7 Regulars of General Orders without Determining that Point to the satisfaction either of England or other Kingdoms and States the Dispute of which begot 7 Civil Wars in France which lasted near 40 years till within 3 years of Queen Elizabeths Death also Inquisitions in Spain and Flanders Tumults and Wars in Germany and near 40 years Wars in the Netherlands between them and Spain and for some few years Fire Fagots and Insurrections in England 11. In this Hurly Burly about Supremacy H. 8. left his Crown to an Infant Edward the 6th Ed. 6. who had the Laws against Rome corroborated and his Revenues augmented by Chappels Chantries c. enjoying them but few years and then the Pope revived fresh experiments by Queen Mary Mary to reverse all especially after she was Married to King Phillip compelling a submission to the Popes Supremacy by Fire and Fagots so as in H. 8. time and even till now upon the suddain Changes of Religion it might be said by the Historian Deus bone hic suspenduntur Papistae illic comburuntur Antipapistae but her time being short the Supremacy was once more reverst and taken up by Queen Elizabeth Eliz. who managed it with such dexterity considering the conjuncture of Affairs in this and other Kingdoms and States that it was needless for the Pope to make any open Attempts but by Mariages Foreign Negotiations and the assurances given by some of the chiefest Nobility and Gentry of the Roman persuasion in this Kingdom who were as they pretended for the Church and not for the Court of Romes Supremacy of their peaceable resolutions the Billows of penal Laws seem'd to be calmed and this Kingdom thought it self as secure as the pretty Halcion in her Nest But those who kept to Calvins Institutions in England and Scotland were finely yoak't together to a disturbance for it being insinuated to them That the Title of Supream Head of the Church given by Act of Parliament was declined and dwindled into an c. and that the Title of Defender of the Faith given by the Pope did only remain with an c. made them call to mind what was alledged in the Council of Trent That the original of Church-Government was Aristocratical and Governed by a certain number of the Presbytery and afterwards it was thought fit to put it into a Monarchical way viz. by a Bishop as Superintendent and finding that the Popes and Kings of England and other Princes had long disputed about this Ecclesiastical Monarchy without determination only in a connivance they thought it convenient to return to the Primitive way of Aristocracy and set up Presbytery that original Government as was pretended and thereupon one all cried against Bishops which bravely workt for the Papal interest the clamour proved so geat that the Learned King James did what he could by Writing to quiet them his unfortunate thought Blessed Son King Charles the First tried it by Action but without Success For the Independent Anabaptist Fifth Monarchy-Men and others coming into the Presbyters assistance he was necessitated after the Wars with Scotland upon the same grounds amongst other condescentions to yield with the Consent of the Lords Temporal 17. Car. 1. and Commons and pass an Act for Abolishing the Bishops temporal Jurisdiction in this Kingdom Now see what followed instead of making of Earls Knights and Squires and maintaining of Hospitals as was proposed to Richard the 2d as I said the Bishops were not only put out of the House of Lords but the Temporal Lords soon after and the Knights and Squires secluded from the House of Commons and the Hospitals and all ruined by an intestine Bloody War the King Sacrificed and every one of the Machineers disappointed of their original plausible intentions and in conclusion by most miraculous Turns in Assairs there was a total submission to a Reestablishment of that Form of Church and State which they had before so zealously overthrown and the Bishops again brought into the Lords House 12. I should now proceed to the Writs which impowred the Bishops to sit in the Lords House but first I think it pertinent to shew how these two Titles of Fidei Defensor Caput Ecclesiae Anglicanae were used disused and altered in theirs and other Writs Though all the Kings of England at their Coronation are Sworn to defend the Christian Faith and the words defensionem Ecclesiae Anglicanae having been in most Parliament-Writs since the 11th of Edward the 3d. Yet the Pope as I said for the good Service which Henry the 8. had done in Writing against Luther sent him a Bull and therein intituled him Defensor Fidei with this Caution that it should be placed next his Title to France and before his Title to Ireland and it may be observed That in the same year he sent the like Bull to the Emperor Charles the 5th intituling him also Defensor Fidei upon which the Emperor took an Oath not only to be Defensor Fidei but Defensor Pontificiae dignitatis Romanae Ecclesiae i. e. Defender of the Court and Church of Rome But Henry the 8th though he accepted the Title did not think fit to be bound by an Oath nor do I find that he stiled himself in any publick Acts Defensor Fidei till the 2.1 of his Reign and then in a
Episcopo Carlilin P. Johanni Episcopo Roffensi P. Roulando Episcopo Coventry Lichffeldiae Henrico Episcopo Assanensis D. Georgio Episcopo Landavensis D. Thomae Episcopo Bangorensis P. Gulielmo Episcopo Norwicae P. Johanni Episcopo Herefordiae D. Roberto Episcopo Wintoniensis D. Gulielmo Episcopo Bathon Wellen. Roberto Episcopo Cecestriae D. Custodi Spiritualitatis Episcopatûs Wigorn ipso Episcopo in Remotis agente Custodi Spiritualitatis Episcopatûs Dunelmensis ipsa fede vacante XX. in all SECT XVI Observations on this Writ to Cardinal Wolsey THis Writ except the Title of it is like that of Ed. 2d yet I have thought fit to enter it for some reasons particularly 1st For the Eminent nature of the Titles which this Cardinal ascrib'd to himself who had also tryed several experiments to have been made Pope and probably the Passions of Hen. 8. and the Cardinals disappointments therein might hasten the dissolution of the Abbots and other proceedings in order to the lessening the Popes interest here and this refusal of the Cardinal may justly give an occasion to say that the English have always had hard measure in their Attempts therein for though the Conclave have admitted above 50. English men to be Cardinals yet it seems their Policy hath been not to admit of any English man to be Pope except one in our Henry 2. time called Nicolas Brakespear who being Pope Intituled himself Adrian the 4th so that from Higynus's time there hath been but one English man made Pope unless Johannes natione Anglicus Gussarus officio Papa Sexu Faemina quae sedet in Papatu An. 20. Mens 6. who in English we call Pope Joane be allow'd for one of the 246. Popes to this time yet the Pope hath exercised the highest Jurisdiction here that England could afford which is a very Partial and unequal way of dealing 2. The 2d reason of Entring this Writ is to shew that the Archbishop of York was herein the Exemplar to the Archbishop of Canterbury of which there is no Precedent before for the three Cardinals which were Archbishops viz. in the time of King John Edward the 3d and Hen. the 6th were all three Archbishops of Canterbury so as this precedency must be attributed to the Cardinals Dignity above all Archbishops and not to any irregularity in placing the Exemplar And here it may be observed that as the Title of Archbishop did long since leap over the Title of Bishop and the Titles of Patriarch and Pope over Archbishops afterwards viz. Anno Christi 1099. when the Title of Cardinal first began by Pope Pascal the 2d his institution the Title being rais'd by him of certain Parochial Priests in Rome of whom he had more confidence did in effect leap over all the Four other Degrees and by it had the sole power of Electing Popes being under their management so as the Pope hath only the Title left and the 70 Cardinals the power of Electing him in which they are unwilling to admit of any English man although if they did he would be so over-ballanc'd that there were no great hazard of his Election In the mean time the Conclave is so kind to its own Interest as to appoint one of those Cardinals to be Protector of England he being at this day Stiled Eminentissimus Dominus Franciscus Cardinalis Barbarinus Angliae Protector 3. It may be observed that amongst many other Titles he Intitled himself Presbyter to gratifie all interests 4. Though H. 8. might intitle himself Fidei Defensor 8 years before this Writ yet this is the first Writ on Record wherein this Title is given and this also is the last Writ that I find was sent to any Cardinal to sit in Parliament for though Cardinal Pool was Cardinal and Archbishop of Canterbury in Queen Mary's time yet he had no Writ either as Cardinal or Archbishop or both but the Exemplar was in that Parliament to the Bishop of Winchester and no Writs to the Bishops of Canterbury York London or Durham 5. When this Writ was made he was Lord Chancellor yet it is not inserted in the Writ possibly because Sir Thomas More was in Prospect to be Lord Chancellor and was actually so before the Parliament met And now having shewn the first Writ among the Pawns I shall proceed to the Writs in the subsequent Pawns and then shew the alteration of them The second Pawn or bundle of Writs extant in the Pettibag is of the 31 of Hen. 8th wherein the first Writ is to Thomas Archbishop of Canterbury and this Writ also agrees with the former except in the Titles and with all the Writs to Archbishops from Edward the 2ds time to this as they are in the Clause Rolls The third Pawn or Record of Writs in the Pettibag is of the 36 of Hen. 8th which is the remarkable Writ because it differs from all the former Writs since Ed. 2ds time both in the Titles and the Praemonition for in this Writ he is intituled King of Ireland and Supream Head but before this only Lord of Ireland Now as to the Title of King of Ireland Hen. the 2d did give the same to his Son King John but the Pope would not let him enjoy it nor did any of his Successors assume it till Hen. the 8th resolved to reassume it in defiance of the Pope and writ himself King of Ireland instead of Lord of Ireland because as I said in the former Section he would not place the Title of Defender before Ireland as the Pope had directed him in his Bull or it may be in respect the Pope pretended a Title under King John to Ireland and as for the other Title of Supream Head though it was given him by the Parliament 12 years before yet I find it not in any Parliament Writ till this year of the 36. H. 8. So that the Preamble or Titular part of the Writ is thus Henricus Dei gratiâ Angliae Franciae Hiberniae Rex fidei Defensor Ecclesiae Anglicanae Hiberniae Supremum Caput Then for the Premonition whereas the words Priorem Capellanum or Capitulum were plac'd next unto Praemonentes in this Writ the words were Praemonentes Decanum Capitulum because Abbies and Priories were newly dissolv'd and Deanaries Constituted and so the Writs thus alter'd have continued till this Writ for the year 1661. But before I set down the Writ for 1661 I must a little repeat some short progresses and methods ushering in that Writ for though the Bishops were in the year 1641. by an Act of King Charles the First with the Consent of the Lords Temporal and Commons disabled from Exercising any Temporal Jurisdiction or Authority and thereupon soon after put out of the Lords House as I have shewn yet there was no occasion of new Writs to them till the year 1661. and then there could be no new Writs made for their Restauration till they were restor'd by the same power of King Lords Temporal and Commons by
Conquerours time there have been 62 Archbishops and Bishops employ'd in these Offices and from the first Institution of Treasurer in William the 2d's time to Ed. the 4ths time there have been 42. Archbishops and Bishops Treasurers but from Ed. the 4th's to this time no Bishop hath been Treasurer except William Archbishop of Canterbury in Charles the 1sts time then Bishop of London they have been also Chief Justices c. But for other Offices in respect I find them not mention'd in any of their Writs of Summons to Parliaments as additional Titles I shall not make any further inquiries but indeed anciently most of the Judicial Offices in the Kingdom or State were under the Care and Management of the Clergy and therefore the Chancellor Treasurer Privy-Seal c. were called Clerici or Clerks as a distinction from the Laity And being men generally of the greatest Knowledge and Learning were thereupon chosen into Offices of the highest nature 16. That though for many Ages before the end of Hen. the 8th's Reign the Bishops were then of the Roman Religion yet whenever they had the least encouragement from the present Kings of England and sometimes without it they still oppos'd the Superintendency and Supremacy both of the Church and Court of Rome as to the Dominions of the respective Kings of England protesting that the same was a destruction of the Realm and Crown of England which hath always said they been Free and hath no earthly Sovereignty but onely God in all Regalities as may be seen in the Parliament Rolls of Rich. 2d Hen. the 6th and in other Kings Reigns and since Hen. the 8th the Bishops and Clergy under them have been almost the only Bulwark against the Storms and Incroachments of Rome upon us 17. It appears by a long concatenation of Records that they have had these various Titles of Honour viz. in the Latin Records Archiepiscopi Episcopi Praelati Pares and in such Records as are writ in French or English Archevesque Evesque Archbishops Bishops Prelates Peers Grantz Grandees or Great ones in distinction of the Lesser Peers or House of Commons of which I shall speak more also Seigniors singly and Signiors du Parlement also Lords and Lords Spiritual and Barons claiming onely a Vital Feudal Tenurial and not Nobilitated Peerage in distinction of the Lords Temporal whose Peerage is Personal Hereditary and Nobilitated 18. Though they absent themselves from the House of Lords upon Tryals of blood yet it was and is still in obedience to the morality of the Canon-Laws for though those Canon-Laws were practised in times of Popery yet the reasonableness and conscientiousness of that Law still continues and now we are free from the bondage of Popery the Protestant Bishops still think themselves obliged to it as the Papal Bishops were before like the 4th Commandment which still morally obligeth Us as formerly it did the Jews yet where they do absent themselves in Cases of blood it is done by leaving Proxy or protestation of their Right of Sitting c. 19. And lastly it may be very well observed though their influence and Interest upon a Spiritual and Temporal account is spread over this whole Kingdom their Revenues great and thereby their Tenants Officiates and Dependents very numerous yet I do not find in Histories that the Bishops of England did ever raise an Army to justifie their interest against any of our Kings or against the other two Estates of Lords Temporal or Commons by Sword or Force but still supported it by their Pen or Prayers 20. Thus I have given an account of the Managers of Religion in this Island and of the Writs whereby they were Summon'd to Parliaments and of other great employments wherein they have been intrusted of a mixt nature part Civil and part Ecclesiastick and both tending to Religious Duties I should now proceed to the Writs which concern Abbots and Priors which till the 36. Hen. 8. were ever entred next the Bishops in the Clause-Rolls and Pawns but there having been no Writs directed to them since the said 36. of H. the 8th except two in Queen Mary's time one to the Abbot of Westminster the other to the Prior of St. John's of Jerusalem I shall follow the Method of the Pawns since the said 36th year referring the Discourse of them to the Chapter of Dissolutions and here proceed to the third Exemplar Writ viz. to the Lord Chancellor being the first Officer of State and Principal Assistant and now annext to a Barony and after to his Title of Earl as will be shewn CHAP. VIII The Third Exemplar of the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper AMongst the Romans this great Officer was called Actuarius Scriba Notarius Principis praesentis Vicarius Cancellarius and so it came into France and amongst the Saxons it had the name of Referendarius but in England we do not find this Title of Chancellor till the first of King John An. 1199 though Lambert and others derive it from Edward the Confessors time This Officer continued in so high an esteem that in the 5th of Richard the 2d The Commons in Parliament in their Exhibits to the King desired that the most wise and able man in the Realm might be chosen Chancellor which made Budaeus one of Hen. the 8ths Orators to give this Description Hunc saith he rerum omnium cognitione omni Doctrinarum virtutumque genere instructissimum ornatissimum ingenioque ad omnia versatili omnia in numerato habere oportere fatendum est This Discription is also to be applyed to the Keeper of the Great Seal which invention of a publick Seal as it was more ancient with the Romans so it seems to be very ancient with us in England that Office being Constituted by William the Conquerer in the Year 1067. and for the honour of both as it is shewn in this Section Geffrey a Natural Son to Hen. the Second was Chancellor and the Queen to Henry the Third was Keeper of the Seal 2. These two Offices were sometimes kept distinct and sometimes united in one Person till the Fifth of Queen Eliz. and then it was Enacted That both those Offices should be accounted but as one and the same and that hereafter both should not be used at one time by distinct Persons 3. Whilst they were distinct they had two Seals the Chancellors was of Gold and the Keepers of Silver the Court esteemed Officina Regis and the Seal Clavis Regni but whenever they were either united or distinctly executed still this high Office was managed by Archbishops or Bishops or by the most eminent Laicks for Learning Integrity and Abilities as may be seen by comparing the History of them with their Catalogues 4. To manifest their Eminency it is evident from the Rolls that in the opening of all Parliaments the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper did constantly by the Command of the King shew them the reasons of Summoning them unless in a Vacancy or
determin Causes yet appealable to the Lord Chancellor 5. There are other Masters of Chancery call'd Extraordinary and six Clerks of eminent Quality and other Clerks imployed both in the Chancery and Rolls but these are not Summon'd to Parliaments of whom I shall speak more but in in those capacities which I have mention'd the Master of the Rolls as Master of the Rolls or chief Clerk of the Pettibag or both or chief Master of Chancery or in all three Capacities he is very Assisting to a Parliament especially in the business of Summons c. For as I have shewn in Cap. 2. whenever the Kings Warrant is sent to the Lord Chancellor to issue out Writs for a Parliament his Lordship either sends it or a like Warrant to the Master of the Rolls who as chief Clerk of the Pettibag causeth the other Clerks of the Office to ingross all the Writs both for the House of Lords and House of Commons so as they may be fit for the Great Seal and these being thus done and fairly abstracted and ingross't into a Roll which is call'd the Parliament Pawn and lies there as a Memorial and Record of what they have done and as a President for the future all the particular Writs mention'd or intimated in that Pawn being fitted are carried to the Lord Chancellor and being in his presence Seal'd they are immediately delivered to Messengers belonging to the Chancellor who do take care to dispose some to the Persons to be Summon'd for the Lords House and others to the respective Sheriffs of all Counties and Comitated Cities for Elections of such as are to sit in the House of Commons and so the Master of the Rolls and the Clerks of the Pettibag having done all their parts and the Messengers and Sheriffs theirs the same Writs which concern the Lords House are or ought to be return'd to the Clerk of the Lords House at the first Sitting and the Writs for Elections are to be return'd by the respective Sheriffs to the Clerk of the Chancery Crown Office and not to the Pettibag as hath and will be shewn for they come no more there till some time after Dissolution of a Parliament and then for ease of that Office and more safely preserving them they are order'd to be carried to the Rolls and from thence to the Tower all which will be more fully shewn which method I often repeat in this Treatise because I find it so much neglected As to the Imployment of the other Eleven Masters of the Chancery in time of Parliament I shall shew it in a distinct Chapter This Master of the Rolls doubtless hath been anciently Summon'd to Sit in the Lords House yet I find no Writs issued to him till the 36th of Henry the Eighth and then as Master of the Rolls not as chief Master of Chancery and after that he was Summon'd to all Parliaments except the 39th of Eliz. and first of King James and in this very Parliament a Writ was prepared for him but being Elected a Member of the House of Commons his attendance was not requir'd in the House of Lords for what reason I know not but he hath his place whenever he Sits there next to the Lord Chief Justice of England upon the second Woolsack as will be shewn in the Chapter of Places The Consimilar Writ to the Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas THE Patent which invests this Chief Justice to his Imployment in this Office is in haec verba Carolus c. Omnibus ad quos Patentes Litterae nostrae pervenerint salutem Sciatis quod Constituimus dilectum fidelem Orlandum Bridgman Militem Capital'Justitiarium nostrum de Banco suo Duran ' bene placito Teste c. Observations HIS Writ of Summons to Sit in Parliament is also Capitali Justitiario nostro de Banco mutato nomine in all other words agreeing with the Exemplar and here it may be again observed to prevent vulgar misunderstandings That the Lord Chief Justice of England is Chief Justice of the Kings Bench or upper Bench and this is Chief Justice of the Common Bench and sometimes one is call'd Chief Justice of the Pleas of the Crown as in the Latin words De placitis Coronae and this Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas or Communia Placita yet in the Latin Writ it is de Banco so as both Courts are call'd Bancks or Benches and both call'd also Courts of Pleas in respect of Pleas or Pleadings one properly concerns the King in matters Criminal the other concerns the Pleas or Pleadings of the Commonalty or Common People among themselves in matters Civil and one also is call'd the Upper Bench the other the Common Bench and therefore what ever the Patent or Writs are yet for an easier distinction I here intitle one the Chief Justice of the Kings Bench the other Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas 2. As for the names Bench or Banc Pleas or Placita I refer them to my Annotations 3. The Chief Justice hath three more Justices to assist him in this Court 4. That which makes the eminency of this Court is That only the learned Serjeants of the Coife of whom I shall speak in order being the next Degree to Judges do Plead in this Court yet not prohibited from Pleading in all other Courts but all other Graduans of Law have the liberty to Plead in all other Courts but not in this 5. The Pleas of this Court cannot be so well ascertain'd as that of the Kings Bench because the Pleas held by Common Persons or between Subject and Subject are devided into as many Branches as Actions and the Actions into as many Causes as there are variety of Contests in the Kingdom yet all these Actions Causes and Contests are included under three notions Real Personal and Mixt which are here tried as they happen according to the strict Rules of Law As for Personal and Mixt Actions they are tried in other Courts but Real Actions are only Pleadable here nor are any Fines of Concord which is observable levied in any Court but this so that as Sir Edward Coke saith the Motto of this Court may be Haec est finalis Concordia 6. Upon these and other considerations the necessity of requiring Assistances from the Justices of this Court may appear For as the Justices of the Kings Bench may acquaint the Lords with what concerns the King so the Justices of the Common Pleas may most properly acquaint them with what concerns the People whereby Laws for either may be corrected repeal'd or made de novo as shall be thought most expedient 7. The Justices of this Court are not concern'd in the managing of any Summons to a Parliament as the Lord Chancellor and Master of the Rolls are Of the Consimilar Writ to the Chief Baron of the Exchequer THE Title of this is different from the two Chief Justices for his Pattent is thus Carolus c. Omnibus ad quos Patentes Litterae nostrae pervenerint Sciatis
quod nos de gratia nostra speciali ac ex certa scientia mero motu nostris ordinavimus fecimus constituimus dilectum fidelem nostrum H. F. Mil. Solicitatorem nostrum Generalem ac ipsum H. F. Solicitatorem Generalem nostrum per presentes ordinavimus fecimus constituimus Habendum gaudend occupand exercend officium illud quamdiu nobis placuerit Percipiend annuatim eidem H. F. pro occupatione exercic ' officij predicti tal' tant ' Vad. Feod Profic ' commoditat ' qual' quanta dicto officio debito sive pertinend prout aliquis alius sive aliqui alij officium predict ' proantea habens sive occupans habuit vel percepit habuerunt sive preceperunt in pro exercitio ejusdem officij eo quod expressa mentio c. In Cujus rei c. Teste c. Observations THough this Imployment was granted by Patent in Edward the Fourths time yet for want of time I shall also begin his Writ of Summons the 21. of Henry the Eight and then Edward Griffin being Attorney General Gosnold was Solicitor and the Writ was Hen. Rex c. Dilecto fideli suo Johanni Gosnold Solicitatori suo Salutem Quia and so verbatim according to the Exemplar in the 36 Hen. 8. William Whorwood was Attorney General and Henry Bradshaw Solicitor and had his Writ the first of Edw. the Sixth Bradshaw was made Attorney General and Edward Griffin Solicitor and had his Writ and the 6. of Edw. 6. Griffith was made Attorney and Jo. Gosnold Solicitor and had his Writ and both continued so till the first of Mary and then William Cordel in the room of Gosnold was made Solicitor and had his Writ also in another Parliament of that year both had their Writs in the 1. and 2 3 and 4. of Phil. and Mary and in the 4. and 5. Phil. and Mary Griffith being Attorney General Rich. Weston afterwards Lord Treasurer was made Solicitor Dominorum Regis Reginae and had his Writ in the 38. of Eliz. Jo. Popham afterwards Lord Chief Justice was Attorney and Thomas Egerton afterwards Lord Chancellor was Solicitor and had his Writ and so they continued to the 39. Eliz. and then Edw. Coke after one of the Justices of the Common-Pleas was made Attorney and Tho. Flemins Solicitor and had his Writ and in the 43. Sir Edw. Coke was put back to be Solicitor and had his Writ and Thomas Egerton was Attorney and in the first of James Edw. Coke then Knighted was again made Attorney General and Tho. Flemins then Knighted also again made Solicitor and had his Writ and in the 21 Jacobi Thomas Coventry Miles after Lord Keeper was made Attorney and Robert Heath Knt. Solicitor after Chief Justice and had his Writ and both had Writs again the first Car. primi and the 15th Jo. Banks Knt. was made Attorney and Edward Harbert Solicitor and had his Writ But at the Summoning of this Parliament no Writ was sent to Sir Heneage Finch then the Kings Solicitor being chosen for the House of Commons and being after made Attorney General still he continued in the House of Commons till he was made Lord Keeper and then he was remov'd to the Lords House by Writ as Lord Keeper and so Sir Francis North being the Kings Solicitor did sit in the House of Commons this Parliament and was not removed thence till he was made Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas so that during this Parliament none whilst actually the Kings Solicitors were Summon'd or did sit in the Lords House yet I thought fit to insert this Degree here though he be not mention'd in this Pawn because there are so many Precedents of his Summons as are before recited in former Kings Reigns Of the Consimilar Writ to the Kings Principal Secretaries THis Officer of State and Assistant is plac't the last in most of the Pawns SECT 19 and brings up the Rear of all the forementioned Assistants which posture is a place of great Honour both in Civil Solemnities and Martial Imployments and that it may so appear in the aforesaid Act of the 31. of Hen. the Eighth none of the other Assistants before recited except the Lord Chancellor are so much as mention'd therein their precedencies being known in their own Courts from a greater antiquity but the Secretaries Place is fix't by that Act viz. if he be under the Degree of a Noble Baron yet it is above all the Assistants and next the Lord Chancellor if he be of the Degree of a Baron then above all Barons or if an Earl as in the case of the Lord Arlington then above all of that Degree unless any of the Superior Officers of State be of that Degree and then next to him and above the rest He hath his Office as Secretary not by Patent but by delivery of the Privy Signet to him and so if there be more than one as now there are two each considered as Principal hath also a Privy Signet delivered to him His Parliament Writ in this Pawn was thus Carolus c. Dilecto fideli Edwardo Nicolas Militi uno primariorum Secretariorum suorum salutem Quia c. and so verbatim according to the last mention'd Exemplar as an Assistant and the Title in the Label is like the Title of his Writ Observations 1. THis Writ agrees with all the former except in the word Vni and so if there be more as I have shewn in the Writ to the Judges yet commonly in Superscriptions he that is made Chief is Stiled Principal without the word one and the other One of the Principal Secretaries of State 2. The word Capitalis is us'd in the Writs to the two Chief Justices and Chief Baron but to the chief Secretary the word Principali is us'd not only signifying the Capital First or Chief but intimating his more immediate Imployment on his Prince for Principali is properly from Principe 3. If there be more Secretaries than one as there are seldom less than two they divide their negotiations into the Title of Provinces both in relation to this Kingdom or Foreign Kingdoms or States and so each of them give an account to the King accordingly and they have an Office appertaining to them call'd the Signet Office Signet where they have four Clerks as their Substitutes to perform their Directions for all Dispatches both Foreign and Domestick and generally they are of his Majesties Privy-Council 4. Their Imployments in Parliament are either in the House of Lords or House of Commons according as they are Summon'd to one or Elected to the other and as the King thinks them in either place most useful for his occasions 5. I need not go back to find the Antiquity of their Summons for it may be presum'd to be ancient from the Eminency and nature of their Imployments so it may suffice only to instance here that in the 36 Hen. 8. William Packet Mil. had his
therefore I conceive there is some mistake in Mr. Selden but however the mistake be the first Exemplar Writ to a Duke was not till this year for though Edward Prince of Wales was Duke in the Third or Eleventh year of his Father and Thomas Earl of Norfolk soon after was created Duke of Norfolk and Henry Earl of Lancaster soon after created Duke of Lancaster yet they had not any Exemplar Writs as Dukes but before as Earls so as John Duke of Lancaster in this Parliament of the 37. Edw. the 3d. was the first Duke which had an Exemplar Writ 47 Edw. 3. As I have shewn the first Exemplar to an Earl of the Bloud so this shews the first Exemplar to an Earl not of the Bloud which was this year to Richard Earl of Arundel for though there were many Earls before not of the Bloud yet they had only Consimilar Writs but no Exemplars extant to any of them till this Year 28 H. 6. And though there were many Dukes not of the Blood since the first Creation of that Title yet the first Duke not of the Blood who was thought fit to be an Exemplar was not till this Parliament and the Predecessor of this Duke was an Earl in Edw. 3ds time and even this Duke was Earl in the time of his Predecessors before any Duke was created 6 Edw. 6. Though the first Marquess created in England was in the 9th of Rich. 2d yet none were thought fit to be Exemplars till this 6. of Edw. the 6th that William Marquess of Winchester was made the first Exemplar in Parliament of that Dignity but his Exemplar had the additional Title of Lord Treasurer who is the second Officer of State 36 H. 8. Although a Baron is a more ancient Title with us in England than any of the other Degrees of the Nobles yet we find no Record now extant wherein a Baron singly as Baron had the Exemplar Writ for as I said Thomas Wriothesly Baron of Tichfield being Chancellor William Pawlet Baron of Bazing being Lord Keeper were Exemplars in those Parliaments and had Consimilars appointed them but Edward Hyde Baron of Hindon having a distinct Assisting Writ had no Consimilar allotted him either in respect of his Barony or Assistancy Thus we find that Earls Dukes Marquesses and Barons have been Exemplars but we do not find any Viscounts to be so in any Parliament since the creation of that Dignity which was as I said in Hen. 6ths time to John de Beaumont And the reason is because the word Vicecomes doth imply a Consimilar to Comes so it were improper for Comites to be Consimilars to a Vicecomiti Concerning the additionals of the Titles to those Nobles mentioned in their Exemplars it may be observed That in all those Writs to Hen. the 8ths time the words Consanguineo Charissimo Praedilecto Dilecto Fideli were not so positively sixt to the several Degrees in their Writs but since that time they have past in a more constant method viz. to Dukes and Marquesses Praecharissimo Consanguineo to Earls and Viscounts Charissimo Consanguineo to Barons Praedilecto Fideli and to the Lord Chancellor as chief Assistant Praedilecto perquam Fideli but to all the other Assistants of which I shall speak more only Dilecto Fideli SECT III. Observations on the Consimilars to the former Exemplars WHen Princes of the Blood were made Exemplars there was ever some Prince of the Blood in the Consimilars and then followed in the same Register in every Clause-Roll or Pawn the other Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons without interposition of the Lords Spiritual and Ecclesiastical to the Princes of the Blood and the Temporal Lords not of the Bloud so it continued in that method till the 21. of King James but then the Exemplar being to the Prince of Wales and no Consimilar to him there follows the Exemplar and Consimilars to the Lords Spiritual of which I have spoken and after them follows the particular Writ to John Bishop of Lincoln as Lord Keeper and after that the Exemplar to Lodowick Duke of Richmond who had one Duke one Marquess Thirty eight Earls nine Viscounts and Fourty seven Chevaliers his Consimilars and ever since the 21. Jac. there hath been an interposition either of the Lords Spiritual or Lord Chancellor between the Dukes of the Blood and the Nobles that were not of the Blood and so in the 13 Car. 2. though the Bishops were deprived from that Roll as I have shewn yet the Lord Chancellors Writ did interpose and it may further be observed That when Princes or Dukes of the Blood or not of the Blood were Exemplars other Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons were Consimilars but when Earls were Exemplars there were no other Consimilars admitted of Degrees above them but still under them viz. of Earls Viscounts and Barons and yet when the three Dukes beforementioned were made Exemplars 't is true the Duke of Suffolk and Oxford had Dukes to their Consimilars as formerly being pari gradu but the Duke of Norfolk had no Duke to his Consimilar for he had only four Earls one Viscount and Thirty one Barons of which there is no other precedent that I can find 2. As to the different Titles of these six Degrees viz. Princes of the Blood Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons of whom I have spoke more in the Fifth Chapter it is fit to be hinted here that Prince in English and Principi in the Latin Writ Duke and Duci Marquess and Marchioni Viscount and Vicecomiti have little difference in their Orthography but Comiti in all their Latin Writs and Earl which is their general appellation in English have very great difference concerning which and the other Degrees I have writ more at large before and in my Annotations to which I refer the Reader and so Baron and Baro have but little variation yet this may be observed here of this Title Baro that in all the Consimilar Writs in Clause Rolls or Pawns wherein those of that Degree are enumerated from the 15th of Edw. 2d to the 13. of Car. 2. neither the Titles or words Baro nor of Banerettus are mentioned in the Writs but either the Articles De or Le or La or the words Dominus Miles Equies Auratus or Chevalier are added to the Barons name viz. Hugo de Spencer Johanni de Bello Campo Johanni de St. John de Bazing Roberto de Monte albo Johanni de Sancto amando Willielmo de la Souch de mortuo mare Nicolao de Cantilupo le Quint Johanni de Insula de rubro monte Nicolao de Sancto Mauro Michaeli de la Pool who was then Banneret Admirallo Maris Johanni de Moubray Mariscallo Petro de malo lacu le Quint Hugo de le Spencer Willielmo la Zouch de mortuo mare Johanni le Strange Johanni le Shelton and many more and some only in their Christian names and Sirnames viz. Richardo Gray Richardo Talbot Gulielmo Aincourt