Court of the said Lady the Queen here before the Queen her self were sent The aforesaid Thomas Skinner and John Catcher in the Court of the Exchequer aforesaid divers matters for Errors in the Record and Proceedings aforesaid for the revoking and annulling of the Judgement aforesaid assigned To which the said Titus in the said Court appearing pleaded That neither in the Record nor in the Proceedings aforesaid for the revoking and annulling of the Judgement aforesaid in any thing was there Error After which that is to say Monday the 20 th day of October in the year of the Reign of the Queen that now is the 37 th the premises seen And by the Court of the said Lady the Queen there diligently examined and fully understood as well the Record and proceedings aforesaid and the Judgement upon the same given as the Cause aforesaid for Error by the said Thomas and John above assigned and alleged It seemed to the Court here That the Record aforesaid was in nothing vitious or defective and that in the Record aforesaid is Error in nothing Therefore then and there in the same Court it was granted That the Judgement aforesaid should be affirmed in all things and stand in all his force and effect the said Causes for Error here assigned in any thing notwithstanding And further It was granted That the said Titus should reover against the said Thomas and John 80. shilings to the said Titus by his Assent by said Court of the Lady the Queen there adjudged according to the form of the Statute late made and provided for his costs and charges which he had by reason of delay of the Execution of the Judgement aforesaid by Colour of prosecuting the said Writ of Error c. And thereupon the Record aforesaid as also the proceedings thereupon before the Justices of the Common Pleas and the Barons of the Exchequer aforesaid in the premises had before the Queen wheresoever c. by the Justices and Barons aforesaid were sent back according to the form of the Statute aforesaid c. And in the same Court of the said Lady now here before the Queen they remain c. Ejectione Firme Mich. 30. 31. Eliz. in the Exchequer Sir William Pethams Case co 1. part MEmorandum That at another time that is to say in the Term of Lond. ss St. Hillary in the year of the Reign of Queen Elizabeth that now is the 30 th Henry Page Debtor of the Lady the Queen that now is before the Barons of the Exchequer of the said Lady the Queen at Westminster in the County of Middlesex by John Hawkesworth his Attorney and brought then and there his Bill against Edward Griffin of a plea of Trespass Ejectment out of his Farm The Tenor of which Bill followeth in these words ss London ss Henry Page Debtor of the Lady Elizabeth the Queen that now is cometh before the Barons of the Exchequer the 27th day of January this Term by John Hawkesworth his Attorny and complaineth against Edward Griffin present here in Court the same day by Richard Hatton his Attorny of a Plea of Trespasse and Ejectment of him out of his Farm for that viz. That whereas one Thomas Bowes Mr. of Artes the 10 th day of January in the yeer of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29 th at London in the Parish of St. Mary Wolnoth in the Ward of Langborn London had demised granted and to farm letten to the said Henry Page one Capital Messuage then or late in the tenure or occupation of Edward Griffin of London Haberdasher situate lying and being in Lomberstreet in the Parish of St. Mary Wolnoth in the Ward aforesaid within the City of London commonly called and known by the name of the White Lyon together with all Shops Sellers Chambers Places Easements Advantages Profits and Commodities with their appurtenances whatsoever to the said Messuage belonging or in any wise appertaining To have and to hold the said Messuage and all other the premises with their appurtenances to the said Henry Page his Executors Adminstrators and Assignes from the Feast of the Birth of our Lord then last past untill the end and Term of 6. years from thence next and immediately following to be compleat and ended By virtue of which Demise the said Henry Page into the Messuage aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and was thereof Possessed and so being thereof Possessed The said Edward Griffin afterwards that is to say the 11 th day of January in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29 th aforesaid with Force and Armes c. into the Messuage aforesaid which the said Thomas Bowes to the said Henry in form aforesaid demised for the Term aforesaid which is not ended entred and the said Henry from his Farm aforesaid thereof his Term aforesaid not ended did eject expell and amove and other wrongs did unto him to the great damage of the said Henry and against the peace of the said Lady the Queen that now is Whereupon the said Henry saith that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 20. Marks So as the less the aforesaid Henry cannot satisfie the Queen that now is the Debts which to the said Queen he oweth at her Exchequer And thereupon he bringeth Sute c. Pledges of Sute John Doo and Richard Roo And now this day that is to say in 8 â—â— of St. Michael this Term that is to say the 30 th year Until which day the said Edward Griffin prayed license to imparle and then to answer come here as well the said Henry Page as the said Edward Griffin by their Attornies aforesaid and the said Henry demandeth that the said Edward Griffin answer him in the premises c. And upon this The said Edward Griffin by his aforesaid Attorny cometh and defendeth the force and injury when c. And saith That he of the Trespasse and Ejectment aforesaid is no way thereof guilty And of that he puts himself upon the Country and the said Henry Page likewise Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriffs of London that they make come here from the day of St. Michael in one Moneth 12. c. of the Nighbourhood of the Parish of St. Mary Wolnoth in the Ward of â—augborn within the City of Lond. whereof every one c. by whom and who never c. And the same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c. At which day come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And the Sheriffs of London That is to say Hugh Offley and Richard Saltonstall send here the Writ of Venire Facias of the Jurors aforesaid with the Pannel of the names of the Jurors to the said Writ annexed and the said Jurors being called did not appear Therefore it was commanded to the Sheriffs of London that they destrein the Jurors aforesaid by their Lands c. So c. upon Wednesday the 6 th of
at Westminster in the County of Midd. was holden at Westminster aforesaid unto the Castle of the Lady the Queen c. is adjorned c. and their holden c. Afterwards the said Lady the Queen By other Letters Patents Constituted John Clench and Francis Rodes one of her Serjants at Law Justices to Assizes in the a-aforesaid County of York c. And the said Justices by virtue of the said Lett. Patents Afterward that is to say Monday in the 4th week of Lent in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 25th At the Castle of York came before whom then and there come the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth by their Attorney aforesaid and pray a Writ of Reattachment to the aforesaid Edward George Richard Coats c. that they be before the Justices of the Lady the Queen at the next Assizes in her County of York to be taken assigned to be holdē at the afores Castle of York to hear the Record and their Judgement of the Assize aforesaid w hc was in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is at the Castle aforesaid so that that Assize then be here in the State as it was in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is before the aforesaid John Clench and Francis Gawdy Justices to Assizes c. At the aforesaid Castle of York the aforesaid Monday the 6th day of August in the year of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 24th in which day the Assize aforesaid was adjorned before the said John Clench and Francis Gawdy then Justices c. from the aforesaid Castle of York unto the aforesaid Inn of the Justices in Chancery Lane London untill the aforesaid Saturday next after the aforesaid morrow of All Souls then next following c. At which next Assizes holden at the Castle of York aforesaid Monday the 29th day of July in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 25th before the aforesaid John Clench and Francis Gawdy then Justices to Assizes c. came as well the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth by their Attorny aforesaid as the aforesaid Edward George Richard Coats Iohn William Robert and Robert by the aforesaid Thomas Hill their Attorny And the Sheriff that is to say Thomas Wentworth Esq now sent That the aforesaid Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn William Robert and Robert c. And upon this day is given to them before the Justices of the said Lady the Queen that now is of the Bench in the Bench at Westminster in the morrow of All Souls next comming to hear and receive what to the said Justices should seem in this behalf because the said Iohn Clench and Francis Rodes Justices to Assizes c. thereof not yet c. And the Assize aforesaid with all touching the same to the said Justices of the Bench is sent c. The Warrant of Attorny followes and the Writ of Resummons in the Roll and the Tenor of the Writ of Reattachment and Retorn of the said Writ Elizabeth c. To the Sherriffs of York greeting Reattach Edward Vavasor Esq George Richard Coats Iohn William Robert and Robert or their Bailiffs if they shall not be found before our Justices to Assizes in your County to be taken assigned at the Castle of York in your County upon Monday the 22d. day of Iuly then next to come to hear the Record and Judgement of the Assize of Novel disseisin which was in our Court at the Castle aforesaid which Assize Thomas Dowman Esq and Elizabeth his Wife there arraigned against them of 6. Messuages 300. Acres of Land 100. Acres of Meadow and 200. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in Spaldington VVillytoft and Southcone So as they that Assize then be there in the same state as it was in our Court before Iohn Clench third Baron of our Exchequer and Francis Gawdy one of our Serjants at Law our Justices to Assizes in your County to be taken assigned At the aforesaid Castle of York Monday the 6th day of August last past which day the assize aforesaid for certain causes was from thence adjorned before the same our Justices unto the Inn of the Justices in Chancery Lane London Untill Saturday next after the morrow of All Souls then next following And have here the names of the Pledges and this Writ Iohn Clench at the Castle of York the 11th day of March in the yeer of our Reign the 25th Frankland Cresly The within named Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn VVilliam Robert and Robert hath not any thing nor any of them have any thing in my Baliwick by which they can be attached or any of them can be attached nor have they nor any of them hath a Bailiff or Bailiffs nor are they or any of them to be found in the same Thomas VVentworth Esq Sheriff And now here that is to say at VVestminster aforesaid at this day that is to say at the aforesaid morrow of All Souls came as well the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth by the aforesaid Henry Cressy their Attorny as the aforesaid Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn VVilliam Robert and Robert by Tho. Algar their Attony And because the Justices of the Bench here will avise themselves of and upon the premses before they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the parties here until 8. dayes of St. Hillary and so it is continued in 8. dayes of St. Hillary the yeer following At which day here come as well the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth as the aforesaid Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn VVilliam Robert and Robert by their Attornies aforesaid and upon this The premises being seen and by the Justices here fully understood It seemeth to the said Justices here That the aforesaid Indenture by the aforesaid Peter Vavasor Esq after the aforesaid Recovery in form aforesaid made and had was good and sufficient in the Law to lead the uses of the Recovery aforesaid of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenunces so that the same Recovery of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in the view of the Recognitors of the Assize aforesaid put and in the Plaint aforesaid specified by the aforesaid Andrew VVindsor VVilliam Vavasor Peter Vavasor the younger and John Laundere against the aforesaid Peter Vavasor Esq in form aforesaid had was to those uses in the aforesaid barr of the aforesaid Edward above specified in manner and form as the said Edward in his bar aforesaid above alleged Therefore it is considered That the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth take nothing by their Writ aforesaid but in mercy for their false clamour c. And the aforesaid Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn VVilliam Robert and Robert go thereof without day c. Audita Querela Easter Term Anno 80. of King JAMES Doctor Druries Case C. 8. part Fol. 139. a. AT another time as appeareth in
called came who to say the truth of the matters within contained being chosen tried and sworn say upon their Oath That the said Humphry Morley did buy of the said John Slade the within written Wheat and Rye in eares upon the within written Close as is said before growing being for 16. pound of good and lawful mony of England To be paid to the said Iohn Slade in the Feast of St. Iohn the Baptist then next following as in the Declaration within written is within specified And further The said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That betwixt the said Iohn Slade and the said Humphry Morley There was no promise or taking upon him besides the bargain aforesaid But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid by the said Jurors in form aforesaid found The said Humphry Morley did take upon him in manner and form as in the Declaration within written within specified or no the said Jurors are altogether ignorant and thereof they ask the Advice and Consideration of the Court here c. And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the said Jurors in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices of the Court here That the said Humphry Morley did take upon him in manner and form in the Declaration within specified Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Humphry Morley did take upon him in manner and form as the aforesaid Iohn Slade within against him complaineth And then they do assesse the damages of the said Iohn Slade by occasion of not performance of his promise and taking upon him within written besides his charges and his costs by him in the sute aforesaid by him expended to Sixteen pounds And for those charges and costs by Twenty Shillings And if upon the whole matter by the said Jurors in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the said Justices and Court here That the said Humphry Morley did not take upon him in manner and form in the Declaration within specified Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath That the said Humphry did not take upon him in manner and form as the said Humphry hath within alleged And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of their judgement of and upon the premises to be given is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid in State as now it is before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Monday next after 15. dayes of the Holy Trinity to hear their judgement of and upon the premises Because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. And so from Term to Term untill Saturday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael to hear their judgement of and upon the premises Because the Court of the Lady the Queen here not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid came the parties aforesaid in their proper persons Upon which seen and by the Court of the Lady the Queen all and singular the premises fully understood and mature deliberation being thereupon had For that it seemeth to the Court of the said Lady the Queen now here That the said Humphry did take upon him in manner and form in the Declaration aforesaid above specified It is granted That the aforesaid John Slade shall recover against the said Humphry Morley his damages and costs aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed As also Nine pounds for his charges and costs aforesaid to the said John Slade by the Court of the said Lady the Queen here by his assènt of encease adjudged which damages in the whole do amount to Twenty and six pounds And the said Humphry Morley in mercy c. Hillary Term. 8. Jacobi Rott 1112. William Banes Case C. 9. part fol. 91. a. Mâ—morandum That at another time that is to say In the Term of St. Michael last past before the King at Westminster cometh William Banes by Thomas Ferrer his Attorny and brought here in the Court before the said Lord the King that now is his Bill against Edward Paine and Mary his Wife in the Custody of the Marshal of a Plea of Trespass upon the Case And are Pledges of Sute that is to say John Doo and Richard Roo Which Bill followeth in these words ss Willam Banes complaineth of Edward Paine and Mary his Wife in the Custody of the Marshall of the Marshalsey of the Lord the King before the King himself being for that is to say That whereas one William Havert in his life time the late Husband of the aforesaid Mary That is to say the first day of March in the year of the Reign of the Lord James that now is King of England the 6th at London that is to say in the Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap London was indebted to the said William Banes in 77. pounds of lawful Money of England for divers summs of Mony to him the said William Havert by the aforesaid William Banes give to loan and lent And so being endebted the said William Havert afterwards that is to say the 6th day of April in the year of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is of England the 7th at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid lying sick earnestly required the said Mary then his Wife to pay to the said William Banes after the death of the said William Havert the said 77. pounds And then and there the said William Havert made his Testament and last Will and made and constituted the said Mary Executrix of his said last Will then there dyed After whose death the said Mary took opon her the burthen of Execution of the Testament aforesaid And whereas the aforesaid Mary after the death of the said William Havert by colour of the last Will aforesaid was possessed of the interest of a Term for divers years then and yet to come Of and in certain Gardens and a Bowling-Ally scituate and being in Morefield that is to say in the Parish of St. Leonard in Shordich in the County of Midd. And the said Mary when she was single perceiving that the aforesaid William Banes intented to trouble and sue the said Mary for the aforesaid 77. pounds because that the said Mary the said 77. pounds to the said William Banes after the death of the aâ—oresaid William Havert her Husband deceased had not paid the said Mary whilest she was single afterwards that is to say 25th day of June in the year of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is of Engl. the 7th aforesaid At London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid In consideration that the said William Banes at the instance and especial request of the said Mary should not trouble or sue the said Mary for the said 77. pounds but would forbear the payment thereof until the next Quarter that is to say until the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel then next following Promised unto the said
of the said Eldest Son Lawfully begotten c. and so to the ninth Son of the said Thomas and for default of such issue male of the Body of such ninth Son To the use of Rich. Vavasor Brother of the said Peter Vavasor Esq for term of his natural life without impeachment of any wast after his decease to the use of the Eldest son Lawfully begotten of the body of the the said Richard Vavasor and of the Heirs males of the Body of the said Eldest Son Lawfully begotten c. and so to the ninth Son of the said Richard and for default of such issue male of such ninth Son to the use of the Heirs males of the Body of Sir Peter Vavasor of Spaldington Knight Lawfully begotten And for default of such issue male To the use of the right Heirs of the said Richard Vavasor for ever c. Provided c. And farther the Recognitors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid TenemeÌ„ts with the appurtenances in their view put and in the plaint aforesaid specified and in the recovery aforesaid comprized are parcel of the Mannors Lands and Tenements in the Indenture aforesaid specified and not other nor diverse But whether the Indenture aforesaid after the recovery aforesaid by the aforesaid Peter Vavasor Esquire in form aforesaid made and had bearing date the aforesaid first day of February and first delivered the aforesaid 15th day of February in the 15th year abovesaid after the recovery aforesaid being to the uses in the same specified be good and sufficient in Law to have and declare the uses of the aforesaid recovery of the aforesaid Tenements in the view of the Recogniters put and in the plaint aforesaid specified with the appurtenances or not The said Recognitors are altogether ignorant and thereof pray the advice of the Justices aforesaid and of the Court here c. And if to the same Justices and to the Court here It shall seem That the Indenture aforesaid by the aforesaid Peter Vavasor Esquire after the aforesaid Recovery in form aforesaid had and made bearing date the aforesaid first day of February and first delivered the 15th day abovesaid after the recovery aforesaid To the uses in the said Indenture specified be good and sufficient in Law to read and declare the uses of the recovery aforesaid of the tenements aforesaid in the view of the Recognitors aforesaid put with the appurtenances and in the plaint aforesaid specified Then the said Recognitors say upon their Oath aforesaid that the said Recovery of the Tenements aforesaid in view of the Recognitors aforesaid put with the appurtenances and in the plaint aforesaid specified was to the uses in the said Barr of the said Edward specified in manner and form as the said Edward in his Bar aforesaid above alleged And that the aforesaid George Richard Coats John William Robert Thissilwood and Robert Ward did not disseise the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth of the Tenements aforesaid in their view put and in the plaint aforesaid specified with the appurtenances as the said George Richard Coates John William Robert and Robart above have alleged And if it shall seem to the same Justices and to the Court here that the Indenture aforesaid by the aforesaid Peter Vavasor Esquire after the Recovery aforesaid in form aforesaid made and had bearing date the aforesaid first day of February in the 15th yeare aforesaid after the aforesaid Recovery is insufficient in Law to lead and declare the uses of the Recovery aforesaid of the Tenements aforesaid in view of the Recognitors put and in the plaint aforesaid specified Then the said Recognitors say upon their Oath aforesaid that the said recovery of the Tenements aforesaid was not to the uses in the said Bar of the said Edward specified in manner and form as the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth above have alleged and that the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth were seised of the Tenements aforesaid in the view of the same Recognitors put and in the plaint aforesaid specified with the appurtenances in their demesn as of Fee in the right of the said Elizabeth until the aforesaid Edward Vavasor George Vavasor Richard Coates John Lawson William Musgrave Kobert Thissilwood and Robert ward them the said Thomas and Elizabeth thereof unjustly and without Judgment but not with force and Armes disseised them and then they assesse the Damages of the said Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth by occasion of the disseisin aforesaid besides their costs and charges by them about their sute in this behalf expended to 20 shillings and for their costs and charges to 10 shillings And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premisses before that they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Justices here aforesaid at the Inn of the Justices in Chancery Lane London until Satturday next after a moneth of St. Michael next following c. to hear their Judgment thereof because the said Juste â—s here are not yet c. and diverse other meetings until Saturday nex after the morrow of All Souls c. Until Saturday next after the morrow of Martin c. And until Wednesday next after 8. dayes of the Holy Trinity c. At which day before the aforesaid Robert Shute and John Glench then Justices c. At the aforesaid Inn of the Justices As well the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth as the aforesaid Edward George Richard Coats John William Robert and Robert by their Attornies come And because the Justices aforesaid here c Further day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Justices of the said Lady the Queen to take Assizes in the aforesaid County of York assigned at the aforesaid Castle of York until Monday the 6th day of August next comming c. Before which day the said Lady the Queen that now is By other her Letters Patents whose date is at Westminster in the year of her Reign the 24th the Tenor of which followeth in these words c. Elizabeth c. To our Beloved and Faithful John Clench Baron and Francis Gawdy one of her Serjants at Law Greeting Know ye c. And then follow the Letters Patents c. And because the same Justices here will farther avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day c. Before them the said John Clench and Francis Gawdy then Justices c. At the aforesaid Inn until Saturday next after the morrow of All Souls c. At which day the aforesaid John Clench and Francis Gawdy then Justices of the Lady the Queen to Assizes in the aforesaid County of York at the Inn aforesaid came not but withdrew themselves from the said Inn because before the said day for the infection of the Air and of the Plague of Men in the City of London and the Suburbs thereof as also in the City of Westminster being the Term of St. Michael which then
the Term of the Holy Trinity in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is of England France and Ireland the 7th and of Scotland the 42 d. Rott 3642. It is contained thus Somers ss It was commanded to the Sherriff Whereas of the grievous Complaint of Owen Bray of Cobham in the County aforesaid Gent. to the Lord the King grievously complaining It was shewed That whereas John Drury Doctor of Law in the Court of the Lord the King of the Bench here That is to say In the Term of St. Michael in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King of England the 5th before the Justices of the said Lord the King of the Bench aforesaid here that is to say at Westminster by Judgement of the said Court had recovered against the said Owen as well a certain debt of 200. pounds as 33. shillings 4. pence which to the said John in the Court aforesaid of the said Lord the King here were adjudged for his damages which he had by occasion of the detaining of the said debt whereof he is convicted And whereas also the said Owen for that that he did not come unto the said Court of the Lord the King here to satisfy the aforesaid John of the debt and damages aforesaid was put in exâ—gent in the County of the Lord the King of Sussex to Outlawry and for that occasion afterwards that is to say the 19th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is was Outlawed And notwithstanding the said Owen in execution for the Debt and Damages aforesaid by virtue of a certain Writ of the said Lord the King of Capias utlagatum thereof to the late Sheriff of the aforesaid County of Surry by Herbert Morley Esq then Sheriff of the aforesaid County of Surry at the Sute of the said Iohn was taken and imprisoned And after he was so taken and imprisoned was by the said Sheriff out of the same Prison at large where he would freely and voluntarily suffered to go and from the execution aforesaid was delivered as the said Owen by ways and means convenient was ready to shew Yet the aforesaid Iohn sueth forth Execution of the Debt and Damages aforesaid against him the said Owen by reason of the Recovery aforesaid and endeavoureth and threatneth unjustly him the said Owen to be taken and imprisoned to his no smal Damage Whereupon he had supplicated the Lord the Kings congâ—uous remedy for him to be provided The said Lord the King Willing what is just to be done to the said Owen in this behalf sent to the Justices here That the Complaint of the said Owen in this part being heard and calling before theâ— the Parties aforesaid and other which in this behalf they shall see to be called and their reasons thereof here being heard To the said Owen full and speedy Justice they should cause to be done in this behalf which of right and according to the Law and custom of the Kingdom of the Lord the King of England should be done And that they cause to come here at this day that is to say from the Holy Trinity in 15. dayes the aforesaid Iohn to answer of and upon the premises and further to do and receive what the Court the said Lord the King here shall consider in that behalf And now here at this day come as well the aforesaid Owen by Otho Gayer his Attorny as the aforesaid Iohn by Iohn Nye his Attorny And upon this the said Owen saith That whereas the aforesaid Iohn in the Court of the said Lord the King that now is here that is to say in the Term of St. Michael in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is of England c. the 5th before Edward Coke Kut and his Companions then Justices of the said Lord the King of the same Bench here that is to say at VVestminster by the consideration of the said Court recovered against the said Owen as well the aforesaid Debt of 200. pounds as the aforesaid 33. shillings and 4. pence which to the said Iohn in the same Court of the said Lord the King here was adjudged for his Damages which he had by occasion of detaining the same Debt whereof he is convicted And whereas also the said Owen for that he did not come into the same Court of the said Lord the King here to satisfie the said Iohn of his Debt and Damages he was put in Exigent in the aforesaid County of Sussex to be Outlawed and for that occasion afterwards that is to say the 9th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 6th was Outlawed upon the said Outlawry the aforesaid Iohn Drury afterwards that is to say in the Term of the Holy Trinity in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 6th abovesaid sued forth out of the Court of the Lord the King of the Bench here a certain Writ of the said Lord the King of Capias utlagatum against him the said Owen then to the Sherriff of the aforesaid County of S. directed By which Writ the said Lord the King then commanded the said Sherriff of S. that he do not omit for any Liberty within his County but that he take the said Owen Outlawed in the said County of Sussex the said 19th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 6th abovesaid At the Sute of the said Iohn Drury of the plea of Debt whereof he is convicted of c. And him safely keep c. So as he have his body before the Justices of the said Lord the King here in the morrow of All Souls then next comming to do receive what the Court of the said Lord the King thereof should consider in that behalf By virtue of which Writ the said Owen afterwards that is to say the 7th day of October in the 6th yeer aforesaid at Guildford in the aforesaid County of Surry by the aforesaid Rob. Morley then being Sheriff of the aforesaid County of Surry was taken and imprisoned And after he was so taken and imprisoned the said Owen by the said Sherriff the same day and yeer c. At Guildford aforesaid out of that Prison at large where he would freely and voluntarily to go was suffered and from the execution aforesaid was delivered And this he is ready to aver Whereupon he prayeth Judgement And that the aforesaid John from having his execution aforesaid by colour of the Judgement aforesaid be barred and that the said Owen thereof be discharged c. And the aforesaid John prayeth licence thereof to imparl here until 8. dayes of St. Michael c. And hath it c. And the same day is given to the aforesaid Owen here c. At which day the plea aforesaid was adjorned by Writ of the Lord the King of Common adjornment
here untill from the day of St. Michael in one Moneth then next following At which day here cometh as well the said Owen as the said John by their Attornies aforesaid and upon this further prayeth liecnce thereof to imparl here c. Until from Easter day in 15. dayes and hath it c. And the same day is given to the said Owen here c. At which day of 14. dayes of Easter came as well the aforesaid Owen as the aforesaid John by their Attornies aforesaid and upon this The said Owen prayeth that the aforesaid John to his Writ and Declaration aforesaid answer And the said John Drury saith That he for any thing before alleged from having execution of his Debt and Damages against him the said Owen ought not to be barred or delayed Because he saith That after the aforesaid time in which it is supposed the aforesaid Owen out of the custody of the aforesaid Sheriff of Surry to have escaped and before any further execution against the aforesaid Owen by him the said John by Colour of the Judgement aforesaid was sued forth and had that is to say in the Term of St. Michael in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 6th abovesaid out of the aforesaid Court of the said Lord the King that now is of the Bench here upon the Outlawry as is before said pronounced Issued forth a certain Writ of the said Lord the King of Capias utlagatum against him the said Owen At the Sute of the said John then to the Sheriff of the County of Midd. directed By which Writ The Lord the King commanded the aforesaid Sheriff of Midd. That he should not omit for any Liberty of his County but that he take the aforesaid Owen by the name of Owen Bray late of Cobham in the County of Surry Gent. Outlawed in the aforesaid County of Sussex the aforesaid 19th day of May in the year of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 6th abovesaid at the Sute of him the said John by the name of John Drury Doctor of Law Of a Plea of Debt whereof he was convicted if he should be found in his Baliwick and him should safe keep c. So as he have his Body here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid in the aforesaid morrow of All Souls the self same Term of St. Michael in the yeer aforesaid to do and to receive what to the Court of the said Lord the King thereof should consider in that behalf At which morrow of All Souls here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Owen by William Brown then his Attorny And the Sheriffs that is to say George Bolles and Richard Farrington then Sheriffs of the aforesaid County of Midd. then here sent That the aforesaid Owen was not found c. And upon this the said Owen then prayed the hearing of the Writ of Exigent upon which the said Owen at the Sute of the said John Drury aforesaid in form aforesaid stood Outlawed And it was then read to him in these words JAMES by the grace of God of England Scotland France and Ireland King defender of the Faith c. To the Sherifs of Sussex greeting We command you that you put in Exigent Owen Bray late of Cobham in the County of Surry Gent. from County in County until according to the Law Custom of our Kingdom of England he be Outlawed if he shall not appear And if he shall appear then that you him take cause safely to be kept so as you have his body before our Justices at West in the morrow of the Holy Trinity to satisfie to Iohn Drury Doctor of Law as well of a certain debt of 200. pounds which the said Iohn in the said our Court before our Justices at Westminster Recovered against him as of 33. shillings and 4. pence which to the said Iohn in the same our Court were adjudged for his Damages which he had by occasion of the detaining the same Debt whereof he is Convicted And sent to our Justices at Westminster in 8. dayes of St. Hillary That the aforesaid Owen is not found in your Baliwick And have here this Writ witnesse Edward Coke at Westminster the 25th day of Ianuary in the yeer of our Reign of England France and Ireland the 5th and of Scotland the 41. Which being read and heard The said Owen said That he of the Outlawry aforesaid ought not to have him charged because the said Writ of Exigent had not any certain day of Retorn these words Saint between the word morrow and Trinity not having any signification as by the Writ aforesaid then it appeared And for the same Cause the said Owen then prayed Judgement and that the Outlawrie aforesaid in form aforesaid pronounced and had be annulled made void and altogether holden for nought Upon which the Writ aforesaid then being seen And by the Justices here then fully understood To the same Justices it then appeared That the Allegation of the aforesaid William Brown in discharge of the aforesaid Owen of the Outlawry aforesaid was true Therefore then it was considered in the said Court here that the said Owen by occasion of the Outlawry aforesaid should not be be molested or troubled but should go thereof acquitted c. as by the Record thereof in the said Court here remaining fully appeareth And so the said John Drury saith That there is not any such Record of the Outlawry aforesaid as the said Owen by his Writ and Declaration aforesaid above supposeth And this he is ready to aver whereupon he prayeth Judgement if he from execution of his Debt aforesaid and damages aforesaid against the aforesaid Owen ought to be barred c. and the aforesaid Owin saith that the aforesaid plea of the aforesaid John in form aforesaid above pleaded is not sufficient in Law to the said John his execution by Colour of the Iudgment aforesaid to have and maintain and that he to that plea in manner and form aforesaid above pleaded needs not nor by the Law of the Land is bound to answer and this he is ready to aver wherefore for default of sufficient plea of the aforesaid John in this behalf the said Owen as at first prayeth Iudgement and that the said John from his execution by colour of the Iudgment aforesaid be barred and that the said Owen be thereof charged c. and the aforesaid John in as much as he sufficient matter in Law to him the said John his execution by colour of the Iudgment aforesaid against the said Owen to have and maintain above hath alleged which he is ready to aver which matter the said Owen doth not deny nor to the same any waies answereth but the said averrant altogether refuseth as before prayeth ludgement and execution of his Debt and damages aforesaid against the said Owyn to him to be adjuged c. and because the Iustices here will avise
th year of his Reign and from thence adjorned to Westminster and there holden and from that time continued by divers prorogations untill the 4 th day of February in the year of his Reign the 27 th and then and there holden amongst other things it was enacted That the said late King Henry the 8 th his Heirs and Successors Kings of England should have hold and enjoy to him for ever the Lordships or Manor of Bishops Lynne and Gaywood amongst other with all and singular their Appurâ—enances As also all Liberties Franchises Goods and Chattels Waifes and Strays Views of Frank-pledge Courts profits of Courts and all and singular other Temporal possessions and Hereditaments with the appurtenances in Bishops Lynne and Gaywood aforesaid which late before then belonged to the late Bishop of Norwich as in the said Act of Parliament more fully appeared The said late King Hen. the 8th For that by the said Act the same Mannors and Possessions to him and his Heirs Kings of England were enacted and were willed and Ordained by the same his Letters Patents declared for him and his Heirs That the said Town of Bishops Lynne from thenceforth for ever should be named and called Kings Lynne and not by any other name and that the same name of Bishops Lynne from henceforth should be destroyed and deprived And further the said late King Henry out of his special grace and meer motion and for the love which he bore to the aforesaid his beloved and faithful Subjects The Mayor and Burgesses of his Borough of Lynne aforesaid in his County of Norfolk aforesaid and the said Borough and the Inhabitants of the same he had and bore desiring further peace quiet and tranquillity in the said Borough continually to be had and from time to time to be encreased from whence all prosperity utility and their accommodations undoubted take beginning had condescended and by the same his Letters Patents had granted for him his Heirs and Successors to the aforesaid Mayor and Burgesles and Inhabitants of his Borough aforesaid That they for ever after The name of Mayor and Burgesses of his Borough of Lynne Regis commonly called Kings Lynne in his County of Norfolk should have and enjoy and by the same name should be called and named and not by any other name And that by the same name they should be persons able and capable in Law to have and purchase Lands and Tenements Goods and Chattels and other possessions whatsoever and to plead and be impleaded answer and to be answered defend and might be defended before whatsoever Justices either Judges Temporal or Spiritual in what Court soever and in all and singular Actions â—â—uses Matters Plaints and Demands of what kind soever they should be or nature in the same manner as the other Liege people of the said late King were able and capable in Law to plead and be impleaded answer and be answered defend or might be defended as by the said Letters Patents to the Jurors aforesaid in evidence shewed amongst other things more fully appeareth And farther the Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That after the making of the said Letters Patents aforesaid that is to say the aforesaid 27 th day of Ianuary in the year of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 6 th within written The aforesaid John Payne the Testator in his life The writing Obligatory in the Declaration above specified made sealed and as his Deed delivered to the aforesaid Mayor and Burgesses of the Borough of the Lord the King of Lynne Regis commonly called Kings Lynne in his County of Norfolk in the aforesaid Letters Patents named By the name of the Mayor and Burgesses of Kings Lynne in the County of Norfolk But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid by them the said Jurors in form aforesaid found the writing Obligatory aforesaid in the Declaration within written be the Deed of the said John Payne or not the same Jurors are altogether ignorant and pray thereof the advise of the Justices and Court here c. And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by them the said Jurors in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices here That the writing aforesaid in the Declaration within written specified be the Deed of the aforesaid John Payne the Testator Then the said Jurours say upon their Oath aforesaid That the writing aforesaid is the Deed of the said John Payne the Testator and then they assess the damages of the said Mayor and Burgesses by occasion of deteining of the debt within written above their Costs and Charges by them in their sute in this behalf expended to 12. pence and for their Costs and Charges to 12. pence And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by them the Jurors in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices here That the writing aforesaid be not the Deed of the aforesaid John Payne the Testator Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the writing aforesaid is not the Deed of the aforesaid John Payne the Testator aâ— the aforesaid John Payne the Executor above in pleading hath alleaged And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before that they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the parties aforesaid untill c. To hear their Judgement thereof because the said Justices here thereof are not yet c. Dower Trinity Term Anno 80. Of King JAMES Edward Althams Case Co. 8. part fol. 14. a. THomas Lawrence and Marcy his Wife by Charles Cardinal their Attorny demand against Edward Altham Gent. and Margaret his Wife the Third part of 100. Acres of Land 10. Acres of Meadow and 60. Acres of Pasture with their Appurtenances in Gosfield as the Dower of the said Marcy of the Endowment of Thomas Nash the Elder sometimes her Husband c. And the aforesaid Edward and Margaret by John Rowley their Attorny come and say That the aforesaid Thomas and Marcy the Dower of the said Marcy of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. Of the Endowment of the said Thomas Nash sometimes Husband c. Against them ought not to have because they say That the said Thomas Nash sometimes the Husand c. Was seized of the Tenements aforesaid whereof c. In his Demesn as of Fee and held the same of John Wentworth Esq as of his Mannor of Gosfield with the Appurtenances in the County aforesaid in Free Socage that is to say by Fealty only for all manner of Services and Demands And the said Thomas so of the Appurtenances whereof c. being seised The 10 th day of April in the yeer 1592. at Gosfield aforesaid made his Testament and last Will in writing And by the same his last Will willed and bequeathed the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof to one Zachary Nash Younger Son of the same Thomas Nash To have and to hold to the said Zachary for term of his
within conteyned before Thomas Walmsley one of the Justices of the Lady the Queen of the Bench and Edward Fennes one of the Justices of the said Lady the Queen of pleas before the Queen her self holden assigned Justices of the said Lady the Queen to take Assises in the County of Dorset assigned by the form of the statute c. came aswell the within named George Stroud Esquire by Thomas Clayton his Attorny as the within named Ralph Horsey Knight Richard Veal and Edward Goor by Henry Collier their Attorny and the Jurors of the Jury whereof within mention is made some of them appeared and some of them did not appear as it appeareth in the pannel c. and some of the Jurors now appearing that is to say Richard Ham Thomas Tooner John Burt Henry Hâ—rbyn Gentleman John Young Gentleman John Butler Gentleman William Withington John Payn and Christorher Dolling in the Jury aforesaid are sworn and some of the said Jurors now appearing that is to say Thomas Heal Edward Carter Robert Chippe Henry Squib and George Frome because they between the parties aforesaid are found to be suspicious from the pannel aforesaid they were utterly drawn out and because the rest of the Jurors of the said Jury did not appear therefore others of the standers by by the Sheriff aforesaid to that being chosen at the request of the said George Stroud and by the Command of the Justices aforesaid were of new put whose names to the pannel within written are fyled according to the form of the statute in such case thereof late made and is provided and the Jurors so nâ—w put that is to say Clement Jay Nicholas Brown and Thomas Eyres being called likewise appeared who to say the truth of the matters within conteyned together with the other Jurors aforesaid first impanelled Chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath aforesaid that the Tenement within written in which it is supposed the Trespass and Ejectment within written to be are and time whereof the memory of men is not to the Contrary were parcel of the Mannor of Nether Melcum otherwise called Melcum Bingham with the appurtenances and that the said Mannor of Neither Melcum otherwise Melcum Biugham with the appurtenances whereof c. lyeth within the Parish of Melcum in the County aforesaid and that before the time within written in which the Trespass and Ejectment within written was supposed to be done one Robert Bingham the elder was seised for the aforesaid Mannor of Nether Melcum otherwise Melcum Bingham with the appurtenances whereof c. in his demesne as of Fee and so thereof seised held the said Mannor with the appurtenances of one John Hrosey Knight as of his Mannor of Melcam otherwise Horseys Melcum otherwise Starges Melcum in the County aforesaid by Knight service that is to say by Homage and Fealty and Escuage to the Lady the Queen of 40. shillings when it should happen 2. shillings and for more more and less less c. and the said Robert Bingham being so seised before the time within written in which c. that is to say the morrow of the Holy Trinity in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 12 a sine was levyed in the Court of the said Lady the Queen at Westminster in the County of Middlesex before James Dyer Richard Weston Richard Harper then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench and other the Queens faithfull people then present between Thomas Buckley and Henry Gawen Gentlemen plaintifs and the said Robert Bingham the Elder Deforceant Of the Mannor of Neither Melcum otherwise Melcum Bingham aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. by the names of the Mannor of Nether Melcum otherwise Melcum Bingham aforesaid with the appurtenances and 5 Messuages 4 Tofts 4 Barns 5 Gardens 2 Orchards 120 Acres of Land 30 Acres of Meadow 300 Acres of pasture 8 Acres of Wood and 20 Acres of Furze and Heath with the appurtenances in Nether Melcum other wise Binghams Melcum whereupon a plea of Covenant was between them in the said Court that is to say that the said Robert Bingham did acknowlege the said Mannor and Tenements with the appurtenances to be the right of the said Thomas Buckley as that with the said Thomas Buckley and Henry Gawen had of the gift of the said Robert Bingham and then released and quit claimed from him and his heirs to the said Thomas Buckley and Henry Gawen and the heirs of the said Thomas for ever And afterwards the said Robert Bingham granted for him and his heirs that they would warrant to the said Thomas Buckley and Henry Gawen and to the heirs of the said Thomas the aforesaid Mannor and Tenements with the appurtenances against all men for ever the Tenor of which Fine followeth in these ss Dorset ss This is a final concord made in the Court of the Lady the Queen at Westminster in the morrow of the holy Trinity in the year of the Reign of Elizabeth by the grace of God of England France and Ireland Queen defender of the faith c. from the Conquest the 12th before James Dyer Richard Weston and Richard Harper Justices and other the Queens faithfull people there present Between Thomas Buckley and Henry Gawen Gentlemen plaintifs and Robert Bingham Esquire Deforceant of the Mannor of Neither Melcum otherwise Binghams Melcum with the appurtenances and of 5 Messuages 4 Tofts 4 Barns 5 Gardens 2 Orchards 12â— Acres of Land 30 Acres of Meadow 100 Acres of pasture 8 Acres of wood and 20 Acres of Furz and Heath in Nether Melcum otherwise Binghams Melcum whereupon a plea of Covenant was between them in the said Court that is to say that the said Robert acknowledged the aforesaid Mannor Tenements with the appurtenances to be the right of the said Thomas and those which the said Thomas and Henry had of the gift of the aforesaid Robert and the same released and quit claimed from him and his heirs to the said Thomas and Henry and the heirs of the said Thomas for ever And farther the said Robert granteth for him and his heirs that they warrant to the aforesaid Thomas and Henry and to the heirs of the said Thomas the aforesaid Mannor and Tenements with the appurtenances against all men for ever and for this Recognition remission and quit claym warranty and Concord the said Thomas and Henry give to the said Robert 150 pound sterling which said Fine of the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid whereof c. in form aforesaid Levied was had and Levyed to the use of the said Robert Bingham the Elder and Jane his wife and the heirs of the said Robert for ever by virtue whereof and by force of a certain Act of Parliament of transferring of uses into possession made at Westminster in the year of the Reign of the late King Henry the 8th of England the 27th made and provided the said Robert Bingham the elder and Jane were
Messuage and 26 Acres of Land in which c. amongst other in form aforesaid being seised the said Richard before the aforesaid time in which c. at Lugarshall in the said County of Wilts of such his estate dyed thereof seised and the aforesaid Johanna him over-lived and held her self in the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land in which c. amongst other and was thereof sole seised in her demesn as of Fee tail in form aforesaid the remainder thereof over as before is said and farther the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath that the said Johanna being thereof so seised The aforesaid Anthony Bridges the 4 day of December in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 32 th at Walcot aforesaid by his Indenture made between the aforesaid Anthony Bridges Son of the aforesaid Richard and Johanna and Barbara then wife of the said Anthony and one Edward Langford Gentleman by the name of Anthony Bridges of West-Shefford otherwise great Shefford in the County of Berks. Esquire and Barbara his wife and Edward Langford of Lincolnes Inn Gentleman of the one part and one George Brown Knight by the name of George Brown Esquire second Son of the right Honourable Anthony Viscount of the most noble order of the Garter Knight of the other part which other part with the Seals of the said Anthony Bridges Barbara and Edward Langford Sealed bearing date the same day and year to the Jurors aforesaid in evidence shewed it was Covenanted granted condescended unto concluded and fully agreed by and between the said parties to the said Indenture in manner and form following That is to say that the said Anthony Bridges Son of the said Richard Bridges and Johanna and Edward Langford covenanted and granted for them their heirs and assigns to and with the aforesaid George Brown his Heirs and assigns by the same Indenture that they the said Anthony Bridges Son of the aforesaid Richard Bridges and Johanna and Barbara together with the aforesaid Edward Langford before Easter Term then next following would levy and acknowledge before the Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench at Westminster one Fine or diverse Fines with the proclamations according to the course of Fines in the said Court used to the aforesaid George Brown of all that Mannor of Kintbury with all and singular the Rights members and appurtenances in the aforesaid County of Berks. And of all Messuages Lands and Tenements Rents Services Advowsons Patronages Liberties Privileges Profits and Hereditaments with all and singular their appurtenances to the said Mannor belonging or appertayning and also of the aforesaid whole Tenements within specified by the name of Lands Tenements and Hereditaments with the appurtenances called or known by the name of Walcot lying in Swindon within written whereof the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Lands then were and yet are parcel As also of all messuages Cottages Lands Tenements Rents Services and Hereditaments whatsoever to the same belonging occupied reputed demised or taken as part or parcel thereof by the name of 40 Messuages 20 Tofts 1 Dove-house 30 Gardens 20 Orchards 1000 Acres of Land 300 Acres of Meadow 1000 Acres of Pasture 100 Acres of Wood 500 Acres of Furz and Heath and 40 shillings of free Rent with the appurtenances in Kintbury Holt Hungerford Walcot and Swindon in the Counties of Berks. and Wilts or by whatsoever number of Acres either sole or together with any other Mannors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments and that the aforesaid Fine or the aforesaid Fines concerning the premises in the said indenture before mentioned and the execution of the Fine or Fines should be and be to the use of the said George Brown and his heirs and assigns for ever to no other use intent or purpose And the said Jurors farther say That in performance and accomplishment of a Covenant and agreement in the said Indenture between the said Anthony Bridges the Son of the said Richard and Johanna Barbara and Edward Langford and the said George Brown in form aforesaid mentioned afterwards and before the aforesaid â—aster Term That is to say in the Term of Saint Hillary in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 32 th aforesaid a certain Fine was Levied in the Court of the said Lady the Queen at Westminster in the county of Middlesex before Edmund Anderson Francis Windham William Periam and Thomas Walmesly then Justices of the said Lady the Queen and other the Lady the Queens faithfull people then there present between the aforesaid George Brown plaintiff and the aforesaid Anthony Bridges Son of the said Richard and Johanna and Barbara his Wife and Edward Langford Gentleman deforceant of the whole Tenements in the said Indenture specified whereof the said Messuage and 26 Acres of Lands are and at the time of the levying of the said Fine were parcel amongst other by the names of the Mannors of Kintbury and Fally otherwise great Fally with the appurtenances and 60 Messuages 20 Tofts 3 Dovehouses 40 Gardens 50 Orchards 4000 Acres of Lands 300 Acres of Meadow 4000 Acres of Pasture 300 Acres of Wood 1000 Acres of Furz and Heath and 6 pound 13 shillings 4 pence of Rent with the appurtenances in Kintbury Holt Fally otherwise great Fally Hungerford and West Shefford otherwise great Shefford as also of the Rectory of great Fally with the appurtenances and Free Warren and liberty of a Park in West Shefford otherwise great Shefford and also of the Free Fishings Kennet in the County of Berkss And of the Mannor of Baddesden with the appurtenances and 20 Messuages 10 Tofts 12 Gardens 8 Orchards 1000 Acres of Land 100 Acres of Meadow 1000 Acres of pasture 200 Acres of Wood 500 Acres of Furz and Heath and 40 shillings Rent with the appurtenances in Baddesden Lugershall Walcot and Swindon in the County of Wilts whereupon a plea of Covenant was summoned between them in the said Court that is to say That the said Anthony Barbara and Edward acknowledge the said Mannors Tenements Hereditaments Rectorie Warren liberty and Fishing with the appurtenances in the said Fine conteined to be the right of the said George as those which the said George had of the gift of the said Anthony and the same remised and quit claimed from the said Anthony Barbara and Edward and their heirs to the aforesaid George and his heirs for ever And besides the said Anthony and Barbara granted for them and the heirs of the said Anthony that they warrant to the aforesaid George his Heirs and Assigns the aforesaid Mannors Tenementâ— Rents Rectorie Warren and Liberties and Fishing with the appurtenances in the same Fine conteined against the said Edward and his heirs for ever and for this Recognition release quit claym warranty Fine and Concord the said George granted to the aforesaid Edward a certain yearly Rent of 100 pound to be going out of in the aforesaid Mannors
not yet concealed nor detained but the Rents and the Reversions thereof to the said Lord the King and Lady the Queen then were answered And that Mannor was in charge and account of Record and the Rents and the Reversions thereof to the said late King and Queen Philip and Mary were answered But whether the Lands and Tenements in the Declaration above mentioned by the said Letters Patents to the aforesaid George Howard Kt. passed or not the Jurors aforesaid are ignorant and thereof pray the Advice and Consideration of the Court in the premises And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices of the Court That the aforesaid Lands and Tenements in the Declaration aforesaid mentioned by the aforesaid Letters Patents of the Lord Philip and Mary late King and Queen of England to the aforesaid George Howard did passe Then the Jurors aforesaid say that the aforesaid Edward Cockle is not guilty of the Trespasse and Ejectment as he before in pleading hath alleged And if upon the whole matter by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices and Court That the Lands and Tenements in the Declaration within written by the aforesaid Letters Patents of the Lord Philip and Mary King and Queen of England to the said George Howard passed not c. False Imprisonment Michaelmass Term in the 6th yeer of King JAMES in the COMMMON-PLEAS Doctor Bonhams Case Co. 8. part London HEnry Atkins of London Doctor of Physick George Turner of London Doctor of Physick Thomas Moundford of London Doctor of Physick John Argent of London Doctor of Physick John Taylor of London Yeoman And William Bowden of London Yeoman were Attached to answer to Thomas Bonham of London Doctor in Philosophy and of Physick of a Plea wherefore they together with William Dun of London Doctor of Physick and Richard Ware of London Skinner with force and Arms him the said Thomas Bonham took imprisoned and evil handled and him in Prison against the Law and Custom of the Kingdom of England did long detain and other harms to him did to the great damage of the said Thomas Bonham and against the Peace of the Lord the King that now is c And whereupon the same Thomas Bonham by Richard Coke his Attorny complaineth That the aforesaid Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden together c. the 10th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 4th with force and Arms him the said John in the Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap took and imprisoned and evilly handled and him there so in Prison a long time that is to say by the space of 7. dayes against the Law and Custom of this Kingdom of England detained and other harms c. to the great damage c. and against the Peace c. whereupon he saith that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 300. pounds and thereof bringeth sute c. And the aforesaid Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden by Francis Barker their Attorny come and defend the force and injury when c. And as to the coming with force and Arms say That they are not thereof guilty And of that put themselves upon the Country and the aforesaid Thomas Bonham likewise And as to the rest of the Trespass and Imprisonment aforesaid above supposed to be done The said Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and VVilliam Bowden say That the aforesaid Thomas Bonham his Action aforesaid against them ought not to have because they say That before the aforesaid time in which it is supposed the aforesaid Trespasse and Imprisonment to be done The Lord Henry late King of England the 8th the 23d day of September in the yeer of his Reign 〈◊〉 by his Letters Patents which the said Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden with his great Seal of England sealed bearing date at VVestminster the same day and yeer here in Court brought Reciting Wherereas he thought it the duty of his Kingly Office in all reason to provide for the good and welfare of his People That would first of all be done if he might in due season meet with the enterprizes of wicked men first therefore ye held it necessary to restrain the boldness of wicked men who professed Physick more for avarice than out of confidence of a good Conscience Whereupon very many incommodities did arise to the rude and credulous Cōmon-people Therefore partly imitating the example of the well-governed Cities and other Nations inclined thereunto at the request of the grave Men and Doctors John Chambre Thomas Linacre Ferdinand de Victoria his Physicians of Nicholas Hatswel John Francisco and Robert Yoxley Physicians and chiefly of the right Reverend Father in Christ and Lord Thomas titled of the Holy Church beyond Tyber Priest of the most Holy Church of Rome Cardinal of York Arch-Bishop and our Well beloved Chancellor of our Kingdom of England A College perpetual of Doctors and Grave Men who Physick in his City of London and the Suburbs and within 7. Miles from the said City every way might publickly exercise he Willed and commanded to be instituted to whom for his honour and in the name of the publick good and care as he hoped the ignorance and rashness of the malitious which he remembred as well by their example and gravity to deterr as by his Lawes late made and and by Constitution to be made by the same College to punish Which that they might more easily well accomplish to the remembred Doctors John Chambers Thomas Linacre Ferdinand de Victoria his Physicians Nicholas Hatswel John Francisco and Robert Yoxley Physicians he granted that they and all Men of the same faculty of and in the City aforesaid should be in deed and Name one Body and Comminalty perpetual or College perpetual and that the said Comminalty or College every yeer for ever might chose and make of that Cōminaltie any diligent man and skilful in the faculty of Physick to be President of the said College or Comminalty to oversee rule and govern for that yeer the College or Comminalty aforesaid and all men of the said faculty and their businesses And that the said President and College or Comminalty should have perpetual succession and a Common Seal to serve for the businesses of the said Comminalty and President for ever And that they and their Successors for ever should be persons able and capable to purchase and possesse in Fee and for ever Lands Tenements Rents and other possessions whatsoever He also granted to them and their Successors for him and his Heirs That they and their Successors might purchase to them and their Successors aswell in the said City as out of it Lands and Tenements whatsover not
examined strictly by the said Supervisors according to the form devised by the said Elects and also by the said Supervisors approved as by the said Act amongst other things more fully appeareth And the said Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William further say That afterwards and before the time in which c. By another Act of Parliament of the Lady Mary the Queen of England the 24th day of October in the year of the Reign the first at Westminster aforesaid That whereas in the Parliament holden at London the 5th day of April in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th the 14th and from thence adjourned unto VVestminster the last day of June in the yeer of his Reign the 15th and there holden It was Enacted That a certain grant by Letters Patents of Incorporation made and granted by the aforesaid late King to the Physicians of London and all clauses and Articles contained in the said grant should be approved granted ratified and confirmed by the said Parliament In consideration whereof It was Enacted by the Authority of the same Parliament That the aforesaid Statute and Act of Parliament in all the Articles and clauses in the same contained from thenceforth for ever should stand and continue in full strength force and effect any Statute Law Custom or any thing made had or used to the Contrary in any thing notwithstanding And for the better Reformation of divers enormities happening to the Commonwealth by the evill usage and undue administration of Physick and for the amplifying and inlarging of the last Articles for the better execution of the things in the aforesaid grants conteined it was further Enacted That whensoever the President of the College or Comminalty of the faculty of Physick in London for the time being or such as the aforesaid President and College yearly according to the Tenor and meaning of the same Act should authorize to search examine and correct and punish all offenders and transgressors in the aforesaid faculty within the same City and precinct in the aforesaid Act expressed should send or commit such offender or offenders for his or their offences or disobedience contrary to any Article or Clause conteined in the aforesaid grant or Act to any Ward Gaol or Prison within the aforesaid City and precinct aforesaid the Tower of London excepted that then and from time to time the Warders Gaolers and Keepers of the Wards Gaols and Prisons within the City or precinct aforesaid the Tower of London excepted should receive into his or their Prisons all and every such person or persons so offending which should be sent or committed to him or them as aforesaid and there safely should keep the person or persons so committed into any of their Prisons at the proper costs and charges of the person or persons so committed without Bail or main prise until such offender offenders or disobedients be discharged of the aforesaid imprisonment by the aforesaid President and such persons as by the aforesaid College should be authorized upon pain that every such Warder Gaoler or Keeper doint the contrary should lose and forfeit double of such fine and amercement as such offender or offenders or disobedients should be assessed to pay by such as the said President and College as should be authorized as before is said so as the said Fine and Amercement should not be at any time above the sum of 20 pound the moiety whereof to be imployed to the use of the said late Queen her Heirs and Successors and the other moiety to the aforesaid President and College all which forfeiture should be recovered by Action of debt Bill Plaint or Information in any of the said late Queens her heirs or successors Courts of Record against any such Warden Gaoler or Keeper so offending in which no Essoin wager of Law nor Protection should be allowed nor be admitted for the defendant And further it was Enacted by the authority of the said Parliament That all Justices Mayors Sheriffs Bayliffs Constables and other Ministers and Officers within the City and precinct aforesaid upon request to them made should help aid and assist the President of the aforesaid College and all persons by them from time to time authorized for the due execution of the said Act or Statute upon pain for not giving of help to them of being in cōtempt of the said late Queen her Heirs and Successors as by the same Act amongst other things more fully appeareth And the said Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William further say That by virtue of the said Letters Patents and by force of the Statutes aforesaid One Thomas Langhton Doctor of Physick a man diligent and skilful in the faculty of Physick and then one of the Comminalty of the College of Physitions in London aforesaid before the time in which c. that is to say the 30 th day of September in the year 1605. at the College of Physicians situate in London in the Parish of Saint Bennet-Pauls-Wharf in the Ward of Baynards Castle was duly chosen President of the College aforesaid and then and there held the said Office of President of the College aforesaid And the said Thomas Langton being President of the College aforesaid The same President and Cōminalty of the College aforesaid the same 30th day of September in the yeer 1606 abovesaid at the College aforesaid chose Ralph Wilkinson William Du◠Richard Palmer and John Argent diligent men and skilful in the faculty of Physick and then being 4. Doctors of the College aforesaid to be the 4. Censors or Governours of the Comminalty aforesaid to oversee teach correct and govern all and singular Physicians of the said City using the faculty of Physick in the said City and other forein Physicians whomsoever frequenting to and using the said faculty of Physick any wayes within the said City the Suburbs thereof or within 7. Miles in circuit of the same City and to punish their defects in not well exercising doing and using the same As also to oversee and search all manner of Medicines and their Receipts by the said Physicians or any of them for curing of infirmities as often as need should be And to punish the said Physicians Delinquents exercising the said faculty of Physick by Fines Amercements and Imprisonment of their Bodies and other wayes reasonable and fitting according to the form and effect of the said Letters Patents and the Statutes aforesaid And the said Thomas Langton being President of the College aforesaid and the aforesaid Ralph Wilkinson William Dun Richard Palmer and John Argent being likewise the 4. Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid The aforesaid Thomas Bonham within the aforesaid time in which c. That is to say the 10th day of Aprill in the yeer of our Lord 1606. within London aforesaid in the aforesaid Parish of the blessed Lady of Bow in the Ward of Cheap aforesaid
year of our Lord 1595 above said in the University aforesaid at Cambridge aforesaid in the County of Cambridge was duly and lawfully ordained and made a Graduate of â—â—e University aforesaid that is to say Doctor in Physick according to the Lawes Statutes Constitutions and ordinances of the said University of Cambridge aforesaid and that he the said Thomas Bonham then and there had accomplished all things concerning his Degree aforesaid by his form without grace from time to time according to the Lawes Statutes Constitutions and Ordinances of the said University of Cambridge aforesaid By colour whereof the same Thomas Bonham a Graduate of the University of Cambridge aforesaid that is to say being Doctor in Physick in the form aforesaid who had accomplished all things concerning his Degree aforesaid for his form without any grace The said faculty of Physick from time to time in the said City of London that is to say in the aforesaid Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap aforesaid did exercise as it was lawful for him to do until the aforesaid Henry Atkins George Turner Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden together with c. the aforesaid 10th day of November in the 4th yeer abovesaid with force and Arms him the said Thomas Bonham at London aforesaid in the aforesaid Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap took and imprisoned and him there in Prison long that is to say by the space of 7. dayes against the Law and Custom of this Kingdom of England did detain as the aforesaid Thomas Bonham above against them complaineth and this he is ready to averr Whereupon in as much as the aforesaid Henry Atkins George Turner Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden the Trespasse and Imprisonment aforesaid above have acknowledged The said Thomas Bonham demandeth Judgement and his damages by reason of the Trespasse and Imprisonment aforesaid to be adjudged unto him c. And the aforesaid Henry Atkins George Turner Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden say That the aforesaid Plea of the aforesaid Thomas Bonham above by Replication pleaded is not sufficient in Law to the Action of the aforesaid Thomas Bonham against them the said Henry Atkins George Turner Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden to maintain and that they to that Plea in manner and form aforesaid by Replication pleaded need not nor by the Law of the Land are bound to answer and this they are ready to averr whereupon they demand Judgement and that the said Thomas Bonham from having his Action aforesaid against them to be barred And the aforesaid Thomas Bonham for as much as he sufficient matter in Law to maintain his Action aforesaid against the said Henry Atkins George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden above hath alleged which he is ready to aver which matter the aforesaid Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden do not deny nor to the same any wayes answer but the same averment altogether to admit do refuse as at first he demands Judgement and his damages by occasion of the Trespasse and Imprisonment aforesaid to be adjudged to him c. And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises aforesaid whereof the parties have put themselves to the Judgement of the Court aforesaid before that they give their Judgement thereof Day is given to the parties here until in 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the Justices here are not yet c. Formedon Michaelmass Term Anno 37. 38. Eliz. Rot. 82. in the COMMON PLEAS Lincoln College Case C. 3. part fol. 53. a. Robert Chamberlain Esq by Apollo Plain his Attorny demandeth against the Warden or Rector and Scholars of the Blessed Lady Mary and All Saints of Lincoln in the University of Oxford the Mannors of Pettesho and Eckney with the appurtenances Except 120. Acres of Pasture in Pettesho aforesaid and 30. Acres of Pasture in Eckney aforesaid which Alured Cornburgh Esq Richard Danvers Esq Nicholas Statham and William Callow gave to Richard Chamberlain Esq and Sibil Fowler and the Heirs Males of the Body of the said Richard Chamberlain begotten And which after the death of the aforesaid Richard and Sibil and of Edward Son and Heir of the said Edward Chamberlain and of Leonard Son and Heir of the said Edward and of Francis Son and Heir of the said Leonard to the aforesaid Robert Son and Heir of the aforesaid Francis ought to descend by the form of the gift aforesaid c. Whereupon he saith That the aforesaid Alured Connâ—burgh Richard Danâ—â—rs Nicholas and William gave the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain and Sibil and to the Heirs Males of the Body of the said Richard Chamberlain begotten in form aforesaid c. By which gift the said Richard and Sibil were seised of the said Mannors with the appurtenances that is to say the said Richard in his Demesn as of Fee and Right and the said Sibil in her Demesn as of Free hold by the form c. in the time of peace in the time of the Lord Ed. late King of England the 4th after the Conquest taking thereof the profits to the yeerly value c. And from him the said Richard the Right descended by the form to one Edward as Son and Heir c. And from him the said Edward the Right descended by the form c. to one Leonard as Son and Heir c. And from him the said Leonard the Right descended by the form c. to one Francis as Son and Heir c. And from the said Fran. Son of the said Leonard the Right descended by the form c. to this Robert who now demandeth as Son and Heir c. And which after the death c. And thereof bringeth Sute c. And the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars by William Pain their Attorny come and defend their Right when c. And say That the aforesaid Robert Chamberlain his Action aforesaid against them ought not to have By protestation taking it That the aforesaid Alured Cornburgh Richard Danvers Nicholas Stathum and William Collow did not give the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain and Sibil Fowler in manner and form as in the Declaration aforesaid is alleged For Plea say That long after the time in which the gift aforesaid is supposed to be made Richard Lyster Gent. Martin Linsey John Cotesford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor Clerks were seised of the Mannors aforesaid with th appurtenances in their Demesn as of Fee and so being thereof seised The aforesaid Sibil Great-Grandmother of the said Robert Chamberlain whose Heir the same Robert is The 5th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord Henry late King of England
the 8th the 11th at Pettesâ—o aforesaid By her certain Writing of Release which the said Warden or Rector and Scholars with the Seal of the aforesaid Sibil sealed here in Court bring whose date is the same day and yeer remised released and altogether for her and her Heirs for ever quit claimed to the aforesaid Richard Lyster Martin Linsey John Coteford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor then of the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances in form aforesaid being seized in their full and peaceable possession then being their Heirs and Assignes for ever All her Right Claim Title Use Interest and Demand which ever she had now hath or at any time after might have of and in the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances And further the said Sibil by her aforesaid Writing granted for her and her Heirs That she the said Sibil and her Heirs the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances to the said Richard Lyster Martin Linsey John Coteford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor their Heirs and Assignes against the then Abbot of Westminster and his Successors would warrant and for ever defend as by the said Writing of Release more fully appeareth And this the said Warden or Rector and Scholars are ready to averr whereupon they demand Judgement if the aforesaid Robert Chamberlain against the aforesaid Writing of Release the said Warranty of the said Sibil his Ancestor whose Heir the said Robert is in it contained his Action aforesaid against them ought to have c. And the aforesaid Robert Chamberlain saith that he for any thing before alleged to have his Action aforesaid ought not to be barred because he saith That long before the aforesaid Deed and before the aforesaid Alured Richard Danvers Nicholas Stathum and William Collow had any thing in the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances The aforesaid Richard Chamberlain was seized of the aforesaid Mannors with the appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee And the said Richard so thereof being seized before the gift aforesaid that is to say the 12th day of June in the yeer of the Lord Edward late King of England the 4th after the Conquest the 11th The aforesaid Richard Danvers Alured Cornburgh Nicholas Stathum and William Collow out of the Court of the Chancery of the said late King Edward the 4th at Westminster in the County of Middlesex then being brought and prosecuted a certain Writ of the said late King Edward the 4th of Right against the said Richard Chamberlain then being Tenant of the Free hold of the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenaces amongst other things to the then Sheriff of the County of Buckingham directed By which Writ the said late King then and there commanded the said Sherif That he should command the said Richard Chamberlain by the name of Richard Chamberlain Esq that justly and without delay he render to the said Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas and William by the names of Richard Danvers Alured Gorneburgh Esq Nicholas Stathum and William Collow the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other by the names of the Mannors of Pettesho and Eckney with the appurtenances 6. Messuages 200. Acres oâ— Land 20. Acres of Medow 200. Acres of Pasture 100. shillings Rent with the appurtenances in Pettesho Eckney Emberton which he claimeth to be his Right Inheritance And whereupon they complained Chamberlain them unjustly deforced and unlesse he do and the aforesaid Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas and William Collow should him the said Sheriâ— secure to prosecute their claim That then he summon by good summoners the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain that he be before the then Justices of the said late King Edward the 4th here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid from the 15. day of St. John the Baptist then nexâ— following to shew wherefore ye shoâ—ld not do And that he have then this summons and that Writ Because Thomas Rokes Esq Chief Lord of the same Fee remised thereof his Court to the said late King Edward the 4th At which 15. dayes of John the Baptist before Thomas Brian Kt. and his Companions then Justices of the said late King Edward the 4th of the Bench here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid came aswell the aforesaid Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas Stathum and William Collow by Thomas Gurney their Attorny as the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain by John Wildstall then his Attorny And then the Sherif of the aforesaid County of Buckingham that is to say Reginald Gray Esq then there returned the Writ aforesaid to him in form aforesaid directed in all things served and executed and sent that the aforesaid Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas and VVilliam Collow found to the said then Sherif sureties to prosecute his Writ aforesaid that is to say Richard Doo and Iohn Roo And that the said Richard Chamberlain was summoned by Iames Tye and Iohn Baker good summoners c. And hereupon The said Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas Stathum and William Callow by the said Thomas Gurney their Attorney in the said Court of the aforesaid late King Edward the 4th of the Bench here that is to say at Wostminster aforesaid at the 15. dayes aforesaid of St. Iohn Baptist Declared against the said Richard Chamberlain of and upon their Writ aforesaid and upon their Writ aforesaid by the same Thomas Gurney demanded against the aforesaid Richard Chambrlain the Mannors Tenements Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in the said Writ of Right specified as their Right and inheritance by the aforesaid Writ of the said late King Edward the 4th because the aforesaid Thomas Rokes Chief Lord of the same Fee Released thereof his Court to the said late King And whereupon then they said That they themselves were seized of the Mannors aforesaid and of the Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in the said Writ of Right specified in their Demesn as of Fee and Right in the time of Peace in the time of the said late King Edward the 4th taking the profits therof to the value c. And that such is their Right then they did offer c. And the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain by the aforesaid John Wildstaâ—e by his Attorny came and defended the Right of the said Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas and William when c. And their seisin of which seisin c. as of Fee and Right c. And all c. And chiefly of the Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in the said Writ of Right specified and then vouched hereof to warranty Robert King who was present in the same Court in his proper person and willingly the Mannors and Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in the said Writ of Right specified to them then did warrant c. Whereupon the aforesaid Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas and William then demanded against the aforesaid Robert Tenant by his warranty the Mannors Tenements and Hereditaments aforesaid in the said Writ of Right specified in form aforesaid c.
mentioned of which wound the said Richard Fells then and there that is to say in the Parish and Ward last aforesaid instantly dyed And futher the Jurors aforesaid say That at the time of the Killing of the aforesaid Rich. Fells in maner and form aforesaid The said Jo. Murray and John Engles otherwise English were present aiding to the said John Mackall otherwise Mackalley to him the said Richard Fells in manner aforesaid to be killed But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found The killing aforesaid of the said Richard Fells in form aforesaid don be Murther or not the Jurors aforesaid do not know And thereof demand the Advise of the Justices and Court here and if upon the whole matter aforesaid It shall seem to the Justices and Court here That the aforesaid killing of the aforesaid Richard Fells be Murder Then the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid John Murray John Mackally and Iohn English are guilty and every one of them is guilty of the Murder of the said Richard Fells in manner and form as by the Indictment aforesaid against them it is supposed And that they at the time of Murder aforesaid in form aforesaid committed had no Goods or Chattels Lands or Tenements to the knowledge of the Jurors aforesaid And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices and Court here That the aforesaid killing of the aforesaid Richard Fells in form aforesaid committed be not Murder Then the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Iohn Murray Iohn Mackall and Iohn Engles are not guilty nor any of them is guilty of the Murther of the aforesaid Richard Fells as they have alleged nor for that occasion ever with-drew themselves or any of them with-drew himself And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form foresaid found It shall seem to the Justices and Court here That the killing of the aforesaid Richard Fells in form aforesaid done be Fellony or Man-slaughter Then the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Iohn Murray Iohn Mackall and Iohn Engles are guilty and every of them is guilty of the Felony and Man-slaughter aforesaid And that they have no goodâ— nor Chattels Lands or Tenements And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Archibald Miller in the said Indictment named of the Felony and Murder aforesaid is not guilty nor for that occasion ever with-drew himself Therefore it is considered by the Court That the aforesaid Archibald Miller go thereof acquitted without day c. And because the Court here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises concerning the aforesaid Iohn Murray Iohn Mackall and Iohn Engles are not yet avised Day is given to the aforesaid Iohn Murray Iohn Mackall and Iohn Engles until the next Sessions of Gaol Delivery aforesaid for the aforesaid City to be holden under the Custody of the aforesaid Sherifs in the mean while committed safely to be kept for to hear their Judgement thereof c. And because the Justices aforesaid are not yet c. Indictments The Record of the Conviction of Carliel and others The Lord Sanchars Case C. 9. part fol. 114. THE Inquisition taken at the Sessions of the Peace of the Lord the King for the City of London at the Guild-hall of the City of London aforesaid upon VVednesday the 27th day of May In the yeer of the Reign of our Lord Iames by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith c. the 10th and of Scotland the 45th before James Pemberton Knight Mayor of the City of London aforesaid Stephen Soan Knight John Garrad Knight Thomas Bennet Knight Thomas Low Knight Henry Row Knight and Henry Mountague Knight one of the Sergeants at Law of the Lord the King and Recorder of the said City Justices of the said Lord the King to the Peace in the City aforesaid to be kept As also to divers Felonies Trespasses and misdeeds in the said City committed to hear determine assigned by the oaths of William Palmer John Pemberton Edward Bishop John Harrison William Erbury Thomas Nicholson Humphry VVaterson John Woodhall Zachary Healing Richard Downes Thomas Eagles Thomas Dennis Richard Taylor Meredith â—roughton and Ralph Hanson good and lawful men of the Body of the City aforesaid Who say upon their Oath aforesaid That Robert Carliel late of London Yeoman and John Jrweng late of London aforesaid Yeoman Not having God before their Eyes but moved and seduced by the Instigation of the Devil The 11th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of our Lord James by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith c. and of Scotland the 45th at London aforesaid that is to say in the Parish of St. Dunston in the East in the Ward of Farrington without London aforesaid with force and Armes c. Feloniously on their fore though Malice in and upon one John Turner then and there being in the Peace of God and of the said Lord the King made an assault and an affray And the aforesaid Robert Carliel a certain Gun called a Pistol of the value of 5. shillings then and there charged with Gunpowder and one leaden Bullet which Gun the aforesaid Robert Carliel in his Right Hand then and there had and held in and upon the aforesaid John Turner then and there Feloniously voluntarily and of his fore-thought Malice did shoot off and discharge And the aforesaid Robert Carliel with the leaden Bullet aforesaid from the Gun aforesaid then and there sent out the aforesaid John Turner in and upon the Left part of the Body of him the said John Turner neer the Left Papp of the said John Turner then and there feloniously struck giving to the said John Turner then and there with the leaden Bullet aforesaid out of the Gun aforesaid then and there sent out in and upon the aforesaid Left part of the Body of the said Iohn Turner neer the aforesaid Left Papp of the said Iohn Turner one mortal Wound of the Bâ—edth of half of one Inch and in the Depth of 5. Inches of which mortal Wound the aforesaid Iohn Turner at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid instantly dyed And that Iames Irweng Feloniously and of his fore-thought Malice then and there was present adjoyning assisting abbetting comforting and maintaining the aforesaid Robert Carliel to the Felony and Murder aforesaid in form aforesaid Feloniously to be done and committed And so the Jurors aforesaid upon their Oath aforesaid say That the aforesaid â—obert Carliel and Iames Irweng the aforesaid Iohn Turner at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid in manner and form aforesaid Feloniously Voluntarily and of their fore-thought Malice did kill and murder contrary to the Peace of the Lord the King that now is his Crown
and Dignity c. And afterwards That is to say at the Gaol Delivery of the Lord the King at Newgate holden by the City of London aforesaid at the Justice Hall situate in the Old Baly in the Parish of St. Sepulcher in the Ward of Farrington without London aforesaid the 23d day of Iune in the yeer of the Reign of the said our Lord Iames by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland the 10th and of Scotland the 45th before Iames Pemberton Knight Mayor of the City of London aforesaid The right Reverend Father in God Iohn Bishop of London Thomas Flemming Knight Lord Chief Justice of the Lord the King to Pleas before the King himself to be holden assigned Edward Coke Kt. Chief Justice of the said Lord the King of the Bench Lawrence Tanfeild Knight Chief Baron of the Exchequer of the Lord the King Christopher Yelverton Knight one of the Justices of the said Lord the King to Pleas before the King himself to be holden assigned David Williams Knight another of the Justices of the said Lord the King to Pleas before the King himself to be holden assigned John Croke Knight another of the Justices of the said Lord the King to Pleas to be holden before the King himself to be holden assigned Stephen Soan Knight John Garrard Knight Thomas Bennet Knight Baptist Hicks Knight Francis Bacon Solicitor General of the Lord the King Henry Mountague Knight one of the Kings Serjeants at Law and Recorder of the City of London aforesaid and other their Fellows Justices of the Lord the King To his Gaol aforesaid of Prisoners in the same being to be delivered assigned The aforesaid Robert Carliel and James Irweng under the custody of Edward Barkham and George Smythes Sherifs of the City aforesaid to the Barr aforesaid brought in their proper persons came and severally being asked how of the Felony and Murder aforesaid they would acquit themselves The said Robert Carliel saith That he cannot deny but that he is guilty of the Felony and Murder aforesaid to him in form aforesaid imposed and the Felony and Murder aforesaid expresly confesseth and thereof putteth himself upon the Mercy of the King and the aforesaid James Irweng saith That he of the Felony and Murder aforesaid to him in form aforesaid imposed is not guilty and thereof for good and ill puts himself upon the Country Therefore immediately he cause a Jury to come c. And the Jurors of the Jury aforesaid by the aforesaid Sherifs of the City aforesaid to this impannelled being called that is to say Humphry Slâ—cy William Morgan Rouland Healing Hugh Hawesh Henry Colthurst William Hicks William Hayes Richard Bridges William Wilde John Palmer Solomon Green and Richard Rudd came who to say the truth of and upon the premises to the said Iames Irweng imposed chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid John Irweng is guilty of the Felony and Murder to him in form aforesaid imposed in manner and form as by the indictment aforesaid against them it is supposed And that he the time of the Felony and Murder aforesaid in form aforesaid committed or ever after had no Goods or Chattels Lands or Tenements to the knowledge of the Jurors aforesaid Upon which the said Robert Carliel and Iames Irweng being severally spoken unto If they had any thing for themselves or could say Wherefore the Court aforesaid to Judgement and Execution of them and either of them of the premises ought not to proceed who said nothing but what at first they had said Upon which then and there It is considered by the said Justices That the aforesaid Robert Carliel and James Irweng to the Gaol of Newgate aforesaid from whence they came should be sent back and thence be lead and either of them be lead unto the place of Execution and there be hanged and either of them be hanged until c. The Indictment of Robert Creighton Esq THE Jurors present for the Lord the King upon their Oath That Middle whereas Robert Carliel late of London Yeoman and James Irweng late of London Yeoman Not having God before their Eyes but seduced by the instigation of the Devil the 11th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of our Lord James by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith c. and of Scotland the 45th at London that is to say in the Parish of St. Dunston in the West in the Ward of Farrington without London aforesaid c. with Force and Armes c. Feloniously and of their fore-thought Malice in and upon one John Turner then and there in the Peace of God and of the said Lord the King being made an Aassult and Affray And the aforesaid Robert Carliel a certain Gun called a Pistoll of the value of 5. shillings then and there charged with Gunpowder and one leaden Bullet which Gun the said Robert Carliel in his Right Hand then and there had and held in and upon the aforesaid John Turner then and there Feloniously Voluntarily and of his Malice fore-thought did shoot off and discharge And the aforesaid Robert Carliel with the leaden Bullet aforesaid from the Gun aforesaid then and there sent out the aforesaid Iohn Turner in and upon the left part of the Body of him the said Iohn Turner then and there feloniously struck giving to the said Iohn Turner then and there with the leaden Bullet aforesaid neer the left papp of him the said Iohn Turner one mortal Wound of the Breadth of half an inch and Depth of 5. inches of which mortal Wound the aforesaid Iohn Turner at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid instantly dyed And that James Irweng Feloniously and of his fore-thought Malice then and there was present ayding assisting abetting comforting and maintaining the aforesaid Robert Carliel to the Felony and Murder aforesaid in form aforesaid to be done and committed And so the aforesaid Robert Carliel and James Irwenge the aforesaid John Turner at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid in manner and form aforesaid Feloniously Voluntarily and of their fore-thought Malice killed and Murdered against the Peace of the Lord the King that now is his Crown and Dignity one Robert Creighton late of the Parish of St. Margaret in the County of VVestminster Esquire not having God before his Eyes but being seduced by the Instigâ—tion of the Devil before the Felony and Murder aforesaid by the aforesaid Robert Carliel and James Irweng in manner and form aforesaid done and committed that is to say the 10th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of our Lord James by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith the 10th and of Scotland the 45th the aforesaid Robert Carliel at the aforesaid Parish of St. Margaret in Westminster aforesaid in the County of Middlesex aforesaid to the Felony and Murder aforesaid in manner and form aforesaid done
Memorandum That Edward Coke Esquire The Attorny General of the Lady the Queen that now is who prosecutes for the said Lady the Queen present here in Court the 20th Day of June this Term in his own person for the said Lady the Queen gave the Court here to understand and be informed That whereas a Wood with the appurtenances called Alcon otherwise Aluington Wood containing by estimation 3000. Acres of Wood in Alton otherwise Aluington and Rock in the aforesaid County of Worcester in the Hands and possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is the first Day of October in the first yeer of her Reign and long before and continually after were and stood and of Right ought to be and yet ought as in the Right of her â—rown of England as in very many Records Roules and Remembrances of this Exchequer it is evident and appeareth upon Record Yet one Ann Countess of Warwick Humphry Hill Richard Bushopp and Edward Bushopp little regarding the Lawes and Statutes of the said Lady the Queen that now is but intending the Disenherism of the Lady the Queen in the premises with Force and Armes c. the first Day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 27th and diverse Dayes and turns between the same first Day of October in the 27th yeer and the Day of Exhibiting of this Information in and upon the possession of the said Lady the Queen of the premises Entred Intruded and made Entry and the Issues and Profits thereof coming perceived to their own uses and had and as yet do perceive and have the same Trespass continuing and as yet continuing in contempt of the said Lady the Queen that now is and against her Lawes Whereupon the aforesaid Attorny of the said Lady the Queen for the said Lady the Queen prayes the Advise of the Courâ— in the premises And the aforesaid Ann Countess of Warwick Humphry Hâ—ll Richard Bishopp and Edward Bishopp come here to answer the said Lady the Queen of and in the premises as it is contained there And now that is to say From the day of Holy Trinity in three Weekes this Term came here the aforesaid Richard Bishopp by Arthur Salwaie his Attorny to this by special favour of the Court admitted and prayeth the hearing of the Information aforesaid and it is read unto him c. Which being read and heard and by him the said Richard fully understood The said Richard complaineth by colour of the premises in the Information aforesaid above specified to be troubled and unquietted and that not justly Because By Protestation that the Information aforesaid and matter in the same contained is not sufficient in Law and to which the said Richard is not necessitated nor by the Law of the Land bound to answer in any manner By Protestation also That the Wood aforesaid in the Information aforesaid above mentioned doth not contain nor the aforesaid time of the Trespass and Intrusion aforesaid above supposed to be done did contain in it 3000. Acres in manner and form as by the Information aforesaid above is supposeed Yet for Plea The said Richard as to the Force and Armes or whatsoever is against the Peace of the said Lady the Queen that now is As also the whole Trespass Contempt and Intrusion in the Information aforesaid above specâ—fied supposed to be done besides the Entry and Ingresse into the Wood aforesaid called Alton Wood otherwise Alvington Wood the 21th Day of February in the Yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 32th and from the same Day until the Day of Exhibiting of the Information aforesaid and besides the perceiving the Issues and Profits thereof by that time comming above supposed The said Richard saith that he in nothing thereof is guilty in manner and form as by the Information aforesaid above is supposed and upon this puts himself upon the Country And the aforesaid Attorny General of the said Lady the Queen that now is who for the said Lady the Queen in this behalf prosecutes likewise c. Therefore an Inquisition be made thereof c. And as to the Entry and Ingress into the Wood aforesaid the aforesaid 21th Day of February in the 32th Yeer aforesaid and from that Day until the Day of Exhibiting of the Information aforesaid as also to the taking of the Issues and Profits thereof by the time thereof comming above supposed to be done the said Richard saith That the said Lady the Queen that now is him the said Richard ought not any wayes to impeach or trouble because he saith That long before the aforesaid time in which it is supposed the Entry Intrusion and Ingress aforesaid to be done One Ann Countess of Warwick Widow sometimes Wife of Richard sometimes Earl of Warwick was seized of the Mannor of Abbotesley otherwise Abberley otherwise Abbedeley with the appurtenances in the aforesaid County of Worcester whereof the aforesaid Wood in which c. then and until the time of the grant here after specified made to Robert Earl of Leicester the third Day of July in the 30th Yeer of Queen Elizabeth here after mentioned whereof the Memory of Man then was not to the contrary was parcel in her Demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seized a Fine was levied in the Court of the Lord Henry late King of England the 7th at Westminst in the County â—f Middlesex from the Day of St. Hillary in 15. Dayes in the 3d Year of his Reign before Thomas Brian Roger Townsend and Iohn Haugh Justices and other the said late Kings Faithful Subjects then there present Betwâ—en him the Lord the King plantiff and the aforesaid Ann sometimes Countess sometimes Wife of the aforesaid Richard Earl of Warwick by the Name of Ann Countess of Warwick deforceant of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. amongst other c. whereof a Plea of Covenant was sued between them in the same Court that is to say That the said Countess granted to the said Lord the King the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. And the same rendred back to him in the same Court To have and to hold to the said Lord the King and the Heirs Males of his Body begotten and if it shall happen That the said Lord the King should die without Heir Male of his Body begotten then after the decease of the said Lord the King the aforesaid Mannor with the appurtenances whereof c. should wholly Revert to the same Countess and her Heirs quieted from the other Heirs of the aforesaid Lord the King as by the Record of the aforesaid Fine in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is of the Bench at Westminster aforesaid remaining more fully appeareth By virtue of which Fine the aforesaid late King Henry the 7th was seized of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. in his demesn as Fee tail that
consent and agreement do covenant and grant to and with the said Thomas Ovington and Thomas Diggss their Heirs and Assigns by these presents that from the time of the Inrollment of this present Indenture in the Queens Majesties Court of Chancery that all and every the said use and uses considerations and intent in any wise limitted declared and mentioned in the abovesaid Indenture in these presents above comprised and for and as concerning all and singular their Manors Messuages Lands Tenements Rents Reversions Services and Hereditaments whatsoever with the appurtenances in any wise mentioned meant comprised and specified in the abovesaid Indenture in these presents above comprised except or Meadow lying and being in the Parish of Bishopsborne in the said County of Kent contayning by estimation or thereabouts and now or late in the occupation or possession of one Vincent Edley or of his Assigns shall be utterly void and frustrate and be determined and ended and that the said Christopher Digges and his heirs and all and every person and persons which now stand and be seised or at any time hereafter shall stand and be seised of and in all and singular the said Mannors Messuages Lands Tenements Rents Reversions Services and Hereditaments whatsoever with the appurtenances or any parcel thereof in any wise mentioned meant comprised or specified in the abovesaid Indenture in these presents comprised except before excepted shall from the time of the Inrolment of these presents stand and be seised of and in all and singular the said Manors Messuages Lands and Tenements Rents Reversions Services and Hereditaments whatsoever with the appurtenances in the said former Indenture or in these presents meant contained or specified and of and in all and every part and parcel thereof except before excepted to the only use of the said Christopher Digges his Heirs assignes for ever to no other use or uses purposes or intents In witness whereof the parties abovesaid to these present Indentures their Seals enterchangeablie have set dated the day and yeer first above written as by the said other Indenture further recited more fully appeareth And the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father so as before is said of the Manors Messuages Lands Tenements and Hereditaments aforesaid with the appurtenances in the aforesaid Indenture bearing date the 20th day of September in the 13th yeer abovesaid as the same requireth being the said Christopher Digges the Father afterwards and before the day of the being of the Monstrans de droâ—t within written that is to say the 20th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 14th By another certain Indenture between the said Christopher Digges the Father of the one part and Richard Gaunt Gentleman and Lawrence Applegate of the other part made one part of which with the Seal of the said Christopher to the Jurors aforesaid in evidence was shewed whose date is the same day and yeer covenanted and granted for him and his Heirs to and with the aforesaid Richard Gaunt and Lawrence Applegate in manner and form as in the Indenture aforesaid is conteyned the Tenor of which followeth in these words Thiâ— Indenture made the 25th day of ctober in the 14th yeear of the Reign of our Soveraign Lady Elizabeth by the gâ—ace of God Queen of England France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. Between Christopher Digges of Barham in the County of â—ent Esquier on the one party and Richard Gaunt of the City of Canterbury Gentâ—emâ—n and Lawrence Applegate of the Parish of Saint George of the same City Draper on the other party Witnesseth That it is Covenanted granted condescended and agreed by all the parties to these Indentures by these presents in maner and form following that is to say that first the said Christopher Digges for him and his Heirs Executors and Administrators doth Covenant and grant to and with the said Richard Gaunt and Lawrence Appâ—egate their Executors and assigns by these presents that he the said Christopher and Martha his Wife before the end of this Instant Term of Saint Michael upon the writ of Covenant to be persued by the said Richard and Lawrence out of the high Court of Chancery and retornable before the Queens Majesties Justices of the common plea at Westminster shall acknowledge and levy a fine of all those the Manors Lands Tenements Meadows Marshes Pastures Feedings Woods Underwoods Rents and Services to any the same Manors appertaining or in any waies belonging set lying and being in the Parishes of Barham Kingstone Bishop Borne Patiâ—chborne Littleborne Wellborne Sturrey Harrisham Saint Stephens Hackington Netherherds Lenham Brensted in the County of Kent and also all other the Lands Tenements whatsoever which he the said Christopher Dighes now hath or late had in the same County and that by he names of Owtelmestone Mayton Hackington and Yokes Court with the appurtenances 40 Messuâ—ges 20 Tofts 1 Mill 3 Dovehouses 20 GardeÌ„s 10 Oâ—châ—rds 1000 Acres of Land 100 Acres of Meadow 100 Acres of Pasture 600 Acres of Wood 10 Acres of Heath Furze 5 pound Rent the Rent of 10 Quarters of Barley with the appurtenances in Barham Kingstone Bishopsborne Bridge Patricksboone Littleborne Wellborne Sturrey St. Stephens Hackington Netherherds Lenham Harrisham Frensted Sutton Repple and Sholden and nevertheless it is covenanted granted and agreed between the said Christopher Digges Rich Gaunt Lawrence Applegate they their Heirs Executors Assignes do covenant and grant by these presents to and with the said Christopher Digges his Heirs Executors and Assignes in form following that is to say that the same Fine and the use and execution of the same as to the Manor of Yokes Court with the appurtenances and one Messuage called Fokeham 500 Acres of Land Meadow and Pasture by estimation be it more or less with the appurtenances set lying and being in the parishes of Fremsted Lenham Harrisham in the County of Kent aforesaid 160 Acres of Land Meadow and Pasture in the Parish of Netherherds Nackington and Patricksborne in the said County And all those Lands arable and Pasture conteyning by estimation 200 Acres called Gore and Ilding lying and being in the Parishes of Barham and Kingstone now late in the 〈◊〉 of James Herenge and John Nethersale or of their assigns all Woods Wood-Lands Underwoods Courts Rents perquisites of Court to all the same only excepted shall be to the use of the said Christopher Digges and Martha and the Heirs and Assignes of the said Christopher Digges for ever And that the said Fine use and execution thereof as well to the said Manors of Owtelmestone Mayton and all the Lands Meadows Marshes Feedings Woods Underwoods Rents and Services to the same Manors or any of them belonging or in any wise appertayning and also all other the Lands Messuages Tenements Meadows Pastures Marshes Woods Underwoods and other Hereditaments whatsoever above in these presents specfiâ—ed mentioned or comprised the
use thereof in the abovesaid Fine in form abovesaid to be levyed and acknowleged before by this Indenture not limited or appointed the Rent of 10 quarters of Barley only except to be to the only use and behoof of the said Christopher Digges his Heirs and Assignes for ever and to no other use or uses purpose or intent and that the said Fine or use and execution thereof as to the abovesaid 10 Quarters of Bâ—rley to be to the only use and behoof of the abovesaid Richard Gaunt and his Heirs for ever In witness whereof the parties abovesaid to these present Indentures their Seals enterchangeably have set dated the day and yeer first above wriâ—ten And the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father so as afore is said of the Manors Messuages Lands Tenements and Hereditaments aforesaid with the appurtenances in the Monstrans de droiâ— within written specified as the Law requireth being seised Afterwards and before the bringing of the Monstrans de droit within written that is to say from the day of Saint Martin within writen in 15 dayes in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 14th abovesaid A Fine was levyed in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is at Westminster in the County of Middleâ—ex before James Dyer Richard Weston John Welsh and Richard Harper then Justices and afterwards in 8 dayes of Saint Hillary in the yeer of the same Lady the Queen that now is the 14th abovesaid there then granted and recorded before the said Justices and oâ—hers of the Queens faithfull people then and there present between the aforesaid Richard Gaunt Gentleman and Lawrence Applegate plaintiâ—s and the aforesaid Christopher Digges and Martha his Wife deforceants of the Manors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments in the Monstrans de droit within written with the appurtenances amongst other by the names of the Manors of Owtelmestone Mayton Nackington and Yokes Court with the appurtenances and 40 Messuages 20 Tofts one Mil 3 Dovehouses 20 Gardens 12 Orchards 1000 Acres of Land 100 Acres of Meadow 700 Acres of Pasture 600 Acres of Wood 100 Acres of Furze and Heath and 100 shillings of Rent and the Rent of 10 Quarters of Barley with the appurtenances in Barham Kingstone Bishopsborn Bridge Patricksborne Littleborne Wellborne Sturrey Saint Stephens Nackington Netherherds Lenham Harisham Frinsted Sutton Ripple and Shalden whereupon a plea of Covenant then was summoned between them in the said Court That the aforesaid Christopher Digges and Martha do acknowlege the aforesaid Manors and Rents with the appurtenances to be the Right of the said Richard and those which the said Richard and Lawrence then had of the gift of the aforesaid Christopher and Martha and these then remised and quit claimed from them the said Christopher and Martha their Heirs to the aforesaid Richard and Lawrence and the Heirs of the the said Richard for ever and moreover the said Christopher and Martha then had granted for them Heirs the of the said Christopher that they warrant to the aforesaid Richard and Lawrence and the Heirs of the said Richard the aforesaid Manors Tenements and Rents with the appurtenances against all men for ever and for this Recognition Release Quit claim warranty Fine and Concord the said Richard and Lawrence gave to the aforesaid Christopher and Martha 8 pound Sterling which Fine was levied with proclamations according to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided And further the Jurors say upon their oath aforesaid that the aforesaid Fine in form aforesaid levyed was had and levyed to the uses and intents in the Indenture aforesaid bearing date the 26th day of October in yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 14th as abovesaid above specified By colour of which Fine Indenture and Statute aforesaid the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father was seised of the Manors Tenements and Hereditaments aforesaid with the appurtenances as the Law requireth And the Jurors aforesaid further say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father so as before is said of the Manors and Tenements above written as the Law requireth being seised the said Christopher Digges the Father and the aforesaid John Brook Richard Brook and Richard Horewood afterwards that is to say the 7th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 14th came into the Court of the said Lady the Queen of her Chancery and then and there acknowleged the Indenture aforesaid bearing date the 20th day of September in the 13th yeer aforesaid to be their deed and upon that the said Indenture afterwards that is to say the 7th day of November in the 14 yeer aforesaid in the said Court of Chancery in due Maner of Record was Inrolled By virtue of which and force of the Statute aforesaid the said Christopher Digges the Father was of the Manors Lands and Tenements within written seised as the same Law requireth and so thereof being seised the said Christo Digges the Father afterwards and before the day of the bringing of the shewing of right within written that is to say the first day of February in the yeer of our Lord 1576 and in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 19th made his Testament and last Will in writing of which said Testament and last Will the Tenor amongst other followeth in these Words In the Name of God Amen The first day of February in the yeer of our Lord God 1576 and in the 19th yeer of the Reign of our Sovereign Lady Elizabeth by the grace of God Queen of England France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. I Christopher Digges of Saint Gregories without the Walls of the City of Canterbury Esquire Son and Heir of William Digges late of Barham in the County of Kent deceased being sick in body but of good and perfect remembrance thanked be the Almighty God Revoking and making void all other my former wills ordayn and make this my present Testament and last Will in manner and form following That is to say this is the last Will of me the abovesaid Christopher Digges made the day and yeer abovesaid touching the disposition of all my Lands Tenements and Hereditaments in the County of Kent and Canterbury or elsewhere in the Realm of England First touching the thirds and third part of my Land to be due unto the Queens Majesty or any other for Wardship Primer seisin Livery or otherwise my Will and meaning is to leave to descend to Thomas Digges my Son to have and to hold to him and his Heirs for ever All these my Lands and Tenements called or known by the name of Eastendown containing by estimation 10 Acres of Land and all these Lands Tenements Hereditaments which I had by descent after the death of Thomas Digges of Newington next Sittingborn Esquire deceased and if the
aforesaid are utterly Ignorant And thereof pray the Advise of the Justices aforesaid and of the Court here c. And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the same Justices and Court here c. That the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father dyed seised of the Manors Tenements in the Monstrans de droit within written specified in his demesn as of Fee or of any part thereof with the Appurtenances Then the Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father dyed seised of the Manors and Tenements with the Appurtenances in the Monstrans de droit specified or of so much thereof as to the same Justices shall â—eem the same Christopher so dyed seised in his demesn as of Fee as the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son the aforesaid Edward Digges within pleading have alleged And if upon the whole mâ—ttâ—r aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid sound It shall seem to the same Justices and Court here c. That the aforesaid Chrâ—stopher Digges the Father dyed not seised of the Manors and Tenements with tâ—e appurtenances in the Monstrans de droit within written specified or of any parcel thereof in his demesn as of Fee Then the said Juror say upon ther Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father dyed not seised of the Manors and Tenements with the Appurtenances in the Monstrans de droit within written specified or of so much thereof as to the said Justices aforesaid shall seem the same Christopher so not to dye seised of â—n his demesn as of Fee in his demesn as of Fee as the said Thomas Palmer and Margaret within pleading have alleged And because the Court of the Lady the Queen hereof giving their Judgement of and upon the premises are not yet avisâ—d day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid in state is now before the Lady the Queen untill the morrow of the Holy Trinity wheresoever c. to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises c. because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof are not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come as well the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges by their Attorney aforesaid as the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret in their proper persons And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Jugement of and upon the premises are not yet avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid in sute as now before the Lady the Queen untill in 8. dayes of Saint Michael wheresoever c. to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court or the Lady the Queen here thereof are not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come aâ—well the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and the said Edward Digges by their Attorney aforesaid as the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret in their proper persons and because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here oâ— giving their Judgement of and upon the premises are not yet avised day thereof is given to the parties aforesaâ—d before the Lady the Queen untill in 8. dayes of Saint Hillary wheresoever e. for to hear their Judgâ—ment thereof c. because the Court of the Lady the Queen here are not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges by their Attorney aforesaid as the said Thomas and Margaret in their proper persons and because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises are not yet avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen untill from Easter day in 15. dayes wheresoever to hear their Judgement thereof c. because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof are not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges by their Attorney aforesaid as the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret in their proper persons And because the Court of the Lady the Queen of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises are not yet avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster untill the morrow of the Holy Trinity wheresoever c. to hear their Judgement hereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here are not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come as well the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges by their Attorney aforesaid as the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret in their proper persons Upon which seen and by the Court of the Lady the Queen here all singular the premises here fully understood and mature deliberation thereof being had Because it seems to the Court of the Lady the Queen that now is here That the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father dyed not seised of the Manors and Tenements with the Appurtenances in the Monstrans de droit aforesaid above specified or of any parcel thereof in his demesn as of Fee It is granted that the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges take nothing by their Writ aforesaid but for their false clamor thereof be in mercy c. And the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret go thereof without day c. Prohibition and Attachment upon Prohibition Easter Term Anno 38. Eliz. Rott 628. in the Kings Bench Co. 2. part The Bishop of Winchesters Case MEmorandum that at another time that is to say Michael Term last past before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come Robert Wright by Thomas VVebb the younger and brought here in the Court of the said Lady the Queen then and there his Bill against John VVright Executor of the Testament and last Will of Nicholas VVright late whilest he lived Farmer as he affirmed of the Rectory of the Parish Church of Eastmeon otherwise called Eastmeam in the Diocesse of VVinchester in the Province of Canterbury in the Custody of the Marshalsea c. in a Plea of Trespass and Contempt against those who prosecuted in the Spiritual Court against the Queens Prohibition to the contrary thereof directed and delivered And are Pledges of sute John Doo Richard Roo which Bill followeth in these words ss South That is to say Robert Wright who as well for the Lady the Queen as for himself prosecuteth complaineth of John Wright Executor of the Testament and last Will of Nicholas â—â—ight deceased late whil'st he lived as he affirmed of the Rectory of the Parish Church of Eastmeon otherwise called Eastmeam in the Diocess of Winchester in the Province of Canterbury in the Custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsey of the Lady the Queen before the Queen her self being why he sueth
that the Tax aforesaid for the Reparations of the Church aforesaid in the case aforesaid is a matter determinable at the Common Law and not in the spiritual Court Yet the said spiritual Judge to admit the same Plea Allegation utterly refused And the aforesaid Abraham and Tho. Foster him the said William Jeffrey in the spiritual Court aforesaid in the premises to be condemned and to the payment of the aforesaid several sums of Mony upon him the said William Jeffrey for the Reparations of the Church aforesaid above in this behalf specially imposed and taxed which then by the Law of the Land as before is said to pay for the reason aforesaid ought not or is bounden to do by the definitive Sentence of the said spiritual Court with all his strength endeavoreth and daily threatneth in contempt of the Queen that now is and to the losse prejudice impoverishing and manifest grievance of him the said William as also contrary to the Law of the Land aforesaid And this the said William Jeffrey is ready to aver and humbly imploring the aid assistance of the said Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is here demands remedy And the Writ of the said Lady the Queen of Prohibition to the aforesaid spiritual Judge in form aforesaid to forbid him that he the Plea aforesaid nor any thing touching the same before him he futher hold not and it is granted unto him c. And thereupon cometh John Porter of Cheddingley in the County aforesaid of Sussex Esquire Ard Thomas Aynscomb of Buxted in the County aforesaid Gent. in their proper persons and undertake for the aforesaid William Jeffrey That if it happeneth the aforesaid Abraham Kenshley and Thomas Foster To the Court of the Lady the Queen hereafter to come to demand the said Queens Writ of Consultation or otherwise to sue for Justice there of and upon the premises That then the said William the said matter or suggestion should follow with effect untill the Plea thereof by some lawful means be ended that is to say each of the Bail aforesaid upon the penalty of 10. pound which said sum of 10. pound the Bail aforesaid acknowledged and each of them acknowledged of their Lands and Goods and of every of them to be levied to the use of the said Lady the Queen If it shall so happen the said William not to prosecute in form aforesaid with effect c. REPLEVIN Michaelmas Term Anno 23. Eliz. Rot. 1160. in the Common Pleas C. 1. part Capels Case Fo. 54. THomas Gately was summoned to answer John Hunt of a Plea wherefore he took the Cattel of the said Iohn and them deteined against Gages and Pledges c. And whereupon the said Iohn by Iohn Lutwich his Attorney complaineth that the aforesaid Thomas the 27th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 22th at Howcaple in a certain place called Stockins took his Cattel that is to say 6. Oxen and 6. Cows of him the said Iohn and them unjustly deteined against Gages and Pledges untill c. whereupon he saith he is the worse and hath loss to the value of 100 pound and thereof bringeth sute c. and the aforesaid Thomas by Thomas Willis his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when c. And as Bayliff of Anthony Capel Gent. acknowledgeth the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. and justly c. Because that he saith that the place in which it is supposed the taking of the Cattel aforesaid to be done doth contein and at the time of the taking of the Cattle aforesaid supposed to be done did contein in it 300. Acres of Land with the appurtenances in Howcaple aforesaid and that long before the aforesaid time in which c. One Thomas Capel Esquire was seised of the Manor of Howcaple with the appurtenances in the County aforesaid whereof the aforesaid 300. Acres of Land with the appurtenances in which c. are and at the aforesaid time in which c. as also time whereof the memory of men is not to the contrary were parcel in his demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seised after the fourth day of February in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th the 27th and before the time in which c Of the said Manor with the appurtenances whereof c. amongst other enfeoffed Iohn Warmcombe Richard Wahrein Alexander Whittington Thomas Walwem Iohn I loid and Henry Iones To have and to hold the said Manor with the appurtenances whereof c. amongst other to the said Iohn Warmcombe Richard Walwein Alexander Whittington Thomas Walwein Iohn Llud and Henry â—ones their Heirs and Assigns for ever To the use of the aforesaid Thomas Capel and the Heirs Males of his body lawfully begotten and for default of such issue to the use of Edward Capel and the Heirs Males of the body of the said Edward lawfully begotten and for default of such issue to the use of Richard Capel and the Heirs Males of the body of the said Richard lawfully begotten and for default of such issue to the use of William Capel and the Heirs Males of the body of the said William lawfully begotten and for default of such issue to the use of Giles Capel for the term of the life of the said Giles and after the decease of the said Giles to the use of the Right Heirs of the said Thomas Capel for ever By virtue of which Feoffment and by force of a certain Act of Parliament of the aforesaid late King at Westminster of transferring uses into possession in the 27th yeer abovesaid holden made The aforesaid Thomas Capel was seised of the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof amongst other in his demesn as of Feetail that is to say to him and the Heirs Males of his body lawfully begotten and for default of such issue the remainder thereof to the aforesaid Edward Capel and the Heirs Males of his body lawfully begotten and for default of such issue the Remainder thereof in form aforesaid expectant and the aforesaid Thomas Capel of the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. amongst other in form aforesaid being seised before the aforesaid time in which c. at Howcaple aforesaid dyed of such his estate thereof seised after whose death The Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other descended to one William Capel as Son and Heir of the body of the aforesaid Thomas Capel lawfully begotten by which the said William Capel the Son before the aforesaid time in which c. into the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Feetail that is to say to him and the Heirs Males of his body lawfully begotten for default of such issue the remainder thereof to the aforesaid Edward and the Heirs Males of his
c. into the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances wherof c. amongst other entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Feetail that is to say to him and his Heirs Males of his body lawfully begotten and that the aforesaid William Capel the Son of the said Manor with the Appurtenances whereof c. amongst other in form aforesaid being seised The said Richard Capel Son of the aforesaid Edward Capel the 22th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 18th at Howcaple aforesaid by the aforesaid his Writing granted to the aforesaid Anthony Capel the aforesaid annuity or yeerly Rent of 50. pound to be going out of the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. as the aforesaid Thomas Gately above alleged But the said John Hunt further saith That the aforesaid William Capel of the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. in form aforesaid being seised That the Fine was levyed in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is here at Westminster aforesaid from the day of Saint Martin in 15. dayes in the yeer of her Reign the 19th before James Dyer Richard Harper Roger Manwood and Robert Mounson then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench here and afterwards in the 8th day of Saint Hillary in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 19th aforesaid there granted and Recorded before the same Justices and other the said Lady the Queens faithful people then there present Between Richard Wooton and Richard Shawley Plaintiffs and the aforesaid Will. Capel defendaÌ„t of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. amongst other By the names of the Manors of Capel otherwise Hugh Capel Showle and Okeridge with the Appurtenances and 20. Messuages 10. Tofts 20. Cottages 2. Mills 3. Dovehouses 800. Acres of Land 260. Acres of Meadow 1700. Acres of Pasture 200. Acres oâ— Wood 1000 Acres of Furz and Heath and 5. pound Rent with the Appurtenances iâ— Capel otherwise Hugh Capel Showle Okeridge â—â—rkell and â—edbary As also of the Advowson of the Church of Capel otherwise Hugh Capel whereof a Plea of Covenant was summened between them in the said Court That is to say That the aforesaid William acknowleged the aforesaid Manors Tenements and Rents with the Appurtenances and the Advowson of the Church aforesaid to be the Right of the said Richard as these which the said Richard and John had of the gift of the aforesaid William and those remised and quit claimed from him and his Heirs to the aforesaid Richard and John and the Heirs of the aforesaid Richard forever And further the said William granted for him and his Heirs That they warrant to the aforesaid Richard and Iohn and to the Heirs of the said Richard the aforesaid Manors Tenements Rents with the Appurtenances and the Advowson aforesaid against all Men forever And for that Recognition remise quit claim Warranty Fine and Concord The said Richard and Iohn gave to the aforesaid William 700. pound Sterling Which Fine in form aforesaid levied was levied and had to the use of the said Iohn Hunt and his Heirs By virtue of which Fine and by force of the Statute aforesaid the said Iohn was seized of the Manors aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in his demesn as of Fee And the said Iohn so thereof being seized Thomas Spenceley and Baldwin Castleton before the aforesaid time of the taking c. that is to say the 4th day of Iunuary in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 19th abovesaid sued forth out of the Court of the Chancery of the said Lady the Queen that now is at Westminster in the County of Middlesex then being A certain Writ of the said Lady the Queen of Entry upon Disseisin in the Post against him the said Iohn Hunt of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. amongst other by the names of the Manor of Capel otherwise Hugh Capel otherwise How Capel with the Appurtenances and 20. Messuages 10. Toâ—ts one Mill 2. Dovehouses 500. Acres of Land 200. Acres of Meadow 600. Acres of Pasture 100. Acres of Wood 700. Acres of Furz and Heath and 4. pound Rent with the Appurtenances in Capel otherwise Hugh Capel otherwise How Capel Brocherton and Sellershop as also of the Advowson of the Church of Capel otherwise Hugh Capel otherwise How Capel To the then Sheriff of the aforesaid County of Hereford directed By which Writ the said Lady the Queen that now is To the said then Sheriff commanded That the said Sherif should command the said Iohn Hunt that justly and without delay he render to the aforesaid Thomas Spenceley and Baldwin the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances and the Advowson aforesaid which the said Thomas and Baldwin to be their Right and Inheritance and in which the said Iohn then had not Entry but after Disseisin which Hugh Hunt thereof unjustly and without Judgement did to the aforesaid Thomas Spenceley and Baldwin within 30. yeers then last past as they said And if he should not do and the aforesaid Thomas Spencely and Baldwin should secure him the said Sheriff for the prosecuting of their claim Then he summon by good Summoners him the said John Hunt that he should be before the then Justices of the said Lady the Queen here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid in 8. dayes of St. Hillary then next following to shew wherefore he did not do it And that the said then Sheriff should have there the summons and that Writ At which 8. dayes of St. Hillary before the aforesaid Janes Dyer Knight and his Companions then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench here came aswel the aforesaid Thomas Spenceley and Baldwin as the said John Hunt in their proper persons And James Warnecome Esquire then Sheriff of the aforesaid County of Hereford then and there retorned the Writ aforesaid to him in form aforesaid directed in all things served and executed that is to say That the said Thomas Spenceley and Baldwin had found to him the said Sheriff sureties for to prosecute that Writ that is to say John Doo and Richard Roo And that the said John Hunt was summoned by John Den and Richard'â—en and upon that The aforesaid Thomas Spenceley and Baldwin declaring against him the said John Hunt upon the Writ aforesaid demanded against him the said John Hunt the Manor Tenements and Rent aforesaid with the Appurtenances and the Advowson aforesaid as their Right and Inheritance and in which the said John had not then Entry but after the Deseisin which Hugh Hunt thereof unjustly and without Judgment did to the aforesaid Thomas Spenceley and Baldwin within 30. years c. And whereupon they then said That they themselves were seized of the Manor Tenements and Rent aforesaid with the Appurtenances in
and for his costs and charges to 2. pence And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found it shall seem to the Justices and Court here That the aforesaid 4. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in which c. the aforesaid time in which c. were the Soil and Freehold of the aforesaid John Kent the Son as the said John Smith above allegeth Then they assess the damages of him the said John Smith by the occasion aforesaid above his costs and charges by him about his sute in this behalf expended to 12. pence and for his costs and charges to 2. pence And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the parties here in the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid William as the aforesaid John by their Attornies aforesaid And because the justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their judgement thereof day farther is given to the parties here until in 8. dayes of St. Michael to hear their judgment of them because the same justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh aswel the aforesaid William as the aforesaid John by their Attornies aforesaid And because the justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their judgement thereof day is given to the parties here in 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their judgement thereof because the same justices here thereof not yet c. At which day cometh aswel the aforesaid William as the aforesaid John by their Attornies aforesaid And because the justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises day further is given to the parties aforesaid here until from Easter-day in 15. dayes to hear their judgement thereof because the same justices here thereof not yet c. At which day cometh aswel the aforesaid William as the aforesaid John by their Attornies aforesaid And because the justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their judgement thereof day further is given to the parties aforesaid here until the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their judgement thereof because the same justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh aswel the aforesaid William as the aforesaid John by their Attornies aforesaid And upon this The premises being seen and by the justices here fully understood It is granted that the said William take nothing by his Writ aforesaid but be in mercy for his false clamour and the aforesaid John thereof go without day c. And that he have retorn of his Cattel aforesaid to hold for ever irreplegiable c. how c. And that the Sheriff make it appear here in 8. dayes of Saint Michael c. It is also granted That the aforesaid John recover against the said William his damages to 14. pence by the jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed as also 18. pound 8. shillings and 10. pence to him the said John at his request for his costs and charges aforesaid by the Court here of Encrease adjudged which damages amount in the whole to 19. pound c. Replevin Trinity Term Anno 380. Eliz. Rot. 183. in the Common-Pleas C. 1. part Bredons Case Fo. 67. Suss WIlliam Bredon and John Bredon were summoned to answer to Agnes Gardiner Widow of a Plea Wherefore they took the Cattel of the said Agnes and them unjustly detained against Gages and Pledges c. And whereupon the said Agnes by Thomas Waller her Attorny complaineth That the aforesaid William and John the 18th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 37th at Stow-market in a certain Place called the Parkwood parcel of the Manor of Columbine hall took Cattel that is to say 15. Cowes Milch and 5. Calves of the said Agnes and them unjustly detained against Gages and Pledges until c. Whereupon she saith that she is the worse and hath damage to the value of 10. pound And thereof bringeth sute c. And the said William and John by Richard Walker their Attorny come defend the force and injury when c. And as Bayliffs of Martha Cary Widow do acknowledge the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the place in which c. And justly c. Because they say That the same place in which it is supposed the taking above to have been made doth contain and at the time of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid did contain in it self 8. Acâ—es of Lands with the appurtenances in Stow-market aforesaid and that long before the aforesaid time in which c. One John Gardiner Gent. was seized of and in the Manor of Collumbine hall otherwise Thorney Collumbers with the appurtenances in the County aforesaid whereof the aforesaid 8. Acres of Land with the appurtenances in which c. are and the aforesaid time in which c. And also from the time whereof the Memory of Man is not to the contrary were parcel in his demesn as of Fee and he being thereof so seized A Fine was levied in the Court of the Lady the Queen that now is of the Bench here that is to say at Westminster in 8. dayes of Saint Michael in the yeer of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29th before Edmond Anderson Francis Windham William Periam and Francis Rodes then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench here and other the said Queens faithful people here then present Between Edmond Cary Knight and Robert Cary Esquire Plaintiffs and VVilliam Cary Esquire the aforesaid John Gardiner and the said Agnes now Plaintiff then the Wife of the said John and George Totty Gentleman and Elizabeth his Wife by the names of VVilliam Cary Esquire Iohn Gardiner Gentleman and Agnes his Wife George Totty Gentleman and Elizabeth his Wife Deforceants of the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. And of 10. Messuages 10. Cortages 10 Barns one Dove-house 20. Cartilages 20. Gardens 10. Orchards 300. Acres of Land 60. Acres of Meadow 200. Acres of Pasture 30. Acres of Wood 60. Acres of Furz and Heath the Rent of 1. pound of Wax and 4. Capons 30. shillings of Rent with the appurtenances in Stow market Newton Gipping and One House As also of the view of Frank Pledge in Stow-market Newton Gipping and One House By the names of the Manors of Collumbine hall otherwise Thorney Collumâ—bers with the appurtenances and of 10. Messuages 10. Cottages 10. Barns one Dove house 20. Curtilages 20. Gardens 10. Orchards 300. Acres of Land 60. Acres of Meadow 200. Acres of Pasture 30. Acres of Wood 60. Acres of Furz and Heath 30. shillings of Rent of the
keep until of the aforesaid Annuity or yeerly Rent of 40. pound with the Arrerages thereof if any were they should be satisfied and paid as by the Record of the said Fine in the Court of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench aforesaid here remaining amongst other things more fully appeareth And the aforesaid VVilliam Cary afterwards that is to say the 4th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 35th at Stow market aforesaid dyed After whose death By virtue of the Fine a-aforesaid last recited The aforesaid Martha was and yet is seized of the aforesaid Annuity or yeerly Rent of 40. pound in heâ— demesn as of Freehold for the Term of her life if the said Iohn Gardiner and Agnes his Wife or either of them should so long live And because 40. pound of the aforesaid yeerly Rent to the said Martha at and after the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 35th as also the aforesaid time in which c. were behind not payd The said VVilliam Brâ—don and Iohn Bredon as Bayliffs of the said Martha acknowledged the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. And justly c. for the said 40. pound of the Annual Rent aforesaid to the said Martha so being behind as in the Lands to the distresse of the said Martha of the Rent aforesaid in form aforesaid charged and bound c. With this that the said Iohn Bredon and VVilliam will aver That the aforesaid Martha is yet living and is in full life that is to say at Littlewrating in the aforesaid County of Suffolk c. with this also That the said William Bredon and John Bredon will aver That the aforesaid Agnes now Plaintiff and the aforesaid Agnes one of the Deforceants in the aforesaid several Fines named are one and the same person and not others or diverse c. And the aforesaid Agnes as to 20. pound of the yeerly Rent aforesaid at the Feast of the Annuntiation of the blessed Mary the Virgin in the 35th yeer abovesaid payable saith That she cannot deny but that the said 20. pound at the said Feast were behind to the aforesaid Martha not paid as the aforesaid William Bredon and John by their Conusance aforesaid supposed And as to the aforesaid other 20. pound of the aforesaid 40. pound Residue which the aforesaid William and John by this Conusance aforesaid suppose to have been behind not paid to the aforesaid Martha at the aforesaid Feast of Saint Michael in the 35th yeer abovesaid It is said That the aforesaid William Bredon and John Bredon by reason of the aforesaid taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. For the same 20. pound ought not acknowledge it to be just for it is said That well and true it is That the said John Gardiner was seized of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in his demesn as of Fee And the said John so thereof being seized The said Fine in the Conusance of the said William Bredon and John Bredon above first mentioned was levied in the aforesaid Court of the Queen here in the aforesaid 8. dayes of Saint Michael in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 29th above written before the aforesaid then Justices and other the Lady the Queens faithful people then there present Between the aforesaid Edmond Cary Knight and Robert Cary Esquire Plaintiffs And the aforesaid VVilliam Cary Esquire and John Gardiner and the said Agnes now Plaintiff then Wife of the aforesaid John Gardiner And the aforesaid George Totty and Elizabeth his Wife Deforceants of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. And of the aforesaid Tenements and Appurtenances in the Conusance aforesaid above mentioned and that the said Fine in form aforesaid levied was had and levied to the use of the aforesaid John Gardiner and of her the said Agnes for the Term of their lives and the longer liver oâ— them And after the decease of the aforesaid John and Agnes To the use of the aforesaid VVilliam Cary and the Heirs his body lawfully begotten And for default of such issue To the use of the aforesaid Robert Cary Knight and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten And for default of such issue To the use of the aforesaid Henry Cary Knight Lord of Hunsdon and his Heirs for ever By virtue of which Fine and by force of the aforesaid Act of transferring uses into possession holden made The aforesaid John and the said Agnes were seized of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in demesn as of Freehold for the Term of the lives of them the said John and Agnes and the longer liver of them the Remainder thereof after the death of them the said John and Agnes to the aforesaid VVilliam Cary and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten the Remainder thereof for default of such issue to the aforesaid Robert Cary and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten the Remainder thereof for default of such issue to the aforesaid Henry Cary Knight Lord of Hunsdon and his Heirs for ever as the aforesaid William Bredon and John Bredon by his Conusance aforesaid above supposeth But the said Agnes further saith That the aforesaid Iohn Gardiner and Agnes so of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. for the Term of the lives of them the said Iohn and Agnes and the longer liver of them in form aforesaid being seized the Remander thereof after the death of the aforesaid Iohn and Agnes to the aforesaid William Cary and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten the Remainder thereof for default of such issue to the aforesaid Robert Cary and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten the Remainder thereof for default of such issue to the aforesaid Henry â—ary Knight Lord of Hunsdon and his Heirs expectant before the levying of the aforesaid second Fine in the Conusance of the said William Bredon and John Bredon above mentioned Another Fine was levied in the same Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is of the Bench here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid from the day of Easter in 15. dayes in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 31th before the aforesaid Edmond Anderson Francis Windham and William Periam then Justices of the Lady the Queen of the Bench here and other of the Queens faithful people then and there present Between David Bulward and Robert Ham by the names of David Bulward and Robert Ham Plaintiffs And the aforesaid William Cary by the name of William Cary Esquire Deforceants of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. And of 20. Messuages one Dove-house 20. Gardens 300. Acres of Land 100. Acres of Meadow 200. Acres of Pasture
30. Acres of Wood and 1. pound 6. shillings 4. pence Rent and of the Rent of 4. Capons and 1. pound of Wax with the Appurtenances in Stow-market Newton Gipping and One House by the name of the Mannor of Collumbine-hall otherwise Thorney Collumbers with the Appurtenances and 20. Messuages one Dove-house 20. Gardens 300. Acres of Land 100. Acres of Meadow 200. Acres of Pasture 30. Acres of Wood and 1. pound 6. shillings 4. pence Rent and the Rent of 4. Capons and 1. pound of Wax with the Appurtenances in Stow-market Newton Gipping and One House whereof a Plea of Covenant was sued between them in the said Court That is to say That the aforesaid William acknowledge the aforesaid Manor Tenements Rents and premises with the Appurtenances to be the Right of the said David as those which the said David and Robert had of the gift of the aforesaid VVilliam and those released and quit claimed from him and his Heirs to the said David and his Heirs for ever And besides the said VVilliam granted for him and his Heirs That they warrant to the said David and Robert and to the Heirs of the said Dazid the aforesaid Manor Tenements Rents with the Appurtenances against the aforesaid VVilliam and his Heirs for ever as by the Record of the same Fine in the Court of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench here remaing more fully appeareth Which Fine in form aforesaid levied and had was levied and had to the use of the aforesaid David and Robert and their Heirs to the intent and until a perfect Recovery by Writ of the Lady the Queen of Entry for Deseisin of the Post of the Manor and Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances were sued against the said David and Robert by one Robert Peirson Gentleman according to the course of Common Recoveries used to be had And the aforesaid Iohn Gardiner and Agnes his Wife of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof for the Term of the lives of them the said John Gardiner and Agnes and the longer liver of them so as before is said being seized the Remainder thereof to the aforesaid David and Robert Ham and their Heirs in form aforesaid expectant The said Fine in the Conusance of the said William Bredon and John Bredon above second mentioned in form aforesaid was levied in the aforesaid Court of the Lady the Queen here from the day of Easter in 15. day in the yeer 32th abovesaid before the aforesaid then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench Between the aforesaid John Hâ—gham Knight and Thomas Turner Esquire Plaintiffs and the aforesaid â—illiam Cary and the aforesaid Martha then his Wife Deforceant of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenance whereof c. And the aforesaid John Higham and Thomas by the same Fine granted unto the said Martha the aforesaid Annuitity or yeerly Rent of 40. p. to be issuing out of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances and those to her in form aforesaid rendred To have and perceive the aforesaid Annuity or yeerly Rent of 40. pound at the aforesaid Feasts of Saint Michael the Archangel and the Annuntiation of the blessed Mary the Virgin by equal portions yeerly to be paid all the life time of the said Martha if the aforesaid John and Agnes or any of them should so long live the first paymeÌ„t therof â—o begin at thaâ— Feast of the Feasts aforesaid which next after the decase of the said VVilliam Cary should happen to be with the aforesaid clause of distresse in the said Fine mentioned As the aforesaid William Bâ—edon and John Bredon by their Conusance aforesaid above suppose By virtue of the levying of which Fine last mentioned so had and levied The aforesaid John Gardiner and Agnes Forfeited their Estate aforesaid for the Term of their lives the life of the longer liver of them in the aforesaid Manor with the Appurtenances whereof c. And afterwards that is to say the aforesaid 24th day of March in in the 35th yeer abovesaid the aforesaid William Cary at Stow-market aforesaid dyed without issue of his Body lawfully begotten After whose death and before the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel in the yeer of 35th abovesaid The aforesaid Robert Cary Knight by reason of the aforesaid Forfeiture of the Estates of the aforesaid John Gardiner and Agnes and and in the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. entred and was thereof seized in Feetail that is to say to him the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten And so thereof being seized The said Robert afterwards and before the aforesaid time of the taking aforesaid made that is to say the 17th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 37th abovesaid At Stowmarket aforesaid gave licence to the said Agnes to put her Cattel into the aforesaid place in which c. to eat the grasse in the same then growing By virtue of which licence the said Agnes after and before the aforesaid time in which c. put her Cattel aforesaid into the aforesaid place in which c. to eat the grasse in the same Which Cattel were in the aforesaid place in which c. Until the aforesaid VVilliam Bredon and John Bredon the day and yeer above in the Declaration aforesaid above specified At Stow market aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which called the â—arkwood took the aforesaid Cattel of the said Agnes and them unjustly detained against Gages Pledges until c. as she above against them complaineth And this she is ready to aver wherofore in as much as the said William Bredon and John Bredon the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. above acknowlegeth The said Agnes demands Judgement and her damages for the occasion of taking and unjustly deteining of her Cattel aforesaid to be adjudged unto her And the aforesaid VVilliam Bredon and John Bredon as to the aforesaid Plea of the Agnes to the Conusance of the said William and John for the aforesaid 20. pound Residue made in Bar pleaded say That well and true it is that the aforesaid Fine in the Bar of the aforesaid Agnes second specified in the aforesaid Court of the Lady the Queen of the Bench aforesaid here in the aforesaid 15. day of Paster in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 3â—th abovesaid before the said Edmond Anderson Francis VVindham and VVilliam Periam then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench aforesaid here and other of the said Lady the Queens then Faithful People then here present Between the aforesaid David Bulward and Robert Ham Plaintiffs and the aforesaid VVilliam Cary Deforceant of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. And of the aforesaid Tenements and Rents with the Appurtenances in the said Fine in the Bar of the aforesaid Agnes second specified and mentioned in form aforesaid was
Court the very same Term in his proper person And the aforesaid David Howell although he be then sollemnly called doth not come back but in despight of the Court departeth and maketh default wherefore then it was granted in the said Court here That the said Roger should recover his seisin against the aforesaid David Bulward and Robert Ham of the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances and that the said David Bulward Robert Ham should have of the Lands of the aforesaid William Cary to the value c. And that the said David Howell should be thereof in mercy c. Upon which the aforesaid Roger then in the same Court demanded the Writ of the Lady the Queen to have to him full seisia and possession of the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid to the Sheriff of the County aforesaid to be directed and to him it was granted retorunable here in the morrow of the Holy Trinity then next following At which day here cometh the aforesaid Roger in his proper person and the then Sheriff of the County of Suffolk The aforesaid Philip Tilney Esquire then sent here That he by virtue of the Writ aforesaid to him directed the 16th day of May then last past gave to the aforesaid Roger seisin of the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances as by the said Writ to him it was Commanded c. Which Fine in the Barr of the aforesaid Agnes above specified in form aforesaid levyed and the Recovery aforesaid in form aforesaid had were levyed and had To the use of the aforesaid Iohn Gardiner and Agnes for the Term of their lives and the longer liver of them and after the decease of them the said Iohn Gardiner and Agnes to the use of the said William Cary and the Heirs of his body lawfully begotten By virtue of which Fine and Recovery in form aforesaid had and by force of the aforesaid Act of transferring of uses in possession The aforesaid Iohn Gardiner and Agnes were seised of the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. in their demesn as of Freehold for the term of the lives of the said Iohn and Agnes and the longer liver of them the remainder thereof after the death of the aforesaid Iohn and Agnes to the aforesaid William Cary and the Heirs of his body lawfully begotten expectant and the said Iohn Gardiner and Agnes so thereof being seised the Remainder thereof to the aforesaid William Cary in form aforesaid expectant The aforesaid Fine in the Conusans of the said William Bredon and Iohn Bredon above specified in form aforesaid was levyed in the aforesaid Court of the said Lady the Queen here from the aforesaid day of Easter in 15. dayes in the 32th year aforesaid before the aforesaid then Justices of the Lady the Queen of the Bench aforesaid here Between the aforesaid Io. Higham and Thomas Turner Plaintiffs and the aforesaid VVilliam Cary and Martha and the aforesaid Iohn Gardiner and Agnes deforceants of the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. And the aforesaid Iohn Higham and Thomas by the same Fine granted to the said Martha the aforesaid annuity or yeerly Rent of 40. pound to be issuing of him the aforesaid Manor with the Appurtenances whereof c. And the same to her in the said Court here in form aforesaid Rendred To have and to hold the same Annuity or yeerly Rent of 40. pound to the aforesaid Martha at the aforesaid Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel and the Annuntiation of the blessed Mary the Virgin by even portions yeerly to be paid all the life time of the said Martha if the aforesaid John Cardiner and Agnes the first payment thereof to Martha if the aforesaid J. Gardiner Agnes or either of them should so long live the first paymēt therof to begin at the Feast of the Feasts aforesaid next after the decease of the aforesaid VVil. Cary should first happen to be with the aforesaid clause of distress in the Fine mētioned And the aforesaid VVil. Cary afterwards that is to say the 24th day of March in the yeer 35th aforesaid at Stow-market aforesaid dyed After whose death by virtue of the Fine aforesaid The aforesaid Martha was and as yet is seized of the aforesaid Annuity or yeerly Rent of 40 p. in her demesn as of Freehold for Term of her life if the aforesaid Iohn Gardiner and Agnes or either of them shall so long live And this they are ready to aver Wherefore they demand Judgement and Retorn of their Cattel aforesaid together with their damages to be to them adjudged c. And the aforesaid Agnes as at first saith That the aforesaid Iohn Gardiner was seized of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in his demesn as of Fee and he the said Iohn so thereof being seized the Fine aforesaid in the Conusance of the aforesaid William Bredon and Iohn Bredon first above mentioned was levied in the aforesaid Court of the Queen here in the aforesaid 8. dayes of Saint Michael in the yeer of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29th abovesaid before the aforesaid then Justices and others the said Lady the Queens faithful people then there present Between the aforesaid Edmond Cary Knight and Robert Cary Esquire Plaintiffs and the aforesaid William Cary Esquire Iohn Gardiner and her the said Agnes now Plaintiff then the Wife of the aforesaid Iohn Gardiner and the aforesaid George Totty and Elizabeth his Wife Deforceants of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenancs whereof c. And of the aforesaid Tenements and Rents with the Appurtenances in the aforesaid Fine in the Conusance aforesaid first mentioned And that the said Fine in form aforesaid levied was had and levied To the use of the aforesaid Iohn Gardiner anc her the said Agnes for the Term of their lives and the longer liver of them and after the decease of the aforesaid Iohn and Agnes To the use of the aforesaid VVilliam Cary and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten and for default of such issue to the use of Robert Cary Knight and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten and for default of such issue to the use of the aforesaid Henry Cary Knight Lord of Hunsdon and his Heirs for ever By virtue of which Fine and by force of the aforesaid Statute of transferring uses into possession holden and made The aforesaid Iohn and Agnes were seized of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in their demesn as of Freehold for the Term of the lives of them the said Iohn and Agnes and the longer liver of them the Remainder thereof after the death of them the said Iohn and Agnes to the aforesaid William Cary and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten the Remainder thereof for default of such issue to the aforesaid Robert Cary and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten the Remainder thereof for default of such issue to the aforesaid
Henry Cary Knight Lord of Hunsdon and his Heis for ever And that the aforesaid John Gardiner and Agnes so of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. for the Term of the said John and Agnes and the longer liver of them in form aforesaid being seized the Remainder thereof after the death of them the said John and Agnes to the aforesaid William Cary and the Heirs oâ— his Body lawfully begotten the Remainder thereof for default of such issue to the aforesaid Robert Cary and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten the Remainder thereof for default of such issue to the aforesaid Heny Cary Knight Lord of Hunsdon and his Heirs expectant Before the levying of the aforesaid Fine in the Conusance of the aforesaid William Bredon and John Bredon above second mentioned The aforesaid other Fine in the aforesaid Plea of her the said Agnes above specified was levied in the aforesaid Court of the Queen here from the aforesaid day of Easter in 15. dayes in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 31th before the aforesaid then Justices and other the faithful people of the Lady the Queen then there present Between the aforesaid David Bulward and Robert Ham Plaintiffs and the aforesaid William Cary Deforceant of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. And of the aforesaid 20. Messuages One Dove house 20. Gardens 300. Acres of Land 100. Acres of Meadow 200. Acres of Pasture 30. Acres of Wood 1. pound 6. shillings 4. pence Rent and the Rent of 4. Capons and 1. pound of Wax with the Appurtenances in Stow-market Newton Gipping and One house Which Fine in form aforesaid levied and had was had and levied to the use of the aforesaid David and Robert Ham and to their Heirs for ever to the intent in the Plea of the aforesaid Agnes above mentioned the aforesaid John Gardiner and Agnes of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. for the Term of the lives of them the said John Gardiner and Agnes and the longer liver of them so as before is said being seized the Remainder thereof to the aforesaid David and Robert Ham and their Heirs expectant the aforesaid Recovery in the aforesaid Plea of the aforesaid William Bredon and John Bredon above mentioned in form aforesaid was had And the aforesaid Agnes further in Facto saith That the aforesaid John Gardiner and Agnes from the time of the levying of the Fine in the Conusance of the aforesaid William Bredon and John Bredon second mentioned in form aforesaid was levied Without that that the aforesaid David and Robert Ham the aforesaid day of bringing of the Writ of the Lady the Queen of Entry Sur Disseisin in the Post in the aforesaid Plea of the aforesaid William Bredon and John Bredon above mentioned or ever afterwards were ever Tenants of the Freehold of the Manor Tenements and Rents with the Appurtenances in the Recovery aforesaid above mentioned as the aforesaid William Bredon and John Bredon above have alleged And this she is ready to aver Wherefore she demandeth Judgement and his Damages by occasion of the taking and unjust detaining of the Cattel aforesaid to her to be adjudged And the aforesaid William Bredon and John Bredon say That the aforesaid Plea of the aforesaid Agnes to the Conusance of them the said William and John as to the aforesaid 20. pound residue of the 40. pound at the aforesaid Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel in the yeer 35th abovesaid payable above by Rejoynder pleaded is insufficient in Law to bar her the said Agnes from having her Action aforesaid of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which against them the said William and John or to bar the said William and John from the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. And that they to that Plea in manner and form aforesaid pleaded need not nor by the Law of the Land are bound to Answer for that that is to say That the aforesaid Induction of the Plea of the said Agnes to the Traverse aforesaid in her Plea aforesaid to the Conusance of them the said William and Iohn above rejoyning pleaded is not sufficient in Law to induce that Traverse And that the Traverse of the aforesaid Tenances of the David and Robert Ham the day of the bringing of the aforesaid Writ of Entry upon Disseisin in the Post of the aforesaid Manor Tenements Rents with the Appurtenances in the same Plea pleaded is not material in Law And this they are ready to aver wherefore for want of sufficient Plea of the said Agnes in this behalf the said William and John as at first demand Judgement and the retorn of the Cattel aforesaid together with damages c. to be to them adjudged And the aforesaid Agnes for as much as she hath alleged sufficient matter in Law and the aforesaid William Bredon and John Bredon from their Conusance aforesaid as to the aforesaid 20. pound of the aforesaid 40. p. residue at the aforesaid Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel payable to have to bar and the said Agnes to have her Action aforesaid against the said William and John above hath alleged which she is ready to aver which matter the aforesaid William and John do not deny nor to the same do any wayes Answer but the the same Averment utterly refuse to admit as before demandeth Judgement and her damages by occasion of the taking and unjustly detaining of the Cattel aforesaid to her to be adjudged And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the parties aforesaid here until in 8. dayes from Saint Michael to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh aswelthe aforesaid Agnes as the aforesaid Wil. Bredon J. Bredon by their Atornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day further is given to the parties aforesaid here until in 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh aswel the aforesaid Agnes as the aforesaid Wil. Bredon and John Bredon by their Attornies aforesaid And upon this The premises seen and by the Justices here fully understood It seemeth to the said Justices here That the aforesaid Plea of the aforesaid Agnes to the Conusance of the aforesaid William and John as to the aforesaid 20. pound residue of the aforesaid 40. pound at the aforesaid Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel in the yeer 35th abovesaid payable by Rejoynder pretended is not sufficient in Law for the said Agnes to have her Action aforesaid of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid against the said William and John or to
in which c. the said Walter and the aforesaid Robert who c. demand Judgement and their damages by the occasion of the taking and unjust deteining of the Cattel aforesaid to the said VValter to be adjudged And the aforesaid Nicholas as at first saith That the aforesaid John Bevill was seized of the aforesaid Services by the Hands of the aforesaid Robert Smith the Father as by the Hand of his very Tenant as he above alleged And of this puts himself upon the Country and the aforesaid Walter and the aforesaid Robert Smith the Son who c. likewise Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff that he cause to be here from the day Saint Martin 15. dayes 12. c. by whom c. and who neither c. to Recognize c. Because as well c. Processe against the Jurors to try the issue aforesaid is conteined until 15. of Easter in the 19th yeer of Queen Elizabeth unless the Justices to Assizes in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the Statute c. Upon Monday in the 5th Week of Lent the said 19th yeer first come At which Assizes the Verdict was given as followeth The Jurors say upon their Oath That the within named John Smith the Father held the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances called Newton of the within named John Bevill as of the within written Manor of Keligath by Knights Service within written And that the said John Bevill was seized of the Fealty and Sute of Court only parcel of the Services within written by the Hands of the aforesaid Robert Smith the Father as by the Hands of his very Tenant But whether the aforesaid seisin of Feâ—lty and Sute of Court aforesaid be a good and sufficient sâ—isin of the whole Services within written or not the Jurors are altogether ignorant And pray thereof the advice and diâ—cretion of the Justices aforesaid And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the same Justices That the aforesaid seisin of Fealty and Sute of Court be not a good and sufficient seisin of the whole Services aforesaid Then the Jurors say upon their Oath That the aforesaid John Bevill was not seized of the within written Services by the Hands of the aforesaid Robert Smith the Father as by the Hand of his very Tenant as the said Walter within alleged And then they assess the damages of him the said Walter by occasion of the taking and unjust detaining of the Cattel aforesaid besides his costs and charge by him about his Sute in this behalf expended to 12. pence and for his costs and charges to 40. shillings And if upon the whole matter aforesaid it shall seem to the Justices That the said seisin of Fealty and Sute of Court aforesaid be a good and sufficient seisin of the whole Services within written Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said John Bevill was seized oâ— the Services within written by the Hands of the aforesaid Robert Smith the Father as by the Hands of his very Tenant as the aforesaid Nicholas within alleged And then they assess the damages of the said Nicholas by occasion of the premises besides his costs and charges by him about his Sute in this behalf expended to 12. pence and for his costs and charges to 40. shillings And because the Justices here will avise themselves of upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the parties here until in the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the Justices here thereof not yet c. And so the Plea aforesaid was continued until the Morrow of the Holy Trinity in the 25th yeer of Queen Elizabeth which day Judgement was given as followeth At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Walter Parker by his Attorny aforesaid as the aforesaid Nicholas Francis by William Aylesbury his Attorny And upon this The premises being seen and by the Justices here fully understood It seemeth to the Justices here That the aforesaid seisin of Fealty and Sute of Court aforesaid is a good and sufficient seisin of the whole Services aforesaid Therefore it is granted That the aforesaid William Parker take nothing by his Writ aforesaid but be in mercy for his false clamour And the aforesaid Nicholas Francis thereof go without day and that he have Retorn of his Cattel aforesaid to be kept by him irreplegible for ever c. It is also granted That the aforesaid Nicholas Francis recover against the aforesaid Walter Parker his damages aforesaid to 41. shillings by the Jurors in form aforesaid assessed as also 13. pound to the said Nicholas at his request for his costs and charges aforesaid by the Court here of Encrease adjudged which damages in the whole do amount to 15. pound 1. shilling c. REPLEVIN Trinity Term Anno 7 mo JACOBI Rot. 3661. in Salop. the COMMON-PLEAS Co. 8. part John Talbotts Case IOhn Pendleton was attached by the Writ of the Lady the Queen of second deliverance to answer to John Chapman of a Plea wherefore he took the Cattel of him the said John Chapman and them unjustly deteined against Gages and Pledges c. And whereupon The said John Chapman by Thomas Salter his Attorney complaineth That the aforesaid John Pendleton the second day of September in the yeer of the Lord the King that now is of England c. the 6th at Albrighton in a certain place called Bromly took his Cattel that is to say two Bullocks of the said John Chapman and them unjustly deteined against Gages and Pledges untill c. whereupon he saith that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 20. pound and thereof he bringeth sute c. And the aforesaid Iohn Pendleton by Nicholas Gibbens his Attorny cometh and defendeth the force and injury when c. and as Bayliff of Jo. Talbot Esquire doth well avow the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. and justly c. Because he saith That the place in which it is supposed the taking aforesaid to be done doth contein and at the time of the taking thereof above supposed to be done did contein in it self 3. Acres of Pasture lying in the aforesaid field called Bromley in Albrighton aforesaid and that long before the taking of the Cattel aforesaid supposed to be done One John Chapman Father of the now Plaintiff was seised of the aforesaid 3. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in which c. in his demesn as of Fee and the said 3. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in which c. held of the aforesaid John as of his Manor of Albrighton in the County aforesaid by Fealty and the Service of doing sute at the Court of the said John Talbot of his Manor aforesaid from 3. weeks to 3. weeks at that Manor to be holden As also by the service of rendring after
now is the 6th abovesaid by his deed sealed with his Seal and to the Jurors aforesaid shewed in Evidence whose date is the said 6th day of July aforesaid of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. Enfeoffed the aforesaid John Chichester To have and to hold the said Manor with the Appurtenances whereof c. To the said John Chichester his Heirs and Assigns for ever to the only use and behoof of the said John Chichester his Heirs and Assigns for ever And by the said deed aforesaid The said Christopher granted for him and his Heirs That he and his Heirs the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. to the aforesaid John Christopher his Heirs and Assigns to the only use and behooâ— of the said John Christopher his Heirs and Assigns against all Men would warrant and defend by the said deed as by the said deed more fully appeareth By virtue of which Fefeoffment and of which aforesaid Bargain and Sale the aforesaid John Chichester was seized of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. as the Law requireth And so living thereof seized The aforesaid Christopher Chudleigh aftewards and before the within written time in which c. that is to say the first day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 12th dyed being the aforesaid Stretchly Chudleigh Eldest Son and Heir of the said Christopher and John Chudleigh his second Son And afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the 7th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said â—ady the Queen that now is the 13th The said Stretchley Chudleigh dyed without issue of his Body begotten the said John Chudleigh Brother and Heir of the said Strechley then living and in full life being that is to say at Tawstock aforesaid in the County aforesaid And that the aforesaid John Chudleigh after the death of the aforesaid Stretchley his Brother was and yet is Heir of the aforesaid Christopher Chudleigh his Father And the said John Chudleigh of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in form aforesaid being seized The said John Chichester before the within written time in which c. that is to say the 6th day of September in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 7th of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. enfeoffed one Philip Chichester Gentleman To have and to hold the said Manor with the Appurtenances whereof c. to the said Philip Chichester his Heirs and Assigns for ever to the only use of him the said Philip Chichester his Heirs and Assigns for ever By virtue of which Feoffment the said Philip Chichester was seized of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. as the Law requireth And that the Close aforesaid with the Appurtenances in which c. is and the within written time in which c. as also from the whole time aforesaid was customary Land of the Manor aforesaid and demised and demisable by Copy of Court Roll of the Manor aforesaid by the Lord or his Steward of the Manor aforesaid for the time being to any person or persons who were willing to take the same for Term of Life or Lives at the will of the Lord according to the Custom of the Manor aforesaid And the aforesaid PHILIP Chichester of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. as the Law requireth c. Being seized before the time within which c. That is to say the 8th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 15th At the Court of his Manor aforesaid then holden at the said Manor of Hescot aforesaid of his own delivery the Close aforesaid with the Appurtenances amongst other things to the aforesaid John Frayne granted for the Term of his Life at the Will of the Lord according to the Custom of the Manor aforesaid By virtue of which grant the said John Frayne before the time in which c. entred and was thereof seized as the Law requireth c. And so thereof being seized the said John Chudley being Heir as before is said of the aforesaid Christopher Chudleigh before the within written time in which c. That is to say the 11th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 28th in the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in and upon the possession of the aforesaid Philip Chichester thereof entred and was thereof possessed as the Law requireth c And so being possessed before the within written time in which c. that is to say the 11th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is Of the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof enfeoffed the aforesaid William Dillon To have and to hold that Manor with the Appurtenances whereof to the said William Dillon his Heirs and Assigns for ever By virtue of which Feoffment before the time in which c. The said William Dillon into the Close aforesaid with the Appurtenances in which c. in and upon the possession of the said John Frayne thereof entred and him the said John Frayne from his possession thereof expelled and amoved and was thereof seized as the Law requireth until the aforesaid John Frayne the within written 16th day of November into the Close within written with the Appurtenances in which c. in and upon the possession of the said William Dillon thereof entred and the Grasse then and there growing with the Gattel within written fed trod and consumed and continued the same from the aforesaid 16th day of November in the 29th yeer aforesaid until the within written 8th day of February the 30th yeer within written But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found the aforesaid John Frayne be guilty of the Trespasse within written or not the Jurors aforesaid are ignorant And thereupon pray the Advise and Discretion of the Court c. And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices here That the aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid John Frayne into the Close within written with the Appurtenances in and upon the possession of the aforesaid William Dillon thereof be not a good and lawful Entry in Law Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Frayne is guilty of the Trespasse within written as the aforesaid VVilliam Dillon above against him complaineth And then they assesse the Damages of the said VVilliam by occasion of that Trespasse above his costs and charges by him about his Sute in this part expended to 4. pence And for his costs and charges to 20. shillings And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices and Court here
to the value of 20. l. growing with certain cattel trod and consumed and other harms to him did to the grievous damage of him the said William Thoroughgood and against the Peace of the Lady the Queen that now is c. And whereupon The said William Thoroughgood by William Aylesbury Attorney complaineth That the aforesaid William Cole the 12th day of October in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 23. with force and arms the Close and House of him the said William Thoroughgood at great Paringdon aforesaid brake and his grass to the value c. there late growing with certain cattel that is to say Horses Cows Hogs and Sheep fed trod and consumed the Trespass aforesaid as to the feeding treading and consuming of the grass aforesaid from the aforesaid 12th day of October in the 23th year abovesaid until the day of the bringing of this Writ Original of him the said William Thoroughgood that is to say the 6th day of November then next following diverse dayes and terms continuing and other harms c. To the grievous damage c. and against the Peace c. and whereupon he saith he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 40. l. and thereof he bringeth Sute c. And the aforesaid William Cole by Thomas Reynolds his Attorney cometh and defendeth the force and injury when c. And as to the coming with force and arms he saith That he is not guilty thereof and of this puts himself upon the Country and the aforesaid William Thoroughgood likewise And as to the rest of the Trespass aforesaid above supposed to be done The said William Cole saith That the aforesaid William Thoroughgood ought not to have his Action against him because he saith That the Close and House aforesaid as also the places in which it is supposed the Trespass aforesaid to be done are and at the time of the Trespass aforesaid above supposed to be done were one Messuage and two Acres of Meadow with the Appurtenances called Nichols Tenement in great Paringdon aforesaid which Tenements with the apturtenances are and the aforesaid time of the Trespass aforesaid above-supposed to be done were the soyl and Freehold of him the said William Cole for which the aforesaid William the aforesaid time in which c. the Close and House aforesaid as his Close and soyl and Freehold of him the said William into the same Messuage and two Acres of Meadow with the appurtenances brake and the grass of him the said William Cole there of his own there growing with his Cattel did feed tread and consume as it was lawfull for him to do And this he is ready to aver whereupon he demandeth Judgemēt whether that the aforesaid Wil. Thoroughgood his action aforesaid against him ought to have c. And the aforesaid William Thoroughgood saith That he for any thing before alledged from having his Action aforesaid ought not to be barred because he saith That the Close and house and also the places in which the Trespass aforesaid whereof he above maketh complaint was are and at the time of the Trespass aforesaid done were one Messuage called Burrowes 8. Acres of Land called the great West field four Acres of Land called Diggins Holme and six Acres of Land called Grove field with the Appurtenances in great Paringdon aforesaid others then the aforesaid Messuage and two Acres of Meadow with the Appurtenances called Nichols Tenements in the Bar of the aforesaid William Cole above specified and this he is ready to aver wherefore in as much as the said William Cole to the Trespass aforesaid in the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances new assigned over doth not Answer the aforesaid William Thoroughgood demandeth Judgement and his damages by occasion of that Trespass to be to him adjudged c. And the aforesaid William Cole as to any Trespass in the aforesaid Tenements now assigned supposed to be done he saith That the aforesaid William Thoroughgood his action against him ought not to have because he saith That long before the aforesaid time of the Trespass aforesaid above supposed to be done That the aforesaid William Thoroughgood was seized of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances new assigned in his Demesn as of Fee and so thereof being sized before the aforesaid time in which c. A Fine was Levied in the Court of the Lady the Queen that now is here that is to say at Westminster in 8. days of St. Hillary in the 10th year of her Reign before James Dyer Richard Weston John Welsh and Richard Harper then Justices and afterwards from the day of Easter in 14. days then next following granted and recorded before the same Justices and other the Queens faithfull peuple then and there present between William Chicken and Elizabeth his wife Plaintiffs and the aforesaid William Thoroughgood and Agnes his wife Defendants of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances amongst other things by the names of one Messuage one Garden 45. Acres of Land 5. Acres of Meadow 10. Acres of Pasture and four Acres of Wood with the Appurtenances in great Paringdon and Avydon whereof a Plea of Covenant was sued between them in the said Court here That is to say that the aforesaid Will. Thoroughood Agnes his wife acknowledged the Tenements aforesaid to be the Right of the said VVilliam Chicken as those which the said VVilliam and Elizabeth had of the gift of the aforesaid VVilliam Thoroughgood and Agnes and them remised and quit claimed from them the said VVilliam Agnes and their Heirs to the aforesaid VVilliam Chicken and Elizabeth the Heirs of the said VVilliam forever which Fine in form aforesaid levied and had was levied to the use of the aforesaid William Chicken and Elizabeth and the Heirs of the said William forever By vertue of which Fine the aforesaid William Chicken and Elizabeth were seized of the Tenements aforesaid that is to say The said William Chicken in his Demesn as of Fee and the aforesaid Elizabeth in her Demesn as of Freehold for the term of her life And the said William and Elizabeth so thereof being seized before the aforesaid time in which c. Of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances enfeoffed one Edward Turner Esauire To have to him and his Heirs for ever By vertue of which Feoffment the aforesaid Edward was of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances seized in his Demesn of Fee By which the said William Cole as servant to the said Edward and by his Commandment the aforesaid tim in which c. the Close and House aforesaid as the Close and House soyl and Freehold of the said Edward his own brake and the grass aforesaid as the proper grass of him the said Edward in the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances new assigned then growing with his Cattel aforesaid fed trod and consumed as it was lawfull for him to do And this he is ready to aver whereupon he
to the Sheriff that he cause to come from the day of the Holy Trinity in 3. Weeks 12. c. By whom c. And who neither c. To Recognize c. Because as well c. Afterwards the processe was continued between the parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid by Jurors put between them in respite here until this day that is to say the Morrow of Saint Martin in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is 25th And now at this day come as as well the aforesaid VVilliam Thoroughgood as the aforesaid VVilliam Cole by their Attornies aforesaid And the Jurors thereof impannelled likewise come who to say the truth of the premises chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath that the aforesaid VVilliam Thoroughgood is a Lay-man and unlearned and that divers arrerages of the yeerly payments aforesaid to the aforesaid VVilliam Thoroughgood the aforesaid time of making of the aforesaid Writing of Release were unpaid And also that the said Wriging of Release at the time of the sealing thereof was not read to the aforesaid VVilliam Thoroughgood But after one Thomas VVard had begun to read that Writing to the aforesaid VVillam Thoroughgood One John VVard snatcht that Writing out of the hands of the aforesaid Thomas before he had read the first line thereof saying to the aforesaid VVilliam Thoroughgood these words following Good-man Thoroughgood you are a man unlearned and I will declare it unto you and make you understand it better than you can by hearing it read And afterwards the aforesaid John VVard declared the aforesaid Writing of Release to the aforesaid VVilliam Thoroughgood in these words following Good-man Thoroughgood the effect of it is this That you do release to VVilliam Chicken all the arrerages of Rent that he doth ow you and no otherwise and then you shall have your Land again meaning the Tenements aforesaid of new assigned To which the aforesaid VVilliam Thoroughgood then answered in these words following that is to say If it be no otherwise I am content And upon that The said VVillam Thoroughgood giving credit to the words of the aforesaid John VVard then and there sealed the said Writing of Release and delivered it to the aforesaid VVilliam Chicken But whether upon the whole matter in form aforesaid found The said Writing of Release be and in Law ought to be adjudged the deed of the aforesaid VVilliam Thoroughgood or not the Jurors aforesaid are utterly ignorant And thereof pray the Advise of the Justices and the Court here And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices here that the Writing is not nor ought in Law to be adjudged the deed of the aforesaid VVilliam Thoroughgood Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath That the aforesaid Writing of Release is not the deed of the aforesaid VVillliam Thoroughgood as the said William above allegeth and they assesse Damages of the said William Thoroughgood by occasion of the Trespasse aforesaid above his costs and charges by him in this part about his Sute expended to 20. shillings and for his costs and charges to 12. pence And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices here That the Writing aforesaid of Release is the deed of the aforesaid William Thoroughgood as the aforesaid VVilliam Cole above hath alleged Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath That the said Writing of Release is the deed of the aforesaid William Thoroughgood as the said William Cole above hath alleged And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof Day is given to the parties aforesaid here until in 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to here their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid William Thoroughgood as the aforesaid William Cole by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof further day is given to the parties aforesaid here from the day of Easter 15. dayes to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid William Thoroughgood as the aforesaid William Cole by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof Day further is given to the parties aforesaid here until the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid William Thoroughgood as the aforesaid William Cole by their Attornies aforesaid And upon this The premises being seen and by the Justices here fully understood It is granted That the aforesaid William Thoroughgood shall recover against the said William Cole his damages to 21. shillings by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed as also 23. pound 19. shillings to the said VVilliam Thoroughgood at his Request for his costs and charges aforesaid by the Court of Encrease adjudged which damages in the whole do amount to 25. pound and that the aforesaid VVilliam Cole be taken c. TRESPAS Easter Term Anno 310. ELIZABETH Rot. 115. in the COMMON-PLEAS C. 2. part Baldwins Case fol. 18. CCristopher Marton late of Marton in the County aforesaid Esquire was York Attached to answer Anthony Baldwin of a Plea wherefore with force and Arms the Close of him the said Anthony at Marton he brake and his Corn there to the value of 10. pound there late growing with his Feet trod and consumed and other harms to him did to the grievous damage of him the said Anthony and against the Peace of the Lady the Queen that now is c. And whereupon the said Anthony by Robert Somervile his Attorny complaineth That the aforesaid Christopher the 10th day of September in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 30th with force and Arms the Close of him the said Anthony at Marton broke and his Corn that is to say Oats to the value c. then there late growing with his Feet trod and consumed And other harms c. Whereupon he saith that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 20. pound and thereof he bringeth Sute c. And the aforesaid Christopher by VVilliam Barton his Attorny cometh and defendeth the force and injury when c. And as to the force and Arms he saith that he is thereof not guilty And as to the rest of the Trespass aforesaid supposed to be done The said Christopher saith That the aforesaid Anthony his Action against him ought not to have Because he saith That the Close aforesaid as also the places in which it is supposed the Trespass aforesaid to be
That the said Christo the day and yeer in the Declaration above specified entred into the aforesaid 4. acres of Land with the Appurtenances in which c. upon the possession of the aforesaid Anthony and the Oats within written then there with his Feet trod and consumed as the aforesaid Anthony within against him complaineth But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found The aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid Christopher in the aforesaid 4. acres of Land with the Appurtenances in which c. be a good and lawful Entry or not the said Jurors are utterly ignorant And thereof pray the Advise and Judgement of the Justices of the Court here And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices and Court here That the aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid Christopher be not a good and lawful Entry in Law in the aforesaid 4. acres of Land upon the possession of the said Anthony Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath That the aforesaid Christopher is guilty of the Trespass in the aforesaid 4. acres of Land within new assigned as the aforesaid Anthony within against him complaineth And then they assesse the damages of the said Anthony by occasion of that Trespass above his costs and charges by him about his Sute in this behalf expended to 20. shillings and for his costs and charges to 40. shillings And if upon the whole matter aforesaid It shall seem to the Justices and Court here That the aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid Christopher in the aforesaid 4. acres of Land new assigned upon the possession of the said Anthony is a good and lawful Entry in Law Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath That the aforesaid Christopher is not guilty of the Trespas within written in the within written 4. acres of Land within new assigned And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before that they give their Judgement thereof Day is given to the parties aforesaid here until in 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the said Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day come as well the said Anthony as the aforesaid Christopher by their Attorney aforesaid and upon this all and singular the premises being seen and by the Justices c. fully understood It is granted that the aforesaid Anthony recover against the aforesaid Christopher his damages to 3. l. by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid Assessed as also 11. l. 6. s. 8. d. to the said Anthony at his request for his costs and charges by the Court here of increase adjudged which damages in the whole amount to fourteen pound six shillings and eight pence and that the aforesaid Christopher be taken c. TRESPAS Michaelmass Term Anno 36. and 37. ELIZABETH Rot. 136. in the KINGS-BENCH Co. 2. part Tookers Case Fol. 62. MEmorandum that at another time that is to say in the Term of Easter Devon last past before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came William Rud by Michael Bland his Attorney and brought here in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is then there his Bill against Edward Tooker in the custody of the Marshall c. of a Plea of Trespass and are Pledges of Sute that is to say John Doo and Richard Roo which Bill followeth in these words ss Devon ss William Rud complaineth of Edward Tooker in the custody of the Marshall of the Marshal-Sea of the Lady the Queen before the Queen her self for that he the first day of April in the year of the Reign of the Lady Elizabeth now Queen of England the 36th with force and Arms c. the Close and house of him the said William called Bertonland otherwise the Barton of Sprecombe at Morthoe in the County aforesaid broke and entred and his grass of the value of an hundred Marks in the Close aforesaid then late growing with certain Cattel that is to say with Horses Oxen Cows Hogs and Sheep fed trod and consumed and other harms to him did against the Peace of the said Lady the Queen that now is to the damage of the said William an hundred pound and thereof bringeth sute c. And now at this day that is to say VVednesday next after eight dayes of Saint Michael this Term until which day the aforesaid Edward had leave to impart to the said Bill and then to Answer c. before the Lady the Queen at Westminster cometh as well the aforesaid William by his Attorney aforesaid as the aforesaid Edward by John Halstaff his Attorney And the said Edward defendeth the force and injury when c. and saith that he is not thereof guilty and of this puts himself upon the County and the aforesaid William likewise c. Therefore it is commanded the Sheriff that a Jury come before the Lady the Queen at Westminster Friday next after 15. days of St. Hillary c. and who neither c. to recognize c. Because as well c. the same day is given to the parties aforesaid there c. Afterwards the Process is continued between the parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid by Jurors thereof betwixt them put in respite of the Plea aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Wednesday next after 15. dayes of Easter then next following unless the justices of the Lady the Queen to Assizes in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned first upon Monday the 10th day of March at the Castle of Exeter in the County aforesaid by form of the Statute c. come for want of jurors c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And the aforesaid justices to Assizes before whom c. sent their Record before them had in these words ss Afterwards the day and place within contained before Edmond Anderson Knight Chief justice of the Lady the Queen of the Bench and Thomas Walmesley one of the justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench justices of the said Lady the Queen to Assizes in the County of Devon to be taken assigned by form of the Statute c. come as well the within named William Rud by Erasmus Ford his Attorny as the within written Edward Tooker by Thomas Clayton his Attorny And the jurors of the jury whereof within mention is made being called some of them that is to say David Matacotâ— of Saint Giles John Hayman of Shelbere John Hooper of Westdown Richard Clyeff of Chanford John Bow of the same and John Hole of Drew Steinton came and are sworn in the said Jury And because the rest of the Jurors of the said Jury did not appear Therefore others of the standers by by the Sheriff of the County aforesaid chosen at the request of the said William Rud and by the Command of the justices
against him complaineth But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found The aforesaid Entry of the said Edward into the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in which c. be a good and lawful Entry in Law or not the Jurors aforesaid are utterly ignorant And thereof pray the Advise and Consideration of the Court c. And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices and Court here That the aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid Edward in the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in which c. in and upon the possession of the said William Rud be not a good and lawful Entry in Law Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath That the aforesaid Edward Tooker is guilty of the Trespass within written as the said W. Rud above against him complaineth And assess the damages of the said William Rud by that occasion above his costs and charges by him about his Sute in that behalf expended to 6. pence and for his costs and charges of 20. shillings And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices and Court here That the aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid Edward in the Tenements within wrtten with the Appurtenances in which c. in and upon the possession of the aforesaid William be a good and lawful Entry in Law Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Edward is not guilty of the Trespass within written as the said â—dward above against him allegeth And because the Court of the said Lady the Q. here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Fryday next after the Morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster aforesaid until Thursday next after the Morrow of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen hereof giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queeen at Westminster until Fryday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Fryday next after 18. dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the said Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Fryday next after the Morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Saturday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement o and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster aforesaid until Monday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until Wednesday next after 18. days of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day further thereof is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until Fryday next after the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. AT which day before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until Monday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until Monday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear
their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until Wednesday next after 18. dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westmin aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the said Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until Fryday next after the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here therof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Wesminster aforesaid until Monday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at West aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westmin aforesaid until Tuesday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Wesminster aforesaid until Wednesday next 18. dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until the Morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the partes aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until Tuesday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of upon the premises is not yet avised day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until Wednesday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until Wednesday next after 18. dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until Fryday next after the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Thursday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid until VVednesday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid Upon which all and singular the premises being seen and by the Court of the Lady the Queen here fully understood and mature deliberation being had thereof Because it seemeth to the said Court of the said Lady the Queen and the Justices here That the aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid Edward into the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in which c. in and upon the possession of the said William thereof is a good and lawful Entry in Law Therefore it is granted That the
Essex with all and singular Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever As also of and in all those Manors and Lordships of Bustingthorp otherwise Buslingthorp and Dunnesby in the County of Lincoln with their Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever And of and in all those Manors of Salthorp otherwise Saltrop otherwise Halthrop Chilton and Black-grove in the County of Wilts with their Rights Members and Appurtenances And of and in all those Lands and Pastures called Black-grove conteining by estimation 200. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in Black-grove and Wroughton in the County of Wilts And of and in all those Manors of Mihenden otherwise Missenden otherwise called the Manors of Mussenden in the Parish of Wroughton Lydepard and Tregose in the said County of Wilts with all and singular their Rights Members and Appurtenances and of all that Manor of Elcomb and Park called Elcomb Park with the Appurtenances in the said County of Wilts And of and in all that Manor of Wattlescote otherwise Wigglescote otherwise Wiggetscete with the Appurtenances in the said County of Wilts And of and in all that Mannor of Wescot otherwise Wescet with the Appurtenances in the said County of Wilts And of and in all those Lands and Pastures conteining by estimation 100. Acres of Land and 60. Acres of Pasture in Wigglescot Wroughton in the said County of Wilts And of and in all that Manor of Vscot with the Appurtenances in the said County of Wilts And of and in all those two Messuages and 1000. Acres of Land 2000. Acres of Pasture 300. Acres of Pasture and 300. Acres of Wood with the Appurtenances in Broadhinton in the said County of Wilts And of and in all those Manors and Lordships of Campes otherwise Campes-Castle otherwise called Castle Campes with the Appurtenances situate lying being and extending into the Counties of CAMBRIDGE and ESSEX or either of them or elsewhere in the Kingdom of ENGLAND And also of and in all that Manor of Balsham in the County of Cambridge with all and singular Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever And also of and in all and singular those Messuages and Lands situate and being in the Parish of Hackney and Tottingham in the County of Middlesex with their Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever which Messuage was lately purchased of Will. Bowper Knight the said Lands in Tottenham now are or late were in the Tenure or Occupation of William Benning Yeoman And of and in all and singular Manors Lordships Messuages Lands Tenements Reversions Services Feedings Pastures Woods Advowsons Patronages of Churches and Hereditaments of the aforesaid Thomas Sutton whatsoever situate lying and being in the said Counties of Essex Lincoln Wilts Cambridge and Middlesex or any of them with all and singular their Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever in his demesn as of Fee And the said Jurors further say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Thomas Sutton so thereof being seised before the time in which that is to say At the 4th Session of Parliament begun and holden by Prorogation at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 9th day of February in the yeer of the Reign of our Lord James by the grace of God of England France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith c. the 7th and of Scotland the 3d. and there continued untill the 24th day of July then next following and then prorogued until the 16th day of October then next following amongst other things it was Enacted and established by Authority of the same Parliament as followeth in these words Humbly beseecheth your Majesty Your Loyal and dutiful Subject Thomas Sutton of Bedsham in the County of Cambridge Esquire That it may please your most excellent Majesty and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled To Enact Ordain Establish And be it Enacted Ordained and Established by the Authority aforesaid That in the Town of Hallingburn otherwise called Hallinborn Bowchers in the County of Essex there may be builded and erected at the Costs and Charges of your suppliant one meet fit and convenient House Buildings and Rooms for the abiding and dwelling of such number of poor People Men and Children as your suppliant shall name by limit and appointment to be lodged harboured abide and be relieved there And for the abiding dwelling and necessary use of one School-master and Usher to instruct the said Children in Reading Writing and the Latine and Greek Grammar And of one Divine and godly Preacher to instruct and teach all the rest of the same House in the knowledge of God and his word And of one Master to govern all these persons of in or belonging unto the same House And that the same shall and may be called The Hospital of King James founded in Hallingbury in the County of Essex at the humble Petition and at the only Costs and Charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire And that the Right Reverend Father in God Richard now Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and his Successors Arch-Bishops there Thomas Lord Ellesmore Lord Chancellor of England and such as after him shall succeed to be Lord Chancellors or Lord Keepers of the Great Seal of England for and during the time they shall so continue or be in the same Office Robert Earl of Salisbury Lord High Treasurer of England and such as after him shall succeed to be Treasurers of England and such as after him shall succeed to be Treasurers of England for and during the time they shall continue or be in the same Office The Reverend Father in God Launcelot Bishop of Ely and his Successors Bishops there Richard Bishop of Rochester and Dean of the Cathedral Church of Westminster and his Successors of and in the same Deanery Sir Thomas Foster Kt. one of the Justices of your Majesties Court of Common-Pleas usually holden at Westminster Sir Henry Hobart Knight your Majesties Attorney General John Overal Doctor of Divinity Dean of the Cathedral Church of Saint Paul in London and his Successors Deans there Henry Thursby Esquire one of the Masters of your Majesties Court of Chancery Thomas Fortescue Thomas Paget Geffrey Nightingale and Richard Sutton Esquires John Law and Thomas Brown Gent. and such others as shall be from time to time for ever hereafter chosen and nominated in and to the places and steads of such of them as shall decease by your suppliant during his life and after his decease by the most part of them which them shall be Governors of the said Hospital to be and succeed in and to the place and places of him and them deceasing shall and may be the Governors of the said Hospital and of the Members Goods Lands Revenews and Hereditaments of the same at all times hereafter for ever And that the same Governors and Hospital shall for ever hereafter stand and be incorporated Established and founded in name and indeed a body Politick Corporate to have continuance for ever By the name of the Governors of the Hospital
And that the said Thomas Sutton during his life and after his decease the Governours hereafter named and their Successors and the Survivors and Survivor of them and his and their Successors for ever and the Governours of the said Hospital for the time being and their Successors shall have full Power License and lawful Authority at his or their Wills and Pleasures from time to time and at all times hereafter to place therein such number of poor Children or Scholars as to him the said Thomas Sutton during his life and after his decease to the said Governours and their Successors and to the Survivors or Survivor of them and his and their Successors and to the Governours of the said Hospital for the time being and their Successors shall seem convenient And also one godly and learned Preacher to teach and preach the Word of God to all the said persons poor People and Children As also one learned able and sufficient person to be the School-Master of the said School and one learned able and sufficient person to be the Usher thereof to teach and instruct the said Children in Grammar And further we of our said special Grace certain Knowledge meer Motion have ordained constituted assigned limitted appointed and by these presents for us our Heirs and Successors do ordain constitute assign limit and appoint That the said House and other the premises shall from henceforth for ever hereafter be remain continue and be converted imployed and used for an Hospital and House and Place for the abiding sustentation and relief of such number of poor People Men and Children as the said Thomas Sutton during his life and after his death the Governours hereafter named and their Successors and the Survivors and Survivor of them and his and their Successors and all and every the Governours of the said Hospital for the time being and their Successors shall name assign limit or appoint to be lodged harbored abide and to be maintained and relieved there and for the abiding dwelling sustentation and relief of such number of poor Children as the said Thomas Sutton during his life and after his death the Governours hereafter named and their Successors and the Survivors and Survivor of them and his and their Successors and the Governours of the said Hospital for the time being shall from time to time name assign limit or appoint to be lodged harbored abide and to be maintained and relieved there And for the abiding dwelling sustentation and finding of one School-Master one Usher and one Preacher as is aforesaid and of one Master or Head of the said House and Hospital And that it shall and may be lawful to and for the said Master Preacher School-Master Usher poor people Children Men and Officers of the said Hospital or therein to be placed for the time being to assemble be remain abide and cohabit together in the said Hospital And that the said Hospital shall for ever hereafter be incorporated named and called the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex At the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esq And the same Hospital and Free-school by the name of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex At the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esq We do firmly by these presents for us our Heirs and Successors erect found establish and confirm to have continuance for ever And for the better maintainance and continuance of the said Hospital and Free-school and the said godly and charitable uses intents and purposes and that the same may have and take the better effect and that all and every the Manors Lands Tenements and Rents Reversions Services and Hereditaments Goods and Chattels granted conveied assigned devised willed limitted and appointed for the maintainance sustentation and relief of the persons aforesaid in the same Hospital may be the better governed used imployed and bestowed for the mantainance of the persosn in the said Hospital for the time being to have continuance for ever We Will Ordain and do appoint assign limit and name and for us our Heirs and Successors do grant and ordain by these presents That there shall be for ever hereafter 16. persons who shall be called Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex At the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire And for that purpose we have elected nominated ordained assigned constituted limitted and appointed and by these presents do for us our Heirs and Successors elect nominate ordain assign constitute and appoint The Right Reverend Father in God George now Arch Bishop of Canterbury our trusty and Well-Beloved Counsellor Thomas Lord Ellesmere Lord Chancellor of England our trusty and Well-Beloved Cosin and Counsellor Robert Earl of Salisbury Lord High Treasurer of England John the elect Bishop of London Launcelot now Bishop of Elie Sir Edward Coke Knight Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas Thomas Foster Knight one of our Justices of our Court of Common-Pleas Sir Henry Hobart Knight and Baronet our Attorny General John Overal now Dean of the Cathedral Church of Saint Paul in London George Mountain Dean of the Collegiate Church of Westminster Henry Thursby Esquire one of the Masters of our Court of Chancery Jeffery Nightingale Esquire Richard Sutton Esquire John Law Gentleman Thomas Brown Gentleman and the Master of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter House within the County of Middlesex At the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of the said Thomas Sutton Esquire and such person and persons as shall be from time to time Master or Masters of the said Hospital for and during such time as they shall be Master or Masters thereof to be the first and present Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex At the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire and that they and the Survivors of them and such as the Survivors or Survivor of them from time to time Elect and Chuse to make up the number of 16. when and as often as any of them or any of their Successors shall happen to decease or to be removed from being Governours or Governour thereoâ— shall be incorporated and have a perpetual succession for ever in Deed Fact and Name and shall be one Body Politick and Corporate And that the said persons and their Successors and the Survivors and Survivor of them and his and their Successors and such as shall be elected and chosen to succeed them as aforesaid shall be incorporated named and called by the name of the Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex At the humble Petition
the 22th day of June in this present 9th yeer of his Reign over England upon the humble Sute of the said Thomas to give License Power and Authority to him the said Thomas Sutton to place found and erect an Hospital and Free-school in the House called the late dissolved Charter-House besides Smith field in the County of Middlesex And like License Power and Authority for him the said Thomas Sutton at any time during his life to ordain appoint and place a Master of the said Hospital And that the said Hospital should be called by the name of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esq And where furthermore by the said Letters Patents The Master of the said Hospital for the time being is ordained and appointed to be one of the 16. Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the said Hospital And that the same 16. Governours are by the said Letters Patents incorporate to purchase and take Lands to them and their Successors for ever for the maintainance of the said Hospital by the name of the Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and the onely costs and Charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire as by the said Letters Patents amongst other things more at large may appear By reason whereof there must be a Master made before such time as the said Thomas Sutton can convey the Lands intended by the said Thomas Sutton to be conveied for the maintaiance of the said Hospital unto the said Governours according to the said Letters Patents Now the said Thomas Sutton minding the performance of the said charitable Act hath according to the power given him by the said Letters Patents and by these presents doth place nominate constitute and appoint his Right trusty and Well-Beloved John Hutton Clerk the first and present Master of the said Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire To have and to hold the said Office Room and place of Master of the said Hospital to him the said John Hutton from henceforth during the good will and pleasure of the said Thomas Sutton In witnesse whereof the said Thomas Sutton hath put his Hand and Seal dated the 13th day of June in the yeer of the Reign of our said Sovereign Lord JAMES by the Grace of God King of England France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. And of Scotland the 45th And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Thomas Sutton of all and singular the premises aforesaid in form aforesaid being seized Afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the first day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is of England c. the 9th abovesaid made a certain Indenture between him the said Thomas Sutton of Balsham in the County of Cambridge Esquire of the one part And the Right Reverend Father in God George â—ord Arch Bishop of Canterbury Primate and Metropolitan of all England The Right Honourable Thomas Lord Ellesmere Lord Chancellor of England The Right Honourable Robert Earl of Salisbury Lord High Treasurer of England The Reverend Father in God John Lord Bishop of London The Reverend Father in God Launcelot Lord Bishop of â—lie Edward Coke Knight Lord Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas Thomas Foster Knight one of the Justices of the Common-Pleas Henry Hobert Knight and Baronet the Kings Attorny General that now is John Overal Dean of the Cathedral Church of St. Paul in London George Mountain Dean of the Collegiate Church of Westminster Henry Thursby Esquire one of the Masters of the Chancery Jeffery Nightingale Esquire Richard Sutton Esquire John Law Gentleman Thomas Brown Gentleman and John Hutton Clerk By the name of the Reverend Father in God George Arch Bishop of Canterbury Thomas Lord Ellesmere Lord Chancellor of England Robert Earl of Salisbury Lord High Treasurer of England The Reverend Father in God John Lord Bishop of London The Reverend Father in God Launcelot Lord Bishop of Elie Edward Coke Knight Lord Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas Thomas Foster Knight one of the Justices of the Court of Common-Pleas Henry Hobert Knight and Baronet Attorny General of the Lord the King John Overal Dean of the Cathedral Church of Saint Paul in London George Mountain Dean of the Collegiate Church of Westminster Henry Thursby Esquire one of the Masters of the Court of Chancery Jeffery Nightingale Esquire Richard Sutton Esquire John Law Gentleman Thomas Brown Gentleman and John Hutton Clerk Master of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and at the onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire the first and present Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire of the other part made and within 6. Moneths then next following that is to say the 4th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord JAMES now King of England the 9th abovesaid in the Court of Chancery of the Lord the King that now is at Westminster aforesaid then being in due manner of Record inrolled according to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided And whereof one part sealed with the Seal of the said Thomas Sutton to the Jurors aforesaid was shewed in Evidence bearing date the same day and yeer The Tenor of which Indenture followeth in these words This Indenture made the first day of November in the yeer of our Lord God 1611. and in the yeers of the Reign of our Sovereign Lord JAMES by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. that is to say of England France and Ireland the 9th and of Scotland the 45th Between Thomas Sutton of Balsham in the County of Cambridge Esquire of the one part And the most Reverend Father in God George now Arch Bishop of Canterbury Primate and Metropolitan of all England The Right Honourable Thomas Lord Ellesmere Lord Chancellor of England The Right Honourable Robert Earl of Salisbury Lord High Treasurer of England The Right Reverend Father in God John Lord Bishop of London The Right Reverend Father in God Launcelot Lord Bishop of Elie Sir Edward Coke Knight Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas Sir Thomas Foster Knight one of the Justices of the Court of Common-Pleas Sir Henry Hobart Knight and Baronet Attorny General of our Sovereign Lord the King John Overal Dean of the Cathedral Church of Saint Paul in London
said Lady the Queen of the Bench here at Westminster in Easter Term in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen the 30th abovesaid before the then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench here as the deed of the said William Haw by him the said William acknowledged and within 6. Moneths then next following that is to say the same Easter Term in due manner in the said Court of Record inrolled according to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided for and in consideration of 120. pound to the said William by the said Richard before that time paid bargained and sold to the said Richard amongst other things the Reversion aforesaid To have and to hold to him and his Heirs for ever By Colour of which Bargain and Sale and Inrollment aforesaid and by force of a certain Statute made in the Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th holden at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 4th day of February in the yeer his Reign the 27th Of transferring of uses into possession the aforesaid Richard was and yet is seised of the Reversion aforesaid in his Demesn as of Fee And the said Richard so thereof being seised and the aforesaid Elizabeth of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances to her in form aforesaid granted being possessed The said Elizabeth did waste spoyle and destruction of the Lands that is to say in digging in 10. Acres of Land in Goring aforesaid parcel of the Tenements aforesaid to the aforesaid Robert demised 100. loads of Clay taking for the price of every load of Clay thereof 8. pence and cutting down and selling of the Woods also in a certain Wood called Heighgrove containing 10. Acres of Wood with the Appurte in Goring aforesaid and parcel of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the said Robert above in form aforesaid demised 20. Oaks the price of every Oak 5. shillings through the said whole Wood here and there growing and in a certain other Wood called the Hedge Row lying in Goring aforesaid near the aforesaid Wood called Heighgrove in Goring aforesaid parcel of the Tenement aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid to the aforesaid Robert demised 40. Oaks the price of each of them 6. shillings through the said whole Wood here and theregrowing and in a certain Coppice called Home Coppice in Goring aforesaid parcel of the aforesaid Tenements with the Appurtenances to the said Robert in form aforesaid above demised 100. Oaks price of each of them 10. shillings in the said Coppice called Home Coppice late growing here and there And in 20. Acres of Pasture called the Hanging in Goring aforesaid lying there bebetwixt a certain Close called High grove hill and another Close called Dicker grove hill that is to say parcel of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert in form aforesaid demised 10. Oaks price of each of them 6. shillings Six Ashes price of each of them 5. shillings and 10. Beeches price of each of them 6. shillings in the aforesaid 20. Acres of Pasture likewise late here and there growing and in a certain Hedge of a certain Close called Home field in Whitchurch aforesaid that is to say parcel of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert in form aforesaid demised lying near unto a Wood called Hawes Coppice 3. Oaks price of each of them 10. shillings and one Beech price 10. shillings and in a certain other Hedge of the Close aforesaid called Home field in VVhitchurch aforesaid that is to say parcel of the Tenements aforesaid to the aforesaid Robert in form aforesaid demised lying near to the aforesaid Wood called Home Coppice 10. Oaks price of each of them 20. shillings and also in suffering the sprouts of the Roots of 20000. other little Oaks called Oakesciapling of 20000. Beeches and 200. Ashes to the value of 20. pound in the said Wood called Heigh grove and 10000. of other little Oaks called Oakesapling 10000. of Beeches and 100. of Ashes to the value of 20. pound in the aforesaid Wood called the Hedge Row and 10000. of Oaks 10000. of Beeches and 200. of Ashes in the aforesaid Coppice called Hawe Coppice by the said Elizabeth through the whole Woods here and there growing to be cut and to be eaten and utterly destroyed and wasted with Cattel to the dissenherisin of the said Richard and against the form of the Provision aforesaid Whereupon he saith he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 200. pound and thereof he bringeth Sute c. And the the aforesaid Elizabeth by Ralph Burges her Attorny cometh and desendeth the force and injury when c. And whatsoever c. And saith that the aforesaid Richard his Action against her ought not to have Because she saith That well and true it is That the aforesaid William Haw was seised of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee and being thereof so seised the aforesaid 4th day of January in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29th abovesaid By his Indenture demised to the aforesaid Robert the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances except before excepted To have and to hold to him and his Assigns from the aforesaid Feast of the birth of our Lord then last past until the end and Term of the aforesaid 16. yeers then next following and fully to be compleat and ended By virtue of which demise the aforesaid Robert into the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances above in form aforesaid demised entred and was thereof possessed and so thereof being possessed the aforesaid 20th day of August abovesaid granted all his Estate Interest and Term of yeers which he had then to come of and in the aforesaid premises with the Appurtenances above demised to the aforesaid Elizabeth Hynde By virtue of which grant the aforesaid Elizabeth into the aforesaid Tenements with the Appurtenances above demised entred and waâ— thereof possessed as the aforesaid Rich. by his Declaration above supposeeth But the said Elizabeth further saith That the said Elizabeth of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances above demised in form aforesaid being possessed and the said William Haw of the Reversion thereof being seised in his Demesn as of Fee after the aforesaid 7th day of May in the 30th yeer aforesaid and before the aforesaid Indenture of Bargain and Sale Between the aforesaid William of the one part and the aforesaid Richard of the other part made in the Court of the Lady the Queen of the Bench in form aforesaid was inrolled A Fine was levied in the aforesaid Court of the Lady the Queen of the Bench here that is to say at WESTMINSTER aforesaid from the aforesaid day of Easter in 15. days in the yeer of her Reign the 30th abovesaid before Edmond Anderson Francis Windham William Periam and Francis Rodes then Justices of the said
whether upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found The aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law be guilty of the Trespasse aforesaid or not the said Jurors are utterly ignorant And pray the advise of the Court here c. And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Court here That the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law are guilty of the Trespasse aforesaid as the said Simon Baxter against them complaineth Then they assesse the damages of the said John Baxter by occasion of that Trespasse of costs and charges by him about his Sute in his part expended to one penny and for his costs and charges to 12. pence And it upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Court here That the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law are not guilty of the Trespasse aforesaid Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law are not thereof guilty as the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law above for them have alleged And because the Court of the Lord the King here is not yet avised of and upon the premises day thereof is given to the parties before the Lord the King at Westminster until Wednesday next after 15. days of Easter to hear their Judgemēt of upon the premises because the Court of the L. the K. here therof not yet c. At which day before the Lord the King at Westm come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lord the King here is not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises day thereof is further further given to the parties aforesaid before the Lord the King at Westminster until Fryday next after the Morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lord the King here thereof not yet c. Upon which The premises by the Court of the Lord the King that now is here seen and all and singular the premises fully understood and mature deliberation being thereupon had For that it seemeth to the Court of the Lord the King that now is here upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found That the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law are not guilty of the Trespasse aforesaid as the said Richard Sutton and John Law above for them have alleged It is granted that the aforesaid Simon Baxter take nothing by his Bill aforesaid but for his false clamor thereof be in mercy c. And that the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law go thereof without day c. And that the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law recover against the aforesaid Simon Baxter 24. pound for their costs and charges by them about their defence in this part expended to the said Richard Sutton and John Law with their assent by the Court of the Lord the King here according to the form of the Statute in such case late made and provided adjudged And that the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law have Execution thereof c. WASTE Hillary Term 340. ELIZABETH in the COMMON-PLEAS Rot. 2380. Co. 4. part Hyndes Case Fol. 68. ELizabeth Hynde was summoned to Answer to Richard Libb Esquire of Oxon. a Plea Wherefore Whereas of the Common Counsell of the Realm of the Lady the Queen of England it is provided That it shall not be law-for any one waste spoyle or destruction to do in Lands Houses Woods or Gardens to him demised for Term of life or yeers The said Eliza. of Lands and Woods in Goring and Whitchurch which she holdeth for Term of yeers of the demise of Robert Garrard of the aforesaid Richard of the Assignment of William Haw who those to the said Robert demised for the said Term thereof made to the said Richard did waste spoyle and destruction to the dissenherisin of him the said Richard and against the form of the Provision aforesaid c. And whereupon the said Richard by Thomas Lane his Attorny saith That whereas the aforesaid William Haw was seised of a Messuage called Haw Place 200. Acres of Land 10. Acres of Meadow 100. Acres of Pasture and 50. Acres of Wood with the Appurtenances in Goring and Whitchurch aforesaid in his Demesn as of Fee And so thereof being seised the 4th day of January in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 28th at Goring aforesaid By Indenture between the aforesaid William Haw of Haw Place in the Parish of Goring in the County of Oxon. Yeoman of the one part and the aforesaid Robert Garrard by the name of Robert Garrard of Hedsor in the County of Buckingham Gentleman made One part of which sealed with the Seal of the aforesaid Robert the said Richard here in Court brings whose date is the same day and yeer demised to the said Robert the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances Except during the life of Agnes Haw Mother of the said William such part of the Messuage aforesaid parcel of the premises Orchard and Garden One Close called Reaves Dean and one Close called Bell Close and one Orchard called the Orchard Pedel parcel of the premises which the said Agnes then occupied and then had taken and agreed to receive for her Dower of in and for the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances To have and to hold the said Tenements with the Appurtenances except before excepted to the said Robert and his Assigns from the Feast of the Birth of our Lord God then last past until the end and Term of 16. yeers from thence next insuing and fully to be compleat and ended By virtue of which Demise the said Robert in the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances above in form aforesaid demised entred and was thereof possessed and so thereof being possessed the 20th day of August in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29th at Goring aforesaid granted all his Estate Interest and Term of yeers which he had then to come of and in the aforesaid Tenements with the Appurtenances above in form aforesaid demised to the aforesaid Elizabeth Hynde By virtue of which grant the aforesaid Elizabeth into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances above in form aforesaid demised entred and was thereof possessed And the aforesaid Elizabeth being thereof so possessed and the aforesaid VVilliam Haw of the Reversion thereof in form aforesaid being seised the said William the 7th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30th at Goring aforesaid By his Indenture of Bargain and Sale made between him the said William of the the one part and the aforesaid Richard of the other part one part of which sealed with the Seal of the said William the said Richard here in Court brings whose Date the is same day and yeer and in the Court of the