Selected quad for the lemma: justice_n
Text snippets containing the quad
|
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
|
A41808
|
Considerations upon the second canon in the book entituled Constitutions and canons ecclesiastical, &c.
|
Grascome, Samuel, 1641-1708?
|
1693
(1693)
|
Wing G1569; ESTC R11703
|
35,734
|
45
|
whole Croud of all his Brethrens Arguments and thereby to their great grief bereaved them of all their Topicks wherewith they were used to blaspheme God in the Pulpits on their Mock-Thanksgiving-Days Nor doth his Performance seem any way displeasing even to the Government it self For though his Book was presented openly at the Parliament-Door yet it not only stands uncensured but is thought to have been the great occasion that the Salisbury Dictator's Book was doom'd to be burnt by the hands of the common Hangman But to make some amends for this triumphant Squander he hath set up a Plea of his own and indeed to do him justice he hath bid the fairest to set the present Government upon somâ— bottom if it could be possibly set on any For if he could make it appear that the late Proceedings were warranted by our Constitutions he would speak more to the purpose than all that hath been said hitherto but I doubt not but to make it appear that our Constitutions utterly overthrow his Plea Now this knocking Argument which will suffer nothing to stand before it is only Abdication still but then it is indeed a Passive Abdication wherein the Person abdicated is a Sufferer and is abdicated not by his own â—ct but by another who hath a certain Right in him and Superiority over him as a Father is said abdicare Filium He seems inclinable rather to call it Abrogation than Abdication a Word which seems harsh with respect to Persons though proper as to Laws and yet in the Verb is sometimes used in that Sense by later Historians but abdicare properly respects Persons However to his purpose he tells us That the People of England did actually abrogate or dethrone King James the Second for Misgovernment and promoted the Prince of Orange in his stead By the People I suppose he means not the dissusive Body but their Representatives for as the former seems impracticable so it is evident that the Feat was done by what they called a Convention and afterwards ratified by what they call a Parliament But herein he and his Masters cannot agree sor they put it upon an Active Abdication which Julian seems by no means willing to allow For they say expresly That King James abdicated the Government and that thereby the Throne became vacant So that all they pretend to is to supply a Vacancy whether there can be any such thing by our Constitutions in our Government I do not here dispute and provide a Remedy against a grand defect when there was no King in Israel and in that very place where he cites the Word abdicate in Tully it is taken in an Active Sense For after they had driven away their Kings the highest share of the Regal Power was conferred on the Consuls and when Mark Anthony offered a Crown to Caesar if he did not expresly yet he effectually renounced his Consulship For had Caesar accepted it he could no longer have been the Consul of a popular State but must thenceforth have acted by Authority srom Caesar or not at all So that this would have been no Forseiture but a real giving up his Power But contrary herâ—to Mr Johnson sairly makes King James tenacious enough of his Authority and tells us that the People abrogated and dethroned him a Power which the Convention knew not of nor did so much as pretend to they had done wisely if they had consulted this Learned Man to understand their own Power before they had gone about their work For though he contradicts them yet he makes them much greater than they were aware of and hath not only set the Subjects above the Sovereign but hath advanced the House of Commons into the place of the Almighty God of Heaven giving them Power to pull down and set up Kings as they shall 〈…〉 and convenient But I hope we are not so bound to follow Mr. Johnson with an 〈◊〉 Faith but that we may examine upon what Grounds he hath given Subjects such a Paramount Authority over their Sovereign And for this he urges in the first place a Message to King Richard the Second then at Elâ—ham wherein his Parliament averrs that in the case there mentioned it is lawful for them ipsum Regem de regali solio abrogare propinquiorem aliquem de stirpe regia loco ejus in Regni solio sublimare And for this Power in the same Message they plead only an unknown Statute and the infamous Precedent and Larbarous usage of Edward the Second Had not Discontent and Anger blinded them they would have been ashamed of their Precedent and for their Statute neither they nor any other have transmitted it to us So that it seems they durst not trust any with the examination of it But if he please to make amends for that Defect I will recommend to Mr. Johnson's second Thoughts a known Statute in the Reign of the same King Richard the Second wherein it is judged High-Treason for any Person to compass the King's Death to dâ—pose him or make War against him within the Realm or to render up his Homage 21 Ric. 2. Where we shall find his Statute I know not but this is to be found in our Statute Book and in the same King's Reign against whom he sets up a contrary Plea If no Subject can render up his Homage which by the way I take to be much the same with Dr. Burnet's transferring his Allegiance wherein of late he hath had too many Followers nor raise War against his Prince nor depose him without being condemned by the Law for a Traitor I would fain know how he will reconcile his unknown Statute to this known one We are hard put to our Shifts when we are forced to run eight hundred Years backwards for a piece of a Sentence that may seem to look favourably on our Cause And what good at last will King Alfred's Stile do him Dei Gratia Benevolemia West-Saxonicae Gentis I confess he has a hard Task and bad Game to play who through the Artifices of designing Knaves labours under the ill Opinion and hard Thoughts of his Subjects and it was a singular Happiness to King Alfred that he had the Good Will and the very Hearts of his People But though King Alfred for his Piety Justice and Bravery might stand for an eternal Pattern to all Kings that come after him yet no Person that ever sat on the Saxon or English Throne ever acted with a freer or fuller Power than he did as will plainly appear to any that read his History Nor indeed was it possible for him to have done those great Things which he did had he been shackled with those Fetters which our Demigogues endeavour now to hang upon Kings with pretence indeed to curb their Extravagancies and restrain their exorbitant Power but with a real design to drive out all Kings and introduce a Democracy nick-named a Common-wealth the most unquiet troublesome and most arbitrary and tyrannical of all Governments