â—â—â—â—ell in the Vacation time as in Term. And in the 4th Instit fol. 88. Speaking of the Court of â—â—â—â—cery he saith And this Court is the rather alvvayes 〈◊〉 for that if a man be vvrongfully Imprisoned in the Vacation the Lord Chancellour may grant an Habeas Corpus 〈◊〉 â—o him justice according to Lavv. And â—ide 4. Instit 〈◊〉 182.190 Thus the Lord Cook Mr. Jenkes Counsel did likewise ossâ—â— a President or two but the Lord Chancellour making light of the Lord Cooks opinion saying The Lord Cook vvas not Infallible And â—â—â—gâ—â—ng all that Mr. Jenkes Counsel offered over-ruled the matter denying to grant the VVrit On Tuesday morning July 11th at the Quarter Sessions holden for the liberty of Westminster Mr. Jenkes being still a prisoner in the Gate-house within that liberty did move by his Counsell to be bayled where this was the substance of what passed as it was taken by a by-stander Court We have no such Name in our Kalender and we sitting here by a limited Commssion can take no notice of any person that is not in our Kalender Council Every keeper of a Prison either in County or Franchise ought by the statute of 3. H. â— cap. 3. to certifie the names of every Prisoner in their Custody at the next generall Goal-delivery there to be Kalendered before the Justice of Goal-delivery that the partys may be delivered according to Law upon pain of 100 l. For every defalt there recorded and I demand that this defalt of the Goaler may be recorded according to that statute and that you would as you may command him to Kalender him now The statute was read Court VVe are no general Goal-delivery for we cannot Try severall felons but they must be tryed at the generall Goal-delivery for the County Counsel You are a generall Goal-delivery for all offences within the Cognisance of your Franchise and therefore unlesse the Fact for which he is Committed be such as is above your Cognisance he ought to be Tryed here and if it be such a Fact he ought notwithstanding to be Kalendered here that you may send him to the County Goal where he may be tryed Goaler I never did Kalender any man that was committed by the Councill Table Counsel The neglect hath not taken away your duty and as often as you have ommitted to do so so oft you have deserved to be fined and I do again demand of this Court that this default of yours may be recorded The Court inclined to the Goaler and would not record his default whereupon the Counsel proceeded Counsel Since you exclude him from the benefit of your present Commission I apply my self to you without respect to that as you are Justices of peace in general and as such you have power to bail any man bailable by Law except in some particular cases where you are restrained by statute Court By whom is he committed Counsel By the Council Board Court Do you believe the Council Board can commit to prison Counsel I admit it Court VVe don't know for what offence he is committed Counsel I have here a Copy of the Commitment and desire it may be read But the Goaler refusing to own it for a true Copy tho given by himself and the Court requiring a nicer proof that it was a true Copy than could at that time be made they â—â—â—erd the Counsel to attend in the afternoon and in the 〈◊〉 time the Goaler to give a true Copy In the afterâ—oon the Counsel appearing the Court called to him and asked him what he had to say Counsel I have now a Copy given and signed by the Goaler for a true Copy and desire it may be read The Goaler who was to prove it a true Copy upon the Counsels coming into Court took an occasion to slink away and the Court as if it had been by design were ready to take hold of that opportunity to evade the businesse but Mr. Jenkes friends fetched him back and he Swearing it to be a true Copy it was read Court What is it you demand Counsel What I did before that there being nothing in this warrant for which he is not Bailable by Law I demand that he may be Bailed Court You have taken a wrong course in comming to us Counfel I presume he applyes himself properly to you for he being a Prisoner within your Liberty you are the most proper persons to bayl him As Justices of the Peace you have power to bayl any man within your Jurisdiction bayl-able by Law and where you may bayl by the Law you ought to do so and I demand it for Mr. Jenkes Court Where do you find such power given to Justices of the Peace Counsel By the same Statute of H. 7. that I oited against the Goaler the enacting part whereof saith That the Justices of the Peace in every Shire City or Tovvn or tvvo of them at the least vvhereof one to be of the Quorum have authority and povver to let any suck prisoner or persons Mainpernable by the Lavv that have been Imprisoned vvithin their several Counties City or Tovvn to bail or mainprize unto their next General Sessions or unto the next Goal-delivery of the same Goales of every Shire City or Tovvn as vvell vvithin Franchises as vvithout vvhere any Goales be or hereafter shall be c. The whole Statute was read and the Court taking boâ— of the preamble said Court This statute was made for the prevention of bailing Felons not bailable by Law and enables us only to bail Felons bailable by Law Counsel The Preamble of the Act recites that mischief occasinoned by the Statute of 1. R. 3 But the Enacting part Repeales that Act and gives you a general power of letting any persons mainpernable by the Law to bail and I 'm sure no statutes made for the liberty of the subject ought to receive such a strait Construction Court Do you consider by whom he is commited the Privy Council Counsel I do and think that alters not the case Court He is commited by a superiour Court and we who are an Inferiour one cannot bail him Counsel It is not the Court that commits but the Fact for which the party is committed ought to direct you in Bail The Statute of H. 7. hath no such exception in it nor hath any other since put any such restraint upon you Court Would you have us Bail him after the Lord Chancellour and the Lord Chief Justice have refused to grant a Habeas Corpus Counsel They did not deny the Habeas Corpus because he was not Bailable by Law but because the Course of their Courts in their opinions would not admit it but however if you ought to Bail him as by the Statute I think you ought their refusal does not lesten your duty Then the Court put him several cases that did not at all reach the present case as they seemed to think themselvs by their faint urging them Court We doubt very much that any
Mr. Jenkes I believe they may The King I know whose Scholar you are and I 'll take care that none such as you shall have to do with the Government Several Lords What was 't you mov'd What was 't you mov'd M. Jenkes My Lords What I spake was not in a Corner but openly in the faces of a Multitude and therefore cannot want a Witness to attest it A Lord. Just now it was a Court and now it is a Multitude Mr. Jenkes We Citizens pretend not to place our words so exactly inform but that there may besome mistake in them but I think my expression was no great absurdity for though it were a Court yet the Persons there were so numerous that it may not be very improper to term them a Multitude Yet if I have failed in due expression I beg his Majesties pardon I know somewhat of the Customs of the City of London and the Powers and Priviledges of the Courts there and somwhat also of the Laws of England but what the Powers and Customs of this Court are I know not and therefore shall desire to say little lest I should unwillingly offend Lord Chancellour Sir Pray tell us who advised you in this matter The King Who advised you Mr. Jenkes VVhat I then proposed was consented to by the whole Court and so became their Act as I said before Lord Chancellour and Others Answer directly to the Question or declare you will not Mr. Jenkes Since I see your Majesty and the Lords are angry tho I am not sensible that I have given you any just cause for it I must not say I did it without advice lest you should be more angry and to name any particular Person if there were such would be a mean and unworthy thing therefore I desire to be excused all farther answer to such questions since the Law doth provide that no man be put to answer to his own prejudice The King We will take that for an answer Lord Chancellour Since you name the Law by the Law you shall be tryed Mr. Jenkes I thank you and this Board Lord Chancellour You may withdraw He immediately withdrew and the room being cleared of all his friends and other company then the Messenger was kept there for the space of an hour and an half and afâ—â—◠〈…〉 â—â—ing called in any more was by a Warrant of the Council sent to the Prison of the Gate-house within the Liberties of Westminster Soon after his commitment he demanded of the Keeper a Copy of the Warrant by which he was was commited as he might and by Law ought to have The Keeper gave him a promise of it but delaying the performance for two dayes Mr. Jenkes resolutely demanded it of him as his duty but could not yet obtain it Sometime after the Keeper sent him one voluntarily by his man with this excuse That before he had positive order to deny him one and now had to give it him The Copy of the Warrant WHereas it appears to his Majesty in Council by the examination of Sir Thomas Gold Sir John Shorter Knights Sheriffs of the City of London John VVells Common-Gryer of the said City and John Green one of the Attorneys of the Lord Mayors Court taken upon Oath before the Lord chief Justice Raynsford That Francis Jenkes of the said City Linnen-Draper did on the 24th of this instant June at a Common Hall then assembled at the Guild-Hall of tâ—â— said City for choosing Officers for the ensuing Year in a wâ—â— seditious and mutinous manner openly move and stir ' the persons thâ—n present That before they did go on to the choice of nevv Officers vvhich vvas the only occasion of that Assembly they should go to the Lord Mayor and desire him to call a Common-Counsel that might make an address to his Majesty in the Name of the City to call A New Parliament And vvhereas the said Francis Jenkes being novv called in and heard before his Majesty in Council vvas so far from denying or exicâ—â—ating his offence That be did in a presumptuous and arrogant manner endeavour to justify the same These are therefore to command you to take into your custody the Body of the said Francis Jenkes herevvith sent you and him to Keep safely until he shall be delivered by due course of Lavv for vvhich this shall be your Warrant Dated at the Council Chamber in White-Hall this 28th Day of June 1676. To the Keeper of the Gate-House VVestminster or his Deputy Lindsey Peterborow C. Craven G. Carter Lauderdale Northampton Carbery W. Maynerd Tho. Chicheley Danby Anglesey Arlington Bathe J. Williamson R. Carr Finch Ormond Bridgwater Hen. Coventry J. Ernle Robert Sowtwell NExt day being the. 29th of June divers of Mr. Jeâ—kes Friends waited upon Mr. Secretary Williamson and desired to become Bail for him but Mr. Secretary refused to take any Bail but told them if they did mind him of it upon Wednesday morning he would move it at the Council But Mr. Jnkes beleiving that to be as it proved but a delay ordered some of his friends to wait upon the Lords Chiefe Justice Raynsford and moved him for an Habeas Corpus ad Subjiciend Recipiend c. which accordingly was done but his Lordship denied to grant it Alleading no other reason but that it was Vacation though his Lordship could not but know that Writ to be the Subjects Right at all times as well out of Term as in Term and Mr Jenkes friends were ready to offer him multitudes of Presidents when it had been granted out of Term both anciently and since his Majesties Restauration Mr. Jenkes resolving to leave no legall course to attaine his liberty untryed upon Friday the 30th Of June at a General Seal did by his Counsel move the Lord Chancellor for an Habeas Corpus at first his Lordship did seem much surprized and did refuse to hear his Counsel but after a little pause his Lordship bid Mr. Jenkes Counsel to move it again the next Seal and ordered the Seal to be put off from Tvvesday the 4th untill Thursday the 6th of July Upon Wednesday the 5th of July Mr. Jenkes friend waited upon Mr. Secreatary Willamson and desired him according to his promise to move in Councill that Mr. Jenkes might be Bayled but he said he had spoake with the King and could do nothing without a Petition so upon Thursday the sixth of July being a Publick Seale Mr. Jenkes Counsell did again move the Lord Chancellor according to his Lordships order and asserted the Authority of the Lord Cook who is most clear in the Case 2. part Instututes fol. 53. Speaking of the VVrit of Habeas corpus in the Kings Beach 〈…〉 The like Writ is to be granted 〈◊〉 of the Chancery 〈…〉 as in the Kings Bench or in the Vacation 〈◊〉 the Court of Chancery is Officina Justitiae and is ever â—pâ—â—ed and never Adjourned So as the Subject being vvrongfully â—â—prisoned may have justice for the liberty of his person
cognizance of any thing whatever that did relate to the good of the City and therefore it was conceived that nothing was more proper at that time than this which concerned the preservation of the City from utter ruine Upon which the other Sheriff directing his discourse to the Assembly said That what the Gentleman had moved there was true and not unknown to most of the persons there present but that he was of his Brothers opinion 〈◊〉 it was fit first to go on to the work of the day and not to carry up that message till after the Election Many persons being still dissatisfied and calling for a present message to be sent up the Gentleman who first moved the business made it his request that since there seemed a difference touching the circumstance of time that they would proceed to Election and carry up the Message with the persons Elected as the Sheriffs desired to which the common Hall unanimously agreed Upon which silence being made the common Hall proceeded to election of Sheriffs and made their Election and sent up an account thereof to the Lord Mayor and Aldermen by the Sheriffs and common Sergeant as is usual in such cases The Lord Mayor and Aldermen presently came down and took their seats in the Court of Hustings according to custom upon which the common Sergeant came forth to the front of the Court and declared the Names of the persons Elected and immediately gave back Thereupon the common Hall called out for an Answer to their Message upon which the common Sergeant steping forward again in the presence of the Lord Mayor Aldermen and Sheriffs said That he had acquainted his Lordship and the Aldermen with their request and that his Lordship had commanded him to declare unto them that he would be ready to joyn with them in that or any other thing for the good of the City And with that the Lord Mayor and Aldermen c. left the Court of Hustings and dismissed the Assembly After Dinner the grave Recorder Sir John Hovvel out of a great pretence of Loyalty but indeed a personal Grudge against Mr. Jenkes conveyed the news to White Hall where with his usual strain of Retorick he made such a dismal representation of the matter and was so powerful in his Eloquence as to occasion both the Sheriffs and some other of the City Officers to be sent 〈◊〉 who were examined by tâ—â— Lord Châ—â— Justice Rainsford in the presence of the King the Lord Chancellour the Lord Treasurer Duke Lauderdale and other Lord. The Sheriffs 〈◊〉 others made Affidavits but a Copy of them could never be obtained Upon the 〈…〉 Mr. Jenkes was summoned by a Messenger to appear at the Council Board the next day Accompanied with many of his Friends he attended in the Lobby near the Council Chamber according to his summons and after some time was called in but his Friends pressing to follow him as is usual on such occasions were kept out and not one suffered to go in with him The King sitting in Council the Lord Chancellour D. Lauderdale and other Lords about him The Clerk read an Affidavit made by the two Sheriffs the common Cryer and one John Green an Attorney the Substance whereof was That Fr. Jenkes at a Common Hall in London the 24th of June last past did complain of Grievances an did desire that before they vvent upon any other business certain Members of that Court might accompany the Sheriffs and the Common-Sergeant to vvait upon the Lord Mayor then in the Chamber to desire that a Common-Council might be called to Petition his Majesty in the Name of the City to Call a New Parliament The Affidavit being read the Council Board proceeded to this effect Lord Chancellour Sir What say you to this matter Mr. Jenkes I desire to know if this be all you have to charge against me A Lord. Then you make little of this You will find it to be enough Lord Chancellour Sir Did you move for a Common-Council to Petition for a Nevv Parliament Mr. Jenkes Is it any Crime to Petition for a Nevv Pâ—rliament 〈◊〉 which his â—â—â—â—ship not thinking fit to give any 〈◊〉 proceeded Lord â—â—â—â—â—llour Answer to the matter in charge Mr Jenkes Wâ—â—â— the liberty of his Majesty and this â—oard I will The King Goâ— Mr Jenkes May it please your Majesty Of all the Subjects you have A Lord interrupting him Answer to the matter Mr. Jenkes If his Majesty will be pleased to hear me I hope you will The King Let him go on Mr. Jenkes May it please your Majesty Of all the Subjects you have none are more Loyal than your City of London and in the City none more loyal than my self and no man there did more desire and in my circumstances act more in order to your Majesties Restauration than my self And I do desy any Citizen or other whomsoever to say I have forfeited my loyalty by any one individial act The King interrupting him Sir you are not Lord Mayor and I am very well satisfied with the loyalty of the City and that it needs no such Vouchers Lord Chanâ—â—llour Speak to the matter Mr. Jenkes May it please your Majesty Being summoned to a Court of Common Hall in London which is a Court that consists of the main Body of the City Lord Chancellour interruping him Sir you are under a double mistake for first it was not a Court and next it did not consist of the main Body of the City of London Mr. Jenkes With your Lordships leave it was a Court which doth consist of all the Livery of the City of Lâ—â—don which if I understand any thing is the main Body of the City of London And every member of that Court hath freedom to propose and debate any such matter or thing as he believes is for the service of his Majesty and the good of the City and no man can use more understanding than God has given him And I assure your Lordship what I then moved was according to the utmost of my understanding for his Majesties service and the good of the City And my Lord if I were under a mistake I had the fortune to have good Company for what I moved was approved by the whole Court The King It was not so Secretary We have a deposition to the contrary M. Jenkes It was so Other Lords It was not so Mr. Jenkes May it please your Majesty If you have a hundred depositions to the contrary if the matter of fact were so it was so and I do affirm it was approved by the whole Court A Lord. How came you to be a Privy Councellour Mr. Jenkes I never had any such ambitious thought in my head A Lord. How came you then to meddle with matters of State Mr. Jenkes I thought any of his Majesties subjects in an humble manner might Petition his Majesty for a Remedy of any Grievance whatsoever A Lord. Do you think any one may Petition for a Parliament