Selected quad for the lemma: justice_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
justice_n	chief_a	king_n	william_n	2,601	5	7.3449	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A90794	An exact abridgment in English, of The commentaries, or reports of the learned and famous lawyer, Edmond Plowden, an apprentice of the common law. Concerning diverse cases and matters in law, and the arguments thereupon; in the times of the reignes of King Edward the Sixth, Queen Mary, King Philip, and Queen Mary, and Queen Elizabeth, with the exceptions to the pleadings, and answers thereunto; the resolutions of the matters in law, and all other principall matters arising upon the same. By F.H. of the Inner Temple London, Esq;	Plowden, Edmund, 1518-1585.; Hicks, Fabian.	1650 (1650)	Wing P2609A; Thomason E1297_1; ESTC R208982	174,168	307

the act which amounteth to so much that the precise words and the Statute restrains the estate and not the person of the Donee And the Prerogatives are in respect of the person of the King and goes in his person which the King by Prerogative without other act cannot enlarge but in taking of the estate is restrained with the estate insomuch that the act saith Dominus Rex perpendens c. It sheweth that the King is named effectually and so bound and when it provides remedy for the mischief it is not to be presumed that he intended to be at liberty to do the mischief every thing which is the intent of the donor shall be within the Stat as plainly as if it had been expressed as other estates Tail which are not mentioned in W. 2. Litl fol. 5. Lands intailed shall not be charged against the issue for the debt of his father to the King by Anthony Brown who said That it was so adjudged in William Browns case which was his Father Puttrel fol. 240. otherwise which proves that the Statute of Donis Conditionalibus binds the King Dier Chief Justice The King onely is a good name of purchase and is the highest name of honor and drowns all other names of honor and is certain enough but not so used without his name of Baptism And the name King contains both bodies natural and politick and Heirs implies Heirs and Successors and the adding of Successors is a new devise The Donor may limit in what capacity the King shall take and ●ail may be to the King as well as to a Common person That H. 8. entailed the Crown to him and the Heirs of his body the will of the Donor is the effect of the Statute of West 2. that every thing which is against his will is reformed by the Act and every thing which is his will is made Law by this Act and therefore this Tail shall not be forfeit for Felony Litl 169. it shall not be charged by the donee 14. H. 8.7 by Roo 5. H. 6 14. nor alien neither shal the second wife be endowed 46. E. 3.24 nor the second Tenant by the courtesie now 46. E. 3.5 and to express those in the Act is superfluous because included in the proviso quod voluntus c. And these three Tails mentioned there viz. Special General and Free Marriage are but examples and not as containing all Tails that his will is a law to limit other Tails Fee after issue at the Common Law is Tail now 12 E. 4. and 3. and Fee in the Donor by implication of the Act because it restrains the Donee to do the Acts of Fee or no Fee without his properties And therefore it shall be intended That the Act would not that the Donee should have Fee because it would not make an Act of Fee and it is no Tail because the Statute is limitted Docked or cut off The King shall be bound by the Statute of W. 2. de donis conditionalibus for that it is made in preservation of the inheritance in benefit of the Common wealth and in restitution of the observation of the intent and will of the giver and in Restitutions the King hath no favor but the party restored in favor as an Heir restored to a Mannor shall have the advowson without mentioning of it So a Bishop to the Temporalties shall have Knights Fees and Advowson 5. E. 3.238 41. E. 3.5 and Brian Townsend Davers and Vavasor who took this so or thought that the King should have but an estate tail that otherwise the Remainder over will be invailable and the Exposition that the Denee might alien after issue before the Statute is Communis Error Dame Hales against Petit. LEase for years to the Husband and Wife the Husband drowned himself M. 4. 5. El in the ● P. in Trespass and so became a felo de se the Wife enters an Office is found the Q. shall have the whole Term adjudged 1. The quality of the offence is murther because that it was upon malice prepenced otherwise of Homicide also it was made Nullo sciente nullo praesente 2. It is an offence against nature the Law of God and to the King for to kill his Subject and deprive him of one of his mystical members whereof he is the head and by breaking of his peace and for the ill example given to others 3. He shall forfeit for this Felony all Goods Debts Chattels real and personal which he had at the time of the Act done which was the cause of his death viz. the casting of himself into the water and the forfeiture shall have relation to this act done in his life and is an Attainder in Law to that purpose but not to make Corruption of bloud forfeit Dower or make Fee-simples escheat by the Court. 4. Although the wife be remitted to the Term by the survivor yet this is defeated by the office ex post facto 5. Where the Bishop maketh a Lease for years which is not confirmed in his life it needs not to be averred in respect it is onely voidable otherwise of Lessee for life for that it shall be void by his death 6. The pleading that Sir James Hales was possessed of two Leases at the time of his death and the Office found that he had two without saying at the time of his death sufficeth reddendo singula singulis 7. Lessee for years to commence at Michaelmas brings Trespass before the Defendant gives colour by the Lease this is not good yet the Plaintiff shall not recover because he had no Title Southcot and Puttrel Serjeants for the Plaintiff He that striketh another after this wound given giveth his goods to another before the death the gift is good So a Constable 11. H. 4.12 which arrests him permits him to escape before the death of the other is not a Felon the finding by the Coroner of his death in this case countervails an Attainder indeed because after his death he cannot be Attainted and he himself is the cause he cannot A Felon of himself cannot make a Testament or Executor nor forfeit any thing but that which ought to come to his Executor Instant is the end of one time and the Commencement of another in Instant is priority of time in consideration of Law Husband and Wife Joynt-Tenants of a Lease for years there is no Moities between them but every one of them hath the whole and if the Husband charge the land she after his death shall avoid it because remitted to the Term and in by Title Paramount to the Grant 7. H. 6.1 So 18. E. 4.5 Tenant in Tail gives Trees growing and dies before they are cut down the Donee shall not cut them because the Issue and Wife are in by Title Paramount the gift by Southcot So 14. H. 4.32 and Fitzh nat br fol. 14.143 The Lord shall take his Ward which is an Apprentice out of the possession of his Master for that his

H. 6.25 Of vigor of an appeal pleaded against an excomunication the usuall form shall be observed and good as in debt when the defendant acknowledgeth himself to be bound c. So in forgery against one only quod falsa conspiratione habita good 11. H. 6.2 because the usuall form where a man may not have by common intendment precise notice of the certainty of a thing it sufficeth to alleadge this generally as 21. H. 6.9 9. H. 7.15 that executors have administred to B. without shewing what things good because he may not know that another hath administred and that he is not privy So 5. E. 4.8 Obleige to discharge the Sheriff of all things touching his office he said that he had discharged him generally good because for the infiniteness of it Talbot and Corbets case tempore H. 7. upon the same Statute 23. H. 6. where the issue was joyned that Corbet was chosen Knight for the Parliament and he was admitted to prove it c. So 2. E 4. 19. imprison to make an obligation to the defendant to others unknown without naming them good contrary in false imprisonment So 10. E. 4. 19. bound for to serve in all lawfull commands he said that he had served him lawfully untill such a day without shewing in what good So in 12. H 7.14 he had found him meat drink and apparel untill one and twentd yeers without shewing what good So monstraverunt homines without shewing the number because a great number for the Law compels not to shew the certainty of the thing which is not to be known or remembred Brook Chief Justice so 128. and in Parliament the most voices in the upper house shall be numbred by the Clerk of the house for every one there shall be severally demanded otherwise it is in the house of Commons for there the assent is tryed by voices sounding all at one time So in election of Coroners Sanders so 126. the County of Chester was alwayes parcel of the Realm of England yet Knights and Burgesses came not from thence untill the Statute of 34. 35. H. 8. ca. 13. Statute penall extends not further then the words and namely for to punish others as 21. H. 7.21 of malefactors in Parks extends not to Forrests So 13. H. 6. cap. 10. that Sheriffs shall not let their Counties extends not to him which Leases parcel of it 21. H. 7.36 the contrary was held 20. H. 7.12 and before fol. 87. So treble dammages for a forcible entry in an Assise or trespas extends not to entry in the nature of an Assise 7. H. 4. which limit order for the election of Knights extended not to the false return of the Sheriff untill 11. H. 4. was made if London inlarge the Ancient custome viz that a villen shall not be drawn out which hath remained there a yeer and a day because Ancient demeansne 7 H. 6.32 extends not to enlargment So England altered not the subjecton of Wales Rape is made fellony by W. 2. ca. 34. Abetters inquirable cap. 12. and at one time good 2. E. 2.22 E. 3. yet Chapter the 12. seeme to be intended of fellons before made and not by the same Statute Sanders justice the allegation alledged under the viz. is a plain precise and effectuall affirmation in deed proved by Rules in grammer the authority of Latine Authors by the Register 66.160 natura brevium 63.134 h. 135. b. and the opinion of the Doctors of the Civill Law 21. E. 4.49 and after so 143. by Catlin an Abbot in discharge to be collector saith inter Record of such a term continetum that R. 2. had granted to his predecessors that he nor his successors shall be collectors and naught for it may be contained amongst the Records and yet no Record escuage was first invented to suppress the Welch and Scots rebels against whom war was made by the King of England as against Rebels and not as against enemies for that they were subject to England H. 3. made E. 1. his eldest son Prince of Wales and so it hath continued to this time which Act of H. 3. was the first alteration of Wales King E. 1. made the Statute of Snowdon The third was the Statute of 27. H. 8. the welch may sue by quod ei deforceat in the nature of what action they will Statutes sometimes explaines the Common Law Merton cap. 2. quod vidua legare possunt bluda c. and late Statutes aided by equity Statutes made before so lineal warranty Bars not the issue in taile without assets by the equity of Glocester made long before after fol. 78. so Land delivered in execution by the Statute of Marchants 1● E. 1. yet it shall be delivered also to so high extendors although 13. E. 1. speaketh not of it by equity of Acton Burnel 11. E. 1. cap. 2. which giveth goods prised at two high prises in dammage and that the Connusee shall have them for the price because it intended to aide things in like degree although not in esse then Brown Justice to the same purpose and said that in things touching Grammer their predecessors have consulted with Grammarians and pursued their Rules as it appeareth in our books that the the Judges have said proximo antecedenti fiet Relatio the which sentence they might take out of Grammar and he argued that licet was a plain affirmative and that the matter contained under the licet is an affirmation with greater vehemency then it should be without the licet and that the licet augments the affirmation And he argued further that the generall words of the Statute of 27. enabled the plantiffe to take benefit of the penalty and in what he said agreed with Sanders in effect Brook chief Justice Gavel kind commenced by the Brittans by partition of England Scotland and Wales between the three sons of Brute continued by Bellinus Brennus Ferrex and Porrex and was altered in England by the conquest of the Saxons and the eldest son by their Law was inheritable But Gavel kind continued in Wales until 27. H. 8. for it was not conquered Priviledges within certain precincts or Dominions followed not the enlargement of the place So 38. H. 6.10 Liberties granted to the Bishop of Durham in feedis suis extends not to the purchase after So 21. H. 6. Warren is granted to B. in all his Lands in Dale and he purchaseth other Land in Dale he shall not have warren there So a grant of Conusans of Pleas of a thing parcel of the mannor of Dale tenancy Escheats afterwards he shall not have of it For the grant taketh execution of his precinct and circuit at the time of the making of it and the services shall be then parcel of the mannor and not the demeans which now escheat So grant wreck to B. in all his Lands it shall not extend to the Land of which he was then disseised because not his but the disseisors pro tempore Reference to another

probat And by him the Ordinary ought not to suffer the Executor to refuse after he hath once medled with the Goods of the Testator for if before the probat he had released a Debt and after he proves the Will this hath made the release good Walsh probat maketh the Release of the Executor made before good because it is a consummation of the Will and refers to the death Dier Chief Justice If the Ordinary commit and after the Metropolitan commit to another because the intestate hath Goods of the value of 10 l. in diverse Dioces 10. H 7.18 this disproves the authority of the first Administrator and avoids his mean Acts and by Keeble the second Administrator shall have Trespass against the first for taking of the first Goods So 7. E. 4.12 Executor pleads that he hath proved the Testament the action of the Administrator depending against him a good Bar because the power of the Administrator disproved and mean acts avoided by Probat of the Testament and the Executor which is made not knowing of it if he agree after good seems to be 3. H. 7.14 The Ordinary ought to award Proces against the Executor to come in for to prove the Testament before he commits the Administration The Probat here disproves the Administration for ever and proves the Executor to be full Executor from the death of the Testator and is not like to the cases before fol. 239. because the mean time in which no Executor and this time the Ordinary hath authority The Seal of the Ordinary put to the administration is but matter in fact and no estopple and the executor shall not be inforced to sue in the spiritual Court to recall this but shall avoid it by Plea or by matter in fact as 44. E. 3.16 A. bringeth Debt against B. as administrator and sheweth certainly how his Deed was as he ought B. saith he and another are executors Judgement of the Writ and shew forth the Testament to prove it A. offers to aver that he died intestate B. saith to it he shall not be received contrary to the Testament proved and under Seal to take the Plaintiff from his averment but that he shall have it and try it by the Country also the taking of Letters of Administration discharges not a Suit against those which were executors of their own wrong before 21. H. 6.8 2. R. 3.20 So 34. H. 6.14 in debt by the Administrator the Defendant received to avoid Letters of Administration by saying the dead made an executor and taking issue upon it Chapman against Dalton A Man makes a Lease for 21. years by Indenture and Covenants with his Lessee Tr. 7. El. in the K. B. Covenant and his Executors to make a new Lease for 21. years after the expiration of the first to the Lessee and his Assignes the Lessee dies and the Executor of the Executor brings Covenant after the first Lease determined against the Lessor and adjudged good 1. That the executor is an Assignee in Law to whom the Lease ought to be made and so the executor of an executor by the Common Law 2. That the Lease ought to be made to the Lessee if he were alive or to his Assignes in Deed and if he die Assignee in Deed then to his executor and although that the Covenant be in the Copulative in the Letter yet it shall be expounded disjunctive in sense for to avoid absurdity or impossibility 3. Admitting that the word Assignee were void or omitted out of the deed yet this shall be made to the executor for that the intent was such which shall be performed where the words could not Baber and Wray argued for the Defendant as it is abridged by Ash fol. 50. Fleetwood and another apprentice for the Plaintiff Every Covenant and Grant shall be taken most strong against the Maker and most available to the other And if the words thereof have a double sense that which is for the benefit of the Grantee shall be taken then the word Assigned here shall be drawn to so effectuall sense for the avail of the Grantee And if the word Assignee as the Councel on the part of the Defendant would have it applied to a limitation viz. in the sense of an Habendum to him and his Assignes for 21. years it is void and conveys no benefit to the Grantee because if I Lease to A. for 21. years and his Assignes shall have this as largely as I do vest this Lease in him and his Assignes because the Law gives power to him to assign it to another Assignee hath two senses in the one it signifies the person to whom the thing granted or given shall be afterwards conveyed by him which hath the thing as the Lessor Grants to the Lessee for years That he or his Assignes shall have twenty Carts of Wood annually in such a Wood Assignee there hath the sense of the person to whom he shall Assign the Lease So one warrants Land to the Feoffee his Heirs and assignes there the second Feoffee shal vouch So I sell a Horse upon Condition That if I pay 40 s. to him or his Assignees that I shall have the horse again Assignee there is he to whom he grants the horse but such Assignee is not in our case because he hath not any estate first made and such a one is Assignee after the thing granted in the second it contains the person to whom the thing which is to be made and is not made shall be made as I am bound to make a Feoffment or give a horse to you or your Assignee there the Assignee is such a person which you shall name to me to receive and the Assignee in this sense is before the things done or granted and Assignes in this sense is in the first also But with this in the first sense we have not to do here there are Assignes in Deed and Law in Deed where you name such a one to whom I shall make the Feoffment or give the horse in Law where you name no man to receive then the Executor shall have it because the Law saith That they are your Assignes to such purpose and present your person as to receive any Chattels real or personal So 27. H. 8 2. Executor is an Assignee in Law to take a Rental where the Lessee bound himself to deliver it to the Lessor or his Assignes at the end of the Term a true rental and the Lessor made no Assignee he is an ill expounder which confounds the Text. And therefore here and the Copulative shall be taken for or the Disjunctive for otherwise the sense will be absurd that the Lessee if he had been alive at the end of the first Lease should not take a new Lease until he names his Asasignee or impossible as joyning his assignee in law with him because he cannot have an Executor in his life So in our Law a copulative is taken as a disjunctive and a disjunctive as a

others is exclusive of those comprised in the first saving and the exception And because he is heir and so within the first saving he is excluded out of the second saving by the word other by Walsh and others if a Tenant for the life of another the Remainder to B for his life the Remainder to A. in Fee is Disseised the Disseisor levies a Fine and five years pass after proclamations if he for whose life and the Remainder for life dies he shall have new five years because it is another estate and the first remains to him but by Weston and Catline otherwise because not another person also this right which first Discends to Stowell here is not such a right as the Statute intends to give new five years by the second saving for a new right for it was once right in the Ancestor and given to him before And the word first is of great purpose put into the act and this word joyn as it ought to every of the words subsequent viz. Accrue Remain Discend or Come excludes Stowel of the benefit of the second saving and 1. R. 2. cap 7. touching Fines hath all the words of 4. H. 7. touching the purview and body of the Act but the word First which is added to 4. H. 7. as a thing thought very necessary and so he that wil take benefit of the second saving ought to prove four things 1. That he is another person Secondly That the right first came to him Thirdly and that it came after the Fine ingrossed and Proclamations made Fourthly That his right is before the Fine levyed as where right or Title shall first accrue And therefore if the elder brother be professed when the Father died seised and the youngest is Disseised at the levying of the Fine with Proclamations and five years pass and after is deraigned he shall be aided by the second saving for the cause aforesaid So if the Dissesor of a Mortgagee levies a Fine with Proclamations five years pass after the Mortgagor pay or tender the Money he shall have years after his payment or tender because his Title first accrued after the Proclamations by the payment or tender by matter before viz. the condition Plowden s●ems that he is at large and not bound to five years because at the time of the Fine levied no wrong was done to him nor to the estate which he claims So a husband levies a Fine with Proclamations and after the five years past dies and from thence by this second saving his wife shall have five years to sue out her Writ of Dowe● for her Title accrued by the death of her husband upon cause before the Fine viz. their inter-marriage and seisin of her husband by Plowden she is at large and not bound to five years because it was a real wrong done to her at the time of the Fine or before because her Title accrued after the Fine viz. by the death of her husband So Tenant cess one year before the Fine and another year after the Proclamations the Lord is at large to have his cessavit 20. years after for it is not within the purview of the Act because he had not Title at the time of the levying of the Fine but it accrued afterwards viz. to the end of the two years where first it should remain as to the Donee to his heirs Females of his body Remainder to his Son in Fee Levy a Fine with Proclamations and die then the Son shall have five years So Tenant for life Remainder in Fee Levies a Fine with Proclamations and dies then the Son shall have five years So Tenant for life Remainder in Fee is Desseised the Disseisor Levies a Fine and five years pass and Tenant for life dies he in Remainder shall have new five years Tenant for life and Feoffee Levies a Fine five years pass entry for Forfeiture is gone but there by Walsh he shall have a Formedon after the death of the Tenant for life if he sues it within five years by Catline otherwise because his right accrues not first or Remain after the death of the Tenant for life because he might have entred before and therefore is excluded from the benefit of the second saving Tenant for years by Statute or Elegit is ousted and a Fine with Proclamations levied and five years pass now none may enter nor he in Reversion nor particular Tenant and shall not be aided by the second saving for both might have entred before the Proclamations pass because they all are comprised in the first saving and therefore he in Reversion shall not have years after the Term ended as he shall have where the particular estate was Free-hold and a Termor is bound by this Statute of 4. H. 7. by the word Interest in the saving which word may comprehend Term First it shall Discend as by Dier Discontinuance of Tenant in Tail Levy a Fine with Proclamations and five years pass Tenant in Tail dies the issue in Tail shall have five new years but by him and Catline if the Disseisor of Tenant in Tail Levy a Fine c. the issue is bound there for ever because the right was present to the Tenant in Tail when the Fine was Levied and he and the heirs in Tail comprised within the first saving and therefore barred because they pursued their right within five years according to the first saving by Southcot but Weston contrary and by them every issue in Tail shall have a new five years but by the said Chief Justice the word first added as it ought to be to it shall discend will not admit every discent to have five years the Remainder or Reversion in Tail upon an estate for life discends to his issue there the issue shall have five years by the second saving after the death of Tenant for life by Weston and Dier if the Son purchase and dies the Daughter enters and is Disseised the Disseisor Levies a Fine five years pass the Son born after shall have new five years by the second saving because it is he to whom the right first Discended after the Fine and Proclamations So if the Feoffee of Non sane memory Levies a Fine and dies from thence his Heir shall have five years for the reason aforesaid First shall come as Tenant in Tail Levy a Fine five years pass and then dies without issue from thence the Donor shall have five years for to bring his form●don in Revertor because aided by the second saving because it is him to whom the right first cometh after the Fine and Proclamations and in all those cases there is a new right or Title accrued Discended remains or comes after the Proclamations which was not in any other before upon cause made before the fine And disseisen here is no such cause which shall make Stowel to have such right which was not in any other but first in himself and so it is not here because the right was first

their Husbands is contrary to the intent of the Statute and the intent ought to be thought on because the Purviewe extends not further then the intent of the makers of the Statute as the Wife infeoffs the Father of him with whom she intends to marry for to regive the Land to them after their intermarriage for lives or remainder in tayle to the Wife the Father doth so they have issue the Wife after the death of the Husband levies a Fine to other uses their issue may not enter yet it is with in the words of the Act of 11. H. 7. because the Father gave it to them But this cometh from the Wife her selfe by circumstance And the Father was but as an Instrument of it and therefore out of the intent of 11. H. 7. which restraineth the generalty of the letter of the Statute and maketh the Cases within the words out of the penalty of the Statute by the intent of the Makers As Infants and mad Men are excepted out of the Cases of Fellonies made by any Statute so neither those nor a Fem covert shall be concluded in the intent of the Statute which maketh them accessary which shall give them Meat Drink or other ayde to them which shall commit such an Act. So if a bargaine for Land be made before a Writ brought against him and the suite depending Livery and Seisen is made It is not Champarty 19. R. 2. because he ought to performe the bargaine made upon just consideration notwithstanding W. 2. Cap. 49. and Articul super Chart. Cap. 11. So a barr fee is within the letter but not the intent of the Statute of 32. H. 6. cap. 10. because appointed to the Sheriffe in the beginning by the order and discretion of the Court for his labour and attendance when the Prisoners are brought to their delivery 21. H. 7.16 So Wreck if a Man Dog or Car escapes alive shall be kept that the party may have his goods if he claimes within the yeare by W. 1. cap. 4. is intended of such things which will endure so long and not perish in the meane time as are Lemans Oringes c. So a rent granted by tenant in tayle for a release of right in other Lands is good 44. E. 3.21 because for the benefit of the estate tayle And W. 2. De donis c. intends not to restraine that which amends the estate tayle So Parsonages and Vicarages are within the words but out of the sense and intent of 1. E. 6. cap. 14. which inlargeth the words of the Statute and maketh that Cases within the like mischeife shall be within the Purview by equity as by the Book of entrys fol. 406. a man shall recover double damages for costs sustained with force by equity of 4. H. 4. cap. 8. which gives this for disseisen of the Land So that Executor which cometh first by distresse shall answer by equity of 9. E. 3. cap. 5. which speaketh of Executors by equity of Gloucester the Lessor shall have wast against the Lessee for half a yeare or for twenty weeks which pleads yeares So 1. E. 6. cap. 12. which takes away Clergy for stealing Horses takes it away also for one Horse because included in the Plurall Number and therefore Plowden disallows 2. E. 6. cap. 33. which taketh away Clergy for the stealing of one Horse as a superfluous Statute and was made in vaine And so 1. E. 6 cannot of Law but morall vertue which reforme the Law and the other equity is Quasi equality because in the like reason in the like Law Sobye against Molins TIthes shall be payd for the Boughs of Hornebeame H. 17. El. in the Kings Bench. Attachment upon prohibition Hasell Sallows Maple and such Trees which are not fit for building and so of the Trees themselves although that the Trees and Boughs are above the age of one and twenty yeares for they are not great Trees which are exempted and priviledged of Tithes by the Statute of 45. E. 3. cap. 3. or rather by the Common Law in affirmance of which this Statute was made as appeareth 50. E. 3.10 But Tithes shall not be payd for Ashes Oaks and Elmes Beech and such like Trees which are fit for building and of the age of twenty yeares nor for the Branches of them which are of the age of twenty yeares Quere if the Branches are within such age as the Timber trees which use to be lopped and lopt if Tithe shal be payd for them and it seemeth Tithes shall be payd of them by the Book The use at this day is upon suggestion to have a prohibition that the party shall be bound by Obligation or Recognisans to the King to preferr a Bill of attachment against the party which sues in the spirituall Court if he requires it and upon it to declare and joine issue or demurr upon the right of Tithes and award consultation which Plowden held vicious First for that the Defendant is not Actor and therefore may not have consultation upon such proceedings Secondly For that the Judgement upon the Attachment ought to be to acquit or attaint the party of the Contempt and not proceed upon the right of Tithes Thirdly For that the Plaintiffe cometh into the Court voluntarily Scilicet by his Recognisans to exhibit his Attachment where he ought to be brought in voluntarily by Process Fourthly Because the suggestion of the Attachment is false Fifthly For that if the Plaintiffe will not proceed the Defendant hath no remedy but a Recognisance forfeited to the King But Plowden held it to be the best course after the prohibition that the Defendant sues out a Scire facias against the Plaintiffe Quare consultatio concedi non debeat And upon this the Plaintiffe may declare and the matter shall be tryed and the Defendant may have consultation and then he will be an Actor Sanders and Archers Case ARcher gave Poison to Sanders to Poison his Wife H. 18. El. the Report of the opinions of Dyer Cheife Justice and Barham Justices of Assises in Warw. and Sanders gives this to his Wife in a roasted Apple which did eate part of it and gave the residue to their daughter being an Infant and after the Wife recovers and the Infant dyes and it was adjudged Murder in Sanders for which he was hanged but not in Archer for he was acquit to be no accessary to this Murder First For that Sanders had an evill intent of Murder at the beginning of his Act to kill his Wife and therefore the consequent of his Act by which the Daughter dyes shall be adjudged according to the commencement So if a man shoots at one and kills another or lyeth in waite to kill one and kills another otherwise it is where he hath no ill intent of killing any as to lay poyson to kill Rats and one eates of it and dyeth Secondly The consent of Archer to kill the Woman may not bee conjectured further then he gave it