Selected quad for the lemma: king_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
king_n edward_n england_n year_n 23,637 5 4.8786 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A30739 An enquiry whether the Lord Jesus Christ made the world, and be Jehovah, and gave the moral law? and whether the fourth command be repealed or altered? by Tho. Bampfield. Bampfield, Thomas, 1623?-1693. 1692 (1692) Wing B629; ESTC R10575 118,081 148

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

the Sabbath day Yet I know not why without any damage to the Question it may not be admitted that whilst persons are perswaded tho' mistaken any thing is to be religiously observed and yet violate it the Lord might then and may still in like cases punish that Violation by Judgments as we find in the Histories he frequently punished Heathens when they prophaned their Heathenish Worship and Temples Particularly Xerxes's Army who were sent to pillage and destroy the Temple and Oracle of Apollo at Delphos for which themselves had some veneration were said to be destroyed by Thunder and Lightning And Herod's Messengers digging that so they might rifle the Temple for hidden Gold a Fire is said to break out of David's and Solomon's Coffins and to have consumed them to Ashes And Marcus Crassus a Roman Consul and General taking Two thousand Talents of Gold out of the Temple at Jerusalem which Pompey left there his whole Army was routed a little after Crassus was taken and some of that melted Gold poured into his Mouth which was thought a Judgment for that Sacrilege And Caepio a Consul of Rome after he with his Army had destroyed the Church of Tholouse in France and had taken thence a great Mass of Gold the History sa●● every man in his Army came to a miserable End whence wh●n any man was remarkably followed by the Hand of God they used this Proverb saying of him Aurum habet Tolosanum He hath some of the Gold of Tholouse And whatever gross Mistakes some men have been and are still under in their own devised mediums of Worship whereof some have been as that of Apollo at Delphos was plainly Diabolical and others very diverse from what God has instituted in his Word yet how far the Lord may make men Examples of suffer them to be so made for sinning against their own Consciences though they be Misinformed Consciences I cannot tell And I think it may be true also that some Judgments have been executed upon Violaters of the Sabbath whereof the Stick gatherer of old is one famous Example and whereof I could assign some very Signal within these few years past if that were a good way of reasoning And what more there may yet be I know not Christ can vindicate his Commands and recover his own when and by what methods shall please him and to him I wholly leave it But this I am fully satisfied in that he that walks according to his Commands has no manner of cause to fear his Displeasure for obedience to his Will And this I assign as Answer to the many Reflections about Judgments supposed to be inflicted in this Case which Judgments of God I acknowledge to be a great Deep and hard to be fathom'd by the Wisest and are sometimes easie to be wrested both ways by willing Minds but are then best understood when considered as directly punishing Sins against the plain Commands and Word of God Now although this Precedent of Eustachius be somewhat long yet being Seconded by a Council and that transmitted and published to all the World in one of the Volumes of the General and Provincial Councils out of which I have translated it and this passing at the initiating or first bringing in of the Celebration of the First day of the week or Sunday into the Kingdom of Scotland which is famous for having the Gospel early preached there and in this as famous viz. for not receiving this Innovation so soon as some other parts of the World and England being then much of the same mind as before has been said and this being one Precedent which may serve to abate what is printed about the First day as if all the World since Christ and the Apostles time had observed it and as if the Sabbath ever since had been universally laid aside I have therefore inserted it and from hence at present shall only observe That the First day which some call the Dominical or Lord's day was not observed by the Christian Kingdom of Scotland nor I think by England Twelve hundred years after Christ Of the Dominical day the Magdeburgenses say It was ordained in a Council in Scotland about the observation of the Dominical day newly and lately brought into that Kingdom as is before noted out of Binius That it should be holy from the Twelfth hour of Saturday Even till Monday And fol. 788 a Synod in Scotland under Pope Innocent III. An. Dom. 1203 for inaugurating the King and the Feast of the Sabbath which I think might be about a year or two after the Abbot of Flay's being there William King of Scotland called a Council of the Chief of his Kingdom and commanded them to do Homage to his Son Alexander There came also a Legate from the Pope with a Sword and a purple Hat Indulgences and Priviledges to the young King also there it is decreed That Saturday from the Twelfth hour at Noon should be holy That the People should do nothing prophane but apply themselves to things sacred and this they should do even until Monday Boetius lib. 13 de Scotis fol. 788 which place in an hasty seeking I could not find By inaugurating the Sabbath was the more solemn settling of that matter which was as I guess about a year or two before first initiated or brought in by the Abbot of Flay As Binius Or whether this inaugurating were not by the King and Parliament of Scotland because it is said to be by the King and the Council of the Chief of his Kingdom I cannot say but this last seems to me most probable But that makes no difference in the case there and this well agrees with that of the Abbot of Flay as I think about a year or two before And how far this Precedent after the fine Device of the Epistle from Heaven and after this Abbot of Flay's coming to York may reach to this Kingdom of England you may see there I shall quote Binius once more the same Book fol. 1445 where he says At a Council at London celebrated by Hubert Archbishop of Canterbury in the time of Pope Innocent III Ann. Christi 1200 they decree That every Dominical day the Hostia should he renewed The Hostia is the Host in the Popish Mass i. e. a round Wafer Cake which after the Priest's Consecration they suppose to be the Body of Christ The Church of England then and some time before and long after till Edward the Sixth's time were devoted to the Church of Rome howsoever the Kings and Civil Government were disposed whereof we find a little in the President before cited of Eustachius and we have no Statute made for Sunday till that in Edward the Sixth which was but about 150 years since whereof more hereafter And Binius fol. 877 878 In the time of Pope Marcellus II there were some who kept the Sabbath day Sabbatarii which I think was in Rome who it seems held that the Dominical day was not to be
observed Dominicam diem non colendam and this was An. 1555 in the sixteenth Century but they if it be true what is written of them by Popish Writers were otherwise Heretical as in their sence all Dissenters from them are And if they were Hereticks yet this will disprove part of the Assertion before mentioned but frequently the most Orthodox were by them called Hereticks as they are by them and others to this day In Lucius's Thirteenth Century f. 264 B and fol. 357 C D of introducing the Dominical day into Scotland we have before in the Story of the Abbot of Flay and the King's Council of Scotland An. Dom. 1203. Fol. 385 a Synod was held at Oxford An. 1223 by Stephen Archbishop of Canterbury where they determine That all Dominical days be kept with all veneration and a Fast upon the Sabbath c. So that how far some part of England then followed the Example of Scotland is worth further enquiry which is about Twenty one years after that of the Abbot of Flay And this is the sum of what I have collected out of those Books As for the Books quoted by Binius by the Magdeburgenses and by Lucius I had very few of them where those Passages probably would be found more at large which such as are furnished with or have the use of a better Study may collect if they please and give a more exact account thereof But these Writers as to Matters of Fact written by them I take to be of Credit although one of them viz. Binius were a profest Romanist and Canon of the Virgin Mary at Collen and writ permissu superiorunt But the Magdeburgenses and Lucius were Protestants and are generally allowed for ought I know as persons of Fidelity in their Collections So that as to the Matters of Fact which I have brokenly gathered from them some for and some against my Opinion I think there remains little doubt Inferences from what I have collected I leave to the impartial Reader Binius's 13th Century King John about Ann. Dom. 1208 and the Tenth year of his Reign upon occasion of a Popish imposing upon his Prerogative in a Case of Conge-de-lier was excommunicated by the Pope and his Kingdom interdicted which bred so great Troubles at home and abroad as at last forc'd him to lay down his Crown at the Feet of Pandulphus the Pope's Agent After he was humbled by that Excommunication and Interdiction this King An. 15. of his Reign by Writ removes the Market of the City of Exon from the Dominical or first day of the week on which it was formerly held to Monday Prinn's History of the Pope's Usurpations part 3 fol. 17. So that Exon kept Markets on Sunday above 1200 years after Christ And the Market of Launceston was from the first to the fifth day of the week And in the 2d and 3d of Henry III the next King succeeding King John K. Henry III removes another Market in Devon and Ten more in other Counties from the First day to other days of the week Which alteration of Markets which we find before in the Case of the Abbot of Flay King John would not then admit And 6 Hen. III Prinn's Jurisdiction of Courts fol. 153 there is the King's Writ Ballinis de Hastings to answer before the Justices for removing Markets from one day to another without the King's Licence unless it be from the Dominical day It seems some then held Markets on that day but might remove them to another day without the King's Licence And those who desire and need such Presidents may probably there find many more like these these coming to hand upon the perusal of a few Leaves of that voluminous Book In our Records we find by the Writs to summon Parliaments that they were of old appointed to meet upon Sundays Elsyng's Method of holding Parliaments fol. 91 92 in the time of Edw. I Edw. II and Edw. III which Edw. I. succeeded Henry III who succeeded King John But 5 Rich. II. who was deposed by his Popish rebellious Subjects and Clergy and who succeeded Edward III. the Parliament appointed to meet upon Sunday met that day and adjourned till Monday Prinn's Jurisdict of Courts fol. 4. From which time of 5 Rich. II. Prinn says no Parliaments have been summoned to meet on the Dominical days And Prinn thinks Modus tenendi Parliamentum was compiled after 5 Rich. II. for many ancient Parliaments of Edw. I Edw. II and Edw. III were summoned to meet on Sunday on which day the Modus c. says Parliaments ought not to be held but upon all other days that excepted So that it seems in Edward the Third's time Sunday was not much if at all observed by that King and the Civil Government of England See his Jurisd fol. 42 and his Register fol. 10 11 15. England which one lately in his Defence of the First day calls a barbarous and remote Corner of the World had the Gospel here preached in the First Century as Historians say and it was afterward generally entertained for some hundreds of years before they received the Change of the Passover to the Dominical day and by the best Collection I can make with my few Books about 1200 years or more before they received the observation of Sunday and yet had a weekly day of Rest which all the Records of old yet extant and down along to this day did then and do still call the Sabbath day And having once received the Gospel they did not so soon receive Alterations in Religion for the worse as other places nearer to Rome as appears by the Case of the Passover the change of which from the 14th day of the first Moon to the first day of the week was not here admitted as I take it till the Sixth or Seventh Century and then also but in part as appears in the Passage of Bishop Coleman which Alteration Scotland then refused And for the First day it seems to be introduced by the Popes and their Agents by degrees but not generally to obtain in England nor at all in Scotland till the beginning of the 13th Century and without any Law that I can recollect made by the King and Parliament till Edward the Sixth's time 5 6 Edw. VI cap. 3 which Act was made about 150. years since where Sunday and many Holy-days the Feast of All-saints and of Holy Innocents are established Festivals and jumbled all together it seems then esteemed much alike Which Act provides that it shall be lawful for Husband men Labourers Fishermen and all others in Harvest or any time of the year when Necessity shall require to labour ride fish or work any kind of Work at their free will and pleasure upon any of the said days So that the Civil Government of England did never that I find give Countenance to Sunday by any Act till about 150 years since and then allowed a Liberty so large as shews what Esteem they had of