Selected quad for the lemma: justice_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
justice_n	according_a	court_n	law_n	2,915	5	4.6268	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A91283	A soveraign antidote to prevent, appease, and determine our unnaturall and destructive civill warres and dissentions. Wherein divers serious considerations tending to this purpose are propounded both to the King and subjects, the Parliaments and Sir Iohn Hothams proceedings at Hull and in the militia justified, Sr Iohn Hothams actions proved to be neither treason, felony, nor trespas, by the laws of the land, nor any just ground or cause at all for his Majestie to rayse an army, or a most unnaturall civill warre in his kingdome. With a most serious exhortation both to the King and subjects to embrace and preserve peace and abandon civill warres, with other matters worthy of consideration.	Prynne, William, 1600-1669.	1642 (1642)	Wing P4086A; Thomason E239_6; ESTC R19412	26,708	37

house be on fire in a Towne men may iustifie the pulling downe thereof and of the next adjoyning houses if there be cause to prevent the burning of the whole Towne it being for the Common good Yea o Fishers at Sea may iustifie their going on other mens ground adjoyning to the Sea because their fishing is for the common profit of the whole Realme If then private persons may thus legally prejudice other particular men in these cases in their Lands and Houses for the common good then much more may the whole representative body of the Kingdome in Parliament seize upon Hull and the Magazine there for a season being the Common-wealths and the Kings onely in right of and for the service of the Kingdome for the publique peace and safety and the prevention of Civill-warres without any danger of trespasse much lesse of Treason in making Sir Iohn Hotham their Agent in this Service They having a common interest therein since Souldiers Citizens and other private persons may lawfully raise Forts and Trenches on others grounds or pull down any houses and suburbs for the publique good though they have no particular interest in their lands or houses but onely a temporary common interest upon these publique occasions The fourth PROPOSITION THe fourth Proposition is this That in all doubtfull cases of Treason not within the expresse Letter and words of 25 E. 3. Parl. 5. c. 3. neither the King himselfe nor his Iudges but the Parliament and King in Parliament if hee will be there ought to declare and determine what act is Treason and what not This is cleare by these expresse words of 25. E. 3. c. 3. of Treason And it is accorded that if any other case supposed Treason which is not above specified in this Act doth ●appen before any Iustices the Iustices shall ●arry without any going to judgement of the Treason 〈◊〉 the cause be shewed and declared before the King and his Parliament whether it ought to be judged Treason or Felony Which clause was afterwards ratified by 11 R. 2. c. 3. 1 H. 4. c. 10. and by 21 R. 2. c. 11. where Judge Thorning affirmes That the Declaration of Treason not declared belongeth to the Parliament which part of declaring Treason some hold is utterly taken away by 1 Ma●●a Session 1 R●s●al Treason Sect. 20. which others deny and that no other Treason is or can be at this day unlesse by speciall Act of Parliament but what is within the very Letter of 25. ● 3. c. 3. This being indubitable these Conclusions will necessarily follow First that neither his Majestie alone nor yet accompanied with his privy Counsell or Iudges hath any legall power or right at all to declare or determine what is Treason and what not or to declare or adjudge any particular Act to be Treason unlesse it be clearely within the expresse Letter of 25 E. 3 c. 3. Therefore his Majesties own private p Declaration of Sir Iohn Hothams Act in seising the Towne and Magazine of Hull and his refusall to admit his Majestie into the Town when he came to dispossesse him of it to be Treason being out of the Letter of the 25. Ed. 3. and his proclaiming of him to be a Traytour must necessarily be both void and illegall Secondly The Kings Judges and Justices even in Courts of Judicature where they may finally determine and resolve what is law in all other cases neither can may nor ought to declare and determine what is Treason and what is not in any cases out of the very Letter of 25. E. 3. but ought to resert to the Parliament and receive a resolution from them whether it be Treason or not So are the expresse words of this Act of 25. E. 3. and others since If then the Judges are thus to be resolved by the Parliament onely what is Treason and what not then there is no reason or sence why the Parliament should be sent to the Judges to be advised and resolved by them what is Treason or why the Parliament should be taxed for Voting Sir Iohn ●othams Act not to be Treason without consulting first with the Iudges to know of them whether it were Treason or not Since the Parliament in this case of Treason are to direct and resolve the Judges not the Judges them Thirdly both Houses of Parliament upon the Kings Appeale to them for justice against Sir Iohn Hotham as a Traytour for not admitting him into Hull and upon Sir Iohn Hot●ams Letter to them relating the truth of his whole carriage to the King in this cause have acquitted Sir John Hotham and q Voted this Act of his warranted by the command of both Houses not only to be no Treason nor Felony but not so much as a Misdemeanour seeing all he did was only in discharge of the trust which the Parliament had reposed in him for the safety and peace of the whole Kingdome and prevention of a Civill-warre Since then the whole Parliament the onely proper Judges of Treason upon the Kings and Sir Iohn Hothams severall appeales to them have both voted and resolved Sir Iohn Hothams Act to be no Treason nor Crime nor he to be any Delinquent neither the King himselfe who oft professeth in his late Declarations to rule and governe all his people onely according to the Laws of the Realme according to his Oath nor his Counsell nor Judges can by any proclamation or Declaration or by any Judgement in any Court of Justice which hath Conusance of Treason declare this Act of his to be Treason or him a Traytour or Offender Let all of them and the whole Kingdome both for the present and future rest fully satisfied and concluded by the ●arliaments Votes and Resolutions whom our Lawes declare to be the onely proper Judges of this cause pretended to be Treason and so Sir Iohn Hotham must go scot-free Having thus passed through these foure Propositions and the Deductions from them I shall now draw towards a conclusion of this Discourse Sir Iohn Hothams case and Pulls truly stated and debated The onely if not principall pretence of his Majesties late raysing an Army in the North and of a most sad and unseasonable Civill-warre which if proceeded in may soone prove destructive to all his Majesties three Kingdomes is Sir Iohn Hothams seising on the Towne of Hull and the Magazine there by Order from the Parliament for the peace and security of the Realme and his denying his Majestie entrance into the Towne when he came to take possession of it Which Acts his Majestie hath in his Proclamations and Declarations declared and proclaimed to all his subjects to be no lesse then high Treason and Sir Iohn ●otham to be a notorious Traytour The sole question then will be Whether these Actions of Sir John Hotham be Treason or not by the Laws of the Realm And under correction I conceive it is as cleere as the Noone-day Sunne that they are no Treason That his taking possession

was to endure only among the Queenes l●fe as appeares by the 〈◊〉 in it whereby they enact that if any person or persons 〈◊〉 discover do unlawfully 〈◊〉 or t●eir owne Authority which is none of Sir Iohn Hothams case who did nothing but by order of Parliament compasse imagine conspire or advise 〈◊〉 wayes or meanes wit fo●ce or craft c. Maliciously or Rebel●iously which he did not but by authority of Parliament to take detaine or keepe from the Queene any of her Castles Towers Fortresses or holds c. And do advisedly by any expresse word speech act deed or writing utter or declare his said malicious and rebellious intents that then every pe●son or persons so offending in the Premises being thereof lawfully convicted according to the Lawes of the Realme shall be adjudged a Felon ● Felons and suffer paines of death as in cases of Felony c. And if any person or persons do at any time hereafter with force Maliciously and Rebelliously which is none of Sir Iohn Hothams case who did all by the Parliaments command detaine keepe or with hold from the Queenes Majestie any of her Castles Towers Fortresses or holds within the Realme or any of her Dominions or Countries or Marches of the same or do Maliciously and Rebelliously or with force detaine keepe or with-hold from her Maiestie any of her Ships Ordnance Artillery or other Munitions or Fortifications of Warrs and do not render and give up the same to our Soveraigne Lady or such persons as her Majestie shall appoint to receive the same to her use within six dayes next after he or they so offending shall be commanded by our Soveraigne Lady the Queene by open Proclamation under the great Seal of England to be made in any place or Market Towne within the County where any such offence shall be committed c that then every person or persons so offending their Ayders Counsellors and Abbetters being thereof Lawfully convict according to the Lawes of the Realme shall have and suffer such paines of death and also shall forfeit and lose as in cases of high Treason limitted and acustomed By this expired Act which was to continue onely during the Queenes life it is evident First that this detaining of the Kings Castles Forts Ships and Ammunition is no Treason within 25. 6. 3. for then this Law had beene idle and superfluous especially being to continue but during the Queenes life and so there can be no Treason at this day in Sir Iohn ●othams Act Secondly That no detaining or with-holding of such Castles Forts Ships and Ammunition is Treason within these particular acts but that which is done maliciously and Rebelliously and continued six dayes after a Proclamation under the great Seale and proclamed in the Cou●ty to deliver them up unto the Queene or her substitutes for her use Now Sir Iohn Hotham detained Hull and denyed his Majestie to seize and enter it not Maliciously and Rebelliously but in obedience to the Parliaments command which intrusted him to keepe it for the present both for the King and Kingdomes use for the prevention of Civill-warres and danger to the Realme and the excluding of forraigne forces which might be landed there neither did his Majestie make any Proclamation under his great Seale or give him six dayes space to deliver it up Therefore this Act of his is and can be no Treason neither within the particular expired forecited Acts were they in force much lesse within 25. E. 3. which extends not to this case And so his Majestie was utterly mistaken in the Law in proclaming Sir Iohn Hotham Traytour and declaring this act of his to be Treason of his owne head without consulting with his Judges or Councell learned in the Lawes who would questionlesse have informed him That this Act of his is now neither Treason nor Felony by the Law had he done it of his owne voluntary accord much lesse seeing he did it onely by the Parliaments direction and command as their Servant for the common safety of the Realme exclusions of forraigne forces and Artillery and prevention of an intended Civill-warre without any thought of the least disobedience or disloyalty to his Majestie into whose possession he declared he was and is ever ready to surrender up the Towne as soone as the Parliament shall command him In a word the Scot● late seizing upon all his Majesties Townes Castles in Scotland and on New castle here and detaining them against him after demands hath by his Majestie and both Kingdomes in Parliament beene tacitly if not expresly resolved and declared to be no Treason being done for the publique peace and safety of the whole Realme of Scotland and England Therefore much more must Sir Iohn Hothams seising but of Hull one single Towne and his detaining it for a season onely for his Majesties and the Kingdomes use and the peace and safety of the whole Kingdome and that by the Parliaments expresse command as their Instrument be adjudged no Treason Felony no nor Misdemeanor And since both Houses of Parliament the only proper Judges of Treason to whom both the King Sir Iohn appealed for justice have upon full hearing and debating of the cause voted and adjudged it to be no Treason or offence and published these their Votes in print to all the world I cannot discerne how by any Law his Majestie or his Malignant Counsellors can possibly fasten any charge of Treason Felony or Misdemeanour on Sir Iohn but must all conclude him to be an innocent Noble and weldeserving Gentleman for so faithfully and couragiously discharging the trust reposed in him by the Parliament for the whole Kingdomes peace and security and his Majesties safety too As for his late drowning of the Country about Hull to the spoile of much Grasle Corne and great prejudice of particular men with which his Majestie chargeth him in his last Letter to the Houses it is onely for the better preservation and defence of Hull for the common safety and therefore he may by Law justifie this Act even as men in times of Warre may justifie the burning or demolishing of a Suburb for the whole Cities safety and the making of Forts and Trenches in another mans ground for to resist an invading Enemy Which I have formerly proved Lawfull by our Law-bookes Moreover this drowning was through his Majesties owne occasion on whom the blame must originally rest who came to beseige Sir Iohn Hotham as a Traytour and take Hull out of his custody contrary to the trust reposed in him by the Parliament by force of Armes with an Army of Horse and Foote to the open violation of the Kingdomes peace the endangering of the whole Realme and Parliament against whom this warre is principally raised and intended under pretext of being avenged of Sir Iohn Hotham who hath done nought but by the Parliaments direction as their servant and trustee for the safe keeping of Hull not against the King but onely for the King and