presence is of the two the worse And certain it is that it cannot be less seeing that Everlasting Life which is The Gift of God and Crown of holiness is at the least so much better as the second death or pains of hell are worse then this mortal life But if I mistake not the Members of this Distinction concerning the punishment of losse and the punishment of sense by pain are not altogether Opposite but Co-incident The very conceit or remembrance of this infinite loss and of their folly in procuring it cannot but breed an insufferable measure of grief and sorrow unto the damned which will be fully equivalent to all their bodily pain And this fretting remembrance and perpetual reflection upon the folly of their former wayes is as I take it That Worm of Conscience that never dies But of this hereafter The miserable estate of the damned or such as shall suffer the second death may be reduced to these two Heads to Punishment Essential or to Punishment Accidental or concomitant The Essential Punishment comprehends both Poena damni and Poena sensus The positive pains of that brimstone Lake and the Worm of Conscience which gnaweth upon their souls The Punishment Accidental or concomitant is that Loathsomnesse of the Region or place wherein they are tormented and of their Companions in these torments In this life that Saying is generally true Solamen miseris Socios habuisse doloris it is alwayes some comfort to have Consorts in our pain or distress But this Saying is out of date in the Region of death the more there be that suffer these pains the less comfort there is to every one in particular For there is no concord or consort but perpetual discord which is alwayes so much greater by how much the parties discording are more in number And to live in continual discord though with but some few is a kind of Hell on earth And thus much in brief of the second death wherein it exceeds the First 10. If any one that shall read this should but suspect or fear that God had inevitably ordained him unto this death or created him to no better end then to the day of wrath This very cogitation could not but much abate his love towards God Whom no man can truly love unless he be first perswaded That God is good and loving not towards his Elect only but toward all men towards himself in particular But this opinion of Absolute Reprobation or ordination to the day of wrath I pray may never enter into any mans brains But flesh and blood though not polluted with this Opinion will if not repine and murmur yet perhaps demur a while upon another Point more questionable to wit How it may stand with the Justice of the most righteous Judge to recompence the pleasures of sin in this life which is but short with such exquisite and everlasting torments in the life to come Specially seeing the pleasures of sin are but transient neither enjoyed nor pursued but by interposed Fits whereas the torments of that Lake are uncessantly perpetual and admit no intermission The usual Answer to this Quaere is That every sin deserves a punishment infinite as being committed against an infinite Majestie But seeing this answer hath no Ground or warrant from the Rule of Faith in which neither the Maxim it self is expresly contained nor can it be deduced thence by any good Consequence we may examine it by the Rule of Reason Now by the Rule of Reason and proportion the punishment due to offences as committed against an infinite Majestie should not be punishment infinite for time and duration but infinite for qualitie or extremitie of pain whiles it continues If every minute of sinful pleasures in this world should be recompenced with a thousand years of Hell-pains this might seem rigorous and harsh to be conceived of him that is as infinite in Goodness as in Greatness as full of Mercie as of Majestie But whatsoever our thoughts or wayes be his wayes we know are equal and just most equal not in themselves only but even unto such as in sobrietie of spirit consider them But wherein doth the equalitie of his wayes or justice appear when he recompenceth the momentany pleasures of sin with such unspeakable everlasting torments It appears in this That he sentenceth no creatures unto such endlesse pains but only such as he had first ordained unto an endlesse life so much better at least then this bodily and mortal life as the second death is worse then it Adam had an immortal life as a pledge or earnest of an eternal life in possession and had not lost it either for himself or us if he had not wilfully declined unto the wayes of death of which the righteous Judge had fore-warned him Now when life and death are so set before us as that Hold is given us of life to recompence the wilful choice of death with death it self this is most equal and just And if the righteous Lord had sentenced our first Parents unto the second death immediately upon their first transgression his sentence had been but just and equal their destruction had been from themselves Yet as all this had been no more then just so it had been less then justice moderated or rather over-ruled by mercie Now instead of executing justice upon our first Parents the righteous Lord did immediately promise a gratious redemption and as one of the Antients said Foelix peccatum quod talem meruit Redemptorem it was a happy sin which gave occasion of the promise of such a Redeemer 11. But did this extraordinary mercy promised to Adam extend it self to all or to Adam only or to some few that should proceed from him Our publick Liturgie our Articles of Religion and other Acts of our Church extend it to Adam and to all that came after him But how the Nations whom God as yet hath not called unto the light of his Gospel or whose fore-elders he did not call unto the knowledge of his Laws given unto Israel how either Fathers or Children came to forsake the mercies wherein the whole humane nature in our first Parents was interested is A Secret known to God and not fit to be disputed in particular This we are sure of in the General That God did not forsake them till they had forsaken their own mercies But for our selves All of us have been by Baptism re-ordained unto a better estate then Adam lost Now if upon our first second third or fourth open breach or wilful contempt of our Vow in Baptism the Lord had sentenced us unto everlasting death or given Satan a Commission or warrant to pay us the wages of sin this had been but just and right his wayes in this had been equal because our wayes were so unequal But now he hath so long time spared us and given us so large a time of repentance seeking to win us unto his love by many blessings and
free Pardon for all shall be excluded from it that are Unworthy of it But the grievous and most patient sufferings of the Apostles themselves are here adjudged by our Apostle to be altogether Unworthy of the Glory that shall be revealed in respect of Gods Justice Or if he should enter into Judgment with them after these three branches of Grace Faith Hope and Charity had fructified in them But have they no Answer to this Objection Yes Cardinal Bellarmine the only man which ever that Church had for traversing the Testimonie or verdict of Scriptures alleadged by our Writers hath Two in store or rather two branches of one and the same answer His answer in General is this That our Apostle in this place Rom. 8. 18. doth speak of the Substance of works done by just and holy men not of the absolute Proportion between them and the glory which shall be revealed If we respect the Substance of their works they are not equal for the one is momentany or temporal and the other eternal to the reward or gift of God which is eternal life or glory yet saith he there is a true or just Proportion between them 9. To put a Colour upon this Distinction he gives Instance First in the sufferings of our Saviour which were but temporary and no way comparable for duration of time with the everlasting pains of hell which without his sufferings we all should have suffered and yet his temporary sufferings did make a full and just satisfaction for the sins of men which deserved everlasting torments For what was wanting to the duration or continuance of his sufferings was supplyed by the dignity of his person which suffered them In like sort as he would have it the worth or dignitie of that charity from which the sufferings of Martyrs or other good works of just and holy men do proceed may make up that defect which they apparently have in respect of their short duration or continuance His Second Instance is that the pleasures or contentments of sin are in no wise comparable to the everlasting torments of hell which yet these momentary pleasures justly deserve for the contempt of God and his commandements and thus as he would have us believe the good works of Saints though but few and short may through the vertue of Grace or Charity as justly deserve eternal glory 10. But as his Answer in General is Sophistical so the Instances which he brings to prove it are most impertinent and if they be well scanned most pregnant for Us against him To the First we reply as all Divines agree That Christs sufferings though but temporary for duration and for quality not infinite did make a full satisfaction for the sins of mankind because the Person of the sufferer was truly and absolutely infinite his satisfaction or the value of his sufferings were truly infinite Non quia passus est infinita sed quia passus est infinitus Not because he suffered infinite pains but because He who suffered those grievous and unknown pains was truly infinite But neither the persons of the Saints which suffered martyrdom nor any pains which they suffered or good works which they did had any just Proportion to Infinity and therefore could not be Meritorious of eternal Glory which is for duration infinite either in respect of their persons or of their charity which questionless was much less then Christs love and charity towards us as man though this was not so absolutely Infinite as the love and charity of his Godhead So that this Instance is not only impertinent but altogether unadvised and the Reader may well wonder how such gross and somnolent incogitancie could possibly surprize so wary a man so great a Scholar as Cardinal Bellarmine was His Second Instance though it include no such gross incogitancie as the former nevertheless it is involved in an error too common not only to the Romanist but to many in reformed Churches For the pleasures of sin though but temporary deserve eternal death betwixt which and them in themselves considered there is no just proportion But the True Reason why they justly deserve this death is because men by continuing in sin and by following the pleasures of it do reject or put from them the promises of Eternal Life betwixt which and everlasting death there is a just proportion And when Life and Death everlasting are proposed unto us the One out of Mercie the other out of Justice it is most Just dealing with God to give such as chuse the pleasures of sin before the Fruits of Holiness the native issue of their choice But it could not have stood with the Justice of God to have punished our first Parents transgression with everlasting death unless out of his Free Bounty and liberality he had made them capable not of a temporal only but of an everlasting life But now that Adam hath sinned and made himself and his posterity subject unto everlasting death doth not this Original Sin or every Actual Sin which issueth from it deserve everlasting death Yes they do and would inevitably bring death upon all without intervention of Gods Mercy or Free Pardon made in Christ But this free Pardon being presupposed and being proclaimed unto the world it is not Sin Original or the Positive sins of men in themselves considered which bring everlasting death upon them but their wilful neglect or slighting of Gods mercy promised in Christ or of the means which God affords them for attaining this mercy which leaves them without Excuse or Apology or which makes up the full measure of their iniquity This is our Saviours Doctrine John 3. 17. God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world but that the world through him might be saved From what original then doth the condemnation of the world proceed Our Saviour tels us ver 19. This is the condemnation that light is come into the world and men loved darknesse more then light because their deeds were evil It is not then the works of darkness in themselves considered but considered with mens love unto them or delight in them that doth induce a neglect or hate of light which brings condemnation upon the world Now if the works of darkness or pleasures of sin which are but momentany do not in themselves procure everlasting death albeit they proceed from Sin Original much lesse shall the good Works of Gods Saints albeit they proceed from Grace procure or deserve everlasting life For the Grace by which we do them is from God not from our selves but the evil works which we do are our own God hath no share in them So that the Height or Accomplishment of sin consists in the neglect or contempt of Eternal Life and the neglect hereof could not be so heynous if this life could be deserved by us or if it were awarded to us out of Justice not out of meer Mercie and Grace 11. This difference betwixt the Title
which Bad works have to Death and the Want of Title which the Best works have to Life Everlasting is most significantly exprest by St. Paul Rom. 6. 23. The wages of sin is death saith He and wages are merited are never detained without some interruption of the course justice But Eternal Life is not the wages of holiness but the Gift of God And if in any sort it might be deserved or merited the Apostle questionless would have said it had been if not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the wages yet 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Reward of Holinesse But in as much as this word Reward sometimes includes Rationem dati something given as well as taken not alwayes a Reward of meer bounty therefore the Apostle doth not say it is the Reward of Holinesse or the Reward of God Nor doth he say it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which properly signifies A Gift for Gifts though freely given in kindness and not by Covenant may be mutual and may include a kind of merit de congruo as we say One Kindnesse requires another like but our Apostle to prevent this conceit of Merit useth a word which in its true and proper signification is incompatible with the conceit of Merit he calleth life eternal 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is as the vulgar Latine renders it Gratia Del the Grace of God CHAP. XXVIII ROMANS 6. 23. But the Gift of God or The Grace of God is Everlasting Life through Jesus Christ our Lord. Whether Charismata Divina that is The Impressions of Gods Eternal Favor may he merited by us Or whether the Second Third Fourth Grace Life Eternal it self may be so About Revival of Merits The Text Heb. 6. 10. God is not unjust c. expounded The Questions about Merits about Justification have the same Issue The Romish Doctrine of Merit derogates from Christs Merits The Question in order to practise or Application stated betwixt God and our own souls Confidence in merit and too Hasty perswasion that we be The Favorites of God Two Rocks God in punishing Godly men respects their former Good Works 1. THe Gift or Grace of God This word Grace is sometimes taken for The Favour of God which in the Greek is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sometimes it implyes the Stamp or Impression of this Favour in us and this in the Greek is exprest by the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 used here by St. Paul That The Favour of God cannot be merite by any works of man is out of Question For it was the Favor or Free Grace of God which gave our First Parents Being which continues their posterity here on earth And neither our first Parents nor any of their posterity could deserve or merit their Being This Favour of God is as he is without Beginning without Change But so is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is the Impression or Effect of this Eternal Favour in us It hath no Being in us before we Be And after it be inherent in us it admits of Alteration or Change in us The Question then is Whether the Effects or Impressions of Gods eternal Favour to us may be deserved or merited by us Or seeing the Degrees or Parts of Grace inherent be many it is Controversed between the Romish Church and us Whether any parts of this Grace can be deserved or merited by us That the First Grace that is The first stamp or impression of Gods Favour towards us cannot be merited by us They grant For the First Grace as some of them say is Fundamentum meriti The Foundation or ground-work of all Merits Et fundamentum meriti non cadit sub merito Every Merit is precedent to the thing merited But there can be no Merit-precedent to the First Grace which is the Root the Ground or Original of all Merits But the Second Third or Fourth Grace or Degrees of Grace may in their divinity be merited through the Virtue or Excellencie of the First Grace or First Degree of Grace so we use that as we should Between the First Degree or Seed of Grace sowen in our hearts by the finger of God and the Full Growth or increase of it there is as Cardinal Bellarmine alleadgeth a True proportion though no Equalitie And therefore there may be some Ground of Merit for the increase of Grace though not for the first beginning of it Indeed if Grace did grow in us as trees or plants do from the first seed without any great care or operation of him that plants them and if it did thus grow without any interruption or default on our parts there might be some pretence for merit or some probabilitie at least that the fruits of Grace so growing should be Ours or so far Ours as we are our selves because we are the soil wherein the first seeds of Grace were sowen But if it be God not we our selves that gives the increase if it be God that sends Paul to plant and Apollos to water the seeds which he hath sowen in us if it be He that made us and not we our selves All the fruits of Grace are his by proprietie not Ours but only so far as he shall suffer us to enjoy them by continuance of the same Gracious Undeserved favour by which he hath made us and by which he sowes the first seeds of Grace in us 2. But Grace being sowen or planted in us by his immediate hand without any Co-operation on our parts non Crescit ecculto velut arbor aevo doth not grow up in us as wel-thriving plants out of their proper seed without ceasing or interruption though by degrees unsensible for sometimes it decreaseth oft-times it suffers many interruptions in its growth by our default or negligence And is it possible that we should deserve or merit the increase or fruits of that Grace whose growth in spring is oft-times blasted or hindred through our negligence or wilfull default This They do not say This in congruity of Reason They cannot say Who deny that Grace once implanted in us cannot be displanted can admit no intercision in its substance or Being however it may admit interruptions in its growth or some decay or waning But the Romish Church with her Advocates willingly grant That Grace truly inherent in men and inherent in such perfect measure as inables them to fulfill the moral Law of God may be utterly lost may be expelled by mortal or deadly sin and yet may be recovered again but lost or expelled it cannot be without the default or negligence without some mortal default or negligence of him who had it in his custody And yet being so lost they hold the like Grace may be gotten again and the Grace so gotten and recovered they call The second Grace and if it be twice lost and so recovered it is The third Grace The Question then is How the second third and fourth Grace is or may be recovered by us whether by way of Merit or
manner of Gods augmenting the punishments or plagues upon succeeding Generations which would not take warning by the punishments of their fore-fathers usually runs by the scale of seven Every man that seeth me saith Cain after the Lord had convented him for killing his brother will kill me whereas there was not a man in the world besides his father and himself But a mans Conscience as we say is a thousand witnesses And his Conscience did sufficiently convict him to have deserved Execution whereas there was neither Witness nor Executioner According to this Sentence engraven in this murtherous heart did God afterwards enjoyn Noah and gave it in express Commandement under his hand to Moses Whosoever doth shed mans blood by man shall his blood be shed If this Law were Just amongst the Israelites why was it not executed upon Cain the first Malefactor in this kind Nay why doth God expresly exempt him from it and punish him with exile only Doubtless this was from His Gracious Universal Goodness which alwayes threats before it strike offereth favour before he proceed to Judgment and mingleth Judgment with Mercie before he proceed in rigor of Justice Now Cain had no former warning how displeasant murther was to God and therefore is not so severely punished as every murtherer after him must be For so it is said Gen. 4. 15. Whosoever slayeth Cain vengeance shall be taken on him seven-fold Yet for any of Seths Posteritie to have killed murtherous Cain had been a sin in its nature farre less then for Cain to murther his righteous brother yet by Rule of divine Justice to be more greivously punished then Cains murther was because in him they had their Warnings 6. The same Proportion God observes in visiting the sins of Fathers upon their Children So in that Great Covenant of Life and Death made with the Israelites Levit. 26. 14 15 16. After promise of extraordinary blessings to the Observers of his Law the Lord thus threatneth the transgressors But if ye will not hearken unto me and will not do all these Commandements And if ye despise my Statutes or if your soul abhor my Judgments so that ye will not do all my Commandements but that ye break my Covenant I also will do this unto you I will even appoint over you terror consumption c. But if for all this they will not yet turn unto him he will plague them still with the pursuit of their enemies Nay it followeth verse 18 And if ye will not hearken unto me then will I punish you seven times more for your sins and if all this will not reclaim them these later plagues shall be seven times multiplied and this third plague three hundred forty three times greater then the first and the fourth Transgression shall likewise be multiplied by seven So that the same Apostasie or rebellion not amended after so many warnings if we may call the literal meaning to strict Arithmetical Account shall in the end be One thousand one hundred ninety seven times more severely punished then the first But it is likely that a Certain Number was put for an uncertain That the visitation of sins of Fathers upon their Children may be continued seventy Generations even from the first giving of the Law by Moses unto the worlds End is apparent from the verses following Levit. 26. 37. unto This Yet will the Lord still remember the Covenant made with Abraham c. For not putting this Rule or Law of confessing their fathers sins in practise the Children of that Generation which put our Lord and Saviour to death are punished this day with greater hardness of heart then the Scribes and Pharisees were For however They were the very Paterns of Hypocrisie yet had they so much sense or feeling of conscience that they did utterly dislike their Fore-fathers Actions and thought to super-erogate for their Fathers transgressions by erecting the Tombs or garnishing the Sepulchres of the Prophets whom their Fathers had murthered or stoned to death But these modern scattered Jews will not to this day confess their fore-fathers sins nor acknowledge that they did ought amiss in putting to death the Prince of Prophets and Lord of Life And their Fathers sins until they confess them are become their sins and shall be visited upon them To confess the sins of their Fathers according to the intendment or purpose of Gods Law implies an hearty Repentance for them and repentance truly hearty implies not only an Abstinence from the same or like transgressions wherewith their Fathers had provoked Gods wrath but a zealous Desire or Endeavour to glorifie God by constant Practise of the Contrary vertues or works of Piety This Doctrinal Conclusion may easily be inferred from the afore-cited 18. of Ezekiel 7. Sin is more catching then the Pestilence and no marvel if the plagues due for it to the Father in the course or doom of Justice seize on the Son seeing the contagion of sin spreads from the unknown Malefactor to his neighbors from the Fields wherein it is by Passengers committed into the bordering Cities or Villages unless the Attonement be made by Sacrifice and such solemn deprecation of guilt as the Law in this Case appoints Deut. 21. 1 2 c. If one be found slain in the Land which the Lord thy God giveth thee to possesse it lying in the field and it be not known who hath slain him Then thy Elders and Judges shall come forth and shall measure to the Cities which are round about him that is slain And it shall be that the City which is next unto the slain man even the Elders of that City shall take a Heifer which hath not been wrought with and which hath not drawn the yoak And that City shall bring down the Heifer into a rough valley which is neither cared nor sown and shall strike off the Heifers neck there in the valley And the Priests the sons of Levi shall come neer for them the Lord thy God hath chosen to minister unto him and to bless in the name of the Lord and by their word shall every controversie and stroke be tryed And all the Elders of that City that are next to the slain man shall wash their hands over the Heiser that is to be beheaded in the valley And they shall answer and say Our hands have not shed this blood neither have our eyes seen it Be merciful O Lord unto thy people Israel whom thou hast redeemed and lay not innocent blood unto thy People of Israels charge and the blood shall be forgiven them So shalt thou put away the guilt of innocent blood from among you when thou shalt do that which is right in the sight of the Lord. The nearer unto us Actual Transgressors be the more they should provoke our zealous endeavors for performance of contrary duties otherwise Gods Justice will in time over-sway his mercie and plagues first procured by some one or few mens sins will diffuse themselves from the
you see how the terrour of the last day or fear of everlasting death must work in us an Abstinence from evil or repentance for evil past as the Hope of Everlasting Life doth work patience and constancie in persecution Yet both parts of that brief Receipt Sustine et Abstine may be effected by our serious meditation upon either branch of our belief concerning life and death everlasting For if all the sufferings of this life be not worthy of or equivalent unto the glory which shall be revealed in us we must needs be worthy of and obnoxious to everlasting death if we do not with patience suffer persecution in this life rather then hazard our hopes of Life Eternal Again if the sufferance of everlasting death be much worse then the suffering of all persecutions possible in this life our not repentance at the Terrour of it doth make us uncapable of everlasting life Our hopes of avoiding it by repentance if they be sound and firm will animate and in a manner impell us to follow the wayes of life to bring forth fruits worthy of repentance 4. Seeing then we are thus invironed on the right hand and on the left having the hopes of Eternal Life set before us to encourage us to constancy and resolution and are so strongly beset with inevitable fear of everlasting death if like faint hearted souldiers we should retreat or revoke our vow in Baptisme may not the Lord in Justice take up that complaint against us which sometimes he did against Jerusalem and Judah What could I have done more for my vineyard that I have not done unto it Other means to make men either good men or good Citizens the old world knew none nor could the wit of the wisest Law-givers devise any besides poena et praemium Reward and punishment Now what Kingdom or Common-wealth had either so bountiful Rewards or so dreadful punishments proposed unto them as we Christians have What then is the reason why we of all others are more defective in good duties most fruitful in evil lesse observant or more desperate transgressors of our Princes Lawes then the subjects or Citizens of any other well governed Kingdoms ever were how often do we pawn our hopes of everlasting life upon less occasions then Esau did his birth-right and set Christ our acknowledged Lord and Redeemer to sale at a lower price then Judas did The original of this our desperate neglect or contempt must either be misbelief or unbelief of the Reward promised to well doing or of the Punishment threatned to evil doers And it would be a point very hard to determine Whether of such as make any conscience of their wayes especially since the reformation of Religion more have miscarried through misbelief or through unbelief of this Great Article of our Creed Everlasting life and everlasting death Our Misbelief for the most part concerns the Article of everlasting life Of everlasting death we are rather unbelievers then misbelievers Misbelief alwayes includes a strong belief but the stronger our belief the more dangerous it is if it be wrested or misplaced and the worst way we can misplace our belief of heavenly joyes is when we make our selves certain of our salvation before our time or ranke our selves amongst the elect or heirs not disinheritable of the heavenly kingdom before we have made our Election sure 5. As the absolute infallibilitie of the present Romish Church doth make up the measure of heathenish Idolatry or iniquity So the immature belief of our own salvation or Election doth make up the measure of Jewish or Pharisaical Hypocrisie The manner how it doth so is this If no covetous if no sacrilegious person if no slanderer of his brethren or reviler of his betters can enter into the Kingdom of heaven as it is certain they cannot untill they repent then no man which is certain of his salvation can perswade himself or be perswaded that he is a covetous or sacrilegious person that he is a slanderer of his brethren or a reviler of his betters and hence the Conclusion arising from the Premisses is inevitable that albeit such men as presume of their Election or salvation before their time before they be throughly sanctified do all that covetous or sacrilegious men do be continual slanderers or malicious revilers of their brethren yet it is impossible that they should suspect much less condemn themselves of these crimes until they correct their former errours and rectifie their misbelief or presumption of their immutable estate in grace Yea their errour not being corrected makes them confident in these wicked practises and causes them to mistake hatred to mens persons or envy to others good parts for zeal to Religion and stubbornness in Schisme and faction for Christian charitie or good affection unto truth And if any man of better insight in the Stratagems of Satan shall go about to detect their error or convince them by strength of Reason grounded upon Scripture that their mis-perswasions do branch into Blasphemie and can bring forth no better fruit then Pharisaical hypocrisie yet they usually requite his pains as that young Spanish spark did the Physician which had well nigh cured him of a desperate Phrensie no sooner had he brought him to know what he was indeed no more then a Page though to a great Duke or Grandee of Spain but the Youth instead of a Fee or thankful acknowledgement began to revile and curse the Physician for bringing him out of a pleasant dream of golden mountains much richer then the King of Spain had any it seemed as a kind of hell unto him to see himself to be but a Page who in his raving fits had taken upon him to create Dukes and Earls and to exercise the Acts of Royal Authoritie Very much like him in Horace Epistol Libr. 2. Ep. 2. Fuit haud ignobilis Argis Qui se credebat miros audire Tragoedos In vacuo laetus sessor plausorque Theatro Hic ubi cognatorum opibus curisque refectus Expulit helleboro morbum bilemque meraco Et redit ad sese pol me occidistis amici Non servastis ait cui sic extorta voluptas Et demptus per vim mentis gratissimus Error But with the Originals of Mis-belief besides what is said in our Fifth Book of Comments upon the Creed in this particular we shall have fitter occasion to meet hereafter And the greater part of men amongst us I am perswaded offend more in Unbelief then in Mis-belief 6. And by Unbelief lest we should be mistaken we understand somewhat less then the lowest degree of Infidelity Now of Infidels there be two degrees or ranks Infideles Contradictionis and Infideles purae Negationis He is an Infidel in the former sense that contradicts or opposeth the truth of Scriptures especially concerning Everlasting Life and Everlasting Death and such Infidels I presume there are none amongst us He is an Infidel in the Later Sense that doth not believe the
nature Now any Symptom or Branch of pride or vain-glory is less deadly then the Root of Pride vain-glory or pharisaical hypocrisie Far be it from any of us to think that the like sin committed by a man regenerate doth not deserve worse at Gods hands then if it had been committed by an unregenerate or meer natural man because he thinks himself to be of the number of the Elect For if this sin or transgression be for Substance the same the Circumstances make it a great deal worse in a regenerate then in a meer natural man That saying of the heathen Satyrist or Censurer of ill manners holds as true in Divinitie as in Morality Omne animi vitium tanto conspectius in se Crimen habet quanto major qui peccat habetur The crime or fault is so much the greater by how much the partie offending is in his own esteem or others better qualified 12. From what Original is it then that the righteous Judge doth oft-times lesse punish the sins of men which have lived a godly life then he doth the like sins in men not as yet regenerate or in men that have been altogether barren of good works The true Resolution of this Probleme or Question must be taken from that general rule or Maxime That God will render to every man according to all his wayes either in Justice or in mercy Now albeit God alwayes punish the ungodly in this life Citra condignum in lesse measure then they deserve because his mercy and long suffering inhibits the execution of his punitive justice yet he alwayes rewards the good works which we do Ultra condignum far above their deservings for albeit the best works which we can do deserve no reward at all yet his infinite goodness will not suffer the least good works which we do to go without his Reward Rewarded we shall be either with some Positive Blessing or with the Mitigation of some punishment which our evil works had justly deserved From this Original it is that albeit the bad works of men regenerate or endowed with grace do weigh heavier in the scale of Gods Justice then the like works of men unregenerate do yet they do not sway so much because whiles he weighes the bad works of men regenerate in the scale of his justice he weighes the good works which they have formerly done in the scale of his mercy and bounty But as for such as have lived a lewd and godless life and have made themselves unworthy of his mercy their grosser sins are weighed in the scale of his Justice without a Counterpoize and therefore do sway the further and nearer towards hell albeit for their nature and quality they be not more heynous then some offences of the regenerate So that God is no Accepter of persons albeit in this life he punisheth the same sin more grievously in one then in another for this he doth not with any respect unto their persons but with respect unto his own mercy whereof the one sort are Capable the other are altogether unworthy And this was the true meaning of our Apostle and the ground of his Hope or good perswasion of these Hebrews Chap. 6. ver 9 10. But we are perswaded better things of you and things that accompany salvation For God is not unrighteous to forget your works and labour of love which ye have shewed towards his name in that ye have Ministred to the Saints and do Minister CHAP. XXIX ROMANS 6. 23. But the Gift of God is Eternal Life through Jesus Christ our Lord. Three Points 1. Eternal Life the most Free Gift of God both in Respect of The Donor and of The Donee 2. Yet doth not the Soveraign Freeness of the Gift exclude all Qualifications in the Donees rather requires better in them then others which exclude it or themselves from it Whether the Kingdom of Heaven was prepared for all or for a certain number 3. The first Qualification for Grace is to become as little children A parallel of the conditions of Infants and of Christians truely humble and meek 1. THe Points remaining to be handled are Three The First is in part touched before That Eternal Life is nor only The gift of God or as the Vulgar renders the Original Gratia Dei but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The gift of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is as if you would say The Gift of Gifts the greatest Gift and the Freest Gift that God hath to bestow on mankind for in or through Christ Jesus our Lord. The second that The Absolute Freedom or graciousness of this Gift doth not exclude all Qualifications of works or inclinations to good works but only confidence in works The third is The Qualification required in all such as hope to receive this Gift or The manner how they are to work out their own salvation that they may be capable or at least not Totally uncapable of this free gift To the first That Eternal Life is the Gift of Gifts or the most free or Gracious Gift that God hath to bestow on man may be easily proved from the Conditions required in a Free Gift And These are Two The first respects the estate or condition of the Donor as that he be not tied by any necessitie either natural moral or politick to bestow his benevolence The second condition respects the Donee And it is Absentia if not Carentia meriti Being without if not a want of desert or merit In both respects Life Eternal is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is The most excellent and most undeserved Gift that can be given That it is freely given without any constraint or Tie of necessity is clear For no operations of the most Holy and Blessed Trinitie besides the Eternal Generation of the Son of God and the Eternal Procession of the Holy Ghost have any Natural necessitie in them These be operations of the Divine nature all extraneous things are works of Gods divine will and pleasure God who worketh all things worketh all things else according to the Counsel of his Will that is he so worketh them he so preserveth and ordereth them as it was free for him from eternity not to make them not to preserve them not so to order them as he doth He was when the world was not and might so have continued And this clearly evinceth that there was no Natural necessitie why he should create the world or any thing in it for so the world should have been as he is eternal without beginning Nor was there any Moral necessity that he should create the world or man or Angel for none could have impeached him of injustice or unkindness or of other transgression of any Law or Rule if he had never given them such Being as they have Nor was there any Politick necessitie that he should create the world or man or Angel in whose creation he had no respect to any private end he gained nothing by their Being the best
of them are but Unprofitable servants 2. It was free then for God to create or not to create man but as it was his pleasure to create him so it was necessary that man being created by him he should be created good and righteous Suppose then the First man had continued in his First Estate that is righteous and good his righteousness could have merited nothing of God much lesse Eternal Life It was as free to God to have annihilated him or to have resolved him into nothing as it was to make him of nothing Indeed to have punished him with everlasting death unlesse he had wilfully and through his own default lost his Orginal righteousness could not have stood with the righteousness or goodness of God There was a morall necessity that his Creator should not punish him with everlasting death unlesse he had transgressed his Law and made himself unworthy of everlasting life But the First Man did wilfully and freely that is without any necessity transgresse the Law of his God and make himself and his posteritie unworthy of eternal life That God upon this transgression did not instantly punish him with everlasting death this was An Act of the Free Grace and mercy of God thus he might have done without any impeachment to his Justice without any disparagement to his Goodnesse That unto man thus ill deserving he made A Promise of Redemption and of Restitution to a better Estate then he lost this was An Act of his Mercie and gracious goodness a more Free Act then his first Creation For that was not deserved and therefore Free But not so Free as the Promise of his Redemption after he had justly deserved the contrary to wit condemnation unto everlasting death But this Promise of Redemption through the Womans Seed being freely made is not the performance of it on Gods part necessary Is he not bound by promise to bestow his Grace on all them to whom he promised Redemption Though he be Debter unto no man yet he is Faithful in himself and cannot deny himself or not perform what he hath promised It is true if the parties to whom he promiseth do so demean themselves as they should or as by the Second Covenant they stand bound But who is he can make this Plea with God Who is he that can truly say there was any necessity at that time when the promise was made to our first Parents in the Womans Seed that he should be begotten or born or that he was such a child of promise from the time of Adams Fall as Isaac was And if there were no necessity then that he should be born what necessity is there that he should be partaker of Grace after he is born Or what necessity is there that after the Grace of Baptism received he should come to be of the number of the Elect No man can plead any worth or merit in himself for the receiving of Grace or any necessity whereby God is tyed by promise or otherwise to bestow Grace or perseverance in Grace upon him in particular These and the like Favours must still be sought for by the Prayer of Faith that is by unfeigned acknowledgement of our own unworthinesse and of Gods Free Mercie not only in making the First Decree concerning mans Redemption but in continual dispensing the Effects of the same Decree or the means of our Salvation This is the only way To lay hold upon the General Promise 3. It was no Contradiction in Cardinal Bellarmine as some conceive it after he had strongly disputed for Merit of Works thus to conclude Tutissimum est It is the safest way to place our Confidence in the Merits of Christ This Resolution of his will truly inferre that albeit the Question concerning Merits were doubtful yet we Protestants take the more useful and safer way and the way which Cardinal Bellarmine himself in his Devotions and as I hope on his death bed did take Yet admit his Doctrine concerning Merits had been true indefinitely taken There had been no Contradiction between his Premisses and Conclusion For many things which are unquestionable in Thesi or in the General are doubtful or vncertain in Hypothesi when we come to make particular Application This Doctrine is most true in Thesi That God is faithful in all his promises that he cannot deny himself or falsifie his promise Yet is it not safe for Thee or Me thus to infer that God cannot deny eternal life to us in particular because he hath promised it as sincerely to Thee or Me as to any others The absolute and unchangeable Fidelity of God will not inferre how strongly soever we believe it That either Thou or I are faithful for the present or shall continue faithfull unto the End or until our finall victory over the divel the world and the flesh which is the True Importance of this Phrase To the End in many places of Scripture Now Gods promise of eternal Life is not immediately terminated To any mans Person or Individual Entity but unto such as continue faithful unto the End or unto such as overcome as you may observe in many places of Scripture especially in the second and third Chapters of The Revelation of St. John Now it is a great deal more easie for a man to assure himself that he is faithful for the present or victorious in respect of instant temptations then to assure himself that he shall continue victorious in respect of temptations that may befal him And yet in respect of the deceitfulness of our own hearts it is not safe for most men to make it as an Article of their Faith or point of Absolute Belief that they are so faithful for the present as that God cannot deny Eternal Life unto them though not in respect of their Merits yet in respect of his Promise if they should instantly depart this life So that such as have as full and perfect Interest in the Promises of God as others have may forfeit their Interest as well by Immature Perswasions or Presumptions that they are of the number of the Elect as by conceit of Merit or Confidence in works Both perswasions are dangerous because both prejudice the Free Mercie and Grace of God in bestowing eternal Life or in dispensing the means required unto it The Romish Church saith it was Free for God to give us Grace or ability to do the works of Grace or not to give it but this Grace being Freely given and the works performed it is not Free but Necessary in respect of Gods Justice to give eternal Life as the Reward of Works Others opposite enough to the Papists say that it was Free for God to Elect or not to Elect us unto eternal Life but being Elected it is not Free for God to deny eternal Life unto us For this in their language were to deny himself or falsifie his promise Yet by their leave If we were thus Elected from Eternity it was never Free
fruit whereby they sought to be like him in Majestie Conscious of this transgression the first Actors immediately hid themselves from his presence And as if this their terror had imprinted a perpetual Antipathy in their posteritie the least glympse of his glory for many generations after made them cry out Alas we shall dye because we have seen the Lord. We stil continue like the off-spring of tame Creatures growen wild alwayes eschewing his presence that seeks to recover us as the Bird doth the Fowler or the beasts of the Forrest the sight of fire And yet unless he shelter us under the shadow of his wings we are as a prey exposed to the destroyer already condemned for Fewel to the flames of hell or as nutriment to the brood of serpents To redeem us from this everlasting thraldome our God came down into the world disguised in the similitude of our flesh made as a stale to allure us with wiles into his net that he might draw us with the cords of Love The depth of Christs humiliation was as great as the difference between God and the meanest man therefore truly infinite He that was equal with God was conversant with us here on earth in the form and condition of a servant But of servants by birth or civil constitution many live in health and ease with sufficient supplies of all things necessary for this life So did not the Son of God his humanitie was charged with all the miseries whereof mortality is capable subject to hunger and thirst to temptations revilings and scornings even of his servants an indignitie which cannot befal slaves or vassals either born or made so by men Or to use the Prophets words He bare mans infirmities not spiritually only but bodily For who was weak and he was not weak Who was sick and he whole No malady of any disease cured by him but was made his by exact and perfect sympathie Lastly He bare our sinnes upon the Crosse and submitted himself to greater torments then any man in this life can suffer And although these were as displeasant to his humane Nature as to ours yet were our sins to him more displeasant As he was loving to us in his death so was he wise towards himself and in submitting himself to this ignominious and cruel death did of two evils chuse the lesse Rather to suffer the punishment due to our sins then to suffer sin stil to reign in us whom he loved more dearly then his own life If then we shall continue in sin after manifestation of this his Love the heinousnesse of our offence is truly infinite in as much as we do that continually which is more distasteful to our gracious God then any torments can be to us So doing we build up the works of Satan which he came purposely to destroy For of this I would not have you ignorant that albeit the end of his death was to redeem sinners yet the only means predestinated by him for our Redemption is destruction of the works of Satan and renovation of his Fathers Image in our souls For us then to re-edifie the works of Satan or abett his Faction is still more offensive to this our God then was his Agony and bloodie Sweat For taking a fuller measure of our sins let us hereunto adde his patient expectation of his enemies Conversion after his Resurrection 15. If the son of Zaleucus before mentioned should have pardoned any as deeply guilty as himself had been of that offence for which he lost one eye and his Father another the world would have taxed him either of injustice folly or too much facility rather then commended him for true Justice or Clemencie But that we may know how far Gods Mercie doth over-beare his Majestie he proceeds not straight way to execute vengeance upon these Jewes which wreaked their malice upon his deare and only Son who had committed nothing worthy of blame much lesse of death Here was matter of wrath and indignation so just as would have moved the most merciful man on earth to have taken speedy vengeance upon these Spillers of innocent blood specially the Law of God permitting thus much But Gods mercy is above his Law above his Justice these did exact the very abolition of these sinners in the very first act of sin committed against God made man for their redemption Yet he patiently expects their repentance which with unrelenting fury had plotted his destruction Forty yeers long had he been grieved with this generation after the first Passeover celebrated in sign of their deliverance from Egyptian bondage and for their stubbornesse he swore they should not enter into his rest And now their posterity after a more glorious deliverance from the Powers of darknesse have fortie yeers allotted them for repentance before they be rooted out of the Land of Rest or Promise Yet hath not the Lord given them hearts to perceive eyes to see or ears to hear unto this day because seeing they would not see nor hearing they would not hear but hardened their hearts against the Spirit of Grace Lord give us what thou didst not give them hearts of flesh which may melt at thy threats ears to hear the admonitions of our peace and eyes to foresee the day of our visitation that so when thy wrath shall be revealed against sin and sinners we may be sheltred from stormes of fire and brimstone under the shadow of thy wings so long stretched out in mercie for us Often O Lord wouldst thou have gathered us and we would not But let there be we beseech thee an end of our stubborn ingratitude towards thee no end of thy mercies and loving kindness towards us Amen CHAP. XLVI HEER 4. verse 12 13. For the Word of God is quick and powerful and sharper then any two edged Sword piercing even to the dividing asunder of Soul and Spirit and of the joynts and marrow and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart Neither is there any Creature that is not manifest in his sight but all things are naked and open unto the eyes of him with whom we have to do 1. IF a meer Artist altogether unacquainted with the Mysteries contained in Scripture or with the drift on scope of this Epistle should have dipt upon this Text he would have thought the Author of it had intended some Copia Verborum or Poetical Sylva of Epithites the words be so many and so ponderous And yet there be as many several Propositions almost as there be words And of all these Propositions or this weighty structure of words the Foundation or Subject is but One to wit The WORD OF GOD. About the Attributes or Epithites of This Word though these be many there is no difficultie or matter worthy of any disquisition which is not meerly Verbal or Grammatical The Subject though but One admits or rather requires many Disquisitions all truly Theological worthy the search or paines of a true
become a better man by this practise by which he doth utterly cease to be a man if his hopes had been terminated with this mortal life or if he had not remained capable of reward or punishment after death That very thing was even by the verdict of the Heathen highly magnified in Regulus a wise States-man and good Patriot which in a bruit Beast of what kinde soever would have been accounted and that justly more then unreasonableness a very madness For no beast unless it be altogether mad will evidently expose it self to death That which exempts Regulus his witting exposing of himself to a more cruel death then any sober man could finde in his heart to put a dumb beast unto from censure of Folly was The managing of his undertakings by Resolution and Reason And all the reason that he had thus to resolve was That he hoped not utterly to perish as beasts do although certain he was to die Beasts which run upon their own deaths are therefore accounted mad because by death they utterly cease from being what they were For them to desire death is to desire their utter destruction which they could not desire but seek by all means possible to avoid unless they had first put of all common sense wherein the height of their madness consists Regulus was therefore accounted manly resolute and resolutely wise for that in choosing rather to die then to live with stain of perjury or taint his soul with breach of oath he did not desire his own destruction but the continuation of his well-being or bettering his own or his Countries estate And this his desire or resolution which supposeth another sentence after this life ended the Heathens which so highly magnified his resolution did subscribe unto as good and fit to be imitated by all honest men and true Patriots albeit perhaps most of them were unwilling to be his seconds in like attempts when the matter came to the tryal 6. Nor did the Romans onely commend this Resolution in Regulus whose Memory for well deserving of that Commonweal they had in perpetual Reverence But other Heathens which did detest the very name of Christians and eagerly sought the extirpation of Christs Church on earth did as much admire and commend the like in Christian Bishops Two memorable stories very apposite to this purpose come to my minde the one related by St. Gregory Nazianzen the other by St. Austin Nazianzens story is of Bishop Marcus Arethusus who was sentenced to a cruel death and torture by Julian the Emperor unless he would at his own cost and charges build up an Idol Temple which he had caused to be pulled down After that his persecutors had brought the damages required at his hands so low that if he would be content to give but an Angel or some small piece of Gold currant in those times to the re-edifying of the Temple which he had destroyed he should live yet he persevered so constantly in his former Resolution which was not to give so much as a peny by way of Contribution for building up any house of Iniquity that his Persecutors were ashamed to take life from him Saint Augustine in his Tract against Lying tells us of Bishop Firmus who being pressed to bewray another Christian Brother whose death or Turning the Heathens earnestly sought having strong presumptions that This good Bishop knew where he was after many torments and threats of more with great constancy refused All the words that they could wrest from him were these Mentiri non possum I cannot lie and yet he must haue lyed if he had denyed that he knew where the Party was whose life they sought But as I cannot lie so I cannot become a Traytor or Bewrayer of my Brother do what you will or can unto me This constant Resolution as Saint Austine testifies did so turn the edge of his Persecutors malice into admiration and reverence of his integrity that they dismist him with honor Howbeit there had been no wit or praise-worthiness in the practise unless the Practiser had expected some beter Sentence after Death to which he did thus constantly expose himself then the applause of these Heathens which he could not hope for which he did not expect And the heathens in commending and admiring his constancy and integrity did though faintly or unwittingly yet necessarily subscribe unto the truth of his hopes or belief of a Iudgment after death as also unto that Oracle of God delivered by his Apostle that seeing Christ hath laid down his life for us we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren 1 Iohn 3. 16. At least we ought to expose our selves to bodily death rather then suffer them to be put upon the hazard of death eternal As it is likely this Good Bishop feared lest he should hazard this poor Christian soul whose death or Turning the Heathens sought being not so certain of his Resolution as of his own but doubtful whether he would not deny Christ or renounce the Christian Faith rather then suffer such tortures as he now felt or expose himself to such a violent and cruel death as they threatned him with 7. Again The most wise and learned among the heathen Philosophers did place Felicity or true happiness in the constant practise of Virtue as in Temperance Justice Wisdom c. The Stoicks were so wedded to this Opinion that they held virtue to be a sufficient recompence to it self at what rate soever it was purchased or maintained though with the loss of life and limbs with the most exquisite and lingring tortures that our senses are capable of They esteemed Regulus more happy even in the middest of his torments then his persecutors were or could be in the height of their mirth and prosperity or in the perfect fruition of their health or best contentments of their senses or understandings Yea so far they went that they judged Regulus to perpetual happiness albeit he had been perpetually or everlastingly so tormented as for a time he was But This 〈…〉 as was formerly intimated then any good Christian is bound to believe 〈…〉 we are bound to believe the contrary For so St. Paul who was more virtuously constant then Regulus was in his profession more then virtuously Religiously constant in all the wayes of Godliness tels us 1 Cor. 15. 19. That if in this life only we had hope that is were quite without hopes of a better life then this present is we Christians such good Christians as he himself was were of all men the most miserable The Heathen then the Stoicks especially did well and wisely in acknowledging Felicity to consist in Virtue in acknowleding Virtue to be a full recompence to it self in respect of any temporary evil or punishment that could be opposed unto it They wisely resolved in holding them more happy which did suffer torments for a good Cause then they which made it a part of their pleasure or happiness
imports the Real Cause of the thing it self which is known But oftentimes the Cause only of our knowledge of it Again such Causal Particles do not alwayes import some Efficacious Causalitie but only Causam sine qua non some necessarie means or condition without which the prime and principal Cause especially if it work freely doth not produce its intended effect To give you Examples or instances of these Observations If a stranger coming into a Citie should say surely yonder Gentleman is the chief Magistrate because the sword is born before him No wise man would hence collect that the bearing of the sword before him is The Cause why he is the chief Magistrate For his lawful Election is The Cause of that and that is the Cause why the sword is born before him Yet may we not for this reason deny that the former speech doth necessarily import a Cause for the bearing of the sword before him is the true True Cause of his knowing him to be the chief magistrate And in as much as we oftentimes come to know the Cause by the Effect this word For or other Conjunction Causal doth oft-times point out the Effect rather then the Cause of the thing it self So it doth in the speech of our Saviour Luke 7. 45. Wherefore I say unto thee her sins which are many are forgiven for she loved much However some Romanists whose delight it is to set Christian Charitie and faith at odds would hence collect that Charitie is the Cause of the forgiveness of sins yet their greatest Scholars acknowledge their error or oversight and ingenuously acknowledge their understanding being convinced by the evidence of truth that This womans Love was not the Cause why her sins were forgiven but that the Free forgiveness of her sins which were many was the True Cause why she loved so much however her extraordinary love being testified in such solemn sort was a true Cause or reason by which all that saw her might know both that her sins had been many and that she had an internal feeling or apprehension of their forgiveness And the true reason why the Pharisee did neither bear such love unto our Saviour nor exhibit the like signes of respect unto him was because he did not feel himself sick much lesse did he feel or apprehend the cure of his sickness as the woman did For if he had known either the measure of his own sins or that our Saviour was the Physician of his soul he would have given better Testification of his love and respect unto him then he did by a Complemental Invitation of him 12. To instance again If of two parties equally suspected of Felonie a man admitted to hear their examination or tryal should say This is the thief For Two competent witnesses have given evidence against him no man would hence infer that the evidence given in against him by two honest men was the Cause why he was a thief and yet was it the true Cause why he knew him to be the thief Every Revelation or authentick Declaration of any truth before unknown is the true Cause of our knowledge of it but not of the Truth it self for that is the Cause why the Declaration or our knowledge of it is true Now amongst such as professe Christ and call him Lord it is unknown to us who be the true heirs of this heavenly kingdom who be not but in the day of Final Judgement in which all shall be judged by their works the sheep shall be known from the goats and the first certain knowledge which we shall have of this difference shall be from The Declarative sentence of the Judge who cannot erre and his Declaration as you see shall be made according to their works The ones performance of the Good works here mentioned declared and testified by the Judge shall be the True Cause by which men and Angels shall know them to be heirs of the everlasting Kingdom the others Omission of the like works testified likewise by the same Judge shall be the true cause by which we shall know them to be altogether unworthy of Gods favour or mercy most worthy of everlasting death We shall then truly know that the one sort are crowned as Saint Cyprian saith according to Gods Grace and that the other are condemned according to Justice That the ones omission of Good Works is the true Cause of condemnation and that the others performance of Good works is not the Cause of their salvation but the Declaration only or a Testimonie that they are the Sons of God and that they did Good works by the secret Operation of the spirit of Grace in them And thus much if you observe it is implyed in the Reply or Answer of them that be saved to their Judge Lord When saw we thee an hungred c So farre they shall be from conceiting their works to be meritorious or worthie of eternal bliss that they shall be ready to disclaim them as not worthie of it ready to blame their sluggish backwardness or want of chearfulness to have done much better seeing what they did unto their poor brethren as now they perceive shall be so graciously accepted that Christ in his Throne of Majestie will acknowledge that he takes them as kindly as if they had been done unto himself The Case is the same as if a Gracious Prince of his own free motion and goodness should proclaim a general Pardon to a multitude of Rebels Thieves and Traytors so they would accept of it and make their peace with their honest neighbors whom they have wronged All of them in shew accept the Pardon but some of them in the Interim secretly practise treason or disturb the publick peace If at the general Assize or at their Arraignment the Judge upon certain notice of their several demeanors should say to the one sort I restore you to your former state and dignity Because since the Proclamation of your Pardon you have demeaned your selves as becomes Loyal Subjects and thankful men And to the other you I condemn to death Because you have abused your Soveraigns Clemency No man would ascribe the restauration of the one unto their good demeanor in the Interim betwixt the getting of their Pardon and their Arraignment but unto the Princes Clemencie Albeit the condemnation of the other were wholly to be ascribed unto their misdemeanors not unto any want of Clemencie in the Prince towards them The good demeanor of the one could but be at the most Causasine qua non A necessary Condition without which the Princes Clemencie in his Pardon exprest could not profit them And so we say of Good Works They are Causae sine quibus non necessary Conditions or means without which no man shall inherit the Kingdom of Heaven but no Positive or meritorious Causes of our inheritance in it To conclude If any one should ask me Why all men that profess they beleive in Christ shall not be saved Albeit Christ
destroy but rather to save and heal you If your impenitencie and perverseness have moved me to speak severely or threaten you it is still for your good Severum medicum ager intemperans facit Your obdurate hearts have caused me oft-times the mildest Physician that ever took cure of the body or soul upon him to use tart speeches unto you yet shall it never provoke me to be cruel in my practice So farre am I from seeking your blood or harm that my blood which you have continually sought whensoever you shed it shall make an Attonement for you shall procure a Free and Gracious General Pardon for all your sins and for all the sins of your fore-fathers in shedding the Blood of Prophets sent unto them But when I have done all when all is done that could be done unto this Vineyard which my Father planted according to the Rules of Equity of mercy and benignity without wrong or prejudice to eternal Iustice Unless by sincere Repentance as well for your own sins as for the sins of your fore-fathers wherein you have been too deep part-takers with them you submit your selves unto my Fathers will and with all humility crave allowance of that most Free and Gracious Pardon which my blood shall purchase for you and for all the world besides The City of Abel's and of Zachariah's blood will at the last prevail against you the blood of both of them and of all the Prophets whom your fore-fathers have slain will be Required of this Generation in fuller measure then it was of those which slew them and this will be a burden too heavy for you to bear much heavier then the punishment of Cain albeit neither my blood nor the blood of any of mine Apostles or Disciples do come at all upon the Score or Reckoning wherewith Moses in whom ye trust and the Prophets whose Tombs and Sepulchres ye build and garnish will be ready to charge you in the day of your Account or Visitation For if the blood of Christ or of his Apostles had been Required at their hands which shed it me thinks this Emphatical Ingemination Verily I say unto you it shall be required c. should not be so needful and weighty as were all the words uttered by Him who spake as never man spake 10. But may we from any or all these Premisses conclude that This present Generation was not punished at all for putting our Saviour to death Or that his death or the indignities done unto His more then sacred Person at or before his death was no Cause at all of those Exemplary Punishments or unparalleld plagues which fell upon Ierusalem and Iudah upon this whole present generation God forbid The Question is not Whether our Saviours death was any Cause at all of the exemplary punishments but What manner of Cause it was or In what sense they may be said to be plagued for wronging him thus We answer that the indignities done unto Him at his death and at his arraignment were such Causes of the ensuing Woes and calamities which came upon this Generation as Absentia Nautae is naufragii The Case or Species facti is thus Suppose a skilful Navigator and experienced Pilot which had long governed some tall and goodly Ship with good success in many difficult voyages should at the length either by the greediness of the Owner be casheerd or inforced to leave his place and a storm upon his departure should arise and through want of good steerage or sounding should run them on ground or dash them against the rocks we may say without Solecisme that the Abandoning or Absence of the former Master or Pilot was the Cause of the shipwrack or the loss of men or goods although he neither were any Cause of raising the storm nor prayed against them as Zacharias did against his persecutors nor gave them any wrong directions before he left them Now the Son of God from the time of his peoples thraldom in Egypt but more especially from the time of their deliverance thence had been in Peculiar manner the King and Governor of the Iews in all their Consultations of Peace or Warre their only Pilot in all their storms And however throughout their several Generations they were often greivously punished yet were they alwayes punished Citra condignum much less then their iniquities had deserved Briefly by His wisdom he preserved them safe in such distresses as without his only skill would utterly have overwhelmed the State and Nation And by his Intercession prevented the Out-bursting or fall of that hideous storm which had been secretly and by degrees more insensible gathering against them then that Cloud which Eliah's servant saw rising out of the Sea even from the death of Zachariah the son of Iehoiada and other Prophets and righteous men whose blood their fore-fathers before and after his had shed But after this last Generation had both by express words and practice verified that saying of God to Samuel They have not cast off thee from being King over them but they have cast off Me. That other prophesie or sweetly mild fore-warning for which they took occasion to stone Zachariah to death in the Courts of the Lords House was exactly fulfilled in upon them This Prophecie or fore-warning we have 2 Chron. 24. verse 20. Thus saith God Why transgress ye the Commandements of the Lord that ye cannot prosper because ye have forsaken the Lord he hath also forsaken you This Prophesie with that other of Samuel was most exactly fulfilled Tam verbis quam factis male ominatis mala ominantibus when they solemnly protested before Pilate that they had no other King but Caesar From this time the hideous storms of Gods wrath and anger against them for their own sins and the sins of their fore-fathers did dayly encrease and at last were poured out in full measure upon them when they had no Prophet nor any man that understood any more no Signs or Tokens but such as were dismal no Pilot or skilful Governor to direct them no pious Priest to make Intercession for them For having thus solemnly abandoned The Son of God their King and Lord who had been their continual Sanctuary the destroying Angels who had long waited their Opportunity to put their Commission in Execution did Arrest their bodies delivering up some to the Famine some to the Sword others to the Fowls of the air and Beasts of the field and did seize upon their Land which God had given to their Fore-fathers for the use of others even for the most wicked of the Heathens first bestowing it upon the Romans afterward upon the Saracens and last of all upon the Barbarous Turk under whose heavy yoke the inheritance and some of the posterity of Iacob have long groaned and still must groan until they confess their own sins and the sins of their fore-fathers and return unto the Allegiance of their Gracious Lord and Sovereign whom their Fore-fathers this
times seven generations as many several successions of men or families as have lived since Abels death unto this present day All this being supposed or admitted yet the Expression of Gods mercies in the same Commandement unto the children of such as love him and keep his Commandements is a lively Character of that Truth which we must believe to wit That Gods Mercie as farre exceedeth his Justice towards men as a thousand doth three or four unless they desperately make up the full measure of their own and their fore-fathers sins either by positive transgressions or by slighting or not repairing in time unto the out-stretched wings of his Mercie In this Case they provoke or pull down the heavy stroak of his out-stretched Arm of Justice 3. This difficultie in the Entry into or Barre of this narrow passage being cleared we may safely proceed by the former way proposed that is by searching the Mean or sounding the difference between these two Absolute Truths 1. God never punisheth the Children for their Fathers sins Secondly God usually visiteth the sinnes of the Fathers upon the Children c. The most punctual difference of these two undeniable Truths to my apprehension and Observation is this To punish the Children for their Fathers sins implies a punishment of some persons be they more or few without any personal guilt in them or actual transgressions committed by them And thus to do in awarding punishments temporarie whether Capital or Corporal for with punishments everlasting or in the world to come I dare not meddle or interpose my verdict were open injustice The sons of Traytors or Rebels against the Crown and dignitie of the State wherein they live are not by humane laws obnoxious to any Corporal or Capital punishment unless they be in some degree guilty of their Fathers treason or rebellion not by misprision only but by Association And however Good Laws do deprive guiltless Children of the Lands and Titles of honour which their Fathers enjoyed yet are they oftentimes upon their good demeanor restored to their blood and to the lands and dignities of their Ancestors even by such Princes as are no fit paterns of that Clemencie which becometh Princes Not so much as good foyls to set forth or commend the clemencie and benignitie of God if we consider it as it is avouched by Ezekiel in the eighteenth Chapter However earthly Princes may demean themselves towards the guiltless or well-deserving sons of Traytors or Rebels the reason or intendment of severest publick Laws in this Case provided was not to lay any punishment upon the Children but rather a Tye or bond upon their Fathers not to offend in this high kind so often as otherwise they would do save onely for the love they bear unto their Children and posterity or for the fear of tainting their blood or dishonouring their Friends and Families Of the equity or good intendment of such Laws we have the fairest patern in the fore-cited place of Ezekiel chap. 18. 31 32. Cast away from you all your transgressions whereby ye have transgressed and make you a new heart and a new spirit For why will ye die O ye house of Israel For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dyeth saith the Lord God wherefore turn your selves and live ye 4. To visit the sins of the Fathers upon their Children alwayes supposeth some degree of personal guilt in the Children yet such a guilt or such transgressions as would not be punished so greivously either for measure or manner as usually they are unless their Fathers had set them bad Examples by sinning in the same or like kind But the Circumstances or Conditions which most aggravate or bring the heaviest visitation of Fathers sins upon the Children are these First if their Fathers have been punished citra condignum that is in a less measure or lower degree then their personal transgressions had deserved The Second if their Fathers punishments have been upon Register or Record so remarkably suited unto their sins that their Children might as they ought have taken notice of the occasions of Gods displeasure against them or punishing hand upon them To draw these Generals more close unto the Hypothesis or to joyn them together by annexing some particular Instances unto them Few here present can be so ignorant either of domestick or publick Statutes amongst us but may easily observe that the same offence being re-iterated or often committed by one and the same party is or ought to be more greivously punished for the second Turn then for the first more greivously for the third time then for the second more for the fourth then for all the three former This manner of proceeding in Colledges or Academical Societies is most agreeable to the Ancient Constitutions of this Kingdom for the manner of Processes in Courts Ecclesiastick The not appearing upon lawful Summons in Courts Ecclesiastick was for the first neglect but a mulct of Twenty pence according to the Rate of money in those dayes The second mulct for not appearing upon like Summons did double the first and so did the third the second The mulct for the fourth neglect did more then double or treble all the former For the party thus offending the fourth time in the same kind became liable to the Writ De Excommunicato Capiendo without more ado And this was an heavie punishment if it were executed according to William Rufus his Constitutions Now the Covenant of Life and Death which God made with the Seed of Abraham or with the Sons of Jacob upon their deliverance out of Aegypt afterwards in more express words with the house of David or tribe of Judah throughout their generations is the true Patern or Authentick leading Case of all Just and Legal Proceedings with One and the same Partie for often committing the same Offence especially in Case he had been solemnly fore-warned whether without any punishment at all or with some light punishment annexed for the first time Every fore-warning makes the following offence though in it self not so great a great deal more hainous and liable to more greivous punishment 5. To take a more particular view of the peculiar Aspect which these heavenly Lights Gods Laws I mean had to the Seed of Jacob or Kingdom of Israel and Judah For in respect of other Kingdoms or Nations their aspect admits some variation To keep the seed of Jacob upright in the wayes of Faithful Abraham the God of their fathers left them a Twofold Register to be perpetually continued by his Prophets or other sacred Writers The One containing their fore-fathers Good deeds and the prosperity which alwayes did attend them The Other of their Fore-fathers grossest sins or transgressions and of the calamities which pursued them The former Register was to encourage them to do that which was good and acceptable in his sight The other to deterre them from evil from turning aside from him and his Laws The
intended by Maldonate and others That the plagues here threatned by our Saviour must wholly be ascribed to the murthering of Him and his Apostles without any Reference to the slaughter of Gods Prophets The Infiniteness of the Person offended makes up but one and not the greatest Dimension in the body of sin the Soliditie or heynousness of it must be derived from another Root And though it be most true that every sin is an offence against an Infinite Majestie yet is He whose Majestie is Infinite in a manner infinitely more offended with some sinnes then with others 2. Ignorance of those great mysteries which we beleive and acknowledge did somewhat mitigate the Iews offences as personal against our Saviour and excuse their Persons a Tanto though not a Toto We speak the Wisdom of God which none of the Princes of this world knew for had they known it they would not have crucified the Lord of Glory 1 Cor. 2. 7 8. And again They of Jerusalem and their Rulers because they knew him not nor yet the voices of the Prophets they have fulfilled them in condemning him Acts 13. 27. St. Peter hath avouched as much upon his own knowledge as St. Paul did in mitigation of these Jews offence And now brethren I wot that out of ignorance ye did it as did also your Rulers Act. 3. verse 17. Some rigid Accuser of these hateful men would perhaps reply that they were ignorant through their own default All this being granted their fault lies properly in the true and immediate Cause of their Ignorance not in that ignorance which was no otherwise Cause of their actual murther then by not restraining their malice which first brought forth ignorance and then murther What then were the true and proper Causes of their malitious Ignorance Self-conceit of their own righteousness pride ambition covetousness unto all which as also to their obdurateness in all these and like enormities such partial apprehensions of their fathers idolatry and cruelty in killing the Prophets as we have of their hypocrisie and cruelty against Christ did concurre as Accessarie or Causes Collateral Being so much addicted to covetousness to pride and ambition and so self-conceited of their own righteousness in respect of other men it was impossible they should not do as they did These Collections to my apprehension are the same with that of our Saviour He that believeth not is condemned already because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God And this is their condemnation What That they went about to kill Christ No but that light is come into the world and men loved darkness rather then light But why did they so Because their deeds were evil For every one that doth evil hateth the light He that now is otherwise as evil as they were before Christ came would have hated him and his Disciples as much as they did and is as liable as they were to any punishment which they suffered for their trespasses against him Suppose he had come into the world in the dayes of Joash who put Zachariah to death done the same works used the same admonitions and reproofs to have recalled that headstrong generation from Idolatry which he did to reclaim the Scribes and Pharisees from their hypocrisie and malice Gods Prophets which knew their temper would not I am perswaded have been too forward to have been their Bails for much better behaviour towards their Lord and Master then they had shewed towards themselves his servants St. Stephen's Censure of this people from time to time Ye do alwayes resist the holy Ghost As your fathers did so do ye gives us occasion to suspect that they were sometimes afore Christs time so wicked as if he had come in their dayes they would have done as this later generation did But these have killed him De Facto Their sin notwithstanding is not hereby greater then theirs that would have been as forward to kill him if he had given them the like provocation For so his manifestation in the flesh should necessarily have made this later Generation worse then any former had been and God had dealt less graciously with them in presenting his Son unto them then with their wicked fathers which never had seen him But against these and the like necessary Consequences of the former Position our Saviour protests God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world but that the world through him might be saved John 3. 17. And this salvation was first out of love no doubt to be tendred unto Ierusalem and her children 3. The Issue of these Deductions in brief is this The Scribes and Pharisees did no way exceed their fathers in wickedness unless perhaps in Hypocrisie or unwillingness to be reclaimed Christ was a better Teacher then the Prophets were and unto us it is manifest that these Scribes and Pharisees which would not learn goodness of him were most wickedly wilful But whether more wicked or wilful then any of their fathers before or others that lived since that time have been is more then man can determine It must be left to his judgment which judgeth not as man doth by the Event but by clear sight of the heart For the same reason it cannot be resolved whether they that put our Saviour to death were greater sinners then King Ioash and his Princes Only this we know and must believe That these later did fill up the measure of their fore-fathers iniquity that the complement of their iniquity being come the vials of Gods wrath were poured more plentifully upon this last Generation then upon any former but should not have been so plentifully poured upon it unless Zacharias and the Prophets had been so desperately slain by their fathers And for any Argument that can be brought to the contrary had Christ been crucified when Zacharias was slain and Zacharias slain when he was crucified all other proper Circumstances of each Fact besides this change of time continuing the same it is probable from my Text That Gods judgments upon this Nation had been less in the former age then they were and more greivous more sudden and terrible in the later then are now recorded Nor can this Consequence be any whit prejudiced albeit we grant the practises of cruelty against our Saviour to have been seven hundred thousand times more heynous in themselves then any could have been attempted against Zacharias The destruction of our Saviours Enemies upon the first Arrest or shameless abuse of His sacred Body in justice might and without his Intercession perhaps would have been more sudden and dreadful then Sodoms was Obdurate pride unrelenting cruelty and general impenitencie for other foul sins as they concerned the Whole Trinity or were matter of sin against the Holy Ghost he could not remit or make intercession for them in the dayes of his flesh but is to call their Authors to strict account as he is the Judge
true Comment on my Text Therefore said the wisdom of God I will send them Prophets and Apostles and some of them they shall slay That the blood of all the Prophets shed from the foundation of the world may be required of this generation from the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias Verily I say unto you it shall be required of this generation Luke 11. v. 49 50 51. The Emphatical resuming of the Terms which Zacharias used It shall be required of this generation implies as much as if our Saviour had said The day of vengeance and execution which Zacharias sollicited against your fathers for their Apostasie from God and their Cruelty towards him is yet to come His innocent blood which was in part required of that wicked King and the Princes which shed it shall be required in fuller measure of this generation which is more bloodily minded then that was and herein worse then all the former in that it will not take warning either by Cain's punishment or the calamities which befel this people for their cruelty towards Zacharias and other Prophets For the Army of the Syrians came with a small company and the Lord delivered a very great hoast into their hands because they had forsaken the Lord So they executed judgment against Joash And left him in great diseases and his own servants conspired against him for the blood of the sons of Jehoiadah the Priest and slew him 2 Chron 24 24 25. 5. Yet some there be which question Whether Zacharias did not use these words only by way of Prophecie fearing belike least his using of them by way of Curse or Imprecation might argue he died not in perfect charity But seeing he was a Prophet he might foresee many reasons unknown to us not to pray for them but against them Or if out of the bitterness of his soul or indignation at this graceless Kings ingratitude he did thus pray against him and his people we may not condemn him of sin although it would be a damnable sin in us to imitate him in like Cases Nor is it necessary we should think he did wish their eternal destruction but only indefinitely desire that God would not suffer such an Execrable Conspiracie to go unpunished least others should be emboldened to do the like And though we know not upon what motives or warrants all other Prophets of God or Types of Christ in their perplexity and distress so zealously pray for vengeance against their malicious persecutors yet we should know One true Use or End of these their usual practises to be this that the world might note the difference between them and the promised Messias who though he had suffered greater indignities more open shame and more greivous vexations at this peoples hands then all his fore-runners had done yet never complains never prayes against them but for them even whiles they crucifie him This his peculiar Character argues he came into the world not to condemn but to save it And when his Disciples desire him to call down fire from heaven as Elias did he derives his sharp Check from this Principle which they should have known Ye know not what Spirit ye are of for the Son of God is not come to destroy mens lives but to save them Luke 9. 55. Did then Elias or Elisha his Scholar sin in taking vengeance upon the enemies of their God Who dare avouch it Or if to execute vengeance were lawful to them as they were Prophets was it unlawful for Zacharias upon greater personal indignities to desire the Lord would revenge his death Yet Christs Disciples might not do so because they were to be of another Spirit as having a better example set by their Master at his death 6. But whence is it that Zacharias's curse should take better effect against this Generation which had never offended him never known him then our Saviours prayers powred out for their safety whiles he offered himself in sacrifice Was it possible Zacharias's spirit of cursing and indignation should be stronger so long after his death then the spirit of prayer and blessing was in the Redeemer of Israels living mouth God forbid Rather this Generation by reviving their fore-fathers sins awaked Gods Justice to renew their plagues and by their impenitencie made themselves uncapable of that General Pardon which Christ had procured for all that be penitent or would rightly use it But neither did he pray that their stubbornness might be pardoned nor did Zachariah's curse make them stubborn Their impenitency is from themselves and whiles they continue stubborn and impenitent they can have no Allowance of that General Pardon which they will not plead or stand to as standing too much upon their own integrity Since Christs death they have been perpetually punished for their impenitencie yet not punished with perpetual impenitencie for putting him to death But take we them as they are in their impenitency may we think they were thus grievously punished for shedding His Blood or for the blood of Abel Zacharias and other Prophets unjustly shed by their fore-fathers for their personal hatred against him as the Son of God or for their habitual hatred and opposition unto that truth which made his person and presence as it had done all the Prophets before him so hateful unto them They were plagued questionless for that Blood which was required of them And that was Zacharias's and Abel's Blood not Christs 7. That this multiplication of punishment cannot be meant only of the same persons multiplying the same or the like offences but withall of different ages or successions is apparent partly because it is spoken generally of the whole State or Nation partly from the different specifical qualitie or extent of the plagues here mentioned often inflicted on several generations of the Israelites But specially from the Tenour and purpose of the Law it self strictly enjoyning the scattered Reliques of this people after execution of the last plague To confess the iniquity of their Fathers as an especial Duty to be performed on their parts and as a necessary mean in Gods Ordination for their Absolution or deliverance And if without Confession of their fathers iniquitie they cannot be absolved from their own their fathers iniquitie not repented of was their own so was the punishment due unto it The Consequence is evident to Reason but more evident from the express words of the Text Ye shall perish among the heathen and the land of your enemies shall eat you up And they that are left of you shall pine away in their iniquity in your enemies lands and also in the iniquities of their fathers shall they pine away with them If they shall then confess the iniquities of their fathers with their trespass which they trespassed against me and that also they have walked contrary unto me And that I have also walked contrary unto them and have brought them into the land of their enemies If then their uncircumcised
hearts be humbled and they then accept of the punishment of their iniquity Then will I remember my Covenant with Jacob and also my Covenant with Isaac and also my Covenant with Abraham will I remember and I will remember the land Gods Covenant is with his people whether Jews or Gentiles and their children joyntly Every Child is born as it were heir to his Fathers sins and their plagues unless he renounce them by taking their guilt upon him in such hearty Confession as this law prescribes and patient submission of himself to Gods correction To satisfie Gods justice for the least trespass committed by our Ancestors is impossible But to avert their just punishment from our selves by unfeigned Conversion unto God in those particulars wherein our fathers have forsaken him is a duty possible because necessary to every faithful soul As if the father have been an unconscionable gatherer or cruel oppressor the son is more strictly bound then otherwise he were to abound in works of mercie towards the poor to give liberally to such as need to lend freely to such as desire rather their kindness then meer Almes If the father have been a blasphemer or greivous swearer the son must consecrate his tongue to God and use no speech but such as may minister grace unto the hearers Briefly Posterity besides performance of duties common to all must alwayes be zealous observers of those precepts which their fore-fathers have principally transgressed The truth of this Inference is warranted by that very Text of Scripture intirely considered whose first passages are by worldlings brought against it What more common shelter for security in this kind then the Prophets speech The soul that sinneth it shall die Ezek. 18. v. 4. But every soul that sees his fathers sins and sorrows not for them sins them over again And now Lo saith the Prophet if he beget a son that seeth all his fathers sins which he hath done and considereth and doth not such like one that hath not oppressed any nor with-held the pledge one that hath not spoiled by violence shall he by not doing all or any of these escape Gods wrath kindled against his father No Performance of Negatives makes no man just If doing none of these he hath given his bread to the hungry whom his father deprived of food covered the naked whom his father spoiled with a garment And taken off his hand from the poor on whom his fathers hand was heavy if he hath not received usury nor increase but hath executed my judgments and hath walked in my statutes he shall not die for the iniquity of his father saith the Lord he shall live Ezek. 18. 14 15 16. From these Laws thus expounded specially from that of Gods visiting the sins of fathers upon their children unto the third and fourth generation The reason is plain why some Royal or noble families have had their Fatal Periods in the dayes of such as to the sight of men were no way so heynous offenders as their fore-elders had been With instances to this purpose you that can read may furnish your selves out of Histories sacred and moral domestick and forreign Every one of you may without reading observe that many extortioners or cruel oppressors children come oft-times to greater misery then their fathers in this life suffered albeit they did not so well deserve it in your judgments But if positive or actual transgressions otherwise equal be liable by the Rule of Divine Justice to more then double punishment in the son that hath had fair warnings in his father It is very consonant to the same Rule that the son albeit he do not imitate his fore-fathers in actual transgressions should suffer greater temporal punishments then they did for not confessing their sins as Gods Law requires or not glorifying Gods name by his fidelity in contrary practises of charity and godliness Many children by not making restitution of goods ill gotten by some of their Ancestors have forfeited unto Gods hands whatsoever all had gotten The best way for all to make kingdoms or private inheritances greater in length or duration would be to diminish them in mass or substance by paring off what is tainted or corrupted But leaving these particulars to the Application let us apply the doctrine hitherto generally delivered unto the point in Question We must consider that the Jewish Nation had many fore-warnings of Gods displeasure in the Ages before Zacharias That in his time both Prince and People the whole Nation stood as condemned by that his sentence solemnly pronounced Ex Cathedra ye shall not prosper ye have forsaken the Lord and the Lord hath forsaken you though God tempering his judgments with mercy reprieved this State in hope of amendment But of succeeding Princes some proved more gross Idolaters then Joash had been viz. Ahaz Some shed more innocent blood then he had done so did Manasses And of the people more grew worse few better then their fathers had been such as were better were not so forward to expiate the sins of former times as the worse sort were to augment them And according as they were augmented Gods judgments did gather and multiply by degrees against this people And the sentence solemnly denounced by Zachariah often re-iterated in more severe termes by later Prophets is executed at length according to the full measure of their iniquity witness the first and second destruction of the City and Temple the desolation of the Land and captivity of the whole Nation The whole manner of Gods proceeding against them first in Mercie then in Judgment lastly in Severity and fury is most directly set forth unto us by Our Saviour in the Parable of the Vineyard let out to husbandmen whose estate in it was utterly void upon the first Non-payment of rent if the Lord had dealt in justice with them But though of his servants or rent-gatherers they had beaten one and killed another and stoned a third yet in merciful expectation of their amendment he sent other servants mo then the first and they did unto them likewise Though this iniquity exceeded the former yet the Lords mercy exceeded both and out of his abundant kindness last of all he sent His Son saying They will reverence my Son But as mercy had abounded so their sins did still super-abound For when they saw the Son they said among themselves This is the Heir Come let us kill him and let us seize on his inheritance And as they said so they did They caught him and cast him out of the Vineyard and slew him So fully ripe for Justice was iniquity once come to this height that they themselves whom this Case concerns adjudge the authors of this murther uncapable of mercy For to Our Saviour demanding of them When therefore the Lord of the vineyard cometh What will he do unto these husbandmen They make Reply He will miserably destroy those wicked men and will let out his vineyard unto other
of Syria and he went away from Jerusalem But though the Chaldeans had burnt the House of God and the Palaces of Ierusalem with fire had destroyed all the goodly vessels thereof yet the Lord doth not utterly forsake his vineyard his Church the Quire of Saints still nestles in the branches that are transplanted whose off spring within seventy years is restored unto their native soyl Jerusalem repaired the Temple re-edified and the Land of Iudah sown with the seed of man and beast After this State thus raised again from Civil Death if posterity will not believe nor bring forth better fruits then heretofore their fathers have done neither would they believe though Moses and the Prophets were raised from the dead to exhort them to repentance For this reason after their return from Babylon and re-edification of the Temple God sends no more Prophets save such as they brought with them until the fulness of time or the Third Climacterical Period of this State wherein the disease being become more desperate he sent his only Son the Heir of all things as knowing that if he could not none ever after should be able to recover it This his Son was that Lord which by his peculiar presence had brought this vine out of Egypt but after he had planted it in Iudea and let it out unto these husbandmen went into a farre Country that is he appeared not unto them as he did to Moses to Joshuah c. until in the last dayes he descended from Heaven in the true form and substance of man to receive the fruits He looked at this time especially his vineyard should had brought forth grapes but it brought forth more wild grapes then before He looked for weighty matters of the Law and behold tithing of Mint Annise and Cummin He looked for judgment mercy and faith But behold covetousness extortion pride and cruelty grapes more bitter then the grapes of Sodom Sourness it self the very leaven of Hypocrisie yet upon the first denial of such fruits as he expected he departs not from them he accuseth them not unto his Father But as they had two or three fore-warnings more remarkable then ordinary in several Generations of their Ancestors so he expects a loyal Answer at more times of fruit then one or two presenting himself to them for three years and more together at every several Passover besides other anniversary solemnities And yet at last for constant delivery of that Embassage which he had from his father they caught him and condemned him in the vineyard but carry him out of it to be crucified in Mount Calvarie And thus at length Zachariah's Prophecie against Ioash and his wicked Princes and his Imprecation at his death are fulfilled in this wicked generation they formally forsook their God when they cried We have no King but Caesar and demanding Barabbas a murtherer the son of their father the Divle they destoyed Iesus the Son of God And the Lord hath utterly forsaken them not the Temple and City only but the Inhabitants but the whole race of the Jewish Nation and hath let forth His Vineyard to us Gentiles They were so rich by his bounty that they were ashamed to acknowledge so mean a man as Our Saviour for their Lord and Owner of the Land they inhabited And as the Prophet foretold they hid their faces from him And therefore as Moses testified against them in his dying Song The Lord hides his face from them Darkness did over-spread the Land of Iudah at his Passion and the light of his countenance since that time hath never shined upon that Nation They lost Gods extraordinary Illumination by Urim and Thummim as some hold at Zachariah's death as most agree at the destruction of Salomon's Temple but now are destitute of the light of Scripture without all knowledge of Gods Word since they rejected Him which enlighteneth every man that cometh into the world In the very sun-shine of the Gospel they grope like blind men that cannot see a beaten way and must so continue throughout their generations unto the worlds end until they shall unfeignedly confess the iniquity of their fathers and that they have walked contrary unto me And that I also have walked contrary unto them and have brought them into the land of their enemies Lev. 26. 40 41. As the sins of those Jews which rejected the Light of the world and solemnly revolted from their King have been thus remarkably visited upon their children that will not confess their sins in so doing nor acknowledge him whom they rejected for their expected Redeemer So were the sins of that generation which slue Zachariah visited upon this which crucified our Saviour because they neither did truly confess them but rather revive and increase them nor finally admit of his Sacrifice which was appointed for the expiation of that Prodigious Fact as of all others wherewith the City and Temple had been polluted Unless God's mercy had warded off the stroke of his justice Ierusalem it self had been made an heap of stones when King Ioash stoned Zachariah to death So had the Temple it self wherein his guiltless blood lay uncovered been covered with Dust The whole Nations plagues in rigour of justice might have been much greater at that time then they have been since Now all the mercie or mitigation of Justice which former Generations found was through the Mediation of the Son of God And seeing these later have been more refractorie to this their Mediator himself then were their fathers to his Prophets seeing they have solemnly disavowed him and bid a defiance to his Embassadors Gods mercies which had daily shrowded Ierusalem from his wrath as the hen doth her young ones from the storm leave it and her children open to his justice For Resolution of the main Point or difficulty proposed The forsaking or putting the Son of God to death is for ought I can gather no direct and positive cause of all the miseries expressed or intimated in my Text Only such a Cause of Ierusalems destruction as the Pilots absence is of shipwrack a Cause of it only in this sense that her inhabitants by forsaking him have exempted themselves from his wonted protection and God's justice which had long watched his departure from the City and Temple as Sergeants do their egress which have taken Sanctuary now attatches them when there is none to become their Surety none to intercede for mitigation of Justice none to hinder why judgments heretofore alwayes abated and oft-times altogether deferred may not be executed upon them in full measure But that their Personal Offences against their Mediator should wholly or specially procure this woful doom or come at all into the Bill of their Indictment is in my Opinion no way probable The character of his own speeches as well in my Text or elsewhere altogether disclaims this Assertion as unconsonant to the form of wholsome doctrine But may we say that albeit his blood did not augment their
shall live Hence it is that this people of God in their distress make The Confession of their fore-fathers sins as Essential an Ingredient or Condition of their prayers as the confession of their own Dan. 9. Ezra 9. Nehem. 9. Psal 106 6 7. For this the Lord himself had expresly taught them Levit. 26. For your transgressions the Land of your enemies shall eat you up And they that are left of you shall pine away for their iniquitie and for the iniquities of their fathers shall they pine away with them also Then they shall confess their iniquity and the wickedness of their fathers Ver. 38. Thus doing I will remember saith the Lord my Covenant with Jacoo and my Covenant also with Isaac and also my Covenant with Abraham will I remember and will remember the Land You see then it is evident that as Adam's-sin remaines in his Posterity until it be taken away in Christ so doth Gods wrath abide upon a Land for the former Inhabitants sins and passeth from the Dead unto the Living unless the Attonement be made by the sweet incense of prayer and fervencie of spirit which is to be in every Christian and spiritual Priests heart as ready upon this occasion as fire from the Altar was in Aarons hand when he stayed the Plague by standing betwixt the dead and them that were alive Numb 16. 46. It is not the sacrifice though of the calves of mens lips without an humbled and contrite spirit and fervent zeal of blessing Gods Name by Contrary good deeds that can stay the plague and divert the wrath gone out from God against a Land for her former Inhabitants their Predecessors sins 3. From these Principles we may easily gather How Gods Mercies may be abridged towards a Land or People less sinful perhaps then others formerly have been for actual transgressions if we consider the sins only of the present time From the same Principles we may likewise clearly discern how the full measure of any Lands or Peoples iniquity may be accomplished then when to mens seeming their out-rages be nothing so greivous as others before them have been or when their Princes or Rulers are more then ordinarily religious First Where the transgressions of Predecessors have been many and greivous and the Reformation of their Successors but slight or imperfect the wrath of God procured by the former may remain still and light heaviest upon the Third Generation following who shall procure it further if they follow their Grandsires sins notwithstanding their immediate Parents or Predecessors did in part repent or in some sort renounce their Fathers wayes For the fruits of such repentance seeing it is not Total and proceeds not from a perfect and unfeigned heart do but as it were for a time put off the Fit or Extremity of Gods wrath they take not away the disease it self which therefore returns to its course again As the Psalmist excellently describes the effects of such repentance When he stew them they sought him and they returned and sought God early And they remembred that God was their strength and the most high God their Redeemer but their heart was not upright with him Neither were they faithful in his Covenant The fruit of this was that oft-times he called back his anger and would not suffer his whole displeasure to arise This stayed the Course or Motion of his wrath It did not minish the Inclination or Propension of the same But when the former sins burst out again either in them or their posterity His judgments drew nearer unto them then before and his vengeance was more fierce and sudden Secondly Where the Reformation of Religion and turning unto the Lord is on the Princes parts perfect and compleat yet the people do not inwardly repent and with a perfect heart abjure their fore-fathers wayes the wrath of God due unto their fathers sins comes upon them and is executed by taking away their good and giving them Princes alike minded to themselves And so by little and little they fulfil the iniquity of their fore-fathers 4. To give you a view of these General undoubted Truths in the succession of this Kingdom Righteous David had left Gods Mercie towards this Land and People so farre over-ballancing his Justice that all the Idolatry which Solomon his son had set up albeit idolatry be a most greivous sin did not any more then bring his Mercie to an Equipoize with it again But Rehoboam following his Fathers footsteps in evil not his religious Grandfathers paths in good puls down Gods judgments upon his head and first bears the rod of his transgression having more then one half of his Kingdom rent from him by his servant Jeroboam and afterwards both he and Judah which had remained with him bear the strokes of their iniquity by the hand of Shishak King of Egypt who forraged the Land and took away the treasures of the Temple of the Lord. But in this God did but shake his sword over their heads These beginnings of plagues and judgments are but the Motions of His wrath which abides not for his Mercie presently retired unto the same Point where it stood at Jeroboams revolt Of an unwise father there sprung up immediately an unrighteous son Abijam who though he had sometimes good success against his enemies yet as the sequel of this Story intimates 1 King 15. 3. he had almost brought Gods fierce wrath upon the Land by following his fathers footsteps but that the Lord as yet drew back his punishing hand for Righteous David his great Grand-fathers sake For David 's sake did the Lord his God give him a light in Jerusalem and set up his son after him and established Jerusalem ver 4. This was Asa in whose dayes the Land had peace for he followed the footsteps of his Father David yet was there no perfect Reformation wrought in his raign for the High places were not taken away And he himself after good success in victory was infected with the Fatal disease of Kings and Princes To begin to trust too much to secular Policie and grew impatient of the Lords Prophets reproof But by his carriage and good example such as it is and the righteous reign of his son Jehosaphat is the Current of the Lords former wrath stopped yet so as it is ready to overflow the Land with greater violence in the next succession wherein the like iniquity as had reigned in former times should burst out afresh again Although Jehoshaphat's heart was upright yet did he work no perfect Reformation For the high places were not taken away And as it is 2 Chron. 20. 23. The people had not yet prepared their hearts unto the God of their fathers Neither so penitent as that they could recal Gods wrath or bring his mercie back again unto its former stay Nor yet so extream bad and forward in sin as that the Lord would not spare the Land and be merciful to
any good Christian that will but raise his thoughts above the earth by this or the like Experiment of nature Albeit this bodily Sun which we dayly see were much further distant from the earth then now it is yet could we easily conceive it to be of force and efficacie enough to enlighten the earth whereon we dwell and those coelestial Spheres which are or might be as farre above it as it is above the Center And in the greatest distance we can imagin it is or might be distant from the earth it would give life and vigour to things vegetable or capable of vital heat It were a silly Argument to infer that because the hottest fire on earth cannot impart his heat to bodies 10 miles distant from it therefore the Sun cannot communicate vital heat and Comfort to vegetables more then ten-hundred-thousand miles distant from it This Inference notwithstanding is not so foolish in Philosophie as This following is in Divinitie The Sun cannot quicken trees or herbs which have lost their root and sap Ergo the Sun of righteousnes or Christs Humane Nature in which the Godhead dwelleth Bodily cannot quicken the dead or raise up our mortal bodies to immortalitie The only sure Anchor of all our hopes for a joyfull Resurrection unto the life of Glorie is the Mystical Union which must be wrought here on earth betwixt Christs Humane Nature glorified and our mortal or dissoluble nature The Divine Nature indeed is the Prime Fountain of Life to all but though inexhaustible in it self yet a fountain whereof we cannot drink save as it is derived unto us through the Humane Nature of Christ 11. Although it be most true which Tertullian in the 17 Chapter of his Apologie hath observed That even those Heathens which adored Jupiter Capitolinus and multiplied their Gods according to the number of the places wherein they worshiped them when they were throughly stung with any grievous affliction or calamitie were wont to lift up their eyes and hands not to the Roman Capitol but to heaven it self as knowing that by instinct of nature to be the seat or throne of Divine Majestie And the Hill from whence came their help Yet notwithstanding the truth of this Observation and the profitable use which that Father there makes of it it was an extraordinary Favour of God unto the Israelites that they were permitted and instructed to worship God in his Sanctuarie and to present their devotions towards the Ark of the Covenant or the Mercy-seat before which they might adore him in such manner and sort as they might not in any other place or before any other creature They knew much better then the heathen that Gods Throne of Majestie was in heaven and yet were to tender their devotions unto him as extraordinarily present in his Temple or Sanctuarie here on earth For as our bodily sight doth scatter or dazle without some sensible Object to gather and terminate it So our cogitations though of heaven and heavenly things do float or vanish without some determinate and comprehensible Object whereon to fasten them Now albeit the Temple of Jerusalem wherein Gods People only were to worship were long since demolished yet the Sanctuarie wherein they were to worship God is rather translated or advanced from earth to heaven then destroyed For it was Gods Presence that made the Temple and That is more extraordinary in Christs Body which the Jewes destroyed but which he raised again in three dayes then ever it had been in Solomons Temple in the Glorie of whose goodly structure and manifestation of Gods Glorie in it the true Israelites did much rejoyce and the later Iewes too much boast and glorie But this Prerogative we have in respect of the ancientest and truest Israelites that since the vail of the Temple was rent we may at all times reflecting upon that modell the Scripture hath imprinted in our mindes look within the vail and behold the Ark or Mercy-seat and use the most holy Sanctuarie or inner place made with hands as a Perspective Glasse or instrument for surveying the heavenly Sanctuarie which God hath pitched and not man This hope have we saith S t Paul Heb. 6. 19. as an anchor of the soul both sure and stedfast and which entreth into that within the vail whither the fore-runner is for us entred even Jesus made an high Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedek He is gone before us into the Sanctuarie to make perpetual intercession who before had made an everlasting attonement for us here on earth He is now become to us the Temple of God the Ark of the Covenant the Propitiatorie or Mercie-seat the fulfilling of all things and unto him now placed in his Sanctuarie at the Right-hand of God we are not only to direct our Cogitations or devotions but to transmit our affections to the Divine Nature by him The Son of God after he had suffered in Our flesh and made a full sufficient satisfaction for all our sins did in our nature rise again did in our nature ascend into heaven and in our nature sitteth at the Right-hand of God not only to gather our scatered contemplations and broken notions of the Godhead but withall to draw and unite our affections unto him which otherwise would flagg droop or miscarry if we should direct them to heaven at large or to the incomprehensible Majestie of the Godhead without a known Advocate or Intercessor to present them and to return their effects or issues Hence saith our Apostle Colos 3. 1. If ye be risen with Christ that is if you sted fastly believe that Christ who was the Son of God and as incomprehensible for his Divine Nature as God the Father to whom he was equal did dye in your flesh and comprehensible nature and in the same nature did rise againe from the dead then seek those things which are above where Christ sitteth at the Right-hand of God Set or settle or fasten your affections on things above not on things on the earth And as we are to settle our dearest affections on him so are we to direct our prayers unto him in his heavenly Sanctuarie 12. That we may direct our prayers unto the Blessed Trinitie according to the Rule of Faith which is the first Degree of praying in Faith take for the present these short Directions The First and Fundamental Object of Belief as Christian is the acknowledgement of the Blessed Trinitie And by this Belief we acknowledge such a Distinction of Persons or Parties between God the Father God the Son and God the Holy-Ghost that God the Father doth Personally and in proprietie of Person exact Satisfaction for all the offences committed against the God-head or Blessed Trinitie and that the Son of God doth by like Personal Proprietie undertake to make Satisfaction and Reconciliation for us He it is that doth avert the wrath of God from us and inhibit the proceedings of Divine Justice against us We are then in the First
place either expresly or implicitly to direct our prayers to God the Father that he would be pleased to forgive us our sins to be reconciled unto us and bestow such blessings upon us as he hath promised to such as shall be reconciled unto him In the Second place either expressly or implicitly we are to beseech him to forgive us our sins to be reconciled and blesse us for the merits of his only Son who hath made satisfaction for us This is a Point which every Christian is bound expressely to believe that God the Father doth neither forgive sins nor vouchsafe any Term or Plea of Reconciliation but only for the merits and satisfaction made by the sacrifice of the Son of God who by the eternal spirit offered himself in our humane nature upon the Crosse In the next place we are to believe and acknowledge that as God the Father doth neither forgive nor vouchsafe Reconciliation but for the merits and satisfaction of his only Son so neither will he vouchsafe to conveigh this or any other blessing unto us which his Son hath purchased for us but only through his Son not only through him as our Advocate or Intercessor but through him as our Mediator that is through His humanitie as the Organ or Conduit or as the only Bond by which we are united and reconciled unto the Divine Nature For although the Holy Spirit or Third Person in Trinitie doth immediately and by Personal Proprietie work faith and other spiritual Graces in our Souls yet doth he not by these Spiritual Graces unite our souls or Spirits immediately unto himself but unto Christs Humane Nature He doth as it were till the ground of our hearts and make it fit to receive the seed of life But this seed of righteousnesse immediately flows from the Sun of Righteousnesse whose sweet influence likewise it is which doth immediately season cherish and ripen it The Spirit of life whereby our Adoption and Election is sealed unto us is the real participation of Christs Bodie which was broken and of Christs Blood which was shed for us This is the true and punctual meaning of our Apostles speech 1 Cor. 15. 45. The first man Adam was made a living soul or as the Syriack hath it Animale Corpus an enlivened bodie but the second Adam was made a quickning spirit and immediately becometh such to all those which as truely bear his image by the Spirit of Regeneration which issues from him as they have born the Image of the first Adam by natural propagation And this again is the true and punctual meaning of our Saviours words John 6. 63. It is the Spirit that quickneth the flesh profiteth nothing the words that I speak unto you are spirit and life For so he had said in the verses before to such as were offended at his words what if you should see the Son of man ascend up where he was before The Implication conteined in the Connexion between these two verses and the precedent is this That Christs Virtual presence or the influence of life which his Humane Nature was to distil from his heavenly Throne should be more profitable to such as were capable of it then his Bodily presence then the bodily Eating of his flesh and blood could be although it had been convertible into their bodily substance This distillation of life and immortalitie from his glorified Humane Nature is that which the Ancient and Orthodoxal Church did mean in their Figurative and lofty speeches of Christs Real presence or of eating His very Flesh and drinking His very Blood in the Sacrament And the Sacramental Bread is called His Bodie and the Sacramental Wine His Blood as for other reasons so especially for This that the vertue or influence of his Bloody Sacrifice is most plentifully and most effectually distilled from heaven unto the worthy Receivers of the Eucharist And unto this Point and no further will most of the Testimonies reach which Bellarmin in his books of the Sacraments or Maldonat in his Comments upon the sixth of Saint John do quote out of the Fathers for Christs Real Presence by Transubstantiation or which Chemnitius that Learned Lutheran in his Books De duabus in Christo naturis and de Fundamentis sanae doctrinae doth avouch for Consubstantiation And if thus much had been as distinctly granted to the Ancient Lutherans as Calvin in some places doth the controversie between the Lutheran and other Reformed Churches had been at an end when it first begun Both Parties acknowledging Saint Cyrill to be the fittest Umpire in this Controversie The end of the Third Chapter A Transition of the Publisher's IT must not be dissembled that I had no Intimation much lesse Commission of the Author's to Insert the Two following Chapters herein this place Yet besides that I knew not of any fitter place where to dispose of them I had these Reasons so to do 1. I held it fit that His Powerful Disputes against the Church of Rome about The Lords Supper in the fourth Chapter and about another Point in the fifth should immediately follow his Learned Argument with the Lutheran 2. The sequence seems very Methodical The Subject of the first Chapter being partly About Christs Exaltation by becoming The Chief Corner-Stone cut out of the Rock or quarrey by his Resurrection from The New Scpulchre lifted up by his Ascension and placed at the Chief Corner by his Sitting at Gods Right-hand and partly about The Union of Christ with true Christians which Union is both a Considerable part of the fourth Chapter and was happily touched upon in the Close of the Third 3. In case any Restive soul should perhaps some faint Dejected Spirit having read Christs Great Exaltation may say Who shall ascend into Heaven that is to bring Christ down from above Such an one besides the quickenings he may hear from other Remembrancers Saint Peter telling us that we are pilgrims here and Saint Paul that we seek a Countrie and look for a Citie Jerusalem that is Free and that being Fellow-Citizens with the Saints and of Gods hous-hold our Conversation or Traffick is to be in heaven for those things which are above where Christ sitteth at Gods Right-hand c. may receive mightie encouragement by Experimenting the Contents of these two next Chapters The avowed neer approach and Intimacie of our Lord Jesus Christ with the Believing and Receiving Christian The word is nigh thee even in thy mouth and in thy heart When the holy Sacramental pledges be in the mouth and Faith in the heart The Word the Eternal Word that was made flesh is nigh indeed For Verily Verily He that eateth my Fesh and drinketh my Blood dwelleth in Me and I in Him CHAP. 1111. A Paraphrase upon the sixth of St. John In what sense Christ's flesh is said to be truly Meat c. What it is To eat Christs Flesh and drink his Blood Of eating and drinking Spiritual and Sacramental And whether of them is meant