condemnation due to Sinners I speak of those Sinners who being turned from their sins by serious Repentance fly to Christ by Faith But methinks I do already hear what your Divinity in this case will mutter against us you will not deny that Christ died for us and that our righteousness is placed in him but yet so that these benefits of his and rewards of justice come not to us by Faith nor by imputation but by the study of Works and Holiness which being given to the Merits of Christ we receive in this Life by the free gift of God Therefore that we who were of old shut up in darkness And even extinct by the strength of death now we do escape the tyranny of Death that we do now recover the gifts of divine righteousness formerly lost and slipt out of our hands and that we obtain the reward of life proposed to vertue all that consists in this that we should wholly abdicate and forsake whatsoever we have from our first Father and transfer our selves wholly to the similitude and imitation of our second Father and so it will come to pass that we shall purchase immortal and divine riches and eternal glory and true righteousness with everlasting praise not by our merits but only by the vertue of Christ Who works all these things in us Therefore according to this sort of Divinity the merits of Christ do nothing else in Heaven but that they obtain unto us Divine Grace whereby we may by way of imitation more easily resemble the most holy footsteps and similitude of Christ our second Father and lead our lives well in this World according to his Laws But now what if we cannot exactly follow the footsteps of his holiness What if imitation falter sometimes and stagger What if the servency of charity and the care of our most holy Religion and the observance of Iustice becomes too remiss Yea what if somewhere a defilement of sin creeps in as infirmity may occasion Or what if that I may use the words of Hierom he that rows a Boat against the stream slacken his hands a little doth he not presently slide back and is carried by the stream whither he would not and who is not remiss sometimes Seeing Paul also confesses that he is sometimes drawn thither whither he would not And then where is the righteousness which was hoped for by Works where is the immortality proposed to vertue Verily unless the greater mercy of our most gracious Father had so taken care for us that our whole Salvation should be laid up in the righteousness of his Son and if faith and imputation did not help us more than imitation of life our condition had stood on a miserable enough and too broken foundation But eternal thanks be to Almighty God the Father of all mercies who according to his unspeakable Wisdom which reaches from end to end strongly and disposes all things sweetly hath not settled our estate by any law of works but by faith that according to Grace the Promise may be sure to all the Seed that though we our selves are weak and void of all righteousness yet it is sufficient that there is one in our Nature which hath fulfilled all righteousness and that he only is righteous for all How say you for all Why not as well as the unrighteousness of one Adam of old was sufficient to bring ruine upon all Therefore let us behold Christ in Adam and compare the one with the other Who though they are very unlike to one another yet agree in this that both being First Fathers of Propagation by an equal similitude something came from both as Progenitors which hath spread abroad upon all Men. To wit Death and Life Sin and justice Therefore one Man destroyed all Men And in like manner one Man saves all Men neither do you your self deny this But let us see how the one destroys and how the other saves those that are destroyed Through his fault say you not our own we contracted the pollution of Sin in our Birth these are your very words Which as I entertain willingly so if they are true and if he in this respect was a Type of Christ which is shewed out of Paul what hinders but that we also in like manner in Regeneration may obtain the reward of Righteousness not for our own Obedience but his The one sinned and by his wickedness ruinated all Men the other obeyed and by his righteousness saves all You say it is true if so be we lead our Life well according to the Imitation and Example of him And where then is the agreement of similitude between Christ and Adam if the one destroyed us in our being Born as you your self confess but Christ cannot save us in our Regeneration except Imitation be joyned And where now is the Grace of Imputation and the Imputation of Faith unto Righteousness so oft repeated in the Scriptures taught by the Apostles testified by the most Ancient Fathers received and delivered by the Church Shall it be sufficient cause to inflict Death upon thy Body that thou wast propagated from Adam and shall it not have cause enough for the justification of thy Soul that thou art born again in Christ What say you Do none dye but they that Sin after the Example of Adam Are none saved but those that by a due imitation attain unto the most Holy Vertues of Christ And what then doth Baptism the Sacrament of Faith in Regeneration if Salvation is purchased by no other thing but by treading in the Footsteps of Christ The Objection of Osorius is Answered where the Imitation of Christ is discoursed of at large BUT you will say what is it not an excellent thing is it not a Pious thing is it not very necessary for every Man who counts his Life and Salvation dear to him who looks for Immortal Glory who seeks stable and eternal pleasures that he separate himself as much as he can from theImitation of the Earthly Father and frame himself wholly to the imitation of the Heavenly Who denies or is Ignorant of that O Osorius Who is so void of all Religion and Sense but is ready of his own accord and with his whole Heart to confess that very thing to you which that you may persuade you do not only explain but also draw forth all the force and efficacy of Speech that you can upon it with so much earnestness and vehemency First who is so Ignorant but knows what we received from both our Parents of which you dispute so prolixly The thing it self and the experience of all things does abundantly make it evident into what deceits and straits into what a gulf of miseries the former hath brought us into So on the contrary how many and how great good things have proceeded from the other Father I think it is unknown to no Man Whose acts for us if we consider what is more excellent If the
and Sinners insa different account Sinners in our selves Righteous in Christ. Isaiah 9. Whole Christ is ours Christ bears our publick person before the Father What is our Righteousness according to Paul Osor. de just lib. 2. lib. 7. p. 187. lib. 9. p. 228. Osor. de just lib. 2. lib. 7. p. 187. lib. 9. p. 228. God commands not any thing which cannot be observed by men according to the opinion of Osorius it is no fault in God if he command those things which cannot be kept by us Rom. 3. There had been no need for God to Iustifie us by Faith if we could be justified by works de justit lib. 4. pag. 90. Pag. 105. Preparation for Righteonsness Mat. 5. Whatsoever things the law 〈◊〉 it saith to those that are in the law that every mouth may be stopped and all the World may be guilty before God R. 3. Rev. 15. 4. The Ecclesiastical Hymn thou only are holy Hierom. ad Ctesiphontem Dial. 2. Aug. in Io. Hom. 49. Rom. 3. Rom. 9. Gal. 2. 1 Cor. 1. Rom. 4. Rom. 11. Hab. 2. Rom. 4. Gal. 3. 2 Tim. 1. Ephes. 2. Tit. 3. Rom. 11. Phil. 3. Rom. 4. Rom. 9. Concil Trident Sess. 6. A definition of rig hteousness according to the Iesuits of Colonia Censur Coloniensis 186 frat Alpbonsus Philip 4. p. 34. Argum. ex Topicis Aristot. 1 Cor. 1. 2 Cor. 5. Rom. 4. 3. Answer to the Iesuitical quibbles Men judge by qualities but God judgeth otherwise 2 Cor. 5. Prov. cap. 8. Aug. ad Boniface lib. 3. cap. 7. Bernard in Dominic Serm. 3. By what Righteousness they are justified before God by Christs or our own Aug. in Psal. 31. Christ is wholly ours with all his good things As Christ was made sin so we are made righteous But Christ was not made sin by inherent sin Therefore we also are not made righteous by inherent rightcousness The Righteousness of Faith Internal and inherent righteousness whereby we are justified according to the Gospel Faith is a most internal and inherent righteousness This is the work of God that ye should believe in him whom he hath sent Iohn 6. Augustine Iohn 3. So God loved the World that he gave his only begotten Son that all that believe in him c. Rom. 8. 1 Cor. 1. A rule of Law that which a Man doth by another he seems to have done by himself A comparison of Adam and Christ. The former Adam a Type of the second Rom. 5. As Evil was 〈◊〉 ed by the Sin of one so good is propagated by the Iustification of one by the Disobedience of one many were made Sinners Rom. 5. As many dyed by the Sin of one so by the grace of one many are justified Rom. 5. After what manner the sin of one is imputed unto all in like manner also the Righteonsness of one is imputed to all Otherways there would be no resemblance between Christ and Adam Adam a Type of Christ. Wherein the similitude of Adam and Christ consists A Imitation of Life Christ to be seen in Adam The severity of the Iudgment of God in Adam again the excellency of Mercy in Christ. The Type is compared with the Archetype Death took its beginning of making havock from the Sin of one not of many The heaviness of Iustice was again made amends for and over-balanced by as great mercy 2 Cor. 5. Isaiah 53. The Blood of Redemption encountering with Righteousness yet not violating Righteousness but Redeeming it An Answer The singular providence of the Eternal God in governing the business of our Redemption Rom. 6. Christ Iustifies Sinners but what Sinners Oso dejust lib. 7. The whole nature of our Salvation consists in nothing else but in the imitation of Christ and expressing a resemblance of him according to Osorius In what respect the similitude of Christ and Adam agrees Death and Sin from Adam Osor. de just lib. 7. p. 179. Osorius is opposed to Osorius Only by being propagated from Adam we perish And why are we not as well saved by being born again from Christ Object Osor. pag 180. Answer The imitation of Christ is very necessary for all Matt. 11. Charitv the bond of perfection Colos. 3. How no sign of Charity appears in the Roman Tyranny The Laws of the Popes are written with blood 1 Cor. 15. 1 Pet. 2. The promises of God are not tyed to the imitation ofChrist but to Faith A comparison of the First and Second Adam Christ the external cause of justification Faith in Christ the Internal Effects causes De just lib. 7. pag. 186. An argument from like things Luk. 18. Baptism a Sacrament of Faith Galat. 3. what Faith in Christ performs according to Paul Galas 3. Chrysostom Oso de just lib. 7. de just 1. 9. p. 232. de just 1. 6. p. 148. Iames. 2. Mat. 12. What the renewing of the Holy Ghost makes in us Oso de just lib. 9. P. 233. De just lib. 9. P. 234. Rom. 5. Ephes. 3. Rom. 4. De just lib. 9. pag. 234. We are beholden to the grace of God for all benefits and what that is which his singular favour towards us is ehiefly seen Luke 12. Daniel 7. Romans 5. Romans 4. Titus 3. Romans 8. On what foundation doth the free Promise of God chiefly stand Theassurance of confidence and persuasion from the free promise of God Osor. de just 1. 9. pag. 234. Ibid. p. 233. Lib. 9. p. 232. Two Paradoxes of Osorius both of which are false Ier. 31. 〈◊〉 11. Osor. l. 9. No man denies that the works of new Obedience proceed from the fountain of Divine Grace and the Merits of Christ. Every faithful man that is truly born again in Christ is a Law to himself or ought so to be Works of Faith Osor. de Iust. lib. 3. p. 71. Ier. 32. Ezek. 11. How far the Spirit of renovation promised and given by God reaches Ier. 31. Ezek. 36. Deut. 30. Hier. cont Pelag. Dial. 1. A twofold perfection or a twofold righteousness according to Hierome August cont duas Epistolas Pela l. 3. cap. 8. A twofold sort of Obedience according to Augustine Aug. de peccat merit remiss lib. 2. cap. 15. Aug. de peccat merit remis lib. 1. cap. 7. Aug. ad Bonifac lib. 3. cap. 7. Hierom. Advers pelag lib. 1. Hierom. ibid. Prover 18. Hierom. ad Ctesiphontem Deut. 30. I will Circumcise the Foreskin of thy Heart that thou mayst love me with all thy Heart and with all thy Soul Pelagianism August of the Perfection of Righteousness By whom Righteousness is obtained When Perfection is attained Aug. of the Spirit and Letter Aug ad Bonifac. lib. 3. cap. 7. Begun Obdience Imputation of Righteousness according to Augustine Augustine to Hierom. Epist. 29. Cpprian cited by Augustine Hierom. adversus Pelagi Ambros. lib. 10. Epist. 84. Aug. lib. 10. Epist. 84. Bernard super Cantic Serm. 50. Why God commanded things impossible Hieron Augustin Cyprian Orig. hom 21. on 〈◊〉 Cyprian de
if he who knew no sin is made a sinner before God by the imputation of the sin of another What and shall not we who are by nature unrighteous in like manner be made Righteous before God by the same dispensation of mercy and imputation What can hinder but that as the rebellion of one was imputed to us all to destruction after the same manner the obedience of one may be imputed to us all for Salvation Let your Wisdom consider what you should answer in this case not only to me but also to Paul But now that this may be more clear first you see this common and fatal necessitv of Dying whereunto all mortal men are liable which with the same Foot beats at the Gates of Kings Palaces and at the Doors of Poor mens Cottages Now I would know of you whence this cause and necessity of dying had its first original and began to make havock Whether through our fault or the fault of another You will say not through our fault What if Death had snatched your self away in your Infancy you had then deserved nothing your self And yet was you not then born on that condition that you could dye Verily many Infants and Innocents are dayly snatched away who deserved nothing themselves yet they were born on those very Terms that they were Mortal and lyable to dye at some time Why so I beseech you Unless it be because they proceed from him the Transgression of which one Man was imputed to all to suffer the punishment of Death so that that is cause sufficient why you should dye because you are propagated from him who deserved Death you will say by a hard enough Law I also would fay the same with you unless the same Iustice of the Eternal Deity had opposed an equal remedy to this great calamity making amends for and alfo over-balancing just severity with a like kind of mercy You will say what way That way which St. Paul mentions in this place he that knew no Sin saith he was made Sin for us that we might be made the Righteousness of God through him What is that I pray you to be made sin for us but to undergo what was due to our Sins Which if the most merciful Father condescended to Translate unto his only begotten Son not for any demerit of his but for our sakes only Verily it cannot be neither is it agreeable to the Iustice of God nor to reason neither that he should punish both his own Son and us also for our Sins so that one of those two must needs follow that if Christ hath made satisfaction for us either Iustice hath nothing now in us that it may accuse us of Or if it have it is false then which is mentioned in this place by Paul Christ was made Sin for us and that is false which we hear in the Prophet And he shall bear their iniquities c. For how did he bear them if they remain yet tobe born by us Whence the Apostle concluding very well he reasons to this purpose That we might be made saith he the Righteousness of God through him as if he had said as Christ did bear our Sins so also we do bear his Righteousness He was punished not for his own Sins but ours in like manner we are endued with Righteousness which is not ours but his In which thing the admirable Artifice of our Redemption is seen Where Mercy encountering with Iustice doth so contend that it overcomes also and yet so overcomes that in the mean while there is not made any violation of Iustice but a just recompence for sins For as unjust as it is that he who was free from sin should suffer the punishment of sin for the guilty It is again as unjust that our sins already expiated in him for us should again be punished in us by the judgment of condemnation And upon a different account how just it was that the sin of one who sustained the person of all nature should be propagated unto all that came of him and should be given to publick condemnation Again it is as agreeable to Iustice that the obedience of one man who undertook the cause and person of all men should be likewise communicated to all regenerated of him to the imputation of righteousness But you on the contrary plead that it seems not to be just at all that any man should seem just by another mans righteousness who is unrighteous himself I answer to the contrary and thus I plead neither was it just that Christ being innocent should be 〈◊〉 into the condemnation of Death who was in himself free of all spots You object to me the definite nature of Iustice Which because it is a vertue giving to every man according to his desert therefore you argue that it cannot be but it must measure unto all men by equal right whatsoever is due to their merits Be it so and why then doth not this same justice my good friend distribute to Christ the Son of God according to his deserving Why is the innocent beaten with stripes Why is he torn unjustly with punishments wherefore contrary to his deserving contrary to Right and Iustice is he drawn to the judgment of Death and being innocent is stretched forth upon the Cross What can you answer me in this case What say you What have you whereby you may defend this distributive Iustice What will Iustice it self bring for it self which is the most exact and perfect of all things so often proclaimed by you and in so many books Which it may probably make a pretence for the receiving of so great an injury Except that it may say this only That we and the sins of us all came under punishment in this one most innocent body of his and there were with deserved punishments most justly recompensed by God Which unless it were so Iustice it self had sinned against him most unjustly Now the singular Providence of the Most High Artist hath governed the matter with that moderation that he did both wisely look to the glory of his own Son and our Salvation and also to his own justice so that there is nothing wherein his Iustice may be accused neither is any thing found in us in which the very Law of Iustice may justly condemn us Whence it is rightly said by the Apostle that there is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Iesus For otherwise to what purpose did Christ dye if he died not for sins and sinners or how did he dye for sins if the punishment of sin remains to be suffered again by us How was he made sin and a curse for us if we yet fall under the Curse Or what fruit will redound to us from this most Holy Sacrifice if Christ by the right of Redemption hath not taken away that which is due to our sins by the Law of Iustice But if he took it away where is then the
unreasonable so to do as if a man disputing concerning Osorius should thus conclude that because he hath no power of governing in the Kings Chamber therefore he hath nothing he can do at home amongst his own family Or because he is not at all excellent in military vertue to gain a victory that therefore he hath no faculty or dexterity in managing the affairs of his own business Luther separates charity from faith and the Law from the Gospel and does it not without cause But it must be considered where in what place and for what cause he does it Not to cause the godly works of good men to be despised nor to discourage the exercise thereof but that the power of justifying should not be attributed to the performance of them Not that faith should not work by love before Men but that it should not work before God For it is one thing to work before Men and another thing to work before God Therefore one and the same faith acteth both ways but one way before God and another way before men for before men it works by love that it may perform obedience to the will of God and be serviceable for the benefit of our Neighbour but before God it works not by any love but by Christ only that it may obtain the pardon of sins and eternal life By which you see what is the difference between faith and vertue and wherein they both agree and how different the working of both is How faith is alone without works and again how the same is not alone for in the mean while Godly works are not therefore condemned because they are not admitted to the justification of life but the trusting in works is only overturned Here then a wise and suitable division should be used that things may be distinguished each by their own places and bounds lest one thing should rashly rush into the possession of another and disturb the order of its station Therefore let the praise-worthy merits of the greatest vertues have their own honour and dignity which no man withholds from them Nevertheless by their dignity they will never be so available in the presence of the Heavenly Iudge as to redeem us from our sins to satisfie Iustice to deliver us from the wrath of God and everlasting destruction to restore us that are so many ways ruinated unto grace and life to unite us as Sons and Heirs to God and to overcome Death and the World These things cost a far dearer price than that we should ever be able to pay so many and so great debts by any works or merits or means of our own For so great is the severity of Iustice that there can be no reconciliation unless Iustice be satisfied by suffering the whole punishment that was due The wrath is so very great that there is no hope of appeasing the Father but by the price and death of the Son And again so great is the mercy that the Father grudged not to send his own Son and bestow him on the World and so to bestow him that he gives Life Eternal to them that believe in him Moreover so great is the loving kindness of the Son towards us that he grudged not for our sakes to bring upon himself this infinite load of wrath which otherways our frailty however assisted with all the help of moral vertues had never been able to sustain Whence Faith hath received its efficacy BEcause Faith alone with fixed eyes looks upon this Son and Mediator and cleaves unto him who only could bring about this Atchievement of our Redemption with the Father therefore it is that it alone hath this vertue and power of justifying not with works nor for works but only for the sake of the Mediator on whom it relies Therefore that is false and worthy to be rejected with disdain which some unhappy and wicked School-Divines affirm in discoursing of Charity to wit that it is the form of Faith and that it must not by any means be separated from faith no more than the vital Soul can be separated from the body or the essential form from matter which otherwise is a rude and unweildy Mass. In answering of whom I think there is no need of many words seeing the whole meaning and drift of Scripture if rightly understood the very end of the Law seeing Christ and the instruction of the Apostles and the whole nature of the Gospel seem to be manifestly against them and wholly to overturn that most absur'd Opinion by so many Oracles so many Signs Examples and Arguments to the contrary Now if that be form which gives subsistence to a thing how much more truly must it be said that faith is the form of charity without which all the works of charity are base and contemptible as again the form of faith is not charity but Christ only and the promise of the word But what say they are not the pious works of Charity acceptable to God being so many ways prescribed unto us and commanded by him Are not these also remunerated with plentiful fruits of Righteousness and heaped up with manifold Rewards in the Gospel I was hungry says he and ye fed me I thirsted and ye refreshed me with drink so that not so much as a cup of cold water shall want a reward when it is given in the name of Christ besides an infinite number of other things of that kind which being taken out of the Scriptures are enlarged upon to the praise of Charity Indeed no man denys that pious and holy works of Charity are greatly approved of God and it is an undoubted truth that the love of God and of our Neighbour as it comprehends the Summary of both Tables and is the greatest complement of the whole Law so it hath excellent promises annexed unto it Neither is there any Controversie between us about that But when we affirm that Charity pleases God we ask this how it pleases whether simply of it self in respect of the very work or upon the account of faith and the Mediatour and then whether the same Charity so pleases that it justifies us before God and obtains the pardon of sins and overcomes the terrours of death and sin that it may be opposed to the judgment and anger of God Moreover whether it hath the promises of Eternal Life annexed unto it If without a Mediatour and the faith of him there is nothing which can please God and it is impossible that works should please him before the person of him that worketh be reconciled it follows that Charity depends on Faith and not Faith on Charity But that it rather goes before Love and is so far from being joyned with it for justification that it also justifies Charity and makes all the works of Charity acceptable to God The matters appear more evident by Example Suppose a Iew or Turk does daily bestow great gifts upon the poor with very great cost
all our actions should be directed therefore it is his opinion that it is not possible that he who puts away the rule it self from him and hates it should be joined to the same But what do you drive at in all these florid expressions it is this He then that asserts it to be possible that God should approve the wicked and join them to himself asserts it to be possible for God not to be God These things need no prolix answer For though we grant this to be very true which you mention from the Scriptures that the rule of Divine Iustice is perfect and that eternal light cannot endure any thing that is wicked or not agreeable to equity but you have not yet proved that those should be called wicked who flying to Christ by Faith receive from him the Pardon of their Sins who having their Sins blotted out and all Iniquity forgiven are written by the same Psalmist among the number of the blessed whom God himself purifying by faith and pouring his holy Spirit upon them of ungodly he hath made them godly and graciously received them into his favour for the sake of his dear Son And such we were all formerly as your Oration describes wicked sinners and all void of the glory of God before Christ washed us with his blood but now after we are washed from our former filthiness sanctified and justified in the name of our Lord Iesus Christ and by the spirit of our God Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God's Elect Those whom God Iustifies who shall condemn Then you go on and deny that it is possible that God should be unlike himself to favour wickedness or make friendship with wicked men of an unclean life And therefore you conclude we must needs be first righteous before we are received into the favour of God Right but who are they whom you call by the name of Iust You must teach us that If you judge they are such as are defiled with no pollution or can say with Christ Who amongst you will prove me guilty of Sin Verily I confess it seems not unlike to truth what you prove concerning the conformity of the Righteous unto God and that we must needs be all of us such if we would with acceptance have to do with that most pure Nature of the Divine Righteousness without a Mediator and Redeemer But if you take those for Righteous who are Righteous by Faith not by Life that is those whom daily forgiveness received by faith brings as righteous in the Presence of God in that sense this debate of yours about Righteousness does us no diskindness For by this means it comes to pass that whom Faith dayly absolves you your self cannot hold them guilty of any crime Therefore if they are not unrighteous nothing hinders them from being admitted with bold access into the presence of the Divine Majesty through the benefit of their Redeemer But you deny that it is agreeable to the nature of God to account any man worthy of his approbation except him whom his countenance beholds to be righteous Therefore it is necessary that our righteousness should go before the favour of God But whence that righteousness should come to us herein is all the contention between us You seem to acknowledge no righteousness but that which the perfection of life procures We place all our righteousness in Christ not in our selves in the faith of him only not in our own works What say you can any man obtain favour from that highest goodness as long as he hates not wickedness as long as be puts not away Iniquity from him which hath a perpetual War with Divine Equity Who is ignorant of or denies that For how can it be that that everlasting Law should not hate sin and wickedness with the greatest abhorrency Well and what do these Mountains of Gilboa bring forth unto us at length he concludes That it is therefore necessary that whosoever thinks to be received into the friendship of God must first hate wickedness Verily there is no man that denies it For though we should grant that a wise and wholesom or sound sorrow whereof you speak makes the first part of our conversion and that the true righteousness of faith doth not follow except some trouble of a penitent mind go before it doth not therefore come to pass that the very cause of justification should be attributed unto repentance for if repentance be nothing else but a grief of mind at the remembrance of sin it proves indeed that sin went before but takes not away that which was committed It declares perhaps some change of mind in him that committed it but takes not away the punishment that is due to justice Moreover repentance testifies that justice is lost but repairs not the loss thereof As pain coming of a wound inflicted makes not a medicine to it self but receives it from some other thing In like manner repentance goes before the remission of sins but doth not cause it just as Seryphius did not cause the recovering of the City of Tarentum who unless he had first lost it Fabius had not recovered it How many may you see in a common-wealth who having violated the publick Laws or been guilty of Treason against their Prince being overwhelmed with grief and shame with all their heart lament the wickedness of their crime and they do not wickedly that they are ashamed and repent But yet they do not escape the due punishment of the Law Therefore the detestation of their sin proves them guilty but doth not free them from condemnation But if there is so great severity of Laws and Iudgments in humane offences which no deploring of ill life can wash away what then should be judged of these that are committed against the highest and infinite Majesty Which Angels offending in one thing were not unpunished having been thrust out of Heaven and whom no sorrow could restore again what should be said to us in this frail condition of sinful nature in which dwelleth no good thing who offend by a daily either negligence of duties or filthiness of deeds Is it sufficient to turn away the vengeance of so great a God to say I have erred unless there be some other thing besides the sense of grief to help guilty and wounded nature which may defend this weak part of our repentance with a stronger safe-guard and may be sufficient to appease and reconcile offended justice with a proportionable price and so to speak can contend with Divine Iustice by opposing a righteousness equal thereunto For as the wound is infinite that is inflicted on our nature so it is just that a remedy of the like nature should be applied the strength and greatness whereof being infinite may by proportionable greatness be suited to the Majesty offended which verily consists not in repentance or charity or any offices of ours but is
Therefore seeing God is altogether so just in his own Nature that he cannot but hate Sin and on the contrary Man is so wholly drowned in sin that in every good work according to the Opinion of Luther the Saints themselves also do sin in this so great dissimilitude of things that are opposite to one another how can it be that Infinite Holiness can be joyned by any Communion with Man if he is such a one as Luther describes him For so Osorius from things well said by Luther but badly understood by him and worse wrested for the occasion of cavilling doth very ill argue not because it is true but because it seems so to him But let us first oppose the frivolous Objection and then let us take Luther's part as well as we can against the cruel Incursions of his Adversaries And first indeed it cannot be denied that Iustice and Sin are repugnant to one another by the most contrary opposition Likewise we must confess that it is no less true that all impurity of sin is hateful and abominable to God For the Anger of God is revealed from Heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who ditain the Truth in unrighteousness as the Apostle speaks very evidently Which being so what remains then but that the Life of the Godly should either be free of all sin in this World as Osorius contends or if that cannot be as Luther affirms all must be liable to the Wrath of God I answer with the Apostle Paul That indeed would follow unless there comes a Mediatour who may interpose himself against the Anger of God in the sinners behalf who may satisfie for sin who may obtain pardon who may mollifie the rigour of Iustice yea who may transpose all the Iudgment given against the guilty upon himself and that now he himself may be Iudge of the Cause who is the forgiver of the Crime For so we hear in the Gospel My Father judgeth no man but hath given all Iudgment to the Son And again All things are delivered unto me by Father All which benefits seeing we receive from Christ the most bountiful Mediatour in such plenty as exceeds all belief there is no cause O Osorius why in such great abundance of grace you should press us with such strict weights of Iustice as if we were now under the Law and not under Grace But how much more agreeable would it be both to your Duty and Salvation that you should by a submission common to you and us give place to the Grace of God and acknowledge the benefits of the Mediatour and apply your self with all gratitude of mind to his everlasting praises that are worthy to be celebrated through all Generations Therefore that we may expedite a matter not very difficult in a few words Whereas you say sin is hateful to God nothing is more true But it is one thing to speak of sin and another thing to speak of Man that is a sinner he indeed hates sin and the Physician also hates the disease but yet not so that he should destroy the diseased person but that he should heal him Concerning which thing if you do not trust me hear Augustin he is not a God that condemns some sins and justifies and praises other sins He praises none but hates all as a Physician hates the disease and by curing endeavours to drive away the disease So God by his Grace procures that sin is consumed in us But how is it consumed It is diminished in the life of them that are going on to Perfection it shall be consumed in the life of the perfect c. The Assertion of Luther against Osorius concerning the Sins of the Saints is defended I Come now to Luther whom you reproach after such an unworthy manner and with such shameful slanders yea and lyes so tragically Why so to wit because he durst accuse the Saints themselves of sin which seems to you so execrable a wickedness as if no greater reproach could be cast not only on holy men themselves but also on the Author and Prince of all Holiness You may upon the same account cast reproaches in like manner upon Hierom Augustin and Bernard and other most approved Writers of the Primitive Times Whom you must either by necessary consequence absolve with Luther or not condemn Luther without them Seeing there is none of all these that thought this Title of Honour should be attributed to any man but Christ only that he should be wholly without all stain of sin No but Luther say you pleads that all mortal men though confirmed in Faith are yet in a state of sinning and that sin is lively also in the Saints even so long as they live by Faith and also he profeses that the same do sin in every good work And what hath any man said or done so rightly but it may be depraved by relating it wrong especially when calummy makes the Interpretation That which Luther asserts concerning the sins of the Saints if the words be suitably weighed with the state of the Question there is no offence in it As if it be asked whether the works of the Regenerate should be called good in this Life or sins Luther denies not that the pious deeds of the Regenerate are good but affirms this very thing That they are good in the sight of God and pleasing to him which comes not to pass upon the account of the work it self but upon the account of Faith and a Mediatour for whose sake the pious endeavours of his own are pleasing to God and their begun obedience though it is otherways of its own nature imperfect Therefore this is not the Controversie whether the Regenerate by the help of the Grace of God can do any thing in this Life piously and commendably Neither is this the Controversie whether the absolute Grace of God in the Regenerate is able to perform this that their work should be free of all sin But whether the Grace of God in this flesh furnishes any of the Regenerate with so great a power of perfecting Righteousnns that any work of his is so compleat and perfect if it be examined according to the Rule of the Divine Law that it needs no Pardon nor Mediatour But if it needs Mercy then it is necessarily joyned with pollution and sin so that now the Praise belongs to the Mediatour and not to Man to Imputation not to Action to Grace not to Merit to Faith not to Works that God accepts of the Works of the Regenerate and most holy men Neither is the rectitude of our good things any thing else but the forgiveness of God and the remission of his just severity Whence the Apostle rightly concludes that those who are of the Works of the Law not speaking of evil works but the most perfect Works are under the Curse and upon this account it is true which Luther says that a righteous man sins in every
vain They according to their subtilty divide the manifold efficacy of grace most of them into two parts and some of them into three or more To wit into grace freely given and that which makes acceptable And again they subdivide this latter as it were by an Anatomical Dissection into more Veins into Operative grace which again they divide into three Rivulets Preventing Beginning delivering and afterwards into cooperating which likewise is threefold Following promoting assisting O holy Christ with what study with what labour what Cobwebs do these Praters here weave that they may darken the wholesome Doctrine of Grace with Smoke and Soot of their idle Talk for if we speak of that Grace unto which our whole Salvation is referred who is there but understands by the Writings of the Evangelists and Apostles that it is thus described to wit that it is the only thing which being placed in the free Indulgence of God towards miserable sinners doth with dear Love in Christ the Son of God embrace all that believe in him and forgive their sins and for the sake of his own Son bestows his Spirit and Eternal Life and Felicity upon them tho' otherways they are unworthy And tho' the Operation of this Grace is not one and the Effects are divers and the Gifts various according to the diversity of donations yet the Divine Grace it self is only one which is both freely given to us for Salvation and makes those acceptable to God whom it saves and is one and the same Cause both of Salvation and Renovation Wherefore their distinction is justly found fault with who by grace making men grateful or acceptable understand habits and gifts communicated by God and they do most frivolously conclude that men are made acceptable to God by these whereas it is only Mercy in Christ the Mediatour which doth not only account us dear to it self but also chose us before we were adorned with any Ornaments of gifts Moreover if the matter be so as those men define that not only Faith in Christ but gifts and habits of vertues infused by God make us acceptable to God What then shall be said of those who also out of Christ have possessed many such excellent gifts as well as we in which many of them are not only equal to us but some of them also excel us such as are variety of Tongues gifts of Healing Prophecy excellent Powers sharpness of Wit strength of Body Ornaments of Mind The Iews have a strong hope in God The Turks maintain Love towards one another But what shall we affirm that those men also are by these things made acceptable to God which is absurd and unreasonable Therefore that we may conclude we confess that such gifts are things which adorn this Life beautifie Nature and declare the liberal Bounty of God but which nevertheless neither regenerate nor justifie us in the sight of God For that is due to Christ only by Faith neither is it convenient to attribute it to any other Creatures whatsoever According to that of St. Paul Being justified therefore by Faith we have peace with God through our Lord Iesus Christ. Though in the mean while I am not ignorant what they answer here that they treat not of those Works which the Heathen perform by the strength of Nature nor those Works which are done by the Iews without Faith by the guidance of the Law only but those Works which are of the Faith of Christ. What then say they are not such excellent performances of Works pleasing to God Is not that very pleasing and acceptable to God whatsoever is right whatsoever is joyned with vertue and honesty whatsoever being undertaken with Faith is rightly performed according to Duty and Piety That I may answer this three things by the by must be observed First What manner of Works these are which are discoursed of whether perfect or not And then how they please of themselves or upon the account of Faith Thirdly How much they please whether so much as to deserve Eternal Life and obtain the pardon of violated Righteousness and being set against the wrath of God to turn away all vengeance and be effectual to satisfie Iustice without any remission of sins For all these must be regarded with necessary attention First Because God the great Creatour of the World is perfectly holy in his own Nature and the Perfection of all Goodness it is evident that nothing is of it self acceptable to him and well-pleasing which being defiled with any spot of imperfection doth not agree in all respects to the most exact Purity But now seeing it is most true which neither Osorius himself denies That there is no man hath led his life so exactly that in the whole course of his life he hath not been guilty of any gross offence And that there is not any state of Mind so framed by Divine Grace although it abounds with Divine Benefits in which nothing was ever violated by perfidiousness or offensive through errour of mind or omitted through negligence or which doth not more consist of the remission of sins than the perfection of vertues What remains then but that it should either be false which this Osorius of ours cracks of an humane perfection or at least it behoveth that something should be searched for besides the vertues themselves which may commend these first beginnings of our imperfections to the Divine Perfection and reconcile them to his favour And now then this remains to be searched into What it is that reconciles sinners to God and restores them to his favour and because this Reconciliation cannot be perfected by the Righteousness of our vertues therefore we must confess that all the Office of reconciling consists in the Grace of God only which the Papists themselves will not deny unto us who agree with our Party in this That Man is justified by Grace for so we hear it testified expresly by Osorius himself in these words Therefore saith he They that give Heaven to the Merits of holy men do not weaken the Grace of God as some ignorant men say but they celebrate the wonderful effect of his Grace with due praises for we are such as judge all the Morits of the Saints should be referred to the Bounty and Grace of God so that it should always be said Not unto us Lord not unto us but unto thy Name give glory c. I hear indeed very good words if you had not already imposed upon us sufficiently with words O Osorius But he that will with judicious attention consider the matters themselves and the Arguments and the whole tenour of your discourse will find it to be far otherways that you do not at all intend what your words pretend and that you drive at nothing more in all your endeavours than to hide under the plausible title of grace so hidden an adversary of grace that I may speak with Augustin together with the other
Companions of your Society who being all instructed in the same School seem to make a Conspiracy about this one thing as it were giving notice by a watch-word viz. to overthrow all the efficacy of Evangelical Grace to destroy the assurance of Faith to oveturn all For what place is there for Grace I beseech you if Heaven is given not by the free gift of the bestower but to the Merits of holy men as you say And what will you answer Paul the Apostle who denies that grace is any more grace if men deal with God by Works whence that may be brought not without just cause against you and yours which Augustine of old brought in his contending with the Antient Pelagians of his time For thus you plead That Heaven is justly and deservedly given to the Merits of holy men On the contrary Augustine being taught by Apostolick Authority If it is given saith he to any Merits it is not then given freely but is render'd as due and by this means it is not by a true name called grace where the reward as the Apostle speaks is not imputed according to grace but according to debt But that it may be true grace that is free it finds nothing in Man to whom it should be due otherways according to the mind of the Apostle grace would not be grace c. And now with what fair colours cast on them will those things being contrary to one another be made to agree Augustine with St. Paul affirms that grace finds nothing in Man to which it should be due That it may be free On the contrary the Papists contend that Heaven is given as a due debt to the Merits of the Saints What is more contrary Grace saith he doth not only help the righteous man but also justifies the ungodly in which there appears a twofold effect and fruit of Divine Grace both in helping the righteous and justifying the ungodly With the one of which you being contented ye either unworthily pass by the other or which is more abominable ye oppose it wickedly whilst ye admit no grace of justifying but that which seems to be joyned with Vertue and the Iustice of Merits And yet after all these things whereas nothing more contrary to grace can be spoken this sweet Oratour would perswade us with his flourished speeches that they are no such men as overturn the Grace of God as some ignorant men say but that they celebrate with due praise the wonderful effect of grace and teach that all the Merits of the Saints should be referred to the Grace of God Now we acknowledge this to be most certain that there is not any thing but what should be referred to the Grace of God whence Hierom accounts it for Sacrilege if any man thinks he can abstain from sinning without grace But here there is need to explain what the word grace signifies according to the caution of the Gospel For grace in the holy Scriptures is not only understood concerning the help of the Holy Spirit but it comprehends both free Imputation which is by Christ which the Papists cannot endure and the help of the Holy Spirit in performing the Offices of Vertues How the Papists and Protestants agree and differ in understanding the word Grace Now whereas both Papists and Protestants seem to attribute Man's Iustifaication to grace herein they both agree But they say this after their manner of speaking we after ours For this is the difference between these and the Protestants that the Papists by the name of grace understand only gifts that are conferr'd upon those that are justified to wit habits which they call infused and excellent Endowments of lovely Vertues and other things of that kind wherewith the Elect are adorned by the free gift of God But the contrary party being otherways taught by the Scriptures and confirmed by the sayings of the Fathers perceiving these very gifts of the Spirit of God as long as they live in this flesh are imperfect through our default they deny that men can be justified by these because Divine Iustice cannot at all be satisfied by these And therefore it is that they attribute Iustification only to the grace and mercy of God which consists not of any remuneration of Vertues but rather imputation of Righteousness and forgiveness of sins For we do not find fault with this in them that they do rightly affirm that all our good works should be referred to the grace of God which neither the Iews themselves nor the Turks will deny But we justly disapprove that they do not define this grace according to Scripture For whereas grace is so defined by this sort of men that it is nothing else but a habit infused by God like his own goodness and love whereby he that hath it is rendered acceptable to God and it makes Works acceptable to him and meritorious It is easily demonstrated both by Scriptures and Reason how faulty this definition is because the thing defined is of a larger extent than the definition For the grace whereby God loved Iacob and hated Esau before they did either good or evil was grace which yeâ—â—as not any Habit either begotten in them by the power of Nature or infused by grace whereby Iacob that had it that I may use their words was render'd acceptable to God After the like manner the grace which in the midst of his persecution of Saints changed Paul into an Instrument in the hand of Electing grace was not an infused Habit but went before an infused Habit and first made him a man acceptable to Christ before the Habit making acceptable was infused The same should be said of the Thief the Publican the Leper and many others in the History of the Gospel who were not saved by an infused Habit but only by an infused Faith for otherways what did that word so often repeated in the Gospel signifie Thy Faith hath saved thee Which word if it be true then either Faith is Righteousness or else Righteousness can by no means save us And the same reason is to be given of the Conversion of the Gentiles whom of old the grace of God brought from impure Paganism to the Communion of the Gospel not for any Inherent Righteousness but for his great Love wherewith he loved the unworthy and the wretched sinners Moreover what shall be said of the Apostles themselves whom Christ verily chose not being just as Augustine speaks but to be justified when he said I chose you out of the World What if Christ chose them out of the World that they might be just then they were first unjust in the World whom he chose out of the World that they might be just If they were first just and not sinners of the World whom Christ chose out of the World then they first chose Christ that they being just might be chosen by him But it was not so for he himself says to them
As if this Assurance and full Perswasion which we maintain did rely on any Dignity of ours and did not wholly depend upon the certainty of the promise of God I come to their other Calumny no less absurd whereby they most unjustly slander us as if we referred the whole cause of our Iustification to nothing else but only an opinionative assurance so that to obtain the Remission of sins we taught that no other thing is necessary but that every Man should by a special faith be perswaded in his own mind that his sins are forgiven him which is most false as there is almost nothing true in the Books of Hosius For though we confess this to be most sure that nothing is more sure than our Iustification by Christ yet if the cause be enquired for which properly justifies us from our sins we answer It is faith not whereby we believe that we are Iustified as Hosius chatters but whereby we believe in Christ the Son of God who only is a propitiation for our sin Concerning the Word Iustification what it signifies in the Scriptures Whether it consists of Remission of Sins only or not And by what ways and means Iustification is obtained NOW ye Papists ye have our Opinion of Iustifying Faith and the true Nature thereof explained unto you what its power is and what its object Moreover ye understand how this Faith is distinguished from Hope and Assurance And wherein the true and next cause of Iustification is taken up whereof if ye enquire for the Internal cause it is faith only whereby we belleve in Christ If ye enquire for the External Matter thereof it is Christ only whom we embrace by Faith But because ye do by no means allow thereof that we should be Iustified by Faith only that we may confute your Calumnies in this matter or amend your errour I see there remain two things to be unfolded by me and to be considered by you First What the Scripture properly understands by the word Iustification And then Who and what manner of persons they are who are Iustified by Faith As touching Iustification they of Trent deny that it consists only in the Remission of sins unless there is joyned therewith a voluntary receiving of grace and some other things go before by which as preparatories Men are disposed to receive Iustification But Pious Reader If you have not yet heard what this Preparatory Disposition is and by what degrees it arises and into what order it is digested by these Men it is worth while to take notice of it For Men are disposed unto Righteousness whilst being helped by the preventing grace of Divine Vocation without any Merits of Works going before they receive Faith by hearing Now what this Faith is it hath been shewed above for according to the opinion of the Papists it is a firm assent unto those things that are revealed and discovered by God And yet they plead that a Man is not presently Iustified by this naked assent or faith But it behoves that other Dispositions be added by Divine grace whereby men are prepared for Iustification Faith Fear Hope Love Repentance Hatred and Detestation of Sin Love of Righteousness Prayer and the like so that indeed the beginning of Iustification is the free calling of God Whence Faith comes by hearing Whereby Men believe those things to be true that are revealed by God Whether they be such things as belong to the free mercy of God towards sinners through the Redemption which is in Christ Iesus Or whether they be such things as belong to the fear of Divine Iustice from which Faith by consideration of the Divine Iudgment fear ariseth whereby Men are terrified to their advantage that they may forsake and detest their sins And afterwards from the same faith through consideration of free Mercy purchased fo penitent sinners by Christ assurance proceeds whereby they are perswaded that God will be gracious to them for Christ's sake And thus by this consideration of so great goodness they begin to call upon God as the Fountain of all Righteousness and to love him and to cast away sin and to endeavour after newness of life and to keep the Commandments And by this means we obtain a perfect disposition or preparation to Righteousness whereby we are commanded to prepare our Hearts to the Lord. And afterwards Iustification follows this preparation which is not only the Remission of sins but also Sanctification and Renovation of the inner Man by a voluntary accepting of grace and gifts whence a Man of unjust is made just and of an Enemy a Friend that he may be an Heir according to the hope of Eternal Life c. But now from what part of the Apostolick or Prophetick Scripture have they taken this Doctrine From none neither is there need of any The Tridentine Oracle is sufficient for Scripture Amongst the Doctors Canisius endeavours a valiant defence of this Decree but he gains nothing at all For tho' we acknowledge with Augustin and the Doctors that which cannot be deny'd that we are Debtors to the grace of God for all we receive both for those things which belong to the forgiveness of sins and also those things which belong to new Obedience Yet what makes this for the matter we are now treating of For the Subject matter at present is not what the efficacious power of Divine grace performs in us without which Augustin justly pleads against the Pelagians that all our strength is wholly ineffectual but what that is which justifies a wicked Man before God What that 〈◊〉 wherein this our Iustification whereof I speak consists in the Remission of sins only or in the possession of Vertues Moreover what that is which is properly signified in the Scriptures by the word Iustification Though in this also the Adversaries are not very well agreed with one another but in this one thing they are wonderfully agreed to oppose Saint Paul with all their might First they of Trent as I have said do thus divide their opinion that they make two parts of Iustification The one in Remission which they attribute to Faith The other in new Obedience and Works meritorious of increase as they speak by which the Righteouness of Faith is perfected of which opinion Tilet an is the Author Again there are Others who are so far from explaining what is signified by the word Iustification that referring all to the Righteousness of Works they think that Iustification is not worthy to be mentioned in Books Of whom and the chief amongst many is this Osorius of ours Thomas Aquinas discoursing of many things about Iustification as also about many other things seems to have described it after this manner To wit according to the nature of Motion which is made in Man from one contrary to another So that it is a kind of Transmutation from a State of unrighteousness to a State of Righteousness And he explains the
Argument There are also many other Scriptures which they have wrested abominably for the defence of their Opinion about Inherent Righteousness As for example where the Lord says That he came not to destroy the Law but to fulfil it Hence they infer that all that would be saved must of necessity keep the Law That I may answer this Objection I acknowledge that saying of the Lord to be very true and I know what he professed in words he performed in the practice of his Life For he came not to destroy the Law but perfectly to fulfil it and that not so much upon his own account as upon ours But it is not therefore a right consequence which they draw from an ill formed Argument Argument Christ came not to destroy the Law but to fulfil it Therefore there is no Salvation to any but those that perform the Law This is a false consequence for there is more in the conclusion than in the antecedent For this should have been the conclusion Therefore should we diligently endeavour to fulfil the Law according to his Example especially in those things that belong to us for we are not subject to the same Ceremonies of the Law that he was As when he was circumcised and went to the Feast at Ierusalem thrice a year abstained from things that were ceremonially unclean and from things strangled and blood and celebra-ted the Passover according to the Law and many things of that kind whereunto we are not now obliged But though it be very true that he came to fulfil the Law yet we are not therefore obliged to the fulfilling of the Law as a thing necessary to our Salvation For the Office of Christ is distinguished by a twofold end For he was sent by his Father partly for this purpose that in our stead he might yield perfect Obedience unto the Law to which impossibility we our selves had a woful Obligation and that he might stir us up unto Vertue by his own Example but the Office of the Mediatour consists chiefly in this That he hath delivered us from the dreadful Curse of the Law and by his Death made full satisfaction to Divine Iustice for all our Debts and translated us from our bondage and slavery into a blessed state of liberty Which makes us now to rejoyce in the hope of the glory of God Therefore it is seasonable here to give notice that they who upon this account take Christ for a Law-giver as if he had been sent by God for no other cause but to make new Laws in the World are in a great Errour For though he made a sound and right Interpretation of his Countrey Laws which were commanded by God and given by the Ministry of Moses yet he was not sent principally for this purpose to make new or old Laws but rather to bring help to those that were under the Curse of the Law and thereby in peril of damnation Another Argument Unless Christ had kept the Law he had neither saved himself nor others Therefore we cannot be saved unless we keep the things that are commanded in the Law Answer Under this similitude there lies hid a great disparity For there is no small disproportion between us and Christ. If he had failed in any thing commanded by the Law there was no other Redeemer that could have interposed for him The same may be said of the Angels if they had sinned But if we through infirmity go astray the blood of our Lord Iesus Christ is in readiness for our Redemption to raise us up when we are fallen to procure the pardon of our offences and to restore us unto a blessed state Argument Unless a man be born of Water and the holy Spirit he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God Iohn 3. Unless ye eat the flesh of the Son of God and drink his blood ye shall have no life in you Iohn 6. Therefore Faith only is not sufficient for Salvation Answer Verily there is no other Weapon put into our hands that we can retort with greater advantage upon Enemy than this very Argument For the Mystical signification of both these Sacraments Baptism and the Lord's Supper is nothing else but Faith in Christ Iesus for as Baptism is called a Sacrament of Faith and therefore is sometimes by Augustin put for Faith so those that are well instructed in the knowledge of Christ understand that to eat the flesh of Christ is the same with believing in him If we rightly consider the nature of this Sacrament there cannot be a more evident demonstration that we are justified by no other thing but Faith only For by what Argument could it be more manifestly set before our Eyes how great benefit redounds to us from the shedding of the blood of Christ than by the Institution of the Sacramental Bread and Wine for a memorial of his Body and Blood Or by what other thing could he more effectually represent unto our Faith the powerful efficacy of his Death than by the Institution of this Sacrament First Pious Reader call to mind and consider with your self this miserable and mortal Nature which how void and destitute it is of all things and how empty of Divine Grace and laden with iniquities you cannot be ignorant Thou who in thy self art a wretched and destroyed man comest to the Banquet where thou art commanded to take the Sacramental Bread and Cup in the name of him that was slain for thee and then thou art bid Eat for otherwise to what purpose should you hold the Bread in your hands when it is broken and reached forth unto you unless it be received inwardly for digestion Eat saith he and drink ye all of it for this is my Body and this is my Blood that was shed for you What was his design in expressing himself thus but to make us understand that his Death would be like a great Supper to his whole Church in which sinners that in themselves were wretched and miserable and empty and hunger-bitten might be refreshed with an everlasting Feast of fat things according as the Lord had long since promised by the Prophet Isaiah For as this mortal Life cannot continue without daily nourishment so neither hope of Eternal Life nor any other Grace can endure unless it be supported by Faith in the Lamb of God and thereby receive spiritual nourishment And therefore unless ye eat saith he the flesh of the Son of Man c. Whence it is evident that there is no Iustification for miserable sinners but that which consists in Christ only who was slain for us Yea there is no Iustification in him neither but by Faith which receives inwardly and digests this Bread that came down from Heaven according as we are taught in the Gospel He that believes in me hath Life eternal that believing ye may have life through his name Unless ye believe that I am he c. Thy Faith hath made thee
consists not in the Merits of Works but in Grace only and the Hope of Mercy unto which Men fly for refuge in their emptyness of Vertues as he speaks But let us proceed Another Argument Evil Works deserve Eternal Destruction Therefore Good Works Merit Eternal Life Answer Both are true indeed if you consider things in respect of the just rewards due unto them For as the vile Abominations of an Ungodly Life procure the Wrath and Vengeance of God so Works of Righteousness would procure his favour if we could perform good things with as great perfection as we do Evil things But because we cannot do that therefore of our selves we can deserve nothing according to the rules of Iustice but only Death and Damnation But now by the right of Redemption through Christ we are set free from the Law of Iustice and translated into the Kingdom of Grace by Vertue of a new Covenant whereby it comes to pass that God hath respect not to our Merits but only to Christ the price of our Redemption Therefore I answer That this opposition of contraries is of force according to the strict severity of the Law but not according to the Grace of the Gospel for here there is a block put in the way To wit The Blood of the Redeemer that frees us from the Law of Sin and Death Moreover the Argument from contraries avails not except the contraries are set equally in their full extent one against another Now Evil Works in us are perfectly Evil but good Works though assisted by Grace yet because of the refractary imperfection of the Flesh in the sight of God are imperfect at the best as they are performed by us Wherefore Hierom says The perfection of all Righteous Men in the Flesh is Imperfection Another Argument The Grace of Iustification is lost by Evil Works Therefore it is retained by good Works Answer By the same Answer the Fallacy of this Sophistical Argument is discovered because our Sins and Vertues are not equally contrary to one another But whereas it is said that the Grace of Iustification is retained by Obedience though this in some sense may be granted yet Iustification is not thereby procured Moreover when we say It is retained by Works that should not be so understood as if this were done for the Merit of the Actions but only for the sake of the Redeemer upon whose account first the person is accepted and afterwards the actions are well pleasing which otherways would be unclean and of no value They say that perseverance in Righteousness is lost by Evil Works But Evil Works as they are in us admit of a twofold consideration either as they are inherent in us as in all Saints thro' the infirmity of the Flesh and we presently rise up again by Repentance and Faith And such kind of Sins as Paul asserts shall not have dominion over us or in the next place as we give up our selves to Sin against our own Conscience that we may serve it and take a sinful delight therein But such a Sin can by no means consist with this Faith whereof Paul speaks which hath place in none but those that are turned from Sin and returned to God Another Argument Faith Iustifies Faith is a Work Therefore Works Iustifie Answer I Answer The Argument is faulty because the middle term is of a larger extent in the Major than in the Minor For Faith in the Major is taken correlatively for Christ or the Promise which is apprehended by Faith In the Minor it is taken only for a quality of the Mind as it is an act of our Will Otherways if Faith is taken in the Minor just as it is in the Major it is false and the Minor should be denied To wit That Faith is a Work Another Argument of the Iesuits If Faith only Iustifies it would Iustifie without Charity Faith doth not Iustifie without Charity Therefore Faith only doth not Iustifie Answer I may oppose unto this Argument another not unlike it that the Fallacy of the one may appear the more easily by the other Thus then by way of Instance a Man may infer If the heat of Fire only makes warm then it makes warm without light But the heat of Fire doth not make warm without light joyned therewith Therefore The heat of the Fire only doth not make warm I doubt not but by this mutual comparing of Arguments it appears evident to the Reader how like the one is to the other and consequently how he should judge thereof so that there is no need of any further Refutation For all things that are joyned and agree together in some respects are not therefore engaged in the same Office He that hath Feet Eyes and Ears though he hath not these Members in separation from one another yet it is an untruth if it is said That he sees not with his Eyes only or walks not with his Feet only Though I deny not that in the performance of those duties which belong to this Life Faith is not separated from Charity So if we look upward to things that are Divine and Eternal if we contemplate and view what that is which can help us at our appearance before the Dreadful Iudgment Seat of God and appease his Wrath and deliver us from Eternal Destruction and conquer Death and the Devil and regain the favour of God and Iustifie us and procure us the Crown of Life Faith only in the Mediatour doth so bear rule in these affairs and so fully performs all things requisite to our Salvation and Redemption that here Charity hath nothing to do for the Kingdom is not promised or due to you because you love this or that Neighbour after your manner but contrarily because you neither love God as you ought nor your Neighbour as your self therefore unavoidable destruction is due to you unless Faith only through the Mediatour should come in for your help and set you free from the condemnation due unto you notwithstanding your Charity Faith is so far from needing to be joyned with Charity for Iustification that unless Charity it self were justified by Faith it could not stand nor keep it self from falling to ruine and Destruction Of the like nature is that Argument which they wrest out of the Writings of the Apostle Paul An Argument out of 1 Cor. 13. If I have all Faith so that I can remove Mountains but have not Charity I am nothing Therefore Iustification comes by Faith and good Works Answer Erasmus did write in his Exposition on the Second Chapter of Iames Faith which is cold without Charity and puts not forth it self when the matter requires it is not Faith but only the Name of Faith c. They of Paris argue contray ways that Faith can be without Charity out of this place of Paul If I have all Faith so that I can remove Mountains Erasmus following Basil Interprets this Scripture on this manner That we should take this to
of the Works of Christ were not they Works of the Law For he himself hath said that he came not to destroy the Law but to fulfil it were not the things which he performed in fulfilling the Law VVorks of Grace VVhat difference then is there between those VVorks that are called VVorks of the Law and those other that are called VVorks of Grace So that it appears that he who excludes the VVorks of the Law excludes also the VVorks of Grace from Iustification Though I acknowledge there is great difference between the Law and Grace in respect of the manner of Doing and the ends of their Offices For what the Law exacts that Grace performs but in respect of the things themselves and the Actions unto which they are directed seeing both the Law and the Grace of God are exercised in the same subject Matter there is no difference between them The Law commands us to Love our Neighbour and lays a Punishment on him that disobeys But Grace communicates Strength and Ability to perform what the Law commands VVhich when we perform we are said to do not only a VVork of Grace but also a VVork of the Law by Grace so that it is a matter of small concernment whether it be called a VVork of the Law or a VVork of Grace a VVork of our own or a VVork of Faith Therefore if the Scripture denies That a man is justified and attributes his Iustification to another cause that is Faith what should be inferr'd from hence but that Man's Iustification comes neither by the VVorks of the Law nor the VVorks of Grace Iust as if a Man writing to his Friend should say thus This Benefit was procured for him by no Money or charge of his own VVhat matter is it whether it was his own Money or borrowed of some other Man when the meaning of the VVriter was to signifie that this Benefit whatsoever it was was not bought by any Price of the Receiver but obtained by the free Bounty of the Giver So Paul desiring to set before the Eyes of all Men the boundless Immensity of Divine Grace toward Mankind that they might behold and embrace it expresly denies that Man is justified by the VVorks of the Law But here the Distinction of Hosius as I have said presents it self It is true saith he in respect of the Works that are of the Law and belong to our own Free-will which being attended with Imperfection can avail nothing to Iustification To which I Answer in a Word Give then that Grace which may furnish frail Nature with Strength to yield perfect Obedience to the Law and may restore us to perfect innocency in this Life and you have won the cause But in the mean while let those Disputants consider how many gross and pernicious Absurdities proceed from this kind of Doctrine for hereby the infinite greatness of the free Grace and Mercy of God towards us is taken away and abolished this also destroys our thankfulness to him for his goodness and withholds Consolation from afflicted Consciences so that very great injury is done to him that hath freely communicated so many and so great Benefits and much greater injury is done to those on whom they are bestowed Hereby also it comes to pass that there remains no Assurance in the Promise of God no firmness in our Faith no soundness in the Doctrine of Religion nor Comfort or Refreshment in the Suffering of the Saints A second Argument out of St. Paul Being justified freely by his Grace through the Redemption which is in Christ Iesus whom he hath set forth to be a Propitiation by Faith in his Blood to declare his Righteousness at this time that he may be Iust and the Iustifier of him that is of the Faith of Iesus Christ and again we reckon that a Man is justified by Faith without Works Unless the Hearts of these our Adversaries were fully set in them to pervert the ways of the Lord it could not otherways be but these clear and evident sayings of the Apostle must be sufficient to satisfie them and prevail upon them to beware lest they kick against the Doctrine of the Apostles and exalt themselves in their proud Imaginations and vain Conceit of their own Righteousness against such clear Manifestation of Divine Grace But here the Roman Legions make a fresh incursion again and the Ring-leader of them is Andraeas Vega who fights against the Righteousness of Faith Whom there is no need of answering in this World For he hath been removed out of this Life a great while since that he might answer to God his Iudge And because he denied that he was justified by the Faith of Christ only let him look to it what he must answer his Iudge in that Iudgment wherein he must give account of his whole Life where of necessity he must either overcome or fall If he overcome where is the Truth of Scripture in which it is said God only overcomes when he is judged But if he fall where then is the Righteousness of Works What if David so great a King and Prophet could not endure that God should enter with him into Iudgment If Iob a Man of so Holy a Life yet durst not answer to one of a thousand What will our Vega say what will he bring his Cowls his Fastings his lyings on the Ground his Night Watches his Vows his Liturgick-Prayers his Propitiatory-Masses his Mumbled over Confessions his Penances and Satisfactions But who hath required these things at your Hands Nay but he will defend himself and take Sanctuary in the Law which he hath fulfilled not by the Strength of his own Free-will but by the help of Divine Grace Say you so David being guarded with as much Grace as any Man was yet sunk down under the weight of the Law of God I suppose Iob wanted not Divine Grace and yet he dares not appear before God in Iudgment And will Vega nevertheless hope to bring such an account of his Life before the Tribunal of God that if God strictly Mark it and weigh it in the balance of his Iustice he will not find more Sins than Merits therein But I need not ask him what he will answer to God his Iudge To whom I know he can make no satisfaction with all his inherent Righteousness But this is that which I ask him and not him only but all the other Tridentines also what they will answer the Apostle Paul who openly pronounces a Curse both on Men and Angels if any of them should dare to preach any other Gospel than he had preached And what Gospel is it that we have received by the preaching of Paul Is it not the same that he taught so often in all his Epistles with frequent Repetitions and great Care and Diligence and also confirmed it with Miracles Now the summ of the Gospel which he preached is this That Man is justified freely without Works by the Grace of
promulgation of the Law I would ask him What the Law is which if it is nothing but the Rule of Righteousness how can any man be just where there is no Law But what man was there ever in the World but he carried about with him the Law of God if not written in Tables yet written on his heart and engraven on his conscience But the Decalogue was not yet engraven on Tables of Stone But what was contained in the Moral Decalogue which that holy man did not already comprehend within his own heart both of loving God and his Neighbour of not Murthering of not committing Adultery or honouring Parents c. 3. As touching the scope of this Epistle how greatly is campian mistaken For who is so void of sense that he doth not clearly perceive that the drift of the Apostle is not that which those Iesuits dream of to attribute our Salvation or Iustification to any Works either going before or following after Neither was this Office of an Ambassadour committed unto him that he might contend with the Iews about Ceremonies or with the Gentiles about Moral Duties but as Peter was entrusted with the Apostleship of the Circumcision so also the Preaching of the Gospel to the Uncircumcision was committed unto Paul not that he should Preach the Law but the Faith which before he opposed Not that he might declare the Righteousness of Works in which there is no Salvation but that God by him might reveal his Son amongst the Gentiles and might manifest unto the World that heavenly Trophy and glad Tydings of Peace and Victory obtained in Heaven by Christ and spread abroad far and wide through the Churches the boundless riches of Divine Grace which he had experienced in himself For he was called for this purpose to the Apostleship that the infinitely gracious Lord and Redeemer Christ Iesus might first exercise his Mercy towards him and afterwards by him declare his great Mercy towards Sinners not only by hisExample but also by his Ministry For thus he bears witness of himself that the Ministry of Reconciliation was committed to him for which he was appointed to be a Preacher and Apostle and Teacher of the Gentiles in Faith and Truth that he being an Ambassadour in Christ's stead might invite all men yea and beg of them that they would be reconciled unto God And this seems to be the principal scope that Paul aims at not only in the Epistle to the Romans but also in all his Doctrine to proclaim amongst the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ and that he might set before the view of all men what is the Communion of the Mystery that was hidden with God in former Ages c. But now in the Righteousness of Works no such Mystery lay hidden with God from former Ages Therefore it is false and abominable which Campian the Iesuit and such like Sophisters assert concerning the scope and sense of Paul's Epistle to the Romans For by the Law which Paul excludes from Iustification they understand that part thereof which comprehends Ceremonial and Iudicial Works wherein the Iews gloried or Works purely Moral performed before Faith on which the Gentiles relied Yea on the contrary when Paul removes the Law from Iustification he doth not only exclude it upon the account of Iewish Ceremonies or Moral Works performed before Faith but also upon the account of its weakness through the flesh both in Iews and Gentiles both in the regenerate and the unregenerate so that it cannot make sufficient satisfaction to the Iustice of God And Paul affirms That for this cause God sent his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh What did God do but what flesh could not do For sin he condemned sin in the flesh In what flesh ours or his own Sons Who of all the Regenerate though endued with great habitual Faith and Grace hath so led his life walking not according to the flesh but according to the spirit but he always carries about with him flesh that is weak in many respects and vicious and subject to sin Concerning which every one may complain with the Apostle I know that in me that is in my flesh dwells no good thing And again I find a Law that when I would do good evil is present with me c. For what they speak of Works following Faith and Grace how little that helps their cause appears not more evident by any Argument than by the Lives of those that maintain this Controversie if they be strictly enquired into If that be true which Campian with his Iesuits pleads for That Righteousness is not obtained in men come to years but by Works that follow after Faith Let us behold then what excellent Works this Faith of the Mother Church of Rome brings forth seeing they so much glory in the Title of Catholick Faith and Preach so many things about Charity which is the fulfilling of the Law Let us look into the Life and Works of the Roman Popes Cardinals and Bishops and the whole Crew of the Monks and Iesuits Where can you find more of the flesh or less of true holiness than in those false-hearted and painted Hypocrites whose whole profession of Religion consists in Purple Gowns high topped Mitres Purple Caps Rings adorned with Iewels solemn Vows Ceremonies which in reality are rather Stage-playes than Exercises of Piety This appears to be too true by the unhappy Tumults raised in the World the Wars and Persecutions that are stirred up by none more than by those very men that call themselves Spiritual and Catholick whom it should become to be the chiefest encouragers of Concord and Messengers of Peace But having so much enlarged upon this sort of men with their Works and Merits let us return to the Examples of those of whom we spake before who were freely admitted unto Baptism and received into favour by Faith without any commendation of Merits at all yea without mention of any Works except such perhaps as were evil Amongst which number those Iews may be reckoned of whom three thousand at one time were Baptized by Peter Likewise also the Eunuch whom Faith only without Works made not only meet for Baptism but also an Heir of the Heavenly Kingdom And the Iaylor whom Paul Baptized Moreover Paul himself and all the Apostles and Publicans the family of Cornelius Zacehaeus Mary Magdalen and the Thief on the Cross If Faith without Works was sufficient to them for the Grace of Baptism why not also for the obtaining of Iustification and Life Eternal Vega and those of his Association answers after his usual manner that in all these Repentance was joyned with Faith and other things also belonging to good Manners and a godly Life But it easily appears how vain and insignificant this Answer of Vega is He says Repentance and other Vertues are joyned with Faith Which tho' I confess to be in some sense true in the lives and persons of
without any disadvantage to our Cause For suppose we grant that Faith is Dead which is not moved with a desire of doing good Works according to the saying of St. Iames yet it doth not therefore follow from hence that no Faith Iustifies without Works From which two things do follow worthy of consideration First That no Faith justifies that is not lively And next though it abounds in good Works and never is without them yet it only without Works Iustifies This will appear evident by the Example of St. Paul Who though he was not conscious to himself of any Wickedness yet he durst not affirm himself to be thereby Iustified I think nothing hinders but the whole Argument may be yielded unto if so be the terms are rightly placed The Adversaries gather out of the Apostle Iames that Faith is dead which is without Works and herein we do not much oppose them But what follows from hence Therefore as they say dead Faith without Works doth not justifie And I deny it not But what Conclusion flows from this manner of Arguing Therefore only Faith doth not justiste Why so If no Faith but that which is lively justifies and if it receives Life only from Works then this is the consequence that Faith justifies only upon the account of good Works I Answer First though we grant it is true that the Faith which justifies us in the sight of God is lively and always joyned with a Godly Life Yet that this Faith justifies and reconciles us no other ways but upon the account of good Works is most false For this is not a good consequence from the premises Because Faith is not alone in the Life of the Believer therefore Faith is not alone in the Office of justifying Or because the Faith that justifies is not a dead but a lively Faith therefore it doth not justifie alone without Works For herein is a fallacy of the Consequence But you may object Whence then is Faith said to be lively and not Dead but from Works Which if it be so of necessity it must draw all its Life and Vertue from Works Nay the matter is quite contrary For though in the sight of Men Faith is not discerned to be Lively and Vigorous but by Works yet Faith receives not Life from Works but rather Works from Faith As Fruits draw their Life and Sap from the Root of the Tree but not the Root from them Iust so external actions proceed from Faith as the Root which if they be good they evidence the Root to be sound and lively and this is all they do but they communicate no Life thereunto And this Life and Vertue of Faith is not one but Twofold And it acteth partly in Heaven and partly in Earth If you ask what it doth amongst Men upon Earth It does good to its Neighbour working by Love But before God in Heaven it justifies the Ungodly not by Love but by the Son of God whom it only lays hold of Therefore those Men seem not to have got a clear insight into the Vertue and Nature of the Grace of Faith that suppose the whole Life thereof to consist in Love as if Faith of it self could do nothing but as it receives Vertue and Efficacy from Charity Indeed both may seem to be true in the External Actions of Human Life in which Faith lyes like a dead thing unless it be enlivened by Charity to the exercise of good Works And hereunto belongs that saying of Paul whereby he so much commends Faith working by Love understanding such Works as Faith working by Love brings forth to the view of a Human Eye Yet with God Faith hath a far different operation for it only without any reliance upon Works or assistance of Charity but trusting to the naked promise of God and the dignity of the Mediatour climbs up to Heaven and gets access into the presence of God where it does great and wonderful things combating with the Iudgment to come fighting against the terrours of Death Satan and Hell pleads the cause of a Sinner obtains his pardon absolves and justifies him from the accusations of a guilty Conscience takes away all Iniquity reconciles God to the Sinner appeases his wrath subdues the power of Death and the Devil and procures Peace yea and Paradise it self with theThief that had led a wicked Life and yet at Death was justified by Faith in the Redeemer Who would desire more or greater things And now so many and great things being done by Faith let us enquire After what manner it does them Not as it lives and works by Love but as it lives only by Christ and relies on the promise for the Life of Faith which lives before God is not Charity but Christ not receiving Life from Charity but communicating life unto it and justifying Works that they may be acceptable to God which would otherways be abominable Unto the truth of this we have a sufficient Testimony given us by Paul When he says my Life is Christ and again the Life that I now live in the Flesh I live not by the Love but by the faith of the Son of God who loved me and gave himself for me And elsewhere speaking of himself he says That he was not conscious to himself of any VVickedness and yet he denies that he is thereby Iustified as the same Apostle discoursing about the works of Abraham though they were never so Eminent for Holiness yet he saw nothing in them which that Great Patriarch might make a matter of Glorying before God Hereunto may be added the Arguments of others that have been strangely wrested out of Scriptures There are six Reasons principally which they pretend the Evangelists furnish them with against the Righteousness of Faith First they draw an Argument from these words of Christ Come ye blessed of my Father to the Kingdom prepared for you For I was an hungred and ye gave me Meat Argument Da. That which is the cause of blessedness is also the cause of Iustification Whom he hath Iustified them he hath also Glorified c. Rom. 8. Ri. Works of Mercy are the cause of blessedness for I was an hungred and ye gave c. Mat. 25. I. Therefore Works of Mercy are the cause of Iustification Answer I deny the Minor For Works of Mercy as they are considered in themselves are not the cause of Iustification or blessedness but rather effects and furits of Iustification for they are no otherways pleasing to God but as they are performed by persons in a justified state and it is by the Faith of Christ that they become acceptable For unless Faith go before and justifie the person of him that worketh his works are not at all regarded by God because they do not satisfie the Law of God being tainted with the corruption of depraved Nature and come far short of that perfection which Divine Iustice requires Wherefore if we will Reason aright about
the cause of blessedness this manner of arguing will appear to be more forcible by an evident Testimony of Scripture Argument Ma. That which is the cause of blessedness the same is the cause of Iustification Mi. Remission of Sins is the cause of blessedness and Salvation Con. Theresore Remission of Sins is the cause of Iustification But you may say What must then be answered to the Words of Christ who seems to promise the blessedness of the Kingdom as a reward of Works You may find an answer to this objection in the Book of Iacobus Cartusiensis who hath written on this manner Men do accept and love the persons of others for their Works that are acceptable and profitable to them but God accepts the Works for the sake of the person c. Therefore here there is need of a distinction between the Work and the person of the Worker But you may say Are not Works that are performed in Charity for the relief of the Poor pleasing and acceptable to God We deny not that our selves But we enquire into the cause wherefore they become acceptable Which that it may appear the more evidently let us examine these words of Scripture I was an hungred said Christ and ye gave me Meat I was thristy and ye gave me Drink c. I ask in the first place who is it here that was an hungred You will say Christ either himself in his own Body or in a Member of his Body Did you then feed Christ when he was an hungred That was Piously done indeed Therefore I see and commend what you have done But I ask what was it that stirred you up to do it Whether was it Charity setting Faith a work or was it not rather Faith setting Charity a work But what if some other that was no Member of Christ whether Heathen or Turk had need of your Meat Would you in your Charity have fed him I doubt of that But suppose you your self had not believed in Christ but had been an Enemy to him if you had seen one that belonged to Christ almost ready to perish for hunger would you have relieved him I do not believe so Why Because it is only believers that feed Christ but Infidels persecute him The Lord was thirsty on the Cross and he had Vinegar given him for drink which was a Hellish wickedness But why did they give him Vinegar Was it want of Love or was it not rather want of Faith in those unbelieving Pharisees Who if they had not wanted Faith they would not have wanted Charity to administer help and Charity would not have been unrewarded But let us proceed Suppose one that is not a believers whether Turk or Heathen should refresh a hungry Christian by giving him of his Meat as old Simon the Pharisee entertained Christ with a Dinner And many of the Heathens have been Eminent in offices of kindness and Love Can the giving of Meat and Drink by any such without Faith merit Eternal Life Surely not But if a believer gives his Christian Brother so much as a Cup of cold Water in his necessity shall he lack his Reward Christ himself says he shall not Hereby you may see whence it is that our Vertues and good deeds are acceptable to God and dignified with Rewards not for themselves but for the Faith of him that works them which first justifies the person before all works And after the person is justified his performances are accepted and though they are of small value in themselves yet they are looked upon as great and rewarded plentifully Wherefore we deny not that sometimes in the Scriptures the name of Reward is joyned with Eternal Life and that the works of Brotherly Charity may in some sense be called meritorious if so be these works are performed by persons who are already justified and received into favour by remission of sins and have obtained a right unto the promise of Eternal Life Not that their works are of such value that they should make satisfaction to the Law of God or merit any thing with God ex congruo or condigne as they phrase it either by congruity or worthiness But they are imputed as Merit by Grace Not that Eternal Life is due to the works themselves but because there are consolations laid up in Heaven for Saints and persons in a justified state to support them in their afflictions Eternal Life not being due to them for their works but by right of the promise just as a Son and Heir to whom his Father's Inheritance is due doth not merit the right of Sonship by any duties that he performs but he being born a Son his duties upon that account are meritorious so that he wants not a due reward and recompence Therefore in this Popish Argument there is a fallacy Another Argument taken from the words of Christ Matth. 25. Da. HE that doth the will of the Father shall enter into the Kingdom of Heaven Ti. It is the will of the Father that we should do good works that are commanded in his Law Si. Therefore an entrance into Heaven is obtained by the works of the Law Answer Suppose we grant all contained in this Argument what will these Roman Iusticiaries infer from thence Therefore as Vega speaks Faith is not sufficient to Salvation without the keeping of the Commandments It is easie to answer him in a word Let him keep the Commandments according to the exact Rule of the Divine Will and he shall be saved But neither he nor any other man can perfectly keep the Commands of God in this Life From whence we infer this by necessary consequence That either there is no hope of obtaining the Kingdom or else that it lies not in the works of the Law Now if it be so what remains but that finding this is not the way to Heaven we should seek for another way and because there is no door of Salvation opened to sinners in the Law of Commandments therefore we must flie to another Refuge But what that Refuge is appearing to us from Heaven it self the Divine Will declares unto us which is not set forth in the Old Law but in the New Testament of the Gospel And this is his Will that every one who believeth in the Son should not perish but have Eternal Life For whereas the Law was weak because of the flesh God sent his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin condemned sin in the flesh that the Righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us that walk not after the flesh but after the spirit Objection But here some may object Will the Faith of Christ justifie us in such a manner that there may be a Legality and Impunity for us to disobey the Will of his Father God forbid The Liberty of the Gospel allows not that for it openly affirms That they who are justified by the Faith of Christ walk not after the flesh but