Selected quad for the lemma: king_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
king_n earl_n henry_n sir_n 22,904 5 6.1717 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A54680 The ancient, legal, fundamental, and necessary rights of courts of justice, in their writs of capias, arrests, and process of outlary and the illegality ... which may arrive to the people of England, by the proposals tendred to His Majesty and the High Court of Parliament for the abolishing of that old and better way and method of justice, and the establishing of a new, by peremptory summons and citations in actions of debt / by Fabian Philipps, Esq. Philipps, Fabian, 1601-1690. 1676 (1676) Wing P2002; ESTC R3717 157,858 399

There are 8 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

or not so necessary convenient or useful as was intended or expected or like unto some of the Laws of the Medes and Persians which were said to be irrevocable but the People had by the grace and favour of the Soveraign a remedy by Parliament to abrogate repeal explain or amend them by substracting of some clause or adding some other unto it for liberties are both by Civil and Common Law defined to be of things not forbidden otherwise vaga liber●● as may quickly come to be misera servitus and bring those that would use an unbounded liberty where it shall meet either with Laws or a greater force into a most miserable slavery And therefore just liberties do by our Common Laws saith Sir Edward Coke signifie the Laws of the Land And that which is the Law cannot be called Tyranny nor that which is against the Law liberty And that ancient manner of Trial for those who were criminally accused called Fire ordeal which ordained the Partie suspected to walk blindfold over certain Plow-shares of Iron heated red hot laid at a distance one from another and if the Party did not touch any of them or treading upon them received no harm he was declared to be innocent coming into this Land with the Eazons and the Law of Trial of Titles by Battle or Duel continuing here long after the Norman Conquest and to this day in force in certain doubtful cases though they had very much of blood and cruelty in them could be suffered to wear out into better Laws and yet be obeyed as Laws whilst they were such the Law of torturing or pressing such men to death in case of Felony as will not plead● or do refuse to be tryed by a Jury to be so many houres in dying and have no other drink but Kennel-water hath enough of horror in it to be found fault with if it were not the Law and the only means to preserve the Authority of Laws and Judicature and there were not toom enough for men to avoid that direful way of punishment For there was never since the blessing of Laws Magistracy and Government came into the World any legal liberty not to appear in Judgment or not to be compelled to do right one unto another by Judges and those that were in Authority commissionated by their Superiours And if ever there had been such a liberty it may be renounced or released by our own Acts as in the entring into Bonds and Contracts one with another wherein we oblige our selves to the performance of any thing which the Laws of God and Nature do demand of us the Obligees may dispense with it And if the Law of Nature could have given us such a vast liberty as some would pretend a right unto the same Law of Nature doth in civil Conversation and Society give us a power sufficient to restrain it and make that which at the first was merae voluntatis in our own wills to be postea necessitatis a necessity and out of any supposed freedom of our own wills or the power thereof Neither can any man by any rule of Law charge our Laws with oppression because positive or made in terror or binding to strict rules to avoid arbitrarines or oppression in the Judges or rigour and severity as in some particular mans case they may happen to be by an abuse of them but the fault is rather to be laid at the doors of those who do violate and break them For an unlimited or absolute liberty and the liberty of the Subject are each unto other contradictory and there are no Laws but do retrench or take away some liberty which People had or took to do ill or might be inconvenient to the publick good For God the greatest and wisest of all Legislative Powers did put the Jews who were as he saith himself as the Bracelet upon his arm and the signet upon his right hand under a Law of fourty stripes and of death if they disobeyed the Sentence of the Judge And yet we do find them in their Generations above two rhousand years after in such an opinion of their freedom as they thought nothing could be added unto it saying they were of the Seed of Abraham and under no Bondage and are yet above sixteen hundred years since bragging of those their Laws When David had slain Goliah and might justly have expected the reward of having his Fathers House to be made free in Israel as some of the promised rewards he did not when he durst not lift up his hand against the Lords Anointed believe it to have been such a freedom as might exempt him from the duty of a Subject When our King Athelstan by his Charter gave Lands to St. Wilfrid and the Church of Rippon in Yorkshire in the words Al 's frelich as I may and in all things be al 's free as Hert may think or eych may se. And King William the Conquerour granted the Earldom of Chester to his Nephew Hugh Lupus Tenendum sibi haeredibus ita libere ad gladium sicut ipse totam tenebat Angliam ad Coronam to him and his Heirs to be holden as freely by the Sword as he did himself hold England and the Crown thereof Those very large Grants did neither free the Lands so given to St. Wilfrid and the Church of Rippon and that Earldom to the Earl of Chester unsubject the Owners or give either of them as our Records and Law-Books in the course of the after Ages will testifie any liberty not to appear upon any Summons to the Courts of Justice of our Kings and Princes For legalis liber homo saith Sir Henry Spelman hath in our Laws no other signification then Qui stat rectus in Curia non exlex seu utlagatus non excommunicatus vel infamis c. sed qui in lege postulet vel postuletur who standeth right in the Kings Court is not outlawed excommunicated or infamous but may at Law sue and be sued And it cannot be denyed but that in order to Justice a Summons or citation only might be sufficient and would certainly be most consonant to the ease and liberty of the People if they were or could be so of one mind or inclination to Justice as to obey the first Summons either of the Parties complaining or the Courts of Justice commanding or not make excuses or delayes hide themselves or run away or be loath to come to it be so of one kind of affaires and business as never or seldom to be absent so alwayes provided of their Councel Witnesses and Evidences as not to need any further time to make their necessary deffences and to be of so much sufficiency of estate as to have wherewithal to make a speedy answer or satisfaction And that there were no such pravity or incertainty in the wills and actions of men as that the Creditor would be alwayes sure to demand no more
deliriums are likewise to be added those giddy Assertions that the People are unsecure in their Estates and that their good and welfare depends upon their being manumitted and enfranchised in their persons and made Noble and free by Abolishing of the Process of Arrest and Outlary And that such an Act of Grace will be accompted by all goodmen and their posterities a sufficient recompence for all the Subjects past sufferings and be the greatest mercy that ever any King of England extended to his Subjects since they were a Nation Which should it take effect may be as little successful to the pretended Advocat and his Party and the Trade and Interest of the Kingdom as the Eagles carrying in another Case the burning Cole in the Apologue to her Nest And until they could have been sure of a better which they are never like to be might have forborne their Snarling and Barking at our Laws of which that Act of Parliament of 25. E. 3. ca. 17. Was accompted to be a part which until the Distemper which seized upon a seditious part of the people in the unhappy year of 1641. were so well beloved and deservedly commended as Thirning Chief Justice of the Court of Common Pleas publickly declared in the 12th year of the Reign of King Henry the 4th that the Laws of England were in the Reign of King Edward the 3d. In the greatest perfection that ever they were the Judges Sage and learneds and the pleading the greatest Honour and Ornament of the Law were in that Kings Reigne of that excellency as those of former times were but feeble unto them Sir John Fortescue Knight Lord Chief Justice of the Court of Kings Bench in the Reign of King Henry the sixth by comparing of our Laws and Government with the Laws and Government of France and other Nations hath in his learned Book Written on that Subject proved and demonstrated that our Laws of England Do deserve the Preheminence over all other Laws and do more secure the People in their Estates Liberties and Properties then those of France or any other Nation Queen Elizabeth who made it her constant and usual Charge to her Judges to do Justice and not to disturbe or delay it Governed her people by her Laws in Plenty Peace and Prosperity to the Worlds admiration Terror of her Enemies and the Comfort and Support of her Friends and Allies did so after her death Reign and live in her peoples hearts as they in or about London have to this time from the Coronation or beginning of her happy Reign now above one hundred and sixteen years ago in a grateful acknowledgment of it never omitted to Celebrate that day with the Ringing of Bells some legacies having been given in some places also for the perpetuating thereof King James had a great care of the expedition and execution of the Laws in whose peaceable and plentiful Reign ten years have passed without any Tax or Assessment of the people And King Charles his Son made a great part of his Coyn to wear the Inscription that he fought against a Rebellious part of his Subjects to maintain the Laws priviledges of Parliament and liberties of the people and dyed a Martyr because he would not betray or deliver them up to a Lawless unlimited and ever to be dreaded Arbitrary power So as that seducing Author might have found a better imployment then to throw dirt at our Laws before he understands them and might have been able to have given a better accompt of his time if he had followed the advice of Sir Edward Coke Who was so much a welwiller to the Proces of Arrest and Utlary as whilst he was Chief Justice of the Court of Comon Pleas he did never dislike or refuse the putting his name and Teste to such kind of Writs under the Kings Seal entrusted to his custody and being afterwards made Lord Chief Justice of the Court of Kings Bench had so good an opinion of the Process of Arrest and the necessity and usefulness thereof as that to maintain and support the Writs of Latitat and Bills of Midlesex in Actions of Debt and other personal Actions then too often made by that Court which had no Jurisdiction or Conusans thereof but in Case of a Defendants present imprisonment or of priviledge of some of their Members to hold Pleas in such kind of actions he feigned a prescription to be made and used in the declarations thereupon that the Defendant was in Custodia Marr ' Marescalli Curiae and actually a Prisoner when he neither was so at the time of the making of the said Writs or the time of the Defendants giving Bond for his appearance to the Sheriff or at the time of the Plaintiffs declaring against him as he did publiquely declare in Print That every man ought next to his duty to God and his King to yield a due reverence and obedience to the Common Laws of England for that of all Laws humane they were most equal most certain of great antiquity least delay most beneficial and easie to be observed And That he could defend them against any Man that is not malicious without understanding and make it manifest to any Man of judgment and indifferency by proofs pregnant and demonstrations and by Records and testimonies luculent and irrefragable Which just and due value and estimation of our Laws may well be credited when if a Jury of the Subjects of our Neighbour Nations Kings and Princes or of the Republique of Holland that Corporation of Kings were impannelled and fitted with the knowledge and understanding of the excellency of them they could not either as to the imposing or payment of Taxes or to any other particulars refuse to give a Verdict upon Oath that our Laws and Customes do in their perfection and right reason generally far excel those by which they are governed aud that the Subjects of England and Wales are by the happiness of a well tempered Monarchy and our Laws as secure from any danger of arbitrary power as any people under Heaven And he would find it to be a difficulty insuperable to ptocure our Merchants of England or any of those who do undertake to insure the hazardous adventures of those that do go or send to Sea and see the wonders of the deep and adventure their personal Estates upon the cholerick waves thereof not seldom accompanied with humerous and raging winds to give him an assurance and certainty that the people shall not be ruined by that his goodly indigested project which in its folly and inconveniencies as to the credit reputation and Justice of the Nation exceeds that of Jack Cade that great Master of Ignorance who had perswaded his Rable-rout to believe that it would be an excellent piece of Reformation and much for the good of the people to suppress all learning and dispatch all business and affaires by the help only of the Score and the Tally And will howsoever be as
Jurisdictions being great grievances and oppressions might be taken away the Laws translated into English the Six Clarks Head Registers Masters of Chancery and the Petty-bag Affidavit Office Prothonotaries and all other grand Monopolies and Patentees might be abolished no mans life taken away for Felony unless accompanied with Murther that the eldest Sons in every Family might have a double Portion in the Fathers Estate and the rest be divided amongst the younger Children that no Fines be paid to any Cursitor or upon any Original Writ but may be quite abolished that no mans person might be imprisoned for Debt but his Estate made liable to satisfie the same it being more suitable to the Turkish or Heathenish practice then to Christian English Professors of the Gospel to rack and grind the bodies of men in prison At the heels whereof was brought to that Assembly at Westminster who named themselves a Parliament and to cherish such doings seldom failed by their Speaker to give thanks in the name of the House to all Petition and Declaration-drivers a Petition of the Well-affected in the County of Buckingham said to be a Representation of the middle sort of men within the three Chilterne Hundreds of Disborough Burnam and Stoke and part of Alesbury Hundred declaring That they had waited eight years in the pursuance of their just Rights and Freedom with which God had invested them and the whole Nation kept from them by Arbitrary power and Tyrannical factors of the Nobility Courtiers Episcopal Priests cheating Lawyers Impropriators Patentee men Lords of Mannors and all illegal Courts and other diabolilical interessed parties and desire that all Licences Commissions c. and Grants from the late King whose first predecessor was that Outlandish Bastard William the Conqueror from whence proceeded the original of all their slavery both in Tenures Laws Terms Customs c. in an Outlandish tongue the Lawyers being the chief Instruments of their misery might be abolished and protesting against all arbitrary Laws Terms Lawyers Impripriators Lords of Manors Priviledges Customs Tolls Tithes going to the Terms at Westminster payment of Heriots Quit-Rents Head-Silver Lawyers Fees and the whole Norman power being a burden too intollerable to bear did invite all men to enter upon Commons and cut and fell the Wood growing thereon and desired which they would not be willing to do if they had been Lords of Manors and other the parties struck at to go by the golden rule of Equity viz. to do as they would be done by not to tyrannize over any or to be tyrannized over Another Pamphleteer feared he should be taken to be ill affected to the babe of Sedition if he also should not be doing somewhat in a Modest Plea as he terms it dedicated to the High Court of Parliament which he would have to be the Supreme Authority of the Nations prayed that there might be an equal Commonwealth against Monarchy wherein there is a Lift against the Vniversities Colledge Lands Tenures Hereditary Nobility Church Revenues Churches and Bells Mercenary Lawyers and Tithes with an Apology for Younger Brothers and desires a restitution of the Tenures in Gavelkind In the same year the Lord General Fairfax Lieutenant General Cromwell the Lord Mayor of London Colonel Harrison Mr. Francis Allin Colonel Martin and others were impowred to place and displace any Judges of the Courts at Westminster and all Officers thereunto belonging and all Sheriffs and Justices of Peace Mr. John Hare being unwilling to stay behind such Company in a Pamphlet sent out upon that design desired that the Norman yoke might be taken off and saith that the Norman Innovations are destructive to the honour freedom and other unquestionable Rights of the Nation In the same year the Officers and Souldiers in the Regiments of Colonel Scroope Sanders and Walton and the Souldiers in the Garrisons of Arundel Rye and Chichester did petition the Lord General Fairfax that the abuses in the Courts of Justice be reformed that there be a Registring of Deeds and Contracts Tithes abolished Six Clarks in Chancery taken away and their Clarks sworn Attornies Mr. Sadler a Lawyer and a man in such favour with the Usurper as he was by them made one of the Judges for the proving of Wills and Testaments in his Book entituled The Rights of the Kingdom and Custom of our Ancestors saith that the Writs of Capias as now used were very mischievous did not lye at the Common Law in Actions of Debt cites Sir Edward Cokes opinion in Sir William Herberts Case and declared that in Debt the Mirrour of Justice did pronounce the Outlawry to be a great abuse In the year 1650. S. D. then an Attorney but since his Majesties happy Restauration and the altering of the Scene Knighted and put into several places of Honour and Trust having convened and gathered together some Tides-men and small understanding Clarks and Attorneys that were well inclined to set their Watches by Cromwells new Court-Dial did in order to the Regulation of the Law propound a Law to be made against Fines to be paid upon Original Writs for that the best reason that they could give against it it was against the reason of the Fundamental Laws of England which never imposeth any Fines but against offenders and the like against Vtlaries which were unnecessary and did tend only to Charges and delay and that a second Summons being served upon a Defendant and left at his house and by the Sheriff or his Officer retorned upon Record the first Summons being made seven days before the day of Apparance in which time the Plaintiff may enter his Declaration in Court and if no Apparance entred within eight days after then a new Summons in the nature of a Scire facias to be awarded upon the Imparlance roll to summon him to appear at a certain day to come when not appearing and pleading within eight days after Judgment shall be given by default Mr. John Jones of Nayoth in the County of Brecon in a Book printed and published in the same year entituled Judges Judged out of their own mouths or the Question resolved by Magna Charta who have been Englands Enemies King-seducers and the Peoples destroyers from King Henry the 3d. to King Henry the 8th and before and since stated by Sir Edward Coke late Lord Chief Justice of the Court of Kings-Bench wherein that mighty Cambro-Britain in his own opinion doth with as little Law as Reason charge the Judges and Professors of the Law with the destruction of honest men whom it should save and the saving of all those whom it should destroy or punish for unlawful respects and considerations tending to their own profits and ends And that by Prerogative Statutes devised by mercenary Lawyers to steal from the people their Birth-right contrary to Magna Charta and the Common Law of England they are become an intollerable mischief to the Commonwealth and do deserve exemplary punishments and cites the said Sir Edward Cokes opinion
and divid●d amongst his Creditors proportionably to their debts and be liable to the penalties of the said Act and the orders and provisions therein contained For certainly without competency of trust and confidence in Trade and dealings one man with another and a pawn or security of their Bodies subject to Arrests compulsion or disgrace all Commerce and Traffique would be destroyed no Merchant or Chapmen will or can give day for his Wares when he neither knows whether his Customers have Goods sufficient to pay for what they buy or where to find them when the Wares that he sells may either be used or sold away again to another or if they could be met with again will not be of half the value they were sold for No man without personal Security Contract or Promise will lend any money to Merchants because their Goods are either at Sea or in Forreign Countries and sent out so often and upon so many adventures and hazards as if they do they will not know how to get it again Young Tradesmen and Men of hope and industry that have none or very little Stocks of their own will have no Money lent them or if they have it must be upon such other Cautions or Security as may starve and take away the hopes of their preferment Moneys given to Charitable uses as they are many times to be lent upon security to poor Tradesmen or young Beginners that have little or nothing in Estate or their Shops cannot without Bonds or personal Security be lent or distributed according to the mind and intention of the Donors mortgage of Lands not being likely to be had for otherwise it cannot be done but to such as are rich already No Merchant or whole Sale-men will adventure to trust or sell to Retaylors upon one two three or ●ix Moneths as they shall be able to make or return it nor Retaylers to Retaylers as they do often use to do if they do not give personal Security whereby to be arrested if they do not pay the Money contracted for No Country Vintner will without it be furnished by the London Vintners or Merchants no man shall know how to do good to a Friend or Servant or set up a young man if personal Securities shall not oblige their Proces of Arrest No Tradesman shall be able to Trade as they do now and get his living and a comfortable subsistance by retailing under other Tradesmen nor any Mariner Souldier or Servant be trusted because they have nothing but their Bodies to be answerable for it Many Lawyers and Ministers who do carry much of their Estates in their brains the Arti●an in his hands and a few Tools the Souldier the most that he hath by his side Unlanded men or untrading Batchelors or single Men all or the most part upon their backs and the smaller sort of Farmers and Country Cottagers having very little Goods or Houshold-stuff may bewail their want of Credit when personal Security cannot help them and all the Trade and Commerce good will and charity of the Nation that was wont to flourish more by the Care and Credit and honesty of Men then any certainty or visibility of Estate must if necessities and occasions cannot be supplied as they were wont to be by Bonds Bills or personal Security now be turned into a way of Pawns and Bro●age and three times more given then the value of that which is bought or borrowed where ready money is wanting And all Credit and Industry fall to the ground especially if it shall be considered that not long before our late times of Troubles and Confusion the money of some Dutch and Forreign Merchants lodged here being estimated to have been as much as five Millions Sterling have been much of it by reason of our bringing down of Interest to six per Cent and other disturbances called home and that the money Current in the Kingdom is by no very random computation verily believed to be scarce enough to pay the Interest of the Capital of what is owing by the People one unto another and if the course and way of Credit should be now stopped and turned out of his Chanel we may not expect to see any more happy effects of trusts and Credit as in this Age of ours we have done in a rich Sir John Spencer Sir William Craven Sir William Cockain and Sir Paul Bayning who beginning their World with no Original Riches have gone out of it with the comfort and honour of laying the foundations of several noble Families and every day in the hopes and flourishing of many young Merchants is ready to proclaim the great benefits of trust and Credit and that which not seldom happens by the only employ and advantage of another mans money And the sad ineluctabile fatum dismal and not to be overcome disasters which do fall upon those whose former props of trust and Credit have failed them when their Friends stand afar off and look upon them as Lepers and Persons infected do by the ill government of their tongues and censures debar them more then they should of all the opportunities of fortune or means to a more happy condition It was Credit and the care of it not Lands or a visible Personal Estate which made our Prince of Merchants Sir Thomas Gresham in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth to be able to lame the King of Spain and his Indies in his design of subduing England by draining of his Banks beyond the Seas with his personal security It was personal Security Credit and the care of not having any man come twice to his house for money which made Sir Abraham Dawes one of the Farmers of the Customs in the Reign of King Charles the Martyr able to take of those who voluntarily offered it one thousand Pounds at a time upon his single Bond or Bill which to support he did alwayes as he himself acknowledged keep five thousand Pounds at a time in a Chest in his house at Interest and when he had paid out any considerable part of it borrowed and took in as much to replenish it It was an imaginary Credit an heretofore punctual performance of our late handy dandy men the Bankers of London paying one mans money with anothers that decoyed and enticed almost all the money of England into their running ebbing and flowing Cash upon their or their Servants single notes for some years under their only hands for five hundred or a thousand Pounds at a time for some years after upon the Masters single Bonds And it was Credit and personal Security not so much any real Estate in Lands or Houses that have made the Banks of Lyons and Amsterdam so to flourish in the midst of Wars and abundance of Taxes and enabled the Dutch those mighty men of Trade and money whose Lands and Territories in all their Seven United Provinces do in quantity scarce equal our Yorkshire and Lincolnshire to ingross almost all the Trade of the Heathen
ends of Justice and those that seek it as it verifies and gives us the benefit and right use of that moderation and care of our Laws in that rule and maxime of it to threaten more then execute ut metus ad omnes poena ad pauco● that the punishment of a few may operate as much as if all did partake thereof the affright being most commonly that which makes the suffering to be so disproportionate and less then what was necessarily or otherwise threatned For if four thousand Writs of Exigent be awarded and issued out of the Court of Common Pleas in the year 1674. which is very near an exact accompt taken thereof not much above one thousand of them do come to be returned filed or outlawed But the residue and those very many which are not are either stayed by Agreements or Retraxits and Complyance betwixt the Attorneys or in order to appearances upon new Originals without returning and filing the Writs of Exigent And may be taken to be no fancied Calculation when the number of all the Capias utlegatums special or general made by the Clark of the Outlaries in the year 1674. were no more then 1034. the Outlaries reversed no more then 27. And the Outlaries certified into the Exchequer no more then sixteen And all the Prisoners that were for Debt and other actions not Criminal in the Prison of the Kings Bench being the greatest in England and Wales either in the Prison or the Rules or abroad by Writs of Habeas Corpus the third day of May 1653. were under the hand of Sir John Lenthal Knight Marshal of the Court of Kings Bench with the several times of their Commitments certified upon the special order and command of the then miscalled Parliament to be no more then three hundred ninety one of which there appears to have been committed in the year 1616 but one In the year 1631-one In the year 1633 one In the year 1636 one In the year 1637-one In the year 1638-one In the year 1639-one In the year 1640 nine In the year 1641 five In the year 1642 two In the year 1643 three In the year 1644 four In the year 1645 seven In the year 1646 fourteen In the year 1647 fiveteen In the year 1648 twelve In the year 1649 fourty-six In the year 1650 thirty-two In the year 1651-fourty-one In the year 1652 one hundred thirty And in the year 1653 fourteen And it must needs then be a wonder and none of the smaller sort or size of wonders how or upon what ground cause or reason that so very ancient rational legal necessary and useful way of Capias Proces and Outlary derived and deduced from the Laws of God Nature and Nations should either deserve or come into so ill an opinion with some of the People or that it should be called or understood to be an Illegal Iron sharp and cruel Law a Tyranny thraldom mischief slavery lamentable bondage terror and sorrow of heart and utter ruin● of the free born People of this Nation founded upon a misconstruction and inadvertency of the genuine sense of the Common Law it self and contrary to thirty Acts of Parliament made in Confirmation of Magna Charta or should be repealed by the Act of Parliament made in the 28th year of the Reign of King E. 3. ca. 3. and by the Statute of 42. E. 3. 〈◊〉 3. Or should now in its old age have no better a title then a grievance and those unjust Rabsheka railing reproaches when it hath been helpful to multitudes of men in several Ages cast upon it CHAP. X. The way of Capias and Arrest is no oppression or Tyranny exercised upon the People since the making of the Statute of 25 E. 3. ca. 17. or hath been hitherto or may be destructive to their liberties WHen as Tyranny in the known and general definition and understanding of it is a cruelty or power executed by one or more at pleasure contrary to Laws Divine and Humane and inconsistent with the Laws of that Place or Country wherein it is exercised For Laws do or at the least should intend to prohibit things unjust and to order things good and useful for that People and Nation unto which they are applied The intent of a virtuous and good Lawmaker being as Aristotle saith To make the People good and conduct them to virtue Or how it can be called Tyranny when it is no less then right reason which should be the Parent and Director of all Justice when as God himself the most just and rational Law-giver the Watch-man of Israel and the Keeper of the liberties thereof that gave unto Mankind a reasonable Soul and that great blessing of reason which is the Divini luminis radius A beam or ray of his own Excellency did in the Laws which he gave to Moses when he talked with him enact and ordain That if a man shall deliver unto his Neighbour money or stuff to keep and it be stoln and the Thief be not found the Master of the house shall be brought unto the Judges to see whether he hath put his hands upon his Neighbours Goods which was nothing less then an Arrest The Law of Nature that giveth every man leave and enjoyneth them to work rather then to be idle and want allows them not to hinder publick good or disturb the Rules of Civil Society and work within the City of London or the Liberties thereof if they be not thereunto authorized as Free-men of the said City or was it an oppression by an Act of Parliament as King Edward the 3. did in the 25th year of his Reign to limit Artificers Labourers and Servants wages or as Queen Elizabeth did by an Act of Parliament yet in force and unrepealed made in the 5th year of her Reign or when King Henry the 8th did limit the price of Victuals and Houshold Provisions by an Act of Parliament made in the 25th year of his Reign or an oppression of the People by Sumptuary Laws for Apparel made in his Reign and of his Daughter Queen Mary's which otherwise in a private man according to the bent and rules of Nature giving every one a liberty In rebus licitis non prohibitis in thing lawful not sinful and consistent with the Laws of publick good and Civil Society would have been within the freedom and dispose of his own will Neither do the People of Spain and Italy in their submission to a Banda or Rate imposed upon the Sellers of Victuals and Houshold Provisions or the Natives of France Spain and the elective Kingdom of Sweden think themselves to be too much or any thing at all abridged of their natural liberty by yielding for publick good a just obedience to their Sumptuary Laws lately made and ordained For there is no Law extant of this Nation so made but the Subjects might chuse to incur the penalty or hardship of it or if they should happen to be too severe or unfit
be at the trouble hazard and charge of the experiments may do better to understand or if they cannot give leave to others to help them to understand That the purport intent and true proper and genuine signification of the words of our Magna Carta ca. 29th was to secure the People that the King might not take or imprison any Man Nisi per legale judicium parium suorum vel per legem terrae which if extended to the People in their affaires one with another and made to be as obligatory and binding unto them as it is and ought to be to the King can have no other just interpretation then what Sir Edward Coke hath given us in his Comment thereupon published after his death in the later end of March 1641. or the beginning of the year 1642. Which is saith he as the Statute of 37 E. 3. ca. 18. expoundeth it by due Proces of Law and what that kind of Process was hath been already determined and proved to be as well by Writs and Process of Arrest as by Summons Pone and Distress though the latter as the condition and course of the affairs of the Nation then stood was much more frequent and usual and it appeareth by that part of Magna Carta ca. 29. and the Exception therein that there was a Process or proceeding in Law besides the Legale Judicium or Trial by Peers or Jury and the Process where Defendants were not willing to come to Judgement and have their Controversies determined which but in very seldom Cases never was or is likely to be otherwise there was and will ever be a necessity of compelling them by Proces to appear in Judgment when they delayed or refused it For as the great and learned Grotius hath said upon another occasion The Liberties claimed from a Prince ought to be such as competere possint subditis might accord with his Superiority and their duty of Subjects for our so eager clamours of Liberty cannot certainly be so nayled to any of their extravagant opinions and desires as to induce them to think it either to be lawful rational or consistent with the Great Charter to deny the King or his subordinate Courts of Justice a power to Imprison any that shall be guilty of Contempt against His Person or Authority and to constrain them to appear in Judgment For the way which the Judges and Interpreters of our Laws have hitherto used in the Construction and understanding of Parliaments nothing appearing to the contrary hath been an Inquiry into the occasion and purport of them commonly expressed in the preambles and reason thereof and into the sense as well as the words of them for the preamble of an Act of Parliament saith Dyer sometimes Lord Chief Justice of the Court of Common Pleas is the Key to open the minds of the Makers of the Act and of the mischiefs which they did intend to remedy and a Man ought not to dwell upon the letter nor to think that when he hath the letter on his part that he hath the Law on his part say the Judges in the Resolution of the Case between Easton and Studde in regard that the rule in the expounding of Statutes is to search out the mind of the Law-makers what Construction they would have made of it if they were living And that Acts of Parliament ought to be understood by a reasonable Construction to be collected out of the words thereof according to the true intention and meaning of the Makers of the Act that Statutes in the affirmative do not regularly take away Statutes precedent in the affirmative unless in some special Cases and Statutes referring to other Statutes do not make any alteration in Law but unto the points unto which they do Refer nor doth a latter Act with Negative words say our Laws take away a former if it be not contrary in matter And the Parliaments of this Nation have alwayes taken care to use express and clear words of repealing any Statutes which they intended to Repeal by plain and certain mention thereof with the times wherein they were made sometimes repealed but a part of some former Acts by a new Act of Parliament and enlarged and proceeded further then the former Acts did extend unto as in the Act of Parliament concerning Servants and Artificers wages made in the fifth year of the Reign of Queen Elizabeth The words and meaning of the Statute 28 E. 3. ca. 3. being no more then That no man of what Estate or Condition that he be shall be put out of Land or Tenement nor taken nor imprisoned nor dis inherited nor put to death without being brought to answer by due Proces of the Law And in that of 42 E 3 ca. 1. It is assented and accorded that the great Charter and the Charter of the Forrest be holden and kept in all points and if any Statute be made to the contrary that shall be holden for none And being a confirmation in general of all the thirty-seven Points Articles or Chapters of Magna Carta granted in the Ninth year of the Reign of King Henry the Third some of which did concern the King in his profits did neither only intend that particular Chapter of Magna Carta ca. 29. to be made void or repealed or declare that what was done or to be done by lawful Judgment of Men by their Peers which could not be without some kind of Proces or proceedings then in use or that what was done or to be done by the Law of the Land should be repealed as contrary thereunto but did so not at all then intend to do it or to affirm the due Proces of the Law to be contrary unto Magna Carta either as to that twenty-nineth Chapter or to any other the Points Articles or Chapters of Magna Carta As that some of the People being at the time of the making of the said Act of Parliament of 42 E. 3. ca. 3. or not long before too busie in Arresting Imprisoning and vexing one another by false Accusations made to the King and his Councel that Chapter or Branch of 42 E. 3. ca. 3. was made for the redress thereof and for the good Government of the Commons as that Act doth import having these words To eschew the mischiefs and damage done by false Accusers which oftentimes have made their Accusations more for revenge and singular benefit then for the profit of the King or his People of which accused Persons some have been taken and sometimes caused to come before the Kings Councel by Writ and otherwise upon grievous pain against the Law It is assented and accorded That no Man be put to answer without presentment before the Justices or matter of Record or by due Proces or Writ original according to the old Law of the Land and if any thing from henceforth be done to the contrary it shall be void in the Law and holden for error Both of
of Debt if it had been a grievance or not understood as it ought to be a legal and necessary part of the Laws of the Land or have omitted so often and daily happening Concernments of themselves and their Posterity if they could have thought that way of Proces● and proceedings at Law either was or could have been a grievance when as they did then so much believe all the grievances of the Nation to be by that abundantly satisfactory Act of Parliament made upon that Petition of Right to be banished and their fears quieted as they caused publick rejoycings and Bon-fires to be made for it And if it had not been so understood by the Reverend and Learned Judges and Sages of the Law who were then in being and have been since entrusted with the Administration of Justice such Proces and proceedings would never certainly have been made when the Petition of Right prayed That in the things aforesaid all his Majesties Officers should serve him according to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm as they would tender the honour of His Majesty and prosperity of the Kingdom and the King in his answer thereunto and giving it the life and power of a Law did will that right should be done according to the Laws and Customes of the Realm and that the Statutes be put in Execution that His Subjects may have no cause to complain of any Wrong or Oppression contrary to their just Rights and Liberties For it must be a more then an ordinary Hypochondriacal Melancholy that can perswade any Man to think that if the Process of Arrest or Outlawry could by any foresight or prospect have been believed to have been either a grievance or illegal or any Seminary of ill Consequences that ever to be lamented unhappy Parliament begun in November 1640. would in that fatal Remonstrance of theirs published to the People the 15th day of December following wherein they were so willing to amass every thing that might but look like a grievance of the People and were so effascinated in their evil purposes as they crowded in amongst them many essentials and necessaries of Government have omitted such an important and often happening grievance if any could with any colour of Law or reason have believed it or that in the nineteen high and mighty Propositions sent by them unto him in June 1642. or in the Message or Committe of the Lords and Commons then remaining at Westminster sent unto him at Oxford in Anno 1643. by the Earl of Northumberland William Peirpont Esquire and others or in the Treaty and Propositions at Vxbridge for Peace betwixt the King and that misnamed Parliament in the year 1644. such a necessary if it had been thought to have been one should have been neglected or in the Message of the Lords and Commons in the then so called Parliament sent unto him when he was a Prisoner at Holimby in the year 1647. with propositions for Peace nothing should have been desired to prohibit Arrests but on the contrary an Act of Parliament was required for confirmation of all Customs Charters Liberties and Franchises of the City of London which for many hundred of years before had been approved Or that in the Bills and Propositions sent unto Him in the same year to the Isle of Wight when he was there a close Prisoner Or in an Act or Ordinance made by the Lord Major and Common Councel of London in the year 1660. for the better regulating of that Cities Courts at Guild-hall in which notice was taken of their ancient Customs and diverse abuses committed by Serjeants at Mace and their Yeomen in arresting of Men there should be no mention made of any original Grievances or Illegality by or in the Proces of Arrest nor any orders made or desired to be made against it Until therefore this invisible and untelligible repealing Act of the Statute of 25 E 3. ca. 17. shall be pleased to appear and shew it self the Founders of that fancy may do well to build no further upon it but silence their causeless out-cries against it And when such or the like imaginations shall offer themselves think rather that Acts of Parliament according to the advice and opinion of the Judges in Doctor Foster's case which have been established with so much solemnity wisdom gravity and universal consent for the good of the Weal publick ought not by any strained construction or ambiguous words if there had any been in any subsequent Act to be laid aside disused or abrogated and that doubtful aequivocal words if there had been any ought according to the rule in Gregories Case to be interpreted in the better and more likely sence And not trouble themselves as they have lately done for before the year 1640 and 1641. when Liberty ran mad and the Factious part of the People did too much read the Books of Plunder and Sequestration and admired the Models and Contrivances of Hugh Peters Huson the Cobler Pride the Drayman and every Mechanick and Tradesman and every Mercenary Red-coat Rebel-Souldier who would by his indigested conceptions be a Solon or Licurgus they did not to subvert as they endeavour'd to do our long experimented approved Laws Customs to make room for their own ungodly advantages and sordidly ignorant alterations and at the same time allow the Caption and Horning of that by them Conquered and once illegally Covenanting Scotland to be lawful Nor vex themselves and others as they have done with the Chymeras and phancies of that never to be found repealed Statute of 25 E. 3. cap. 17. and their so much mistaken Gorgons head and affrights of their Liberties being likely to be lost by that or other our Laws when our Laws and the due Execution thereof are and have been by our Kings and Princes and their just authority the only means under God to preserve them Or be so over-lavish in shooting their Bolts in undertaking to assert That England is impoverished more then a Million of Money Sterling every year by Sheriffs Bailiffs Serjeants Marshals-men Proces-makers Habeas Corpus Rules Writers c. As a late Anonimous Champion of those kind of Liberty mongers terms them for which he would decoy as many inconsiderate People as he could into an opinion and belief that the Creditor is not the better one Peny for it which is as impossible to be proved or be lieved as that Bears are enabled by Nature to fly and usually do it or that the Mountains of Mountains the Alpes those highest Hills of the Christian World do usually at every Jubile leap to Rome to obtain an Indulgence or Pardon from that Holy Father for being so high-minded And what ever far lesser Sum of Money those Officers Fees which as to the Process-makers are very small and dearly enough earned do amount unto yearly it will be very difficult for that Man of confidence whosoever he be to prove that none or very many of the Creditors did
a magis and minus and variatioe of Circumstances in such kind of Offences which may either lessen or heighten them Nor do those Rules which are given by Bracton for the reason of Arrests or Restraints of liberty in personal Actions before judgment that a Habeas Corpus which amounteth in effect to a Capias or Restraint of the person or his liberty is presently to be granted propter privilegium eruce signatorum mercatorum in respect or favour of those that were to go to the Holy War or were Merchants or propter causam sive necessitatem for some urgent cause or necessity of dispatch or in Trespas propter atrecitatem injuriae the horridness or evil of the Offence or propter personam contra quem injuriatum est ut si injuriatus sit Domino Regi vel Reginae vel eorum liberis vel Fratribus vel Sororibus vel eorum Parentibus Propinquis in respect of the Person against whom the wrong is done as the King Queen their Children Brothers Sisters or their Parents or Kindred come up to the Rules of Justice for urgency of Affairs necessities or occesions considerations or respect of Persons can of themselves be no cause of making Justice which is not to be a respecter of Persons to be Eccentrick or go a step out of her way or to do any thing in one case which should not or ought not to be done in other Cases having the like ground of reason and justice attended with the same circumstances neither can atrocitas facti vel injuriae the grandeur and oughliness of the offence be the sole cause or ground of Arrest in common or petty actions of Trespas or for words if there could properly be any atrocitas or hainousness in them or where it is done involuntarily as in Cases of Trespass or damage done by a mans Cattle for Trespass may be greater or lesser and if every Trespass could be understood to be of the greater size or magnitnde and so horrid and enormous yet there can be no reason to make the Caption or Arrest to be in part of Corporal punishment before the Judge or Magistrate be ascertained of the guilt of the Party or instructed how to keep the order which the Laws of God Nature and Nations and our Magna Carta have enjoyned that is to say to punish only secundum quantitatem delicti according to the nature of the offence And that supposed ground or reason given by Sir Edward Coke will be as deficient that the Common Law of England abhorring all force as the capital Enemy to it subjects the body to imprisonment until it hath made agreement with the Party and fined to the King bring any better reason with it For if the King shall as he conceiveth punish force by a Capias to Arrest the body before the party be permitted to defend him-or a Tryal had by Jury whether he be guilty or not that would be more against Magna Carta then any Process of Capias or Arrest in Debt can be dreamed or fancied to be and a Capias pro fine after a Tryal and finding guilty will either shew that it was not the arresting of the body in Trespass which was intended or inflicted for the punishment but the Capias pro fine and if both the Capias in Trespass before Judgement and the Capias pro fine after Judgement should be inflicted for one and the same offence They would not be secundum modum sive quantitatem delicti proportionate to the offence and the Capias to Arrest would be before the King or his Courts of Justice could be ascertained that there was an offence Nor will that other cause or ground given by him in the Report of the said Sir William Herberts Case that the King may by the Common Law arrest the body of the Debtor for that Thesaurus Regis est vinoulum bellorum nervus The Money and Treasure of the King is the Bond of Peace and Sinuwes of War obtain the conclusion which he aims at For that were to make a King or supream Magistrate which ought to be Lex viva and Justice it self to destroy that which he was sworn to protect and give him licence to break Laws who is not in ordinary Cases against the Rules of Justice and right reason to give such a liberty to himself or any others or to do an act for an advantage or necessity which the even and adequate Rules of Justice common right or right reason cannot allow So as by the favour of so great an autho●●ty in our Laws as Sir Edward Coke is and with as much reverence as is or can be due to so great a lover of the Laws of England and the veneration which he justly merits I must of necessity by what appears in the Cabinet and Treasury of time and Antiquity and what is clearly to be perceived in those pure streams which the Fountains of Justice and right reason have imparted unto Mankind assert what I have done and conclude that he was a man and hath as the best Authors may in their Books sometimes do which are not Scripture and Canonical erred in averring that there was no Process of arresting the body of a Debtor either before or after judgment until the Statute of 25 Ed. 3. which gave Process of Outlawry in Actions of Debt When in allowing Process of Arrest in debt in the Kings Case as he doth in Actions of Trespass he must acknowledge the same reason and necessity which is a just and rational coertion to appear before the Tribunals of Justice and of caution to be given to abide their judgments to be in Actions of Debt and other personal Actions And he himself in many of his Books and Writings hath as well as the Civil Law and our Common Law and the Law of Nations affirmed that the same Reason may claim the like Law For the reason that Joseph would have imprisoned his Brethren upon a suspition that they were come to espie the Land and kept Simeon a Prisoner until their words and denials were proved gives us the reason necessity and justice of arresting in personal Actions and Debt as well as Trespass until cause or caution be given of appearing in Courts of Justice and performing the judgments And that learned Judge could if he were now living very well remember that he hath often said as well as found that many of our Acts of Parliament are but declaratory of the Common Law and that which was long before used and understood to be as it was reasonable That the matter or thing excepted in an Act of Parliament is not included in any purvieu or provision of it but is out of the reach and gun-shot thereof and that when in the Statute of Magna Carta made in 9 H. 3. ca. 29. it is said That no Freeman shall be taken and imprisoned or be disseised of his Freehold or Liberties or free Customes or be outlawed or exiled