Son Lay him low and humble abase his soul for his sins and all his unworthinesses before thee Men cannot speak evil enough of our sins In this perswasion this abasement and humiliation thy Servant desires to die And dear Lord thou seest knowst all things and art able to witness to the truth integrity of thy Servant When his blood is shed upon the Block let it have a voice afterward that may speak his Innocency and strengthen the Faith of thy Servants in the Truth Let it also serve for conviction to the worst of thy Enemies that they may say Surely the Lord knows and the Lord owns his Servant as one that belongs to him The desire of our soul is to hasten to thee O God to be dissolved that we may be with Christ Blessed be thy Name that this great strait that we were before in is now determined that there is no longer abode for me in this mortal body Our great Captain the great General of our souls did go in a way of affliction before us to Heaven Come Lord declare thy Will that thy poor Servant may manifest a readiness to come to Thee Prepare his heart that in his access to Thee may he be brought down at thy feet in shame confusion for all the evil is so of hul but Thou art his salvation Let thy Servant speak something on the behalf of the Nation wherein he hath lived Lord did we not exceed other Nations in our day Great things have been done by thee in the midst of us Oh that thou wouldst look down in pity compassion and pardon the sins of this whole Nation and lay them not to their charge shew them what is thy good and acceptable Will and bring them into subjection thereunto We humbly pray thee O Lord look down with compassion upon this great populous City cleanse away the impurity sinfulness and defilements thereof cause their souls to delight in thy Word that they may live Let a spirit of Reformation and Purity spring up in and amongst them with power make them willing to lay down all that is dear to them for thee that Thou mayst give them a Crown of Life that they may always desire chuse affliction and to be exposed to the worst condition hardest circumstances that can be brought upon them in this world rather than sin against him that hath loved them and bought them with a price that they might live to him in their bodies and in their spirits We are assured Thou knowest our suffering case and condition how it is with us We desire to give no just occasion of offence nor to provoke any but in meekness to forgive our Enemies Thy Servant that is now falling asleep doth heartily desire of thee that thou wouldest forgive them and not lay this sin to their charge Before the stroke he spake to this effect I bless the Lord who hath accounted me worthy to suffer for his Name Blessed be the Lord that I have kept a conscience void of offence to this day I bless the Lord I have not disserted the Righteous Cause for which I suffer But his very last words of all at the Block were as followeth Father glorifie thy Servant in the sight of men that he may glorifie thee in the discharge of his Duty to Thee and to his Country It was observed that no signs of inward fear appeared by any trembling or shaking of his hands or any other parts of his body all along on the Scaffold Yea an ancient Traveller and curious observer of the demeanor of persons in such publick Executions did narrowly eye his Countenance to the last breath and his Head immediatly after the separation he observed that his Countenance did not in the least change and whereas the Heads of all he had before seen did some way or other move after severing which argued some reluctancy and unwillingness to that parting-blow the Head of this Sufferer lay perfectly still immediately upon the separation on which he said to this purpose That his Death was by the free consent and act of his mind which Animadversion notably accords with what the Sufferer himself had before expressed in differencing a death by rational choice from that by sickness which is with constraint upon the body He desired to be dissolved to be with Christ The Names of the Grand Jury in the Case of Sir Henry Vane SIr John Cropley of Clarkenwel London Knight and Baronet Thomas Taylor of St. Martins in the Fields London Esq Francis Swift of St. Gyles in the Fields Esq. Jonas Morley of Hammersmith Gent. George Cooper of Covent Garden Gent. Thomas Constable of Covent Garden Gent. Edward Burrows of East-Smithfield Gent. Michael Dibbs of the same Gent. Edward Gregory of St. Gyles in the Fields Gent. Richard Freeman of Istington Gent. Thomas Pitcock of the same Gent. Richard Towers of Clarkenwel Gent. Robert Vauce of Paddington Gent. Thomas Benning of Wilsdon Gent. Francis Child of Acton Gent. Isaac Cotton of Bow Gent. Peter Towers of Mile-end Gent. Thomas Vffman of Hammersmith Gent. Matthew Child of Kensington Gent. Bryan Bonnaby of Westminster Gent. George Rouse of St. Gyles in the Fields Gent. Twenty one in all The Names of the Petty Jury Sir William Roberts Sir Christopher Abdy John Leech Daniel Cole John Stone Daniel Brown Henry Carter Thomas Chelsam Thomas Pitts Thomas Upman Andrew Brent William Smith Judges of the King 's Bench. Chief Justice Foster Justice Mallet Justice Twisden Justice Windham The Kings Counsel against the Prisoner no Counsel being permited to speake one word in his behalf to the matter or form of the Indictment or any thing else Sir Geoffry Palmer the King's Attorney General Sir Henneage Fynch the King's Sollicitor General Sir John Glyn. Sir John Maynard Sir William Wild. Serjeant Keeling Witnesses against Sir Henry Vane Marsh a Papist 't is said who witnessed what was accounted most dangerous against the Prisoner as to change of Government William Dobbins Mathew Lock Thomas Pury Thomas Wallis John Coot The Peoples Cause Stated HE in whom is the Right of Soveraign and to give Law is either so of himself or in the Right of another that may derive the same unto him which shews that there are two sorts of Soveraings A Soveraign in the first sense none is nor can be but God who is of himself most absolute And he that is first of all others in the second sence is the Man Christ Jesus to whom the Power of Soveraign in the Right of the Father is committed over all the Works of Gods hands Christ exercised the same in the capacity of David's Root from before the beginning of the World He owne himself thus to be long before he became David's Seed This his being in Spirit or hidden being even as a Creature the first of all Creatures in personal Union with the Word David saw and acknowledged Psal 110. 1. Thus Christ may be called God's Lieutenant
to have dissolv'd all the bands of service and confidence between his Majesty and his Parliament of whom the Law sayes a dishonourable thing ought not to be imagined This Conclusion then is a clear Result from what hath been argued That in all Cases of such difficulty and unusualness happening by the over-ruling Providence of God as render it impossible for the Subject to know his duty by any known Law or certain Rule extant his relying then upon the Judgment and Reason of the whole Realm declared by their Representative Body in Parliament then sitting and adhering thereto and pursuing thereof though the same afterwards be by succeeding Parliaments judged erroneous factious and unjust is most agreeable to right Reason and good Conscience and in so doing all persons are to be free and secure from all Account and Penalties not only upon the ground and equity of that Statute 11 Hen. 7. but according to all Rules of Justice natural or moral The day of Arraignment being Monday June 2. 1662. Reader The best account thou canst yet be furnished with as to this dayes proceedings in Court is as followeth SIR Henry Vane was the last Term indicted of High Treason before the Middlesex Grand Jury and the Bill being found by them he was upon Monday the second of June this Term arraigned to this effect That you as a false Traitor against his most excellent Majesty King Charles the second your supream and natural Lord not having the fear of God before your eyes and withdrawing that your duty and allegiance which a true Subject ought to have and bear to our said Leige and sovereign Lord thirteenth of May in the eleventh year of our said sovereign Lord the King at the Parish of St. Martins in the fields in the Country of Middlesex did compass and imagine the Death of our said sovereign Lord the King and the ancient frame of Government of this Realm totally to subvert and keep out our said sovereign Lord from the exercise of his Regal Government and the same the better to effect the said Sir Henry Vane the said thirteenth day of May in the said eleventh your c. at St. Martins aforesaid together with other false Traitors to the Jurors unknown did traiterously and maliciously assemble and sit together and then and there consulted to bring the King unto destruction and to hold him out from the exercise of his Regal Authority and then and there usurped the Government and appointed Officers to wit Colonels and Captains of a certain Army raised against the King against the Peace of our sovereign Lord the King his Crown and Dignity and contrary to the form of the Statute in that case made and provided And the better to effect this the twentieth of December in the said eleventh year with a multitude to the number of a thousand persons to the Jurors unknown in warlike manner assembled and arrayed with Guns Trumpets Drums c. did levy War against the Peace c. and contrary to the form of a Statute Which being read he prayed to have it read a second time which was granted him He then prayed to have it read in Latine which all the Court denyed and Keeling the King's Serjeant said That though all Pleas and Entries are set down on Record in Latine yet the agitations of Causes in Court ought to be in English The Prisoner moved several Exceptions to the Indictment as that the 25. Ed. 3. is not pursued that he had levied no such force as amounted to a levying of War Also the place in which persons with whom are both uncertain and the particular acts of levying War being not set forth he thought therefore the Indictment was insufficient Also he said here is a long time of Action for which I am charged and I may be concern'd for what I acted as a Member in that sovereign Court of Parliament and if any thing concerns the Jurisdiction of that Court I ought not to be judged here at which the Court and King's Counsel took great offence He said also There hath been an Act of General Pardon since that time whereby all Treasons are put in utter oblivion and though Sir Henry Vane were excepted yet none consent that he was that Sir Henry Vane But the King's Counsel said If he would plead that Plea they would joyn that Issue with him if he pleased which if it should be found against him it would be too late to plead not guilty But the Court said in favour of life a man may plead a double Plea and give in his Exception and plead over to the Felony or Treason not guilty But as to the Exceptions taken to the Indictment they gave little heed to them but pressed him to plead or confess Whereupon he pleaded Not guilty and had four dayes to wit till Friday next for his Tryal From another hand take as followeth The Prisoner did much press for Counsel to be allowed him to advise with about any further Exceptions to the Indictment besides those by him exhibited and to put all into form according to the customary proceedings and language of the Law as also to speak to them at the Bar on his behalf he not being vers'd in the punctilio's of Law-writings and Pleas. He further said That the Indictment which so nearly concern'd his Life being long and his memory short it could not well be imagined that he should upon the bare hearing it read be able in an instant to find out every material Exception against it in form or matter He pleaded a good while on this account but Counsel was finally denied him till he should plead guilty or not guilty unto which being a third time urged he pleaded Not guilty The Court having assured him beforehand that after pleading Counsel should be assigned him which yet never was performed Here followeth a Transcript of the Prisoners own Papers containing certain Memorandums pleadable upon his Arraignment Memorandums for and towards my Defence Upon hearing the Indictment read and before pleading FIrst To lay before the Court the impossibility that he humbly conceives is already in view as to the having any such indifferent and equal Tryal as the Law intends him and doth require and command on the behalf of all the free-People of England The Rise for this Conception he takes from what hath been already done in relation to the Prisoner himself unheard unexamined and yet kept close Prisoner for near two whole years This he shall leave to the Judgment of the Court after he hath made known the particulars thereof unto them as necessary to precede the thing demanded of him in pleading guilty or not guilty Secondly What is the indifferency which the Law requires and appoints throughout as well in matters that go before the Tryal as in the proceedings at the Tryal if it self Before the Tryal and in the first step to it which is the keeping and securing his person Magna Charta is clear and gives this
Rule cap 29. Nullus liber homo capiatur c. No free-man shall be taken or imprisoned or be disseised of his freehold or liberties or free-customs or be outlawed or exiled or any otherwise destroyed Nor we will not passe upon him nor condemn him but by lawful Judgement of his Peers or by the Law of the Land We will sell to no man we will not deny or defer to any man either Justice or Right Out of this Chapter as out of a root saith Sir Edward Cook do many fruitful branches of the Law of England spring It contains nine branches some whereof I shall insist upon in my Case First That no man be taken or imprisoned but per Legem Terrae that is by the Common Law or Custom of England which words per Legem Terrae though put last refer to all the precedent branches Secondly The Goods of any Offender cannot regularly be taken and seized to the King's use before Conviction nor be Inventoried nor the Town charged therewith before the owner be indicted of Record Thirdly No man shall be exiled or banished out of his Country not be in any sort destroyed but by the verdict of his Peers This appears by Bracton and other ancient Writers quoted by Cook in the third part of his Institutes fol. 228. Upon the whole matter saith Cook these two Conclusions are manifestly proved First That before Indictment the Goods or other things of any Offender cannot be searched inventoried or in any sort seized nor after Indictment seized removed or taken away before Conviction or Attainder Secondly That the begging of the Goods or Estate of any Delinquent accused or indicted of any Treason Felony or other offence before he be convicted and attainted is utterly unlawful Stat. Ri. 1. cap. 3. And besides it maketh the prosecution against the Delinquent more precipitant violent and undue than the quiet and equal proceedings of the Law and Justice would permit Or else by some under-hand Agreement stops or hinders the due course of Justice and discourageth both Judge Juror and Witness to do their duty Thirdly The Judges are not to give so much as their Opinion before-hand concerning the Offence whether it prove that Offence in that Case Cook in the chap. of Petty Treason fol. 29. expresly saith And to the end the Tryal may be the more indifferent seeing the safety of the Prisoner consists in the indifferency of the Court the Judges ought not to deliver their Opinions before-hand of any Criminal Case that may come before them judicially And he there cites Humphrey Staffords Case that Arch Traitor in which Hussey Chief Justice besought Hen. 7. not to demand of them their Opinions before-hand And in the 4th of his Institutes in the chap. of the High Court of Parliament fol. 37 he fully shews the evil of asking the Judges Opinions before-hand But instead of this The Judges being assistant in the Lords house when all Acts of Parliament passe and whose Advice is taken in them have as appears by what is declared in the said Acts prejudg'd by their Opinions and the Opinions of the Parliament before-hand the merit of the Cause that now appears to be put upon the Issue in my Tryal Hereby the Judges are rendred ex parte and the indifferency the Law requires impossible to be afforded Nor is this all but by the Rules declared in the Act of Indempnity all are disenabled to plead or make use of the Ordinances Orders and Votes of both or either Houses of Parliament that may have occasion thereof and then by excepting the Prisoner and his fellow out of the said Act and all benefit thereby a door is left open to Arraign bring to Tryal and Sentence the whole Cause from the beginning to the ending in the person of the Prisoner and at the same time deprive him of all means and possibility of Justification and Defence Fourthly It is observable how early hard measure appeared in the way wherein the Prisoner became excepted out of the Act of Indempnity when the Commons his proper Judges declared him in their thoughts not fit to be endangered in the point of Life yet unto the Judgment of the Lords that ought not to judge Commoners unbrought before them by the Commons much less in opposite Judgement to the Commons The Commons were necessitated to yeeld lest otherwise the Act of Indempnity to the whole Nation should stop upon this dispute and essential difference between the two Houses A Competition easily over-ruled although as it proves by the sequel That Act of Indempnity is like to become felo de se or a destroyer of it self if your Lordships shall conceive your selves at liberty notwithstanding that Act not only to bring anew into memory upon the stage the state of all the passed differences from first to last but to try and judge the merit of them in my person and therein call in question the validity of that whole Act and make void the benefit intended by it in case the War undertaken and managed by both or either of the Houses of Parliament be judged unlawful and within the Statute of 25. Ed. 3. For this adjudges all the People of England morally guilty of the evil of a sin and offence against the Law of Nature which once done what ever promised Indempnity be granted for the present the Evil of the Action remaining upon Record not only to the Infamy of the whole People of England but their future danger upon pretence they have forfeited the very Indempnity granted Fifthly The length of time taken to search out matter against the Prisoner and the undue practices and courses to find out Witnesses do further evidence how unlike the Prisoner is to have an equal and indifferent Tryal He doubts not this will appear in his two years close Imprisonement six months whereof was Banishment during which time he was never so much as once examined or had any question put to him whereby he might conjecture wherefore he was committed to Prison any further than was expressed in the Warrants of Commitments Now these were so general that nothing certain or particular could be gathered out of them But upon the received opinion that he was excepted out of the Act of Indempnity and in the sence of both Houses a great Delinquent his Estate was attempted to be inventoried his Rentals demanded his Rents were actually seized in the Tenants hands and they forbidden to pay them His very Courts were prohibited by Officers of great Personages claiming the Grant of the Estate and threatning his Officers from doing their duty By these kind of undue proceedings the Prisoner had not wherewithal to maintain himself in Prison and his Debts to the value of above ten thousand pounds were undischarged either Principal or Interest The hopes of private lucre and profit hereby was such in the Tenants and other persons sought out for far and near to be Witnesses that it is no wonder at last something by way
of Powder Then one Marsh was produced a Witness who proves That Sir Henry Vane proposed the new Model of Government Whitlock being in the Chair in these particulars 1. That the Supream Power delegated by the People to their Trustees ought to be in some Fundamentals not dispensed with 2. That it is destructive to the Peoples Liberties to which by God's blessing they are restored to admit any earthly King or single person to the Legislative or Executive Power over this Nation 3. That the Supream Power delegated is not on trusted to the Peoples Trustees to erect matters of Faith or Worship so as to exercise compulsion therein Tho. Pury proves That he was at the debating of the two last of these Propositions and believes they were proposed to the Chairman Whitlock by Sir Henry Vane but affirms confidently that Sir Hen. Vane gave Reasons to maintain them Tho. Wallis produced proves Sir Henry Vane and Col. Rich in the head of a Company in Winchester Park in Southwark and that the Capt. Leiutenant Linn said to the Souldiers that Sir Henry Vane had given them five pounds to drink that the said Linn sent home a key to his wife to send him four pounds out of his trunk to give the Souldiers John Cook deposeth That he was sent to the Horseshoe-stairs to meet Sir Henry Vane and Col. Rich and that Sir H. Vane delivered five pound to Capt. Linn to reward the Souldiers This was all the Evidence given by the King's Counsel To which Sir Henry Vane was required to make his Defence and to go through with his Case all at once and not to reply again upon the King's Counsel who resolved to have the last word to the Jury Sir HENRY VANE Cook in his Pleas of the Crown fol. 6. saith King is to be understood of a King regnant and in actual possession of the Crown and not of a King when he is onely Rex de jure and out of possession Now an interregnum is confessed by the Indictment All ensigns of Authority and badges of Government were visibly in another name and stile the King 's best friends suing and being sued in another name The Court told him He should first make his Case out in point of Suit and it would be then seasonable to stand upon matter of Law for said they it is a good Rule in facto jus Oritur and enjoyn'd him to call his Witnesses if he had any To which Sir Henry Vane desired Process of Court to summon them and a further time to answer the Charge But it was told him The Jury were to be kept without meat drink fire or candle till their Verdict was delivered in and therefore that could not be granted He then cited the 4th part of Cook 's Institutes concerning the Priviledge of Parliament and that many of these things being transacted there The Court here interrupted him and said If the things charged were done justifie them if not excuse them So he went to give answer to the Fact And as to the first Warrant Jan. 30. 1648 He said that his hand had been oftentimes counterseited and amongst other occasions for two great sums to the value of ten thousand pounds and that he had great reason to believe that this Warrant was forged and produced two Witnesses to prove it Then said Windham Justice It may be your hand may have been forged for receiving of Money but it is not to be conjectured that it should be forged to set Ships to Sea and directed to the Jury to consider of the circumstances Sir H. Vane Neither of the Witnesses ever saw me set my hand to either of these Warrants or Orders nor doth one Witness prove that he ever saw me sit in the Council of State He further said That he absented from the House from Decemb. 3. 1648 till Febr. 7. That he 〈◊〉 â—â—osen a Member of the Council of State without his consent and knowledge and being demanded to take an Oath of Approbation of what had been done to the late King he refused and caused it to be expunged That these Actings in Council if any were were by Authority of Parliament of a Parliament constituted in an extraordinary manner made indissolvable but by Act of Parliament He insisted much on the Preamble of that Act so as that Parliament being co-ordinate with the King for the Government was in the King and the two Houses what-ever he acted by Them or their Authority cannot be Treason within the Statute of 25 Ed. 3. He cited an Ordinance of Parliament in 1642 and said That he hoped these things had been laid asleep by the Act of Oblivion and if they should now rise in Judgment against him he feared they would shake that Security which the People promised themselves under that Act. But if he should be now called in question for those things which were transacted in that Parliament of which he was a Member he shal have the comfort and peace of those Actions to support him in his greatest sufferings He added That if he were excepted then must he be judged for the crime of the whole Nation and that crime must be ravelled into through him That the Case is such as never yet fell out to wit that the Government being entrusted to three Estates they should so fall out among themselves as the People cannot tell which to obey That where these great Changes fall out it is not possible for any man to proceed according to all formalities of Law That there was a Political Power by this Act of 17. Caroli co-ordinate with the King and where these Powers are not in conjunction but enmity to each other no Court inferiour to the Parliament by whose Authority these things were acted ought to be Judges of this Case which certainly never happened before He farther saith he was not the first mover in these actions and that he should be called in question for these matters by a King that was out of possession at the time when these things were acted would be inconvenient to say no more That when the three Estates were disjoyned he thought it the best policy to preserve the Government in its root to wit the Commons by whom it was preserved and at last restored to its former course That as to the Regiment that passed under his name he disown'd it That Reports of Messages are not the fault of the Reporter for his judgment does not always go along with them but he is bound to deliver his Message That he alwayes loved the Government as it is set forth in our ancient Law-Books and that that Parliament so much decried at last restored affairs to the â—â—sture in which they now are As to the Warrants signed by him he said they appear to be signed in the Name and by Order of the Council and his hand that subscribes is not so much active as passive to the Commands of the Council If the Council who commanded the signing were unwarrantable
of that Statute several Kings have been deposed by Parliaments since the Conquest and as to my compassing or designing the natural death of the King's Person with what colour can I be accused of such intentions in the circumstances the King at that time was in beyond the Seas Secondly The assembling of men together without any hostility or injury offered to any person but for a man 's own security and defence in a time of confusion and distraction is not Levying War or Treason at the Common Law or by that Statute Yea in this Case and at the season wherein such an Act as this is alledged it might be supposed to be done for the King's Restoration as well as in opposition thereunto and the most favourable and advantagious construction ought to be made and put upon the Prisoner's actings or words where there is ambiguity so that they may be taken or interpreted divers wayes For the Law alwayes presumeth actions to be innocent till the contrary be manifestly proved However in a time of vacancy or an Interregnum when the Foundations of Government are out of course by the Law of Reason Nature and Common Prudence every man may stand upon his own guard endeavouring his own security and protection from injury and violence Thirdly To be adherent to the King's Enemies within his Realm c. cannot ought not to be understood of any adhaesion to a Parliament wherein the King by Law is supposed alwayes present as a part thereof Nor can the Long Parliament be called the King's Enemies without overthrowing the Act of Indempnity which the King hath declared to be the Foundation of the Nations present Peace and Security Lastly The Treasons alledged in the Indictment are said to have been committed when the King was out of possession So the Indictments runs to keep out the King c. Now my Lord Cook in the third part of his Institutes fol. 7. saith A King de jure and not de facto is not within this Statute Against such a one no Treason can be committed For if there be a King regnant in possession though he be Rex de facto and not de jure yet is he Seignior le Roy within the purview of this Statute and the other that hath Right and is out of possession is not within this Act. Nay if Treason be committed against a King de facto non de jure and after the King de jure cometh to the Crown he shall punish the Treason done to the King de facto And after in the same place he saith That by Law there is alwayes a King in whose Name the Laws are to be maintained and executed otherwayes Justice would fail The Act also of 11. Hen. 7. was made for security of the Subject on this behalf The word King also may and ought to be taken largely for any Sovereign Power in a King or Queen as Cook in the place fore-quoted shews and why not by the same reason in a Protector though a Usurper or any other persons one or more in whom Soveraignty is lodged or that have all the badges of Soveraignty as the calling of Parliaments enacting of Laws coining of Money receiving Forreign Ambassadors c. His Majesty that now is is granted by the very Indictment to have been then out of possession If so then was there either some other King or what was equivolent some Sovereign Power in actual possession and exercise or none If the former then was there a King de facto so no Treason could be committed against him that was King de jure only If the latter then the Government was dissolved no allegiance was due to any persons and so no offence could be properly Treason within the Statute But had the late Protector had the name and stile of a King no Treason could have been committed against the King de jure only Now God forbid that you should give away my Life upon such niceties because a usurping Protector was not clothed with the Title as well as Power of a King The Protector or any Usurper's taking or not taking the Title of a King in case he have the Power cannot alter the state of my supposed crime You ought not to be byassed by popular Reports concerning me 'T is easier to be innocent than so reported The one is in our own power not the other Fifthly Concerning the Evidence 1. No allegation was directly proved by two positive lawful Witnesses as in this case it ought to be 2. One of the Witnesses for the King confessed in open Court that to his knowledge my hand had been counterfeited to my prejudice and dammage in great Sums of Money yet Orders pretended to be signed by me wherein my hand may as well be counterfeited are taken as Evidence against me 3. The Issue of the whole Cause depended on the solution of some difficult Questions of so high a nature and great importance as could not safely be determined but in the high Court of Parliament As 1. Whether the Long Parliament called in Novemb. 1640 were dissolved by the late King's Death 2. Whether the successive remaining Powers that exercised the Royal or Supream Authority from 1648 to the Restoration of his now Majesty were not within the true sense and meaning of 25. Edw. 3. and 11. Hen. 7 As to other pertinent Queries thou mayest see them Reader in other parts of this Tryal That which remains as an Appendix to this Bill of Exceptions is to lay before thee the Grounds which plainly shew that there was a downright Conspiracy in Sir Vane's Tenants and others to prosecute him for Life and Estate under colour and pretence of Justice 1. Presently after I was committed to the Tower for High Treason and made a Close-Prisoner Mr. Oneale Sir William Darcy and Dr. Cradock obtained an Order from the King to seize and take into their possession all the Estates of such persons that were already or should be forfeited to his Majesty Hereupon the said Mr. Oneale and Sir Will. Darcy appointed some under them in the Bishoprick of Durham by name Thomas Bowes Esque now deceased and Capt. William Darcy to joyn with the said Dr. Cradock to put in execution the said Warrant as their Deputies who thereupon went to Raby Castle and demanded the Rent-Books of Thomas Mowbray my Steward offering him his place under them which he refused Contrary to this proceeding Sir Edward Cook expresly declares That before Indictment the Goods or other things of any Offender cannot be searched inventoried or in any sort seized nor after Indictment seized removed or taken away before Conviction or Attainder Institut 3d part chap. 133. concerning the Seizure of Goods c. for Offences c. before Conviction 2. At the Instance and Prosecution of my Tenants and others an Order was made by the House of Commons not of the Lords requiring the Tenants of such persons as were excepted out of the General Pardon to detain their Rents in
before and who is the Proper and Competent Judge Also whether the Laws be not perfectly silent as never supposing such a Case possible to happen by reason that the Power used by the one for Dissolving the other never before suffered the Opposition to rise so high The Fourth Querie is Whether he in this Case that keeps his Station and place of Trust wherein God and the Law did set him with care to demean himself according to the best of his Vnderstanding agreeably to the Law and Customes of Parliament and pursuant to their Votes and Directions so long as they sit and affirm themselves to be a Parliament and uses his best endeavours in the exercise of that publick Trust that no Detriment in the general come unto the Common-wealth by the failer of Justice and the necessary Protection due from Government without any designing or intending the Subversion of the Constitution but onely the securing more fully the Peoples Liberties and just Rights from all future Invasions and Oppressions be not so far from deserving to be judged Criminal in respect of any Law of God or Man that he ought rather to be affirmed One that hath done his Duty even the next best that was left to him or possible for him to do in such a dark stormy season and such difficult Circumstances As to the Right of the Cause it self it ariseth out of the matter of Fact that hath happened and by the Just and Wise Providence of God hath been suffered to state it self in the Contest between the Personal Will and declared Pleasure of the King on the one Hand and the publick Will or Vote of the People in Parliament on the other declaring it self either in Orders or Ordinances of both Houses or in the single Act of the House of Commons asserting it self a Parliament upon the Grounds of the Act 17 Car. providing against its dissolution This will appear with the more evidence and certainty by considering wherein either part had a wrong Cause or did or might do that which was not their Duty taking the measure of their Duty from what as well the King as the Peoples Representative are obliged unto by the Fundamental Constitution of the Government which binds them in each of their Capacities and distinct Exercises of their Trust to intend and pursue the true good and welfare of the whole Body or Community as their End This in effect is to detain the People in Obedience and Subjection to the Law of God and to guide them in the wayes of Righteousness unto God's well-pleasing and to avoid falling out or disagreeing about the Way or Means leading to that End Hence that party which in his or their actings was at the greatest distance from or opposition unto this end and wilfully and unnecessarily disagreed and divided from the other in the Ways and Means that were most likely to attain this End they were assuredly in the Fault and had a Wrong Cause to mannage under what ever Name of Face of Authority it was Headed and Upheld And such a Wrong Cause was capable of being espoused and mannaged under the face of Authority as might be pretended unto by either part For as the King insisting upon his Prerogative and the binding force which his personal Will and Pleasure ought to have though in distinction from and opposition to his Parliament might depart from the end of Government answerable to his Trust and yet urge his Right to be obeyed So the publick Will of the People exercised in and by the Vote of their Representative in Parliament asserting it self to be of a binding force also and to have the place of a Law though in distinction from the King and Laws also as saith the King whatever otherwise by them is pretended might also depart from the true end of Government answerable to their Trust and yet insist upon their Right to be Obeyed and submitted unto and having Power in their hands might unduely go about also to compel Obedience It is not lawful either for King or Parliament to urge Authority and compel Obedience as of Right in any such Cases where according to the Law of Nature the People are at Liberty and ought to have a Freedom from yeelding Obedience as they are and ought to have when ever any would compel them to disobey God or to do things that evidently in the eye of Reason and common sense are to their hurt and destruction Such things Nature forbids the doing of having for that very purpose armed Man with the defensive Weapon of refusing to consent and obey as that Priviledge whereby Man is distinguished from a Beast which when he is deprived of he is made a Beast and brought into a state of perfect Servitude and Bondage Such a state of Servitude and Bondage may by God's just Judgement be inflicted upon man for sin and the abuse of his Liberty when by God restored The Liberty which man was at first created in is that Priviledge and Right which is allowed to him by the Law of Nature of not being compelled under any pretence whatsoever to sin against God or to go against the true good and welfare of his own Being that is to say of his inward or outward man but in both these cases to have and to use his just Liberty to Dissent and refuse to Obey For this every man hath that in himself which by God is made a proper and competent Judge For as to all sin against God and the righteousness of his Law the Light of Conscience that is to say the Work of the Law in and upon the Mind or inward Sense and in conjunction with it doth lighten every one that cometh into the World accusing or excusing if it be but hearkened unto and kept awake And for all such actings as tend to the ruine and destruction of man in his outward and bodily concerns and as he is the Object of Magistratical Power and Jurisdiction every man hath a Judgement of common Sense or a way of discerning and being sensible thereof common to bruit Beasts that take in their Knowledge by the door of their Senses but is much heightned and enobled in man by the personal union it is taken into with his intellectual part and intuitive way of discerning things through the inward reflectings of the mind compared with the Law of God This inferiour Judgement in man when it is conjoyned with and confirmed by the Judgement of his Superiour part is that which we call Rational or the dictates of right Reason that man hath a natural right to adhere unto as the ordinary certain Rule which is given him by God to walk by and against which he ought not to be compelled or be forced to depart from it by the meer Will and Power of another without better Evidence that is a higher a greater or more certain way of discerning This therefore in Scripture is called Man's Judgement or Man's Day in distinction from the Lord's