Rewards in store which they conferr'd proportionably to their Services and such Rewards were purposely reserv'd for such as had either given good Counsel or followed it by venturing their Lives and Fortunes for preservation of the Empire and some such Orders were made in our Edw. the 3ds time and confirmed by many Successive Councils as may be read in Sir Edw. Coke and Judge Dodridge 12. There are also other lesser Councils besides what I mentioned before as the Common Council of London and the like though not for number in other Cities which relate only to the Government of those Cities and Counsellors at Law and the meeting of such degrees as are qualified for that purpose are called in some of the Inns of Court Parliaments which relate only to matters of Law and Government of their Societies and Councils of War and Trade and many of these are great Assistants and often imploy'd both in the Privy and publick Council of the Kingdom 13. I have been the longer on this subject because all the Degrees hereafter mentioned are Members either of the Kings Privy Council or the Parliament or both yet their Writs of Summons are not singly Conciliario but by annexation to those Degrees which are capacitated to be Counsellors but the Degrees mentioned in the Act of whom I treat next are constantly of the Privy Council or Parliament but there are only some of the Parliament which are of the Privy Council by which means matters are more easily manag'd between the King the Privy Council and the Parliament the one constantly Sitting the other Summon'd only upon Emergencies of State which latter being thus Constituted it may well be call'd Magnum Concilium Animarum or a Council of Souls rather than Bodies so as the King may say with Cicero Conscientia conciliorum meorum me Consolatur i. e. The knowledge and Conscientious concurrence of minds or Souls for so Conscientia sometimes siguifies and integrity of my Counsellors are my Consolation 14. In the first Chapter I have shewn the List of the Privy Council who gave their Advice as t is said in the Warrant for Summoning the Parliament to begin the 8th of May 1661. and all but one of them had Summons and did sit in the Lords House or were Elected for the Commons House yet it may be observed that Prince Rupert was Summon'd as Duke of Cumberland The Duke of Laderdale being a Scotch Lord was not Summon'd till he was made Earl of Gilford some years after The Duke of Ormond was Summon'd as Earl of Brecknock in Wales the Lord Anthony Ashly Cooper was chosen a Burgess of Dorsetshire for the House of Commons but his Writ was time enough to sit in the Lords House Sir Charles Berkley Knt. was chosen a Burgess in Somersetshire and soon after made Lord Fitz Harding an Irish Title and so continued in the House of Commons to his death Sir George Cartret Knt. and Bar. was chosen Burgess for Portsmouth and continued in the Commons House to the end of that Parliament Sir Edward Nicholas Knt. was Summon'd to the Lords House but Sir William Morrice was chosen Burgess for Plymouth and continued with the Commons to his death Now I proceed with the chief of such as are for the most part of the Kings Privy Council mention'd in the Act and do with others of lesser Degreees Constitute both the Privatum and Magnum concilium or Parliament SECT III. Of the Princes of the Bloud IN this Act the King by vertue of his Kingly Office for so is the word in the Act and Prerogative Obs I. having power to give such Honors Places and Reputation to his Counsellors and other his Subjects as shall seem best to his most Excellent Wisdom especially to his Council or Parliament gives the Priority of all Places and Precedings to these following seven Degrees of the Bloud-Royal viz. 1. to the Kings Son first entituled Prince of Wales in the 11. Edw. the 3d. 2. to the Kings Children 3. to the Kings Brother 4. to the Kings Uncle 5. to the Kings Nephew 6. to the Kings Brothers Son 7. to the Kings Sisters Son all of these have Title of Earls or Dukes and any one of these where others in priority are wanting are to be accounted the first in their own seven Degrees and are Prior to the 5 following Degrees which comprehend all the Lords Temporal and these as they happen to be more or less have their distinct Writs as also their proceedings to all or any other Degrees either Spiritual or Temporal Official or Hereditary of whom I shall speak more in the following Sections and Chapters but if there be a failour of any of these or that they are absent from Parliaments in respect of Minority or otherwise then some of the Lords Spiritual have precedency to the Lords Temporal as will be shewn All that were Summon'd of this Degree to this Parliament were only the Duke of York the Kings Brother and Prince Rupert his Sisters Son Sect. Cap. 2. Fig. 1. and 2. SECT IIII. Of the Kings Vice-Gerent or Vicar-General Obs THe words of the Act are That forasmuch as the Kings Majesty is justly and lawfully Supream Head on Earth under God of the Church of England and for the good Exercise of that most Royal Dignity and Office viz. of Supream Head of the Church hath made Thomas Lord Cromwel who was not only Lord Privy Seal as in the Act is exprest but Master of the Kings Jewel-House Baron of Okham Knight of the Garter Earl of Essex and Lord Great Chamberlain 2. His Vice-Gerent for the good and due administration of Justice to be had in all Causes and Cases touching the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and for the Godly Reformation of all Errors Heresies and Abuses in the said Church so as he injoy'd Dignities and Offices of a mixt nature Ecclesiastical and Civil and thereby was placed above all the Lords Spiritual and above all the Lords Temporal of the following Degrees and not only in respect of his Temporal Dignities but as Vice-Gerent in Ecclesiasticals had power given him and to his Successors in that Office to sit above those Degrees in Parliament and to have a Voice and Liberty to assent or dissent as other Lords 3. But there hath been none imploy'd in this Office since that time as needless I conceive for the Archbishops of Canterbury and York in their Provinces and the Bishops in their Diocesses have ever since in a manner suppli'd the Duty of that Office under their own Titles and by their own Jurisdictions especially the Archbishop of Canterbury who is rankt in the next place in this Act and in all Pawns except this where some of the Bloud Royal are not exemplars SECT V. Of the Arch-Bishops and Bishops Obs I THE Title of Bishop is more ancient than the Title of Christian as I shall shew in the seventh Chapter however it became more general after Christianity spread it self The word comes from the
but of the Majores now in their Order which consist of 5 Degrees besides those of the Stem Royal of which I have spoke and first of Dukes SECT II. Of Dukes BEfore I proceed to the Writs of Summons to the Individuals of these Degrees Obs I. I shall give a brief description of the nature of them and first as for the word Duke it is the same with Dux in Latin from Duco to lead for they were antiently Leaders of Armies and thereby gain'd that Title as might be shewn from Histories and were it not for hindering my other intentions I might recite most of the Learned Seldens Authorities which he hath rendred from other Authors concerning Dukes but in short he tels us that Comes i. e. a Count or Earl was esteemed of an higher quality than Duke and that Earl was chief in Matters Civil and Duke in Matters Military but in process of time the Sword got the upper hand and prioritie of Earl and further saith that both Dukes and Earls from Substitutes to their Princes in certain dependent Territories became afterwards Soveraigns as the great Duke of Tuscany c. and the Earl of Flanders c. still owning the Titles of Dukes or Earls though they had gain'd an intire and independent Soveraignty 2. The diversity of Names attributed to Dukes both in sacred prophane and modern stories were according to the humour of the region where they sway'd for in some Nations he was call'd Princeps Magnus Illustrissimus Robustus Millenarius that is a Duke or Leader of a Thousand Men in other Countries Grave Waiward and Despot and still the words Duke and Earl promiscuously us'd to one and the same Person but whatever they were or are in foreign parts Dukes are now in England accounted the chief and most honourable Subjects and first Degree of Nobility except Princes or Dukes of the Blood-Royal and as a distinction from the rest is call'd Grace given to no other Spiritual Lord but the Arch-Bishops of Canterbury and York and to no other Temporal Lord except to the Lord High Steward pro hac vice upon tryal of Peers for the Princes and Dukes of the Blood are intituled Highness and all the other Temporal Lords Right Honourable but any of those being Admiral or General Excellence 3. The Title of Duke was very probably us'd here in England before Edward the Third's time for History tells us of Asclepiodolus Duke of Cornwal in Anno Christi 232. which was in the time of our old Britains and well might he be call'd Duke for disgarrisoning of all the Roman Holds Prideaux Introduct to Hist and for his quick Marches to London and killing the Governour thereof and for many other Heroick Actions in freeing his Country from their Servitude However there were many Dukes Created in Germany about that time But our History tells us That none was Created a Duke in England Selden Speed 's Acts. till 11 Edw. 3. An. Christi 1344. when the King in Parliament Created his eldest Son Edward being first made Earl of Chester then Duke of Cornwal and from thence that County was erected to a Dutchy or Dukedom and many more Dukes both in that King's time and almost in every Kings Reign since that time have been Created to that Title 4. The Dukes of England are of two sorts first those of the Blood Royal i. e. such as have a possibility to inherit the Crown upon a legal succession 2dly Those not of the Blood Royal i. e. such as are not related to the Succession of the Crown or at least so remote that it is not visible to meer probability and these two sorts have sat in former and in this Parliament as will be shewn 5. As they are distinguish'd in their Titles so they are also in their Coronets Robes and Habits c. with which they are invested before they enter the House of Lords which will be in the third Part of this Treatise represented in Figures 6. Here I must not pass over one observable That to this Parliament of 13 Car. 2. there were three Dukes summon'd by Writ viz. George Duke of Buckingham Charles Duke of Richmond and George Duke of Albemarle the Duke of Buckingham was then Master of the Horse the Duke of Richmond of the Blood Royal by the Scotish Line yet neither of those two appendant Titles were mention'd in their Writs but George Duke of Albemarle in his Writ is intituled Generalis exercituum suorum and is plac'd the third in that Record and the reason may be because there was no provision for that great Office in the Act of Precedency whereby to preceed all of the same degree as other degrees do being a Title not mention'd in the Act though on some occasions he preceeds by vertue of his Office the other grand Officers and so being not in the Act he is named in this Pawn the last of the three Dukes without respect to his Office of Generalship Nor do I find in any Clause Roll or Pawn the Title of General annext in any Parliament Writ to any one of the Degrees except this though History does plentifully furnish us with several persons of those several Degrees who were Generals when Parliaments were summon'd and yet as I said there is no provision in this Act for the Place or Precedency of this great Officer as there is for the Marshal Admiral c. although his great merits might well have deserv'd an additional Clause to that Act for his precedency 7. Three Dukes were summon'd 18 Feb. 1661. as in the Pawn vide cap. 2. The next Degree to Dukes are Marquesses SECT III. Of Marquesses THe third Degree of the Hereditary and fixt Nobility is intituled Marquio Obs I. and Marquess in English which began in Germany Anno Christi 925. when Henry Emperour of Germany and the first of that Name in that Empire Created Sigefred then Earl of Kinglesheim Marquess of Brandenburgh who after in the Year 1525. having the addition of Duke of Prussia did exchange the Title of Marquess to be call'd Duke of Brandenburgh However he was the first Marquess of that Empire and probably the Emperour did fix this Title between the Dukes and Earls that there might be no more disputes concerning them for the two Titles of Duke and Earl were promiscuously us'd till this Title of Marquess was interpos'd and the same reason might also occasion Philip the Fair King of France 425 years after viz. Anno Christi 1350. to insert into John Duke of Britain's Patent Vt ne posset saith the Patent in dubium revocari Ducem ipsum qui Comes fuit aliquando c. ut Ducem in posterum deberet vocari c. and the reason is therein given Selden Quod Comitatus ejus potius debet duci esse Ducatus quam Comitatus quoniam sub se habet decem ultra Comitatus and 56 years after viz. Anno Christi 1386. This might occasion also our Richard
dilecto fratri Jacobo Duci Eborum Albaniae magno Admirallo suo Angliae Salt'm Quia de Advisamento assensu Consilii nostri pro quibasdam arduis urgentibus negotiis nos statum defensionem Regni nostri Angliae Ecclesiae nostrae concernentibus Quoddam Parliamentum nostrum apud Civitatem nostram Westm ' octavo die Maii prox ' futur ' teneri ordinavimus ibidem nobiscum ac cum magnatibus proceribus dicti Regni nostri colloquium habere tractatum Vobis Mandamus in fide ligeantia quibus nobis tenemini firmiter injungentes quod consideratis dictorum negotiorum arduitate periculis imminentibus cessante excusatione quacunque Dictis die loco personaliter intersitis nobiscum ac cum magnatibus proceribus predictis super predictis negotiis tractatur ' vestrumque consilium impensur ' Et hoc Sicut nos honorem nostrum ac Salvationem defensionem Regni Ecclesiae predictae expeditionemque dictorum negotiorum diligitis nullatenus omittatis Teste me ipso apud Westm ' decimo octavo die Februarii Anno Regni nostri Decimo tertio SECT II. Observations IN An. 12. Hen. 8. the words fidei Defensor were then added before Salutem instead of Super diversis causis The latter Writs are Quia de advisamento assensu concilii nostri pro quibusdam causis yet I find the word Quia us'd in the great Councils or Parliament Writs before Edw. 2ds time and probably the words assensu Concilii nostri is added to shew the distinction of his Privy-Council and his Publick Council or Parliament 2. Instead of Specialiter tangentibus the latter Writs are concernentibus quoddam 3. Instead of habere proponimus the latter Writ is teneri ordinavimus and habere is put in between Colloquium and Tractatum 4. Ligeantia is put in the latter Writs instead of Dilectione this word Dilectione being for many Ages particularly apply'd to the Episcopal Writs 5. The latter Writs do contain all that are in the more Ancient except the Insertions of some Causes of Summons and some inlargements added upon Emergent occasions viz. quod consideratis dictorum negotiorum arduitate periculis imminentibus cessante Excusatione quacunque 6. And also those words are added near the end of the latter Writ viz. Sicut nos honorem nostrum ac Salvationem Defensionem Regni Ecclesiae predicte expeditionemque dictorum negotiorum diligitis which additions are only more full Expressions to oblige the Attendances of the Grandees Thus having shewn the Exemplar Writs to the Bloud Royal Ancient and Modern I shall set down such Earls Dukes or Princes of the Bloud Royal to whom this Exemplar Writ was directed even to this time according as they are either in the Clause Rolls in the Tower or in the Pawns in the Pettibag-Office which I shall recite in English though the Writs are in Latin SECT III. THe Exemplar Writ was then to Edward Earl of Chester Exemplar 15 Edw. 2. Eldest Son to King Edw. 2d and by vertue of this Writ this Prince had his Exemplar Writ but for this one Parliament and was soon after King Edw. 3d. 2. 3 Edw. 3. To Edward Prince of Wales and Earl of Chester Eldest Son to Edw. 3d. and this Prince had Exemplar Writs for 9 Parliaments viz. 3 Edw. 3. 4. Edw. 3. and 4. Edw. 3. 5. Edw. 3. 25. Edw. 3. 27. Edw. 3. 28. Edw. 3. 29. Edw. 3. 42. Edw. 3. 3. To Thomas Earl of Norfolk 4 Edw. 3. soon after created Duke Marshal of England great Uncle to Edw. 3. who had his Exemplar Writ but for this one Parliament 4. To Henry Earl of Lancaster 14 Edw. 3. soon after created Duke Son to John the 4. Son of Edw. 3. who had Exemplar Writs in this Kings and Richard 2. and H. 4ths time for 7 Parliaments viz. 14. Edw. 3. 17. Edw. 3. 18. Edw. 3. 22. Edw. 3. 25. Edw. 3. 23. Rich. 2. 1 Hen. 4. as Duke of Lancaster 5. To John Duke of Lancaster 37 Edw. 3. who then was King of Castile and Duke of Acquitane the 4th Son to Edw. the 3. as aforesaid and Uncle to Rich. the 2. who had Exemplar Writs for 17. Parliaments in this and Rich. the 2ds time viz. 37 Edw. 3. 38. Edw. 3. 1 R. 2. 3 R. 2. 4 R. 2. 7 R. 2. 7 R. 2. 8 R. 2. and 8 R. 2. 9 R. 2. 13 R. 2. 14 R. 2. 15 R. 2. 17 R. 2. 20 R. 2. and 20 R. 2. 21 R. 2. Exemplar 6. 50 Edw. 3. To Richard Prince of Wales Duke of Cornwall and Earl of Chester Grand-child to Edw. the 3d. and Son to Edw. the former Prince of Wales and afterwards King Richard the 2d who had an Exemplar Writ but for this Parliament and at the opening thereof he did sit in the Kings Chair 7. 10 Ric. 2. To Edmund Earl of Cambridge Duke of Clarence and first Duke of York the 5. Son of Edw. the 3d. who had Exemplar Writs for 3 Parliaments viz. the 10.11.12 of Rich. 2. as Duke of York 8. 11 Ric. 2. To Thomas Duke of Glocester Uncle to the King who had one Exemplar for one Parliament 9. 1 Hen. 4. To Henry Prince of Wales and Duke of Cornwall who had his Exemplar Writs for 9. Parliaments in his Fathers life time and was after King Hen. the 5th viz. 1 H. 4. 2 H. 4. 3 H. 4. 6 H. 4. 7 H. 4. and 7 H. 4. 9 H. 4. 11 H. 4. and 13 H. 4. 10. To Thomas the 2d Son of Hen. the 4th Duke of Clarence and Earl of Albemarl had Exemplar Writs for 7 Parliaments in this and Hen. 6ths Reign viz. Exemplar 1 Hen. 5. 1 H. 5.3.4.5 of Hen. the 5th and in the 1st and 6. and 3 H. 6. 11. To John Duke of Bedford 3. 8 Hen. 5. Son to Hen. 4th who had Exemplar Writs for 5 Parliaments in this and Hen. 6th Reign viz. 8 H. 5.4 and 4.11.14 H. 6. 12. To Humphrey Duke of Glocester 2 Hen. 6. the 4th Son of Hen. 4. he had Exemplar Writs for 10 Successive Parliaments viz. 4.6.9.10.15.18.20.21.25 and 25 H. 6. 13. To Rich. Duke of York 27 Hen. 6. Grand-child to Hen. 4. and Eldest Son to Edw. the 4. when Duke of York who had Exemplar Writs for 4 Parliaments viz. 27.29.31.33 H. 6. 14. To George Duke of Clarence 3d. 7 Edw. 4. Brother to Edward the 4th who had Exemplar Writs for 3 Parliaments viz. 7.9.12 Edw. 4. 15. To Edward Prince of Wales 22 Edw. 4. Eldest Son to Edward the 4th who had Exemplar Writs for Two Parliaments and after was King Edward the 5th viz. 22. and 23. Edw. 4. Note That from this time to the 21. of Hen. the 8th we are disappointed of the knowledge of any Exemplars and from thence to the 21. of King James there are no Exemplar Writs to
and Recesses so he gives the second Fiat to its Dissolution he hath also an appartment near the Lords House as will be shewn for himself to retire to and for his Serjeant at Arms and others of his Attendants Thus having considered the Lord Bishops and Lord Chancellors Writs I must observe how exquisitely and harmoniously these two Degrees are interpos'd both in their sitting in the Lords House and in the method of their Writs in Pawns and in the Act of Precedency being placed in all of them between the first and second Rank of the Lords Temporal as it were to shew that the Lords Temporal are always to embrace and maintain Religion and Equity as the two chief Supporters of a Parliament I have spoken of the first Supporters to Religion and Equity viz. Princes of the Bloud and now I shall speak of the other Supporters viz. the Nobles not of the Bloud distinctly five Titles viz. Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons but more especially of their Writs which Summon them to sit in Parliament which will guide me into several observations CHAP. IX Of the Fourth Exemplar Writ to the Nobles not of the Bloud-Royal To the Lord-Treasurer c. IN the Eighth Chapter I shewed the Exemplar Writs to Princes Dukes and Earls of the Bloud-Royal I am now according to the method of this Pawn to shew the Exemplar Writs to Dukes Marquesses Earls and Barons not of the Bloud I shall begin with that in Anno 1661. being agreeable to that Exemplar before recited to the Dukes of the Bloud from the word Salutem to the end of the Writ but the Preambles to that word do afford variety almost in all Writs and therefore before I make the Observation upon it I shall give a view of the Writ at large being only abbreviated in the Pawn CArolus Secundus Dei Gratia Angliae Scotiae Franciae Hiberniae Rex fidei defensor c. Praecharissimo Consanguineo suo Thomae Comiti Southampton Thesaurario Angliae Salutem Quia de Advisamento assensu Concilii nostri pro quibusdam arduis urgentibus negotiis nos statum defensionem regni nostri Angliae Ecclesiae ' Anglicanae concernen ' Quoddam Parliamentum nostrum apud Civitatem nostram Westm ' 8. die Maii prox futur ' teneri ordinavimus ac ibidem vobiscum ac cum Magnatibus Proceribus dicti Regni nostri Colloquium habere tractatum vobis sub fide ligeantia quibus nobis tenemini firmiter injungendo mandamus Quod consideratis dictorum negotiorum arduitate periculis imminentibus cessante excusatione quacunque dictis die loco personaliter intersitis nobiscum ac cum Magnatibus Proceribus praedictis supra dictis negotiis tractatur ' vestrumque Concilium impensur ' Et hoc sicut Nos honorem nostrum ac Salvationem defensionem Regni Ecclesiae praedictae expeditionem dictorum negotiorum diligitis nullatenus omittatis Teste Rege apud Westm ' 18. die Febr. Anno Regni nostri 13. SECT II. Observations 1. ALl Parliamentary Exemplar Writs of this nature which are extant from the 15. of Edward the Second to the 21. of Henry the Eighth if they were not directed to some one of the Heirs of the Crown or to Princes Dukes or Earls of the Bloud were still directed to an Earl not of the Bloud except Three to Three Dukes in Henry the Sixths and Edward the Fourths time it being evident from what hath been said That Earls called in Latin Comites was a more ancient Title in this Kingdom than Dukes Richard the Eldest Son to Edw. the Third being the first that was so created but Earls long before and though Edward the Third did create many Dukes more than his Son which were of the Bloud yet still to keep the old Title of Earl and in veneration thereof as may be supposed he in the Fourty Seventh of his Reign did think sit as the King usually appoints the Sword to such a Person as he directs to carry it before him to grant the Exemplar Writ to an Earl not of the Bloud for the Parliament to be holden that year and so did his Successor as may be seen in this following Table viz. 47. Edw. 3. Richardo Comiti Arundel who sat one Parliament 18. Rich. 2. Henrico Comiti Darby who sat one Parliament 3. Hen. 5. Radulpho Nevile Comiti Westmerland and the like Writ in the same year so he sat two Prrliaments 7. Hen. 5. Henrico Percey Comiti Northumbr and the like in the same year and in the Eighth and Ninth of this King and Twelfth of Hen. 6. so he sat five Parliaments note that the Christian names and Sirnames of Nevile and Percey are in this Writ which is not usual to Earls only the Christian names The three Exemplars to Dukes not of the Bloud are in time subsequent to Earls for the first Exemplar to a Duke was not till 28 H. 6. Gulielmo Duci Suffolciae who sat one Parliament 38 H. 6. Henrico Duci Oxoniae who sat one Parliament 1 Edw. 4. The third Johanni Norfolciae and the like in the same year so he sat two Parliaments And then after these Three Dukes again to an Earl viz. 3 Edw. 4. Richardo Comiti Warwick who sat one Parliament so from the 47. of Edw. 3. to Rich. the 3. there was Eight not of the Bloud viz. Five Earls and Three Dukes who had Exemplars From Richard the Third to the 21. of Hen. 8. there is as I have shewn a want of Records in the Tower so as the first Exemplar that appears to us in the Pettibag of such as had Exemplar Writs being not of the Bloud do begin at the 36. of H. 8. viz. 36 Hen. 8. Thomae Wriothsley Militi Domino Wriothsley Cancellario he sat one Parliament and was the year before made Baron of Titchfield and in the first of Edw. 6. Earl of Southampton 1 Edw. 6. Gulielmo Pawlet Militi Domino Senescallo magni hospitii nostri ac Praesidenti Concilii nec non Custodi magni Sigilli He was then Lord St. John of Bazing and afterwards created Marquess of Wincester 6 Edw. 6. Gulielmo Marchioni Winchester Thesaurario Angliae Thomas Goodrick Bishop of Ely being Chancellor and had his distinct Writ this Marquess had his several Writs viz. in the 6 of Edw. 6. and 7 of Edw. 6. and 1 Mariae and 1 M. 1. and 2 Phil. and M. and 2 and 3 P. and M. and 4 and 5 P. and M. in which time the Bishops of Ely Winchester and Archbishop of York were Lord Chancellors and had distinct Writs it being not proper for them being Lords Spiritual to be Exemplars to the Lords Temporal besides he was Exemplar in the 28. 30. 35. 39. and 43. of Eliz. and Primo Jacobi in which time Sir Thomas Bromley and Sir Christopher Hatton were Lord Chancellors and Sir John Puckering and Sir Thomas Egerton LordKeepers and each of them had distinct Writs so as it
is remarkable that this William Lord Pawlet Marquess of Winchester was Exemplar in all the Parliament Pawns which are extant in the Pettibag from the first of Edw. the Sixth to the first of King James inclusive which is 55. years and was in that time Lord Treasurer 22. years which was longer than any of his Predecessors continued in that Office except Cicil who continued 27. years 1 Car. 1. Georgio Duci Buckingham for one Parliament Sir Thomas Coventry being then Lord Keeper and had a distinct Writ and Sir Richard Weston Treasurer who was then in Scotland 15 Car. 1. Johanni Marchioni Winchester for one Parliament Sir John Finch being then Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and had a distinct Writ also Will. Bishop of London was Lord Treasurer and had his Writ 13 Car. 2. Thomae Comiti Southampton for this Parliament Sir Edward Hyde being then Lord Chancellor and had his distinct Writ this Earl was Grandchild to that Wriotheslly mentioned in the 36. of Hen. 8. and died without Issue Anno. 166 So from the 36. of H. 8. to this Parliament of the 13. of Car. 2. there were three Exemplars to Three Barons Two of them being Chancellors and one Lord Keeper and to Two Marquesses to one Duke and to one Earl and all these not of the Blood Now as to the three Barons having Exemplars which Degree had not any before the 36. H. 8. it may be presumed that the Exemplars were given them in relation to their Offices as Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper or President of the Kings Council And as to the two Marquesses having Exemplars who had not any till the 6. of Edw. 6. one was as he was Treasurer and the other in the 15. of Car. 1. only as Marquess because there was no Duke Summon'd to that Parliament and Sir John Finch was then Lord Keeper and William Bishop of London Lord Treasurer and both had distinct Writs so there was none of the three great Officers of State remaining to be Exemplars except Henry Earl of Manchester then Lord Privy-Seal who according to the fore-mentioned Act of Precedency is placed in the Lords House before all Dukes Marquesses c. not of the Blood but I suppose because there was no President wherein the Lord Privy-Seal had been Exemplar since its first Institution in the 11. of Hen. 4. and being not called Lord Privy-Seal nor that place in the Lords House allotted to him till the 31. H. 8. possibly for those reasons it was not given to the Lord Privy-Seal but to the Marquess singly or else it was an omission in not minding the Act of Precedency These latter Writs from the 36. of Hen. 8. did seem to break the method of the former for before that Pawn of that year no Dukes or Marquesses were made Consimilars where an Earl was made Exemplar but in the Exemplar of the 36. H. 8. Wriothesly Earl of Southampton was made Exemplar and the Duke of Norfolk then Lord Treasurer of England and Charles Duke of Suffolk the Great Master of the Kings Houshold and President of the Council were besides the Marquess of Dorchester and Thirteen Earls and Twenty eight Barons made his Consimilars so as the precedency of his Exemplarity must be ascribed to his Chancellorship which according to the Act of Precedency was to be before all Dukes c. not of the Blood and upon the same reason Pawlet Lord St. John in the first Edw. 6. being then Lord Keeper had the Exemplar Writ and the Duke of Somerset though the Kings Uncle Governor of the Kings Person and Protector of England as also the Marquess of Dorchester and Marquess of Northampton and Thirteen Earls and Thirty Barons were his Consimilars which is the only President which I know of where the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper had the Exemplar to a Duke of the Bloud and upon the like reason as I conceive in the 6 of Ed. the 6. William Marquess of Winchester being Lord Treasurer the next in Precedency to the Lord Chancellor by the Act of 31. H. 8. had the Exemplar to two Dukes one Marquess Fourteen Earls One Viscount and Thirty one Barons all which were his Consimilars and it is probable the reason why this Exemplar was given to the Treasurer and not to the Chancellor was because Thomas Goodrick Bishop of Ely was then Lord Chancellor and so it was not proper for that Bishop to be Exemplar for the reasons before alledged Now in the first Car. primi Thomas Coventry being Lord Keeper and having a distinct Writ the Duke of Buckingham had the Exemplar who had one Marquess Thirty seven Earls Eleven Viscounts and Fourty seven Barons to his Consimilars Also in the 15. Car. 1. John Marquess of Winchester Son to the former Marquess of Winchester was made Exemplar Sir John Finch being Lord Keeper who had a distinct Writ and William Bishop of London being in Scotland but he had no Duke or other Marquess but Fifty eight Earls Five Viscounts and Forty four Barons his Consimilars and so reduced the proper Consimilars to its former method But the 14. Car. 2. Thomas Wriothesly Earl of Southampton Lord Treasurer Grandchild to the former Earl of Southampton altered it again there being now also a distinct Writ to Sir Edward Hyde Lord Chancellor for this Earl had three Dukes one being General Four Marquesses Fifty five Earls Eight Viscounts and Sixty eight Barons his Consimilars I conceive as Lord Treasurer for according to ancient Practice as I have shewn an Earl had not any Dukes entred as his Consimilars The number of all the Exemplar Writs extant from the 15. of Edw. the 2d in An. 1322. to the 13. of Car. 2di An. 1661. are but Twenty and but Fourteen Kings from whom they were granted The number of the Parliaments in which the Nobles did Sit to whom such Exemplars were issued were 107. and these 107. Parliaments were in the space of 341. Years As concerning the years when these Exemplars were first issued to the respective degrees of Nobles before mentioned they are in this order of time 15 Edw. 2. This first Exemplar Writ as I have shewn was to an Earl and 〈◊〉 was of the Bloud viz. to Edward 〈◊〉 of Chester Eldest Son to Edw. 2. and â—â—â—ter King Edw. the 3d. for there was then no Duke in England 3 Edw. 3. The first Exemplar Writ to a Prince of the Bloud was to the same Earl being then made Prince of Wales 37 Edw. 3. The first Exemplar Writ to a Duke of the Blood was not till this year though the first Duke in England distinct from that of Earl as Mr. Selden saith was the Eleventh of Edw. 3d. and then Edward the Kings Eldest Son was in Parliament created Duke of Cornwall yet Speed in his Chronicle of Edw. 3d. makes this Creation in the 3d of Edw. 3d. when saith he he was created Prince of Wales Duke of Aquitain and Cornwall which agrees with the Records of the Tower and
when Created Of two sorts of Dukes how distinguisht A Duke as Generall is not provided for in the Act of Precedency as other degrees of officiall honors are SECT III. Of Marquesses When begun in the Empire and in France When in England the reason of placing him between Duke and Earl From whence the Title is suppos'd to come Noble Actions caus'd Noble Titles and by some Hereditary SECT IV. Of Earls Of the word Comes or Count signifying Earl 6. sorts of Counts according to Selden 22. sorts according to Cassiadore 3. sorts in England Of the incongruity of the words Comes and Earl and from whence the word Earl is derived when first given in England Titutarly and upon what occasion when by Creation Of the Tachygraphy of the word Earl Of the Antient Titular and Created Earls little difference Of Local and Personal Earls here in England SECT V. Of Viscounts Sometimes considered as Equal sometimes of a lesier degree then an Earl Two sorts in England why the Hereditary Viscount interpos'd to Earl and Baron Of the first Created Viscount in England of the Parliamentary dignity of the one and Official Dignity of the other SECT VI. Of a Baron Of the word Baron the Baronial Tenures were the foundation of the Superior Tenures and Degrees Of Contributions to the King from Barons Spiritual Barons how Exempted from Contributions Of several other sorts of Barons The advantages of Created Barons CHAP. VI. Of the Writ to Princes of the Blood Royal. Of the Writ to Edward Earl of Chester Eldest Son to King Edward the 2d Anno 15. Ed. 2. And the Writ to James Duke of York 13. Car. 2. Compar'd Observations on both Writs A Recital or Numeration of the Exemplars of Earls Princes and Dukes of the Blood from Edward the 2d to this Parliament 1661. Observations on the Title of York the Consimilar to the Duke of York Observations on the Consimilars CHAP. VII Of the Writ to the Arch-Bishop and Bishops with Observations Reasons for incerting this Exemplar in this Place shewing that the Idolatrous Jews brought in Paganism into Britain manag'd by Druids and Bards after by Arch-Flamins and Flamins which were Pagan Priests Afterwards Christ Himself or his Apostles or Disciples or some of them brought in Christianity into Britain Bishops had Eleven several Titles according to several Regions given to the first managers of Christian Religion All included in the Word Bishop as Inspector or Father Of the Antiquity of the word Bishop Aristobulus the first Bishop of Britain who were his Successors Of King Lucius his message to Pope Eleutherius and the Popes answer about the first ordering of Christian affairs in Britain Of Linus the first Bishop of Rome and his Successors till the time of Lucius and Eleutherius all subsequent to Aristobulus The Amity between the Bishop of Britain and the Bishop of Rome in that time without any discord about Supremacy Afterwards the Bishop of Rome assum'd the Title of Pope and also a Supremacy to Britain and planted their Dependents there some small Endeavours to oppose it but Fruitless Of several Laws made to lessen the Power and Revenue of the Pope in Britain from the 9th of Hen. the 3. to the 5th of Hen. the 5th Of other wayes us'd by Hen. the 8th from the 9th of his Raign till his death in support of his Supremacy What Countermines were us'd by the Pope Historical passages from Hen. the 8ths Death to the dissolution of this Parliament Anno 1678. against and for the Papal Interest Of the the Titles of Defensor Fidei Supremum Caput how Vs'd disus'd and alter'd from the 12. of Hen. the 8th to the 13. Car. 2d Of Writs to Bishops before and in Edward the 2ds time having both the same and a greater Extention of Power than what is given in the Writs to the Lords Temporal and so to the 31. and 36. of Hen. the 8th and the 13. of Car. the 2d how they continued and alter'd some Observations on the old Writs Of the first Writ in the first Pawn of the 21. Pawns now remaining in the Pettibag Observations on that Pawn Of the 2d Pawn there Of the 3d. Pawn there Of the Pawn of this Parliament begun the 8th of May 1661. wherein Bishops were Omitted though entred in all former Pawns and the reasons of that Omission Of their Writ of Restitution in the same year Aug. 1661. and where Recorded Of their Consimilar Writs Fifteen Observations on their Writs and Temporal Employments CHAP. VIII Of the Writ to the Lord Chancellor Of the Original of the Office of Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper and of the Discription of them Antiently distinct but now Vnited Of their different Seals Of their eminent Imployments Seates and Stations in the Lords Houss Of his single Writ of Summons as Assistant and of his other Writ if otherwise dignified The Office antiently dispos'd of to Ecclessiasticks and of later years wholly to Laicks Of some difference between the Warrant and Writ to Sr. Edw. Hide The form of the Writ Observations on this Writ and the nature of the Office CHAP. IX Of the Writ to the Earl of Southampton Lord Treasurer of England and to the Nobles not of the Blood Of the form of the Writ to the Lords Temporal Observations upon it that the Degrees of Nobles viz. Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons and Titles of the Officers of State are still intermixt in the Writs with some of those fiue Degrees Which of these Degrees are usually made Exemplars Of the Antiquity of the method us'd herein Of their Consimilars Observations concerning the various applications of the Titles Chevaleer Dominus Miles Eques Auratus Bannerettus CHAP. X. Of Patents of Creation enabling the Lords Patentees to sit in Parliament The difference between Writs and Patents and advantages of Patents what the word signifies Patents of 3. sorts viz. of Confirming Reviving and Creating that is given where none was before The form of those 3. sort of Patents Their ellegant preambles The Patents consisting of 4. parts Of the distinct form of the Patents to Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons impowring them to sit in Parliaments Of the Confies of Antient Patents Of Creation money Of the difference in the former and late value of moneys CHAP. XI Of Lords and Peers Of the words Dominus Pares or Lords and Peers what the words signifie When Peers us'd in France and of their number there when in England and of their number there Of the words Praelates Magnates Proceres how to be appy'd Who properly called Peers how placed in the Lords House the words Generally applyed and promiscuously us'd the number increase or decrease according to the pleasure of the King a Corrollary on the Subject CHAP. XII Of Proxies in the Lords House Of the word Procurator Proxie Proctor considered as distinct appellation Proxie only proper in the Lords House Licenced by the King and to whom and sometimes denied A
of God King of England Scotland France and Ireland Defender of the Faith c. To Our right Trusty and well beloved Counsellor Sir Edward Hide Knight Chancellour of England Greeting Whereas We by our Council for certain great and urgent Causes concerning Vs the good Estate and Common-wealth of this our Realm and of the Church of England and for the good Order and Continuance of the same have appointed and ordain'd a Parliament to be holden at our City of Westminster the eighth day of May next ensuing In which Case divers and sundry Writs are to be directed forth under our Great Seal of England as well for the Nobility of this our Realm as also for the Election of Knights Citizens and Burgesses of the several Counties Cities and Burrough Towns of the same to be present at the said Parliament at the Day and Place aforesaid Wherefore We Will and Command you forthwith upon receipt hereof and by Warrant of the same to cause such and so many Writs to be made and sealed under our great Seal for accomplishment of the same as in like Cases have been heretofore used and accustomed And this Bill signed with our Hand shall be as well to you as to every Clerk or Clerks as shall make or pass the same a sufficient Warrant in that behalf Given at Our Palace at White-hall this Eighteenth Day of February in the Twelfth Year of Our Reign and in the Year of our Lord One Thousand Six Hundred Sixty and One. Observations and Proceedings on this Warrant THe King of England by his undoubted Prerogative hath and his Predecessors ever had in himself the Power of Summoning as also to appoint the times of beginning continuing discontinuing or dissolving of Parliaments This Summoning for I shall speak of the rest in order or Uniting the chiefest Parts of his Kingdom into a Parliament or Representation of the Kingdom in a less Body than it self is performed by the King's Warrant in his Name and by his Authority only as Supreme not only of his Kingdom but of its Representation and from this Warrant all Writs of Summons for a Parliament are deriv'd The Warrant is in English Sign'd by the King 's own Hand and Seal'd with his Privy Seal or Signet but the Writs are always in Latin or anciently some few in French and are Seal'd with the King 's Great Seal in his Name with a Teste of his Approbation though not manually Sign'd or Seal'd by him The Warrant is General viz. for summoning the Nobility as also for Elections of Knights Citizens and Burgesses but the Writs deriv'd from those Warrants are to particular persons of particular degrees as will be shewn The Form of this Warrant is ancient and hath had little or no variation except in the leaving out of Abbots and Priors ever since the 36 of Henry the 8th and except in leaving out Prelates and Bishops in this very Warrant whereby the Bishops had no particular Writs before the sitting of this Parliament but within three Months after for which Omission Reasons will be given in the 7th Chapter Before this Warrant was issued the King and so former Kings did advise with their Privy Council which is manifested by the Words of the Warrant viz. Whereas We by our Council yet if these words had been omitted at any time and not inserted in the Warrant the Warrant was held good and sufficient for due Summons However for publick satisfaction the words of every Writ are always Quia de advizamento assensu Concilij nostri and this Council is call'd the King's Privy or Private Council of which I shall speak more and is the King 's constant or standing Council as well in time of Parliament as when there is none sitting so as before this Magnum Concilium or Parliament is summon'd this Privy Council consults and deliberates concerning the Motives and Reasons for calling it and after such deliberations and results doth advise the King to send out a Warrant And therefore I conceive it useful to set down the Names of such as were of the King 's Privy Council when the calling of this Parliament was advis'd and resolv'd upon At the Court of White-hall Feb. 1660 1. The KING Present His Royal Highness the Duke of York His Highness Prince Rupert William Lord Arch-Bishop of Canterbury Juxon Edward Earl of Clarendon Lord Chancellor of England Hide Thomas Earl of Southampton Lord Treasurer of England Wriothesley John Lord Roberts Lord Privy-Seal Baron of Truro John Duke of Latherdale Maitland Earl of Guilford James Duke of Ormond Lord Steward of the King's House Butler George Duke of Albemarle Monk Henry Marquess of Dorchester Pierpoint Montague Earl of Lindsey Lord great Camberlain Bertie Edward Earl of Manchester the King's Chamberlain Montague Aldjernoone Earl of Northumberland Piercy Robert Earl of Leicester Sydny Charles Earl of Berkshire Howard Thomas Earl of Cleveland Wentworth George Earl of Norwich Goring Henry Earl of St. Albans Jermin Edward Earl of Sandwich Montague Arthur Earl of Anglesey Annesly Charles Earl of Carlile Howard William Viscount Say and Seal Fiennes Francis Lord Seymour Baron of Troubridge Frederick Lord Cornwallis Baron of Ai. Anthony Lord Ashley Cooper Charles Berkley Knight and Baronet Sir George Carteret Knight Vice-Chamberlain Sir Edw. Nicholas Knights Secretaries of State Sir Will. Morrice Knights Secretaries of State After the Warrant is sign'd and seal'd by the King it is sent from the Signet-Office to the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper and Directions are given to the Heralds to make Proclamation at the Court-gate and Capital City of London of the King's Resolutions of which I shall speak more in the Chapter of Proclamations The Lord Chancellor c. upon the receipt of this Warrant doth issue out his Warrant also to the Master of the Rolls as the chief Clerk of the Pettibag-Office in this Form YOu are hereby requir'd forthwith to prepare for the great Seal of England the several Writs of Summons for the Lords Temporal As also for the Judges and others to appear at the Parliament to be holden the 8th of May next together with the several Writs of Election of the several Knights Citizens and Burgesses of the several Counties Cities Towns and Burroughs within the Kingdom of England Dominion of Wales and Town of Berwick upon Tweed as also of the several Barons of the Cinque-Ports to serve in the said Parliament in such Method and Form and directed to such persons as are and have been usual in such Cases all which said Writs are to bear date this present eighteenth of February 1661. and for the so doing this shall be your Warrant Dated c. Upon receipt of the Lord Chancellor's Warrant the Clerks of the Pettibag by the assistance of the former Precedents of Writs and anciently by help of the Masters of Chancery and by advice with the Heralds as to Titles and true Names of Persons do fix a Schedule or digest or Forms of Writs to be issued
Transcript of the Act of Predency 31. Hen. 8. Cap. 10. The Act of Precedency 31. Hen. 8. Cap. 10. FOrasmuch as in all great Councils and Congregations of men having sundry Degrees and Offices in the Common-wealth it is very requisite and convenient that an order should be had and taken for the placing and sitting of such Persons as been bound to resort to the same To the intent that they knowing their places may use the same without displeasure or let of the Council Wherefore the Kings most Royal Majesty although it appertaineth to his Prerogative Royal to give such Honors Places and Reputation to his Counsellors and other his Subjects as shall seem best to his most Excellent Wisdom He is nevertheless pleas'd and contented for an Order to be had and taken in this his most High Court of Parliament that it shall be Enacted by Authority of the same in manner as hereafter followeth First It is Enacted by Authority aforesaid That no Person or Persons of what Estate Degree or Condition soever he or they be of except only the Kings Children shall at any time hereafter attempt or presume to sit or have place at any side of the Cloth of State in the Parliament-Chamber neither of the one hand of the Kings Highness nor of the other whether the Kings Majesty be there Personally present or absent 2. And forasmuch as the Kings Majesty is justly and lawfully Supream head in Earth under God of the Church of England and for the good exercise of the said most Royal Dignity and Office hath made Thomas Lord Cromwel and Lord Privy Seal his Vicegerent for good and due ministration of Justice to be had in all Causes and Cases touching the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and for the Godly reformation and redress of all Errors Heresies and Abuses in the said Church It is therefore also Enacted by Authority aforesaid That the said Lord Cromwel having the said Office of Vicegerent and all other Persons which hereafter shall have the said Office of the grant of the Kings Highness his Heirs or Successors shall Sit and be plac't as well in this present Parliament as in all Parliaments to be holden hereafter on the right side of the Parliament-Chamber and on the same Form that the Archbishop of Canterbury sitteth on and above the same Archbishop and his Successors and shall have Voice in every Parliament to assent or dissent as other the Lords of the Parliament 3. And it is also Enacted That next to the said Vicegerent shall sit the Archbishop of Canterbury and then next to him on the same Form and side shall sit the Archbishop of York and next to him on the same Form and side the Bishop of London and next to him on the same side and Form the Bishop of Durelme and next to him on the same side and Form the Bishop of Winchester and then all the other Bishops of both Provinces of Canterbury and York shall sit and be plac't on the same side after their Ancienties as it hath been accustomed 4. And forasmuch as such other Personages which now have or hereafter shall happen to have other great Offices of the Realm that is to say the Offices of the Lord Chancellor the Lord Treasurer the Lord President of the Kings Council the Lord Privy Seal the Great Chamberlain of England the Constable of England the Lord Marshal of England the Lord Admiral the Grand Master or Lord Steward of the Kings most Honourable Houshold the Kings Chamberlain and the Kings Secretary have not heretofore been appointed and ordered for the placing and sitting in the Kings most High Court of Parliament by reason of their Offices It is therefore now Ordained and Enacted by Authority aforesaid That the Lord Chancellor the Lord Treasurer the Lord President of the Kings Council and the Lord Privy-Seal being of the Degrees of Barons of the Parliament or above shall sit and be placed as well in this present Parliament as in all other Parliaments hereafter to be holden on the left side of the said Parliament-Chamber on the higher part of the Form of the same side above all Dukes except only such as shall happen to be the Kings Son the Kings Brother the Kings Vncle the Kings Nephew or the Kings Brothers or Sisters Sons 5. And it is also Ordained and Enacted by Authority aforesaid That the Great Chamberlain the Constable the Marshal the Lord Admiral the Great Master or Steward and the Kings Chamberlain shall sit and be placed after the Lord Privy-Seal in manner and form following that is to say every of them shall sit and be placed above all other Personages being of the same Estates or Degrees that they shall happen to be of that is to say the Great Chamberlain first the Constable next the Marshal third the Lord Admiral the fourth the Grand Master or Lord Steward the fifth and the Kings Chamberlain the sixth 6. And it is also Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That the Kings chief Secretary being of the Degree of a Baron of the Parliament shall sit and be placed above all Barons not having any of the Offices aforementioned and if he be a Bishop that then he shall sit and be placed above all other Bishops not having any of the Offices before remembred 7. And it is also Ordained and Enacted by Authority aforesaid That all Dukes not afore mention'd Marquesses Earls Viscounts counts and Barons not having any of the Offices aforesaid shall sit and be placed after their Ancientry as it hath been accustom'd 8. And it is further Enacted That if any Person or Persons which at any time hereafter shall happen to have any of the said Offices of Lord Chancellor Lord Treasurer Lord President of the Kings Council Lord Privy-Seal or chief Secretary shall be under the Degree of a Baron of the Parliament by reason whereof they can have no interest to give any assent or dissent in the said House That then in every such case such of them as shall happen to be under the said Degree of a Baron shall sit and be placed at the uppermost part of the Sack in the midst of the said Parliament-Chamber either there to sit upon one Form or upon the uppermost Sack the one of them above the other in order as is above rehearsed 9. Be it also Enacted by Authority aforesaid That in all Tryals of Treason by Peers of this Realm if any of the Peers that shall be called hereafter to be Tryers of such Treason shall happen to have any of the Offices aforesaid that then they having such Offices shall sit and be placed according to their Offices above all the other Peers that shall be call'd to such Tryals in manner and form as is above mention'd and rehears'd 10. And it is also Enacted by Authority aforesaid That as well in all Parliaments as in the Star Chamber and in all other Assemblies and Conferencies of Councils the Lord Chancellor the Lord Treasurer the Lord President the Lord
was commonly taken for the Master of the Horse to the Emperour and is a Place still of great Honour in most parts of Europe but I conceive he was rather call'd Comes stabuli as an Officer or Office of refuge for so stabulum also signifies However for many Ages this Office was held in Grand Sergeanty by those persons hereafter nam'd but in 12 H. 8. it became forfeited to the Crown and since that never granted to any Subject but pro hac vice at some Solemnities as at the Coronation of King Charles the Second in April 1661 a little before this Parliament Algernoone Piercy Earl of Nortbumberland was made High Constable of England pro hac vice for with the Ceremony of that day his Office ended and Henry the Eighth I conceive did enter it in the Act of 31 of his Reign that in case there should be any use of this Officer when any such Solemnity happen'd in time of Parliament his place might be known without dispute 3. Before the 13th of Henry the 8th in some respects it had a greater power than the Earl Marshal and in others equal to it and so the extravagant parts being taken away the rest fixt in the Earl Marshal of whom I shall speak next however it hath left a name of great honor and use those of Honor are the Constable of Dover c. those of Use are the high Constables and Constables disperst in all parts of England 4. Whilst this great Officer was of constant use he was constantly summon'd to Parliaments viz. 50. E. 3. Thomas de Woodstock Comes de Buck Constabularius Angliae and so that 1.3 and 4. Ric. 2. Thomas Dux Glostriae Constabularius Angliae 17. R. 2. and the 1st of Hen. the 4th Henry Percy Earl of Northumberland Constab Angliae and the 2d of Hen. the 5th and 1. H 6. Summons to Humphrey Duke of Gloster Const Angliae and to John Duke of Bedford Const Angliae 2. H. 6. and from thence again to the Duke of Buckingham Const Angliae but from thence to the 20. of Hen. the 8. there are no Pawns as I said to guide us to the knowledge of such as were summon'd to the intervening Parliaments but it appears by other Records that in the 13th of Hen. the 8. this Office of Constable of England was turn'd into an hac vice and so only granted upon the Solemnity of Coronation and thereupon is not mention'd in any following Pawns to this time or was of any use in this Parliament SECT XII Of the Earle Marshal of England THis great Officer hath not so great a Latitude of power as the Constable of England had yet he hath under his Jurisdiction the Care of the Common Peace of the Land in deeds of Ams and matters of War when it happens in Forraign or Domestick parts in most of which he is guided by the Civil Laws and yet not to do any thing repugnant to the Common Laws In times of War he is more absolute in times of Peace less this mane of Marshal 't is very probable had its Original from Mars the Romans God of War and was the same which they call'd Comes Militum 2. However with us this Great Officer had and hath several Courts under his Jurisdiction viz. the Court of Chevalry now almost forgotten and the Court of Honor now quiet layd aside but the Sedes Mariscalli or Court of Marshalsee is still in being where he may sit in Judgment against Criminals offending within the verge of the Kings Court and the chief Officer under him is call'd the Knight Marshal 3. As also the Herauld Office or Colledge where when doubts arise concerning Descents Pedegrees Escuchteons c. he determins them this was Incorporated by Ric. the 3d. and many priveledges added by Philip and Mary 4. and 5. 4. Heraulds amongst the old Romans were a certain Order of Priests call'd Faeciales and so term'd because Bello paceque faciendo apud eos jus erat pronuntiare c. they were also call'd Caduceatores from a little wand which they carried whereon was fixt two wings to represent Mercury the nimble Messenger of War quod Contentionem Bella Cadere facerent 5. This Office or Colledge consists of 3 Regulators of Arms Ceremonies Pedegrees and Descents of Nobility and Gentry the first is call'd Garter Rex Armorum Principalis chief King at Arms and is also an Officer to the Soveraign and Knights Companions of the most noble order of the Garter the 2d call'd Clarentius also King of Arms but his Jurisdiction is only on the Southside of Trent The 3d. call'd Norray also King of Arms for the Northside of Trent these two being confin'd but Garter not consin'd 6. Besides these there are 6 more properly call'd Heraulds quasi Honorem tenentes Haeredes Aulae dicentes such as are able to give an account to the Court of Heyres to Families and these have distinct Titles distinguishing their Imployments viz. 1. York 2. Lancaster 3. Somerset 4. Richmond 5. Chester 6. Windlesour 7. And there are also 4 Under Graduats call'd Pursevants or such who with readiness do pursue the Commands of their Superior Officers properly in Marshal Causes and therefore call'd Pursevants at Arms to distinguish them from other Pursevants or Messengers from other Courts and these 4 have also 4 distinct Titles viz. Blewmantle 2. Rougecross 3. Rouge-Dragon 4. Portcullis but of the Earl Marshal and Heraulds I shall speak more as they are imployed in Parliamentary Ceremonies 8. There is no doubt but these Earls Marshals have for many ages sat in Parliaments viz. the Duke of Norfolk Marshal of England was summon'd 15 Ed. 2. But 11 R. 2. the Title of Earl Marshal of England being by Patent granted to Thomas de Mowbray Earl of Nottingham and entail'd on the Heirs Males of his Body which failing yet the Title of Mowbray descending on Thomas Earl of Arundel King James did by Pattent make him Earl Marshal for life and he was Summon'd to Parliament by both Titles but he dying Thomas Earl of Arundel and Mowbray Grandson and Heir to the said Thomas had no Writ provided for him in Feb. 1660 when this Pawn was made being then suppos'd to be a Lunatick and upon that account kept close at Padua in Italy but soon after by the Solicitation of Henry Howard next Brother and Heir to the said suppos'd Lunatick the Dukedom of Norfolk was restor'd after a long Attainder and by Act of Parliament settled on the said Thomas the Grandson and the said Henry being soon after created Earl of Norwick did manage the Office of Earl Marshal and had a Patent for the same from this present King Charles therein setling this Office upon him and the Heirs Males of his Body with a large Intaile for want of such Issue to the next Heir Male of that Noble Family So Henry was Summond about the middle of this Parliament as Earl of Norwich with the Title also of Earl
Marshal and Duke Thomas dying at Padua about the end of this Parliament Henry the Brother succeeded in the Dukedom and sat as Duke of Norfolk and Henry the Eldest Son of the said Duke Henry being then intituled Earl of Arundel did sit as Earl of Arundel and Lord Mowbray so as that Title of Earl Marshal is in Duke Henry and the Title of Mowbray in the Earl of Arundel and that Title of Earl Marshal only inpossibility to come again into Mowbray And this may be added that during Duke Thomas his Life James Earl of Suffolk by Deputation did execute that Office for reasons which I leave to other Writers SECT XIII Of the Lord Admiral of England Obs I THE Kings of England do constantly make Admirals of Squadrons of Ships but the Admiral which I am here to speak of is the highest of all intituled the Lord Admiral of England and may be well call'd Admirals from their seeing and knowing the mirabilia or Wonders of the Deep The Greeks call'd this Officer Thalassiarcha from Thalassa the Sea and Archos the Chief at Sea and from thence the Romans according to the Latin Idiom call'd him Thalassiarchus and of later days Admirallus which is no Latin word and in English Admiral 2. To him is committed the Government of the King of England's Navy and Power to decide all causes Maritim as well Civil as Criminal and of all things done on or beyond the Seas in any part of the World and many other Jurisdictions on the Coasts and in Ports Havens and Rivers and of such Wrecks and Prizes as are call'd by the Lawyers Lagon Jetson and Flotson that is Goods lying in the Sea floting on the Sea or cast by the Sea on the shore admitting some few exceptions and Royalties granted to other Lords of Mannors And these and all other Cases dependant on this Jurisdiction are determin'd in his Courts of Admiralty by such Rules of the Civil Law as do not invade the Common Laws of England 3. And of these Civil Laws which concern Sea assairs there are two most eminent Guiders to Civilians viz. Those made at Rhodes in the Mediterranean by the Grecians and augmented by the Romans call'd Lex Rhodia or the Rhodian Law The other made at Oleron an Island anciently belonging to England but lying on the borders of France by out King Richard the First both of which are still in great veneration 4. So as well for the Laws by which he governs the Maritim concerns as for his great Jurisdiction being as vast as the Ocean he may be said to have alterum Imperium extra intra Imperium and therefore this Honour and Care is intrusted to the hands of some one of the Blood Royal or some one or more joyntly of the most eminent of the Nobility 5. And in respect of this Power there is a constant Converse and Commerce with all parts of the World especially where the Civil Laws are practis'd and therefore it hath been the prudence of our former Kings even to this day to allot him a place in the Lords House as to the Marshal of England for both of their concerns are chiefly manag'd as I have shewn by the Civil Laws so as the Lord Marshal and Lord Admiral may be look'd on as the two Supporters to the learned Professors of those Laws as the other Lords are to the Professors of the Common Laws and possibly the greatest number of the Masters of Chancery of whom I shall speak in order who sit in the Lords House were originally contrived to be Doctors of the Civil Laws upon this ground That if there were at any time just occasion in that House to make use of any points in that Profession they might give their advices or opinions therein 6. This Dignity as I said was ever conferr'd upon some of the chief Nobility by vertue whereof they had their Writs of Summons and their Place in the Lords House and this long before the Act of Precedency for we find the Earl of Arundel in 13 Edw. 3. and the Earl of Northumberland in 7 R. 2. the Earl of Devon and Marquess of Dorset in the same Kings time and so the Earls of Salisbury Shrewsbury Worcester and Wiltshire and others of the like Degrees recited in the Clause Rolls needless to renumerate being Admirals were summon'd and in our extant Pawns in 36 H. 8. Johanni Dudley Vicecomiti Lisle Magno Admirallo and in 1 E. 6. Tho. Dom. Seymer Magno Admirallo and in 7 Edw. 6. Edv. Fenys Domino Clinton Magno Admirallo and in 1 2 3 4 Mariae Phil. Mar. Gulielmo Howard de Effingham Magno Admirallo and in 4 5 Phil. Mar. Edw. Fenys again and Charles Earl of Nottingham in Queen Elizabeth's time and George Duke of Buckingham in King James's time and King Charles the First 's time were still summon'd to Parliament with the Title of Admiral added to their hereditary Titles in their Writs and to this Parliament Jacobo Duci Ebor. Magno Admirallo c. And all these had their places in the Lords House according to the Act of Precedency as those before the Act was made This Office was conferr'd on the Duke of York for this Parliament Vid. Cap. 2. SECT XIV Of the Lord Steward of the King's House AS for the Orthography and Etymology and Antiquity of this Title Steward Obs I. I shall refer them to my Annotations However as it is sometimes writ with a T and sometimes a D it is under four Considerations the first as it represents a Royal Name and Family and therefore for distinction this is writ Stewart with a T and hath the superintendence chief interest and influence in all Parliaments since that Name was of that use in England 2. The other three are Titles official and written Steward with a D and as a further distinction from the first in Latin they are call'd Seneschalli and this the chief of the three is call'd Seneschallus Angliae or Lord High Steward of England of whom I shall give a full account in the Chapter of the Trials per Pares and shew how this great Officer is imploy'd either in or out of Parliaments 3. The last and least Degree of the 3 is call'd also Senescallus such as are the Stewards of Corporate Towns or Mannors which are not concern'd in the Summons or of use in Parliaments otherwise than as considerable Assistants in Elections of Members to serve in Parliaments But the Lord Steward of whom I now speak was call'd in H. the 8th time Magnus Magister Hospitij Regis or the Great Master of the Kings Houshold and ever since Magnus Senescallus Hospitij Regis or the Lord high Steward of the Kings House and he hath not only an eminent Employment Trust and Authority in ordering the Kings Houshold but an Authority above all Officers of that House except the Chappel Chamber and Stables but in all Parliaments is obliged to attend the Kings
hath no place in the Lords House and particularly excepted to be chosen into the House of Commons by the Writs of Elections as will be shewn and the reason is because the Official Viscountship is in the King who gives only an annual Deputation to the Person who executes that Office in such County of which he is made Vicecomes or Deputy to the King and so is not the Noble Viscount who cannot be made Sheriff or return'd of a Jury but hath his constant Writ of Summons to every Parliament as will be shewn 4. Seven Viscounts Summon'd by Writ 18. Feb. 1661. and One Viscount Summon'd by Writ 20th Ap. 1661. And now I come to the Barons the last Degree of the Nobility but anciently the First or Second SECT VI. Of Barons I Shall refer the Etymology of this word Baron to my Annotations because the learned Cambden Selden and others have taken pains about it but for many ages as at present it comprehends all such Prelates and Bishops as are Summon'd by vertue of their Baronies or Tenures to sit in the House of Lords As also all such Dukes Marquesses Earls and Viscounts as did anciently mount to any of those 4 Degrees by the proportion of their Baronies which they obtain'd by gift from the King or other acquisitions so differing from the other 4 in Nominal gradations rather than Essential And though there were Nominal differences antiently in the Tenures of Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons yet they were all subject to a general Contribution to the Kings affairs according to their certain number of Knights Fees for as Baronies made the other 4 Superior Degrees so the increment of Knights Fees whereupon I conceive Sir Thomas Smith made that Degree of Nobiles Minores did capacitate a Baron to be made a Baron and so a certain number of Baronies to be a Viscount and Earl and of Earledoms to be a Duke as may be read in Sir Edward Coke and others more ancient by him cited and Mr. Selden forgiving the Knight saith that Istud verbum Baro est caput scala dignitatum Regalium i. e. Majoris Nobilitatis 2. In former times these proportions were observ'd amongst the Temporal Lords but not with the Spiritual for Mr. Selden tells us of a Bishop pag. 580. Tit. Hon. that had 220 Baronies and did sit in Parliament by vertue of his Baronies yet was neither Duke nor Earl so those were the computations of Honour and Contributions till the method of Creations were us'd and at last by the late Act of Parliament all Tenures in Capite were Dissolved and thereby the Tenurial Contributions but not the Titles of Honour yet for a little variety I may inform some that in former times the Spiritual Barons had some exemptions from Contributions unless there was as the learned Selden calls it Trinoda necessitas viz. of War of Repairs of Castles or Bridges but they were generally exempted from Personal Assistance in War for though as he saith that in the 4th year of William the First that King made the Bishops c. subject to Knights Service in chief by creation of their Tenures and so was the first King that turn'd their possessions by Frankalmoine a French word signifying charitable Gifts for so began their temporalities into Baronies and thereby made them Barons of the Kingdom by Tenure yet when it was pray'd by them in the 5th Hen. the 3d. Vt omnes Clerici tenentes Baronias c. personaliter procederent contra Regis adversarios c. it was answer'd by the Bishops and their Answer allow'd Quod non debent pugnare cum gladio materiali sed Spirituali scilicet cum Lachrymis orationibus humilibus devotis quod propter beneficia sua manutenere debent pacem non bellum Quod Baroniae eorum ab Eleemosynis puris stabiliuntur c. So as he conceives that the Baronies of the Clergy were made of such Lands as formerly were as I said held in Franckalmoine 3. But what ever exemptions the Spiritual Barons had the Temporal Barons were oblig'd by their Baronial Tenures of several natures to all defensive and offenfive duties for the King and Kingdoms preservation according to the proportion of their dependent tenures or territories and so are yet in honour oblig'd to perform and they all had and have equal Votes in Parliament by vertue of their Baronial Interest for as to matters Parliamentary the Title of Baron is more ancient copious and comprehensive than any of the other Titles of Lords in Parliament 4. This word Baron we see is appilicable not only to the two degrees of Lords Spiritual viz. Archbishops and Bishops but to the 5 degrees of Lords Temporal so as the noble Barons and all the Degrees above them do set in the Lords House virtute Baroniae and by Writs of Summons the Superior Titles to the Barons differing rather upon some extrinsick order than any real intrinsick distinction 5. As for those Titles of Barons which are given to Degrees equal or under the noble Barons they are of several sorts 1st Some noble Barrons by Ancienty never Summon'd to a Parliament yet capable of Summons 2ly The Barons of the Exchequer which are 4 in number who are Summon'd by Writ ad consulendum or to be Assistants in the Lords House as will be shewn 3ly Barons of the Cinqueports out of whose number 16 are usually Elected to sit in the House of Commons as will be shewn 4ly Barons of Court-Barons who are also capable of being Elected to sit in the House of Commons 5th Barons in the Law French call'd Baron i. e. and Husband and Feme the Wife but I here only speak of the Nobiles Barones distinct from these Titular Barons though such of them as sit in the Lords House are in some sort thereby Nobilitated of whom I shall speak more when I come to the Assistants and such as sit in the Commons House are thereby Dignified though not Nobilitated of whom I shall speak when I come to the House of Commons 6. Now it may here be observed that some Persons of merit have been Summon'd to sit in the Lords House as Barons which were not Barons or any otherwise capacitated to sit there but by Writs of Summons upon this occasion Sir Edward Coke cites a Case where one Summond by Writ to sit in the Lords House died before he sat there and it was adjudged that if he had sat there he had been Nobilitated thereby but having not sat there whereby that writ was not executed for want of his Personal attendance it was adjudg'd that the direction or delivery of the Writ barely to the Person to whom the Writ was directed without Personal appearance and investiture of Robes and a possession of place was not sufficient to enoble him without a conjunction of those Circumstances and Ceremonies 7. But Barons created by Letters Patents and made to them and their Heirs are thereby Nobilitated and to be
esteem'd Nobles though they do not Sit in respect of the power given them by Patent to Sit without restrictions or ceremonial qualifications and therefore Sir Edward Coke saith that though the Creation by Writ be ancienter than by Patent yet the Creation by Patent is the surer way for that one may be sufficiently Created by Patent and made Noble though he never sit in Parliament and he gives this reason That if issue be joyn'd whether one be a Baron or not that point shall not be tried by a Jury of 12 men but by the Records of the Parliament and if he did not sit there there can be no Record but a Patent is a Record 8. So there were 62 Barons Summon'd by Writs of the 18. of Feb. 1661. and 6 more by Writs of the 29. of Ap. 1661. whereby the number of Temporal Lords Summon'd to this Parliament began the 8th of May 1661. were 140. viz. 1. Two Dukes of the Bloud 2. Three Dukes not of the Bloud 3. Four Marquesses 4. Fifty five Earls 5. Eight Viscounts 6. Sixty eight Barons In all of the 6 Degrees 140. as in the Pawn Cap. 2. which we may compare with former times viz. Regno  Anno. The highest Number Summon'd in these Years Num. Maj. The lowest Number Summon'd in these Years Anno. Num. Mi. Edwar. 3. 25º 62 4º 18 Richar. 2. 8º 63 18º 36 Henry 4. 1º 50 11º 39 Henry 5. 2º 44 3º 29 Henry 6. 38º 55 1º 23 Edwar. 4. 7º 47 12º 37 Henry 8. 37º 45 28º 44 Edwar. 6. 6º 59 1º 47 Mariae  2º 56 1º 42 Elizabeth  30º 60 43º 52 Jacobi  21º 98 1º 84 Caroli 1. 15º 109 1º 97 Caroli 2. 13º 140   I do insert this observation That the Ingenious Historian may see whether the greater or lesser number of the Nobility in Parliament hath been most advantageous to its Constitution and the like may be observed concerning the number of the House of Commons of which I shall speak in the next part By which we may see that the highest Number was in 12. and 13. of Car. 2d and the Lowest in the 4th of Edw. the 3d. not troubling the Reader with the Numbers Summon'd to Intervening Parliaments Thus having given some short Illustrations of those Titles of Honour which are mentioned in the Parliamentary Writs and the Act of Precedency for the clearer satisfaction of such as are not verst in matters of that nature I may now with the more content to them and my self proceed to the particular Writs of Summons to those noble Degrees which I have regularly mention'd according to their prescrib'd Order both from the method of the Writs in the Pawns and Act and these Writs of which I am particularly to speak others falling in collaterally are Sect. 1. The form of the Writs to any of the Bloud Royal. 2. The form of the Writs to Archbishops and Bishops 3. The form of Writs to the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper 4. The form of Writs to Dukes not of the Bloud Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons wherein the Grand Official Titles beforementioned are inserted CHAP. VI. Of Writs of Summons and first of the Exemplar Writs for Summoning Princes Dukes and Earls of the Bloud-Royal to the Parliament SECT I. I Have shewn in Chap. 2. how Parliament Writs are sorted into Close Writs and Open Writs or Patents and those into Exemplars and Consimilars I need not inlarge more therein but proceed to the first Exemplar Writ of Summons and so to other such Writs of Summons to other Degrees as concern the Lords House for I shall speak of other Parliament-Writs of another nature when I have dispatcht the Summoning Writs and Patents of Creation according to the method of Pawns and Clause-Rolls made before the Act of Precedency as also in all Pawns since that Act. Those of the Bloud-Royal are placed in the first Rank of those Records and were still Exemplar to the rest and therefore the Writ which I am now to speak of viz. To the Duke of York Brother to King Charles the 2d is the Exemplar of the Consimilar Writ to Prince Rupert Duke of Cumberland being Son to the Sister of King Charles the First and so persuant not only to the said Act but to the most ancient methods of Writs of Summons as will be more fully shewn in the following Chapters But before I recite this Writ methinks I hear some say Nolumus consuetudines Angliae mutare therefore let us know what Writs of this nature were issued in former Ages by former Kings which is a Question so pertinent to my own scruples that I hope the same ease I gave to my self after my inquiry will serve to satisfie others for having gone backward with as much safety to the avouching of Records as I could and being not satisfied with what was delivered to us concerning the Parliament Writs in the Brittish Romans Danes Saxons or Norman times or by some of the Plantagenets or those of Hen. 3ds time from whence most Writers of our English Parliaments take their Original I fixt upon and took my Rise from the Writs in the 15th of Edw. 2d which are clear and still extant in the Records of the Tower which the other are not By these Records it is evident that in 97. Parliaments as I account them which were Summon'd from that 15th year to this Parliament there is no material difference in this Exemplar Writ from those Antecedent and therefore that this Writ to the Duke of York may be compar'd with that of Edw. 2d I have here set them both down verbatim so that upon 339. years experience viz. from the year 1322. to the year 1661. Inclusive we may acquiesce that we in this Age have not much trespass't or varied from the ancient and wise Form prescribed to us by so many former Kings and continued to this time The Form of the Exemplar Writ to the Princes of the Bloud Tempore Edw. 2.15 EDwardus Dei Gratia Rex Angliae Dominus Hiberniae Dux Aquitaniae Edwardo Comiti Cestriae filio suo Charissimo Salutem Super diversis arduis negotiis nos statum Regni nostri specialiter tangentibus Parliamentum nostrum apud Eboracum a die Paschae prox ' futuro in tres septi'anas teneri vobiscum cum ceteris Prelatis Magnatibus Proceribus dicti Regni habere proponimus colloquium tractatum Vobis Mandamus in fide diléctione quibus nobis tenemini firmiter injungentes Dictis die loco omnibus aliis pretermissis personaliter intersitis ibidem nobiscum cum ceteris prelatis magnatibus proceribus supradictis negotiis tractatur ' vestrumque Consilium impensur ' Et hoc Nullatenus omittat ' Teste me ipso apud Westm ' decimo quarto die Martii Anno Regni nostri decimo quinto Caroli 2.13 CArolus Secundus Dei Gratia Angliae Scotiae Franciae Hiberniae Rex fidei defensor c. Praecharissimo
on a special account of Absence and then it was performed by one of the Chief Justices 5. But to pass these being more fully shewn in my Annotations I do not find in any of the Clause-Rolls or in the Pettibag-Pawns that a Chancellor or Keeper had any distinct Writs of Summons to a Parliament till the 28. of Eliz. when Sir Tho. Bromley Knt. being the Queens Sollicitor was made Lord Chancellor and Summoned by a distinct Writ in the same Form as is hereafter set down which very Form hath continued ever since And in the 35. of Eliz. Sir John Puckering being but Serjeant at Law was made Custos Sigilli and had a particular Writ of Summons to that Parliament and in the 39. of Eliz. Sir Tho. Egerton Knt. being then Master of the Rolls was made Custos Sigilli and had this assisting Writ of Summons for that Parliament and the like in the 43. of her Reign and so in the 21. of King James and in the First of Caroli Primi particular assisting Writs were sent to the Bishop of Lincoln in these words Reverendo in Christo Patri praedilecto fideli Consiliario nostro Joanni Episcopo Lincolniae magni sigilli Angliae Custodi So as he had this Writ as an assisting Writ and another Writ virtute Baroniae 6. It may here be observed that this was the only Bishop that was either Keeper or Chancellor from the First of Eliz. to this time whereas before Queen Eliz. for the most part Bishops or Ecclesiasticks did execute those Offices but whenever it was conferred upon the Laicks choice was made out of the most eminent Families as in the 26. of Hen. the Second as I said Gessrey Natural Son to Henry the Second was made Chancellor and in the 15th of King John Ralph de Nevile was made Keeper of the Great Seal and in 22. of Henry the Third Geffrey a Templer and John de Lexington were made Keepers of the Great Seal and in the 37. of his Reign his Queen upon the Kings going into Gascoine which is remarkable as I said had the Custody of the Great Seal and in the 45. of that Ring Walter de Merton was made Chancellor and in the 49. of that King Thomas de Cantilupe was made Chancellor and in the 53. Richard de Middleton made Custos Sigilli and in the 56. John de Kirkley and Peter de Winton made Keepers of the Seal and in the 2. of Edward the Third Henry de Bughersh made Chancellor In the 14. of Edw. the Third John de St. Paul made Keeper of the Seal in the same year Sir Robert Burgtheire Knt. made Chancellor and Keeper of the Seals and the like in the 15th to Robert Parning and in the 17th to Robert de Sadington and in the 19th to John de Offord and in the 20. to John de Thoresby In the Records of the same year it is said that Sir Lionel Duke of Clarence the Kings Son then Lord Keeper of England gave Command by Proclamation That no Arms should be worn sitting that Parliament whose name is omitted in the Catalogue of the Lord Keepers by Mr. Selden in his Discourse of the Office of Chancellor and Keeper and in the 45. to Sir Robert Thorpe and in the 46. to John Knivet and in the 2. of Rich. the Second to Sir Le Scroop and in the 6. of Rich. 2. to Sir Michael de la Pool and in the 11. of Hen. 4. to Sir Thomas Beaufort and in the 32. H. 6. Richard Earl of Salisbury was made Chancellor singly and in the 21. of Hen. the Eighth Sir Thomas Moor Knt. made Chancellor and Keeper and in the 24. of Hen. the Eightht Thomas Audley made Chancellor and Keeper and in the 36. Hen. 8. Thomas Lord Wriothesly made Chancellor and Keeper and in the First of Edw. the Sixth Sir William Pawlet Knt. Lord St. John of Basing made Keeper and in the same year Sir Richard Rich made Chancellor and in the First of Eliz. Sir Nicholas Bacon Keeper and the 21. Thomas Bromley Chancellor who continued so to the 28. of her Reign and was the first that I find as is before mentioned that had a particular Writ of Assistance and though in the Fourteenth of King James Sir Francis Bacon was Keeper in the Eighteenth of Jac. Henry Viscount Mandevile Lord President of the Council and Lodowick Duke of Richmond William Earl of Pembroke Sir Julius Caesar had jointly the Custody of the Great Seal and in the first Car. 1. Sir Thomas Coventry and in the 16. Car. 1. Sir Edw. Littleton and 21. Car. 1. Sir Rich. Lane were Keepers of the Great Seal yet we find no particular Writs in the Pettibag directed to any but such as I have before mentioned and to these which follow viz. in 15. Car. 1. Sir John Finch Knt. Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas was made Custos Sigilli and had a particular Writ of Summons to attend that Parliament 7. As to this Writ of 13. Car. 2. of which I am to treat it is to be observed that the Warrant before mentioned sent to Sir Edward Hyde Knt. and Chancellor to impower him to send out Writs was directed in these words To our Right Trusty and Well-beloved Counsellor Sir Edward Hyde Knt. Chancellor of England but in his Latine Writ of Assistance the words are Praedilecto perquam fideli Consiliario suo Edwardo Domino Hyde Cancellario suo Angliae leaving out Militi or Equiti aurato and putting in Domino and the reason of this variation as I conceive was That the Warrant was agreed on by the King and Council before the Third of November at which time he was Baron of Hindon and therefore in the Warrant he is named only Sir Edward Hyde Knt. but in the Writ Domino Hyde which is the Adjunct Title of a Baron as he then was and I find before the Parliament met he was created Viscount Cornbury and Earl of Clarendon and thereupon had another Writ in relation to those Dignities which was entered in the Pawn and the entry dated the 12th of April before the Parliament met and in the latter Writ he had also his additional Titles so that I observe that if the Chancellor or Keeper be above the Degree of a Baron he hath his Writ according to his Degree and therein only intimating his Chancellorship or Keepership as is before shewn in the 36. of Hen. the Eighth 1 Mariae c. But if he be not a Baron then he hath this Assisting Writ Quatenus Chancellor or Keeper as may be seen in the former Precedents from the 28. of Eliz. to this Writ of 13. Car. 2. If he be a Baron as I said he hath or may require a Baronial Writ besides this Assisting Writ The form of his Assisting Exemplar Writ is as follows the other will be seen among the Barons SECT VIII The Form of the Assisting Writ to the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper CArolus Secundus Dei Gratia Angliae
therefore I conceive there is some mistake in Mr. Selden but however the mistake be the first Exemplar Writ to a Duke was not till this year for though Edward Prince of Wales was Duke in the Third or Eleventh year of his Father and Thomas Earl of Norfolk soon after was created Duke of Norfolk and Henry Earl of Lancaster soon after created Duke of Lancaster yet they had not any Exemplar Writs as Dukes but before as Earls so as John Duke of Lancaster in this Parliament of the 37. Edw. the 3d. was the first Duke which had an Exemplar Writ 47 Edw. 3. As I have shewn the first Exemplar to an Earl of the Bloud so this shews the first Exemplar to an Earl not of the Bloud which was this year to Richard Earl of Arundel for though there were many Earls before not of the Bloud yet they had only Consimilar Writs but no Exemplars extant to any of them till this Year 28 H. 6. And though there were many Dukes not of the Blood since the first Creation of that Title yet the first Duke not of the Blood who was thought fit to be an Exemplar was not till this Parliament and the Predecessor of this Duke was an Earl in Edw. 3ds time and even this Duke was Earl in the time of his Predecessors before any Duke was created 6 Edw. 6. Though the first Marquess created in England was in the 9th of Rich. 2d yet none were thought fit to be Exemplars till this 6. of Edw. the 6th that William Marquess of Winchester was made the first Exemplar in Parliament of that Dignity but his Exemplar had the additional Title of Lord Treasurer who is the second Officer of State 36 H. 8. Although a Baron is a more ancient Title with us in England than any of the other Degrees of the Nobles yet we find no Record now extant wherein a Baron singly as Baron had the Exemplar Writ for as I said Thomas Wriothesly Baron of Tichfield being Chancellor William Pawlet Baron of Bazing being Lord Keeper were Exemplars in those Parliaments and had Consimilars appointed them but Edward Hyde Baron of Hindon having a distinct Assisting Writ had no Consimilar allotted him either in respect of his Barony or Assistancy Thus we find that Earls Dukes Marquesses and Barons have been Exemplars but we do not find any Viscounts to be so in any Parliament since the creation of that Dignity which was as I said in Hen. 6ths time to John de Beaumont And the reason is because the word Vicecomes doth imply a Consimilar to Comes so it were improper for Comites to be Consimilars to a Vicecomiti Concerning the additionals of the Titles to those Nobles mentioned in their Exemplars it may be observed That in all those Writs to Hen. the 8ths time the words Consanguineo Charissimo Praedilecto Dilecto Fideli were not so positively sixt to the several Degrees in their Writs but since that time they have past in a more constant method viz. to Dukes and Marquesses Praecharissimo Consanguineo to Earls and Viscounts Charissimo Consanguineo to Barons Praedilecto Fideli and to the Lord Chancellor as chief Assistant Praedilecto perquam Fideli but to all the other Assistants of which I shall speak more only Dilecto Fideli SECT III. Observations on the Consimilars to the former Exemplars WHen Princes of the Blood were made Exemplars there was ever some Prince of the Blood in the Consimilars and then followed in the same Register in every Clause-Roll or Pawn the other Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons without interposition of the Lords Spiritual and Ecclesiastical to the Princes of the Blood and the Temporal Lords not of the Bloud so it continued in that method till the 21. of King James but then the Exemplar being to the Prince of Wales and no Consimilar to him there follows the Exemplar and Consimilars to the Lords Spiritual of which I have spoken and after them follows the particular Writ to John Bishop of Lincoln as Lord Keeper and after that the Exemplar to Lodowick Duke of Richmond who had one Duke one Marquess Thirty eight Earls nine Viscounts and Fourty seven Chevaliers his Consimilars and ever since the 21. Jac. there hath been an interposition either of the Lords Spiritual or Lord Chancellor between the Dukes of the Blood and the Nobles that were not of the Blood and so in the 13 Car. 2. though the Bishops were deprived from that Roll as I have shewn yet the Lord Chancellors Writ did interpose and it may further be observed That when Princes or Dukes of the Blood or not of the Blood were Exemplars other Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons were Consimilars but when Earls were Exemplars there were no other Consimilars admitted of Degrees above them but still under them viz. of Earls Viscounts and Barons and yet when the three Dukes beforementioned were made Exemplars 't is true the Duke of Suffolk and Oxford had Dukes to their Consimilars as formerly being pari gradu but the Duke of Norfolk had no Duke to his Consimilar for he had only four Earls one Viscount and Thirty one Barons of which there is no other precedent that I can find 2. As to the different Titles of these six Degrees viz. Princes of the Blood Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons of whom I have spoke more in the Fifth Chapter it is fit to be hinted here that Prince in English and Principi in the Latin Writ Duke and Duci Marquess and Marchioni Viscount and Vicecomiti have little difference in their Orthography but Comiti in all their Latin Writs and Earl which is their general appellation in English have very great difference concerning which and the other Degrees I have writ more at large before and in my Annotations to which I refer the Reader and so Baron and Baro have but little variation yet this may be observed here of this Title Baro that in all the Consimilar Writs in Clause Rolls or Pawns wherein those of that Degree are enumerated from the 15th of Edw. 2d to the 13. of Car. 2. neither the Titles or words Baro nor of Banerettus are mentioned in the Writs but either the Articles De or Le or La or the words Dominus Miles Equies Auratus or Chevalier are added to the Barons name viz. Hugo de Spencer Johanni de Bello Campo Johanni de St. John de Bazing Roberto de Monte albo Johanni de Sancto amando Willielmo de la Souch de mortuo mare Nicolao de Cantilupo le Quint Johanni de Insula de rubro monte Nicolao de Sancto Mauro Michaeli de la Pool who was then Banneret Admirallo Maris Johanni de Moubray Mariscallo Petro de malo lacu le Quint Hugo de le Spencer Willielmo la Zouch de mortuo mare Johanni le Strange Johanni le Shelton and many more and some only in their Christian names and Sirnames viz. Richardo Gray Richardo Talbot Gulielmo Aincourt
as disjoynted from Scotland and Wales but upon reduction of Wales by Henry the 8th and by the happy Union with Scotland by King James the Kings Title hath been more general viz. Rex Magnae Britanniae comprehending England Scotland and Wales but not to be so understood in our Parliamentary Writs for they are applicable only to England and Wales and not to Scotland though Scotland be mentioned in the Writs and it may be observed that this distinction of England and Scotland were united under the Name of Britain by King Egbert Anno 819 but after that they were again disjoynted and though both did continue so disjoynted neere 800 years yet now the Ancient Name of Britain is restor'd being bound by one Ocean and Govern'd by one King as it was 800 years before and though it is now thus intire yet England hath a distinct Parliament for its Laws and Scotland a distinct Parliament for its Laws and both distinctly consisting of 3 Estates under one King so as in all Writs for Summoning an English Parliament though Scotland be mentioned yet the operation of the Writs can only be applyed to England The addition of Scotland in the Title of our Parliament Writs Scotland did begin with King James who happily united both Kingdoms as I said under one King and so wrot himself Rex Angliae Scotiae c. But they never send any Representative to our Parliaments nor we to theirs yet the King of Scots before the union had a Chair allotted for him in the House of Lords but never sat there yet he was sometimes Summon'd as Earl of Huntington and so by vertue of that English Title might have sat there but not by his Regal Title untill the said union Although we had several inlets to France by Normandy France Anjoy Poictors Tourny Mayne c. yet the addition of King of France to the Title of English Kings was not till Edward the 3ds time who had a Just Title to it and there upon did Quarter the Armies of France But Hen. the 6th was actually Crown'd King of France in Paris and from these two the Title and right hath continued ever since though dispossest and as I shall shew in the second Part of this Treatise that Callis did send Burgesses to our English Parliaments for many years till it was Lost by Qu. Mary Ireland The Title of Rex Hiberniae was as Ancient as our King Hen. the 2d who created his Son John the King thereof yet for what reason of State otherwise then what I shall mention in the 7th Chapter that Title of the King of Ireland was never annext to the regal Title of the Kings of England till the 33d of Hen. the 8th and then to his other Titles he added Rex Hiberniae before it was only Dominus and their Parliaments are fram'd like our English Parliaments yet Subject to the Kings pleasure in confirming of their Laws here in England See more of this in Chap. 7th As to this part of the Kings Title viz. Defender Defender of the Faith I shall speak more fully of it in the 7th Chapter Or c. id est other Titles which were formerly and may still be added as you may Read also in the 7th Chapter c. Section the 11 and 12. Thus having past through the General words of the Kings Titles in his Warrants and Writs now in observance to Sr. Edward Coke I shall make a Summary of the particular Titles of our several Kings from William the first Inclusive to this time shewing what words were added or withdrawn When the Normans entred William the first stil'd himself sometimes Willielmus Rex and sometimes Rex Angliae Anglorum as other former Kings Omitting Dei Gratia as the Institutor saith though I am not satisfied therein and not adding Primus William surnamed Rufus had the same Title yet sometimes adding Dei Gratia not adding Secundus Henry stil'd himself Rex Anglorum and sometimes Dei Gratia Rex not adding Primus Stephen did the like Henry did the like but Omitted Dei Gratia as Sr. Edward Coke saith but in the Coins which Mr. Speed Exhibits to us his stile was Dei Gratia Rex Angliae Dux Normaniae Aquitaniae Comes Andegaviae not adding Secundus Richard not adding primus us'd the same sometimes Changing the Declension and the singular Number into the plural viz. Dei Gratia Rex Anglorum Dux Normanorum Aquitaniarum Comes Andegaviarum John us'd the same with Addition of Dominus Hiberniae John Henry stil'd himself like his Father King John till the 44 of his Reign and then he left out Normaniae Andegaviae and writ only Dei Gratia Rex Angliae Dominus Hiberniae Dux Aquitaniae not adding tertius Edward the 1st and Edward the 2d stil'd themselves like Henry the 3d. Edward us'd also the same stile till the 13 of his Reign Edward and then having and Challenging a Just Title to all France he left out the parts of it before mention'd and stil'd himself Dei Gratia Rex Angliae Franciae Dominus Hiberniae not adding Tertius Richard and Henry not adding Secundus or Quartus stil'd themselves like Edward the 3d. from the 13 of his Reign Henry not adding Quintus us'd the same stile till the 8th of his Reign and then writ himself Dei Gratia Haeres regens Franciae Dominus Hiberniae Henry not adding Sextus being Crown'd King of France in Paris wrote Dei Gratia Rex Angliae Franciae Dominus Hiberniae Edward Richard and Henry not adding Quartus Tertius vel Septimus stile themselves Dei Gratia Rex Angliae Franciae Dominus Hiberniae Henry writ also the same till the 10th of his Reign as I said and then and not before he added a Numeral word to his Title and so made it Henricus Octavus Dei Gratia Rex Angliae Franciae Dominus Hiberniae Now as to the Additional Titles to Henry the 8th after his 10 years they Consisted of so many varieties that I shall refer them to the 7th Chapter of this Treatise Section the 11 As also the Titles of Ed. the 6th Q. Mary Q. Elizabeth K. James and K. Charles the first In which Chapter and Section I conclude with the Title of our present King Charles the 2d viz. Carolus Secundus Dei Gratia Rex Angliae Scotiae Franciae Hiberniae Fidei Defensor viz. as in the Warrant And so having shown how the ten Names of our Kings from the Normans have been dignified by Kings Emperours c. Especially the Name of Charles by its Priority which is the more remarkable because that by Transposition only of its Letters it doth Anagrammatise and render it O CLARUS Anagram CAROLUS Anagram This Anagram may be applyd generally to all of that Royal Name and it may be one reason why so many Kings in Europe do at this day own that Name and possibly another reason of assuming it may be
Privy Seal the Great Chamberlain the Constable the Marshal the Lord Admiral the Grand Master or Lord Steward the Kings Chamberlain and the Kings chief Secretary shall sit and be placed in such order and fashion as is before rehearsed and not in any other place by Authority of this Act. SECT I. Observations Obs 1. THis Act is observable being Enacted as it were by the King 's single Authority yet by the Preamble it seems to be only an Order or Ordinance at most and this upon Record in that House for it doth not concern the Commons 2. The Lords House is here call'd the High Court of Parliament i. e. the highest Court of Judicature in Parliament and so it is an Act by authority of the same including the Kings 3. It is also Parag. 2. call'd the Parliament Chamber and Parag. 8. the said House not the House of Lords or House of Peers as it is now call'd 4. Though this Act doth contain the Rules for Places as the several degrees do sit in their distinct degrees yet it doth not contain the intermixt Precedencies of the several Degrees both in calling over the House and at other Solemnities as will be more exactly shewn in the local part 5. In the 8th Paragraph the Lord great Chamberlain Constable Marshal Admiral Steward and King's Chamberlain are omitted because it is presum'd that those Titles were never given to any under the degree of a noble Baron 6. Here the Seat for the State-Officers being not Barons is call'd a Sack but in all Records where those Seats are mention'd they are call'd Wool-Sacks being stuff'd with Wool to mind them of the Staple Commodity of the Kingdom 7. The use which I make of this Act is to shew the several Titles of the Degrees of such as are mention'd therein 2dly the ordering of those Degrees and 3dly how this Act doth agree or disagree with the Pawns before and subsequent to it First The Degrees mention'd therein are four viz. first Princes of the Blood 2dly Lords Spiritual 3dly Ministers and Officers of State 4thly Lords Temporal 1st The Princes of the Blood are said therein Parag. 4. to be first the King's Son 2dly the King's Brother 3dly the King's Uncle 4thly the King's Nephew 5thly the King's Brother's Son 6thly the King's Sister's Son as in Paragraph the 1st and 4th 2dly The Lords Spiritual are said therein to be the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and York the Bishop of London Duresm and Winchester and all the Bishops of both Provinces according to their Ancientries Paragraph 2 3. 3dly The Ministers and Officers of State Ecclesiastical and Civil are in the 2d and 4th Paragraphs said to be the Vice-Gerent and eleven more therein mention'd of which I shall speak distinctly Paragraphs 2 4 5 6 8 9 10. 4thly The Lords Temporal are said to be those five Degrees mention'd in the seventh Paragraph viz. Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons of which I shall also speak more fully and lower than to these Degrees the Act doth not extend 5thly This Act doth agree with the Method of the Pawns in the placing of the Princes of the Blood as also of the Bishops but the Pawns do differ from the Act concerning the Ministers and Officers of State for they meddle with them no otherwise than they are annext to some Spiritual or Temporal Degrees but if they are under the Degree of those Degrees they have then only particular Writs of Assistance as shall be shewn 6. The Act doth not take notice of the several Assistants of the Long Robe viz. the Lords Chief Justices c. But the Pawn makes a Record of them also and of their Writs and of their Precedencies in relation to each other of whom I shall speak more particularly in the Thirteenth Chapter 7. This Act was made upon the dissolution of the Abbots and Priors and that there might be no more room for them in the House of Lords whereas the two preceeding Pawns remaining still in the Pettibag viz. of the 22 and 31 Hen. 8. did place them next the Bishops now their Abbies Monasteries and Priories being dissolved they in this Act were excluded as in all future Pawns only Queen Mary did venture to summon the Abbot of Westminster and the Prior of St. John's of Jerusalem but that being turn'd into a Deanry and this dissolved they were as useless as all the others the Ecclesiastical and Civil Estate of this Kingdom being thereby restor'd to its Primitive Constitution as will be shewn CHAP. IV. A Discription of the Degrees concern'd in this Act of Precedency HAving spoken of the Pawns or Digest of Writs of Summons in general as also of the Act of Precedency this having respect only to the House of Lords and other great Councils those both to the House of Lords and House of Commons this only to the Dignity of the Nobles those not only to the Dignity and Degrees of Nobles but also of the form and order of the Writs constantly enabling the Nobles to make a noble use of their distinct Degrees that to the Places and Precedencies of such persons whenever they meet in Parliament as by the King's favour may be summon'd those to the persons actually summon'd wherein these Pawns much ancienter than the Act were doubtless a good Guide to the framing of this Act I think it convenient before I proceed to particularize their Writs for the Titles must be fix'd before the Writs can be perfected to take a view of the order of such Degrees as are mention'd in the Pawns but better methodiz'd in the Act viz. 1st of the King's Counsellors comprehending all the following degrees and others 2dly of the Princes of the Blood consisting of seven Degrees 3dly of the grand Officers and Ministers of Church and State consisting also of seven Degrees some of them being of a mixt nature viz. Spiritual Ecclesiastical and Civil and 4thly of the Temporal and Hereditary Nobility consisting of five intire Degrees and this I shall do by a distinct account of them for the clearer understanding of the Writs and Persons concern'd in them And this I do to entertain the Readers time whilst the Clerk and others are busied in Drawing Writing and Ingrossing the Writs and carrying them to be Seal'd and then disposing them to the several persons and places to whom and where they are to be deliver'd which will admit of as much or more time than may be spent in reading these following Discourses intended for the reviving of the memory of some and improving the knowledge of others concerning the Persons to be imploy'd in the House of Lords as also concerning the Writs for the House of Commons and herein in this First Part as to the House of Lords I shall be guided by the ancient Method of the King's Warrant the Pawns and the Act of Precedency And first of the King's Counsellors SECT II. Of the Kings Privy-Counsellor AS to the Original of this Officer and of the reason
Person to adjust their Parliamentary expences Westminster being anciently the Kings Court and still within its Verge and his Lordships Jurisdiction 4. His place is appointed by the Act of Precedency in this order not but that he was Summon'd to Parliaments before that Act as may be seen in several Clause-Rolls of Rich. the 2d c. but after the said Act viz. 36. H. 8. Charles Duke of Suffolk was Summon'd and his Writs directed Magno Magistro Hospitij sui but after that as in this very Parliament 1661. the Writ to the Duke of Ormond was Jacobo D'no Brecon being his English Title by which he sits in Parliament Vid. Cap. 2. Senescallo Hospitij Magnus Magister Senescallus being still the same Officer though varying in Title SECT XV. Of the Lord Chamberlain of the Kings Houshold THat High-Chamberlain before mentioned is called Magnus Camerarius Obs I. but this hath not that Epethite of Magnus and yet his authority is very great within the Verge of the Kings Court so that though there is some Subordination yet in many great Regalios he hath an intire command and even in some things which concern the conveniency of a Parliament and its places of Addresses to the King that the furniture of the Rooms may be sutable to the Majesty and Grandure of such as are imployed there 2. He hath been anciently summon'd to sit there as may be seen in the Clause-Rolls of the 25. and 27. and 28. of Edw. the 3d. in the Summons of Sir Bartholomew Bergehurst Camerario Hospitij he being also Guarden of the Cinqueports and in 1. H. 4. to Sir Tho. Erpingham Baneret Camerario Hospitij he being also Guarden of the Cinqueports and so the 10. H. 6. to Radulpho Cromwel Chevalier or Baron Camerario Hospitij I might instance many others but I shall skip as the Records do to the Act of Precedency 31. H. 8. where he is call'd the Kings Chamberlain and in the Pawns of the 36. H. 8. the Writ was Carolo Duci Suff. Magno Magistro Hospitij sui Praesidenti Consilii sui and in the same Pawn which may be observable the Office of great Chamberlain of England was supplied by Edward Earl of Hereford of a lesser Degree than a Duke in the 6. and 7. Edw. 6. the Writ was Tho. D'no Darcy Chevaleer Camerario Hospitij sui and in the 43. Eliz. to Tho. Cary Lord Hunsden Camerario Hospitij and continues in the same Office he was Summon'd again primo Jacobi and in the 15. Car. 1. Philip Earl of Penbrook was Summon'd Camerario Hospiti sui and to this Parliament first Edward Earl of Manchester Camerario Hospitij then Henry Earl of St. Albans Camerario Hospitij and after him Hen. Earl of Arlington Camerario Hospitij who continued his place and precedency in this Parliament to the Dissolution of it 3. Edward Earl of Manchester Lord Chamberlain of the Kings Houshold was Summon'd so by Writ 18. Feb. 1661. Vid. Cap. 2. SECT XVI Of the Principal Secretary of State HE brings up the Honourable Rere to all the 12. Officers of State both in this Act of Precedency and in the Pawns and therefore I may the more justifiably defer my Discourse of him till I come to his Writ of Summons and past the method of the Pawn as I have done the method us'd in the Act of Precedency and so conclude these Sections with some few Observations Observations WHen the Act of 31. H. 8. was made Obs I. the State Officers though now but 9 in use were then 12. a Number as I shall shew agreeable to the 12 Judges 12 Masters of Chancery 12 Constituting a Jury and much more of the efficacy of that number cited by the Learned Institutor and Petrus Bongus de Sacris Numeris and this number is thus used by us as t is thought in veneration either to the 12 Tribes of the Jews or 12 Tables Sacred among the Old Romans or to to the 12 Apostles of the Christian Religion or 12 Signs in the Zodiack reverenct in Astrology 2. That if the Writs to any of these Officers be to any of the Lords Spiritual or such Officers as have usually consisted of the Clergy as the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper the Lord Treasurer Lord Privy Seal then the Writs were like the Assistants Writs to the Judges of which I shall speak in order but if any of these Offices be executed by any of the Temporal Lords then the Writ is the same as to that noble Person to whom the Office is anext or if any be Summon'd meerly virtute Officij without annexation to the Degree of some Lord Spiritual or Temporal Lord then the Writ is only as an Assistant Writ and they sit in the Lords House but as Assistants without Vote c. as will be shewn 3. Sir Edward Nicholas Knight was summon'd by Writ dat 18. Feb. 1661. Vid. Cap. 2. and now I proceed to the fixt Nobility call'd Lords Temporal CHAP. V. SECT I. Of the Degrees of Nobles Obs I Have given a short Character of the Grand Officers and Ministers of State and now according to the Act of Precedency I shall speak of the fixt Nobility as they are consider'd in Distinct Degrees and these are not mention'd distinctly in the Kings Warrant for Summoning a Parliament but referr'd therein to the Lord Chancellor to distinguish them by their Writs 1. As for the Nobility in general most Authors derive the word Nobiles or Nobles in the Plural from Noscibiles viz. Viri Nobiles or Persons indu'd with great knowledge than other men and so conceive it may admit of another Etymology viz. Nobilis quasi Non-bilis i. e. men of such debonair and complacent tempers and so much Masters of their passions that they are not in respect of their better Education subject to choler wrath or fierceness for so the word Bilis is Englisht but of even and serene tempers which dispositions are fittest for Affairs relating to Government but to pass these niceties the Question is amongst some 2. How far the Degrees of Nobility do extend which is partly resolv'd by Sir Tho. Smith in his Republica who saith there be two sorts of Nobles viz. Majores and Minores and this was according to the Old Romans the Majores he calls the fixt Hereditary Nobles diversifide into 6 Degrees viz. Princes of the Bloud of whom I have spoken in Cap. the 4th Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons not of the Bloud and descend no lower and these are capacitated by such Creations and Writs to sit in the Lords House The Minores he begins at Knights for he wrote before Baronets were known Esquires and Gentlemen and descended no lower and out of these the Knights Citizens and Burgesses for Parliaments are Elected and Compos'd and thereby capacitated to sit therein as the Representatives of the Commons of England but of these Nobiles Minores I shall speak more in the second part of this Treatise
any of the Bloud Royal only to other Lords Temporal as will be shewn in its proper place but in the 21. of King James Exemplar 16. 21 Jacob. An Exemplar Writ was to Charles Prince of Wales Duke of York for that one Parliament who was afterwards King Charles the First 17. 15 Car. 1. To Charles Prince of Wales who had an Exemplar Writ for one Parliament and after was King Charles the Second 18. 13 Car. 2. To James Duke of York who sat by vertue of the aforementioned Writ in the Parliament begun the 8th of May 1661. to the end thereof SECT IV. Observations on the Title of York THere were other Dukes of York besides these which are mention'd in this Collection viz. Edward the Son of Edmund Duke of York and upon Edwards Death his Brother Richard was created Duke of York and Henry the son of King Henry the 7th was created Duke of York who after was stiled King Henry the 8th but these 3 Dukes of York being not mention'd in any Clause Rolls to have Exemplar Writs I have omitted them in the Register of Exemplars 2. The City of York was dignified with the Title of an Arch-Bishoprick in the year 180 as some say but all agree that Taurus was Arch-Bishop there in the year 610. and also with the Title of a Dukedom in the 10th year of Ric. the 2d whereas London the Metropolitan of England hath onely a Bishoprick but no Dukedom Earldom or Marquesate appropriate to it and in Anno the Civil Government of the City was honour'd with the Title of a Lord Mayor as it was at London but how far the equivalency of that Title extends to those two Cities will be further discourst when I speak of London in its proper place and in my Annotations 3. Whilst the quarrel continued between the Dukes of York and Lancaster which lasted for many Ages York had the Title of White-rose the House of Lancaster call'd the Red-rose till both were inoculated into one Stock of Hen. 7th 4. The Title of this James Duke of York and Albany in Scotland is the same which was given by King James to Prince Charles afterwards call'd King Charles the First being first created Duke of Albany c. and at 4 Years of age Duke of York SECT V. Of Consimilar Writs to the Royal Exemplars NOw I should proceed to the Consimilars of these Exemplars but in respect that they consist of a very great number and it were too great a labour to treat of all Consimilars I shall forbear to recite them Especially being in hopes that my Learned Friend Sir William Dugdale will publish a particular Treatise of them and ease me of that labour so as I shall only take notice here of the Writ for this Parliament to Prince Rupert the Sisters Son to King Charles the First and this is Consimilar in all parts to the Duke of Yorks Exemplar except in the Title so I need not set it down at large but by abbreviation shall thus render it viz. Carolus c. Rex c. Praecharissimo Consanguinco Duci Cumbriae Salutem and so Verbatim with the Dukes Exemplar Duke of Cumberland being his English Title SECT VI. Observations on these Consimilars 1. FIrst in most of the Clause-Rolls and Pawns from the 15. of Edw. the 2. to this time after the Exemplar Writs are set down these words following are in the Clause-Rolls and Pawns viz. Consimilia Brevia diriguntur Subscriptis and in some Consimiles Literae instead of Brevia directae Subscriptis and in some Consimiles Literae directae Conscriptis thereby seeming to retain the ancient words of Patres Conscripti which the Romans did usually apply to their Elected Senators But here it is only Consimile Breve in the singular Dirigitur praecharissimo c. Ruperto there being no other of the Bloud in England 2. Princes of the Bloud have been Consimilars when Princes of the Bloud have been Exemplars as in the 25 Edw. 3d. Edward Prince of Wales was Consimilar to Henry Earl of Lancaster his Uncle of the Bloud but not where any were Exemplars who were not of the Bloud and so many more might be cited which may be seen in Cottons Collections of the Tower Records 3. In this Consimilar Writ Prince Ruperts Foraign Titles are omitted because none of the Peers do sit in the Lords House but in respect of their English Titles yet in the Proxy-writs which they allow to others their Foraign Titles are recited without scruple as will be shewn in the 10th Section of the 12th Chapter 4. I cannot but take notice here that till the Union with Scotland there was a Chair plac'd in the Lords House on the right hand of the Kings Chair for the King of Scots and call'd the King of Scots Chair Yet I cannot find by any Records of the House of Lords or elsewhere that the King of Scots did ever sit there or was Summon'd or had any proxy to sit there for him by vertue of any Exemplar or Consimilar Writ And now I shall proceed to the Exemlar for Bishops CHAP. VII The second Exemplar viz. To the Archbishop of Canterbury Section I THe Examplar for Bishops of which I am now to speak is not entred into this Pawn in the Pettibag which I have recited verbatim as all the other Exemplars are but it is entred in the Chancery Crown-Office an Office of Record also as I have shewn being issued after the Parliament was sitting nor would I have entred it here in respect my design in this first part is to write only of such Writs as were previous to the sitting of this Parliament had not I found that the Exemplar for Bishops is constantly entred in all the Clause-Rolls extant from the 15 of Edw. 2d and in all Pawns extant from the 21 of Hen. 8. except in this of the 13. Car. 2d which omission proceeding from the reasons which will be given in the following Chapter was upon the first sitting of this Parliament rectified and therefore I thought fit rather a little to deviate from my method than to defer or puzzle the Reader with the discourse of it at too great a distance from all the other Writs of Summons of which I intend to treat according to the order of the Pawn and so I crave leave as most suiting to all former precedents to treat of this Exemplar in the second place especially having the Act of Precedency unrepeal'd also to justifie my proceedings 2. Before I proceed to discourse of Archbishops or Bishops it is convenient to look back to the several Titles which were given to those who were Managers of the Religion practis'd in this Island before the name of Bishop was here known This Religion was by the Jews call'd Paganism and the Professors thereof Pagans Panims Ethnicks Gentiles Heathens and Infidels which Titles are all of the same nature The word Pagan comprehending the other five only the word Infidel was not
and die in that Persuasion But he did not think himself safe in carrying on so great an opposition as was like to be well knowing how the Papal Interest was dispers'd in all Kingdoms and States of Europe till he had incouraged the off-spring of the Waldenses and other opposers of Rome in France Germany and in other Kingdoms and States to revive their Doctrines as also to imbrace the Lutherans Centum Gravamina and the Calvinian Institutions and others less remarkable yet all serving to his purpose whereby in a few years after almost all Christendom was brought into a Papal and Antipapal Ballance or rather consisted of Professors of the Roman Religion and Protestors against both the Court and Church of Rome as Usurping and Antichristian 10. But on the other side the Pope seeing that he could not by forcible ways withstand this almost universal desertion of him he made his Applications to several Kings and Princes for his assistance And at last by a more plausible way he did obtain a Council of Trent wherein it is observable That he did not think fit to move in his Point of Supremacy till after eighteen years that That Council had been sitting by Adjournments and Prorogations and then the Question was That Episcopus Locum principalem teneret à Pontifice Romano dependentem to which the opposers did so far comply that they allowed principalem Locum sub Romano Pontisice but not dependentem so after that Council had sate nineteen years in the sixth of Queen Elizabeth it was dissolved by 4 Legats 20 Cardinals 3 Patriarchs 25 Archbishops 168 Bishops 7 Abbots 39 Proctors and 7 Regulars of General Orders without Determining that Point to the satisfaction either of England or other Kingdoms and States the Dispute of which begot 7 Civil Wars in France which lasted near 40 years till within 3 years of Queen Elizabeths Death also Inquisitions in Spain and Flanders Tumults and Wars in Germany and near 40 years Wars in the Netherlands between them and Spain and for some few years Fire Fagots and Insurrections in England 11. In this Hurly Burly about Supremacy H. 8. left his Crown to an Infant Edward the 6th Ed. 6. who had the Laws against Rome corroborated and his Revenues augmented by Chappels Chantries c. enjoying them but few years and then the Pope revived fresh experiments by Queen Mary Mary to reverse all especially after she was Married to King Phillip compelling a submission to the Popes Supremacy by Fire and Fagots so as in H. 8. time and even till now upon the suddain Changes of Religion it might be said by the Historian Deus bone hic suspenduntur Papistae illic comburuntur Antipapistae but her time being short the Supremacy was once more reverst and taken up by Queen Elizabeth Eliz. who managed it with such dexterity considering the conjuncture of Affairs in this and other Kingdoms and States that it was needless for the Pope to make any open Attempts but by Mariages Foreign Negotiations and the assurances given by some of the chiefest Nobility and Gentry of the Roman persuasion in this Kingdom who were as they pretended for the Church and not for the Court of Romes Supremacy of their peaceable resolutions the Billows of penal Laws seem'd to be calmed and this Kingdom thought it self as secure as the pretty Halcion in her Nest But those who kept to Calvins Institutions in England and Scotland were finely yoak't together to a disturbance for it being insinuated to them That the Title of Supream Head of the Church given by Act of Parliament was declined and dwindled into an c. and that the Title of Defender of the Faith given by the Pope did only remain with an c. made them call to mind what was alledged in the Council of Trent That the original of Church-Government was Aristocratical and Governed by a certain number of the Presbytery and afterwards it was thought fit to put it into a Monarchical way viz. by a Bishop as Superintendent and finding that the Popes and Kings of England and other Princes had long disputed about this Ecclesiastical Monarchy without determination only in a connivance they thought it convenient to return to the Primitive way of Aristocracy and set up Presbytery that original Government as was pretended and thereupon one all cried against Bishops which bravely workt for the Papal interest the clamour proved so geat that the Learned King James did what he could by Writing to quiet them his unfortunate thought Blessed Son King Charles the First tried it by Action but without Success For the Independent Anabaptist Fifth Monarchy-Men and others coming into the Presbyters assistance he was necessitated after the Wars with Scotland upon the same grounds amongst other condescentions to yield with the Consent of the Lords Temporal 17. Car. 1. and Commons and pass an Act for Abolishing the Bishops temporal Jurisdiction in this Kingdom Now see what followed instead of making of Earls Knights and Squires and maintaining of Hospitals as was proposed to Richard the 2d as I said the Bishops were not only put out of the House of Lords but the Temporal Lords soon after and the Knights and Squires secluded from the House of Commons and the Hospitals and all ruined by an intestine Bloody War the King Sacrificed and every one of the Machineers disappointed of their original plausible intentions and in conclusion by most miraculous Turns in Assairs there was a total submission to a Reestablishment of that Form of Church and State which they had before so zealously overthrown and the Bishops again brought into the Lords House 12. I should now proceed to the Writs which impowred the Bishops to sit in the Lords House but first I think it pertinent to shew how these two Titles of Fidei Defensor Caput Ecclesiae Anglicanae were used disused and altered in theirs and other Writs Though all the Kings of England at their Coronation are Sworn to defend the Christian Faith and the words defensionem Ecclesiae Anglicanae having been in most Parliament-Writs since the 11th of Edward the 3d. Yet the Pope as I said for the good Service which Henry the 8. had done in Writing against Luther sent him a Bull and therein intituled him Defensor Fidei with this Caution that it should be placed next his Title to France and before his Title to Ireland and it may be observed That in the same year he sent the like Bull to the Emperor Charles the 5th intituling him also Defensor Fidei upon which the Emperor took an Oath not only to be Defensor Fidei but Defensor Pontificiae dignitatis Romanae Ecclesiae i. e. Defender of the Court and Church of Rome But Henry the 8th though he accepted the Title did not think fit to be bound by an Oath nor do I find that he stiled himself in any publick Acts Defensor Fidei till the 2.1 of his Reign and then in a
Decree made in the Star-Chamber which is Printed in Poltons Abridgment he is Stiled Defensor Fidei in terra Ecclesiae Anglicanae Hiberniae Supremum Caput which was 5 years before the Supremum Caput was settled by Act of Parliament but as a preparative to it in the 22 of his Reign he is stiled Praepotentissimus Metuendissimus Angliae Franciae Rex and only Fidei Defensor is added and no mention of Supremum Caput Then in the 30 year of his Reign he is Stiled Defender of the Faith and Lord of Ireland and on Earth Supream Head immediately under Christ of the Church of England In the 32. year he left out the word immediately and the next year the words under Christ So that in the 33 of his Reign the Title was Hen. by the Grace of God King of England France and Ireland Defender of the Faith and of the Church of England and also of Ireland on Earth Supream Head And thus by making himself King of Ireland he disobeyed the Pope in placing Defender after Ireland and this Title continued thus all his Life and the Circumscription on his Great Seal wrot accordingly and so did his Son Edward the sixth on His Great Seal and in Publick Acts. And the like did Queen Mary in the first year of her Reign but upon her Marriage with King Philip in the second year of her Reign and first of both their Title was King and Queen of England and France Naples Jerusalem and Ireland Defenders of the Faith Princes of Spain and Cicily Arch-Dukes of Austria Duke of Milan Burgundy and Brabant Countess of Hasburgh Flanders and Tyroll quite jostling out Supream Head during their Reigns When Queen Elizabeth came to the Crown the Circumscription of her Great Seal was Elizabetha Dei gratiâ Angliae Franciae Hiberniae Regina Fidei Defensor yet she maintained both Titles of Defensor and Supream during her Reign When King James came to the Crown the Circumscription of his Broad Seal was also Jacobus Dei gratiâ Angliae Scotiae Franciae Hiberniae Rex Fidei Defensor and no more yet he maintained the other Point both in his Government and Writings as may be read in his Praemonition to all Christian Monarchs and his Declaration against Vorstius and his Defence of the Right of Kings against Cardinal Perrone and in several of his Speeches in Parliament leaving men at liberty as Queen Elizabeth did to use the Title of Supream Head in their Pulpits and Evidences as they thought fit so as the learned Cambden in his Dedication of his Britannia to King James instead of Defensor writes him Propugnator Fidei When King Charles the First came to his Crown the Circumscription of his Great Seal was Carolus Dei gratiâ Rex Angliae Scotiae Franciae Hiberniae Fidei Defensor and no more yet to justifie both Titles in the seventeenth year of his Reign he caused the 39 Articles which were agreed on in the fourth of Queen Elizabeth to be reprinted and in the Front did publish his own Declaration in these words Being by God's Ordinance according to our just Titles Defender of the Faith and Supream Governour of the Church within these Our Dominions He therein declares That the Articles of the Church of England allowed and authorized heretofore do contain the Doctrine of the Church of England and requires his Subjects to continue in the uniform profession thereof And then as to the Discipline he further declares himself Supream Governor of the Church of England and that if any difference arise about the external Policy concerning Injunctions Cannons or other Constitutions whatsoever thereunto belonging the Clergy in their Convocations is to order and settle them having first obtained leave under his Majesties Broad Seal so to do and he approving their said Ordinances and Constitutions So here the word Supream Head is changed into Supream Governour When King Charles the Second came to the Crown the Circumscription of his Broad Seal was Carolus Secundus Dei gratiâ Angliae Scotiae Franciae Hiberniae Rex Fidei Defensor and no more yet to justifie both Titles the very same year of his Return Anno 1660. he publish'd a Declaration to all his loving Subjects well worth the reading concerning Ecclesiastical Affairs which shews both his Christian condescention to his Subjects and Justifications to those two Titles for which he is styl'd by Writers Supream Moderator Now though in all Parliament-Writs which have come to my view and in other publick Acts and Writings since the first of Queen Elizabeth to this time after the words Defender of the Faith except in their Broad Seals there is added only one c. which I conceive was done for brevity and must be understood in relation to the Act of 36 Hen. 8. never yet repealed and every man had then and hath still liberty in their Deeds or Pulpits to mention the full Titles but by degrees about the year 1640. it began to cease in Pulpits and soon after in Pens contenting themselves with the c. These and other matters seeming trivial though proving dangerous in the consequences were yielded to as condescentions to gratifie a dissenting party in England who very probably were incited thereunto by underworking Papal Contrivers being excellent Artists in spurring on the least humour of Schism in this Church and so dealing in little things till greater were ripen'd in which latter they often made Attempts as may be read in Queen Elizabeth King James King Charles the First and this present King's time yet without success except in the Assassination of King Charles the first which was manag'd with such dexterity that it was made difficult to judge whether some of the English Dissenters in those times or the Romish Incensors were the chief Actors And after that it was carried on by a subtil way of redeeming their credits in this King's Preservation at Worcester yet still underhand endeavouring to subvert the whole Fabrick of this Kingdom as was discovered about the end of this Parliament 1678. which determin'd my publick Employments and therefore shall leave that Subject to other Pens Thus the new Empire of Rome and the old Empire of England have strugled through many Ages for Supremacy It is the Interest of England to be quiet within its own liquid Arms and so increase it self with other Kingdoms and States by a real mutual Traffick and Commerce But it is the Interest of Rome to be troublesome and increase it self in all Kingdoms and States without any real commutation or advantage to any but it self Yet it is difficult to make the Dissenters to the Church of England believe that the way which they take in opposing Rome will in time be destructive to their own Designs and Opinions Some of the Dissenters to the Church of England see and know this yet are so inveigled by such Dissenters to the Court of Rome who pretend to be for that Church but not for
Episcopo Carlilin P. Johanni Episcopo Roffensi P. Roulando Episcopo Coventry Lichffeldiae Henrico Episcopo Assanensis D. Georgio Episcopo Landavensis D. Thomae Episcopo Bangorensis P. Gulielmo Episcopo Norwicae P. Johanni Episcopo Herefordiae D. Roberto Episcopo Wintoniensis D. Gulielmo Episcopo Bathon Wellen. Roberto Episcopo Cecestriae D. Custodi Spiritualitatis Episcopatûs Wigorn ipso Episcopo in Remotis agente Custodi Spiritualitatis Episcopatûs Dunelmensis ipsa fede vacante XX. in all SECT XVI Observations on this Writ to Cardinal Wolsey THis Writ except the Title of it is like that of Ed. 2d yet I have thought fit to enter it for some reasons particularly 1st For the Eminent nature of the Titles which this Cardinal ascrib'd to himself who had also tryed several experiments to have been made Pope and probably the Passions of Hen. 8. and the Cardinals disappointments therein might hasten the dissolution of the Abbots and other proceedings in order to the lessening the Popes interest here and this refusal of the Cardinal may justly give an occasion to say that the English have always had hard measure in their Attempts therein for though the Conclave have admitted above 50. English men to be Cardinals yet it seems their Policy hath been not to admit of any English man to be Pope except one in our Henry 2. time called Nicolas Brakespear who being Pope Intituled himself Adrian the 4th so that from Higynus's time there hath been but one English man made Pope unless Johannes natione Anglicus Gussarus officio Papa Sexu Faemina quae sedet in Papatu An. 20. Mens 6. who in English we call Pope Joane be allow'd for one of the 246. Popes to this time yet the Pope hath exercised the highest Jurisdiction here that England could afford which is a very Partial and unequal way of dealing 2. The 2d reason of Entring this Writ is to shew that the Archbishop of York was herein the Exemplar to the Archbishop of Canterbury of which there is no Precedent before for the three Cardinals which were Archbishops viz. in the time of King John Edward the 3d and Hen. the 6th were all three Archbishops of Canterbury so as this precedency must be attributed to the Cardinals Dignity above all Archbishops and not to any irregularity in placing the Exemplar And here it may be observed that as the Title of Archbishop did long since leap over the Title of Bishop and the Titles of Patriarch and Pope over Archbishops afterwards viz. Anno Christi 1099. when the Title of Cardinal first began by Pope Pascal the 2d his institution the Title being rais'd by him of certain Parochial Priests in Rome of whom he had more confidence did in effect leap over all the Four other Degrees and by it had the sole power of Electing Popes being under their management so as the Pope hath only the Title left and the 70 Cardinals the power of Electing him in which they are unwilling to admit of any English man although if they did he would be so over-ballanc'd that there were no great hazard of his Election In the mean time the Conclave is so kind to its own Interest as to appoint one of those Cardinals to be Protector of England he being at this day Stiled Eminentissimus Dominus Franciscus Cardinalis Barbarinus Angliae Protector 3. It may be observed that amongst many other Titles he Intitled himself Presbyter to gratifie all interests 4. Though H. 8. might intitle himself Fidei Defensor 8 years before this Writ yet this is the first Writ on Record wherein this Title is given and this also is the last Writ that I find was sent to any Cardinal to sit in Parliament for though Cardinal Pool was Cardinal and Archbishop of Canterbury in Queen Mary's time yet he had no Writ either as Cardinal or Archbishop or both but the Exemplar was in that Parliament to the Bishop of Winchester and no Writs to the Bishops of Canterbury York London or Durham 5. When this Writ was made he was Lord Chancellor yet it is not inserted in the Writ possibly because Sir Thomas More was in Prospect to be Lord Chancellor and was actually so before the Parliament met And now having shewn the first Writ among the Pawns I shall proceed to the Writs in the subsequent Pawns and then shew the alteration of them The second Pawn or bundle of Writs extant in the Pettibag is of the 31 of Hen. 8th wherein the first Writ is to Thomas Archbishop of Canterbury and this Writ also agrees with the former except in the Titles and with all the Writs to Archbishops from Edward the 2ds time to this as they are in the Clause Rolls The third Pawn or Record of Writs in the Pettibag is of the 36 of Hen. 8th which is the remarkable Writ because it differs from all the former Writs since Ed. 2ds time both in the Titles and the Praemonition for in this Writ he is intituled King of Ireland and Supream Head but before this only Lord of Ireland Now as to the Title of King of Ireland Hen. the 2d did give the same to his Son King John but the Pope would not let him enjoy it nor did any of his Successors assume it till Hen. the 8th resolved to reassume it in defiance of the Pope and writ himself King of Ireland instead of Lord of Ireland because as I said in the former Section he would not place the Title of Defender before Ireland as the Pope had directed him in his Bull or it may be in respect the Pope pretended a Title under King John to Ireland and as for the other Title of Supream Head though it was given him by the Parliament 12 years before yet I find it not in any Parliament Writ till this year of the 36. H. 8. So that the Preamble or Titular part of the Writ is thus Henricus Dei gratiâ Angliae Franciae Hiberniae Rex fidei Defensor Ecclesiae Anglicanae Hiberniae Supremum Caput Then for the Premonition whereas the words Priorem Capellanum or Capitulum were plac'd next unto Praemonentes in this Writ the words were Praemonentes Decanum Capitulum because Abbies and Priories were newly dissolv'd and Deanaries Constituted and so the Writs thus alter'd have continued till this Writ for the year 1661. But before I set down the Writ for 1661 I must a little repeat some short progresses and methods ushering in that Writ for though the Bishops were in the year 1641. by an Act of King Charles the First with the Consent of the Lords Temporal and Commons disabled from Exercising any Temporal Jurisdiction or Authority and thereupon soon after put out of the Lords House as I have shewn yet there was no occasion of new Writs to them till the year 1661. and then there could be no new Writs made for their Restauration till they were restor'd by the same power of King Lords Temporal and Commons by
Regni Angl'antea haec tempor ' melius honorificentius et quietius usu sunt et gavisi seu in presenti gaudeant et utuntur There is an addition of most of the latter Patents concerning Annuities granted which I shall speak of so soon as I have recited so much as concern the Places appointed to the several Degrees of Nobles to sit in Parliament suitable to what is inserted in the Dukes Patent at the Figure B. Of the Marquess his Place in Parliament by his Patent 15. AFter the King's Title and Preamble in the Sciatis these words are in the Marquess his Patent viz. Prefat ' R. in Marchionem D. creavimus c. per Gladij cincturam circuli aurei quo Capiti impositionem investivimus c. Habendum c. honorem Marchionis D. c. prefat ' R. heredibus masculis de corpore suo exeuntibus c. Then as to Parliaments Et quod dictus R. heredes sui masculi predicti eorum quilibet habeat teneat possideat sedem locum vocem in Parliamentis Comitijs Consilijs nostris heredum successorum nostrorum infra Regnum nostrum Angliae inter Pares Parliament ' in gradu celsiori videl't inter Duces Comites ut Marchio Of the Earls Place in Parliament by his Patent 16. AFter the Kings Title and the Preamble in the Sciatis these words are also in the Earls Patents viz. Prefat ' N. in Comitem A. c. creavimus per gladij cincturam Capae honoris Circuli aurei impositionem investimus Habendum c. honorem Comitis A. c. prefat ' N. heredibus masculis de Corpore suo exeuntibus c. Then as to Parliaments Et quod dictus N. heredes sui Masculi predicti eorum quilibet habeat teneat possideat sedem locum vocem in Parliamentis Consilijs nostris heredum successorum nostrorum infra regnum nostrum Angl'inter alios Comites ut Comes A. Note It is not here said inter Marchiones Vicecomites because they were Degrees erected after the Earls Of the Viscounts Place in Parliament by his Patent 17. AFter the Kings Title and the Preamble and the Sciatis these words are also in the Viscounts Patents viz. Prefat ' A. in Vicecomitâ—m N. c. creavimus ac ipsum insignijs Vicecomitis investimus c. Habendum c. honorem Vicecomitis N. c. Et quod idem A. heredes sui Masculi gerant titulum Vicecomitis N. c. Et heredes sui Masculi predicti Then as to Parliaments Et eorum quilibet habeat teneat possideat successive sedem locum vocem in Parliamentis publicis Comitijs in the first Patent to Beaumont it is Congregationibus nostris heredum successorum nostrorum infra Regnum nostrum Angliae inter alios Vicecomites ante omnes Barones ut Vicecomes Of the Barons Place in Parliament by his Patent 18. AFter the Kings Title and the Preamble in the Sciatis these words are in the Barons Patent Prefat ' A. B. c. ad honorem Baronis B. c. creavimus ipsumque A. B. Baronem B. Creavimus c. no mention of Investitures Habendum c. honorem A. B. heredibus suis Masculis c. per nomen Baronis B. de C. heredes sui Masculi predicti Then as to Parliaments Et eorum quilibet habeat teneat possideat sedem locum vocem in Parliamentis publicis Comitijs Concilijs nostris heredum successorum nostrorum infra Regnum nostrum Angliae inter alios Barones ut Barones Parliamentorum publicorum Comitiorum Consiliorum Note That the word Chevalier is in his Writ but not in his Patent nor the word Dominus which was us'd in ancient Patents is also disus'd in the latter Patents Of the Conciseness of ancient Patents 19. HEre I must observe how wanton the Penmen of these Patents have been in latter days by multiplying words in them which former ages thought superfluous and even the Sages of the Law who are the most knowing in what is sufficient have anciently and do still reject them as may be seen in the Thirteenth Chapter and yet the Jurisdiction and Priviledges which are granted to those Sages are little inferiour to what is granted in these whereas those Patents do not contain besides the names from the Sciatis to the Teste above twelve words and these by the redundancy of Sentences at least one Thousand two Hundred words Of Creation-Money 20. IN the recital of the Sciatis in Sect. 8. I did omit the extravagant slourishes which are us'd in many of these Patents about Creation-Money and Annuities given to the Patentees Concerning an Annuity of twenty Marks granted in the Patent of Creation 21. IMmediately after the words gaudent and utuntur in the Sciatis at large a little before mention'd these words follow viz. Et quoniam aucta status dignitatis celsitudine necessario crescunt sumptus accedunt onera grandiora ut predictus A. heredes masculi sui predicti melius decentius honorificentius statum honorem dignitatem predictam Vicecomiti N. ac Onera ipsi A. heredibus suis masculis predictis incumbentia manutenere supportare valeat Ideo de uberiori gratia nostra dedimus concessimus eidem A. heredibus masculis de Corpore exeuntibus feodum sive annualem redditum tresdecim librarum sex solidorum octo denariorum legalis monet ' Angliae Habendum percipiendum annuatim dictum feodum sive annualem redditum tresdecim librarum sex solidorum octo denariorum eidem A. heredibus suis masculis de Corpore Exeuntibus de exitibus profituis et reventionibus magnae parvae custumae et subsidijs nostris nobis concessis sive debitis seu imposterum nobis heredibus seu successoribus nostris concedendis sive debendis provenientibus crescentibus sive emergentibus infra portum Civitatis nostrae Londini per manus Custumariorum sive Collectorum nostrorum heredum et successorum nostrorum custumarumet subsidiorum nostrorum heredum et successorum nostrorum ibidem pro tempore existentium ad festum Pasche et Sancti Michaelis Archangeli per equales portiones volumus c. absque fine hanaperio c. et quod Expressamentio c. and so concludes in cujus c. Teste c. too tedious to recite making above one Hundred words more and almost the like is to an Earl for 20 l. per annum so as the Money given will scarce pay for the words written or but little left to support such a Dignity unless the meer expression of the uberious munificence of the Donor be sufficient Sure it was less chargeable and as effectual when the words of the whole Patent of Creating the Earl of Essex tempore H. 2. and others in other Kings Reigns was only thus viz. Do