Selected quad for the lemma: justice_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
justice_n	henry_n	king_n	law_n	2,736	5	4.6988	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A05354	A treatise tovvching the right, title, and interest of the most excellent Princess Marie, Queene of Scotland, and of the most noble king Iames, her Graces sonne, to the succession of the croune of England VVherein is conteined asvvell a genealogie of the competitors pretending title to the same croune: as a resolution of their obiections. Compiled and published before in latin, and after in Englishe, by the right reuerend father in God, Iohn Lesley, Byshop of Rosse. VVith an exhortation to the English and Scottish nations, for vniting of them selues in a true league of amitie.; Defence of the honour of the right highe, mightye and noble Princesse Marie Quene of Scotlande and dowager of France. Selections	Leslie, John, 1527-1596.	1584 (1584)	STC 15507; ESTC S108494	94,307	147

most open and euidente so it is moste conformable to the lawe of God of Nature and of that Realme And consequentlye in a manner of all other Realmes in the worlde as growing by the nearest proximitie of the Royal blood She is a Kinges and a Queenes daughter her selfe a Queene daughter as is before declared to the late King Iames of Scotlande sonne to Ladie Margarete the eldest Syster to the late King Henrie the eight VVhose daughter also the late Ladie Lenoux was by a later husbande But Ladie Frauncis late wife to Henrie Marques Dorsette afterwarde Duke of Suffolke and the Ladie Eleonour late wife to the Earle of Cumberlande and their Progenie proceede from the Lady Marie Dowager of Fraunce yongest Sister of the sayd King Henrye late wyfe to Charles Brandon Duke of Suffolke as is before declared I might here fetche foorth olde farne dayes I might reache backe to the noble worthie Kings long before the Conquest of whose Royal blood she is descended VVhiche I Intend not to treat vpon at this tyme. And though perhappes it might seme not much to enforce her title yet may it serue to proue her no stranger to England being of so long continuance and so many wayes descended of the kings and Royal blood of that Realme But the Argumentes and prouffes whiche we meane to alleage and bring forth for the confirmation of her right and title in Succession as Heire apparent to the Croune of England are gathered and grounded vpon the lawes of God and nature and not onely receaued in the Ciuile policies of other nations but also in the olde lawes and Customes of the Realme of England by reason approued by vsage and longe continuance of tyme obserued from the first constitution of that Realme in politicall order vnto this present day And yet for all that hath it bene and yet is by some men attempted artificiallye to obiecte and caste many mystie darke cloudes before mennes eyes to kepe from them if it may be the cleare light of the sayd iust title the whiche they would extinguish or at the least blemish with some obscure shadow of lawe but in deede against the lawe and with the shadowe of Parlamentes but in deede against the true meaning of the Parlamentes And though it were enough for vs our cause being so firmely and suerly established vpon all good reason and lawe to stande at defence and only to auoide as easely we may their obiections whiche principally and chiefly are grounded vpon the common lawes and Statutes of that Realme yet for the bettering and strengthening of the same we shall Lay forth sundrie great inuincible reasons conioyned with good and sufficient authoritie of the lawe so approued and confirmed that the Aduersaries shal neuer be able iustly to impugne them And so as we trust after the reading of this Treatise and the effectes of the same well digested no maner of scruple ought to remaine in any indifferent mans hart concerning her right and title VVhose expectation and conscience allthough we truste fully in this Discourse to satisfie doubt nothing of the righteousnes of our cause yet must we nedes confesse the manner forme to entreate therof to be full of difficulty perplexity For such causes of Princes as they be seldome and rare so is it more rare strange to finde them discoursed discussed and determined by any lawe or statute albeit nowe then some statutes tende that waye Inst de iust iure ● fin Neither do the lawes of England nor the Corps of the Romaine and Ciuil lawes medle so muche with the direction of the right L. princeps ● de leg l. dignū v●x C. eodem and titles of kings as with priuate mens causes And yet this notwithstanding for the better iustification of our cause albeit it I denie not but that by the common lawe it must be knowen who ought to haue the Croune and that the common lawe muste discerne the right aswel of the Croune as of subiectes yet I saye that there is a great difference betwene the Kings right and the right of others The common lavve of England is rather grounded vpon a generall custome than vpon any lavve vvritten And that the title of the Croune of that Realme of England is not subiect to the rules and principles of the common lawe of that Realme as to be ruled and tryed after suche order and course as the inheritance of priuate persones is by the same For the proofe whereof let vs consider what the common lawe of that Realme is and how the rules thereof be grounded and do take place It is very manifeste and plaine In Prologo suo eiusdē li. fo 1. 2. De dict Ranulpho Glanuilla vide Giraldum Cambren in topogra de VVallia that the common lawe of the Realme of England is no lawe written but is grounded onely vpon a common and generall custome throughout the whole Realme as appeareth by the Treatise of the auncient famous VVriter of the lawes of the Realme named Ranulphus de Glanuilla who wrote in the time of the noble King Henrie the second of the lawe and Custome of the Realme of England being then and also in the time of the raigne of King Richarde the firste the chiefe Counsailour and Iustice of the same king and also by the famouse Iustice Fortescue in his booke whiche he wrote being Chauncellour of England De laudibus Legum Angliae Fortescue de lau Leg. Angl. c. 17. 8. E. 4. 19. 33. H. 6. 51. Pinsons prime And by 33. H. 6. 51. and by E. 4. 19. VVhiche Custome by vsage and continuall practise heretofore had in the kinges Courts within that Realme is onely knowen and mainteined wherein the English nation seeme much agreable to the olde Lacedemonians who many hundred yeres past Inst de in re natura gent. ciuil §. ex non script most politikely and famously gouuerned their common VVealth with lawe vnwritten whereas among the Athenians the writen lawes bare all the sway This thing being so true as with any reason or good authoritie it can not be denied then we are further to consider whether the kinges title to the Croune can be examined tried and ordered by this common Custome or no. Yf it may then must yt be proued by some recorde that it hath bene so vsed otherwise the aduersaries only say it and nothing at all proue it For nothing can be sayde by lawe to be subiecte to any custome vnlesse the same hath bene vsed accordingly and by force of the same custome But I am well assured The Aduersaries haue shevved no rule of the common lavve that bindeth the Croune that the aduersaries are not able to proue the vsage and practise thereof by any record in any of the Kings courts Yea I will further say and also proue that they neither haue shewed nor can shew any one rule general or special of the

take the succession of the Croune it were any thing reasonable or euer was once meant of the Parlamēt that the King without cause should disherite and exclude them from the title of the Croune On the other side if ther were any such impedimēt whereof this surmised will geueth out a great suspicion it is to be considered whether it standeth with reason and iustice with the honour of the king and the whole Realme or with the minde purpose and intente of the said Parlament that the King should not onely frustrate and exclude suche whose right by the common lawe is moste euidente and notoriouse but call and substitute suche other L. si pater ff Quae in frau credit L. fili fami ff de D●rat L. 1. 6. quae res pign l. obligation ff de pigno c. in gener de Regum iuris in 6. L. quidā ff de ver sig L. vt grad §. 1. de uumer hono L. permittēdo cū notatis ff de iure dotiū In geuing generall authoritie that seemeth not to be comprised that the partie vvould not haue graunted being specially demaunded Generall vvordes must be referted to hable persons L. 2. c. de Nopall L. sin §. in computatione De iure deliber ibi notat Alciat in l. 1. de ver significat as by the same lawe are plainely excluded In consideration whereof many notable Rules of the Ciuil lawe doo concurre First that who soeuer geueth any man a generall authoritie to do any thing seemeth not to geue him authoritie to do that thing whiche he would not haue graunted if his minde therein had bene seuerally and specially asked and required Againe generall wordes either of the Testatours or of such as make any contract especially of statutes touching any persons to doe or enioy any thing ought to be restrained and referred to hable mete and capable persons onely It is furthermore a rule and a Principle that statutes must be ruled measured and interpreted according to the minde and direction of the generall and common lawe VVherefore the King in limiting the succession of the Croune in this sorte as is pretended seemeth not to answere and satisfie the expectation of the Parlament putting the case there were any suche surmised impediment as also on the other side likewise if there were no suche supposed impediment For here an other rule must be regarded which is that in Testaments Contractes and namely in statutes the generalitie of wordes must be gently and ciuily moderated and measured by the cōmon lawe and restrained when so euer any man should by that generalitie take any dammage and hurte vndeseruedly Yea the Statute shall rather in that casse ceasse and quaile and be taken as void As for example it appe eth by the Ciuill lawe that if it be enacted by statute in some Cities that noman shall pleade against an Instrument no not the Executour yet this notwithstanding if the Executour make a true and perfect Inuentorie of the goodes of the Testatour if he deale faithfully and truely rather than he should wrongfully and without cause paie the Testatours debt of his owne he may come and pleade against the Instrumēt VVherefore the kings doings seeme either muche defectiue in the said Ladie Francis Ladie Elenour or much excessiue in their children And so though he had signed the said will with his hand yet the said doings seme not conformable to the mind and purpose of the Parlament VVe will now go forward and propound other great and graue cōsiderations seruing our said purpose and intent VVhereof one is that in limiting the Croune vnto the heires of the bodie of the Lady Francis the same Ladie then and so long after liuing the said King did not appoint the Successiō of the Croune according to the order meaning of he honorable Parlament forasmuch as the said Acte of Parlament gaue to him authoritie to limite and appoint the Croune to such persone or persones in reuersiō or remainder as should please his Highnes Meaning thereby some persone certaine of whome the people might haue certaine knowledg vnderstanding after the death of king Henrie the eight VVhich persones certaine the heires of the Ladie Francis could not by any meanes be intended 11. H. 4. fo 72. 9. H. 6 fo 24. 11. H. 6. fol. 15. forasmuch as the said Ladie Francis was then liuing and therfore could then haue no heires at al. By reason whereof the people of that Realme could not haue cettaine knowledge and perfit vnderstanding of the Succession according to the true meaning intent of the said Acte of parlamēt But to this matter some peraduenture would seeme to answere and say that although at the time of the said King Henries death the Heires of the bodie of the said Ladie Francis begotten were vncertaine yet at suche time as the said remainder should happen to fal the said heires might then certainly be knowen In deede I will not deny but that peraduēture they might be then certainly knowen But what great mischieffes and incōueniēces might haue ensued and yet may if the wil take place vpō that peraduenture vncertaine limitation I would wishe all men well to note and consider It is not to be doubted but that it might haue fortuned at such time as the remainder should happen to fall to the said heires of the Ladie Francis the same Ladye Francis should then be also liuing who I pray you then should haue had the Croune Paraduenture ye wold say the heires of the body of the Ladie Eleonour to whome the next remainder was appointed Vndoubtedlye that were contrarie to the meanyng of the sayde supposed will forsomuch as the remainder is therby limited vnto the heires of the body of the Ladie Eleonour onely for default of issue of the Ladie Francis VVherby it may be very plainly gathered vpō the said supposed wil that the meaning therof was not that the children of the Lady Eleonour should enioye the Croune before the children of the Lady Frācis But what if the said Lady Eleonour had bene then also liuing which might haue happened forasmuch as both the said Ladie Francis and Ladie Eleonour by common course of nature might haue liued longer then vntil this day who then should haue had the Croune Truly the right Heire whome this supposed will meante to exclude so long as there should remaine any issue either of the body of the said Ladie Francis or of the bodie of the said Ladie Eleonour lawfully begotten And therefore quite contrarie to the meaning of the said supposed will wherefore I doe verely thinke that it would hardly sinke into any reasonable mans head that had any experience of the great wisdome and aduised doings of King Henry the eight about other matters being of nothing like weight that he would so slenderly and so vnaduisedly dispose the successione of the Croune wherevpon the whole estate of that Realme doth depend in suche wise that they to whome

is set foorth VVherein it may appearo at first sight how by the Mariage of King Henry the seauenth and Queene Elizabeth his wyfe the vndoubted title of that Croune was shut vp in them two in their issue How they lost but thre children hauinge yssue to witt King Henry the Eight Margaret their eldest daughter wyfe of Iames the .4 King of Scot. And mary wyfe of Charles Duke of Suffolk And that after the decesses of K. Henry the .8 and of his issue the right of succession of the said Croune is to remayn to the yssue of the sayd Margaret before all others And that is to the most gracious Lady Mary now Queene of Scotland and from and by her to the sixt King Iames of Scotland her Graces most noble sonne To the wellwilling Reder Here thou haist wellwilling Reder the cōtinuall Rase processe of Succession of the triumphāt Croune of England set forth before thy eyes not so muche thereby to gratifye my vndoubted Soueraignes as to dissolue all doubtes touching the laufull succession of that Croune to shew some aduise for the dignitie peace and weale publique of the whole yle of Britaine to the ende that all matter of sedition may be extinguished Farewell and take in good parte this my trauail IOHN LESLEY Byshop of Rosse VVilliam Duke of Normandie subdued and slewe in battail at hay stinges Herold the vsurpor in the yere of our lorde 1066. and obteined the kingdome to hym selfe whose posteritye hath enioyed the same till this daye 1. Kyng VVilliam Conquerour 2. Kyng VVilliam Rufus 3. Kyng Henry 1. Maried to Maude daughter of Malcom 3. K. of Scot. Maude daughter of Henry .1 maried to Henry .5 Emperour first husband of Maude Geoffrey Plātagenet second Husband of maude 5 King Henry 2. sonne of maude by G. Pl. 6. Kyng Richard 1. Called cuer de Lyon 7. Kyng Iohn Ioan wyfe of Alexāder .2 Kyng of Scotlād Alexander 2. Kyng of Scotland Alexander 3. Kyng of Scotland 8. Kyng Henry the third The house of Lancastre Edmond Erle of Lancastre Henry Erle of Lancastre Henry Duke of Lancastre Blāche heir of Henry D. of Lancastre vvife of Iohn of Gaunt Margaret wyfe of Alexāder .3 Kyng of Scotland 9. Kyng Eddward the first 10. Kyng Edward the second maried to Isabel daughter of Philip le beau Kyng of France Ioan wyfe of Dauid de bruise king of Scotlād Dauid de bruise Kyng of Scotland 11. King Edward the thyrd Iohn of Gaunt D. of Iāc in right of his wife Philip wyfe of Iohn 1. Kyng of Portugal Edward Kyng of Portugal The line of Poratugl Ferdinand Emanuel Kyng of Portugal Isabel the eldest daughter of Emanuel and vvife of Charles 5 Emper. Philip Kyng of Spayn D. Iames. D. Philip. Eleonor wyfe of Frederik Emperour Maximilian .1 Emperour Philip king of Castill in right of his wife Catharin wyfe of Henry .3 Kyng of Castil The lyne of Castil Iohn Kyng of Castil Elizabeth heyr of Castil vvyfe to the Kyng of Aragon Iohn Quene heir of Castil wyfe of Philip. Charles .5 Emperour and kyng of Spayn Ferdimand Emperour and Archeduke of Austriche Maximilian Emperour Archeduke of Austriche Mary daughter of Charles and vvife of Maximillam Emperour Rudolphe Emperour archeduke of Austriche Anne wife of Philip kyng of Spayn 13. Kyng Henry the foworth 14. King Henry the fift 15. King Henry the sixt Edward Iohn Erle of Somerset Ioan wyfe of Iames .1 king of Scotland Iames .1 Kyng of Scotland The lyne Iames .2 Kyng of Scotland Iames .3 Kyng of Scotland Iames .4 king of Scotland maried to Iohn Duke of Somerset Margaret maried to Edmond Erle of Richemōd 19. Kyng Henry the seauenth maried to Margaret first maried to King Iames 4. and after to Of Scotland Iames .5 Kyng of Scotland Marye Queene of Scotlād maried to Archebald Erle of Angus secōd husbād to Queene Margaret Margaret wyfe of Mathew Erle of Leneux Henry Stuart second husband of Mary Queene of Scotland Iames .6 Kyng of Scotland Mathew Stuart Erle of leneux Charles Stuart maried to Elizabeth Canendish Arbella 20. King Henry the eight 21. king Edward the sixt 23. Queene Elizabeth 22. Queene Marye Edward called the blacke prince 12. King Richard the second Lionel Duke of Glarence Philip maried to Edmōd mortimer Erle of marche The house Edmond of langley Duke of Yorke Richard Erle of Cambridge maried to Anne mortimer Anne mortimer maried to Richard Erle of cambringe Roger mortimer and Eleonor hys sister died vvithout yssue Rogermor timer .4 Erle of marche Edmond mortimer .5 Erle of marche died without isse of Yorke Richard Plantagonet Duke of Yorke 18. King Richard the third Edward dyed without issue George Duke of Glarence Margaret Countise of Sarisbury maried to R. Pole Reinald Pole Cardinal and Geffrey Pole Henry Pole Baron of Montague The house of huntingdon VVenefride wyfe of Barington knight Catharin maried to Frācis Erle of hūtingdon Henry Erle of huntingdon George hastings others Arthur Pole Mary wyfe of Iohn Stannay Margaret wyfe of tho fitzherbert 16. kyng Edward the fowerth Elizabeth maried to king Henry the seuenth The howse of Suffolke Mary daughter of K. Henry 7 maried to Charles Duk of Suffolk Francise wyfe of marques dorcet 1. Iane wyfe of Guilford dudley 2. Catharin Henry sonne of Catharin by the Erle of hereford Edward 3. Mary Eleonor maried to George Erle of cūberlād Margaret maried to the Erle of darby Ferdinand VVillyam Francis 17. Kyng Edward the fyft Adela wife of Stephan Erle of Bloys 4. Kyng Stephan A FVRTHER PROOFE OF THE SAYD TITLE OF SVCCESSION VVITH A RESOLVTION OF the obiections of the Aduersaries VVE SAY THEN and affirme that the next right Heire Successour apparent vnto the Croune of the Realme of England is at this time suche a one as for the excellent guiftes of God and nature in her most princely appearing is worthie to inherit either that noble Realme or any other be it of much more dignitie and worthines But nowe I clame nothing for the worthines of the persone whiche God forbid should be any thing preiudiciall to the iust title of others Yf most open and manifeste right iustice and title do not concurre with the woorthines of the persone then let the praise and woorthines remaine where it is and the right where God and the lawe hath placed it But seing God Nature and the lawe doth call the person to this expectation whose interest and clame I do now prosequute I meane my vndouted soueraine Ladye Marye Queene of Scotlande I hope that when her right and iuste title shal be throughly heard and considered by the indifferent Reader if he be persuaded already for her right he shal be more firmelye setled in his true and good opinion and that the other parties being of a contrarie minde shall finde good causes and groundes to remoue them from the same and to geue ouer and yelde to the truthe Her Graces Title then as it is

Chattles of the testatour not the heyre And yet is it other wise in the case of the Croune For there the successour shall haue them and not the executour as appeareth in 7. H. 4. by Gascoine It is likewise a general rule that a man attainted of felony or treason his heire through the corruption of blood without pardon and restitution of blood is vnable to take any landes by discente 6. VVhich rule although it be generall yet it extendeth not to the descente or succession of the Croune Nor that a traitour is vnable to take lādes by discēte and vvithout pardō although the same Attainder were by acte of Parlamente as may appeare by the Attainder of Ricarde Duke of Yorke and king Edward his son and also of king Henry the seuenth who were attainted by acte of Parlament and neuer restored and yet no dishabilitie thereby vnto any of them to receaue the Croune by lawfull succession But to this the aduersaries wold seeme to answere in their said booke sayeing that Henry the seuenth not with standing his attainder came to the Croune as caste vpon him by the order of the lawe for so much as when the Croune was caste vpon him that dishabilitie ceassed VVherein they confesse directly that the Attainder is no dishabilitie at all to the succession of the Croune For although no dishabilitie can be alleaged in him that hath the Croune in possession yet if there were any dishabilitie in him before to receue and take the same by lawful successiō then must they say that he was not lawful King but an vsurpet And therfore in confessing Henry the seuenth to be a lawful king and that the Croune was lawfully caste vpon him they confesse directly thereby that before he was kinge in possession there was no dishabilitie in him to take the Croune by lawful succession his said Attainder not withstanding whiche is as muche as I would wish them to graunt But in conclusion vnderstanding them selues that this their reason can not mainteine their intent An aunsvvere to the aduersary making a difference betvvene attainder the birth out of the allegeance they goe about an other way to helpe them selues making a difference in the lawe betwene the case of Attainder the case of foraine birth out of the kinges allegeance sayeinge that in the case of the Attainder necessitie doth enforce the succession of the Croune vpon the partie attaynted For otherwise they say the Croune shall not descēde to any But vpon the birth out of the kinges allegeāce they say it is otherwise And for proofe thereof they put a case of I. S. being seased of landes and hauing issue A. and B. A. is attainted in the life of I. S. his father and after I. S. dieth A. liuing vnrestored Nowe the lande shal not descende either to A. or B. but shal goe to the Lorde of the Fee by way of eschete Otherwise it had bene they say if A. had bene borne beyond the sea I. S. breaking his allegeance to the king and after I. S. cometh agayne into the Realme and hath issue B. and dieth for now they say B. shall inherite his fathers Landes Yf the Croune had bene holden of any person to whome it might haue escheted as in theyr case of I. S. the lande did then peraduenture there had bene some affinitie betwene theyr said case and the case of the Croune But there is no suche matter Bysides that they muste consider that the king cometh to the Croune not onely by descent but also chiefly by succession as vnto a corporation And therefore they might easely haue sene a difference in theyr cases betwene the kinges Maiestie and I. S. a subiecte And also betwene landes holden of a Lorde aboue the Croune holden of no earthly Lorde but of God almighty onely But yet for arguments sake I woulde faine knowe where they finde their difference and what authoritie they can shew for the proof thereof They haue made no marginal note of any authoritie therefore vnlesse they also saye that they are Pythagoras I will not beleue theyr difference VVel I am assured that I can shew good outhoritie to the contrarie and that there is no difference in theyr cases Yf they peruse 22. H. 6 22. H. 6. fol. 43. there may they see the opinion of Iustice Newton that there is no difference in theyr cases but that in both theyr cases the lande shall eschete vnto the Lorde And Prisote being then of Counsaile with the party that clamed lands by a descent wher the eldest sonne was borne beyond the seas durst not abide in lawe vpon the title This authoritie is against theyr differēce this authoritie I am well asseured is better then any that they haue shewed to proue their difference But if we shall admit their difference to be according to the lawe yet their cases where vnto they applie their difference are nothing like as I haue said before Now then to procede on in the proofe of our purpose as it doth appeare that neither the King nor his Croune is bound by these generall rules whiche before I haue shewed so do I likewise say of all the residue of the general rules Maximes of the lawe being in a manner infinite The supposed Maxime of the aduersaries toucheth not Kinges borne beyond the sea as appeareth by King Stephen and King H. 2. But to retourne againe vnto their onely supposed Maxime whiche they make so general concerning the dishabilitie of persones borne beyond the seas it is very plaine that it was neuer taken to extende vnto the Croune of the Realme of Englande as it may appeare by king Stephen and by king Henry the second who were both straungers and Frenchemen borne out of the kinges allegeance and neither were they kinges children immediate nor their parentes of the allegeance and yet they haue bene alwaies accompted lawfull kinges of England nor their title was by any man at any time defaced or comptrolled for any suche consideration or exception of foraine birth The aduersaris obiection touching King H. 2. auoided And it is a worlde to see how the aduersaries would shifte their handes from the said king Henry the second They say he came not to the Croune by order of the lawe but by capitulation for asmuche as his mother by whome he conueied his Title was then liuing VVell admitte that he came to the Croune by capitulation during his mothers life yet this doth not proue that he was dishabled to receaue the Croune but rather proueth his abylitie And although I did also admit that he had not the Croune by order of the lawe during his mothers life yet after his mothers death no man hath hitherto doubted but that he was king by lawfull succession and not against the lawes and Customes of that Realme For so might they put a doubt in all the Kinges of that Realme that euer gouerned sithens VVhiche thing