7. N. 3. saith then as well the person so doing as also every other person receiving thm to that intent shall incurre a Praemunire so that then only when the person delivering them so doth that is delivers them to be worn or used the person receiving them to that intent shall incurre a Praemunire But yet there needs not any such concurence of intentions in the giver and receiver to make the giver an offender and therefore if a man brings into the Realm such superstitious things and delivers them to be worne or used tho the party receive them not to the intent to use or wear them but defaces burns or otherwise destroyes yet he that gave or delivered them incurrs a Praemunire for the words in the act 13 Eliz. 2. § 7. N. 2. relating to the offerer or deliverer are intire in themselves and have no dependence on the subsequent words 13 Eliz. 2. § 7. N. 3. relating to the receiver but generally make all offenders who bring them in and either offer or deliver them to a superstitious intent without any respect to the intent of the party who receives or is offered them LVI Justices Page 54. Upon 13 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 1. If the person to whom such Agnus Dei c. Is offered do bring the offender to any Justice of Peace of the County where the offer is made altho he be not the next Justice yet it is good enough and satisfieth the intent of this act for the word next is put in such cases into acts of Parliament but for conveniency and the more speedy Execution of Justice Styles 246. pl. Maine and Sergeants Case LXVII Justices Page 54. The Statute 13 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 1. provides for the discovery of the offender in order to his punishment in three Cases 1. If any such superstitious thing be offered and the party be able to apprehend him that offers it he must bring him to the next Justice of Peace of the County where the offer is made 2. But if he cannot apprehend him he is to disclose his name and place of abode or resort to the Ordinary of that Diocese or a Justice of Peace of that County where the person to whom the offer was made is resident and that within three dayes after such offer made 3. But 13 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 2. If he receives the thing offered then he is not to apply to the Ordinary but is strictly tyed to deliver it within a day after to some Justice of Peace of that County where he who received it shall then be Resident or happen to be and in this last Case if he receives it with an intent to use or wear it and keeps it above a day or delivers it to any other person or Justice of Peace or any other County he incurrs a Praemunire But these Justices of Peace are strangely confounded as well in Dalt 229. cap. 89 tit high Treason as in Wingate Crown 37 Lambert 194. 195. Page 56. LXVIII Upon 13 Eliz. 2. § 10. N. 1. As is aforesaid So that if the offence be not declared as is aforesaid that is to such Justice of Peace as is appointed in 13 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 1. but it shall be declared to any oother Justice of Peace of a wrong County that other Justice of Peace shall not incurre a Praemunire if he doth not signifie or declare it to a Privy Counsellor Here 13 Eliz. 2. § 10. N. 1. 'T is plain that any one Privy Counsellor sufficeth and the Justice of Peace is not bound to signifie the offence to the Privy Council as Wingate Crown 138. misrecites the Statute 23 Eliz. 1. Of CHVRCHES PAge 58. Upon 23 Eliz. 1. § 2. N. 1. LXXIX Conspiracy It was held Mich. 12 Jac. in Loult and Faulklands Case 2 Cro. 357.358 and 2 Bulstrode 271. 253. and 1 Rol. 209. pl. 49. that if a man were indicted for endeavouring and practising voluntarie felonice proditorie to perswade and withdraw any of the Kings Subjects from his obedience unto the Romish Religion and was afterwards debito modo acquietatus yet an Action upon the Case in Nature of a Conspiracy would not lie a-against the party who procured him to be Indicted and the main reason given was that sorasmuch as every man is bound to discover Treason and 't is dangerous to conceal any thing which may tend to Treason therefore the procuring one to be Indicted concerning it was no Cause of Action And Coke Chief Justice said that such an Action was never brought before that time But later Resolutions have been to the contrary of this opinion and 't is held for Law at this day that if a man procures another to be Indicted of High Treason an Action upon the Case in nature of a Conspiricy lieth against him that procures it as well as if it were for Felony the first leading Case of this nature which was resolved upon solemn argument or debate was that of Hil. 1. Car. 1. of Smith and Crashaw c. addition to Bendloes 152. Latch 79.80 Jones 93.94.95 Where it was adjudged upon great deliberation by all the four Judges of B. R. that an Action in nature of a Conspiracy doth well lie in such Case and that not only in Case of acquital upon Tryal but upon the Exhibiting a Bill of Indictment for High Treason to the Court or Jury if the Jury bring in Ignoramus altho in this last Case a Writ of Conspiracy lyeth not and Lovets Case was denyed to be Law and Justice Dodderidge who concurred 2 Bulstrode 271 253 changed his opinion in Smiths Cas◠and held the Action maintainable so that whosoever of meer malice without probable cause causeth any to be Indicted on 23 Eliz. 1. § 2. N. 1. or on 3 Jac. 4. § 22. N. 1. for endeavouring or practiceing so to perswade or withdraw any Subject or prefers a Bill to the Court or Jury for that purpose is lyable to an Action upon the Case for so doing if the party be acquitted or the Jury bring in Ignoramus as in other Cases of Felony LX. Accessory Page 59. These words And shall not within twenty dayes c. disclose the same 23 Eliz. 1. § 3. N. 1. have no reference to those who are aiders and maintainers of the offender but only to those who have barely a knowledge of the offence without aiding or maintaining the party And therefore if such as are aiders or maintainers of the person offending discover the offence within twenty daies yet such discovery shall not free them from the guilt of Imprisonment of Treason as Wingate Crown 42. mistakes but if they once aid or maintaine the party knowing him to be an offendor they are guilty whither they disclose or conceal the offence and shall have no benefit of the twenty dayes LXI Enfant Page 60. Upon 23 Eliz. 1. § 5. N. 1. Moor 606. pl. 838. Talbot was Indicted quod existens aetatis 16
Cro. 529. the demand was but for 11 months and when the Jury finds the defendent guilty it shall be intended to be for the 11 months for which the penalty is demanded and that shall be accounted from the 10 September which was the first day of absence alledged in the Information and the rest of the time to the 9 September following after the first 11 months is to be accounted as surplusage But in this Case on 23 Eliz. 1. § 5. N. 1. where the Jury abridgeth the time for which penalty is demanded it may be questioned whither the Verdict shall be intended to be for the first 12 months of the 13. and the Judges of B. R. to salve a Case of the like nature 3 Cro. 835. seemed to be of opinion and 8 Ed. 4.2 § 2. N. 3. that it is not material which were the 12 months wherein the party offended but if that opinion be law it must follow that the party can never be punished for the 13 month but that must be remitted to him because it s left uncertain which of the 13 shall be accounted the month not found by the Jury and it rather seems for this reason that the Verdict is void for the uncertainty which 12 months of the 13 the party offended unless it shall be intended of the first 12. 5. Mr. Shephard in his sure Guide cap. 6. Sect. 5. Raiseth this question viz. 23 Eliz. 1. § 5. N. 1. having reference to 1 Eliz. 2. § 14. N. 1. which sayeth every one shall come to Church every Sunday and Holy-day whither he that is not at Church every Holy-day doth not rigore juris forfeit 20 pound a month by force of 23 Eliz. 1. § 5. N. 1. but this question seems altogether needles for t is clear by the express words of 23 Eliz. 1. § 5. N. 1. that it must be a forbearance from Church for a whole month together that makes the party liable to the forfeiture of 20 l. and if he comes to Church on any Sunday or Holy-day within the month he is ficed from the penalty of 20 l. altho not from the 12d and by 1 Eliz. 2. § 14. N. 1. for the dayes of his absence if he comes not every Sunday and Holy-day both LXVI Behaviour Page 63. 64. Upon the words Be bound in 23 Eliz. 1. § 5. N. 2. Some have made a question and among them Mr. Shephard in his Sure Guide cap. 6. Sect. 5. by whom or in what Court the Recusant shall be bound to the good behavior by force of this Statute for that the Court is not expresly mentioned and Wingate Crown 44. hath stumbled upon a conceit that after certificat made in B. R. a Justice of Assie Goal delivery or Peace shall bind the party to the good behavior and misrecites the Statute accordingly but it seemeth the intention of the Law makers was that he should be bound in B. R. and of that opinion is Dalt 192 § 5 cap. 79 tit good behaviour 2. For where any proceedings are appointed to be upon or after a certificate sent to any Court there by common intendment the proceedings are to be in that Court to whom the Certificate is sent if no other Court be named and it cannot be presumed by any reasonable construction of 23 Eliz. 1. § 5. N. 2. That the Certificate into B. R. is to any other end than for the Justices there to proceed in such manner as the Act directs to be done after such Certificate as no question they may in this Case as well as upon Certificate of a presentment or of refusal of the Oath of Supremacy against 5 Eliz. 1. § 5. N. 10. Supra 39. and t is a rule in Construction of Statutes that where the intention plainly appears the Law ought to be advanced according to its end tho the words be short and imperfect especially Laws made for Religion as is held Hob. 157. and 11 Co. in Magdalen Colledge Case and 2 Bulstrode 155. 3. Popish Recusants convicted are not to be reputed sufficient sureties within 23 Eliz. 1. § 5. N. 2. and therefore were refused by the Court of B. R. in the Case of Grifith 2 Bulstrode 155. LXVII Schools Page 64. An Usher or assistant in teaching is a Master in the School and seemeth to be included within the word School-Master 23 Eliz. 1. § 6. N. 1. and the following words here or teacher explain who is intended viz. Every teacher of youth 23 Eliz. 1. § 7. N. 2. LXVIII Licence Page 64. 65. This Clause repair to Church as is aforesaid or be allowed 23 Eliz. 1. § 6. N. 1. being in the dis-junctive it seemeth that altho a School-Master doth not come to Church yet if he be Licensed by the Bishop or Ordinary it shall excuse the penalty and this is not altered in that particular either by 1 Jac. 4. § N. infra nor by 13 and 14 Car. 2.4 § 11. N. 1. but then he must by 13 and 14 Car. 2.4 § 11. N. 1. c. Among other things subscribe a declaration or acknowledgment that he will confirm to the Liturgy of the Church of England as it is now by law Established or he shall for the first offence suffer three months imprisonment without bail and for the second and every other offence shall suffer three months imprisonment without bail and also forfeit V. li. 2. But if he be licensed and subscribe and do as aforesaid and so cannot be punished by 23 Eliz. 1. § 6. N. 1 or either of the other said acts yet now by 17 Car. 2.2 § 4. N. 1. unless he take the Oath there mentioned and frequent Divine service Established by the Laws of this Kingdom and carry himself there as the said Statute is appointed he shall forfeit for every offence ten pound li. so that now conformity in repairing to Church is is necessarlly required of every such Schoolmaster 3. But now by 13 and 14 Car. 2.4 § 11. N. 1. There may be 12 pence taken for such licence notwithstanding 23 Eliz. 1. § 7. N. 1. LXIX Dayes Page 65. 66. This limitation of time within one year and day 23 Eliz. 1. § 8. N. 1. extends not to any offence made Treason by 23 Eliz. 1. but only to such offences mentioned in this act or 1 Eliz. 1.2 and 5 Eliz. 1. and 13 Eliz. 2. as concern the Kings Supremacy in Causes Ecclesiastical the service of God coming to Church or Establishment of Religion 2. And for those touching Religion 23 Eliz. 1. § 8. N. 1. enlargeth the time limited by 1 Eliz. 2. § 20. N. 1. which saith the party must be Indicted the next Sessions or 1 Eliz. 2. § 22. N. 1. If in a Corporation within fifteen dayes after Easter or Michaelmas for now he may be Indicted at any time within the year and day 3. But for absolving or withdrawing or for being absolved withdrawn or reconciled which are 23 Eliz. 1. § 2. N. 1.
made Treason no time is limited for the persecution but the offender may be Indicted at any time after the year and day for the latter part of 23 Eliz. 1. § 8. N. 2. Speakes of those offences of Treason which the Justices of Peace cannot hear and determine and there no time is limited altho there be in the former part 23 Eliz. 1. § 8. N. 1 for those offences which are inquirable by Justices of Peace 1 Leonard 238. pl. 322. Guilfords Case LXX Justices Page 66. 67. Upon 23 Eliz. 1. § 9. N. 1. The Justices of the Court of B. R. are the Soverain Justices of Oyer and Terminer and Goal-delivery 9 Co. 118. Lord Sanchors Case and therefore may enquire of hear and determine the offences against this Act altho they be not here especially named 2. If an Indictment be preferred upon this Statute 23 Eliz. 1. § 9. N. 1. before Justices of Oyer and Terminer or of Assie for any offence not made Treason or misprision and there is an Indictment before Justices of Peace likewise for the same offence the Judgment of the Justices who do first enquire hear and determine the same shall stand and the Judgment given by the other shall be void as was held in the like Case 2 Inst 739. Upon 31 Eliz. 7. § N. of Inmates 3. The Power here given 23 Eliz. 1. § 9. N. 2. The Justices of Peace in their open Quarter Sessions to hear and determine the offence of not coming to Church is in force at this day notwithstanding 29 Eliz. 6. § 2. N. 2. which saith that every conviction for not coming to Church shall be in B. R. or at the Assizes or General Goal-delivery and not elsewhere for 3 Jac. 4. § 7. N. 1. hath given power to Justices of Peace in their General or Quarter Sessions to enquire hear and determine of all offences for not coming to Church according to former Laws in such manner as the Justices of Assize and Goal delivery might do by former Laws in the Case of Recusancy for not repairing to Church which is clearly a reviver of the power of Justices of Peace given to them by 23 Eliz. 1. § 9. N. 2. to proceed against Recusants and taken from them by 29 Eliz. 6. § 2. N. 2. 4. Nor doth that following Clause 3 Jac. 4. § 7. N. 2. Touching Conviction by proclamation impeach this or restrain the Justices of Peace to proceed to conviction upon proclamation only and default of appearance no more than the Justices of Assize or Goal-delivery are restrained thereby or by 29 Eliz. 6. § 2. N. 5. which gives them likewise Authority to proceed by Proclamation 5. For these Clauses of 3 Jac. 4. § 7. N. 1.2 are in the Affirmative viz. first that the Justices of Peace shall have power to hear and determine the offence of not coming to Church according to Laws in such manner as Justices of Assize and Goal-delivery might do and those Justices might hear and determine that offence according to this Statute 23 Eliz. 1 § 9. N. 1. and then comes the next Clause of 3 Jac. 4. § 7. N. 2. That the Justices of Peace shall have power to convict by proclamation which is purely affirmative also and therefore abrogates no part of the power given them by the former Clause of 3 Jac. 4 § 7. N. 1. and this agrees with what Sir Ed. Coke saith 12 Co. 13 that if a man be Indicted for Recusancy at the Assizes or Sessions of the peace the Court may waive the proceedings by proclamation upon 3 Jac. 4. § 7. N. 2. And may still if they please proceed against the party by process upon this Statute 23 Eliz. 1. § 9. N. 2. in which Case the process must be by Venire facias capias c. As in Indictments of trespass and if saith he the party be fugitive in another County the Indictment may be removed in B. R. and then process may be there made out against him into any County of England LXXI Justices Page 67. Upon 23 Eliz. 1. § 9. N. 2. by Quarter Sessions is intended here only the Sessions of the Peace held at four times of the year and not any other altho it be general Sessions 2. And therefore the Justices of Peace in London who hold a Sessions every month cannot take Indictments upon this Statute 23 Eliz. 1. § 9. N 2. at any of them unless it be the Quarter Sessions For that their Authority is given them only at a certain time as was resolved upon 5 Eliz. 9. § 9. N 1. in the like Case Mich. 17. Jac. B. R. Palmer 44. pl. Taylors Case 3. And 3 Jac. 4. § 7. N. 1. which gives Justices of Peace power to take Indictments of Recusancy at their general or Quarter Sessions for so the word said there imports having reference to the general or Quarter Sessions mentioned before 3 Jac. 4. § 4. N. 2. about presentments yet doth not enlarge the power of the Justices of Peace in this particular nor enable them to take such Indictments at any Sessions but at their four Quarter Sessions for altho it be put there 3 Jac. 4. § 4. N. 2. dis-junctively General or Quarter yet the latter word is but Explicative of the former and shews what general Sessions are meant as appears by 3 Jac. 4. § 14. N. 1. and 7 Jac. 6. § 26. N. 5. touching the Oath of Allegiance for in 3 Jac. 4. § 14. N. 1. t is said that if the party refuse the Oath he shall be committed to Goal until the next Assizes or general Quarter Sessions and if he refuse the Oath tendred him by the Justices of Assize and Goal-delivery in their open Assizes or by the Justices of Peace in their said general Quarter Sessions he shall incurre a Praemunire and in 7 Jac. 6. § 26. N. 5. that the party refusing shall be committed to Goal until the next Assizes or general Quarter Sessions and if he refuse the Oath tendred him by the Justices of Assizes and Goal-delivery in their open Assizes or Goal-delivery or the Justices of Peace or the greater part of them in their general or Quarter Sessions he shall incurre a Praemunire which clearly shews that the same thing is intended by General Quarter Sessions and General or Quarter Sessions and that all General Sessions which are not Quarter Sessions are excluded out of the meaning of those Statutes LXXII Endictment Page 68. the Justices named in 23 Eliz. 1. § 9. N. 2. are hereby impowered to proceed by Indictment only and no other way for they are to hear and determine after enquiry infra 95. 165. 2. And the word Enquire implyeth an Indictment and is alwaies so to be expounded supra 35 and so are the other words hear and determine where other proceedings are not specially named as here they are not 3. For the Action of debt Information c. in any Court of Record is given to the Informer
King die all proceedings in Suits depending between party and party shall stand But 2 Cro. 14. is to be understood of such Cases where after a Plea or demurrer by the defendent the Attorny General alone replies or joynes in demurrer there the proceedings shall be void and the defendent shall plead de novo But the Information it self shall stand to avoid a manifest inconvenience for that the Informer is limited to a certain time wherein to exhibit his Information and so these two opinions are reconciled 20. An Informer Release qui tam c. may be Nonsuited altho the King cannot 1 Inst 139. Hutton 82. Farrington versus Arundell If pending the popular action or Information the Plantiff or Informer qui tam c. be Nonsuited or release or Enter a nolie prosequi or die none of these shall bar the King but the Attorny Genaral may proceed upon the Information for the Kings part 1 Leonard 119. pl. 191. 3 Cro. 138. Stretton versus Taylor 3 Cro. 583. Hamond 3 Inst 194. Moor 541. pl. 715. and 11 Co. 66. Dr. Fosters Case 2 Bulstrode 261.262 Waller versus Hanger 2 Rol. 33. Smith versus Carter And therefore the opinions in 37 H. 6.5 and 38 H. 6.2 that if the Plantiff in a Decies tantum which is a popular Action be Nonsuit the King is without remedy but by Indictment or if such Plantiff will relinquish his Suit that the King hath nothing further to do seem not to be Law at this day 21. If a popular Information be brought upon a penal Statue in a wrong Court where the Informer cannot sue Courts yet it was held Moor 564 c. pl. 770. in Agar and Candishes Case that the King should not for that loose his advantage of the suit but the Information should be good for his part of the penalty By 18 Eliz. 5. § 3. N. 3. If an Informer or Plantiff Costs upon a penal Statute where any forfeiture is generally limited to him that will sue shall delay or discontinue his suit or be Nonsuit or shall have the Tryal or matter pass against him by Verdict or Judgment of Law he shall pay to the defendent his Cost Charges and Damages see the addition to Bendloes 141. Rhobotham and Vincent and if it be upon a special Verdict or demurrer those Cases are within 18 Eliz. 5. § 3. N. 3. and he shall pay Costs by force thereof Hutton 36. Pies Case But an Informer is not compellable to find Sureties to answer Costs howbeit the Court if they see Cause may order him to appear in person before the defendent answer the Information 2 Bulst 18 Martin and Gunnystons Case Savil 10. pl. 26. Wilkes Case it was held in the Exchequer Chamber that if a writ of Error be brought upon a Judgment given for the King at the Suit of an Informer a Scire facias ought to be awarded against the Informer LXXX Courts Page 82 83 84. By any Court of Record is here 23 Eliz. 1. § 11. N. 1. meant the four ordinary Courts of Record at Westminster For they are the general Courts of Record and the Courts where the Kings Attorny may acknowledge or deny and the words of 23 Eliz 1. § 11. N. 1. being general are left to the construction of law where the Rule is that verba equivoca in dubio posita intelliguntur in digniori potentiori sensie And in this sense shall these words Court of Record be construed in all penal Statutes where the penalty is to be recovered in a popular suit so that the Informer qui tam c. cannot sue before Justices of Assize Goal-delivery or Oyer and Terminer or Justices of Peace as in Borrough or corporate Towns or in a Court of Pipowders Stannary Courts c. Jones 193. And such a construction hath been made of those words Court of Record upon several Statutes as 6 Co. 19.20 and Moor 600. pl. 827. Gregories Case on 4 and 5 Ph. Mar. 5. § N. of Woolen Cloathes In 1 Cro. 149. Green versus Guy on 21 11.8.13 § 11. N. 2. of Non-resid nee In 1 Cro. 112.113 and Hutton 99 Farrington and Keymer on 23 H. 8.4 § 5. N. 3. of Brewers In Stiles 340. Buck stone and Shurlock on 7 Ed. 6.5 § 6. N. 3. of selling wine without Licence In 3 Cro. 737. Barnabee versus Goodale and 2 Cro. 538. Millors Case and Styles 383. upon 5 Eliz. 4. § 13. N. 3. of Trades In Moor 421. pl. 581 upon the Statutes for Tanning of Leather and divers others 2. It was held Mich. 6 and 7 Ed. 6. Dyer 236. pl. by all the Justices but three that where a Statute appoints a penalty for any offence made thereby which was not an offence at the common law to be Recovered in any of the Queens Courts of record by Action of debt and no other Court is appointed The Statute intends the sour ordinary Courts of Record at Westminster and the offence and penalty cannot be punished and determined by Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer in Patriam But Dyer makes a Quaere hereupon and Sir Edward Coke in Scarlets Case 12 Co. 98. saith 10 Jac. that the opinion of Catlin Sanders and Whiddon which were the three dissenting Justices before c. is at this day held for good law and the opinion of the rest of the Justices that any Courts of Record are restrained to the ordinary Courts at Westminster of Record is not held for law Continual Experience saith he being against it for that Justices of Assize in respect of their Commission of Oyer and Terminer have alwaies enquired of offences where the penalties is appointed to be sued in any Court of Record as upon 33 H. 8.9 § 18. N. 1. of unlawful Games 35 H. 8.17 § 9. N. 2. of words and 5 and 6 Ed. 6.14 § 9. N. 2. of forfeitures and other Statutes But under favor altho Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer may take Indictments for the doing of that which is made malum prohibitum by a Statute Law yet that part of the opinion in Dyer 236 which relates to the Action of debt and the Courts of Record where such Action must be brought is good law and where only Courts of Record are named such Action cannot be brought in any other Court then the four ordinary Courts of record at Westminster as appears by the several Cases and resolutions before recited 3. Sir Edward Coke 3 Inst 193. and 4 Inst 174. saith that this exception of Recusancy in 21 Jac. 4. § 5. N. 1. doth not extend to the Courts 21 Jac. 4. § 1. N. 5. wherein the Informer is to sue but only to the County where 21 Jac. 4. § 2. N. 1. the offence is to be laid So that notwithstanding that exception 21 Jac. 4. § 5. N. 1. the Kings Bench Chancery C. B. Exchequer or Exchequer Chamber cannot relieve or hold plea of any Information for Recusancy either by the Kings Attorny or
there is a great difference between the penning of this Statute 35 Eliz. 2. § 15. N. 1. and 35 Eliz. 1. § 1. N. 5. for in 35 Eliz. 1. § 1. N. 5. there is an express designation of the place where such Submission and Declaration shall be viz. in any Church Chappel or usual place of Common prayer whither the Offender comes and this shall free him from his Imprisonment supra 112 But 35 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 3. Where 't is said that he shall abjure unless he comes usually to Church and make such Confession and Submission c. His coming usually to Church cannot be applied to his Confession and Submission for that is to be made but once and not usually and therefore there being no place appointed where this Confession and Submission shall be made we must necessarily have recourse to 35 Eliz. 2. § 15. N. 1. where a place is appointed viz. some Parish Church So that the coming usually to Church without this formal Submission and Confession or Declaration in some Parish Church frees not the Offender here in any Case from abjuration Altho the coming to any Church Chappel or usual place of Common-prayer and hearing Divine service and making open Submission and Declaration there shall free an Offender within 35 Eliz. 1. § 1. N. 5. from Imprisonment Page 144 145. CXLVI Submission 35 Eliz. 2. § 15. and 16. If a Popish Recusant Indicted upon this Statute makes his Submission and brings with him into B. R. a testimonial thereof it is the Course of that Court to cause him there to make his Submission again upon his knees which the Clerk of the Crown reads to him and so was it done Pasch 2. Car. 1. Latch 16. in the Case of one Throgmorton but Jones Justice said there was no Statute to compel him to this second Submission and Throgmorton complained that he was not therein dealt with according to Law 2. 35 Eliz. 2. § 16. N. 2. Is Over her Majesty or within any her Majesties Realms or Dominions And not over her Majesty within any her Dominions as Wingate Crown 85. grosly misrecites for that denies only Popes or See of Romes Authority over her Majesty but not any other ther Authority which they might claim over her Subjects And 't is clear by the disjunctive or which Wingate omits that both these Authorities are intended to be denied by this Submission these words or any Colour or means of any Dispensation which are a very material part of the Submission are likewise omitted by Wingate CXLVII Certificate Page 145. Such Relaps 35 Eliz. 2. § 18. N. 1. with the Indictment thereof is to be certified into the Court of Exchequer as was done by the Justices of B. R. 1 Bulstrode 133 in the Case of Francis Holt Pasch 9 Jac. 1 Iac. 4. Of SEIZVRES CXLVIII Oath PAge 147. By the Oath of Obedience is here 1. Jac. 4. § 1. N. 2. meant the Oath of Supremacy in 1. Eliz. 1. § 19. N. 4. supra and by that name it is here called afterwards 1 Jac. 4. § 3. N. 2. Crompt 13. Page 148. CXLIX It hath been doubted on 1 Jac. 4. § 2. N. 1. whether these words Accodring to the true meaning of the Statutes in that behalf do refer only to the manner of the Recusants Conformity or to the time likewise when it is to be done as well as to the manner For if they refer to the time then the Recusant is still bound notwithstanding this Statute to Conform before Judgement according to 23 Eliz. 1. § 10. N. 1. or his Conformity afterwards shall not discharge him of the penalty But the better opinion is that by these words according to the true meaning of the Statutes 1 Jac. 4. § 2. N. 1. is to be Intended only that the Recusant must Conform in such manner as is there appointed But as to the time the general words 1 Jac. 4. § 2. N 1. have enlarged the time limited by 23 Eliz. 1. § 10. N. 1. For this Statute 1 Jac. 4. § 2. N. 1. is made in further favour of the Recusant So that now if he Conforms after Judgment 't is time enough and he shall be discharged of all penalties in respect of his Recusancy 2. And if an Information tam pro Domino Rege quam pro seipso be brought upon 23 Eliz. 1. § 11. N. 1. against the Recusant and after Judgment had against him thereupon he Conforms he shall be discharged of the Judgment but first his Conformity must appear of Record otherwise the Court cannot take notice of it and as for that his Remedies against the King and the Informer must be several for against the Informer he must bring his Audita Querela and against the King he must plead his Conformity which he may do in this Case after Judgment for that no Audita Querela lieth against the King 11 H. 7.10 and it he should not be admitted to plead he would be without any legal Remedy to discharge himself of the forfeiture and Judgement as to the Kings part whose Execution will not be hindered by the Audita Querela against the Informer But if the Defendant neglect to put in his Plea and Execution issueth for the King and he be taken in Execution he comes too late to plead his Conformity and hath then no other way left to releive himself as to the Kings part but by his Petition to the King to pardon the Debt 2 Bulstrode 324 1. Rol. 95. Dr. Fosters Case Savil 23. pl. 56. Tiringhams Case CL. Heir Page 149. If any Recusant shall hereafter die 1 Jac. 4. § 3. N. 1. that is a Recusant either Convicted upon Proclamation and default or Convicted by Verdict Confession c. and adjudged for in both those Cases if the Recusant die the discharge of the Heir depends upon his Conformity CLI Forfeiture Page 149 150. Of all and singular the penalties Charges and Incumbrances 1 Jac. 4. § 3. N. 1. If Judgment be had at the Kings suit against a Recusant Tenant in Tail for Recusancy this is a charge and Incumbrance within this Stature of which the Heir in Tail shall not be discharged unless he conforms but must satisfie all the Arrears incurred in the life time of his Ancestor For it being a debt to the King upon a Judgment the entailed Lands are lyable thereto by 33 H. 8.391 § N. But these two Clauses 1 Jac. 4. § 3. N. 1. discharge the Arrears of the 20 l. per month Incurred in the Recusants life time upon the Conformity of the Heir in such Cases only where the two parts of the Recusants Lands were not seized before his death For if they are seized in his life time and continue so till his death neither his fee simple Lands nor his Intailed Lands if a Judgment were had against him for his Recusancy at the Kings suit shall be discharged upon the Heirs conformity without payment of
of his Wife Page 255 CCLXXII 256. Shall continue out of Prison 7 Jac. 6. § 28. N. 1. A married Woman convicted as a Popish Recusant is after her Conviction and before any further prosecution or any Election made by the Husband whether he will pay the ten pound per Month or yield the third part of his Lands imprisoned by Process of Law or for some other Clause not relating to such Conviction and afterwards is set at liberty it seems that the Husband shall not pay the ten lib. per Month for the time she was in Prison For the Act 7 Jac. 6. § 28. N. 1. speaks only of the time during which she continueth out of Prison and altho she were not imprisoned for her Recusancy yet seeing she had not during such her imprisonment the Benefit intended to her in consideration of the ten lib. per Month or third part viz her liberty the Husband shall not for that time pay the Penalty here appointed to save her Imprisonment but if he pay it for the time after she is set at Liberty that is sufficient to satisfy the intent of this Act. But if after such Conviction the Wife be imprisoned by Covin upon some pretence not relating to such Conviction that shall not save the Husband's payment of the ten lib per Month for the time she was imprisoned but after she is set at Liberty she may be again imprisoned by force of this Act 7 Jac. 6. § 28. N. 2. unless the Husband pay the ten pound per Month or satisfy to the King the third part of the Profits of his Lands as well for the time of such Covenous Imprisonment as for the future for the Covenous Imprisonment was upon the matter her own act and no person shall take advantage of an Imprisonment covenously caused by him or her self 16 Ed. 45. and here she continued out of Prison in the sense of this Act 7 Jac. 6. § 28. N. 1. because her Imprisonment was not by process of Law in invitam And so if a man be outlawed while he is in Prison yet the Oatlary shall not be avoided for that cause if the Imprisonment were by Coven or consent of the party outlawed 1 Inst 259.38 Ass 17. 3 Car. 1 2. 3 Of Ouster le Mere. PAge 258 259. Or of Oyer and Terminer 3 Car. 1. Cap. 2. 3 § 3. N. 1. Justices of Peace cannot take an Indictment upon this Statute for no inferior Court shall take authority by any Statute unless it be specially named Savill 135. pl. 212. Agard and Sandish And altho Justices of Peace have in their Commission § 14. an express Clause ad audiendum terminandum yet forasmuch as there is a Commission of Oyer and Terminer known distinctly by that name and the Commission of peace is known distinctly by another Name they shall not be included under the general words of Justices of Oyer and Terminer as was adjudged 3 Co. 87. Hill 30 Eliz B. R. in Smyth's Case who was Indicter at the Sessions of the Peace in the County of Oxford on 5 Eliz. 14. of Forging Deeds which impowers Justices of Oyer and Terminer to inquire of hear and determine that Offence and yet the Indictment before the Justices of Peace was quasht as taken coram non judice 9 Co. 118 3 Inst 103. and 3 Co. 60. 1. Wilson's Case and 3 Co. 697. Hunts Case See Justices FINIS KNowing the Learning and Industry of the Author of this Work who hath therein very seasonably bestowed his Pains upon Explaining the Antient Laws made against Recusants I do Recommend the same to the Publick Fra. NORTH May the 7. 1681
this Statute for his weekly absence 1 Eliz. 2. § 14. N. 2. and by 23 Eliz. 1. § 5. N. 1. for his monthly absence nor is he helped by this Act in case of Conformity as he is by 23 Eliz. 1. Dr. Foster's Case 11 Co. 63. and 1 Rolls 94. pl. 41. But yet altho 1 Eliz. 2. § 14. N. 2. doth not discharge him of this twelve pence upon Conformity it seemeth that 1 Jac. 4. § 2. N. 1. Page 28. XXIX The Ordinary or Ecclesiastical Judge by 1 Eliz. 2. § 15. N. 1. and § 16. Ordinary N. 1. cannot legally punish any man for not coming to the Church of that Parish where he inhabits if he goeth to any other altho he sheweth not any reasonable let for it shall be a good Plea for the Party to say that that is not his Parish Church but that he had used to frequent another Church and did resort thereunto and if the Ecclesiastical Court will not receive this Plea the Party shall have a Prohibition for the Spiritutual Court hath no power to judge what shall be said a mans Parish Church and so it was resolved by the whole Court of Kings Bench Trin. 9. Eliz. 1. Bulstrode 159. nor can the Spiritual Court try the limits or bounds of Parishes but they shall be tryed by the Common Law 13 Co. 17. XXX Corporation Page 30. These words in like manner and form in 1 Eliz. 2. § 22. N. 1. appoint in what manner the offences shall be enquired of heard and determined by Mayors and Head Officers of Corporations c. By Indictment for so inquire imports and tryal and verdict of twelve men or such other legal proceedings upon the said Indictment as are used by the Justices of Oyer and Terminer and Assizes in their general Sessions For the Mayor or Head Officer is not left by this Act to his own arbitrary will or discretion in the hearing and determining the offence but must proceed according to the rules and forms of Law in the Conviction of the offender 2. And 1 Eliz. 2. § 22. N. 1. saith to which Iustices of Assize do not commonly repair so that the Mayor or head Officer of such places were only intended in the lieu and room of Justices of Assize and are therefore to proceed by the same Rules as they do in the Counties at large 3. Dayes But these words 1 Eliz. 2. § 22. N. 1. extend not to the point of time limited for indicting such offender nor are Mayors and head Officers tyed to their next Sessions as the Justices of Oyer and Determiner and of Assize are as Wing Tit. Service and Sacraments N. 26. mistakes for in like manner and form is intended in such respects only where it is not otherwise provided for by the Statute but it is expresly provided here 1 Eliz. 2. § 22. N. 1. that Mayors and Head Officers of Corporations shall inquire of these offences only twice in the year Viz. Within fifteen dayes after Easter and Michaelmas and not at their general Sessions unless it happen to be the Sessions after one of those two Feasts Nor can the Arch-Bishop or Bishop by 1 Eliz. 2 § 8. N. 1. associate himself in this Case to any Mayor or Head Officer of a Corporation as Wing Tit. Service and Sacraments N. 25. mistakes XXXI Ordinary Page 31. This Clause 1 Eliz. 2. § 23. N. 1. and § 24. N. 1. being in the affirmative doth not abrogate the Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical which was in the Ecclesiastical Judge before the making of this Statute for that no negative words are here added as that he should proceed no otherwise or in no other manner or form than this Statute directs 2. And therefore if any Parson Vicar c. deprave or observe not the Book of Common-Prayer altho 1 Eliz. 2. § 4. N. 5. inflicts only the forfeiture of a years value and six months imprisonment for the first offence yet the Ecclesiastical Judge may for the first offence deprive him notwithstanding this act as he might have done if no form of punishment had been here appointed 3. And the said Book 1 Eliz. 2. § 4. N. 1. being enjoyned by Authority the Offence of depraving or non observing it is punishable by the Ecclesiastical Judge according to the Ecclesiastical Law without the further aid of any temporal Law than the commanding it to be observed 5 Cook 6. Cawderyes Case and in such Case the Sentence of deprivation given by the Ecclesiastical Judge tho it exceed the punishment inflicted by the temporal Law is not to be questioned by the temporal Judges but they ought to give faith and credit to it 5 Cook 7. Cawderies Case 4 Cook 29. Buntings Case 5 Eliz. 2. Of ROME XXXII Books PAge 34. The Printers of any Book which attributes to the Pope or Sea of Rome any such Authority or Jurisdiction within this Realm c. And the Utterers thereof are in most Cases within the danger of this Law 5 Eliz. 1. § 2. N. 1. 2. And if any man bring over such books written beyond the Seas knowing the Contents thereof or secretly deliver out such books to others he knowing the Contents thereof or secretly deliver out such books to others he knowing the Contents thereof unless in this last Case he be a Trader in them and deliver them out upon that account without any act or attribution by conference or allowance he is an Offender within 5 Eliz 1. § 2. N. 1. by the words hold and stand with to maintain c. 3. And so is the Receiver likewise if he afterwards Reads and confers upon any such book with any other person and in his conference by any words or speeches allows the book to be good or conveyes it secretly to his friend to the intent he should read it and be perswaded to be of that opinion 5 Eliz. 1. § 2. N. 2. Or if a man hear of the Contents of such book by the repute of others and doth by any overt Speech commend or affirm it to be good In all these Cases the person so doing especially he that reads it and then allows of it is an Offender within this Act 5 Eliz. 1. § 2. N. 1. 4. And shall for the first Offence incur a Praemunire and for the second be guilty of high Treason So likewise if any Book to that effect be made and written within the Realm and sent over Seas as if it were made out of the Realm and be afterwards bought read or conference be had thereupon ut supra such Offenders are within the danger of this Law Dyer 281 282 pl. and 6 Cook the Preface XXXIII Accessories Page 35. A. was indicted upon 5 Eliz. 1. § 2. N. 3. and that of 13 Eliz. 2. § 4. N. 1. of a Praemunire for aiding one E. knowing him to be a Principle maintainer of the authority and jurisdiction of the Bishop and Sea of Rome contra formam Statuti praedict
and the Indictment was certified in B. R. and it was held by the greater part of the Justices that the Indictment was insufficient for want of those words 5 Eliz. 1. § 2. N. 3. upon purpose and to the intent to set forth and extol the Authority c. contra formam Statuti will not supply that defect Trin. 20. Eliz. Dyer 363 pl. 2. Note in the report of Dyer 363. pl. the Statute 1 Eliz. is mistaken for this 5 Eliz. 1. there being no mention of the intent in 1 Eliz. 1. The Intent is a thing hidden and lieth in the heart and therefore there must be some overt act or speech which declares the intent for the intent it self is not traversable but that by which it is made manifest as was adjudged in 5 Cook 77. Booths Case XXXIV Indictment Page 36 37. All Offences 5 Eliz. 1. § 3. N 1. contrary to the true meaning of the premisses that is the Offences 5 Eliz 1. § 2. N. 1. in holding or standing with to extoll c. the Jurisdiction of the See or Bishop of Rome or attributing such jurisdiction c. or procuring counselling c. which is here for the first offence made a Praemunire for these are the only premisses in the Act. 2. And 5 Eliz. 1 § 3. N. 1 Extends not to the Oath of Supremacy or any offence in refusing of it much less to all Offences against this act as it is mistaken in the late Additions to Dalt Cap. 140. Tit. High Treason Sect. 11. 3. Nor doth it seem to be the intent of 5 Eliz. 1. § 3. N. 1. to give the Justices of Peace any power to enquire of any offence made High Treason thereby for the power here given to the Justices of Peace is only to inquire of Offences contrary to the true meaning of the premisses and the premisses extend only to those Offences made a Praemunire and this clearly appears by the subsequent words viz. 5 Eliz. 1. § 3. N. 2. that the Presentment thereof shall be certified in B. R. who shall hear and determine every such Offence as if the Offender had been presented upon any matter in the Statute of 16 Rich. 2. § Now that cannot be intended of high Treason Dalt 54. Cap. 20. 4. The like may be said of Justices of Assize for as they are meerly Justices of Assize they cannot by force of this Act 5 Eliz. 1. § 3. N. 1. inquire of either the first or second Offence in refusing the Oath of Supremacy nor of the second Offence in extolling the Bishop of Romes authority only for the first Offence in Extolling c. they may inquire and take Indictments thereof and certifie them in B. R. 5. But then by their Commission of Oyer and Terminer they may not only inquire of the first or second Offence in extolling the Bishop of Romes authority or refusing the Oath of Supremacy but may hear and determine them and accordingly Savil 46 47. pl. 99. Slade and Bode were indicted arraigned and tryed in the County of Southampton of a Praemunire for the first Offence in extolling the Bishop of Romes authority upon which they were attainted and afterwards of Treason for the second Offence before Sir Roger Manwood and Justice Periam Justices of Assize by vertue of their Commission of Oyer and Terminer for the Certificate here mentioned 5 Eliz. 1. § 3. N. 2. which is to be sent in B. R. is required only of the Justices of Assize and the Justices of the Peace but Justices of Oyer and Terminer upon Indictments taken before them may proceed to hear and determine as Manwood and Periam did in that Case as well for the first as second Offence 6. For which first Offence in extolling the Bishop of Romes authority it seems the Justices of Assize who have a Commission of Oyer and Terminer have their Election either as Justices of Assize to enquire only and then they must certifie the presentment or Indictment into B. R. or to inquire hear and determine as they are Justices of Oyer and Terminer and then they are not bound to certifie for Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer are not within the meaning of this branch of 5 Eliz. 1. § 3. N 2. as was held Savil 46 47. pl. 69. 7. By what hath been said it appears that the question put in Savil 47. pl. 99. by Ayloffe viz. how they could proceed upon such an Indictment not certified in B. R. within forty dayes was grounded upon a double mistake 1. That Justices of Oyer and Terminer were bound to certifie in B. R. all Indictments for extolling the authority of the Bishop of Rome taken before them 2. That Indictments for the second Offence were within the meaning of 1 Eliz. 1. § 3. N. 2. for the speaks thereof the second Indictment which was for High Treason Page 37. By Presentment here 5 Eliz. 1. § 3. N. 2. is to be understood not only that which is properly so called which the Jurors find and present to the Court XXXV Indictment without any former Indictment delivered to them 〈◊〉 also an Indictment which is drawn and engrossed in form of Law and delivered to the Jurors to be inquired of which Indictment the Justice here named have power to take by force of the word Inquire 5 Eliz. 1. § 4. N. 1. and is included within the word Presentment 5 Eliz. 1. § 3. N. 2. being a species of it for every Indictment found by the Jurors is a Presentment and the Record saith Juratores c. presentant c. when they find an Indictment but every Presentment is not an Indictment 2 Inst 239. and as well the one as the other touching the Offences aforesaid must be certified in B. R. infra 72. Page 27 38. XXXVI Dayes If the term be then open in 5 Eliz. 1 § 3. N. 2. is the Essoyn day which is the first day of the Term properly so called and on that day the Term is open At the first day of ful Term 5 Eliz. 1. § 3. N. 2. that is quarto die post which is the usual day of Appearance and the first day of every Term in common reputation for the Essoyn day is the first day of the Term only to some perticular intents and 't is not full Term till quarto die post Savil 124. pl. 193. Matthew ver Harcourt So that if forty dayes expire on the day before the Essoyn day the Presentment need not be certified until quarto die post which is the day of Appearance but if they expire on the Essoyn day or afterwards and before the quarto die post the Justices here named 5 Eliz. 1. § 3. N. 1. must not stay till the quarto die post but are bound to certifie by the last day of the Forty days under the penalty here limited 5 Eliz. 1. § 3. N. 3. for the Term was then open XXXVII Oath Page 39. All Persons who are preserred to any
any Common Informer but the matter shall be heard and determined before Justices of Assize Nisi prius Goal-delivery or Oyer and Terminer or Justices of Peace in their general Sessions according to 21 Jac. 4. § 1. N. 3. but the Informer if it be for Recusancy may by force of that exception 21 Jac. 4. § 5. N. 1. lay or alledge such offence in what County he will for the said exception extends only to the County 21 Jac. 4. § 2. N. 1. and not to the Courts 21 Jac. 4. § 1. N. 5. where the Informer is to sue Which opinion of his touching the extensiveness of the exception is probable enough viz. that 21 Jac. 4. § 5. N. 1. extends only to the County and not to the Courts where the Informer is to sue for the latter part of it speaks only of the County but this is unaptly applied to popular Informations upon 23 Eliz. 1. § 11. N. 1. for they are not within the meaning of that branch of 21 Jac. 4. § 1. N. 5. touching the Courts where the Informer is to sue for 21 Jac. 4. § 1. N. 5. medles not with those Informations upon those penal Laws which give the Informer no other remedy for recovery of the penalty but by Debt Bill plaint or Information in the Courts of Record at Westminster Nor doth 21 Jac. 4. § 1. N. 3. give the Justices of Assize or other Justices there named any new or further power than they had before but only appoints that where Informations might have been brought before them or in the Courts of Westminster at the Election of the Informer now they shall be brought before Justices of Assize Nisi prius Goal delivery or Oyer and Terminer or at the Sessions of the Peace in the County where the offence was committed for the ease of the Subjects who are defendents and not in the Courts at Westminster 4 Co. 1. 1 Cro. 112.113 But in our Case of Recusancy there is no such Election given the Informer by 23 Eliz. 1. § 11. N. 1. but he is strictly tyed to take his remedy by debt Bill plaint or Information in one of the Courts at Westminster and therefore 21 Jac. 4 § 1. N. 5. extends not to it in that branch touching the Courts where the Informer is to sue And as for Sir Edward Cokes Opinion that since 21 Jac. 4. § 1. N. 5. the Courts at Westminster cannot receive or hold Plea of any Information brought by a Common Informer not only common Experience ever since that Statute is against it but the Judgments and resolutions both of B. R. Mich. 4. Car. 1. Greene and Guy 1 Cro. 146. pl. upon 21 H. 8.13 § 11. N. 2. and Fentons Case Mich. 27. Car. 2. upon this Statute of 23 Eliz. 1. and of C. B. in Farrington and Leymer 1 Cro. 112. Hutton 99. Trin. 4 Car. 1. upon 23 H. 8.4 § 5. N. 3. Are directly in point Contrary thereunto and so is the opinion of Rolls in Styles 340. Buck stone and Shurlock 7 Ed. 6.5 § 6. N. 3. and the resolution in Jones 193. And yet altho in penal Statutes any Court of Record shall be restrained to the ordinary Courts of Record at Westminster possibly in other Statutes those words may admit of a larger Construction 1 Rol. 51. pl. 21. Floyd and Best LXXXI Information Page 85 86. Upon 23 Eliz. 1. § 11. N. 1. by Action of debt Bill plaint or Information by 18 Eliz. 5. § 1. N. 3. it is enacted that none shall be admitted or received to prosecute against any person upon any penal Statute but by way of Information or original Action and not otherwise 6 Co. 19.20 Moor 412. pl. 565. and 600. pl. 827. Gregories Case 3 Cro. 544. Gadley versus Whitecote And this seems to extend as well to penal Statutes made afterwards as to those that were in force when 18 Eliz. 5. § 1. N. 3. was made for t is usual for a latter act of Parliament to be guided by a former as 4 Co. 4. Vernons Case But then it must be in such Cases where there are not express words in the latter act to controule the former and therefore altho the word of 18 Eliz. 5. § 1. N. 3 that the Informer shall not prosecute otherwise then by Information or original action yet the Affirmative words of this subsequent Statute 23 Eliz. 1. § 11. N. 1. that the Informer may sue by Bill hath taken away the force of that negative in 18 Eliz. 5. § 1. N. 3. in relation to the offence mentioned in 23 Eliz. 1. and the prosecutor qui tam c. upon 23 Eliz. 1. § 11. N. 1. may sue by Bill in B. R. as well as by Information which otherwise had there been no direct words here to that purpose he could not do as it seems by the resolution 3 Inst 194. in Woodson and Clerks Case In a suit brought by Bill in B. R. upon 23 H. 6.10 § 1. N. 12. of Sheriffs and in Moor 248. pl. 390. Vdeson and the Major of Nottinghams Case contrary to the opinion in Styles 381. Hill and Dechair LXXXII Imprisonment Page 86. Upon 23 Eliz. 1. § 11. N. 2. Qui non habet in aere luet in corpore And yet in this Case the Judgment shall be absolute that the King and the Informer recover c. 1 Anderson 140. pl. 190. Vachels Case 2. A Feme Covert Recusant if the forseiture be not paid within the time limited 23 Eliz. 1. § 11. N. 2. may be imprisoned by force of this Statute until she pay or conform 11 Co. 61. Dr. Fosters Case Hob. 97. Moor and Hussey And if she be convicted upon Indictment at the Kings suit in which Case the Husband is not bound to pay the penalty she ought by the opinion of Manwood to have hard and close Imprisonment and sequestred from all Company until she conform or forfeiture be paid Savile 25. pl. 59. But if the Husband and Wise be sued upon 23 Eliz. 1. § 11. N. 2. in a popular Action or Information for the Recusancy of the Wife and Judgment be had against them and the forfeiture is not paid within the three months the Husband in that Case may be Imprisoned likewise LXXXIII Assurances Page 87. Upon 23 Eliz. 1. § 13. N. 1. since the beginning of this Session of Parliament and yet a Covenons Conveyance tho made before that Session of Parliament should not have defeated the Interest right or Title which was given to the Queen by this Statute and therefore in the Case of Sir John Southwell 3 Leonard 147.148 pl. who in Anno 19 Eliz. Conveyed his lands to certain Feoffees and their heirs in trust for the maintenance of him and his Family Marriage of his Daughters payment of his debts c. and to answer him the surplusage of the mean profits with a Clause of revocation after which he granted Trees took Fines for leases c. And then
and in such a case it is to be taken in divers other Cases Infra 173. XCVII Days Page 104. Upon 29 Eliz. 6. § 4 N. 1. That is the Term of Easter or Michaelmas which shall first happen and not the next Easter and Michaelmas Terms both for the Recusant ought to pay the whole penalty for the time conteined in the Indictment in the very first of thse Terms next after his Conviction 3 Jac. 4. § 8. N. 1. Infra 172. Page 104. Upon 29 Eliz. 6. § 4. N. 3. Take seiz and enjoy But as to Lands and tenements there must first be an office found for the King XCVIII Seizure for regularly before the finding of such office Lands or Tenements cannot be seized into the Kings hands 2 Inst 573. and 8 Co. 169. Stoughters Case Br. tit Off. 17.55 Com. 486. Nichols Case Page 105. by 29 Eliz. 6. § 4. N. 3. the Queen was to have and enjoy two parts of the Recusants lands and Hereditaments nomine poenae or districtionis XCIX until he had in some other manner satisfied her of the whole forfeiture of the twenty pound per month incuried for his Recusancy And the profits of those two parts should not have been accounted to go to the payment of any part of the said debt or forfeiture for the Statute 29 Eliz. 6. § 4. N. 3. Inflicted this forfeiture upon him meerly as a further penalty for his neglect of payment of the twenty pounds per month as was resolved by the two Chief Justices and Chief Baron Trin. 43 Eliz. in Gages Case 3 Cro. 845.846 and by all the Judges 3 Jac. at Russel house Jones 24 Standen versus Vniversity of Oxford and Whitton but now the law is altered in this point by 1 Jac. 4. § 5. N. 1. Infra 153. Page 105 106. A Recusant is Indicted and convicted and then failes of payment of the twenty pound per month C. Chattels yet his goods are not forfeit to the King by 29 Eliz. 6. § 4. N. 3. before seisure for the King hath his Election whither he will seize them or no by Coke Chief Justice B. R. 12 Jac. Cullom versus Sherman 1 Rol. 7. pl. 8. 2. A Recusant lends mony and for security hath a rent charge granted him in fee by deed indented with condition of Redemption and takes likewise a Recognizance for performance of Covenants in the said Indenture the Recognizance is forfeited and afterwards he is Indicted and convicted of Recusancy and failes of payment of the twenty pound per month in this Case the King shall have the recognizance by force of 29 Eliz. 6. § 4. N. 3. for when forfeited to the Recusant it is but a Chattel personal and shall pass to the King by this word Goods for in an act of Parliament where the offendors goods are given to the King all debts and personal Chattels and actions are thereby given him as well as goods in possession and here in 29 Eliz. 6. § 4. N. 3. as take and seize referre to two parts of the Recusants Lands and Tenements so enjoy referrs to goods and the King shall enjoy the debt due by the Recognizance Nor doth it alter the Case for that the Recognizance was acknowledged for performance of Covenants in an Indenture concerning a rent charge in fee which seems to savor of the realty for it was originally for the loan and forbearance of mony which is personal 12 Co. 1.2 Ford and Sheldon 3. If a man who is a Recusant take such a Recognizance in the name of another the King upon his Conviction shall have the Recognizance for when the Recusant was such at the time of the Recognizance taking it shall be intended that it was done by Covin and that he took it in the name of another with an intent to prevent the King of levying of the forfeiture And such Covin shall not Bar the King 12 Co. 2.3 4. If a Recognizance or obligation be forfeited to the King by force of 29 Eliz. 6. § 4. N. 3. he may grant it over as he may any other Chattel in Action under his private Seal 1 Rol. 7. pl. 8. Cullom versus Sherman Page 106. A Rent of Inheritance CI. Forfeiture and an Advowson in gross are comprehended under this word Hereditaments 29 Eliz. 6. § 4. N. 3. but whither the King may seize such an Advowson as part of his two parts and present by vertue thereof since 3 Jac. 5. § N. which gives the presentation to the Universities see Infra Page 106 107. CII Copy-hold It hath been much disputed whither Copyhold Lands are within this branch of the Statute 29 Eliz. 6. § 4. N. 3. of all other the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments lyable to such seizure or to the penalties aforesaid For regularly in Acts of Parliment which are enacted for forfeiture of Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Copyholds shall not be forfeited but only Lands Tenements and Hereditaments which are such as the C. Law and not those which are such by custome only as Copyholds are And it was agreed in Heydons Case 3 Co. 8 Savil 66 pl. 138. that where an Act of Parliament alters the service or tenure or other thing in prejudice of the Lord there general words in the act of Parliament shall not extend to Copyholds And if the King should seize them by force of the general words 29 Eliz. 6. § 4. N. 3. Lands Tenements and Hereditaments the Lord would during the time they are in the Kings hands lose his Seigniory customes and services But yet it was held by Manwood Chief Baron and Baron Clerk 1 Leonard 97. pl. 126. in the Case of Sulherd and Everet Mich. 30. Eliz. that Copyholders are within 29 Eliz. 6. § 4. N. 3. and altho Manwood seemed to grant that they are not within it directly by express words yet they both conceived they were within the intent of the Act by reason as Manwood said of these words all other the Lands c. liable to such seizure or to the penalties aforesaid 2. But it was granted on all hands that by these general words here 29 Eliz. 6. § 4 N. 3. the King hath not any estate given him in the Recusants Copyhold Lands but only a right and title to two thirds of the profits By the Kings receiving of which the Lord cannot be impeached of his customes and services as he would be if the King should seize the land it self And a difference was there taken 1 Leonard 98. pl. 126. between an Act of Parliament which transsers an Estate to the King and an Act of Parliament which gives him only the profits of the Estate for in the first Case the Rule 3 Co. 8. that Copy-hold Lands shall not pass by general words shall stand good for the prejudice that may otherwise accrew to the Lord But where the Lords Seigniory Custome and services are not to be impeached or taken away as here they will not by the Kings bare
receiving of the profits there it was said Copy-holds shall be included within the general words of Lands Tenements and Hereditaments 3. And yet see Owen 37. where this Case of Sulhard and Everet is otherwise reported and that it was at length after great debate adjudged that Copyhold Lands are not within 29 Eliz. 6 § 4. N. 3. nor are seizable for the Kings two parts And according to this Judgment I take the modern practice of the Exchequer to have been that neither the Land it self nor the profits of Copyhold Lands are lyable to such seizure CIII Process Page 107 108. If the same be taken at any Assize or Goal-delivery 29 Eliz. 6. § 5. N. 6. for if the Indictment had been taken before Justices of Peace no Proclamation thereupon could have been made upon this Statute by the Justices of Assize or Goal-delivery as was resolved in the Case of Sir Edward Plowden And therefore upon such an Indictment for Recusancy taken before Justices of Peace the Court was to remove the Indictment in B. R. and there process might have been made out against the Recusant and he Convicted for the Justices of Peace could do no more than Indict all other proceedings being taken away from them by this Statute 29 Eliz. 6 § 2. N 2.11 Co 63. and 1 Rol. 94. but now by 3 Jac. 4. § 7. N. 1. the Law is altered in this point and the Justices of Peace upon Indictments taken before them may proceed to proclaime and convict the Recusant as well as Justices of Assize and Goal delivery supra 95. N. 2. Page 108 CIV Upon such default 29 Eliz. 6. § 5. N. 6. that is upon his default of appearance of record at the next Assizes or Goal delivery For if he make such appearance that shall save his default of not rendring his body to the Sheriff And the not rendring himself to the Sheriff shall be no Conviction as Wingate Crowne 66. would make it Page 108. CV As sufficient a Conviction in Law 29 Eliz. 6. § 5. N. 6. that is as if he were Convicted by Verdict but not as sufficient as if a Judgment were had against the Recusant For altho by force of 29 Eliz. 6. § 5. N. 5. and other Statutes the Conviction upon Proclamation and default of appearance make a Recusant lyable to divers penalties and Incapacities and is in those respects as forceable as a Judgment yet it shall not in other Cases have the force or effect of a Judgment and therefore it was resolved 37 and 38 Eliz. in the Case of the general pardon Anno 35 Eliz. where there is an exception of all penalties and forfeitures due to the Queen and converted to a debt by Judgment that notwithstanding that exception a Recusant Convicted upon Proclamation was within the pardon and the forfeitures due upon such Conviction were thereby pardoned for the debt was not due to the Queen by Judgment but upon Conviction only but otherwise it had been if he had been Convicted according to 23 Eliz. 1. § 5. N. 1. without Proclamation and Judgment had been given thereupon 11 Co. 65. Dr. Fosters Case Page 109 110 111. CVI. Upon 29 Eliz. 6. § 6. N. 1. It was resolved by all the Judges Mich. 37 and 38 Eliz. 1 Rol. 94. in Dr. Fosters Case that if a man had been Convicted according to this Statute 29 Eliz. 6. § 5. N. 5. by Proclamation upon default and afterwards conformed himself he should be discharged of the penalty due upon his Conviction notwithstanding these words 29 Eliz. 6. § 6. N. 1. and full satisfaction of all the Arrearages and the reason of this is given by Coke Chief Justice B. R. for that 29 Eliz. 6. § 5. N. 6. saith that such Conviction should be as sufficient as if there were a Verdict recorded but 't is only a Judgment which converts the penalty into a debt and not a Verdict And here all the penalties are discharged upon Conformity unless such as are Converted into a debt 29 Eliz. 6. § 6. N. 1. But otherwise it would have been if there had been a Judgment against the Recusant upon Tryal or Confession upon 23 Eliz. 1. § 5. N. 1. for then his Conformity would have come too late to have saved the penalty Incurred by his Conviction for by the Judgment the penalty was Converted into a debt Quaere tamen Whither these words here 29 Eliz. 6. § 6. N. 1. Due and payable are to be understood due and payable upon a Judgment only However now by 1 Jac. 4. § 1. N. 1. if the Recusant confirm either before or after Judgment he shall be discharged of all penalties 2. But the profits of the Recusants Lands taken before his Conformity shall never be restored 3. It hath been questioned upon 29 Eliz. 6. § 6. N. 1. if a Recusant Convicted by Proclamation upon default had died before seizure of two parts of his Lands whither his lands might have been seized after his death for the Arrearages of the 20 l. per month or if they were seized in his life time whither they should have been discharged after his death without payment of such Arrears And the opinion of those who held that the seizure should neither ensue nor continue after his death but that the Arrears were discharged was pricipalpally grounded upon 29 Eliz. 6. § 6. N. 1. that due and payable extended only to Arrearages due and payable upon a Judgment and converted into a debt But when the Recusant was Convicted by Proclamation the penalty was never Converted into a debt and therefore when he died there were no Arrearges due in the sense of 29 Eliz. 6. § 6. N. 1. for the heir to pay and yet by such offendor here is generally intended all Recusants Convicted as well by Proclamation upon default as upon on Judgment and the heirs of either should have had the benefit of this Proviso viz. that upon the death of the Ancestor no seizure should ensue or be continued only in the Case of a Judgment the Arrears were to have been paid 4. But there seems now to be no further need of this Question for 1 Jac. 4. § 3. N. 1. meets with both these Cases For if there be no seizure of the Recusants Lands in his life time the discharge of the heir will depend upon his Conformity and if there were seizure the two parts shall continue in his Majesties possession till the Arrears are paid and satisfied But this 29 Eliz. 6. § 6. N. 1. is not intended of entailed Lands For without any aid of this Proviso if a Recusant Tenant in Tail be convicted by Proclamation upon default and dieth neither any Seizure for the Arrears of the 20 l. per month shall ensue after his death nor if they were seized in his life time shall the seizure be continued after his death nor is the heir in Tail bound to pay any such Arrears But if a Judgment be had
this is not like the Case of Jurors upon 2 H. 5. § 2. cap. 3. § 1. N. 2. where t is said that the Juror shall have Lands of the clear yearly value of 40 s. if the debt or damage declared amount to 40 marks in which Case altho it be in the disjunctive debt or damage yet it hath been adjudged that where the debt and damages doth amount to 40 marks it is sufficient and the Juror must have 40 s. per Annum 1 Inst 272. For in that Case the word or is cumulative and debt or damage both amount to no more than one intire thing viz. The value of the Cause or Action depending And it appears plainly to be the intent of the makers of the Law 2 H. 5. Sect. 2. Cap. 3. § 1. N. 2. that no Cause declared to be of the value of 40 Marks shall be tryed by Jurors of a less Estate But in our Case the Lands and Goods are things of different natures one real and the other personal and cannot be regularly reduced under one and the same head and therefore shall not be valued together unless 35 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 2. had expresly appointed such a valuation 2. But yet if a Popish Recusant hath a lease for years and personal Goods and both do amount in value to above 40. l. he shall be out of the danger of abjuration for altho the lease is in the realty and the goods are personal yet they shall in this Case be valued together For that by this Copulative and 35 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 2. expresly so appoints without distinguishing between the values of either but makes it sufficient if both of them be of that value 3. Mony secured upon a Mortgage of Lands is within the meaning of these words Goods and Chattels 35 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 2. And if the Popish Recusant hath above 40. l. owing to him upon such Mortgage he cannot be required to abjure CXXXIII Days Page 137. Within three months next after such person shall be apprehended or taken 35 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 3. Wingate Crown 80. clearly mistakes the meaning for he saith that a Popish Recusant whose Estate is under value must make the submission prescribed by this Act within three months next after his arrival at his place of abode which is a complicated Error for he quites leaves out him who is to repair to the place where he was born or his Father or Mother dwells he makes the party lyable to such submission before he becomes an offendor by not repairing or not presenting himself and giving in his true name or Travelling above five Miles He speakes nothing of his being apprehended whereas by the Act he cannot be required to abjure until three months after his apprehension and he turns the three months after his apprehension into three months after his arrival all great mistakes and fit to be taken notice of by Justices of Peace whose part it is to require the submission and abjuration that they may not be misled in the Execution of this part of their office by trusting to that abridgment Page 138. CXXXIV Being thereunto required by the Bishop c. 35 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 3. If the offendor be not before the end of the three months next after his appreliension required by the Bishop a Justice of Peace or the Minister or Curate to make such submission he cannot be required afterwards nor be compelled to abjure by force of this Act but if he be required within the three months to make submission and refuse he may be at any time afterwards warned or required to abjure CXXXV Exile Page 138 139. The Oath of abjuration 35 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 4. may be in this form or to this effect You shall Swear that you shall depart out of this Realm of England and out of all other the Kings Majesties Dominions and that you shall not return hither or come again into any of his Majesties Dominions but by the licence of our said Soveraign Lord the King or of his heirs So help you God 3 Inst 217. Stamford 119.120 Wilkinson 66. hath set down another form c. resembling that of a Felon c. This hear you Sir Coroner that I J M. of H. in the County of S. am a Popish Recusant and in the contempt of the Laws and Statutes of this Realm of England I have and do refuse to come to hear Divine Service there read and exercised I do therefore according to the intent and meaning of 35 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 4. c. abjure the Land and Realm of King Charles now King of England Scotland France and Ireland and I shall hast me towards the Port of P. which you have given and assigned to me and that I shall not go out of the high-way leading thither nor return back again c. If I do I will that I be taken as a Felon of our laid Lord the King and that at P. I will diligently seek for passage and I will stay there but one flood and Ebb if I can have passage and unless I can have it in such space I will go every day into the Sea up to my knees assaying to pass over So God me help and his holy Judgment But in alluding to the old Oath for Felony c. Wilkinson is mistaken in the very Offence for which the Popish Recusant is to abjure by force of 35 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 4. For the Offence is not his Refusal to hear Divine Service for that is but one of the precedent qualifications of the person but the Offence it self is of another nature viz. his not repairing to the place the Statute appoints him or his removal from thence contrary to the Statute or his not presenting himself and delivering his true name as aforesaid Either of these if he be a Popish Recusant within the meaning of this Act is a Crime for which he ought to abjure unless he prevents his abjuration by a timely Submission Nor is the Popish Recusant bound to swear that he will not go out of the high way or return back or will tarry but one Flood and Ebb or go into the Sea up to his knees Nor ought the Coroner or Justices of Peace to require any such Oath of him for this is a new Offence made by a Statute Law which doth not require the strict form of Abjuration as in Case of Felony and altho the Felon were tied to these Circumstances yet the Recusant is not nor shall be a Felon for omitting them but 't is sufficient if he simply abjure as 35 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 4. directs and go from the appointed Port within the time limited and not return without Licence into any of the Kings Dominions He that thus abjures the Realm doth yet owe the King his Ligeance and remaineth within the Kings Protection Qui abjurat Regnum amittit regnum sed non Regem amittit Patriam sed
non patrem patriae 7 Co. 9. Calvins Case Page 139. The Offender is 35 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 1. Strictly tied to depart from the same Haven assigned him CXXXVI and within the time appointed him by the Justices of the Peace or Coroner so that if he depart the Realm from any other Haven or Port or over-stay his time and depart afterwards yet he is a Felon within this Act. CXXXVII Ireland Page 139 140. Or returns or come again into any her Majesties Realms or Dominions 35 Eliz. 2. § 10. N. 1. An Offender within this act abjures in form aforesaid and departs this Realm and afterwards goeth into Ireland without licence and then returns into England with licence which going into Ireland seems to be Felony by this Act. But Quare how the offence shall be tried not in Ireland for this Statute binds not that Kingdom nor can he taken notice of there nor yet can it be tried in England for that the Offence was done elsewhere so that this is Casus omissus and cannot be punisht for that no way of trial is appointed Crompt 53.54 Page 140. CXXXVIII Suspected 35 Eliz. 2. § 11. N. 1. Altho the party be no Jesuit Seminary or Massing Priest yet if there be cause to suspect him and he refuse to answer whether he be so or no such suspition and refusal is ground enough for his Commitment Page 140. 141. Having lawful Authority in that behalf 35. Eliz. 2. § 11. N. 1. This Clause seems to refer to 27. Eliz. 2. § 13. N. 1. Which appoints that the discovery of a Popish CXXXIX Priest or Jesuit shall be made to some Justice of Peace or higher Officer who is to give Information thereof to some of the Privy Council c. under the penalty of two hundred Marks Which Statute of 27 Eliz. 2. § 13. N. 1. tho it do not in express terms say that the Justices of Peace or other higher Officer shall examine the Priest or Jesuit so discovered yet in as much as it gives power to take Cognizance of the matter it seems Implicitely to impower him to inform himself of the truth whether the party be a Priest or Jesuit or not as well by examination of the party as otherwise that he may be the better enabled to give Information thereof to some of the Privy Council c. and one Justice of Peace having by 27 Eliz. 2. § 13. N. 1. lawful Authority to examine him he hath authority likewise by this Statute 35 Eliz. 2. § 11. N. 1. to Commit him if he be suspected to be a Priest or Jesuit and refuseth to answer whether he be so or no. As for Master Shepherd's opinion in his sure Guide Cap. 14. § 5. That there must be two Justices to commit a man by force of 35. Eliz. 2. § 12. N. 1. who is suspected to be a Jesuit or Priest CXL till he answers directly I see no ground at all for it Page 141. Answer to the said Questions 35 Eliz. 2. § 11. N. 1. That is whether he be a Jesuit Seminary or Massing Priest for he is not bound to answer to any other Question nor can be Committed by force of this Act for his refusal Page 141 142. CLXI Vrged by Process 35 Eliz. 2. § 13. N. 1. If a Popish Recusant restrained by this act be summoned by Warrant of a Justice of Peace to appear before him the Recusant ought not to travil to such Justice out of his compass of five miles For altho a Justice of Peace's warrant be the Kings Process yet it is not intended here for these words Vrged by Process are restrained by the subsequent words 35 Eliz. 2. § 13. N. 1. as requires the Recusants appearance in some one of the Kings Courts and extend not to all Cases of summons and Process as Wingate Crown 83. mistakes But if in the Case aforesaid the Warrant be to arrest the Recusant and by force thereof he be carried by the Constable c. out of the compass of five miles there he is excused and forfeits nothing for that it was done by Compulsion and yet if there be any Covin between the Recusant and the Justice of Peace or Officer it may be otherwise CXLII Courts Page 142. In any her Majesties Courts 35 Eliz. 2. § 13. N. 1. All Courts wherein the Proceedings are directed by the Kings Laws are the Kings Courts and therefore a Court Leet tho of an Inferior nature and kept in the Lords name yet is the Kings Court 5 Co. 39. Cawdries Case Hetley 18. 2. If a Popish Recusant restrained by this Act be cited into the Ecclesiastical Court he may be force of this Proviso travel out of the compass of five miles to appear there 35 Eliz. 2. § 13. N. 1. For all Ecclesiastical Courts are the Kings Courts and the Laws by which they proceed there are the Kings Laws Page 142 143. This 35 Eliz. 2. § 14. CXLIII N. 1. Extends to all Cases in general where the Popish Recusant ought to render his body to the Sheriff upon Proclamation and is not restrained to a Proclamation upon an Indictment for Recusancy And therefore if a Popish Recusant confined by 35 Eliz. 2. had been proclaimed upon the Statute of Marlebridge 52. H. 3.7 § 1. N. 1. in a Plea de Custodia as a Deforceor he might lawfully have gone out of the compass of five miles the like he may do at this day upon any other Proclamation commanding him to render his body to the Sheriff Page 143. CXLIV Before he or they shall be thereof Convicted 35 Eliz. 2. § 15. N. 1. A Popish Recusant confined by this Act whose Estate is under value is apprehended for offending against this Act 35 Eliz. 2. § 8. N. 1. and before the expiration of three months next after his apprehension is Convicted of such Offence and then before the three months expire conforms and makes such Submission and Declaration as 35 Eliz. 2. § 8. N 3. and § 16. N. 1. is appointed this Case altho he come too late after Conviction to save the forfeiture of his lands and goods yet he shall not be compelled to abjâ—re for the affirmative words here 35 Eliz. 2. § 15. N. 1. That upon such Conformity Submission and Declaration before Conviction he shall be Discharged of all Pains and Forfeitures do not carry in them the force of a Negative viz. that if it be after Conviction he shall not be discharged of any of them and by 35 Eliz. 2. § 8 N. 3. he is not compellable to abjure I at any time within three months next after his apprehension he conforms confesseth and submits as is there appointed CXLV Church Page 143 144. It seems clear that no Submission Confession or Declaration can discharge the Popish Recusant who is an Offender within this Act from any Pain or Forfeiture thereby inflicted unless it be performed in some Parish Church for
for the King and himself before any of those Justices but must sue in one of the Courts of Record at Westminster Page 161. CLXIV Of all and all manner of Popish Accusants 3 Jac. 4. § 4. N. 1. As this Act is penned it seemeth that the Church-wardens and Constables are not bound thereby to present the monthly absence from Church of any of the Children or Servants of a Popish Recusant altho such Children or Servants be Recusants unless they are Popish Recusants and that 't is sufficient to satisfie 3 Jac. 4. § 4. N. 2. to present their names without taking any notice of their absence from Church But if they be Popish Recusants they fall within the general words of the Act and their monthly absence ought to be presented as well as that of their Parents or Masters and in this Wingate Crown 100. hath clearly mistaken for he tells us that the monthly absence of all the Children and Servants of a Popish Recusant ought to be presented Page 162 163. CLXV To enquire hear and determine 3 Jac. 4. § 7. N. 1. This is intended of Indictments only and revives the power of the Justices of Peace given them by 23 Eliz. 1. § 9. N. 2. suprà 72. and taken from them by the negative words of 29 Eliz. 6. § 2. N. 2. suprà 95. N. 2. so that now the Justices of Peace may proceed to Judgment against the Recusant upon 23 Eliz. 1. § 5. N. 1. or convict him upon Proclamation and default and so may the Justices of Assize and Goal-delivery proceed either way For the words of 3 Jac. 4. § 7. N. 2. and of 29 Eliz. 6. § 5. N. 5. which give the Proclamation being in the Affirmative do not take away the proceedings upon 23 Eliz. 1. § 9. N. 2. but that the Justices may waive the Conviction by Proclamation if they please Nor is the Informers popular suit 23 Eliz. 1. § 11. N. 1. taken away by 29 Eliz. 6. § 4. N. 3. or by this Statute 3 Jac. 5. § 7. N. 2. Dr. Fosters Case 11 Co. 61. Page 163. CLXVI Against any person either for not repairing to Church c. 3 Jac. 4. § 7. N. 2. so that this branch of the Statute which gives the Conviction by Proclamation extends to other Recusants besides Popish Recusants and is not restrained to this latter sort but is misrecited in this particular Dalt Cap. 100. tit forfeiture Page 163. CLXVII Shall be rendred to the Sherif c. before the next Assizes c. 3 Jac. 4. § 7. N. 2. in 2 Rol. 108. Bridgman 122 in an action brought against Sir John Web and his Wife for recovery of twenty pound per month for the Recusancy of the Wife the defendants plead that the Feme was before that time Convicted for the same absence upon Indictment at the Kings suit and Proclamation made that she should render her self at the next Assizes and default of appearance thereupon but it was resolved by the Court of B. R. that the plea was ill and that this was not a Conviction according to Law and therefore was in effect as no Conviction for the Proclamation was Erronius in two points 1. In the person to whom 3 Jac. 4. § 7. N. 2. saith it shall be proclaimed that the offendors body shall be rendred to the Sherif c. but this Proclamation was that she should render her self to the Justices of Assize For the rendring of the body to the Sherif is a material point And the intent of the Statute is not persued in this Proclamation for the intent was that Recusants being dangerous Members of the Common-wealth should be in the Custody of the Sherif c. ne nocere valeant 2. In the time when the Proclamation was that she should render her self at the next Assizes but 3 Jac. 4. § 7. N. 2. before the next Assizes And when the Proclamation is ill the Conviction for default of appearance thereupon cannot be good nor shall Bar the King or the Informer of their Action And altho by 3 Jac. 4. § 16. N. 1. That no Proclamation shall be avoided for any defect c. The Recusant perhaps may be estopped to take such exception to the Proclamation yet the King is not Note that Palmer 40 41. hath slated the difference beetwen the Statute and the Proclamation as here and so was the truth of the Case but in reciting Bridgmans Argument he reports it quite contrary viz. that the Proclamation was that the Recusants body should be rendred to the Sheriff and that it ought to have been that it should be rendred to the Justices of Assize but this is a mistake and contrary to the Statute and the truth of the Case Page 164. CLXVIII Or other Keeper of the Goal 3 Jac. 4. § 7. N. 2. a Keeper of a Goal may be by usage or prescription 42. Ass 7. and 1 Inst 114. and if the person Indicted for Recufancy live in a Corporation where the Sheriff hath not to do and he be proclaimed upon this Statute he may render himself to the Keeper of the Goal there CLXIX Appearance Page 164 Shall not make appearance of Record 3 Jac. 4. § 7. N. 3. and if the Recusant do appear of Record at the Assizes Goal-delivery or general or Quarter Sessions it shall be sufficient to save his default altho he did not render himself to the Sheriff upon the Proclamation and this is clear by the words of 3 Jac. 4. § 7. N. 3. which is grosly mistaken Wingate Crown 102. who saith the Recusant shall be Convicted if he render not his body to the Sheriff or Bayliff of the Liberty and that default be recorded 2. This appearance on 3 Jac. 4. § 7. N. 3. must be in proper person and not by Attorny for none can at first appear by Attorny unless enabled by some Statute and all appearances by the defendent in any Court ought by the Common Law to be in person 10 Co. 101. Bewfages Case But after a Plea pleaded to an Indictment an Attorny may be admitted at the discretion of the Court if they think fit but not otherwise and in some Cases not not without a special Writ directed to the Justices to that purpose 16 Ed. 4.5 F. N. B. 26. 3. The party Indicted and proclaimed on 3 Jac. 4. § 7. N. 3. who appears at the Assizes or Sessions must take care that his appearance be entred of Record For if the Clerk of the Assizes or Clerk of the Peace should mistake and instead thereof record his default he hath no way to avoid his standing Convicted But he is put to his Action upon the Case against such Clerk of the Assizes or Peace see Popham 29. Keilway 180. 4. The personal presence at the next Assizes or Sessions of the Party indicted of Recufancy and proclaimed on 3 Jac. 4. § 7. N. 3. altho he continue there from the beginning to the ending is no
the King the King only should by his Prerogative have presented during the Wardship 47 Ed. 3.14 and 38 H. 6.9 But yet altho two parts of an Advowson shall pass to the King by the word Hereditaments and the Seizure of the Mannor shall draw with it the Seizure of the Advowson yet the Kings two parts of the Advowson shall not pass from him by such General words and therefore if the King seizeth two parts of a Mannor belonging to a Recusant Convict to which an Advowson is appendent and grants over his two parts of the Mannor to a Subject with all Hereditaments appurtenances c. yet two parts of the Advoswon will not pass unless specially named or the grant be adeo plene integre in tam amplis modo forma prout c. The Recusant had the Manor Hob. 126. Moor 872. Page 173. CLXXIX In lieu and full recompence of the twenty pound per month 3 Jac. 4. § 11. N. 4. So that if the King makes his Election to seize the two parts the Recusant is no longer lyable to pay the twenty pound per month but the two parts of his Lands shall go in lieu and full recompence thereof Jones 24. Standens Case Page 173. CLXXX Mansion-house is in Law most commonly taken for the Chief messuage or habitation of the Lord of a Mannor or the Mannor-house where he most remains or continues Termes de la Ley 199. But it is to be taken here 3 Jac. 4. § 12. N. 1. in a larger sense for any other house which is the Recusants chief dwelling house Page 174. CLXXXI These words passing c. and unknown 3 Jac. 4. § 13. N. 4. being in the Conjunctive it seems that the Bishop or two Justices ought not to examine upon Oath or tender this Oath to any passenger or Traveller quatenus such unless he be unknown viz such an one as conceals his true name or quality for so it must be reasonable intended and not of all Travellers through the Country as Wingate Crown 106. mistakes for it appears by the other qualifications here enumerated that the intent of the Act is that it shall be offered by the Bishop or two Justices to such only of whom there is any just Cause of suspition 7 Jac. 6. § 26. N. 2. Infra 260. CLXXXIL Imprisonment Page 175. there to remain without Bayl or maynprise 3 Jac. 4. § 14. N. 1. The Bishop or two Justices can not take Suretyes of him who refuseth the Oath for his appearance at the Assizes or Sessions as Wingate Coton 107. mistakes but must commit him immediatly to Goal nor can any other Court or Justices Bail him in this Case CLXXXIII Justices Page 175 Until the next Assises or General or Quarter Sessions 3 Jac. 4. § 14. N. 1. This being in the disjunctive the Bishop or two Justices have their Election to commit the Party refusing the Oath either until the next Assizes or until the next Sessions as they shall think fit for some may be more aptly committed untill the next Assises and some untill the next Sessions 12. to 131. Page 175 176. CLXXXIV These words any other Person whatsoever 3 Jac. 4. § 14. N. 3. are Exclusive of the said Person or Persons who are committed for refusal for 't is here in the disjunctive so that it seems that if any person whatsoever of the age of 18 years or above and under the degree of a Nobleman or Noblewoman be at the Assizes or General Quarter Sessions of the peace whether voluntarily or brought in upon process on an Indictment of recusancy or for any other matter and be there tendered this Oath and refuse to take it altho it were never tendered to him before yet upon his refusal there he incurs a praemunire and in this respect this Statute 3 Jac. 4. § 14. N. 3. is more Exclusive than 7 Jac. 6. § 26. N. 6. where there must be a prior tender and refusal of this oath otherwise a refusal of it at the Assizes or Sessions doth not make a praemunire by that act 12 Co. 131 infra 265. CLXXXV Corent Page 176. shall incurre the danger and penalty of premunire 3 Jac. 4. § 14. N. 3. If a man be committed by the Bishop or two Justices of peace for the refusal of this oath and the tender and refusal be expressed in the Mittimus the Justices of Assize or Justices of Peace in their Sessions are bound to take notice of this tender and refusal Indictment And after they have there made the party a second tender of the oath and he refuseth it by which he incurrs a praemunire the indictment against him to convict and attaint him of praemunire must contain all the special matter viz that he stood convicted or indicted of recusancy or that he had not received the Sacrament twice within the year next before or that passing through the countrey and unknown being examined upon oath he confessed or denyed not c. as the case is and that the oath was tendered to him by the Bishop or two Justices of peace Quorum â—â—us c. and he refused it and that it was again tendred to him in open Court and he again refused it for in this case the Mittimus is the ground upon which he must be proceeded against at the Assizes or Sessions But if the first tender and refusal be not expressed in the Mittimus or warrant of Commitment there altho there was a tender and refusal of the oath before the Bishop or two Justices yet the Justices of assize or Justices of peace in their Sessions can take no notice of it but they must there tender him the oath without reference to any prior tender which they may do by such of the General words any other person whatsoever 3 Jac. § 14. N. 3. and if he refuse he incurrs a praemunire and in this case the Indictment may be short and General scilicet that he was tendred the oath in the open Court and refused it c. and so it must be in all cases where in truth there was never any prior tender and refusal See 7 Jac. 6. § 26. N. 2. Whereby the power of the Justices of Peace is in some particular cases enlarged in reference to this oath of Allegiance infra 266. CLXXXVI Oath Page 179. unto which Oath so taken the said person shall subscribe his or her name or mark 3 Jac. 4. § 15. N. 6. if a man refuse to take any word of this oath 't is a refusal of the whole 1 Bulstr 198. Lord Vauxes Ca CLXXXVII Vilary Page 179. 180. Outlary 3 Jac. 4. § 16. N. 1. a Termor for years was utlawed upon an indictment of Recusancy the term was sold by the Lord Treasurer and Barons of the Exchequer and afterwards the utlary was reversed The Question was whether upon reversal of the utlary the recusant should have restitution of term again 3 Cro.
that the Recusant if he live within ten miles distance of London is to deliver up his name to the Lord Mayor there and 3 Jac. 5. § 4. N. 1. if he live above ten miles distant then to the next Justice of peace but the Statute is there mistaken in both points for by 3 Jac. 5. § 3. N. 3. if the Recusant dwell within ten miles of London and not in London he is to deliver up his name to the next Justice of peace and not to the Lord Mayor and if he dwell above ten miles from London he is not within this Act 3 Jac. 5. § 3. N. 4 nor bound by force thereof to deliver up his name at all Infra 278. CCXIX. Lieu. Page 203 204. This Proviso 3 Jac. 5. § 5. N. 1. is by some taken to be in force at this day But yet under favour as the Proviso is penned it seems to the contrary and that now all Popish Recusants convicted or indicted of Recusancy or not repairing to Church but forbearing by the space of three months are by this Act to depart London and ten miles compass of the same notwithstanding they are Trades-men or have no other place of Dwelling For as to Tradesmen here 3 Jac. 5. § 5. N. 1. are no other excepted than such as when this Act was made used some Trade mystery or manual ocupation and as to both Tradesmen and such as had or should have their only Dwelling in London or ten miles compass the Statute limits them to that place where they inhabited three months next before the Session of Parliament wherein this Act was made which cannot by any strained construction extend to those in future times But the meaning of 3 Jac. 5. § 5. N. 1. seems to be that Popish Recusants indicted or convicted of recusancy or not repairing to Church c. who were then Tradesmen within London or ten miles compass or such as then resided within London or ten miles compass and should have no other place of abode might continue there so that they removed not to any other Dwelling than where they inhabited by the space of three months next before that Session of Parliament or if they did they were to lose the benefit of this Proviso and must have removed above ten miles from London as well as other Popish Recusants convicted or indicted or not repairing to Church as aforesaid And for those words such as shall have their onely Dwelling within the said City c. 3 Jac. 5. § 5. N. 1. the future tense shall have doth not intend such Recusants as should have their Dwelling there or within the ten miles compass after the making of this Act and not before but only such who having their Dwelling there before that Session of Parliament should at the time of their being indicted or convicted have their onely Dwelling there For if they had at such time of their being convicted or indicted two several houses one within London or ten miles and the other at a further distance altho they inhabited in that which was within London or ten miles for three months next before that Session of Parliament yet if they were not Tradesmen at the time of the makieg of this Act 3 Jac. 5. § 5. N. 1. they should have had no benefit by this Proviso but ought within ten days after such Indictment or Conviction for Recusancy to have removed out of the compass of ten miles Page 205. CCXX Licence Giving Power to grant license or licenses unto the said Recusants by 35. Eliz. 2. § 12. N. 1. in the Proviso which is by 3 Jac 5. § 6. N. 4. here repealed is only that which there impowers the Justices of peace for that is the onely Provise which gives power to grant licence and the cause here alledged for the repeal 3 Jac. 5. § 6. N. 2. is the giving of sundry Licences to recusants under colour of a Proviso in 35 Eliz. 2. which can be construed only of those which were given by the Justices of peace 35 Eliz. 2. § 12. N. 1. and not of the other Licenses given by 35 Eliz. 2. in several other Cases so that the Proviso's there 35 Eliz. 2. § 13 and 14. permitting the Popish recusant to travel in case of process or commandment by privy Counsellours or the Queens Commissioners or Proclamation to render his body to the Sheriffs remain still in force and unrepealed and the recusant may take the benefit thereof ae this day Page 207 CCXXI 208. by such Recusant is intended here 3 Jac. 5. § 7 N. 1. such Recusant as is confined by 35 Eliz. 2. § 3. N. 1 and § 4. N. 1. and not only such as were mentioned in 3 Iac. 5. § 6. N. 1 for that recital is imperfect in that it mentions only the Popish recusant convict 35 Eliz. 2. § 3. N. 1. whereas 35 Eliz. 2. § 4. N. 1. speaks as well of the Popish recusant not convicted who hath no certain place of abode And the benefit of having Licenses from the King or three Privy Counsellours by force of this Act 3 Jac. 5. § 7. N. 1. is intended as well to the one as the other altho the convicted only are mentioned in the recital And this will plainly appear 1. by the following words here 3 Iac. 5. § 7. N. 2 which impower the Justices of peace to grant licences and expressly extend to all now It cannot be presumed that the makers of the Law intended any difference between the persons to be licensed by the King or privy Counsellours the persons to be licensed by the Justices of peace the power given 3 Jac. 5. § 7. N. 1. to the King or privy Counsellours being more absolute and not under such praecautions as is that which is given 3 Jac. 5. § 7. N. 3. to the Justices of peace for the King or privy Counsellours may grant a license to the Recusant to travel without any particular Cause shewn in the license or the assent of any other person and whithout any oath to be made by the recusant which the Justices of peace cannot do and there is no reason to think that the power here given to the King or privy Counsellours which in all other Particulars is so much more absolute and extensive than that given to the Justices of peace should be yet less extensive as to the persons to be licensed 2. It were absurd to think that the makers of 3 Jac. 5. § 7. N. 1. intended to confer a greater Priviledge upon the Recusant convicted whose offence appears upon record then to such as are not convicted c. But if by such Recusants should be meant only such as are mentioned in the recital 3 Jac. 5. § 6. N. 1. viz those convicted and not all who are confined by 35. Eliz. 2. § 3. N. 1. § 4. N. 1. it would follow that the convicted recusant who is the more notorious offender may have a licence
but no particular cause for the recusants travel was expressed in the license and this seems to be a good exception for the inserting into the License that the Popish recusant hath urgent or necessary occasion or business answers only the former part of this Proviso 3 Jac. 5. § 7. N. 2. which gives the former Justices power to license him if he hath necessary occasion or business to travel out of the compass of five miles but withall it ought to be mentioned in the license particularly what that occasion or business is which is the cause of the License for so this Act here 3 Iac. 5. § 7. N. 3. expressly appoints and therefore that form of a License for a recusant to travel which Dalton 379 Cap. 124. tit licenses hath set down wherein no cause is mentioned but urgent and necessary business seems too short and general and is not to be relyed on Page 210 CCXXVIII First taking his Corporal oath 3 Iac. 5. § 7. N. 4. in Mansfiel ca. Moor 836. pl. 1127. there is another oath mentioned for a Popish recusant to take before he can be licensed to travel and that is the oath of Allegiance prescribed by 3 Jac. 4. § 25. N. 1. for in Moor 836. it 's said that in an Information brought against the recusant for travelling out of the compass of five miles the defendant pleaded a licence from four Justices of peace and his plea was disallowed because among other things that did not shew that before the licence he had taken the oath of Allegiance yet Quaere of this and by what Law the omitting to take that Oath makes the Licence void but I rather think it to be a mistake and that such an exception might be moved but the plea not disallowed for that reason Page 210 211. Before the said four Justices of the Peace or any of them 3 Jac. 5. § 7. N. 4. Master Shepherd in Sure Guide Cap. 14. Sect. 5. thinks that no less than two of the four Justices of the peace can minister this Oath to the recusant But I take it to be there that any one of the four Justices may minister the Oath in this Case And there is a great difference between any Justices for that denotes the Plural number as in the subsequent clause 3 Jac. 5. § 27. N. 1. where any Justices may imprison the Offender that is any two Justices or more and Any of the Justices are here 3 Iac. 5 § 7. N. 4. which denotes the singular number and the following words who shall have Authority by vertue of this Act to minister the same may be well enough applied to any one Justice of peace Page 211. CCXXX That he hath truly informed them of the Cause of his journey 3 Iac. 5. § 7 N. 4. If an information be brought against a Popish recusant for travelling out of his compass of five miles and he plead a licence from four Justices of peace it seems necessary that he averr in his plea that the cause contained in his licence was true and real Moor 836. pl. 1127. CCXXXI Ability Page 212. This clause 3 Iac. 5. § 8. N. 9. extends not to all sorts of recusants who are convicted or have Wives who are recusants convicted as is mistaken in the Additions to Dalton Cap. 81. Sect. 46. tit Recusants but at this day only to the Popish recusant convicted or having a Wife who is a Popish recusant convicted A Popish recusant not convicted hath a Wife who is convicted of recusancy but is no Popish recusant the Husband is not disabled by 3 Iac. 5. § 9. N. 1. to exercise any publick Office or Charge for that neither the Husband is a convicted recusant nor the Wife a Popish recusant A person who is convicted of recusancy but is no Popish recusant hath a Wife who is a Popish recusant but not convicted the Husband is out of this branch of the Statute 3 Iac. 5. § 9. N. 1. for that neither the Husband is a Popish recusant nor the Wife convicted CCXXXII Women Page 213 214 215. The Issues and Profits of two parts of her Dower 3 Iac. 5. § 10. N. 1. and not of two parts of her Joynture or Dower as Wingate Coron 134 For there are divers Cases where notwithstanding 27. H. 8.10 § 6 N. 3. the Wife shall have her Dower and Joynture both and if she offend against 3 Iac. 5. § 10. N. 1. she shall forfeit the profits of two parts of both and that not only where the Joynture made to her is not warranted by 27 H. 8.10 § 6. N. 1 But in some Cases where the Joynture is pursuant and according to the Statute she shall have her Dower and Joynture both If an Estate be made of Lands to the wife for the Life of another Dower 4 Co. 3 Vernons Case Or for a thousand years if she lives so long 1 Iust 36. Or if a Rent be granted to the Wife for the life of another or for years or any other way not pursuant to 27. H. 8.10 § 6. N. 1. Bickley's Ca. 1. Anderson 288. pl. 296. and 2 Anderson 30 pl. 2. Wentworth's Case Or if an Estate be made to others in Fee or for the Wives life upon trust for her benefit 1 Inst. 36. Or if a man covenant to stand feised to the use of himself in Tayl the Rem to the use of his Wife for life Pasch 16. Jac. B. R. Wood's Ca. Or if the Husband make a Feoffment in Fee to the use of himself for life the Remainder to another for life or years the remainder to the Wife for her life 4 Co 2. Hutt 51. Shrewell's Ca. In all these Cases altho the Lands or rent were conveyed to the Wife for her Joynture yet the Estate not being within 27 H. 8.10 § 6. N. 1. her acceptance thereof shall not barre her Dower but she shall have such Joynture and her Dower also And the reason why in the two last Cases the Wife shall not be barred of her Dower altho there be an Estate limited to her for her life is because the Estate is not in its first Creation appoynted to take immediatly after the death of the Husband and no matter which ariseth ex post facto can salve this or make it a Joynture within 27 H. 8.10 § 6. N. 3. to barre her Dower And therefore if in Wood's Câ—â—â—â—… the Husband Tenant in Tayl dyeth without issue or if in Hutt 51. he in remainder dye before the Husband or the term for years determine in the Husband's life-time so that the Wife may enter presently after his death yet because the Estate to the wife for her life was not originally limited to take immediately after his death it shall not barre her Dower quod ab initio non valet c. And as in all the Cases befo-rementioned if the Estate were made for her Joynture the Wife shall have such Joynture and Dower both so if
against the Defendant upon failer of the Record Hetley 18. But yet if there be a Plea of a Conviction of Recusancy had before the Justices of Gaol delivery and the Defendant mistakes Certiorari and takes out a Certiorari to the Justices of Peace this shall not be a failer of the Record altho the Defendant hath it not at the day for that the issuing of a Certiorari was the Award of the Court but a Certiorari shall be awarded de novo to the Justices of Gaol delivery before whom the Plaintiff was convicted Hob. 135. Pye and Thrill Note If the Defendant be sued in C. B. or any other of the Principal Courts at Westminster and he plead a Conviction of Recusancy before the Justices of Gaol delivery or Justices of Peace he need not take his Certiorari out of the Chancery and so bring it by Mittimus but the Court may send a Certiorari immediately to that inferiour Court where the Plaintiff was convicted as was held Hob. 135. See 19 H. 6.19 And the Justices themselves before whom the Conviction was had must certify and therefore if the Conviction was had before Justice of peace the Certificate cannot be by the Custos Rotulorum alone though he keep the Records for the Certiorari is in such Case directed to the Justices of peace Hob 135. A Popish Recusant is convicted of recusancy in a popular suit and after such Conviction sues the Informer qui tam c. upon some other matter or cause of action arising between them Quaere whether the Desendant may plead such Conviction in disability of the Recusant by 3 Jac. 5. § 11. N. 2. for this Conviction disables the Recusant to sue as if he were excommunicated and no otherwise Now if a Bishop excommunicate any one and the Bishop be afterwards sued at Law for any other matter or cause by the person so excommunicated the Bishop cannot plead this Excommunication in disability of the plaintiff who sueth 1 Inst 134. Swinborn 305. part 5. sect 6. and the reason given for this 8 Co. 68. in Trollop's Case is because the Bishop was a party to the Excommunication and therefore shall take no advantage by it Which reason seems to hold likewise in the case of an Informer Qui tam c. who is a party to the Conviction of the Recusant upon the popular suit which conviction renders the Recusant disabled to all intents as an excommunicate person and therefore he being a party to it by the same Rule shall not take advantage of it in disability of the Recusant in any action brought by the Recusant against him But yet notwithstanding I conceive the Informer qui tam c at whose suit the Recusant was convicted may well take advantage of this Conviction and plead it in disability of the person of the Recusant and that the true reason why the Bishop shall not be admitted to plead an Excommunication pronounced by him in disability c. is not because he is a party to the Excommengement but because in matters of Excommunication the Bishop acts as judge and 't is by his Sentence and Authority that the party is excommunicated and he shall not take advantage in another suit of a sentence given by himself judicially and this will not hold in the case of an Informer c. 14. H. 4.14 If an Executor or Administrator becomes a Popish recusant convict it seems he is disabled by this Act 3 Jac. 5. § 1. N. 1. to sue in either of these capacities for 3 Jac. 5 § 11. N. 1. saith he shall be disabled to all intents as an excommunicate person Now a person actually excommunicated can not sue as Executor or Administrator as is held 21 Ed. 4.49 21 H. 6.30 and 14. H. 6.15 and 1 Inst 134. altho there are some opinions to the contrary Finch 27. Page 219 CCXXXVI 220. Which are not to be seized or taken into the King's hands c. 3 Jac. 5 § 12. N. 1. these words are not restrained to such Lands c. as cannot be seized into the King's hands for recusancy for then the Recusant could in no case sue for more than the third part for that the King may if he please make his Election and seize the other two parts in lieu of the XX. lb per Month But they are intended of all Lands c. of the recusant which neither the King hath seized nor are by Law to be seized by vertue of any thing which the king hath already done or in respect of what the recusant after his conviction hath omitted to do And therefore if a man be convicted of recusancy upon a popular suit or an action of debt at the King's suit alone in which cases the penalty of XX. lib. per Month is not appropriated to the King for the time to come and he payeth the penalty recovered or if he be convicted upon Indictment and after such Conviction duly payes the XX. lib. per Month into the Exchequer and the King makes no Election to take the two third parts of his Estate in lieu thereof such Recusant may by this Proviso 3 Jac. 5. § 12. N. 1. in either of those Cases sue or prosecute for any of his Lands Tenements Leases Rents Annuitys or Hereditaments whatsoever notwithstanding his conviction for when the penalty recovered is satisfied or the forfeiture appropriated to the King is duely paid into the Exchequer his lands c. are not to be seized by force of any Law for recusancy unless the King make his Election to have the two parts and untill that Election they cannot in the sense of this Proviso 3 Jac. 5. § 12. N. 1. be said to be Lands to be seized or taken into the King's hands for that the King cannot have the two parts and the XX. lib. per Month both But if the King make no such Election and the XX. lib. per Month be duely paid into the Exchequer the Recusant is to hold and enjoy all his Lands Tenements c. as if he had never been convicted and during that time there can be no distinction made between the two parts and the Recusants third part so that in this Case the recusant must either be enabled to sue and prosecute for all his Lands c. or none and and to think the latter of these were to render this Proviso 3 Jac. 5. § 12. N. 1. nugatory and vain But when once the King hath seized the two Thirds for Recusancy either by way of Election or for non-payment of the XX. lib. per Month penalty then the Recusant is enabled to sue only for the other Third part whether in the hands of the King or of a common person CCXXXVII Marriage Page 220 221. Every man being or which shall be a Popish Recusant convicted 3 Jac. 5 § 13. N. 2. A man who is no Popish recusant convicted marrieth a Woman who is a Popish recusant convicted in other form than is here
complicated Offence consisting of several Particulars 1. In giving just cause of Suspicion without which the Party complain'd of according to this Act 7 Iac. 6. § 26. n. 4 cannot be tendered the Oath by one Justice of Peace Then 2. In refusing the Oath before the Justice of Peace who tendered it And lastly 3. In refusing it upon the second Tender at the Assizes or Sessions all which must be comprized in the Indictment So that the cause of Suspicion is pars communis and that arising in the County where the Party dwelt and was complained of cannot be punished in another County unless the Statute 7 Iac. 6. § 26. n. 4. had expressly made it examinable there supra 184. True it is that some Statutes do enable Justices of Peace to punish an Offence done in another County but that is where they enable them likewise to examin the truth of the Fact and take Process and Evidence thereof So 1 Iac. 27. § 5. n. 2. and 7 Iac. 11. § 8. n. 3. and supra 255. impower the Justices of Peace where the Party is apprehended to examin and punish the Offence but in our Case the cause of Suspicion arising in one County is not made examinable and consequently not punishable in another County and if not punishable there no Justice of Peace of that other County can proceed upon that cause of Suspicion notwithstanding the Party happen to be within his Commission or Power But yet the Party so flying into another County may without any Complaint or cause of Suspicion be tendered the Oath and proceeded against there by two Justices of Peace Quorum unus c. by vertue of the fore-going words of this Clause 7 Iac. 6. § 26. n. 2. Altho he dwell in another County and that for the reason before given viz because this Oath sequitur personam non locum But Wingate Coron 150. saves the labour of this Question for he erroneously restrains the pawer of tendring the Oath in this Case to the Justice of Peace to whom the Complaint is made as if no other Justice of peace of that County could proceed therein which is contrary to the express words as well as the meaning of 7 Iac. § 26. n. 4. Note That Dalton 107. Cap. 45. saith it seems requisite that the Justice or Justices of Peace do make like Certificat as 3 Iac. 4. § 13. n. 5. at the next Assizes or Quarter-Sessions of such Persons as have taken this Oath before them by force of 7 Iac. 6. § 26. n. 4. But upon what ground Master Dalton thought this requisite to be certified at the Assizes I know not seing there is no such Certificate to be made by 3 Iac. 4. § 13. n. 5 but only to the General or Quarter-Sessions of the Peace And as for the Sessions I conceive neither the Justices of Peace if they proceed on 7 Iac. 6. § 26 n. 4. and not upon 3 Iac. 4. § 13. n. 5. are bound to make such Certificate nor the Clerk of the Peace or Town-Clerk to record it for it is not here required to be done But yet in such Cases where the same persons are impowered by both these Statutes to require and minister this oath as where the Party is convicted of Recusancy in which Case two Justices of the Peace Quorum unus c. may require the Oath by the Special words in this Clause of 7 Iac. 6. § 26. n. 2. or of the General words in this Clause of 7 Iac. 6. § 26. n. 2. And it doth not appear upon which of these Statutes they proceed as it may sometimes so happen there if the Party take it will be fafest for the two Justices to make such Certificate to the next General or Quarter-Sessions as is appointed 3 Iac. 4. § 13. n. 5. and for the Clerk of the Peace or Town-Clerk to record it Page 250. CCLXVII If any Person or Persons this Clause 7 Iac. 6. § 26. n. 5. is General and extends to all before So that if any of the Nobility refuse this Oath they may be committed to the Common Gaol c. by such as are by this Act Authorized to tender it 12 Co. 131. Page 251. CCLXVIII Shall refuse to take the said Oath duly tendered to him or her 7 Iac. 6. § 26. n. 5. If the Persons authorized to tender this Oath ask the Party whether he will take it and he saith he will not quaere whether this be such a Tender and Refusal as shall make the refuser liable to be imprisoned proceeded against by force of this Act unless he or they who tender it have in readiness both the Form of the Oath and the Book to swear on for it is to be presumed that the Act intends all requisite Circumstances ready to enable the one to minister and the other to take the Oath And 't is held that before there can be any such Refusal of this Oath as is here intended it ought to be read or offered to be read to the Party especially if he be illiterate or if he be not yet that at least it ought to be offered to him for himself to read it for perhaps the Party never saw or heard it And in such Case it would be against Reason that the Refusal should be penal and therefore in 9 Iac. upon the Tender of this Oath at Sarjeants-Inne in Fleet-Street it was read by Order of the Judges there Page 251. CCLXIX To the Common Gaol 7 Iac. 9. § 26. n. 5. The Justices of the Court of B. R. used to tender this Oath in Court as Justices of Peace of Middlesex and upon Refusal the Party is to be committed to the Prison of the Marshalsey which is the Ordinary Prison of that Court untill the next Sessions 2 Bulstr 155. Dyer 297. Page 252 253 254. CCLXX. Being lawfully Convicted as a Popish Recusant 7 Iac. 6. § 28 n. 1. That is upon Indictment at the King's Suit or a Popular Action or Information upon 23 Eliz. 1. § 5. and 11. or Debate at the King's Suit alone by 35 Eliz. 1. § 10. n. 2. supra 119 In which two last Cases the former Laws are somewhat altered by this Statute For by the former Laws 23 Eliz. 1. and 35. Eliz. 1. If a Person had been convicted of Recusancy any other way than by Indictment no more could have been demanded either by the King or Informer than for the Months mentioned in the Information or Count and the Penalty should not have run on in such Case for that 29 Eliz. 6. § N and 3 Jac. 4 § N. which appropriate the Penalty to the King after Conviction intend no other Conviction than by Indictment as hath been there said But by this Act 7 Jac. 6. § 28. N. 1. If a Popular Action or Information or Action of Debt c. at the King's Suit alone be brought against the Husband and Wife for the Recusancy of the Wife and Judgment be had