to them in all ordinary Civil and criminal causes For prooâ— whereof you may peruse at leisure M. Seldens Titles of Honour Part 2. c 5. Sect. 5. Sir Edw. Cooks Institutes on Magna Charta c. 35. His 4. Institutes c. 53. the Laws of King Edgar and Edward there cited Spelmanni Glossarium Tit. Comites Mr. Lambards Archaion f. 135. Horns Mirrour of Justices c. 1. Sect. 2 3. If then they were Judges of the Commons and people in every County by reason of their Honours Dignities even in antientest times in ordinary Causes there is great right and reason too they should be their Judges also in all their extraordinary causes as well criminal as civil even in Parliament 3ly The Lords Peers and great Officers of State in respect of their education learning experience in all proceedings of Justice and Law are more able fit to be Iudges of Commons in Parliament than ordinary Citizens and Burgesses especially if chosen out of the Cities and Boroughs themselves for which they serve as antiently they were and still ought to be by the Statutes of 1 H. 5. c. 1. 32 H. 6. c. 15. and by the very purports of the writs for their election at this very day de qualibet Civitate Com. praedict DVOS CIVES de quolibet Burgo DUOS BVRGENSES who have better knowledg skill in Merchandise and their several Trades than in matters of Judicature or Law Therefore the Right of Judicature was thought meet even after the Commons admission to our Parliaments to be still lodged and vested in the House of Peers as before who are the ablest and fittest of the two rather than in the Commons House 4ly Since the division of the Houses one from another if ever they sate together which cannot be proved the House of Peers are dis-ingaged and indifferent parties between the King and Commons and so fittest of all to he Judges between them as the Mirrour of Justices c. 1. resolves so it hath been stil furnished with the ablest Temporal and Spiritual persons for their Assistants in judgement and advice to wit with all the Judges of the Realm Barons of the Exchequer of the Coyâ— the Kings learned Counsel the Masters of the Chancery who are Civilians or Lawyers the Master of the Rolls the Principal Secretaries of State with other eminent persons for parts and learning and the Procuratores Gleri all which are called by Writ to assist and give their attendance in the upper House of Parliament where they have no voices but are to give their counsel and advice only to the Lords when they require their assistance especially in cases of Law and Judicature For proof whereof you may consult the Statutes of 31 H. 8. c. 10. The Register of Writs f. 261. Fitz. Nat. Brev. f. 229. a. b. M. Seldens Titles of Honor part 2. c. 5. Sir Edw. Cooks 4 Instit p. 4 5 6 44 45 46. and the Parliament Rolls and Authorities there cited by them seconded by our present experience Now the House of Peers being thus assisted with the advice of all the Judges of England the Kings learned Counsel and others ablest to advise them in all Criminal Civil or Ecclesiastical matters cases that come before them were in this regard thought fittest by our Ancestors and the Commons themselves who have no such assistants to have the principal and sole power of Judicature in all civil and criminal causes as well of Commoners as Peers that are proper for the Parliaments Judicature by way of censure or redress 5ly There can be no judgement given in any of the Kings Courts in Criminal causes but where the King is personally or representatively present sitting upon the Tribunal and where the proceedings are Coram Rege And therefore in the end of most antient Parliament Rolls we find the Title of Placita Coronae CORAM DOMINO REGE IN PARLIAMENTO SUO c. as in 4 E. 3. 21 R. 2. 1 H. 4. and other Parliaments Now as the Kings person is represented Judgements given Justice executed in all Criminal and Civil cases in the Kings Bench Eyres Goal Deliveries Oyers and Terminers and all his other Courts by his Judges and Justices in his absence So is it represented in our Parl. in the Lords house by his Commissioners and the Lords and Judgements given Justice executed by them in al criminal civil causes and no ways by the Commons who neither sit nor judge in the House of Peers Therefore the House of Peers only noâ— the Commons are the true and proper judicatoâ—y where the King the supream judge fits usually in Person and alwayes in representation in his absence 6ly There can be no legal trial or Judgement given in Parliament in Criminal causes or others without examination of witnesses upon Oath as in all other Courts of justice But the House of Peers alone have power to give and examine witnesses upon Oath and the whole House of Commons no such power but to take Informations without Oath which neither they nor their Committees can administer unless by special Order and Commission from the King or Lords Therefore the power of judicature in Parliament even in Commoners cases is inherent only in the House of Peers and not in the Commons House 7ly It is a rule both of Law and justice that no man can be an informer prosecutor and judge too of the persons prosecuted informed against it being contrary to all grounds of justice therefore he ought to complain and petition to others for Justice But the Commons in all ancient Parliaments and in this present have been informers and prosecutors in nature of a Grand Inquest to which some compare them being summoned from all parts of the kingdom to present publike Grievances and Delinquents to the King and Peers for their redress and thereupon have alwayes petitioned complained to the King and Lords for Iustice against all other Delinquents and offenders in Parliament not judged them themselves witness their many impeachments accusations complaints sent up and prosecuted by them in former Parliaments and this to the Lords not only against Peers but Commoners of which there are hundreds of presidents this very Parliament Therefore the House of Lords hath the proper right of judicatory vested in them even in Cases of Commoners not the Commons who are rather Informers Prosecutors and Grand Jury men to inform impeach than Judges to hear censure determine and give judgement as is resolved in 1 H. 4. n. 79. 8ly Those who are proper Judges in any Court of Justice whiles the cause is judging sit in their Robes and that covered on the Bench not stand bare at the bar sweat and examine the witnesses in the cause not produce them or manage the evidence and when the cause is fully heard argue and debate the businesse between themselves and then give the definitive sentence But in all cases that are to be tried and judged in Parl. the
by their Speaker acknowledge the right of judicature in the case of a Commoner to be only and wholly in the Lords even in a criminal cause and thereupon pray the Lords to give judgement against him upon their Impeachment which they did accordingly in their robes as Judges by the mouth of the Lord Keeper their Speaker In this very Parliament now sitting Decemb. 21. Jan. 14. Febr. 11. 1640. and July 6. 1641. The Commons House by their Members impeached Sir John Bramston Chief Justice of the Kings Bench Sir John Finch Chief Justice of the Common Pleas Sir Humphry Davenport Chief Baron Judge Berkly Judge Crawly Baron Weston and Baron Trever of high Treason and other misdemeanors for that they had trayterously and wickedly endeavoured to subvert the fundamental Laws and established Government of the Realm of England and instead thereof to introduce an arbitrary and tyrannical Government against Law which they had declared by trayterous words opinions and judgement in the point of SHIP MONY by their subscriptions and judgement given against them in the case of Mr. Hamden in the Exchequer Chamber Which Impeachments they transmitted to the Lords House praying THE LORDS to put them to answer the premises and upon their examinations and trial to give such judgement upon every of them as is agreeable to Law and Justice To avoid which judgement Sir John Finch fled the Realm and the rest of them made fines and compositions to the publike and were most of them removed from their Judges places After this the Lords themselves as Judges in Parliament passed several judgements and censures against Dr. John Pocklington for his Sunday no Sabbath and other Books and against Dr. Bray for licensing them In October 1643. The Lords fined and imprisoned Clement Walker Esq in the Tower for some scandalous words against the Lord Viscount Say a Member of he House of Peers After that the Lords alone without any Impeachment of the Commons on their privity imprisoned fined and censured one Morrice upon complaint of Sir Adam Littleton after a full hearing at which I was present for forging an Act of Parliament with four or five more of his confederates therein which was most clearly proved by Witnesses upon Oath whereby he would have defrauded Sir Adam of some Lands in Essex And at least one hundred more Commoners have been committed by THE LORDS this Parliament and fined by them for several offences Misdemeanors and Breaches of their Privileges as well as Lilburn and Overton yet none of them ever excepted against or demurred to their Jurisdiction nor did the Commons House ever yet except against them for these their proceedings as injurious or illegal but approved and applauded this their Justice Finally John Lilburn himself in his printed Pamphlet intituled Innocency and Truth justified p. 74 75. relates that on May 4. 1641. himself was accused of High Treason and brought before the Lords Barr for his life where one Littleton swore point-blank against him But he having Liberty given to speak for himself without any demurring to their Jurisdiction because we was a Commoner desired that his Witnesses might be heard to clear him was upon Mr. Andrews Oath acquitted at the Barr of the whole house And thereupon concludes I am resolved to speak well of those who have done me JUSTICE From all these punctual successive presidents impeachments and clear confessions of the Commons House themselves in many former and late Parliam and in this now sitting it is undeniable That the King and Lords joyntly and the Lords severally without the King have an indubitable right of Iudicature without the Commons vested in them not only over Peers themselves but likewise Commoners in all extraordinary criminal cases of Treason Felony Trespass and other Misdemeanors triable only in Parliament which hath been constantly acknowledged practised submitted to in all ages without dispute much more then have they such a just judicial rightfull power in cases of breach of their own privileges of which none are or can be Judges but themselves alone as Sir Edw. Cook resolves they being the supremest Court. And to deny them such a power is to make the Highest Court of Judicature in the Realm inferiour to the Kings Bench and all other Courts of Justice who have power to judge and try the persons causes of Commoners yea to commit and fine them for contempts and breaches of their Privileges as our Law books resolve and every mans experience can testifie The Lords right of Iudicature both over Peers and Commoners in criminal causes being thus fully evicted against the falseâ— ignorant pretences of illiterate Sectaries altogether unacquainted with our Histories and Records of Parliament which they never yet read nor understood there remains nothing but to answer some Authorities Presidents and Objections produced against it These presidents in Sir Edward Cooke Sir Robert Cotton and others are of 3 Sores 1. Such as are produced by them only to prove that the Commons have a Copartnership and joynt Authority with the King and Lords in the power and right of Judicature in our Parliaments 2ly Such as are objected to evidence they have a sole power of Judicature in themselves in some cases without the K. and Lords 3ly Such as are urged to prove they have no right of Judicature in Parliament in the cases of Commoners that are capital or criminal I shall propose and answer them all in order 1. Sir Edward Cook and Sir Robert Cotton produce these presidents to prove That the Commons have a Joint inâ—erest right and share with the King and Lords in the Iudicatory or Judicial power of Parliaments which I shall propound according to their Antiquity The 1. President alleged for it is that of Adomar Bishop of Winchester elect cited by Sir Robert Cotton in his Post-humous Discourse concerning the Power of the Peers Commons in Parliament in point of Iudicature who An. 44 H. 3. as affirms he was then exiled by the Ioint Sentence of the King Lords and COMMONS as appears by the Letter sent to Pope Alexander the 4th Si Dominus Rex et Regni Majores hoc vellent meaning Adomars revocation COMMUNITAS tamen ipsius ingressum jam nullatenus sustineret The Peers subsign this answer with their names and Peter de Moâ—tfort vice totius COMMUNITATIS as Speaker or Proctor of the Commons I answer under the favour of this renowned learned Antiquary that this president is full of gross mistakes For 1. Bishop Adomar was not banished the Realm at all either by King Lords or Commons but fled out of it voluntarily for fear to avoid the Barons who purâ—iâ—ed him with forces as Mat. Paris with others relate which the Nobles and Generality of the Barons in direct terms inform this Pope in another Letter sent together with this objected Maxime cum ipse a regno expuisus non extiterit sed sponte cesserit non ausus exhibitionem justiâ—iae quae
special Clause inserted into the Writs of Summons Nolumus autem quod tu seu aliquis alius Vicecomes regni nostri aut Apprentius aut aliquis alius homo ad Legem aliqualiter sit electus as appears by the Exem â—caâ—ron thereof in the Claus Roll of 5 H. 4. pars 2. m. 4 dorso in the Tower which I have viewed with mine own eyes by sundry transcripts thereof in Manuscripts and by this testimony of Thomas Walsingham who lived in writ the History of that time Direxit ergo Rex Brevia Vicecomit bus ne quosquam pro Comitatibus eligerent quovismodo milites qui in jure Regni vel docti fuissent vel Apprenticii sed tales omnino miâ—teren ur ad hoc nâ—gotium quoâ— constat ignorare cujusque juris methodum factumque est ita Whence he stiles it in his Margin PARLIAMENTUM INDOCTORUM No Lawyer being elected by reason of this Clause grounded on the forecited Ordinance Sir Edward Cook who is not only full of mistakes and mis-recitals of Records but most confident in them citing this passage of Walsingham thus bodly contradicts him But the Historian is deceived for there is no such Clause in these Writs but it was wrought by the Kings Letters by pretext of an Ordinance in the Lords House in 46 E. 3. when as the Writ it self in the Clause Roll concurring which Walsingham ascertains me that Sir Edward himself was deceived not the Historian by whom or upon what mis-information I know not And that he was so in truth we have his own expresse confession and testimony against himself within few leaves after At the Parliament holden at Coventry Anno 6 H. 4. the Parliament was summoned BY WRIT and by coâ—ler of the said Ordinance of Parliament in the Lords House in 46 E. 3. it was forbidden that no Lawyer should be chosen Knight Citizen or Burgess by reason whereof this Parliament was fruitless and never a good Law made thereat and therefore called Indoctum Parliamentum or Lack-latin Parliament And seeing these Writs were against Law ergo this Clause against Lawyers elections was in the Writs themselves Lawyers ever since for the great and good service of the Commonwealth have been eligible And then contradicting himself again in the very next lines he addes And albeit the prohibiting clause had been inserted in the Writ implying it was not yet bâ—iâ—g against Law Lawyers were of right eligible and might have been elected Knights Citizens or Burgesses in that Parliament of 6 H. 4. His reason is because Lawyers being eligible of Common right cannot be disabled by the said Ordinance of Parliament in the Lords House being no Act though Acts and Ordinances of Parl. are both the same in substance vigor as I have elsewhere proved at large against his New false Doctrine to the contrary Wherefore this Ordinance is still obligatory to practising Lawyers whiles they practise as well as to Sherifs whiles they are Sherifs unlesse they give over their practice sitting the Parl. to attend the service of the House which their practice makes them to neglect Clause 8 E. 2. m. 31. The chief Justice and other Officers of Ireland and R. de Burgo Earl of Vlton are sent for by Writ to come to the Parliament of England ad tractanduâ— cum Praelatis et Proceribus de regno nostro praedicto Claus 50 E. 3. part â— m. 23. Pro Hibernis de Hibernia venientibus ad Parliamentum Angilae there is a Writ directed to the Justices and Chancellor of Ireland Quod de Communitate Comitatuum Burgorum terrae praedictae faciatis habere per Breve de magno sigillo nostro hominibus ejusdem terrae nostrae praedictae regnum nostrum Angliae penes Concilium nostrum pro Communitate Comitatuum Burgorum ultimo venientibus videlicet euilibet eorum de Communitate Comitatus pro quo electus fuiâ— sive Civitatis sive Burgi rationabiles expensas suas c. Teste 25 Julii The Parliament ended the 10th of July By which Writ it is apparent That not only the great Officers and some Nobles but likewise knights and Burgesses were sometimes summoned and chosen in Ireland to come to this Parliament of England and had Writs for wages allowed them These varieties of the Kings writs for electing Knights and Burgesses summoning sometimes 4. sometimes 2. sometimes but one Knight out of a County most times 2 Citizens and Burgesses sometimes but one limiting the qualifications of their persons and summoning not only Great Officers and Peers but likewise Knights Citizens and Burgesses out of Ireland and particular persons by name amongst the Commons as in 32 Ed. 3. part 2. m. 32. dorso together with his making of new Burroughs by his Patents and authorizing them to send Burgesses to Parliam when they never sent any before there being now three times as many Burgesses of Parliament as there were in the reigns of King Edward the 1 2 and 3. as appears by the Writs in the Dorse of the Clause Rolls for their expences and wages are clear proofs and evidences that the King and his Council in the Lords House are the sole Judges of the elections of the Knights Citizens Burgesses of the Commons House and that they themselves have no power at all to seclude or eject any persons duly elected and sent thither by the Kings Writs though more or less than usual or from new erected Burroughs And if any City or Burrough which sends Members to the Commons House by the kings Charter or usage forfeit their Charters and Privileges for which the king seiseth them into his hands as in 49 H. 3. he seised Londons and others Liberties and Cambridges since he may deny to send them Writs to elect Citizens or Burgesses till their Franchises be restored and their Charters renewed and deny to grant them this liberty of Election any more if he please proceeding from his meer grace and grant to them at first and so to be restored out of Grace not Justice when forfeited by their default The Statute of 5 R. 2. Parl. 2. c. 4. The King willeth and commandeth it is assented to by the Prelates Lords and Commons That all persons which shall from henceforth receive the Summons of Parliament be he Archbishop Bishop Abbot Peer Duke Earl Baron Baronet knight of the Shire Citizen of the City Burgess of the Burgh or other singular person or Commonalty and come not at the said Summons except he may reasonably and honestly excuse himself to our Soveraign Lord the King he shall be amerced and otherwise punished as of old times hath been used to be done within this Realm Here the Excuse is to be made by the Knights Citizens Burgesses and Commons as well as Lords Spiritual and Temporal to THE KING not Commons House and if they cannot excuse themselves unto him then they are to be amerced as of old time have been used And that was never by the Commons House but
Parliament which prerogative of the Court is so great as our learned Counsel informeth us as all Acts and Processes coming out of any other inferiour Courts must for the tiime cease and give place to the highest And touching the party it was a great presumption in him knowing our servant to be one of this House and being warned thereof before would nevertheless prosecute this matter out of time and therefore was well worthy to have lost his debt which I would not wish and thereforefore doe commend your equity that having lost the same by Law have restored him to the same against him who was his debtor and this may be a good example to other not to attempt any thing against the privilege of this Court but to take the time better Whereupon Sir Edward Montague then Lord chief Justice very gravely declared his opinion confirming by divers reasons all that the King had said which was assented unto by all the residue none speaking to the contrary The Act indeed passed not the higher House for the Lords had not time to consider of it by reason of the dissolution of the Parliament From this President I shall observe 1. That this is the first President that the Commons house ever sent their Serjeant to demand a Member imprisoned without first acquainting the King and Lords whereupon the Serjeant was thus resisted affronted 2ly That upon the Serjeants report of this resistance and contempt the Commons house did not undertake to punish it themselves though there were many of the Kings privy Council then of and in it but according to former presidents went and complained thereof in rhe Lords house praying them to redress and punish it 3ly That all the Lords and Judges there assembled judged the contempt to be very great 4ly That thereupon being busied with other weighty publike affairs they by special order referred the examination punishment thereof to the Commons House 5ly That thereupon the Commons by vertue of this special reference from the Lords not by their own inherent authority or Jurisdiction sent for the delinquent parties examined the contempt imprisoned the Sherifs of London and White in the Tower and the under Officers in Newgate 6ly That afterwards they acquainted the King and Lords with their proceedings who approved and commended the same 7ly That they would have confirmed part of their judgement by an Act to discharge Ferrers of the execution and not to revive it after the Parliament which passed but by 14. voices and never passed the Lords house who would not assent thereto All which particulars unanswerably evidence that the judgement and punishment of contempts and breaches of privilege of the Commons house and their Members belong wholly and solely to the Lords not to the Commons house at all unless by special order and reference from the Lords to the House of Commons who are to be informed of their proceedings and censures upon such a reference and to ratifie them by their assents or some Act of Parliament Therefore the conclusion of Crompton from this president and Dyer f. 60. which hath not a syllable to this effect That any Knight Burgess Baron of the 5. Ports or others called to the Parliament of the King shall have privilege of Parliament during the Parliament or Session of it so that he who arrests any of them during that term shall be imprisoned in the Tower by the Nether House of which he is and shall be put to a fine and the Kéeper also if he will not deliver him when the Serjeant at Arms shall come for him by command of the House is but a meâ—r mistake And the late objected Presidents have been grounded only upon his Authority and the mistaking or misapplying of Ferrers case W. Trewynnard a Burgess of Parliament in 35 H. 8. the very next year after this case of Ferrers was taken in execution upon an Exigent grounded on a Capias ad saâ—isfaciendum by the Sherif of Cornwal upon a complaint thereof to the King and Lords in Parliament there issued a Writ of Privilege in the Kings name during the Sessions of Parliament to R. Chamond then Sherif of Cornwal to release him reciting that he was a Burgess and likewise the Custom of the privilege of Parliament whereupon he was released the personal attendance of every Member being so necessary in Parliament that he ought not to be absent for any business because he is a necessary Member and therefore ought to be privileged from arrests Now the Parliament consisting of 3. parts to wiâ— of the King as chief Head the Lords the chief and principal Members of the Body and the Commons the Inferiour Members making up one body of Parliament as Chief Justice Dyer there resolves these inferior Members have no means to relieve themselves when their persons are arrested but by complaint to the Head or Chief and principal Members of this body as in all other Corporations where the Mayor Recorder Aldermen Justices and chief Officers are the only Judges not the Commons to hear and determine all injuries done to any Commoner Pasch 1. 2. Phil. Mariae Rot. 16. B.R. The Attorney General in the Kings and Queens name exhibited an Information against 34. Knights Citizens Burgesses of the Commons House for absenting themselves and departing from the Parliament then held without the Kings and Queens special license contrary to their Prohibition and in manifest contempt of the said King Queen and Parliament and to the great detriment of the state of the Commonwealth of this Realm and the ill example of others The Great Lawyer Edmond Plowden being one pleaded he was present at the Parl. from the very beginning of it to the end and that he departed not from it which he was ready to verify as the Court should direct and prayed judgement to be discharged Edward Harford another of them pleaded a special license to depart whereupon his prosecution was stayed but so that Process â—ill issued against the rest The Commons house therefore iâ— Q. Maries reign were not reâ—ted sole Judges of their own Members in cases of departure from Parliament in contempt to the publike prejudice and ill example of others as now they deem themselves by Sir Edward Cooks new-invented Law and Custom of Parliaments In the Parliament of 18 Eliz. Feb. 22. A report was made to the Commons House by a Committee appointed to consider how Mr. Halls man then a Member and imprisoned against his privilege might be released that the Committee found no President for setting at large by the Mace any person in arrest but only by Writ of Privilege And that by divers presidents and records perused by the Committee every Knights Citizen or Burgess requiring privilege for his Servant hath used to take a Corporal Oâ—th before the Lord Chancellor that the paâ—ty for whom such Writ is prayed came up with him and was his servant at the time of the arrest made Whereupon Mr.
2. c. 4. 7 H. 4. c. 15. 11 H. 4. c. 1. 1 H. 5. c. 1. 6 H. 6. c. 4. 8 H. 6. c. 7. 10 H. 6. c. 2. 11 H. 6. c. 11. 23 H. 6. c. 15. which cite Our Lord the King willeth commandeth and Ordaineth or hath Ordained by advice and assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal upon complaint or at the special request of the Commons to shew that they are only Petitioners not Judges nor Ordainers in all or any of them give them not the least title of Jurisdiction in cases of elections or privileges And therefore according to the resolution of all the Judges Hill 2. Jacobi in the case of Penal Statutes Cook 7 Rep. f. 37. That the prosecution of penal Statutes cannot by law be granted to any nor be prosecuted or executed in any other order or manner of proceeding than by the Acts themselves is prescribed and provided the Commons cannot against the Letter and provision of all those Acts be Judges of them in any other manner or order than they prescribe As for their proceedings in the Committee of Privileges touching Elections since they have interposed in them as they have been very irregular illegal in respect all the Witnesses they examin touching them are unsworn and give their testimonies without Oath upon which they Ground their Votes So they are for the most part very partial and for that cause it is usually stiled The Committee of Affections he that can make the most Friends and strongest party being sure to carry the election for the most part both at the Committee and in the House though never so foul as I could instance in many cases of late times and more especially in the case of the Election of Cirencester 1647. too foul to blot my paper with For their suspending secluding ejecting their own Members I have sufficiently manifested its illegality long since in my Ardua Regni being a late dangerous president began within our memories the sad effects and consequences where of we now discern by these dangerous gradations 1. The Commons began to seclude one another upon pretence of undue elections and retornes in Queen Elizabeths reign but not before which they have since continued and that rather to strengthen or weaken a party in the House then to rectifie undue elections and retorns which a good Act would easily do 2ly In the later and last Parliaments of King Charls they began to seclude Projectors though duly elected 3ly They proceeded to suspend and eject such who were royallists and adhered to the late Kings party 4ly They proceeded to imprison and eject those Members whom the Army Offices impeached or disliked as opposite to their designs 5ly The Minority of the House at last by the power of the Army secured secluded expelled the Majority and 50 or 60. near 400 Members and made themselves the Commons House without them 6ly They then proceeded to vote down and seclude both King and House of Lords then voted themselves to be the Parliament of England sole Legislators and supream authority of the Nation without either King or House of Lords or majority of their fellow Members prescribing an Engagement under strictest penalties against K. House of Lords to seclude them from all future Parliaments 7ly Hereupon the Army Officers and Souldiers who made continued them an absolute Parliament and first of all subscribed the Engagement to be true and faithfull to them without King and House of Lords at last by Divine Justice against their very engagements to them secluded suppressed them all as they had done the King Lords and their fellow Members and declared them to be actually dissolved and no longer to be a Parl. or the supreme authority of the Nation 8ly They then proceeded to chuse and nominate a Parliament at Whitehall alone without the peoples election and then one part of them without the rest resigned their new soveraign power and secluded dissolved the residue and turned them out of doors 9ly They then proceeded to a New model of Parliaments wherein they disabled most of the Freeholders Citizens and Burgesses of England to be either Electors or elected Members contrary to their privilege and all former laws for elections appointed those they stiled the Council of State at Whitehall to seclude what Members they pleased though duly chosen according to their new ill-tuned instruments before or without any examination or reason rendred for their seclusion to the secluded Members or their Electors for their new created Parliaments by which means they secluded whom and how many they pleased in all their late conventions And most of those Reipublican Members and some cashiered Army Officers who were most active in securing secluding their fellow Members in December 1648. and in voting down the King and House of Lordspunc who may now justly say as Adoâ—bezâ—eh once did in another case Judg. 1.8 As I have done unto-others so God hath requited me being secluded secured cashiered dissolved and some of them sent prisoners to remote Castles as they secluded and thus imprisoned my self with other their fellow Members without cause and most justly branded in several Pamplets and Declarations for a CORRVPT PARTY carrying on their own ends to perpetuate themselves in their late Parliamentary and supream Authority never answering the ends which God his people and the whole Nation expected from them but exercizing an arbitrary power at Committees and elsewhere over them likely to swallow up the antient Liberties and Properties of the People to increase their vexations c. as they had most unjustly taxed the secluded Members 1648. for A CORRVPT MAJORITY acting contrary to their trusts Which I desire them now seriously to lay to heart and to acknowlege Gods Soveraign Justice therein 10ly Their new Major Generals in their last elections prescribed to all Countries and to most Cities Burroughs by letters lists of names sent to them what persons they must elect secluding those they elected which were not in their lists and caused Sherrifs to return many they nominated though never elected but protested against by those who were to chuse them rather to carry on private interests designs than the private or publike good Laws Liberties Properties Peace Ease of the Nation from importable Taxes Excizes Slaverie and armed guards and to set up private Conventicles Parties instead of free publike English Parliaments duly elected and constituted These the sad effects of this Innovation and Usurpation of the Commons over their own Members by the objected Presidents which by Divine Justice have made all their new modelled Conventions abortive successess yea to end in sudden confusions and unexpected dissolutions ever since Besides from this their late fining imprisoning and judging of their fellow Members in the House they proceeded in the last long Parl. to make almost every Committee of the Commons House a most arbitrary tyrannical Court of Justice independent on the
House it self without any report at all of their proceedings to the House authorizing Committees to secure imprison close imprison cashire banish condemn execute many persons sequester confiscate sell dispose their Inheritances Offices Lands Tenements Benefices real and personal estates to deprive them of their callings professions to search and break up their houses by Soldiers and others without any legal sworn Officers day and night to seize their Letters Papers Horses Arms Plate Money yea debts in other mens hands at pleasure to indemnifie and stay their legal actions sutes Judgements at Law and null their executions at their pleasures yea to commit them till they released all sutes actions Judgements and paid costs and damages to those they justly sued and recovered against to adde affliction to affliction and cruelty oppression to injustice These are the bitter fruits of Commons usurped judicature whereof there are thousands of most sad presidents which may hereafter be objected to prove the sole Power of Judicature to reside of right not in the K. or House of Lords but in the Commons House alone and every of their Committees especially for Examinations Plundered Ministers Sequestrations Indempnity Haberdashers and Goldsmiths Halls Privileges sales of Delinquents the Kings Queens Princes Lands and Estates Excise the Army Navy and the like yea in their new created High Courts of Justice who have acted as absolute arbitrary unlimited lawlesse Courts of justice in the highest degree to the subversion destruction of the antient Liberties Freeholds Properties Great Charters and fundamental Laws of the Nation in general and of thousands of the highest lowest degree of English Freemen in particular with as much ground of reason Warrant from the many late Presidents of this Nature as these here objected to prove a soâ—e right of â—udicature in the Commons House in cases of undue elections retorns misdemeanors privileges relating to their Members and their seruants Which strang exorbitant Presidents and Proceedings if they should be made Patterns for future Parliaments and Committees I shall desire all sober minded men to consider of the dangerous consequences of them thus notably expressed by the late King in his Answer concerning the Ordinance for imposing and levying the 20th part of mens estutes 29 November 1642. After this Ordinance and Declaration t is not in any sober mans power to believe himself worth any thing or that there is such a thing as Law Liberty Property left in England under the jurisdiction of these men and the same power that robs them now of the twentieth part of their estates hath by that but made a claim and entituled it self to the other nineteen whne it shall be thought fit to hasten the general ruine Sure if the minds of all men be not stubbornly prepared for servitude they will look on this Ordinance as the greatest prodigie of Arbitrary power and tyranny that any age hath brought forth in any Kingdom other grievances and the greatest have been conceived intollerable rather by the logick and consequence than by the pressure it self this at once sweeps away all that the wisdom and justice of Parliaments have provided for them Is their property in their estates so carefully looked to by their ancestors and so amply established by Us against any possibility of Invasion from the Crown which makes the meanest Subject as much a Lord of his own as the greatest Peer to be valued or considered here is a twentieth part of every mans estate or so much more as four men will please to call the twentieth part taken away at once and yet a power left to take a twentieth still of that which remains and this to be levied by such circumstances of severity as no Act of Parliament ever consented too Is their liberty which distinguishes subjects from slaves and in which this freeborn Nation hath the advantage of all Christendom dear to them they shall not only be imprisoned in such places of this kingdom a latitude of judgement no Court can challenge to it self in any cases but for so long time as the Committee of the House of Commons for Examination shall appoint and Order the House of Commons it self having never assumed or in the least degree pretended to a power of Judicature having no more authority to administer an Oath the only way to discover and find out the truth of facts than to cut off the heads of any our Subjects and this Committee being so far from being a part of the Parliament that it is destructive to the whole by usurping to it self all the power of King Lords and Commons All who know any thing of Parliament know that a Committee of either House ought not by Law to publish their own results neither are their conclusions of any force without the confirmation of the House which hath the same power of controling them as if the matter had never been debated but that any Committee should be so contracted as this of examination a stile no Committee ever bore before this Parliament as to exclude the Members of the House who are equally trusted by their Country from being present at the Counsels is so monstrous to the privileges of Parliament that it is no more in the power of any man to give up that freedom than of himself to order that from that time the place for which he serves shall never more send a Knight or Burgesse to the Parliament and in truth is no lesse than to alter the whole frame of government to pull up Parliaments by the roots and to commit the lives liberties and estates of all the people of England to the arbitrary power of a few unqualified persons who shall dispose thereof according to their discretion without account to any rule or authority whatsoever Are their friends their wives and children the greatest blessings of peace and comforts of life pretious to them would their penury and imprisonments be lesse grievous by those cordials they shall be divorced from them banished and shall no longer remain within the Cities of London and Westminster the Suburbs and the Counties adjacent and how far those adjacent Counties shall extend no man knows The 3 sort of Presidents and Objections are such as Lilburn and Overton insist on to prove That the King and Lords have no power at all to judge or censure Commoners in our Parliament The only Record they insist on is the Lords own Protestation in 4 E. 3. n. 2. 6. in the case of Sir Simon Bareford which because I have already fully answered p. 323 324 325. and cleared by sundry subsequent presidents and there being no one president in any Parliament since to contradict it I shall wholly pretermit and proceed to their objections which are only two The first and principall objections whereon they most insist and rely is the Statute of Magna Charta chap. 29. That no Free-man shall be imprisoned outlawed exiled or any other may destroyed Nor we shall not passe
though amiable delightfull in themselves and gratefull to all true Philopaters Philologers and learâ—ed Nobles Statesmen Lawyers Scholars in this degenerous age wherein all sorts of Learning and insight in Records or Parliamentary Antiquities are very much decayed will yet be very displeasing to some sorts of ignorant heady extravagant persons who love darkness more than light because their deeds are evil but more especially to the Anabaptistical Levellers Lilburnians innovating Publicans and Republicans much like the Chaldeans of old a bitter and hasty Nation lately marching through the breâ—th of the Land to possesâ— the dwelling places that are not theirs they are terrible and dreadfull their judgement and dignity proceedeth of themselves they are all for violence they scoff at KINGS AND PRINCES ARE A SCORN UNTO THEM as appears by their late Votes Declarations Engagements not only against Kings and Kingship but the whole House of Lords and to â—lliterate self-conceited Lawyers and ignorant Members of the Commons House who deem that House and its Committees if not every Member of it the only Supream Judges and Judicature of the Realm paramount our Kings Lords Laws Liberties Great Charters and all other Courts of Justice having an absolute arbitrary unlimited power to act vote and determine what they please without appeal or consult which this Plea irrefragably disproves as a most gross and dangerous mistake for which they will frown upon it if not â—ate and prosecute me as their Enemy But the Sun must not cease from shining because weak and sore Eyes will be offended with its splendor nor seasonable truths of most publike concernment be concealed smothered in time of greatest need because ignorant erronious sottish â—air-braind Levellers or Innovator will be displeased with and storm against them they being always Sweet and lovely in themselves yea precious to the best of men and will prove victorious in conclusion though clouded suppressed maligned for the preâ—ent yea he who by the publication of such truths rebukes wise ingenuous mens extravagant actions and opinions for the present shall afterwards find more favour with them when they come to know themselves and their mistakes by meditating on the truths revealed to them heâ— he that flattereth them with his lips in their exorbitant actions or erronious opinions I shall therefore recommend this Plea for the Lords and all the truths therein discovered asserted to the omnipotent â—rotection and effectual blessing both of THE LORD OF LORDS and GOD OF TRUTH whose Eyes are upon the TRUTH in this sad age of Errors Falshoods Lies Fraud and desperate Hypocrisie wherein truth is fallen in the Streets and he that dares boldly assert it is reputed mad and maketh himself a prey And shall leave it as a lasting monument to posterity of my Cordial affection to the antient Parliamentary proceedings Lords Peers Laws Liberties Properties Great Charters of the English Nation and my sincere endeavours to plead their cause in the worst of times against all their Antagonists and professed Enemies though never so numerous and formidable albeit to my own private prejudice Whatever the Reader shall find wanting in this Plea relating to the Constitution Summons Proceedings of our antient English Parliaments in general or to the power Judicature Rights privileges transactions of our Kings Lords or House of Com. in Parl. in particular you may read at leisure in my Preface and Tables to An Exact Abridgement of the Records in the Tower of London from the reign of King Edward the 2. to Richard the 3. and in the Abridgement it self collected by that famous Antiquarie Sir Robert Cotton lately published which will better instruct the Readers in all Parliamentary affairs than all the slight unsatisfactory Treatises of our Parliaments hitherto published except this Plea which I humbly submit to the friendly Imbrace and impartial Censure of every Judicious Reader especially of my own profession for whom it is most proper whose general ignorance and mistakes in Parliament Antiquities proceedings and matters of the Crown hath brought some disparagement upon the function and led others into dangerous publike Errors which that this Plea may wipe off and rectifie hereafter for the common benefit ease settlement re-establishment of our late dissipated Parliaments and confused distracted Nations shall be the Vote and dayly prayer of Thy unfeigned Friend and his Countries publike unmercenary Servant WILLIAM PRYNNE Lincolns-Inne 6 Decemb. 1657. A Plea for the LORDS AND HOUSE of PEERS OR A short yet full and necessary Vindication of the Judiciary and Legislative Power of the House of Peers and the Hereditary just Right of the Lords and Barons of this Realm to sit vote judge in the high Court of Parliament THe treasonable destructive design of divers dangerous Anabaptists Levellers Agitators in the Army City Countrey and of Lilburn Overton their Champions Ring-leaders in this Seditious Plot to dethrone the King unlord the Lords new-model the House of Commons extirpate Monarchâ— suppress the House of Peers and subvert Parliaments the only obstacles to their pretended Polarchy Anarchy are now so legible in their many late printed Petitions Lâ—bels Pamphlets so visible in their actings and publike proceedings that it rather requires our diligence and expedition to prevent than hesitancy to doubt or dispute them they positively protesting against yea denying both King and Monarchy in their late printed Pamphlets Remonstrances with the Power Judicature of the House of Peers and their undoubted just Hereditary right to vote act or sit in Parliament because they are not elecâ—ed by the people as Knights and Burgesses are asserting That they are no natural issues of our Laws but the Exorbitances and Mushromes of Prerogative the Wenns of just Government the Sons of Conquest and usurpation not of choice and election intruded upon us by power not made by the people from whom ALL POWER PLACE and OFFICE that is just in this Kingdom OUGHT TO ARISE meer arbitrary Tyrants Vsurpers an illegitimate and illegal power and Judicatory who act and Vote in our affairs but as INTRUDERS who ought of right not to judge censure or imprison any Commoner of England even for libelling against them refusing to appear before them reviling and contemning them and their Authority to their faces at their very Barr as Lilburn Overton boast and print they did or breaking any of their undoubted Privileges To accomplish this their design the better they endeavour by their most impudent flattery to ingage the House of Commons against the House of Peers the better to pull them down stiling and proclaming the Commons in their Petitions and Pamphlets The ONLY Supreme legal Judicatory of the Land who ought BY RIGHT to judge the Lords and their proceedings from whom they appeal for right and reparations against the House of Peers affirming That in the Commons House alone resides the formal and legal Supreme Power of England who ONLY are chosen by the People and THEREFORE IN THEM ONLY
and chief men in the Parliament together with the evident testimonie of the twelve Peers c. The reason is Because there was wont to be a cry or murmur in the Parliament for the Kings absence because his absence is hurtfull and dangerous to the whole Commonalty of the Parliament and Kingdom Neither indeed ought or may he be absent but only in the case aforesaid After which it follows The Archbishops Bishops and other chief of the Clergy ought to be summoned to come to the Parliament and also EVERY EARL and BARON and their PEERS OUGHT TO BE SUMMONED and COME TO THE PARLIAMENT c. Touching the beginning of the Parliament The Lord the King shall sit in the midst of the great bench and is bound to be present in the first and last day of Parliament And the Chancellort Treasurer and Barons of the Exchequer and Justices were wont to record the defaults made in Parliament according to the order following In the third day of the Parliament the Barons of the Cinqueports shall be called and afterwards the BARONS of England after them the EARLS Whereupon if the Barons of the Cinqueports be not come the Baronie from whence they are shall be amerced at an hundred marks and an Earl at one hundred pounds After the same manner it must be done to those who are Peers to Earls and Barons After which it relates the manner of placing the Earls Baron and Peers in Parliament Then adds The Parliament may be held and OUGHT every day to begin at one of the clock in the afternoon at which time the King is to be present at the Parliament and all the Péers of the Kingdome None of all the Peers of the Parliament may or ought to depart alone from the Parliament unless he have obtained and that in full Parliament leave from the King and all his Péers so to doe and that withall there be a remembrance kept in the Parliament roll of such Leave and Libertie granted And if any of the Peers during the term of the Parliament shall be sick or weak so as he is not able to come to the Parliament then he ought three dayes together send such as may excuse him to the Parliament or else two Peers must go and view him and if they find him sick then he may make a Proxie Of the Parliament the King is the Head the beginning and ending So this Treatise The Statute of 5 R. 2. Parl. 2. ch 4. enacts by Command of the King and Assent of the Prelates Lords and Eommons in Parliament That all and singular persons and Commonalties which from henceforth shall have the Summons of the Parliament shall come from henceforth to the Parliament in the manner as they be bound to doe and hath been accustomed within the Realm of England of old time And every person of the said Realm which from henceforth shall have the said Summons be he Archbishop Bishop Abbot Prior Duke Lord Baron Baronet Knight of the Shire Citizen of City Burgess of Burgh or other singular person or Commonalty do absent himself or come not at the said Summons except he may reasonably or honestly excuse himself to our Soveraign Lord the King he shall be amerced and otherwayes punished according as of old time hath béen used to be done within the said Realm in the said case Which relates unto and agrees expresly with that forecited out of Modus tenendi Parliamentum which took it out of this Act. If then all the Lords Peers in Parliament are bound to attend in Parliament being oft times there all called for by name and ought not to depart from it without the Kings and Houses leave under pain of Amercement and other punishment as this Statute resolves and 3 Ed. 3.19 Fitzh Coron 161. Stamford l. 3. c. 1. f. 153. Cook 4 Instit p. 15 16 17.43 28 E. 3. Nu. 1 2. 5 R. 2. n. 2. 8 H. 4. n. 55. and 31 H. 6. n. 45. Where fines were imposed on absent Lords most fully mamanifest then questionless they ought of right to sit in Parliament else it were the height of Injustice thus to fine them In the tenth year of King R. 2. this King absented himself from his Parliament then sitting at Westminster residing at Eltham about forty daies and refusing to come to the Parliament and yet demanding from them four Fifteens for maintenance of his Estate and outward Warres Whereupon the whole body of the Parliament made this answer That unless the King were present they would make therein no allowance Soon after they sent the Duke of Glocester and Bishop of Ely Commissioners to the King to Eltham who declared to him among other things in the Lords and Commons behalf how that by an old Ordinance they have an Act if the King absent himself 40 dayes not being sick but of his own mind not heeding the charge of his people nor their great pains and will not resort to the Parliament they may then lawfully return to their Houses And now sir said they you have been absent a longer time and yet refuse to come amongst us which is greatly to our discontent To which the King answered Well we do consider that our own people and Commons go about to rise against us wherefore we think we can do no better than to ask aid of our Cosen the French King and rather to submit us to him than unto our own subjects The Lords answered Sir that Counsell is not best but a way rather to bring you into danger c. By whose good perswasions the King was appeased and promised to come to the Parliament and condiscend to their Petitions and according to his appointment he came and so the Parliament proceeded which else had dissolved by the Lords departure thence in discontent aâ—d the Kings wilfull absence Ranulf de Glanvil the first writer of our Common Laws in his Prologue to his book De legibus consuetuainibus Regni Angliae used in the reign of King H. the 2. under whom he flourished and his Predecessors writes thus of the Parliamentary Councils in that age and their Members power to enact Laws Leges Anglicanas licet non scriptas leges appellari non videtur absurdum cum hoc ipsum Lex sit quod Principi placet et legis habet vigorem eas scilicet quas super dubiis in Consilio desiniendis Procerum quidem Concilio et principis accidente authoritate constat esse promulgatas And lib. 13. cap. 32. f. 110. Cum quis itaque infra assisam Dom. Reg. id est infra tempus A Dom. Rege de consilio Procerum adhoc constitutum quod quandoque majus quandoque minus censetur So as the Parliaments under this King and his Ancestors consisted only of the King and Nobles who then made and enacted Laws by the Kings royal assent without any Knights Citizens or Burgesses elected by the people of which I find no mention in the Parliamentary Councils under
in barr of the Writs of Summons directed to them because those writs themselves did ennoble and make them their posterity successors Peers of Parliament though they held no Lands by Barony 8ly it is undeniable by sundry presidents that the Kings general writs of Summons create none Lords or Peers of Parliament for life or Inheritance if they hold not by Barony which I shall evidence by these presidents in point To the Parliament of 49 H. 3. there were no less than 64 Abbots 36 Priors the Master of the Temple and 5. Deans of Cathedral Churches namely of York Exeter Salisbury Lincoln Bath and Wells summoned by general writs as the Bishops Earls Barons and other Nobles were yet this did not make themselves nor their Successors Barons or Peers of Parliament for neither of these Deans nor their successors were ever afterwards summoned to Parliament as they would and must have been had this writ made them or their successors Barons and Lords nor any of the Abbots or Priors but such only who held by Barony who were constantly summoned but those who then held not by Barony or Militare servitium if casually summoned to one Parliament were yet upon their complaints thereof omitted and discharged in the next as the Writs of Summons themselves attest and Mr. Selden manifests out of them Therefore the Writs did neither create them Barons for life much less their successors after them for then they should still have of right been summoned to succeeding Parliaments and ought not to have been discharged In the 18 of Ed. 2. A Writ of Summons was sent by the King Magistro Gilberto de Middleton Archidiacono Northampton Officiali Curiae Cantuariensis Magistro Roberto de Sancto Albano Decano de Arcubus London But no writ was ever directed to them afterwards but in this one Parliament only therefore it made them not Lords and Barons for life inheritance or succession The like is evident by the forecited presidents of the Abbots of St. James Leicester and other Priors So the Gardians of the Spiritualties of Bishops during the vacancy and their Vicars Generals during their absence beyond the Seas have been frequently summoned to Parliaments by writs But being summoned only as substitutes or in the right of the Bishops or Bishopricks it made them no Barons or Peers neither were they ever esteemed such heretofore or at this day as Mr. Selden informs us And as it was thus amongst Abbots Priors Deans and other Clergy-men that these writs made them not Barons for life nor yet in succession so by the selfsame Law and Reason they made no Laicks who held not by Barony such for life or inheritance Whence we find many such in the summons to Parliament of King Henry 3. Ed. 1 2 3. R. 2. H. 4 5 6. who were summoned once twice or thrice but never afterwards nor any of their name or posterity of which no other solid reason can be given but that these general writs of summons made them neither Barons for life nor inheritance no more than they did Abbots Priors or Clergymen For example I find Edmond Barstaff Robert de Crendon H. Huse Ader de Estlye Serton de Hansladorn and sundry others summoned by Writ to Parliament in 33 E. 1. Peter Corbet Andrew de Hamloe Henry Tregor Maurice de Buen Roger Banuent and some others in 13 E. 2. Simon Ward Henry Dandle William Blunt in 4 E. 3. Roger de Claudes Ralph de Bevil William de Kineston in 14 E. 3. Ralph Bulmer Thomas Bugworth in 22 E. 3. William de Ridehal in 27 E. 3. Robert de Colvil John de Kirton John de Wodhurst John Northwood John de Strivelin in the Parliament summons of 37. and one of them again of 38 E. 3. Henry Quarts in 6 H. 4. Henry Cuart in 7 H. 4. William Cheyney Chief Justice in 4. 6 H. 6. But neither of their persons nor any of their posterity were ever after summoned that I find to any other Parliaments as no doubt they would have been had those their writs of summons made them Lords and Barons In the Clause Roll of 5 E. 3. m. 12. dorso the King sent writs into Ireland to William de Burgh Earl of Ulster James de Botâ—ler Earl of Ormond William de Bremigham Knight and Walter de Burgh strictly enjoyning them with all speed to come over into England Nobiscum tractaturi vestrumque Consilium impensuri concerning his intended Voyage in person into Ireland and setting the peace and affairs therof and I read in the reign of King Henry 3. Edward the 1. 3. and other of our Kings that the King of Scots and his Nobles were oft summoned by Writs to our English Parliaments concerning the affairs of Scotland yet these writs made none of them Peers and Barons of our English Parliaments From all which I may safely conclude Sir Edward Cooks and others Opinions to be no Law but a clear mistake that a general writ of Summons doth or can create any who hold not by Barony Peers or Barons for life much less in fee or fee-tayl Therefore such may be afterwards elected Knights or Burgesses of Parliament and be Members of the Commons house and refuse to sit or serve in the Lords house upon summons without contempt or fine but no Baron or Peer of the Realm may be thus chosen or neglect his service in the Lords house Finally Mr. Cambden in his Britannia p. 120 122. Apologia p 11. and Mr. J. Selden in his Titles of Honour part 2. chap. 5. Sect. 31. p. 708. to 718. assert That as some Spiritual Barons who were conceived to be Barons by writ as well as by tenure though sometimes summoned to Parliament by writ were wholly omitted at length as not having of right Voice and Place with the rest because they held not by Barony So sundry of the Lesser Barons and Tenants in Capite holding only of the King as Vavasors by Knights service and not by an intire Barony were likewise excluded the Parliament and not summoned thereunto by King John Henry the 3. Edw. the 1. being not great and honourary Barons nor having estates sufficient to support that dignity and that as Mr. Selden conceites by some Law made not long before the Great Charter of King Iohn procured by MAJORES BARONES who foreseeing that their power and dignity might suffer much diminution if the new tenants in chief or Patentees of Escheated Baronies and the rest that were decayed should have equality with them and be indifferently Barons of the Kingdom every way as they were procured a Law in some of the Parliaments that preceded the Great Charter of King John by which themselves only should hereafter be properly stiled summoned as BARONS and the rest only Tenants in chief or Knights which Titles shold be given them as distinct names from Barons which could not but much lesen the dignity and honor of the rest
in summo silentio Rex autem interius cum Principibus sedens pro tribunali Euntes ait DISCERNITE QUID PERJURUS CONTUMAX PRODITOR DEBEAT SUSTINERE Itur JUDICATUR Et a quo vel qualiter pronunciandum esset JUDICIUM informatur Processerunt tandem a Rege Comites Barones cum turba multa quorum primi praecipui erant Robertus Leicestriae Reginaldus Comes Cornubiae Qui cum Archiepiscopo quasi improperantes retulissent quae et quanta ei bona Dominus Rex contuliâ—set tandem Comes Leicestriae qui erat dux verbi caepit subâ—iliter inflectere sermones quasi ad judicium Curiae in Archiepiscopum proferendum Praeâ—entiens hoc Archiepiscopus mox non expectaâ—o judicio surgit protestans non esse eorum Archipraeâ—ulem suum judicare de crimine Non est inquit in eum ferenda sententia qui judicem superiorem appellavit etiam si Laico liceret Episcopum judicare Unde tibi Comes Leicestriae potestate mihi a Deo collata ut filio Ecclesiae praecipio ne in patrem tuum spiritualem judicium proferre praesumas Verum mox improperatum et inclamatum a nonnullis est quod tanquam Perjurus et Proditor a Curia discederet Ipse vero sic se vertens et austero vultu respiciens râ—spondit quod nisi ordo sacerdotalis obstaret et si sibi fas esset in armis bellicis a Perjurio Proditione se contra ipsos defenderet His dictis a Curia discessit et per aulam transiens probris multis a Curialibus affectus est Cum autem januam clausam repperisser et jâ—nitor puero â—erberando intendisset accurrens quispiam clavem repperit januam apperuit patrem demisit sic pater patriae manus impiorum evasit c. King Richard the 1. Anno 1189. going to the holy Warrs made William Longchamp Bishop of Ely not only his Chancellor and Chief Justice but the chief Protector and Guardian of the whole Realm who having obtained a Legatine Power also from the Pope and getting the Militia with most of the Kings Castles into his hand proved a most unsufferable Tyrant to the Nobility Gentry Laity and Clergy so oppressing domineering over their persons Liberties Estates imprisoning taxing disseising spoyling them of their Offices Castles Lands Privileges Estates at his pleasure and over-awing them with Troops of Horse Garrisons New Governors set over and quartered in every County and with his great Guards of armed horse which he constantly kept about his person that Earl John the Kings brother the Nobility Prelates and People being no longer able to indure his exorbitant insolency intollerable Pride Oppressions Rapines Exactions and transcendent Tyranny raised great forces against him to regulate his Excesses and bring him to Justice Whereupon he being somewhat terrified in the 2. year of King Richard the 1. Anno 1191. Earl John and the Bishops with the Prelates Earls and Nobles of the Realm assembled in a kind of Parliamentary Council came to an agreement touching the future settlement reformation Peace and Government of the Realm and preventing all future tyranny and oppression which was drawn up in writing published subscribed and sworn to be inviolably observed both by the Earl John and Chancellor and by 14. other Earls and Barons on either side One of the Articles of this Agreement recorded at large by Roger de Hoveden was this Concessum est quod Episcopi Abbates Comites Barones Vavasores et liberi tenentes non ad voluntatem Justiciarium vel Ministrorum Domini Regis de terris catallis suis disseisientur sed judicio Curiae domini Regis secundum legitimas consuetudines et Assisas Regni tractabuntur vel per mandatum domini Regis agreeable to Magna Charta c. 29. No sooner had the Chancellor taken his Oath but his forein forces he had privily sent for ariving in England he presently violated it and played the Tyrant worse than before commanding the Kings own Brother Geoffry Archbishop of York to be apprehended at Dover in the very Church dragged out violently in his Archiepiscopal robes from the Altar and then thorough the dirty streets in the sight of all the people who cried out after the Chancellors servants who thus abused him O ignavi quare ita ducitis illum quid mali fecit Archiepiscopus est Regis filius Regisque frater But they taking no notice of their clamors carryed him to Dover Castle and there kept him Prisoner till he was thence released by Earl Johns command The Archbishop coming to London complained to Earl John the Bishops and other Nobles of the injury done to him by the Chancellor ut Cancellurius juri staret in CURIA REGIS super injuria illa quam Archiepiscopo Eboracensi feâ—erat et Hugoni Dunelmensi Episcopo Quod cum ipse Cancellarius facere de die in diem distulit Eodem tempore ad instantium Comitis Johannis Convenerunt apud pontem de Loedone inter Radingum Wyndleshores die Sabbathi pâ—oxime post festum Sancti Michaelis ad Colloquium MAGNATES ANGLIAE de arduis magnis Regis regni negotiis tractaturi The next day the Archbishop and Bishops who all came to this Parliamentary Assembly meeting at Reading excommunicated all those who were aiding and assenting to the imprisonment of the Archbishop After which Comes Johannis Archiepiscopus Rothomagensis Episcopi Principes Regni statueruâ—t illi diem peremptorium apud Ridinges Ad diem autem illum venerunt illuc COMES Moretonii fere omnes Episcopi Comites Barones Regni Et post diem peremptorium moram fecerunt ibi expectantes adventum Cancellarii sed ipse venire noluit nec nuntium mittere Deinde Comes Johannes et Episcopi Barones qui cum eo erant paraverunt se Londoniâ—s ire ut ibi in Majorâ— audientia Londinensium fruerentur consilie quid eis faciendum esset de Cancellario qui sic conturbaverat regnum juri stare noluit The Chancellor hereupon flying from Windeshores into the Tower of London for shelter Comes Johannes fere omnes Episcopi Comites BARONES Angliae eadem die scil 3. die post octavas Sancti Michaelis intraverunt Londonias Et in crastino praedistus Johannis frater Regis Archiepiscopus Rothomagensis omnes Episcopi Comites Barones cives Londinenses cum illis convenerunt in atrio Ecclesiae Sancti Pauli where sitting together as in a Great Parliamentary Council and Court post longos tractatus Ricardo regi fidelitatem juraverunt Imprimis Comos Johannis deinde duo Archiepiscopi et omnes Episcopi quotquot convenerunt Comites Barones Deinde die Jovis proximo habitum est Colloquium in Orientali parte turris Londinensis praesentibus MAGNATIBUS praedictis Accusabant praedictum Cancellarium in multis praecipue in injuriis quas fecit Domino Eboracensi Archiepiscopo Domino Dunelmensi Episcopo
ill counsellors about him neglecting hating banishing his own Nobles and natural Subjects as Traytors without any just cause or legal trial and subverting confounding their Lawes Liberties Justice c. 2ly To manifest the proceedings impeachments in these Parliaments against the Earls and Nobles refusing to appear at these Parliaments upon the Kings these successive Writs of Summons his outlawing them of high Treason and spoiling burning seising their houses Lands thereupon being adjudged by the Lords in Parliament to be illegal and afterwards reversed as unjust and against the Law Claus 18. H. 3. m. 19. 3ly To manifest that the Lords in Parliament would not act any thing in the absence of these eminent Lords refusing to appear 4ly To evidence the Sentence and Justice of the King and Lords against these ill Counsellors Aliens and Traytors to the Publique whom they caused to be removed from the King Court Kingdom put from their publike Trusts and Offices called to an account publikely arraigned before the King himself and his Justices by whom they were imprisoned their lands confiscated and better Counsellors of State and Judges put into their places Anno 1240. Accusatus est graviter Comes Cantiae Hubertus de Burgo CORAM REGE ET CURIA TOTA London ubi post multâ—s disceptationes ut iraâ—undia Regis quae immoderate nimis conâ—â—â— ipsum excanduerat quiesceret ADJUDICAâ—UM EST ut quatuor Castra sua Charissima scilicet Blancum Castrum Grosmunt Scenefrithz Haetfeild Domino Regiâ— resignaret ut caetera sibi cum Regis benevolentia in pace remanerent Anno 1258. The Nobles complained in Parliamnnt of the Kings advancing his half Brothers who were aliens swaying all things and impoverishing the Realm and of their intollerable pride insolency and injuries and the Earl of Leicester particularly complained to the Parliament of William de Valentia non tamâ—n Regi sed universitati praecordialiter est conquestus exigens instanter sibi justitiam adhiberi The same year the Great men and Nobles of the Land Videntes Regnum undique desolatum tum exactionibus tallagiis tam Curiae Romanae quam Regis quam etiam alienigenarum praecipue Pictavensium elatione praesumptuosa fivore regio in regno nimium in sublimi provecta tantas in Anglia Dominationes sibi usurpantium magisteria â—ost Pentecosten apud Oxon. COLLOQUIUM GENERALE CELEBRAVERUNT being summoned to this Parliament by the Kings Writ super hiis necnon status regni meliorationâ— efficaciter exquisite tractaturi Quo non sine armis equis electissimis muniti venerunt ut si Rex alienigenae suiâ— provisionibus statutis sponte contemnerent assentire vigore opposito cogerentur aut ipsi alienigeni universaliter sine morae regnum Angliae poenitus evacuarent Quas quidem provisiones Oxon. stat necnon ET MAGNAM CHARTAM TAM DE LIBERTATIBUS ET DE FORESTA tandem Domino Rege ad suorum PROCERUM observantiam statutorum inclinato per queÌ„dam de suis militibus tactis sacrosanctis jurameÌ„tum praestante 24 prudentium virorum Nationis Anglicanae quos ad Regni gubernationem sub eodem duxerint inter se eligendos consilio se commendavit considerationâ— His igitur pâ—ractis fidelitatem Regi regni ET AD CONSIDERATIONEM SUORUM PARIUM STARE omnes quotquot in regno commorare vellent fecerunt jurare The Nobles in this Parliament required that all the Poictovines might surrender up all the Castles they held in England into the Kings hands Whereupon they peremptorily swore by the passion and wounds of Christ that they would never doe it whiles they breathed Whereupon the Earl of Leicester said to William of Vairencia the most insolent of them all That he should either surrender up the Castles he held of the Kings without delay VEL CAPUT AMITTERET on he should lose his head Similiter ALII COMITES ET BARONES DICEBANT etiam constructissime assertione consistentes The Poictovines being very much terrified with these words not knowing what to doe and fearing to fly to any Castle lest they should there be besieged and soon taken or starved by the Lords fled secretly and speedily from the Parliament to Winchester not sparing their horses sides and setting spies upon hills and Towers to observe whether the Barons pursued them who hearing of their flight commanding all their followers to arm themselves and dissolving the Parliament without adjourning it to any certain day pursued them to Winchester where the King and Nobles holding another PARLIAMENT the Poictovines JUDIDIUM EXPECTARE NOLENTES nec ausi exhibitionem JUSTITIAE quae singulis secundum juramentum REGIS PROCERUM debebatur expestare being the sole judges of them in Parliam for their exorbitant offences they presently fled out of the Realm beyond the Sea to avoid their sentence Hereupon Significatum est literatorie ad multos etiam quos praedicti Pictavienses impudentur offenderant ut â—nerelam super hoc reponeâ—res ostenderent Maguatibus Regni daâ—a sibi a dictis Regis fratribus illata eas querelas dilucidantes constanter moras sequerentur ut sibi omnia secundum quod jus dictaret restituerentur Sed quia instabat tempus messium considerantes simultatem et instantes labores forte inutiles sequi renuerunt donec majorem cernerent opportunitatem The Lords in Parliament being willing to award them damages and reparations against the Kings own Brothers in Law upon complaint and clear proof of the injuries and damages they sustained by them Anno 1260. There falling out a great difference between King Henry the 3. and Prince Edward his Son Simon Earl of Leicester and other Nobles thereupon Convocato in praesentia Regis apud sanctum Paulum BARONAGIO habitoque prius tractatâ— de Eadwardo super injuriis Regi ut dicebatur illatis paratus est idem Eadwardus se omnium objectorum probare immunem et ad duorum Regum scil Patris sui et Avunculi provisionem in emendatione facienda se dare tractabilem dicens Omnes alios Barones et Comites sibi de jure non esse Pares nec suas in eum exercere discussiones Unde dâ—cuâ—a hinc inde veritate omniumque relatorum falsitate probata pacificato Regi concordatus est filius multiplicatis de jure inimicorum confusionibus Concordato itaque Eadwardo Regi et Reginae et aliis amicis mox querela subsequitur de Comite Leicestriae Simoâ—e super pluribus injuriis tam citra mare quam ultra contra Regem ut dicebatur perpetratis Praefixo igitur die ad respondendum se de objectis expurgandum idem Comes ad dictum diem licet breviorem paratus est quantotiens petitis satisfacere et ad discutiendam super oppositis veritatem omnium transmarinorum quam cismarinorum arbitrio obtemperare exceptis quinque tantum minutis tam suae quam Eadwardi discordiae seminatoribus Qâ—o audito Comes Gloverniae cum
Vice-Chamberlain before the King and Lords of divers offences against the King who taking the accusation to be good because of the Bishops order and that he was of the kingâ— linage pardoned the said Bishop all his misprisions done against his person and reconciled the Bishop and Sir Thomas one to another And n. 30 31. all the Lords Temporal whose names are there recorded being 25. in number by assent of the King declared and ADJUDGED Thomas Holland late Earl of Kent John Holland late Earl of Huntingdon John Mountague late Earl of Salisbury Thomas le Despencer Sir Ralph Lumley Knight and divers others who were for their Rebellions and Treasons in levying war against the King taken slain or beheaded by certain of the Kings Subjects to be Traytors and that they should forfeit all such Lands as they had in fee the 5. of January the first year of the King or at any time after with all their goods and chattels The Record is Toutz les Seigneurs temporelz esteantz en Parlement per ussent du Roy declarerent et adjuggerent les ditz Thomas c. pur Trayteurs pur la leve de Guerre encountre lour Seignior le Roy nient obstant qils furent mortz sur le dâ—t leve de guerre sanz process de ley Lo here the Lords alone by the Kings assent declare and adjudge what is Treason both in the case of Lords and Commoners too and â—taint and give Judgement against them both without the Commons after their deaths without legal trial In the Parliament of 5 H. 4. rot Parl. n. 11 12 13 14. On Friday the 18 of February the Earl of Northumberland came before the King Lords and Commons in Parliament and by his Petition to the King acknowledged that he had done against his Lawes and allegeance and especially for gathering power giving of Liveries for which he put himself upon the Kings grace and prayed pardon the rather for that upon the Kings Letters he yielded himself and came to the King at York whereas he might have kept himself away Which Petition by the Kings command was delivered to the Justices to be examined and to have their counsel and advice therein Whereupon the LORDS made a Protestation que le Juggement appentient a â—ux tout soulement THAT THE JUDGEMENT APPERTAINED ONLY TO THEM And after the said Petition being read and considered before the King and the said Lords as Peers of Parliament aus queux teils juggemeâ—t apperteignent de deoit to whom such Iudgements appertained of right having had by the Kings command competent deliberation thereupon and having also heard and considered as well the Statute made in the 25. year of King Edward the Kings Grand father that now is concerning the Declaration of Treason as the Statutes of Liveries made in this Kings reign ADJUDGED That that which was done by the said Earl contained within his Petition was neither Treason nor Felony but Trespas for which the said Earl ought to make fine and ransom at the will of the King Whereupon the said Earl most humbly thanked our Lord the King and the said Lords his Peers of Parliament for their rightfull judgement and the Commoners for their good affections and dâ—ligence used and shewen in this behalf And the said Earl further prayed the King that in assurance of these matters to remove all jealousies and evil suspitions that he might be sworn a new in the presence of the King and of the Lords and Commons in Parliament and the said Earl took an Oath upon the Crosier of the Archbishop of Canterbury to be a faithfull and loyal liege to our Lord the King the Prince his Son and to the heirs of his body inheritable to the Crown according to the Laws of England Whereupon the king out of his grace pardoned him his fine and ransom for the trespass aforesaid After which num 17. the Lords Spiritual and Temporal humbly thanked the King sitting in his royal Throne in the white Chamber for his grace and pardon to the said Earl of his fine and ransom and likewise the Commons thankâ— the Lords Spiritual and Temporal for the good and just Iudgement they had given as Peers of Parliament to the said Earl From this memorable Record I shall observe First that though this Declaration of this Earls case was made by his Petition in the presence of the King Lords and Commons in Parliament according to the Statute of 25 E. 3. yet the Lords only by Protestation in presence of the King and Commons claimed to be the sole Iudges of it as Peers of Parliament and belonging to them OF RIGHT Secondly That this claim of theirs in this case was acknowledged and submitted to both by the King and Commons and thereupon the Lords only after serious consideration of the case and Statutes whereon it depended gave the definitive sentence and judgement in this case that it was neither Treason nor Felony but Trespass only c. Thirdly That the Earl thanked the King only for his grace the Lords for their just Iudgement and the Commons only for their good hearts and diligence having no share in the judgement though given by the Lords both in the Kings and their presence and that the Commons themselves returned special thanks to the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament for their good and just judgement Fourthly That this judgement of the Lordr only was final and conclusive both to the King and Commons who acquiesced in it In the Parliament of 2 H. 5. rot Parl. num 13 14. Thomas Mountague Earl of Salisbury son and heir of John Mountague Earl of Salisbury exhibited his petition in Parliament to reverse a judgement given against his said father in the Parliament at Westminster in the second year of King Henry the fourth rot Parl. n. 30 31. forecited wherein amongst others he was attainted of Treason by judgement of all the Temporal Lords in Parliament and thereupon he exhibited certain reversals of Judgements given in Parliament as making on his behalf to the Lords consideration reversed for some errors assigned in those judgements to wit one judgement given against Thomas heretofore Earl of Lancaster before King Edward the second at Pomfract the Monday before the feast of the Annunciation in the fifteenth year of his reign and another Judgement against Roger de Mortymer late Earl of March in the Parliament of King Edward the third the Monday after the feast of St. Katherine in the fourth year of his reign at Westminster Which Judgements being distinctly and openly readâ— and fully understood It seemed to the King and Lords that the case of the death and execution of the said John late Earl of Sarum and of the judgement aforesaid against him given is not nor was like to the case of the executing of the said Th. heretofore Earl of Lancaster nor to the case of the putting to death of Roger Earl of March nor to any judgement given against
committed to the Tower of London The 7 day of February the Commons by William Trussel their Speaker brought up and presented to the King and Lords in the Lords House a Bill against the said Duke containing an impeachment of several High Treasons committed by him against the King requiring of the Lords all their Articles therein to be enacted with prosecution therein The 9. of March they exhibited new articles of complaint against the Duke comprising sundry misdemeanors against the king and other persons which they require might be enrolled and that the Duke might answer to them The 9. of March the Duke was brought by the kings writ from the Tower into the Parliament Chamber before the King and Lords where the Articles were rehearsed to him who desired Copies of them which was granted And he for more ready answer was committed to certain Esquires to be kept in the Tower within the kings palace The 14 of March the Duke appeared before the K. Lords where on his knees he denied as untrue the 8 Articles of Treason and the same offered to prove as the King shall appoint The Chief Justice thereupon by the kings command asked this Question of the Lords what advise they would give the King what is to do further in this matter which advise was deferred till Monday then next following whereon nothing was done in that matter On Tuesday the 17 of March the king sent for all the Lords Spiritual and Temporal then being in Town being 24 in all into his Inner Chamber within his Palace of Westminster where when they were all assembled he then sent for the Duke thither who coming into the Kings presence kneeled down and continued kneeling till the Chancellor of England had delivered the kings command to him and demanded of him what he said to the Commons Articles not having put himself upon his Peerage Whereupon the Duke denied all the Articles touching the kings Person and state of the Realm as false and scandalous And so not departing from his said Answers submitted himself to the kings Rule and Governance without putting himself upon his Peerage Where thus the Chancellor told him That as touching the great and horrible crimes contained in the first Bill the king holdeth him neither declared nor charged And as touching the second Bill containing misprisions which are not criminal the king by force of his submission by his own advice and not reporting him to the advice of the Lords nor by way of judgement for he is not in place of judgement putteth you to his Rule and Governance that before the first of May next coming he should absent himself out of the kingdom of England and all other his Dominions in France or elsewhere and that he nor no man for him should shew or wait any malice nor hate to any person of what degree soever of the Commons in the Parliament in no manner of wise for any thing done to him in this Parliament or elsewhere And forthwith Viscount Beaumont in behalf of the said LORDS both spiritual and Temporal and by their advice assent and desire said and declared to the Kings Highness That this that so was decreed and done by his Excellency concerning the person of the said Duke proceeded not by their advice and Counsels but was done by the Kings own demeanoir and rule Wherefore they besought the King that this their saying might be enacted in the Parliament Roll for their more declaration hereafter with this protestation that it should not be nor turn in prejudice nor derogation of them their heirs ne of their successors in time coming but that they may have and enjoy their liberty as they or any of their Ancestors and Predecessors had and enjoyed before this time This is the sum of this large Record which makes nothing to the purpose for which Sir Edward Cook cites it in his 4 Institutes p. 25. That it is ERROR when both Houses joyn not in the Judgement For first here is nothing but an impeachment only by the Commons of a Peer who ought to be tryed judged only by his Peers not by Commoners Secondly there was no judgement given in Parliament in this case but only a private Award made by the King out of the Parliament House in his own Chamber in presence of the Lords Thirdly the Lords entred a special protestation against it as not made by their advice or consent Fourthly they enter a special claim in the Parliament Roll for the preservation of their Right and Freedom of Peerage for hereafter both of being tried and judged only by their Peers in Parliament and so an express resolution that the Peers in Parliament are and ought to be Judges especially of Peers not the Commons These Records of these cited at large lest Sir Edward Cooks brief quotation and mis-recital of them should deceive the credulous or ignorant Readers In the Parliament of 31 H. 6. rot Parl. n. 28. Thomas Earl of Devonshire was accused of Treason tried for and acquitted thereof by his Peers before Humfrey Duke of Buckingham Steward of England for the time being And for that the Duke of York thought the loyalty of the said Earl to be touched thereupon the said Earl protesting his Loyalty referred himself to further Trial as a Knight should doe upon which declaration THE LORDS in Parliament acquitted him as a loyal Subject Edward Duke of York with the Earls of March Warwick Salisbury Rutland John Lord Clinton and others were impeached and attainted by Judgement of the Lords in Parliament of High Treason for raising forces and levying war against King Henry the 6. and afterwards attainted by Bill in the Parliament of 38 H. 6. n. 7. to 26. In the Paâ—liamenr of 1 E. 4. n. 17. to 71. The Duke of Exeter Viscount Beamont the Earls of Pembroke Wilts and Devonshire the Lords Nevil Roos Gray Dacre Hungerford and others were first attainted and condemned of High Treason by THE LORDS and after by Bill for levying warr against King Edward the fourth The Duke of Somerset and others in the Parliament of 4 E. 4. n. 28. to 39. and John Vere Earl of Oxford with others in the Parliament of 14 E. 4. n. 34. to 41. were in the same manner for the same offence attainted of High Treason and their Lands forfeited To pretermit all other Attainders of this Nature in cases of High Treason in the reigns of Henry the 8. Edward the 6. Queen Mary Queen Elizabeth and King James both in our English and Irish Parliaments formerly touched p. 196 197 198 199. In the Parliaments of 18 21 Jacobi Sir Francis Bacon Viscount St. Alban Lord Chancellor of England and the Earl of Middlesex Lord Treasurer of England were impeached accused convicted of Bribery Corruption and other misdemeanors removed from their places fined Middlesex 50000 l. imprisoned made uncapable of any Office and thus censured by Iudgement of the Lords house as the Journals of those Parliaments
inform us In the Parliament of 2. Caroli the Duke of Buckingham impeached the Earl of Bristol and the Earl of Bristol impeached this Duke before the Lords in sundry Articles for divers misdemeanours touching the Spanish match King Prince to seduce him in his religion praying judgment of the Lords thereupon against each other In the Parliament of 3. Caroli the Duke of Buckingham was accused and Impeached by the Commons before the Lords for sundry high Misdemeanors and the Parliament thereupon dissolved to prevent his censure In this very Parliament of King Charls now sitting Thomas Earl of Strafford was accused and impeached by the House of Commons of High Treason and other misdemeanors comprised in sundry Articles which they transmitted â—o the House of Lords desiring that he might be put to answer them and such proceedings examination trial and judgement thereupon had and given against him by the Lords as is agreeable to Law and Justice Hereupon he was openly tried in Westminster Hall before the House of Lords there sitting as his Judges where the House of Commons prosecuted and gave in Evidence against him sundry dayes and in conclusion demanded the Lords to give Iudgement against him in the Iudicial way After which they proceeded against him by way of Bill not to decline their Lordships Iustice in a Iudicial way but to husband time by preventing some doubts and as the speediest and soonest way Upon the passing of which Bill he was beheaded and executed as a Traytor On the 26 of February 1640. William Laud Archbishop of Canterbury was accused and impeached of High Treason by the House of Commons of 14. Articles then transmitted by them to the House of Lord The first whereof was this That he had trayterously endeavoured to subvert the fundamental Laws and Government of the Realm and instead thereof to introduce an Arbitrary and Tyrannical Government against Law And the last of them this That he had laboured to subvert the rights of Parliament and the ancient Course of Parliamentary proceeding which the New-modellers of our Parliaments more guilty hereof by many degrees than he may do well to consider Upon which they prayed from the Lords such proceedings examination trial and Iudgement against him as is agreeable to Law and Justice Upon these Articles he was brought to a publike Trial in the Lords House the 12. of March 1643. and after 17. whole dayes spent in his meer Trial and proof of the Charge against him and his defence thereto morning and evening and several other dayes spent in the hearing of him and his Council and the Commons Reply touching his Charge and the matters of Law whether the Charge prâ— against him amounted to High Treason the Lords upon most mature deliberation voted him Guilty of all the Articles and matters of fact charged against him and also of High Treason and thereupon passed an Ordinance for his Attainder by vertue whereof he was beheaded as a Traytor on Tower-Hill January 10. 1644. To these I might add the seveeal Articles of Impeachment transmitted by the House of Commons this Parliament to the Lords against Matthew Wren Bishop of Norwich the 20. of July 1641. against William Pierce Bishop of Bath and Wells and against the Bishops of Winchester Coventry and Litchfield Glocester Chichester Exeter St. Asaph Hereford Ely Bangor Bristol Rochester Peterborough and Landaffe August 4. 1641. requiring such proceedings from the Lords against them as to Law and Justice shall appertain All which are a superabundant impregnable Evidence of the Lords inherent Judicial power and right of Judicature in our English Parliaments even by the Commons House own Impeachments and acknowledgements against the Levellers pretences to the contrary By all these forecited presidents it is most apparent 1. That the King and Lords in our Parliaments in all ages both before and since the Commons admission to sit and vote in Parliaments have been the sole Judges of Ecclesiastical Peers and Lords in all criminal cases without the Commons 2ly That the Lords and Peers of the Realm except only in case of appealâ— both in and out of Parliament are triable only by their Peers And therefore the Trial condemnation and execution of any of them by Marshal Law or now misnamed High Courts of Justice by Commoners and others who are not their Peers is most illegal unjust and nought else but murther as the Parliaments of 1 H. 4. rot Parl. n. 45. of 1 E. 4. rot Parl. n. 18. resolve and as it was adjudged in the case of Thomas Earl of Lancaster Paâ—ch 39 E. 3. Coram Rege Rot. 92. Wiâ— Cooks 3. Institutes p. 52 53. Secondly The next and main question now conâ—roverted will be Whether the King House of Peers have any lawfull or sole power of Judicature in and over the persons of the Commons of England as well as over Peers in criminal causes misdemeanours offences or breaches of their Parliamentary privileges so farr as to fine imprison censure judge or condemn them in any kind without the House of Commons concurrent vote or judicature This the ignorant sottish Levellers Sectaries seduced by their blind guides John Lilburn and Overton peremptorily deny the contrary whereof I shall here infallibly make good to their perpetual shame and refutation by unanswerable Reasons and presidents in all ages 1. I have already manifested That the Parliament being the supremest Court of Judicature in the Realm must consequently have a lawfull Jurisdiction over all persons and members of the Realm whether Spiritual or Temporal Lords or Commons in all criminal and civil Causes proper for Parliaments to judge or punish That this power of judicature was originally and primitively vested in the King and Lords alone before there were any Knights Citizens Burgesses or Commons summoned to our Parliaments as is evident by the antient writers Glanvil Bracton Fleta Horn the Parliament of Clarindon Anno. 1164. and other forecited authorities and never transferred by them to the House of Commons upon or after their admission into our Parliaments but remaining intirely in the King and Lords as at first as the whole House of Commons acknowledge upon record 1 H. 4. rot parl n. 79. Therefore they may lawfully exercise this their judicial power and jurisdiction over the Commoners of England in all such causes now and hereafter and that of right as this record resolves they may do in positive terms 2ly Our Histories Law-books and Records agree that in ancient times our Earls who were called Comites or Counts from the word County had the chief Government and Rule of most of the Counties of this Realm under our King and that they and the Barons were the proper Judges of the Common people both in criminal and civil Causes in the Tourns County-Courts even by vertue of their Dignities and Offices as our Sheriffs are now in which Courts they did instruct the people in the Laws of the Land and administer Justice
Lords only sit upon the Bench and that covered and in their Parliamentary Robes the badges of Judicature but the Commons stand and that bare at the Bar without any robes at all the Lords only swear examine the witnesses and judge of their testimony the Commons only produce the witnesses presse and manage the evidence and when the buâ—nesse is fully heard the Lords only debate the cause among themselves and give the final Sentence Judgement without the Commons though sometimes in their presence and that both in cases of Commoners and Peers Therefore the Lords and House of Peers are sole Judges in Parliament not the Commons 9ly The Commons themselves in all ages since admitted into our Parliaments have always presented their Petitions in Parliament to the King and Lords alone for redress of all Grievances wrongs misdemeanours abuses whatsoever publike or private criminal or civil ecclesiastical marine or military And the Lords House alone have in all antient Parlaments appointed particular persons of their House to receive al Petitions Triers of them to hear and answer them by their advice and the kings assent when necessary which Triers of Petitions had power given to call the Lord Chancellor Treasurer Chamberlain Judges kings Servants and others to this assistance prescribing where when their Petitions should be presented examined redressed at all our Parliament Rolls aâ—est and Sir Edward Cook himself relates There being few or no Petitions at all presented by any to the Commons before â—â— H. 7. c. 19. 4 H. 7. c. 6. These Petitions then presented to them and all ever since with all in this present Parliament being only to this end that they upon the examination of the truth matters complaints grievances mentioned in them might transmit and represent them in the name of the Commons House to the Lords House for to give full redress relief and judgement on them to the Petitioners not for the Commons themselves to judge finally determine them or give relief upon them without the Lords as all the transmissions of private and publike Petitions by the Commons to the Lords heretofore and in this Parliment in the cases of Dr. Layton Dr. Bastwick Mr. Burton Mr. Walker my self and of Lilburns own Petition against his censure attest Therefore the Judicature of our Parliaments must wholy rest and intirely reside in the Lords House as well in all Criminal as civil cases both of Commoners and Lords 10ly The surest badge and highest evidence of the right and exercise of Juridical and Judicial Authority in Parliament is the examination affirmation control repeal nulling adjudging and finall determining all Errors in Judgements Decrees Proceedings all Misprisions Abuses Corruptions grievances whatsoever of Judges Justices in all other Courts of Justice Civil Ecclesiastical Marine or military Now the Lords-alone in Parliament upon Wtits of Error Appeals Complaints Petitions c examine confirm repeal null redresse and finally determine all Errors misprisions in Judgements Decrees Proceedings and all Abuses Corruptions Grievances whatsoever in all other Courts of Justice whether Civil as the Kings Bench Chancery Exchequer Chamber Common Pleas Exchequer Court of Wards Courts of Requests Stanneries c. or Ecclesiastical as the High Commission Archbishops Consistories the Convocation and the Admiralty Court Marshal Council Table Star-chamber and in former Parliaments as is evident by sundry presidents in former ages and in this present Parliament of King CHARLS in the cases of Dr. Layton Dr. Bastwick Mr. Burton Lilburn himself Mr. Grafton Alderman Chambers Mr. Rolls Sir Rob Howard Alderman Langham and Limry Mr. Johns and le Gay with sundry others But more especially in cases of Writs of Error brought in Parliament by Peers or Commoners upon any Erronious judgements touching their real or personal estates lives limbs liberties persons upon Indictments or Attainders In all which writs the King and Lords only are sole judges without the Commoners and the returns of the proceedings upon such Writs are only before the Lords in the Vpper House secundum legem et consuetudinem Parliaments So Sir Edward Cook himself expresly resolves in direct terms in his 4 Institutes p. 21 22 23. And 22 E. 3.3 Fitz Error 8 Br. 3.1 H. 7.20 21 22. Br. Error 137. Old Book of Entries p. 302.16 E. 3. Fitz. Brev. 651.21 E. 3.46 Br. Error 65.29 E. 3.24.39 Ass 18.42 Ass 22.7 H. 6.28 8 H. 5. Fitz. Error 88.19 H. 6.12.35 H. 6.19.37 H. 6.16.11 H. 4.65.9 E. 4.3.2 R. 3.22.37 H. 8.14 15 25. Dyer f. 62.196 201 315 375. intimate as much This is most clear by the Writs of Error Judgements and Proceedings on them in the Parliament House before and by the Lords alone mentioned in the Parliament Rolls themselves as 14 E. 1. roâ— Parl. 1.4 E. 3. n. 13 14.21 E. 3. n. 65 66.28 E. 3. n. 8. to 14.50 E. 3. n. 38.1 R. 2. n. 28 29 105.2 R. 2. n. 31 32 33 37 38. Parl. 2. and Parl. 1. n. 21. to 27.3 R. 2. n. 19.20 21 22.6 R. 2. n. 17.7 R. 2. n. 20 21.8 R. 2. n. 13 14 15 16.13 R. 2. n. 16 17 15 R. 2. n. 22 23 24.16 R. 2. n. 17 18.17 R. 2. n. 17.19 â—8 R. 2. n. 11 12 13.20 R. 2. n. â—6 21 R. 2. n. 25 55. to 66 71.1 H. 4. n. 91 92.2 H. 4. n. 38 39 40.4 H. 4. n. 26.5 H. 4. n. 40.6 H. 4. n. 31.1 H. 5. n. 19.2 H. 5. n. 13 14.3 H. 5. n. 19. with sundry Writs of Error in succeeding Parliaments and this now sitting adjudged determined by the King and Lords alone without the privity or interposition of the Commons A truth so clear that Lilburn himself in his Argument against the Lords jurisdiction confesseth iâ— If then the Lords House be the soâ—e Judges in all Writs of Error and Appeals from all other Courts of Justice concerning the Lands Tenements Goods Estates Liberties Members Lines Attainders of all English Freeholders and Commoners whatsoever notwithstanding the Statute of Magna Charta ch 29. No Freeman shall be â—aken or imprisoned c. neither will we pass upon him nor condemn him but by the lawfull judgement of his Peers c. the grand and principal objection against the Lords Judicature in Cases of Commoners then by the self same reason they are their lawfull Judges and may regally proceed against them in all other criminal or Civil causes especially in cases of breach of their own Privileges wherein they are the sole and only Judges since no other Court can judge of nor yet punish them as Sir Ed. Cook resolves being properly triable only in Paâ—liament as contempt against all other Courts are punishable and triable by themselves alone the present cases of Lilburne and Overton Now that they are and alwayes have been so de facto unless by way of Bill of Attainder or in such extraordinary cases when their concurrence hath been desired even in criminal cases misdemeanors and offences of Commons as well as Peers I
shall prove by most clear and infallible evidences and presidents as well antient as modern Our Noble King Alfred as he ordained for the good estate of the Realm that the Earls and Noble thereof by a perpetual custom should twice every year or oftner in times of Peace assemble together in Parliament at London to govern the people of England and keep them from sinne as Andr. Horn informs us in his Mirrour of Justices c. 1. p. 10. So the same Author records c. 5. p. 296 297 c. That this royal Justiciary who took a short account each year of all his Judges proceedings in his Parliaments condemned and hanged up in one year about An. 890 as I conjecture no lesse than 44 of his Judges and Justices as Murderers for executing his Subjects and putting them to death against Law without any legal cause or sufficient evidence or tryal by a Jury of their Peers and imprisoned fined punished others of them in the self same kind as they had injuriously imprisoned fined and punished his Subjects against Law and that no doubt by the advise and assent of his Nobles in Parliament upon complaint of their injustice and corruption the proper Court for punishment of such Offenders whose names and causes recorded at large by this Author shew them to be all Commoners and no Peers of the Realm Anno 1096. William de Anco and William de Alderi were hanged for Treason against William Rufus by judgment of the Lords in a Parliament at Salisbury King Henry the 2. Anno 1166. holding a Council at Oxfâ—quidam pravi dogmatis seminatores tracti sunt IN JUDICIUM praesente Rege et Episcopis Regni quos à fide Catholica devios et in examine superatos facies cauteriata notabiles cunctis exposuit qui expulsi sunt à regno These Hereticks thus branded in the face and banished the Realm by the judgement of the King and this Council ae Nubrigensis informs us were above 30. men and women who came out of Germany into England under one Gerard their Captain stiled Publicans who went about the Country to spread their errors but at last being detected they were apprehended and cast into prison and then brought before the King and a Council of his Bishops where being convicted of Heresie they were adjudged by the K. to be publikely whipped branded in the face and then banished the Realm Hujus severitatis pius rigor non peste illa quae jam irrepserat Angliae regnum purgavit verum etiam ne ulterius irreperet incusso haereticis terrore praecavit as Nubrigensis observes In the year 1224. the 8. of King Henry the 3. his reign the King requiring a restitution and resumption of his Castles and Lords detained from him by some Nobles and others who at last for fear of the Bishops excommunication against such as detained them and disturbed the peace of the Realm and also of the Kings power and justice much against their wills reddiderunt singuli Castella et municipia et honores et custodias Regi quae ad coronam spectare videbantur Thereupon Falcatius de Breut a Norman born a Soldier under King John in the Barons wars trusting on the Kings and other great mens favors fortified the Castle of Bedford situated on another mans ground and presuming on his friends and his own military power and wealth gained in the wars he feared not violently and unjustly to take away the Freeholds lands and possessions of divers of his neighbours and more epecially he disseised 52. Freemen in the Manor of Luiton of their Freeholds and Tenements without judgement and appropriated their Common pastures to himself Whereof complaint bing afterwards made to King Henry the 3. Anno 1224. the King assigned Martin de Pateshulle Thomas de Multon Henry de Braibroc and certain other Justices to take the recognition of the parties complaining of these disseisins by an Assise of Novel disseisin and to do them Justice Who having received their recognitions according to custom the said Falcatius was condemned to pay them costs and damages for the spoils done in the said Tenements to which the Plaintifs were judicially restored Which Falcatius taking very impatiently being likewise amerced one hundred pounds to the King for every of the said Tenements for his forcible entry into them he in a great fury commanded his Garison souldiers in the Castle of Bedford to march armed to Dunstaple where the Justices Itinerant sate and gave judgement against him and to take and bind them in chains and carry them to Bedford Castle and there detain them close prisoners in the Dungeon The Justices having notice thereof fled thence with all speed some one way some another but Henry de Braibroc flying was at unwares taken by the Souldiers who used him very inhumanly then carryed him prisoner to Bedford Castle and there kept him prisoner King Henry at that time was at Northampton where he held a Parliamentary Council Cum Archiepiscopis Episcopis Comitibus Baronibus et aliis multis de regni negotiis tractaturi voluit erim Rex uti consilio MAGNATUM SUORUM de terris transmarinis quas Rex Francorum paulatim occupaverat but it hapned otherwise than he hoped For the rumor of this act of Falcatius being divulged the wife of the said Henry Braibroc came to the King at Northampton et audiente univerâ—o Concilio de viro suo cum lachrymis querulans deposuit Quod Rex factum minus indigne ferens quaesi vit Consilium a Clero simul et Populo to wit the Spiritual and Temporal Lords Clerus Regni Populus when single being frequently used for the Lords Spiritual and Temporal both in Matthew Paris Hoveden Bromton and others not for the inferiour Clergy and Commons house not then in being as some Antiquaries mistake quid sibi super tanta injuria foret agendum At omnes una voce concilium Regi dederunt quatenus sine mora et omnibus aliis praetermissis negotiis in manâ— valida et armata ad Castrum praedictum procedens tantam temeritatem studeat vindicare Cumque Domino Regi placuisset SENTENTIA ipso jubente omnes ad arma quam citius convolantes ad castellum praedictum de Bedeford tam Clorus quam Populus pervenerunt The whole Parliament marching in person to execute this their Sentence upon these transcendent military Malefactors Hereupon the King sending Messengers to the Commanders of the Castle required entrance to be given to him and commanded Henry Braibroc his Justice to be rendered But William de Brent Brother of Falcatius and the rest within it answered the Messengers that they would not render the Castle nor Justice unless they had a command from their Lord Falcatius and especially for this reason quod Regi de Homagio vel fidelitate non tenebantur astricti With which answer the King being much incensed commanded the Castle to be presently encompassed with military
trenches and those within prepared to defend their walls and Bulwarks Then the Archbishop and all the Bishops with burning Papers smote Falcatius himself and all within the Castle with the sword of Excommunication The King commanded all warlike engines to be brought and gave many assaults to the Castle to win it by force since they refused to render it many were slain and wounded on both sides At last after many weeks siege the Kings soldiers entring the Castle by force those within it being unable to hold out any longer rendred themselves to the Kings mercy who putting them in close custody and chains commanded 24 of the Knights and Souldiers who stouted it most against him even when the siege was ended QVI OMNES SVSPENDIO ADJUDICATI SVNT to be hanged that day Matthew Westminster writes there were near one hundred of them hanged up Henry Braibroc being then restored to the King safe and sound rendred him many thanks In the mean time the King sent an armed Troop to seek out and apprehend Falcatius and bring him prisoner to him who having notice thereof fled into Wales for shelter The K. thereupon swore that if he took the Castle by force he would hang up all who were within it And withall seised upon all Falcatius his Manors Lands Corn goods and chattels throughout England as confiscated At last Falcatius hearing that the Castle was taken and his Brother and souldiers hanged came to the King to Bedford under the conâ—uct of Alexander Bishop of Coventry and there casting himself at the Kings feet humbly implored his mercy in respect of the many great and costly services he had done in his father and himself in time of warr Tum Rex per Consilium of his Nobles and Barons tradidit illum Casteliis Terris et rebus omnibus spoliatum sub custodia Euâ—châ— Londoni 〈◊〉 Eâ—iscopi donec quid de illo ageret esset sententialiter deâ—nitum Et sic quasi in momento idim Falcatius de duissimo pauperimus effectus multis et maxime nocentibus poterit fieri in exemplum Regi autem pro maximis laboribus et expensis in the siege of this Castle tam à Clericis quam à â—nicis concessum est per totam Angliam Carucagium de qualibet caruca duo solidi argenti MAGNATIBUS item concessit Rex scutagium scilicet de scuto quolibet duas marcas sterlingorum et sic omnes ad propria recesserunt Castellum quoque illud fecit Rex complanari et redigi in acervos A most memorable example of regal and Parliamentary Justice upon insolent contemners of Law Justice and Justices the whole Parliament turning Souldiers and continuing together at the Siege of this Castle above two Months space till they had taken the Castle and Malefactors by force and done execution on both And an eminent president of the Ks. Lords Jurisdiction in causes both of Commoners and Souldiers as well as Peers and Nobles Henry de Bathonia a learned Knight most skilfull in the Laws of the Realm one of the Kings Justices and special Counsellors in the year 1251 the 35 of Henry the 3. was most grievously defamed and accused of bribery and corruption in the Office of his Justiceship wherein he feared not treacherously to empty other mens purses to fill his own growing thereby in a short time extraordinary rich in Rents Monies Gold and Silver being instigated thereunto by his wife whereby adeo turpibus per fas et nefas emolumentis inhiabat ut in una sola itinaratione Justiciaria dicebatur plusquam ducentas libratas terrae sibi appropriare Whereupon appellatus est de infidelitate et proditione by Philip de Arci Knight coram Rege et Curia Regis And attached for to answer it John Mansell the Kings Chief Justice profered to bayl him and to be his Manucaptor ut staret Justitiae but he could not be heard the King being so incensed that he answered he would take no Clergy-man for his bayl in such a case reputing it to be HIGH TREASON at last by the Bishop of Londons others mediation intercession he was bayled by 24 Knights and delivered to their custody pro ipso Hen. responsionem justificationem rite et judicialiter statuto termino facturum After which by gifts and large promises he earnestly sollicited his friends to intercede for him with the King â—nd procure his pardon or else if they could not effect it to stand constantly for him in the day of peril armis si necesse sicut et equis communiti which they by unanimous consent promised to doe The King being privily informed thereof majori iracundia accensus omnia munera et verba reconciliationis praecise refutabat jurans quod per medium judicii districti necessario fuerat transiturus Upon this he by intreaties and gifts procured Earl Richard to mediate to the King for him adjungens sub tremendi judicii attestatione quod si Dominus Rex mortem suam imo etiam exhaeredationem procuraret totum regnum in ipsum Regem insurgeret tota perturbaretur quod si fieret cum sub sint aliae causae maxime alienigenarum injustae dominationes Anglorum oppressiones non sedaretur schisma ventilatum The Earl hereupon most effectually interceded for him and the peace of the Realm but could not mitigate the Kings wrath and indignation In March there was a great Parliament held at London where Henry was appointed to appear and answer who came thither guarded with a great multitude of Souldiers of his Wives and his own kinred and friends Whereupon the King being highly incensed he was on every side grievously assaulted and accused by his adversaries and by the King more heavily than the rest imponens eidem inter caetera quod totum regnum perturbavit et Barnagium universum contra ipsum Regem exasperavit unde seditio generalis imminebat Fecit igitur acclamari voce praeconia Londini et in curia ut si quis aliquid habere actionis vel querelae adversus Henricam de Bathonia veniret ad curiam ante Regis praesentiam ubi plene exaudiretur Insurrexerunt igitur multi queruli contra eum ita quod unus etiam sociorum suorum scilicet Justitiarius palam protestaretur quod unum facinerosum convictum incarceratum abirâ— permisit impunitum sine judicio opimis respectus muneribus quod factum est in Regis praejudicium Justitiariorum comitum suorum periculum et discrimen Rex igitur magis inde provocatus ascendit superius exclamavitque dicens Si quis Henricum de Bathonia acciderit quietus sit a morte ejus quietum eum protestor sic propere recessit Rex Et fuerunt ibi multi qui in ipsum Henricum hostiliter irruissent nisi Domini Johannis Mansel prudentia eorum impetum temperans refranasset Dixit enim Domini mei et amici non est necesse quod in iuâ—a praprepere dicitur prosequamur Poenitebit forte
the King wherein he accused Sir William Cogan knight for extorting 300 l. by menaces from the Prior of St. Iohns Sir William appearing upon Summons prayed Counsel which was denied for that it concerned Treason whereupon he pleaded Not Guilty After which the same Parliament n. 46. to 61. The Mayor Baylifs and Commonalty of Cambridge were accused before the King and Lords that in the late insurrection they confederating with other Malefactors did break open the Treasury of the University of Cambridge burn sundry Charters of the University and compel the Chancellor and Scholars under their common Seal to release to the said Mayor and Burgesses all manner of Liberties real and personal actions and also to become bound to them in great sums of money Whereupon special writs were directed to the Mayor Baylifs and Commonalty to appear in Parliament to answer the premises The Mayor and Baylifs appear in person and plead that they 〈◊〉 not privy to any such act but if any thing was done it was by compulsion by others which the Kings learned Counsel disproved whereupon they pleaded Not Guilty The Commonalty appeared by Attorney and delivered in the Release and Bond of the University complained of under their Seal which were ordered to be cancelled After which the Chancellor and Scholars of the University exhibited Articles against the Mayor and Baylifs shewing their whole carriage and discourse in this tumult Upon reading whereof it was demanded of them in the Kings behalf What they could say why their Liberties lately confirmed should not be seised into the Kings hands as forfeited They thereupon required a Copy of the Articles Councel and respite to answer To the Copy of the Bill it was answered by the Lords that seeing they had heard it read it should suffice for by Law they ought to have no Copy For Councel it was said That to such articles if any were wherein Councel was to be had they should have it otherwise not Wherfore they were then appointed to answer to no crime or offence but only to their Liberties To which they answered by their Council That this Court ought not to have any Conusance or Jurisdiction of them for certain causes then alleged But at last they were ordered to say what they could otherwise they would give Iudgement against them as those who had nothing to say Whereupon they pleaded they did nothing but by Duress and constraint of the Rebels At last after many dilatory shifts touching their Liberties they wholly submitted themselves to the Kings mercy and grace saving their answer to other matters The KING therefore by the assent of the Prelates and Lords in Parliament â—o is the Rolâ— seised their Liberties into his hands as forfeited and by assent of the Lords and Prelates in Parliament granted to the Chancellor and Scholars the Assise and correction of bread weights measures and forestallers and fines thereof within the Town and Subâ—rbs of Cambridge which the Townsmen had before The King Lords and Prelates being Judges and giving the Judgement in this case of Commoners as the record a â—ge attests Walsingham relates that in a Parliament holden at London this year about the feast of St. John upon the Petition of the knights of Shires John Straw Captain of those in the insurrection at Bury and Myldenhale tractationi et suspentioni ADJUDICATUR to wit by the King and Lords licet multi putassent eum fuisse pecunia redimendum In the 7. year of R. 2. Rege vocante congregati sunt multi de Nobilibus Regni apud Rading to restrain the seditious motions of John de Northampton late Mayor of London qui ingenia facinora nisus est de quibus et convictus est ibidem his familiar Clerk accusing him both of divers practises and designes projected by him as well to the prejudice of the King as of the whole City of London and objecting them against him When Judgement was to be given against him in the Kings presence he pleaded that such a Judgement ought not to be given against him in the absence of the Duke his Lord whereby he raised a sinister suspition as well in the people AS NOBLES against the Duke of Lancaster The Justice who was to pronounce the Judgement told him He ought to refute his charge by Duel or by the Laws of the Realm to submit himself to drawing hanging and quartering At which when he stood mute and said nothing DECRETVM EST ut perpetuo carceri tradiretur et eâ—us bona regis usibus confisâ—arentur ut Londonias non appropinquaret per centum miliaria in vita sua whereupon he was sent prisoner to Tyntagel Castle in Cornwall and his goods seised on by the Kings Officers In the Parliament of 7 R. 2. holden at Westminster the Monday next before the feast of All Saints num 17. Bryers Cressingham and Iohn Spicâ—worth Esquires were accused before the LORDS for surrendring the Castle of Drinkham in Flanders to the kings enemies for money without consent of the kings Lieutenant Spickworth proved that the same was not in his custody and thereupon he was discharged Cressingham pleaded that he yeelded the same upon necessity without money and submitted himself to the Lords order who thought this no good cause and therefore committed him to prison The same Parliament n. 24 25. Sir William de Elinsham Sir Thomas Trivet Sir Henry de Ferriers and Sir William Farnden knights and Robert Fitz-Ralph Esquire were accused before the Lords in Parliament for selling the Castle of Burburgh with all the arms ammunition and provisions therein to the French the kings enemies for sundry summs of gold received by them of the French without authority from the king or his Lieutenant who pleaded they surrendred it for salvation of themselves and their people c. After all their excuses made they were upon consideration adjudged insufficient by the Lords and the Chancellor by their order pronounced this Judgement against them That they should repay all the monies they received from the Enemy to the King be committed to prison ransomed at the Kings will and moreover that Sir Will. de Farnden being the greatest Offender should be at the Kings mercy both for body and goods to do with them as he pleaseth In this Parliament there was a Duel fought between John Walsh an English Esquire and one of Navarr who accoused him of Treason against the King and Realm effectually but yet falsly out of envy Walsh having layen with his wife whiles he was under Captain of Cherburgh as he afterwards confessed This Dueâ— was fought within the lists in the presence of the King and Nobles of the Realm where this Navarrois being vanquished by Walsh REGALI JVDICIO tractus et suspensus est quanquam Regina et plures alii pro eo preces sedulas porrexissent In the 2. of Parliament of 7 R. 2. n. 13.10 19. John Cavendish a Fishmonger of London praying Surety of the peace
against Sir Michael de la Pool Knight Lord Chancellor of England first before the Commons and afterward before the Lords which was granted Then he accused him BEFORE THE LORDS for bribery and injustice and that he entered into a bond of 10 l. to Iohn Ottard a Clerk to the said Chancellor which he was to give for his good success in the business in part of payment whereof he brought Herring and Sturgeon to Ottard and yet was delayed and could have no justice at the Chancellors hands Upon hearing the cause and examining witnesses upon Oath before THE LORDS the Chancellor was cleared The Chancellor thereupon required reparation for so great a slander the Lords being then troubled with other weighty matters let the Fishmonger to Bail and referred the matter to be ordered by the Judges who upon hearing the whole matter condemned Cavendish in three thousand marks for his slanderous complaint against the said Chancellor and adjudged him to prison till he had paid the same to the Chancellor and made fine and ransom to the King also which the Lords confirmed In the Parliament of 8 R. 2. n. 12. Walter Sybell of London was arrested and brought into the Parliament before the Lords at the sute of Robert de Veer Earl of Oxford for slandering him to the Duke of Lancaster and other Nobles for maintenance Walter denied not but that he said that certain there named recovered against him the said Walter and that by maintenance of the said Earl as he thought The Earl there present protested himself to be innocent and put himself upon the trial Walter thereupon was committed to Prison by the Lords and the next day he submitted himself and desired the Lords to be a mean for him saying he could not accuse him whereupon THE LORDS CONVICTED and FINED HIM FIVE HUNDRED MARKS TO THE SAID EARL for the which and for his fine and ransom to the King he was committed to prison BY THE LORDS A direct case in point By these two last Presidents of the Lords â—ining and imprisoning Cavendish and Syber two Commoners in Parliament for their standers and false accusacions only of two particular Peers and Members of their house it is most apparent the Lords now may most justly not only imprison but likewise fine both Lilburn and Overion for their most scandalous Libels against all the Members just Privileges Judicatory and Authority of the whole House of Peers which they have contemned vilisied oppugned and libelled against in the highest degree and most scurrillously abused reviled in sundry seditious Pamphlets to incite both the Army and whole Commonalty against them In the Parliament of 11 R. 2. the Duke of Glocester and other Lords came to London with great forces to secure themselves and remove the kings ill Counsellors and bring them to judgement whereupon the King for fear securing himself in the Tower of London and refusing to come to them at Westminster contrary to his faithfull promise the day before they sent him this threatning Message nisi venire maturaret juxta condictum quod eligerent alium sibi Regem qui vellet et deberet obtemperare consiliis Dominorum Wherewith being terrified he came unto them the next day Cui dixerunt PROCERES pro honore suo regni commodo oporterâ—â— ut Proditores susurrones adulatores et male fici detractores juratores à suo Palatio et Comitive etiam eliminarentur Whereupon they banished sundry Lords Bishops Clergy-men Knights and Ladies from the Court and imprisoned many other Knights Esquires and Lawyers to answer their offences in Parliament The first man proceeded against in Parliament was the Chief Justice Tresylian whom the Lords presently adjudged to be drawn and hanged The like Iuegement the Lords gave against Sir Nicholas Brambre Knight Sir Iohn Salisbury Sir Iames Burwâ—yes Iohn Beauchamp Iohn Blakes who were all drawn and hanged accordingly as Trayâ—ers one after another and Simon Burly beheaded after them by like judgement notwithstanding the Kings and Earl of Derbies intercessions for him to the Lords After their Execution Robert Belknapâ— John Holâ— Roger Fulthorp and William Burgh Justices were banished by the Lords sentence and their lands and chattels confiscated out of which they allowed them only a small annual pension to sustain their lives After which these Judgments against them were confirmed by Acts of Attainder as you may read in the Statutes at large of 11 R. 2. where their Crimes and Treasons are specified in Cokes 3 Institutes c. 2. p. 22 23. and in Knyghton Holinshed Fabian Speed Trussel with other Historians In the Parliament of 13 R. 2. n. 12. Upon complaint of the Bishop Dean and Chapter of Lincoln against the Mayor and Bayliffs thereof for injustice in keeping them from their rights and rents by reason of the franchises granted them which they abused Writs were sent to the Mayor and Baylifs to appear at a certain day before the Lords and to have full authority from the whole Comonalty to abide their determination therein At which day the Mayor and Bayliffs appearing in proper person for that they brought not full power with them from the said Commonalty they were anâ— goâ— by the Lords to be in contempt and so were the Mayor and Bayliffs of Cambridge for the self same cause this very Parliment n. 14. In the Parliament of 15 R. 2. n. 16. The Prior of Holland in Lancashire complained of a great riot done by Henry Treble John Greenboâ— and sundry others for entring into the Parsonage of Whitwâ—rke in Leicestershire thereupon John de Ellingham Serjeant at Armes by vertue of a Commission to him directed brought the said Treble and Greenbow the principle malefactors into the Parliament before the Lords who upon 〈◊〉 confessed the whole matter and were therefore committed to the Fleaâ— there to remain at the Kings pleasure after which they made a fine in the Chancery agreed with the Prior and found sureties for the Good behaviour whereupon they were dismissed The same Parliament n. 19. Sir Will. Bryan was by the King with the assent of the Lords committed prisoner to the lower during the Kings will and pleasure for purchasing a Bull from Rome to the Archbishops of Canterbury and York to excommunicate all such who had broken up his house and taken away divers Letters Privileges and Charters which Bull was adjudged prejudicial to the King his Councâ—l and in derogation of the Law Num. 20. Thomas Harding was committed to the Fleet by the King and Lords assent there to continue during the Kings pleasure for falsly accusing Sir John and Sir Ralph Sutton as well by mouth as writing of a conspiracy whereof upon hearing they were acquitted And n. 21. John Shadwell of Baghsteed in Sussex was likewise committed to the Fleet by THE LORDS there to remain during the Kings pleasure for misinforming of the Parliament that the Archbishop of Canterbury had excommunicated him and his neighbours wrongfully in his
spiritual Cour◠for a temporal cause belonging to the Crown and Common Law which was adjudged by the Lords upon examination to be untrue To passe by the accusation of Sir Philip Courtney of divers hainous matters oppressions dissensions before the King and Lords in the Parliament of 16 R. 2. n. 6.13 14. of which more anon In the Parliament of 17 R. 2. n. 20 21. John Duke of Lancastre Steward and Thomas Duke of Gloucester Constable of England complained to the King that Sir Thomas Talbot Knight with other his adherents conspired the deaths of the said Dukes in divers parts of Cheshire as the same was confessed and well known and prayed That the Parliament might judge of the fault Whereupon the King and the Lords in Parliament without the Commons adjudged the said fact to be open and High Treason And thereupon they awarded two Writs to the Sherifs of Yorks and of Derby to take the body of the said Sir Thomas retornable in the Kings Bench in the month of Easter next ensuing And open Proclamation was made in Westminster Hall That upon the Sherifs retorn and at the next coming in of the said Sir Thomas he should be convicted of Treason and incurr the loss and pain of the same and that all such who should receive him after the Proclamation should receive the like losse and pain In the Parliament of 20 R. 2. n. 15 16 23. Sir Thomas Haxey Clark was by the King Lords in Parl. adjudged to die as a Traytor and to forfeit all his Lands Goods Chattels Offices and Livings for exhibiting to the House of Commons a scandalous Bill against the King and his Court for moderating the outragious expences of his Court by Bishops and Ladies c. Upon the Bishops intercession the King spared his life and delivered him into the custody of the Archbishop to remain as his Prisoner In the Parliament of 21 R. 2. n. 19 20. Pl. Parl. n. 2. to 15. The Lords Appellants appealed Sir Tho Mortimer Knight of High Treason for raising war against the King accroaching royal power and purposing to surrender his homage and allegiance and depose the King Who flying into the parts of Ireland thereupon the Lords in Parliament assigned him a certain day to come and render himself to the Law or else to be adjudged and proceeded against as a Traytor and Proclamation thereof was made accordingly in England and Ireland to render himself within 3 months And that after that time all his Abettors and Aiders should be reputed for and forfeit as Traytors He not coming at the day The Duke of Lancaster Steward of England by assent of the Lords in Parliament adjudged him a Traytor and that he should forfeit all his Lands in fee and see tayl together with all his Goods and Chattels The like Judgement in like manner was in the same Parliament given against Sir John Cobham Knight for the like Treason Placit Coronaen 16. On the 22 day of March 22 R. 2. n. 27. The King by assent of the Lords adjudged Sir Robert Plesington Knight then dead a Traytor for levying war against him with the Duke of Glocester at Harrengary for which he should lose all his Lands in fee or fee tayl and all his goods And n. 28. Henry Bowht Clerk for being of Counsel with the Duke of Hereford in his device was adjudged by the King and Lords to die and forfeit as a Traytor after which his life was pardoned and he banished In the Parliament of 1 H. 4. n. 79. As the Commons acknowledged that the Iudgements in Parliament had always of right belonged to the King and Lords and not unto the Commons So therein the King and Lords alone without the Commons gave Judgement in sundry cases as Judges in Parliament 1. In Sir Thomas Haxey his case who in his own name presented a Petition in this Parliament a nostre tresedoute seigniour le ROY a LES SEIGNIORS DU PARLIAMENT shewing that in the last Parliament of 21 R. 2. that he delivered a Bill to the Commons of the said Parliament for the honour and profit of the said King and of all the Realm for which Bill at the will of the King he was by the King and Lords adjudged a Traytor and to forfeit all that he had praying that the record of the said Judgement with the dependants thereupon might be vacated and nulled by them in this present Parliament as erronious and that he might be restored to all his degrees farms estate goods chattels ferms pensions lands tenements rents offices advow sons and possessions whatsoever and their appurt and enjoy them to him and his heirs notwithstanding the said Iudgement or any grant made of them by the King The Commons House exhibited a Petition likewise on his behalf to the like effect adding that this judgement given against him for delivering this Bill to the Commons in Parliament was eneontre droit et la course quel avoit estre use devant in Parlement en anientesment des Customs de◠le◠Communes Upon which Petitions Nostre Seignior le ROY de Induis assent des touz les Seigniors esperituelz et temporelz ad ordinez et adjudges que le dit juggement renus vers le dit Thomas in Parlement soit de tout casses revorses repellez et adnullez et tenus pur nul force n'effect et que le dit Thomas soit restitut a ses nom et fame c. nient obstant mesme le juggement 2ly In the case of Judge Rickhill 1 H· 4. n. 92. On the 18 of November the Commons prayed the King that Sir William Rickhill late Just of the Common Bench arrested for a Confession he had taken of the Duke of Gloucester at Calice might be brought to answer for it devant les Seigniors du Parlement whereupon he was brought into Parliament before the Kings presence and all the Lords spiritual and temporal and Commons assembled in Parliament where Sir Walter Clapton Chief Justice of the Kings Bench by the kings command examined the said Sir William how and by what warrant he went to Calice to the said Duke of Glocester and upon what message Who answered that king Richard sent him a special Writ into Kent there recited verbatim commanding him by the faith and allegiance whereby he was obliged to him and under pain of forfeiting all he had to goe unto Caleys And that at Dover he received a Commission from the said king by the hand of the Earl Marshal to confer with the Duke of Glocester and to hear whatsoever he would say or declare unto him and to certifie the king thereof in proper person wherever he should be fully and distinctly under his Seal Whereupon he went thither and took the said Dukes Examination in writing according to the purport of the said Commission a Copy whereof the Duke himself received c Upon the hearing of his answer and defence
every temporal Lord being in full Parliament examined touching the answer of the said Sir William and the matters and evidences which they had examined said severally that the said William had done his message well and legally and that in the person of the said William there was no fault nor evil touching the said message nor any thing that he did to the person of the said Duke Whereupon Walter Clapton Chief Justice of the Kings Bench by command of the king adjudged and declared that the said William should be fully excused and acquitted for ever in time to come touching this matter 3ly The last day of this Parliament it was agreed by the King and Lords that all the remembrances called Raggemans or Blantâ—es Charters lately sealed in the City of London and divers Counties Cities and Burroughs of England should be sent to the City of London and from every County City and Burrough from whence they came and Writs sent to every of them rehearsing That the king held all the resiants and Inhabitants in them for his good and loyal Subjects and that no confession by them made comprised in the said remembrances are nor shall be in derogation of the estate of any such person and that the same remembrances shall be burnt and destroyed in the most open place of the said Counties Cities and Burroughs and if any thing remain of record in any Court or place the king wills that it shall be cancelled and totally adnulled revoked and repealed and held for no record and of no force nor value for time to come 4ly The 19th of November in the said Parliament Placita Coronae coram Domino Rege in Parliamento suo c. Anno regni Regis Henrici quarti post Conquestum primo n. 17. The Commons prayed she King that rhe pursute arrest and judgements made against Sir William le Scropâ— knight Henry Green knight and John Bassy knight might be affirmed and held good Whereupon Sir Richard Scroop humbly prayed the King that nothing which should be done in this Parliament might turn to his or his Childrens dis-inherison Of which Sir Richard it was demanded whether the said pursute arrest and judgements were good or not who answered that he feared not to say and must confesse that when they were made thâ—y were good and profitable for the King and Realm and that his Son was one of them for which he was very sorrowfull Whereupon the king rehearsed that he claimed the Realm and Crown of England with all their members and appurietenances as heir of the bloud by the right line of king Henry the 3d. and although through the right which God had sent him by the aid of his Parents and friends he recovered the said Realm which was at the point to be undone by default of government and defesance of the Laws and customs of the Realm yet it was not his will that any should think that by way of Conquest he would disinherit any man of his heritage franchise or other right which he ought to have nor out any man of that which he had or should have by the good Laws or Customs of the Realm except these who had been against the good purpose and common profit of the Realm of which only the King held the said Sir William Henry and John for such and guilty of all the evil which had come upon the Realm and therefore he would have and hold all the Lands and Tenements they had within the Realm of England or elsewhere by conquest Whereupon fuist demande de touts les Seigniors temporellez lour advys de les pursuite arreste juggem 〈◊〉 suiâ—diâ—z Les queux Seigniors touz de â—ne accorde disorent que mesmes les pursuite arreste juggement quinâ—que fuist fait come defuist dit uist bons et les affirmente Piur bons et profitables 5ly In the case of John Hall 1 H. 4. Placita Coronae n. 11 to 17. who being in custody of the Marshal of Englana was brought by him before the Lords in Parliament and there charged before them by Walter Clapton Lord Chief Justice by the King command with having a hand in the murther of the Duke of Glocester who was smothered to death with a Featherbed at Calues by king Richard the seconds command the whole transaction whereof he confessed at large and put in writing before James Billingford Clerk of the Crown which was read before the Lords upon reading thereof the King and all the temporal Lords in Parliament resolved that the said John Hall by his own confession deserved to have as hard a death as they could adjudge him to because the Duke of Glocester was so high a Person and thereupon toutes les Seigneiors temporelz per assent du Roy adjuggerent all the temporal Lords by assent of the King ADJVDGED that the said Jo. Hall should be drawn from Tower hill unto the Gallows at Tiburn and there bowelled and his bowels laid before him and after he should be hanged beheaded and quartered and his head sent to Calice where the murther was committed and his quarters sent to other places where the king should please and thereupon command was given to the Marshal of England to make execution accordingly and it was so done the same day Lo here the Lords in Parliament gave judgement against a Commoner in case of a murther done at Calice and so not â—riable in the Kings Bench but in Parliament and passe a Judgement of High Treason on him for murthering of a great Peer only In the Parliament of 2 H. 4. rot Parl. n. 23 24. The Commons shewed to the King that William Bagot had been impeached of many horrible deeds and misprisions the which if they had been true the Commons supposed the the King aad ths Lords would have had good notice thereof for that they had made many examinations thereof whiles the said William was in distress And therefore the said Commons prayed the King that the said Sir William being in Flanders and no offence found in his person upon the slanders in his impeachment aforesaid that he would be pleased to restore him to his lands To which prayer was answered in the Kings behalf that although the said Sir William upon the said impeachment made the last Parliament was put to his answer before the King and the Lords and there pleaded a general Charter of pardon against which Charter it seemed to all the Lords then present that the said Sir William ought not to be impeached nor put to answer by the King on his part for that the said Sir William was not attainted of any impeachment suggested against him and that the King had done him justice in this behalf therefore he would in the same manner doe him justice in the residue at the Commons request A most full proof of the Kings and Lords judicial power in Parliaments even in case of a Commoner The same Parliament 2. H. 4. num 29. William
Sautre being condemned of Heresie in the Convocation by Archbishop Arundel and the Clergy thereupon by order and advice of the Temporal Lords without the Prelates who must not have their hands in blood though they gave the Sentence that he should be burned or the Commons there issued out a Writ to the Sherifs of London for the burning of Sautre as an Heretick accordingly burnt thereon being the first writ of this Nature issued by the Lords alone in the Kings name before the Statute of Heresie was made and passed in this Parliament In the same Parliament of 2 H. 4. n. 30. The Temporal Lords by assent of the King adjudged and declared Sir Ralph Lumly Knight and others Traytors for levying war in sundry parts to destroy the K. his people and that they should forfeit all their lands in fee goods and chattels though they were slain in the field not arraigned nor indicted by reason thereof In the Parliament of 4 H. 4. n. 19 20 21. Sir Philip Courtney being complained against and convicted of a forcible entry into Lands and for a forcible imprisonment of the Abbot of Mâ—nthaem in Devonshire and two of his Monks was upon hearing and examination adjudged by the King and Lords to be bound to his good behaviour and for his contempt committed to the Tower of London prisoner Anno 1403. Henry Percy the younger confederating with Thomas Percy Earl of Worcester to raise forces â—nd rebel against the King sent Letters to the people of every County propositum quod assumpserant non esse contra suam ligeantiam et fidelit tem quam regi fecerant nec ab aliunde exercitum congregasse nisi pro salvatione personarum suarum reipublicae meliori guvernatione Quia census et Tallagia Regi concessa pro salva regni custodia covertebantur ut dixerunt in usus indebitos et inutiliter consumebantur praeterea querebantur quod propter aemulorum dilationes pessimas rex eis insensus fuerat ut non auderent personaliter venire ad ejus praesentiaem donec Praelati regnique Barones regi supplicassent pro eisdem ut coram Rege permitterentur declarare suam innocentiam per Pares suos legaliter justificari Plures igitur visis his literis collaudabant tantum virorum solertiam extollebant fidem quam erga Rempublicam praetendebant Having raised great forces against the King by this means which the kings forces encountred at Shrewsbury in a pitched battel Henry Percy and sundry of his adherents were there slain in the field and the rest routed For which levying of war in the Parliament of of 5 H. 4. n. 15. the said Henry Percy and his Coâ—federaâ—es were declared and adjudged Traytors by the King and Lords in full Parliament and their Lands goods and chaâ—tels confiscated In the same Parliament n. 18. At the Petition of the Commons The Lords â—enâ—ed and ordered that the Kings Confessor the Abbot of Dore Mr Richard Durham and Crosby of the Chamber should be removed out of the Kings house and Court whereupon 3. of them appearing before the King and Lords in Parliament the King though he excused them yet charged them to depart from his house for that they were hated of the people In the Parliament of 13 H. 4. n. 12 13. The Lord Roos complained against Robert Thirwit one of the Justices of the Kings Bench for withholding from him and his Tenants Common of Pasture and Turbâ—ry in Warbie in Lincolnshire and lying in wait with 500 men for the Lord Roos Thirwit before the King and Lords confessed his fault and submitted himself to their Order who appointed 3. Lords to end the difference who made an award between them that Thirwit shouâ—d confess his fault to the Lord Roos crave his pardon and tender him amends In the Parliament of 5 H. 5. n. 11. Sir John Oldcastle knight being outlawed of Treason in the Kings bench and excommunicated before the Archbishop of Canterbury for Heresie was brought before THE LORDS and having heard his conviction made no answer nor excuse thereto Upon which Record and Process THE LORDS ADJUDGED that he should be taken as a Traytor to the King and Realm carried to the Tower of London from thence drawn through the City to the new Gallows in St. Gyles without Temple-barr and there hanged and burned hanging which was accordingly executed Sir Iohn Mortymer knight being committed to the Tower upon supposition of Treason done against King Henry the 5. in the 1. year of H. 6. brake out of the Tower for which breach he was indicted of Treason being afterwards apprehended he was brought into the Parliament of 2 H. 6. n. 18. and upon the same Indictment then confirmed by assent of Parliament JUDGEMENT was given against him BY THE LORDS that he should be carried to the Tower drawn through London to Tiburn there to be hanged drawn and quartered his head to be set on London-bridge and his four quarters on the four Gates of London In the Parliament of 38 H. 6. n. 20 2â— 22. Sir William Oldham knight and Thomas Vaughan Esquire were attainted of Treason by the LORDS and in the Parliaments of 1 E. 4. n. 19. to 31. 4 E. 4. n. 28. to 38. â—4 E. 4. n. 34. to 40. sundry Knights Esquires Citizens and Commoners are attainted of Treason by the Lords for levying warr and holding forts against the King then after by Bill whose names are overtedious to reherse which you may peruse at leisure in the Exact Abridgement of the Records in the Tower To omit all other presidents of this Nature in the reigns of King H. 7.8 Ed. 6. Qu. Mary and Qu. Elizabeth of Commoners censured in and by the Lords house in Criminal causes upon impeachments complaints petitions which those who please may find recorded in the Journals of the Lords house I shall recite only some few Presidents more of late and present times In the Parliaments of 18. 21 Iacobi Sir Giles Mompesson and Sir Iohn Michel upon complaints and impeachments by the Commons for promoting Monopoliâ—s Corruption and other Misdemeanors were fined imprisoned by Judgement of the Lords House and Sir Giles degraded of his knighthood In the Parliament of 3. Carolâ— the Commons impeached Roger Manwaring Dr. of Divinity for preaching and printing Seditious and dangerous Sermons and sent up this Declaration against him to the Lords June 14. 1628. For the more effectual prevention of the apparent ruine and destruction of this kingdom which must necessarily ensue if the good and fundamental Laws and customs therein established should be brought into contempt and violated and that form of government thereby altered by which it hath been so long maintained in peace and happiness And to the honour of our Soveraign Lord the King and for the preservation of his Crown and Dignity the Commons in this present Parliament assembled do by this their Bill shew and
informed of divers oppressions and injuries done to sundry people of his Realm by divers of his Officers and Ministers and likewise by some of his Counsellors by reason of his tender age to his damage and dishonour which things he would not suffer and desired to redresse that thereupon any persons which would complain of any oppressions durances and grievances done to them against right and the Laws and Usages of this Realm should repair to Westminster the next Parliament and there shew their plaints to him and such as he should appoint where they should receive convenient speedy remedy Then follows this Clause And because before these times some of the Knights who have come to Parliament for the Commnalties of Counties have been people of covyne and maintainers of false quarrels and have not suffered that good men should declare the grievances of the Common people nor their things which ought to have been redressed in Parliament to the great damage of us and our people We command and charge you that you cause to be chosen by the common assent of the County two of the most loyal or lawfull and most sufficient Knights or Sergeants of the said County who are not at all suspected of any crime nor common maintainers of Parties to be at the said Parliament according to the form of our Writ which you have received And this you may not fail to doe as you will eschew our grievous indignation Here the King by a special Writ takes care to prevent the election of Knights of Shires that were any way guilty of crime or maintenance as in former times had been used and that the loyallesâ— and most sufficient Knights or Esquires in the County should be elected by common consent because when once duly chosen and returned by the Counties as their lawfull Proxies and Attornies and impowred by them as such neither the King nor Lords could justly seclude or eject them much less the Commons House as they have ejected Projectors other Members of late times having no such authority given them by their Writs or retâ—rns but only to assent to such things as by the Common advice of the King Lords and Commons shall be there agreed concerning the King Church and Realm and being all of equal rank and power as Attornie Proctors for the Counties Cities and Burroughs for which they serve can no more discharge or eject one another than one Attorny Proctor Grand Jury-man Juror Justice of Peace Judge Commissioner or Executor discharge or remove another of his Colleagues equally impowred intrusted with them by the parties they represent To omit the summoning of sundry Merchants to attend the Parliament and Council to be advised and treated with upon sundry occasions in the Clause Rolls of 11 12 13 14. and 16 Edw. 3. Claus 26 E. 3. m. 14. dors there is a Parliamentary Council summoned to wit two Knights are by the Writ to be chosen and sent out of every Counry and but one Burgess out of every Burrough Claus 27 E. 3. m. 12. dorso Summonitio Concilii the Writ commands only one Knight to be chosen and sent out of every County but 2 Citizens and Burgesses out of every City and Burrough And the Prologue of the printed Statute of the Staple made therein 27 Ed. 3. recites that there was in it only of every County one Knight for all the County according to the limitation in the Writ Claus 45 E. 3. m. 29. The Parliament having granted a Subsidy to the King payable out of every parish and then departing the King for the better and speedier levying thereof desired the advice of the Commons yet would not put them to the trouble to meet all together And therefore issued out Writs to summon one Knight out of every County and one Citizen and Burgess out of every City Borough that had been of the former Parliament to meet together at Winchester Who meeting accordingly had their expences allowed them Dors 22. Here the King summons only half the Commons House to compleat what the whole had granted without the other moity for their greater ease and saving expences In the Parliament of 46 E. 6. n. 13 14. There was this Ordinance made and read Because that men of Law which pursue divers businesses in the Court of the Kings for particular persons with whom they are of Counsel procure and make divers Petitions to be preferred in Parliament in the name of the Commons which nothing concern them but only those singular persons or those whom they cause to put them in as also Sherifs which are common Officers to the people and ought to reside upon their Office to doe right to every man are named and have been before thâ—se hours retorned Knights of Shires in Parliaments by the same Sherifs It is agreed and assented in this Parliament that from henceforth no man of Law pursuing businesses in the Courts of the King nor Sherif for the time that he is Sherif shall be returned or accepted Knights of Shires and that those who are men of Law and Sherifs now returned to Parliament shall have no wages But THE KING WILL that Knights and SERJEANTS of the best esteem in the Country shall be henceforth returned Knights in Parliament and that they shall be chosen in full County Sir Edward Cook inform us That this Ordinance was made in the Lords house to wit by the King and Lords without the Commons as he insinuates If so then the K. Lords alone in that age had the sole power 1. of disabling secluding unfitting Members as practising Lawyers and Sherifs to be elected knights of Shires for the future 2ly of depriving them of wages though elected for that Parliament before the Ordinance made but not of ejecting them out of the House when duly elected because till now there was no Law or Ordinance against their choice 3ly Of rejecting and refusing to accept such for knights if elected and returned after this Ordinance as the words no accepted chivalers des Countees superadded too ne â—oient returnez imply 4ly By vertue of this Ordiâ—ance all Sherifs of Counties have been not only disabled but prohibited to be elected knights Members of the Commons House by this special Clause inserted into all writs for elections Nolumus autem quod tu vel aliquis alius Vicecomes ALIQUALITER SIT ELECTUS Now the Writ being the sole authority and ground for all elections prescribing the Freeholders to elect 2 of the most discreet fit sufficient persons and precisely inhibiting the election of any Sherifs in any sort either for Knights Citizens or Burgesses by vertue of this Ordinance The elections of such are meerly void and the King and Lords may justly seclude them if eâ—ected and retorned whiles Sherifs 5ly As Sherifs have been secluded by this Clause and Ordinance ever since so in the Parliament of 6 H. 4. All Apprentices and other men at Law were likewise secluded by this
4. n. 19 20 21. upon these and other Petitions of forcible disseisins and for imprisoning the Abbot of Meniham in Devonshire THE KING LORDS adjudged that this Sir Philip Courtney should be bound to his good behaviour and committed to the Tower for his contempt From which records it is evident First that Members of the Commons house may be complained and petitioned against for misdemeanors and put to answer before the King and Lords in Parliament and there fined and judged not before the Commons house and that this was the antient way of proceeding Secondly that the Commons cannot suspend or discharge any of their fellow-Commoners or Knights from sitting in Parliament but only the King and Lords in full Parliament in whom the power of Judicature rests much less then can they expell or eject any of their Members by their own authority without the King and Lords concurrent consents No more than one Justice of peace Committee-man or Militia-man can un-un-Justice or â—move another since Par in parem non habet Imperium neither in civil military ecclesiastical nor domestical affaiâ— Thirdly that the power of restoring readmitting aâ—ended Member of the Commons house belongs not to the Commons themselves but to the King and Lords to whom the Commons in this case addressed themselves by petition for Courtneys readmission after his submission of the complaints against him to the arbitrement of those Members to whom the King and Lords referred the same In the Parliament of 17 Rich. 2. num 23. It was accorded and resolved by the King and Lords at the Complaint petition request of the Commons that Roger Swinerton who was endited of the death of one of their companions Iohn de Ipstones Knight of the said Parliament for the County of Stafford slain in coming towards the said Parliament by the said Roger should not be delivered out of prison wherein he was detained for this cause by bail mainprise or any other manner until he had made answer thereunto and should be delivered by the Law The Commons alone by their own power having no authority to make such an order even for the murther of one of their own Members without the King and Lords who made this ordinance at their request I find this objected against King Richard the 2. in the Parliament of 1 H. 4. n. 37. That he frequently sent his Mandates to Sherifs to return certain persons named only by himself and not freely chosen by the people to be knights of Shires thereby to effect his own ends and oppress the people with Subsidies But yet I find not in all his reign any one Knight thus unduly returned questioned by the Commons or suspended the House much less ejected by them or by the King and Lords upon the Commons complaint thereof unto them A clear evidence they had then no such power to eject their Members for being unduly elected returned as how they use In the Parliament of 20 R. 2. n. 14 15 16 17. The King being highly offended with the Commons for receiving Haxyes Bill said that the Commons thereby had committed an offence against him his dignity and liberty the which he willed THE LORDS to declare the next day to the Commons Who thereupon delivering up the Bill came fort with before the King shewing themselves very sorrowfull declaring to him that they meant no harm and submitting themselves to the King herein most humbly craved his pardon Whereupon the Chancellor by the Kings commandment declared That the King held them excused and the King by mouth declared how many wayes they were bound unto him Lo here the whole House of Commons submit themselves to the King in the House of Lords as Judges of them and their misdemeanors in Parliament and crave pardon for offending him In the Parliament of 2 H. 4. n. 45 46. The Commons house petitioning the King that the Act for his moderation of the Statute against Provisions might be examined for as much as the time was recorded otherwise than was agreed by them The King granted thereunto by protestation that the same should be no example where after Examination by the Bishops and Lords they affirmed the same to be duly entred which the King also remembred Whereupon the COMMONS the same day for this their misinformation came into the Lords House and knéeling before the King beseeched the King to pardon them if happily they through ignorance had or should offend him which the King granted Here the Bishops and Lords are Judges of the Commons misinformation misentry of an Act and the King of their Offence against him in Parliament by this misinformation which he pardons them upon their humble submission and no doubt might have punished them for it by the Lords assent and advice had he pleased So farr are they from being Judges in Parliament that themselves may there be judged if they therein offend as all their Speakers usual protestations and petitions to the King when presented evidence That the Commons may have liberty of speech and that if any Members in the House of Commons in communication and reasoning should speak more largely than of duty they ought to doe that all such offences may be pardoned which the King may punish if there be cause unâ—eâ—â—â— he pardon it of record upon the Speakers Protestation before hand Sir Edward Cook himself as well as the Parliament Rolls and experience informs us of these particulars touching the Speakers of the Commons House in Parliament their chiefest Member 1. That though the Commons are to chuse their own Speaker and that by the kings special command and license to them in every Parliament since they had one not with due â— who likewise prescribes them the time when to present him yet the use is as in the Conge de eslâ—yer of a Bishop that the king doth name a discreet and learned man to them whom the Commons do eâ—ect pro formâ— only because he cannot be appointed for them without their election being their mouth and â—usted by them 2ly That after the Commons choice the King may refuse him 3ly That after he is chosen he must be presented to the king by the Commons in the Lordâ— House for his approbation and confirmation in that plaâ—s the Commons sending up some of their Members to acquaint the Lords Spiritual and Temporal that according to the Kings command they had chosen such a one their Speaker and are ready to present him at the â—me appointed 4ly That where he is thus presented he is in disable himself for so weighty a service and to make sutâ— to the King to be discharged and a more sufficient man chosen in his place To which I shall adde that upon this excuse the king may discharge him if he please and command the Commons to elect another as King Henry the â— did discharge Sir John Popham when presented Speaker to him by the Commons in the Parliament
upon him nor condemn him but by the lawfull judgement of his Peers or by the Law of the Land Whence thus they argue The Lords in Parliament are not Commoners Peers but the Commons only therefore they cannot be judged in Parliament by the Lords but by the Commons alone and if Peers there judge Commoners it is a tyranny and usurpation even against Magna Charta it self though it be in case of privilege To take away this grand seeming Objection and give it a satisfactory answer I say First in general that there is scarce one Parliament ever since Magna Charta was first confirmed but the Lords have sentenced and given Judgement against some Commoners capitally or penally in body purse or both without the Commons and did so doubtlesse before Magna Charta was made as I have already manifested yet never did the Commons in any one of those Parliaments till this present complain of it as a violation of Magna Charta or a tyrannical usurpation as Lilburn and Overton stile it but acknowledged ir as a just right in the Lords even in 3 Caroli it self when the Petition of Right was passed in the Lords Judgement and Sentence against Dr Manwaring a Commoner impeached by the Commons in Parliament And therfore for this Ignoramus alone against the judgment of the Commons in Parl. in all ages to averr this a breach of Magna Charta for imprisoning and sining him for the highest affront and breach of privilege ever offered to any Parl. is the extremity of ignorance malice singularity Secondly I answer That the Statute of Magna Charta extendeth not to nor was ever intended of the high Court of Parliaments Judgements Proceedings but only to and of the Proceedings Judgements in the Kings great Courts of Justice at Westminster Hall the Exchequer his Privy Council and other inferior Courts held before Judges Justices of Assise and other Officers as is evident by comparing this objected Chapter with c. 11 12 13 14 18 28 30 34 37. by the Statutes of 25 E. 3. Stat. 5. c. 4. 28 E. 3. c. 3. 37 E. 3. c. 18. 38 E. 3. c. 9. 42 E. 3. c. 2. 17 R. 2. c. 6. and the Petition of Right it self 3. Caroli which so expound it there being never any complaint against the Parliament it self or House of Peers in any age for breach of Magna Charta in censuring or imprisoning Commoners till now Therefore this misapplying of this Law to the Parl. and House of Peers is a gross oversight Thirdly the very literal sence of this Law is much mistaken by the Objectors The main scope whereof is this That no man should be deprived of his Freehold Liberties Limbs life or outlawed exiled or otherwise destroyed without legal process in due form of Law in Courts of Justice not by meer force violence injustice arbitrary and tyrannical power or martial Law nor being brought to his legal trial or answer And that none should pass upon them in any trials for freehold or life but only English Freemen Now in respect of Freedom any every Freeman of England is a Peer to another Freeman quatenus such a one within this Law though of an higher degree in point of honour dignity office estate as Knights Esquires Gentlemen Yeomen Citizens Merchants these as Freemen are all Peers one to another and may pass upon each other in Juries both in civil and criminal causes and this clause No Freemâ—n shall be imprisoned c. but by the lawfull judgement of his Peers extends only to villains and those who are not Freeholders from being Iudges of Freemen and Freeholders in trials by Jury whence the Writs to the Sherifs to summon Jurors require them alwayes to return Liberos Legales homines not to exclude Lords or Peers who are Freemen in the highest degree to be Judges of Commoners who are Freemen So as the Argument from the true meaning of this Law can be but this in respect of the persons quality who are to give judgement Villains and those who are no Freemen are not to be Judges of or impannelled in Juries to condemn Freemen because they are not their Peers nor Freemen as well as they Therefore Lords who are Freemen of the highest degree may not give judgement against Commoners who are Freemen Very learned nonsence We all know that the Lord Chancellor of England Lord Keeper Lord Treasurer Master of the Court of Wards and some of the Judges of the Kings Courts in Westminster Hall in former times with the Chief Justiciar and Justices in Eyre were antiently and of late too as the Earl of Holland and others Peers of the Realm not Commoners and that all the Peers of the Realm are in Commissions of Oyer and Terminer and of the Peace yet did we never hear of any Commoner demurring or pleading thus to any of their Jurisdictions in Chancery Kings Bench the Exchequer Chamber Eyres Assises or Sessions Sir I am a Commoner and you are a Peer of the Realm but no Commoner as I am besides you sit here only in the Kings right doing all in his name and representing his person who is not my Peer but Sovereign Therefore you ought not to judge my cause condemn my person nor give any sentence for or against me it being contrary to Magna Charta which enacts That no freeman should be judged or passed upon or condemned but by the lawfull judgement of his Peers Certainly no person was ever yet so mad or sottish to make such a Plea before Ignoramus Lilburn And if Lords Peers may judge the persons causes of Commoners in the Chancery Kings Bench Exchequer Court of Wards Eyres and at Assises Sessions without any violation of this clause in Magna Charta though they are exempted to be impannelled or serve in Juries in cases of Commoners as Commoners in Juries to try them much more may the House of Peers in Parliament doe it who are certainly Peers to Commoners as Freemen though Commoners be not Peers to them as Lords within the meaning of Magna Charta chap. 29. Fourthly If the Lords in Parliament cannot meddle with or give judgement in Commoners causes without breach of this clause in Magna Charta then why did Lilburn himself sue and petition to the Lords as the only competent Judges to reverse his sentence in Star Chamber and give him damages because it was against this very Chapter of Magna Charta If Lords cannot give judgement in the case of Commoners as now he holds without express violation of this Law then himself in petitioning the Lords to relieve him against the Star-Chamber sentence because contrary to this very Law and Chapter of Magna Charta was a great a violator of it as his Star-Chamber censurers and his sentence in Star-chamber remains still unreversed because the Lords examining reversing of it they being no Commoners as he is but Peers was Coram non judice and meerly void by the Statute of 25 E.
the Prior of Coventry the King granteth by Assent of the Bishops and Lords that no man do break the head of their Conduit nor cast any filth into their water called Sherbouâ—n on pain of ten pound and treble dammages to the Prior. In the Parliament of 9. H. 5. n. 12. Upon long debates of the Lords and Iustices it was resolved by them that the Abbot of Ramsy should have no prohibition against Walter Cook parson of Somersham who sued for Tithes of a Meadow called Crowland Mead in the hands of the Abbots Tenants In the great case of Precedency between the Earl Marshall and Earle of Warwick in the Parliament of 3. H. 6. n. 10 11. c. The Lords being to bee Iudges of the same suspended both of them from sitting in the house till their case was fully heard and they all voluntarily swore on the Gospel that they would uprightly judge the case leaving all affection In the Parliament of 11. H. 6. n. 32 33 34 35. Upon a Petition the King and Lords in Parliament adjudged the Dignity Seigniory Earledome of Arundel and the Castle and Lands thereunto belonging to John Earle of Arundel who proved his Title thereto by a deed of Entayle against the Title of John Duke of Norfolck who layed claim thereunto And in the Parliament of 39 H. 6. n. 10. to 33. The claime of the Duke of York and his Title to the Crown of England against the Title of King Henry the 6 th was exhibited to the Lords in full Parliament the Lords upon consultation willed it to be read amongst them but not to bee answered without the King The Lords upon long consultation declared this Title to the King who willed them to call his Justices Sergeants and Attorney to answer the same Who being called accordingly utterly refused to answer the same Order thereupon was taken That every Lord might therein freely utter his conceit without any impeachment to him In the end there were five objections made against the Dukes Title who put in an answer to every of them which done the Lords upon debate made this order and agreement between the King and Duke That the King should injoy the Crown of England during his life and the Duke and his heirs to succeed after him That the Duke and his two sons should bee sworne by no means to shorten the dayes or impaire the preheminence of the King during his life That the said Duke from thenceforth shall be reputed and stiled to bee the very Heir apparent to the Crown and shall injoy the same after the death or resignation of the said King That the said Duke shall have hereditaments allotted to him and his sons of the annual value of ten thousand marks That the compassing of the death of the said Duke shall bee Treason That all the Bishops and Lords in full Parliament shall swear to the Duke and to his heirs in forme aforesaid That the said Duke and his two sons shall swear to defend the Lords for this agreement The King by Assent of the Lords without the Commons agreeth to all the Ordinances and accords aforesaid and by the Assent of the Lords utterly repealeth the statute of intayle of the Crown made in 1. H. 4. so alwaies as hereafter there be no better Title proved for the defeating of their Title and this agreement by the King After all which the said Duke and the two Earles his sonnes came into the Parliament Chamber before the King and LORDS and sware to performe the award aforesaid with protestation if the King for his part duly observed the same the which the King promised to do All which was inrolled in the Parliament Rolls Lo here the Lords alone without the Commons judge and make an award between King Henry the 6th and the Duke of York in the highest point of right and title that could come in question before them even the right and title to the Crown of England then controverted and decided the King and Duke both submitting and assenting to their award and promising swearing mutually to perform it which award when made was confirmed by an Act passed that Parliament to which the Commons assented as they did to other Acts and Bills And here I cannot but take special notice of Gods admirable Providence and retaliating Justice in the translation of the Crown of England from one head family of the royal blood to another by blood force war treason and countenance of the Authority of the temporal and spiritual LORDS and COMMONS in Parliament in the two most signal presidents of King Edward and King Richard the 2 d. which some insist on to prove the Commons Copartnership with the Lords in the power of Judicature in our Parliaments the Histories of whose Resignations of their Regal Authority and subsequent depositions by Parliament I shall truly relate Anno 1326. the 19. of Ed. 2d Queen Isabel returning with her Son Prince Edward and some armed forces from beyond the Seas into England most of the Earles and Barons out of hatred to the Spencers and Kingâ— repaired to them and made up a very great army The King thereupon proclaimed that every man should resist oppose kill them except the Queen Prince and Earle of Kent which they should take prisoners if they could and neither hold any correspondency with them nor administer victuals nor any other assistance to them under pain of forfeiting their bodies estates But they prevailing and the King being deserted by most hee fled into Wales for shelter Whereupon Proclamation was made in the Queens army every day that the King should return and receive his Kingdome again if hee would conforme himself to his Leiges Quo non comparente Magnasâ—es Regni Hereâ—ordiae Concilium injeâ—unt in quo filius Regis Edwardus factus est Cusâ—os Angliae communi Decreto cui cuncti tanquam Regni custodi fidelitatem fecerunt per fidei sacramentum Deinde Episcopum Norwicensem fecerunt Cancellarium Episcopum vero Wintoniensem regni Thesaururium statuerunt Soon after the King himself with most of his evil Counsellors were taken prisoners being betrayed by the Welch in whom they most confided Hagh Spencer Simon Reding Baldoik and others of the Kings party being executed at Hereford Anno 1327. the King came to London about the feast of Epiphany where they were received with great joy and presents Then they held a Parliament wherein they all agreed the King was unworthy of the Crown and fit to be deposed for which end there were certain Articles drawn up against him which Adam de Orleton Bishop of Winchester thus relates in his Apology i Ea autem quae de Consilio et assensu omnium Praelatorum Comitum et Baronum et totius Communitatis dicti Regni concordata ordinata fuerunt contra dictum regem ad amotionem suam a regimine regni contenta sunt in instrumentis publicis Reverendo patre domino J. Dei
these 2. deposed Kings these 2. inferences have been made 1. That the Commons have a joynt interest with the Lords in the Judicature and Jugements in Parliament 2. That the Proceedings against our late condemned beheaded King are justifiable and warranted by them I answer that neiâ—her of these 2. Consequences are proved by them For 1. The Commons themselves in this Parliament of 1 H. 4. n. 79. immediately after King Râ—chards deposition confess That the Judicature and Judgements of Parliament belong only to the King and Lords not to the Commons 2ly The Commons neither in nor out of Parliament are may or ought to be the Judges of the meanest Lord or Peer of the Realm who are to be judged tried by their Peers alone as I have abundantly evidenced in the premises Much less then can they be lawful Judges of their Soveraign Lord and King who is a degree above all the Peers of highest dignity In the Parliament An 1260. Prince Edward as I have proved before would be tried only by 2. Kings because all the rest of the Earls and Barons were not his Peers neither could they be his Judges much less then can Peers or Commons be their Kings Judges Peers to ondemn or try him 3ly Our Law-books resolve That the King hath no Peers in his own Realm and Therefore he can neither be legally tried nor judged by the Peers themselves much less by the Commons in Parliament 4ly The Lawes of Hoel Dha King of Wales about the year 940. Lex 20. resolve Rex non poterit secundum legem in lite stare coram Judice suo agendo vel respondendo per dignitatem naturalem yea all the Lords and Commons of England in the Parliament of Lincoln Anno 29. E. 1. in their forecited Letter to the Pope p. 128. resolve That the Kings of England Ex praeeminentia status suae Regiae dignitatis ex consuetudine cunctis temporibus observata neque responderunt neque respondere debebant coram aliquo Iudice Ecclesiastico vel seculari supâ—r juribus suis in regno c. Much less then may or ought they to be put to answer criminally for their lives or Crowns before any Ecclesiastical or Temporal Judge Peers or Commons House or High Court of COMMONS 5ly The Statutes of 16 R. 2. c. 5. and of 25 H. 8. c. 19.21 thus declare resolve and the Archbishop of Canterbury in the Parliament of 16 R. 2. n. 20. protested against the Popes pretended Supremacy That the Crown of England hath been so free at all times that it hath been in subjection to no Realm or Person but immediatly subject to God and to none other in all things touching the Regality of the said Crown And the Statutes of 25 H. 8. c. 19 21 22. 26 H. 8 c. 1.3 27 H. 8. c. 15. 28 H. 8. c. 7.10 31 H. 8. c. 10.15 32 H. 8. c. 22.24 26. 33 H. 8. c. 29. 35 H. 8. c. 1.3.17 19. 37 H. 8. c. 17. 1 E. 6. c. 2. 1 Eliz. c. 1. 8 Eliz. c. 1. 3 Jac. c. 3 4. declare and enact The King to be the only Supreme Head Governor upon Earth both of the Church Realm of Engl. both of which recognize no Super or under God but only the King To affirm then that the Lords or Commons in Parliament may lawfully judge depose the King and deprive him of his Crown Regalities Head Life is to contradict repeal all these Statutes since the inferior Members can no more legally judge the Supreme head of the body politick than the head of the body natural or the Courrs in Westminster hall or Hundred Courts judge the High Court of Parliament and condemn repeal their Acts or Judgements 6ly Though Articles were drawn up against these two Kings pro forma yet neither of them was ever required or judicially summoned to make answer to them or heard or brought to trial before the Lords or Commons Barr or any other Tribunal or Court of Justice Whence the Bishop of Carlisle protested against it as most illegal unjust and trayterous Therefore neither the Lords nor Commons could be properly said their Iudges in this case and their Judgement without hearing or trial of them must needs be most erronious as well as Mortimers and the Earl of Arundels forecited 7ly The Lords and Commons resignation of their Homage to these 2. Kings when deposed shew that even then they esteâ—med them their Superiors Lords Homage being the most honourable and humble service that a franktenant may do to his Lord the tenant being ungirt his head uncovered kneeling down on both his knees before his Lord sitting covered and holding up his hands joyntly together between his Lords and the Kings hands when he doth his homage saying I become your man from this day forward of limb and of earthly worship and unto you shall be true and faithfull and bear faith for the tenements I hold of you And when done to any other Lord it is with a Saving the faith I owe unto our Soveraign Lord the King and his Heirs 8ly The Sentences of Deposition against them were given only by the Legislative power not JUDICIAL by way of Bill consented unto in the Parliament house by the Lords and Commons then sent to these Kings to their prisons and there read unto them by Committees and Proxies representing all the Estates in Parliament Therefore the reading of them to these Kings in their prisons was not properly a judgement neither did it constitute them who read it to them their Judges much less create the Commons Judges of these Kings 9ly All the Lords Spiritual Temporal and Commons concurred joyntly in this Act of resigning their Homage to these Kings to whom they were all joyntly obliged and in whom they had all a common interest Et quod tangit omnes ab omnibus debet approbari Therefore it is no warrant for the proceedings against our late King without the consents and against the Express Votes of the whole House of Lords and of the Majority of the Commons house 10ly The Lords alone without the Commons gave Judgement for the close and perpetual imprisonment of King Richard the 2. therefore they were his sole and proper Judges by way of Sentence his deposition being by the Legislative not Judicial power 11ly These Kings especially the later of them had no sentence of deposition nor proceedings against them til they had through fear or pusillanimity first resigned their Crowns and kingship as unfit to reign or govern any longer which was made the principal ground of their subsequent declaratory depositions by the Lords and Commons when they had reduced themselves into the condition of private men by their resignations These presidents therefore cannot justifie the late proceedings against an actual lawful hereditary King by a small party of the Commons house alone without the House of Peers or the Majority of their fellow-Members who never resigned his
Gulielmus Nubrigensis relates Qâ—cunque Rege tyrannice occiderat eo ipso personam et potestatem Regiam induens suo quoque occisori tandem post modicum fortunam inveteratae consuetudinis lege relicturus Quippe ut dicitur à centum retrò annis et eo amplius cum Regum ibidem numerosa successio fuerit Nullus eorum senio aut morbo vitam finivit fed omnes ferro interiere suis interfectoribus tanquam legitimis successoribus regni fastigium relinquentes ut scilicet omnes qui tanto tempore ibidem imperasse noscuntur illud quod Scriptum est respicere videatur OCCIDISTI INSUPER ET POS SEDISTI Wherefore to prevent the dangerous Consequences of these false Glosses on the Statutes of 25 E. 3. c. 2. 11 H. 7. c. 1. I shall lay down these infallible grounds 1. That all publike Laws are and ought to be founded in Justice righteousnes and common honesty for the preserving securing the lives persons estates of all men especially of lawful Kings and Supreme Magistrates from all violence invasion force disseisins usurpations conspiracies assassinations being against all rules of Law and Justice Exod. 20.12 to 18. c. 21 22. 23. Mat. 5.17 to 48. c. 7. 12. Deut. 4.18 Psal 19.8.9 Ps 119.7.106 137 138·160 167. Rom. 7.12 Deut. 6.25 Ps 33.5 Ps 45.7 Ps 72.2 Ps 74.15 Prov. 8.18 Prov. 24.21 Rom. 13.1 to 7. Lu. 20.25 Tit. 3.1 2 3. 1 Tim 1.9 10. Job 20.19 c. 24.2 Mich. 2.1 2 3 4. Jer. 6.7 c. 20.8 c. 22.3.17 Ezech. 45. c. Hab. 1 2. to 10. Lu. 3.14 Whence Cicero thus defines Law Lex est ratio summa insita in natura quae jubet ea justa quae facienda sunt prohibe que contraria Therefore these 2. Statutes were purposely made for those great ends and ought to be interpreted onely for the best advantage of Lawfull Kings and their adherents not for the indemnity impunity encouragement of Traytors Rebels Intruders Usurpers 2ly What Tully writes of the Roman Senators we ought to doe the same of our English Parliaments and Legislators Ea virtute et sapientia majores nostri fuerunt ut legibus scribendis nihil sibi aliud quam salutem atque utilitatem reipublicae proponerent Whence he there inferrs A Legibus nihil convenit arbitrari nisi quod reipublicae conducat proficisci quoniam ejus causa sunt comparatae Therefore these Laws are to be interpreted for the best security safety preservation of the lawfull heads of the Commonwealth and their rightfull heirs and loyal dutifull subjects not for their destruction and the indemnity security of Usurpers Traytors Rebels aspiring after their Crowns Thrones Assassinations to the publike ruine 3ly All the branches of the Statute of 25 E. 3. c. 2. made at the special request of the Lords and Commons and that by a lawful King at that season declare this Statute to be meant only of a lawful King whiles living whether in or out of actual possession of the Realm not of a bare Usurper in possession without right as Sir Edward Cooke expounds it else it will necessarily follow That it shall be no Treason at all to compasse or imagine the death of the King de jure if once dispossessed for a time by Violence and Treason or of his Queen or eldest son and heir or to violate his Queen or eldest daughter not married or to levy war against the lawfull King in his Realm or to be adherent to his Enemies within the Realm or elsewhere or to counterfeit his Great or Privy Seal or mony c. But high Treason in all these particulars in relation only to the Vsurper in possession without and against all right and Title which would put all our rightful Kings and Supreme Governors into a farr worser sadder condition than their Trayterous Vsurpers and into a worse plight than every Disseisee or lawfull heir intruded upon by abatement or dispossessed by torcions unjust or forcible entries for which our Common and Statute Laws have provided many speedy and effectual means of recovering their possessions and Damages too against Disseisorâ— Abators Intruders on their Inheritances Freeholds for exemplary punishment fining imprisonment of the Disseisors Abaters but no means of recovery at all for our dishinherited disposseâ—ed Kings or their heirs against Intruders Vsurpers of their Crowns nor punishments against them their Confederates or Adherents if our Laws concerning Treasons extend not unto them though Kings de jure but only to Usurpers de facto et non de jure and if the Statute of 11 H. 7. exempt them from all kinds of penalties forfeitures by the lawfull King when he regains possession of the Crown as some now expound them 4ly It is resolved both by our Statutes Judges Law-books over and over That there is no Inter-regnum in our hereditary kingdom or any other That so soon as the rightfull hereditary King dies the Crown and Realm immediatly descend unto and are actually vested in the person and possession of the right heir before either he be actually proclaimed or crowned King and that it is high Treason to attempt any thing against his Person or royal authority before his Coronation because he is both King de jure de facto too as was adjudged in Watsons and Clerks case Hill 1. Jacobi Hence upon the death of King Henry the 3. though Prince Edward his heir was absent out of the Realm in the holy wars where he received a dangerous wound by an assassinate and was not certainly known to be alive yet all the Nobility Clergy and people going to the high Altar at Westminster swore fealty and allegeance to him as their King appointed a New Seal and Officers under him qui thesauram Regis pacem regni fideliter custodirent Sicque pax Novi Regis Edwardi in cunctis finibus regni proclamatur Edwardo fidelitatem Jurantes qui si viveret penitus ignorarunt Besides it is both enacted resolved in our Statutes Lawbooks That Nullum tempus occurrit Regi and that when the King is once in legal possession of his Crown Lands or any Lands holden of him by reason of his Praerogative he who enters or intrudes uppon them shall gain no freehold thereby yea if the Kings Tenant dieth and his heir enter into the lands his ancestors held of the King before that he hath done his homage and received seisin of the King though he hath a right of inheritance to the Lands by Law yet he shall gain no freehold and if he die yet his wife shall not be indowed because he gained no freehold by his entry but only a naked possessioÌ„ much les then shal a meer Intruder gain any Freeheld or interest in the Crown or Crown lands it self to the prejudice of the rightfull King or his heirs This is most evident by the sacred presidents of K. David still King when unjustly dispossessed driven out of his
kingdom by his unnatural Son Absolon who made himself King de facto who was yet a traytor with all his Adherents and came to a tragical end 2. Sam. c. 15. to c. 20. by the case of Adonijah the Vsurper and his Adherents slain and degraded as Traytors and of the Usurper Athaliah who had near 7. years possession of the Throne and slew all the bloud royal but Ioash yet was shee dispossessed slain as a murderer traytor usurper and Ioash the right heir set upon the Throne and crowned King by Jehoiada the high Priest the Captains and Rulers of the host and Officers people of the Land who all rejoyced and the City was quiet after that they had slain Athaliah with the sword 2 Kings 11. 2 Chro. c. 23. And as this was Gods Law amongst the Jews So it was the antient Law of England under the antient Britons as is evident by the case of the Usurper Vortigern who afâ—er his Usurpation of the Crown by the murther of two rightfull Kings Constantine and Constance and near 20 years possession by usurpation the Britons calling in and crowning Aurelius Ambrosius the right heir for their lawfull King he was prosecuted by him as a Traytor both to his Father and Brother whom he caused to be murdered to gain the Crown besieged assaulied and burnt to death in the Castle of Genorium in Wales with all his adherents that were in it This Law continued not onely under our Saxon Kings but English too as is evident by the case of Qu. Maud reputed a lawfull Queen notwithstanding the usurpation Coronation and actual possession of King Stephen in her absence all whose grants of the Crown lands were resumed by her Son King Henry the 2. and King Stephens Charters and Grants of them resolved null and void against King Henry because made by a Usurper and Invader of the Crown King John in the year 1216. was renounced by most of his Nobles Barons people who elected crowned and swore allegeance to Lewes as their King and dispossessed King John of all or most of the Realm who thereupon at his death cum summa mentis amaritudine maledicens non valedicens omnibus Baronibus suis pauper omni thesauro destitutus nec etiam tantillum terrae in pace â—inens ut vere JOHANNIS EXTORRIS diceretur ex hac vita miserrime transmigravit Henricum primogenitum suum REGNI CONSTITUENS HAEREDEM Yet no sooner was he dead though Lewes was K. de facto and that by the Barons own election who called him in and crowned him but Gualo the Popes Legat and many of the Nobles and People asâ—embling at Glocester there crowned Henry his Son for their true and lawfull King at Glocester cogente necessitate quoniam Westmonasterium ubi locus est ex consuetudine regiae consecrationis deputatus tunc ab inimicis suis suit obsessum After his Coronation he received the homages and fealties of all the Bishops Earls Barons and others present at his Coronation Sicque Nobiles Universi Castellani eo multo fidelius quam regi Johanni adhaeserunt quia propria patris iniquitas UT CUNCTIS VIDEBATUR filio non debuit imputari After which most of the Nobles and English deserting Lewes submitted themselves to Henry as their lawfull Soveraign routed the French forces besieged Lewes in London forced him to swear that he would depart the Realm and never to return more into it during his life and presently restore all the Lands and Castles he had taken in England by warr and resign them to King Henry Which he accordingly performed Most of the Barons who adhered to Lewes and submitted themselves to King Henry were by agreement restored to all their rights inheritances and Liberties But some Bishops Abbots Priors Secular Canons and many Clergy-men qui Ludovico Baronibus consilium praestuerant et favorem and continued obstinare were excepted out of the composition between King Henry and Lewes and thereupon deprived of their livings goods and forced to make fines and compositions for adhering to the Usurper Lewes though King de facto for a season Therefore a King de facto gets neither a legal freehold against the King de Jure or his heirs nor can he indemnify his adherents against his Justice who are still Traytors by adhering to him though crowned and the King de jure may punish them as such 5ly Since the Statute of 25 E. 3. which altered not the Law in this point before it in the Parliaments of 1 E. 4. roâ— Parl. n. 8. to 37.4 E. 3. n. 28. to 41.14 E. 4. n. 34 35 36. King Henry the 6. himself though king de facto for 39. years and that by Act of Parliament and a double descent from Henry the 4th and 5th Usurpers and Intruders together with his Queen and sundry Dukes Earls Barons Nobles Knights Gentlemen who adhered to him in his wars against Richard Duke of Yorke and Edward the 4th King de jure were all attainted of high Treason all their lands goods chattels forfeited some of them executed as Traytors for adhering to Henry the 6. and assisting him in his wars against Edward the 4th king only de jure it being adjudged High Treason within the Statute of 25 E. 3. against Sir Edward Cooks fond opinion to the contrary As for the Year-book of 9 E. 4. f. 1. b. that the King de jure when restored to the Crown may punish Treason against the king de facto who usurped on him either by levying warr against him or compassing his death it was so farr from being reputed Law in any age being without and against all Presidents or in King Edward the fourths reign that those who levied war against Henry the 6. were advanced rewarded as loyal Subjects not punished as Traytors for it by King Edward the 4th when actually King It being not only a disparagement contradiction to the Justice Wisdom Title Policy and dangerous to the person safety of any King de jure to punish any of his Lieges Subjects for attempting the destroying deposing of an Vsuper of his Crown and Archtraytor to his person but an owning of that Usurper as a lawfull King against whom high Treason might be legally committed and a great discouragement to all loyal Subjects for the future to aid him against any Intruders that should attempt or invade his Throne for fear of being punished as Traytors for this their very loyalty and zeal unto his safety Moreover all the gifts grants made by Henry the 4 5 6. themselves or in and by any pretenced Parliaments under them were nulled declared void and resumed they being but meer Usurpers and kings de facto not de jure 6ly It is the judgement resolution of learned Polititians Historians Civilians Canonists Divines as well Protestants as Papists Jesuites and of some Levellers in this age that it is no Offence Murther Treason at all by the Laws of God
Dantzick or Hamborough in France Spain Denmark or Germany within the Ward of Cheape London a suggestion never made before his time in or by any Law-Book or Record only to rob the Admiralty of its antient unquestionable right and Jurisdiction 3ly That the words of the Statute of 13 R. 2. c. 5. whereon Sir Edward Cook and other Judges ground their Prohibitions to the Admiralty That the Admirals and their deputies shall not meddle from henceforth with any thing done within the Realm of England but only of things done upon the Sea c. are clearly strained and construed by them directly against the words meaning and intent of the Law-makers and Commons Petition whereon it was made For the later clause but ONLY of things done upon the Sea is put in opposition and contradistinction to the precedent words with any thing done within the Realm of England or within the bodies of the Counties as well by land as by water as the Stat. of 15 R. 2. c. 3. 5 Eâ—l c. 5.27 Eliz. c. 11.25 E. 3. c. 2. directly interpret and explain the sense thereof And they strain and apply them to contracts made by Merchants and Mariners not within the Realm of England or bodies of the Counties thereof by land or water but beyond the seas and quite out of the Realm being no part of the Realm or within the body of any County of England or Kings Dominions Than which a greater Solecism and contradiction cannot be imagined against the scope and letter of these Statutes For by this construction they may likewise strain the very Oath of Supremacy That no foreign Prince Person Prelate State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction power c. Ecclesiastical or Spiritual WITHIN THIS REALM With the Statute of 13 Eliz. ch 2. for the abolishing of the usurped Iurisdiction of the Bishop and See of Rome WITHIN THIS REALM and against raising sâ—dition bringing in Bulls Agnus Dei Crosses Pictures c. WITHIN THIS REALM and other the Dominions thereof to the punishment of all such as shall avetr that any forein Prince Person Prelate State Potentate or the Pope have or ought to have any Jurisdiction power or Authority OUT OF THIS REALM or the Dominions thereof or shall raise any sedition or vent Popes Bulls c. in any forein Kingdom or Country as France Spain Italy Poland Germany out of the Realm as if they had done it within this Realm of England 4ly That by the opinion resolution agreement of the Judges of the Kings Bench 1575. and of all the Judges of England whereof Hutton and Crook were 2. 4 Febr. 1632. Hiâ— 8. Caroli the original whereof I produced subscribed with all their hands If sute he commenced in the Court of Admiralty upon Contracts made and other things personal done beyond the Seas or upon the Sea no Prohibition is to be awarded contrary to Sir Edward Cooks opinion This being the Iudgment of all our Judges in former ages wherein no record or president could be produced of any such Prohibition from Richard the 1. till the later end of Queen Elizabeths or King James his reign The Lords upon my Argument were so fully satisfied in this point of Law that they all unanimously and immediately adjudged and ordered notwithstanding Iustice Bacons and Reeves opinions upon the late presidents to the contrary that the Rule for the Prohibition in the Kings Bench should be vacated and that the Delegates should proceed to Sentence in the cause which they did And so my Client got both Judgement and Execution soon after against these Sureties I might here very fitly inform our Levellers and their Confederates That the Lords in Parliament as they did antiently so since the Commons admission unto this Great Council have made not only some Acts for the Government of London without the Commons as in 17 R. 2. n. 25 26 27. Granted Ayds for themselves to the King and likewise for the Merchants by the Merchants consents confirmed Charters Patents in Parliament reversed attainders restored persons attainted and their heirs to Lands and bloud elected the Kings Great Officers Privy Counsellers and prescribed them Laws Rules Orders appointed a Protector during the Kings Minority limited his power and discharged him from his place without the Commons confirmed an imposition upon Cloth by the King against the Commons petition to take it off Ordered a Subsidy to be paid absolutely which the Commons granted but conditionally called receivers of Subsidies and Monies to account without the Commons and opposed the Commons encroachments upon their privileges as you may see in the Parliament Rolls of 13 E. 3. n. 5 6. Parl. 1. Parl. 2. n. 8.15 E. 3. n. 41.21 E. 3. n. 16. Par. 2 R. 2. n. 22. to 27.57 5 R. 2. n. 16. 5 H. 4. n. 51. to 58. 4 H. 6. n. 22. 6 H. 6. n. 22 23. 8 H. 6. n. 13.27 28.14 H. 6. n. 10. 31 H. 6. n. 34. In Claus 50 E. 3. m. 3. 4. De essendo in Parliamento there are writs directed to particular persons in this form Sis coram Nobis et cateris Proceribus et Magnatibus regni nostri Angliae in praesenti Parliamento without mentioning the Commons apud Westm convocato hac instante diâ— Sabbatâ— proxime post futur ad informandum Nosipsos Proceres et Magnates not the Commons super quibusdam de quibus per te volumus informari c. 4. Junii Per Concilium in Parliamento And for the Nobles of Ireland I find this Record Claus 2 E. 3. m. 17. Rex dilecto et fideli suo Johanni Darcy de Nevien Justiciario suo Hyberniae salutem Ex parte quorundam hominum de Hybernia Nobis exstitit supplicatum uâ— per statutum inde faciendum concedere volumus Quod omnes Hybernici qui voluerint legibus utantur Anglicanis ita quod necesse non habeant super hoc Cartas aliquas a Nobis imperrare Nos igitur certiorari volentes si sine aliquo praejudicio praemissis annuere valeamus vobis mandamus quod voluntatem Magnatum terrae illius not of the Commons in proximo Parliamento nostro ibidem tenendo super hoc cum diligentia praesentari facias de eo quod inde inveneritis una cum vestro consilio advisamento Nos distincte aperte cum celeritate qua potestis certificetis hoc Breve nostruÌ„ Nobis remittentes c. upon which Petition the use of the English Laws was afterwards granted as appears by Clause 5 E. 3. part 1. m. 25. But I shall close up this Plea and Supplement with a few Presidents more pertinent to demonstrate the Lords undoubted Right of Judicature Council and Advice in publike affairs both in and out of Parliament In the Parliaments of 5 E. 2. n. 31.4 E. 3. c. 14.36 E. 3. c. 10.50 E. 3. n. 181.1 R. 2. n. 35.2 R. 2. n. 5. It was enacted that a Parliament
Deut. 17.14 15. When thou art come into the Land which the Lord thy God giveth thee and shalt possess it and dwell therein and shalt say I will set a King over me like as all the Nations that are about me Thou shalt in any wise set him King over thee WHOM THE LORD THY GOD SHALL CHUSE not the people Upon which account when the Israelites grew wearie of the Government of Samuel and his Sons all the Elders of Israel gathered themselves together and came to Samuel unto Ramah and said unto him Behold thou art old and thy Sons walk not in thy wayes Make or Give thou us a King to judge us like all the Nations not taking upon themselves the power to nominate and elect their very first King but referring the choice to Samuel himself Who thereupon prayed unto the Lord for direction therein After he prayed God commanded him to hearken to the voice of the people and to make them a King 1 Sam. 8.4 to the end yet such a one as God himself not Samuel or the people should appoint For soon after God told Samuel that to morrow about this time he would send him a man out of the Tribe of Benjamin and thou shalt anoint him to be Captain over my people Israel whereupon Saul coming to him at that time when Samuel saw him The Lord said unto him Behold the man whom I spake to thee of this same shall reign over my people then Samuel took a horn of oyl and powred it upon his head and kissed him and said Is it not BECAUSE THE LORD HATH ANOINTED THEE KING OVER HIS INHERITANCE Who being afterwards brought forth before all the people assembled at Mizpeh Samuel said to all the people See ye HIM WHOM THE LORD not I or you HATH CHOSEN that there is none like him among all the people Upon which all the people shouted and said GOD SAVE THE KING 1 Sam. 9.16 17. c. 10.1.17.23 24. So that God himself not Samuel nor the people elected and made Saul King over his own people which is further evident by the 1 Sam. 15.17.35 After which God rejecting Saul from being King he both elected appointed and anointed David to be King over Israel 1 Sam. 16.1.12 13. Psalm 78 70 71. 2 Sam. 7.8 1 Chron. 28.4 Whereupon all the Tribes after Sauls death came to David to Hebron made a League with him and anointed him King before the Lord upon this account that the Lord had said unto him Thou shalt feed my people Israel and thou shalt be a Captain over Israel 2 Sam. 5.1 2 3. acknowledging therby the choice of their King to be Gods peculiar right not theirs After which God himself to manifest the choice of their Kings to be not in the people but in his own disposal being but his Vicegerents Substitutes and sitting upon his throne to be Kings for the Lord their God 2 Chron. 9.8 Isay 44.28 Acts 13.22 setled the inheritance of the Crown and Kingdom of Israel in David his Sons and posterity for ever appointing Solomon his Son immediately to succeed him and making him King over his people as is evident by the 2 Sam. 7.8 to the end 1 Kings 5.5 c. 6.12 c. 8.20 1 Chron. 22.20 c. 28.4 5 6 7. 2 Chron. 1.8 9. c. 2.11 Psal 89.3 4 20. to 38 2 Chr. 23.3 c. 6 16. c. 7.18 1 Kings 15.4 5. Jer. 33.15.17.20 21. c. 23.5 6. c. 30.9 Ezech. 34.23 24. c. 37.24 29. Hos 3.5 Lu. 1.32 33. Upon which account afterwards when the ten Tribes revolted from Rehoboam and the House of David against Gods institution and made Jeroboam their King God thereupon chargeth it upon them as a high incroachment upon his prerogative in these terms Hosea 8.4 They have set up Kings but not by me they have made Princes and I knew it not And hereupon Abijah heir by hereditarie succession to David thus charged Jeroboam and all Israel with rebellion against God and Rehoboam therein 2 Chron. 13 5 6 7 8. Ought you 〈◊〉 to know THAT THE LORD GOD OF ISRAâ—â—AVE THE KINGDOM OVER ISRAEL TO â—D FOR EVER EVEN UNTO HIM AND TO HIS SONS BY A COVENANT OF SALT But Jeroboam the Son of Nebat the Servant of Solomon the Son of David is risen up AND HATH REBELLED AGAINST HIS LORD And there are gathered unto him vain men the children of Belial and have strengthned themselves against Rehoboam the Son of Solomon when Rehoboam was young and tender hearted And now you think TO WITHSTAND THE KINGDOM OF THE LORD IN THE HANDS OF THE SON OF David and ye have a great multitude c. O children of Israel fight ye not against the Lord God of your Fathers for YOV SHALL NOT PROSPER And God smote Jeroboam and all Israel before Abijah the right heir and Judah and God delivered them into their hand And Abijah and his people slew them with a great slaughter So there fell down slain of Israel five hundred thousand chosen men The greatest slaughter we ever read of in one battel in sacred or prophane Histories If then God allowed not the free election and nomination of Kings and Supreme Governours to his own people of Israel their Tribes or Elders but reserved it only to himself as his own peculiar prerogative which they might not intrude upon without high presumption and exemplarie punishments as the forecited Scriptures with Iudges 2.20 Acts 13.20 21 22 23. undeniably evidence By what Law of God or Nature any other vulgar rabble or people of God can now challenge this as their proper birthright and natural inherent due to elect all their Kings all their Supreme or subordinate Officers and all Peers of Parliament especially in an hereditarie kingdom transcends my reason to comprehend unless they will blasphemously tax God himself for injuring his own peculiar people in usurping upon and depriving them of this their Natural right and freedom 8ly The Scripture is most express and positive That it is God who removeth Kings and setteth up Kings Dan. 2.28 That the God of Heaven setteth up kingdoms and Kings That the most high ruleth in the kingdoms of men and giveth them to whomsoever he will Dan. 2.44 c. 4.25.34 35. That promotion cometh neither from the East nor from the West nor from the South but God not the people is the Judge he pulleth down one and setteth up another Psa 75 6 7. He looseth the bond of Kings and girdeth their loins with a girdle He powreth contempt upon Princes and weakneth the strength of the mighty Job 12.18 19. Whereunto God adds Prov. 8.15 16. By me Kings reign and Princes decree Justice By me Princes rule and Nobles and all the Judges of the earth Hereupon Samuel used this speech to King Saul 1 Sâ—m 15.26.28 The LORD hath rejected thee from being King over Israel The LORD hath rent the kingdom of Israel from thee this day and hath given it to a neighbour of thine better than thou Yea the Apostle Rom.
if that of Ingulphus with other our Historians and some Lawyers be true which Sir Edward Cook and Mr. Selden deny that King Alfred first divided the Realm into Counties as all grant he did into Hundreds and Tithings and erected Hundred Courts wherein Knights of the Shire were alwaies yet are and ought to be elected there could be no Knights of Shires at least if any Citizens or Burgesses to serve in Parliament before this division though there were Earls Dukes Barons before his reign who were present by the Kings summons not peoples elections at our Great Councils or Parliaments as Mr. Selden and Sir Henry Spelman undeniably manifest and I have elsewhere proved at large Their sitting voting judging therefore in Great Councils Parliaments being so antient clear and unquestionable ever since their first beginning til now and the sitting of Knights Citizens Burgesses by the peoples election in our antientest Great Councils Parliaments not so clearly evident by History or Records as theirs we must needs acknowledge subscribe to this their Right and Title or else deny the Knights Citizens Burgesses rights to sit vote in our Great Councils Parliaments rather than theirs who have not so antient nor clear a Title or right as they by many hundreds of years Fourthly This Right and Privilege of theirs is vested legally in them by the very Common Law and Custom of the Realm which binds all men By the unanimous consent of all our Ancestors and all the Commons of England from age to age assembled in Parliament since they sat in any Parliaments who alwaies consented to desired and never opposed the Lords sitting voting power or Judicature in Parliament and by Magna Charta it self signed and ratified by King John wherein it is expresly granted Ad habendum COMMUNE CONCILIVM REGNI de auxiliis assidendis de Scutagiis assidendis submoneri faciemus Archiepiscopos Episcopos Abbates Comites MAJORES BARONES REGNI singulatim per Literas nostras c. And in the Great Charter of King Henry the 3. they are first mentioned and provided for Hereupon King Henry the third not long after Magna Charta was granted and at the same time it was proclamed confirmed with a most solemn Excommunication in the presence of all the Lords and Commons by all the Bishops of England against the infringers thereof summoning a Parliament at London in the year 1255. to aid him in his warrs in Apulia the Earls and Barons absolutely refused to give him any assistance or answer at all for this reason Quod omnes Barones tunc temporis non fuerunt juxta tenorem Magnae Chartae suae vocati ideo sine Paribus suis tunc absentibus nullum voluerunt tunc responsum dare vel Auxilium concedere vel praestare That ALL THE BARONS were not summoned by him to this Parliament as they ought to be according to the tenor of Magna Charta whereupon they departing in discontent and refusing to sit longer the Parliament was first adjourned and at last dissolved And upon this very ground among others the Parliament of 21 R. 2. with all the Acts and proceeding therein were totally repealed and nulled by the Parliament of 1 H. 4. because the Lords who adhered to the King were summoned by him to the Parliament and some of the opposite party imprisoned impeached unsummoned and many of the Knights of the shire were elected only by the Kings nomination and Letters to the Sherifs And the Parliament it self kept by force viris armatis et sagittariis immensis brought out of Cheshire as an extraordinary guard quartered in the Kings Court at Westminster and about Charing Crosse and the Muse of which Grafton and other Historians write thus That they fell into so great pride of the Kings favour that they accounted the King to be as their fellow and they set the Lords at nought yet few or none of them were Gentlemen but taken from the plough and Cart and other Crafts And after these rustical people had a while courted they entred into so great a boldness that they would not let neither within nor without the Court to beat and slay the Kings good Subjects to take from them their victuals and pay for them little or nothing at their pleasure as our free-quarâ—erers do now falling at last to ravish mens wives and daughters And if any man fortuned to complain of them to the King he was soon rid out of the way no man knew how or or by whom so as they did what they listed the King not caring to doe justice upon them but favouring them in their mis-doings confiding in them and their guards against any others of the kingdom which gave the Lieges of his kingdom great matter of commotion and discontent The bringing up of which guard to Westminster to force and overawe the Parliament to effect his designs is one principle Article exhibited against him by the Parliament of 1 H. 4. wherein he was forced to resign his Crown and then deposed I pray God our new armed Guard and Courtiers at Whitehall and the Muse of as mean condition as those fall not by degrees to the self-same exorbitances contempt of the King Lords Parliament and oppression of the people to their general mutining and discontent In the Parliaments of 6 E. 3. N. 1. Parl. 2 N. 5.6 8 9 8 E. 3. N. 5. 15 E. 3. N. 4. 17 E. 3. N. 2. 20 E. 3. N. 5. 21 E. 3. N. 4. 22 E. 3. N. 1. 25 E. 3. N. 1. 29 E. 3. N. 4. 30 E. 3. N. 1. 37 E. 3. N. 1. 42 E. 3. N. 1. 50 E. 3. N. 1. 51 E. 3. N. 3. 1 R. 2. N. 1. 2 R. 2. N. 1. 3 R. 2. N. 1. 4 R. 2. N. 1. 5 R. 2. N. 65. 6 R. 2. N. 6. 7 R. 2. N. 1. 9 R. 2. N. 1. 8 H. 4. N. 54. We find in these Parliament Rolls that these Parliaments have been usualy prorogued adjourned from the days they were summoned to meet and have not saie nor acted at all because sundry of the Lords some Commons were not come but absent by reason of foul weather shortness of warning or other publique imployments all their personal presence in Parliament being reputed necessary and expedient And 20 R. 2. N. 8. The Commons themselves in Parliament required the King to send for such Bishops and Lords who were absent to come to tho Parliament before they would consult upon what the Chancellor propounded to them in the Kings name and behalf to consider of To recite no more antient presidents In the Parliament of 2 Caroll the Earl of Arundel not sitting in the Parliament being after his summons committed by the King to the Tower of London about his Sons mariage May 25. 1626. without the Lords privity and consent whereby their privileges were infringed and the House deprived of one of their Members presence thereupon the House of
this King who as some erroniously assert first summoned Knights Citizens and Burgesses to our Parliaments In the Parliamentary Councel at Clarindon under King H. the 2. An. 1164. Jo. de Oxonia by the Kings command there present sate President Presentibus etiam Archiepâ—scopis Episcopis Abbatibus Prioribus Comitibus Baronibus et Proceribus regni wherein they made a Recognition of the customs and liberties of his Grandfather King Henry the 1. and other his Ancestors which ought to be observed by all persons within the Realm by reason of the discords often happening between the Clergy and temporal Justices and great men of the Realm These they reduced to 16 Articles very much ecclipsing the Popes and Bishops ecclesiastical Jurisdiction This Recognition the Archbishops Bâ—shops Abbots Priors Clergy cum Comitibus Proceribus et Baronibus cunctis una voce firmly promised in the word of truth bona fide to observe and keep to the King and his heirs for ever without male engin The 11 of these Articles runs thus Archiepiscopi et Episcopi sicut caeteri Barones debent interesse Iudiciis Curiae to wit of Parliament cum Baronibus quousque perveniatur in judicio ad dâ—minutioneÌ„ membrorum vel ad mortem Which proves the judicial power of Parliaments to be then only in the Lords and Barons In the year 1170. the 16 of Henry â— on the Feast of St. Bernard Rex magnum celebravit Concilium Londoniis cum Principibus et Magnatibus curiae suae de coronatione Henrici filii sui So Hoveden Anno 1172. Rex Angliae Henricus convocatis regui Primoribus apud Northamptoniam renoveâ—unt Assisâ—m Clarindoniae eamque praecepit observari In the year 1175. King Henry the second and his son held a great Council at York where the agreement between him and the King of Scots there present with most of his Bishops Abbots and Nobles was read and confirmed before the King and his Son the Arehbishop of York the Bishop of Durham Comitibus Baronibus Angliae The sâ—me year Rex magnum congregavit coneslium â—pud Windeshores in octavis Sancti Michaelis praesentibus Rege filio Richardo Cant. Archiepiscopo Episcopis Angliae Laurentâ—o Dubliâ—ensi Archiepiscopo Praesentibus eâ—iâ—m Comitibus et Baronibus Angliae In which some controversies in Ireland were ceâ—cided In the year 1176. King Henry coming to Noâ—ingham on the feast of Sr. Pauls conversion ibi celebravit Magnum Concilium de statute regni sui et coram rege filio suâ— Archiepiscopis Episcopis Comitibus et Baronibus Regnâ— sui Communi omnium Concilio divisit regnum suum in sex partes per quarum singuâ—aâ— tres Justiciarios itinerantes constituit whose names Commissions and Articles are there at large recorded And the same year this King held another Great Council at London in which the King Consilio universorum Episcoporum Comitum et Baronum Regni concessit Regi Siciliae filiam suam In the year 1177. King Henry the 2. summoned a Great Councâ—l to determin the great Controversy between Sanctius King of Navarr and Alphonsus King of Castile whose Advocates propounding and debating their cases in the presence of the King and of his Bishops Earls and Barons the King habito cum Episcopis Comitibus et Baronibus nostris cum deiiberatione consilio drew up by their advice an award between them under his great Seal recorded at large in Hoveden who writes Comites et Barones Regalis Curiae Angliae adjudicaverunt plenariam utrique parti supradictae quae in jure petita fuerâ—nt fieri restitutionem The like they did in the Council of Northampton in other cases held the same year Anno 1188. King Henry the 2. on the 3d of February held a Parliamentary Council at Gaintington about 8 or 10. miles from Northampton where convenerunt unà cum Rege PRAESULES ET PRINCIPES REGNI de defensione sacrosanctae terrae Jerosolymae tractaturi where after long debate they made 8. Statutes concerning that voyage The very same year the Kings of England and France on the 10. of February came to a conference about their Voyage to Jerusalem cum Archiepiscopis Comitibus et Baronibus Regnorum suorum as they had formerly done in the same manner and place An. 1173. and as they did afterwards An. 1189. Cum Archiepiscopis Episcopis et Baronibus suis So as during King Henry the seconds whole reign we read of no Knights Citizens and Burgesses electcted by the people present in our Parliamentary Councils but only the King Prelates Earls Barons and Nobles alwaies mentioned by name and Judges in them Only I find this one expression in Hoveden An. 1188. Rex statim apud Gaintington congregavit Magnum Concilium Episcoporum Abbatum Comitum et Baronum et aliorum multorum tam Clericorum quam Laicorum but that these were Knights Citizens and Burgesses elected by the people and not persons particularly summoned and nominated by the King himself to be Assessors Collectors of the Tenths there to receive their instructions for it which is most probable cannot be thence inferred ubi in publica audientia recitari fecit omnia supradicta capitula quae constituerat de Cruce capienda et tunc Dominus Rex misit servientes suos Clericos Laicos per singulos Comitatus Angliae ad Decim as colligendas most likely the aliorum muliorum tam Clericorum quam Laicorum present at this great Council secundum praedictam Ordinationem in terris suis transmarinis constitutam to wit at Cenomanum ubi consilio suorum to wit of the Archbishops Bishops Earls and Barons there with him ordinavit quod unusquisque decimam redditorum et mobilium suorum in eleemo sinam dabit ad subventionem terrae Jerosolymitanae hoc anno exceptis armis equis vestibus militum c. Sed de singulis urbibus totius Angliae fecit elegi omnes ditiores videlicet de Londonio 200 de Eboraco 100 de aliis Urbibus secundum quantitatem numerum eorum fecit omnes sibi praesentari diebus locis statutis de quibus caepit Decimam mobilium suorum secundum aestimationem virorum fidelium qui noverant redditus et mobilia eorum Si quos autem invenisset rebelles statim fecit eos in carcerari et in vinculis teneri donec ultimum quadrantem persolverent similiter fecit de Judaeis terrae suae unde inaestimabilem sibi acquisivit pecuniam Andrew Horn in his Mirrour of Justices in the reign of King Edward the first writes That our Saxon Kings divided the Realm of England after it was turned into an heritage into 38 Counties over which they set so many Counts or Earls and although the King ought to have no Peers in his land yet for that if the King should do wrong to or offend any of his people neither he nor any of his Commissaries ought to
Kings accusation at the Bar of the whole House And for my part I am resolved to speak well of those that have done me justice and not to doubt they will deny it me till such time as by experience I find they doe it And at that time he was so much for the Loâ—ds that he writes most disgracefully derogatorily of the Commons House and other his Confederates by his example tells them of their want of power injustice and illegal proceedings quarrels only with them and their Committees for their delays and injustice towards him telling them to their faces in many of his former and late printed Libels That they have no power at all to commit or examin him or any other Commons of England without the Lords nor yet to give or take an Oath That they are but a peece and lowest part of the Parliament not a Parliament alone That they can make no binding Votes Ordinances or Laws nor commit nor command any Commoner without the Lords and in one or two Pamphlets more he endeavours to prove them to be now no lawfull house of Commons at all nor would he ever acknowledge them to be so and that he would make no more conscience of cutting theirs and the Lords throats the Tyrants and Oppressors at Westminster than of killing so many Weasels and Polcats with many other like scurrilous and mutinous expressions His own printed Papers Petitions Actions therefore are an unanswerable confutation of his malicious coÌ„tradictions of their Authority and judicature since for their exemplary justice on him And he must either now re-acknowlege thâ—ir right of sitting voting judging in Parliament to be lawfull or else renounce his own former Petitions and addresses to them for justice retract all his former printed Papers asserting their judicature and extolling their justice yea disclaim their judgement for vacating his own sentence in the Starchamber their awarding him damages and passing an Order to recover them as meerly null and void being made before no lawfull nor competent Judges as now he writes since not elected by the Peoples Vote Let those his followers who admire him for his Law observe these his palpable invincible contradictions and be ashamed and afraid to follow such an ignorant erronious guide who writes only out of malice faction not of judgement as his contradictions evidence 13ly The Acts for preventing the inconveniencies happening by the long intermission of Parliaments And to prevent the inconveniences which may happen by the untimely adjourning proroging or dissolving the Parliament made this Parliament and assented to by the King at the Commons importunity confirm the Lords interest right to sit and Vote in Parliament beyond all dispute and give them now power to summon a Parliament themselves in some cases in default of the King his Chancellor and Officers 14ly The antient form still continued till this day of dismissing and dissolving Parliament the King licenseth THE LORDS and COMMONS TO DEPART HOME and TAKE THEIR EASE 37 E. 3. n. 34. 38 E. 3. n. 18. 40 E. 3. n. 16. 43 E. 3. n. 34. 45 E. 3. n. 8.13 47 E. 3. n. 7. and all Parliaments since proves their right of sitting in and attending the service of the Parliament in person without special license of the King dispencing with their absence during its continuance in despite of all ignorant cavils to the contrary The Kings license of them to depart being void and nugatory if not bound by Law to attend the Parliament in person as well as the Commons 15ly Finally this hereditary right of the English Barons Lords is demonstrated resolved in this very clause of their Patents of creation when first created Earls or Barons inserted into all Patents since 20 H. 2. and implyed by our Laws though not precisely mentioned in all the antient Patents of creation before Volentes per praesentes concedentes pro nobis haeredibus successoribus nostris quod praefotus A. Comes vel Baro c. S. haeredes sui masculi ut Comites vel Barones de S. in omnibus teneantur tractentur reputentur et eorum quilibet habeat teneat et possideat sedem et locum in Parlamentis nostris haeredum et successorum nostrorum inâ—ra regnum nostrum Angliae inter alios Comites vel Barones ut Comes vel Baro. Than which nothing than be more positive and direct in point I shall close up all the premises with two memorable Clauses in two writs of Summons to Parliament evidencing not only the undoubted right but absolute necessity of the Lords personal fitting voting and advising in our Parliaments In the Parliament held at York in the 6 year of King Edward the third the Archbishop of Canterbury with some other Bishops and Nobles being absent thereupon the Prelates Nobles Knights and Burgesses there present refused to act any thing and resolved they could conclude nothing by reason of their absence whereupon they prayed the King to adjourn the Parliament and by a new Writ to summon the Archbishop and all other Bishops and Lords then absent personally to appear at York on the day whereto the Parliament was adjourned under a penalty as is evident by these Clauses in the Writs of Summons then issued Rex é venerabili in Christo Patri eadem gratia Archiepiscopo Cantuar. c. Verum quia dictis negotiis in eodem Parliamento praepositis quae salvationem jurium Coronae nostrae regni nostri intimè contingunt Et nobis incidunt multum cordi per Praelatos Proceres Milites Comitatuum tunc ibidem praesentes deliberato consilio responsum existit quod in tam arduis negotiis sine vestri ac aliorum Prelat ac Magnat et Procerum prodictorum absentium praesentia consilium et assensum praebere non possunt nec debent Ita quod nobis cum instaâ— a suppli◠〈◊〉 Paâ—liam illud usque ad diem Mercurâ—iâ— octavâ—s Sancti Hilari prox iâ—de futur continuari seu proâ—ogari inteâ—im vos eâ— caeteros Prelatos et Proceres tunc absentes convocari faceremus Ac nos quanquam huâ—usmodi â—iâ—tio noâ—s dâ—mâ—sâ— eâ— periculosa plurimum videâ—tur eorum Petitioni in hac parte annuentes c. Parliamentum praedictum usque ad octav praedictas duximus continuandum seu prorogandum Ac Praelatis Magnatibus Militibus Civibus Burgensibus injâ—nximus quod tunc ibid. intersint quacunque excusatione cessante ac omnibus aliis praetermissis Ne igitur contingat quod absit dicta negotia ad nostri regni nostri damnum dedecus per vestri seu aliorum ABSENTIAM ulterius prorogari vobis in fide dilectione quibus nobis tenemini et sub periculo quod incumbit districte iniungendo mandamus quod omni excusatione cessanie sitis personaliter apud Ebor. in dictis Octab. nobiscum cum caeteris Praelatis Magnatibus dicti regni nostri super dictis negotiis tractaturus et
should alwayes be summoned to and bear chief sway in our Parliaments in respect of their Peerage Power Nobility only without the peoples election This reason of their sitting in Parliament we find expresly recorded in Bracton l. 2. c. 16. fol. 34. and in Fleta l. 1. c. 17. The King say they hath a Superiour namely God also the Law bâ— which he is made a King likewise his Court to wit THE EARLS BARONS because they are called Counts as being the KINGS FELLOWS and he who hath a Fellow hath A MASTER And therefore if the King shall be without a bridle that is without a Law debent ei frâ—num imponere THEY OUGHT TO IMPOSE A BRIDLE ON HIM c. which the Commons being persons of less power and interest were unable to do Andrew Horn in his Mirrour of Justice ch 1. § 2.3 renders the like reason In all the contests in Parliaments and Wars between K. John Hâ—n 3. Edw. 2. Rich. 2. concerning Magna Charta the Charter of the Forest the Liberties Properties of the Subjects and opposition of unjust Taxes Ayds Exactions the Lords and Barons were the Ring-leaders the chief Opposers of these Kings Usurpations Exactions and Encroachments on the Great Charters Laws Rights Liberties of the people as all our Histories and Records relate whence they stile the Wars in their times THE BARONS WARS and before this the Nobles were the principal Actors in resisting the Tyranny of K. Sigebert and K. Bernard and dethroning them for their misdemeanours as is clear by Mat. Westminster in his Flores Historiarum An. 756. 758. To give some pregnant Instances of this kind not vulgarly known or taken notice of to clear this truth beyond contradiction Upon the death of William Rufus An. 1100. Magnates the Nobles of England not knowing what was become of Robert Duke of Normandy who had been 5. years absent in the holy Warrs thereupon Henry his Brother Congregato Londoniis Clero Angliae populo universo to wit the Lords Spiritual and Temporal expressed by these terms not the inferiour Clergy Knights Citizens Burgesses and Commons of the Realm as some Antiquaries and others mistake who derive their sitting in Parliaments from the beginning of this Kings reign promisit emendationem legum quibus oppressa fuerat Anglia tempore Patris sui Fratris nuper defuncti ut animos omnium in sui promotionem accenderet et amorem et illum in Regem susciperent et patronum Ad haec CLERO respondente et MAGNATIBUS CUNCTIS the Clerus populus there summoned quod si animo volente ipsis vellet concedere et Charta sua communire illas Libertates et Consuetudines antiquas quae floruerunt in Regno tempore Regis Edwardi in ipsum consentirent et in Regem unanimiter consecrarent Henrico autem libenter annuente et se id facturum cum juramento affirmante consecratus est in Regem favente Clero et populo cui continuo à Mauritio Londonensi Episcopo et à Thoma Eboracensi Archiepiscopo corona capiâ—i imponitur Cum fuerat diademate insignitus has Libertates subscriptas in regno ad exaltationem sanctae Ecclesiae et pacem populi tenendas concessit His Charter is recorded at large in Matthew Paris Bromton and others It begins thus Henricus Dei Graâ—ia Rex Angliae c. Sciatis me Dei misericordia Communi Consilio Baronum Regni Angliae Regem esse coronatum which proves that the Clerus Angliae Populus forementioned were only the Spiritual and Temporal Barons not ordinary Clergy and Commons as contradistinguished from them et quia regnum oppressum erat injustis exactionibus Ego respectu Dei et amore quam erga vos omnes habeo sanctam Dei Ecclesiam liberam facio c. et omnes malas consuetudines quibus Regnum Angliae injuste opprimebatur inde aufero quis malas consuetudines in parte hic pono Si quis Baronum meorum Comitum c. Lagam Regis Edwardi vobis reddo cum illis emendationibus quibus Pater meus eam emendavit Consilio Baronum suorum This Charter was subscribed by all the Bishops Earls Nobles and Barons of England Et factae sunt tot Chartae quot sunt Comitatus in Anglia et Rege jubente positae in Abbatiis singulorum Comitatuum ad monimentum So Matthew Paris relates William of Malmsbury records In regem electus est aliquantis tamen ante controversiis INTER PROCERES agitatis atque sopitis Which done aliquarum moderationem legum revocavit in solidum Sacramento suo et OMNIUM PROCERUM ne luderentur corroboravit Simeon Dunelmensis records that Consecrationis suae die Sanctam Dei Ecclesiam liberam fecit ac omnes malas consuetudines et injustas exactiones quibus regnum Angliae opprimebatur abstulit Legem Regis Edwardi omnibus in commune reddidit c. MAJORES NATU ANGLIAE MAGNATES TERRAE CONGREGAVIT LONDONIAE The Chronicle of Bromton records the same in the self-same words and so doth Henry Knyghton de Eventibus Angliae l. 2. c. 8 9. Polychron l. 7. c. 12. Roger de Hoveden Annal. pars 1. p. 468. and that the Lords procured this Charter King Stephen being elected and crowned King à PRIMORIBUS REGNI against his own and their former Oaths Omnes tam Praesules quam Comites et Barones qui filiae Regis et suis haeredibus juraverant Fidelitatem consensum Stephano praebentes In pursuance of his Coronation Oath Anno 1136. EPISCOPOS PROCERES REGNI SUI regali Edicto in unum convenire praecepit cum quibus GENERALE CONCILIUM CELEBRAVIT Oxoniis Wherein he confirmed all their Laws and Liberties by a special Charter in which there are these Clauses among others Sanctam Ecclesiam liberam esse concedo et debitam reverentiam illi conservo Omnes exactiones et injustitias et meschemingas sive per Vicecomites sive per alios quoslibet male inductas funditus extirpo Bonas leges et antiquas et justas consuetudines in hundris placitis et aliis causis observabo et observari praecipio et constituo This Charter was subscribed by all the Bishops Earls and Barons who procured it in this Common Council at Oxford Which they promised inviolably to observe generaliter se servaturum juravit sed nihil horum quae Deo promiserat observavit writes Matthew Paris Henry Huntindon Holinshed and others observe that the Archbishops Bishops and Nobles who contrary to their Oaths of Allegiance to Henry the 1. Mawde and their heirs elected Stephen King for this their detestable perjury soon after came to exemplary ends especially Roger the great Bishop of Salisbury qui secundum illud Sacramentum praefatum fecerat et omnibus aliis praedicaverat unde justo Deo judicio postea ab eodem Stephano quem creavit in Regem captus et excruciatus miserandum sortitus est
nos et nos ei in omnibus obtemperabimus Dilata igitur sunt omnia et in respectu posita usque ad quindenam Sancti Johannis Baptistae Sed Dominus Rex interim vel suo Spiritu vel aulicorum suorum qui nollent suam enervari potestatem induratus contra suos homines magis exaspetatus minimum emendationis in praedictis excessibus fidelibus suis secundum quod promisiâ— curavit impendere Whereupon they would grant him no aid at all When he could not move the Nobles all assembled together the next year he sent begging Letters to every one of the Nobles apart for ayd nor as a duty but meer gratuity to carry on his wars against the King of France sed nihil ex inde à circumspectis nisi derisum et sibilum suscitavit King Henry Anno 1252. the 35. year of his reign assembled all the Prelates to London and demanded of them a Tenth for 8. years granted him by the Pope which they refused to grant taxing him for oppressing his Realm and rhe Church with various and innumerable exactions and depriving them of their antient and accustomed Liberties and their money against his Oath and primitive Protestation The Lords and Prelates after sundry publike and privat Discourses and devices then used to draw them to a Contribution recorded at large in Mat. Paris chiding and telling him to his face asserentes ipsum natum tantum ad pecuniam emungendam Soluto igitur cum Regis Cleri et Magnatum indignatione Concilio Rex iram et odium praecordiale thesaurizavit credens haec omnia sibi facta et dicta in spiritu maligno et exoso malignandi materiam parturire About the same time Isabella Countess of Arundell coming to the King about a Wardship and he denying to doe her justice therein though a woman gave him this manly and bold answer Domine Rex quare avertis faciem tuam à Justitia Jam in curia tua quod justum est nequit impetrari Medius inter Dominum nos constitueris sed nec teipsum nec nos sane regis nec ecclesiam veritus es multipliciter perturbare quod non tantum in praesentiarum sed multoties est aperta Nobiles insuper Regni variis modis vexare non formidas vel erubescis Quod cum audisset Rex corrugans nares et subsannans voce dixit elevaâ—a Quid est hoc O Domina Comitissa confecerunt ne Magnates Angliae chartam et pepigerunt tecum ut fieres eorum quia eloquens es advocata et prolocutrix Ad quod Comitissa licet juvencula non tamen juveniliter respondit Nequaquam mihi Domine Regni tui Primates chartam confecerunt sed tu CHARTAM quam confecit pater tuus et tu eam concessisti jurasti observare fideliter et irrefragabiliter et multoties ut eam observares à fidelibus tuis pecuniam de libertatibus observandis eorum extorsisti sed tu semper eis impudens transgressor extitisti Unde fidei laesor enormis Sacramenti transgressor manifestus esse comprobaris Ubi Libertates Angliae toties in scripta redactae toties concessae totiesque redemptae Ego igitur licet mulier omnesque indigenae et naturales ac fideles tui appellamus contra te ante tribunal tremendi judicis Et erunt nobis testes coelum terra quoniam inique nimis nos tractas insontes et nos Deus ultionum Dominus ulciscatur Ad haec Rex siluit confusus quia dictante propria conscientia cognovit quoniam à tramite veritatis non exorbitavit Comitissa et ait Nonne postulas gratiam eo quod mihi cognata sis at illa Ex quo mihi quod jus expostulat denegasti quomodo spem concipiam ut mihi gratiam facias postulanti sed et contra illos ante faciem Christi appello qui te fascinantes et infatuentes consiliarii tui sunt et te a via veritatis avertunt suis tantummodo commodis inhiantes His autem auditis Rex siluit satis civiliter redargutus Comitissa autem nec licentiata nec licentiam postulata magnis laboribus et sumptibus inaniter factis ad propria remeavit Anno 1253. the 37 of Henry the 3d. In quindena Paschae mense Aprilis tota edicto Regio convocata Angliae Nobilitas convenit Londini de arduis Regni negotiis simul cum Rege tractaturi Extiâ—erunt igitur ibidem cum Comitibus Baronibus quamplurimis Archiepiscopus Cantuariensis Episcopi Angliae fere omnes c. Et cum de magna Regis indigentia qui postulavit sibi peregrinaturo infinitam exhiberi pecuniam diu et inaniter tractassent et hinc inde nuncios utrobique consensus haberetur contigit ut ex parte Episcoporum omnium Praelatorum destinarentur Archiepiscopus Cant et Carliolensis et Sarisburiensis Episcopi et electus Wintoniensis ad persuadendum et inducendum Regem ut permitteret prout saepius solenniter jurando promisit sanctam Ecclesiam suis gaudere libertatibus maxime de electionibus in quibus praecipue ecclesiastica constat libertas Nullibi enim cum in Ecclesiis Cathedralibus vel Conventualibus potest aliquis promoveri nisi per Regem intrusus c. Quod si hunc et alios mores SECUNDUM MAGNAE CHARTAE DE LIBERTATIBUS CONFECTAE TENOREM emendaret ipsi usque ad gravamen magnum petitionibus suis inclinarent Quibus Rex Verum est et inde doleo poenitet me graviter hoc secisse Instanter igitur procurandum ut et talia peracta corrigantur et amplius similia non perpetrentur Et vos in hoc mihi sitis coadjutores ne sic promoticum subditis condemnentur c. Tandem protracto tempore diuturno et multis revolutis disceptationibus post quindecim et amplius dierum continuationem in hoc residit omnium unanimus consensus ut voluntas Regis peregrinaturi et ideo pia non penitus suo desiderio fraudaretur nec Ecclesiae vel Regni status enorme pateretur dettimentum Concessa est igitur Regi decima pars proventuum ab Ecclesia recipiendo cum iter Hierosolymitanum per visum Magnatum arriperet in viaticum distribuenda per triennium in succursum Terrae sanctae contra Dei inimicos a militibus scutagium illo anno scilicet ad scutum tres Marcae et Rex bona fide sine aliqua cavillatione promisit se CHARTAM MAGNAM ET OMNES EJUS ARTICULOS FIDELITER OBSERVARE Quam tamen a multis retroactis annis Pater ejus Rex Johannes TENERE JURAVIT limiliter qui praeâ—ens est in susceptione Coronae et postea multoties unde infinitam emunxit pecuniam Tertio igitur die Mali in majori aula Regia Westm. sub praesentia assensu Domini Henrici Dei gratia Regis Angliae illustris Dominorum Râ— Comitis Cornubiae fratris sui Ri. Comitis Norfollkiae
ad ipsum Regem confirmationem omnium istorum sub sigillo suo tanquam ab eo qui 〈…〉 â—tus erat cedendum malitiae temporis censuit obtinuerunt Pro eonfirmatione et harum rerum omnium dedit populus Anglicanus Regi denarium nonum bonorum suorum Clerus vero Cantuariensis Decimum et Clerus Eboracensis Quintum qui propiordamno fuit So Walsingham truly relates the History of this transaction These Statutes thus obtained by the Earls and Barons from the King are printed in our Statutes at large with the excommunication of the Prelates then denounced against the infringers of them in Rastals Abridgement of Statutes Sir Edward Cooks 2 Institut p. 527. to 537. being thus intituled Confirmationes Chartarum de Libertatibus Angliae et Forestae et Statutum de Tallagio non concedondo made both in the 25 year of Edward 1. not in the 34 as our Statute books and Sir Edward Cook misdate the latter of rhem The differences between the King these Earls and Nobles touching these liberties with his confirmation of them and the aid granted him for the same are likewise recorded in the Patent Roll of 25 Ed. 2. par 2. m. 6 7 9. And Claus 25 E. 1. m. 2.5.14.18.76 dors there are sundry Writs and Proclamations sent to all the Sherifs for the keeping of Magna Charta in all its articies and to the Bishops to excommunicate the Infringers of them agreeing with Walsinghams relation Anno 1299. the 26 of King Edward the first the king holding a Parliament at York the foresaid Earls because the Confirmation of the Charters forementioned was made in a forein land requested that for their greater security they might be again confirmed by the King in England which the Bishop of Durham and three Earls engaged he should doe upon his return out of Scotland with victory Whereupon this King the next year being the 27 of his reign holding a Parâ—iament at London Ubi rogatus a Comitibus saepe dictis ut Chartarum confirmationem renovaret secundum quod in Scotia promiserat post aliquas dilationes instantiae eorum acquievit hac additione Salvo jure Coronae nostrae infine adjecta Quam cum audissent Comites cum displicentia ad propria recesserunt sed revocatis ipsis ad quindenam Paschae ad votum eorum absolute omnia sunt Concessa And thereupon the Statutes intituled Articuli super Chartas 28 E. 1. in our printed Statutes and Cooks 2 Institutes whereas it should rather be 27. were then made and published by these Earls and Nobles procurement and Writs sent to all the Sherifs De quibusdam Articulis in MAGNA CHARTA contentis Chartae de Foresta Henrici Patris nostrae observandis Rot. Claus 27. E. 1 m. 17. And Pat. 28 E. 1. m. 14. Commissions are sent into all Counties de Artic. in mag Chart. content Stat. Regis apud Winton edita observandis and that whosoever did not observe every Article should be punished per imprisonamentum redemptionem vel amerciamentum secundum quod transgressio exigeret there being no certain way of punishment before ordained And Claus 28 E. m. 7 8. There are Writs sent to every Sherif to read proclaim magna Charta in his County 4 times every year to proclaim Articulos super Chartas à Rege populo concessos But the Execution of the Articles of the Forest being deferred notwithstanding these Proclamations thereupon King Edward held a Parliament at Stanford the 29 year of his reign ad quod convenerunt Comites et Barones cum eqnis et armis eo prout dicebatur proposito ut executionem Chartae de Foresta hactenus dilatam extorquerent ad plenum Rex autem eorum instamiam importunitatem attendens eorum voluntati in omnibus condescendit To omit all other Presidens these forecited abundantly evidence the gallantry stoutness heroical courage care vigilancy of the Lords in all our Parliamentary Councils to maintain and defend the fundamental Liberties Properties Great Charters of the Realm and to perpetuate them to posterity without the least violation to vindicate re-establish them when infringed and to withstand oppose all unjust aids taxes subsidies when either demanded levied exacted by our Kings though in cases of pretented or real necessity to supply their wants maintain their wars and protect the Realm from forein enemies I shall only produce three of four Historical Presidents more demonstrating what great Curbs Remoraes Obstacles some particular potent Noblemen of great estates alliance publike spirits have been to the exorbitant arbitrary wills power proceedings of our Kings who most endeavoured openly to subvert or cunningly to undermine our publike Laws and Liberties Mat. Paris speaking of the death of Geoffry Fitz-Peeter one of the greatest Peers of that age writes thus of him This year Anno 1218. Geoffry Fitz-Peeter Chief Justice of all England a man of great power and authority TO THE GREATEST DETRIMENT OF THE KINGDOM ended his dayes the 2. day of Octob. ERAT autem FIRMISSIMA REGNI COLUMNA for he was the most firm pillar of the Kingdom as being a Nobleman expert in the Laws furnished with treasures rents and all sort of goods and confederated to all the great men of England by blood or friendship whence the King without love did fear him above all men for he governed the reigns of the Kingdom Whereupon after his death England was become like a ship in a storm without an helm The beginning of which tempest was the death of Hubert Archbishop of Canterbury a magnificent and faithfull man neither could England breath again after the death of these two When K. John heard of Fitz-Peeters death turning to those who sate about him He said By Gods feet now am I first King and Lord of England He had therefore from thenceforth more free power to break his Oaths and Covenants which he had made with the said Geoffry for the peoples Liberty and Kingdoms peace Such Pillars and Staies are great and stout Peers to a Kingdom and Curbs to tyrannical Kings which caused Vortigern the British Kingâ— who usurped the Crown with the treacherous murder of his Soveraign Nobiles deprimere et moribus et sanguine ignobiles extollere quod maximè regiae honestati contrarium est to secure his throne thereby against their predominant power as other Usurpers and Tyrants since have done Therfore of meer Right they ought to have a place and voice in Parliaments for the very Kingdoms safety and welfare without the peoples election William Duke of Normandy having slain the Usurper King Harold with many thousands of Englishmen in the field routed his whole Army and caused the City of London and most parts of England to subject themselves unto him as their Soveraign out of base fear thereupon Stigand Archbishop of Canterbury and Eglesine Abbot of St. Augustine chief Peers of the Realm and Lords and Governors of Kent to preserve themselves their Country Laws and
est satisfactum The Pope hereupon taking more boldness than before to trample the English Prelates Clergy under his feet fleece them imperiose solito imperiofius Praelatis Angliae demandavit ut in Anglia omnes beneficiati in suis beneficiis residentiam facientes tertiam partem bonorum suorum Domino Papae conferrent non facientes residentiam dimidiam multis adjectis durissimis conditionibus praedictum mandatum restringentibus per illum verbum et adjectionem detestabilem NON OBSTANTE quae omnem extinguit justitiam praehabitam The Bishops assembling in convocation to exact it the King thereupon by his Nobles advice and instigation sent Sir John de Lexeton a Knight and Lawrence St. Marin his Clark to them strictly commanding them in the kings behalf not to consent by any means to this contribution demanded by the Pope to the desolation of the English kingdom The next year 1247. Vrgente Papali mandato redivivo de importabili contributione Papali praetacta ad quam Episcopi in generali Concilio Clerum infeliciter obligarent fecit Dominus Rex MAGNATES SUOS nec non et Angliae Archidiaconos per scripta sua Regia Londini convocari Quo cum pervenissent die ptaefixo Episcopi omnes sese gratis absentarunt ne viderentur propriis factis eminus adversari Sciebant enim corda omnium usque ad animae amaritudinem sauciri Convenerunt tunc ibidem Archidiaconi Angliae nec non et totius regni Cleri pars non minima CUM IPSIS MAGNATIBUS conquerentes communiter super intolerabilibus frequentibus exactionibus Domini Papae pro quibus Dominus Rex non mediocriter compatiendo tristabatur Res enim publica periclatabatur et commune negotium regni totius agebatur imminebat tam populi quam cleri inanis desolatio et cunctis temporibus inaudita After long consultation the King and Nobles by common advise resolved to send a remonstrance of all their grievances together with Letters in the name of the whole Parliament and kingdom to the Pope and his Cardinals speedily to redress them which Letters they sealed with the Common Seal of the City of London thereby obtained some shew of redress of their grievances which the Nobles further prosecuted and complained of in another Parliament the selfsame year Dominus Rex comperiens regnum suum enormiter undique periclitari by the Popes exactions taxes oppositions jussit OMNEM TOTIUS REGNI NOBILITATEM CONVOCARI ut de statu ipsius tam manifeste periclitantis Oxoniae contrectarent Praelatos autem ad hoc Parliamentum vocavit anxius quia videbat eos tam frequenter per Papulâ—s extortiones depauperari quod frequentia consuetudinem regni ruinam manifeste minabatur Sperabatur igitur communiter aliquod salubre Ecclesiae et universitati ibi statuendum quod tamen omnes fefellit through the Prelates and Clergies cowardise and the kings overmuch compliance with the Pope the Nobles only continuing constant in their oppositions against these papal exactions and enormities being more zealous for the Churches Clergies Prelates liberties against the Popes intolerable exactions oppressions incroachments than they themselves and the only persons who manfully and constantly maintained them when the King Prelates and Clergy through fear cowardise and treachery betrayed and deserted them Anno 1264. Pope Urban being much incensed against the BARONS spoiling the goods of Ecclesiastical persons who were Aliens advanced by his provisions said That he desired to live no longer but till he had subdued the English whereupon he sent a Legate towards England a great Person to wit Sabin a Bishop Cardinal to interdict the Land and excommunicate THE BARONS the oppugners of his Provisions But when he would have entred England he found he could not safely do it by reason of the Barons resistance Whereupon citing some Bishops of the Realm first to Ambayonne and afterwards to Bononia Sententiam excommunicationis et interdictionis super Civitatem Londoniae et 5. Portus necnon quasdam personas illustres ET NOBILES REGNI fulminatum commisit exequendam At illi Sententiam illam contra justitiam illatam attendentes appellarunt ad Papam ad meliora tempora vel ad generale Concilium necnon et supremuÌ„ judiceÌ„ certis de causis et rationibus commendabilibus Quae postea appellatio in Anglia congregato apud Radingum Concilio recitata est et ab Episcopis et Clero approbata et executa Interdictum autem licet inviti suscipientes a Legato praedicti Episcopi secum detulerunt Sed cum applicuissent Doveriae scrutinio ex more in portu facto intâ—â—â—eptum est a Civibus et in minutias dilaneatum jactatur in mare So little did they then regard and so much detest and scorn the Popes unjust Interdict in so just a cause An. 2 E. 1. Rot. Fin. m. 9. in Sched Cook 4 Inst p. 13. Pope Gregory by his Letters demanding the rent of 1000. marks by the year of K. Ed. the 1. reserved for England upon his regranting the Realm to King John the king writ thus to him Se sine PRAELATIS ET PROCERIBUS REGNI NON POSSE RESPONDERE quod jurejurando in coronatione sua fuit astrictus QVOD JURA REGNI SUI SERVARET ILLIBATA nec aliquid quod Diadema tangit Regni ejusdem absque ipsorum requisitus consilio facere And the Parliament being ended he could doe nothing without them who afterwards gallantly opposed his usurpations as will appear by this following president King Edward the 1. in the 29. year of his reign being summoned by the Pope by himself or his Proctors to declare his right to the Realm of Scotland in his Court at Rome where he should receive justice concerning it The King thereupon called a Parliament to consult about it where he refused to return any answer by himself but committed it to the Earls and other Lords of the Land to return the Pope an answer thereunto Who making a large and learned Historical Remonstrance of the subjection of Scotland and her Kings to the Kings of England and of their Homage done to them in all ages as their Soveraign Lords sent it to the Pope with this notable Letter signed as Mat. Westminster and Sir Edward Cook inform us with no less than 100 Seals of Arms of Earls and Barons in the name of the whole Parliament and Kingdom Sancta Romana Ecclesia per cujus ministerium fides Catholica in suis artibus cum ea ut firmiter credimus et teneamus maturitate procedit quod nulli praejudicare sed singulorum jura conservari velit illaesa Sane convocato nuper per Serenissimum Dominum nostrum Edwardum Dei gratia regem Angliae illustrem Parliamento apud Lincolniam generali idem Dominus noster quasdam literas Apostolicas quas super certis negotiis conditionem et statum Regni ex vestra parte receperat in medio exhiberi ac
Whether they be the genuine offspring of these their Noble Ancestors or natural Freeborn English Peers or Freemen and not rather the degenerate off-spring of Russian Vassals or Turkish Gally-slaves who never knew what English Freedom was as if now born only to the greatest servitude and Bondage that ever mortals voluntarily submitted unto through pusillanimous fear or baseness For alas where is the Nobleman Knight Citizen Burgess Lawyer Gentleman or English Freemen to be found who now dares manfully to claim plead avow defend or contend for the undoubted rights and privileges of his own Peerage or our Parliaments the famous Grand Charters of his own and the Nations Liberty and Freedom either in or out of Parliament after so many old late military and Parliamentary Contests Acts Oathes Excommunications Remonstrances Declarations Protestations Vows Leagues Covenants for their inviolable maintenance and defence in every Article especially those which concern Peerage Liberty Property Freehold Life the Members privileges of our Parliaments and that not only against their Soveraign and Superiors with whom they formerly contested but even against those late or present domineering Army-Officers and Vpstaris who but a few years since were not only their fellow Subjects but their Inferiors in all respects yea their Mercinary Servants Hirelings and Mechanicks of the lowest rank or against the meanest Publicans Officers or Excise-men Governors of our new-moulded Common-wealth who have trampled our Great Charters Laws Liberties properties and Parliaments themselves under feet and not only scorn deride but disgust the very Name and Mention of Magna Charta as offensive to their lawless tyranny and repute the urging of it to controll their arbitrary proceedings encroachments Taxes Excises little less than a capital offence For proof whereof I shall instance in One particulat In August 1650. during my close Imprisonment in Dunster Castle by Mr. Bradshaw and his Whitehall Associates lawless warrant there came an Order from them and the Committee of the Militia of Somersetshire with near 200 pioneers of the County to slight and demolish that Castle to the Ground without giving Mr. George Luttrel then owner thereof the least notice Who thereupon was advised by his Councel to send a Petition to Whitehall to stay the execution The Petition then drawn by his Council being long and imperrinent I did at his Wives request draw up another short one for him to this effect That Dunster Castle was the antient inheritance and chief Seat of his Ancestors and himself of which many Manors were held by Knight Service and Castle-Gard That his Father fortified and held it for the Parliament at his own charge for which he was kept and died a Prisoner under the King That his Vncle who was slain near the Castle and himself were both Colonels for the Parliament serving them gratis without any pay for which the Kings party had sequestred his estate felled his woods seised his rents to the value of ten thousand pounds at least that the Castle was regained from the Kings party principally by his means being his only Mansion house which if now suddenly pulled down he and his family must lye in the Streets and he sustain at least thirty thousand pounds new damage by it instead of a recompence for his former losses and publike unmercenary services which would expose both himself and thē to the obloquy of their malignant Enemies He thereupon humbly prayed that according to Magna Charta he might not be disinherited or disseised of this his Freehold without any hearing or Legal trial by this their Order but that they would suspend or revoke it This petition being sent to London was delivered to a Great Lawyer one of Mr. Bradshaws Associats and a then sitting Member to present who commanded the very name and mention of Magna Charta only to be struck out and the rest of the petition to be new written because the very name of it would give offence or distaste to the COVNCEL at Whitehall as he affirmed Which I then found true by experience my insisting on it in my Letters to them to demand my Liberty being so offensive that they would neither answer nor read my Letters but with indignation How others in late and present power have vilified and contemned the Great Charter the petition of Righr and all other Laws in confirmation of it by dissolving the House of Peers making and unmaking new forms of Parliaments at their pleasures condemning beheading Peers and others in new misnamed High Courts of Justice without trials by their Peers imprisoning close imprisoning confining banishing sequestring disinheriting disofficing Nobles Parliament-men and all sorts of Freemen at their pleasures without any lawful cause hearing or legal trial by breaking up and ransacking their houses by armed Soldiers day and night seising their horses arms Letters papers denying to grant them when imprisoned Habeas Corporaes or to return them when granted or bayl them when returned by imposing intollerable uncessant Taxes Excises Imposts payments penalties sequestrations forfeitures Treasons exiles restraints Engagements Disabilities on the people by commanding all Courts of Justice in their new Commonwealth and all Judges and Justices of the same Sherifs Committee-men Attornies Sollicitors and all other persons without any Opposition or dispute whatsoever to conform themselves to their most tyrannical Ordinances touching Taxes Imposts Excises though so much decried condemned by two Parliaments and themselves authorizing their Excisemen and Agents to levy their illegal new kind of Impositions by ex officio Oaths Distresses Fines Forfeitures sequestrations seisures both of their real and personal Estates breaking up of their houses which must stand open to their searches day and night without opposition by imprisonment of their persons by indemnifying all Officers who shall thus illegally abuse them giving them good costs and damages if sued staying all their actions at Law for their just relief and imprisoning all such Lawyers as grand delinquents who shall dare to move for their Liberties or plead their causes which not one dares doe since Mr. Conyes late case And how our New-modelled Parliaments as some stile them instead of complaining against and regulating these tyrannical oppressions Exorbitances Taxes Ordinances Excises and reprehending the Authors of them to their faces have countenanced them by their stupid silence confirmed them by new Edicts yea made it their principal business to burthen our 3. whole Nations with perpetual endless illegal New Taxes Excises Imposts Customs Payments unheard of by our ancestors in any former ages amounting to more thousands millions in one year than King Henry the 3. whom the Barons so much opposed and complained against for Exactions levied upon his Subjects by way of Tax or Ayds in all his 51 years reign yea to null the Great Charter it self with all our fundamental Laws Liberties and the Privileges Essence of Parliaments themselves by secluding disabling what members they please from sitting by depriving the people of their Votes freedom
in electing Members both in antient Boroughs and Counties by subjecting them to new imprisonments forfeiteres of Estate life and trials by Marshal Law in sundry particulars against this Charter instead of easing them of their long-continued illegal Taxes Excises Imposts Imprisonments Confinements c. confirming their former Liberties Franchises Properties Parliamentary privileges punishing the manifold high violations of them with those ill Councellers Projectors who were the chief contrivers of these intollerable grievances and resuming the antitient dissipated Lands Revenues of the Crown which should defray al publik ordinary expences yea how instrumental some of them have been to promote the desperate designs Practises Conspiracies of the Pope and Jesuits themselves now swarming amongst us under sundry disguises to ruine both our Kings Parliaments Church and State is so experimentally visible and well known to them all that I hope the consideration thereof compared with the forecited Presidents of our noble Ancestors and Parliamenâ—s will strike such a confusion of face such a compunction of heart into them for this their degeneracy Apostacy and breach of publike trust that they will now at last to regain their own lost reputations publikely renounce and abhor their former Exorbitances and study to equalize out act those their heroick predecesors by regaining re-establishing our lost Great Charters Laws Properties Liberties Parliaments privileges Peerage and make us once more a free thereby a happy and united Kingdom Church Nation that so they may be deemed worthy to sit vote in our future Parliaments It is storied of our renowned victorious warlike King Edward the 1. that in a Parliament held at Westminster in July 1297. he ascended upon a wooden scaffold before the great hall there with his Son Prince Edward the Archbishop of Canterbury and Earl of Warwick and there before all the people standing by erumpentibus lach ymis veniam de commissis humiliter postulavit dicens se minus bene tranquilliter quam Regem deceret ipsos rexisse portiunculas facultatum suarum quas sibi dederaut seu quas ministri ejus ipso inscio extorserant ideo acceptasse ut in â—urâ—osos hostium conatus sitientium sanguinem Anglicanum sumpta Rei publicae particula massa quietius possidendo potentius expugnaret Et addens ecce expositurus meipsum discrimini propter vos peto si rediero suscipiatis me velut in presentia habetis ABLATA OMNIA REDDAM VOBIS c. If our late or present all-swaying Governors Officers Swordmen will now make but the self same ingenuous acknowledgement as he before all the people that they have not governed them so well and peaceably as they should have done and became them to do that they and their Officers have much oppressed extorted from them not small but great sums of Money by undue and exorbitant means against their wills though with a publike intention to conquer those Enemies more effectually who thirsted after English blood for whose safety they are still ready to adventure their lives That they have sought their own wealth advantage honour preferment more than the publike or peoples welfare thereupon shall with weeping eyes humbly beg pardon of the whole Nation and those particular persons they have any ways ruined or oppressed and promise them full reparation of their injuries and what ever they have unjustly taken from them as this noble King Edw. did and confirm and enlarge all their Great Charters Laws Liberties as fully as freely as he then did upon his Nobles importunity they may then expect that reciprocal Love and dutifull respect to them as the Archbishop with the people then promised to King Edward and his Son with stretched out hands and be deemed worthy to sit and vote in Parliament notwithstanding their former miscarriages exorbitant arbitrary Ordinances and Provisions of which if they repent not I fear in conclusion what Matthew Westminster records of the Barons provisions at Oxon. Lewes and London will be recorded of them to Posterity Haec de provisionibus imo DE PRODITIONIBUS Oxon Lewens Londini dicta sufficiant quae variis aequitatis justitiae fictionibus dealbatae intus autem plenae Versutiae Provisores suos pessime prodiderunt which some of our late swaying republican Legislators have already found true by sad experience Fourthly our Nobles are persons of greater Estates Families Fortunes than others contribute most to all publike Taxes charges and have more to keep and lose than other ordinary Commoners and therefore in respect of themselves their families kinred tenants reretainers allies have greater interest in the Common-wealth and State affairs than they We see by Common experience in all kingdoms Nations and our own Realm that mens great estates innoble and inable them to bear publike Titles Places of Honour Dignity Trust Power as to be Lords Knights Esq Privy Counsellors Justices Sherifs Mayors Aldermen and the like which persons of mean fortunes unable to support these Dignities Offices places of trust and expence likewise are uncapable or unable to bear or manage Wherefore our Ancestors thought it meet just equal that they should have this privilege among others above ordinary Commoners to be present in all our Parliaments by Patent and Tenure only and that of right ex debito justitiae not by election as Knights Citizens and Burgesses are being persons of meaner estate quality and present in Parliament only in the right of others who elect them not in their own rights as the Lords are whose estates antiently were and still are far more worth yea their publike payment greater than many whole Burroughs put together and their families retainers followers far more in number And so their engagements to maintain the Laws Liberties properties of the Subject farr greater than inferiour mens Upon which ground all Barons and Peers of the Realm in cases of debt and executions are free from arrests of their bodres because by reason of their estates and Dignities the Law intends they have lands and assets to satisfie all their debts Fifthly It is one principal property of Members of Parliament to be constant stout inflexible and not to be bowed or turned from the right the publike good or liberties by fear favour promises rewards Now Peers of noble birth education and more generous heroick spirits than the vulgar sort of men are not so apt to be over-awed with regal threats terrified with menaces tempted with honours preferments wealth which they already injoy in a higher proportion than others nor seduced with rewards and privat ends from the common good and interest wherein their honour wealth safety are imbarqued as ordinary Commoners and men of meaner rank and fortunes are which experience of former ages and this present manifests Therefore it was thought just and reasonable by our Ancestors that the Nobles in this regard should sit in all our Parliaments in their own rights without the peoples election and to leave the people to
constricti usque ad lachtymarum compuncti sunt effusionem Rex autem confessus est in veritate quod compulsus ab Episcopo Wintoniensi et Petro de Rivallis aliis Consiliariis suis jussit figillum suum apponi in quibusdam literis sibi praesentatis sed tenorem eorum se nunquam audisse cum juramento affirmavit Ad hoc responâ—um Archiepiscopus dixit Scrutamini Rex conscientiam vestram quia omnes illi qui literas illas mitti procuraverunt et hujus proditionis conscii fuerunt rei sunt de morte Marescalli ac si illum propriis manibus occidissent Tunc Rex HABITO CONSILIO fecit vocari per literas Episcopum Wintoniensâ—m Petrum de Rivallis Stephanum de Segrave et Robertum de Passeleve ut venirent ad festum Sancti Johannis ratiocinium reddituri de thesauris suis receptis pariter expensis sed et de sigillo suo quod male tractaverant ipso penitus ignorante mandavit ut tunc venirent RESPONSURI ET JURI PARITURI Sed illi proprias conscientias habentes suspectas in omnibus ex una parte Regem ex altera fratres et amicos metuebant Marescalli cujus necem procurasse videbantur Unde ad pacem Ecclesiae confugients Episcopus et Petrus de Rivallis in Ecclesia Cathedrali apud Wintoniam latitabant a conspectu hominum sese penitus subtrahentes Stephanus vero de Segrave in Ecclesia Sanctae Mariae in Abbatia Canonicorum apud Legecestriam delituit et qui prius a clericatu ad militiam per arrogantiam confugerat ad clericatus officium reversus coronam quam reliquerat inconsulto Episcopo revocavit Robertus quoque Passeleue ad latibulum divertit incognitum c. Sed revera ad Novum templum â—e infirmum simulans in quodam secreto celatus cellario laâ—itabat more tectus leporino Tandem Aedmundus Cant. Episcopus impetravit a Rege ut sub salvo conductu ipsius et Episcoporum possunt ad diem certum coram illo â—enite ut omnis in regno dissentionis occasio sopiretur Statuit igitur illis diem Rex pridie Idus Julii apud Westmonasterium ubi sub protectione Archiepiscopi et Episcoporum ad Regis praesentiam sunt producti Petrus de Rivallis primus in causam vocatuâ— apparuit coram Rege in habitu clericali cum tonsura et lata corona Regemâ—ue reverenter salutavit cum Iusticiariis suâ—s in Banco sedentem Quam Rex torvo respiciens oculo O PRODITOR inquit per iniquum consilium tuum sigillum meum ignorans apposui literis de proditione Comitis Mareschalli Per tuum etiam pravum consilium ipsum et alios de regno meo homines naturales et eorum animos à me pariter amorem averti Per pravum etiam consilium tuum et complicum tuorum guerram contra illos movi in jacturam irrestauribilem et regni opprobrium per quam guerram thesaurum meum et vitam multorum illustrium simul et honorem meum amisi lamentabiliter Exigit igitur Rex praeterea ratiocinium de thesauro suo et custodia puerorum nobilium et escheatarum cum aliis proventibus multis quae ad Coronam spectabant Cumque haec et alia multa Rex ab eo sub proditionis nomine exigisset nihil omnino de objectis sibi criminibus negavit sed coram Rege in terram corruens per haec verba ejus misericordiam imploravit Domine Rex inquit nutritus sum a vobis et in bonis temporalibus dives factus ne confundes hominem quem creasti sed concede saâ—tem tempus deliberandi ut de rebus exactis competenter vobis valeam reddere rationem Cui Rex Mittam te iu Turrim Londinensem ut ibi deliberes donec mihi satisfacias praevia ratione Ad haec Petrus Domine Clericus sum nec debeo incarcerari vel sub Laicorum custodia deputari Respondit Rex Te ut laicum hactenus gessisti a te agitur ut Laico cui meum commisi thesaurum exigo Veruntamen eâ—â—e pro sens est Archiepiscopus qui si pro te fidiâ—ubere voluerit tradam te illi ut miâ—i â—â—tisfaciâ—t de exactionibus supradictis Ad quod cum siluiâ—seâ— Archiepiscopus misit Rex praedictum Petrum in Turrim memoratam accipieâ—s in manus suas omnes laioas possessiones ejus quia sub habitu clericali lâ—ica erat induius gestans anelaâ—ium ad lumbare quod clenicum non decebat Et tunc Pâ—tâ—us fleâ—it amare scilicet ingredieâ—s nâ— ioulum â— ducendus ad turrim supradictam Fuit autem in ea die Jovis et sâ—quenti die Veneris Et tunc ab Archiepiscopo liberatus apud Wintoniam perductus est et in ecclesia dimissus cathedrali Apparuit autem eadem die in Regis praesentia Stephaphanus de Segrave veniens sub protectione Archiepiscopi de rebus sibi impositis resâ—onsuâ—uâ— Qui cum staret in judicio Juri pariturus increpavit eum Rex sub nomine nequissimi proditoris de domnibus articulis de quibus increpaveâ—at Petrum de Rivallis hoc etiam adâ—iciens quod consilium dederat et ut Hubertum de Burgo ab officiâ— Justiciarii amoveret incarceraret patibulo suspenderet Nobilâ—s de regno exilio relegaret Cumque haec alia multa ei imposuisset slagitia exegit ab eo ratiocium de ossicio Justiciarii quod sub eo ministraverat post Hubertum de Burgo de rebus receptis pariter et â—xpensis Super his autem Archiepiscopus et Episcopi impetraverunt inducias a Rege usque ad festum S. Michaelis ut deliberandi tempus haberet De pravis quoque consiliis sibi imputatis alios altiores eo medios scilicet intâ—r Regem et eum quibus necesse habuit immediate respondere nepote Wâ—lierum Carleolensem Petrum de Rivalliâ— non me redarguat Et sic de aliis umbonem fâ—oiens recessit in alios crimen retorquendo Et sic absdondit se iterum Robertus Passeleue The King made Hugh de Pateshulle an honest and faithfull man chief Justice of England much against his will in Passeleues place And at the Archbishops request in the same Parliament restored to Gilbert Brother and heir to murdered Richard Earl Marshal all his inheritance both in England and Ireland received his homage knighted and gave him the rod of his Marshals Court as the manner is to hold that office as well and freely as his ancestors enjoyed it And so this Civil warr and Combustion between the King and his Nobles was fully reconciled I have transcribed this History and these Parliamentary proceedings at large out of Matthew Paris First to manifest the Gallantry Courage Zeal Vigilancy Unanimity of our Nobles Lords Barons and Prelates in that age in opposing reprehending the King himself to his face and threatning to depose and excommunicate him both in and out of Parliament for entertaining foreigners and
Communi Iudicio Which he more amply relates in his History of England p. 69. to 77. Here we have judgement of banishment given against Gaverston by the Lords in Parliament 3. several times the 1. whiles a Commoner the two later whiles an Earl as an Enemy to the Realm and publike Traytor and a Sentence of death denounced against him in case he returned which was accordingly executed on him by the common Sentence of the Lords A Convincing proof of their Jurisdiction in criminal Causes both over Commoners and Peers His second banishment by the Lords was ratified by a Bill as the Spencers was to which the Commons gave their Assent as they did to two Acts in the Parliament of 7 Edward the 2. printed in Totles Magna Charta part 2. f. 43 44. Ne quis occasionetur pro reditu as also pro morte Petri de Gaverston made by the Grant and Assent of the King Archbishops Bushops Abbots Priors Earls and Barons ET TOUTE LA COMMVNALTIE de nostre Royalm By which Bill his Lands were all forfeited and giveâ— to the King as appears by Claus 1.2 E. 2. m. 5. where Hugh de Audeley the younger and Margaret his wife petitioned A nostre Seigneur la Roy son Counscil PRELATES COUNTS BARONS de la terre The Petition was for the Earldom of Cornwall after the death of Peter de Gaverston to whom it was given in general tayl Margaret being his daughter and heir because THE GREAT CHARTER wills that after the death of a Baron his heir shall have his heritage and mariage and the Statute of Westminster 2. wills That heirs in tayl shall not be prejudiced by the deed fine or feofment of their Ancestors and the GREAT CHARTER also wills That no man shall be outed of his freehold without the award and judgement of the Law of the Land Afterwards upon debate of this Petition pro eo quod recordatum fuit by the LORDS AND COMMONS that it had been AGREED BY THEM that all things given by the King to Gaverston and Margaret should be revoked per quod in hoc Parliamento modo per praefatos Praelatos Comiteâ— Barones et totain Communitatem Regni cousideratum est that the Earldom and all the rest of his Landâ— should remain in the King that all Charters of it should be repealed all enrolments cancelled quod est adjudicatum intretur ad Scaccarium et ad utrumque Câ—riâ—m there to be inrolled also And there is a writ directd to the Treasurer and Barons and Chief Justices of both Benches to inrol it in this Roll. This judgement being by way of Bill in pursuance of the former Bill for his attainder had the Commons assent thereto as well as the Lords though the Petiâ—ion here was directed only to the King and Lords for restitution not to the Commons who could not be Gaverstons proper Judges in Parliament being a Peer but only by way of Bill of Attainder In the 15 year of King Ed. 2. the two Sir Hugh Spencers Father and Son were articled against impeached and condemned of High Treason by the Lords in Parliament and exiled by their judgement without the Prelates or Commons who only consented to the Act for their banishment after the judgement given of which at large before to which I shall here annexe the Arricles of their impeachment being very memorable Alhonnour de Dieu de sainct esglise et de nostre seignour le roy et au profite de luy et de son royalmâ— a peace de quiete maintenir en son people et pur meinteynment de lestate de la Corone luy monstrent Praelates Counâ—z et Barons et les autres Pieres de la terre common du royalme contresir Hugh le Despenser le fitz et Sir Hugh le Despenser le Pier que come le dit sire Hugh le Despenser le fitz au Parlement Deverwike fuit nosme et assentu destre en lossice du Chamberlain nostre seignor le roy de servir en cel office come afferoit An quel parlement fuit auxi assentu que certeins Prelates et â—u res Grandes du roialme demorerent pres de roy par sâ—isons de lan pur meulx counseiler nostre seignor le roy sans queux nul grosse bosoigne ne se deveroit fair le dit sir Hugh le fitz attreit a luy syr Hugh son pier que ne fuit nient assentu ne accorde en parlement a demourer ensi pres de roy enter eux deux acroachant a eux royal power sur le roy fes ministers le guyment de son royalme a dishor our du roy emblemisement de sa corone et destruction du royalme des grandes et du people et sesoient les maluesiees desâ—us escriptes en compassant deâ—â—oigner le coer nostre seignour le roy des Piers de la terre pur avoir eux soule governance de la terre En primes que sir Hugh le Dispenser le fitz feusi coruce vers le roy et sur ceo coruce fist un bille sur la quel bille il voillet auoir en aliance de sir John Gyffarde de Brymmesfeld sir Richard de Greye et dautre davoir mesne le roy par aspertee de faire sa volunte issent que en luy ne temist mye que il ne â—e euâ—t fair â—a tenure de la bille sensuit sous escript Homage serement de ligeance est pluis par reson de la corone que per reason de person le roy pluis se lie a la corone que a la person ceo piere que avant que â—estate de la corone soit descendu nul ligeance est a la person regardant Dont si le roy par case ne se meisne par reasone en droit de la corone les leiges sont lies per sâ—rement fait a la corone de remeuer le roy et le state de la corone par reason auâ—rement ne serroit le serement tenus Ore fait a demander coment lem doit amesner le roy ou par suite de ley ou par aspertee par suite de ley ne luy poet home pas redresser â—ar il navera pas juge si ceo ne soit depart le roy En quel case si la volunte le roy ne soit accordant a reason si naveroit il forsque errour maintenue confirme Dont il covient pur le serement lauuer et quant le roy ne voet chose redresser oustre que est pur le common people malueis et damageous pur la corone a judger est que la chose soit ousle par aspertee que il est lie par â—on serement de governer son people ses lieges ses liege â—ont lies de govern en eide de luy en defaut de luy Et auxint par lour covin
Earl of Ireland Mâ—chael de la Poole Earl of Suffolk Robert Tresylam Chief Justice Nicholas Bramber Knight and other of their adherents of High Treason against the King and his Realm The Articles they exhibited against them were 36 in number at large recorded in Henry de Knyghton de Eventibus Angliae l. 5. col 2713. to 2727. with the whole proceedings thereupon for which many were attainted condemned executed BY JUDGEMENT OF THE LORDS notwithstanding the Kings intercession for some of them to the LORDS they are likewise mentioned in the printed Statutes at large of 11 R. 2. c. 1 3 4. in Walsingham Hist Angliae p. 359 to 367. and other vulgar Historians I shall therefore for brevity refer you to them Exactum est juramentum a rege ad standum REGULATIONI PROCERUM et non solum a rege sed a cunctis regni incolis idem juramentum est expetitum In the Parliament of 14 R. 2. n. 14. The King and Lords without the Commons declared That in the 7 year of this King the Earldom of Richmond with the appartenances WERE ADJUDGED BY THE KING AND LORDS to be forfeited to the King by reason of the adherence of John Duke of Britain then Earl of Richmond to the French against his allegiance to the King and his father king Edward the 3. which judgement was not then enrolled in the Rolls of Parliament for certain causes known to the King and LORDS but was now inrolled and the lands granted to the Earl of Westmerland which King Henry the 4th would not revoke upon the Commons Petition to restore them to the Duke 1 H. 4. rot Parl. n. 78. In the Parliament of 17 R. 2. n. 11 Richard Earl of Arundel in the presence of the KING and LORDS accused the Duke of Lancastre of 5 particular misdemeanors In which when the King had justified him it was awarded by the King BY THE ASSENTS OF ALL THE LORDS that the Earl should in full Parliament make a formal submission to the Duke and crave pardon for his false accusation In the Parliament of 21 R. 2. rot Parl. n. 12. to 17. the Commons impeached Thomas Arundel Archbishop of Canterbury of high Treason for procuring the Duke of Glocester and others there named to accroach to themselves regal power and execute the Commission of 10 R. 2. when he was Chancellor praying that he might be kept under safe custody with a protestation of making for her accusations during the Parliament against him and others After which they prayed the King to give judgement against the Archbishop according to his desert who submitted himself to the Kings mercy Whereupon the KING LORDS and Sir Thomas Piercy the general Proctor for the Bishops in this case adjudged the fact of the Archbishop to be Treason and himself a Traytor and that thereupon he should be banished his temporalties seised and all his lands in proper possession or use together with his goods forfeited to the King and presenting the day and place of his departure into exile After this in the same Parliament of 21 R. 2. the Lords Appellant therein named accused the Duke of Glocester the Earls of Arundel and Warwick and others of High Treason for procuring the Commission in 10 R. 2. for raising forces and coming to the Kings person armed For accroching to themselves royal power and adjudging some to death and executing them as Traytors in the Parliament of 11 R. 2. For intending to surrender up their Homage and allegeance to the King and then to depose him and saying they had good cause to depose him c. Hereupon the Earl of Arundel being brought in custody to the Parliament before the Lords by the Kings command and assent of the Lords had his charge read and declared before him by the Duke of Lancaster Steward of England to which he pleaded his pardon which plea being disallowed because his pardon was revoked by this Parliament and he relying on it without any other plea the Lords appellants prayed judgement against him as convict of the Treasons aforesaid Whereupon the Duke of Lancaster by assent of the KING Bishops Earles and LORDS adjudged him convict of the Articles aforesaid and thereby a Traytor to the King and Realm and that he should be therefore hanged drawn and quartered and forfeit all his Lands in fee or fee-tayl which he had in the 10. year of this King with all his goods and chattels But for that he was come of Noble bloud the King pardoned his execution of hanging drawing and quartering and granted that he should be beheaded which was accordingly executed the same day on Tower hill by the Marshal of England The 28. of September the Earl of Warwick was brought ao his Trial in the same manner as the Earl of Arundel who confessed all the Articles submitted to the Kings grace and had the same judgement pronounced against him in the same manner as the Earl of Arundel But the King at the Lords Appellants and others requests pardoned his execution granted him his life and banished him into the Isle of Man The Duke of Norfolk by assent and Act of Parliament was tried in a Court Martial by the King Lords and some Knights for words spoken against the King and judgement was there given that he should be banished into Hungary and his lands forfeited to the King Within one year after such is the vicissitude of all worldly honour and power in the Parliament of 1 H. 4. Plac. Coron n. 1. to 11. at the prayer of the Commons the great Lords Appellants Edward Duke of Albemarl Tho. Duke of Surry John Duke of Exeter John Marquess Dorset John Earl of Salisbury and Thomas Earl of Glocester were all questioned and brought to their several answers before the King and Lords for their Acts and proceedings in the Parliament of 21 R. 2. the records whereof being read before them in Parliament they made their several answers and excuses thereunto whereupon the King and Lords after consultation thereupon ADJUDGED that the said Dukes Marques and Earls should lose their several Titles and Dignities of Dukes Marquess and Earls with all the honor thereunto belonging and that they should forfeit all the Lands and goods which they or any of them had given them at the death of the Duke of Glocester or since and that if they or any of them should adhere to the quarrel or person of King Richard lately deposed that then the same should be Treason The which Judgement was pronounced against them by William Thurning Chief Justice of the Kings Bench in Parliament by the Kings command but in the Parliament of 2 H. 4. rot Parl. n. 33. upon the Petition of the Lords and Commons to the King the Earls of Rutland and Somerset were pardoned and restored by the King in Parliament In the Parliament of 2 H. 4. n. 14. the Bishop of Norwich was accused by Sir Thomas Erpingham the Kings
fined a 1000 l. to Edmond Earl of Cornwal and 2000 marks to the Abbot of Westminster and committed to the Tower of London by JUDGEMENT of the King Earls Barons and Iustices in full Parliament for citing and attaching the said Earl of Cornwal in Westminster hall to appear before the Archbishop sitting the Parliament whereof he was a Peer against his Privilege and the privilege of Sanctuary granted to the Abbot of Westminst and remained prisoners there till they put in Sureties and paid the 1000 l. fine to the Earl notwithstanding their plea of ignorance of these their Privileges In the Parliament of 4 E. 3. n. 2 3 4 5 6. Sir Simon Bereford knight John Mautravers Boso de Bayons John Deverall Thomas de Gournay and William of Ocle confederates with Roger Mortimer Earl of March in all his Treasons and misdoings for which he was then impeached and condemned and guilty of the murders of King Edward the 2. after his deposition in Berkley Castle and of the Earl of Kent his Brother were attainted and condemned of High Treason by the Lords Barons Péers in Parliament as Iudges of Parliament though they were Commoners and not their Péers whom they were not at all obliged to judge as Péers adjudging them by the Kings assent as Traytors and Enemies of the King and his Realm to be drawn and hanged Whereupon Sir Simon being in Custody was executed by the Marshal and Proclamation made by the Kings writs by the Lords order to apprehend the others with promise of great rewards to those who should apprehend them that they might be executed and if they could not take them alive to bring in their heads for which thty should receive the reward of 500 l. from the King It is true indeed that after these Judgements given the Lords the same Parliament entred this special Protestation in the Parliament Roll n. 6. against being forced to give Judgement in such cases against those who were not their Peers which Sir Edward Cook stiles an Act of Parliament though it be no such thing but a voluntary Protestation of the Lords with the Kings assent It is assented and agreed by our Lord the King and all the Great men in full Parliament that albeit the said Péers as Iudges of Parliament took upon them in the presence of our Lord the King to make and render the said Judgements by assent of the King upon some of those who were not at all their Peers and that by reason of the murder of our Leige Lord and destruction of him who was so near of the bloud royal and son of a King that thereby the PEERS which now are o◠the Péers which shall be in time to come shall not be bound or charged to render Iudgements upon others who are not their Péers nor yet to doe it but upon the Péers of the Land but that they shall from henceforth be for ever acquitted thereof And that the said Iudgements now rendered shall not be drawn into example nor consequence for time to come whereby the said Peers may be charged hereafter to adjudge others than their Peers against the Law of the Land if such another case should happen which God defend From this Protestation of the Lords which Lilburn principally insists on he and some others conclude that the Peers in Parliament have no right at all to imprison fine judge or pass sentence of death against any Commoner for any offence no not for breach of their own Privileges but only the Commons To which Objection I answer First that this is no Act of Parliam as Sir E. Cook mistakes but a bare Protestation of the Lords alone assented to by the King without the Commons assent which no wayes impeacheth the Lords right of judicature Secondly that neither the House of Commons nor the Commoners then attainted of Treason and adjudged to death by the Lords ever demurred or excepted against their Jurisdiction as Lilburn and Overton doe but acknowledged and submitted to it Thirdly That in this very Protestation the Lords profess and justifie their right of BEING JVDGES in Parliament without admitting or acknowledging any Joynt or sole right of Judicature with them in the Commons Fourthly That this Protestation was meerly voluntary not in derogation but preservation of their own Honour Right Peerage and the Parliaments privileges too The substance of it is no more than this That the Lords should not be constrained against their wills by the Kings command and in his presence to give judgement of death in ordinary cases of Treason or Felony in the high Court of Parliament or elsewhere out of it against such who were no Peers who in such cases by the Law might and ought to be tried in the Kings Courts at Westminster or before the Iustices of Oyer and Terminer by a Iury of their equals but only in cases which could not well be tried elsewhere and were proper for their Judgement in Parliament they fearing that by this president in Parliament they might be sworn and impannelled on Juries in cases of Treason committed by Commoners against the Great Charter c. 29. and the Privilege of their Peerage which exempted them being sworn or put into Juries as Fitz. Nat. brev f. 165.48 E. 3. f. 30. Exemption 6.48 Ass 6.27 H. 8. f. 22. b. This is the whole summ and sence of their protestation To argue therefore from hence That they cannot pass sentence or judgement against any Commoners in any case proper for their Judicature in Parliament because they protested only against being COMPELLED to give Iudgement against such as were no Peers in cases triable elsewhere and not proper for their tribunal as the Objectors hence conclude is quite to mistake their meaning end to speak rather non-sence than reason or Law Fifthly This Protestation was made only against the Lords giving sentence in Felony and Treason and that in the Kings own presence in Parliam who usually pronounced the judgment himself or by some other with the Lords assent did not charge the Lords to pronounce it as here not against sentencing fining imprisoning any Commoner for rayling and libelling against their Persons Jurisdiction and procedings or refusing to answer and contemning their Authority to their faces at the barr or appealing from their Judicature in case of breach of Privilege of which themselves alone and no others are or can be Judges the cases of Lilburn and Overton whose commitments are warranted by hundreds of Presidents in this and former Parliaments Therefore for them to apply this Protestation to their cases with which it hath no Analogy is a manifestation of their injudiciousness and folly rather than a justification of their Libellous Invectives against the Lords injustice Sixthly The Lords gave judgement against all these persons by the Kings command in their absence without any Indictment hearing Trial witnesses heard or examined against them face to face or due process or Law against the Great Charter
and Law of the Land And this was the main reason of this their Protestation as the close of it shews to prevent such dangerous presidents for the future Upon which ground the Judgements they then gave against Roger Mortymer John Mautravers were reversed in the Parliament of 21 E. 3. n. 65.28 E. 3. n. 8. to 16. Lastly This Protestation did not foreclose the Lords in this or future Parliaments to give Judgement against Commoners in other cases of Felony and Treason even without the Commons which I shall prove by some other instances In the Parliament of 4 Ed. 3. n. 16. Sir Thomas Berkeley Knight was arraigned and tried by a Jury for Treason as being guilty of the death of King Edward the 2. committed to his custody who pleaded not guilty and was tried in full Parliament before the King by a Jury and by them acquitted Which case being rare and memorable I shall here insert the whole Record Thomas de Berkele Miles venit coram Domino Rege in pleno Parliamento suo praedicto et allocutus hoc Quod eum Dominus Edwardus nuper Rex Angliae pater Domini Regis nunc in custodia ipsius Thomae et cujusdam Johanuis Mautravors nuper extitit collatus ad salvo custodiendum in castro ipsius Thomae apud Berkele in Com. Gloucestriae et in eodem castro in custodia ipsorum Thomae Johannis murdratus extitit et interfectus qualiter se velit de morte ipsius Regis acquietare Dicit quod nunquam fuit consentiens auxilians seu procurans ad mortem suam nec unquam scivit de morte sua usquam in praesenti Parliamento isto et de hoc paratus est acquietare se prout CURIA REGIS consideraverit Et super hoc quaefitus est ab eo ex quo ipse est Dominus castri praedicti et idem Dominus Rex in custodia ipsorum Thomae Johannis extitit liberatus ad salvo custodiend ipsi custodiam ipsius Regis recepeâ—unt et acceptarunt quali er se excusare possit quin de morte ipsius Regis respondere debeat Et praedictus Thomas dicit quod verum est quod ipse est Dominus Castri praedicti et quod ipse simul cum Johanne Mautravers custodiam ipsius Regis recepit ad salvo custodiend ut praedictum est Sed dicit quod eo tempore quo dicitur ipsum Dominum Regem esse murdratum et interfectum fuit ipse taliter tanta infirmitate apud Bradeley extra Castrum praedictum detentus quod ei currebat memoriae Et super hoc dictum est ei quod ex quo cognovit quod ipse simul cum dicto Johanne custodiam ipsius Domini Regis obtinuit ut praedictum est et ipse custodes et ministros sub se posuit ad custodiam de eo faciendam si per aliquam infirmitatem excusari posset quin respondere debuit in hac parte Et praedictus Thomas dicit quod ipse posuit sub se tales custodes et ministros in castro praedicto pro custodia facienda a quibus ipse se confidebat ut de seipso qui custodiam ipsius Regis simul cum praedicto Johanne Mautravers inde habuerunt unde dicit quod ipse de morte ipsius Domini Regis auxilio assensu seu procuratione mortis suae in nullo est inde culpabilis Et de hoc de bono et malo ponit se suâ—er patriam Ideo venerint inde Juratores coram Domino Rege in Parliamento suo apud Westm in Octabis Sancti Hilarii proxime futuri c. Ad quam diem venit praedictus Thomas coram Domino Rege in pleno Parliamento ac similiter Juratores scil Johannes Darci Iohannes de Wisham Willielmus Trussell Rogerus de Swyneuerton Constantius de Morâ—imer Iohannes de sancto Phileberto Richardus de Rivers Petrus Hussey Iohannis de Dynton Richardus de la Rivere Robertus Dabenhate Richardus de Corveyes omnes milites Qui dicunt super Sacramentum suum quod praedictus Thomas de Berkelie in nullo est culpabilis praedicti Domini Edwardi Regis Patris Domini Regis nunc nec de assensu auxilio seu procuratione mortis ejusdem Et dicunt quod tempore mortis ejusdem Domini Edwardi Regis patris Domini Regis nunc fuit ipse tali infirmitate gravatus apud Bradely extra castrum suum praedictum quod de viâ—a ejus desperabatur Ideo idem Thomas inde quietus Juratores quaesiti si idem Thomas unquam substraxit se occasione praedicta dicunt quod non Et quia idem Thomas posuit custodes et ministros sub se scil Thomam de Gourney et Willielmum de Ocle ad custodiam de ipso Domino Rege faciendam per quod idem Dominus Rex extitit murdratus et interfectus datus est ei dies coram Domino Rege nunc in proximo Parliamento suo de audiendo JUDICIO SUO c. Et praedictus Thomas de Berkelei interim committitur Radulpho de Nevill Mareschallo hospitii Domini Regis c. It is observable that though Edward the 2. was murdered after he was deposed by this Parliament yet he is still â—â—lled a King in this Indictment and record and his murder adjudged Treason in those who did it After his acquittal he put in Mainpernors to appear in the next Parliament Where appearing he and his Mainpernors were discharged but yet himself ordered to appear again the ensuing Parliament as appears by the Parliament Roll of 5 E. 3. n. 16. William Thorp Chief Justice of the Kings Bench and one of the Justices of Assize in the County of Lincoln in the 23 year of Ed. the 3. against his Oath took 10 l. of Richard Saltley 20 l. of Hildebrand of Beresward 40 l. of Gilbert Holliland 40 l. and 10 l. of Ro. Daldorby to stay an Exigent upon an Indictment of diverse felonies that should have issued against them Whereupon he was indicted before the Earls of Arundel Warwick and Huntingdon the Lord Gray and Lord Burghers Anno 24 E. 3. to whom the King by Commission referred the examination of the businesse before whom he could not deny but confessed the Bribery Ideo consideratum est per dictos Justiciarios assignatos ad judicandum secundum voluntatem Regis et secundum regale posse suum quod quia praedictus Willielmus Thorpâ— qui sacramentum Domini Regis quod erga populum suum habuit custodiendum fregit malitiose false et rebelliter in quantum in ipso fuit ex causis supradictis ipsum Willielmum expresse cognitis ideo SUSPENDATUR et quod omnia terra et tenementa bona et catalla sua remaneant forisfacta The King by a writ under the privy Seal stayed his execution and sent him Prisoner to the Tower In the Parliament of 25 Ed. 3. nu 10. command was given that the record of this Judgement
against Judge Thorp should be brought into the Parliament and there read openly BEFORE THE LORDS to have every of their advice concerning it whether this Iudgement were legal or not et nullo contradicente all the Lords affirmed the judgement to be legal and good considering that he against his Oath received Bribes And therefore it was agreed by all the Lords that if the like case should hereafter happen the King might take to him such Nobles as he should think meet and therein do according to his pleasure Provided this judgement should not be drawn into example against any other Officers who should break their Oaths but only against those qui praedictum Sacramentum fecerunt of Justices et fregerunt et habent leges Regales Angl. ad custod Here the Lords were sole Judges of the Judge who was a Commoner and gave judgement against him without the Commons yea declare the Law in this new case both in and out of Parliament In the Parliament of 21 E. 3. n. 68. The Commons by divers Bills complained to the Lords of divers extortions grievances prejudices done to the King and Commons by John Wattenham and Walter de Cheriton Merchants who desired the King would command them to come before THE COUNCIL LORDS in Parliament to answer what should be objected and clear themselves In the Parliament of 50 E. 3. n. 17 18 19 20. The Commons accused Richard Lyons Merchant of London of divers deceits extortions and misdemeanors whiles he was farmer of the Customs and last subsidy for transporting wools and staple Commodities procuring new Impositions on staple ware for buying debts from the Kings Creditors at under rates and making the King to pay the whole for taking of bribes and defrauding the King To some of which charges he answered and to the rest submitted himself to the King touching Body Lands and Goods Whereupon THE LORDS adjudged him to prison during the Kings will that his lands tenements and goods should be seised to the Kings use that Commissions should issue throughout all England to inquire of his Extortions whiles farmer of the subsidies and that he should be disfranchised Upon this Judgement in the Fine Roll of 50 E. 3. m. 19 21 22. there issued out writs for the arresting and selling the goods of Richard Lyons to the Kings use which were his on the 19 of March certis de causis coram Nobis et Concilio nostro in praesenti Parliamento nostro propositis c. per Concilium in Parliamento The same Parliament 50 E. 3. n. 31 32. William Ellis of great Yarmouth was accused by the Commons of sundry extortions whiles he was Deputy Farmer of the kings subsidie to Richard Lyons To which he seemed sufficiently to answet yet was BY THE LORDS adjudged to prison and to make a fine at the Kings pleasure Ibidem Num. 33. Iohn Peach of London was impeached by the Commons for procuring a license under the Great Seal that he only might sell sweet wines in London by colour whereof he took 4 s. 4 d. of every man for every Tun thereof sold which he justified he lawfully might doe Notwithstanding JUDGEMENT was given against him by THE LORDS that he should be committed during the Kings pleasure and make recompense to all parties grieved Num 37. Adam de Bury was accused of divers deceits and wrongs done by him whiles Mayor of Callice and Captain of Bellingham Being sent for to come to the Parliament he came not nor could he be found Thereupon the Lords agreed that all his goods and chattels should be arrested and so they were All these Commons were first impeached by the Commons and thus judged and censured by THE LORDS in this GOOD PARLIAMENT as Historians and others stile it And in the Commons petitions therein there are divers Petitions of Grievances from sundry Counties Towns persons complaining of wrongs and grievances presented to the King and Lords for redresse of oppressions extortions Monolies c. In the Parliament of 1 R. 2. n. 41 42 43. Dame Alice Pâ—etrees was brought before THE LORDS by Sir Richard Scroop Knight and there charged for pursuing matters at the Court contrary to an Order made in the Parliament of 50 E. 3. n. 35. and procuring King Edward to restore Richard Lyons to his lands and goods c. she denied she pursued any such thing for singular gain against that Ordinance whereupon diverse Officers Counsellers and Secretaries of king Edward 3. were examined against her who proved she made such pursutes and that for private gain in their conceits Whereupon the Lords alone without the Commons gave Iudgement against her that she should be banished according to the order aforesaid and forfeit all her Lands Goods and Tenements to the King The same Parliament 1 R 2. n. 32 33. The Lords committed William Fitz-Hugh Goldfiner and Citizen of London to the Tower for refusing to averr a Petition exhibited by him in the name of the poor Commonalty of that mystery complaining against John Chichester and John Bolcham of the same mystery of divers oppressions done by them to the said Commonalty In this very Parliament of 1 R. 2. n. 38 39 40. The Commons prayed that all those Captains who had rendred or lost Castles or Towns through default might be put to answer it in this Parliament and severely punished according to their deserts BY AWARD or Judgement OF THE LORDS and BARONS to eschew the evil examples they had given to other Governors of Towns and Castles Whereupon Sir Alexander de Buxton Constable of the Tower was commanded to bring BEFORE THE LORDS IN PARLIAMENT William de Weston and Lord of Gomynes both of them Commoners on Friday the 27 of November to answer such Articles as should be surmised against them on the Kings behalf Being brought BEFORE THE LORDS in full Parliament they were severally articled against at the command of THE LORDS by Sir Richard le Scrop Knight Steward of the Kings House and their several Articles and answers to them in writing read before THE LORDS Which done the Constable was commanded to bring them again before THE LORDS on Saturday next ensuing being the 20 of November on which day it was shewed unto them severally by the said Steward by THE LORDS COMMAND That THE LORDS OF THE PARLIAMENT whose names are particularly mentioned in the Roll had met together and considered of their respective answers and that IT SEEMED TO THE LORDS AFORESAID that the said William had delivered up the Castle of Onâ—herwycke to the Kings enemies without any duress or want of victuals contrary to his allegiance and undertaking safely to keep it and therefore the Lords above-named sitting in full Parliament adjudge you to death that you shall be drawn hanged But because our Lord the King is not informed of the manner of the Judgement the execution of it shall be respited till the king be thereof informed After which Judgement given
singulis secundum Iuramenta Regis et Procerum debebatur expectare 2. The reason why he thus sled was to avoid the Justice of THE KING LORDS as they in plain terms inform the Pope without any mention of the Commons 3ly This expulsion is said to be in 44 H. 3. or rather in 41. as Mat. Paris and others inform us An. 1458. And that is at least 5. or 8. years before any Commons Knights and Burgesses were summoned to our Parliaments by Sir Robert Cottons Mr. Seldens and others confessions and that by the Writ in 49 H. 3. Rot. Claus m. 10. dorso Therefore if the Commons had any vote in his banishment it was 5. or 8. years before they were admitted into our Parliaments and so a Banishment not in but out of Parliament 4ly This Letter to Pope Alexander begins thus Sanctissimo Patri in Christo Alexandro c. COMMUNITAS COMITUM PROCERUM MAGNATUM ALIORUMQUE REGNI ANGLIAE and it is subscribed joyntly by 6. Earls and 5. Noblemen whereof Petrus de Montfort is the last VICE TOTIUS COMMUNITATIS to wit Communitas Comitum Procerum Magnatum aliorumque Regni Angliae who writ the Letter mentioned in the beginning thereof not of the Commons House contradistinct from the Earls Nobles Great-men and Barons of the Realm praesentibus literis sigilla nostra apposuimus in testimonium praedictorum not by the 10 first Earls and Nobles in behalf of themselves the Earls Lords and great men of the Realm and by Peter de Montford as Speaker or Proctor of the Commons who as Sir Robert Cotton himself acknowledgeth had no Speaker aâ— all in 6 E. 3. An. 1332. being at least 74. years after this Letter nor yet till 51 E. 3. rot Parl. n. 87. for ought appears by History or Record being 119. years after this Letter Wherefore this president consisting of so many mistakes as I have more largely proved in my Preface to Sir Robert Cottons Exact Abridgement of the Records in the Tower makes nothing at all for the Commons joynt Right of Judicature with the King and Lord The rather because the Communitas in the objected clause of the Letter is not meant of the Commons in Parliament but the Communitas or Universitas Regni popularis etsi non Nobiles as Mat. Paris stiles them or popular rabble of Commons out of Parliament The 2. president is that of Sir Nicholas Segrave 33 E. 1. rot 33. Cooks 3. Institutes p. 7. 4 Instit p. 23. in the margin Who being charged in Parliament in presence of the King Earls Barons and OTHERS OF THE KINGS COUNCEL not the Commons or Burgesses but the Iudges and Kings learned Councel at Law or his Privy Council who were assistants to the Lords as I conceive which Sir Edward Cook mistaking would have to express the Commons in Parliament then and there present that the King in the wars of Scotland being among his enemies Nicholas Seagrave his leigeman who held of the King by Homage and fealty and served him for his aid in that warr did maliciously move discord and contention without cause with John de Crombewell charging him with many enormous crimes and offered to prove it upon his body To whom the said John answered that he would answer him in the Kings Court c. and thereupon gave him his faith After which Nicholas withdrew himself from the Kings hast and aid leaving the King in danger of his enemies and adjourned the said John to defend himself in the Court of the King of France and prefixed him a certain day and so as much as in him was subjected and submitted the Dominion of the King and kingdom to the subjection of the King of France and to effect this he took his journey towards Dover to passe over into France All which he confessed and submitted himself therein de alto et Basso to the Kings pleasure And hereupon the King willing HABERE AVISAMENTUM to have the advise of the EALS BARONS LORDS magnatum and OTHERS OF HIS COUNCEL enjoyned them upon the Homage fealty and allegiance wherewith they were obliged to him quod ipsi sideliter CONSULERENT that they should faithfully ADVISE HIM what punishment should be inflicted for such a fact thus confessed Qui omnes habito super hoc diligenti tractatu et avisamento c. Who all having had thereupon diâ—igent debate and advise having considered and understood all things contained in the said fact DICUNT not by way of Judgement judicially pronounced but of answer to the Kings question propounded and as their opinion of the cause Said that this fact deserved losse of life members c. So as this offence notes Sir Edward Cooke was then adjudged in Parliament to be High Treason But under his favour First here was no judgement at all given against the party himself but only an opinion and advice touching this case not pending judicially in Parliament by way of Inditement or impeachment but voluntarily proposed by the King in answer to the kings question and so it can be no proof of any actual proper judicature vested in both Houses Secondly For ought appears this question was only propounded to the Earls Lords Barons and the Kings Council that assisted them and so only to the House of Peers not to the Commons and answered resolved only by them aliorum de Concilio suo not expressing nor including the Commons as I apprehend being never so intitled in any Parliament Records for ought I can find That these alii de Concilio were not the Commons as Sir Edward Cook insinuates but the Kings Justices and Judges who attended them is most clear by this passage of Matthew Westminster who lived and writ the story of it at that time in these words Sub illo quoque tempore Nicholaus de Segrave unus de praestantioribus de regno pro tali causa arrestatus fuerat coram rege Alius quidam Johannis de Cromâ—ewell ipsum de proditione arguerat Ille autem in defensionem obtulit se duello Rex propter bella sua noluit ista pati ille vero non licentiatuâ— et contra prohibitionem Regis mare transivit persequens accusatorem ipso Rege adhuc inter hostiles acies constituto Ideirco reputaâ— eum Rex in judicio vitae suae contemptorem nec per ipsum stare quin Rex ab hostibus interiret Et ille in gratiam Regis se submisit Cui Rex justitiam fieri volo in judicio Proinde JUSTITIARII mark it not the Commons TRIDUO SUPER HOC CONSULTANTES responderunt regi hujusmodi hominem reum esse mortis et omnia bona sua mobilia et immobilia regii juris esse Veruntamen propter generositatem sanguinis addiderunt non hunc in regis contemptum Angliam egressum fuisse sed propter iram se de suo criminatore vindicandi Regis autem esse posse facere misericordiam cum eodem Quibus Rex O
but by Bill The 8th President that may be objected is this Adam de Arleton or Tarlton Bishop of Hereford in a Parliament held at London Anno 1322. was apprehended by the Kings Officers and brought to the Bar to be arraigned for Treason and Rebellion in aiding the Mortimers and others in their wars with men and arms where having nothing to say for himself in defence of the crimes objected and standing mute for a space at last he flatly told the King That he was a Minister and Member of the Church of Christ and a consecrated Bishop though unworthy therefore I neither can nor ought to answer to such high matters without the consent of my Lord Archbishop of Canterbury my direct Judge next after the Pope and of the other Fathers the Bishops my PEERS At which saying the Archbishops and Bishops there present rose up and interceded to the King for their Colleague and when the King would not be intreated they all challenged the Bishop as a Member of the Church exempt from the Kings Justice and all secular judicature The King forced thereunto by their claimors delivered him to the Archbishops custody to answer elsewhere for these crimes Within few days after being apprehended again and brought to answer before the Kings royal Tribunal in the Kings Bench at Westminster for his Treasons the Archbishops of Canterbury York and Dublin hearing of Tarltons arraignment came with their Crosier staves carried before them accompanied with 10 Bishops more and a great company of men entred into the Court and by open violence rescued and took away the Bishop from the Bar before any answer made to his charge chasing away the Kings Officers and proclaiming openly That no man should lay violent hands on this Trayterly Bishop upon pain of excommunication and so departed The King exceedingly incensed at this High affront to Justice and himself commanded an Inquest to be impanelled and a lawfull inquiry to be made of the Treasons committed by the Bishop in his absence being thus rescued from Justice The Jury without fear of the King or any hatred of the Bishop found the Bishop guilty of all the Articles of Treason and Rebellion whereof he was indicted Whereupon the King banished the Bishop seised all his temporalties lands and goods But yet notwithstanding the Bishop by consent of all the Prelates was by strong hand kept in the Archbishops custody till he had reconciled him to the King After which by way of revenge he was a principal instrument of the Kings deposing and murther which having effected in the Parliament of 1 E. 3. 6. this Bishop petitions that the Indictment and Iudgement against him and the proceedings therein might be brought into Parliament and there nulled as erronious which was done accordingly Et quia recitatis et examinatis coram nobis et consilio nosâ—ro recordo et processu praedictis Et etiam coram Praelatis Comitibus Baronibus Magnatibus tota communitate regni nostri praesenti Parliamento nostro praesentibus compertum fuit quod in eisdem recordo et processu errores manifesti intervenerunt per assensum totius Parliamenti adnullatur and so he had restitution I answer that as this rescue of proceeding and judgement against this trayterous Bishop were singular So is this repeal and reversal of it as erronious before and by all the Commons and whole Parliament as well as King Prelates and Nobles and that no doubt at the special instance of this and all the other Bishops highly concerned in this cause Wherefore this one Swallow makes no Summer and proves no judicial authority joyntly with the King and Lords since they never joyned with them before nor since in reversing of any such error upon Judgement in the Kings Bench but only where an erronious Attainder by Bill in one Parliament was reversed by Bill in another The 9th is the Clause of King Edward the thirds Letter to the Pope in the 4th year of his reign already answered p. 274. The 10th is Sir John at Lees case 42 E. 3. n. 20. said to be ADJVDGED by the Lords and COMMONS I answer this Case is somewhat mâ—staken For the Record only mentions That the 21 day of May the King gave thanks to the Lords and Commons for their coming and aid granted on which day all the Lords and sundry of the Commons dined with the King After which dinner Sir Iohn at Lee was brought before the King LORDS COMMONS next aforesaid who dined with the King to answer certain objections made against him by William Latymer about the wardship of Robert Latymer that Sir John being of power had sent for him to London where by duresse of Imprisonment he inforced the said William to surrender his estate unto him which done some other Articles were objected against the said Sir John of which for that he could not sufficiently purge himself HE was committed to the Tower of London there to remain til he had made fine and ransom at the Kings pleasure and command given to the Constable of the Tower to keep him accordingly And then the said Lords and Commons departed After which he was brought before the Kings Councel at Westminster which COUNCEL ORDERED the said ward to be reseised into the Kings hands So as this record proves not that this judgment was given in the Parliament house nor that the Lords and Commons adjudged Sir Iohn but rather the King and his Councel in the presence of the Lords and Commons after the Parliament ended The 11 12 13. Are the cases of the Lord Latymer Lord Nevil and Richard Lyons forecited Here p. 283 284 350. which are nothing to purpose the Lords alone giving judgement in them without the Commons who did only impeach them and the King removing the Lord Latymer from his Council at their further request So that these 3. cases refute their opinions who object them The 14. is the Case of Weston and Gomines 1 R. 2. n. 38 39. In which the Lords alone gave the Judgement as I have proved p. 332 333 Therefore pointblank against the Objectors The 15. president is that of Iohn Kirby and Iohn Algar two Citizens of London in the Parliament of 3 R. 2. n. 18. who conceiving malice against John Imperial an Ambassador sent hither from the State of Genoa who had procured a Monopoly to furnish England with all such wares as come from the Levant keeping his staple at Southampton killed him in London upon a sudden quarrel picked with him for which they being committed this being a new and difficult case and the Judges being in doubt whether it were Treason or no it was thereupon propounded in Parliament according to the Statute of 25 E. 3. c. 2. like that of 25 E. 3. Parl. 2. of those who are born beyond the Seas 14 E. 3. c. 5. 13 E. 1. c. 24.32 E. 1. rot 17. 22. Claus 46 H. 3. n. 3. Claus 14
made and if he do not he shall be attainted of the said deed and pay to the party grieved his double damages to be taxed by the Judges of the said Bench for the time being or by Enquest if need be and also he shall make fine and ransom at the kings will which was accordingly executed as appears by 8 H. 4. f. 13 14. And moreover it is accorded in the same Parliament that likewise it be done in time to come in case like By which Petition and Act it is most apparent 1. That the King and Lords have the sole power of judging and punishing the breaches of Privilege of Parliament by batteries wounding or imprisonment and that both in the cases of Knights Citizens and Burgesses and of their menial seruants in such and the like cases 2ly That this Act gives the Commons no power at all to punish any man for breach of privilege in like case but only prescribes a certain remedy for time to come by imprisonment action double damages fine and ransom at the kings pleasure in the Kings Bench not Commons House or Parliament who are not fit to be troubled with such particular cases of privileges which would interrupt the more publike affairs Hence THE KING willing to provide for the ease and tranquillity of them that came to his Parliaments and Councils by his commandment hath ordained and established upon the Commons Petition by the Statute of 11 H. 6. c. 13. That the self same remedy proceeding damages and punishment shall be had in the Kings Bench not Commons House or Parliament as was prescribed in 5 H. 4. c. 6. against any person that shall doe any assault or affray to any Lord Spiritual or Temporal Knight of the Shire Citizen or Burgesse coming to the Kings Parliament or Council by his command How then the Commons can judge or determine such violation of privileges now against these Statutes and presidents and create themselves Judges of them transcends both my Law and reason In the Parliament of 7 H. 4. as I find in a special note though not in the Parliament Roll Sir John Tibetot the Speaker prayed que plest le Roy Seigniors That it would please THE KING AND LORDS that Robert Clifford companion of Richard Chiderough chosen knights for the County of Kent might appear for them both and doe all in both their names as if both of them were present in Parliament which the king and Lords assented to In the Parliaments of 8 H. 4. n. 83. 139. and of 11 H. 4. n. 54. Upon Petitions and complaints of the Commons to the king and Lords there were two Statutes made to prevent the abuses and false retorns of Sherifs touching the Elections of knights of Shires to inflict penalties on them by a Law which formerly were arbitrary at the kings and Lords discretion 7 H. 4. c. 15. and 11 H. 4. c. 1. The penalty inflicted by these Acts on the Sherif for a false return contrary to these Acts is only 100 l. fine to the king and such undue retorns are from thenceforth to be examined and tryed not by the Commons alone by information without Oath as now but by the Justices assigned to take assizes and that by Enquest and due examination upon trial before the said Justices which is likewise afterwards ratified by the Statutes of 6 H. 6. c. 4. 8 H. 6. c. 7. 32 H. 6. c. 15. wherof if the Sherif be found guilty he shall forfeit 100 l. to the king and the knights of Counties unduly returned shall lose their wages of the Parliament of old time accustoned not be turned out by a Committee of Privileges and others chosen in their places by the Commons Order as now And the Statutes of 1 H. 5. c 1. 6 H. 6. c. 4. 8 H. 6. c. 7. 12 H. 6. c. 2. 32 H. 6.15 touching elections of knights Citizens and Burgesses made since the former do not alter this Law nor give the House of Commons the least power or authority to judge or determin the legality or illegality of any elections but leave this to the King and Lords to redress as at first before their making and give the knights duly chosen but not returned 100 l. damages against the Sherif and Citizens and Burgesses 40 l. against Mayors and Baylifs who make false returns by way of action of Debt in the kings Courts at Westminster where the parties must sue for relief or in the Starchamber before the Kings Lords and Council as in Bronkers case Trin. 1. Eliz. not in the Commons house as these Statutes and presidents in our Law-books Dyer f. 113.168 Plowden f. 118. to 131. Old Book of Eniries f. 446 447. resolve How then the Commons are now becom sole Judges of all false returns and elections and that per legem et consuetudinem Parliamenti against all these Acts and presidents let Sir Edward Cooke and others resolve me and the intelligent when they are able not by the objected late arbitrary presidents which are of no value but by antient usage and Law of our Parliaments and solid reason which cannot be produced for to justifie these late Innovations and extravagances It is most true that in the cases of undue elections and breaches of privilege of the Commons house Members or Servants the King and Lords were antiently sole Judges not the Commons in any one case and that upon the Commons own Petitions as the premises evidence and I shall fully manifest by these ensuing punctual presidents In the Parliament of 8 H. 6. n. 39. The Commons petitioned the King for a Law to be made to prevent the manifold tumults uproars at and disorders in the election of knights of the shire by the vulgar rabble and meaner sort of people of small or no estate most busie and tumultuous in them having then a voice that the King by advice and assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal would seclude all from having voices at such elections for the future but freeholders who held 40 s. freehold by the year above all reprisals more than 40 l. a year now or upwards Which the King and Lords assented to and the Statute of 8 H. 6. c. 7. was hereupon made agreeable to this petition with that of 10 H. 6 c. 2. by like Petition in pursuance of it In this very Parliament of 8 H. 6. rot parl n. 57. One William Lake servant to William Mildred a Burgess of London was taken in execution for a Debt and committed Prisoner to the Fleet contrary to the privilege of the Commons house whereupon the Commons petitioned the King that by the advice and assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal at the special request of the Commons he might be enlarged which the King and Lords assenting unto gave order for his release and authorized the Chancellor to appoint certain Commissioners to take him again in Execution after the Parliament ended The Commons not then claiming the least power
or jurisdiction to enlarge him or to fine or imprison those who took him in Execution as of late times they have done And in this Parliament upon the petition and supplication of the Prelates and Clergy n. 32. the King by the assent and advice of the Lords enacted the Statute of 8 H. 6. c. 1. That the Clergy and their Attendants called to the Convocation by the Kings writ should have and enjoy for ever hereafter the same liberty and immunity in going coming and tarrying as the Great men and Commonalty of England called or to be called to the Kings Parliaments have used and enjoyed they complaining to the king that they and their servants coming to the Convocation were oftentimes and commonly arrested molested and inquieted Which they had no power to redress but only the King and Lords upon their complaints thereof In the Parliament of 18 H. 6. n. 13. It was shewed to the King and the Lords Spiritual Temporal that Gilbert Hore Sherif of the County of Cambridge upon the kings writ directed to him to chuse 2. knights for that shire had made no return of any knights for that County for certain reasons therein expressed Whereupon the King by advice and assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal not the Commons house alone as now nor yet joyntly with them ordered that a New writ for electing 2. knights for that County should be directed to him and that he should make proclamation that no person should come to the election with arms or arrayed in warlike manner in disturbance of the said election and breach of the kings peace A memorable president of the Kings and Lords Jurisdiction even in point of elections In the Parliament of 23 H. 6. n. 41. The Commons petitioned the king that by the advice and assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and at their special request it might be enacted that every Member of the Lords and Commons house who should have any assault or affray made upon him being at the Parliament or going to or coming from thence might have the like remedy at Sir Thomas Parr knight had given him in this Parliament to wit upon petition of the Commons in his behalf to the King and Lords being the same as was enacted in Chedders case 11 H. 6. c. 11. before Whereunto the king answered The Statutes therefore made shall be observed In the Parliament of 31 H. 6. rot parl n. 25 26 27 28. we have this memorable famous case touching privilege of Parliament in their very Speakers own case resolved by the Lords Thomas Thorp chief Baron was chosen Speaker of the Parliament after his election and before the Parliament which was prorogued sat he was arrested and taken in execution at the sute of the Duke of York whereupon some of the Commons were sent up by the House to the king and Lords spiritual and temporal sitting in Parliament desiring that they might enjoy all their ancient and accustomed privileges in being free from arrests and propounded the case of Thomas Thorp their Speaker to them desiring his inlargement whereupon the said Lords spiritual aad temporal not intending to hurt or impeach the privilege of the Commons but equally after the course of Law to administer Justice and to have knowledge what the Law will weigh in that behalf declared to the Justices the premises and asked of them whether the said Thomas ought to be delivered from prison by force and vertue of the said privilege of Parliament or not To the which question the chief Justices in the name of all the Justices aforesaid communication and mature deliberation had among them answered and said That they ought not to answer that question for it hath not been used aforetime that the Justices should in any wise determine the privilege of this high Court of Parliament for it is so high and mighty in his nature that it may make that Law which is not and that that is Law it may make no Law and the determination and knowledge of their privilege belongeth to the Lords of the Parliament and not to the Justices But as for declaration of proceedings in the lower Courts in such cases as writs of Supersedoas of Privilege of Parliament be brought and delivered the said chief Justice said that there be many and divers Supersedeas of privileges of Parliament brought into the Courts but there is no general Supersedeas brought to furcease all Processes for if there should be it should seem that this high Court of Parliament that ministreth all Justice and equity should let the process of the common Laws and so it should put the party plainant without remedy for so much as actions at Common Law be not determined in this high Court of Parliament And if any person that is a Member of this high Court of Parliament be arrested in such cases as be not for Treason or Felony or surety of the Peace or for condemnation before the Parliament it is used that all such persons should be released of all such arrests and make an Attorney so that they may have the freedom and Liberty freely to attend upon the Parliament After which answer and Declaration it was throughly agréed assented and concluded by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal that the said Thomas according to the Law should remain still in prison for the causes abovesaid the privilege of the Parliament or that the same Sir Thomas was Speaker of the Parliament notwithstanding And that the premises should be opened and declared to them that were comen for the Commons of this land and they should be charged and commanded in the kings name that they with all goodly hast and speed proceed to the election of another Speaker The which premiâ—es for as much as they were matters of Law by the commandement of the Lords were opened and declared to the Commons by the mouth of Walter Moyle one of the kings Sergeants at Law in the presence of the Bishop of Ely accompanyed with other Lords in notable number and there it was commanded and charged to the said Commons by the said Bishop of Ely in the kings name that they should proceed to the election of another Speaker with all goodly hast and speed so that the matters for which the king called this his Parliament might be proceeded in and this Parliament take good and effectual conclusion and end Whereupon the Commons accordingly elected Thomas Charlton knight for their Speaker the next day and acquainted the Lords therewith and desired the kings approbation of their choice which was accorded unto by the king by assent of the Lords Lo here 1. the Lords Spiritual and Temporal are the sole Judges of the privilege of the very Speaker of the House of Commons who is here adjudged to remain in execution notwithstanding their petition for his enlargement 2ly The whole House of Commons could not then send for nor yet enlarge their own Speaker when imprisoned
was again resolved in another Parliamentary Assembly held that year by King Henry the first the Bishops Abbots Great men and Nobles of the Realme as you read before p. 173. Anno 1109. there sprung up another â—ot contest between Arch-Bishop Anselme and Thomas Elect of York about the oath of subjection and canonical obedience which was again debated and after Anselmes death again debated and finally setled in another Parliamentary Council by the King Bishops Nobles and Barons of the Realme of which at large before p. 174 175 176 177. The same Debate coming again between Ralph Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and Thurstan of York after his returne from Exile Anno 1121. was again concluded omnium Concilio Episcoporum Principum Procerum Regni p. 180. After many years intestine bloody wars between the perjured Usurper King Stephen Mawde and Duke Henry her Son for the Crown of England Anno 1153. apud Walingford in conventu Episcoporum et aliorum Regni Optimatum there was a final accord made between Stephen and Henry touching the inheritance and descent of the Crown that Stephen should adopt and constitute Henry for his son heir and successor to the Crown of England immediately after his death which Stephen should enjoy during his life yet so as that Henry should bee chief Justice and Ruler of the Kingdome under him This accord made between them by the Prelates Earles and Barons of the Realme was ratified by King Stephens Charter and subscribed by all the Bishops Earles and Barons in their Parliamentary Council at Walingford The difference and suit between King Henry the 2d and Roderic King of Conact in Ireland touching his Kingship Royalties Dominions Services Homage Loyalty and Tribute to King Henry were heard decided and a final agreement made between them in a great Parliamentary COUNCIL held at Windeshores Anno 1175. wherein King Henry the 2d and his Son with the Arch-bishops Bishops Earles and Barons of England without any Commons were present who made and subscribed this agreement recorded at large in Houeden where you may peruse it King Henry the 2d Anno 1177. Celebrato generali CONCILIO apud Northampton after the feast of St. Hilary by the advice of his Nobles restored to Robert Earl of Leicester all his Lands on this side and beyond the Sea as hee had them fifteen daies before the Warre except the Castles of Mounsorel and Pasci Hee likewise therein restored to Hugh Earle of Chester all the lands which hee had fifteen daies before the warre and gave to William de Abbine Son of William Earle of Arundel in the County of Southsex And in the same Council Deane Guido resigned into the hand of Richard Arch-Bishop of Canterbury the deanery of Walteham and all his right which hee had in the Church of Walteham quietum clamavit simpliciter absolute similiter fecerunt canonici seculares de Walteham de praebendis suis resignantes eas in manis Archiepiscopi sed Dominus Rex dedit eis inde plenariam recompensationem ad Domini Cantuariensis Archiepiscopi aestimationem Deinde Dominus Rex authoritate Papae Domini instituit in eadem Ecclesia de Walteham canonicos regulares de diversis domibus Angliae sumptos constituit Walterum de Garent canonicum sumptum de Ecclesia de Osencie Abbatem primum super congregationem illam magnis redditibus domibus pulcherrimis dotavit illos And then hee expelled the Nunnes out of the Monastery of Ambresbury for their incontinency and distributed them into other Nunneries there to bee kept more strictly under restraint and gave the Abby of Ambresbury to the Abbesse and house of Frum Everoit to hold it for ever Sanctius King of Navar and Alfonso King of Castile in the year 1177. submitted the differences between them concerning certain Lands Territories Towns and Castles to the determination of King Henry the 2d who thereupon summoned a Parliamentary Council of his Bishops Earles Nobles and Barons to hear and decide it by their advice Wherein the case being propounded debated and opened before them by the Ambassadours and Advocates of both Kings appeared to be this That King Sanctius during the minority of King Alphonsus an Orphant his Nephew Pupil and innocent from any crime unjustly and forcedly took from him without any demand hearing or Title divers Territories Towns and Lands there specified which his Ancestors had enjoyed and of right descended to him which hee forcibly detained Whereof hee demanded restitution and dammages On the other side Sanctius complained that Alphonsus the Emperour Father of this Alphonsus had by force of armes unjustly dispossessed his Grandfather of the Kingdome of Navarre after whose death Garsias his Nephew and next heir by the help of his friends and subjects recovered the greatest part thereof from the Emperour but not all Who dying leaving his Son Alphonso an infant with whom Sanctius made a league for ten years Alphonso during the League took by force of armes divers Castles Towns and Lands from Sanctius being his inheritance who thereupon demanded restitution both of the Castles Towns Lands and Territories taken from his Grandfather by Alphonsus his Father and from himself by Alphonsus together with the maine profit of the latter quia sine ordine judiciario ejectus est King Henry having fully heard their cases by the Advice and Assent of his Bishops Earles and Barons adjudged that both these Kings should make mutual restitution of what had been forcibly taken from either party together with the mean profits and dammages for part of them by an award and judgement under his Great Seal subscribed by all his Bishops Earles and Barons which recites super quaerelis vero praetaxatis de castellis terris cum omnibus terris pertinentis suis hinc inde violenter et injuste ablatis cum nichil contra Violentiam utrinque objectam à parte alterutra alteri responderetur nec quicquam quo minus restitutiones quas petebant faciendas essent alligaretur Plenariam utrinque parti supradictorum quae in jure petita erant fieri restitutionem adjudicabimus A clear Parliamentary resolution and judgement in point That Territories Lands Towns Castles injuriously taken by one King from another by force of armes and warre without just Title to them ought in Law and Justice to bee restored to the right heirs and owners of them and that Conquest and the longest Sword are no good Titles in Law or conscience against the right heir or inheriter which I desire those Sword-men and Lawyers who now pretend us a conquered Nation determine Conquest or the longest Sword a just Title to the Crowns Lands Revenues Offices Inheritances Houses Estates of other men now sadly to consider together with the sacred Texts Hab. 7. Micha 2.1 2 3 4 5. Job 20.10 18 19 20. Obad. 10. to 17. Ezek. ch 19. 35. Isa 33.1 1 King 21.1 to 25. Matth. 21.33 to 41. Luk. 20.14 to 17. ch 19.8
Lords gave him remedy by a Writ out of the Chancery Claus 14. E. 2. m. 12. in the Schedula there is a Judgement in Parliament by King Lords and Council touching the Abby of Abingdon and a composition formerly made between the Abbot Prior and monks thereof reversed nulled because inconvenient Claus 14. E. 2. m. 17. dorso there is a case concerning a reprisal brought by appeal out of the Chancery into the Parliament before the King Lords and Council and there heard and decided And Claus 15. E. 2. there are many cases and Writs touching Reprises In the Parliament of 1. E. 3. there were many Judgements given in sundry civil cases upon petitions To the King and his Council by the King Lords and Council extant in the bundle of Petitions and Claus Rolls of that year and those things that were proper for the Courts of Law and Chancery were referred to them to be there ended Claus 1. E. 3. m. 1. Upon the petition of Alice Gill and Robert Carder to the King Council and Parliament that they buying Corne in Abevil in France to transport to London it was arrested by the Baily of St. Valeric to the value of one hundred pounds at the suit of Will de Countepy of Crotye in Picardy and delivered to him against their wills because the Ship of the said Will was taken upon the Sea by the men of Bayon which ship the petitioners finding in the port of London had arrested by writ out of the Chancery directed to the Sheriffes of London until the said hundred pounds was paid them by the Merchant the King and Council ordered upon their petition that the ship might not be discharged till the 100 l. was satisfied that a Writ should be directed out of the Chancery to the Sheriffes of London to do Justice upon the contents in the Petition according to the Law of Merchants The like case of Reprise upon the Petition of Hugh Samson is in 1. E. 3. rot 5. In Claus 1. E. 3. part 1. m. 10. There is a Judgement given by the Lords and Council for the Bishop of Durham touching the Liberties and Royalties of his Bishoprick against the Kings revocation where in sundry Petitions and answers in former Parliament under King Edward the 2d are rehearsed wherein hee could have no right Mem. 12. there is a Judgement given by the Lords and Council in Parliament for the Bishop of York his prisage and preemption of wines next after the King in the Port of Hull and in Claus 1. E. 3. Pâ— 2. m. 11. Claus 4. E. 3. m. 9. remembred in the year Book of 6. E. 3. f. 50. So Claus 2. E. 3. m. 20. in Schedula there is Placitum in Parliamento before the King and his Council of the Dean and Chapter of Litchfield touching their Title to Camock Claus 14. E. 3. part 1. m. 41. Upon the Petition of the Bishop of Carlisle it was resolved by the Lords and Council in that and sundry other Parliaments in the Reign of this King and his Father non esse â—uri consonum that Churches and other things spiritual annexed to Archbishopricks and Bishopricks should belong to the King and Gardians of the temporalties but to the Gardians of the spiritualties and so ordered accordingly yea so was it resolved upon the Petition of the Bishop of Winchester to the King and his Council in the Parliament of Claus 1. E. 3. rot 9. dorso Where coram Rege et Magno Concilio concessum est et concordatum quod custodâ—s temporalium Episcopatus non se intromittant amplius temporibus vacationum hujusmodi fructibus Ecclesiarum de Estanmer Hamoldan annexed to the Bishoprick of Winchester In the Parliament of 14. E. 3. Sir Geoffry Stantens case upon his Petition to the King and Lords in Parliament the Justices of the Common Pleas came with the record of his case which had long depended before them in the Court of Common Pleas which being read and debated in the presence of all the LORDS Justices and others of the Kings Council their assistants in this case of Law they resolved that the Sonne being a stranger might aver that his Father who levyed the fine had nothing in the Lands and that the Wife in this case could not vouch her Husband And thereupon a Writ under the great Seal was sent to the Judges by the Lords order to give judgement accordingly Claus 35. E. 3. m. 40. A villain commits fellony and is attainted after that the Lord had seised his goods whereupon his goods were prized and seised on for the King notwithstanding the Lords seisure upon a Petition in Parliament It was resolved by the Lords and Council that it was just the goods should be restored to the Lord if they were not seised fraudulently to prevent the Kings seisure of them And a Writ of Restitution was thereupon awarded per ipsum Regem et per Petitionem in Parliamento In the 6. year of King Richard the 2d it was agreed between the Duke of Lancaster and the Scots in the Marches that for the benefit of both parties ut â—de caterâ— ipsi nee Anglici vexarenâ—ur per tot labores expensas sed singulis annis certi utriusque gentis destinarentur ad Parliamentum Regni utriusque qui et injurias acceptas proferrent in medium emendas acciparent secundum quantitatem damuâ—rum per Judicium Dominorum here the Lords both in the Parliament of England and Scotland are made sole Judges of injuries and dammages done by Scots or English upon one another in the Marches Quia vero Scoti ad Parliamentum Londoniis Anno 1383. supersederunt venire juxta conductum insuper damna interim plura Borealibus praesumpserunt inferre c. decretum est per Parliamentum ut frangenti fidem fides frangatur eidem Et concessae sunt Borealibus commissiones congregandi virtutem exercitus Scotis resistendi damna pro damnis inferendi quoties contingeret Scotos irrumpere vel hostili mâ—re partes illas intrare In the Parliament of 4. H. 4. n. 9. Upon the complaint of Sir Thomas Pomeroy and his Lady against Sir Philip Courtney and others forcible entry into several Lands and Mannors in the Country of Devon The King and Lords adjudged that the said Sir Thomas should enter into the said Mannors and Lands if his entry were lawful or bring his Assize without all delayes at his election In the Parliament of 5. H. 4. n. 41 42 43 44. in a case concerning Mannors and certain Lands in the County of Cornwal between the Prince and John Cornwal and the Countesse of Huntington his wife the King and Lords gave Iudgement that the Prince should â—e restored to the said Mannors and Lands being parcels of the Dutchey of Cornwal and that the Prince after seisin had should regrant them unto them which was done accordingly in Parliament In 6 H. 4 n. 28. Upon the Petition of
gratia nunc Cantuariensi electo tunc Wintoniensi Episcopo et Angliae Thesaurario câ—nceptis et dictatis manu magistri Willielmi de Mees Clerici sui Secretarii publici Notari conscriptis et in publâ—cam formam redactis Quam quidem concordiam ad mei excusationem duxi praesent bus inferendam quae talis est Accorde est qe sire Edward fiz aisne du roy ait le government del Roialme et soit rois Coronne par les Causes qe sensiwent 1. Primerment Pur ceo qe la persone ly Roy nest pas suffisaunt de governer Car en touz son temps ad il este mene et governe par autres qe ly ount mavoisement consaillez a deshoneur de ly et destruction de sâ—int Eglise et de tout son people saunz ceo qe il le vousist veer ou conustre le quel il sust bon ou mavoys ou remedie mettre ou faire le vousist quant il fuist râ—quis par les graunts et sages de sâ—n Roialme ou suffrir qe amende fuist faite 2. Item Par tout son temp 〈◊〉 se voloit doner a bon consail no le croire ne a bon governemeâ—t de son Roialm meys se ad done toux jours as ouraignes et occupationes nient covenables entre lessaunt lesploit des bosoignes de son Roialme Item Par defaute de bon governement ad il perdu le Roialme Descoce et autres terres et seignuries en Gascoygne Hytland les quex son pere li lessa en pees amiste ly Roy de Fraunce et detz moults des autres graunts 4. Item Par sa fierte qualte par mavoys consail ad il destruit seint Eglise les persones de seint Eglise tenuz en prisoun les uns Et les alires en destresce et auxint â—lusours graunts et nobles de la terre mys a hountose mâ—nt enprisâ—nez exulâ—tz disheritez 5. Item La ou il est tenuz par son serement a faire droit a toux il ne bad pas volu faire pur son propre profâ—it et convetise de ly de ces mavois conâ—saili es â—e ount este preâ— de ly Ne ad garde les autres pointz del serement qil fist a son corounement si com iâ— feust tenuz 6. Item Il deguerpist son Royalme et fist taunt come en ly fust qe son Roialme son poâ—ple fust perduz qe pys est pur la crualte de ly defaute de sa personne il est trove incorrigible sauntz esperaunce de amendement les quex choses fount si notoires qil ne poount estre desdiâ—z The form and instrument of his deposition is thus recorded by Ranulp Cistrensis and Henry de Knyghton Also that year in the Octaves of Twelfth day was made a Parliament at London There BY ORDINANCE with a solemn message is sent to the King that was in prison 3 Bishops 3 Earls 3 Barons 2 Abbots 2 Justices for to resign to the King that was then in warde the homage that was make to him some time for they would no longer have him for their Lord One of them Sir William Trussel Knight and PKOCURATOR OF ALL THE PARLIAMENT spake to the king in the name of all the other and said I William Trussel in the name of all men of the lond of Englond and of all the Parleament Procurator I resign to thee Edward the homage that was made to thee sometime And from this time forthward now following I defie thee and pryve thee of all ryal power and I shall never be tendant to thee as for King after this time Also this was openly cryed at London The true form of his deprivation is thus recorded in the Chronicle of Leycester and transcribed out of it by Henry de Kryghton in French Jeo William Trussel Procurator dez Prelatez Conrez et Barons et altrez Gentz en ma procuracye nomes Eyantal ceo ployne suffysant poure eâ— Homages et Fealtez au vous Edward Roy Dengleterre come al Roy avant ces â—enres de par lez ditz persones en ma procuracye nomes renk et rebaylle sus a vous Ed. et deliver et face quiâ—ez lez persones avant ditz en la meâ—lâ—our manere que ley et custome donnent E face protestacion en nom de eaux qils ne voillent deformes estre en vostre sâ—alâ—e ne en vostre lyance ne cleyment de vous come â—e Roy â—iens teniâ— Encz vous teignent de â—horse priveye persone sans nule manere de â—eale dignite Cum haec Rex audisset multum de fuis malefactis doluit rugitus et lamenta emittens eo quod per falsos et proditiosos consiliarios sic omni suo tempore ductus fuerat Thomas of Walsingham thus relates the proceeding Convenit etiam illuc tota regni Nobilitas citata per prius ad Parliamentum tenendum ibidem trastino dicti â—esti ubi cuncti centuerunt regem indignum diademate et propteâ— plures articulos deponendum er Edwardum filium ejus primogenitum in regem unanimiter eligendum Quod etiam consequenter factum fuit et electio in aulâ— magna Westmonasterii publice divulgare per quendam ex Magnatibus sapientem Cui electioni consensit populus universus Archiepiscopus vero Cantuariâ—e praesenti consensit electioni ut omnes Praelati Archiepiscopus quidem assumpto themate vox populi vox Dei sermonem feci populo exhortans omnes ut apud regem regum intercederent pro electo Facto sermone discessum esâ— Ut autem notuit Reginae filliâ—ni electio et viri dejectio plena dolore ut foris apparuit sere mente alienata fuit Edwardus quoque filius suus mateâ—no doâ—ori compassus juravit quod invito patre nunquem susciperet coronam regni Idcirco communi decreto ex parte totius regni tres Episcopi duo Comiteâ— et duo Abbates et de quolibet Comitatu regnitre milites ac etiam de Londoniis et aliis civitatibus et magnis villis ut praecipue de portubus de qualibet certus raimerus persoâ—arum missi sunt ad regem apud Kenelworth qui nunciaâ—ent electionem filii sui et requirerent diligenter quod renunciaret dignitati regiae et coronae et permitteret eundem filium suum regnare pro eo alioquin ipsi reddirent sibi homagia et procederent in praetactâ—s Rex autem ut haec audivit â—um stetu et ejâ—latu respondit quod multum doluit de eo quod sic demeruit erga populum sâ—i regni et ab omnibus qui aderant veniam precabatur Sed ex quo aliter elâ—e non potuit gratias egit quod filium suum primogenitum elegissent Nuncii vero ad Parliamentum Londonias rede untes cum regis responâ—o et insigniis plebem laetam fecerunt mox tota regni
Picardy ready to be transported into England But when it was certainly certified that King Richard was dead and that their enterprise of his deliverance was frustrate and void the Army scattered and departed asunder But when the certainty of King Richards death was declared to the Aquitaynes and Gascons the most part of the wisest men of the Country fell into a bodily fear and into a deadly dread for some lamenting the instability of the English people judged them to be spotted with perpetual infamy and brought to dishonour and loss of their antient fame and glory for committing so hainous a crime and detestable an offence against their King and Soveraign Lord. The memory whereof they thought would never be buried or extincted Others feared the loste of their goods and liberties because they imagined that by this civil dissension and intestine division the Realm of England should so be vexed and troubled that their Country if the Frenchmen should invade it should be destitute and left void of all aid and succour of the English Nation But the Citizens of Burdeaux took this matter very sore at stomach because King Richard was born and brought up in their City lamenting and crying out that since â—he beginning of the world there was never a more detestable or more villanous or hainous act committed which being sad with sorrow and inflamed with melancholy said that untrue unnatural and unmercifull people had betrayed and slain contrary to all Law and Justice and honesty a good man a just Prince and lawfull Governour beseeching God devoutly on their knees to be the revenger and punisher of that detestable offence and notorious crime 15ly The proceedings against King Richard the 2. in the Parliament of 1 H. 4. were in the Parliament of 1 E. 4. n. 9 10 11 12. condemned as illegal the Tyrannous usurpation of Henry the 4th with his hainous murdering of King Richard the 2. at large set forth his reign declared by Act of Parliament to be an intrusion and meer usurpation for which he and the heirs of his body are utterly dis inabled as unworthy to enjoy any inheritance estate or profits within the Realm of England or Dominions of the same for ever and that by this memorable Petition of the Commons wherein the pedigree of King Edward the 4th and his title to the Crown are likewise fully set forth a Record most worthy the publike view being never yet printed to my knowledge Ex Rotulo Parliamenti tenti apud Westm anno primo Edwardi Quarti n. 8. Memorandum quod quaedam Petitio exhibita fuit praefato Domino Regi in praesenti Parliamento per praefatos Communes sub eo qui sequitur tenore verborum For as much as it is notary openly and evidently known that the right noble and worthy Prince Henry King of England the third had issue Edward his furst gotten Son born at Westminster in the 15 kalende of Juyll in the vigille of Seint Marce and Marcellian the year of our Lord M. C.C.XLV the which Edw. after the death of the said King Henry his Fader entituled and called King Edward the furst had issue his furst gotten Son entituled and called after the decease of the same Edward the furst his Fader King Edward the second which had issue the right noble and honourable Prince King Edward the third true and undoubted King of Englond and of France and Lord of Irelond which Edward the third had issue Edward his furst gotten Son Prince of Wales William Hatfield secund gotten Son Leonel third gotten Son Duke of Clarence John of Gaunt fourth gotten son Duke of Lancaster Edmund Langley the fifth gotten son Duke of York Thomas Wodestoks the sixth gotten son Duke of Gloucester and William Wyndesore the seventh gotten Son And the said Edward Prince of Wales which died in the life of the said King Edward the thurd his Fader had issue Richard which after the death of the same King Edward the third as Cousin and heir to him that is to say Son to the said Edward Prince of Wales Son unto the said King Edward the third succeeded him in royal estate and dignity lawfully entituled and called King Richard the secund and died without issue William Hatfield the secund gotten Son of the said King Edward the third died without issue the said Leonel Duke of Clarence the third gotten Son of the same King Edward had issue Phelip his only daughter and died And the same Phelip wedded unto Edmund Mortimer Earl of Marche had issue by the same Edmund Roger Mortymer Earl of Marche her Son and heir which Edmund and Phelip died the same Roger Earl of March had issue Edmund Mortymer Earl of March Roger Mortymer Anne and Alianore and died And also the same Edmund and Roger sons of the foresaid Roger and the said Alianore died without Issue And the same Anne wedded unto Richard Earl of Cambridge the Son of the said Edmund Langley the fifth gotten son of the said king Edward the third as it is afore specified had issue that right noble and famous Prince of full worthy memory Richard Plantagenet Duke of York And the said Richard Earl of Cambridge and Anne his Wife died And the same Rich. Du. of York had issue the right high and mighty Prince Edward our Liege and Soveraign Lord and died to whom as Cousin and heir to the said King Richard the Crown of the Realm of England and the royal power estate dignity preheminence and governance of the same Realm and the Lordship of Ireland lawfully and of right appertaineth of the which Crown Royal power estate dignity preheminence governance and Lordship the said King Richard the second was lawfully rightfully and justly seised and possessed and the same joyed in rest and quiet without interruption or molestation unto the time that Henry late Earl of Derby son of the said Iohn of Gaunt the fourth gotten son of the said King Edward the third and younger Brother of the said Leonel temerously agenst rightwisnes and Iustice by force and Arms agenst his faith and liegeaunce rered werre at Flynte in Wales agenst the said King Richard him took and enprisoned in the Tower of London of grete violence And the same King Richard so being in prison and living usurped and intruded upon the royal power estate dignity preheminence possessions and Lordships aforesaid taking upon him usurpously the Crown and name of K. and L. of the same Realm and Lordship And not therewith satisfied or content but more grievous thing attempting wickedly of unnatural unmanly and cruel tyranny the same King Richard King anointed crowned and consecrate and his Liege and most high Lord in the Earth agenst Gods Law Mans liegeance and Oth of fidelite with uttermost punicion attormenting murdred and destroyed with most vile hainous and lamentable death whereof the heavy exclamation in the doom of every Christian man soundeth into Gods hearing in Heaven not forgotten in the Earth specially in this
possessions and hereditaments with their appurtenances which come to the hands of the said King Richard by forfeiture by force of an Act made in a Parlement holden at Westminster the 21. year of his reign except the said Commons beseeching our said Liege Lord to have and take all only the issues and revenues of all the said Castles Manors Lordships Honors lands tenements rents services and of other the premises aforesaid with their appurtenances except afore except from the said fourth day of the said moneth of March and not afore Saving to every of the liegemen and subjects of our said Soveraign and liege Lord King Edward the fourth such lawfull title and right as he or any other to his use had in any of the premises the said third day of March other than he had either of the grant of the said Henry late Earl of Derby called King Henry the fourth the said Henry his son or the said Henry late called King Henry the sixth or by authority of any pretenced Parlement holden in any of their dayes And that it be ordained declared and stablished by the assent advice and authority aforesaid That all Statutes Acts and Ordinances heretofore made in and for the hurt destruction and avoyding of the said right and title of the said King Richard or of his heirs to ask claim or have the Crown Royal power estate dignity preheminence governance exercise possessions and Lordship abovesaid be voyd and be taken holden â—nd reputed voyd and for nought adnulled repealed revoked and of no force value or effect And furthermore consideration and respect had to the horrible detestable cruel and inhuman tyranny by the said Henry late Earl of Derby against his faith and ligeance done and committed to the said King Richard his rightwise true and natural Liege and Soveraign Lord the unright wise and unlawfull usurpation and intrusion of the same Henry upon the said Crown of Englond and Lordship of Irelond the great intollerable hurt prejudice and derogation that thereby followed to the said Edmund Mortymer Earl of March next heir of blood of the said King Richard time of his death and to the heirs of the said Edmund and the great and excessive damage that by the said usurpations and the continuance thereof hath grown to the said Realm of Englond and to the politique and peaceable governance thereof by inward wars moved and grounded by occasion of the said Vsurpation It be therefore Ordeined declared and stablished by the advice assent and authority aforesaid for the more stablishing of the assured and undoubted inward rest and tranquility of the said Realm of Englond And for the avoyding of the said usurpation and intrusion very cause and ground of the tribulation persecution and adversity thereof that the said Henry late Earl of Derby the heirs of his body coming be from henceforth unabled and taken and holden from henceforth unable and unworthy the premises considered to have joy occupy hold or inherit any estate dignity preheminence enheritaments or possessions within the Realm of Englond Wales or Irelond aforesaid or in Caleys or the Marches thereof And sith that the Crown Royal estate dignity and Lordship above rehearsed of right appertained to the said Noble Prince Richard Duke of York And that the said Usurper late called King Henry the sixth that understanding to the intent that in his opinion he might the more surely stand and continue in his usurpation and intrusion of and in the same Crown Royal estate dignities and Lordship evermore intended and laboured continually by subtile imaginations frauds deceipts and exorbitant means to the extreme and final destruction of the same noble Prince Richard and his issue And for the execution of this malicious and damnable purpose therein in a preâ—ence Parliament by him and his usurped authority holden at Coventree the 38 year of his usurped Reign without cause lawfull or reasonable declared and judged the same noble Prince Richard and the Noble Lords his Sons that is to wit Edward then Earl of March and now the King our Soveraign Lord abovesaid and Edmund Earl of Ruthland to be his Rebels and Enemies them and all their issue dis-inheriting of all name state title and preheminence tenements possessions and enheritaments for evermore cruelly wickedly and unjustly and agenst all humanity right and reason whereby the said noble Prince Richard and his sons above named were compelled by the dread of death to absent them for a time out of this Realm of Englond the natural land of their birth unto their intollerable hurt prejudice heavinesse and discomfort And where after these the said noble Prince Richard Duke of York using the benefice of the Law of Nature and sufficiently accompanied for his defence and recovery of his right to the said Crown of the said Realm came thereunto not then having any Lord therein above him but God And in the time of a Parliament holden by the said Henry late called King Henry the sixth the sixth day of October the 39 year of his said usurped reign intended to use his right and to enter into the exercise of the royal powers dignitees and Lordships abovesaid as it was lawfull and according to Law reason and justice him so to doe and thereupon shewed opened declared and proved his right and title to the said Crown to fore the Lords Spiritual and temporal and Commons being in the same Parlitment by antient matters of sufficient and notable Record undefaisible whereunto it could not be answered or replyed by any matter that of right ought to have deferred him then from the possession thereof yet nevertheless for the tender zeal love and affection that the same Duke bare of Godly and blessed vertues and natural disposition to the restfull governance and pollicy of the same Realm and the Common wele thereof which he loved all his life desired and preferred afore all other things earthly though all the seid Lords spiritual and temporal after long and mature deliberation by them had by good advice upon the said right and title and the authorities and Records proving the same the answers thereunto gives and the replâ—cations to the same made knew the same right and title true by them and the seid Commons so declared accepted and admitted in the same Parliament Iâ— liked him at the grete instance desire and request of the seid Lords solemnply and many times unto him made to assent and grant unto a convention concord and agreement between the seid Henry late called King Henry the sixth on that opâ—party and him on that other upon the seid right and title by the same late called King by the advice and assent of the seid Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons being in the seid Parliament auctorized in the same comprehending among other that the seid Vsurper late called King Henry the sixt understanding certainly the seid title of the said Richard Duke of York just lawfull true and sufficient by the
his life land or livelihood and many inward discords battels effusion of much Christian bloud and destruction of the Nobles bloud of this land ensued and were committed through all the Realm unto the great sorrow and heaviness of all true Englishmen And then he declared himself undoubted heir and inheritor of the Crown by descent grounded on the Laws of God and Nature and the antient Laws and laudable Customes of this Realm yet for further security superadded another Title of lawfull Election by the three Estates in Parliamen◠then he intayled the Crown upon the issue of his body begotten and declared his son Prince Edward to be his heir apparent to succeed him in the Crown and royal Dignity by Act of Parliament which he ratified with his own royal assent This done he reputed the Crown cock-sure to him and his heirs for all generations Yet notwithstanding all his Machiavilian Policies Power Vigilancy care industry to secure his usurped Royalty by the murther of two Kings and many others some of them most instrumental to advance him to the royal Throne before he had worn the Crown full 3. years Henry Earl of Derby laying Title it and landing in Wales only with 2000 soldiers King Richards own Souldiers Friends and others revolting from him and joyning with the Duke he was slain in Posworth field and lost both his life and Crown together if not his soul for all eternity and by the Statute of 1 H. 7. c. 6. he was declared an Usurper of the Realm So unable are Parliaments themselves to secure Crowns on Usurpers heads or to entayl them for any long continuance on their Posterities as these sad tragical domestick presidents of later times with sundry antienter demonstrate King Henry the seventh having gained actual possession of the Crown as right heir thereunto by the Lancastrian line and espoused the better title of York by marrying the heir female to secure himself and his adherents for the future if any wars should arise about these dubious litigious Titles by Perkin Warbecks or others claims confirmed by several Acts of Parliament and Successions of Kings of both Houses claiming both as next heirs of the antient royal Line not to secure any future Usurpers without just right or title though not of the old bloud Royal if once Kings de facto as Sir Edward Cooke seems to intimate and some ignorant Lawyers assert against the intent and Prologue of the Act it self caused it to be enacted 11 H. 7. c. 1. That from henceforth no person or persons whatsoever that attend upon THE KING and Soveraign Lord of this Land for the time being in his person and do him true and faithfull Service of allegeance in the same or be in other places by his commandment in the warrs within the Land or without shall for the said deed and true duty of allegiance be in no wise convict or attaint of High Treason or other offences for that cause by Act of Parliament or otherwise by any process of Law whereby he or any of them shall lose or forfeit life lands goods chattels or any other things but to be for that deed and service utterly discharged of any vexation trouble or loss And if any Act or Acts or any other process of the Law hereafter thereupon for the same happen to be made contrary to this Ordinance that then that Act or Acts or other process of the Law whatsoever they shall be shall stand be utterly void The reason is rendred in the Prologue That it is not reasonable but against all Laws reason and good conscience that the said Subjects going with their Soveraign Lord in wars attending upon his person or being in other places by his commandment within this Land or without any thing should lose or forfeit for doing their true duty and service of Allegiance This Act which some conceive to be only personal and temporary for Henry the 7. alone could not secure the Heads Lives Liberties Lands Offices Goods or Chattels of those Lords Gentlemen and other English Subjects from Executions Imprisonments Banishments Forfeitures Sequestrations who accompanied assisted our late King in his warrs against the Parliament though King de facto and de jure too without any competitor Both Houses declaring them to BE TRAYTORS and sequestring proceeding against them as Traytor yea our Grandees since have executed them as such in their new erected High Courts How then it can totally indemnify any Perkin Warbecke Jack Cade or apparent Usurpers of the Crown without right or Title who shall per fas aut nefas get actual possession of the Royal throne and be Kings de facto or secure all those who faithfully adhere unto them though to dispossess the King de jure or his right heir of their just royalty and right against all Laws of God man all rules of justice and their very Oathes of Allegiance Supremacy Homage Fealty Protestations Leagues Covenants formerly made unto them from all sutes vexations losses forfeitures whatsoever and null all Act or Acts and legal Process made against them as many Grand Lawyers now conceive it doth transcends both my Law and reason too That opinion of Sir Edward Cooke 3. Instit f. 7. 9 E. 4. f. 1. b. whereon this erronious Gloss is grounded That a King regnant in possession of the Crown and kingdom though he be Rex de facto non de jure yet he is Seignior le Roy within the purview of the Statute of 25 E. 3. ch 2. of Treason and the other King that hath right and is out of possession IS NOT WITHIN THIS ACT. Nay if Treason be committed against a King de facto et non de jure and after the King de jure cometh to the Crown he shall punish the Treason done to the King de facto And a pardon granted by a King de jure that is not also de facto is voyd being no doubt a very dangerous and pernicious Error both in Law and policy perverting those Laws which were purposely made for the preservation of the Lives Crowns Rights Titles Persons of lawfull Kings against all attempts Treasons Rebellions against them and for the exemplary punishment of all Traytors Rebels Usurpers who should rebel wage warr or attempt any Treason Conspiracy against their royal Persons Crowns Dignities Titles into a meer Patronage of Traytors Rebels Usurpers and a Seminary of endless Treasons Assassinations Conspiracies against them by indemnifying exempting both them and their Confederates from all legal prosecutions penalties forfeitures whatsoever if they can but once gain actual possessiō of the Crown by any means upon the forcible expulsion deposition assassination or murder of the King de jure Which if once declared for Law I appeal to all Lawyers Polititians Statesmen whatsoever whether it would not presently involve our kingdoms in endless perpetual Rebellions Usurpations War Regicides as it did the Norwegians heretofore where by a kind of Law and Custom as our
or men but a just lawfull commendable heroick righteous and meritorious action to kill destroy dethrone or wage warr against a professed Tyrant especially such a one who invades his lawfull Soveraigns Throne Crown by perjury treason force regicide expulsion deposition or assassination of his rightfull undoubted Soveraign against his duty and allegiance without any colour of just Title to the Crown And this they hold unquestionable when done either by command or commission from the King de jureâ— or his rightfull heir or successor though out of actual possession or out of meer loyalty and duty to restore them to the just possession of their Thrones or to free their Native Country from the miseries oppressions wars murders bloudsheds and apparent destruction occasioned by his Usurpation of the Crown which is warranted by the presidents of Athaliah 2 Kings 11. 2 Chron. 23. and of Zimri 1 Kings 16.8 to 23. recorded in Scripture with hundreds of examples in other Histories of all antient and modern Empires kingdomâ— Besides when the usurping King de facto is removed dead destroyed and the king de jure or his right heir restored by way of remitter to the actual possession of the Crown in disaffirmance of the usurpers right and possession they are in the selfsame plight and condition in Law as if they had never been usurped upon or dispossessed of the Throne Therefore the King de jure can neither in Law nor Justice when remitted punish any such attempt against the king de facto as Treason it being no Treason in it self and the Usurper no lawfull king at all but the very worst and greatest of Traytors whiles a Usurper So that 9 E. 4. f. 1. b. can be no Law at all but a most gross absurdity 7ly It is a Principle in Law that no Disseisor Trespassor or Wrong-doer shall apportion or take advantage of his own wrong in the case of a common person much less then shall the Usurper of the actual possession of his lawfull Soveraigns Crown being the highest Offender Traytor Wrong-doer take advantage to secure himself or his adherents by his wrongfull trayterous possession against the Statute of 25. E. 3. or the ax of Justice The rather because this Statute was made and the Treasons therein specified declared and enacted to be Treason by King Edward the 3. and most of of those Lords who in the Parliament of 4 E. 3. but 21. years before at this Kings request and by his assent declared adjudged condemned executed Roger Mortimer and his Complices as Traytors guilty of HIGH TREASON for murdering King Edward the 2. his father after he was deposed in Parliament because he was still king de jure though not de facto Therefore they most undoubtedly resolved the king de jure though not regnant to be a King within that Act not the king de facto without right or title as Sir Edward Cooke erroniously asserts 8ly If the imagining or compassing the death or deposing or imprisoning of the King declared by overt act or rearing war against him or adhering to his enemies by any ambitious Usurper be High Treason within this Act for which he and his adherents shall lose their lives lands estates and suffer as Traytors though he never actually kill depose imprison or dispossess the King of his actual Regal power as the Council of Calchuth An. 787. cap. 3. The Council of Aenham An. 1009. cap. 26. with all our antient Laws Lawbooks Lawyers cited by Sir Edw Cook in his 3. Instit c. 1 2. the Statutes of 25 E. 3. all our other Acts concerning Treason and the forecited Judgements Presidents in Parliament with others in Queen Elizabeths reign abundantly evidence Then it is much more High Treason in the highest degree within the letter intention of all these Laws actually to usurp and get possession of the Crown by levying warr against and imprisoning degrading expelling banishing or murdering the lawful King himself and depriving him or his right heir of the possession of the Crown there being a complication of all the highest Treasons involved in an actual usurpation and a greater damage prejudice to the King kingdom than in a successless attempt alone which proves abortive and is quickly ended And if so then such an Arch-Traytors actual usurpation of the Crown must by consequence be so far from indemnifying him or mitigating or expiating his Treasons that it doth aggravate them to the highest pitch and expose him and his adherents to the highest penalties though king de facto and that both by the Law of God himself as is evident by the cases of Athaliah and of Baasha who conspiring against and slaying his Soveraign Nadab son of Jeroboam and then reigning in his stead smote all the House of Jeroboam not leaving to him any that breathed according to the saying of the Lord yet because he provoked God to aâ—ger with the works of his hands in being like the House of Jeroboam and BECAUSE HE KILLED HIM his son Elah who reigned in his stead two years was by Gods retaliating Justice slain by Zimri who reigning in his stead assoon as he sat on the Throne slew all the house of Baasha so that he left him not one that pissed against the wall neither of his kinsfolks nor of his Friends according to the word of the Lord which he spake against Baasha by Jehu the prophet When Zimri had thus reigned by Usurpation bloudshed but 7. days all the people of Israel that were incamped against Gibethon hearing that Zimri had conspired and also slain the King made Omri Captain of the host king over Israel that day in the camp who presently all marched from Gibethon to Tirzah besieged Zimri in it where he was burnt with fire in the Kings house and died for his sins and THE TREASON which he wrought All these Usurpers though kings de facto and Gods special instruments to punish and cut off other evil Kings and their families who usurped the Crown of Israel and kept the 10. revolting Tribes from the house of David to whom God had annexed them at first till rent from it by Jeroboams rebellion for Solomons sin were yet Traytors still in Gods and mens account and thus exemplarily slain and punished as such The like Examples we find in the Gothish and Spanish Histories every such actual Invader of the Crown qui regem nece attractaverit aut potestate Regni exuerit aut praesumptione tyrannica regni fastigium usurpaverit being condemned and for ever accursed excommunicated with the highest Anathema that can be inflicted by the 4. Council of Toledo can 74. and also by the 5. Can. 2 3 4 5 6. The like presidents we find in the Histories of the Roman Emperors of the kings of Denmark Poland France Scotland and other Realmes where Usurpers of the Crown though in actual possession have been oft times slain and executed as the archest Traytors by the
should be holden once every year or more often if need be to redress divers mischiefs and grievances which daily happen especially delayes in Judgements and sutes at Law through difficulty or diversity of Opinions among the Judges To prevent which the Statute of 14 E. 3. c. 5. enacts that from henceforth at every Parliament shall be chosen a Prelate two Earls and two Barons which shall have Commission and power of the King to hear by Petition delivered to them the complaints of them that will complain of such delayes and grievances and to cause the records of such Judgements to be brought before them and to hear the cause and reasons of such delayes and by the assistance and advice of the Chancellor Treasurer Justices of both Benches and as many other of the Kings Council as shall seem convenient shall proceed to take a good award and make a good judgement therein And that the Judges shall proceed hastily to give Judgement according to their determination And in case it seemeth to them the difficulty be so great that it may not well be determined without the assent of the Parliament that the said Prelate Earls and Barons shall present the tenor or tenors of the said record or cause to the next Parliament and there shall be a final accord taken what judgement ought to be given in his case And according to this award shall be commanded to the Judges before whom the plea did depend that they shall proceed to give Judgement without delay And to begin to give remedy upon this Ordinance it was assented that a Commission and power be made to the Archbishop of Canterbury the Earls of Arundel and Huntington the Lord of Wake and the Lord Raufe Basset to endure till the next Parliament After which I find this Commission made in pursuance of this Ordinance Edwardus Dei gratia c. authorizing the Bishop of Chichester the Earls of Huntingdon and Devonshire and Tho. Wake of Lidell and Thomas de Berkley Barons assigned to hear querelas omnium qui se de gravaminibus dilationibus sibi factis coram Iustic et aliis conqueri voluerint per avisamentum Cancell Thes Iustic de atroque Banco aliis dâ— Consilio Regis according to the Ordinance made in Parliament 14 Ed. 3. c. 5. that Unus Praelatus Duo Comites et Duo Barones should have Commission and power to hear and determine such complaints Test Rege apud Westm nono die Iunii There is this Petition of the Commons to the King for declaring Treasons in 25 E. 3. Rot. Parl. n. 17. Item come les Iustices nostre Seignior le Roy assignez en diversâ—es Countees ajuggent les gentz que sont empeschez devant eux come Traiteurs pur diverses Causes desconues a la Comune estre Treason que please a nostre Seignior le Roy per son Counseâ—l eâ— per les Grantz et sâ—ges de la terre declarer les pointz de Treason en cest present Parlament Quant aâ—la Petition touchant Treason nostre Seignior le Roy ad Fait declarer les Articles de Y celle en maneâ— que ensuit as in the Statute of 25 E. 3. c. â— By which Petition Act and the like Petition in 21 E. 3. n. 15. it is apparent That the Right of declaring Judging what is High Treason in Parliament belongs originally to the King himself by the advise of his Councel Great men and Sages of the Land and not unto the Commons House at whose request the KING then made a Declaration of the Articles of Treason as in this Statute by his Nobles Councils and Iudges advice Therefore the Declaration of all other Treasons in particular cases not within this Statute belongs wholly to the King Lords Council and Judges in the Lords House not to the Commons alone or joyntly with them within the later branch of this Act as well as the Treasons within the body thereof viz. Because that many other like cases of Treason may happen in time to come which a man cannot imagin nor declare at this present time it is accorded that if any other case supposed Treason which is not before specified shall happen de novel before any Iustice the Iustice shall demurâ— without going to Iudgement of the Treason tanque per devant le ROY EN SON PARLEMENT soit le case monstre et declare de que leceo doit estre a jugge Treason ou autre Felony Against the Opinion of Sir Edward Cooks 3 Institutes p. 22. The Commons having no power at all to declare and judge what shall be Treason in such new particular cases but only when a New Treason is made or declared for the future by Bill or Act of Parliament wherein their concurrence is necessary as in all new Acts concerning Treasons since 25 E. 3. as is evident by Mr. Sr. Iohns Argument at Law this very last Parliament at the Attainder of Thomas Earl of Strafford and Mr. Samuel Browns Argument at the Lords House Bar to prove and satisfie the Lords House that he and Archbishop Laud were guilty of High Treason upon the Articles of their several Impeachments exhibited and proved against them of which the Lords and King alone were the proper Iudges but the Commons only their Impeachers and Prosecutors in the Iudicial way of Parliamentary Proceedings as I have formerly evidenced Therefore all the late Votes knacks Declarations of the Commons House alone before or without the Kings House of Lords Declarations Resolutions of sundry things to be high Treason and divers persons to be Traytors upon bare informations suggestions though not within the Letter of 25 E. 3. c. 2. are but meer illegal innovations extravagancies yea Nullities in Law fit to be eternally exploded especially by Lawyers the chiefest Innovators Promoters of them rather out of ignorance or rashnesse than Prudence Law or solid Iudgement for which they can produce no presidents in former ages In the year 1392. the 15 of King Rich. the 2. we have this memorable President of the Lords Iudicature together with the King assembled in a Great Councel without the Commons in the case of the Mayor Sherifs Citizens and City of London thus related by Walsingham at large Misit Rex ad Cives Londoniarum petens ab eis mutuo mille libras cui procaciter et ultra quam decuit restiterunt Sed quendam Lumbardom volentem accommodare regi dictam summam male tractaveâ—unt veâ—beraverunt er paulominus occiderunt Quae cum Rex â—udisset iâ—aâ—us est valde et convocaas omnes regnipene Majorâ—s apperuit proterviam civium Londoniarum et de praesumptione conqueritur eorundem Qui omnes infesti Civibus propter diversas causas consulunt ut reprimatur citius eorum insolentia et superbia destruatur Eranc quippe tunc inter omnes fere nationes gentium clarissimi arrogantissimi et avarissimi ac male creduli in deum traditiones avitas Lolardorum sustentatores
E. 3. n. 1.10 R. 2.17 R. 2. n. 6.7 8 H. 4. n. 66 67. some of the valiantest wisest discreetest Spiritual and Temporal LORDS were by Petition of the Commons and special Order of the Lords in Parl. placed about these Kings to BE THEIR PRIVY COVNSELLORS to advise counsel them and manage all the Great affairs of the Realm under them so in this Parliament they exhibited this Petition to the like eâ—â—ect Primerement que plese a nostre dit Seigniour le Roy ordeigner et assigner en cest present Parlement les pluis vaillantz sages et discretes Seigniours espirituelx et temporelx de son roialme pur estre de son counseil en eid et supportation del bone et substancial gouvernance et la bien de Roy et de Roialme et que les ditz Seigniours de counseill et les Justices de Roi soient overtement jurez eny cest present parlement de eux bien et loialment en lour counseill et faitz acquiter pur le bien de Roy et de Royalm en toutz pointz saunz favour pur affection ou affinite faire a ascune manere de persone Et que plese nostre dit Seigniour le Roy en presence de toutz les Estates de parlement comander les ditz Seigniours et Justices sur lour foy et ligeance que lui devont qils feront pleyne justice et droit ouelment a chescuny sanz tarians si bonement come ils purront sanz ascun commandement on charge de queconque persone a contrarie Le Roy le voet was the answer which was answered See the like Petitions afterwards in 1 H. 6. n. 26.2 H. 6. n. 15 16.8 H. 6. n. 27 28.11 H. 6. n. 41. I shall conclude with these 2. memorable late presidents In the Parliament of 8 Eliz. upon the death of Thomas Williams Esquire Speaker of the Commons house Richard Onstoe Esquire the Quâ—ens Sollicitor first chosen a Member of the Commons house and after called by Writ to attend the Lordâ— House as an Assistant at the request of the Commons to the Queen and Lords was sent down again to the Commons house without any new election and there chosen and presented by them for their Speaker and allowed of by the Queen and Lords So in the Parliâ—ment of 23 Eliz. upon the Queens making John Bell Esq then Speaker chief Baron of the Exchequer Iohn Popham Esq then Queens Sollicitor called from the Commons house to the Lords as an Assistant by writ at the Commons request to the Queen and Lords was remitted to them again upon his old without any new election and thâ— chosen presented accepted for their Speaker Which 2. late presidents infallibly prove 1. That the King hath an absolute power over any Members of the Commons house upon a just occasion to call them thence by writ to be Assistants to the Lords house or else to create them Peers and call them to be Members of the Lords house as he did Sir Francis Seymore Mr. Arthur Capell and others created Lords the last long Parliament 2ly That the calling of any to the Lords house from the Commons by writ as Assistants only doth not totally disable them to be Members of the Commons house again the self-same or the next Parliament but that upon the Commons Petion and assent of the King and Lords they may be remanded to the Commons house and be Members and Speakers thereof again but not by the Commons votes or order but only by the Kings with the Lords assent who may refuse to remand them if they please A very pregnant argument chat the power of removing judging suspending approving readmitting Members of the Commons house upon Elections or Misdemeanors belongs not of right to the Commons house but to the King and House of Peers as I have formerly evidenced Admitâ—ing then that the Commons have de facto gained exercised this privilege of late years to judge suspend or eject their own Members in such cases without the King and House of Peers yet having most grosly abused it of late to the ruine subversion of Parliaments I must conclude with the Canonists Privilegium meretur amittere qui abutitur potestate Jer. 6.16 Thus saith the Lord Stand ye in the wayes and see and ask for the old pathes where is the good way and walk therein and ye shall find rest for your souls But they said We will not walk therein Prov. 24.21 22. My son fear thou the Lord and the King and meddle not with those who are given to change For their Calamity shall rise suddenly and who knoweth the ruine of them both Jer. 21.3 4. c. 17.25 27. Thus saith the Lord Execute ye judgement and deliver the spoiled out of the hands of the Oppressor and do no wrong do no violence to the stranger the fatherless nor the widdow neither shed innocent bloud in this place For if ye do this thing indeed then shall there enter into the Gates of this House KINGS PRINCES sitting upon the Throne of David riding in chariots and on horses they and their PRINCES the men of Iudah and the inhabitants of Ierusalem and this City shall remain for ever But if you will not hearken unto me c. then will I kindle a fire in the gates thereof and it shall devour the PALACES of Ierusalem and it shall not be quenched FINIS An Omission in pag. 30 l. 7. RAnulph de Glanvil Chief Justice under King Henry the 2. In his Tractatus de Legibus et Consuetudinibus Regni Angliae written in the 33 year of his reign hath this memorable passage relating to the Parliamentary Councils in that age l. 2. c. 7. Est autem magna Assisa REGALE QVODDAM BENEFICIUM CLEMENTIA PRINCIPIS DE CONSILIO PROCERUM POPVLIS INDVLTUM to wit in a Parliamentary Council of the King and Lords without any Commons quo vitae hominum et status integritati tam salubriter consulitur ut in jure quod quis de libero soli tenemento possidet retinendo duellâ— casum declinare possunt homines ambiguum c. Ex aequitate autem maxiâ— prodita est LEGALIS ISTA INSTITUTIO Jus enim quod post multas longas dilationes vix evincitur per duellum per beneficium ISTIUS CONSTITUTIONIS commodius et acceleratius expeditur By which it is evident that the Grand Assize was no original Processe or Trial at the Common Law but a legal institution and beneficial constitution proceeding from the Grace of the Prince and indulged to the People BY THE COUNSEL OF THE LORDS assembled together in a Parliamentary Council which Lib. 2. c. 9. Glanvil stiles Recordum per Assisam DE CONSILIO REGNI inde factum for the speedier and better recovery of their freeholds without endangering their lives by a Duel to recover them which was fuller of delays but less certain and more unjust than a recovery by verdict in this new