the people when the Friars and Pardoners had authoritie to preach against their wills It is well knowen that the innouation in Germany sprang from the Sermons of Fryar Iohn Techel and of Friar Martin Luther among the Suisses from the Sermons of Friar Samson of Milan And the residing Bishop was able to doe nothing but fight with disaduantage against these who were armed with priuiledges The Bishop is not able to make the Clergie liue honestly for that besides the generall exemption of all the Regulars euery Chapter hath one and there bee few particular Priests that want it The Bishop cannot prouide that fit men bee promoted to that charge for the licences to promote and the faculties which the titular Bishops enioy who suffer him not to vse so much as the ministery of the Pontificals And it may be said in one word that the Bishops doe not reside because they haue nothing to doe or rather that they may not make greater inconueniences to arise which would happen by their concurrence and contention with priuiledged men Hee concluded that as he thought it fit to restore residency so they ought to treat how to restore the Episcopall authoritie The Bishops that spake after this Prelate followed his opinion that it was necessary to commaund residency and to remooue the exemptions which do hinder it And the Legats were enforced to cōsent that both should be considered of and that euery one speake his opinion of them and that some Fathers should be deputed to frame the Decree that it might be examined The deputies for collecting the Articles of iustification hauing receiued The Deputies for collecting the Articles dissent about the manner of proceeding the extracts of the propositions noted by euery one to be censured were not all of one opinion One part desired that foure or sixe fundamental Articles of the new doctrine might bee chosen and condemned as was done in the matter of originall sinne alleadging that it was fit to follow the stile begun and the example of the ancient Councels which hauing declared the principall Article condemned the heresie neuer descending to particular propositions but condemning the bookes of the heretiques in that vniuersall they comprehended all the pernitious doctrine and so the honour of the Councell required But the other part aymed to put vnder censure all the propositions which might receiue a bad construction that those might be condemned which in reason did deserue it saying that it was the office of a Pastor to discerne intirely the wholesome grasse from the hurtfull and not to suffer the flocke to taste of this And if the example of ancient Councels ought to be imitated they should imitate that of Ephesus which made so many and so famous Anathematismes against the doctrine of Nestorius that they did containe whatsoeuer the heretique had saide and the Councels of Africa which descend to the condemnation of all the propositions of the sectes The first opinion did vndoubtedly propose a more easie way and would 25. Articles concerning iustification haue pleased whosoeuer desired a speedie ende of the Councell and left a chinke open for agreement which future times might produce Yet the second was embraced which said it was good to examine all the propositions of the Lutheran doctrine to censure and condemne that which after mature deliberation should seeme necessarie and conuenient And 25. Articles were framed 1. Faith without workes is sufficient to saluation and alone doth iustifie 2. Iustifying faith is a sure trust by which one beleeueth that his sinnes are remitted for CHRIST and those that are iustified are bound to beleeue certainely that their sinnes are remitted 3. By faith onely wee are able to appeare before God who neither regardeth nor hath need of our workes faith onely making vs pure and worthy to receiue the Eucharist beleeuing that in it wee shall receiue grace 4. Those that doe honest things without the holy Ghost do sinne for that they do them with awicked heart and it is sinne to keepe the Commandements of God without faith 5. The best repentance is a new life and the repentance of the life past is not necessary neither doth the repentance of actuall sinnes dispose vs to receiue grace 6. No disposition is necessary to iustification neither doth faith iustifie because it disposeth vs but because it is a meanes or instrument by which the promise and grace of God is laid hold on and receiued 7. The feare of hell helpeth not in gaining of iustice yea hurteth and is sinne and maketh the sinners worse 8. Contrition which ariseth from the discussion calling to minde and detestation of sinnes weighing the grieuousnesse multitude and filthinesse of them or the losse of eternall happinesse and gaine of perpetuall damnation maketh a man an hypocrite and a greater sinner 9. The feares by which sinners are terrified either internally by God or externally by Preachers are sinnes vntill they are ouercome by faith 10. The doctrine of the dispositions destroyeth that of faith and taketh consolation from the consciences 11. Onely faith is necessary and other things are neither commanded nor forbid neither is sinne any thing but incredulity 12. Hee that hath faith is free from the precepts of the Law and hath no neede of workes to bee saued for faith giueth all abundantly and alone fulfilleth all the Commandements and no worke of a faithfull man is so bad as may accuse or condemne him 13. A man baptized cannot lose saluation by reason of any sinne whatsoeuer except hee will not beleeue and no sinne but infidelity separateth vs from the grace of God 14 Faith and workes are contrary and workes cannot be taught without shipwracke of faith 15. Externall workes of the second Table are hypocrisie 16. The iustified are set free from guilt and punishment and satisfaction neither in this life nor after death is necessary and therefore there is no Purgatory or satisfaction which is part of Penance 17. The iustified though they haue the grace of God cannot fulfill the Law or auoide sinnes though mortall 18. Obedience vnto the law in the iustified is weake and vnpure in it selfe not acceptable to God but accepted for the faith of the person reconciled who beleeueth that the remainders of sinne are forgiuen him 19. The iust sinneth in euery good worke and no worke maketh the sinne veniall 20. All the works of men yea of the most sanctified are sinne the workes of the iust are veniall by the mercie of God but in the rigor of his iudgement are mortall 21. Though the iust ought to doubt that his workes bee sinnes yet hee ought withall to be assured that they are not imputed 22. Grace and iustice are nothing but the will of God neither haue the iustified any inherent iustice in them and their sinnes are not abolished but onely remitted and not imputed 23. Our iustice is nothing but the imputation of the iustice of CHRIST and the iust haue neede of a continuall
first pleased them all The Legates accompanied with the Prelates went to the Church with the vsuall ceremonies on Thursday the thirteenth of Ianuary and held the Session where Andreas Cornarus Archbishop of Spalato sang Masse Thomas Stella Bishop of Salpi did preach and the Decrees of faith and reformation were read The first conteined sixteene heads with their prohemes and thirty three anathematismes After it had forbid to beleeue preach or teach otherwise then was constituted and expressed in that Decree it declared in substance 1. That neither Gentiles by naturall meanes nor Iewes by the letter of Moyses hath been able to free themselues from sinne 2. Whereupon GOD sent his Sonne to redeeme the one and the other 3. Who though he died for all yet those onely enioy the benefit vnto whom his merit is communicated 4. That the iustification of the wicked is nothing but a translation from the state of the sonne of Adam into the state of the adopted sonne of God by IESV CHRIST which after the publication of the Gospel is not done without Baptisme or the vow thereof 5. That the beginning of iustification in men of age proceedeth from preuenting grace which inuiteth to dispose themselues consenting and cooperating with it freely which they doe willingly and might refuse 6. The manner of the preparation is first to beleeue willingly the diuine reuelations and promises and knowing ones selfe to bee a sinner to turne from the feare of Gods Iustice to his mercie to hope for pardon from him and therefore to begin to loue him and hate sinne and finally purposing to bee baptized to begin a new life and keepe the commandements of God 7. That iustification followeth this preparation which is not onely a remission of sinnes but sanctification also and hath 5. causes the finall the glory of God and eternall life the efficient God the meritory CHRIST the instrumentall the Sacraments and the formall iustice giuen by God receiued according to the good pleasure of the holy Ghost and according to the disposition of the receiuer receiuing together with remission of sinnes faith hope and charitie 8. That when Saint Paul saith that man is iustified by faith and gratis it ought to be vnderstood because faith is the beginning and the things that precede iustification are not meritorious of grace 9. That sinnes are not pardoned to him that vaunteth and reposeth himselfe onely in the confidence and certainty of the remission Neither ought it to be said that onely faith doth iustifie but euery one as hee should not doubt of the mercie of God the merits of CHRIST and efficacie of the Sacraments so in regard of his owne indisposition he may doubt because he cannot know by certainty of infallible faith that he hath obtained grace 10. That the iust are more iustified by obseruing the Commandements of God and the Church 11. That it cannot be said that the Commandements of God are impossible to the iust who though he fall into veniall sinnes yet ceaseth not to be so that no man ought to relie on faith onely nor say that the iust sinneth in euery good action or committeth sinne if he do any thing for reward 12. That no man should presume hee is predestinated beleeuing that the iustified can sinne no more or sinning can promise himselfe repentance 13. That no man can promise to himselfe absolute certaintie to perseuere vntill the end but should put his hope in the assistance of God who will continue if man faile not 14. That those that are fallen into sinne may againe receiue grace beeing stirred vp from aboue to recouer it by repentance which differeth from baptisme because it containeth not only contrition but sacramental confession Priestly absolution at the least in vow and satisfaction besides for the temporall punishment which is not alwayes remitted altogether as in baptisme 15. That the grace of God is lost not onely by infidelity but by any mortall sinne though faith bee not lost by it 16. It proposeth to the iust the exercise of good workes by which eternall life is gained as grace promised by the mercie of God and a reward due to good workes by the diuine promise And it concludeth that this doctrine doth not establish any iustice of our owne refusing the iustice of God but the same is said to bee ours because it is in vs and of GOD being infused by him for the merit of CHRIST In fine to make euery one vnderstand not only the doctrine to be followed but that also which is to be auoided it addeth Canons against him that saith 1. That a man may bee iustified without grace by the strength of humane nature and doctrine of the Law 2. That grace is giuen to liue well with greater facilitie and to merit eternall life as if free The Canons will can doe it but with difficultie 3. That a man may beleeue loue hope or repent as he ought without the preuention or assistance of the holy Spirit 4. That free will excited by GOD doeth not cooperate to dispose vs to grace nor can dissent though it would 5. That after the sinne of Adam free will is lost 6. That it is not in the power of man to doe ill but as well bad as good workes are done not onely by Gods permission but by his owne proper working 7 That all workes done before iustification are sinnes and that a man sinneth the more by how much the more hee laboureth to dispose himselfe vnto grace 8. That the feare of hell which maketh vs abstaine from sin and to flie to the mercy of GOD is sin 9. That the wicked is iustified by faith onely without preparation proceeding from the motion of his will 10. That man is iustified without the iustice by which CHRIST did merit for vs or is formally iust by that 11. That he is iustified onely by the imputation of the iustice of CHRIST or onely by remission of sinnes without inherent grace and charitie or that the grace of iustification is onely the fauour of GOD. 12. That iustifying faith is nothing but confidence in the mercy of GOD who remitteth sinnes for CHRIST 13. That for remission of sinnes it is necessary to beleeue they are remitted not doubting of ones own indisposition 14. That man is absolued and iustified because he doeth firmely beleeue it 15. That he is bound by faith to beleeue that hee is in the number of the predestinated 16. That one may be certaine he hath the gift of perseuerance without speciall reuelation 17. That onely that the predestinated obtaine grace 18. That the Commandements of God are impossible to the iust 19. That there is no other Euangelicall precept but of faith 20. That the iust and perfect man is not bound to obserue the Commandements of God and the Church or that the Gospel is a promise without condition of obseruing the Commandements 21. That CHRIST is giuen for a redeemer not for a law-maker 22. That the iustified may
that the first beginning of saluation proceedes from the vocation of God He auoyded these straits by a distinction that they were preparatory a farre off but not neerely as though giuing a remote preparation to the force of nature the first beginning was not taken away from the grace A new distinction inuented by Soto of God The Franciscans thought that not onely this kinde of workes were good and did truely and properly prepare to iustification but also that they were truely meritorious in the sight of God Therefore Scotus the authour of their doctrine inuented a kinde of merit which hee attributed to workes done by the force of nature onely saying that in congruitie they deserue grace by a certaine law and infallibly and that a man by naturall power only may feele a sorrow for sinne which is a disposition and merit of Congruity to abolish it approouing a common saying of his times that God neuer The doctrine of the Franciscans concerning meritorious works faileth him that doth as much as hee is able And some of that Order passing those bounds did adde that if God giueth not grace to him that doth what he can hee would be vniust vnrighteous partiall and an accepter of persons They clamoured with much stomacke and indignation that it would bee a great absurdity if God made no difference betweene one that is naturally honest and another drowned in all vices and there would be no reason why hee should rather giue grace to one then another They also alledged that Saint Thomas was of this opinion and that otherwise a man is put into desperation and made negligent to doe well and wicked men may excuse their bad workes and attribute them to the want of the assistance of God But the Dominicans did confesse that Saint Thomas was of this opinion when hee was yong and after did retract it when he was old They did reprehend Is contradicted by the Dominicans it because in the Councell of Orange it is determined that no kinde of merit goeth before grace and that the beginning should bee attributed to God saying that the Lutherans hauing made such exclamations for this congruous merit it ought wholly to be abolished as indeede it was neuer heard of in the Church in ancient times in so many controuersies with the Pelagians That the holy Scripture doth attribute our conuersion to God and that it is not fit to leaue the forme of speach which it vseth For the preparations there was no difference in the substance of the doctrine All held that after God doth stirre vs vp feare and other considerations of the malignity which is in sinne doe arise They said that the opinion that these things are bad was hereticall because God exhorteth the sinner yea mooueth him to these considerations and it must not be sayd that God mooueth to sinne and which is more it is the office of a preacher to terrifie a sinner by these meanes and because by the same meanes all passe from the state of sinne to that of grace it seemed very strange that one cuuld no tpasse from sinne to iustice without the meanes of another sinne But for all this they could not free themselues from the difficultie on the contrary part because all good workes may stand with grace but that feare and other preparations cannot and therefore are sinnes Friar Antonius Marinarus thought the difference was verball and said that as passing from a great cold to a heat one must passe by a lesse degree of cold which is neither a heat nor a new cold but the same diminished so one goeth from sinne to iustice by terrors and attritions which are neither good workes nor new sinnes but old sinnes extenuated But he was compelled to retract because all were against him Of the workes done in grace there was no difficulty amongst them For they all sayd they were perfect and merited saluation and that Luthers opinion that they are all sinnes is wicked and sacrilegious and holding it to be blasphemie to say that the blessed Virgine hath committed the least veniall sinne they could not endure to heare that shee sinned in euery action and said that the earth and hell would open themselues against so great blasphemies For censure of the 22. and 23. Articles in the point of the essence of Diuine grace it was a common consideration that the word Grace in the first All agreed to condemne Luther concerning works after grace signification was vnderstood for a beneuolence or good will which when it is in him that hath power necessarily bringing foorth a good effect that is a gift or benefit which is also called Grace That the Protestants thought so meanly of the Maiesty of GOD that it could doe no more then make vs partakers of his good will but his omnipotencie required that we should haue the benefit thereof in effect And because some man might say that the diuine will onely which is GOD himselfe can haue no greater thing to bestow and that to haue giuen vs his Sonne was the greatest benefit and that Saint Iohn to shew the great loue of GOD towards the world alleadged nothing else but that he had giuen vs his Sonne they said that these benefits are common to all and that it was fit he should bestow a particular present to euery one Therefore the Diuines haue added an habituall grace giuen to euery iust man in particular which is a spirituall qualitie created by GOD infused into the soule whereby it is made gratefull and acceptable to the diuine Maiesty wherof though the Fathers speake not in expresse termes nor the Scripture yet it is cleerely deduced from the word Iustifie which being effectiue doth necessarily signifie to make iust by the impression of reall Iustice which reality because it is no substance can bee nothing else but a qualitie and habite And vpon this occasion there was much spoken against the Lutherans who will not haue the verbe Iustificare to be effectiue but iudiciall and declaratiue grounding themselues vpon the Hebrew word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Tsadak and the Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifie to bee pronounced iust and vpon many places of the New and Old Testament and that it is vsed in that signification in the Latine translation alleadging for it places to the number of fifteene But Soto excluded all those of Saint Paul which spake of our iustification which he said must needes be vnderstood in an effectiue sense whereupon arose a great dispute betweene him and Marinarus who said one should not ground himselfe vpon so light a matter But he said the Article of habituall Grace could not be doubted of as being decided in the Councell of Vienna and by the common opinion of all Theologues that this was to make sure foundations which cannot be destroyed and not to say that Saint Paul to the Romanes when he saith that GOD iustifieth doth not meane declaratorily for it is manifestly against the Text
which maketh a iudiciall processe and saith that none can accuse or condemne GODs Elect because GOD doth iustifiethem where the iudiciall words to accuse and condemne doe shew that the word Iustifie is iudiciall also But the Franciscans approued habituall grace because charity it selfe is an habit And here was a sharpe disputation betweene them and the Dominicans whether the habit of Grace be the same with the habit of Charity as Scotus would or distinct as Saint Thomas and neither party yeelding they debated whether besides this Grace or inherent Iustice the Iustice of CHRIST also bee imputed to the iustified as if it were his owne which they did in regard of the opinion of Alvertus Pighius who confessing the inherent added that we must not trust in that but in the imputed iustice of CHRIST as if it were ours None doubted that CHRIST had merited for vs but some blamed the word to Impute and would haue it abolished because it was not to bee found in Fathers who contented themselues with the words Communication participation diffusion deriuation application computation and coniunction Others said that agreeing vpon the thing they ought not to differ vpon the word because it signifieth precisely the same that the others doe which though not by all and often yet sometimes was vsed For this the 109. Epistle of Saint Barnard was brought and Vega defended that though the word be not found in the Scriptures yet it is a most proper Latine word to say that the iustice of CHRIST is imputed to mankind for satisfaction and merit and that it is continually imputed to all that bee iustified and doe satisfie for their owne sinnes but hee would not haue it sayd it was imputed as if it were ours Whereunto it being opposed that Saint Thomas vseth to say that the passion of CHRIST is communicated to the baptized for remission as if himselfe had sustained it and died there was a long and great contention vpon his words The Heremite Generall held an opinion that in the Sacrament of Baptisme the Iustice of CHRIST is imputed because it is communicated wholly and intirely but not in penance when our satisfactions are also required But Soto sayd the word Imputation was most popular and plausible because it signified at the first sight that all should bee acknowledged from CHRIST but yet that he did euer suspect it in regard of the bad consequences which the Lutheranes draw from thence That is that this onely is sufficient without inherent righteousnes that the Sacraments doe not conferre grace that the punishment is abolished together with the guilt that there remaineth no place for satisfaction that all are equall in grace iustice and glorie whence they deduce also that abominable blasphemie that euery iust man is equall to the blessed Virgin This admonition begat such a suspicion in the hearers that there appeared a manifest inclination to condemne the word for hereticall though reasons were effectually replyed to the contrary The contentions betweene the Theologues did certainly arise from the immoderate affection they bare to their owne sect and were cherished by diuers for diuers ends By the Imperialists to constraine them to abandon iustification By the Courtiers to find a way to separate the Councell and so to auoid the imminent reformation And by others to free themselues from incommodities which they feared would be greater by reason of the dearth Contentions in the Councell are cherished by diuers for diuers ends A Iubily is published in Rome in which religion is declared to be the cause of the warâ—e against the Protestants and of the warre which approached and the rather because they had little hope to doe good But while they thus dispute in Trent the Pope published a Iubile in Rome the fifteenth of Iuly by which he eased the Princes of Germany of the paines to find out or perswade others the true cause of the warre For hauing largely declared in that Bull his pastorall affection and care for the saluation of men relating the perdition of soules by the increase of heresies and that to roote them out the Councell was alreadie begun hee bewailed aboue measure the obstinacie of the heretikes who contemne and refuse to obey it and to submit themselues to the determination thereof For remedie whereof he had made a League with the Emperour to reduce them to the obedience of the Church by force of Armes Hee therefore wished them all to haue recourse vnto GOD by prayers fastings confessions and communions that GOD of his Diuine Maiestie would giue a good issue to this warre vndertaken for his glory exaltation of the Church and extirpation of heresies The Emperour in conformity to his purpose of concealing the cause of The Emperours Bandâ— against the Sax on and Landgraue Religion the twentieth of the same moneth published a Bando against the Saxon and Landgraue laying to their charge that they had alwayes hindered his designes had neuer obeyed him made conspiracies against him mooued warre against other Princes of the Empire seased vpon Bishoprickes and other gouernments dispossessed many of their goods and couered all these things with the glorious and sweet name of Religion peace and liberty but hauing indeede rather any other end Therefore hee doeth prescribe them as perfidious rebels seditious guilty of high treason and enemies of the publike peace and commandeth that none doe assist them or be linked with them absolueth the nobility and people of their dominions from their Oath of fidelitie including all those in the Bando who perseuere to obey them The cause of the warre alleadged by the Emperour grieued the Pope and The Pope and the Emperour are offended one with another for alleadging diuers causes of the warre that of the Pope grieued the Emperor because both their ends were hindred For though the Pope pretended that he had published this Manifest that all the people of Christendome might implore the ayde of God to fauour the Emperours Armes yet both he and euery man of iudgement knew very well that it was to giue notice to Germany and the whole world that the warre was for Religion which the simpler sort also did know a little after For his letter to the Suisses before mentioned and a copie of the Capitulations made with Madruccio were published The Pope crossed Casar in this because hee desired the suppression of the Protestants without the exaltation of the Emperour and therefore to ballance them well hee meant to constraine all the professors of the new Religion to vnite against him And it is certaine that the Popes action hindered the Emperours designes For desiring the Suisses to continue their league with the house of Austria and Burgundy and not assist the rebels the Euangelikes answered that they would first be sure that the warre was not for Religion So it hapened that the warre being but newly begun diseords were already sowed betweene the Princes lately confederated The Potentates of Italie were amazed
should be fitted to the exigence of the text read and the capacitie of the auditors After many Discourses in many Congregations they came to establish the Decrees for the Sermons and to ouercome the difficulties they caused the Prelates who were their assured friends to negotiate with the Italian Bishops wishing them to consider how much they were bound for the honour of their nation to vphold the dignitie of the Papacie whose authoritie was treated of by medling with the priuiledges and what they might hope for from the Pope and Legates applying themselues to that which is iust and not depriuing the Friars of that they haue enioyed so long That it was dangerous to despise so many learned men now when heresies doe trouble the Church That the authoritie of Bishops should be enlarged by granting them power to allow or disallow the Preachers when they preach out of the Churches of their Order and when they preach in them by making them acknowledge the Prelate first asking his benediction That the Bishops might punish the Preachers for heresie forbid them to preach to auoyd scandall That they should bee contented with this and that other things should bee added as occasion serued By this meanes they gained so many that they were secure to establish the Decree with those conditions But there remained another difficulty because the Friars and Generals were not satisfied and to distaste them was not secure and expresly forbid by the Pope They endeauored to shew them that the grant made to the Bishops was iust and necessary whereof themselues were cause by extending their priuiledges too much and by passing the bounds of honesty In fine by admonishing the Bishops to proceed so that the Friars might not haue cause to complaine the Generals also were pacified When they made knowne their resolution to condemne in the same Session the Lutheran opinions of originall sinne they alleadged that to keepe the order of putting both the matters together it was necessary to handle some poynt of faith and that they could not begin from any other poynt And they proposed the Articles extracted out of the Protestants doctrine in that matter to bee examined and discussed by the Diuines in the Congregations whether they ought to bee condemned for hereticall The Cardinall Pacceco said that the Councell was to handle Articles of faith onely to reduce Germanie the which hee that would doe out of season should not onely faile of his ende but make matters worse When there is opportunitie to doe it it cannot bee knowen to those in Trent but onely to him that sitteth at the sterne of that Countrey who seeing all particulars knoweth when to applie the medicine Therefore hee aduised that they should craue by letters the opinion of the principall Prelates of the Nation before they went any further or that the Popes Nuncio should speake thereof with the Emperour To which opinion the Emperours Prelates induced by the Ambassadour did adhere But the Legates commending their iudgement and promising to write to the Nuncio added that notwithstanding this the Articles might bee disputed by the Diuines to gaine time whereunto the Cardinall also and the others adhered hoping that many difficulties might come acrosse to cause a delay and the Ambassadour Toledo was contented so that the Summer might bee past before the definition were made The Articles proposed were 1. That Adam by transgressing the precept hath lost iustice and incurred the The points of originall sinne to bee discussed wrath of God and mortalitie and though hee bee impaired both in soule and bodie yet no sinne is transferred from him to posteritie but onely corporall punishments 2. That Adams sinne is called originall because it is deriued from him to posteritie not by transmission but by imitation 3. That originall sinne is ignorance or contempt of God or want of feare without confidence in his Maiestie without diuine loue and with concupiscence and bad desires and generally a corruption of the whole man in his will soule and body 4. That in children there is an inclination to euill proceeding from the corrupted nature so that after the vse of reason it bringeth forth a loathing of diuine things and an immersion in matters of the world and that this is originall sinne 5. That children at the least borne of faithfull parents though they are baptized into the remission of sinnes yet they haue no sinne by descending from Adam 6. That originall sinne is not cancelled in Baptisme but not imputed or so razed that it beginneth to diminsh in this life and is wholly rooted out in that to come 7. That the sinne remayning in the baptized hindereth his entrance into heauen 8. That concupiscence which cherisheth sinne and remayneth after baptisme is truely sin 9. That the principall punishment due to originall sinne is hell fire besides corporall death and other imperfections vnto which man is subiect in this life The Diuines in the Congregation agreed that to discusse those Articles it was necessary not to proceed in that order but to examine all the matter methodically and see what was sinne in Adam and what deriued from him to posterity is sin in all men called originall how it is transmitted and how remitted In the first point also they agreed that Adam being depriued of righteousnesse The discussion of originall sinne his affections rebelled against reason which the Scripture vseth to expresse saying the flesh rebelleth against the spirit and by one onely name calleth his defect Concupiscence That hee incurred the wrath of God and corporall mortalitie threatned by God together with the spirituall death of the soule and yet that none of these defects can be called sinne but punishments that follow For sinne is formally the transgression of a diuine precept And here many enlarged themselues to finde out the kinde of this fault Some said it was pride some gluttony some infidelity and some more soundly that it might bee drawne to all these and more But hee that will take S. Pauls words for his ground can put it in no other kinde but of pure disobedience But seeking to know what thing deriued from Adam is sin in vs the opinions were more diuers For S. Austine who first sought into the essence thereof following S. Paul said it is concupiscence And S. Anselmus many hundred yeeres after holding that sin is cancelled in the baptized concupiscence still remayning maintayned that it is the priuation of originall righteousnesse which in Baptisme is renewed by a thing equiualent which is grace But S. Thomas and S. Bonauenture desiring to reconcile these two opinions considered that in our corrupted nature there are two rebellions one of the soule against God the other of the sences against the soule and that this is concupiscence and that vnrighteousnesse and therefore both together are the sin And S. Bonauenture gaue the first place to concupiscence saying that this is positiue and the other negatiue And S. Thomas contrarily made
is iust and honest to please the Pope but he knew wel that in a Nationall Councel he should neither be able to reconcile the parties nor find whom to make iudge The Ambassadour of Mentz and Triers diuided themselues from the other foure and being vnited with all the Catholikes approoued the Tridentine Councell and besought Caesar to protect it and to perswade the Protestants to goe thither and submit themselues vnto it They answered that the Councell in Trent was not free as was demanded and promised in the Imperiall Diets they desired againe that the Emperour would obserue the peace and ordaine that Religion might be established in a lawfull Councell of Germanie or an Imperiall Diet Job a Colloquie of learned men 〈◊〉 both 〈◊〉 In this Interim the Emperour had made secret prouision for warre which not being able longer to concedles 〈…〉 knowen to the Protestants in the Diet and because peace was concluded with the French King and The prouisions for warre against the 〈◊〉 Protest 〈…〉 〈◊〉 no longer be concealed truce with the T 〈…〉 euery one did easily perceiue the cause especially for that a fame was spread 〈…〉 the Pope also and Ferdinand did arme whereby all was in confusion And the Emperour seeing hee was discouered the ninth of Innosent the Cardinall of Trent Post to Rome to demand of the Pope the succours 〈◊〉 promised and sent Captaines with money into Italie and Flanders to leuie Souldiers and sollicited the Princes and Protestant German Captaines not combined with those of the league of Smalcalda to follow his colours affirming and promising bee would not make warre for Religion but suppresse the rebellion of some who vnder that pretence would not acknowledge the Lawes nor the Maiestie of the Prince By this promise he quieted many of the Cities who before had receiued the renouation in the Rites of the Church promising all beneuolence to the obedient and securitie for their Religion But in the Councell there being no more difference amongst the Fathers concerning the things discussed and the decrees of faith and reformation being framed the Emperours Ambassadour being not able any longer to resist the Legats resolution the seuenteenth of Iune being come the day appoynted for the Session Alexander Pichalhomini Bishop of Pianza sang Masse Marcus Laureus a Dominican Friar preached and when the vsual ceremonies were ended the decree of faith with fiue Anathematismes was read 1. Against him that confesseth not that Adam by transgressing hath The Decree of faith with 5. a 〈…〉 t 〈…〉 in the Session lost sanctitie and iustice incurred the wrath of God death and thraldome to the Deuill and is infected in soule and body 2. Against him that auerreth that Adam by sinning hath hurt himselfe onely or hath deriued into his posteritie the death onely of the body and not sinne the death of the soule 3. Against him that affirmeth that sinne which is one in the beginning and proper to euery one transmitted by generation not imitation can bee abolished by any other remedie then the death of CHRIST or denieth that the merit of CHRIST is applied as well to children as to those that bee of ripe yeeres by the Sacrament of Baptisme ministred in the forme and rite of the Church 4. Against him that de 〈…〉 eth that children which are newly borne ought to be baptized though the sonnes of Christians or saith they are baptized for remission of sinnes but not because they haue contracted any originall sinne from Adam 5. Against him that denyeth that by the grace of Baptisme the guilt of originall sinne is remitted or saith that all is not remooued which hath the true and proper nature of sinne but that it is razed and not imputed concupiscence still remaining in the baptized for an exercise which cannot hurt but him that consenteth to it the which beeing called sinne by the Apostle the Synod declareth that it is no true and proper sinne but is so termed because it ariseth from sinne and inclineth to it That the Synod meaneth not to comprehend in the decree the blessed Virgin but that the constitutions of Sistus 4. ought to be obserued which it doth renew The Decree of the reformation containeth two parts one in matter of the Lectures the other of the Sermons For the Lectures it was ordered that in the Churches where there is a stipend allotted for reading Diuinitie the Bishop should prouide that the holy Scripture should bee read by the Stipendary it he be fit and not being fit the Bishop should depute a substitute The Decree of reformation to performe the charge but for hereafter that the benefice should not bee conferred but vpon a sufficient person That in the Cathedrall Churches of populous Cities and collegiate Churches of great Castles where no such stipend is assigned the first Prebend that falleth void should bee applyed to that vse or some simple benefice or a contribution of all beneficed men to institute the Lecture That in poore Churches there should bee at the least a Master to teach Grammer who shall enioy the fruits of some simple benefice or haue a stipend from the Capitular or Episcopall table or the Bishop shall finde some other way to effect it That in the Cloysters of Monkes there should be a Diuinitie Lecture if it may bee wherein if the Abbats shall bee negligent they shall bee constrained to doe it by the Bishop as the Popes Delegate That in the Conuents of the Regulars there should bee deputed Masters of sufficiencie to performe this charge That in publique studies where a Diuinitie Lecture is not instituted it shall bee instituted by the charitie and pietie of Princes and Republiques and where it hath beene instituted and neglected it shall bee restored That none shall bee made a Lecturer either publike or priuate before hee bee approoued by the Bishop as fit for his life manners and knowledge except those that reade in the Cloysters of Monkes That the priuiledges granted by law to Publique Readers in Diuinitie and schollers for the enioying of the fruits of their benefices in their absence shall be preserued Concerning Sermons the Decree containeth that the Bishops and Prelates bee bound if they bee not hindered to preach the Gospel in person and if they bee to substitute men of sufficiencie That the inferiour Curates ought to teach things necessary to saluation either by themselues or others at the least on Sundayes and solemne Feasts whereunto they shall bee constrained by the Bishops any exemption notwithstanding And the Curates of the Parishes subiect to Monasteries which are in no diocesse shall be constrained to the same by the Metropolitanes as Delegates of the Pope in case the Regular Prelate shall be negligent That the Regulars shall not preach except they be approoued for their life maners and knowledge by their superiours and in the Churches of their Order they shall demand the benediction of the Bishop before the Sermon begin but in other Churches they
vocation are truely preparatory and euer gaue the first place to God Notwithstanding there was a contention betweene the Dominicans themselues For Soto defended that although a man cannot obtaine grace without the speciall preuenting assistance of God yet the will may euer some way resist and refuse it and when it doth receiue it it is because it giueth assent and doth will so and if our assent were not required there would bee no cause why all should not be conuerted For according to the Apocalyps GOD standeth alwayes at the gate and knocketh and it is a saying of the Fathers now made common that God giueth grace to euery one that will haue it and the Scripture doeth alwayes require this consent in vs and to say otherwise were to take away the libertie of the will and to say that God vseth violence Friar Aloisius Catanea said to the contrary that God worketh two sorts of preuenting grace in the minde according to the doctrine of Saint Thomas the one sufficient the other effectuall to the first the will may consent or resist but not to the second because it implieth cōtradiction that efficacity can be resisted For proofe hee alledged places of Saint Iohn Saint Paul and very cleere expositions of Saint Austine Hee answered that it ariseth hence that all are not conuerted because all are not effectually preuented That the feare of ouerthrowing free-will is remooued by Saint Thomas that things are violently mooued by a contrary cause but neuer by their owne and God being the cause of the will to say it is mooued by God is to say it is mooued by it selfe And hee condemned yea mocked the Lutherans manner of speech that the will followeth as a dead or vnreasonable creature for beeing reasonable by nature mooued by its owne cause which is God it is mooued as reasonable and followeth as reasonable And likewise that God conuerteth though men will not and spurne at him For it is a contradiction that the effect should spurne against the cause That it may happen that God may effectually conuert one that before hath spurned against sufficient preuention but afterwards cannot because a gentlenesse in the will moued must needes follow the efficacie of the diuine motion Soto said that euery diuine inspiration was onely sufficient and that that whereunto free-will hath assented obtaineth efficiency by that consent without which it is vneffectuall not by the defect of it selfe but of the man This opinion hee defended very fearefully because it was opposed that the distinction of the reprobate from the elect would proceede from man contrary to the perpetuall Catholique sence that the vessels of mercy are distinguished by grace from the vessels of wrath That Gods election would be for workes foreseene and not for his good pleasure That the doctrine of the Fathers and of the African and French Councels against the Pelagians hath alwayes published that God maketh vs to will which is to say that hee maketh vs consent Therefore giuing consent to vs it ought to bee attributed to the diuine power or else he that is saued would no more be obliged to God then he that is damned if God should vse them both alike But notwithstanding all these reasons the contrary opinion had the generall applause though many confessed that the reasons of Catanea were not resolued and were displeased that Soto did not speake freely but said that the will consenteth in a certaine maner so that it may in a certaine maner resist as though there were a certaine maner of meane betweene this affirmation and negation The free speech of Catanea and the other Dominicans did trouble them also who knew not how to distinguish that opinion which attributeth iustification to consent from the Pelagian and therefore they wished them to take heede of leaping beyond the marke by a too great desire to condemne Luther that obiection beeing esteemed aboue all that by this meanes the diuine election or predestination would bee for workes foreseene which no Diuine did admit This drew them to speake also of Predestination Therefore it was determined by reason of the connexion to draw Articles Articles concerning Predestination drawen out of the writings of the Zuinglians in this subiect also from the doctrine of the Protestants In the bookes of Luther in the Augustan confession and in the Apologies and Colloquies there was nothing found that deserued censure but much in the writings of the Zuinglians whence these following Articles were drawen 1. For Predestination and reprobation that man doth nothing but all is in the will of GOD. 2. The Predestinated cannot be condemned nor the Reprobate saued 3. The elect and predestinated onely are truly iustified 4. The iustified are bound by faith to beleeue they are in the number of the Predestinated 5. The iustified cannot fall from grace 6. Those that are called and are not in the number of the Predestinated doe neuer recelue grace 7. The iustified is bound to beleeue by faith that hee ought to perseuere in iustice vntill the end 8. The iustified is bound to beleeue for certaine that in case he fall from grace he shall receiue it againe In examining the first of these Articles the opinions were diuers The The discussion of the Articles most esteemed Diuines amongst them thought it to be Catholique and the contrary hereticall because the good Schoole Writers Saint Thomas Scotus and the rest do so thinke that is that GOD before the creation out of the masse of mankind hath elected by his onely and meere mercy some for glory for whom he hath prepared effectually the meanes to obtaine it which is called to predestinate That their number is certaine and determined neither can there be any added The others not predestinated cannot complaine for that GOD hath prepared for them sufficient assistance for this though indeed none but the elect shall be saued For the most principall reason they alleadged that Saint Paul to the Romans hauing made Iacob a paterne of the predestinated and Esau of the Reprobate he produceth the decree of GOD pronounced before they were borne not for their workes but for his owne good pleasure To this they ioyned the example of the same Apostle that as the Potter of the same lumpe of clay maketh one vessell to honour another to dishonour so GOD of the same masse of men chuseth and leaueth whom he listeth For proofe whereof S. Paul bringeth the place where GOD saith to Moses I will shew mercy on whom I will shew mercy and I will shew pitty on whom I will shew pitie And the same Apostle concludeth that it is not of him that willeth or of him that runneth but of God who sheweth mercy adding after that God sheweth mercy on whom hee will and hardeneth whom he will They sayd further that for this cause the counsell of the diuine predestination and reprobation is called by the same Apostle the height and depth of wisedome vnsearchable and incomprehensible They added
perseuere without the speciall assistance of GOD or cannot with it 23. That the iust cannot sinne or can auoyde all veniall sinnes without a speciall priuiledge as the Church holdeth of the Virgin 24. That iustice is not preserued and increased by good workes but that they are fruits onely or signes 25. That the iust sinneth mortally or venially in euery worke 26. That the iust ought not to expect a reward for his good workes 27 That there is no mortall sinne but infidelity 28 That grace being lost faith is lost also or that the faith remayning is not true nor of a Christian 29 That man sinning after baptisme cannot be lifted vp by the grace of God or may recouer it by faith onely without the Sacrament of penanace 30. That euery fault and punishment is wholly remitted to euery penitent man there remaning no temporall punishment to bee indured in this life or in Purgatorie 31. That the iust sinneth if hee doe good onely in hope of an eternall reward 32. That the good workes of the iust are the gifts of God and are not withall the merits of the iustified 33. That this doctrine is derogatory to the glory of God and merits of CHRIST or that their glory is not made more illustrious by it When I had made this short narration of the Decree I began to thinke it superfluous seeing all the decrees of that Councel are printed in one volume The authors reason why he rehearseth the decrees though they be printed in a volume apart and in euery mans hands and that in the composition of the Actes that follow I might referre my selfe to that booke and I was about to teare this leafe But considering that some might desire to reade the whole continuation in one booke only and that if any thought it better to see the originall hee might omit this mine abbreuiation I resolued not to change but to obserue the same stile in the matters following and the rather because I am grieued when in Zenophon and Tacitus I see the narration of things most knowen to their times omitted which remaineth vnknowen to mee because there is no meanes to know it againe and I hold it for a maxime that one ought neuer to referre himselfe to another Therefore I come to the summe of the Decree of reformation Which did containe in substance 1. That the Synod being willing to The Decree of reformation amend the depraued manners of the Clergie and people thought fit to begin with the gouernours of the greater Churches Therefore trusting in God and his Vicar on earth that that charge shall be giuen to worthy men exercised from their youth in Ecclesiasticall discipline it doth admonish them to performe their duety which cannot bee executed without residing in the place where it is to bee done Yet many leauing the flocke and care of the lambes wander in Courts and apply themselues to secular businesse Therefore the Synod doth reuiue all the ancient Canons against non-residents and doth constitute besides that euery gouernour of a Cathedrall Church of what title or preeminencie soeuer who shall remaine sixe moneths together out of his Diocesse without a iust and reasonable cause shall lose the fourth part of the reuenues and if he perseuere sixe moneths more shall lose another fourth part and the contumacie increasing the Metropolitane vpon paine of not entring into the Church for three moneths shall delate him to the Pope who by his supreame authoritie may inflict greater punishment or prouide the Church of a more profitable Pastor And if the Metropolitan shall likewise offend the most ancient Suffragan shall bee bound to denounce him 2. But others inferiours to Bishops tyed to residence either by law or custome shall be compelled thereunto by the Bishops abrogating euery priuiledge which giueth a perpetuall exemption from residing But dispensations granted for a time for a reasonable cause true and prooued before the Ordinary shall remaine in force and the Bishop as Delegate of the Apostolike Sea shall take care that a sufficient Vicar bee prouided for the charge of soules with a conuenient portion of the reuenues notwithstanding any priuiledge or exemption 3. Beside that no Clerke by personall priuiledge or regular dwelling out of the Monasterie by priuiledge of his order shall bee exempt from beeing punished if hee offend or visited or corrected by his Ordinary 4. Likewise that Chapters of Cathedrall and other Collegiate Churches shall not by vertue of exemption customes oathes and agreements bee freed from the visitation of their Bishops and greater Prelates when there shall be neede 5. In fine it did ordaine that no Bishop might exercise Pontificall actes in the diocesse of another by pretence of priuiledge without his leaue and The next Session to bee held the third of March. onely ouer his subiects And the day of the next Session was appointed the third of March. In Rome the Decree of faith ministred no matter of discourse in regard it was not new as well because it had beene seene and examined publikely as hath beene sayd as because all men knew that the Germane opinions were to bee condemned But the Court Bishops who had beene afraid a long time of the Article of residencie which was handled did rest content assuring themselues that the Decree of the Councell could worke no greater effect then the Popes Decretals had done before But the inferiour The inferiour Courtiers are discontented with the reformation Courtiers were discontented seeing the Bishop had power to compell them They lamented their owne misery who were to serue all their life to gaine their liuing and after so much paines taken for a reward must be confined in a village or by a base Canonry subiected to a greater slauery in obeying the Bishops who will not onely keepe them as it were tied to a stake but with visitations and pretence of corrections will bring them to a miserable subiection or hold them in perpetuall vexations and charge But elsewhere and especially in Germanie when the Decrees were seene The Decrees are censured in Germany that of faith was more spoken of which must bee read ouer and againe with much attention and speculation because it could not bee vnderstood without a perfect knowledge of the inward motion of the mind and without knowing in whom it is actiue in whom passiue things most subtile and for the diuers appearance they make euer accounted disputable all the doctrine of the Councel turning vpon this hinge whether the first obiect of the will worke vpon the will or the will vpon the obiect or whether they bee both actiue and passiue Some pleasant wits said that if the Astrologers not knowing the true causes of the celestiall motions to salue the appearances haue inuented Eccentriques and Epicicles it was no wonder if the Councell desiring to salue the appearances of the super-celestiall motions did fall into excentricitie of opinions The Grammarians did not cease to admire and scoffe
beene all instituted by CHRIST or that they are more or lesse then seuen or that any of them is not truely and properly a Sacrament 2. And that they differ not from those of the old Law but in the ceremonies and rites 3. And that none of them is in no respect more worthy then another 4. That they are not necessary to saluation and that the grace of God may bee gained by faith alone without them or without any purpose to receiue them 5. That they are ordained onely to nourish faith 6. That they doe not conteine in them the grace signified or doe not giue it to him that doth not resist but are externall signes of iustice and Characters of a Christian profession to discerne the faithfull from Infidels 7. That grace is not alwayes giuen by the Sacraments nor vnto all for as much as belongeth to God though they bee lawfully receiued 8. That by Sacraments Grace is not giuen in vertue of the administration of them called Opus operatum but that it sufficeth onely to beleeue the promise 9. That in Baptisme Confirmation and Order no indeleble Character is imprinted in the soule for which cause they can bee receiued but once 10. That all Christians haue power to administer the Word and all the Sacraments 11. That in ministring the Sacraments the ministers intention at the least to doe what the Church doth is not necessarie 12. That the minister who is in mortall sinne giueth not the true Sacrament though he obserue all things necessary 13. That the vsuall rites approued by the Church may be despised or omitted or changed for others by euery Pastour Of Baptisme there were fourteene Anathematismes 1. Against him The Canons of Baptisme that saith the baptisme of Iohn had the same vertue with that of Christ 2. That true and naturall water is not necessarie to baptisme 3. That in the Church of Rome which is the Mother and Mistris of all the Churches there is not to bee found the true doctrine of baptisme 4. That Baptisme giuen by heretiques in the name of the Father Sonne and holy Ghost with intention to doe what the Church doeth is not true baptisme 5. That the baptisme is free that is not necessary to saluation 6. That the baptized cannot loose Grace though he sinne so that he leaue not to beleeue 7. That the baptized are bound onely to beleeue and not to obserue the Law of CHRIST 8. That they are not bound to obserue the Lawes of the Church 9. That by the memory of baptisme all vowes made afterwards are of no force but derogate from faith and baptismall profession 10. That sinnes committed after baptisme by faith and memory thereof are remitted or made veniall 11. That baptisme is to be renewed in him who hath denied the faith 12. That none should bee baptized but in the age of CHRIST or at the time of death 13 Against him who putteth not children baptized in the number of the faithfull or saith they must be rebaptized at the yeeres of discretion or that it is better to omit their baptisme vntill then 14. That children baptized when they come to age ought to be required to ratifie the promise made in their name and to bee left to their will if they refuse not compelling them to Christian life but by denying them other Sacraments Of Confirmation there were three Canons 1. Against him that saith it is an The Canons of Confirmation idle ceremony not a Sacrament properly or that it was formerly vsed that children might giue a publike account of their faith 2. That to giue vertue to the Chrisme is to wrong the holy Spirit 3. That euery simple Priest is the ordinary minister of Confirmation and not the Bishop onely After this the decree of reformation was read which in the Actes bare The decree of Reformation this title A Canon concerning residencie And it contained in substance 1. That no Bishop be created but of lawfull matrimonie of ripe yeeres learned and of good behauiour 2. That none may haue or keepe more Bishoprickes then one in Title Commenda or any other way and whosoeuer hath now more then one shall choose one and quit the rest within sixe moneths if they be of the Popes free collation or else within a yeere otherwise all shal be accounted void but the last 3. That other benefices especially with Cure be giuen to worthy persons able to take charge of soules otherwise the ordinary Patron is to be punished 4. That hereafter whosoeuer shal receiue many incompatible Benefices by way of Vnion for life perpetuall Commenda or otherwise or shall keepe those that he hath receiued against the Canons shall bee depriued of all 5. That the dispensations of those who haue many Benefices with Cure or incompatible shall bee shewed to the Ordinaries making prouision afterwards for the cure of soules and other obligations 6. That perpetuall Vnions made within forty yeeres shall be reviewed by the Ordinaries as delegates and those that are vniust shall be nullified and those that haue not beene in possession or shall be made hereafter shall be presumed to be surreptitious if they be not made for reasonable causes and with citation of all that be interested and nothing to the contrary of this shall be declared by the Apostolique Sea 7. That Benefices with cure vnited shall bee visited by the Ordinaries euery yeere and shall haue Vicars a signed perpetuall or temporall with such a portion of the fruits as to them shall seeme meete without respect of Appeales or Exemptions 8. That the Ordinaries shall euery yeere by the Apostolique authority visit the Churches exempted prouiding for the care of soules and other dueties without respect of Appeale Priuiledges or Customes prescribed 9. That Bishops shall be consecrated within the time set downe by the Law and all prolongations for more then sixe moneths shall bee voyd 10. That the Chapters of Churches in vacancie of the Bishopricke shall not grant Dimisories for Orders but to him that is obliged to take them because of a Benefice 11. That licences to bee promoted by any Bishop shall bee voyd if a lawfull cause be not expressed for which they may not bee promoted by their owne Bishop and in that case they shall bee promoted by a Bishop that resideth in his Diocesse 12. That Faculties not to receiue due Orders shall not serue for longer time then a yeere but in cases expressed in the law 13. That men presented to Benefices by any Ecclesiasticall person whatsoeuer shall not be instituted before examination made by the Ordinaries except those who are presented by Vniuersities Colledges and generall Studies 14. That in the causes of the exempted a certaine forme shall be obserued and where the question is of reward or concerning those who sue in forma pauperis the Exempted also who haue a Iudge deputed shall be conuented before the Ordinarie but those who haue no Iudge deputed shal bee conuented in all causes
King did oppose by his Ambassadour Marleus M 〈…〉 assisted by Vergerius who knowing the searets and ends of the Romanes told Vergerius discouereth the secret ends of the Romanists to the Suisses and Grisons him how hee should perswade that nation and wrote also a Booke in this subiect so that in the Diet of Bada which then was helde not onely the Euangelicall but the Catholique Suisses also were perswaded not to send any and the Crisons entring into suspicion vpon the aduertisements of Vergerius that the Pope did plotte something to their preiudice did recall Thomas Planta Bishop of Coira who was already in the Councell In Trent the Congregations of the Diuines were diligently hastened who though they spake according to the order of the twelue Articles yet all the matter of Penance was handled not as the Schoole-men only but also as the Canonists doe handle it following Gratian who maketh a question thereof diuided for the length of it into sixe distinctions and the manner prescribed by the Presidents to deduce and prooue the conclusions from the The manner of discussing the points of doctrine is censured fiue places aforesaid caused not prolixity superfluity and vnprofitable and vaine questions to bee auoided but gaue occasion of greater abuses For when they spake Scholastically they kept themselues within the matter at the least and the discourse was all serious and seuere But in this new maner which they call positiue an Italian word drawne from plaine apparell without superfluous ornaments they ranne into fooleries For alleadging the Diuine Scripture they brought all the places of the Prophets and Psalmes especially where the word Confiteor and its verball Confessia are found which doth signifie in the Hebrew prayse or rather religious profession and haled them to the Sacrament of Confession and which was lesse to the purpose figures were drawen from the Olde Testament to shew that it was prefigured without any regard whether it might bee applied to it with similitude and hee was held most learned who brought most of them All the rites signifying humility griefe and repentance vsed by those who confessed were boldy called Apostolicall Traditions Innumerable miracles were related ancient and moderne concerning things which sueceeded well to those who were deuoted to Confession and ill to those who were negligent and despisers of it All the authorities alleadged by Gratian were often recited but various and diuers sences giuen them according to the matter and others also were added And hee that should haue heard those Doctours speake could not but conclude that the Apostles and ancient Bishops did neuer any thing but kneele at Confession or sit to confesse others In summe that to which all did come and which was most to the purpose was the Councell of Florence Among the memorials there doth nothing appeare worthy of particular mention except that which is to be spoken of when the substance of the doctrine must be recited But thus much was necessary to be deliuered Out of these sheaues of diuers sorts of corne caried into the barne it is no maruell if a mingled grist were threshed The points of doctrine by reason of the mixture did absolutly please but few neither was it obserued in this subiect as in others not to condemne any opinion of the Catholikes but where the opinions of the diuines were various to make the expression with such a temper that al parties might be satisfied Which causeth me not to obserue my former order but first to expound the substance of the Decree as it was established to be read in the Session and then to adde that which the same persons of the Councell did not approue The Decree was this That although in handling Iustification much The Decree concerning Penance was spoken of the Sacrament of Penance yet to roote out diuers heresies of this age it was fitte to illustrate the Catholike trueth which the holy Synode doth propose to bee perpetually obserued by all Christians adding that Penance was alwayes necessary in euery age of the world and after CHRIST to those also who were to be baptized which Penance is not a Sacrament There is another instituted by CHRIST when breathing vpon his Disciples he gaue them the holy Ghost to remitte and retaine sinnes that is to reconcile the faithfull fallen into sinne after Baptisme For so the Church hath alwayes vnderstood it and the holy Synode doeth approoue this sense of the wordes of our Lord condemning those who vnderstand them of the power to preach the Gospell And this Sacrament differeth from Baptisme not onely in the matter and forme but also because the minister of Baptisme is not iudge whereas after Baptisme the sinner doth present himselfe before the tribunall of the Priest as guilty to bee set at libertie by his Sentence And by Baptisme a full remission of sinnes is receiued which is not receiued by Penance without sighes and paines And this Sacrament is an necessary for sinners after Baptisme as Baptisme it selfe is to him that hath not receiued it But the forme thereof consisteth in these words of the minister I doe absolue thee vnto which other prayers are laudably added though they bee not necessary And Contrition Confession and Satisfaction are as it were the matter of the Sacrament which are therefore called parts of Penance The thing signified and the effect of the Sacrament is reconciliation with God whence peace and clearenesse of conscience do sometimes arise And therfore the Synod doth condemne those who make horror of conscience and faith to be parts of Penance Contrition is griefe of minde for sinne committed with purpose to sinne no more and was euer necessary in all times but in sinners after Baptisme it is a preparation to remission of sinnes being ioyned with a purpose to doe whatsoeuer else is required for the lawfull receiuing of this Sacrament And it is not onely a ceasing from sinne or a purposing and a beginning of a new life but also an hate of the life past And though Contrition be sometimes ioyned with charity and reconcileth a man to GOD before the receiuing of the Sacrament yet this vertue cannot bee ascribed to it without purpose to receiue the said Sacrament of Penance But the action which ariseth either by reason of the filthinesse of sinne or of the feare of punishment with hope of pardon is not hypocrisie but the gift of GOD by which the penitent beeing assisted doeth goe on to receiue Iustice which although it cannot bring vs to iustification without the Sacrament yet it doeth dispose vs to obtaine grace from GOD in the Sacrament of Penance By this the Church hath euer vnderstood that CHRIST hath instituted the entire confession of sinnes as necessary by the Law of GOD to those that fall after Baptisme For hauing instituted the Priests his Vicars for Iudges of all mortall sinnes it is certaine that they cannot exercise this iudgement without knowledge of the cause nor obserue equitie in imposing
had been granted by the Councell of Basill and by Paul the third whose ministers had they been more couragious and not retired from that dispensation for small terrors because some impertinent Friars preached against them would haue done more good that hee was much offended with the reason alleadged by some that as no man could be receiued with condition that fornication should bee permitted vnto him no more can these people who would be reconciled so that they may haue the vse of the Cup. For the first condition is absolutely bad and this onely as it is prohibited Hee answered the Bishop of Sogorne that the Emperour did not contend with any Prince nor sought preiudices against others and desired the Cup for his people by Grace and not by way of Iustice But vpon those who sayd the care hereof ought not to bee committed to the Ordinaries but that Delegates were to bee sent from the Apostolique Sea hee iested somewhat sharpely asking whether hee that had the charge of their soules and all the Spirituall gouernement might not bee trusted with a thing indifferent or whether they thought that this thing did exceed the Episcopall gouernement He said that to referre it to the Pope was to giue him new and continuall molestations To Philadelphia hee answered that the Catholiques would not onely not be troubled but consolated because they might liue vnited with those with whom they are now much troubled To them who would haue Proctors sent expresly he said it was no maruell that none came to demand this Grace because the Emperour had vndertaken to demand it for them who could make an infinite number of them to come if the Fathers would But as the Councell was carefull not to make the Safe conduct too large that so many Protestants might not come as to put them in fear so they ought to haue the same respect herein because more would come to obtaine this grant His conclusion was that they would haue compassion on their Churches and hold an esteeme of the demand of so great a Prince who out of his desire of the vnion of the Church doeth neuer speake of this businesse without teares In the ende he shewed griefe for the passion of many Prelats who for a vaine feare of seeing a change in their owne Countreys were content with the losse of others In particular he complained of the Bishop of Rieti who held the Emperour for a Prince ignorant in gouernement not knowing what was good for his States which hee sayd his most Reuerend Lordship accustomed to serue at the Cardinals tables in Rome could not teach him Finally hee sayd that many other things did remaine to bee answered which were spoken as to challenge him to a Duell but hee thought it better to beare them and passe them ouer with patience Hee repeated that which hee had sayd before that is that if the Cup were not graunted it had beene better that the Councell had neuer beene called which hee expounded thus that much people remained in obedience to the Pope hoping that this Grace would in the Councell bee graunted vnto them who would wholly aliene themselues when they saw they were defrauded Andreas di Cuesta Bishop of Lion in Spaine sayd that the good intention of the Emperour and Duke of Bauaria could not be doubted of nor disputed whether the Councell might giue such a permission but that it was onely to bee considered what was expedient His opinion was that the ancient Fathers and continuall vse of the Church neuer to yeeld to the petitions of the heretikes was to bee imitated It appeared by the practise of the Nicen Councell that howsoeuer the world went topsie turuie they would neuer graunt any thing vnto them and the Doctours abstained from words vsed by the heretikes though they had a good sence that they would neuer haue been pleased with this grant that the Catholikes would take it ill that for an vncertaine hope of reducing a few heretikes many Catholikes would be lost that because the Bishops of Germanie did not make the demand it was a great argument that it proceeded not from deuotion comming from a people who giue no signe of any spiritualitie that he could not vnderstand how they were penitent and would returne to the Church beleeuing it was gouerned by the holy Ghost and yet be obstinate not to doe it without this fauour that this obstinacie sheweth that they haue not the formall reason of faith that if the Councell of Basil did formerly grant this to the Bohemians it was because they did absolutely referre themselues to the Church which afterwards in kindnesse did graunt it that it ought not to be called a true remedie which is not necessarie by the nature of the thing but by the malice of men that the Synode ought not to nourish nor cherish them that the example of CHRIST in seeking the wandring sheepe is sufficiently imitated when they are called inuited and prayed that if this fauour must bee graunted it were better to bee done by the Pope who may reuoke it if the conditions bee not performed that the Councell granting it if the Pope would afterwards recall it they will pretend he cannot doe it and that his authority is not aboue the Councel that the heretikes doe euer proceede with falshoods and deceits Antonius Coronicius Bishop of Almeria said that hee was confirmed in the negatiue by the reason vsed by the defenders of the affirmatine that howsoeuer God giueth many helpes to the impenitent as preaching miracles and good inspirations yet hee giueth the Sacraments to the penitent onely that if they would bee mooued with charitie they should bee more carefull to preserue the Catholikes then reduce the heretikes that the Councell of Constance ought to bee imitated which to maintaine the good children of the Church prohibited the Communion of the Chalice taught by Iohn Husse that now they ought so to deale with the Lutherans that this grant would open a gate to infinite mischiefes that they would demaund marriage of Priests abrogation of images of fasts and of other godly constitutions alwayes proposing their demands as the onely and necessary remedies to vnite them to the Church that euery little change of the Law doeth breede great dammage especially if it bee made in fauour of heretikes that hee would not giue counsell that the Pope should doe it though hee might doe it better that the people would bee lesse offended then if the graunt were made by the Councell howsoeuer it ought to bee confessed that the supreame authoritie is in the Pope that in case he should graunt it it ought not to bee committed to the Bishops though knowen to bee worthy for some time because they may become bad of a peruerse faith moued by their priuate interests Franciscus di Gado Bishop of Lugo in Spaine made a long exhortation to the Fathers that to auoyde difficulties or to giue satisfaction to Prince or people they would not derogate