sins were but secret infirmities they might be borne with for a time but seeing they justifie open impieties and their filthinesse is manifest to all the world now a cloake cannot hide them Muscul. 6. Confut. The Pope how a servant of servants Vers. 25. A Servant of servants c. This title Pererius saith the Popes doe usurpe as a signe of great humility but we rather trust that as another Caiphas so the Pope prophesieth the ruine of his owne Kingdome that he shall become one day a servant of servants indeed as Canaan was and beâ— made a servant to those that have served him 7. Confut. The tents of Sem not of the Pope or Romanists have the preheminence Vers. 27. TO dwell in the tents of Sem c. Thus we see that Sem hath the prerogative and that the Gentiles received their light from the Jewes But the Pope would draw this privilege from the Jewes to the Romanes that whereas the Apostle saith that the Jewes beare the Gentiles as the root the branches and not they the Jewes Rom. 11.18 yet the Pope would have the faith and profession of the Romans to be the root and foundation of all beleevers 6. Places of morall observation 1. Moral Man must not rule over men as beasts Vers. 2. THe feare of you shall be upon every beast Gregory here hath a good note that the feare of man must be not upon men but beasts That man should not by cruelty or tyranny seeke to be feared of men And yet good men sometimes desire to bee feared of others but it is when the feare of God is not among them that they which feare not the divine judgements may bee by feare of men kept in some awe and then non tam hominib quam brutis annimalib dominantur they doe not rule so much over men as bruit beasts 2. Moral Sobriety in meats commanded Vers. 3. AS the greene herb Although God yeeldeth to the use of man for his food all kinde of fowles fishes beasts yet hee would have man to use them moderately and soberly not to abuse them to gluttony or excesse or not contented with such kinds as are at hand to search the deep for fish to ascend the mountaines to catch fowle to hunt up and downe the wildernesse onely to satisfie his greedy appetite But he ought to use the flesh of beasts as the greene herb that is soberly and without curiosity to take such thingâ— as are at hand 3. Moral Gods great care in preserving the life of man Vers. 5. I Will surely require your bloud Where we see the great care which the Lord hath in preserving the life of man he will require it at the hands of the beasts yea of a mans brother neither shall he goe unpunished by this it appeareth domesticum familiarem Deo hominis esse naturam that mans nature is as domesticall and familiar unto God and that therefore God will not suffer him to be unpunished that offereth wrong as it were to his domesticall and familiar By this men are taught both to take heed of bloud shed and so to fall into the judgement of God neither much to feare the sword of the wicked seeing the Lord himselfe will revenge the death of the innocent 4. Moral The bow a signe of Gods justice and mercy Vers. 13. I Have set my bow in the clouds and it shall be a signe c. 1. The bow is a notable monument of Gods justice to call to our minde the sinne of the old world for the which it was destroyed that wee feare to offend God in the â—ike it is also a signe of Gods mercy in forbearing to bring the like destruction upon the world againe and if God shew such mercy even to wicked men and bruit beasts how great are his mercies that he layeth up in store for his elect 2. We see also how farre the justice of God exceedeth his mercy the rigour of his justice was but for a time in once destroying the woâ—ld by water but his mercy is perpetuall in the continuall preservation thereof so the Prophet Isay saith for a moment in mine anger I hid my face from thee c. but with everlasting mercy have I had compassion upon thee This is unto me as the waters of Noe Perer. 5. Moral The miraculous propagation of mankind Vers. 19. OF them was the whole world over-spread c. here appeareth the wonderfull providence of God that by three men the whole world was replenished when as they were subject to the rage and invasion of beasts and wanted many necessary things the earth having not yet recovered her former vigour and force decayed by the floud the like matter is to be seene saith Chrysostome in the Christian faith that God per duodecem piscatores illiteratos c. that God by twelve fishermen unlearned c. hath subdued the whole world to himselfe and propagated the faith 6. Moral Noahs awaking out of drunkennesse what it signifieth Vers. 14. THen Noah awaked c. This were to bee wished saith Musculus that they which are the Patriarks and take upon them to be the pastors of the Church were herein like unto Noah to awake also from their drunkennesse their ignorance errour and superstition As also all intemperate and riotous persons are to learne by this president to awake from their sinne and not to continue in their licentious course nor make a continuall trade and occupation of drunkennesse CHAP. X. 1. The Method and parts of the Chapter THis Chapter hath three parts according to the severall generations of the three sonnes of Noah Iapheth Cham Sem by whom the world was replenished the generation of Iapheth is expressed from v. 1. to v. 6. their names v. 2 3 4. their habitation and place of dwelling v. 5. the generation of Cham rehearsed from v. 6. to 21. their severall names together with their habitation then followeth the generation of Sem their names from v. 22. to v. 30. their habitation vers 30. 2. The grammaticall sense or difference of translations 2. Thobel Mesoâ—eh S. Thubal Mesech H. Thubal Mesech c. 4. Citij Rhodij H.S. Cethim Dodanim H. Câ—ttâ—m Donanim c. 7. Regma Sabathaca S. H. Ch. Raamah Sabtecha T. B. G. A. heb Ragmah 8. A gyant 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the earth S. a mighty man c. ghibbâ—r robustus strong 9. A giant hunter S. a mighty hunter H. B. G. a mighty man Ch. mighty in hunting T. P. heb 10. Arach S. H. Erech cat Eerech c. in the land of Babylon Ch. Sennaer or Sinhar cat sic heb 11. Out of that land came Assur S. H. cum caeter Out of this land he came into Assur Tr. built the streets of the City H. Rahoboth the City caeter rachab breadth 12. Dasem S. Resen caet 14 Cappadoces Ch. Captharim caeter 18. Cynaeum S.H. Ch. Cynaum caet cum s. Sini Eveum
of his owne people that were espoused unto him he is not said to be jealous of them 2. Hee suffered them to walke after their owne lusts not because hee could not have hindred them but the wise Creator permitteth the reasonable creature to follow the instinct of their nature yet calling some by grace whom he pleaseth and punishing the rest for abusing the light of nature who therefore were left inexcusable because knowing God by the creatures they yet did not glorifie him as God as the Apostle sheweth Rom. 1.21 QUEST V. Of the titles which the Lord here giveth himselfe and wherefore I Am the Lord thy God strong jealous c. The Lord giveth unto himselfe here foure severall titles the more to inforce this commination following 1. He calleth himselfe their God because he had taken them into his speciall protection and had bestowed many benefits upon them therefore they ought to love him more than any other Tostat. 2. He is a strong God potest se veluno nutu vindicare which can revenge himselfe at his becke Lippom. And he is strong as well to effect his promises to the obedient as to punish the disobedient Vrsin 3 Zelotes est nolens habere consortium in amando He is jealous he can abide no partner in that which he loveth Tostat. And this as well signifieth his indignation qua commovetur suis contumeliis whereby he is moved for the contumelies that are offered unto him Vatabl. as the love of God toward them for jealousie ariseth ex amore ejus qui laditur propter turpitudinem c. from the love of him that is hurt because of some uncleannesse committed c. Vrsin 4. Lastly in saying visiting the iniquitie he sheweth his severitie in tantum non connivet ad impietatem c. he is so farre from winking at impietie that hee punisheth it even in the posterity of the wicked and their sonnes and nephewes Lippom. QUEST 6. Of the generall commination and promise annexed VIsiting the iniquitie c. 1. Some take this to be a speciall perswasion added to this commandement Quia inter omnia praecepta nullum majus est quam hoc Because there is none among all the precepts greater than this The generall motive was set before because he brought them out of the land of Egypt Tostat. 2. But I approve rather their opinion which take this commination and promise to appertaine unto all the commandements but to be joyned to this because it is fundamentum caeterorum the foundation of the rest Vrsin Huic mandato tanquam principali ex quo alia oriuntur addidit Dominus minas c. To this commandement as the principall out of the which the other take their beginning the Lord added threatnings and promises c. Lippom. And this is confirmed by the words here following vers 6. to them that love me and keepe my commandements the Lord maketh mention of keeping his commandements not of one but of all 3. It might have pleased God simply to have propounded his commandements but he both adjoyneth promises to stirre up our dulnesse and threatnings to terrifie the perverse and froward which promises are rendred not as the deserved reward of our obedience for it is of mercie as the Lord saith shewing mercie unto thousands otherwise we doe no more than our dutie and therefore deserve nothing Simler QUEST VII How it standeth with Gods justice to punish the children for the fathers sinnes THe iniquitie of the fathers upon the children c. 1. Theodoret upon this place hath this singular opinion by himselfe Quod nudae literae insistere impium sit c. That it is evill to insist here upon the bare letter seeing the law saith The fathers shall not be put to death for the children nor the children for the fathers but every man shall be put to death for his owne sinne Deut. 24.16 And he addeth further Majores apud Deum sunt comminationes quà m poenae c. That God useth greater threatnings than punishments as every one that was not circumcised at the eight day is threatned to be cut off and yet many in the desert were uncircumcised at that age whom Ioshua circumcised in Gilgal and so here he thinketh that this is threatned onely to terrifie parents from sinning So Theodoret. Contra. 1. But this were to give great libertie to offenders to thinke that God onely threatneth for terror it might be inferred as well that God doth but dallie also with his promises as with his threatnings which were impious to thinke 2. If God doe not alwayes punish as hee threatneth it doth not argue any revocation of his judgements but his mercifull forbearing to call men unto repentance 3. That commination against the neglect of circumcision is not denounced against the infant whose fault it was not if he were not circumcised the eight day but against them that did not see it performed on their infant as appeareth by the example of Moses Exod. 4. punished for the neglect of circumcision And so accordingly all they which deferred the circumcision of their children in the wildernesse their carkase◠fell there 2. Origene maketh this allegoricall exposition The father that sinneth he maketh the Devill Pater peccati diabolus est The devill is the father of sinne all they are his children which doe his works Diabolus ergo dum hic mundus stat non recipit sua peccata c. The devill while this world standeth doth not receive punishment for his sinnes redduntur infilios i. in eos quos genuit per peccatum but upon his children whom he hath begotten by sinne are their sinnes rendred for men while they are in the flesh are corrected of God c. Contra. But that this is a forced and farre fetcht exposition the other opposite part manifesteth of the Lords shewing mercie unto thousands but the devils expect no mercie And againe seeing this commination is specially made to terrifie wicked parents it can no wayes concerne the Devill to whom the law was not given but unto men 3. Hugo de S. Victor giveth this reason why children are punished for the sinnes of their fathers because they are Sicut aliquod membrum ipsorum quia in ipsis malefactoribus quo dammodo erant seminaliter peccabant They are as a part of them because they were in seed in the malefactors themselves and so in a manner sinned in them Contra. But the Prophet saith the same soule that sinneth shall die the children being but yet in the loynes of their fathers as the tree in the seed had no soules therefore then could they not sinne 4. Some doe reconcile this law and that other Deut. 24. where it is said that the fathers shall not be put to death for the children nor the children for the fathers after this manner that there a rule is given for the proceedings in civill judgement that one shall not suffer for another but this is understood of Gods judgement
exercise his strength as Augustine againe saith Administrat omâ—ia qua creavit ut etiam ipsa proprios motus exercere sinat God doth so governe all things which he created that yet hee suffereth them to exercise their owne motions 3. God might justly suffer this to be done because hee did know how to turne Adams fall unto good Deuâ— permisit hominem tentari quâ—m sciebut esse casurum quid simul videbat eo casu sâ—â—â—ti posse ad misericordiam c. God suffered man to be tempted whom he knew should fall because he saw how to use his fall to declare his mercy and justice while he justly punished some out of the same damned masse and delivered others in mercy Doct. VI. Adam not damned WHereas v. 15. a promise is made concerning Christ that the seede of the woman should breake the serpents head from hence we infer that our first patents though they sinned yet were by faith in the Messiah to come restored and not utterly condemned which was the heresie of the Tatiaâ—es August de haeres c. 23. In the booke of wisdome we read that wisdome preserved the first father of the world and brought him out of his offence c. 10.1 which is agreeable to the Canonicall scripture because Adam is called the sonne of God Luke 3.38 he was not then the child of death and hell everlastingly to perish Doct. VII Wherein Adam transgressed NOw because carnall men doe extenuate Adams sinne that he was cast out of Paradise for eating an apple I will briefly shew the greatnes of our first parents transgression wherein many sins concurred 1. There was in them both incredulitie in not beleeving Gods words to be true 2. Vnthankfulnesse in not being contented with their estate 3. Pride in desiring to be like unto God 4. Wantonnes in sinning without any necessitie having all the trees in the garden beside to eare of 5. There was the sinne of gluttonie in pampering the desire of the belâ—â—e 6. Disobedience in transgressing the commandement 7. Curiositie in coveting to know the operation of the fruit in bringing them to knowledge 8. Presumption in that they presumed of Gods mercie that they should not die though they did eate 9. Then followed the concupiscence and rebellion of the flesh in being ashamed of their nakednesse 10. They excused their sinne 11. They are guiltie of homicide in bringing death not only upon themselves but all their posteritie 12. Beside Eva seduced her husband 13. Adam sinned in his inordinate affection to his wife in listning to her 14. The easines of the commandemeÌ„t maketh the transgression more heinous as Augustine well noteth answering to this question why God forbad them to eate of that tree Si bona est quare non tango si mala est quare in Paradise ideo in Paradiso est quia bona est sed nolâ— tangâ—â— quiâ— obedienteÌ„ te volâ— if it be good why doe I not touch it if it be evill why is it in Paradise therefore it is in paradise because it is good but I will not have thee touch it because I would have thee obedient God could not then make better triall of mans obedience than in forbidding that which was good Places of confutation Confut I. Infidelity not pride the first sinne of our parent 1. THe opinion of the Popish writers is that pride was the first sinne that Eva was tempted unto because Satan saith unto them yee shall bee as gods but it is rather evident that their first sinne was infidelitie first Satan telleth them ye shall not die at all and so perswadeth them not to give credit to the word of God for if they had verely beleeved that to come to passe which was threatned they would never have given any credit to Satan Confut. II. Our parents lost not their faith 2. BEllarmine also holdeth that our first parents in their transgression lost their faith because by the seducement of Satan they beleeved not what God said unto them ye shall not die Ans. 1. It followeth not if in this one act of faith they failed that therefore totally their faith was extinguished he that shal be seduced in one article or point of faith is he presently stripped of all faith 2. It was no formall infidelitie as though wittingly they rejected Gods word but they were materially deceived onely and their sudden violent affection over-shadowed their knowledge judgement 3. So Peter denied Christ through feare and frailtie yet in his judgement he could not so at once cast off all opinion of Christ hâ—s faith was shaken and winnowed but it failed not as our Saviour testifieth of him that he had praied for him that his faith faile not Luke 23.22 and so was the case in our first parents Confut. III. Not Marie but Christ brake the serpents head 3. vers 15. THe vulgar latine translation readeth shee shall breake thy head c. which the Popish writers understand of the virgin Mary as Pererius doubteth not to give this marginal note B. virgo contrivit caput serpentis the blessed Virgin did break the head of the serpent and Bellarmine also justifieth this translation whereas in the original it is his ipsum it in the neuter gender which must be referred to seed the Septuagint and the Chalde read he in the masculine understanding it of Christ for none else but Christ broke the serpents head Confut. IIII. The tree of life could not actually give life but was a symbole of it 4. vers 22. LEst he take of the tree of life and live for ever Bellarmine would proove from hence that this tree by eating the fruit therof might bring true immortalitie Ans. 1. As the Lord saith by way of derision man is become as one of vs to know good and evill So in the same sense is this other part of the sentence uttered that as a man simply thought to get knowledge by eating of the one so he might imagine to obtaine life by the other 2. For if Adam might have lived by eating of this tree now after he had sinned how would that other saying have taken effect in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt die the death Gen. 2.17 These speeches had beene contrarie the one to the other 3. It was therefore the tree of life as the other was of the knowledge of good and evill that is significative non effective not in operation â—ut in signification it was a signe or symbole of life received from God and by Gods gift should have beene â—reserved if a man had not sinned and therefore man beeing deprived of life lost also the signe thereof Places of Exhortation and practice 1. WE have here set forth unto us from v. 1. to v. 7. the degrees of tentation 1. the suggestion of Satan 2. delectation the woman saw the tree was pleasant c. 3. Consent shee tooke of the fruit 4. The effecting of the thing desired shee did eate
Let the iniquity of his fathers come into remembrance in thy fight 3. If in the meane time the wicked father beget a sonne that seeth his fathers sins c. and repenteth he shall not die in his fathers iniquity Ezek. 18.14.17 As the sonnes of Core died not with their rebellious father Numb 26.10 4. And it is just that God should visit to the third and fourth generation because by the course of nature so long the father may live to see his sinne punished in his posterity and the children so long may have the evill example of their parents in their eyes for whose sins they are said to bee punished though they have made them their owne by imitation because their parents were authors and by their example perswaders and in their owne persons beginners of that sinne 5. Neither for Idolatry onely is the iniquity of the parents visited in their children as Rabbi Moses thinketh but for other sinnes also as here Chams prophanenesse and rebellion toward his father is punished in Canaan 6. Neither are the children guilty of their parents sinnes only by imitation in doing the like but if they continue in other great sinnes though not the same as when the people were plagued because David had numbred the people though therein David was the greatest offender yet they had deserved diversly by their other sinnes to bee punished or if the children though they committed not the same sinnes yet doe winke at them and suffer them by silence and reprove them not as Elie was accessary to his sonnes sinnes because he held his peace as Augustine well saith quamvis bonis vita malorum displiceat c. although the life of the wicked displease the righteous and therefore they are not eternally damned tamen quiapeccatis eorum pareunt jure cum eis temporaliter flagellantâ—r yet because they forbeare and spare their sinne they are justly together with them whipped temporally 7. Neither doth God prescribe vnto himselfe alwayes this rule to punish but to the 3. or 4. generation hee may extend his iudgements to the tenth as here in the posteritie of Canaan but yet the proportion alwayes holdeth that he is more inclined continually to mercie than justice Calvin 6. This Canaan is accursed not onely for his fathers sinne but as being himselfe also which is most like accessarie to it relating the matter to his father and the posteritie also of Canaan though they did beare the curse first denounced against their father yet are worthily punished for their owne sinnes Levit. 18.28 for these abhominations the Lord spued out the people that were before you QVEST. XXII Of the blessing of Sem. Verse 26. Blessed be the God of Sem. 1. Jt appeareth in that Sem hath the chiefe blessing that he was the actor and perswader of that reverent and dutifull behaviour toward their father Tremel 2. In that Noah turneth himselfe to God it sheweth the excellencie of grace wherewith Sem was endued which also is implyed in his name which signifieth one famous or of renowne Perer. 3. He prophesieth that the true religion and Church should remaine in Sems posterity that hee onely should worship the true God which is to be blessed for ever 4. And here also is included a prophesie of Christ to come of Sem in whom all the nations of the world should be blessed Oecolampad QVEST. XXIII How Iapheth was to dwell in Sems tents Vers. 27. GGd perswade or enlarge Iapheth c. 1. This cannot be the meaning that God should dwell in the tents of Sem because there was his temple and Christ also incarnate walked and dwelled amongst them sic Theodoret. Lyran. Tostat. Mercer and the Chalde paraphrast referreth it unto God but the construction of the words following let Canaan be his servant will draw the sense to bee referred to Iapheth not unto God 2. Neither doth Noe speake here of the great increase and dilating of Iapheths posterity into all parts of the world 3. nor yet of any civill society and league which should bee betweene the Gentiles of Iaphets stocke and the Jewes 4. or that they should surprise the inhabitants of Sem and thrust out the Jewes for all those things did equally befall the posterity of Cham the Aegyptians were in league with them and sometimes also surprised them 5. But the word is rather to bee translated perswade as Iunius then inlarge with Mercer or as Vatablus well readeth blande reducat God shall gently reduce Iapheth to Sems tents which was fulfilled not when the Gentiles became Jewes Proselytes as some Hebrewes but when by the mild voyce of the Gospell the Gentiles were called to the knowledge of God and made one Church with the Gentiles Rupertus here also hath a good conceit that the Greekes and Latines comming of Iapheth by those two languages of Greeke and Latine did open the Tabernacles of Sem the Hebrew Scriptures and made them knowne to the Gentiles QVEST. XXIIII Of the life and acts of Noah Vers. 28. ANd Noah lived c. Noah lived 250. yeares after the floud died but two yeares before Abraham was borne for from the floud to the birth of Abraham are counted not above 352. yeares And Sem living 502. yeares after the floud reached to the 50. yeare of Isaack This then is worthy to bee observed that three Patriarkes for the space of two thousand yeares and more from the beginning of the world to Isaack might serve to propagate the true religion Adam to Methuselah who lived with him 242. yeares Methuselah to Sem who lived almost an 100. yeares after Sem was borne and Sem to Isaack 2. Although the Scripture make no mention of the rest of Noahs acts yet no doubt hee was occupied in doing good and in planting religion Berosus writeth that he taught the Armenians the skill of husbandry and planting of vines he distinguished the yeare into 12. moneths instructed them in the true service of God and from thence he went to Italy where he likewise taught Theology and humane arts who was honoured of them as a God under the name of Sol and Coelus and there hee died This record of Noahs acts as it containeth nothing of any improbability saving that Noah so godly a Patriarke would never suffer himselfe to bee honoured as a god so there is no necessity to receive or beleeve it not being expressed in Scripture 3. But whereas Methodius is made the author that Noah should have a certaine sonne called Iovâ—thas that should bee borne in the 100. yeare of the third Chiliad or thousand who invented Astronomy and prophesied of the foure Monarchies this is a meere fiction for Noah lived not till the 100. yeare of the third Chiliad but died in the sixth yeare thereof for to the floud are reckoned 1696. yeares and Noah lived after 350. And againe the text saith that all the earth was overspread of Noahs three sonnes there was no place then for a fourth 4. Though
can save and destroy Iam 4.12 Onely God that gave unto man his life hath power to take it away and therefore otherwise than God hath given direction either by particular precept or generall rule the life of man is not to bee taken away 3. And seeing Magistrates are but Gods Ministers Rom. 13.4 they must execute justice according to his will for it is required of a disposer that he bee found faithfull 1. Cor. 4.2 but Gods will otherwise appeareth not than in his word 4. And seeing whatsoever is not of faith that is firme perswasion is sinne Rom. 14.23 and faith must be grounded upon the word as being wrought by the word Rom 10.17 how can the Magistrate approve his acts of justice as in the sight of God unlesse hee can warrant the same by the word 2. Neither yet can I consent with those which thinke that the punishment inflicted by Moses for the breach of the morall law together with the morall law is imposed upon Christian Magistrates as it is not lawfull to punish adulterie otherwise than by death nor simple theft by death but by restitution Piscator praefation in Exod. for if this were so then the Gospell should overthrow the policie and institution of divers Common-wealths which of a long time have continued but God is the author of peace not of confusion 1. Cor. 14.33 2. Mardoche and Daniel having place of government under the Persian Kings did no doubt minister justice according to the lawes of that countrey 3. Our Saviour Christ commanding to give tribute to Caesar and injoyning obedience to the higher powers which did beare the sword and that for conscience sake Rom. 13. seeme to give approbation to the lawes of nations maintaining right and tending to equity 4. Our Saviour himselfe observed not the judicials belonging to the morall law for whereas he that gathered stickes upon the Sabbath was stoned to death by Moses yet out Saviour excuseth and defendeth his Apostles who did as much as the other in rubbing the eares of corne for their necessity Matth. 12. yea hee giveth a rule that for fornication onely and adulterie it was lawfull for a man to put away his wife Matth. 19. which exception needed not if either in fact then or in right afterward adulterers and adulteresses were to bee punished by death If it be answered that Christ tooke not upon him the office of the Civill Magistrate to impose corporall punishment yet would not our Saviour have defended his Apostles nor yet by silence have left them unreproved for neglect of the law 3. Wherefore the best resolution is that the morall judicials of Moses do partly bind and partly are left free they do not hold affirmatively that we are tied to the same severity of punishment now which was inflicted then but negatively they doe hold that now the punishment of death should not be adjudged where sentence of death is not given by Moses Christian Magistrates ruling now under Christ the Prince of peace Isai. 9. that is of clemencie mercie may abate of the severitie of Moses law mitigate the punishment of death but they cannot adde unto it to make the burthen more heavie to shew more rigour than Moses becommeth not the Gospell to extend more favour is not unbeseeming of these two assertions my reasons are as followeth 1. That which Ambrose urgeth out of the mouth of Luke how our Saviour reproveth his Disciples because they would have had fire come downe upon the Samaritanes upon the which example hee thus inferreth Ostenditur nobis non semper in eos qui peecaverunt vindicandum quia nonnunquam amplius prodest clementia tibi ad patientiam lapso ad correctionem It is shewed us that alwayes vengeance is not to bee taken of those that offend because oftentimes clemencie is more profitable for patience in thee and amendement in the offender And this collection is ratified by the answer of our Saviour in that place The Sonne of man is not come to destroy mens lives but to sâ—ve them Luk. 9.55 2. Augustine urgeth the example of Christ who suffered the woman taken in adâ—â—tery to escape without punishment of death Ioh. 8. Whereupon hee inferreth that the adulter◠〈◊〉 not now to bee put to death but to live rather to be reconciled to her husband or to come 〈…〉 the usuall answer is that our Saviour doth not here abrogate the Law against adultery 〈◊〉 only to meddle with the Magistrates office Piscator Ans. Neither doe wee say that Christ abrogateth that law but leaveth it free and taketh away the necessitie of it And though Christ exercised not the Magistrates office in his owne person yet in this case it had not beene impertinent to have given direction to have her before the Magistrate as in another case he sendeth the leper to the Priest Matth. 8.4 if it had pleased him to impose still the severitie of the law yea our Saviour sheweth by his answer Let him that is amongst you without sinne cast the first stone at her Ioh. 8.7 that hee would not have them such strait executors of the rigour of Moses law upon others but rather to bee severe judges of themselves and with charitable affection to support the frailty of others to the which themselves were subject 3. Further the difference betweene the times of the Law and of the Gospell must be considered then they received the spirit of bondage to feare but now the spirit of adoption Rom. 8.15 then they which came neere the mount where the morall Law was given were stone or stricken thorow with darts whether man or beast Heb. 12.20 but it is not so now then the bloud of Abel cryed for vengeance but the bloud of Christ now calleth for mercie and so speaketh better things than that of Abel Heb. 12.24 Therefore to mitigate the severitie of Moses Law in some cases yet not leaving sinne unpunished nor by connivence cherishing the same it is more sutable to the profession of the Gospell of peace and mercie Wherefore I here say with Chrysostome Vbi paterfamilias largus est dispensator non debet esse tenax Where the master of the house is bountifull the steward must not be sparing Melius est propter misericordiam rationem reddere quà m propter crudelitatem It is better to be called to account for too much pitie than for cruelty 4. The continuall practice of the Church sheweth as much that the rigour of Moses judicials is mitigated S. Paul willeth the incestuous man only to be excommunicate 1. Cor. 5. it seemeth then there was no law in force to put such to death nor in Cyprians time who thus writeth Quidam episcopi in nostro provincia c. Some Bishops in our province have altogether shut up penance against adulterie Nor after that in the time of the Eliberin Councell which was held under the reigne of Constantine where it was decreed can 9. Moechatus post
his stead in earth but the Godhead and name of God is simply and properly given unto Christ. 3. Cont. Ecclesiasticall persons subject to the civill magistrat FUrther though Aaron be Moses mouth and speake for him to the people yet Moses is made his superiour so though the Priests and Ministers doe declare unto the people the will of God and the law is to be required at their mouth yet are they subject to the Civill power as here Aaron to Moses Pellican as the Apostle saith Let every soule be subject to the higher powers Rom. 13.1 4. Cont. Against the baptisme of infants by women Vers. 25. ANd Zipporah tooke a sharpe knife This example is alleaged by the Romanists to prove the lawfulnesse of Baptisme by women in the case of necessity Bellar. lib. 1. de Bapt. cap. 7. Contra But this example cannot serve their turne 1. because the Minister of circumcision in the old Testament is not precisely appointed as the Minister of Baptisme is for the Levites and Priests were not specially charged by commandement to bee Ministers of circumcision but that charge did indifferently lie upon the masters of the family Gen. 17.9 But in the Gospell they are bid to baptise that are commanded to teach Mat. 28.20 Piscato◠2. The Romanists lay upon baptisme a necessity of salvation but here the necessity was not in respect of the infant uncircumcised but in regard of Moses and not a necessity of eternall salvation but of preserving the outward life Piscator 3. Zipporah did it in presence of Moses by this example they may allow women also to baptise in the presence of the lawfull Minister Simler 4. And though it pleased God to remit the temporall punishment upon this externall obedience yet this sheweth not that God did approve this act as before instance is given of the Samaritanes who were delivered from the Lions being but halfe worshippers of God 2. King 17. the Lord onely sheweth hereby that it is pleasing unto him that the externall discipline of the Church should be preserved Simler 5. This then being in it selfe an unlawfull act in Zipporah saving that necessity forced it and extraordinary it cannot be drawne to an ordinarie practice specially where there can bee no such necessity Iun. 6. This example rather sheweth that baptisme though by an unlawfull Minister is to be held to bee baptisme as after Zipporah had circumcised her sonne he was not circumcised againe then that such are to be allowed lawfull Ministers Heretikes are not fit Ministers of Baptisme yet if they keepe the true forme of Baptisme the Church useth not to baptise after them for as Augustine well saith That which is given 〈◊〉 be said not to be given although it may be rightly said not to be rightly given 5. Cont. That the punishment for the contempt of circumcision was not only temporall but in Gods justice eternall Vers. 24. THe Lord met him and would have killed him Bellarmine from hence would prove that the penalty of the neglect of circumcision was only temporall and consequently that circumcision had not to it annexed the promise of remission of sinnes and deliverance from eternall death as the Sacraments of the new Testament have lib 2. de effect sacrament cap. 17. Resp. 33. ad argum 1. Cont. 1. The penalty inflicted for the omission of circumcision is laid upon the party himselfe that is not circumcised even that person shall be cut off Gen. 17.4 therefore this example of punishment imposed upon the parent for the neglect of it in his sonne is not fitly urged to that end 2. that law is made against those that willingly neglect circumcision and so wilfully breake the Lords covenant but here is no contempt but only negligence and oversight 3. It followeth not Moses only should have beene temporally chasticed for this negligence therefore the neglect of circumcision was onely punished by temporall death like as God would have killed Aaron with temporall death for consenting to the Idolatry of Israel Deut. 9.20 Doth it therefore follow that the punishment of Idolatrie was only temporall God unto his servants remitted in mercie the eternall debt chastising them onely temporally for their owne amendment and the example of other 4. But that the contempt of circumcision deserved everlasting death in the justice of God appeareth both by the phrase that soule shall be cut off from his people which signifieth a finall perishing from the Church of God both in this world and in the next as it is taken Levit 20.3 that he which giveth his seed to Moloch shall bee cut off as also by the reason there given because hee hath broken the Lords covenant and cursed is every one which transgresseth any part of the law Deut. 27.26 And the curse of God is not only temporall but eternall 5. Further that circumcision had annexed to it a promise of grace and remission of sinnes the Apostle sheweth calling circumcision the seale of the righteousnesse of faith Rom. 4.11 and the outward circumcision represented the circumcision of the heart whose praise was not of men but of God Rom. 2.29 6. Cont. Against the necessity of Baptisme NEither can this example of Zipporahs necessary circumcision of her sonne bee fitly alleaged to prove an absolute necessity of baptisme an hypotheticall that is a conditionall necessity depending upon the precept of Christ wee graunt that it is necessary that baptisme both in generall should bee retained in the Church because Christ hath instituted it and in particular that every one should yeeld ready obedience thereunto as unto Christs ordinance when it may bee conveniently had but such a penall necessity as to imagine children dying without baptisme to bee excluded the kingdome of God cannot be admitted 1. This were to tye salvation unto the externall signe and so to limit the worke of the spirit 2. Some of the fathers indeed as Augustine held such a necessity but hee made the same necessity of the other Sacrament upon these words of our Saviour Ioh. 6.53 Except yee eat the flesh of the Sonne of man c. ye have no life in you c. Simler 3. There is not the like necessitie of baptisme now and of circumcision then for that was tied to the eight day so is not baptisme and the necessitie was not in respect of the infant but of the parent that neglected it as the child here was not in danger but Moses himselfe 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. That one standeth in need of anothers gifts Vers. 14. DOe not I know Aaron thy brother c. that he shall speake God could if it had pleased him have given unto Moses the gift of eloquence utterance but he rather joyneth Aaron as assistant unto Moses not giving all gifts unto one but so diverslie dispensing and disposing his graces that one may stand in need of another even as the members of the bodie cannot say one to another I have no need of thee 1 Cor. 12.21
owne glorie Augustine saith Aliud Deus fecit ordinavit aliud non fecit sed ordinavit Some things God both doth ordaineth some things he doth not yet ordaineth that is disposeth of them to some good end 3. God is to be considered in the action of the hardning of the heart as a just judge that punisheth sinne by sinne so is he also an agent and not a patient or sufferer onely Their owne master of the sentences doubteth not to say that concupiscentia in quantum poena est peccati Deum habet aâ—thorem that concupiscence as it is the punishment of sinne hath God the author thereof lib. 2. distinct 23. So likewise may it be said that the hardning of the heart as it is a punishment of sinne proceedeth from God and his reason is because all punishments are just Therefore as God is a Creator giving power and life to all as hee disposeth and ordereth evill actions unto good as he is a just Judge and punisher of sinne so is he an agent in hardning of the heart therein shewing his power wisedom and justice but the sinne and evill therein committed is only of man who properly hardneth his owne heart 2. Conf. Against the toleration of any contrarie religion Vers. 29. AS soone as I am out of the Ciâ—ie Moses will not pray in the Citie which was given to superstition and Idolatrie he will separate himself from the companie and presence of the superstitious and unbeleevers that he may give himselfe to fervent and zealous praier And for this cause he said before that the people could not sacrifice unto God in Egypt Simler By this then we see that God cannot be purely served in the middest of Idolaters They which will worship God aright must sequester themselves from among such It is therefore a dangerous thing that any toleration of a contrarie religion should be admitted God will have as the whole heart in man so the whole worship in his Church where Gods arke is there Dagon shall be thrust out of his place for there is no fellowship betweene light and darkenes Christ Belial 2. Cor 6.14.15 As Iacob would suffer no superstition in his familie but removed all the images out of his house Gen. 35. so will a religious prince in his kingdom 3. Conf. Of assurance and confidence in prayer I Will spread mine hands unto the Lord and the thunder shall cease Moses here prayeth with confidence and is assured that God will heare his prayer So ought we to aske in faith pray with assurance that God will heare us S. Iames saith let him aske in faith and waver not neither let that man thinke that is he which wavereth that hee shall receive any thing of the Lord cap. 1.6.7 How then are not the Romanists ashamed thus to affirme non requiri in oratione sidem qua certo credamus Deum absolute facturum quod petimus that faith is not requisite in prayer to beleeve certainly that God will absolutely do that for us which we aske Bellarmin de bon operib in parâ—icul cap. 9. Indeed there is a double kind of such assurance one is extraordinarie which proceedeth of some speciall revelation as here Moses building upon Gods particular promises made unto him was sure his prayer should take effect the other is an ordinarie assurance which is also of two sorts either when we pray for things spirituall concerning eternall life where the faithfull have an absolute assurance to bee heard or for things â—emporall where our assurance is but conditionall that God will grant us such thing so faire forth as they are expedient And even in praying for things temporall there is also an assurance 〈…〉 and determinaâ—e which is somewhat rare yet often found in the children of God when they haâ—e 〈…〉 and constant perswasion that God will heare them for their temporall blessing which they pray for and God therein never faileth them as Iacob was assured that God would keepe him in his journey and give him bread to eat and clothes to put on Gen. 28. And of this assurance S. Iames speaketh thâ—t 〈…〉 of faith shall save the sicke Iam. 5. they which pray with confidence and assurance for the health of the bodie even shall be heard therein they which are not heard have not that fâ—iâ—h and God giveth them not that faith and assurance because he seeth such health not to be good for them There is beside this a generall assurance which every one of Gods children feeleth in their prayer as to be fully perswaded that either God will give them that particular temporall blessing which they pray for or some other gift which God seeth to be more necessary for them As Paul was not in particular assured that the pricke of the flesh should be taken from him yet he knew that his prayer should obtaine either that or a more pretious gift as the Lord said my grace is sufficient for thee he received the grace and strength of God to resist and overcome that temptation though it were not altogether taken from him Augustine concerning this difference of assurance betweene prayer for things temporall and for things spirituall hath this excellent sentence Sanitatem quis petit cum agrotat forte ei adhuc aegrotare utile est potest fieri ut hic non exandiaris at vero cum illud petis ut det tibi Deus vitam aeternam securus esto accipies A man asketh health when he is sicke and yet it may bee good for him to be sicke it may bee then thou shalt not be heard here but when thou asketh of God to give thee eternall life be out of doubt thou shalt receive it 6. Places of morall use 1. Observ. Sinne the cause of extraordinary sicknesse Vers. 10. THere came boiles breaking out into blisters As Pharaoh here and his people were smitten with boiles and ulcers for their sins which they had committed against God and his people so when the Lord sendeth strange diseases and sicknesses into the world wee must take them as signes of the wrath and indignation of God Simler As the Apostle sheweth that the Corinthians for certaine abuses which they were guiltie of in receiving the Lords Supper were chastised some with sicknesse some with death 1 Cor. 11.30 2. Observ. Gods judgements tempered with mercy Vers. 19 SEnd therefore now and gather thy cattell c. The Lord remembreth mercie in the middest of his judgements though the Lord had certainly determined to bring this plague of haile upon Egypt yet together Moses giveth advice how both they and their cattell should be preserved from it thus saith the Psalmist Mercy and truth are met righteousnesse and peace shall kâ—ssâ— one another Psal. 85.10 Gods truth and justice is accompanied with mercy truth and favour Pellican 3. Observ. Confession of sins which proceedeth onely from the feare of Gods judgements is no true or right confession Vers. 27. PHaraoh said unto them I
their time of rest during this three dayes journey Perer. But when they removed from the wildernesse of Sinai they went three dayes together without any stay the Arke still going before them to find out a resting place Numb 10.13 till they came to Kibroth Hatavah which was their next mansion place Numb 33.16 The Lord still animating and strengthning his people to go forward Iunius The third manner of staying was when the cloud remained still upon the Tabernacle two or three dayes and then they pitched their tents and thus the cloud staied in 40. yeere not above 42. times for so many mansion or camping places they had as they are set downe Numb 33. 4. Now how to know when they were to pitch their tents Pererius conjectureth at it and giveth these three rules First if the cloud stayed about noone then they knew that it onely rested till they had refreshed themselves but if it staied in the afternoone before night that they journeyed no more that day they tooke it that then they were to stay there some while and so pitched their tents But if it made no stay till the evening they pitched no tents till the next morning and then if the cloud went not forward they then set up their tents These are onely Pererius conjectures and uncertaine And it otherwise may be gathered out of the Scripture that they did not pitch their tents till the cloud had staied two dayes at the least as we read Numb 9.20 When the cloud abode a few dayes in the Tabernacle they pitched their tents at the commandement of God and afterward vers 22. If the cloud tarried two dayes or a moneth or a yeere upon the Tabernacle the children of Israel pitched their tents It seemeth then by this that this was a rule unto them not to pitch their tents or settle their campe till after two dayes Beside they had Moses to give them direction also in this case when to encampe themselves who continually consulted with God 5. Now the manner of their removing was this when the cloud arose from the Tabernacle the Priests and Levites tooke up the Arke and carried it and when they went forward with the Arke Moses used this prayer Rise up O Lord and let thine enemies bee scattered and let them that hate thee flee before thee And when the Arke rested hee said Returne O Lord to the many thousands of Israel Numb 10.35 Hereunto the Prophet alludeth when hee saith The Lord shall arise and his enemies shall be scattered Perer. 6. This cloud began not onely now to appeare when they were come to their third mansion place in Etham as Hierome thinketh but straightway upon their setting forth from Ramesis though mention be made first of it here that proveth it not now first to have appeared as Moses is said first in this place to have taken Iosephs bones with him which was done notwithstanding at his first comming out of Egypt the Scripture observeth not alwayes the order of time in setting downe matters of historie but the coherence of the argument So neither did the cloud leave them at Aarons death as is the opinion of the Hebrewes for seven moneths after Aarons death who died in the fift moneth immediatly before Moses death when Iosuah was consecrated to succeed him mention is made of the piller of the cloud wherein the Lord appeared to Moses Deut. 31.15 See more of this quest 22. before 7. Gregorie maketh the appearing of the bright cloud by day a signe of Gods favour and mercie to his obedient people and the appearing of the terrible fire by night as a signe of his severitie and justice against the wicked and unbeleevers Gregor hom 21. in Evangel Ex Perer. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Of the lawfull use of ceremonies Vers. 9. THis shall be as a signe unto thee upon thine hand c. As this place sheweth that there were then in the Church and so are still commendable ceremonies which the Lord hath instituted to be â—â—membrances of spirituall things as these were of their deliverance out of Egypt so their superstition is reproved that dwell in the externall ceremony not looking unto the spirituall sense Ferus as the Pharisies did which did weare their phylacteries and fringes yet forgot the law represented and signified by them 2. Doct. Christ the Mediatour both of the old and new Testament Vers. 21. IEhovah went before them He that is here called Iehovah is chap. 14.19 called the Angell of God which was none other but Jesus Christ Iun. the Prince and Captaine of his Church the Mediatour both of the old and new Testament according as the Apostle saith Heb. 13.9 Iesus Christ yesterday and to day and the same also is for ever 3. Doct. Christ sheweth us the way to the heavenly Canaan as the piller did direct the Israelites toward their Canaan Vers. 22. THe Lord went before them by day in a piller of fire This piller divers wayes represented Christ 1. He is the piller and upholder of his Church 2. He leadeth us the way unto eternall life as he himselfe saith I am the way the truth and the life Ioh. 14. 3. Aperit nobis viam maris rubei id est gratiam baptismi sanguine suo rubentes He openeth to us the way of the red sea that is the grace of baptisme died red in his bloud Rupertus 4. Christ is both a fire and a cloud that is both God and man 5. In noctâ— veteris testamenti paucis lucebat c. He did shine but to a few in the night of the old Testament as this fierie cloud gave light by night Ferus 6. But the most lively signification is this that Christ is that covering cloud under whose shadow wee are defended from the heate and stormes of temptation as the Prophet sheweth Isai. 4.6 Simler 5. Places of Confutation 1. Conf. Against the theatricall Pagean of the Masse Vers. 9. THey shall be a signe unto thee upon thine head These externall signets upon the head and frontlets betweene the eyes instituted at the first to a good end to put them in minde alwayes of the law of God they afterward superstitiously abused onely glorying in the outward ostentation of them so in Poperie the right use of the Supper of the Lord is turned into theatricum quâ—ndam actum Missa into a theatricall shew of the Masse calling men à communione ad spectaculum from the communion of the bodie and bloud of Christ to a gazing spectacle Simlerus 2. Conf. Against the adoration of reliques Vers. 19. MOses tooke the bones of Ioseph This maketh nothing for the adoration of the reliques of Saints which idolatrous use is still retained and practised in Poperie for Iosephs bones were carried to be buried they tooke up the bones of Saints and Martyrs after they have beene buried these were true bones they shew counters and ducks bones and such like trash for the bones of the Saints as hath beene found by
he had manifested himselfe among them they could not now as in the fight of God admit of any other The case of the Gentiles was otherwise for though they worshipped other Gods yet it was not coram facit Dei quae illis fuit incognita before the face of God which to them was unknowne Calvin And thus much in effect is declared afterward vers 23. Thou shalt not make with me Gods of gold c. Si me in Deum habetis non potestis habere alium If you will have me for your God you cannot have another QUEST V. What reasons ought chiefely to move us to acknowledge the Lord only to be our God HEre may be added the reasons which ought to move us to acknowledge the Lord Creator of heaven and earth to be our God 1. The first is taken from his dignity and excellency and great glory which is due unto him The Lord himselfe saith Isai. 42.8 My glory will I not give unto another This honour therefore is of right due peculiar and proper unto God to be acknowledged to be the only Lord therefore they rob God of his honour that worship any other God 2. The second reason is from the great benefits which we have received of the Lord hee hath created us and redeemed us and given us all things needfull for our bodies and soules 3. Because in baptisme wee have vowed obedience and service unto God and to become his servants and to renounce all other Gods whatsoever 4. The Lord hath froed and redeemed us from the miserable thraldome of sinne and Satan which was more grievous than the captivity of Egypt and Babylon and hath called us to his service whose yoke is easie and his burthen light This is the fourth reason Ex dominii diabolici gravitate From the heavinesse of the Devils thraldome 5. The fift is ex pramii sui muneris immensitate from the infinite greatnesse of his reward who hath not promised unto us an earthly Canaan a land flowing with milke and honey as to the Israelites but the everlasting kingdome of heaven Ex Thoma 2.2 quaest 122. ar 2. ad 3. 2. Doctrines observed out of the first Commandement 1. Doct. Of the particular contents of the first Commandement THe contents of this Commandement which prescribeth the true worship and acknowledgement of God and forbiddeth the contrary are by Moses himselfe the best Interpreter of the law reduced to these three heads To love the Lord thy God with all thy heart with all thy soule with all thy might Deut. 6.5 Monte affectu viribus with our minde our affection our strength In every one of these three shall be briefely shewed the duties which are commanded and the vices forbidden First in the minde and understanding is commanded here the true confession and acknowledgement in our hearts of the only God as our Saviour saith This is life eternall that they know thee to be the only very God and whom thou hast sent Iesus Christ Ioh. 17.3 Against this duty the offences and transgressions are these 1. Ignorance of God which is of two sorts either simple ignorance such as was that of the disciples of Ephesus that did not know whether there were any holy Ghost or no Act. 19.2 or affected and wilfull ignorance as Psal. 14.1 The foole hath said in his heart there is no God Such an one was Pharaoh who said I know not the Lord Such are all Atheists as wicked Diagorâ—â— and Theodorus that denied there was any God and Protagoras with the Machiavellians and Cotta in Cicero with the Academikes which were doubtfull whether there were any God or no. 2. They also offend here which erroniously bring in other Gods As 1. Some doe worship Devils as the Apostle saith That the things which the Gentiles sacrificed they sacrificed to Devils 1. Cor. 10.20 Of this sort are all Conjures Witches Sorcerers that make any compact or contract with the Devill 2. Some among the Heathen worshipped the Sunne Moone and Starres As Ierem. 44. the Idolatrous women in Israel imitating the Gentiles worshipped the Queene of heaven as they called the Moone 3. Some worshipped the elements as the Persians the fire the Egyptians the water 4. Some adored men as Gods under the names of Iupiter Mars Mercury And the Papists have set up their Saints whom they invocate and make their prayers unto and so rob God of his honour imparting the glory of the Creator to the creature 5. Some have worshipped unreasonable creatures As the Egyptians a Calfe an Oxe Vultures Crocodiles the Syrians and Phenicians a Fish the Persians a Dragon 6. They which erre concerning the Trinity whereof see in the end of the 3. doctrine following Secondly God must have our whole heart and entire affection as 1. Our love 2. Feare and reverence 3. Affiance and trust 4. Thankfulnesse 1. God is to be loved above all as our blessed Saviour saith He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me Matth. 10.35 Contrary unto this affection of love are 1. The naturall emnity of the flesh by nature against God as the Apostle saith The wisdome of the flesh is enmity against God Rom. 8.6 2. Selfe love 2. Tim. 3.2 and the love of earthly things Vrsiâ— 2. We must feare God above all Deut. 6.13 Thou shalt feare the Lord thy God and serve him As we are to love God because of his mercy goodnes and bountifulnesse so we feare him for his justice and power in punishing of sinne And this feare bringeth forth reverence worship serving and adoring of God as the Lord saith by the Prophet If I be a father where is mine honour If I bee a master where is my feare Malach. 1.6 God therefore is to be honoured as our father and to be feared as our Lord. Contrary hereunto is 1. Carnall security and casting off the feare of God as it is in the Psal. 10.11 He saith in his heart God hath forgotten he hideth away his face and will never see 2. Prophanesse and irreverence in the presence of God as in Eutyâ—hus that fell asleepe while Paul preached Act. 20. 3. Hypocrisie when men draw neere with their lips but their heart is farre from God Simler 4. Servile feare which differeth from true filiall feare in these three respects 1. In the beginning and cause thereof the Filiall feare proceedeth from the love of God whom the children of God are afraid to offend because he is so gratious and mercifull a Father unto them but the Servile feare ariseth from the consideration of the justice and wrath of God 2. In the object they differ the Filiall feare worketh upon sinne it selfe the Servile upon the punishment of sinne 3. In the fruits and effects the Filiall feare is joyned with assurance and confidence the Servile with despaire Vrsin 4. As these vices are in the defect so curiosity is in the other extreme of excesse when presumptuously any attempteth to search and pry into
very conscience is polluted Vrsin 4. In the glorious state of the Saints in the next life the obedience of the Saints shall bee perfect and they shall wholly be conformable to the will of God and then we shall be just not onely by the imputative justice of Christ sed propria essentiali justitia but by a proper essentiall justice and then we shall fully be made like to the image of Christ as the Apostle saith Rom. 8.29 Those which he knew before he also predestinate to be made like the image of his Sonne Marbach Now the contrarie objections are these 1. Object The works of the Spirit are perfect but good works in the regenerate are the works of the Spirit therefore they are perfect Answ. This argument proceedeth from that which is simpliciter simplie and absolutely said to bee of the Spirit to that which secundum quid after a sort is of the Spirit the works of the faithfull are not absolutely the works of the Spirit but they are so the works of the Spirit as they be also our works so they are pure as they proceed of the Spirit but impure and imperfect as they are wrought by man 2. Object They which are conformable to the image of Christ have perfect works The faithfull are conformable in this life to the image of Christ Ergo. Answ. The proposition is true onely of those which are perfectly conformable but so are not the faithfull in this life but onely in part as the Apostle saith 1 Cor. 13.12 Now I know in part and as our knowledge is so is our obedience both imperfect 3. Object There is no condemnation to the faithfull Rom. 8.1 therefore their works are perfect Answ. The argument followeth not for the privilege of the faithfull and their exemption from condemnation dependeth not upon the perfection of their works but upon the perfection of Christs righteousnesse imputed to them by faith 4. Object Christ at his comming shall render unto every one according to his works but it standeth not with Gods justice to give a perfect reward unto imperfect works therefore the works of the regenerate because they shall be perfectly rewarded are perfect Answ. 1. The obedience of the faithfull shall bee perfectly rewarded not according to the law of works but according to the law of faith whereby the righteousnesse of Christ is imputed and is rewarded in them being theirs by faith as fully as if it were their owne 2. Yet Christ shall judge also according to their works not as causes of the reward but as testimonies and lively arguments of their faith Vrsin 5. Object The Scripture ascribeth perfection to the works of the Saints as it is said of Noah Gen. 6.9 that he was a just and perfect man in his time so Hezekiah saith 2 King 20.3 I have walked before thee with a perfect heart Answ. 1. These and the like sayings must be understood de perfectione partium non graduum of the perfection of the parts of obedience not of the degree of perfection that is the faithfull doe exercise their obedience in every part of the law but not in a perfect degree or measure 2. They are said to bee perfect in comparison onely of such as were weake and imperfect 3. And further their sinceritie and perfection is understood as being opposite unto dissimulation and hypocrisie that their heart was perfect toward the Lord that is unfained without any dissimulation in which sense the Prophet David saith Iudge me according to mine innocencie Psal. 7.8 6. Object The Apostle saith Whosoever is borne of God sinneth not 1 Iohn 3.9 the faithfull then being borne of God sinne not Answ. The Apostle understandeth here not the dwelling of sinne but the reigning of sinne for otherwise he should be contrarie to himselfe who had said before chap. 1.8 If we say we have no sinne we deceive our selves and the truth is not in us They which are borne of God sinne not that is sinne though it remaine in them it reigneth not in them as S. Paul saith Though we walke in the flesh we doe not warre after the flesh Vrsin 7. It is evident then that the law was not given to justifie men thereby as the Apostle saith Rom. 3.20 Therefore by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified in his sight for by the law commeth the knowledge of sinne This then is the end and use of the law 1. It sheweth what God is one that loveth justice and hateth iniquitie 2. It is as a glasse wherein we may see that image after the which man was at the first created which now is defaced in him by sinne 3. It is a rule and line after the which wee should square out our life and actions 4. It sheweth the corruption of our nature and so is as a schoolemaster to bring us to Christ Marbach So Augustine saith Hac est utilitas legis ut hominem de sua infirmitate convincat gratiae medicinam quae in Christo est implorare compellat This is the profit of the law to convince man of his infirmitie and to drive him to seeke the medicine of grace in Christ Epist. 200. 6. Confut. That the Morall law nor any precept thereof may be by humane authoritie dispensed with THere remaineth yet one point to be discussed whether any of the precepts of the Morall law may be by humane authoritie dispensed withall wherein the Popes Canonists have heretofore given unto their terrene god an infinite and unreasonable power for these were their conclusions that Papa potest dispensare contra jus divinum The Pope may dispense against the law of God contra jus natura against the law of nature contra novum Testamentum against the new Testament contra Apostolum against the Apostle Papa potest dispensare de omnibus praeceptis veteris novi Testamenti The Pope may dispense with all the precepts of the old and new Testament c. But herein I preferre the judgement of Tostatus a moderate writer of that side who denieth unto the Pope any such authoritie and answereth the contrarie objections 1. Object As among men the Law-maker may dispense with his law so God that gave the Morall law is therefore above the law and may dispense with it and if God may dispense then the Prelates of the Church consequently may dispense because they are in Gods stead Answ. First to the proposition this may bee answered 1. That in humane lawes which tend unto the common good the preservation of the publike state the maintenance of peace and of justice the Law-giver himselfe cannot so dispense as to overthrow the end of those lawes as that it shall be lawfull to disturbe the publike state or such like for this were to evert the very scope and end of the law but yet in particular cases he may dispense as where an order is that every one shall watch which is intended for the good of the Citie yet
and 〈◊〉 2. And beside the facility easinesse and readinesse of theft other things are to be respected as the worth and price of the thing stollen and the boldnesse and impudency of the theefe 6. Wherefore these reasons rather may be yeelded 1. Quia frequâ—ntius furtâ— subtraâ—ebantur 〈◊〉 It might be that it was a more frequent and usuall thing to steale oxen among the Hebrewes than sheepes and therefore God would restraine the more usuall theft by the greater punishment Tostat. 2. In hâ—c dominium majus â—adacia major In this theft of oxen the losse was greater to the owner when his exe was stollen and the boldnesse of the theefe greater 〈…〉 esse Such a theefe as should steale oxen had need be bold and cunning because such a theft cannot so easily be hid as of sheepe 3. Ab. Ezra also giveth this reason because when a sheepe is stollen the owner loseth but his sheepe but in the other theft 〈…〉 he loseth his oxe and the labour of his oxe this reason also is approved by Oleaster 〈◊〉 Gallasâ—â—â— But Tostatus taketh this exception that iâ— the losse of the oxeus labour â—e accounted here in the restitution of five-fold why should it not be respected as well when the thing stollen is found with the theefe in which â—ase he was to pay but two-fold qu. 2. The answer here is ready because where the oxe is found though thâ—â—e â—e an intermission of his labour yet there is hope of restitution againe so is there not here the oxe being killed or sold. 7. Iosephus thinketh that this Law extendeth it selfe also to other cattell in the fields as to goats as well as sheepe though they be not here 〈◊〉 But concerning the asse or horse because they are not so easily stollen being kept in the house Tostatus thinketh that the Law of two-fold restitution tooke place as in the stealing of houshold stuffe and other moveable goods But it is more like recording to the rule observed before in other Lawes that by one kinde the rest are understood and these two the oxe and sheepe are given â—n â—ssistance as the most usuall and common beasts unto which all other great and small cattell should be reduced as afterward vers 4. direct mention is made of the asse QUEST III. Of the divers punishment of theft and whether it may be capitall NOw concerning the punishment of theft 1. The licentious liberty of the Lacedemonians is much to be misliked who punished not theft at all because they thought it was a meanes to traine and exercise their people in the practice of warre Gallas for it being a Morall law Thou shalt not steale and so grounded upon the Law of nature it ought not by any contrary custome to be discontinued 2. Neither is that Law of Solâ—â— which the Romans also inserted into their twelve Tables to be altogether approved aâ—â—â—ing opposite to Moses Law for they punished manifest theft with foure-fold when the theefe was taken in the manner whereas Moses setteth it but at two-fold and theft not manifest when the theefe is not found with the thing that was stollen they censured with restitution of two-fold whereas Moses chargeth such offence with foure-fold because such an one as hath sold or killed the stollen good hath added sinne to sinne having no purpose of restitution nor there being any possibility thereof Herein therefore the Law of Moses is more equall than the other 3. The Law also of Draco is too severe which punished theft with death the Scythians did so also but they had some reason for it because they had no houses or places of defence for their cattell so that if theft among them had not beene most severely punished nothing could have beene safe 4. Nor yet am I of their opinion that thinke that lex Mosis non pertinet ad politiam nostram the Law of Moses doth not at all belong to the policie of Common-wealths now Lippom. Non sumus alligati ad leges Iudaicas forenses That we are not bound how to the Jewes Civill lawes at all Osiand but that Magistrates may increase the externall punishment whether by death or otherwise as the circumstance of time quality and condition of the people require Contra. 1. As we are not strictly tied in every point to Moses Judicials so yet the equity thereof remaineth still which chiefly consisteth in this in the due measuring and weighing of the nature of sinnes which are thought to be worthy of death 2. Punishments externall may be increased which concerned either pecuniary mulcts or other bodily chastisement not touching the life as Moses punished theft with foure-fold but afterward the sinne increasing it was set at seven-fold Prov. 7.31 Pelarg. 3. But whereas mans life is only at Gods disposition this may be safely affirmed that no humane Law can take away the life of man for any offence without either generall or particular warrant and direction from Gods Law as is more at large before declared p. 4 5. 5. And yet I cannot consent to those that thinke no theft at all ought to be punished by death for even by Moses Law a violent theft as in breaking up of an house was judged worthy of death it was lawfull to kill such a theefe vers 2. Againe sacrilegious theft was likewise punished in the same manner as Iakob giveth sentence that they should not live that had stollen Labans gods Gen. 31.32 So Achan was put to death for stealing the excommunicate thing Iosh. 7. Theft committed of wantonnesse and without mercie David adjudgeth unto death 2 Sam. 12. vers 6. Chrysostome thinketh that David legem est praetergressus exceeded the Law in that he commandeth beside the restitution of foure-fold the man to be slaine and he calleth it supereffluentem justitiam overabounding justice But the Law of God did beare out David in it for he which did sinne presumptuously and with an high hand that is of malice and obstinacie was to dye for it Numb 15.30 Such was the sinne of the rich man whose case there is propounded which having many sheepe himselfe tooke away the poore mans sheepe by violence and had no pity Further he that did steale a man was to dye for it by the Law of Moses vers 16. So that it is evident even by Moses Judiciall lawes that some kinde of theft deserved death By the Romane Lawes also as is extant in their 12. Tables servants convicted of manifest theft were first beaten and then cast downe headlong from the rocke By the Imperiall lawes a theefe for the first offence was whipped then if he offended againe he lost his eares and the third time he was hanged in Anithent ut nulli Iudici c. for now such a theefe sinneth of obstinacie and malice and contempt against the Lawes and Magistrate and may by the Law of God be worthily put to death Simler So likewise such thefts whereby the publike peace and safety is violated as in the Campe
alleaged QUEST LXXXII Whether Moses did well in wishing to be raced out of the booke of life and in what sense he so prayeth NOw then seeing the elect which are once written in the booke of life can never be blotted out and Moses was not ignorant thereof how could he pray so directly against the will of God 1. Some thinke that he might so pray to be raced out not as he was there eternally written according to Gods prescience but in respect of his present state of grace as Lippoman saith that when Moses sinned at the waters of strife delevit eum de libro secundum praesentem justitiam God blotted him out of his booke in respect of his present justice but afterward put him in againe c. But it cannot be so here for seeing none are so blotted out but by their sinne for Moses to desire to be so raced out had beene petere peccare mortaliter to crave to sinne mortally and againe God doth not thus race out any in respect of their unrighteousnesse but they race out themselves 2. Some thinke that Moses thus prayed quia turbatus erat because he was troubled and perplexed and did not consider at that instant whether that were impossible which he desired and they thinke he thus spake ex impetu passionis in the heat of his passion Ex Lyrano And Calvin saith not much unlike Mosem tanta vehementia fuisse abreptum ut loquatur quasi ecstaticus That Moses was carried away with such vehemencie that he spake as a man beside himselfe But Lyranus reason confuteth this answer because tranquillitas mentis tranquillity of minde is required in him that commeth unto God 3. Augustine giveth this exposition Ego sum certus quod non delebis me de libro vitae c. I am sure that thou wilt not blot me out of the booke of life and so Lord let me be as sure that thou wilt not destroy this people Ex Lyran. Tostat. But in that to this part of Moses request the Lord answereth negatively that he will not blot out him but whosoever sinneth Moses spake not so in that sense of his owne confidence and assurance for then the Lord would not therein have contradicted him but rather have given consent unto his speech as approving his confidence or else it would seeme to be an impertinent answer neither of which is to be admitted 4. Rupertus whom Ferus followeth thinketh that Moses speaketh affirmatively in this sense that if so the Lord in mercie would not pardon the peoples sinne but deale rigorously consequitur ut me de libro tuo deleas it must also follow that I be blotted out of the booke of life But this should have shewed Moses to be wavering and doubtfull of his owne salvation whereof the faithfull have such confidence and assurance that though thousands should perish they would make no question of their owne salvation 5. Lyranus giveth this interpretation that Moses thus spake Secundum dispositionem partis inferioris anima According to the disposition of the inferiour part of his minde that is in his affection and desire though it were not so in voluntate rationem superiorem sequente in his will following his judgement the superiour part of his soule as Christ in his desire wished the cup to passe from him yet simpliciter vellet pati simply would suffer and so Moses here simpliciter voluit non deleri simply would not bee blotted out But this example is nothing like 1. For first divers of the ancient Writers prove out of this place the two wils of Christ as Athanasius Humana voluntas propter infirmitatem carnis refugiebat passionem His humane will by reason of the infirmity of the flesh refused to suffer sed divina prompta erat but his divine will was ready c. So also Hierom then in this sense this example fitteth not Moses at all who had not two such wils as Christ had 2. But allowing Christ here to pray as man which is rather to be received for as God he prayeth not but is prayed unto We may further admit that distinction of Peter Lombard that there is Duplex affectus mentis sensus A double affection of the minde and of the sense Christ in the affection of his minde and judgement was willing to suffer but sensualitatis affectu in the affection of his sense he desired the cup to passe but this was a naturall desire in Christ to escape death now in Moses to wish not temporall but eternall death was a supernaturall desire and therefore proceeded not from the sensuall part of his minde but rather out of his most inward feeling and meditation 6. Tostatus thinketh it to be a parabolicall speech Ad signandum intentionem defideriâ— To shew the intention of his desire like unto that of Rachels unto Iacob Give me children or else I dye Gen. 30. and yet Rachel would rather have chosen to live and have no children than to have children and then presently die like as if a man should say Doe this thing for mee or else kill me and yet he had rather that thing should be left undone than himselfe to be killed and after the same manner doth Moses pray here But this were for Moses to speake one thing and meane another And as Hierom well compareth them together Moses spake here with the like affection that S. Paul prayeth to be an anathema and accursed for his brethren sake which the holy Apostle spake with his whole desire calling Christ to witnesse that he lied not As S. Paul is not to be taken there to speake parabolically or figuratively but even from his heart so doth Moses here 7. Borrhaius saith that Moses thus prayeth with a condition Si non vis if thou wilt not pardon Israel then race me out I am vero Moses non velle Deum Israelem in totum perdere fide agnovit Now Moses was sure by faith that God would not wholly destroy Israel But Borrhaius maketh that the conclusion here God will not destroy Israel therefore I cannot bee blotted out c. which Moses useth as an argument to perswade the other Race mee out of thou wilt not c. And beside Moses here prayeth not that the Lord would not wholly destroy the people for that God had granted him before vers 14. but that the Lord would forgive them their sinne and be fully reconciled 8. Iunius understandeth this desire of Moses also to be conditionall but in another sense as this condition he would have supplied Si Deo placebit si videbitur If it shall please God if it shall seeme good unto him which condition the Apostle would have generally understood Iam. 4. So also Marbachius would have the like condition expressed Si possibile fit If it be possible as our Saviour putteth in that condition If it be possible But these instances are not alike in temporall things because Gods will is not revealed unto us we
the people are in great hazard by the long absence of the governour Lippom. Let idle Pastors and secure Non-residents remember this how that the wolfe will spoile the flocke when the Pastor is gone therefore Saint Paul exhorteth the Elders of Ephesus to take heed of themselves and the flocke because he knew that after his departure grievous wolves would enter not sparing the flocke Act. 20.29 2. Observ. Men are then unthankfull when their good is intended and procured FUrther herein is noted their great ingratitude that while Moses was occupied in receiving lawes for them for their good they go about to make an idoll so as Chrysostom noteth The Jewes the same night sought to take Christ when he instituted his last Supper for their comfort The people here renounce Moses even when he was most carefull for their good Oleaster 3. Observ. Excesse in eating and drinking maketh men forget God Vers. 6. THey sate them downe to eat and drinke and rose up to play Which sheweth that gluttonie and drunkennesse is the mother of play and wantonnesse as Gregorie noteth Cum corpus in refectionis delectatione resolvitur cor ad inane gaudium relaxatur While the bodie is too much delighted in outward refection the heart is let loose to vaine rejoycing Pelarg. So the Apostle saith Be not drunke with wine wherein is excesse but be filled with the Spirit the filling with wine maketh us emptie of Gods Spirit 4. Observ. Against prodigall expenses in superstition and vanitie Vers. 3. THey plucked from them their golden earings Here appeareth the right guise of superstitions men that are very sparing in setting forth the true service of God but are most lavish in decking their idols as many adulterers doe suffer their wives and children to want being most prodigall in maintaining their harlots Simler They also are here noted which upon their vanities can bestow whatsoever as in playing at dice and cards and such like but are verie sparing in workes of charitie as giving to the poore Oleaster 5. Observ. The force of the Saints praiers Vers. 10. LEt me alone Wee see what force is in the prayers of the Saints whereby the Lords hands are as it were tied and bound from smiting Dei potentiam servi praeces impediebant The servants prayers hindred the Lords power Hierom. Ligatum habent sancti Dominum ut non puniat nisi permiserint ipsi The Saints have the Lord bound that he cannot punish unlesse they will Bernard So the Apostle saith The prayer of the righteous availeth much if it be fervent Iam. 5.16 6. Observ. Not to be rash in anger OLeaster further doth thus collect here that as God without Moses consent would not exeicise his fierce wrath upon the people so men in their anger should consult with their friends not as Rehoboam who refused the aduice of his prudent counsellers 7. Observ. Of the commendation of fasting Vers. 19. HE brake them in peeces c. Ambrose hereupon thus noteth Tabulas legis quas accepit abstinentia conteri fecit ebrietas The tables of the law which abstinence and fasting received drunkennesse caused to bee broken that is as soone as Moses saw the riot and excesse of the people through anger he brake them Sterilitatem matris Sampson vini abstinentia faecundavit Annam non manducantum exandivit Deus Abstinence from wine made Sampsons mother fruitfull and God heard Anna absteining from meat c. And our blessed Saviour saith This kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting 8. Observ. No respect of persons to be had in regard of Gods glorie Vers. 21. ANd Moses said to Aaron Calvine here giveth this good note that Moses the question being of Gods worship non minus fratri suo germano parcere c. doth no more spare his owne brother then if he had been a very stranger there must bee no respect had of friendship kinred acquaintance when Gods glorie commeth in question as the Levites afterwards sheathed their swords even in their owne sonnes and brethren So the Apostle saith Have not the faith of our glorious Lord Iesus in respect of persons Iam. 2.1 9. Observ. Not to put off the fault to another whereof our selves are guiltie Vers. 22. THou knowest this people Aaron putteth off the fault from himselfe and laieth it upon the people Hic est pernitiosus iam inde ab Adam in nobis inveteratus mos c. This pernicious error even from Adam is growne into a custome to transferre the fault upon another Lippoman for so did Adam turne it to Eve 10. Observ. Mercie and justice to be tempred together Vers. 27. SLay every man his brother Videmus in Mose duo contraria c. We see two contrarie things in Moses mercie and judgement mercie in his praying for the people and justice in commanding the idolaters to be slaine Ferus which two being joyned together in Governours Civill and Ecclesiasticall doe make a pleasant and sweet harmonie as the Prophet David saith Psal. 101. I will sing mercie and judgement unto thee O Lord I will sing 11. Observ. We must go on in our calling though we see others punished before us Vers. 24. GOe now therefore bring the people c. Though the Lord did respite the peoples further punishment yet he would not have Moses be negligent in that charge which was committed unto him Etsi vult populum punire tamen nobis pergendum est in nostromunere Although God intend to punish his people we must goe on in our dutie Simler So when the plague was begun in the host Moses bid Aaron take his censer and so hee censed betweene the dead and the living and the plague staied Numb 16. CHAP. XXXIII 1. The Method and Argument IN this Chapter is set forth the reconciliation of God with his people wherein first the preparation to this reconciliation goeth before to vers 12. then the manner of the reconciliation followeth to the end of the Chapter 1. In the preparation 1. There is shewed on Gods behalfe how first he telleth Moses that although he would bring them into the land of Canaan yet hee will not goe with them himselfe vers 1 2 3. and the effect that followed the sorrow of the people vers 4. Secondly the Lord chargeth them to lay aside their good raiment vers 5. and the people obeyed vers 6. 2. On Moses behalfe he to shew that the Lord was departed from them the more to humble them pitched his tent without the host vers 7. 3. On the peoples part is described their humilitie in looking toward Moses and worshipping toward the Tabernacle with the cause that moved them Gods presence there in the cloud and his talking with Moses to vers 12. 2. The manner of the reconciliation followeth 1. The reconciliation it selfe is set down 1. With Moses reasons taken from Gods favour toward him vers 12. from his covenant with the people vers 13. from the contrarie inconvenience vers 14. from
mercie Calvin Et quia multi effectus And because there are many effects of the divine mercie Ferus Slow to anger erech aphaim 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 long suffering God straightway punisheth not men when they sinne but spareth them emendationem expectando in expecting their amendment Lyran. Peccata eorum dissimulando as it were dissembling and winking at their sins to bring them to repentance as hee did forbeare the old world 120. yeares Burgens Poenam differendo in deferring the punishment Ferus God doth not presently punish as though he either knew not or neglected our sinnes but that we should come to amendment of life Marbach As Saint Peter sheweth 2 Pet. 3.9 Pelarg. This is a singular effect of Gods mercie Oleaster Abundant in kindnesse rabh chesedh God is so rich in mercie that he hath more compassion of us than we have of ourselves Tostat. He diversly sheweth the effects of his pietie and pitie Lyran. He is propensus ad beneficentiam prone and readie unto mercie Borrh. He extendeth his mercie unto all Oleast And he is multa pietatis of great pitie towards all men Pelargus Multifarie impendit misericordiam he many wayes bestoweth his mercie 1. Sometimes when he seeth men in miserie he hath compassion on them as upon the Israelites in Egypt 2. Sometime ex gratuita voluntate of his owne gracious will though they be in no trouble as Christ in mercie looked upon Paul when he converted him 3. Sometime hee spareth the wicked for the righteous among them as hee promised Abraham not to have destroyed Sodome if ten righteous persons could have beene found among them 4. God also spareth his people lest the enemies should have occasion to blaspheme as Moses intreateth God chap. 32.12 5. God oftentimes sheweth mercie to a multitude for the zeale of one righteous man as Phinches by his zeale appeased Gods wrath toward the people 6. Sometime the Lord considereth the frailtie and weaknesse of man and so forbeareth them as Psal. 78.38 He oft times called backe his anger c. for he remembred that they were flesh Burgens And in truth veemeth As God is mercifull in promising so he is most true stable and constant in performing his promises Lyranus and Burgensis understandeth this of Gods justice verax â—dest justin true that is just As God is said to be just of his word and promise it may be so interpreted but not as Gods justice and severity is compared with his mercie for that property of God is described in the next verse here Gods truth hath relation to his mercie and promises he is verax promissa servando true in keeping his promises Ferus God is faithfull he deceiveth none he cannot lye And if Gods promise be not performed it is because the condition is not kept and so the failing is not on Gods behalfe but on mans such was that promise made to David Psal. 131.12 If thy sonnes keepe my covenant c. their sonnes shall sit upon thy throne for ever Tostat. qu. 7. This mercie and truth of God non aliter comprehendi potest quam ex verbi testimonie cannot be otherwise comprehended than by the testimony of his word Calvin And the Lord specially maketh mention here of his truth ad consolandum Mosem to comfort Moses that hee should not doubt but that God would make good all his promises to Israel Borrh. Vers. 7. Reserving mercie for thousands 1. Here a definit number is put for an indefinit he meaneth all the posterity of the faithfull Pelarg. Hee sheweth mercy not only to those with whom he covenanteth sed etiam descendentibus ex eis but to those which descend of them Lyran. Oleast As the Israelites now found by experience that God respected them for their fathers Borrh. And long after even in the latter times qua sunt valde distantia à temporibus patrum which were farre distant from the times of the Fathers God remembreth his mercy as Levit. 26.41 I will remember my covenant with Iacob c. yea this promise comprehendeth all the time both of the old and new Testament for God remembring his promise to the Fathers sent his Sonne into the world but this must bee understood of such generations as doe not obicem ponere which are not a barre unto themselves by their sinne and disobedience Burgens Here Gods mercy reacheth unto a thousand generations his justice but unto the third or fourth Simlerus Forgiving iniquitie transgression and sinne 1. Lyranus by these three understandeth sinnes committed against our neighbour against God or against our selves 2. Burgensis by the first would have signified sinnes of infirmity by the second sinnes of malice by the third sinnes of ignorance 3. But thus are they better distinguished the first word ghavâ—n or as Oleaster pronounceth it aon commeth of that root which signifieth to be crooked it betokeneth crooked offences which proceed of malice or ex proposito of purpose the second peshagh is of pâ—shagh which is to deale unfaithfully signifieth such sinnes as are treacherously committed against God as was the sinne of idolatry committed against the Israelites Tostat. Pelarg. Such sinnes which proceed ex superbia of pride Oleaster Ex contemptu of contempt Cajetan The third chataah generally signifieth sinne but is more specially here taken for the sinnes of ignorance and infirmity Tostat. quaest 7. Oleaster Cajetane Pelarg. 4. Wherein appeareth Gods singular mercy not only to the righteous but to the unrighteous Ferus 5. Et non levibus tantum dâ—lictis sed gravissimis sceleribus dat veniam Who only doth not pardon small offences but most grievous sinnes Calvin QUEST XI How the Lord is said not to make innocent BY no meanes making the wicked innocent 1. The words in the originall are thus In making innocent he will not make innocent which Ferus following the Chalde paraphrast divideth into two sentences He maketh innocent or dismisseth unpunished them which doe repent yet justifieth not those which are impenitent but the grammaticall construction will not beare this sense In absolving he will not absolve but ate referred to the same object 2. Osiander understandeth it of such as make themselves innocent before God whom the Lord notwithstanding will not hold to bee innocent but nakeh here is not a noune but a verbe In making innocent c. 3. The Latine readeth thus Nullus apud te per se innocens None is with thee of himselfe held to be innocent that is none of himselfe or of his owne power can be innocent before thee So Tostat. qu. 8. But these words with thee and of himselfe are not in the originall 4. Lyranus thus interpreteth that none are innocent before God as having either actuall or originall sinne but the word nakeh is here a verbe naki signifieth the innocent the other to make innocent it cannot therefore be thus construed the innocent he maketh not innocent but in making innocent he will not make innocent
it may be thus answered 1. There is no mans righteousnesse which is sufficient for himselfe much lesse is it of such force as to extend to so many generations that God for the fathers righteousnesse should forgive all the sinnes of their posterity they were not Abrahams merits but Gods gracious promise made to Abraham which procured such favour and mercie to his posterity 2. Only the merits of Christ are of such infinite vertue partly in regard of the perfection of his obedience wherein was no defect and partly for the worthinesse of his person being both God and man that the force thereof indureth to all generations But in Christs death there is both merit and mercie to bee considered in that Christs death satisfieth fully for the sinnes of the world it is a worke of merit not of mercy in respect of the Redeemer for the death of Christ being given for our sinnes is aliquid aequâ—valens of like value fully answerable to Gods justice therefore forgivenesse of our sinnes is merited by Christ not purchased of favour But in respect of us it is of mercie both in that God gave his Sonne to dye for us it shewed his mercy and love toward us 1 Ioh. 4.9 And in that Christ would vouchsafe to dye for us being sinners was his great mercie and love Rom. 5.8 And thirdly that he applieth the merit of his death to us and maketh his righteousnesse ours for where no workes are but faith the wages is not counted by debt but of favour as the Apostle sheweth by the contrary That to him that worketh the wages is not counted of favour but by debt Rom. 4.4 Tostat. qu. 7. QUEST XVII After what manner God sheweth mercie to thousands and visiteth iniquitie to the third and fourth generation VPon occasion of these words vers 7. of Gods reserving mercie unto thousands and visiting iniquitie to the third and fourth generation Tostatus inferreth certaine propositions and conclusions which may serve further for the explanation of this verse 1. The promise of shewing mercie to a thousand generations is most certaine and alwayes performed but the other visitation to punish God alwayes executeth not because he is more inclined to mercie than justice 2. The children which suffer for their fathers sinnes may beare the iniquity of many of their predecessors at once as Tostatus reckoneth fifteene persons in foure generations for whose sinnes the childe may suffer as on his fathers side there are his father his grandfather grandmother great grandfather and great grandmother and his belser and beldame these make seven and there are as many on his mothers side all these make 14. persons of his predecessors and ancestors within foure generations and himselfe maketh the fifteenth so likewise the childe may fare well for many of his good predecessours sake but they are not limited to the generations as the other and so cannot be numbred 3. According to the greatnesse of the righteousnesse or iniquity of the fathers so is mercie or judgement extended more or lesse unto their seed mercy may be shewed to a thousand that is many generations and sometime it may be restrained to fewer as the Lord promiseth Iehu that his seed shall sit upon the throne of Israel but unto the fourth generation 2 King 10.30 And so the punishment never exceedeth the fourth generation but it may fall out that it doth not reach so farre according to the quantity of the sinnes of the fathers which the children imitate 4. It is often seene that the children may both be afflicted for the sinnes of their fathers in one respect and in another receive mercie as Rehoboam for Davids sake held the Kingdome of Judah but for the sinne of Salomon and his owne he lost the Kingdome of Israel 5. The more vertuous predecessors one hath the greater mercie shall he receive as the blessing of Abraham Isaack and Iacob were more availeable than if there had beene but one of them and therefore Iacob saith to Ioseph The blessings of thy father shall be stronger than the blessings of mine Elders Gen. 49.26 for he had his fathers blessing and all the rest concurring therewith 6. The more evill predecessors one hath the greater punishment he receiveth his owne sinne also being added to theirs as Salomon for his owne sinne deserved to be deprived of the Kingdome but for his fathers sake he injoyed it still yet he had trouble in his old age But Rehoboam because of Salomons sinne and his owne had a greater punishment the losse of the Kingdome of Israel Tostat. qua st 10. QUEST XVIII Why Moses made haste Vers. 8. THen Moses made haste 1. Some Hebrewes thinke that Moses made this haste when he heard the Lord pronouncing that he would visit the iniquity of the fathers to the third and fourth generation lest the Lord should have proceeded to more generations to the fifth or sixth But it is not like that Moses would interrupt the Lords speech or that he would presume to alter the Lords purpose Tostat. Simler 2. Cajetane thinketh that Moses à principio visionis prostraverit se from the beginning of the vision did prostrate himselfe But how could he have then seene this goodly vision of the Lords back-parts if he had beene prostrate upon the ground 3. But these were the reasons why Moses made haste being stricken with admiration at the presence of God which both by this glorious apparition and by the Lords voice was manifested hee humbleth himselfe Marbach Being thereto invited also suavissima concione by the most sweet and comfortable speech of the Lord Osiander And he maketh haste ne omitâ—eret opportunitatem lest he should omit the opportunity offered for the Lord passed by as in haste Ferus Like as subjects use to offer their petitions to the Prince at his first comming into any City quia suam praesen iam omnibus jucundam esse volunt because they will have their presence comfortable to all Simler QUEST XIX Of Moses prayer the manner thereof and of Moses perswasions vsed in his prayer Vers. 9. I Pray thee c. that the Lord would now goe with us 1. Moses had obtained this before but he still renueth the same petition Timebat enim ne superveniret impedimentum propter pâ—ccitum populi He was afraid lest through the peoples sinne some impediment might fall out to hinder the Lords purpose Lyran. Tostat. And he doth renue his prayer as our blessed Saviour prayed thrice in the garden quia non sufficit semel orasse because it is not sufficient to pray once Lippom. De novo orat c. Hee prayeth also anew because he desired new promiseâ— Ferus 2. Moses useth three perswasions in this his prayer one is from the condition of the people because they were of a stiffe necke and had so much the more need of Gods presence to mollifie them â—un And so Moses returneth that upon God as a reason of his presence which the Lord had alleaged before
worship him as also this line is continued to shew the accomplishment of Gods promise that the seed of the woman should breake the serpents head and so S. Luke doth fetch the petigree of Christ after the flesh from these fathers before the floud 2. Vers. 22. In that Henoch first walked with God in earth before he walked with him in heaven it sheweth that we must first seeke Gods glory in earth before we can bee admitted unto that everlasting glory so Saint Peter reasoneth that because we looke for new heavens and a new earth we should bee diligent to be found of him without spot c. 1 Pet. 3.13 3. Vers. 29. In that Lamech said of his sonne Noah this same shall comfort us c. it appeareth that the faithfull then looked for a comforter that should deliver them from the curse and give them true rest of which comforter and deliverer Noah was a figure who both by faith was made heire of righteousnesse himselfe Heb. 11.7 and by the arke which was a type of Baptisme 1 Pet. 3.21 did preach and testifie to the world the true deliverance by the Messiah CHAP. VI. The Method THis Chapter hath two parts 1. Gods determination to destroy the world 2. The preparation or making of the Arke In the first part there is set downe 1. the occasion which provoked God to purpose mans destruction which was the sinne of that age described in particular the sinne of carnall pleasure vers 1. of oppression and tyranny v. 4. in generall vers 5. 2. In Gods determination there is first his repentance that hee had made man vers 6. then the limitation of one hundred and twenty yeares to see if they would amend vers 3. 3. Gods full resolution to destroy all flesh vers 7. In the second part there is first set downe the ground of this favour of God towards Noah which was Gods mercy and grace towards him Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord vers 8. and Noahs justice and righteousnesse vers 9. which was by faith Heb. 11.7 then followeth in the next place the commandement of God concerning the making of the Arke and Noahs obedience thereunto vers 21. In the prescription or commandement for the Arke there is described 1. the forme and fashion thereof both of what matter it should be made vers 14. of what length breadth height vers 15. in what order for the cabbines vers 14. window doore vers 16. 2. The use thereof for the preservation of man vers 18. of beasts vers 19. of foules vers 20. and their sustentation in laying up their food vers 21. The grammaticall sense v. 2. They tooke them women T. they tooke them wives caet v. 3. sonnes of princes Ch. sonnes of God cat Elohim hebr of Gods or God v. 4. my spirit shall not remaine or continue in these men 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 S.H. this evill generation shall not remaine forever Ch. my spirit shall not strive alwayes with man or because of man Tr. B.G. heb don to judge contend because their workes are evill c. a terme shall be given them of 120. yeeres if perhaps they will be converted Ch. my spirit shall not alwayes be as sheathed P. neden a sheath v. 4. There were Giants S.H.B.G.P. Ch. there were defectores backsliders Tr. Heb. Nephilim à naphal to fall because Giants cause men to fall through feare the first reading is the best 1. because they are called mighty or strong men heb gabar which the Septuagint also translate Giants 2. So it is taken Num. 13. 34. and cannot be otherwise 3. Because of the consent of interpreters and Iunius in his last edition so readeth v. 6. God considereth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 S. it repented God in his word Ch. it repented God caet v. 7. and the Lord said this clause the latine have not the rest have v. 6. and he thought S. he spake in his word that hee would breake the strength of them according to his good pleasure Ch. and hee was grieved in his heart cat praecavens taking heed for afterward hee was touched with griefe of heart H. v. 7. every one thinketh in his heart 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 diligently unto evill all the dayes of his life S. all the thought of his heart is intent to evill all time H. the sense of his cogitation iâ— evill all time Ch. the imagination of the thoughts of his heart onely evill every day T.B.G.P. rach onely v. 9. Noah pleased God S. walked in the feare of God Ch. walked with God T.B.G. v. 11. filled with iniquity S.H. Rapine Ch. violence T. cruelty B. G. chamas to oppresse v. 2. the time of all flesh is come before me S. The end of all flesh caet v. 14. of square wood S. levigatis plained wood H. Pine tree B. G. of Cedar wood Ch. of Gopheâ— T.P. which is a kinde of Cedar v. 16. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 gathering shalt thou make the Arke S. a window shalt thou make in the arke caet â—sahar a window heb a cleare light T. v. 16. the doore shalt thou make in the side S. thou shalt make the doore of the arke in the side below H. the doore of the Arke in the side caeter thou shalt make parlâ—rs tristega and three lofts therein H. thou shalt make the lower second and third roomes caet The explanation of doubts or theologicall explication QVEST. I. Of the greatnesse of the sinne of the old world 1. THe sinne of the world was very great seeing God could endure the wicked inhabitants no longer but swept them away with the floud which may appeare by these severall considerations 1. their wickednesse was universally spread vers 12. all flesh had corrupted his way 2. Their sinne exceeded in greatnesse it was come unto the very height vers 5. God saw that the wickednesse of man was great 3. Not onely the wicked race but the righteous seed the sonnes of God fell to folly vers 2. 4. They were exercised a long time in doing evill a thousand yeares and more that they were growne to such an habite that they could doe nothing but thinke evill in their heart 5. Unto this may be added their gracelesse obstinacie that having an 120. yeares given them by the preaching of Noe to call them to repentance yet despised Gods long suffering QVEST. II. When the world beganne to be so wicked 2. THis overflowing of iniquity beganne when men beganne to be multiplied upon the earth vers 1. not so soone as the world began to be peopled which might bee within two or three hundred yeares after the creation for then they began to build Cities Ninus King of Assyria who reigned there some 230. yeares after the floud is reported to have had in his armie 70. hundred thousand footmen and 200. thousand horse men in the like time after the creation might the world be exceedingly replenished 2.
So here the Lord holdeth on his unchangeable course of judgement in punishing sinne yet seemeth to repent in undoing his worke in destroying man whom he had made Perer. QVEST. XII Why the creatures are punished with man 9. Vers. 7. I Will destroy from man to beast c. Not onely man shall be destroyed but the other creatures with him and yet man onely had sinned The reason is 1. as Chrysostome sheweth because all things were made for mans use hic igitur cum e medio tollitur quis illorum usus erit and therefore when man is taken away there should be no use of them 2. Like as when the head is cut off all the members die so together with man the creatures over the which he had power are punished not onely he but his Hereby the severity of Gods punishment appeareth as also the greatnesse of mans sin that brought destruction upon many as Davids sin in numbring the people did upon the whole land 3. Because beastly men had abused the creatures to their filthy pleasure and riotous excesse it standeth with Gods justice to punish the instrument with the principall 4. The fishes are not also here threatned to be destroyed because they lived in that element wherewith God purposed to overflow the earth neither had man so much abused them as the other kinds and beside it pleased God to spare them among other creatures at other times the Lord threatneth also to take away the fish of the Sea Hosh. 4.3 Mercer QVEST. XIII How Noah is said to be perfect Vers. 10. NOah was a just and perfect man c. 1. Noah not yet any man living can be said to be perfect in respect of Gods justice or in the sight of God as the Psalmist saith If thou O Lord markest what is done amisse who shall be able to abide it Ps. 130.3 2. Neither yet in regard of that perfection which the Saints shall attaine unto in the Kingdome of God as the Apostle sheweth Not as though I had already attained either were already perfect Phil. 3.12 3. Neither yet is any so perfect as that he can be found in this life without sinne which was the heresie of the Pelagians for the Preacher saith there is not one just man upon the earth that doeth good and sinneth not Eccles. 7.20 4. Neither is any said to be perfect because they can keepe the commandements and doe more than is commanded in observing the Evangelicall counsell as Pererius and other Popish Writers 5. But Noah is said to be perfect in comparison of others and therefore it is added in his generation or in regard of the perfection which may be attained unto in this life which is rather in the will and desire to be perfect and in increasing and going still forward than in any actuall accomplishment of the desire and in this sense the Apostle having a little before denied himselfe to bee perfect yet saith to the Philippians Let as many as be perfect bee thâ—â— minded Philippians 3.15 and so our Saviour biddeth us be perfect as our heavenly Father is perfect that is that we should more and more labour for perfection As Augustine saith Ingredi sine macula non aâ— surde dicitur non qui jam perfectus sed qui ad ipsam perfectionem irreprehensibiliter currit Hee is not amisse said to walke without spot not who is already perfect but runneth unto perfection without reproofe Thirdly how Noah is said to be perfect is expounded vers 8. Noah found grace in the sight of God it was the perfection then of faith whereby Noah was excepted as just and perfect in the sight of God being by faith cloathed with the perfection and justice of Christ. QVEST. XIIII How the earth was corrupt 11. THe earth was corrupt before God 1. That is the inhabitants of the earth where corrupt as Chrysostome saith Homo terra appellatur quia totus terrenus Man is called earth because he was become wholly earthly 2. Or they had infected the very earth with their abominations and made it accursed Iun. as the Psalmist saith A fruitfull land is turned into barrennesse for the wickednesse of them that dwell therein Psal. 107.34 3. The earth may be said to be corrupt that is defiled with those sinnes of uncleannesse which they committed as the Scripture testifieth that the land is defiled with such abominations Levit. 18.25 4. The earth was corrupt before God that is they were growne to such impudency and boldnesse in their sinnes that they would commit them even as in the presence and sight of God as the Prophet saith They declare their sinnes as Sodome they hide them not Isay. 3.9 QVEST. XV. Whether they which died in the floud perished everlastingly Vers. 13. I Will destroy them with the earth c. Here a great question ariseth whether all they which were destroyed in the floud perished everlastingly that is both in body and soule 1. For answer to this question we neither thinke that most of the old world were onely temporally punished which seemeth to have beene the opinion of Hierome that they which perished in the floud as likewise the Sodomites receperunt in vita malasua received their punishment in this life To the which purpose he urgeth that place Nahum 1.9 Non consurget duplex tribulatio Affliction shall not rise the second time and therefore it standeth not with Gods justice to punish twice for the same sinne both in this world and the world to come To this place I answer first that the Prophet speaking of the destruction of the Assyrians sheweth onely that theiâ— overthrow should be finall that God should not need to smite them againe As Abishai said to David when hee found Saul asleepe Let mee smite him and I will not smite him againe 1 Sam. 26.9 Thus Theohpylact and Theodoret expound this place Secondly if it bee expounded as it is alleaged it must be understood onely of penitent persons that such being afflicted in this life shall not need to be punished againe as we may see in the repentant theefe but concerning the the other theefe detemporali ad aeternum transvectus est supplicium he was carried from temporall to eternall punishment as Rupertus saith 2. Neither doe we approve their opinion that thinke many of the old world though incredulous before yet when they saw the floud comming in fine vitae poenetentiam egerunt did repent them even in the end of their life sic Lyranus Bellarmine For S. Peter calleth them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the world of the wicked 2 Pet. â— 5 They then that were wicked so continued to the end 3. Neither is the opinion of Cajetanus to be received that thinketh non fuisse simpliciter incredulos id est sine vera Dei side that they were not simply incredulous that is without the true faith of God but only beleeved not Noah in this that the floud should come
the rest of his sonnes being yet unborne Ramban 3. Neither is this an imprecation but a prediction of that which was to come Theodoret Calvin 4. Canaan is accursed not Cham not for that Canaan first saw his fathers wickednesse Theodoret or because of Gods favour towards Cham in preserving him in the Arke as some Jewes thinke nor yet lest that if Cham had beene named his whole posterity should have beene under this curse whereas Canaan only standeth under it Perer. for the whole lineage of Cham stood accursed But Chams sonne is noted not the father both to shew the greatnesse of his sinne whereby the punishment was derived also to his posterity Calvin And to declare that Canaan following his fathers ungodly steps who was partaker with him deriding Noah Mercer was also worthy of the same malediction Ambrose ibid. As also Canaan is singled out from the rest of Chams sons by the spirit of prophesie whereby Noah foresaw the wickednes of that nation and now the time was come when the event was to answer the prophecy in expelling the Canâ—nites and making them servants to Sems posterity Calvin As also hereby we are given to understand as Gregory well noteth in that Cham sinning Canaan is cursed quod reproborum nequitia hic inultae proficiunt sed in posterum feriuntur that wicked mens sinnes goe a while unpunâ—shed but they are afterwards met withall QVEST. XX. How Canaan became a servant to his brethren SErvant of servants 1. That his condition should be most slavish and servile more vile than the lowest degree of servants which should be so much the more grievous because he is subjected to his brethren whereas to be a servant to strangers is more willingly borne as Iosephus brethren thought great scorne that their brother should be their Lord Muscul. 2. We see that as in Adam sinne brought forth death so in Caine it is the beginning of slavish servitude ecce fratrem eodem natum patre peccatum fecit servâ—m behold sinne maketh the brother borne of the same parent a servant Chrysost. A profitable service and subjection should otherwise have beene in the world as when men for order sake and their better preservation obey their mercifull and prudent rulers that governe them as fathers But the slavish life and service had the beginning in cursed Canaan such as their state is that are taken captives in battell who being saved alive servi fiebant a servando appellati became servants being so called because they were saved Augustine 3. Though this curse did not presently take place for the Cananites did hold the Israelites a while in subjection yet at the length Gods judgements which hee in his wisdome and secret counsell for reasons best knowne to himselfe suspendeth were executed to the full upon Canaans seed Calvin QVEST. XXI How children are punished for their parents sinnes BUt here a great question will be moved that seeing Canaan was accursed for his fathers sinne how it standeth with Gods justice to punish the children for the fathers transgression for the better resolving of this doubt these severall considerations are duly to be weighed 1. The judgements of God are of two sorts they are either executed in this life or in the next in this many times they which sinne escape unpunished and they which are innocent are temporally chastised but in the next world every man shall receive according to their workes 2. Gods judgements in this life are either in spirituall or temporall things in spirituall which properly concerne the soule none are punished for another as the Lord saith by his Prophet Ezechiel the sonne shall not beare the iniquity of the father nor the father of the sonne but the soule that sinneth shall dye But in temporall things as the losse of the commodities and pleasures of this world yea of life it selfe one may be punished for another 3. The judgements in temporall things are to be considered either as chasticements and medicines or as punishments in the first sense they may fall upon innocents as Daniel and Ezechiel went into captivity being not guilty of the peoples Idolatry but this was a medicine tending to their spirituall good But as they are punishments they are onely incident to those which have deserved them So then God in his infinite wisdome doth lay temporall chasticements upon some even for others sinnes 1. That thereby we should be admonished both to detest sinne in our selves and to disswade others from it seeing it enwrappeth many in the same judgement 2. God can recompence abundantly the losse of temporall things yea of life it selfe with spirituall and eternall blessings 3. Yet none are so pure and innocent but must confesse that howsoever they are free from some great offences yet for other sinnes they may justly deserve punishment 4. But this course to punish one for another is onely to bee left unto God Man must observe another rule to punish him onely that sinned as it is in the Law the father shall not be put to death for the sonne nor the sonne for the father Deut. 24.16 though in other punishments which tend not to the death or affliction of the body as in depriving of honours liberty goods it standeth with justice even among men to punish the children for the fathers and many for one as is seene in the case of treason yet this privilege in general to punnish one for another is peculiar to God because he is both the Soueraigne Lord over man and all he hath he only knoweth how to make such chasticements medicinall and how otherwise abundantly to recompense those that are afflicted which things are not in mans power who therefore in inflicting of punishment must respect every mans desert 5. Yet for the most part they which are punished for other mens sinnes are guilty of the same themselves and therefore the Lord saith he will visit the iniquitie of the fathers vpon the children to the third and fourth generation of them that hate me Exod. 20.5 Where is to be considered 1. That God alwayes thus punisheth not but rather by this threatning terrifieth than verifieth the same by his iudgements Theodoret. yet sometime the Lord thus judgeth the posterity of the wicked as Gregory well saith si nulla puniret quis Deum res humanas curare crederet sin cuncta puniret extremum judicium unde restaret if God should punish no sinnes who could thinke that God had any care of humane matters and if hee punished all no man would looke for the latter judgement 2. Herein the long sufferance of God appeareth that hee deferreth his judgement sometime to the third and fourth generation to see if in the meane time the wicked parents or their children may amend if they doe not then the Lord is said to visit their iniquities that is to remember them at the length which he had a great while left unpunished as the Prophet saith
QUEST XXII Of the largenesse of the plaine that was destroyed Verse 25. ANd overthrew those cities and all the plaine c. where now standeth the dead and salt lake or sea 1. Plinie saith it is above an hundred miles long and twenty five broad 2. But Iosephus which better knew being brought up in the countrey giveth it â—ut 580 furlongs in length that is 72. miles and somewhat more and 150. stadia or furlongs broad that is nineteene miles or thereabout By this it may appeare what a great destruction this was which overflowed such a great circuit of ground 3. Aristotle also testifieth by heare-say that the thicknesse and saltnesse of the water is such that it beareth up man or beast throwne into it ex Perer. QUEST XXIII Whether any were saved beside Lot and his company ALL the inhabitants of the cities 1. Then Strabo 〈◊〉 deceived which thinketh that some of the cities were forsaken of those which could flie away lib. 17. so that he supposeth that divers escaped but the Scripture testifieth that all the inhabitants saving Lot his wife and two daughters were destroyed 2. Not onely the men and women but the infants also perished in the fire so that there remained no seed or off-spring of the Sodomites as the Prophet witnesseth Isai. 1.19 Except the Lord had reserved unto us a seed wee should have beene as Sodome c. This the Lord did 1. to increase their sorrow and torment in seeing the destruction of their children 2. to shew his perfect detestation of that wicked nation whose very seed was accursed 3. Although those infants were not guilty of their fathers actuall sinnes yet it may stand with Gods justice temporally to chastise the children for their fathers sins as Davids childe begotten in adulterie died Perer. 4. God hath absolute power and free choice to shew mercy to whom he will and to withhold it at his pleasure 5. Gods judgements are secret yet most just Calvin 4. This destruction of the Sodomites by fire was a foreshewing of everlasting fire the vengeance whereof they now suffer Iude 7. therefore Hierome is deceived that saith Deum ad praesâ—ns reddidisse suppliciâ— ne in aeternum puniret that God did chastise them presently that hee should not punish them eternally Unlesse Hierome bee expounded to speake conditionally if they repented which it is not like they did Wee may therefore safely subscribe to the sentence of Saint Iude that the Sodomites are eternally punished for neither were there any just men left after Lot was gone out upon whom God might shew mercie neither is it like they did repent in that instant seeing they scorned Lots warning before neither can any temporall punishment whatsoever redeeme or buy our everlasting damnation QUEST XXIV Of the barrennesse of the ground where Sodome stood and the strange fruit there growing Verse 25. ANd all that grew upon the earth 1. Not onely for that time were the plants and herbs smitten but the earth was stricken with barrennesse for ever As the Psalme hath reference to this example 107.34 A fruitfull land turneth he into barrennesse or saltnesse for the wickednesse of the inhabitants Aristotle also witnesseth that the bitternesse and saltnesse of the water is such that no fish can live therein lib. 2. meteor 2. Borchardus also that spent 10. yeares in the viewing of that countrey saith that no grasse groweth there and that it alwaies smoaketh 1. pars c. 7. num 38. which is agreeable to that place of the Prophet Isay 34.9 The rivers thereof shall be turned into pitch the dust thereof into brimstone the smoake thereof shall goe up for evermore 3. Others also doe write that the fruit which there groweth is outwardly like other fruit but within the rine there is nothing but dust and ashes Ioseph li. 5. de bell Iudaio Solinus saith Fuliginem favillaceam ambitus extimae cutis cohibet that the goodly outward rine or skinne onely doth keepe in the filthy soily embers cap. 37. Pererius QUEST XXV Why Lot feareth to stay in Zoar. Vers. 30. HE feared to tarry in Zoar c. 1. Not so much for that the City was subject to earth-quakes and had divers times before beene thereby overthrowne whereupon it was called Bala of Balaug which signifieth to swallow or devoure and therefore Lot might thinke that now much more the same calamity might befall it in this fearefull tempest of fire and brimstone sic Hieron in tradition Hebraic 2. But rather Lot seeing the same sinnes to reigne in this place might feare lest the same punishment should overtake them wherein notwithstanding he sheweth his weaknesse in not staying upon the Lords promise Calvin 3. As also that fearefull judgement which fell upon his wife at his entring into Zoar might move him the sooner to depart from thence QUEST XXVI How Lot is said to be delivered for Abrahams sake Vers. 29. GOd thought upon Abraham and sent Lot out c. It may bee here questioned how Lot is said for Abrahams sake to be sent out when Saint Peter saith That just Lot was delivered 2 Pet. 3.7 he was then delivered for his owne righteousnesse by the Apostles sentence The answer here is not that Lot was delivered for his service to Abraham in Egypt in concealing Sarah to be his wife or following him out of his Countrey but 1. Lot was indeed principally delivered neither for Abrahams nor his owne righteousnesse but for the Lords owne mercy and goodnesse sake and it is most certaine that Lot should have beene delivered though he had not beene Abrahams nephew yet the Lord to testifie his love to Abraham and to encourage us one to pray for another doth shew how much the prayers of the faithfull prevaile with him 2. God is said to remember Abraham not what hee prayed but what God said to him that he would not destroy the righteous with the wicked Muscul. 3. As also it may be referred to the Lords first promise made to Abraham I will blesse them that blesse thee Gen. 12. so that Lots deliverance dependeth not upon any merit in Abraham but Gods gracious promise toward him Iun. QUEST XVII Whether Lots daughter were indeed ignorant that there was no man left alive but her father Vers. 31. THere is not a man in the earth to come in unto us c. 1. Origen thinketh that Lots daughters thought verâ—â—y that all the world had beene destroyed by fire as it is like that they had heard of their father that there should be a conflagration of the world but they perfectly understood it not But this is not like for they might easily have discerned from the hils the rest of the Countrey to be untouched and they came but lately from Zoar which was preserved 2. Some thinke further that this ignorance of theirs was invincible and remedilesse and by this argument would excuse their practice with their father sic Ioseph lib. antiq Irenaeus lib. 4. c. 51.
it for a recompence for taking Sarah away as the Septuagint read and Chrysostome expoundeth 2. Or to buy Sarah and her maid vailes to hide their beauty that others be not intangled ex Perer. 3. Or that it was a gift of honour to shew that Sarah was both chaste and innocent Latine translat and the great Bible so also Rasi 2. It is not understood of this excuse or dissimulation which Sarah used as though the sense should be this that she might use this vaile or colour of the truth among her ownr for they could not bee deceived but among strangers she should plainly confesse her selfe to be Abrahams wife Lyranus Tâ—status for what needed Sarah to use any such excuse where she was knowne 3. Some doe referre it as well to Abraham as to the gift and to all that now hapned that they were signes of Sarahs chastity Mercer But the better interpretation is to apply it to Abraham that he should be the veile of her eyes 1. That no man knowing her to be Abrahams wife should looke upon her to desire her Aben Ezra Cajeâ—â—n 2. It also putteth Sara in minde of her subjection to Abraham whereof the veile is a signe 1 Cor. 11. â—0 3. Oleaster also further stretcheth it that Abraham was her veile that is her just excuse that she did this for his cause being by him perswaded but the former exposition is the better QUEST XIII How Sarah was reproved SHe was thus reproved 1. The 70. reade speake the truth that is that I am innocent and touched theâ— noâ— but this reading dissenteth from the originall 2. So doth the Latine remember thou art deprehended Lyppoman saith it should be read reprehensam reprehended not deprehensam deprehended 3. Iunius readeth all this is done that thou maist be learned 4. But the better reading is all this was that sheâ— might be reproved or in all this she reproved her selfe so that they seeme to be the words rather of the writer concerning Sarah than of Abimelech to Sarah QUEST XIV Whether Abimelech were smitten with any disease Vers. 17. GOd healed Abimelech c. for the Lord had shut up every wombe 1. Aben Ezra is not right that thinketh that Abimelech himselfe was stricken with no disease but that he is said so to be because his wife and maidens were punished for the text it selfe saith that God healed Abimelech and it is most like that God sent upon him some infirmity in his secrets whereby he was kept from comming neare to Sarah QUEST XV. What the shutting up of the wombe signifieth 2. THe shutting up of the wombe is not to bee understood as Pererius doth of the difficulty of bringing forth for then the children being ready for birth and staying longer than their time should have beene suffocated and the text saith the Lord had shut up every wombe but all were not great with childe at one instant Neither need we with Calvin because in so short a time Sarah being conceived with childe of Isaack and not yet delivered there could be no experience or triall of their sterility and barrennesse to say the history is transposed and was done before for Abraham till now had no occasion to sojourne in Gerar therefore the meaning is that the women were hindred from conception so signifieth the shutting up of the wombe as the opening of the wombe betokeneth aptnes to conceive as we reade Gen. 29.31 The Hebrewes affirme that not onely in the women but the men also all their pores and passages were stopped as well of the mouth to take meat as of other places that expell them and that the hens could not lay their egges but the text beareth it not 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Adultery a sinne punishable with death Vers. 3. THou art but dead c. God threatneth death to Abimelech conditionally if he did not restore Abrahams wife Iun. whereby we see that in the justice of God adulterie is a sinne to be punished by death as Iudas adjudged Thamar to the fire for whoredome Gen. 38.24 Where the law then is more gentle than to inflict the punishment of death upon adulterers they may thanke the lenity of the Magistrate which useth not that rigour which may well stand with justice 2. Doct. Ignorance excuseth not sinne Vers. 6. I Kept thee that thou shouldest not sinne against mee c. Abimelech then if hee had touched Sarai though he did not know her to be anothers wife had sinned ignorance then excuseth not sinne though it doe some what extenuate and qualifie it Muscul. as it is in the Gospell He that knew not his masters will and yet did commit many things worthy of stripes shall be beaten with few stripes Luk. 12.48 he that sinneth willingly shall receive more stripes and he that falleth of ignorance shall have some also 3. Doct. The whole family blessed because of the Master Vers. 7. THou shalt die the death and all thou hast as the sin of the Master of the house bringeth a judgement upon the whole familie so the Lord also sheweth mercy to the whole house for the masters sake Luk. 19.9 This day is salvation come into this house because he is become the sonne of Abraham 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. No perfect righteousnesse in this life Vers. 5. WIth an upright minde and innocent hands c. This place is no ground for their opinion that thinke a man in this life may attaine to perfect justice for Abimelech doth not absolutely cleare himselfe from all sinne but onely in this particular in this degree of sinne that he had not committed willingly any act of uncleannesse with Sarah Calvin as the Prophet David useth to plead for himselfe Psal. 7.3 If I have done this thing if there be any wickednesse in my hands c. he onely purgeth himselfe from the suspition of a particular fact 2. Confut. The Scripture sendeth us not to pray to the dead but to be holpen by the prayers of the living Vâ—â—s 7. HE is a Prophet and shall pray for thee c. Neither doth this place make for the invocation of Saints that are departed for God sendeth not Abimelech to Noah or any other departed to pray for him but to Abraham then living Calvin The living then may pray for the living which duty may be mutually performed in charity while one knoweth anothers necessities But for the living to pray to or for the dead which know not their wants and they are already certainly disposed of in an unchangeable state as the living are not it hath no warrant upon any precept or example of Scripture or any sound reason drawne from thence 3. Confut. Against the heresie of the Tritheists Vers. 13. WHen God caused me to wander out of my fathers house c. The word is â—lohim Gods in the plurall number which maketh some to understand the Angels Vatablus Calvin but God and not the Angels first called Abraham from his Country fathers house
one people with them which they could not doe with those which were uncircumcised QUEST IV. Whether Simeon and Levi their cruell act may be in part or in whole excused Vers. 25. ANd the third day when they were sore two of Iacobs sonnes Simeon and Levi. 1. Some Hebrewes excuse Simeon and Levi their fact because Hemor and Sichem first went about to breake the covenant thinking to spoile them of that they had for thus they say Shall not their flocks and substance be ours vers 23. Contra. 1. But it appeareth not that Hemor and Sichem went about any such thing they thus speake either to perswade the people who most respect their profit Mercer or they meane that by trading or having entercourse with them they should in a manner possesse their goods Perer. 2. But if it were so onely Hemor and Sichem had beene guilty of the violating of this league there was no cause to punish the whole Citie 3. And although they had reason to revenge themselves yet such a cruell massacre cannot be justified 2. Ramban excuseth this fact thinking that by the decrees of Noah if the Magistrates punished not adultery others might but who seeth not what confusion and disorder this doctrine would bring in â— that every private man should take upon him to bee a punisher of sinne The Apostle saith that the power or magistrate beareth not the sword for nought Rom. 13.4 It is peculiar then to him to exercise the sword 3. Philo allegorizeth this story by Dinah which signifieth judgement understanding the soule by Sichem the sonne of Hemor which is interpreted an Asse the brutish affections from the which Simeon and Levi the sonnes of prudence deliver the soule Lib. de migration Abrah But these allegories being devised onely and not warranted by Scripture cannot give any defence to such rage and violence 4. Some doe but in part excuse Simeon and Levi which may be considered on Gods behalfe and so the punishment was just or on the behalfe of the Sichemites who also for consenting unto that grievous sinne were justly also punished but on the behalfe of Simeon and Levi because they did it craftily this judgement was unjust sic Carthusian in libr. Iudith But this allegation maketh nothing for the justifying of Simeon and Levi their enterprise for God knoweth how to turne mens wicked acts to his glory neither did these furious men aime at any such end but sought to satisfie their revengefull minde 5. Some goe yet further that this act was not unjust quoad rem in respect of the thing because the Sichemites had grievously sinned but quoad modum they did it fraudulently Cajetan others say primum motum that the first motion to commit this slaughter was of God but they in the execution did modum excedere exceed measure Thom. Anglic. Cont. But Iacob condemneth not onely the execution but the very first device and counsell Into their secret let not my soule come Gen. 49.6 therefore the very first thought and device was evill and therefore not of God 6. Some proceed yet further and altogether defend both their fact and the manner thereof calling their craft and dissimulation a prudent caution their reasons are these 1. Because all the Sichemites were consenting unto that wickednesse and therefore they deserved punishment Cont. 1. It cannot bee gathered that all the Sichemites were consenting to the sinne of Sichem their fault was because of a carnall minde for their owne profit they received circumcision 2. And though the whole City had herein offended yet Simeon and Levi had no such calling or commission to put them to the sword 2. The place is objected Iudith 9.2 where the Lord is said to have given unto Simeon a sword to take vengeance upon the strangers that opened the wombe of the virgin and vers 4. Which were moved with thy zeale Contra. Though Simeon and Levi were ministers of Gods justice upon the Sichemites for their sinne yet they did it not without sinne and therefore against this booke which is no Scripture where their zeale is commended I oppose the sentence and censure of Iacob who saith That they did it in their selfe-will therefore not by the motion of Gods spirit and Cursed be their wrath Gen. 49.7 but if they had done it in zeale they were rather to be blessed 3. They further reason thus that if Simeon and Levi had committed such an unlawfull act Iacob would have more sharply reproved them Contra. Iacob partly considered the justice of God upon the Sichemites for the outrage committed against Dinah partly hee was moved with her complaint and moane for the losse of her virginity partly he gave place for the time to the rage of his sonnes that were in their fury and this was the cause of so easie a reprehension Mercer 4. But we reade of no restitution which Iacob caused to be made of the goods of the Sichemites taken away which Iacob would have done if the act had beene unlawfull for he saith He got it from the Amorite that is the fields and possessions of the Sichemites by his sword and bow Gen. 48.12 Contra. 1. It is not unlike but that many of the persons as the women and children taken captive were returned for they could not all remaine in Iacobs house and together with them much of the goods 2. The rest together with the ground though first unjustly had it pleased God should remaine unto Iacob as a recompence for the injurie done to his daughter as the Hebrewes tooke of the Egyptians jewels of silver and of gold without any restitution thereof in respect of their long and hard service yet neither this fact of theirs nor the other of Iacobs is here to be imitated Mercer 3. Iacob is said to get it with his sword not as though he joyned with his sonnes in the action or after consented unto it but because he by force and armes was ready to defend the possession of that ground from the invasion of the Canaanites whom God did strike with a feare they attempted nothing against Iacob or his sonnes Gen. 35.5 Mercer 5. Wherefore the best solution of this question is that although Simeon and Levi were ministers of Gods justice secretly working yet both the act and the manner thereof in respect of the instruments and executioners was unlawfull 1. Because they attempted this thing without the counsell or knowledge of Iacob whom this wrong most concerned in the ravishing of his daughter for Iacob saith Into their secret my soule enter not Gen. 49.7 2. They dissembled propounding a condition as though they would enter into a league with them and yet meant it not 3. They make religion a cloake of their cruelty and abuse circumcision to that end the ordinance of God yet Ioseph somewhat to hide the nakednesse of the fathers of that Nation in his narration omitteth to make mention of this craft 4. They put the whole Citie to the sword even those
inferreth that the Law Levit. 18.16 that a man should not marry his brothers wife was but a judiciall law not grounded upon the law of nature and abrogated by Christ and that it is not simply evill so to doe for then it could not be made lawfull by circumstance Bellar. de maâ—ri cap 27. Contra. 1. For a man of a lustfull and uncleane minde to take his brothers wife is against the law of nature and was never lawfull but in this case onely to marry her in obedience to the law and to revive the memory of the dead was not against the law of nature 2. If it had God who is above nature and who giveth law unto nature might in this case grant an indulgence and dispensation for those times 3. Like as then to kill was simply evill and forbidden in the commandement yet in the zeale of Gods glory to kill the wicked as Phinehes did the adulterer and adulteresse and Samuel the king of Ameleck was lawfull and commendable so notwithstanding that law in Leviticus which forbiddeth the discovering of the shame of the brothers wife Levit. 18.16 that is of a filthy and uncleane desire to marrie her it might be lawfull to doe it onely in this case to shew obedience to the law and love to the dead in raising up seed unto him which was not to discover their shame but rather to cover it in that the brother departed had by this meanes an heire to keepe his memory the woman had issue which was childlesse before 4. That this law which forbiddeth to marry the brothers wife was not abrogated by Christ appeareth by Iohns reprehension of Herod that it was not lawfull for him to have his brothers wife Mark 6. 2. Confut. Against the Anabaptists of the lawfull power of magistrates Vers. 24. LEt her be burnt This maketh against the opinion of the Anabaptists who deny that the Magistrate among Christians hath power to put any to death And lest it might be thought onely lawfull in the Old Testament and not in the new the Apostle confirmeth the same saying that the power beareth not the sword for nought and that he is the minister of God to shew revenge upon those that doe evill Rom. 13.4 Now whereas the Anabaptists object that place Matth. 5.38 Yee have heard that it hath beene said an eye for an eye a tooth for a tooth but I say unto you resist not evill c. Where Christ they say restraineth this power of revenging evill given by Moses to the Magistrate the answer here is readie that although this rule was first given to the Magistrate yet the Scribes and Pharises corruptly applied it to private revenge so that our Saviour in this place disanulleth not the law of Moses but speaketh against their corrupt gloses upon it 6. Places of Exhortation 1. Observ. How life is to bee counted a blessing Vers. 6. ER was wicked c. and therefore the Lord slew him Length of daies then simply and in it selfe is a blessing of God and the extraordinarie shortning and cutting off the daies is a curse the blondie and deceitfull man shall not live out halfe his daies Psal. 55.24 yet this is to be understood with certaine conditions and limitations 1. In respect of the times for long life more apparantly was accounted a blessing under the old testament when the people were fed and nourished with temporall promises but under the Gospel we must looke to spirituall 2. Generally upon all the blessing of long and judgement of short life is not shewed It sufficeth that for the demonstration of Gods mercie in the one and of his justice in the other some are exemplified 3. Short life is a blessing when men are taken away from troubles to come as Abiah was of Ierobohams house 1 King 14.13 And long life is a curse when it bringeth shame and dishonour with it as is seene in Cam Calvin 2. Observ. Not to post over the fault to others Vers. 11. HE thought thou lest he die as well as his brethren Iudah layeth all the fault upon Thamar as though her marriage had beene unluckie whereas it was wholly in his sonnes Thus Adam posted over his fault to Eve but wee are taught hereby to examine our selves and to finde out our owne sinne Muscul. 3. Observ. The pronenesse of our nature to sinne Vers. 16. HE turned to the way towards her Wee see in Iudah what mans nature is without the direction of grace how prone and readie hee was to commit this sinne and so carried headlong into it that hee spared not to give her his best ornaments for a pledge his Ring Kercheffe and Staffe Musculus Therefore that exhortation of Saint Paul is necessarie Flie from the lusts of youth and follow after righteousnesse faith love 1 Tim. 2.22 4. Observ. To feare God more than men Vers. 23. LEt her take it to her lest we be ashamed Ioseph feareth more the shame of the world in this case than the displeasure of God as many doe which are given to the filthie sinne of uncleanenesse Calvin But wee should remember what our Saviour saith Feare not them which kill the body but are not able to kill the soule c. Matth. 10.28 5. Observ. After repentance wee must not fall into the same sinne againe Vers. 26. SO he lay with her no more In this Iudah is to bee commended that having committed a sinne of ignorance hee would not fall into the same willingly againe Muscul. so true repentance worketh a detestation of the sinne repented of and godly sorrow bringeth a great care with it 2 Cor. 7.11 CHAP. XXXIX 1. The Method or Argument THis chapter setteth forth partly the prosperous estate of Ioseph in his master Pâ—tiphars house partly his affliction and humiliation in being cast into prison In the first 1. Wee are to consider the cause of Iosephs prosperitie the blessing of God Vers. 1 2 3. 2. The effect thereof the favour of his Master who committed all to his hand to Vers. 7. 3. Iosephs faithfulnesse againe to his Master in refusing to be entised to folly by his Mistresse whereto two reasons induced him the favour and goodnesse of his Master the feare of God Vers. 8 9. In the second 1. Is set forth the cause of Iosephs imprisonmenâ— the false accusation of his mistresse with the probable shew thereof in detaining first and then producing his vesture Vers. 10. to 19. 2. Then is set forth the affliction of Ioseph in being shut up in prison with the other malefactors Vers. 19 20. 3. The qualifying of his affliction in that the Lord so worketh with Ioseph that hee found favour also with the keeper of the prison Vers. 21 22 23. 2. The divers readings v. 1. One of Pharaohs Lords B. Courtiers T. Princes C. Eunuch caet see further for the divers readings of this word seris and tahâ—ch Gen. 37.36 qu. 29. qu. 30. At the hand of the Arabians C. Ismaelites caet v.
to Benjamin when hee should have stayed for Iosephs cup yet Ioseph keepeth the same proportion in giving to Benjamin five suits of raiment Gen. 45.22 3. Neither with Ambrose need we make this a type and figure of Pauls excellencie in gifts who was of the tribe of Benjamin before the rest of the Apostles 4. But Ioseph did this to shew his love to Benjamin being his onely brother by the mothers side as Elkanah gave unto Anna his best beloved wife a more worthy portion 1 Sam. 1.5 Iun. Mercer 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. God the disposer of mens hearts Vers. 14. GOd give you mercie in the sight of the man Iacob acknowledgeth that God is the disposer of mens hearts and affections as the Wise man saith The Kings heart is in the hand of the Lord c. he turneth it whethersoever it pleaseth him Prov. 21.1 2. Doct. We must rest in Gods providence and carefully use the meanes Vers. 11. TAke of the best fruits c. Iacob though his trust were in God that he would incline the rulers heart toward his sonnes yet he refuseth not to use all meanes whereby they might insinuate themselves as he adviseth them to take double money with them and to carry a present Wee are therefore so to depend upon Gods providence as that we use all meanes which God hath appointed Calvin Like as though the Lord gave to Paul all the soules in the ship yet by swimming and using the boords and broken peeces of the ship they came to land Act. 27.24 44. 3. Doct. Restitution is to be made where any errour or oversight is committed Vers. 12. LEst it were some oversight Iacob would have the money restored which they found in their sacks mouthes thinking that the seller might forget himselfe Iacobs justice herein sheweth that in buying and selling where any oversight is committed restitution and satisfaction should be made Muscul. Not like as now a dayes the buyer and seller thinke it well gained when they can one deceive another which abuse the Wise man reproveth It is naught it is naught saith the buyer but when he is gone apart he boasteth Prov. 20.4 4. Doct. The creatures of God may be used not onely for necessity but delight Vers. 34. THey were made merry or drunke their fill with him That is they did eat and drinke liberally and plentifully so that it is not onely lawfull to use the creatures of God for necessitie onely but we may goe further to receive them with delight and chearefullnesse so that we 〈◊〉 of surfetting and drunkennesse As we reade of Abraham that made a great feast when Isaack was weaned Gen. 21.8 that is a plentifull and liberall banket As God hath made bread to strengthen man so he hath given wine to cheare his heart Psal. 104.15 But men must take heed lest in exceeding they fall to riot and distemper themselves with supâ—rfluous abundance Philo well observeth that of ancient time they used after their sacrifices to make their feasts and in the Temples that the place and action might put them in minde of sobriety whereupon some derive the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to bee drunke of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 after sacrificing So wee reade that the Elders of Israel did eat bread with Moses father in law before God Exod. 18.12 in that place where they had sacrificed Wee should therefore thinke of God in the middest of our feasts and not be like to those of whom Saint Iude speaketh of Without all feare feeding themselves Iud. 12. 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Monkes despised of the Iewes Vers. 30. HIs afflictions were inflamed The word is camar whereof the Idoll Priests were called chemarim of their blacke garments as of a burnt colour The Jewes give that name to the blacke Monkes Mercer who by their superstitious apparell make themselves ridiculous to the blinde Jewes and by such foolish toyes hinder their conversion to the faith 2. Confut. Against the pride of superstitious Papists Vers. 32. THat was an abomination to the Egyptians The Egyptians being a superstitious people despised the true Church of God and counted them prophane in respect of themselves which the Prophet noteth to be the guise of hypocrites Stand apart come not neare me I am holier than thâ—â— Isay 65.5 Even so the Pseudocatholike Papists despise the professors of the Gospell of Christ counting them heretikes refusing to come into their holy assemblies Calvin 6. Places of morall use 1. Morall To commit our counsell to God Vers. 7. COuld we know certainly that he would say so Iacobs sons in making mention of their father and youngest brother thought to have excused themselves but thereby they came into greater danger whereby we see that God doth many times frustrate our counsels and maketh them to fall out farre otherwise than we imagined Mercer as Peter also intrapped Ananias by the words of his owne mouth Act. 5. therefore we must commit our counsels to God that he would both direct the thoughts of our heart and words of our mouth 2. Morall A bad conscience full of suspition Vers. 18. BEcause of the money in our sacks mouth are we brought Thus a guilty conscience is alwayes suspitious and disquieted upon every occasion as appeareth in these men that are fearfull without cause and interpret every thing against themselves Thus Moses describeth the fearfulnesse of men that are punished for their sinnes The sound of a leafe shaken shall chase them Levit. 27.36 3. Morall We must be carefull to instruct our families Vers. 23. YOur God and the God of your fathers This steward of Iosephs house would never have spoken so reverently of the God of the Hebrewes but that he was so taught of Ioseph who had a great care to instruct his family in the right faith in the middest of that idolatrous nation this was Abrahams commendation Gen. 18.18 and Iacobs practice Gen. 35.4 4. Morall Iustice to be tempered with mercy Vers. 29. GOd be mercifull to thee my sonne Ioseph which hitherto had shewed himselfe severe and rigorous towards his brethren beginneth now to use them kindly whose example teacheth that prudent governours should qualifie and temper justice with mercy and severity with clemencie Grâ—gor as Saint Paul did towards the incestuous young man 2 Corinth 2. CHAP. XLIV 1. The Method or Argument FIrst in this chapter is declared the practice of Ioseph in laying theft to Benjamins charge 1. The device by Ioseph vers 1 2. 2. The execution by his servant in accusing them vers 4. to 6. 3. Their defence and agreement for the punishment vers 9 10. 4. The deprehension of the pretended theft with Benjamin vers 11. to vers 14. Secondly the conventing of them before Ioseph with their submission and Iosephs mitigation of the punishment vers 15. to vers 18. Thirdly Iudah interposeth himselfe and maketh intercession for Benjamin where is set downe 1. The narration both of their first speech had with Ioseph vers
hee were rude in speech yet he was not so in knowledge 2. Cor. 11.6 the power of S. Pauls speech consisted not in eloquence of words but in the wisdome of the spirit so Moses though defective in the manner of elocution yet might speake with gravity and wisdome and so bee powerfull in words 9. Wherefore notwithstanding this or what else is objected the most probable opinion is that Moses had some naturall impediment of speech as appeareth both by his owne excuse by the Lords answer by the coadjutorship of Aaron his brother an eloquent man vers 14. and because Moses after this saith he was a man of uncircumcised lips and whereas he saith here nor since thou hast spoken to thy servant his meaning is that if at this time when God spake unto him who was able to take away all impediment of speech yet his infirmity remained much more was it like afterward to continue Iunius QUEST VIII How God is said to make the deafe and dumbe Vers. 11. WHo hath made the dumb or the deafe 1. Wee refuse here the fables of the Hebrewes that when Pharaoh had appointed one to kill Moses he was striken blind that he could not see Moses and Pharaoh became both deafe and dumbe that though he espied Moses escape yet hee could not speake to have him stayed but it is evident by the story that Moses fled before hee was apprehended The Lord here speaketh in generall not of any one dumbe or deafe but that as hee sendeth these infirmities upon man so also hee is able to heale them 2. And although these infirmities are evill in respect of nature yet God is the author of them because they are good also in respect of the end which is to humble man and bring him to repentance and to set forth the glory of God as our Saviour saith of the blind man that his blindnesse came that the workes of God might be shewed upon him Simler QUEST IX How and wherefore the Lord was present with Moses mouth Vers. 12. I Will be with thy mouth 1. Although Moses was no eloquent man in outward speech as humane eloquence is accounted yet there was in him a grave and divine eloquence such as the Apostles were endued with the Lord promiseth the assistance of his spirit and to bee present with his mouth 2. But the impediment of his tongue the Lord doth not altogether take away both that Gods glory and power might appeare and that Moses should see how needfull the helpe and society of his brother was neither did Moses pray unto God to heale that infirmity but only useth it as an argument to decline his calling Simler QUEST X. Whom Moses meaneth that he would have sent Vers. 13. SEnd by the hand of him whom thou shouldest send 1. Lyranus thinketh that Moses meaneth his brother Aaron who was elder than he and fitter for his eloquent speech but no mention was made yet of Aaron whom Moses knew not to be alive as may be gathered vers 18. till the Lord first spake of him and promised hee should assist him 2. Rabbi Selomo taketh that hee meaneth Iosuah whom God revealed unto him should be the man that was to lead Israel into the promised land But beside that Iosuah is not yet spoken of this request of Moses would have shewed some emulation or envy toward Iosuah 3. Many of the ancient writers as Iustenus Martyr Tertullian Cyprian with others thinke that Moses here speaketh of the Messias that should be sent into the world so also Perer. But this seemeth not to be so fit both for that Moses not being ignorant of the prophesie of Iacob concerning the comming of Shiloh and how the Lord promised that he would raise up a Prophet like unto him Deus 18.18 which is understood of Christ could not yet expect the comming of the Messiah and this request for the comming of the Messiah proceeding of faith would not have provoked the Lords wrath Therefore Eugubinus opinion though Pererius checkt him for it is not herein to be misliked that neither would have those places of Scripture which are understood of the Messiah to bee referred to others for that savoureth of Judaisme nor yet that which is spoken of others to be applied to Christ which also would bewray curiosity and superstition 4. Therefore the plaine meaning of Moses is that wheâ—â—as God might find out many more fit than himselfe he would send by their hand that is ministery so he aimeth not at any one in particular to be sent but any other whosoever QUEST XI Whether Moses sinned in his so often refusall seeing God was angry with him Vers. 14. THen Iehovahs wrath was kindled 1. Neither doe we consent to some Hebrewes that doe aggravate Moses sinne as distrusting Gods word and therefore some say hee was punished in being deprived of the Priesthood which was given to Aaron some in that he was not suffered to enter into the land of Canaan Contr. But neither was the first a punishment for Moses still was the chiefe and gave Aaron direction and it was a comfort to Moses to have such a coadjutor and beside Aaron was the elder to whom the priesthood appertained Neither was Moses offence here the cause why he entred not into the land of Canaan but his disobedience at the waters of strife Simler 2. Neither on the other side is their opinion found that doe justifie Moses herein and commend his humility in refusing so weighty a calling as Gregorie who by Pauls example would have us ready to suffer adversities and by Moses to refuse prosperity And Hierome commendeth Esaâ—es readinesse after his lippes were purified and Moses unwillingnesse being guilty to himselfe of his owne infirmity Contra. 1. In that God was angrie with Moses it is evident he offended 2. And as S. Paul was willing to suffer adversity because it was Gods will the spirit so testified every where of him that bands and persecution did abide him so Moses should not have refused this charge seeing God so often had signified his will unto him 3. And if Esay did well after the Lord had purged his lippes being before unwilling to shew his readinesse then Moses did not well who after the Lord had promised to be with his mouth yet still persisted in his refusall 3. Thostatus granteth that Moses sinned yet it was a veniall and small sinne because wee reade of 〈◊〉 punishment that followed Cajetanus is of the same opinion and his reason is taken from the phrase here used The wrath of God was kindled as when a man is moved suddenly of choller than of set purpose Contra. In some sense we confesse that both this and all other of Moses sinnes and of all the elect are veniall in respect of Gods mercie in Christ that pardoneth them but otherwise in it owne nature neither this nor any other sinne is pardonable for the wages of sinne is death Rom. 6.23 in the justice of God 2.
therefore neither fetches nor barley and a middle sort betweene wheate and barley 2. Now in that the barley was smitten and not the wheate and rie the reason is given because the one was cared and the other was hid the word is aphiloth obscure not hid in the hose as Pellican but hid in the ground Iun. 3. the Septuagint reade 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Latine serotina because the wheates and ries were late sowne but it is not like that wheat and rie were sowne after their barley which sooner commeth up and is sooner ripe but though they were sowne together yet the barley lieth not so long hid in the ground as the wheate and rie the reason then of this difference was the barley was growne of good length out of the ground and so was blasted and smitten the other not yet appearing out of the tilth but lying hid 4. But with us the use is contrarie for our wheate and rie which wee call winter corne are out of the ground before the barley is sowne Some thinke that the Egyptians doe sow all their graine together in the slime and soile that Nilus leaveth behinde about the Autumne and then plow it in November and sow it againe in Aprill Borrh. in cap. 7. but that is not like for both the moistnes of the ground after the overflowing of Nâ—lus and the warmth of the aire which in winter time in Egypt is temperate would have brought forth the wheate and rie sooner that it could not have lien so long hid as toward the spring when it is supposed this tempest of haile came And againe the use of husbandmen is not first to sow their ground and then to plow it but first they make it plaine and readie and then cast in their seede as the Prophet sheweth Esay 28.25 Therefore it seemeth more like that the Egyptians sow no corne at all but toward the spring as the like use is in some parts of England as in Cumberland as I have been informed where they sow not their wheate and rie before winter as in other countries but toward the rising of the yeere and so all these kindes being sowne much about one time the barley might sooner appeare above the ground 5. Now by this it may be conjectured at what time of the yeere these plagues came the corne doth begin to eare but toward the spring when all things as it were revive and begin to flourish But the spring in those countries is forwarder then it is with us for they had ripe corne in mid March when they kept the Passeover this plague then of haile might be sent about the end of Februarie and so all the rest within the compasse of a moneth or in a very short time as is shewed before quest 29. in cap. 7. 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. The pestilence is sent of God Vers. 3. BEhold the hand of the Lord is upon the flocke This sheweth that the plague and pestilence commeth not by chance nor by naturall meanes onely but it is sent of God so the Prophet saith Shall there be evill in the citie and the Lord hath not done it Amos 3.6 Ferus 2. Doct. Why the Lord suffereth the wicked and is patient to them ward Vers. 16. THerefore have I kept thee The Lord useth great patience and longanimitie toward the wicked and obstinate as heere to ward Pharaoh which the Lord doth for divers ends 1. Hereby it appeareth how great an evil the hardnes of the heart is which can neither be wonne by benefits nor yet mollified by punishments 2. That the wicked and impenitent may bee inexcusable having so long a time of repentance given them 3. That Gods goodnesse mercie might appeare in suffering so long the vesses of his wrath 4. That God thereby may have occasion to shew his judgements in the world and to set forth his glorie which is the reason here touched why the Lord spared Pharaoh Perer. 3. disput in cap. 9. 3. Doct. How the Lord punisheth sinne with sinne Vers. 12. THe Lord hardned the heart of Pharaoh Thus God in his justice doth punish sin with sin Pharaohs former obstinacie and hardnes of heart is punished with a greater measure and degree of obstinacie Piscator So Saul was punished with desertion and being left unto himselfe after he had committed most grievous sinnes of hypocrisie presumption disobedience crueltie Thus the Lord punished the Gentiles by giving them over to their hearts lusts Rom. 1 2â— The hardning then of the heart as it is evill proceedeth of man as it is a punishment it is disposed and inflicted of God 4. Doct. Of the force of the law of nature Vers. 27. PHaraoh said I have now sinned Heere wee see the force of the law of nature which informeth Pharaohs conscience that he had sinned and done amisse So the Apostle teacheth That the Gentiles did shew the effect of the law written in their hearts their consciences bearing witnes and their thoughts accusing one another or excusing Rom. 2.15 Hence also it is evident how the Law differeth from the Gospell the Law worketh terror and revealeth sinne but the Gospell worketh comfort in the remission and forgivenes of sinne Borrh. 5. Places of confutation 1. Conf. That God hardneth the heart otherwise than by permission Vers. 12. THe Lord hardned the heart of Pharaoh Bellarmine and generally the Romanists do hold that God doth no otherwise blind the mind and harden the heart than permittendo deserendo by permission onely and desertion or forsaking negativè non positivè negatively only not positively that is by denying and withholding his grace not by acting or doing any thing lib. 2. de amission gratia cap. 14. obser 4. But this text evidently doth convince him The Lord is here said to harden Pharaohs heart which sheweth an action in God not a connivence or permission only And three waies God is an agent in hardning of mans heart and yet he is free from all touch or suspition of evill 1. God is to be considered as the Creator of all from whom both the righteous and unrighteous receive al their naturall powers faculties whereby they live move worke or doe any thing In him we move live and have our being Act. 17.28 So Augustine saith Non peccati cujusquam author est deus sed naturae creator God is not the author of any sin but the Creator of nature which when it had power not to offend yet trespassed of it owne accord 2. Though the Lord willeth not sinne to bee done neither approoveth it when it is done yet he doth order and disposeth it being done and directeth it to such ende as himselfe pleaseth so it is said in the Psalme Whatsoever it pleased God that did hee in heaven and in earth Psal. 13 5.6 God would never suffer sin to be committed in the world but that be knoweth how to turne it to good as here he useth Pharaohs hardnes of heart to his
as is taken for the being of the thing hardnesse of heart as it is sinne so it is a punishment of sinne that is it could not be a punishment of sinne unlesse it were sinne this we grant In the next part the same word as signifieth the manner of being therefore if the first be taken in the same sense for one and the same manner of being wee deny that hardnesse of heart in the same respect is both sinne and the punishment of sinne It is both in respect of the subject and being but not both in the same quality affection and manner of being 3. Hee thus proceedeth All punishments of sinne because they are just stand with the will of God hardnesse of heart being a sinne if it should stand with the will of God then it would follow that sinne should stand with the will of God Contr. 1. If sinne no way stand with the will of God then sinne should not be committed in the world for against his will can nothing be done 2. Here then wee must admit a distinction of Gods will there is his will of approbation and the will of his providence by the first he willeth not sinne but by the second he willeth it to be in the world because he knoweth how to dispose of sinne even unto good Origen hath the like distinction Multa sine voluntate Dei geruntur nihil sine providentia providentia est qua dispensat providet voluntas qua vult vel non vult aliquid Many things are done without Gods will nothing withouâ— his providence providence is that whereby he dispenseth and provideth his will whereby hee willeth or â—illeth any thing The master of the sentences saith Mala fieri bonum est it is good that evill should bee done because thereby Gods power and goodnesse is seene in turning evill unto good lib. 1. distinct 46. quaest If God then did not see how to turne evill unto a good end he would not suffer evill to be done in the world 3. So then retaining the former distinction still hardnesse of heart as it is a sinne God willeth it not but as it is a punishment of sinne it standeth very well with the will and justice of God 4. And further concerning the former testimonies of their owne Writers Pererius would have them to speake of such sinnes which are also punishments of sins in divers subjects as that the doing of it should be a sinne in one and the suffering a punishment in the other as the rebellion of Absolon and railing of Shemei in respect of themselves they were sinne but in regard of David they were a chastisement upon him for his sinne and so they were sent of God But in other things where the sinne and punishment are in one subject as in the hardnesse of heart that distinction hath no place Contra. But Pererius by his leave cannot fasten upon them a sense contrary to their words for thus Cajetan writeth as Melchior Canus citeth him Deâ—â— non est 〈◊〉 peccata ut sic sed quaâ—â—um est 〈◊〉 ipsâ—â— peccatâ—â— vel alterius God is the author of sinne not as it is sinne but as it is a punishment in 〈◊〉 that sinneth or in any other And Canâ—â— thereupon collecteth thus Agnoscit Cajetanus maledictionem Shemei quatenus punalem sibi procedere a Deo Cajetane acknowledgeth that the cursing of Shemei as it was penall to himselfe did proceed from God His meaning then is that even in him that sinneth hardnesse of heart is a punishment of sinne and not only in another Their owne master of sentences also saith as I cited him before Concupiscentia in quantum poena est peccati Deum habet authorem Concupisâ—ence as it is a punishment of sinne hath God the author thereof lib. 2. distinct 32. But concupiscence is a punishment in him that hath it not in another Wherefore notwithstanding these contrary objections because of those places of Scripture alleaged before and the testimonies of other Writers I approve this distinction as sound that hardnes of heart not as it is sinne but as it is inflicted as a punishment of sinne is of God and in this sense God is said to harden the heart as Augustine well concludeth Deus indurabit per justum judicium Pharaoh per liberum arbitrium God did harden Pharaohs heart by his just judgement and Pharaoh by his owne free will de liber arbitr cap. 23. QUEST XVIII How God is said to harden the heart by patience and long suffering ANother way whereby God is said to have hardned Pharaohs heart is by his patience and long suffering because the Lord doth suspend his judgements and not presently punish the wicked whereupon they abusing Gods patience and long suffring are hardned This exposition they ground upon that place of the Apostle Rom. 2.4 Despisest thou the riches of his bountifulnesse and patience and long suffering not knowing that the bountifulnesse of God leadeth thee to repentance But thou after thine hardnesse and heart that cannot repent heapest unto thy selfe wrath against the day of wrath This exposition followeth Origen Non aliter Deum indurare corda hominum nisi patienter eos tolerando that God doth not otherwise harden mens hearts than by patience forbearing them And he maketh it a figurative locution like as a master should say to his servant that abuseth his gentlenesse a lewd servant it is I that have made thee thus because I did not punish thee Likewise Basil Obstinavit Deus Pharaonem per longam patientiam God made Pharaoh obstinate by his long patience So also Hierom Patientia Dei induravit Pharaâ—nem Gods patience did harden Pharaoh And he sheweth it by this similitude as the same Sun hardneth the clay and mollifieth the wax Sic bonitas Dei vasa ira indurat vasa misericordia solvit So the goodnesse of God hardens the vessels of wrath and mollifieth the vessels of mercie To the same purpose also Theodoret quast 12. in Exod. Augustine also after the same manner saith Pharaonem non divina potentia sed divina patientia credenda est Deum indurasse Not the divine power but the divine patience is thought to have hardned Pharaoh This is true which is affirmed by these ancient fathers that men by abusing the patience and long suffering of God are hardned yet this is not all this phrase that God hardned Pharaohs heart sheweth that God hath a further stroke in the hardning of their hearts than by connivence and long suffering toward them QUEST XIX Wherefore the Lord useth patience and long suffering toward the wicked YEt it is most true that God useth great patience and longanimity towards sinners and that for these reasons 1. That thereby Gods goodnesse and mercy may appeare and the great malice and frowardnesse of mans heart that cannot be drawne to repentance by the Lords rich and bountifull mercy 2. By this meanes also Gods judgements appeare to be most just when he punisheth the
Chaldeans S. Paul in his Epistles citeth the saying of Aratus Epimenides and Menander Perer. QUEST XLIX Of the number of the Israelites that went up out of Egypt Vers. 37. ABout six hundred thousand men of foot 1. Because the Latine translator readeth ferè almost six hundred thousand Pererius thinketh that there wanted some of this number But that is not like for seeing within one yeere they were numbred to six hundred thousand three thousand five hundred and fifty men Exod. 38.26 it is like that at their comming out of Egypt they were not under that number 2. Neither yet doe I consent unto Thostatus who thinketh there were about 635000. and odde for he to justifie this number alleageth the corrupt Latine text which readeth Exod. 32.28 that there fell of the people which were slaine of the Levites viginti tria millia three and twenty thousand which number he would have added to this summe here set downe whereas in the originall mention is made only of three thousand and so also the Chalde and Septuag reade and it must be admitted for a great oversight in the Latine interpreter to reade three and twenty thousand for three thousand to say that Hierome followed the true Hebrew coppy which might since be corrupted and that the Latine is in many places more perfect now than the Hebrew as Thostatus alleageth is to ground an uncertaine conceit upon meere imaginations and supposals for is it not like that the Hebrew Scriptures should be kept freer from corruption than the Latine seeing that the Jewes which are otherwise adversaries to the Christian faith have beene most diligent keepers of the old Testament and if this be admitted that the fountaines are corrupt and impure there will be no certainty of the Scriptures And further that place of the Apostle 1. Cor. 10.8 That there fell in one day three and twenty thousand doth not helpe Thostatus for there the Apostle speaketh of those that were slaine for the fornication committed with the daughters of the Midianites at Baal Peor Numb 25. where though the number agree not in shew with the Apostles account for Moses maketh mention of 24. thousand the Apostle nameth 23. thousand the right solution is not to say with Thom. Aquin. that it is the fault of the writer or with Lyranus and Cajetane that the number of 24. thousand includeth also 23. thousand as the greater number containeth the lesse but the Apostle only comprehendeth those which were slaine with the sword whereas Moses putteth together not only them but those also of the chiefe which were commanded to be hanged which might bee about a thousand Iun. 3. Therefore I thinke rather with Iosephus that there were full out 600. thousand not fewer but rather more for as Thostatus therein well collecteth there were numbred not long after within a yeere and 14. dayes in the first day of the second moneth 603550. men of warre from 20. yeeres and upward Numb 1.46 in which number the Levites were not counted who from 30. yeere old to 50. yeere made 8580. Numb 5.48 4. This number also is only of these which were fit for warre as appeareth in the summes of the people taken afterwards Exod. 38.26 and Numb 1. so that the women and children are excepted out of this number Now according to the common estimate they that are fit for warre in any country are as two first partes of the whole as forty is to an hundred then â—y this proportion as 40. is to an 100. so six is to fifteene there being then 600. thousand fighting men the whole summe comprehending women and children will amount to 1500. thousand beside the great numbers of other people and strangers among them which might make the whole number above 2000. thousand 5. Herein appeareth the wonderfull blessing of God in increasing seventy persons to such a multitude in the space of 215. yeeres for so long was it and no longer from the comming downe of Iacob into Egypt unto their going out And thus the Lord made good his word unto Iacob I will there make of thee a great nation Gen. 46.3 Iun. 6. And further as God herein abundantly shewed his mercy in so greatly multiplying the Israelites so his justice and severity appeared that of all this great multitude which came out of Egypt only two of them Caleb and Iosua entred into the land of Canaan all the rest because of their idolatry and disobedience died in the wildernesse as the Lord threatned them Numb 14. 7. Hence also appeareth the error of Manethon and Cheremon two ancient Writers who affirmed as Iosephus reporteth lib. 1. cont Appionem that the Israelites at their comming out of Egypt were but 250000. men whereas they were six hundred thousand as Moses here writeth QUEST L. Of Rahmesis from whence the Israelites went Vers. 37. THen the children of Israel tooke their journey from Rahmesis to Succoth 1. This Rahmesisâ—s â—s the same which is mentioned Gen. 47.11 divers from that spoken of Exod. 1.11 For the first Rahmesis is with shevah under ain the other Rahmesis with pâ—tach under ain and beside the first is called the land of Rahmesis the other the City of Rhamesis Rahmesis then seemeth to be the name of the whole country from the which the Israelites went not of a City for one City could not containe such a multitude Pellican and whether that country were capable of them is uncertaine it is like the Israelites were dispersed into some other parts of Egypt before but hearing that they were shortly to goe out of Egypt they might gather into this country the other Rahmesis seemeth to have beene a chiefe City of this province see before quest 11. v. 1. QUEST LI. Of Succoth where the Israelites pitched their tents going out of Egypt TO Succoth 1. This Succoth is a divers place from that which Iacob so called when hee came out of Mâ—sopotamia Gen. 33.17 Piscator 2. Yet both that place and this have the same derivation of the name so called of Boothes and Tents which Iacob there and the Israelites here pitched as Leviâ— 23.43 Iun 3. But this place is so named by anticipation for it was not yet called Succoth before the Israelites came thither it afterward had that name given of the rearing of Tents and Tabernacles there Piscator 4. It is thought to be a part of the region Troglodytis by the red Sea Simler 5. Iosephus calleth it Laâ—â—polis where he saith Babylon was afterward built when Cambyses invaded Egypt Ioseph lib. 2. Antiq cap. 5. QUEST LII What this mingled company was that went out with the Israelites Vers. 37. ANd a great mingled company 1. These were not like to come of those servants which Iacob might bring downe with him into Egypt for it is like the famine being so great that Iacob had no great number of servants in his family beside his children as Abraham had who was able to army three hundred and eighteene persons of hâ—s owne
foreseeth all things did set unto Abraham this terme of 400. yeeres â—ee no doubt most faithfully kept his promise and as he had decreed so after 400. yeeres expired he delivered his seede from their oppressors 3. Moses act in killing the Egyptian was an act of faith not of presumption as both S. Stephen witnesseth Acts 7.25 Hee supposed 〈◊〉 brethren would have understood that God by his hand should give them deliverance as also the Apostle to the Heb. 11.25 By faith Moses when hee was come to age refused to be called the sonne of Pharaohs daughter and chose rather to suffer adversity with the people of God and againe vers 27. By faith he forsooke Egypt c. If Moses then of faith shewed himselfe to be the deliverer of his people as when he killed the Egyptian and cares not for the favour and honour of Pharaohs court then was it not a presumptuous act for the which he should be punished 4. And how standeth it with Gods justice to punish all the people of Israel with the captivity of 30. yeeres longer for the sinne and presumption of one man if Moses had offended and trespassed therein 5. Neither is that observation of forty perpetuall neither David for his sinne nor Peter for his deniall of Christ nor the incestuous young man among the Corinthians were injoyned any such time of penance and Nebuchadnezzars time of repentance farre exceeded this proportion which continued seven yeeres Dan. 4.20 for true repentance is not measured by the number of dayes but by the weight of the contrition and sorrow of heart neither is it found in Scripture that any one man had 40. dayes penance imposed upon him There was another reason of the 40. yeeres wandring of Israel in the desert for according to the time wherein the spies searched the land which was 40. dayes they have a yeere set for a day for the punishment of the sinne of the spies in raising a slander upon that good land all but Caleb and Iosuah and of the people in giving no credit unto them see Numb 14.34 QUEST LXV The time of the Hebrewes departure out of Egypt compared with the Chronology of the Heathen NOw in the last place it shall bee declared how this time of the departing of Israel agreeth with the â—orren computations according to the Chronology of the Heathen 1. They therefore observe five notable periods of times from whence they use to make supputation of their yeeres from the monarchy of Ninus and Semiramis in Abrahams time from the floud of Ogyges and from Inachus and Phâ—râ—neus about the time of the Patriarke Iacob from the battell of Troy which fell out in Sampsons dayes or under Helâ— the high Priest from the beginning of the Olympiades which began in the 8. yeere of the reigne of Ahaz from the building of Rome in the 1. yeere of the seventh Olympiade which concurreth with the 16. yeere of the reigne of Hesekiah 2. According then to these divers kindes of computations there are also divers opinions concerning the time of Israels departure out of Egypt Apion the Gramarian a professed adversary to the Jewes against whom Iosephus wrote two bookes will have Moses to bring the Israelites out of Egypt in the time of the seventh Olympiade when the City Carthage was built by the Tyrians in Africa thus Iosephus reporteth the opinion of Apion in his 2. booke But this to bee apparantly false Iosephus sheweth proving that the Temple of Salomon was built 143. yeeres before Carthage and the Israelites came out of Egypt 480. yeeres before that 1. King 6.1 so that their leaving of Egypt was above 600. yeeres before the building of Carthage 3. As Apion commeth farre short in his computation so Porphyrius goeth as much beyond who in the fourth booke of those which hee wrote against the Christians will have Moses to be before the times of Semiramis which is a grosse error for it is without all question that Abraham was borne under the monarchy of Ninus and from Abrahams birth untill the deliverance of Israel out of Egypt are 505. yeeres whereof an 100. are counted from Abrahams birth to Isaacs and 405. from thence unto Israels redemption as hath beene shewed 4. Lactantius lib. 4. cap. 5. thinketh that Moses was 900. yeeres before the battell of Troy whereas it will be found that he was only 356. yeeres or thereabout elder than those times 5. Manethon an ancient Writer of the Egyptian affaires maketh Moses more ancient by 393. yeeres than when Danaus went to Argos that is about a thousand yeeres before the battell of Troy But that cannot bee seeing the Trojan warre is held to have beene in the time of Sampson or Helâ— not above 356. yeeres after the returne of the Hebrewes out of Egypt 6. Some Christian Writers thinke that the Hebrewes were delivered out of the Egyptian Captivity in the time of Ogyges floud as Iustinus Martyr Clemens Alexandrinus 1. lib. Stromatum Iulian Africanus But that is not like for the same Iulian African by the testimony of divers Heathen Writers sheweth that Ogyges floud was 1020. yeeres before the beginning of the Olympiades But from the departure of Israel out of Egypt untill the Olympiades began which was in the 8. yeere of the reigne of Ahaz are counted but 760. yeere or thereabout so that Moses should bee above two hundred and fifty yeeres after Ogyges floud 7. This is then the right computation compared with the Chronology of the Heathen that the deliverance of Israel out of Egypt was 356. yeere before the Trojan battell and 764. yeeres before the Olympiades 788. yeeres before the building of Rome 910. yeeres before the Captivity of Babylon 980. yeeres before the reigne of Cyrus 1200. yeeres before Alexander the Great 1496. yeeres before Herod under whose reigne Christ was borne And according to the sacred Chronologie this redemption of Israel from the Egyptian bondage was 2453. yeeres after the creation of the world 797. yeeres after Noahs floud 505. yeeres after the death of the Patriarke Ioseph 480. yeeres before the building of Salomons Temple and 1536. yeeres before the birth of our blessed Lord and Saviour Christ Jesus Ex Perer. 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. How the Lords holy dayes should be kept Vers. 16. IN the first day shall be an holy convocation The word is mikra which also signifieth reading which sheweth how holy and festivall dayes ought to be spent in assembling the people together and in reading and preaching unto them the mercies and benefits of God Pellican And this was the use among the people of God as S. Peter saith Moses hath of old time them that preach him in every City seeing he is read in the Synagogues every Sabbath 2. Doct. A particular application of our redemption by Christs death needfull Vers. 21. CHuse out of every of your households a lambe God would as it were by a speciall application have every private house and family admonished of this singular
forbeareth to punish And whereas some thus object Quanta in eo crudelitas ut iram suam usque ad tertiam quartam extendat generationem How great cruelty is in God who extendeth his wrath to the third and fourth generation hee maketh this sufficient answer Non severitatis est iram tenere usque ad tertiam quartam generationem sed signum mâ—sericordiae poenam differre peccati It is no signe of severity to containe anger unto the third and fourth generation but of clemency to deferre the punishment of sinne Hieron in Ezech. cap. 18. 2. Observ. That fathers for love unto their children should feare to offend AVgustine further doth gather hereupon a profitable instruction both for parents and for their children that the fathers Affectu filiorum revocarentur ad reverentiam Creatoris should bee revoked unto the reverence of the Creator by the affection unto their children knowing that their sinne shall bee punished in their posterity and that the children Timentes ne incurrerent peccata patrum legi Dei obteâ—perarent fearing lest they should incurre the sinnes of their fathers should obey the law of God August de quâ—stion vtter nov Test. cap. 14. 3. Observ. God is more inclined to mercy than to severity Vers. 5. SHewing mercy unto thousands Whereas Gods justice is extended but to the fourth generation his mercy to the thousand herein appeareth how much more prone the Lord is to mercy than unto severity as Cajetane well noteth Ad conferendum bona Deus est propensissimus ad inferendum mala parcus God is most ready to conferre good things but sparing to bring upon men evill and the reason is because he conferreth and bestoweth good things of himselfe but evill being urged thereunto by the evill demerites of men Vpon the third Commandement 1. Questions discussed QUEST I. What is signified by the name of God and how diversly it is taken THou shalt not take the name of Iehovah c. 1. The name of a thing is that whereby it is knowne unto others and severed and distinguished from other things In this latter respect God needeth no name because he is but one neither properly can any name be given him because he is infinite and cannot bee comprehended in a name neither is a name given unto God in respect of himselfe but to us that in some sort he may be made knowne unto us that there is a God we all know by nature but what God is we know not but as it pleaseth himselfe to reveale Tostat. qu. 6. 2. The name of God is not here only that name tetragrammaton Iehovah consisting of foure letters as the Hebrewes strictly take it but for whatsoever whereby the Lord is made knowne to us as his wisdome mercy justice truth Calvin 3. The name of God is taken 1. for God himselfe Ioel 2. Whosoever calleth upon the name of God shall be saved 2. For the word of God as Ioh. 17. our blessed Saviour saith I have manifested thy name 3. For the wisdome power mercy and other attributes of God Malac. 1. Great is my name that is my glory power and Majesty 4. For the commandement of God as Ioh. 17. I came in my fathers name 5. For that whereby God is called as Iehovah Exod. 3. This is my name for ever Marbach 4. The names which are given unto God are of three sorts First the names whereby the divine nature and essence is expressed as Elohim God Adonai Lord Iehovah for these only are peculiar unto God Secondly the names taken from his attributes as his wisdome goodnesse justice and such like which properties though in most excellent manner they agree unto God yet are also communicated unto men Gods name is properly taken in vaine by abusing of the first sort and of the second also when they are uttered with some speciall note and reference to God otherwise we may spake of wisdome clemency justice in generall without reverence and yet not prophane the name of God The third sort of names are those which are given to our blessed Saviour both God and Man as Iesus Christ which are the names of God who although he were man yet the name is not given to the parts but to the whole suppositum or person now Christ is divinum suppositum a divine not an humane suppositum or subject because Christ was from the beginning as the Apostle saith Hebr. 13. Christ yesterday and to day and the same for ever Now then to prophane and abuse these blessed names of our Saviour is to take the name of God in vaine Tostat. qu. 6. QUEST II. That it is more to abuse the name of Iesus than simply of God YEâ— it is more offensive to abuse the name of Jesus and a greater dishonour than simply to abuse the name of God or any other appellation given unto him and that for these reasons 1. Because God hath magnified and exalted the name of Jesus above all names in respect of his great humiliation and obedience even to the death of the Crosse as the Apostle sheweth Philip. 2. 2. Because there is no other name under heaven whereby we are saved than the name of Jesus Act. 3. 3. The name of Jesus betokeneth both the divine nature and the second person of the Trinity the name of God sheweth the divine nature onely and that name quod signat Deum sub pluribus perfectionibus est honorabilius that name which describeth God with more perfections is the more honourable name 4. The name of God sheweth him to be our Creator the name of Jesus sheweth him to be both our Creator and Redeemer Tostat qu. 7. QUEST III. How many wayes the name of God is taken in vaine HIs name in vaine 1. As Gods name is hallowed and sanctified three wayes in our mind and thoughts when we conceive and thinke nothing unworthy or unbeseeming the glory of God in our words when we speake reverently of God and his workes and in our workes when wee glorifie God in our life and acts So Gods name is profaned in like manner both in our minde and thoughts in idle curious and vaine speculations of God in our words by rash or false oathes in our deeds when the name of God is abused to sorcery inchantment or such like Simler 2. Two wayes is Gods name taken in vaine Cum nomen Dei assumitur ad confirmationem falsitatis vel frustra when the name of God is taken up to confirme an untruth or to no purpose Lyran. For he is said to doe a thing in vaine qui nullo fine praesupposito agit which doth a thing no end at all propounded or malâ— indebito fine praesupposito or an evill and unlawfull end pretended Tostat. qu. 8. 3. Oleaster noteth these three wayes when the name of God is taken or lifted up in vaine for so the word nashâ— signifieth according as it was their manner to sweare with lifting up of the hand as Abraham did
wine wherein is excesse Ephes. 5.18 Contrarie hereunto are 1. Intemperance in meats and drinks as in drunkennesse and gluttonie 2. Facesse and superfluitie of meats and drinkes which breedeth intemperance as also excesse and pride of apparell reproved by the Prophet in the daughters of Sion Isai. 3. and other unseemely usages of the bodie as in painting or colouring the face or haire as wicked whorish Ieâ—abel used to doe 2 King 9.30 3. Contrarie unto this moderate temperance is in another extreme superstitious and immoderate abstinence such as was that of the Heremites and Anachorites that with too rigorous abstinence and fasting did oppresse nature Vrsin 4. As in temperance in diet is forbidden as the nourishing cause of lust so also in all other kind of behaviour as the wantonnes of the eye which opened as it were a window unto that great sinne of adulterie which David committed with Bathsheba 2 Sam. 12. Likewise obscenitie and vncomelinesse in speech for evill words corrupt good manners 1 Cor. 15.33 Simler But these two last rehearsed are rather opposite unto the second vertue of shamefastnesse before rehearsed 3. Places of Controversie 1. Confut. Against the Anabaptists and Nicolaitans which make their wives common THou shalt not commit adulterie c. First seeing this precept commandeth chastitie in the married estate to be preserved the Nicolaitans and heretikes called Gnostici are condemned which as of other things brought in a filthie communitie and mutual commixtion of their wives Bucanus Contrarie to the Apostles doctrine To avoid fornication let every one have his wife 1 Cor. 7.2 that is the wife ought to bee proper and peculiar to the husband and the husband likewise to the wife for the honour of mariage is stained when the mariage bed is defiled and therefore the Apostle putteth them both together Heb. 13.4 2. Confut. Against the Maniches and Marcionites that condemne mariage FUrther this Commandement forbidding the violating of mariage by adulterie and all other uncleane and unlawfull lust consequently alloweth the wholesome remedie of mariage against the old heretikes the Maniches Encratites Marcionists Chrysost. hom 12. in 1 Timoth. Ambrose addeth to these the Patritians in 1 Tim. 4. that condemned mariage as being instituted of Satan whose wicked opinion is blasphemous against God upon whose blessing Increase and multiplie dependeth the procreation of children which is the speciall fruit of mariage And they contradict the holy Apostle who saith That marriage is honorable c. Hebr. 13.4 3. Confut. Against the Romanists that forbid Mariage THirdly the Romanists are here confuted that enjoyne single life unto their Priests as more agreeable unto their orders which they thinke are defiled and polluted by mariage and they count that to bee the more holy state among them and such to bee most religious which are entred into a vow of single life so that although they doe not in open blasphemie condemne marriage as the other wicked heretikes which made the devill the author thereof yet they speake falshood through hypocrisie and under pretence of greater holinesse condemne the holy institution of marriage so that they cannot escape the censure of the Apostle which calleth it a doctrine of devils to forbid to marrie 1 Tim. 4.1.3 Neither can they shift it off by saying that they doe not forbid mariage generally no more did the Maniches who allowed their hearers such as were lay men to marrie but denied that libertie to their Clergie whom they called their elect and chosen men August hares 46. And the Heretickes called Apostolici would not permit such to marrie as had made a vow of single life being not able to performe it August hares 61. So the Romanists hold it unlawfull for their votaries to marrie though they bee never so weake and unable to performe their vow It is evident then that whereas S. Paul giveth libertie to everie man for avoiding of fornication to have his wife 1 Cor. 7.2 and againe he saith that mariage is honorable among all men Hebr. 13.4 the practice of the Romanists not allowing their Clergie and Monkes to marrie doth contradict the Apostolical doctrine And beside by this restraint of marriage they give occasion of adulterie fornication and other uncleane lusts seeing they restraine the remedie against these enormities which is lawfull and honest marriage and so they are apparent transgressors of this precept Herein they are not unlike to those old Heretickes called Origeniani turpes the filthie Origenists who as Epiphanius writeth of them rejected marriage and yet gave themselves to lust and some of them went in the habit of Monks professing solitarie life and yet were defiled with uncleannesse Epiphan hares 63. Such were the Monks in Poperie given over to al filthinesse as their hypocrisie was notably discovered in the suppression of their uncleane cages and cells here in England See more hereof Synops. pag. 260 261 c. 4. Confut. Against Aquinas that saith in the matrimoniall copulation there may be mortall sinne HEre by the way some exception is to be taken unto certaine positions of Thomas Aquinas who confuting those who affirmed Commixtionem viri uxoris non esse sint peccato that the companying of the husband with the wife could not bee without sinne setteth downe these conclusions 1. That 〈◊〉 conjunctio aliquando non solum est sine peccato sed etiam ad meritum vita â—ternae that such conjunction is sometime not only without sinne but meritorious also of eternall life 2. Quando est cum intentione procrâ—anda prolis vel reddendi debiti c. when in the matrimoniall act there is an intention of procreation or of rendring the mutuall debt of marriage it is an act of justice and so without sin at all 3. Aliquando est cum peccato veniali c. somtime it hath a veniall or small sin as when neither of the two former intendments do concurre 4. Quando autem excedit ut si posset se extenderet in alium tunc est mortale c. but when this matrimoniall copulation exceedeth the bounds that if it might bee it would extend it selfe to another then it is mortall Thomas in opuscul Contra. 1. No act of righteousnesse in man can be meritorious of eternall life seeing our best workes are imperfect and betweene the merit and worke there must be a proportion and kinde of equalitie but so there cannot bee betweene our imperfect workes and such a perfect and infinite reward The Apostle saith That the afflictions of this present life are not worthie of the glorie which shall be shewed unto us Rom. 8.18 If the suffrings of the Saints are not meritorious much lesse their actions 2. When matrimoniall conjunction is applied to the right end it is without sinne as S. Paul saith in the like case Let him doe what hee will he sinneth not 1 Cor. 7.36 that is materially he sinneth not the thing which hee doth is no sin neither is it a sinfull act but yet there
rule of the Gospell is not observed to tell our neighbour his faults privately first before we make them publike therein we also offend and that two wayes first Quia transgreditur ordinem quem Christus posuit in corrigendo because he transgresseth the order set by Christ in correcting of offenders Matth. 18.11 And againe Quia ex mala intentione agit because he doth it of a bad intention to hurt his brother Tostat. quaest 25. 3. But two cases are excepted wherein this private admonition is to be omitted first Si judicialiter inquiratur if the offence be judicially inquired of then one is not to conceale the faults which he knoweth by another for in this case he need not tell it to the Church that is to the Judges and Governours because it is knowne to them already Another case is where the offence though not yet acted but intended only concerneth the whole State wherein there is danger in concealing in such offences complaint may bee first made to authority for of such trespasses our blessed Saviour speaketh not but only of those which are private and particular If thy brother trespasse against thee QUEST IX Of the divers kindes of false testimonies BUt now let us proceed to examine the particular kindes of false testimonies which are of two sorts 1. In doctrine which either concerneth God and religion or the knowledge of humane Arts. 2. In the affaires of the life and that either publike in judgement and making of covenants or private which is either in testifying falsly against others or giving a false testimony of our selves Marbach Simler Of these now in their order QUEST X. Of a false testimony in matters of religion FIrst a false testimony is in doctrine 1. In matters of religion as Cum in religione à vera fide discâ—â—â—â—tur when as in religion any depart from the analogy of faith Marbach As they which maintaine heresie and false doctrine or which for feare in time of persecution deny the truth or such as handle the word of God impurely and mingle with it their owne traditions and fables all these are false wâ—â—nesses against God and his truth And therefore Augustine inferreth well Si mendacium quod adversus vitam cujusquam temporalem dicitur detestabile est c. If a lye which is made against any ones temporall life he detestable much more if it be against life eternall as every lye is that is made in doctrine of reâ—â—gion c. And to this purpose Augustine produceth that saying of S. Paul 1. Cor. 15.15 We are found faâ—se witnesses against God namely if the dead rise not againe for we have testified of God that he hath raised up Christ August de mâ—â—dâ—c ad 〈◊〉 cap. 12. But because this kinde of lying in causes of religion is a transgression of our duty toward God it more properly belongeth to the first Table being a breach of the first Commandement Simler QUEST XI Of falshood and errour in 〈◊〉 ANother kinde of falshood in doctrine is 〈…〉 artibus vel 〈◊〉 à vero 〈◊〉 when 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in arts and disciplines Marâ—â—ch As when 〈◊〉 and false opinions are maintained in 〈◊〉 Physicke or any other 〈◊〉 and profession as Anaxagâ—â—◠〈…〉 that the 〈◊〉 was blacke Now these errours are dangerous in three respects 〈◊〉 Because of the 〈◊〉 Error 〈…〉 turpis errour of it selfe is a beastly and filthy thing 2. The cause thereof is arrogancy and pride Sophisters to shew their wit will take upon them to defend errours and strange opinions 3. But the greatest 〈◊〉 regard of the inconvenience that often ensueth for by such errour in opinion many 〈…〉 seduced also to 〈◊〉 in action and which is worst of all such Sophistry from 〈…〉 oftentimes into Theology and Divinity Simler QUEST XII How falshood is committed in judgement FAlshood in judiciall acts is diversly committed 1. By the false and unjust accusâ—â— therefore the Law saith Levit. 19.16 Thou shalt not stand against the bloud of thy neighbour that is accuse him wrongfully and being his life in danger 2. The Judge offendeth in giving false judgement 〈◊〉 19.15 Thou 〈◊〉 not the â—â—justly in judgement 3. The actuaries also and ministers of unjust Judges and guilty of the same offence Isay 10.1 Wâ— unto them that decree wicked decrees and write grievous things 4. The Advocates and patrons of causes that defend false titles and set a faire shew on bad causes as 〈◊〉 abused his eloquence in disgracing of Paul Act. 24.1 5. False witnesses especially transgresse this Commandement because upon their testimony resteth the whole proceeding in judgement QUEST XIII Of the danger of bearing false witnesse in judgement COncerning false witnesses 1. He is not only a false witnesse that testifieth that which is false against his brother as such were the false witnesses against Naboth but hee also which concealeth the truth of feare hatred or malice whereby the truth is overthrowne 2. Yet there are divers degrees in bearing of false witnesse for a false testimony is more hainous in causes criminall and in those which are capitall and concerne ones life than in civill and such as bring not the life in danger and those which are brought to effect are more odious than where they faâ—â—e of the effect as when the Judge suspecteth such witnesses and giveth no credit unto them Simler 3. But generally to be a false witnesse is a grievous sinne for he sinneth against God whose name he taketh in vaine he abuseth the Judge oppresseth the innocent condemneth his owne soule Simler And three wayes doth a false witnesse commit great impiety ex violâ—tione justitiae because by his meanes justice is violated ex persurio by being perjured ex mendacio by his lying so in every false testimony there is a treble sinne Thom. Aquin. 2.2 qu. 70. art 4.4 The punishment of a false witnesse by the Law of God is retaliation Deut. 19.19 You shall doe unto him 〈◊〉 he thought to have done unto his brother So Haman was hanged upon the same gibbet which he had made for Mardoche and Daniels accusers were cast into the Lions den whither he was condemned before By the Roman Lawes which were contained in the 12. Tables a false witnesse was condemned to be throwne downe headlong from the mount Tarpeye QUEST XIV Of the detorting and wresting of words to another senseâ— another kinde of false testimony NEither are they onely false witnesses which doe bring in a false record against any of such things as were neither said nor done but he also is a false witnesse Qui non eodem sensu dicta intelligit quo dicuntur which understandeth ones sayings in another sense than they are spoken as they are said in the Gospell to be false witnesses against our blessed Saviour that detorted and depraved his words as though he had spoken of the destruction of the materiall Temple whereas he spake only of the dissolution of the Temple of his body which he would raise
originall sinne to be a breach of this precept as originall justice is therein prescribed and commanded because the Morall law is grounded upon the Law of nature which was perfect in man by creation before his fall from which perfection originall sinne is a declining defect This then is the conclusion that these involuntary motions though they doe not venire in rationem coram Deo come into reckoning before God if they presently vanish before the will and affection incline unto them yet they doe shew the corruption of our nature that although they breake not out into a flame yet they are sparkles that flie upward Iob 5.7 our corrupt nature is as the coale and those idle and wandering thoughts as the sparks that flie up but if these sparks doe not kindle into a flame they shall never burne us nor be laid unto our judgement and so Chrysostom sath well Si concupiscentia non consentit voluntas sola concupiscentia non damnat If the will consent not to concupiscence concupiscence alone shall not condemne us Homil. 52. in Matth. which is through Gods mercie for otherwise even originall corruption is sufficient to condemne us QUEST IV. Why there is no precept to direct tha inward passion of anger as of coveting NOw why there is not the like precept given to direct the inward act of the irefull power of the mind as to forbid the first motion of anger and rage as there is virtutis concupiscibilis of the coveting and desiring facultie these reasons are alleaged 1. The like is to be understood in other Commandements that the very internall act and first inclination of the heart unto evill is forbidden but expresly the concupiscence is named because it is more hard to resist the concupiscence whose object is some apparent good either delectable or profitable whereas the inward passion of anger movet ad aliquid triste moveth alwayes to some heavie thing not delightsome or profitable So Tostatus The same reason is yeelded by Thomas Aquin Homicidium secundùm se non est concupiscibile sed magis horribile c. Murther is not of it selfe a thing to be desired but to be abhorred but adulterie Habet rationem alicujus boni scilicet delectabilis furtum boni scilicet utilis Hath respect unto some thing that seemeth good namely delectable good and theft to profitable good therefore the concupiscence of these required a speciall precept rather than the other c. But this is no sufficient reason for both it is as hard to resist anger as any other passion because of all other it is most violent and sudden and beside the angrie man in purposing to doe mischiefe taketh delight therein and thinketh it good for him so to doe so that this passion also hath an object of some thing seeming good for otherwise the will of man naturally is not carried unto that which is taken to be evill 2. In this precept even that concupiscence is forbidden which is involuntarie and hath not the assent of the will for as Chrysostom saith Concupiscimus frequenter etiam quod nolumus We covet often that which wee will not All other voluntarie inclinations of the minde to adulterie or theft are prohibited in those other precepts but there is no anger without a purpose of revenge and so hath a consent of the will and so there need no speciall precept for that it properly belonging to that precept Thou shalt not kill as our blessed Saviour sheweth Matth. 5.22 To this purpose Tostatus saith well Ira audit rationem syllogizantem c. Anger heareth reason disputing whether it be meet to take revenge and before reason hath thus concluded anger riseth not but anger hearing this first conclusion that it is fit to take revenge staieth not to heare the second whom and how wee are to revenge but as a quicke messenger that goeth away before hee hath halfe his arrand and as angrie dogges that when they see one doe straightwayes imagine that it is their part to barke not considering who it is that they barke at whether their master or no so anger being an hot and hastie passion resolving by reason of the thing yet weigheth not every circumstance Now concupiscence when any object is offered heareth no reason at all but presently falleth to coveting of it Ex Tostat. qu. 27. QUEST V. Whether sinne properly consist in the internall or externall act IT is here the opinion of the Hebrewes that if a man onely desire another mans wife in his heart and goe no further he sinneth not and Iosephus lib. 12. Antiquit. reproveth Polybius the Historiographer for saying that Antiochus died miserably because he would have spoyled the Temple adding further Si solùm cogitavit non egit peccatum That if he onely thought to doe so he sinned not therefore he was not punished for that but for other evils which he had done in Jerusalem Ex Lyran. Contra. But it may bee made manifest by divers reasons that sinne consisteth rather in actu interiori quà m exteriori In the internall rather than externall act 1. That maketh a good or evill act which is in a mans power but the externall act is not often in mans power but the internall is as the act of the understanding and will as the Apostle saith Rom. 7.18 To will is present with me but I finde no meanes to performe that which is good c. 2. Onely it is proper unto man beyond beasts to doe a good or evill act but the externall act bruit beasts can doe as well as man therefore it is the internall facultie of the understanding and will that maketh the act good or bad 3. If in the externall act good and evill onely were found then Angels should doe neither good nor bad which have no externall act because they have no externall faculties powers or instruments the will therefore and understanding which onely are in Spirits are the causes of good and bad actions 4. The same externall acts may bee done as well by those that sleepe by fooles and mad men as by the waking by wise and sober men but the externall act in those is not sinne because it proceedeth not from the will and understanding 5. Both divine and humane lawes make a difference betweene voluntarie and involuntarie acts as in wilfull and casuall murther but the externall act in both is all one 6. Therefore Actus exterior secundùm se nec bonus nec malus est The externall act of it selfe is neither good nor evill but yet in men because of the connexion which the externall act hath with the internall there is some goodnesse or evilnesse found though not so properly as in the internall for there are two acts of the will and understanding the immediate act as to understand to will which is called actâ—â— elicitus the act which issueth out and there is a mediate act as to kill to commit adultery which is actâ—â— imperatus the act commanded therefore
of Salomon but now the worship of God is not tied to any certaine place as at Jerusalem where the Temple was Ioh. 4.21 3. Other Sacraments are instituted in place of the old as Baptisme and the Eucharist therefore the old are abrogated 4. The ceremonies did bind the observers to the keeping of the whole law and the rites thereof he which was circumcised was bound to keepe the whole law Galath 5.3 but we are not bound now to the whole law from which bondage Christ hath freed us Ergo. 5. The ceremonies were a wall of partition and distinction betweene the Jewes and Gentiles but now that distinction is taken away all being one in Christ therefore that wall whereby they were parted and distinguished is removed also Simler 2. As touching the politike and judiciall lawes of Moses neither doe they absolutely â—ind now 1. Many of these lawes were peculiar to the policie of that Common-wealth as the lawes concerning their inheritances and possessions which were not to passe from tribe to tribe and they shewed the fashions and manners of that countrie as in building their houses with flat roofes as Deut. 22.8 Of these positive constitutions there is now no use among other nations 2. The condition of all people is not alike some are more stubborne and obstinate some more civill and tractable and therefore some have need of more strict and severe lawes than others one kinde of politicke law then cannot serve for all nations 3. The Gospell which is perpetuall prescribeth not a certaine forme of government to all nations neither overthroweth their severall policies but in generall commandeth obedience to all higher powers Rom. 13.1 Ergo much lesse the law which was to be changed Simler But the judiciall law is not abrogated Quoad substantiam finem universalem â—quitatem In respect of the substance end and universall equitie which is in punishing of vice and maintaining of peace Bucanus See more hereof quest 4. general cap. 1. 3. The Morall law is not now in force quoad justificationem in respect of justification Rom. 3.28 A man is justified by faith without the works of the law but it bindeth quoad obedientiam In respect of obedience we are bound to keepe all the precepts of the law but yet quoad terrorem modum obedientiae in respect of the terror of the law and manner of obedience which was to be obedient and subject unto it for feare of punishment wee are freed now from it and therefore the Apostle saith The law is not given to a righteous man 1 Tim. 1.9 because they of love rather than feare do yeeld their obedience and so are a law unto themselves Simler But this is a privilege onely of the regenerate As for carnall and unregenerate men they are still under the curse and terror of the law according to that saying Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the booke of the law to doe them Buâ—â—â— 2. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Of the particular contents of this precept THou shalt not covet First the things commanded here are these 1. Originall justice which is an inclination and desire of the minde to performe all duties unto our neighbour Vrsin 2. Diligent care and circumspection even to take heed of the smallest sinnes and to watch over the very thoughts Prov. 3.23 Keepe thy heart with all diligence for thereout commeth life Basting Secondly contrarie unto this precept 1. Is originall corruption which is the generall corruption and depravation of our nature and that evill habit wherein wee are conceived and borne as David saith Behold I was borne in iniquitie and in sinne hath my mother conceived me Psal. 51.5 2. All evill inclinations of the heart whereby it is sollicited to doe any thing against the law of God this evill concupiscent is of two sorts it either hath principium internum the beginning within as is fleshly and carnall desire or externum without by some externall object which are the concupiscence of the eye and pride of life as the Apostle calleth them 1 Ioh. 16. 3. And not onely these kinds of concupiscence but all other phantasies and cogitations of the minde which are contrarie to the law of God are here restrained Basting 2. Doct. Of the severall properties of possessions and goods and the distinction of callings FUrther in that the Lord forbiddeth to covet our neighbours house servant c. wee see the Lord establisheth and confirmeth hereby both the severall rights in possessions lands and other substance which right and propertie the Lord will not have violated so much as in the concupiscence and inward desire As also here it is evident that the difference of callings and distinction of degrees as betweene master and servant standeth with the will of God as our blessed Saviour and his Apostles also every where teach Simler 3. Doct. The difference betweene divine and humane lawes HErein also is set forth an apparent difference betweene the law of God and the lawes of men Lex humana judicat facta dicta divina judicat etiam cogitata Mans law onely judgeth doings and sayings but Gods law judgeth the very thoughts and the reason hereof is because man judgeth onely according to the outward appearance and evidence but the Lord seeth the heart Thomas And the perfection of Divinitie is hereby declared beyond Philosophie which condemneth not the inward lusts and desires of the minde neither holdeth a man for the same whether they bee good or evill to be worthie praise or dispraise But the law of God striketh at the very root of evill actions which is the inward concupiscence and corruption of the heart 4. Doct. Of the concupiscence of the soule and of the flesh IT shall not bee amisse here to insert Chrysostomes distinction of concupiscence As wee have two natures one of the soule the other of the flesh so wee have two wils one of the soule the other of the flesh habemus duas itas duas concupiscentias c. we have also two kinds of anger and two kinds of concupiscence one of the soule the other of the flesh the nature of the flesh cannot bee separated from all these Necesse habet irasci concupiscere c. It cannot chuse but to be angrie to covet because it is sold under sinne but the soule being created according to the justice of God potest non irasci c. cannot bee angrie nor covet therefore when wee are angrie and covet if wee displease ourselves and represse these passions it is manifest that our flesh onely is angrie and coveteth and not the soule Such kinde of passions then here are forbidden wherein the soule consenteth with the flesh To this purpose Chrysost. hom 12. in Matth. 3. Places of controversie 1. Conf. Against the Pelagians that denie concupiscence to be sinne FIrst we are here to deale against the Pelagians who did hold concupiscentiam non esse peccatum that
of Christ. 4. Lippoman doth thus morally applie it Nihil Deo offerendum nisi integrum perfectum Nothing must be offered unto God but that which is entire and perfect 5. But the end and use onely was historicall that the first borne should not bee presented unto God before the eighth day because they were yet unfit for any service Marbach Quia talia animalia erant quasi abortiva nondum plenae consistentiae propter teneritudinem Because such yong beasts were yet but as abortive fruit not well consisting or put together because of their tendernesse Thomas QUEST LX. Why they are forbidden to eat flesh torne of beasts Vers. 31. NEither shall yee eat any flesh that is torne c. 1. As well that which was rent and torne of any beast cleane or uncleane as if it were goared of an oxe was not to bee eaten because the bloud was in it as also that which was tasted before and eaten by any uncleane beast as the Latine readeth praegustata if it were tasted before because an uncleane beast had touched it and so made it uncleane Simler Tostatus 2. Not onely that part of the flesh which was so torne but all the whole carcase was to be refused Lyranus Such were fowles and beasts taken in hawking or hunting Tostatus 3. And not onely that which was torne and thereof died but if it after lived and were killed by themselves yet because it was torne of beasts it was uncleane unlesse the beast so torne lived to recover that hurt and and Anabaptists for although the Lord had chosen Israel out of all the nations of the world to bee an holy people to himselfe yet he did foresee that many would depart from his law and therefore appointeth divers kinds of punishment for the offenders Pelarg. 5. Places of controversie 1. Confut. Against the Anabaptisticall communitie Vers. 1. IF any man steale an oxe c. he shall restore five oxen c. This law doth evidently convince the Anabaptists of error who would bring in a communitie of goods for if it were Gods will that all things should be common among men then were it no sinne to steale nay there could be no theft at all committed seeing then no man could take any thing wherein he had not as good an interest as another Ostaâ—d Neither was this onely Moses law that they should not steale but the doctrine of the Gospell also forbiddeth all kinde of theft and stealing Ephes. 4.28 Let him that stole steale no more but 〈◊〉 labour c. 2. Confut. A theefe by his deserved death doth not satisfie for the punishment of his sinne Vers. 2. IF hee bee smitten that he die Lippoman speaking of the capitall punishment of theft that although it doe not satisfie for sinne before God yet expiat eo supplicio 〈◊〉 temporales quanmissa culpa reatâ—â— pâ—nae aeternae reâ—anent exâ—lvendae c. It doth expiate or redeeme those temporall paines which after the fault pardoned and the guilt of eternall death remaine in Gods justice to bee paid c. Contra. This his assertion is grounded upon an error for where God forgiveth sinne he perfitly forgiveth both the sinne and the punishment thereto belonging As he saith by his Prophet I will forgive their iniquitie and remember their sinnes no more Ierem. 31.34 But if there remaine any temporall punishment still after forgivenesse then are the sinnes yet remembred because they are punished Indeed after remission obtained some chastisements remaine But as Chrysostom well saith God doth it Non de peccato sumons supplicium sed ad facuranos corrigens not taking punishment for our sinne but correcting us for our amendment afterward c. The theefe then by his death doth not satisfie before God either for his sinne or the punishment thereof temporall or eternall but onely satisfieth the politike law and giveth satisfaction unto men by his evill example offended His sinne together with the punishment is not otherwise pardoned than by faith in Christ. 3. Confut. Against the Romanists that abridge the power and libertie of the parents in marriage of their children Vers. 17. IF her Father refuse to give her c. This law giveth absolute power unto the father to ratifie his daughters marriage by consenting unto it or by dissenting to breake it off which sheweth what injurie is offred unto this libertie and right of parents by the practice of the Romish Church quae conjugia sine ullo parentum consensu inita probet which ratifieth marriages contracted and begun without consent of parents Gallas And Oleaster a writer of their owne hereupon inferreth thus Est que hic non parvum argumentum ad probandum c. Here is no small argument to prove that libertie unto marriage doth not altogether by the law of nature agree unto the same nor yet to enter into religion c. But it is an ordinarie thing with the Romanists both to marrie children without consent of their parents and to thrust them into Monasteries See more hereof elsewhere 4. Confut. Against Idolatrie Vers. 20. HE that offreth unto any gods but unto the Lord onely c. This is an evident place to convince all Idolaters of great impietie for they in bowing and kneeling unto Idols censing before them and making their prayers looking toward them doe apparently offer unto others than unto God onely Tostatus one of their owne thus writeth upon this text Non solum si immolet eis sed etiam si faciat alia pertinentia ad cultum divinum ut si flectat genua coram eis c. Not onely he which sacrificeth unto Idols but doth other things belonging to the divine worship as if he bow the knee before them c. was to be slaine Cyprian hereof thus excellently writeth Quid ante inepta simulachra sigmeâ—â—taterrâ—nae captivum corpus incurvas rectum te Deus fecit c. Why doest thou bow thy captive bodie before foolish images and terrene fictions God hath made thee upright c. looke up to heaven Quid te in lapsum mortis cum Serpente quem colis sternis What doest thou prostrate thy selfe with the Serpent whom thou worshippest into this deadly fall c. More hereof see elsewhere 5. Confut. Against those which either hold tithes not to be due by the word of God or challenge them by the ceremoniall law Vers. 29 THine abundance and thy liâ—â—ur c. This may be understood as well of the tithes as first fruits which arise of the fruits and increase of the earth whether they be drie or moist Concerning then the law of tithes there was in the paiment thereof a treble right Partim erat morale it was partly morall and naturall for that the people should allow necessarie maintenance unto those qui divine cultu ad salutem populi ministrabant which ministred for the salvation of the people in the divine worship even naturall reason teacheth As even among the Heathen
the absence of another for commonly then many tales are devised Lyran. Or that the Judge should not give care to the accuser before he have heard the partie accused also Borrh. Or this some make to be the meaning Non suscipias vocem testium quos scis mentiri Receive not the voice of witnesses whom thou knowest to lie Tostat. quaest 1. But it is better generally understood of all as well private men as Judges Vetat falsum rumorem de ullo homine vel spargi vel admitti It forbiddeth any false rumour to be spread of any or admitted Gallas Praecipue tamen lex haec ad judicia pertinet And yet principally this law belongeth to judgements Simler because false reports may there doe most harme yet because it is also a fault in private men to raise false reports and to be too credulous to beleeve them it is better here to retaine a generall sense QUEST II. What it is to put to the hand to be a false witnesse NEither shalt put thy hand with the wicked to be a false witnesse 1. Calvins joyneth this to the former clause and saith they are here understood to be false witnesses qui proximos traducunt which joyne their hand with the wicked in traducing of their neighbours So also Oleaster But the manner of the phrase here used of putting to the hand that is of binding and combining themselves importeth a greater matter than onely in carying or spreading of a false report 2. Some referring this law unto publike testimonie in judgement understand it of the person of the Judge that he should not be a meane to procure false witnesses as the Elders of the Citie to whom Iezâ—bel sent did against Naboth R. Salomon Marbach But the words In being a false witnesse which is more than procuring will not beare that sense 3. Some by putting to the hand understand thou shalt not sweare to be a false witnesse because they used to lift up their hand when they did sweare Lyran. Tostat. But this doth make the sense too particular for what if he doe not sweare but onely promise or give his hand to be a false witnesse it is directly against this law therefore by putting the hand is signified hee shall not aid or assist him he shall not consociate himselfe vel conferre operam or promise his helpe or consent unto evill Iun. 4. And withall here is forbidden that wicked confederacie and mutuall ayding one of another in bearing false witnesse as it is a common practice Da mihi mutuum testimonium Witnesse for me and I will bee witnesse for thee Gallas 5. And two things are forbidden Non adjuvabis causam improbi falso testimonio c. Thou shalt not helpe the cause of the wicked by a false testimonie not make a covenant with him to doe it for him Lippomaâ— QUEST III. How great a sinne it is to be a false witnesse Vers. 2. TO be a false witnesse 1. Falsum testimonium habet tripliceus deformitatem A false testimonie hath a threefold deformitie ex perjurie first by perjurie because witnesses are not admitted but upon their oath ali◠〈…〉 justitiae another way by violating of justice tertio ex ipsa falâ—tate thirdly by the falsenesse of his testimonie Thomas These three evils and mischiefes then do accompanie a false witnesse perjurie injustice falsenesse and lying 2. And in three other respects is this sinne of false witnesse bearing odious and abominable 1. In respect of the author thereof who is the divell for when he telleth a lie he speaketh of his owne 2. The inconveniences are great which ensue the perverting of justice and the condemning of the innocent 3. There is also nominis divini contaminatio the polluting and prophaning of the name of God Borrh. QUEST IV. Whether in this law we are to understand the mightie or the many Vers. 2. THou shalt not follow the mightie 1. The most doe read many or the multitude as before is shewed in the divers readings and they make two parts of this law the first to concerne all in â—enerall that they shall not follow a multitude to doe evill the second Judges in particular not to folâ—ow a multitude in judgement Cajetan Oleaster Whether it be to respect the multitude of the parties â—riends that sentence is to be given upon Marbach or the multitude of Judges that consent in a wrong judgement Simler And then the meaning is that in neither case a multitude is to be followed si â—it manifestè iniquum vel falsum if it be manifestly false or unjust which the multitude holdeth for if it be manifeste verum either manifestly true vel dubium or doubtfull which many doe affirme one must not of singularitie depart from their judgement Tostat. quaest 2. 2. Some in the former clause interpret rabbim many Thou shalt not follow many to doe evill but in the other branch of the law they understand it not of the quantitie and number but of the qualitie neither decline after the mightie c. that is where there are many Judges to give sentence the inferiour should not be overruled by the opinion of the Superiour Judges and mightie and therefore among the Jewes this wise course was used in giving of sentence in the assemblie of Judges that the punies and inferiour Judges should deliver their opinion first lest if the greatest began the other might bee swayed by them this is also the use among the Divines in the Vniversitie of Paris the Juniours and Inferiours begin first Lyran. This also is the honourable use of the Star-chamber with us 3. But seeing the same word rabbim is used in both sentences it is taken in the same sense in both places and is better interpreted the mightie than the many for these reasons 1. Because of the opposition of the poore man in the next verse the mightie and the poore are better compared and set together than the many and the poore 2. So Levit. 19.15 gadhol the great and dal the poore are set one against the other that neither the one nor the other should be respected in judgement 3. This interpretation of the mightie comprehendeth also the other whether they be mightie in number or in power Iun. 4. And as respect is not to bee had of the multitude so neither of the paucitie and fewnesse as the Donatists in times past and the Anabaptists in these dayes doe brag of their small number as therefore the best Gallas QUEST V. How the poore is not to be esteemed in judgement Vers. 3. THou shalt not esteeme a poore man c. 1. The word hadar signifieth honour beautie comelinesse Prohibet blandis sermonibus ornari causam pauperis He forbiddeth that the poore mans cause should be set forth with glosing words and so be made better than it is Cajetan Oleaster Therefore Aristotle giveth a good rule that in matters of judgement causa simplicibus sermonibus propeneuda erat that the cause should be laid
the old and new Lippom. panes azymi munditiam vita the unleavened bread betokeneth the holinesse of life without the leaven of maliciousnesse as S. Paul expoundeth 1 Cor. 6. 2. The solemne washing of Aaron and his sons did signifie the Sacrament of Baptisme and as they doe not put on their garments untill first the filth of the flesh be washed away Sic nisi in Christo novi homines renaseantur So unlesse they become new men in Christ they are not admitted unto holy things Hierom. They which come unto God must first bee purged and cleansed from their sins Pelarg. And hereby more specially was signified in this solemne washing with water the publike Baptisme of Christ which though he needed not in respect of himselfe yet thereby he would consecrate that Sacrament for us Osiander 3. By the putting on of the Priestly garments after they were washed is signified the putting on of Christ cum tunicas polliceas deposuerimus after we have put off our old vestures Hierom. So Procopius applieth those words of the Apostle Put on the Lord Iesus Christ So also Pelarg. 4. By the oyle wherewith Aaron was annointed Beda understandeth Gratiam Spiritus sancti The grace of the Spirit And Hierom here applieth that saying of the Prophet David Psal. 45. God even thy God hath annointed thee with the oyle of gladnesse above thy fellowes Therefore was Aaron onely annointed in the head and none of the rest because Christ received the Spirit beyond measure and the holy Ghost descended and lighted upon him when he was baptized Matth. 3. Osiander QUEST X. Why the Priests lay their hands upon the head of the beast Vers. 10. AAron and his sons shall put their hands upon the head c. 1. Augustine by this ceremonie understandeth the receiving of power Vt ipsi etiam aliquid consecrare possent that they also might consecrate afterward unto God So also Lyranus But because the people also did use to lay their hands upon their sacrifices which they brought Levit. 4. who received thereby no power to sacrifice this seemeth not to be the meaning 2. Iunius thus expoundeth it Quasi seipses sisterent sacrificarent Iehovae As though they did present themselves to bee sacrificed unto God yet not in their owne person but Christs But this cannot be the meaning for the former reason because the people did also lay on their hands who were therein no type of Christ that sacrificed himselfe for us 3. Some thinke that by this ceremonie in imposing of their hands they did resigne their right in that beast Tostat. Et destinarunt illud ut fieret sacrificium and ordained it to be a sacrifice Osiander 4. But there is more in it than so they hereby confesse that they were worthie to die in Gods justice for their sins Sed ex divina misericordia mors in animal transferebatur But by the divine mercie their death was transferred upon the beast Lyran. wherein Christ is lively shadowed forth who died for us Simler QUEST XI Of the divers kinds of sacrifices and why some kinde of beasts were taken for sacrifice and not other Vers. 11. SO thou shalt kill the calfe c. 1. There were three kinde of sacrifices which were usually offered the first was called holocaustum a burnt offering because it was wholly consumed upon the Altar and this kinde was offered specially ad reverentiam majestatis for reverence of the divine majestie to testifie our obedience and service The second was the sacrifice for sin whereof part was burned upon the Altar part was for the Priests use unlesse it were a sin offering for the Priest or the people in which cases all was consumed on the Altar The third sort were peace offerings which were offered in signe of thanksgiving for some benefit received or to be received whereof part was burnt upon the Altar part was for the Priest and the rest was for the offerer Thom. 2. Now although there were many cleane birds and beasts yet there were onely two kinde of the one the pigeon and turtle dove and three of the other bullocks sheepe and goats which were taken for sacrifice whereof Philo giveth this reason because both among the fowles and beasts these are of the meekest and mildest nature the pigeon and turtle dove and amongst the beasts these three sorts are tamest when we see that whole heards and flocks of them may be driven by a boy and they have neither pawes or clawes to hurt as ravenous beasts nor yet armed with teeth to devoure wanting the upper row wherein appeareth the harmlesse disposition of these creatures Philo addeth further that these beasts of all other are most serviceable unto mans use sheepe and goats for cloathing and food and bullocks beside the use of their flesh for meat and their skins for leather they serve with their labour in the tilling of the ground To these may a third reason bee added because the land of Canaan most abounded with these kinds of fowles and beasts they are prescribed for sacrifice And a fourth also may be this they were not to offer of wilde beasts because they could not easily bee had and hardly are they gotten alive for which cause they were not appointed to offer fishes which could not so easily be taken and very hardly alive but their sacrifices must be brought alive Riber 3. Now in the consecration of Aaron and his sons all these sacrifices are offered a bullocke for a sinne offering one ramme for a burnt offering and another for a peace offering QUEST XII Why the bloud was laid upon the horns of the Altar Vers. 12. THou shalt take of the bloud and put it upon the hornes c. 1. The bloud here was not used to confirme any league or covenant betweene God and his people as chap. 24. for in that case first the words and articles of the covenant were read before the bloud was sprinkled and beside each partie betweene whom the covenant was made were besprinkled not onely the Altar which represented God but the people also But here neither of these is performed there is no covenant rehearsed neither are the people sprinkled with the bloud 2. There was then another use beside this of the sprinkling of bloud which was to purge and cleanse and so to pacifie and appease as this reason is yeelded why they should not eat the bloud because the Lord had given it to be offered upon the Altar to be an atonement for their soules Levit. 17.11 And not onely the Altar of burnt offering was cleansed by bloud but the whole Tabernacle the high Priest in the day of reconciliation sprinkled the bloud upon the Mercie seat and before the Mercie seat the Altar and Tabernacle also to purge them from the sins and trespasses of the people Levit. 16.16 Therefore the Apostle saith Almost all things by the law are purged with bloud Heb. 9.22 The bloud of the sacrifices then was put upon
quantum praedestinati sunt in noticia Divina as they are ordained to salvation in the knowledge and prescience of God and they that are thus written can never bee blotted out another way they are scripti secundum quid written after a sort not according to the divine prescience or predestination Sed secundum dispositionem in eis actu existentem secundum praesentem justitiam But according to their disposition which is in act in them and according to their present justice and thus are they said to be blotted out not in respect of Gods knowledge as though any thing can fall out against his prescience but in respect of their change from grace into sinne 2. Thomas also to the same purpose some are said to bee blotted out Non secundum rei veritatem sed secundum hominum opinionem Not according to the truth of the thing but in the opinion of men for it is usuall in Scripture ut aliquid dicatur fieri quando innotescit that a thing should be said to be done when it appeareth So some are said to be written in the booke of life quia homines ibi opinantur scriptos propter presentem justitiam because men thinke they are there written in respect of their present justice Then some are there written ex pradestinatione by predestination which can never bee blotted out Some ex gratia in respect of their present grace which they may fall from and so be blotted out And againe in another place he expresseth the same thing in other termes Some are predestinate of God Insâ— ut simpliciter habituri vitam aeternam Simply to have life eternall in themselves and these are so written in the booke of life as they can never be blotted out And some are so written Vt habeant vitam aeternam non in se sed in sua causa To have life eternall not in themselves but in respect of their cause and present state of Justice which when they fall from they are said to be blotted out 3. So before them both Augustine We must not so take it brethren Quod quenquam Deus scribat in librâ— vitae deleat illum That God writeth any in the booke of life and blotteth him out for if a mortall man said that I have written I have written shall we thinke that God writeth and blotteth out Praescius est Deus praedestinavit omnes ante constitutionem mundi regnaturos cum filio God foreseeth all things and he did predestinate all before the making of the world that should reigne with his sonne c. Therefore this is said Secundum spem ipsorum qui ibi se scriptos putabant That some are written which are said to be blotted out in their owne opinion because they thought they were there written so that where it is said let them be blotted out of the booke of life the meaning is ut ipsos constet non illos ibi esse that it may appeare unto them that they are not there To this purpose Augustine as he is alleaged both by Simlerus and Borrhaius 4. Tostatus followeth the same distinction that some are written in the booke of life secundum firmam praedestinationem according to Gods sure predestination some only secundum praesentem justitiam in respect of their present justice these may bee blotted out and not the other but he addeth further that so likewise in the booke of Gods prescience wherein onely they are written whose end is damnation some are written there secundum firmam Dei praescientiam according to Gods firme prescience others secundum praesentem injustitiam according to their present injustice These may be blotted out and not the other And this writing of them in one booke according to their present justice in the other according to their present injustice he calleth the writing foris without the booke the other writing according to Gods predestination and prescience he saith is intus within the booke Then out of these positions he inferreth certaine conclusions 1. That it is possible for one to be written in both these bookes the booke of life and the booke of death together in the one according to Gods predestination or prescience in the other according to their present justice or injustice As he which is predestinate unto life may according to his present state of injustice be written in the booke of death foris without as Paul while he was yet a persecutor and one may be in Gods prescience written in the booke of death and yet according to his present state of grace he may be written in the booke of life as Iudas while yet he continued in Christs obedience and preached the Gospell 2. Yet it is possible for one to be written twice in the same booke both in regard of Gods prescience and his owne state and condition as Moses was thus written in the booke of life and Iudas when he betrayed Christ in the booke of death 3. They which are written in the booke of life according to predestination may be blotted out thence according to their present state and condition as David when he sinned and so in the other booke likewise as Saul while he was yet a vertuous King he was written in the booke of rejection in Gods prescience but blotted out in regard of his present justice 4. But he that is written in the booke of life according unto predestination cannot be written in the booke of death according to Gods prescience and so on the other side because one and the same cannot be foreseene of God both to salvation and condemnation 5. And they which are written according to their present justice in the booke of life cannot at the same time be written in the booke of death according to their present injustice because one cannot at the same time be counted righteous and wicked before God Tostat. qu. 43. But these exceptions may worthily be taken unto Tostatus conclusions 1. Because he maketh a booke of death and speaketh of putting in and blotting out of that booke whereas the Scripture acknowledgeth only a booke of life not any of death for not to be written in the booke of life though they bee not written in any other blacke booke is sufficient unto everlasting perdition 2. He calleth the booke of death the booke of Gods prescience only as though God were not a Judge also in condemning the vessels of wrath into hell and ordaining them justly thereunto as he is in the electing the vessels of honour to salvation 3. It is an errour that God writeth any in either of those bookes on the backside in respect of their present state or condition of justice or injustice for Gods writing there is unchangeable they are there said to be written in regard of their present state secundum spem ipsorum in their owne hope as Augustine or secundum opinionem hominâ—m according to the opinion of men that thinke them to be there written as Thomas before
Analys But we reade not of any such plague mentioned in the Scripture and therefore it being a conjecture without ground is with more reason rejected than received 6. Rab. Salomon thinketh that every day wherein the Hebrewes were punished was this day of visitation and R. Moses Gerundens saith that there is no revenge to this day in Israel Wherein there is not an ounce of the iniquity of the calfe Ex Oleaster But the Lord meaneth some speciall day of visitation here Tostat. quaest 46. And this is the Jewes blindnesse to thinke still that they are punished for their fathers sinnes because they see not their owne 7. Simlerus and Borrhaius Pelargus doe thinke this day of visitation to be understood of all those plagues and calamities which they suffered in the desart where all their carcasses fell which were above twenty yeere old when they went out of Egypt onely Caleb and Ioshua excepted And though this befell them for their murmuring as is declared Numb 14. yet other former sinnes might concurre withall 8. But it is not necessary to set downe any certaine time of punishment which should be this day of visitation Cum varie tum in paâ—res tum in filios Deus animadvertit Seeing God did divers wayes punish both the fathers and the children Gallas And it is no new thing with God Plura simul peccata uno vindictae genere vocare in judicium In one kinde of punishment to judge many sinnes Calvin Therefore seeing God often times deferreth the punishment of the fathers to the third and fourth generation the Lord afterward when he saw his time and other sinnes gave occasion did also remember this 9. But together this must be understood that God would in the meane time expect their repentance and if they did not repent then when time served he would remember them accordingly Marbach Yet the Lord doth also herein a manner foretell that the people would give novas subindies occasiones new occasions still of punishment such was their hardnesse of heart Calvin QUEST LXXXV When the Lord plagued the people for the calfe Vers. 35. SO the Lord plagued the people 1. R. Salomon thinketh that this was some plague sent into the host by the Lord at this time beside the slaughter of three thousand by the Levites So also Tostatus But there being here no expresse mention made thereof this opinion wanteth a foundation to be built upon 2. Lyranus addeth further that thus the Latine text may be helped which readeth 23. thousand for three thousand these 20. thousand might be those which died of the plague But Tostatus taketh away this answer for still if the originall only make mention of three thousand and the Latine of 23. thousand it must needs be in errour departing from the Hebrew fountaine quaest 46. Yet Tostatus falleth into a worse inconvenience in justifying here the Latine text before the Hebrew as is shewed before quest 72. 3. Therefore these words And the Lord plagued the people have relation to the slaughter of three thousand made by the Levites vers 28. and it is said the Lord plagued them that they might know that this punishment Non à Mosis arbitrio sed judicio Dei profectum est Proceeded not from Moses minde but from the judgement of God Gallasius So also Simler Calvin Oleast Osiand Marbach Pelarg. 4. Iunius thinketh that this plague was alio tempore at another time when the Lord punished them for other sinnes But the former exposition is to be preferred because wee reade not of any such plague inflicted for this sinne So Hugo de S. Victor interpreteth so God plagued the people sciliâ—et supradicta interfectione c. that is by the former slaughter which the Levites made whence it appeareth Hâ—c instinctu Dei factum non malevolentia Mosis That this was done by instinct of God not through the malice of Moses QUEST LXXXVI Of the difference betweene the act of sinne the fault staine and guilt Vers. 35. BEcause they made or procured the calfe which Aaron made The Latine Translater readeth the Lord plagued them pro reatu vituli for the guilt of the calfe that is the sinne committed about the calfe Tostatus hereupon taketh occasion to shew the difference betweene pâ—ccaâ—â—do reatus the sinne and the guilt thereof which Hierom thus translating seemeth to confound and because some use may be made of his tractate here I will compendiously and summarily abridge it In every sinfull act then there are five things to be considered Actus peccati cuâ—pa â—acula reatus poena The very act of the sinne the fault the blot the guilt the punishment 1. The act of sinne as it is an act is not alwayes evill for idem est actus in peccato in honesto there is the same act in substance in sinne and in that which is honest as in adultery there is the like externall act as in lawfull matrimony the fault which is in respect of the circumstances which are not observed maketh the difference 2. The second thing to bee considered is culpa the faultinesse of the action which is committed by the not due observing of circumstances which are these 1. Quid what it is that he doth whether it bee lawfull or unlawfull honest or dishonest 2. Quantum the quantitie must bee considered as one may steale much or little and raile sparingly or with a full mouth 3. Quoties how often for hee that committeth the same sinne often is more blameable than he which doth it but seldome 4. Qualiter in what manner whether willingly or unwillingly whether hee be quicke or slow in doing it 5. Cum quo with what instrument as he that smiteth with a stone is not equall to him that striketh with a sword 6. Ad quem with whom the sinne is committed as fornication betweene them that are married is more heinous than betweene single parties 7. Vbi where in what place as to steale any thing out of the Church is worse than out of an house 8. Quando when for it is more to sinne upon the Lords holy day than upon another 9. Ad quid to what end for the end maketh a thing of it selfe lawfull unlawfull to make an action good all these things must concurre but it is enough to make it evill if it faile in any of them Now this faultinesse of the action passeth with the action it selfe which is the subject thereof and remaineth not 3. But there is left behind macula a certaine staine or blot in the soule whereby the image of God is deformed 4. And beside this staine there is a guiltinesse of punishment 5. And then the last thing is the punishment it selfe in this world or the next QUEST LXXXVII How God may justly punish twice for one sinne BUt seeing it is here said that God plagued the people how can it stand with Gods justice to punish them againe for the same sinne as he threatneth he will visit their sinne in
knowledge of God by their names As though Moses in this cleare sight of Gods glorie did see the names of Gods elect Burgensis confuteth this exposition as being both against the text for the Lord speaketh of proclaiming his owne name not of the names of the elect and beside Moses asked no such thing nor yet doth God reveale unto his servants the number of the elect Matthias Thoring taketh upon him in defence of Lyranus to confute Burgensis but his reply is verse unsufficient the two first reasons of Burgensis are verie evident to the third he answereth that seeing Moses saw a representation of the Divine Essence he saw also relucentia in ipsa those things which did appeare and shine in that brightnesse and yet it followeth not that hee should see all hee might see in that glorious representation the election of some though not of all for this hee saith was one of the errours condemned at Paris Quod omnis videns verbum relucentia in verbo videt omnia quae verbum That he which seeth the Word and all things shining in the Word doth see all which the Word seeth Contra. 1. But if as they imagine Moses then saw in Gods glorie and now the Saints in heaven see in Christ as in a glasse the names of the elect then must they see all their names as in a glasse one cannot but see whatsoever is represented therein 2. And yet it followeth not that he which so seeth should see all which the Word seeth for the Word seeth more than is represented as they imagine in the reflexion of the brightnesse thereof 6. The meaning then is this Deus promulgabit nomen suum God will publish his name It was a great benefit that God yeeldeth himselfe in part to be seene but it is a greater that he revealeth himselfe by his voice Multa enim visiones frigida sunt sisermo non accesserit For many visions are but cold if there be no word added thereunto Calvin Per strepet in auribus nomen Domini c. The name of God shall sound in his eares Borrh. And God will manifest himselfe in that name in quojam Mosi innotuit wherein he was made knowne to Moses already namely Iehovah Gallas And beside in the hearing of Moses recitabit omnia epitheta cognomina he will rehearse all his epithetes and other names as it followeth chap. 34.6 Ferus Osiander And all this was both for Moses better understanding that those things which were represented per gloriosam illam by that glorious resemblance should more fully bee declared to Moses Burgens As also Vocabo coram te ut videaâ— manifeste c. I will call before thee that thou mayest see manifestly that which yet thou seest but darkly Rupertus The Lord by calling stirred up Moses attention And further it was a watch-word to Moses when he should see God the Lord when his glorie was passed by should then crie trâ—â—sit aut adest Dominus now the Lord passeth by or is present Oleaster Dominus est coram te the Lord is now before thee Vatab. And then and not before Moses should looke out upon God as he passed by QUEST XL. Why these words are added I will shew mercie c. Vers. 19. FOr I will shew mercie c. 1. Oleaster giveth this reason of these words that in this speech the Lord performeth that which he said before that he would shew him all his good Quod maximè in misericordia consistit which chiefly consisteth in mercie So also Ferus But if all the Lordâ— good had consisted herein in shewing mercie then superfluous mention should have beene made afterward of his justice chap. 34.7 not holding the wicked innocent c. 2. Osiander taketh it to be an exposition of the former words I will proclaime my name that is declare what my will is toward men in shewing mercie to those on whom I will have mercie But this is not the whole will of God for he doth visit the iniquitie of the fathers upon the children to the third and fourth generation as well as he reserveth mercie to thousands 3. Tostatus thinketh that hereby Moses is admonished not to thinke that this grace was shewed him for his owne merits But Moses ascribeth all to the favour and grace which hee found with God vers 12. 3. Therefore it is rather yeelded as a reason of the Lords grace and favour extended here unto Moses 1. Which some apply thus that the Lord hereby gave Moses like privilege as to the Fathers Abraham Isaak and Iacob that as he shewed mercie to them so likewise he would unto Moses that he should not need to alleage the merits of the Fathers as he had done before Lyranus But Moses urged not the merits of the Fathers before he onely insisted upon Gods promise made unto them 2. Some thinketh that the Lord here maketh a reservation and exception of the people that though hee shewed this favour to Moses yet he would doe with the rest as he thought good Gallas 3. But Calvin commeth neerer the sense making this a reason why the Lord shewed this glorious vision more unto Moses than to any other because it was his good pleasure So also Simler Likewise Iunius Non omnino omnibus sed quibus quando quantum decretum est c. God doth not thus reveale himselfe to all and at all times but to whom when and how much he hath decreed from all eternitie 4. Out of this place brought in upon this particular occasion the Apostle à singulari causa ad universalem accommodat doth of a singular matter make a generall doctrine Rom. 9.15 Iun. That God cannot be thought to be unjust si aliis prateritis alios eligat if he chuse some pretermitting others Calvin 5. And here Moses minde is elevated and lifted up to consider who it is in whom the Lord saith I will have mercie in Messia meâ— in my Messiah Borrh. QUEST XLI Why the word is here doubled BUt why the same word is repeated I will shew mercie on whom I will shew mercie 1. Augustine giveth this reason Deus suae misericordiae firmitatem ista repetitione mâ—nstravit God would by this repetition shew the stablenesse and surenesse of his mercie as when Amen Amen is doubled and as Pharaoh had two dreames of the same thing 2. But here is more than a bare repetition if the Lord had said I will have mercie I will have mercie then there had beene nothing but a bare iteration therefore Calvin better observeth that this kinde of doubling and repeating the same words is used in all languages abi causa investigatiâ—nem excladere volumus when we will have no other cause sought out as Pilate said What I have written I have written 3. Though there is no great difference in the signification of these words I will shew mercie c. and have compassion c. yet in the originall they are distinguished for the first
pitched without the host was brought into the campe and so the Lord was knowne perfectly to be reconciled but of this there can be no certainty 1. Some thinke that Moses had not this shining in his face continually while it lasted with him but that while hee was conversant among the people his face did not shine but when hee went in unto God the brightnesse was renued and then he came forth and covered his face when he spake unto the people 2. But it is evident out of the text that Moses face continually shined while this brightnesse remained with him for when he went in unto the Lord he removed the covering from his face his face then shined before hee went in unto the Lord for otherwise he needed not to have covered it his brightnesse then was not renued alwayes when he went in but he had it before Yet it may be granted that when he went in unto God aliqualiter suscipiebat augmentum it might receive some increase and augmentation Tostat. quaest 28. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. God only writeth in the heart Vers. 1. HEw thee two tables of stone and I will write As Moses hewed the stone and prepared the tables but God did write in them So man may move exhort prepare and stirre up But God only docet intus teacheth inwardly writing in mens hearts by the finger of his Spirit Ferus As Paul may plant Apollos water but God giveth the increase 1 Cor. 3.6 2. Doct. Sinne is no substance Vers. 7. FOrgiving or taking away iniquitie If God take away iniquity and sinne and yet spareth sinners then there is great difference betweene sinne and the sinner it followeth then that sinne is not a substance but an accident Marbach The Apostle defineth sinne to bee a transgression of the Law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Ioh. 3.4 as then justice and righteousnesse which is obedience to the Law is no substance but grace infused so sinne which is the transgression of the Law is an evill quality or habite no substantiall thing 3. Doct. Gods generall promises must be specially applied by faith Vers. 9. PArdon our iniquity and sinne God had proclaimed himselfe before to be mercifull forgiving sinne But Moses is not contented with a generall apprehension of Gods mercy but laboureth for a particular assurance thereof so it sufficeth not generally to know the attributes of God nisi speciali fide applicemus unlesse we make speciall application of them by faith Pelarg. As S. Paul saith of Christ Who loved me and gave himselfe for me Galath 2.20 4. Doct. Of the right manner of praying Vers. 8. MOses made haste and bowed himselfe c. Moses here teacheth us a right forme of prayer 1. First though he had prayed before yet he prayeth againe teaching us to pray often 2. He humbleth himselfe bowing to the ground 3. He prayeth in secret in the mount lifting up his minde unto God 4. He is not long in prayer but compendious 5. He prayeth not for himselfe only but for the people 6. He ascribeth all to Gods mercy confessing his and the peoples sinnes If wee follow this paterne and president in our prayers we cannot pray amisse Simler 5. Places of Controversie 1. Controv. That reconciliation is not denied unto any upon their repentance Vers. 1. HEw thee two tables In this chapter is set downe the reconciliation betweene the Lord and his people who although they had committed a great sinne yet the Lord upon their repentance receiveth them to mercie Which confuteth the errour of the Novatians who denied pardon or reconciliation to them which had sinned against their conscience Marbach Whereas both David after those two great sinnes of adultery and murder and Peter after his deniall of Christ were upon their repentance restored to Gods favour 2. Controv. That man cannot prepare his owne heart PRocopius giveth this note that whereas the Lord did both prepare the first tables and writ in them it signified that God first suo spiritu paravit cordis tabulas suo spiritu impressit by his Spirit prepared the tables of the heart and by his Spirit printed them but these second tables of the heart quilibet per poenitentiam praparet every one prepareth by repentance But it is not in mans power to prepare his owne heart who of himselfe cannot thinke a good thought 2 Cor. 3.5 God only must open our heart as he did the heart of Lydia Act. 16.14 3. Controv. All sinne against the holy Ghost irremissible Vers. 7. FOrgiving iniquitie transgression and sinne Cajetane noteth hereupon that Quodlibet peccati genus veniam apud Deum invenit c. there is no kinde of sinne which doth not finde forgivenesse with God And whereas it is said in the Gospell that sin against the holy Ghost shall never be forgiven it is not contrary to this hîc est sermo de venia peccatorum ex parte Dei for here is speech of forgivenesse of sinne on Gods behalfe there ex parte peccantis indispositi on the behalfe of the sinner which is not disposed to repentance and so he concludeth that regulariter ordinarily such shall not obtaine pardon c. So herein he seemeth to concurre with Bellarmine that sinne against the holy Ghost is not simply irremissible sed non ordinarie ut plurimum but not ordinarily and for the most part Contra 1. Wee grant indeed that in respect of Gods omnipotencie and al-sufficient and abounding mercie there is no sinne that is unpardonable yet in respect of the invincible hardnesse of heart in such impenitent sinners which cannot repent it is irremissible 2. The Apostle saith It is impossible that such should be renued by repentance such namely as sinne against the holy Ghost If then it be impossible for any sinne to be forgiven without repentance and it be impossible for such to repent then it is impossible for such to be forgiven See more hereof Synops. Centur. 4. error 73. 4. Controv. The Virgin Marie not privileged from sinne Vers. 7. ANd not making innocent But the Latine text readeth thus Nullus apud te per se innocens est None of himselfe is innocent before thee which text as they reade it doth include that none are innocent before God and so consequently that the Virgin Marie was not free from actuall sinne much lesse originall which question though it be not yet defined in the Romane Church yet Tostat quaest 8. thinketh it more probable that the Virgin Marie was not conceived in originall sinne and then he maketh this answer that true it is that none is innocent before God per se of themselves yet with God it is all one as in his mercie ex nocente innocentem reddere c. he can make a sinner to be innocent so ne nocens esset efficere he can bring it to passe that they should not sinne at all But the question is not here what God can doe but what he doth Let him or any
where the sides joyned together for then the bars could not conveniently have beene thrust thorow them but by the corners are meant the sides neere unto the corners as it is said afterward that the barres were in the rings by the sides of the Arke Tostat. qu. 1. QUEST II. Why it is said He made where the Lord said before to Moses Thou shalt make Vers. 6. HE made the Mercie-seat c. The phrase must be observed that whereas chap. 25. the Lord saith to Moses Thou shalt make an Arke thou shalt make a candlesticke thou shalt make a table and so of the rest here it is said He that is Bezaleel made the Arke he made the table he made the candlesticke The reason hereof is to shew the obedience of Moses and the people lest they might have beene thought to have received many precepts of the Lord and performed few of them In that therefore the Lord said to Moses Thou shalt make there the charge and commandement is given But now where it is thus rehearsed and he made the dutifull and carefull performing is expressed of that which was given them in charge Pellican QUEST III. In what forme the branches of the candlesticke went up Vers. 18. SIx branches came out of the side thereof 1. Pellican seemeth to thinke that these branches went up erectis calamis with their stalkes upright 2. But their opinion seemeth more probable who thinke that the branches in their going up semicirculos effecisse made halfe circles for both that forme and fashion was more comely to sight and beside if they had gone upright this inconvenience would have followed that the lamps above where the oyle was put for the lights would not have stood right up but leaning one way which had been unfit both for the droppings of the oyle and the lights would not have burned so cleare nor so bright if the lamps had not stood even and levell Gallas The rest of the questions concerning these instruments and ornaments of the Temple which are described in this chapter are before discussed chap. 25. and chap. 30. in the beginning of the chapters 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Christ our true propitiatorie and Mercie-seat Vers. 6. HE made the Mercie-seat The Mercie-seat signified Christ our true 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Propitiatorie who hath reconciled us to God his Father The Cherubs upon the Mercie-seat doe represent the holy Angels whose ministerie Christ useth in the government of his Church Pelargus As the Apostle saith They are sent forth to minister for their sakes that shall be heires of salvation Hebr. 1.14 Marbach 2. Doct. Christ both God and man THe making of the Arke of wood within and gold without did set forth the two natures in our blessed Saviour joyned together in one person the divine and humane Simlerus In the Propitiatorie and Mercie-seat are typically set forth the benefits that we have by Christ that as the Propitiatorie covered the Arke wherein was the Law so Christ Legem nos accusantem tegit doth cover and hide the Law which accuseth us Simler But more particularly the Apostle rehearseth the benefits which we have by Christ saying that he is made of God unto us his wisdome righteousnesse sanctification redemption 1. His wisdome in that Christ hath revealed unto us the will of his Father to give his Sonne for us That whosoever beleeveth in him should have eternall life 2. He is our Iustice in that hee imparted to us both his active righteousnesse in fulfilling the Law and his passive obedience in bearing the punishment due unto our sinne so the Apostle saith Christ is the end of the Law for righteousnesse to everie one that beleeveth 3. Christ is our Sanctification in that hee doth not only impute unto us his righteousnesse by faith but doth also sanctifie and regenerate us by his Spirit inabling us in some measure to keepe his Commandements as the Lord saith by his Prophet I will put my Spirit within you and cause you to walke in my statutes 4. He is our Redemption in that he hath by his innocent death appeased the wrath of God toward us as the Apostle saith Who shall condemne us it is Christ which is dead c. Marbachius 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against such hereticks as erred concerning Christs divine or humane nature AS Christ is shadowed forth in the Arke to be both God and man so all such are condemned which doe erre concerning the divine or humane nature of Christ. As touching Christs divine nature 1. Some utterly deny it making Christ a meere man and not to have beene before he was conceived of the Virgin Marie in which heresie were Cerinthus Ebion contrarie to the Scripture which saith that the Word which was made flesh was in the beginning c. Ioh. 1.1 2. Some confesse another nature in Christ beside his humanitie but not of the same substance with God yet of an higher nature than any creature so held Carpocrates Basilides Arrius but our blessed Saviour himselfe saith I and my Father are one Ioh. 20.30 3. Some affirmed that Christ beside his humane nature consisted also of a divine yet not begotten of the Father but making one person with God the Father as well as being of one substance so the Sabellians and Patropassians whereas the Apostle saith God sent his Sonne made of a woman Gal. 4.4 The person then of the Sonne and not of the Father was made man for us Concerning Christs humane nature 1. Some affirmed that he was not a true man but onely in outward appearance as the Manichees and Marcionites who are confuted by Christs owne words Luke 24.39 Handle me and see for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as yee see me have 2. The Valentinians and Anabaptists hold that Christ had not his flesh of the Virgin Marie but brought it with him from heaven contrarie to the Apostle who saith That hee was made of the seed of David according to the flesh Rom. c. 3. 3. Some taught that Christ had a true humane nature but in respect of his body onely not of his soule as Apollinaris Bishop of Laodicea who is convinced by the words of our Saviour Matth. 26. My soule is heavie unto death 4. Some grant that Christ tooke upon him our whole nature but not our humane infirmities But the Apostle teacheth the contrarie that Christ was in all things tempted in like sort as we are yet without sinne There are two kinde of infirmities some are personall as leprosie blindnesse sicknesse diseases these Christ was not subject unto there are naturall infirmities which doe belong unto the whole humane nature as wearinesse hunger griefe and such like these our blessed Saviour undertooke that he might be in all things like unto us 5. Some hold that Christ had a true humane nature but after the uniting thereof in one person to his Godhead it was absorpt of his divine nature which only remained this was
yeare this was the third moneth 2. qu. What day of the moneth the same day was 3. qu. VVhether this first day of the third moneth were the 47. day from the Passeover 4. qu. Of the place where they incamped 5. qu. VVhether the Israelites incamped on the East side of the mount Sinai 6. qu. How Moses is said to goe up unto God 7. qu. VVhy both these names of Jacob and Israel are joyned together 8. qu. How the Lord is said to carrie them upon Eagles wings 9. qu. How they are said to bee the Lords chiefe treasure 10. qu. How they are said to be a Kingdome of Priests 11. qu. By what reasons the Lord perswaded the people and why 12. qu. VVhether the people unfeinedly here promise obedience 13. qu. How the Lord is said to come in the thicke cloud when and in what thicke cloud it was 14. qu. VVhy the Lord talketh with Moses in the hearing of the people 15. qu. VVhy Moses is said twice to have reported the peoples words unto God 16. qu. Why they are bidden to wash their garments 17. qu. Whether this were the third day of the moneth when the law was given 18. qu. VVhether the fifteenth day of the moneth were one of the fiftie which went before the giving of the law 19. qu. VVhether our Saviour with his disciples and the Iewes kept the Passeover together 20. qu. How the Apostles Pentecost and the Iewes Pentecost fell out all upon one day 21. qu. How the Lord is said here to descend 22. qu. VVhether Jehovah Christ Iesus appeared not in the old Testament but onely or usually the Angels 23. qu. VVhether it were Jehovah the Lord Christ or an Angell that came downe upon mount Sinai 24. qu. VVhy the people are forbidden to come up into the mountaine 25. qu. VVhy hee shall bee killed that toucheth the mountaine 26. qu. VVhy no hand was to touch him that came neere the mountaine 27. qu. VVhy the beast that toucheth the mountaine is commanded to be slaine 28. qu. VVhether at any time it were lawfull for the people to goe up to the mountaine 29. qu. VVhy Moses is not set downe to have reported all to the people which was given him in charge 30. qu. VVith what water they washed their cloaths 31. qu. VVhy they are commanded not to come at their wives 32. qu. VVhy Moses maketh such an ample and full declaration and description of the Lords glorious appearing in mount Sinai 33. qu. VVhy it pleased the Lord in this trouble and fearefull manner to appeare with thunder and lightning 34. qu. VVhether this thunder and lightning were naturall 35. qu. VVhy the Lord appeared in a thicke cloud 36. qu. Of the blowing of the trumpet at the giving of the law what it signifieth 37. qu. Of the different manner of the delivering the law and the Gospell 38. qu. VVhat it was that Moses spake and the Lord answered 39. qu. VVhether God himselfe or an Angell spake to Moses in the mount 40. qu. VVhy Moses is commanded to charge the people againe 41. qu. VVhat Priests are here understood 42. qu. Why Moses replieth as unwilling to go downe 43. qu. VVhy the Lord not withstanding Moses answer still chargeth him to goe downe 44. qu. VVhy Aaron is bid to come up with Moses wherefore he went up and when Questions upon the twentieth Chapter 1. QUest Whether this be a Commandement I am the Lord. 2. qu. Of the distinction and difference of the lawes of Moses in generall 3. qu. Of the validitie of the lawes Morall Ceremoniall and Iudiciall which are abrogated which are not 4. qu. Of the difference betweene the Morall and Evangelicall law 5. qu. Of the manifold use of the law in the fourefold state of man 6. qu. Why it pleased God now and not before to give his written law to the world 7. qu. How the Lord spake all these words and why 8. qu. Why it pleased God himselfe to speake to his people in the giving of the Law 9. qu. Of the division of the Morall Law 10. qu. Whether foure Commandements or three onely belong to the first table 11. qu. Whether all morall precepts as of loving of God and our neighbour bee reduced to the Decalogue 12. qu. Of generall rules to be observed in expounding the Commandements 13. qu. Why the Commandements are propounded negatively 14. qu. Of the speciall manner of accenting and writing observed in the Decalogue more than in any part of the Scripture beside 15. qu. Why this preamble is set before I am Jehovah thy God 16. qu. Why their deliverance out of Egypt is here mentioned Questions upon the first Commandement 1. QUest Whether it is better read strange gods or other gods 2. qu. Why they are called strange gods 3. qu. Whether any kinde of externall idolatrie be forbidden in the first Commandement 4. qu. Of the meaning of these words Before me 5. qu. What reasons ought chiefely to move us to acknowledge the Lord onely to be our God Questions upon the second Commandement 1. QUest What a graven image is 2. qu. What things a similitude must not bee made of to worship 3. qu. Of the difference betweene bowing downe and serving 4. qu. In what sense the Lord is called a jealous God 5. qu. Of the titles which the Lord here giveth himselfe and wherefore 6. qu. Of the general commination promise annexed 7. qu. How it standeth with Gods Iustice to punish the children for the fathers sins 8. qu. Why mention is made of the third and fourth generation 9. qu. Why mercie is promised to be shewed to a thousand generations 10. qu. How men are said to hate God Questions upon the third Commandement 1. QUest What is signified by the name of God and how diversly it is taken 2. qu. That it is more to abuse the name of Iesus than simplie of God 3. qu. How many wayes the name of God is taken in vaine 4. qu. What is required in taking of a right oath 5. qu. Whether men be bound to sweare often 6. qu. Whether it be lawfull to use cursing 7. qu. For what things an oath is not to be taken 8. qu. Whether all kinde oaths are to be kept 9. qu. Of the commination added to the third Commandement Questions upon the fourth Commandement 1. QUest Of the order of the fourth Commandement why it is put after the other 2. qu. Why it is said onely in this Commandement Remember c. 3. qu. VVhy the Lord thought good to appoint a day of rest and that upon the seventh day 4. qu. VVhether the precept of keeping the Sabbath were altogether ceremoniall 5. qu. To observe one day of seven unto the Lord is morall 6. qu. VVhat things in the Sabbath were ceremoniall what morall 7. qu. VVhat it is to sanctifie the Sabbath day 8. qu. Of the labouring six dayes whether it bee a Commandement 9. qu. VVhat works are permitted to be done upon the Sabbath 10. qu. VVhy
Gen. de Nâ—e arc c. 30. The wicked life and behaviour of Cham. Whether C ham the youngest sonne De Noe arca c. 31. Chrysost. hom 29. in Gen. Orig. hom 20. in Numer Amber de Noâ— arc c. 30 Ambr. ibid. Greg lib. 26. Moâ—al Hom. 29. in Gen. Lib. 19 de civitat Dei c. 15. Ezech. 18. Divers Kings judgements God may punish one for an other justly â—o cannot man How God doth viâ—â—t the iniquity c. to the 3. and 4 generation Quest. 20. in Exo. Lib. 26. Moral Psal. 109.14 How children are guilty of their fathers sinnes Lib. 16. de civitat dei cap. 2. Rupert lib. 4. comment in Genes c. â—9 Mercerus and Perâ—rius to found here to bee in a great error who affirme that Noah lived in the 58. yeare of Abrahams life whereas he died two yeares before he was borne and that Sem attained to the 50. yeare of Iacobs age whereas he died ten yeares before him lib. 14. in Gen. disp 5. Beros Annian lib. 3. histor scholast lib. 1. c. 37. Abraham honoured of God Noahs drunkennesse whether to be allegorized August lib. 10. de civit dei c. 2. Rom. 9. 2 Tim. 2.21 Metamor l. 15. Antilog â—o the Apolog. Epist. p. 112. Perer. in Gen. 9. explanat v. 4. Perer. in cap. 9. Gen. c. 21. De Abrahamâ— lib. 1. c. â— Theodoret. lâ—b 1. Ecâ—les â—istor â— 11. Perer. in cap. 9. Genes in 〈…〉 lib. 21. Moral c. 1â— Lib. de Noe arc c. 26. Gods mercy exceedeth his justice Isay 54.9 S. alt differ pronunt Chald. alt Ch. alt Tr. H. app prâ— prop. S. alter Ch. alter Ch. plu pro. sing differ pronunt S. add Ioseph 1. lib. Antiquit. Epiphan in Anchoâ—â—â—o Gomer Magog Madai Iavan Thubal Mesech Plin. lib. 6. c. 4. Mela. lib. 1. Geog. c. 21. Thiras Ashkenaz Plin. lib. 5. c. 23. Riphath Elisha Tarshish Kittim Dodanim Tradition in Genes Herodoâ— in Enteâ— Of Chus Two countries of Aethiopia Beroâ—ld in suâ— Chronic. Mizraim Phut Epipâ— cont Seâ—ianos Solin c. 27. Canaan Plin. lib. â— Strabo lib. 16. Chavilah Lib. 1. antiq Sab. â—aâ— Plin. lib. 6. c. 2â— Rahma Sebteca Dedan August liâ— 16. de civit 3. Hâ—er in â—adit Gen. Hug. annotat in Gen. Histor. schol iâ— Gen. 37. Mercator in Chronolog Aug. lib. â—9 de Civit. Dei cap. 3. Accad Sinhar Lib. 16. de Civit· 〈◊〉 cap. 3. Lib. 1. antiqâ— Hieron trad in â— â— Mercator in Chronolog In 2. Osia The number of the Assyrian Kings Lib. 12. de civi Deâ— c. 10. Strabo prin lib. 16. Diodorus li. 9. Strab. liâ— â—16 The largenes of the City Ninive Ludeans Hananims Lehabims Naphtahims Pathrusims Caslahims Capthorims The Capthorims are not the Capadocians RecoÌ„ciliation 〈◊〉 lib. 18. Zâ—don Cheth Iebusi Emori Girgashi Hivi Arki Sivi Arvadi Zemari Camathi Elam Asher Arphacsad Lud. Aram. Vz. Chul Gether Mesch Sheba Dionys. de situ orbis Havilah see before quâ— 10. Plin. lib. 10. c. 29. Gold why called obrizum Plin. lib. 33. c 3. Sem dwelt still in the land of Canaan Whether all the issue of Noahs sonnes are rehearsed Lib. 16. de civ dei c. 3. Pompon 〈◊〉 lib. 1. c. 9. Bâ—llâ—r â—ib 3. de verb. inter pr. cap. 3. Bellar. lib. 3. de verb. interpt cap. 3. De doct Christ. lib. 2. cap. 9. differ ver Chal. cor S.H. cor Ch. cor Hier. prop. pro appell differen ver S. add So readeth the vulgar Latine in the great Bible S. add S. ad Sep. det S. ad S. det S. cor add differ verb. S. ap fpr diff pronunâ— Whether all the people of the world came Lib. 1. antiqu Ioseph lib. 1. antiquit Plin. lib. 5. c. 5â— quest 2. Herodâ— in Clion Strabo lib. 16. What then slimy matter was which they used for morter Iâ—s lib. 1. antiqu Aug. lib 16. de Civiâ— cap. 4. Nimrod beginneth the rest consent Euseb. lib. 9. de prepar Evangel c. 9. Lib. 1. Stadium containeth an 135. paces whereof eight make a mile How long the tower of Babel continued Diodor. Lib. 3. c. 4. quest 55. in Genes Tostatus paradox confuted August lib 4. de civit Dei c. 4. Noah whether present Dei civit Dei lâ—b 16 câ—p 5. Basil. in Psal. 32. descending taken not alwaies in evill part Raban in Glos. 〈◊〉 Râ—pert li. 4. in Genes c. 42. Lib. de conâ—us linguar How God speaketh to Angels Aug. lib. 16. de civ Dei c. 6. Lib. 2. moral in 1. cap. Iob. Greg. hom 30. in Evangel Hom. 30. in Genes Euseb. lib. 9. de prepar Evangel c. ult Hom. 30. in Gen. Lib. 16. de Civit. Dei â— 11. 18.39 In 3. cap. Sophon In cap. 7. Isaia Other tongues borrow of the Hebrew Theodorets opinion examined Whether Moses brought in the Hebrew tongue and letters August lib. 18. de Civit-Dei c. 18. Epiph. in Panaâ— Hier. in 26. Mar. August lib. 16. de civi Dei c. 3. Whether 72. languages then tooke beginning Plin. li. 1. c 10. The place Luke 3 93. Caten in 11. Gen. Can. lib 2 de â—â— c. Theolog c. 1â— Iansen in c. 14. Cancâ—â— Evang. Geneâ—â—â—rd in Chrono Bervaldâ—â— Ioseph lib. 1. antiquit Epiphan 55. heres The Rabbines conceit of the Messiah Hier. tradit in Genes Quest. 25. in Gen. lib. 16. decivit Dei c. 15. Abraham was borne when Terah was an 130. yeare old Lib. 2. Stromat in fine Lip Caten in Gen. Cajetan in Gen. Lib. 22. cont san c. 35. The marriage of brethren and sisters not practised among the faithfull Sarai and Iscah the same Euseb. lib. 9. de prepar Evang. cap. 4. Plin. lib. 6. c. 26. lib. 1. antiqâ—it Suidas in vocal Saraâ—h Epiph. advers haeres subâ—â—â—â— Philo in lib. qui â—nforâ—itur Abraham in lib. antiquit Perer. l. 16. in Gen. disput 17. Philastrius contra haeres ca. 106. In Cratylâ— God the author of languages Perer. disput 14. in 11. Genes art 208. Othoniel proved not to be the brother of Caleb Iun. 21. Chro. c. 4. lib 3. Chrysost. hom in Genes Greg. in 4. Psal penitential differ ver T.G.r. S H. ad C. cor S. de S.H. ap f. pr. T.B.G.r. diff sig S. c. Tr. S. 〈◊〉 pers S. ver diff S. ver diff diff temper T.B.G.I. In c. 7. Isa. August lib. 16. de civit Dei c. 15. Reconciliation of places Why Terah is named as the chiefe in the journey How Abrahams name was great How all nations are blessed is Abraham Lib. 8. antiq Genebrards errour The true computation of the yeeres from Abrahams comming into Canaan to the going of the Israelites out of Aegypt Lib. 16. de civit dei cap. 16. 24. Ioseph lib. 1. antiquâ—â— What soules Abraham got in Charran Euâ—eb lib. 10. de prepa Evang. cap. 〈◊〉 Iustin. lib. 36. Abraham not King of Damascus Wherefore God deferred his promise Why he built an Altar Of Bethel Hai. The mountain where Abraham built an Altar God tempted two wayes Hom. 30. in Gen. Abraham
Neither was this sinne of Moses veniall that is a light and small sinne for such sinnes the Lord passeth over in his children but here he was angry with Moses If the Lord should bee angry with every small sinne and oversight of his children who should abide it 3. The forbearing of punishment sheweth not the smalnesse of the sinne but the greatnesse of Gods mercie 4. Cajetanes observation is false for the same phrase â—ichar aph Iehovah Iehovahs wrath was kindled is used upon occasion of great sinnes as when the people murmured Numb 11.3 and lusted for quailes vers 33. the same words are there put 4. This then may safely be held that although Moses at the first might in humility disable himselfe yet after God had given him satisfaction to all his doubts upon his foure severall refusals first for his owne insufficiencie and the greatnesse of the businesse Chap. 3.11 Secondly because they might inquire after Gods name Chap. 3.14 Thirdly he excuseth himselfe by the incredulity of the people Lastly by his owne imperfection of speech yet after all this to stand still upon his refusall sheweth no small infirmitie in Moses as it may appeare by the effect because God was angrie with him yet Gods anger is not such against his children as against the wicked for there he is angry and punisheth here he is angrie and rebuketh but withdraweth not his favour for immediatly the Lord concurreth with Moses desire and giveth him his brother to be his assistant Simler So that Gods anger here is as when the father is angrie with his child or one friend with another which notwithstanding is no breach of friendship QUEST XII Why Aaron is called the Levite Vers. 14. AAron thy brother the Levite 1. This is not added because the Priesthood should have belonged to Moses the Leviticall order to Aaron but that Moses was deprived of that honour for refusing his calling as Rabbi Salomon Pellican 2. But because there might bee other Aarons not of Levie this is expressed by way of distinction that Moses might know that the Lord did meane none other Aaron but his owne naturall brother of Levi Iun. Simler 3. And this might bee also a reason thereof because the Lord purposed to annex the Priesthood to Aaron and his posteritie Osiander QUEST XIII How Moses is said to be as God to Aaron Vers. 16. THou shalt bee to him in Gods stead This sheweth 1. that Moses should bee superior unto Aaron as his Prince as the Chalde Paraphrast and Aaron as his Chancelor Moses should give him direction from God what to speake Osiander 2. By this also Moses authority is signified by the which as in Gods place he ordained Aaron to be the high Priest Pellican 3. Likewise he is as God that is a wise counsellor and full of Gods spirit to whom Aaron should resort for counsell Vatab. Genevens 4. And as Aaron was Moses spokesman to the people so Moses should bee Aarons mouth to consult with God so the Septuagint and Latine read Thou shalt be for him in those things which appertaine to God 5. But Moses in another sense is said to bee Pharaohs God Exod. 7.1 not only to declare Gods will unto him but to execute Gods judgements upon him Genevens QUEST XIV Whether Moses did well being called of God in taking his leave of his father in law Vers. 18. THerefore Moses went and returned to Iethro 1. Some doe charge Moses here with an oversight that he presently dispatched not into Egypt but first tooke his leave of his father in law for Iacob went away without Labans privity and S. Paul saith that hee did not consult with flesh and bloud after he was called Galath 1. 2. Contra these examples are altogether unlike for Laban was unfriendly to Iacob and he feared he would worke him some displeasure and Iacob was then at his owne hand and kept sheepe for himselfe and beside he had in a manner sold over his daughters to Iacob and used them as strangers But Moses had a kinde and loving father in law he then kept his sheepe as hee covenanted and he entertained Zipporah still as his daughter and therefore Moses could not in humanity but take his leave of him 3. S. Paul consulted not with any for the approbation of his calling being therefore fully assured neither doth Moses conferre with Iethro to any such end but only to performe the office of humanity Simler 4. Wherefore the calling of God doth not take away civill duties toward parents and kindred saving where they are an impediment to our calling in which case wee are rather to forsake father and mother than to disobey God 5. Moses therefore taketh his leave of Iethro both because he purposed to carry away his wife and children and for that he had before covenanted to stay with Iethro chap. 2.21 Ferus QUEST XV. Why Moses concealed from Iethro the principall end of his going LEt me goe and returne to my brethren 1. Moses concealeth from his father in law the principall cause of his journey which was the calling of God both for that he sought Gods glorie and not his owne Ferus lest he should have seemed to boast of his visions Osiander and he doth keepe it secret of modesty least he might be thought to be a vaine man in telling such incredible things 2. In saying he went to see whether his brethren were alive and to visite them he dissembleth not though he went to doe more and it is evident by taking his wife and children with him that Iethro knew hee purposed not only to visite them but to stay there so that it seemeth likely that Moses imparted so much of his purpose concerning his stay there Simler and in generall also that he went for the comfort and profit of his brethren as Iosepus but in particular he kept secret the end of his going 3. Iethro being a good man would not hinder so charitable a worke though he had speciall use of him Ferus especially having such experience of the fidelitie and wisedome of Moses that without great cause he knew he would not desire to depart from him Simler QUEST XVI Whether God spake to Moses in Midian beside that vision in Horeb. Vers. 19. ANd Iehovah said to Moses 1. Some thinke that this sentence is transposed and that God thus spake unto Moses before he had moved his father in law Genevens Pellican But although such transposing of the order be usuall in Scriptures yet heere it need not to bee admitted for God might often appeare to Moses to confirme him Iun. and this was said in Midian the other vision was in Horeb the distinction of the place sheweth them to be divers apparitions Simler 2. The Lord to encourage Moses taketh away all doubts and telleth him that all which sought his life as well Pharaoh as the pursuers of the bloud of the slaine were dead Iun. And thus much Moses might impart also to his father