should be troubled with every such occasion and therefore the giving of advise to William the Conqueror what course he should take to settle the Lawes of England according to the instances in Councills holden An 1060. And 1070. And to gaine favour of the great men according to that in An 1106. and in the manner of endowment of the Abby of Battell as in pag 25. of the Opponents discourse and what to do upon the reading of the Popes Letter according to that in An 1114. And whether the Popes Legate should be admitted as in pag. 18. And how King Steven and Henry shall come to agreement as An 1153. And how to execute Lawes by Judges and Justices Itinerant as An 1176. And touching the manner of ingageing for a voyage by Croisado to Jerusalem An 1189. And to give answer to Embassadors of a forraine Prince pag. 25. And how King John shall conclude peace with the Pope An 1213. Where neverthelesse Math. Paris saith Pag. 23. was Turba multa nimis I say all these might well be done by a Councell of Lords and not in any posture of a Parliament albeit that in none of all these doth any thing appeare but that the Commons might be present in every one or many of them all Secondly as touching judicature the Lords had much power therein even in the Saxon times haveing better opportunites for Knowledge and Learning especially joyned with the Clergy then the Commons in those times of deep darknesse wherein even the Clergy wanted not their share as in the first part of the discourse I have already observed Whatsoever then might be done by Judges in ordinary Courts of judicature is inferiour to the regard of the Parliament and therefore the Plea between the Arch-Bishop and Aethelstan concerning Land instanced An 1070. And betweene Lanfranke and Odo An 1071. and betweene the King and Anselme pag 15 16. and the determining of Treason of John afterwards King against his Lord and King Richard pag 23. And the difference concerning the title of a Barony between Mowbray and Scotvile pag 25. And giving of security of good behaviour by William Brawse to King John pag. 26. All these might well be determined onely before the Lords and yet the Parliament might be then sitting or not sitting as the contrary to either doth not appeare and therefore can these forme no demonstrative ground to prove that the Parliament consisted in those times onely of such as we now call the House of Lords A third worke whereby the Opponent would prove the Parliament to consist onely of the House of Lords is because hee findeth many things by them concluded touching the solemnization and the settling of the succession of Kings both which he saith were done by the Lords in Parliament or those of that House and I shall crave leave to conclude the contrary For neither is the election or Solemnization of such election a proper worke of the Parliament according to the Opponents principles nor can they prove such Conventions wherein they were to be Parliaments Not the election of Kings for then may a Parliament be without a King and therefore that instance concerning William Rufus page 16. will faile or the Opponents principles who will have no Parliament without a King The like may also be sayde of the instance concerning King Steven page 18. Much lesse can the solemnization of the election by Coronation be a proper worke for the Parliament Neverthelesse the Opponent doth well know that both the election of a King and the solemnization of such election by Coronation are Spiritlesse motions without the presence of the people and therefore though his instance page 17. concerning the election of Henry the First by the Bishops and Princes may seeme to be restrictive as to them yet it is not such in fact if Matthew Paris may be beleeved Mr. Seldens Title of Honor. who telleth us that in the Conventus omnium was Clerus and Populus universus and might have been noted by the Opponent out of that Learned Antiquary so often by him cited if he had pleased to take notice of such matters A fourth sort of Instances concerneth matters Ecclesiasticall and making of Canons and hereof enough hath been already sayd that such worke was absolutely challenged by the Church-motes as their proper worke and therefore the Instance page 16 17. of the Councill in Henry the firsts time and the Canons made by the Bishops there and that other called by Theobald Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and instanced by the Opponent page 19. I say both these doe faile in the conclusion propounded Fifthly As touching the most proper worke of Parliaments which is the making of Lawes concerning the liberties and benefit of the people the Opponent produceth not one instance concerning the same which doth not conclude contrary to his proposall for as touching those two instances in his thirteenth page Anno 1060. they concerne not the making of Lawes but the reviving of such as had been difused formerly which might well enough be done by private Councell But as to that in his fifteenth page of the Law made by the Conquerour concerning Remigius Bishop of Lincolne although it be true that wee finde not the particular titles of Knights Citizens and Burgesses yet besides the Councill of Arch-Bishops Bishops Abbats and Princes we finde the Common Councill for so the words are Communi Concilio Concilio Archiepiscopus Episcopus Abatus omnium Principum although the Opponent would seeme to wave these words Et Concilio but putting them in a small Character and the rest in a voluminous Letter that the Readers eyes might be filled with them and overlook the other Secondly as to the instance of the Councill at Clarindon in his nineteenth page which he citeth out of Matthew Paris Matthew Westminster and Hoveden although he pleaseth to mention the severall rankes of Great Men and those in blacke Letters of a greater size and saith That not one Commoner appeares yet Master Seldens Hoveden in that very place Tit. Honor Pag. 703. so often by the Opponent cited tells him that both Clerus and Populus were there Thirdly The Opponent citeth an instance of Lawes made by Richard the First in his twenty fourth page and hee setteth downe the severall ranks of Great Men and amongst the rest ingeniously mentioneth Milites but it is with a Glosse of his owne that they were Barons that were made Knights when as formerly Barons were mentioned in the generall and therefore how proper this Glosse is let others judge especially seeing that not onely Milites and Milites Gregorij but even Ministri were present in such conventions even in the Saxon times And Master Selden in the former knowne place mentioneth an Observation that Tit. Honor Pag. 703. Vniversi personae qui de Rege tenent in Capite sicut ceteri Barones debent interesse judicijs curiae Domini Regis cum Baronibus Fourthly He citeth in his twenty fifth page
the Conquest and during the reigne of these severall Kings UNder the title of the Nobility of England I shall comprehend all such as are of the greatest eminency for birth or wisdome and learning and advancement into place of government and honour These were in the Saxons times the flower of the people flourishing onely from the honour that ascended from beneath their deportment then was full of cheere and safety to the people after that royalty sprung up the influence thereof upon them exhaled such a reciprocall interest backe againe as made them lesse regardfull of their own roote Whereas we see the more mature flowers are the more propence to turne head and looke downward to their own originall This distemper was yet much worse by the comming in of the Normans whose Nobility besides their titles of honour in their own Country obtained by custome such command and power amongst the meaner sort being souldiers under them in time of the service in the field that when the warres had breathed out their last neither of them could forget or were very carefull to lay aside This was observed by Kings and advantage espied to clime to the top of Monarchy by the helpe of these great men whom if they could make their own all would be theirs and wherein they had prevailed much more then they did if they had been wise enough to have maintained them in unity but in that failing Kings were necessitated to take parties and serve the Nobility to save the maine and thus continued they a considerable party in the gouernment of this kingdome from the Normans for the space of two hundred yeeres well nigh to the prejudice both of the growth of the prerogative of Kings and liberties of the Commons and benefit of none but the Lords who in those unquiet times were the chiefe Commanders in the field This errour of Kings was soon espied but could not be avoyded its naturall to man to be proud and to such to fall into contention another course therefore is taken viz. to raise up some so high as may overtop all and keep them under nor is it altogether without reason for Kings are no ubiquitaries and some must beare their power where they cannot be personally present yet it is dangerous to bestow too much upon one man for there is no man fitting to be a King but himselfe that is a King and where kings are immoderate in bestowing power it many times workes much woe to the people and not seldome sorrow to the Kings themselves The place of the chiefe Justice was in shew but one Office yet in these times was in nature of the Kings Lieutenant-generall throughout the kingdome A power and worke too great for any one man in the world that can make no deputies to mannage it Hoveden 443 375. Nubr lib. 4. cap. 14. and yet in those times you shall meet with one man made up of an Archbishop a Legate and chiefe Justice of England or a Bishop a Lord Chancellor a Legate and chiefe Justice of England and a strange kind of government must that needs be wherein the servants Throne is above his masters and a subject shall have a plenitudinary power beyond that which his Lord and King was as the times then were was capable of By these and such like pluralities the great men of England kept the Commons below and themselves above and probably rendred the temper of the government of this kingdome more Aristocraticall then in after ages And if their personall authority was of such value how much rather in their joynt assembly or court of Councell concerning which I must agree that as in their originall in Germany they did consult and determine of the meaner matters that is to say of matters concerning property and therefore were in their most ordinary worke meetings of Judges or Courts of Judicature and also matters of defensive warre because themselves were the Commanders and lastly in matters of sudden concernment to the State not onely to serve as eyes to foresee but to provide also if they can or otherwise to call in the ayd of the peoples advice so also they continued this course and it may be now and then as all Councels have done strained their endeavours beyond their reach especally since the Normans entrance and therefore I shall not deny but that they alone with the King and without the Commons have made many Laws and Constitutions some of which now are called Statutes although many of them in truth are no other then rules for Judicature which ordinary Courts may frame or Judgements in particular cases such as are the constitutions at Clarindon in Henry the seconds time and many other Laws which are reported to be made between the King and his Lords Nor can I looke upon such laws otherwise then as upon judgements in Courts of Justice in new points of controversie grounded upon ancient grounds which properly are not new Laws but the ancient rule applied to new particulars and being so published to the world may beare the name of Laws Ordinances Constitutions or Judgements the word Statute being of later times taken up and used in a more restrictive sence of which more in their due place Now that this Court was a setled Court of judicature Hoveden An. 1175. and so used may appeare in that fines were leavied therein and Writs of right determined as in that great case between the two Kings of Navarr and Castile Ibid. referred to the judgement of Henry the second and tried in this Court it s said that the triall was by plea and if need wereby battell The Judges in this Court were the Baronage of England for the entry of judgement in that great case is thus Comites Barones Regalis Curiae Angliae adjudicaverunt c. so as though doubtlesse many were absent some being enemies others discontented others upon other occasions yet all might claime their votes as Barons The President over all the rest was the chiefe Justice or if the King were present then himselfe and by him was the sentence or judgement declared according to the entry in the case aforesaid Habito Concilio cum Episcopis Comitibus Baronibus adjudicavimus c. The honour of this Court was great so long as the Lords had liberty or care to attend thereon but when Kings began to have private interests they would have these to be more private Councels which weakned the esteem of conclusions that there passed and reduced the honour thereof scarce to the degree of a Conventicle and by this means the necessity of calling together the whole body representative was made more frequent the power of the Nobility of England decayed and this Court forfeited all its juridicall power to the three Courts at Westminster viz. the Kings bench Common pleas and Exchequer saving still the supreame judicature unto the grand Convention of Estates in Parliament where all the Lords had liberty of meeting and free
the Kings high way or open street but by the Kings Officer and speciall Writ because distresse is incident to service and that is due as from the fee and therefore by common right the same must be recovered from the fee and such as owe service in the same but the high way or open street are more properly a franchise belonging to the King although the soile happly may be the Lords and therefore it was an old law that they should be under the Kings safegard Ll. Inae Sit pax publica per communes vias and no violence must be there tolerated but by the Kings especiall Writ which presupposeth the especiall notice taken by the King of the nature of the occasion A moderation also must be observed in the taking of the distresse for it must not be excessive and also in keeping thereof for if the owner will he may replevy the same according to the ancient course Marlb cap 21. Glanvil lib. 12 cap. 12. and the Sheriffe must grant replevy if it be demanded although formerly no replevy was without speciall Writ and yet they also not alwaies readily obeyed For the times were such as the Lords were bold with the Kings courts and Ministers and refused the order of the law now in such cases wherein the matter concerned contempt of the Kings authority a fine was set upon the offender but in case it concerned onely a tort done to the party he was amerced the one is called redemption because the penalty otherwise must lie upon the person Miror cap. 5. Sec. 3. if it be not redeemed by pecuniary fine the other is called amercement which is originally a satisfaction unto the party wronged by recompence out of the personall estate of the delinquent Distric Scac. Artic. mag cart cap. 12. Thirdly as touching the matter of the distresse it must not be of Plough beasts or sheep unlesse in case of dammage fesant if other distresse may be had for the Law had a care of such Cattell as were most of publique concernment and which was the maine stocke of subsistence so farre as justice would allow and therefore the unjust taking of any mans Cattaile by any person whatsoever is liable to the same penalties that unjust distresses are West 1. cap. 16. Fourthly concerning the using of the distresse it must not be sold no not in the Kings case till fifteen daies be past after it is taken Marlbr cap. 4. Distric Scac. nor must it be carried out of the County but it must be so impounded as the owner may come to feed it and it must be discharged if the owner give security of satisfaction before the returne of the Writ Artic. sup cart cap. 12. Fifthly the intent of the distresses must be that which is just and therefore not for other suit then by the feofment is due or else by prescription and in case many are joyntly seised Marlbr cap. 9. the suit shall be by one and the rest shall contribute cap. 22. Nor must any man be compelled to shew his title to his Land by distresse cap. 13. The Common pleas shall be holden in one certaine place The Office of Judge of the Common-pleas was in my opinion distinct and severall from that of the Crown pleas nor though one and the same man might execute both authorities doth it therefore follow that it was by one and the same power as if being Judge he had thereby power in all matters of the Common pleas and also of the Crown for though it be true that Bracton saith the King hath one proper court wherein are the chiefest Judges Capitales Just nostri which both by his own testimony and Britons also did heare and determine causes of all sorts yet is it true also that it was by appeale or Writ of errour as in case of false judgement and that the King had plures curias Marblr cap. 20. which doubtlesse had their proper worke and in the time of Henry the second its cleare that six were especially assigned for the Common pleas throughout the whole Realme and yet by another especiall Commission or Letters patents the same men might also have power to determine matters of the Crown as at this day in their severall circuits This law therefore doth not as I conceive worke any alteration but onely in this that whereas formerly the Judges of Common pleas attended on the Kings Court continually as all other Judges did and whither the King removed they did the like which was a great uncertainty and grievance unto the Commons Henceforth they are fixed to a certaine place Assize of Novel Disseisin and Mortdancester shall be determined in the proper County onely cap. 14. and by the Iustices itinerant sent by the King or his chiefe Iustices The law was so declared in Henry the seconds time and was questionlesse put in practise so farre forth as with convenience to the Judges might be but now the convenience of the people is preferred and they must not be brought up to the Kings Court but the Justices must come down to them and yet in case of difficulty the bench where the Common pleas are holden must determine the matter and where the time in the Iter in one County is too scant the remanets shall be adjourned over to be tried elsewhere in that circuit which sheweth that the Judges itinerant had their time proportioned out to every County These trials also were so favoured Westm cap. 51. as in the then holy times of Advent and Septuagesima or Lent they might be tried which although was gained by prayer made by the King to the Bishops as the words of that law are concluded yet it shewes that the Parliament had so much light as to hold the time not inherently holy but meerely sequestred by the will of the Clergy The Plantiffs also in Mortdancester may be divers if there be divers heires of one ancester by one title Stat. Gloc. ca. 6. And if there be joyntenants and the Writ be against but one and the same pleaded Conjanct feofat An. 34. E. 1. Stat. Gloc ca. 1 the Writ shall abate but if joyntenancy be pleaded and the plea be false the defendant shall be fined and imprisoned And if in the action the verdict be for the plaintiffe he shall recover dammages cap. 15. Darraine presentment shall be taken onely in the common Banke Trials in the common bank or other Courts at VVestminster have ever had an honourable esteem above those in the County by Nisi prius although all be equally availeable This might be one cause why the Titles of Churches were still retained at the common Bank when as all other rode circuit For that Churches affaires in those times were of high regard Speed of triall also was not little regarded herein for Justices by Nisi prius properly were but for inquiry till the Statute at Westm the second made them of Oyer
and terminer in the cases of Quare impedit and Darraine presentment West 2. cap. 30. and gave them power to give judgement And thus the Commons gained still in point of conveniency cap. 16. Free men shall be amerced according to the degree of the fault saving to them their free hold and to Merchants their maine stocke and to villaines their Waynage and Clergy men shall be amerced according to their Lay fee. Barrons shall be amerced by their Peeres others by the vicinage In this regard is to be had first of the persons that are to be amerced then of the parties by whom and lastly of the nature and quantity of amercements The persons amerced are ranked into foure Classes Barons Clergy Free men and villaines But in regard of the parties by whom they are to be amerced they are but two Barons and Freemen for the Clergy villaines and free men are to be amerced by the free men of the neighbourhood Marlb cap. 19. In what Courts these amercements shall be the Stat. Marlbr tels us not before the Escheator nor other that make enquiry by Commission or Writ nor before the Justices of Assize or Oyer and terminer but only before the chiefe Justices or Justices itinerant The Statute of VVestminster addes a fifth Classes of Cities and Towns by expresse words Westm 1. cap. â— which seems not so necessary unlesse in pillaging and oppressing times for they were taken to be within the Statute of Magna carta Miror cap. 5. sect 4. though not therein named The rule of the quantity of amercements is now set down in generall and left to the discretion of the Peeres or Vicinage which formerly by the Saxons were specially set down in the law The rule in generall is with a ne plus ultra viz. not further or more then that the party amerced may spare and yet hold on in the maintenance of his course according to his degree And it must be also according to the quantity of the offence for the greatest amercements must not be ranked with the least offences so as in every degree the maine sustainance of the party is saved yea the villaines how ever meane they be they must have their maintenance And this sheweth that villaines had a maintenance which was under the protection of the Law and not under the gripe of their Lords to all intents unlesse they were the Kings villains who it seemeth were meerely under the Kings mercy as being both their Lord and King against whom they could hold nothing as properly their own and therefore in all other cases even then the villaines were borne under a kinde of liberty as in the Saxon times formerly hath been declared which the Law protected against their owne Lords No man shall be compelled to make repaire cap. 17 18. or maintaine any bridges banks or causies other or otherwise then they were wont to be made repaired or maintained in the time of Henry the second The limitation to the times of Henry the second sheweth that his justice was such as maintained the common rights of men but in the times of Richard the first Miror cap. 5. sect 2. and more especially of King John those rivers waters and fishings formerly used in common were incroached upon inclosed and appropriated to particular mens uses which occasioned many bridges banks and causies to be made and repaired to the great charge of private men all which are discharged by this Law cap. 19. No Sheriff Constable Coroner or other Bayliff shall hold any pleas of the Crown Escheators are also expressed in the old bookes of Magna carta and the abridgements however it seemeth that it s within the intent of the law which was made to avoyd the extraordinary oppression that these Officers exercised upon the people For Escheators under colour of inquiry of estates of men would inquire of matters concerning the lives of men and Sheriffs that had power of trials in cases of theft as hath been already shewen Ll. Hen. 1. c 8. Glanv lib. 1. cap. 2. abased the same for their own benefit because in such cases they had the forfeitures This law therefore takes away such occasions viz. from the Sheriffs and Corroners and Bayliffs or Justices other then by expresse commission thereto assigned all power to hold pleas of the Crown by triall leaving unto them neverthelesse power of inquiry of which anciently they had the right cap. 20. If the Kings tenant dieth supposed in arreare an inventory shall be made of his stocke by honest men but it shall not be removed till accounts be cleared and the overplus shall go to the Executors saving to the wife and children their reasonable part The first clause hereof was a law in Henry the firsts time and a customary law in Henry the seconds time Glanv lib. 7. cap. 5. being a remedy against an old Norman riot of the Lords seisure of the whole personall estate of the party deceased under colour of a law The second part concerning the overplus hath this additionall subjoyned in the Charter of King John If any free man die intestate his Chattels shall be divided by his parents and his friends in the presence of the Church saving to every one their proper debts and thus since the conquest the Church men incroached by degrees unto a great power in matters testamentary I say by degrees for as yet by this law it appeareth that they were but overseers or eye-witnesses for as yet right of ordering or disposing they had none as may appeare in that case of a bastard dying without issue and intestate the Lord shall have his personall estate Glanvil lib. 7. cap. 16. and in all cases the executor had then nothing but bare assets and the overplus was assigned between the wife and children according to their reasonable part or if the party died intestate the next friends did administer paying the debts and making dividend of the overplus into the reasonable parts according to the ancient Saxon custome still continued nor doth the testimony cited out of Bracton prove any other then that the auncestor hath free power to order his estate as he pleaseth Coke instit 2. pag. 33. and that the children shall have no more then is left unto them by their auncester either in his will or in case of dying intestate by the custome or law which is and ever was the rationabilis pars No purveyance for any Castle out of the same Town where the Castle is but present satisfaction must be made cap. 21. and if in the same Town satisfaction must be made within forty daies Purveyance was ancient provision for the necessities of the publique and so farre was commendable seeing it s not the common case of all men to regard the publique above their own private interest therefore the publique must provide for it selfe by their meanes in whom the publique is most concerned and this
they had usurped in their Synods which they held only for Church-visitation which they could never have because the Sapientes regni had their Votes therein as freely as they Nor could the Prelates by any Law entitle themselves to such power or priviledge so contrary to the priviledge of the Wtttagenmote For though it be true that the German Priests had a liberty to be present in these grand assemblies and to have some presidency therein as to command silence c. yet it s no title to these Tacitus unlesse they will interest themselves as their successors to possesse by a jus Divinum that jus Diabolicum which those Priests formerly had in a way of immediate providence somewhat like the possession of the mantle of Eliah found by Elisha They might I grant plead the title from Kings but it must be granted also that Kings as yet had no more power over the Church then in the Common-wealth Nor could they have that from the Lords which the Lords never had but was ever accounted amongst the majora and of which the Wittagenmot had the onely cognisance as it will appeare in some particulars ensuing Unto the King Lords and Clergy must be added as I said the Freemen to make up the Micklemote compleat and though it be true that no monument of story speaks of this grand meeting from their being in Germany untill after the comming of Austin yet when as the Saxon Histories then finde them in the same condition that the German story leaves them it s very probable that in the intervall they continued their wonted custome although they had no Learning to leave monuments thereof unto the world And hereof the examples are not rare in those remembrances that those ancient times have left us For within six yeeres after Austins arrivall Aethelbert cals a Common-councell tam cleri quam populi Concil Brit. 126. Ll. Sax. Lamb. cantab. fo 1. Ibid. fo 22. Ibid. fo 53. Ina after him made Laws suasu instituto Episcoporum omnium senatorum natu majorum sapientum populi in magna servorum Dei frequentia Alfred after him reformed the former Lawes consulto sapientum After him Aethelsian called a Councell in which was the Archbishop and with him the Optimates sapientes frequentissimi besides others whereof I shall treat now that I come to the matters handled in this Court The matters in agitation in the Wittagenmot generally were all both of publique and private concernment That which concerned the publique were such as regarded removall of inconveniences such as are lawes for leagues and affinity with other Nations for preventing of war and thus became the Saxons and Britons united Concil Brit. p. 219. Ll. Lamb. Cantabr fo 36. and the mortall feude between those two Nations laid aside and they made one and the Saxons and Danes reconciled by a covenant agreed unto and sworne between both Nations The like also may be said of their making of war of defence against forrain invasion Matters of publique and general charge also were debated and concluded in that assembly as the payment of Tythes Ll. Edw. Lamb. Cam. fo 139. it s said they were granted Rege Baronibus populo Such also as concerned the Church for so Edwin the King of Northumberland upon his marriage with a Christian Lady being importuned to renounce his Paganisme answered he would so doe Antiq. Brit. p. 51. if that his Queens Religion should be accounted more holy and honourable to God by the wise men and Princes of his Kingdom And all the Church Laws in the Saxons time were made in the Miklemote Monasteries were by their generall consent dedicated Concil Brit. 127. Ibid. 321. their possessions confirmed The City of Canterbury made the Metropolitane matters also of private regard were there proceeded upon as not onely generall grievances but perverting of justice in case of private persons as in that Councell called Synodale concilium under Beornulfus the Mercian King Ibid. 332. quaesitum est quomodo quis cum justicia sit tractatus seu quis injuste sit spoliatus The name of which Councell called Synodall mindeth me to intimate that which I have often endeavoured to finde out but yet cannot viz. that there was any difference between the generall Synods and the Wittagenmot unlesse meerly in the first occasion of the summons And if there be any credit to be allowed to that booke called Cap. 1. Sec. 3. The Mirror of Justices it tels us that this grand assembly is to conferre of the government of Gods people how they may be kept from sinne live in quiet and have right done them according to the Customes and lawes and more especially of wrong done by the King Sec. 2. Queen or their children for that the King may not by himselfe or Justices determine causes wherein himselfe is actor Cap. 4. Sec. 11. and to summe up all it seemeth a Court made to rise and stoop according to occasion The manner of debate was concluded by vote and the sum taken in the grosse by noise Tacitus Plut. Lycurg Thucyd. lib. 1. de Lacedem like to the Lacedemonians who determined what was propounded clamore non calculis yet when the noise was doubtfull they tooke the votes severally The meeting of the Saxons at this assembly in the first times was certaine Tacitus viz. at the new and full Moon But Religion changing other things changed these times to the Feasts of Easter Pentecost and the Nativity at which times they used to present themselves before the King at his Court for the honour of his person and to consult and provide for the affaires of his Kingdome and at such times Kings used to make shew of themselves in their greatest pompe Crowned with their Royall Crown This Custome continued till the times of Henry the second An. 1158. who at Worcester upon the day of the Nativity offered his Crown upon the Altar and so the ceremony ceased This grand Assembly thus constituted was holden sacred and all the members or that had occasion therein were under the publique faith both in going and comming unlesse the party were fur probatus If a member were wronged the delinquent payed double dammages and fine to the King by a Law made by Aethelbert above a thousand yeeres agoe Concil Brit. p. 127. Ll. Canut p. 2. cap. 79. Ll. Edw. cap. 35 This priviledge of safe passe being thus ancient and fundamentall and not by any law taken away resteth still in force But how farre it belongeth to such as are no members and have affaires neverthelesse depending on that Court I am not able to determine yet it seemeth that priviledge outreacheth members unlesse we should conceit so wide that the state did suppose that a member might be a notorious and known thiefe Lastly this assembly though it were called the Wittagenmot or the meeting of wise men yet all that would come might be
people for he had nothing else to make room for his rising True it is he had the good will of his father but he was dead and probably the people as little regarded it as he did them Nor was it ever observed that the English Crown was of so light account as to passe by devise of cestui que use and therefore though it was designed to him from his father yet both right and possession was left to the people to determine and maintaine The Clergy first led the way Eadmer hist Wigorn. M. Paris having fist taken a recognisance of him for his good behaviour towards them which he assured as farre as large promises and protestations would serve the turne and within one yeere after standing in need of the favour of the Commons to maintaine possession against his brother Robert he gave them as good security as the Clergy had which he kept in such manner that it was a wonder that one of so small interest in the Title but what he had by the peoples leave and favour should rule in such manner and yet die a King The favour of the people being like a meteor that must be continually fed or it soon goes out and fals for evident it is that the right of inheritance was his elder brother Roberts who was the braver man and more experienced souldier and upon these principles had obtained the love of the Norman Barons the flower of his fathers chivalry M. Paris An. 1088. the liking of the Clergy after they had found by experience the emptinesse of their hope in his brother William and was every way so superiour to his brother in advantages as we are left to believe that William got the day without any other ground but onely that God would so have it It s true the English stooke close to him but how they were gained or contained writers speake not but tell us of his promises which also they tell us were vaine and never had issue further then would stand with his profit Exit William Rufus Henry first and in comes his younger brother Henry the first of that name A Prince that excelled in wisdome and by it ruled his courage which served him so farre as his aimes and ends reached His title was no better then his fathers or brothers but rather worse for he had no colour of last will to propound him to the people and his elder brother Robert was still alive and by his service of the Church in the warre of Jerusalem might merit that respect of the Clergy as not to permit him to be a looser by so well deserving service as in those daies that was accounted Neverthelesse the English looke upon Henry as the fitter man for their turne being now at hand and Robert at Jerusalem and being a native born in England civilized into the English garb by education and of a wiser and fairer demeanure and more inclining to peaceable government which both Normans and English much inclined to as being weary of thirty yeeres service in the warres And therefore it s not marvellous if they applied themselves to him in a way of capitulation Math. Paris 1100. Eadmer Speed and lesse wonderfull if he hearkned thereunto and yet neither unadvisedly yeelded unto by him nor traiterously propounded by them as some in zeale to Monarchy conclude the point The worst of the whole matter resting in this that the King bound himselfe to be just that he might be great and the people to submit unto justice that they might be free like as their ancestors were and themselves by the Law established ought to be For that capitulation was in substance setled by the ancient laws of the Saxons mixed with some additions of laws made by the Kings father with the joynt advice of the grand Councell of the Kingdom all which both the Norman Williams had often cofirmed by solemn protestations and promises however their actions upon sudden surprisall were malae consuetudines and exactiones injustae Math. Paris by this Kings own acknowledgement Thus these three Norman Kings made their way to the Throne the first by armes under colour of title the second by a kind of title under colour of armes and the last by favour but all entered the same by capitulation election and stipulation and for the generall had some regard to suit their course in order of retaining the good will of their people although in a different measure according to the differency of occasions CHAP. XLVI That the government of the Normans proceeded upon the Saxon principles and first of Parliaments THe principles which I mean are these First the legislative power and influence thereof upon the whole Secondly the members of that government with their severall motions Thirdly the laws customs or rules of those motions and first concerning the legislative power Although it be true that the first Williams great and most constant labour was to have and to hold and had but little time or liberty to enjoy yet that time of rest which had he did apply it and himselfe in the setling of the Laws by advice of Common-councell I say not by advice of his own heart or two or three Norman Lords or of the Norman Nobility onely as some men take the confidence to averre as if they had been eye-witnesses to the actions of those daies but by the joynt advise of the grand Councell of the Lords and wise men of the Kingdome of England Spicileg p. 5. I will not insist upon force of argument to shew that common reason must of necessity sway the King into this course but shall reserve that to another place the testimonies of Writers must now serve the turn and herein the testimony of the Chronicle of Leichfield must have the first place which speaks both of a Councell of Lords and saith that by their advice he caused to be summoned a meeting of all the Nobles and wise men through all the Counties of England to set downe their laws and customes This was in the fourth yeere of his reigne or rather after his entry and as soon as the Kingdome was brought into any reasonable posture of quiet and which besides the intention of governing the Kingdome according unto Law doth strongly pretend that the Parliament had the legislative power and right of cognisance and judicature in those laws that concerned the Kingdome in generall and for the particular laws or customes of severall places or precincts it was referred to a Committee or Jury in every County to set them forth upon oath Secondly that this Councell had power to change laws may likewise appeare in that act made concerning the introduction of the Canon law Spicil 167. Fox Mart. l. 4. which shewes not onely the power of that Councell in Church-matters but also that the Canon was no further in force then the same would allow and this was also done by the Common councell and the Councell
law of Henry the first concerning the County court which reciteth it as a custome in his time used Ll. Hen. 1. c. 7. that the Bishop and Earles with other the chiefe men of that County were there present as assistants in directory of judgement And that in order are handled first matters of the Church Secondly Crown pleas Thirdly and lastly Common pleas however therefore the King spake faire they either acted not at all or so cooly as the current of the custome was too strong but most probable it is that the Kings spake faire till they were setled in their Thrones and afterwards pleased themselves for by the generall thred of story it may appeare that the Clergy in those times were more feared then loved and therefore riden with a streight reine The Prelacy on the contrary grew unruly yet too weake for the rugged spirits of the Norman Kings they are glad to be quiet and the Pope himselfe to drive faire and softly as judging it expedient potestatem Regalem mitius tractandam Greg epist l. 9. and continued that course and posture till the calmer times of Henry the first Eadmer hist l. 4 p. 95. wherein they mended their pace and got that without noyse which they had long striven for viz. the preeminence and presidency in the Synods though the King himselfe be present and if the Historian writeth advisedly the whole ordaining or legislative power for so runnes the stile or phrase of the author Archiepiscopi Episcopi statuerunt in praesentia Regis as if the presence of the King and his Barons and people were but as a great Amen at the common prayer after the old stampe to set a good colour upon a doubtfull matter to make it goe down the better How the Kings brooked this draught I cannot say but it hath made the kingdome stagger ever since and it may be feared will hardly recover its perfect wits so long as the brains of the Clergy and the Laity thus lie divided in severall Cels. CHAP. XLVIII Of the severall subservient jurisdictions by Provinces Marches Counties Hundreds Burroughs Lordships and Decennaries HAd the Normans owned no other title then that of Conquest doubtlesse their mother wit must needs have taught them the expediency of preserving the particular subservient jurisdictions of the kingdome intire and unquashed if they regarded either the benefit of their conquest or reward of their parteners and allies unlesse it should be allowed unto Conquerous to be more honourable for them to doe what they will rather then what is meet But hereof there is no cause of queston in this present subject for nothing is more cleare then that VVales enjoyed in the Conquerours time and for ages after him its ancient liberties Tribute excepted nor did conquest ever come so nigh to their borders as to trench upon the liberties of the Marches For as it had been a piece of state nonsence to have holden two peoples under conquest and their Marches in freedome or to preserve them in good neighbourhood by Marches which by the law of Conquest were made one so was it no lesse vaine if all had been once subdued by conquest to have raised up the liberties of the Marches any more And as they had lesse cause to have invaded the bounds and ancient limits and partitions of the Counties County courts so questionlesse had they so done they would have taken the old course of the Micklemote Eadmer hist l. 4. p. 96. as they did divide the Diocesse of Lincolne into two Diocesses by advice of the Bishops Princes and other wise and holy men Ll. Hen. 1. c. 6. and turned the Abby of Ely into a Bishops See But it was their wisdome to preserve the ancient Land-marks and no lesse both wisdome and care to continue their due priviledges and interests to each Every County had its Court Ll. Gulielm cap. 41. 42. and every Court its wonted jurisdiction No complaint must be to the Kings Court if right may be done in the County no distresse must be taken but by warrant from the County and that must be after complaint thrice made The County court must be called as our ancestors have appointed Ll. Gulielm cap. 64. such as will not come as they ought shall be first summoned and in case of default destrained at the fourth default the complainant shall be satisfied out of the distresses so taken and the King also for his fine These are the expresse Laws of the Conquerours own establishment Ibid. c. 64. the last of which also was confirmed by another expresse Law saving that he would allow but of two summons and two distresses before execution And as it was one principall worke that he undertooke to reduce the Lawes into course which had been intermitted during the violent times of his father and brother the first of whom never had liberty for reformation and the latter never had will so amongst other Laws he setled those concerning the County court Ll. Hen. 1. c. 7. namely That the Bishops Earles and chiefe men should be present for direction 2. That it should be holden once each moneth 3. That the Church matters should precede and then the Crown pleas And lastly the Common pleas besides some other particulars concerning pleading and proceedings in the handling of causes Neither were these causes of a petty regard onely but of greatest concernment One example I shall remember the reader of Epicil 197. and not recite in terminis but referre to Mr Seldens own pen. The occasion was this Odo the Conquerours halfe brother was by him made Earle of Kent and therewith had the gift of a large Teritory in Kent and taking advantage of the Kings displeasure at the Archbishop of Canterbury Stigand possessed himselfe by disseisin of divers Lands and Tenements belonging to that See Lanfrank the succeeding Archbishop being informed hereof petitioned to the King that justice might be done him secundum legem terrae And the King sends forth his Writ to summon a County court the debate lasted three daies before the free men of the County of Kent in the presence of many chiefe men Bishops and Lords and others skilfull in the Laws and the judgement passed for the Archbishop Lanfrank upon the votes of the free men This County court was holden by speciall summons and not by adjournment as was allowable by the Saxon Law upon speciall occasions And this suit was originally begun and had its finall determination in the County court and not brought by a Tolt out of the Hundred court as is supposed by an Honourable reporter nor by the ancient laws could the suite commence in the Hundred because the Lands and Tenements did lie in severall hundreds and Counties The upshot of all is that the County courts in those daies were of so great esteem that two of the greatest Peeres of the Realme one a Norman the other an Italian did cast a title
rules for government I remember it s affirmed by some of those ancient Writers that the Duke or King would have brought in the customes of Norwey but the earnest mediation of the English prevailed against it and it evinceth two things to my opinion first that there was question made what law should be established Secondly that notwithstanding the interest that the Normans had in the Kingdome they could not prevaile to bring in the whole body of their law or of the customes of Norwey which were not onely the prima materia of their law but also in kind had a setling at that very time in those places of this Kingdome where the Danes had their principall seate and therefore not altogether strange to the Saxons themselves The summe of which will be this that upon debate a law must be setled and that not the law of the Conquerours own will nor the law that suits with his desire but the ancient law of the Kingdome and therefore if at any time the unquietnesse of some of the English brought the King to some thoughts of arbitrary rule and to shake off the clog of Saxon law it was long ere it stirred and sprang up too late to raise the title of conquest and withered too soon to settle it As touching the change of customes for that also is imputed to the Conquerour it cannot be denied but some alteration might be in matters of smaller consideration yet are the Writers not without mistake in the particular instances For whereas they tell us that the Conquerour tooke away the custome of Gavell kinde and brought the custome of discent to the eldest sonne and that Kent saved their liberties and continued this custome of Gavell kinde I shall not contend about the liberties of Kent but must till I see better reason hold the opinion of the change of inheritance to be a meere conceit For besides what hath been already said concerning that custome of Gavell kind if we believe Glanvile the difference was between Lands holden by Knights service Lib. 7. cap. 3. and in socage the first of which in his time by ancient custome alwaies descended to the eldest and those Lands that were holden in Socage if not partible by custome in which case they went equally to all the sonnes went by custome in some places to the eldest in other places to the youngest so as the rule of inheritance in the Norman times was custome as well as in former times And furthermore if the custome of Gavell kind had been the generall custome of this Nation the King by his change had contradicted his own Prerogative and granted as great a liberty to his subjects as could have been invented For had the custome of Gavell kind happened upon the Lands in Knight service it had brought all the sonnes under the law of Wardship and had made a ready way to inthrall all men of worth and undoe all husbandry the first whereof had been as advantagious to the Kings private interest as both destructive to the publique Nor is it cleare from any Authour of credit that the Normans changed the tenures of Lands albeit that it cannot be denied but such Lands as he had by forfeiture or otherwise were in his own power to dispose upon what tenure he pleased for as well before the Normans time as long after tenures were like as the services were all at the will of the donor and were of as many individuals almost as the minds of the owners some being of more generall regard and publique use Littlet are recorded amongst the grounds of English laws none of which appeare to me to be of Norman originall although they received their names according to that dialect The next thing objected is the change of Language which thing some Writers tell us the King endeavoured or which is worse to be so absolute as to be absolute tyrant and to publish laws in a forreigne language that the people through ignorance might the rather transgresse and thereby forfeit their estates This if true so far differed from the nature of a Conquerour as rather proveth that he was put to his shifts Neverthelesse the thing tasteth so much of spleen as it might occasion distrust of other relations concerning this subject For besides that it is nonsence for a Conquerour to entitle himselfe by a cheat where he hath an elder title by conquest I shall in full answer to that calumny insert a passage of an Historian that was in the continuall view of publique affaires in those times who speaking of the Conquerour saith That he commended the Confessors laws to his Justices in the same Language wherein they were wonted formerly to be written Ingulfus lest through ignorance the people might rashly offend And another Authour saith M. Paris fragm Gulielm that the King had a desire to learn the English tongue that he might the better know their Law and judge according thereto It s probable neverthelesse that the laws were in the Norman tongue and it s no lesse likely that the pleadings in reall actions especially were also in the same Language else must the Normans be put to schoole to learne English upon perill of losse of their estates but that either the written laws were wholy concluded into the Norman Tongue or that the publique pleading of causes by word of mouth in all actions where the issue was left to the Countrey were in any other Language then English no advised Reader will conceive seeing it had been a madnesse for an English Jury to passe their verdict in any case wherein its likely many of them understood scarce a syllable of the Norman language much lesse ought of the matter upon which their verdict should be grounded Adde hereunto that it s not likely but the Conquerour inhibited the use of the English language in all matters of publique Record in as much as the Charters made by him to corporate Towns and Franchises were sometimes in the Saxon more generally in the Latine but seldome or never in the Norman dialect and that pleadings and indictments were entered in like manner in the Latine Tongue as formerly by an old custome brought in by the Clergy was used for the Clergy who had gotten the Key of knowledge and Law into their own custody layd it up in that Language whereof the Commons had little knowledge that they might thereby be enforced to depend upon these men for justice as well as for piety The Normans therefore either found it too hard to alter the former custome in such cases or else thought it the wisest way to choose the Latine as a third Language indifferent as well to the Normans as Saxons and best understood of any forreine Tongue besides and yet endeavoured to bring both peoples into one Language as they were intended to be one people and to presse the use of the Norman Tongue in publique affaires so farre as might consist with good government and justice leaving
in the Lawes cap. 2. Rights of Tythes of a Lay fee or where the tenure is in question belong to the Kings court Pleas of debts by troth-plight belong to the Kings Court. cap. 3. These were Saxon Laws and do intimate that it was the indeavour of the Clergy to get the sole cognisance of Tythes because they were originally their dues and of the debts by troth-plight because that oaths seemed to relate much to Religion whereof they held themselves the onely professors The Kings Justice shall reforme errourrs of Ecclesiasticall Courts and Crimes of Ecclesiasticall person cap. 4. Appeales shall be from Archdeacons Courts to the Bishops Courts and thence to the Archbishops courts cap. 5. and thence to the Kings court and there the sentence to be finall No man that ever was acquainted with antiquity will question that these were received Laws in the Saxons time Constit at Clarindon nor did the Clergy ever quarrell them till the Normans taught them by curtesie done to Rome to expect more from Kings then for the present they would grant whereof see Cap. 47. But King Steven that was indebted to the Clergy for his Crowne and could not otherwise content them parted with this Jewel of supreame power in causes Ecclesiasticall to the Roman cognisance as hath been already noted but Henry the second would none of this cheate at so easie a rate This strooke so smart a blow as though the Popedome had but newly recovered out of a paralitique Schisme yet seeing it so mainly concerned the maintenance of the tripple Crown Alexander the Pope having lately been blooded against a brave Emperour made the lesse difficulty to stickle with a valiant King who in conclusion was fain to yeeld up the bucklers and let the Pope hold what he had gotten notwithstanding against this law and all former Law and custome And thus the Popes supremacy in spirituall causes is secured both by a recovery and judgement by confession thereupon Constit at Clarindon The King shall have vacances of Churches cap. 6. and power to elect by his secret Councell The party elected shall doe homage salvo ordine and then shall be consecrated This certainly was none of the best yet it was a custome not altogether against reason although not suitable to opinion of many yet we meet two alterations of the ancient custome First that the election shall be by the King and secret Councell whereas formerly the election of Bishops and Archbishops was of such publique concernment as the Parliament tooke cognisance thereof and that which was worse a Councell was hereby allowed called a secret Councell which in effect is a Councell to serve the Kings private aimes and unto this Councell power given in the ordering of the publique affaires without advice of the publique Councell of Lords which was the onely Councell of state in former times and thus the publique affaires are made to correspond with the Kings private interest which hath been the cause of much irregularity in the government of this Island ever since The second alteration resteth in the salvo which is a clause never formerly allowed unlesse by practise in Stevens time when as there was little regard of the one or the other Nor doth it concurre with the file of story that it should be inserted within these constitutions Constit at Clarindon seeing that writers agree it was the chiefe cause of quarrell between him and Becket who refused submission without the clause and at which the King stooke with the Archbishop for the space of seven yeeres which was six yeeres after the Constitutions were consented unto and concluded upon cap. 7. No Clergy man or other may depart the Realm without the Kings licence It s a law of Nations and must be agreed on all hands that no reason of state can allow dispensations therein especially in a doubtfull government where the Supremacy is in dispute and this the wilfull Archbishop never questioned till he questioned all authority but in order to his own for but the yeere before when he went to Turonn to the generall Councell upon summons M. Paris he first obtained licence from the King before he went No sentence of excommunication or interdiction to passe against the Kings tenant or any minister of state cap. 8. without licence first had of the King or his chiefe Iustice in the Kings absence Till the Conquest no Excommunication passed without warrant of Law made by the joynt assembly of the Laity and Clergy but the Conquerour having let loose the Canons Constit at Clarindon and the Clergy having gotten the upper hand in Councels made Canons as they pleased and so the Laity are exposed to the voluntary power of the Canon vid. cap. onely as well the Normans as untill these times Kings have saved their owne associates from that sudden blow and upon reason of religious observance least the King should converse with excommunicate persons ere he be aware The Laity are not to be proceeded against in Ecclesiasticall Courts cap. 9. but upon proofe by witnesses in the presence of the Bishop and where no witnesses are the Sheriffe shall try the matter by Iury in the presence of the Bishop A negative law that implieth another course was used upon light fame or suspition ex officio although the oath at that time was not borne into the world and that all this was contrary to the liberty of the Subject and law of the Land and it intimates a ground of prohibition in all such cases upon the common law which also was the ancient course in the Saxons times as hath been formerly noted Excommunicated persons shall be compelled onely to give pledge and not Oath cap. 10. or baile to stand to the judgement of the Church Upon the taking and imprisoning of the party excommunicate Constit at Clarindon the course anciently was it seemeth to give pledge to stand to order of this the Bishops were weary soon as it seemeth and therefore waved it and betooke themselves to other inventions of their own viz. to bind them by oath or baile both which were contrary to law for no oath was to be administred but by law of the kingdome nor did it belong to the Ecclesiasticall laws to order oathes or baile and therefore this law became a ground of prohibition in such cases and of the Writ de cautione admittenda cap. 11. Persons cited and making default may be interdicted and the Kings Officer shall compell him to obey If the Kings Officer make default he shall be amerced and then the party interdicted may be excommunicated So as the processe in the Spirituall Courts was to be regulated according to Law nor did it lie in the power of such Courts to order their own way or to scatter the censure of excommunication according to their own liking This together with all those that foregoe the Archbishop upon his repentance absolutely
withstood all though he had twice consented and once subscribed to them Constit at Clarindon having also received some kind of allowance thereof even from Rome it selfe cap. 12. Clergy men holding per Baroniam shall doe such services as to their tenure belong and shall assist in the Kings Court till judgement of life or member Two things are hereby manifest First that notwithstanding the Conquerours law formerly mentioned Bishops still sate as Judges in the Kings courts as they had done in the Saxon times but it was upon causes that meerly concerned the Laity so as the Law of the Conquerour extended onely to separate the Laity out of the Spirituall Courts and not the Clergy out of the Lay courts Secondly that the Clergy especially those of the greater sort questioned their services due by tenure as if they intended neither Lord nor King but the Pope onely Doubtlesse the use of tenures in those times was of infinite consequence to the peace of the kingdome and government of these Kings when as by these principally not onely all degrees were untied and made dependant from the Lord paramont to the Tenant peravale but especially the Clergy with the Laity upon the Crown without which a strange metamorphosis in government must needs have ensued beyond the shape of any reasonable conceit the one halfe almost of the people in England being absolutely put under the dominion of a forraine power Sanctuary shall not protect forfeited goods cap. 13 14. nor Clerks convicted or confessed This was Law but violence did both now and afterwards much obliterate it Churches holden of the King shall not be aliened with out Licence Constit at Clarindon cap. 15. It was an ancient Law of the Saxons that no Tenements holden by service could be aliened without licence or consent of the Lord because of the Allegiance between Lord and Tenant Now there was no question but that Churches might lie in Tenure as well as other Tenements but the strife was by the Churchmen to hold their Tenements free from all humane service which the King withstood Sons of the Laity shall not be admitted into Monastery without the Lords consent cap. 16. Upon the same ground with the former for the Lord had not only right in his tenant which could not be aliened without his consent but also a right in his tenants children in regard they in time might by descent become his tenants so lie under the same ground of law for although this be no alienation by legall purchase yet it is in nature of the same relation for he that is in a Monastery is dead to all worldly affaires These then are the rights that the King claimed and the Clergy disclaimed at the first although upon more sober consideration they generally consented unto the five last but their Captaine Archbishop Becket withstood the rest which cost him his life in the conclusion with this honourable testimony that his death Samson like effected more then his life for the maine thing of all the rest the Pope gained to be friends for the losse of so great a stickler in the Church affaires as Becket was In this Tragedy the Pope observing how the English Bishops had forsaken their Archbishop espied a muse through which all the game of the Popedome might soon escape and the Pope be left to sit upon thornes in regard of his authority here in England For let the Metropolitane of all England be a sworne servant to the Metropolitane of the Christian world and the rest of the English Bishops not concur it will make the tripple Crown at the best but double Antiq. Brit. 302. F xe An. 1179. Alexander the Pope therefore meaned not to trust their faire natures any longer but puts an oath upon every English Bishop to take before their consecration whereby he became bound 1. To absolute allegiance to the Pope and Romish Church 2. Not to further by deed or consent any prejudice to them 3. To conceale their counsels 4. To ayd the Roman papacy against all persons 5. To assist the Roman Legate 6. To come to Synods upon Summons 7. To visit Rome once every three yeeres 8. Not to sell any part of their Bishoprick without consent of the Pope And thus the English Bishops that formerly did but regard Rome now give their estates bodies and soules unto her service that which remaines the King of England may keepe And well it was that it was not worse M. Paris An. 1167. considering that the King had vowed perpetuall enmity against the Pope but he wisely perceiving that the Kings spirit would up againe having thus gotten the maine battell durst not adventure upon the Kings reare least he might turn head and so he let the King come off with the losse of appeales Baronus Anal. 1164. Sec. 11. and an order to annull the customes that by him were brought in against the Church which in truth were none This was too much for so brave a King as Henry the second to loose to the scarcrow power of Rome yet it befell him as many great spirits that favour prevailes more with them then feare or power for being towards his last times worne with griefe at his unnaturall sonnes a shaddow of the kindnesse of the Popes Legate unto him wonne that which the Clergy could never formerly wrest from him in these particulars granted by him M. Paris An. 1176. That No Clerke shall answer in the Lay courts but onely for the forest and their Lay fee. This savoured more of curtesie then justice and therefore we finde not that the same did thrive nor did continue long in force as a Law although the claime thereof lasted Vacances shall not be holden in the Kings hand above one yeare unlesse upon case of necessity This seemeth to passe somewhat from the Crown but lost it nothing for if the Clergy accepted of this grant they thereby allow the Crown a right to make it and a liberty to determine its own right or continuing the same by being sole judge of the necessity Killers of Clerks convicted shall be punished in the Bishops presence by the Kings Justice In the licentious times of King Steven wherein the Clergy played Rex they grew so unruly that in a short time they had committed above a hundred murders To prevent this evill the King loth to enter the List with the Clergy about too many matters let loose the law of feude for the friends of the party slaine to take revenge and this cost the blood of many Clerkes the Laity happly being more industrious therein then otherwise they would have been because the Ecclesiasticall Judge for the most part favoured them As an expedient to all which this Law was made and so the Clergy was still left to their Clergy and justice done upon such as sought their blood Clergy men shall not be holden to triall by battaile It was an ancient Law of the Saxons and either
the Clergymens then his Richard was yet a greater burden his reigne was troublesome to him and he deserved it for from the beginning thereof to the ending could never the guilt of his disobedience to his father be blotted out but it was more troublesome to the people because it cost so much treasure was mannaged by such ill governours except the Archbishop of Canterbury and was unsuccesfull in most of his undertakings yet never invaded the liberties of the Commons by any face of prerogative But what wanted in him was made compleat and running over in his successor John who to speake in the most moderate sence of his government being given over to himselfe when he was not himselfe robbed the Lords of their authority bereaved the Church of its rights trode under foot the liberties of the people wasted his own Prerogative and having brought all things into dispaire comes a desperate cure the head is cut off to save the body and a president left for them that list to take it up in future ages And thus that which Steven gave Henry the second lost Richard the first would not regaine and Iohn could not and so all were gainers but the Crown CHAP. LXI Of Judicature the Courts and their Judges IT is no silent argument that the Commons gaine where Laws grow into course and it was the lot of these troublesome times to lay a foundation of a constant government such as all men might learne which formerly was laid up onely in the breasts of wise experienced men The two most considerable points in government is the law and the execution the latter being the life of the former and that of the Common-weale I say not that the law was augmented in the body of it or that the execution had a freer course then in the best of the former times but both were more and more cleared to the world in many particulars as well touching matters concerning practice of the Law as touching rules of righteousnesse for the first whereof we are beholding to Glanvile in Henry the seconds time and for the latter to King Iohn or rather the Barons in his time in the publishing of the grand Charter or an enumeration of the liberties or customes of the people derived from the Saxons revived continued and confirmed by the Normans and their successors which for the present I shall leave in lance dubio to stand or fall till occasion shall be of clearing the point in regard that King Iohn soon repented of his oath the bond of his consent and to heale the wound got the Popes pardon and blessing thereupon so easie a thing it was for a sonne of the Roman Church to passe for a good catholique in an unrighteous way The execution of the Law was done in severall Courts according to the severall kinds of affaires whereof some concerned matters of crime penalty and this touched the Kings honour and safety of the persons of himselfe and his subjects and therefore are said to be contra coronam dignitatem c. The second sort concerne the profits of the Crown or treasure of the Kingdome The third concerne the safety of the estates of the people These three works were appointed unto three severall Courts who had their severall Judges especially appointed to that worke Originally they were in one viz. in the supream Court of Judicature the court of Lords whereof formerly was spoken but after through increase of affairs by them deputed or committed to the care of severall men that were men of skil in such affaires and yet retained the Supremacy in all such causes still And because that which concerned the publique treasure was of more publique regard then the other the deputation thereof was cōmitted probably to some of their own members Gloss who in those daies were Barons of the Realm and afterwards retained the title but not the degree and therefore were called for distinction sake Barons of the Exchequer The particular times of these deputations appeare not clearly out of any monument of antiquity neverthelesse it s cleare to me that it was before Henry the seconds time as well because Henry the first had his Judex fiscalis Ll. Hen. 1. c 24. as Glanvile so frequently toucheth upon the Kings court of pleas which cannot be intended at the court of Lords for that in those daies was never summoned but in time of Parliament or some other speciall occasion but more principally because the Historian speaking of the Judges itinerant reciteth some to be of the common pleas Hoveden which sheweth that there was in those daies a distinction of jurisdiction in Judicatures And it may very well be conceived that this distinction of Judicature was by advise of the Parliament after that the grand councell of Lords was laid aside by Kings and a Privy councell taken up unto whom could not regularly belong any juridicall power because that remained originally in the grand assembly of the Lords Over these Courts or two of them one man had the prime title of chiefe Justice who then was called Lord chiefe Justice of England and whose Office was much of the nature of the Kings Lieutenant in all causes and places as well in warre as peace and sometimes was appointed to one part of the Kingdome and by reason thereof had the name onely of that part and some other of the other parts The greatnesse of this office was such as the man for necessity of state was continually resident at the Court and by this means the Kings court was much attended by all sorts of persons which proved in after times as grievous to the King as it was burdensome to the people Other Judges there were which were chosen for their learning and experience most of them being of the Clergy as were also the under Officers of those courts for those times were Romes houre and the power of darknesse Other Courts also were in the countrey and were Vicontiel or Cours of Sheriffs and Lords of Hundreds and corporations and Lordships as formerly and these were setled in some place Hoveden but others there were which werr itinerant over which certaine Judges presided which were elected by the grand councell of Lords and sent by commission from King Henry the second throughout the Kingdome then devided into six circuits unto each of which was assigned three Justices so as the whole number of Justices then was eighteen The Office was before the comming of the Saxons over hither but the assignation was new as also was their oath for they were sworne But the number continued not long for within foure yeeres the King redivided the land into foure circuits and unto each circuit assigned five Justices making in the whole the number of twenty and one Justices for the Northern circuit had six Justices which the King made Justices of the Common pleas throughout the Kingdome Hoveden 337. Ibid. 445. Neither yet did the first commission continue so long
like manner 11. That debts between Clerks due are determined in the temporall courts 12. That Bishops are compelled by distresse to cause Clerks to appeare in Lay courts without cause 13. That the Church looseth its right by the ceasing of rent or pension by the space of two yeeres 14. That Nuns are compelled to sue in the Lay courts for their right in possessions befalling by decease of their kindred 15. That Churches are deprived of their priviledges till they shew Quo warranto they hold them 16. That Ecelesiasticall Judges are stopped in their proceedings by Sheriffs and great men 17. That Bishops refusals of Clerks presented are examined in the Lay courts 18. That patrons of Religious Houses do oppresse them by extream Quarter 19. That Bigamy and Bastardy are tried in Lay courts 20. That the King suffers his Livings to be vacant for many yeeres 21. That the Clergie are wronged by the Statute of Mortmaine Here 's all and more then all that 's true and more then enough to let the reader see that the Writ Circumspecte agatis was but a face put on for the present after laid aside and the Clergy left to the bare Canon They likewise shew what the Clergy aimed at and in that they did not obtaine was to be attributed to the resolution of the Laity and not to any neglect in themselves for the Archbishop died in the service and its thought that grief for these maters was no little cause thereof But the times within a while grew troublesome Antiq. Brit. and the King in pursuit of the French warres being unadvised in in his way angred the people by his arbitrary levies of men and money Articuli cleri as it brought forth a State scoule little inferiour to a quarrell And to pacifie the Clergy he granted them the Writ de consultatione habenda in all matrimoniall and testamentary cases Stat. de consul tat 24. E. i. which were of their least doubted priviledges and this qualified the first Article of complaint next foregoing if such cause they had of complaint and this was all that the Clergy got at Edward the firsts hands Edward the second was a man that was neither well affected to Rome nor weake in spirit and yet so unhappy that his way neither promised good successe nor ever had it and so he became a servant unto the humours of his servants to keep his head above water but especially after he was chased by the Scots and quite out of breath he cals for help of all but first of the Clergy and bespeakes them with the Ordinance of Articuli cleri wherein he gives some satisfaction to the complaints formerly mentioned which it seems by Baronius were exhibited in Parliament Ecclesiasticall cognisance extendeth unto Tythes Oblations cap. 1. and Mortuaries and to pecuniary recompence In the first times neglect or deniall of Church-duties was punished in the Kings court by fine Afterwards the Bishop was joyned in that worke Ll. Alfred c. 9. Ll. Edw. cap. 6. and the tythable goods were seised eight parts whereof was taken to the Lords and the Bishops use by moities a ninth part left to the owner and the tenth to the Church Ll. Canut c. 8. nor had the Bishops any peculiar Courts of cognisance of causes till the times of the Normans nor as yet in those times had they power to all intents for though it be true that the Roman tribute of Peter-pence was allowed by the Conquerours law to the Bishops court Ll. Gul. 20. cap. Spicileg 180. yet we finde no law for Tythes and other profits to be recovered by the Ecclesiasticall court till about the end of Henry the seconds reigne or King Stevens time for at a Councell at London in Henry the seconds time it was ordained that three summons in the Popes name should be made to such as payed not their Tythes Binius Tom. 7 fo 661. An 1173. and in case they then refused they should be anathema and after that time in a Councell at Oxford under Steven Archbishop of Canterbury it was decreed that the Laity should be intreated first to pay their Tythes Baronius Annal. 1222. cap. 19. and then if necessity require that they should be compelled by Ecclesiasticall censure so as their power crept up by degrees in recovering of Church-duties as it did in testamentary matters and at length Henry the third worne and spent with the Barons warres about his latter end yeelded to Boniface the Archbishop his importunate demands and first gave liberty to the Clergy to be their own Judges and yet the Lay Judges although divers of them were Clergy men did not suddenly forbeare till this law came which gave some satisfaction to the first and fourth Articles of complaint foregoing Ecclesiasticall cognisance extendeth not to a fourth part of the Tythes of any Living cap. 2. nor to pecuniary mulcts for sinne saving by way of commutation The complaint of the Clergy in Henry the thirds time was against the Kings prohibition in case of Tythes indefinitly for in those times afterwards in Edw. the firsts time the Kings court had the cognisance of all Tythes and therefore in the Statute of VVestm 2. c. 5. the Writ of Indicavit was allowed in case of right of any portion of Tythes yet the Church still gained ground and about or before the death of Edward the first the Temporall Judge had yeelded unto the Clergy the cognisance of a portion of Tythes under the value of the fourth part Artic. 1. for in the Article next foregoing the Clergies complaint was that the Kings Justices held cognisance of the fourth part here they were confined thereto by this law which the Clergy could never remove For violence done to Clerks the offender shall render dammage in the Kings Court but Excommunication cap. 3. Penance and Commutation shall be in the Bishops court The Canon law had an ancient claime to the Protection of Clerks both as touching their persons and estates and prevailed so farre as they were thereby imboldned to offer violence unto others But as I formerly shewed by a Law in Henry the seconds time the Temporall Judge resumed his originall power and this became a sore evill between the Clergy and Laity for though it were allowed that Clerks should not be sued but before the Ecclesiasticall Judge in such cases yet it was no warrant for the Laity likewise to be called before the Ecclesiasticall Judge in such cases and therefore the Clergies complaints shew that the matter was doubtfull and that the Lay Judge generally maintained his jurisdiction although sometimes he disclaimed it as it may appeare in the case of a trespasse in the nature of a riot committed upon the priory of St Johns of Jerusalem in the seventh yeere of Henry the third when as it was adjudged per curiam that it belonged to the Ecclesiasticall court to punish Fits Harb 7 Hen. 3. prohibition 30 But
about these times and therewith ended both the worke and common use of the ancient iters and yet all these later courts joyntly considered have not the like comprehensive power that the iters had for they had the power of hearing and determining all causes both of the Crown and Common-pleas albeit in a different manner that is to say in the first times promiscuously united into one and the same person but soon after the Norman times and more clearly in the time of Henry the second that power was divided into severall persons some sitting upon the Common pleas others upon the Crown pleas The Judges of these journying courts were specially assigned by the King as in the case of the Gaole-delivery or setled by the Law upon the Judges of both benches at Westminster as in case of oyer and terminer Westm 2. ca. 29 and of the Assizes or Nisi prius saving that in the last case they were associated with Knights in the Counties for the taking of Assizes Ibid. c. 30. Now concerning the Courts that were setled some were setled or annexed to the Kings personall residence as the Chancellours Court for in these times it began to have a judiciary power of eminent stature and growing out of the decayes of the great chiefe Justice of England Then also the Kings bench was annexed by the same Law unto the Kings Court or personall residence Fleta Artic. sup cart cap. 15. as it anciently ever had that honour although it seems the endeavours were to make it like the Common pleas in that particular Another and last court that was setled in this manner was the Marshals court which in the originall onely concerned the Kings houshold but afterwards compassed in a distance of the neighbouring places 5 E. 4 fo 129. because the Kings attendants were many in those times when as the Courts of justice continually attended on his person and this precinct was called the Vierge and all cases of debt and covenant where both parties were of the Houshold Artic. sup cart cap. 3. and of trespasses vi armis where one of them was of the houshold were handled in the court of the Verge or the Marshals court And inquests of death within the same shall be taken by the Coroner of the County with the Coroner of the houshold Other Courts were rurall and affixed also to some certaine place either of the County or Town or other particular place That of the County suffered in these times great diminution even almost to destruction by a Law restraining the power thereof onely to trespasses of 40 s. value or under Stat. Gouc cap. 8. for though formerly the Kings justices incroached upon the County courts and contracted suits before themselves which by the ancient law they ought not yet it was ever illegall and the County courts held their right till this law was made which kept under those inferiour Courts and made them of lesse account then formerly Neverthelesse the Kings Justicies or Writ to the Sheriffs oftentimes inableth the inferiour Court to have cognisance of cases of greater value Lastly a rule was set to the smaller Courts of Corporations West 1. cap. 23. Faires and Markets viz. that no person should be sued in any of them which was not a debter or pledge there CHAP. LXIX Of Coroners Sheriffs and Crown pleas Coroners Westm 1. ca. 10 COreners shall be chosen in the county from the wisest greatest and chiefe men of the country Of these Officers formerly hath been spoken as touching their election qualification and worke this Law brought in no change of any former Law but onely of a former custome gained by these degenerating times which brought men into place that were farre unfit who otherwise of poore and mean condition maintained themselves by bribery and extortion and being found guilty had not sufficient to give recompence This law therefore revives the first law and hold these men to their worke of taking inquests and appeales by indenture between themselves and the Sheriff and these were to be certified at the next comming of the Justices Sheriffs Artic. sup cart cap. 9. The Free holders in every county if they will shall elect their own Sheriff unlesse the Sheriffwicke be holden in see This was indeed the ancient custome as the Officers of the Kingdome were eligible by the Common-councell of the Kingdome Miror cap. 1. Sec. 3. Stat. de vic 9 E. 2. so were also the Officers of the County chosen by the County But within a few yeeres in the time of Edward the second comes another law that the Sheriffs shall be appointed by the Chancellor Treasurer Barons of the Exchequer and the Justices which Law was made in favour of the people as by the file of that Statute doth more fully appeare for though at the first blush it may seem a priviledge lost by the free men that these great men should have the election of the Sheriff yet it proved a great advantage to the common quiet of the people in those times of parties and was so apprehended Otherwise as the case stood in those daies of Edward the second it was no time for him to gaine upon the peoples liberties Nor had the Statute of Articuli super cartas whereof we now treat been penned with these words if they will and questionlesse in these daies we now live in if the people had but a little taste of this seeming liberty of electing Sheriffs in the County court as formerly it was used it would be soon perceived that the election of these chiefe Officers were better disposed in some other hand if rightly pursued Homicide by mis-fortune shall not be adjudged murther Chancemedly Marlbr cap. 25. That the Saxons made difference between homicide by misfortune and that which was done felleo animo or with a spirit of gall formerly hath been shewed now what it was that altered the case I cannot say unlesse the violence cruelty and oppression of the times formerly all kind of manslaughter was finable I mean in the Norman times and so might more rationally be ranked into one degree but now the punishment began to change from forfeiture of estate and losse of member to death and forfaiture of estate and therefore it was more necessary to make the difference in the penalty seeing in the fine formerly a difference was observed and this difference to assert by a Law that might limit the invenomed spirits of the Judges of those daies Robbery Robbery punished with death This crime hitherto was punished by fine and losse of member at the utmost but is now made capitall punished with death One example whereof and the first that story maketh mention of we finde of an Irish Nobleman in the daies of Henry the third who suffered death for piracy and it was a law that then though rigorous yet seasonably was contrived to retard the beginnings and hasten the conclusion of a civill warre in a
or provide for future generations Neverthelesse if all be granted viz. that this Statute is but a present order that the Armes therein are too slight to resist an enemy and the end thereof was onely to enable the Kingdome against Thieves and Robbers yet could not Edward the first pretend to have any power to assesse Armes at pleasure upon occasion of warre for the defence of the Kingdome nor is there any president in story that countenanceth it seeing Henry the third and Henry the second in their course used the rule secundum facultates as had been formerly observed and the rule foregoing tended onely to freemen and their Lands Nor did King John disclaime the same but pursued it and yet if there be any president of prerogative in story which King John had not that King will be looked upon as a King of wonderment I say King John pursued it when he was in the strength of his distemper threatned by the Pope provoked by the French King now ready in the field vexed by his people and himself scarce himselfe summons to defend himselfe themselves M Paris An. 1213. and the Kingdome of England all men that ought to have Armes or may have Armes and such as have no amres and yet arma habere possint let them also come ad capiendum solidatas nostras and accordingly there came a vast number not onely of the Armed men but of the unarmed multitude who afterward were sent to their own home when victuals failed Hitherto therefore King John not above three yeeres before his death held himselfe to the assessment to Armes onely of such as had Lands and at this time of exigency others unarmed were summoned to take Armes from the King with their pay or otherwise they must fight without weapons I am now come to the last generall point which concerneth the executive power of matters concerning the peace within this law touching which the Statute inforceth this that Constables in every Hundred and Franchise shall have the view of Armes and shall present defaults against the Statute of Justices assigned who shall certifie the same to the King in every Parliament and the King shall provide remedy whereby it seemeth manifest that hitherto no law or custome was made against any for default of Armes but onely such as held by that tenure and therefore they had a shift to cause them to sweare to maintaine Armes and so might proceed upon defaults as in case of perjury and that the Parliament was still loath to set any certaine rule for penalty and absolutely declined it and left it under a generall periculo incumbente which its likely men would rather eschew by obedience then adventure upon out of a daring spirit unlesse their case was very cleere within the mercy of common reason and therefore such cases were left to speciall order of the Parliament rather then they would deliver such a rod as determining power was over into any uncertaine hand what ever It is very true that by the opinion of some this also hath been controverted as if all the executive power had been turned out of the Parliaments order into the directory of Edward the first which thing reacheth farre for then in order thereunto the whole Militia of the Kingdome must have been under his safe command and whether it ever entred into the conceipt of that King I know not but somewhat like thereunto is not obscurely urged to nourish and suggest such a kind of notion and so derive it unto his successors upon the words of a Statute de defensione portandi armorum the English whereof I shall render out of the French as followeth It belongeth to us viz. Edw. 1. and from us by our Royall Seignory to defend force of Armes and all other force against our peace at all times that we shall please and to punish according to the laws and usages of this Realm such as shall oppose and to this they viz. Lords and Commons are bound us to ayd as their good Lord alwaies when need shall be Two things are concurrant with this which is the body of the Statute if such it be the one is the preface or the occasion and the second is the conclusion upon the whole body of the same The preface first set down the inscription or direction of the Law not to the people but to the Justices of his bench and so it s in nature of a Writ or Declaration sent unto his Judges Then it sets down the occasion which was a debate between Edw. 1. and his Lords with a Treaty which was had before certaine persons deputed thereto and it was accorded that at the next Parliament Order shall be taken by common consent of the King the Prelates Earles and Barons that in all Parliaments treaties and other assemblies which shall be had in the Kingdome of England for ever after all men shall come thereto without force and without Armes well and peaceably and thence it recites that the said meeting at Parliament was had and that there the Prelates Earles Barons and Cominalty being assembled to advise upon this matter nous eiont dit saith one coppy and nous eions dit saith another coppy so as whether this was the Declaration of the King unto the Parliament or of the Parliament to the King is one doubt and a principall one it is in such a case as this Then the conclusion of all is that the King commandeth these things shall be read before the Justices in the bench and there enrolled and this is dated the 30. of October in the seventh yeere of his reigne which was Ann. 1279. So as if it were the Declaration of the King then it implieth as if it were not very well accepted of the Parliament and therefore the King would have it rest upon record in nature of a claime or protestando for saving the prerogative of the Crown But if it were the Declaration of the Parliament the King held it so precious a flower that fearing it should fade set it in a private Garden of his owne that it might be more carefully nursed against the blast of time as if the Parliament had not assented thereto or if they did meaned not to hold it forth to the world for future times to be a constant rule but onely by way of concession to ease themselves of the present difficulty in making a Law against wearing of Armour in ordinary civill affaires and so referred it to the Kings care to provide against imergent breach of the peace as an expedient for the present inconveniences in affairs And it will well suite with the posture of affaires then in course for the Welsh warres were now intermitted and a quiet of three yeeres ensued in the middest of which Souldiers having liberty to doe nothing and that is next to naught but recreate themselves used their wonted guise as if they were not dressed that day that they were not armed nor fit for counsell
Church-government during these times fol. 146. XVIII Of the Court of Chancery fol. 162. XIX Of the Courts of Crown Plas and Common Law fo 165 XX. Concerning Sheriffs fol. 168. XXI Of Justices and Lawes concerning the Peace fol. 170. XXII Of the Militia during these times fol. 175. XXIII A short survey of the Reignes of Edward the fourth Edward the fifth and Richard the third fol. 181. XXIV Of the Government in relation to the Parliament fol. 187. XXV Of the condition of the Clergie fol. 191. XXVI A short sum of the Reignes of Henry the seventh and Henry the eighth fol. 194. XXVII Of the condition of the Crowne fol. 202. XXVIII Of the condition of the Parliament in these times fol. 223. XXIX Of the power of the Clergy in the Convocation f. 229. XXX Of the power of the Clergy in their ordinary Jurisdiction fol. 232. XXXI Of Judicature fol. 241. XXXII Of the Militia fol. 245. XXXIII Of the Peace fol. 253. XXXIV Of the generall Government of Edward the sixth Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth fol. 259. XXXV Of the Supream power during these times fol. 268. XXXVI Of the power of the Parliament during these times fol. 277. XXXVII Of the Jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall during these last times fol. 283. XXXVIII Of the Militia in these later times fol. 290. XXXIX Of the Peace fol. 297. XL. A summary Conclusion upon the whole matter fol. 300. A PREFACE CONTAINING A Vindication of the Ancient way of the Parliament OF ENGLAND THE more Words the more Faults is a divine Maxime that hath put a stop to the publishing of this second part for some time but observing the ordinary humor still drawing off and passing a harsher censure upon my intentions in my first part then I expected I doe proceede to fulfill my course that if censure will be it may be upon better grounds when the whole matter is before Herein I shall once more minde that I meddle not with the Theologicall right of Kings or other Powers but with the Civill right in fact now in hand And because some mens Pens of late have ranged into a denyall of the Commons ancient right in the Legislative power and others even to adnull the right both of Lords and Commons therein resolving all such power into that one principle of a King Quicquid libet licet so making the breach much wider then at the beginning I shall intend my course against both As touching the Commons right jointly with the Lords it will be the maine end of the whole but as touching the Commons right in competition with the Lords I will first endeavour to remove out of the way what I finde published in a late Tractate concerning that matter and so proceede upon the whole The subject of that Discourse consisteth of three parts one to prove that the ancient Parliaments before the thirteenth Century consisted onely of those whom we now call the House of Lords the other that both the Legislative and Judiciall power of the Parliament rested wholly in them lastly that Knights Citizens and Burgesses of Parliament or the House of Commons were not knowne nor heard of till punier times then these This last will be granted Viz. That these severall titles of Knights Citizens and Burgesses were not known in Parliament till of later times Neverthelesse it will be insisted upon that the Commons were then there The second will be granted but in part Viz. That the Lords had much power in Parliament in point of Jurisdiction but neither the sole nor the whole The first is absolutely denyed neither is the same proved by any one instance or pregnant ground in all that Book and therefore not cleerly demonstrated by Histories and Records beyond contradiction as the Title page of that Book doth hold forth to the World First because not one instance in all that Book is exclusive to the Commons and so the whole Argument of the Discourse will conclude Ab authoritate Negativa which is no argument in humane testimony at all Secondly the greatest number of instances in that Booke are by him supposed to concerne Parliaments or generall Councils of this Nation holden by the Representative thereof whereas indeed they were either but Synodicall Conventions for Church matters whereunto the poore Commons he well knoweth might not come unlesse in danger of the Canons dint or if they did yet had no other worke there then to heare learne and receive Lawes from the Ecclesiasticks And the Lords themselves though present yet under no other notion were they then as Councell to the King whom they could not cast out of their Councell till after Ages though they often endeavoured it Thirdly the Author of that Tractate also well knoweth that Kings usually made Grants and Infeodations by advice of the Lords without the ayde of the Parliament And it is no lesse true that Kings with the Lords did in their severall ages exercise ordinarily Jurisdiction in cases of distributive Justice especially after the Norman entrance For the step was easie from being Commanders in Warr to be Lords in peace but hard to lay downe that power at the foot of Justice which they had usurped in the rude times of the Sword when men labour for life rather then liberty and no lesse difficult to make a difference between their deportment in commanding of Souldiers and governing of Countrey-men till peace by continuance had reduced them to a little more sobriety Nor doth it seeme irrationall that private differences betweene party and party should be determined in a more private way then to trouble the whole Representative of the Kingdome with matters of so meane concernment If then those Councils mentioned by the Author which concerne the Kings Grants and Infeodations and matters of Judicature be taken from the rest of the Presidents brought by him to maintaine the thing aimed at I suppose scarce one stone will be left for a foundation to such a glorying Structure as is pretended in the Title page of that Booke And yet I deny not but where such occasions have befalne the Parliament sitting it hath closed with them as things taken up by the way Fourthly It may be that the Author hath also observed that all the Records of Antiquity passed through if not from the hands of the Clergy onely and they might thinke it sufficient for them to honour their Writings with the great Titles of Men of Dignity in the Church and Common-wealth omitting the Commons as not worthy of mention and yet they might be there then present as it will appeare they were in some of the particular instances ensuing to which we come now in a more punctuall consideration The first of these by his owne words appeare to be a Church-mote or Synod it was in the yeare 673. called by the Arch-Bishop who had no more power to summon a Parliament then the Author himselfe hath And the severall conclusions made therein doe all shew that the people had no worke
a sufficient Seale to all weights and measures which they committed to some Clerke whom they trusted and at this day though a Lay-person beareth title of Clerke of the market And although anciently they might not interesse secularibus yet afterwards it became a part of their Office to assist Judges in secular causes to see that justice be not wronged and had the sole cognisance of all causes criminall belonging to the Clergy their tenants or servants and in their Synods their power reached to such crimes of Lay-men as came within the savour of the Canon though it were but in the cold sent as the Lawes of Athelstane and other his successors sufficienly set forth And thus dressed up let them stand aside that roome may be made for their traine CHAP. IX Of the Saxon Presbyters THese follow their Lords the Bishops as fast as they can hunt Concil Brit. p. 576. for being of the same Order as the lesse proud times acknowledged they would not be under foot and the others above the top True it is that the Bishops loaded them with Canons and kept them under by hard worke under the tricke of Canonicall obedience yet it was no part of their meaning to suffer them to become vile in the eyes of the Laity for they knew well enough that the Presbyters must be their bridles to lead and curbe the people and their eyes to see whether the winds from below blew faire or foule for them whose consciences already told them that they merited not much favour from the people They see it therefore necessary to inhaunce the price of a Presbyter somewhat within the aloye of a Bishop to the end that the Presbytery may not be too like the Babylonian Image whose head was Gold and feet of Iron and Clay A Presbyter therefore they will have to be of equall repute with a Baron Concil Brit. p. 448. Ll Ethelst 13. Ibid. 406. Concil Brir p. 273. L. Aethel c. 2. Ll. Canut c. 12. Mag. cent 8. cap. 9. and his person shall be in repute so sacred as that all wrong done thereunto must be doubly punished with satisfaction to the party and to the Church His credit or fame must not be touched by lay-testimony Nor is he to be judged by any seculer power but to be honoured as an Angell Such are these instruments of the Bishops government and these are put as a glasse between the Bishops and people and could represent the people to the Bishop black or white and the Bishop to them in like manner as they pleased and so under fear of the Bishops curse kept the people in awe to themselves and it CHAP. X. Of other inferiour Church-Officers amongst the Saxons THey had other inferiour degrees of the Clergy which because they are meerly subservient and not considerable in Church-government I shall onely touch upon them The first are called Deacons Deacons which were attending upon the Presbyters to bring the offerings to the Altar to read the Gospell to baptize and administer the Lords Supper Then follow the Subdeacons who used to attend the Deacons with consecrated vessels Sub. Deacons and other necessaries for the administring of the Sacraments Acolites Next these Acolites which waited with the Tapers ready lighted while the Gospell was read and the Sacrament consecrated Then Exorcists Exorcists that served to dispossesse such as are possessed by the Divell an Office as it may seem of little use Concil Brit. p. 54. Lecturers yet very ancient for they are found at the Synod at Arles which was within three hundred yeeres after Christs death Lecturers come next who served to read and expound and these were of use when Churches began to multiply and Presbyters grew idle Lastly Ostiaries Ostiaries which used to ring the bels and open and shut the Church-doores These are the severall ranks of Church-officers being seven in number for Bishops and Presbyters make but one and might be as thus ordered the seven heads of the beast whereon the woman sitteth Concil Brit. 261. An. 750. and with much adoe make up a kind of Church-service somewhat like a great Hoe in a ship-yard at the stirring of a little log and are neverthelesse well payd for their labour CHAP. XI Of Church-mens maintenance amongst the Saxons I Take no notice in this account of the Abbats and Priors other such religious men as they were then called nor can I passe them amongst the number of Church-governours or Officers being no other then as a sixt finger or an excrescence that the body might well spare and yet they sucked up much of the blood and spirits thereof But as touching the maintenance of those formerly mentioned who had a constant influence in the government of the affaires of the publique worship of God and regard of the salvation of the soules of the people I say their maintenance was diversly raised and as diversly imployed First through the bounty of Kings and great men Lands and Mannors were bestowed upon the Metropolitan and Bishops in free almes and from these arose the maintenance that ascended up in abundance to the higher Region of the Clergy but came againe in thinne dewes scarce enough to keep the husbandmans hope from dispaire otherwise had not the Prelates so soon mounted up into the chaire of pompe and state as they did I say these are given in free almes or more plainly as almes free from all service and this was doubtlesse soon thought upon for it was formerly in president with their heathenish Priests and Druids as Caesar noteth Com. 6. that they had omninm rerum immunitatem yet with the exception of works of publique charity and safety such as are maintaining of high waies repairing of bridges and fortifying of Castles c. and hereof the presidents are numerous The worke whereto this wages was appointed was the worship of God and increase of Religion and thus not onely many of the Kings Subjects were exempted from publique service but much of the Revenue of the Kingdome formerly imployed for the publique safety became acquitted from the service of the field to the service of the beade the strength of the Kingdome much impaired and the subjects much grieved who in those early times saw the inconveniences M. Paris in vit Eadrick Abb. and complained thereof to their Kings but could not prevaile This was the vintage of Kings and great men but the gleanings of the people were much more plentifull for besides the Courts which swelled as the irregularities of those times increased and thereby enriched the cofers of that covetous generation An. 1009. Concil Brit. 523. Ll. Aetheld 31. the greatest part whereof ought by the Canon to goe to the publique the best part of the setled maintenance especially of the inferiour degrees arose from the good affections of the people who were either forward to offer or easily perswaded to forgoe constant supply for the Church-men out
discipline Ll. Canut cap. 58. if they followed their rule which was made not by the arbitry of the Generall but by Parliament These amongst other scattered principles concerning Sea-affaires may serve to let us know that the Law-Martiall and that of the Sea were branches of the positive Lawes of the kingdome setled by the generall vote in the Wittagenmot and not left to the will of a lawlesse Generall or Commander so tender and uniforme were those times both in their Laws and liberties CHAP. XXIII Of the government of the Saxon Kingdome in times of peace and first of the division of the Kingdome into shires and their Officers IF the Saxon government was regular in time of warre how much rather in time of peace All great works are done by parcels and degrees and it was the Saxons ancient way in Germany to divide their Territory into severall circuits or circles and to assigne to each their severall Magistrates all of them ruled by one Law like one soule working in severall members to one common good Thus they did here in England having found the Land already divided into severall governments they likewise what they conquered divided into severall parts called Comitatus or Counties from the word Comes that signifies a companion and the Counties thence called are nothing but societies or associations in publique charge and service But the Saxon word is shire or share that is a portion or precinct of ground belonging to this or that person or great Town and bearing the name of that person or Town and sometimes of the scituation of the people as North or South folke East or South Sex or Saxons This division by the names seems to be of Saxon originall and though by the testimony of Ingulfus and other writers Seld. Tit. Hon. it might seem to be done by Alfred yet it will appeare to be more ancient if the reader minde the grant of Peter pence made by King Offa wherein is recorded the severall Diocesses and shires out of which that grant was made under the very same names that they own at this day M. Westm An. 794. and that grant was more ancient then Alfreds time by the space of 80 yeeres Each of these Shires or Counties had their two chiefe Governours for distributive justice of these the Sheriffe was more ancient and worthy Officer being the Lieutenant Sheriffs and ayded by the power of the County in certaine cases for his Commission extended not to leavy warre but to maintain Justice in that County and within the same and in this work he was partly ministeriall and partly judiciall in the one he was the Kings servant to execute his Writs in the other he regulated the Courts of justice under his survey Ll. Edw. c. 35. He was chosen in the County Court called the Folkmote by the votes of the Freeholders and as the King himselfe and the Heretock were intituled to their honour by the peoples favour Coroners The Coroner though in originall later was neverthelesse very ancient he was the more servant or Officer to the King of the two His worke was to enquire upon view of manslaughter and by indictment of all felonies as done contra coronam which formerly were onely contra pacem and triable onely by appeale Miror cap. 1. Sec. 13. As also he was to inquire of all escheates and forfeitures and them to seize He was also to receive appeales of Felonies and to keep the rolls of the Crown pleas within the County It s evident he was an Officer in Alfreds time Miror p. 300. for that King put a Judge to death for sentencing one to suffer death upon the Coroners record without allowing the delinquent liberty of traverse This Officer also was made by election of the Freeholders in their County Court as the Sheriffe was Fits N. Br. 163 164. and from amongst the men of chiefest ranke in the County and sworn in their presence but the Kings Writ lead the worke CHAP. XXIV Of the County Court and the Sheriffs Torne THe government of the County in times of peace consisted much in the administration of justice which was done in the publique meetings of the Freeholders their meetings were either in one place or in severall parts of the County in each of which the Sheriff had the mannaging of the acts done there Folkmote or County court The meeting of the Freemen in one place was called the Folkmote by the Saxons saving the judgement of the honourable reporter Coke instit 2. p. 69. and of latter times the County court the work wherein was partly for consultation direction concerning the ordering of the County for the safety and peace thereof such as were redresse of grievances election of Officers prevention of dangers c. and partly it was Judiciall Miror p. 147. in hearing and determining the common pleas of the County the Church affaires and some trespasses done therein but not matters criminall for the Bishop was Judge therein together with the Sheriffe and by the Canon he was not to intermeddle in matters of blood yet neither was the Bishops nor Sheriffs worke in that Court other then directory or declaratory for the Free-men were Judges of the fact and the other did but edocere jura populo Ll. Canut Miror cap. 1. Sec. 15. yet in speciall cases upon petition a Commission issued forth from the King to certaine Judges of Oier to joyn with the others in the hearing and determining of such particular eases Miror cap. 5. Sec. 1. But in case of injustice or errour the party grieved had liberty of appeale to the Kings Justice Nor did the Common pleas originally commence in the County court Ll. Canut Ll. Edgar unlesse the parties dwelt in severall Liberties or Hundreds in the same County and in case any mistake were in the commencing of suits in that Court which ought not to be upon complaint the Kings Writ reduced it to its proper place and in this also the Kings own Court had no preeminence Concil Brit. p. 197. tit 22. In those ancient times this County court was to be holden but twice a yeere by the constitution of King Edgar but upon urgent emergencies oftner and that either by the Kings especiall Writ Ll. Edw. cap. 35 or if the emergent occasions were sudden and important by extraordinary summons of ringing the Moot-bels Unto this Court all the free men of the County assembled to learne the Law to administer justice Ll. Edw. cap. 35 to provide remedy for publique inconvenience and to doe their fealty to the King before the Bishop and Sheriffe upon oath and in the worke of administring justice Ll. Edw. cap. 4. causes concerning the Church must have the precedency so as yet the Canon law had not gotten footing in England The other Court wherein the Sheriffe had the directory was in the meeting of the free men in severall
Appellant and Defendant whereas Ordeale rested onely upon the single conscience of the Defendant which oftentimes was rather hardy then innocent And the continuance of this triall in title even at this day shewes that men can away with this and that there is not evill sufficient in it to eradicate this weed although it be kept under ground partly because its fatall and partly because both Scripture and experience shew that right and victory alwaies doe not concurre CHAP. XXXVIII Of the ordinary manner of triall amongst the Saxons by Inquest THe last and most ordinary way of triall was by witnesses upon travers of the matter in fact before the Jurors Inquest and their vote thereupon this made the Verdict and it determined the matter in fact In former time questionlesse it was a confused manner of triall by votes of the whole multitude which made the verdict hard to be discerned but time taught them better advice to bring the voters to a certaine number according to the Graecian way who determined controversies by the suffrages of foure and thirty or the major part of them Emmius But how the number came to be reduced to twelve I cannot conjecture unlesse in immitation of that rule of compurgators that ordinarily exceeded not that number The first law that defined this number was that of Aetheldred about 300 yeeres before the conquest In singulis Centuris c. An. 675. Ll. Sax. Lamb. In English thus In every Century or Hundred let there be a Court and let twelve ancient free men together with the Lord of the Hundred be sworn that they will not condemn the innocent nor acquit the guilty And this was so strictly eyed that Alfred put one of his Judges to death for passing sentence upon a verdict corruptly obtained upon the votes of the Jurors Miror cap. 5. Sec. 1. whereof three of the twelve were in the negative And the same King put another of his Judges to death for passing sentence of death upon an ignoramus returned by the Jury and a third for condemning a man upon an Inquest taken ex officio when as the Delinquent had not put himselfe upon their triall But the Saxons were yet more carefull of the credit and life of man Two Juries for no mans life or credit rested altogether upon the cast of twelve opinions but first twelve men inquired of the fame and ground thereof which if liked rendred the party under the spot of delinquency and meet to be looked upon as under the suspition of the Law who formerly was but under the suspect of some particuler man And then was a second enquiry of the fact if the party traversed the vote of Fame In both which trials the verdict grounded it selfe upon those allegata and probata which were before them The first of these inquiries was before the Coroner who even in those old daies had the view of bloodshed The second was had before the Judge of life and death neither of which could legally indammage the party without the other unlesse the Judge meaned to answer it with the perill of his own person and estate as it befell in Alfreds time when as a Judge suffered death for passing sentence upon the Coroners onely record unto which a replication is allowed Miror cap. 5. Sec. 1. as the booke saith and another Judge had the same measure for condemning one without appeale or indictment foregoing Where by the way I may note another difference between Appeales and Indictments Miror cap. 2. Sec. 11. in this that Appeales were and are the more speedy trials then Indictments in as much as the former were but one act the later two Medietas Linguae And yet time and experience refined this way of triall into a more excellent condition For the bloody times of the Saxons first age passing over and peace arising by degrees they together with the Britons began to intercomon and about the Marches become a mixt people under a mixture of government and Lawes as hath been already noted amongst which one concerned their way of triall of matters in fact by a Jury mixt both of Britons and Saxons Ll. Aetheldr cap. 3. Lamb. which was setled by a law made by Aetheldred Viri sint c. In English thus Let there be twelve men of understanding in the law six of them English and six Welsh and let them deale justice both to English and Welsh The equity of this law in future ages spread it selfe into all trials of Foraigners in every place throughout this Island Unto such as stumble at this conceipt because they are said to be aetate superiores and jure consulti I shall onely note thus much that it is not to be doubted but the worke of Jurors required chiefe men both for experience and knowledge in the customes of those times to enable them to judge of the matter in fact and upon whose judgement the life and death of the party rested principally and as probable it is that those Jurors as they were then chiefe men so they sate in the most eminent place of the assembly or court and were coassessors with the Bishop and Sheriffe who did serve but onely to advise the rest and they or one of them to publish the sentence which the Law predetermined And this chiefe place the Jurors might have possessed at this day as they doe in Sweden had the chiefe men holden the service still worthy of their attendance But great men grew too great in their own esteem for the service of their Countrey Peeres betaking themselves to serve themselves and matters of highest imployment were left to those of the meaner condition who being in their own persons of lesse admiration were thought unmeet to sit in such eminent places and so from the bench descended to the floore as at this day This desidiousnesse of the greater sort made one step further to the full perfection of that Manner of triall both of the persons and estates of the English which hath been the envy of other Nations and is called the triall per pares or by Peeres For the pride of the Danes now growing into one people with the Saxons not induring such fellowship with the mean Saxon free men in this publique service and the wise Saxon King espying the danger in betrusting the lives and estates of the poorest sort unto the dictate of these superbient humours and on the contrary in prostituting the Nobler blood unto the vote of the inferiour ranke of men provided a third way and by agreement between him and Gunthurne the Dane setled the law of Peeres Ll. Alured Si minister regius c. If a Lord or Baron be accused of homicide he shall be acquitted by twelve Lords but if of inferiour ranke Concil Brit. fo 499. he shall be acquitted by eleven of his equals and one Lord. Thus Gods providence disposed of the pride of men to be an
the worke in hand to disclaime that custome which must needs be of infinite consequence in the effecting of what was principally sought after viz. the union of the two peoples Normans and Saxons into one I say it was principally sought after by the Norman conquerour if not led thereto by his own genius yet necessitated thereto by force of reason of state as shall appeare hereafter And what could be imagined a more ready way to stay the effusion of blood and all other unhappy events of enmity then by taking away enmity it selfe or a more speedy and certaine course for union then to reduce the men and women of each people to mutuall society and to seale up all by a lasting bond of marriage or greater encouragement for the comfortable proceedings therein then the setling of the constant maintenance of the wife in case of survivorship by the law of dower of the Lands and Tenements of the Husband Lindenbrog Concil Aenham c. 19. Ll. Edm. which was so full of contingencies and uncertainties in the portion of goods that was by the Saxon law appointed to the wife in such case Nor was this all for by marriage thus made to the Normans they had a great hold not so much over the English as in the English and that not onely during coverture but by reason of this title of Dower the women became tenants and under the Lords wing so as they durst not willingly and illegally offend their Lord in their widdowhood nor by law nor reason match themselves and their dowry to any other that was not first allowed by the Lord to be in friendship with him and thus became the tenants widdows to be at the liking of the Lord for their marriage and the like hereto may be said concerning the husband in case of tenant by the curtesie Miror fo 20. and however by the Norman former practise it was much disturbed yet by Henry the first it was again reduced to its former right rather then originall arising from his grant as some hold and proved advantagious for the ends aforesaid Now as touching their marriage portion of goods because the Saxon law had already endowed them thereof they could not be induced to lay down their known ancient right till they found the new law of dower to settle and so for some time both laws were in force untill the more ancient Saxon law had an honourable buriall Neverthelesse for the present the law abridged that right so farre as to limit it to the widdow during widdowhood according to the former Saxon law Upon consideration of all which it may well be conceived that the power of the Lords in consenting or dissenting to the marriages of their tenants widdows and wards was not so much an usurpation upon the common right of the English subjects as a custome rationally and with great wisdome as the course of affaires then stood upholden and allowed amongst them principally for the speedy setling of a peaceable government and consolidating of two Nations into one and wherein England was then so happy as to come to a conclusion in seven yeeres which cost their ancestors nigh two hundred yeeres experience with the Britons besides a world of bloodshed that might have been spared ere they could finde out the right way to a desired peace by mutuall marriages had between them cap. 4. 4. Wardship Such widdow shall have the custody of the Lands of such children or otherwise such other person as by right ought to have the same This is the first news of Wardships that passed abroad cum privilegio of a received Law which together with the former declare the right custome of the Normans M. Paris and thereby the injustas consuetudines quibus Angliae regnum opprimebatur viz. Arbitrary reliefe taken of the Tenants estate arbitrary marriages made of their persons and arbitrary grants of guardianship of their lands for as yet oppression was not so high flown as to cast the government of the persons of their Wards out of the view of the Lords provisionary care upon adventure of the next inlaw whether man or woman wise or unwife under pretence to train him up in military service fit for the Lords own safety and the Kingdomes lifeguard but it was the proper ground of the Lords own seisure and right of wardship he being looked upon by the eye of common reason as the onely meet man that both could and would effect that worke so as might be most advantagious to the publique which seemed to be chiefly concerned herein and upon the same generall ground the survey of fooles accompanied the former albeit it was not in practise till Henry the first brought it in as the Mirror of justice saith fo 258. Ll. Canut 37. yet it came upon an ancient foundation laid in the time of the Danes For my own part I will not dispute the point whether this custome of Wardship was purely Norman or whether it was derived from the Saxons anciently who possibly might have some respect to Orphans in such cases to traine them up for the publique service in point of war especially being possessors of a known right of reliefe as well as Alfred the Saxon King did undertake the worke for the training of some such particular persons in learning for the service of the publique Asser Menev. in time of peace and civill government yet thus much appeareth that guardianship of Lands was a known custome enough to make and maintaine a right and that it by law was a right belonging to some persons before others and that this had been a custome before the former unjust customs crept into government of the Conquerour and principally of his sonne Rufus and though it be questionable whether it setled first upon the Normans or the English yet its manifest that if one people had it the other people now comming into union with that people could not in reason except against that custome which the other people had taken up upon so honorable grounds as reason of State which as the times then were was evident and superlative especially the customes being under the regulating of Law and not of any arbitrary power and can be no presidents of the reliefe marriage and wardship that after ages usurped Tenants in Knights service shall hold their Lands cap. 5. c. acquitted of all taxes 5. Acquittall that they may be more able to provide Armes and be more ready and fit for the Kings service and defence of the Kingdome This law whither it be a renewing of a former custome or an introduction of a new Law it s cleare it was upon an old ground That Tenants by Knight service must be ready for the service of their Lord and defence of the kingdome whereof afterwards But the law is that these men shall hold their lands of that tenure acquitted of all taxes though legally imposed upon the body of the Kingdome which must be
conceived to be for the publique benefit viz. either for the preparation or maintenance of publique warre for in such cases it hath been in all times held unreasonable that those whose persons are imployed to serve in the warres should hold lands doubly charged to the same service viz. to the defraying of their own private expences in the warre and maintenance of the publique charge of the same war besides CHAP. LIII Of divers Lawes made concerning the execution of justice ALthough in proceedings in cases of vindicative justice delinquents might seem to be left rather to the fury then mercy of the law yet so long as men are under the law and not without the law it hath been alwaies held a part of justice to extend what moderation might possibly stand with the honour of the law and that otherwise an over rigid and fierce prosecution of the guilty is no lesse tyranny then the persecution of the not guilty and although violence was the proper vice of these times yet this point of honour must be given to the Normans that their Sword had eyes and moved not altogether by rage but by reason No sentence shall passe but upon averment of the complaint by accuser or witnesses produced Ll. Hen. 1. c. 5. Fine and pledges shall be according to the quantity of the offence Ll. Hen. 1. M. Paris By these two laws of Henry the first the subjects were delivered from three great oppressions first in making them offenders without complaint or witnesse Secondly in imposing immoderate fines Lastly in urging extraordinary baile Forfeiture of fellons Lands is reduced to a yeere and a day Miror fo 261 The Normans had reduced the Saxon law in this case unto their own last which stretched their desire as farre as the estate would beare but this being so prejudiciall to the immediate Lords who were no offenders in this case and so contrary to the Saxon law it was both done and undone in a short space by the allowance of Henry the first Intent of criminall offences manifested by act punished by fine or mulct This by Alfreds law was punished by Talioes law Miror fo 254. but now by a law of Henry the first reduced to mulcts Mainperners are not to be punished as principals unlesse they be parties or privies to the failing of the principall This law of Henry the first repealed the former law of Canutus which must be acknowledged to be rigorous Miror fo 141. although not altogether without reason No person shall be imprisoned for committing of mortall crime unlesse first he be attainted by verdict of twelve men Ll. Hen. 1. c. 5. By imprisonment is intended close imprisonment or imprisonment without baile or mainprise for otherwise its apparent that as well by the Saxon as Norman laws men were brought to triall by restraint Appeales of murder restrained within the fourth degree Before this law Appeales were brought by any of the blood or kinne of the party slaine Miror cap. 2. Sec. 7. but now by Henry the first restrained The ground seems to be for that affection that runnes with the blood grows so cold beyond the fourth degree that the death of the party is of so small account as can it scarcely be reputed a losse of such consequence to the party as to expose the life or price of the life of the manslayer unto the claime of such an one and thus the Saxon law that gave the satisfaction in such case to the whole kindred became limited to the fourth degree as I conceive from the Ecclesiastical constitution concerning marriage Two things more concerning juridicall proceedings may be noted the one concerning speedy course of justice wherein they may seem to justifie the Saxon way but could never attaine to their pace in regard they yeelded so much time to Summons Essoines c. The other concernes election of Judges by the parties for this we finde in the lawes of Henry the first CHAP. LIV. Of the Militia during the Normans time THe power of Militia is either the legislative or executory power the legislative power without contradiction rested in the grand Councell of the Kingdome to whom it belonged to establish laws for the government of the kingdome in time of peace And this will appeare in the preparation for warre the levying of warre and mannaging thereof after its levied for the preparation it consisteth in leavying men and munition or of money In all which questionlesse will be a difference between raising of warre by a King to revenge a personall injury done to the Kings own person and a warre raised by the whole Kingdome or representative body thereof which is commonly done in defence of publique interest and seldome in any offensive way unlesse in recovery of a right of possession either formerly lost or as yet not fully setled Now although it be true that seldome do injuries reflect upon the Kings person alone but that the Kingdom will be concerned therein to endeavour a remedy yet because it may fall out otherwise Kings having been occasioned to leavy war of their own accord but in such case could neither compell the persons of his subjects or their estates to be contributory And of this nature I take the warre leavied by Harold against the Conquerour to be wherein the greatest part of the Kingdome was never ingaged nor therefore did it feele the dint of the Conquerours Sword at all and in this case the Militia must be allowed to such as beare the purse nor can it be concluded to be the Militia of the Kingdome nor any part thereof although it may connive thereat But to set this consideration aside as not coincident at all with the Norman ingagements after they were crowned and to take all the subsequent warres to be meerly defensive of the right of the Crown as in sober construction they will appeare to be as touching the levying of money its evident that it lay onely in the power of the grand Councell of the Kingdome for otherwise the laws were setled that no Tax should be made or taken but such as were due in the Confessors time as formerly hath been shewed Secondly for the preparing of men and munition it was done either by tenure or by speciall law as touching tenure it was provided by way of contract that those that held by Knights service should be ready with their Armes to assist the King for the defence of the Realme So as they were not bound by their tenure to ayd him in any other cases Ll. Gulielm cap. 57. Others were also by especiall law of the Land bound to be ready for their service in that kind For all the inhabitants of this Kingdome held their estates under a generall service which by common right they are bound to performe viz. in time of danger to joyn in defence of their Countrey This is the common fealty or allegiance which all men owe Ll. Gulielm c. 59. and
ground of the heire who was a woman disadvantaged by a whispering of wilfulnesse and customary government like an Empresse which was too high a saile for an English bottome wherein so precious a treasure as the subjects liberties was to be shipped Thus provided Steven stepped up to the English Throne and with protestations of good government entered and made up the match both for Crown and Scepter the people waving the title both of Empresse and heire the pretensions of the E. of Bloys elder brother to Steven gave way to the common law and liberties of the subject to fasten root and gather recompence after the violence of the Norman blasts was out of breath thus making way over hedge and ditch of all Oathes till the King was quietly setled in the Throne Quietly said I that I must retract for he never had quiet during his life though generally was victorious and did as much as a King could doe that had the passions of a man and Souldier to give the subjects content The true cause whereof was an errour in the tying of the knot wherein he neither became theirs nor they his For the fealty that was sworn to him was but conditionall and eousque and yet the Kings promises were absolute and better observed then the peoples were possibly because his engagements were more For besides his protestations the King pledged his brother the Legate to the people and morgaged himselfe to his brother and to boot gave both to the Clergy and Barons liberty to build and hold Castles for their private security the issue whereof may mind that too much countersecurity from the King to the people is like so many Covenants in marriage that make room for jealousie and are but seeds of an unquiet life and thus it befell this Kings reigne His first troubles are brought in by Historians as if they dropped from Heaven yet probably came immediately from without viz. from beyond Sea where the Empresse was for as the Kings engagements were in their first heate on the one side so was also the Empresses choler on the other side and therefore might make the first assault and the Kings first successe therein falling out prosperously for him conceited him that he was strong enough to encounter his own Covenant although in truth he invaded but the skirts thereof I meane that collaterall security of Castles for by experience he now feeles that they are blocks in his way he must therefore have them into his own power But the Clergy are loth to forgoe their pawn till they had their full bargaine for now they were working hard for investures of the Mitred Clergy under the patronage of a Legate that had the King in bonds acted their parts so well as they ingaged the Nobility for their liberty of Castles in which atchivement the King was taken prisoner The Empresse betakes her selfe to the Clergy and by the Legates meanes procures a kind of election to be Queen but she sicke of the womans humour and thinking too much of the Empresse and too little of the Queen and forgetting that the English Crown would not fit an Empresse unlesse she could fit her head first to it choked her owne title by prerogative and so let the Crown slip through her hands which fell upon the head of Steven againe who maintained it by his Sword after by composition and then died a King and thus like a vapour mounted up by the Clergy tossed by tempests for a time and at length falling gave way to the Crown to have its free course to the Empresses son by Geoffery Plantagenet This was Henry the second Henry 2d. the most accomplished for wisdome courage and power of all his predecessors and one that wanted nothing but purpose to have undone what the foregoing Princes had done in the setling of the liberties of the people for the subjects were tired with the unquiet former times and the Clergy in distraction through the Schisme in the Popedome between Victor the fourth and Alexander the third and very unfitting all were to dispute the point of prerogative with so mighty a Prince And it was the wisdome of God to order his affaires so as that he was not very fit to dispute with the people in that case for his title to the Crown was not very excellent being neither heire to the last King that reigned nor to the last of that title I mean to Henry the first but sonne onely to the Empresse who was now alive and by descent was to be preferred before all other His title therefore is clearly by compact and agreement made between the Lords King Steven and himselfe all being then ready to try the right by the Sword to that to which none of them had any right at all at that time but by the favour of the people Nor did the King ever after dispute the strength of this title although before he died his mothers death conveyed over to him what right of descent soever was consistent with the Law of the Crown nor did occasion favour him thereto for as its never seen that any man is honoured by God with many advantages without proportionable imployment for the same so it befell with this King His great Territories in France brought jealousie in the reare and it strife and contention with France enough to turn his thoughts from waxing wanton against his own people and therefore his wisdome taught him to preferre peace at home to the chiefe of his prerogative to become somewhat popular and yet to loose nothing of a King thereby his way was to keepe the Church men down that had during his predecessors time grown whether more obstinate against the King or insolent over the people is hard to judge and in this he had the people to friend and might have prevailed much more then he did but that the people feared the threats of Rome more then he and himselfe if not guilty of Beckets death more the conceit of fame then there was cause these concurring with unnaturall troubles from most unthankfull sonnes made that spirit of his to faile that formerly knew no peere as it s often seen that the most generous spirits are sooner quelled with shame and griefe then with feare of any danger whatsoever Towards his Lay-subjects he was more regardant for the setling of Laws and executing of justice so as some have thought him the first wombe of our English laws others more truly the first Mecoenas since the conquest that brought on the spring time of a setled Common-weale and thereof left this faire testimony by his putting forth that Primrose of English laws under the name of Glanvill letting all men know that thenceforth England would no more vale it selfe in an unknown law but explaine it selfe unto the World to be a regular government such was the Kings Idea yet was he touched with so much of the common infirmity of Kings as shewed him to be a man especially in his old
the higher nature the party though not the Kings tenant lost his personal estate to the King for ever his free holds also for a yeere and a day after which they returned to the Lord of the soile by way of escheat It seemeth also that the losse not onely of chattels and goods but also of lands c. extended to Outlaries I conceive in case of Felony and the Kings pardon in such case could not bind the Lords right of escheate although it might discharge the goods and the yeere and the day whereunto the King was entituled which case alone sufficiently declareth what power Kings had in the estates of their subjects Manslaughter 5. Manslaughter made not bailable This was law in Henry the seconds time although it crossed the Norman Law Glanvil l. 14. cap. 1 3. and questionlesse it was upon good ground for the times now were not as those in the Conquerours times when shedding of blood was accounted valour and in most cases in order to the publique service And now it seems it was a growing evill and that cried so loud as though in case of Treason baile might be allowed yet not in this case ubi ad terrorem aliter statutum est saith the authour Robbers 6. Robbery shall be committed to the Sheriffe or in his absence to the next Castelane who shall deliver him to the Sheriffe And the Justices shall doe right to them and unto trespassers upon Land Ll. Gul. 4. Spicil 174. By the Conquerours law these offenders were bailable and I conceive this was no repeale thereof and the rather because Glanvile alloweth of pledges in all cases except Manslaughter yea in those crimes that did wound Majesty it selfe Glanvil lib. 14. cap. 1. although they concerne the destruction of the Kings person or sedition in the Kingdome or Army thereof The Justices herein mentioned were intended to be the Justices itinerant and the trespasses upon Land are meant such as are contra pacem Domini Regis as riotous and forcible entries for some trespasses were against the peace of the Sheriffe as formerly hath been observed Fauxonry 7. Fauxonry Glanvil lib. 14 cap. 7. is of severall degrees or kinds some against the King others against other men and of those against the King some are punished as wounds of Majesty as falsifying the Kings charter and whether falsifying of money were in that condition or not I leave or falsifying of measures yet more inferiour I cannot determine but its cleare by Glanvile that falsifying of the deed of a private person was of smaller consideration and at the utmost deserved but losse of member Inheritances may not be aliened 8. Glanvil lib. 7. cap. 1. Ibid. c. 5. Inheritances were in those times of lands or goods for it was the custome then that the personall estate the debts deducted was divisible into three parts one whereof belonged in right to the wife as her reasonable part the other to the heire and third to the testator to make his will of them and of the other two parts he could not dispose by will Concerning Lands it was regularly true that no man could alien his whole inheritance to the disherisin of his heire either by act in his life time or any part thereof by his last will without the concurrance of the heire But of purchased lands he may give part by act executed in his life time though he have no Lands by inheritance and if he hath no issue then he may alien all And where a man hath Lands by inheritance and also by purchase he may alien all his purchased lands as he pleaseth If the lands be holden in Gavel kinde no more of the inheritance can be conveyed to any of the children then their proportionable parts will amount unto This law of inheritance was divers according to the tenure for the lands in Knight-service alwaies discended to the heire but such as were holden in soccage passed according to the custome either to the eldest or to the youngest or to all equally And thus stood the generall state of inheritance from the Normans times hitherto Ll. Hen 1. c. 88. seeming somewhat too strait for the free men that by law of property might challenge a power to doe with their own as they pleased But the Normans saw a double prejudice herein the first was the danger of ruine of many of their families who now ingrafted into the English stocke and yet not fully one might expect a late checke to their preferments from the Saxon parents after a long and faire semblance made of their good will The second prejudice was the decay of their Militia which was maintained by riches more then by multitude of men partly because that rich men are most fearfull of offending and therefore ordinarily are most serviceable both with their bodies and estates against publique dangers and partly because by their friends and allies they bring more ayd unto the publique by ingaging them in the common cause that otherwise might prove unsensible of the condition of their Country The heire of a free man shall by descent be in such seism as 9. his ancester had at the time of his death Vide Glanv l. 7. c 9. doing service and paying releif and shall have his chattailes If the heire be under age the Lord shall have the Wardship for the due time and the wife her Dower and part of the goods If the Lord withhold seisin the Kings Justice shall trie the matter by twelve men The first of these branches is declaratory of a ground of common law but being applied to the last is an introduction of a new law of triall of the heires right by Assize of Mortdancester where formerly no remedy was left to the heire but a Writ of right If these three branches be particularly observed they speake of three sorts of heires of tenants by Knight-service viz. such as are majors or of full age and such as are minors or under age and such as are of a doubtfull age Those that are of full age at the death of their ancestors may possesse the lands descended and the Lord may not disseise him thereof but may be resisted by the heire in the maintenance of his possession so as he be ready to pay reliefe and doe service that is due and if the Lord expell him he shall have remedy by Assize Those heires that are minors shall be under the Lords guardianship till they come to one and twenty yeeres Tbe heires of such as hold by soccage are said to be at full age at fifteene yeeres because at that age they were thought able to doe that service but the sonnes of Burgesses are then said to be of full age when they have ability to mannage their fathers calling such as telling of money measuring of cloath and the like yet doth not Glanvile or any other say that these were their full age to all purposes albeit that some Burroughs at
England albeit that other parts of the Kingdome had not the like present regard as the City of London had cap. 26. The Writ of precipe in capite shall not be granted of any free hold whereby a man may be in danger of loosing his Court thereby It seemeth that it was one of the oppressions in those times that if a suit were commenced in the inferiour or Lords court concerning a free hold A Writ of praecipe in capite might be had upon a surmise that the free hold was holden in capite which might prove an absolute destruction to the inferiour Court and was the spoile of the demandants case and therefore I thinke the charter of King John instead of the word court hath the word cause There shall be but one known weight and measure cap. 27. and one breadth of Cloathes throughout the Realme of England This law of weights and measures was anciently established amongst the Saxons Ll. Edgar c. 3. as formerly hath been shewed and continued in the Normans times and confirmed by Richard the first and King John And as touching the measure of the bredth of Cloaths although it might seem to abridge the liberty of particular persons yet because it was prejudiciall to the common trade of the Kingdome it was setled in this manner to avoid deceit and to establish a known price of Cloths And it seemeth that Wine was ordinarily made in England as well as Ale otherwise the measures of Wine could not have been established by a Law in England if they had been altogether made in other Countries Inquisition of life and member shall be readily granted without fees cap. 28. It was a Law of latter originall made to take away a Norman oppression for by the Saxon law as hath been already noted no man was imprisoned for crime not baylable beyond the next County court or Sheriffs Torne but when those rurall Courts began to lose their power and the Kings courts to devoure trials of that nature especially by the meanes of the Justices itinerant which were but rare and for divers yeeres many times intermitted during all which time supposed offenders must lie in prison which was quite contrary to the liberty of the freemen amongst the Saxons it occasioned a new device to save the common liberty by speciall Writs sued out by the party imprisoned or under baile supposing himselfe circumvented by hatred and malice and by the same directed to the Sheriffe and others an inquisition was taken and triall made of the offence whether he deserved losse of life or member and if it were found for the supposed offender he was bailed till the next comming of the Justices and for this the Writ was called the Writ of inquisition of life or member and sometimes the Writ de odio atia But these inquests were soon become degenerate and subject to much corruption and therefore as soon met with a counterchecke from the Law Or first rather a regulation West 1. cap. 11 for it was ordained that the inquest should be chosen upon oath and that two of the inquest at the least should be Knights and those not interressed in the cause but yet this could not rectifie the matter for it seemed so impossible to doe justice and shew mercy this way Glocest cap 9. that the Writ is at length taken away and men left to their lot till the comming of Justices itinerant But this could not be indured above seven yeeres for though the King be a brave souldier West 2. cap. 29. and prosperous yet the people overcome him and recover their Writs de odio atia againe cap. 29. Lords shall have the Wardships of their Tenants heires although they hold also of the King in Petit Serjeanty Soccage Burgage or fee Farme Inferiour Lords had the same right of Wardships with the King for their tenures in Knightservice although their tenants did hold also of the King unlesse they held of him in Knight-service which was a service to be done by the tenants own person or by the person of his Esquire or other deputy in his stead but as touching such service as was wont to be done to him by render or serving him with Armes or other utensiles this was no Knightservice though such utensiles concerned warre Glanvil lib 7. cap. 9. but was called Petit Serjeanty as in the Lawbookes doth appeare Neverthelesse Henry the third had usurped Wardships in such cases also and the same amongst others occasioned the Barons wars cap. 30. No judge shall compell a freeman to confesse matter against himselfe upon oath without complaint first made against him Nor shall receive any complaint without present proofe This law in the originall is set down in another kind of phrase in the first part thereof which is obscure by reason thereof in expresse words it is thus No Judge shall compell any man ad legem manifestam which implieth that the matter was otherwise obscure if the party that was complained of or suspected did not manifest the same by his own declaring of the truth or matter inquired after and therefore they used in such cases to put him to oath and if he denied the matter or acquitted himselfe the Judge would sometimes discharge him or otherwise put him to his compurgators and this was called lex manifesta or lex apparens and it was a tricke first brought in by the Clergy and the temporall Judges imitated them therein and this became a snare and sore burden to the subjects To avoyd which they complaine of this new kind of triall and for remedy of this usurpation this law reviveth and establisheth the onely and old way of triall for Glanvill saith Ob infamiam non solet juxta legem terrae aliquis per legem apparentem se purgare nisi prius convictus fuerit vel confessus in curia Bracton fo 106 and therefore no man ought to be urged upon such difficulties unlesse by the expresse law of the land The old way of triall was first to bring in a complaint and witnesses ready to maintaine the same and therefore both appeales and actions then used to conclude their pleas with the names of witnesses subjoyned which at this day is implied in those generall words in their conclusions Et inde producit sectam suam that is he brings his sect or suite or such as doe follow or affirme his complaint as an other part also is implied in those words Et hoc paratus est verificare Seld. super Hengham For if the plaintiffs sect or suit of witnesses did not fully prove the matter in fact the defendants averment was made good by his own oath and the oathes of twelve men and so the triall was concluded No free men shall be imprisoned or disseised of his freehold cap. 31. or liberties outlawed or banished or invaded but by the Law of the Land and judgement of his Peeres Nor shall justice be
that if the party appealed was acquitted the appealor should not onely render dammages but be imprisoned for a yeere The County court shall be holden at the wonted time cap. 36. The Torne shall be holden at the accustomed place twice in the yeere viz. after Easter and Michaelmas The view of Frank pledges shal be holden at Michalmas The Sheriffe shall not extort The Sheriffs Courts had now lost somewhat of their jurisdiction though for time and place they are confirmed statu quo to the end that through uncertainty thereof the suiter might not make defaults and be amerced yet they lost much of their respect within the compasse of these few yeeres by two laws Merton cap. 10 the one of which made at Merton allowed all suiters to the rurall Courts to appeare by proxy or atturney which it seemeth had power to vote for the masters in all cases publique and private and did not onely themselves grow into parties and maintenance of quarrels and so spoiled these Courts of their common Justice but rendred the freemen ignorant and carelesse of the common good of the Country and given over to their own private interest And though the corruption of justice was soon felt West 1. c. 33. and against it a law was provided viz. that the Sheriffe should not allow of such corrupt atturnies yet this was no cure to the free men who were still suffered to wax wanton at home albeit that they were discharged from doing their suite in all other Hundreds but that wherein they dwell Marlbr cap. 10. The second law that tooke away much honour from these Courts was that law at Marlbridge Ibid. that discharged the Baronage of England and the Clergy from their attendance at such service and this also opened the doore wider to oppression for where greatnesse is it carieth therewith honour from the meaner sort and a kinde of aw and stop unto the minds of such men that otherwise would riot without restraint and though it might also be said that the pretence of great men in such Courts would oversway the meaner and make strong parties yet it must also be acknowledged that these parties being greater are the fewer and doe not so generally corrupt all sorts as the corruption of the meaner sort doe it s said by the wise man where the poore oppresse the poore its like a raging raine that leaves no food The last branch in this Law is an inhibition to the Sheriffe from extortion and surely there was great need and much more need then ever now that the Lords and Clergy are absent It was thought that the great occasion of the Sheriffs oppression was from above I meane from the King that raised the vallews of the farme of Counties granted to the Sheriffs Artic. super cart cap. 13 14. Stat. de vice com An. 9 E. 2 for in those daies Shieriffs gave no accounts as of later times they have done and therefore the Charter of King Iohn between the 17 and 18 chapter inserteth this clause Omnes commitat Hundred Wapentag Trethingi sint ad antiquas firmas absque ullo incremento exceptis Dominicis Maneriis nostris But this did not worke the worke although it tooke away occasion for the humour was fed from within and turned to a sore upon that place that could never be cured to this day Nor could the wisdome of times finde other helpe to keepe the same from growing mortall but by scanting the diet and taking away that power and jurisdiction which formerly it enjoyed cap. 37. The 37 Chapter hath been already noted in the Chapter of the Clergy next foregoing cap. 38. Escuage shall be taxed as was wont in the time of Henry the second The Charter of King John hath superadded hereunto this ensuing provision There shall be no Escuage set in the Kingdome except for the redeeming of the Kings person making of his eldest sonne a Knight and one marriage of his eldest daughter and for this there shall be onely reasonable ayd And in like manner shall the ayds of the City of London be set And for the assessing of Escuage we will summon the Archbishops Bishops Abbots Earles and greater Barons of the Kingdome specially by our severall Writs and will cause to be summoned in generall by our Sheriffs and Bayliffs all other our tenants in capite to be at a certaine day after forty daies at the least and at a certaine place and we will set down the cause in all our Writs And the matter at the day appointed shall proceed according to the councell of those that shall be present although all that were summoned doe not come And we will not allow any man to take ayd of his free men unlesse for redemption of his body and making his eldest sonne a Knight and one marriage for his eldest daughter and this shall be a reasonable ayd onely Thus farre the Charter of King John concerning this point of taxe or assessment and if the History saith true the Charter of Henry the third was one and the same with that of King John then either this was not left out in Henry the thirds Charter in that Historians time M. Paris or if it was omitted in the originall it was supposed to be included in the generall words of the Law as being accustomed in times past and then these particulars will be emergent First that the ayds and Escuage in Henry the firsts time were assessed by the same way with that in this Charter of King John for that all the quarrell between the Lords and King John was concerning the charter of Henry the first which the Lords sware to maintaine Secondly M Paris An. 1214 1215 25 Edw. 1. cap. 6. 34 Edw. 1. cap. 1. West 1. cap. 36. that neither ayds nor escuage were granted or legally taken but by Act of Parliament although the rate of them was setled by common custome according to the quantity of their fee. Thirdly that some Parliaments in those times as concerning such matters consisted onely of such men as were concerned by way of such charge by reason of their tenancy for escuage only concerned the tenants by Knights service and therefore those onely were summoned unto such Parliaments as onely concerned Escuage nor had the City of London nor the Burgesses right to vote in such cases it is said p. 258. And thus the Forrest laws that were made in the time of Ri. 1. were made by the consent of Archbishops Hoveden 445. Bishops Abbots Earls Barons and Knights of the whole Kingdome for what the great men gained they gained for themselves and their tenants And the truth is that in those times although publique dammage concerned all yet it was ordinary for Kings to make a shew of summoning Parliaments when as properly they were but Parliamentary meetings of some such Lords Clergy and others as the King saw most convenient to drive on his own designe and therefore
Nation who value their estates and liberties above their owne lives Rape West 1. cap. 13. Rape upon the complaint of the party violated made within forty daies shall have right If the delinquent be convicted without such complaint made he shall be fined and imprisoned Before this Law this crime was but finable unlesse the fact was committed upon a virgin for then the member was lost And this was the Saxons Law but the Normans inflicted the losse of the member upon all delinquents in any rape Nor was this made fellony by any law or custome that I can finde till about these daies It s true that Canutus punished it capitis aestimatione by way of compensation which rather gives a rule of dammages to the party wronged then importeth a punishment inflicted for an offence done against the Crown as if it were thereby made capitall But for the more certainty of the penalty another law provideth that if the rape be committed without the womans consent subsequent she may have an appeale of Rape West 2. cap. 34. And though a consent be subsequent yet the delinquent upon indictment found shall suffer death as in the case of appeale But if a wife be carried away with the goods of her husband besides action of the party the King shall have a fine If the wife elopeth she shall lose her Dower if she be not reconciled before her husbands death All which now recited provisoes are comprehended together in one chapter and yet the Chapter is partee per fess French and Latine so farre thereof as concerneth death was written in French being the most known language to the great men in generall many of whom were French by reason of the interest that Henry the third had with France in his late warres against the Barons It was therefore published by way of caveat that no person that understood French might plead ignorance of the law that concerned their lives The residue of that Chapter was written in Latine as all the other Laws of that Parliament were upon grounds formerly in this discourse noted One proviso more remaineth which is also comprehended in the same Chapter with the former viz. Any person that shall carry away a Nunne from her house shall suffer imprisonment for three yeeres and render dammages to the house This crime was formerly onely inwombed in the Canon law and now borne and brought forth into the condition of a Statute law rather to vindicate the right of the free men then in any respect had to the Clergy Antiq. Brit. fo 197. who had been very bold with the liberty of the free men in this matter for Archbishop Peckham not a yeere before the making of this law for this offence had excommunicated Sir Osborne Gifford nor could he get absolution but upon his penance first he was displed with rods three times once in the open Church at Wilton then in the market-place at Shaftsbury and lastly in the publique Church there then he must fast divers moneths Lastly he must be disrobed of all Military habiliments viz. Guilt Spurs Sword Saddell golden Trappings and to use no brave garments but russet with Lambe and Sheepe skins to use no shirt nor take up his order againe untill he had spent three yeeres pilgrimage in the Holy land and unto this penance the Knight by oath bound himselfe A strange power and to represse which it was time for the people to looke about them and rather to punish delinquents themselves then to leave it to the will of such men as never had enough Concealment or neglect of apprehending of felons punished by fine and imprisonment Concealment of Felons West 1. cap. 9. In those ancient times pursuits of felons with hui and cry were made by Lords of mannors Bailiffs of liberties Sheriffs and Coroners whereas now they are made by Constables See more in the Chapter of peace Escapes also were punished with fine and imprisonment and in some places the Lord had the fine in other places the Sheriff and in some cases the King West 1. cap. 3. yet it in no case was any fine assessed or taken till the triall before the Justices Persons defamed for felony Defamed Felons West 1. cap. â— not submitting to triall by Law shall be committed to close and hard imprisonment It hath been accounted an extreame construction of this law and questionlesse so it is that this Law should warrant that punishment of pressing to death which hath been of later times more constantly used then former times ever knew of for though it be granted that some tricke of torture was sometimes used even before the Norman times and so might now and then leave some few examples after the Norman times yet did the law never patronise such courses especially if the death of the party suspected ensued thereupon Miror cap. 1. sect 9. but accounted it manslaughter And the end of this law was not to put a man to death but to urge him to confesse and so Briton saith such as will not submit to triall shall be put to penance till he shall pray to be admitted thereunto and therefore the penance then used was such as did not necessarily inferre death Briton cap. 4. sect 24. nor was it a finall judgement in the triall but onely a meanes thereto and therefore it might rather consist in deniall of conveniences then inflicting of paine Now in what cases it was used may be understood from the manner of the indictments in those daies whereof besides appeales by the party some were of particular fact done others onely of a fame and it may be conceived that the course in the second was Glanvil lib. 10 cap. 1. that if a man would not submit but would stand mute he was put to this kind of imprisonment for the discovering law was by Henry the third taken away But if the delinquent was positively accused of a felony and thereupon indicted by a witnesse of the fact and then the delinquent would not submit to his triall by law in such case the finall judgement was to die O nore fame c. because in the one there was a fact affirmed against him by a witnesse and in the other onely a fame or suspition which is not pregnant against the life of a man But this manner of indictment being now laid aside and all proceedings being upon a fact affirmed against the party I conceive this law of no use at all in these daies Bayle West 1. cap. 15. Baile shall not be allowed to Out-laws fore-jured Thieves taken in the act notorious Thieves appealed persons burners of houses breakers of prison false coiners counterfeiters of the Broad-seale prisoners upon excommunication open malefactors and Traitors against the King The six first are in nature of persons attainted either upon their own confession or such manifest evidence as in common reason cannot be gainsayd all which were before this law under baile yea the last
CHAP. LXXI Of the Peace WArre and peace are two births by severall venters and may like the day and night succeed but can never inherit each to other and for that cause they may claime to belong to one father and that one and the same power should act in both and yet it s no good maxime that he that is the chiefe Commander in warre ought to be the chiefe in the order of peace For it naturally befals that warre especially that which we call civill warre like some diseases in the body does rather breed ill humours then consume them and these must be purged by dieting the State and constant course of justice unto which the rugged waves of warre have little or no affinity if not enmity Neverthelesse the wisdome of our ancestors thought it most meet to keep their Kings in worke as well in time of peace as of war and therefore as they anciently referred the principall care thereof to the Lords who together with certaine select persons in every County did administer justice in severall iters or circuits so when Kings had once gotten the name of being chief in civill affaires as they had it in martiall they soon left the Lords behind them who also were willing enough with their own ease and had the name of doing all notwithstanding it was done by advice of the Lords and directory of Ministers or commissioners thereto deputed And thus that peace which formerly passed under the titles of Pax Domini pax vice comitis it is pax Regni became by eminency swallowed up in that which was called the Kings peace and the Justices called the Kings Justices and himself flattered into that title of Fountaine of Justice which belongeth onely to him that is The Most High or Chiefe Law-giver The manner how this honourable care of the safety and peace of the Kingdome was imployed may be referred to a double consideration the one in execution of justice upon delinquents the other in preventing occasions of offence or delinquency by meanes whereof the publique peace might be endangered The first was acted diversly according to the present sence of affaires for what was at first done by the Princes in their circuits Tacitus with one hundred of the Commons called Comites and that done per pagos vicesque was afterwards done by itinerant Judges sent from the King for the greatest matters and by Lords in their Leets Governours or chiefe Magistrates of Towns in their courts and Sheriffs in their Tornes as Judices stati for the ease of the people in matters of lesse moment I say I conceive it was in the Torne for I suppose no emergent court taken up upon occasion could by the Law draw a necessity of a sudden appearance of all above twelve yeeres of age at the same 52 Hen. 3. Marlb cap. 25. and for the same cause it seemeth that one certaine Torne every yeere was holden for inquiries of homicide unto which all above twelve yeere of age were to come except Barons Clergy and women or otherwise all such had been bound to attendance on every Torne Neverthelesse the worke of the Tornes continued not to heare and determine as anciently they had done For in Henry the thirds time and formerly divers men had prisons to their owne use some as Palatines Mitor cap. 2. Sec. 9. other as Lords of Franchise and others by power and usurpation and had the benefit of all fines incident and by this meanes many were fined that deserved it not Mag. cart cap. 19. and some also that deserved worse to prevent which evill Henry the third tooke away that power of holding Crown-pleas Glocest cap. 8. West 1. cap. 3. And Edward the first tooke away their power to determine escapes and left them onely the power of inquiry and to certifie at the next comming of the Justices But these injurious times had holden too long to be forgotten or laid aside by such coole pursuit Men were still ordinarily imprisoned and so continued oftentimes till the comming of the Justices itinerant For whereas in case of bloodshed the Writ de odio gratia was a remedy the other had no remedy but by procuring a Commission of Oyer and terminer which ordinarily was a cure worse then the hurt Stat. Wint. 13 Edw. 1. As a remedy hereof Edward the first found out the new way of making Justices of peace as may appeare by the Statute at Winton which law being purposely made for the conserving of the peace providing for penalty of crimes already committed as well as for the suppressing of future ordaineth that offences against that Law shall be presented to Justices assigned to enquire thereof and though these at the first might be itinerant yet it soone made way to resiant And before that Statute it seemeth the King had found out the way Coke Inst 4. p. 176 if that note be true which is left revived into memory by that honourable reporter which relating to the sixth yeere of Edward the first saith that then prima fuit institutio justiciariorum pro pace conservanda And yet some semblance there is that it was yet more ancient even in the time of Hen. 1. if I mistake not the sence of that clause in his laws concerning vagabonds he ordereth that they shall be carried Iusticiae quae praeest Hen. 1. cap. 58. although the language be not so Clerkly as to speake the sence out Now though their worke as yet was but in triall and they were onely trusted with power of inquiry yet it induced a new way wherein the Sheriffe was not so much as intrusted to intermeddle and which not onely intermitted the course of his proceedings in such matters but also led the way to the dispoiling of the Sheriffs Torne and Lords Leets of that little remainder that was left them of judicatory power in matters that were against the peace and made their inquisitory power lesse regardfull and eased the Justices itinerant of much of their work in regard they were speedily to certifie up to the King and so these matters should be determined in Parliament according as those Justices were elected in Parliament who as it seemes were jealous of giving the power of determining those offences into any sudden hand To summe up then the first part as touching the punishment of offences against the peace the wheele is now in the turning the Leets and Tornes begin to be slighted the labour of the Justices itinerant lessened the Commissions of Oyer and terminer difused by the bringing in of a new order of Justices for the peace especially appointed And the Parliament as the supreame providors left as the reserve for the asserting and maintenance of the same albeit that under it the power of determining much rested upon Justices or Judges that attended the Kings court after that the Common pleas were setled and confined to a certain place The preserving of the peace for the future
sold delayed or denied It s a comprehensive law and made up of many Saxon laws or rather an inforcement of all laws and a remedy against oppression past present and to come and concerneth first the person then his livelihood as touching the person his life and his liberty his life shall be under the protection of the law and his liberty likewise so as he shall be shut into no place by imprisonment nor out of any place by banishment but shall have liberty of ingresse and egresse His estate both reall and personall shall also be under the protection of the Law and the law also shall be free neither denied nor delayed I thinke it needlesse to shew how this was no new law but a confirmation of the old and reparation added thereto being much impaired by stormy times for the summe of all the foregoing discourse tendeth thereto cap. 32. Merchants shall have free and safe passage and trade without unjust taxes as by ancient custome they ought In time of warre such as are of the enemies Countries shall be secured till it appeare how the English Merchants are used in their Countries That this was an ancient law the words thereof shew besides what may be observed out of the Laws of Aetheldred and other Saxon laws So as it appeareth that not onely the English free men and natives had their liberties asserted by the law but also forrainers if Merchants had the like liberties for their persons and goods concerning trade and maintenance of the same and were hereby enabled to enjoy their own under the protection of the law as the free men had And unto this law the charter of King John added this ensuing It shall be lawfull for every free man to passe freely to and from this Kingdome saving fealty to the King unlesse in time of warre and then also for a short space as may be for the common good excepting prisoners outlaws and those Countrey-men that are in enmity and Merchants who shall be dealt with as aforesaid And it seemeth that this law of free passage out of the Kingdome was not anciently fundamentall but onely grounded upon reason of State although the free men have liberty of free passage within the Kingdome according to that originall law sit pax publica per communes vias and for that cause as I suppose it was wholly omitted in the Charter of Henry the third as was also another law concerning the Jewes which because it left an influence behind it after the Jewes were extinct in this Nation and which continueth even unto this day I shall incert it in this short summe After death of the Jewes debtor no usury shall be payd during the minority of the heire though the debt shall come into the Kings hand And the debt shall be payd saving to the wife her dower and maintenance for the children according to the quantity of the debtors Land and saving the Lords service and in like manner of debts to others The whole doctrine of usury fell under the title of Jewes for it seemeth it was their trade and their proper trade hitherto Concil Brit. 299. It was first that I met with forbidden at a Legatine Councell nigh 300 yeeres before the Normans times but by the Confessors law it was made penall to Christians to the forfeiture of estate and banishing and therefore the Jewes and all their substance were holden to be in nature of the Kings villeines as touching their estate Ibid. 623. Glanvil lib. 7. cap. 16. for they could get nothing but was at his mercy and Kings did suffer them to continue this trade for their own benefit yet they did regulate it as touching infants as by this law of King John and the Statute at Merton doth appeare M. Paris An. 1229. Merton cap. 5. Stat. de Judais An 18 E. 1. but Henry the third did not put it into his Charter as I thinke because it was no liberty of the subjects but rather a prejudice thereto and therefore Edward the first wholly tooke it away by a Statute made in his time and thereby abolished the Jewes Tenants Lands holden of Lands escheated to the King shall hold by the same services as formerly cap. 33. cap. 34. In all alienations of Lands sufficient shall be left for the Lords distresse Prerog Reg. cap. 7. Submitting to the judgement of the learned I conceive that as well in the Saxon times as untill this law any tenant might alien onely part of his lands and reserve the services to the alienor because he could not reserve service upon such alienation unto the Lord paramount other then was formerly due to him without the Lords consent and for the same reason could they not alien the whole tenancy to binde the Lord without his expresse licence saving the opinion in the booke of Assizes 20 ass pl. 17. because no tenant could be inforced upon any Lord least he might be his enemy Neverthelesse it seemeth that de facto tenants did usually alien their whole tenancy and although they could not thereby barre the Lords right yet because the Lord could not in such case have the distresse of his own tenant this law saved so much from alienation as might serve for security of the Lords distresse But tenants were not thus satisfied the Lords would not part with their tenants although the tenants necessity was never so urgent upon them to sell their Lands and therefore at length they prevailed by the Statute of Quia emptores to have power to sell all 18 Edw. 1. Westm 3. ca. 1. saving to the Lords their services formerly due and thus the Lords were necessitated to grant licences of alienation to such as the tenants could provide to buy their lands Nor was this so prejudiciall to the Lords in those daies when the publique quiet was setled as it would have been in former times of warre when as the Lords right was maintained more by might and the ayd of his tenants then by law which then was of little power cap. 35. The 35 Chapter I have formerly mentioned in the Chapter concerning the Clergy cap. 36. No man shall be appealed by a woman for the death of any but her own husband The right of appeale is grounded upon the greatest interest Now because the wives interest seemeth wholy to be swallowed up in her husband therefore she shall have an appeale of the death of him onely and such also was the Law in Glanvils time How far this point of interest shall extend to the degrees of consanguinity the Norman Law formerly hath shewen And against whom appeales did lie the Statute at Westminster tels us viz. not onely against the principall West 1. cap. 14 but also against accessories yet not against them till the principall be attainted And because it was ordinary for men of nought to appeale others in a malicious way Westm 2. ca. 13 it was by another law established