Selected quad for the lemma: judgement_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
judgement_n work_n world_n write_v 181 4 4.8718 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A27029 The Scripture Gospel defended, and Christ, grace, and free justification vindicated against the libertines ... in two books : the first, a breviate of fifty controversies about justification ... : the second upon the sudden reviving of antinomianism ... and the re-printing of Dr. Crisp's sermons with additions ... / by Richard Baxter ... Baxter, Richard, 1615-1691. 1690 (1690) Wing B1397; ESTC R20024 135,131 242

There are 9 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

good men as Mr. Fowler and Mr. Cole by telling the World how unstudied and yet how confident they have been in some points But he did worse in citing Dr Manton that incurr'd their Censure for defending me in that very Pulpit where he saith I Preach'd against such accusers as he and was wholly of my judgment And reciting Arch-Bishop Usher who perused my Confession written against the Antinomians and altered not a word in it before I published it I got him and Mr. Gataker to read it and it was the last Work that Mr. Gataker did in the World as his Epistle and his Sons shew Had the Prefacer read but that one Book my Confession written in 1655. and there the explications of the Co●troversies and the many score plain Texts and Arguments and the hundred Testimonies of Synod and Protestant Divines for the Doctrine which I defend and specially if he have read my Explication of all these Controversies in my Catohlick Theology and Methodus and Dispute of Justification and of Justifying Righteousness and yet h●d call'd for an answer to Mr. Cole or Mr. Fowler I should have told him that he and such as he are too hard or deaf for me to answer But he impertinently citeth other men that say we are justified by Free Grace and the Righteousness of Christ and not by Works as if he would falsly intimate that I deny it when I neither trust to nor know any Righteousness that is not meerly subordinate to the Rig●teousness of Christ and take his Righteousness Habun●l Active and Passive to be the only and perfect Meritorious Cause of our Justification and Salvation of Grace and Glory And I wonder not that Paul counted his own Righteous●ess by the ●aw to be dung in compa●ison of being found in Christ having his Righteo●sness But I abhor the opinion that C●rist's Righteousness given us is all without us and none within us when Christ dwelleth in us as if 600 Texts of Scripture were all false that speak of the necessity of an inherent and act●ve Righteousness I abhor the opinion of any works necessary to Justification or Salvation or to any common Blessings in the sense of Paul such as make the reward to be of Debt and not of Grace I think few men living are less tempted to magnify or trust to any worth of th●ir own than I am I look not for a bit of Bread or an h●urs Ease or Life or the Pardon or Acceptance of one Duty or of my Holiest Affections so faulty are they by their great Imperfection but meerly from the Free Grace of God and the Merits and Intercession of Christ But should I take all for Errour that this Preface reciteth as such and all for truth that Dr. Crispe and such men write I should look for wiser men than him or Mr. Cole to Anathematize me rather as an Anti-Gospeller than a meer Antinomian And I am the sorryer for the prefixing of t●e Twelve Reverend Names when I find by their Epistles that they had read this Preface so full of false Citations and gross Errour and say not a word against it nor against such a Book Mr. Cockain in his Epistle directing it to them that live Godly in Christ Jesus t●lls them that the Kingdom of God within them shall never be shaken and the Divine Nature that hath swallowed them up shall for ever satisfy them with variety of Contentments And is not that ours which is within us And is this Kingdom and Divine Nature nothing but that which Christ did without us imputed to be done by us And if this be no subordinate Righteousness what doth the word signify so many hundred times used in the Scripture Let them but grant Justification by Faith and let them assign Faith what Office therein they can reasonably imagine without flat denying all Pauls Doctrine and they will confute Dr. Crispe Say but that Faith is imputed to us for Righteousness and give not the lye to Paul and sure we shall be reconciled But if they will tell us that by Faith Paul meaneth not Faith but Christ's Righteousness they must prove that they have more than a Papal Power to make God's Word by making the Sense when God maketh but the Letter before we can renounce the Scripture and believe them And yet if they will expound Imputation soberly we shall grant them the matter that Christ's Righteousness is accounted to us of God as the only Meritorious Cause of our Justification and Salvation tho' we believe that by Faith Paul meaneth Faith But if they still say that by Faith is meant only the Object of Faith and not the Act could we but get them to forbear Anathematizing Men for being so Learned as to understand English we might yet hope at least to keep the flame of their Zeal out of the thatch within the Chimney by telling them the difference between the Object of Faith as such and the person that is the Object otherwise considered In real Existence Christ tho' not yet believed in is the sole meritorious Cause But it is only in esse cognito that Christ is the Object of Faith And School-Boyes that have no damnable Learning may teach these confident men that the Object as an Object believed is the very form in specie of the Act of Faith It is an Act without it but not this Act viz. the Christian Faith As sin in esse reall is damning but in esse cognito objectivo it is the form of the Grace of Repentance so is it here But if they will grant that by Faith is meant Faith and not say that Paul condemneth Justification by Faith as being but Justification by Works let them but tell us how it justifieth I say not efficiently at all but only as a meer receptive qualification If they say as an Efficient Instrument they give it much more than I do and lay it on the Act or the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Credere as they speak For what else is the Instrument I hope they mean not that Christ and his Righteousness is but the Instrument But of this more after I thought it meet to have recited many hundred Texts of Scripture which they directly contradict which good Men should rather believe than them But if the Reader will peruse my Confession he will find it there done already And I thought it necessary to commend the good Lives of many of them excepting the Schism and Vnrighteousness that Faction doth involve them in lest the Grosness of their Verbal Errours which come from unskilfulness in Words and Methods should tempt many to judge of the Men by their Words and Opinions and should harden the malignant to justifie all their hard Censures and Vsage of the Non-Conformists for their sakes And yet Mr. Crispe is one of my sharp Censurers for charitably excusing Men from lesser Errours than his own while he falsifyeth my Words about our difference with the Papists I have said oft and long agoe that
THE Scripture Gospel defended AND Christ Grace and Free Justification Vindicated Against the Libertines Who use the names of CHRIST FREE GRACE and JUSTIFICATION to subvert the Gospel and Christianity and that Christ Grace and Justification which they in zealous Ignorance think they plead for to the injury of Christ the danger of Souls and the scandalizing of the weak the insulting of Adversaries and the Dividing of the Churches Yet charitably differencing the wordy Errours of unskilful Opiniaters from their Practical Piety And the mistaken Notions of some Excellent Divines from the gross Libertine Antinomian Errours In Two Books The first A Breviate of Fifty Controversies about Justification written about thirteen years past and cast by till now after many provocations by Press Pulpit and Backbiting The second upon the sudden reviving of Antinomianism which seemed almost extinct near Thirty four years And the re-printing of Dr. Crisp's Sermons with Additions with twelve Reverend Names prefixed for a decoy when some of them abhor the Errour of the Book and know not what was in it but yielded by surprize only to declare that they believed him that told them that the Additions were a true Copy By RICHARD BAXTER an Offender of the Offenders of the Church by Defending the Truth and Duty which they fight against Lux oculos vexat ubi noctua luminis osor Putrida suspecti vexabunt ulcera tactus LONDON Printed for Tho. Parkhurst at the Bible and Three Crowns at the lower end of Cheapside 1690. HEB. 11.5 6. Without Faith it is impossible to please God He that cometh to God must believe that He is and that He is the Rewarder of them that diligently seek him Luke 19.17 Well thou good Servant Because thou hast been faithful in a very little have thou Authority over ten Cities So Mat. 25.21 Mat. 25.34 40 46. Inherit the Kindgom prepared for you from the Foundation of the World For I was hungry and ye gave me Meat In as much as ye have done it to one of the least of these my Brethren ye have done it to me And these shall go into Everlasting Punishment and the Righteous into Life Eternal Gen. 22.16 17 18. By my self have I sworn saith the Lord because thou hast done this thing and hast not withheld thy Son c. John 16.27 The Father himself loveth you because you have loved me and have believed that I came out from God 1 John 3.12 13. Whatsoever we ask we receive of him because we keep his Commandments and do those things that are pleasing in his sight and this is his Commandment that we believe on the Name of his Son Jesus Christ and Love one another Rev. 3.4 They shall walk with me in white for they are worthy Rev. 3.10 Because thou hast kept the Word of my Patience I will keep thee c. Mar. 7.29 For this saying go thy way the Devil is gone out c. Mat. 5.20 Except your Righteousness exceed the Righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees you shall in no case enter into the Kingdom of Heaven Mat. 12.36 37. Every idle Word that Men shall speak they shall give account thereof in the day of Judgment For by thy Words thou shalt be Justified and by thy Words thou shalt be Condemned Jam. 2.24 You see then that by Works a man is Justified and not by Faith only So v. 13. to the end Rom. 8.29 30. Whom he foreknew them he predestinated to be conformed to the Image of his Son that he might be the first born among many Brethren And whom he did predestinate them he also called And whom he called them he also justified and whom he justified them be also glorified Luke 18.13 14. I tell you This man went down Justified rather than the other Prov. 17.15 He that Justifieth the wicked and he that condemneth the Just even they both are abomination to the Lord. Of Faith imputed to Righteousness and our being Justified by Faith See Rom. 3.30 26. Rom. 4.11 22 23 24. He that considereth the different sence of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the first usually signifying the Practical or Preceptive matter that is Righteousness the second Active efficient Justification and the third the State of the Just Qualitative or Relative or ipsam Justitiam will the better expound the Word Justification as it is in our Translations Rom. 4.24 25. For us also to whom it shall be imputed not is before we believe if a Conditional we believe on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead Who was delivered for our offences and was raised again for our Justification Not only obeyed and suffered for our Justification but was raised for it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 efficiently to make us just relatively and qualitatively and so to justify us and consequently to judge us just Exodus 23.7 I will not justify the wicked Obj. Rom. 4 5. He justifieth the ungodly Answ Yes By making him Just by Pardon Adoption and Godliness As he healeth the sick and raiseth the dead in sensu diviso Acts 2.38 Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of the Lord Jesus for the remission of sins 13.38 By him all that believe are Justified from all things from which ye could not be justified by the Law of Moses See Titus 3.6 7. 1 Cor. 6.8 9 10 11. Rom. 2.13 14. 1 Peter 1.16 17. 2 Co● 9.6 Rev. 20.12 13. And the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the Books according to their works c. Which is oft said in Scripture John 5.22.29 The Father judgeth no man but hath committed all Judgment to the Son and hath given him authority to Execute Judgment They that have Done Good to the Resurrection of Life and they that have done evil to the Resurrection of damnation 2 Tim. 4.7 8. I have fought a good fight Henceforth there is laid up for me a Crown of Righteousness which the Lord the righteous Judge shall give me at that day and not to me only but to all that love his appearing See Heb. 6.10 1 Cor. 15.58 Col. 3.24 Heb. 11.26 2. Thes 1.5 6 7. Mat. 5.12 Mat. 6.2.4.6 5.12 10.41.42 10.29 1 Cor. 9.17 Rom. 2.5.10 Mat. 7.4 1 Joh. 1.9 If we confess our sins he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness So Rom. 10.10.13 Mat. 6.14 15. If ye forgive men their trespasses your heavenly Father will forgive you But if ye forgive not men Neither will 1 Joh. 3.17 Let no man deceive you He that doth Righteousness is Righteous Isa 1.16 17 18. Cease to do evil c. Come now If your sins be red as crimson Isa 55.6 7. Seek the Lord while he may be found c. Let the wicked forsake his way c. Let him return to the Lord and he will have mercy on him c. Acts 10.35 In every nation he that feareth God and
worketh Righteousness is accepted of him Rev. 22.14 Blessed are they that do his Commandments that they ●ay have right to the Tree of Life and may enter in by the Gate into the City John 3.18 He that believeth not is condemned already because c. Rom. 8.9 If any man have not the Spirit of Christ the same is none of his See also verse 4.5.7.14 2 Cor. 13.15 Jesus Christ is in you except ye be reprobates Col. 1.27 Christ in you the hope of glory See Eph. 2. What the Elect are before Conversion 1 Cor. 6.9 10 11. Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the Kingdom of God Be not deceived neither fornicators And such were some of you But ye are washed ye are Sanctified but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God 1 Thes 6.10 God is not unrighteous to forget your work and labour of Love Phil. 2.13 Work out your Salvation with fear and trembling For it is God that worketh c. Rev. 2 3. Read the promises to him that overcometh Mat. 6.19 20. Lay up for your selves a treasure in heaven Luke 16.9 Make you friends of the Mammon of unrighteousness that when you fa●l they may receive you into the everl●sting habitations Gen. 4.7 If thou dost well shalt thou not be accepted But if thou c. Luke 13.3.5 Except ye repent ye shall all perish Mat. 18.3 Except ye be converted and become as little Children ye shall not enter into the Kingdom of Heaven Heb. 5.9 He is become the Author of Eternal Salvation to all them that obey him Luke 19.27 These mine Enemies that would not I should reign over them Heb. 10.33 Cast not away your confidence which hath great recompense of reward 39. We are not of them that draw back to perdition but of them that believe to the saving of the Soul Mat. 18.32 35. O thou wicked Servant I forgave thee all that d●bt because c. so shall my heavenly Father do also to you if you from your hearts forgive not every one his brother their trespasses The Answer to all this by the Adversaries I. By the Infidels The Scripture is not the Word of God II. By the Mahometans in special The followers of Christ altered it III. By Papists Scripture is to us but what the Church declareth of it 1. The reading of it and rejecting supplemental Tradition by the Vulgar causeth heresies IV. By the Quaker It is the light within us that is our Rule V. The Enthusiasts or Fanaticks We must try Scripture by the Spirit and not the Spirit by the Scripture the Apostles Spirit by ours and not our low measure by theirs VI. The seekers The Scripture must first be recovered by a true Ministry VII The Cabbalist and Familist It is not to be understood Literally but Mystically VIII The Antinomian Libertine The written word or at least all that prescribeth duty and hath conditional promises is but a Covenant of works The Covenant of Grace is only the Spirits Effectual work I will and you shall A Breviate of the Doctrine of Justification Dilivered in many Books By RICHARD BAXTER In many Propositions And the Solution of 50 Controversies about it Written 1. To end such Controversies 2. To confute Rash Censurers and Errours 3. To inform the Ignorant 4. To procure Correction from wiser men if I mistake Occasioned by some mens Accusation of me to others that will not vouchsafe their Instruction to my self And by the Erroneous and dangerous Writings and Preachings of some well-meaning men such as Mr. Troughton c. who at once mistake and misreport God's Word and ours and fight in the dark against Christian Faith and Love LONDON Printed for Tho. Parkhurst at the Bible and Three Crowns at the lower end of Cheapside 1690. The Preface long ago written Reader IT was the Army and Sectarian Antinomians more fitly called Libertines who first called me in the year 1645. and 1646. to study better than I had done the Doctrine of the Covenants and Laws of God of Redemption and Justification I fetcht my first resolving thoughts from no Book but the Bible specially Mat. 5 and 6 and 25. Grotius de Satisfactione next gave me more light While I was considering many mens friendly Animadversions on my Ap●orisms and answering some that more differed from each other than from me it increased light especially the Animadversions of Mr. George Lawson My Writings against the Antinomians had success beyond my expec●ations though some good men of the Party called Independent having more heat than light deceived by the notions of some that had spoken injudiciously before them cast out suspicions and contradictions in a jealousie that I encroached on the honour of Free Grace I mean such men as prefaced the Book called The Marrow of Modern Divinity which on pretence of Moderation is Antinomian or Libertine and very injudicious and unsound And others Books such as Paul Hobsons Mr. Saltmarshes Bunyan on the Covenants c. which ignorantly subverted the Gospel of Christ came out on the same business and revealed mens mistakes on pretence of revealing the Mystery of Free Grace John Goodwin was then and before publishing his Judgment of Justification and Mr. Walker and Mr. Roborough wrote against him with great disparity of light and strength But because J.G. turned to the Arminians prejudice cryed down his Doctrine of Justification and it was not all to be approved Mr. Gataker published many things to the like purpose and among the rest the Narrative of Mr. Wottons Case referred to many London Divines and decided by them Of my suspension of my Aphorisms and of my Contests with Mr. Craudon Mr. Eyres Mr. Warner and afterwards with Dr. Tully I need not here make particular mention The most that I converst with seemed of my Judgment The rest beside the Animadverters on my Aphorisms who freeliest spake of me beh●●d my back would none of them speak to me Vavasor Powel and Mr. Ed. Bagshaw were two of the chief Many worthy men published the same Doctrine which I ass●rted especially Mr. Gibbons of Black-fryars in his Sermon in the Morning Lectures at St. Gi●●s Mr. Benjamin Woodbridge Mr. Hotchk●● Mr. Thomas Warren Mr. Graile and Mr. Je●●op laboured to prove that Dr. Twisse meant the same who seems to speak for Eternal Immanent Justification And Mr. Truman and Lud. Le Blankes Theses at last came out after the The●es Salmurienses and the Breme Divines Lud. Crocius Conrad Bergius and the Berlin Johan Bergius as clear as any But the practice of some who wanted the humility and ●ili●ence which were necessary to learn the Truths which they knew not was just the same with that of the Prelates in Councils for a thousand years even to put it to the Vote of m●n of their own mind or to lean on the names of some of their Predecessors who were men of note and especially to cry down those that heard them not
And lately came out a Book of one Mr. Troughtons of the same temper with the rest He allarmeth the Nation as if the Enemy were at the Gates He is a man that hath been blind from his Infancy or early Childhood and I suppose never read a Book but hath had some one to read to him and he undertaketh to tell the sense of Protestant Writers and Fathers and the words and sense of Mr. Hotchkis and me and such others whom be fiercely assaulteth as his and the Churches Adversaries And the good man heapeth up untr●●●s in matter of fact in false reciting his Adversaries words and sense Besides his Libertine false Doctrine as that the Covenant or Promise of Justification hath no Conditions no not Faith and such like and abuseth the Authors whom he citeth I thought once to have bestowed two or three days work in answering him but I desisted partly because he was one of those that had written at the rate of some former Adversaries who had so formed their Assaults that they had left me little to answer but a Mentiris which is so unpleasing a task that they that most deserve it cannot bear it And it hath been my lot since 1662. in which the powerful Ringleader Morley began to have so many such Books written against me and such reports divulged of me as if the Devil had been studying to prove Rom. 3.4 that every man is a Lyar to be true in a sense beyond the meaning and to bring all History at least of Disputers into discredit and to make it become a valid consequence It is said and written by a domineering or an ambitious or an erroneous or angry Adversary Ergo it is false And also I was loth to say that against the man that his Book required For I hear he is a very honest man and not only blind but a sufferer for Nonconformity with the rest and when he was a Child his Grand-father Grand-mother and other kindred in Coventry were my hearers and loving friends and godly people His Father and Mother my very near Neighbours and weekly and almost daily company have asked my Counsel what they should do with a blind Boy that was much inclined to Learning and I encouraged them to further him not foreseeing his snares 3. And I perceive that judicious Readers have no need of an Antidote against so weak a Poison He that gave me the Animadversions answered in the end told me He had scarce patience to read him And as to those that are so weak as to need an answer to such a Book it 's like they are too weak to understand one or will think him in the right that hath the last word and that may be he that liveth longest The great fault of the good man is that which is too predominant in all Cases in corrupted Nature even an unhumbled understanding which doth not sufficiently suspect it self much less is acquainted with its own Ignorance but when it most mistaketh doth most confidently rage Who would think that such a man could be ignorant how unfit he was who never saw their Books to undertake such account as he giveth of Fathers Protestant Writers or us his chosen Adversaries When his Reader hath read to him some parcels of our Writings how knoweth he what he omitteth or what explications he never read And how uncapable must his memory needs be of retaining and laying all together out of so many Volumes and making a charge and passing a Judgment thereupon unless his memory be greater far than Bishop Hall saith Dr. John Reynolds reading and memory was next to a Miracle which his gross falsifications shew that it is not And 4. I found so many ready to write on the same Subject for my sense that I the more thought it needless to my self Sir Charles Wolsley hath lately done it very judiciously I have lately perused divers Manuscripts that are such prepared for the Press One of Mr. William Mannings another of Mr. Clerke Son to Mr. Samuel Clerke and Dr. Twisse hath a Latine Disputation to the same sense and some more all Nonconformists But yet I still hear some London Brethren use to cast out their suspicions aspersions and censures behind my back and some in their Conferences when they meet Whereupon I drew up this Paper of Explicatory Propositions and Controversies only to let them truly know my sense and long after gave it that honest Dr. Annesley at whose house sometimes some meet of different Judgments in such things desiring him but to get it read to them and to procure me their Animadversions on what they did any of them dis●ike instead of their unprofitable Obloquy when I cannot hear them for this I should take for a great brotherly kindness But it is now near a twelve month that I have waited in hope of it but cannot procure a word to this day which maketh me think it needful to publish that which I intended but for their private view Yet one that to me prof●ssed dissent seemed to take it well that I intreated his Reasons and promised to give them me but never did Nor hath any one yet answered 1. My Confession 2. My Disputations of Justification 3. My Apology to many 4. My small Tract of Saving Faith to Bishop Barlow 5. My Treatise of Justifying Righteousness to Dr. Tully This week an honest judicious moderate Friend that is more a Consenter than a Dissenter as far as I can judge sent me the Notes which I answer in the latter end as partly his own and partly others which not as opposing them but as tending to elucidate the whole Cause I here adjoyn though all or most here said is said elsewhere before which I mention lest you think that I took all for his own Opinion which he cited out of Dr. Owen who himself reformed much of his former Judgment about Doctrine and Government before he died The Lord heal his Church by Light Love and Humility which is torn by Ignorance Uncharitableness and Pride Amen The Prologue § 1. THE Doctrine of the Justification of sinful man by Christ as our Redeemer Saviour and Judge is of so great moment that it should be Skilfully taught to all that are Catechised And yet by the Unskilfulness of Teachers is become a foot-ball of Strife and Contention and of Wrathful Censures and Reproach among those who are most zealous for the safe and honourable preservation of it and really differ more in the Terms and Methods which they think must preserve it than in the inward practical sense of the matter itself § 2. Two things constitute this itch or leprosy rather of strife which experience maketh us fear is uncurable And these two are one Ignorance Ignorance of the case And Ignorance of our Ignorance But what Ignorance is it I am grieved to know and speak it It is Ignorance of words or the art of speaking of Grammar and Logick O what a plague did Nimrod bring on the World
explaining in what sense Christs Righteousness is imputed to us and how not 3. And do they tell us with any agreement what Righteousness of Christ they call Imputed Some say only the Passive some also the Active Some also the habitual and some also the Divine Much less agree they to what Effects it is imputed and how far 4. Also the name of Faith is used without a due and true explication of their meaning One by Faith meaneth not Faith but Christs Righteousness Another calls it an Instrument and yet denieth it to be the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 credere that is the Act of Faith indeed as if any thing else was that instrument Another saith it is but one Physical act and not like contracting a Moral complication of many Physical Acts One saith it is but one Act and all other Acts of Faith he that looketh to be Justified by denieth the Doctrine of Grace or true Justification and so leave men to despair because they can never tell which that single is and how to escape the damning Doctrine of Justification by works One saith it is the Understandings assent Another that it is the Wills recumbency or trust One saith it is only Faith in Christ that Justifieth and not in God the Father or the Holy Ghost One saith it is only Faith in Christs Priestly Office and not in Christ as Prophet or King some say it is not Faith in his whole Priestly Office either his Intercession or Heavenly Priesthood but only in his Sacrifice and Obedience Another that it is only the trusting on his Imputed Righteousness Another that it is none of all these but only the belief that we are already Justified by Christ One saith we are Justified only at once by the first numerical Act of Faith and never by any after Act Another that an Act of the same Species continueth our Justification And this confusion is from the vain fantasy of men that will divide and mince and yet will not sufficiently distinguish and know not that by Faith is meant our becoming Christians and continuing such 5. So they talk loud against Works in the Case of Justification and know not what either Paul or James or Christ meaneth by works But they dream that Works and Acts are of the same signification As if every humane Act were that which Paul meaneth by works contrary to his express explication And so to be Justified by Faith must be to be Justified by Works One saith we will grant Justification by Faith if you take it aright to be a going wholly out of our selves and denying all our own righteousness and going to Christ and his Righteousness alone But is their chosen Metaphor of Going out and Going to an Act or no Act If an Act than it is works if they may be believed If no Act then their meaning is we confess that you are Justified by Believing if you do not believe You are Justified by Faith if Faith be nothing and by coming to Christ if you come not to him or it be nothing Such is the sence of these Confounders and Corrupters But these and many such mistakes are to be opened in their proper place That which I here intend is not a confutation of this or that writer but to give them a breviate of my own Judgment who will not read what I have largely written in many books long ago pretending that the length of the books is their reason and yet have not so much conscience as to suspend their censures no nor their back-biting false accusations of that which they have not leisure to understand or read They judge hard cases which they never digested by any answerable Study and Scruple not Judging and Slandering per●ons unheard Corrupting the Gospel and so excellent a Subject as the Doctrine of Grace and of the Office and Merits and Judgment of Christ and so of Christianity it self is a matter that conscience should more tenderly fear than wearing a Surplice or kneeling at the Sacrament or communicating with a Church that useth the Common-Prayers To think those unworthy of their Communion that use such Ceremonies or forms of prayer and at the same time to prophane so high a part of the name of God as is his Grace in Christ and his Justifying Governing and Saving works and this quoad verba by corrupting it even in Essentials and then to defame as erroneous those that are not as Ignorant and Erroneous as themselves and to foment malice and errour and Sects by such lying defamations This is a Nonconformity which I earnestly desire that no man that loveth Christ or Free grace or the Church or his own Soul may ever take for his duty or his honour or rashly as a sequacious admirer of any mistaken leader be ever guilty of What is straining at a Gnat and swallowing a Camel if this be not And of how ill a constitution is such a blind and partial conscience I shall here study brevity and first explain the Doctrine of Grace and Righteousness and Justification in some self-evident Propositions And next briefly resolve about fifty doubts or Controversies hereabout THE CONTENTS 1. THe nature of Justification explained Controv. I. Whether it be an Immanent Act in God and from Eternity Cont. II. Whether the Covenant of Grace be made only with Christ or with us also Cont. III Whether the Covenant of Grace have any condition required of us Cont. IV Whether our performance of the Condition efficiently justify us Cont. V. Whether we are justified by Christs righteousness imputed to us And whether the Scripture say we are Cont. VI. In what sense is Christs Righteousness imputed to us Cont. VII What Righteousness of Christ is it that is ours and imputed to us the Passive the Active the Habitual or the Divine or all Cont. VIII Whether Christs Righteousness be the Efficient Material or Formal cause of our Righteousness or Justification Cont. IX Whether the Vnion between Christ and believers be not so near as maketh them the same Subject and so the Accident of Christs righteousness to be ours in itself Cont. 10. Are we not so righteous by an Vnion with Christ as we are sinners by our Vnion with Adam Cont. XI Is not Christs Righteousness ours as our sins were his by imputation Cont. 12. Doth Christs Righteousness cause our Sanctification in the same sort of Causality as it causeth our Justification Cont XIII Is it faith itself that is said to be imputed to us for Righteousness or only Christs or Christs Righteousness Cont. XIV Whether Grace be Grace and free if it have any condition Cont. XV. Whether Repentance be any condition of Pardon and Justification and to affirm it do not equal it with Faith Cont. XVI Whether faith justify us as a meritorious cause or as a dispositive cause of receiving Justification or as a meer condition or an Instrumental cause Cont. XVII Is Justifying faith an act of the understanding or of the Will Cont.
B●t a part it hath as is confessed and for that part it must be trusted and pleaded and no man must trust to be saved without faith repentance and obedience Heb. 12.14 Mar. 16.16 Luk. 13.3 5. I conclude all in Dr. Prestons words Treatise of Faith p. 44 45. And of the Attributes p. 71. ● Justifying Faith defined is a Grace or habit infused into the Soul whereby we are enabled to believe not only that the Messiah is offered to us but also to take and receive him as a Lord and Saviour that is both to be saved by him and obey him No man believeth Justification by Christ but his faith is mainly grounded on this Word of God In Scripture we find that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh and that he is the Lamb slain for the forgiveness of sins That he is offered to every creature That a man must thirst after him and then take up his Cross and follow him Now come to a believer going out of the World and ask him what hope he hath to be saved he will be ready to say I know that Christ is come into the World and offered up and I know that I am one of them that have a part in him I know that I have fulfilled the conditions as that I should not continue willingly in any known sin that I should love the Lord Jesus desire to serve him above all I know that I have fulfilled these conditions and for all this I have the word for my ground c. So far Dr. ●reston Cont. 36. Hath Justification and Salvation the same conditions and do works save us which do not justifie us Ans 1. The works which Paul excludeth from Justification he excludeth from saving us Eph. 2.5 8 9. Tit. 3.5 so Jam. 2.14 c. 2. Justification begun and our right given to Salvation have the same condition 3. Justification in the last Judgment is the justifying of our right to Glory and hath the same condition with our glorification Mat. 25. Come ye blessed c. But more is necessary to final Justification and Salvation than to our first right as is before shewed Cont. 37. Is there any such thing as a Justifying us against Satans false accusations As that a believer is no believer impenitent an hypocrite c. Some say the Devil will not be so foolish knowing that God knoweth all Ans If Justification relate not to Accusation Divines have hitherto much wronged the Church in maintaining it so commonly as they have done If it do 1. It is either to a true or a false accusation Against a true accusation no man can be justified but must confess the charge If it be said that we sinned and that this sin deserved death it must ●e confessed and we cannot be justified directly against this charge For Guilt and Righteousness cann●t consist as to the same particular cause But if it be said 1. That we are unbelievers impenitent hypocrites c. 2. Or that we have no part in Christ 3. Or that we are not pardoned accepted reconciled and adopted for his meritorious righteousness and intercession and were not thus constituted just 4. And that therefore we have no right to life but ought to be condemned All these are false accusations against which we may and must be justified 2. And Satan is a Lyar and a Murderer and the accuser of the brethren And his knowledge hindred not his malice from falsly accusing Job to God himself nor from tempting Christ himself to the most odious sin 3. But it sufficeth us that Justification relateth not only to Actual Accusation but to ●●●tual yea to Possible And if ●od declare the Righteousness of his Servants by his ●ight Sentence or Execution though none accuse them either Satan or Conscience it sti●l relateth to possible Accusation They that deny all this must needs say that at Judgment and before as to any Sentence there will be no Ju●t●fi●ation at a●l because no Accusation true or fa●se And if no Justification nor Condemnation then no Judgment which is all contrary to an Arti●le of Faith Contr. 38. But though all this prove that we are justified by Faith y●● not as a Right●ousness so that it is questioned whether any personal Righteousness consisting in our performance of the Condition of the Covenant be th●t which we are justified by here or at last in subo●●●nation to Christs ●ighteousness which needs no supplement from us Ans 1. This Question is either of the Thing or of the bare Name of ●ighteousness whether it should so be called 1. A● to the Thing it is fu●ly proved already that Faith Repentance and Obedience are of flat necessity to our Salvation and therefore to the Jus●●●ying of our Claim of Right to that Salvation And therefor● to Justi●●e the Person as to that Right and Claim that he is one that truly hath such right For the Person is justified by the justifying of his Cause I suppose none of this will be denied 2. And as to the Nam● 1. The definition will prove it apt That which is Righteous denominateth the subject accordingly Every Cause in Judgment is Righteous or Unrighteous And the Person is Righteous so far as his Cause is so If it be said against a Believer that he hath no right to Ch●ist and 〈◊〉 his Right is his Righteousness as against thi● 〈◊〉 This Right is no natural being at ●ll bu● Moral Relation called D●●ness Yet this is hi● ●u●●ifying Righteousness But the fundamen●●● of that Right is quid absolutum It is an a●surd contradiction to say that a man hath any Righteousness that doth not so far constitute 〈…〉 as it is to say that a man hath Learning W●t Honesty Goodness which do not so far make him Learned Wise Honest or Good Or the Paper hath whiteness that maketh it not white 3. But we ever distinguish between Total Righteousness and Partial in tantum or secundum quid And betw●en that Righteousness in tantum which Salvation is laid on and that which is of small concern And also between Christs part and mans And so we still say 1. That Christs part needeth no supplement from ours nor do we perform the least t●at belongs to him 2. But his own Law Will and Covenant hath laid a necessary part on us 3. That by this we are no further justified than in tantum as it is a Righteousness of ours that is Faith in it self as such justifieth us only against the false Charge of Infidelity Repentance only against the false Charge of Impenitency Holiness and Sincerity against the false Charge of unholiness and hypocrisie c. But as the Condition of the Covenant they prove our right to Christ and Life And so as the Donation in the Gospel is the Titulus 〈◊〉 fundamentum iuri● so Faith and Repentance are the Conditio tituli There is a Partial Righteousness which every wicked man may have which enti●leth no one to Salvation The Devil himself may
justifying is not making Righteous therefore making Righteous is no Justifying nor any part of it It s a shame to stay to cite many ●●xts ●gai●st these men where the whole Bible but especially all Christ's own Preaching and Parables are so expresly against th●m that I admire with what f●ce th●se men pr●fess to believe the Scripture And I w●n●er not that some of them say that all the w●●tt●● Word is a Covenant of Works a●d o●ly the Spirits i●wa●d Work is the Covenant of Grace And wh●n they tell us as Crispe p. 242. Vol. 1. Ed. 1. That for any hurt that such sins can do us it is not possible for Christ hath made satisfaction I wonder why they preach against that which doth no hurt and why t●ey excommunicate men for sin and why they scruple Perjury Liturgies Parish-Communion or any Point of Conformity yea why some of them will suffer rather than conform when it is impossible for any sin to hurt them Why do your hearers pay you for Preaching against a harmless thing Why make you so much Complaint against Vnreforme●ness Sin doth God no hurt it doth not the Elect any hurt by your Doctrine for Christ hath satisfied and born all And the Reprobate are uncapable of good for want of satisfaction for them I pray you do not speak out this Doctrine to the World If you do I shall be glad that you are confined to your seduced ignorant Congregations If you will tell the World If you are elect no sin can possibly hurt you whatever Murders Adulteries Perjuries you commit it is none of your sin but Christs It cannot be his and yours too and if not elect you have no hope and if you be elect you will be never the better for praying considering charity or any Act of Religion or Justice which you do nor must once think to gain any thing by it How many Converts is this like to make And what would such a Nation come to I hope few of the publick Preachers that you call scandalous preach so scandalously as this I have one Request to you that if you or any other be questioned by the judges for Murder Adultery False-witness Perjury or Robbery you will not say as Dr. Crispe hath taught you I am no Murderer Adulterer perjured Robber c. It is Christ that is such a one and not I it cannot be my sin when he hath made it his for I doubt neither the Judges or Jury well believe you If you believe not we ask the Judges whether it be you or Christ that is the sinner I doubt it is you that will be hang'd If you say for what may not ignorance say That it is not at the Bar of man but of God only that Christ is the sinner and not we I Answer Know you not that Judges and Princes are God's Officers and that the Judgment is the Lords and that what they do according to his Will he doth by them He doth not command Rulers to hang men for a sin that is none of theirs All mens Judgments are Nullities that are against the fore-known Judgment of God It is the King that punisheth when the hangman executeth God punisheth men by Rulers and doth it righteously I write all this the rather because Mr. Cokain in his Preface exhorteth Preachers to go on where the Dr. left I humbly beseech them first to read and believe Mat. 5. 6. and 7 8. and 13.18.25 and all the Sermons and Parables of Christ and not downright to give him the Lie and call it exalting him And for them that report that there are no such Words in Dr. Crispe as I report I wonder not while they think that lying can do them no hurt and is not their sin but Christs And they that believe they are under no Law may believe that they have no Transgression nor Christ for them when they had never any And to them that talk of inherent Righteousness as less necessary than God hath made it I desire them but to mark what Christ saith of it and to remember that sin is much of Hell and holiness of Heaven And that Christ came to save his People from their sins as more righteous than the Scribes and Pharisees inh●rently and to make them a peculiar People zealous of good Works and holy as God is holy and to bethink them whether to disgrace the Building be to honour the Architect and whether the ●orth or the worthlesness of the Work more honour the Work-men and whether the Cure of the Sick dishonour the Physitian And whether to say that my Clock or Watch will go by artificial means or only no longer than the Work mans-Finger only moveth it do more honour the Artist And whether the Psalms would so much call us to glorifie God for his Works if all that is ascribed to his Works were taken from his Honour The Lord teach us better to understand that Word that maketh the simple wise and not to set Christ against himself and against his own Honours Government and Laws A Defence of Christ AND Free Grace c. Chap. 1. Prefatory Ortho. Sir Having my self and the Congregation which I am Related to been in danger of the Errours called Antinomian I wrote to you to intreat you who have done so much heretofore to Conquer and Extirpate those Errours to get the London Ministers to publish their Judgments against Dr. Crispe 's Book and such others now Re-printed and rising up with re-newed danger Reconcil You did so and I answered you 1. That I thought it not seasonable till the acceptance and success of that Book and such others made our danger so notorious and great as would clearly justify our Confutation I have written on that Subject so much already 1. In my Confession of Faith 2. In my Apologies against Mr. Craud●n Mr. Aaires and others 3. In my Disputations of Justification 4. In my Life of Faith 5. In my Justifying Righteousness and there against Dr. Tully and my last Animadversions on Mr. Cartwright 6. In my Cathol●ck Theol●gy especially the five last Chapters 7. And in my Methodus Theologiae All which are unanswered to this day that I know not why I should be forward to write much more For they that will not read this that hath been so long written are not like to read it if I yet write more And I am so fearful of stirring up the hidden spark of this mischief that having written Fourteen Years ago a short Decision of a multitude of these Controversies I suspended it lest it should kindle New Oppositions 2. And I told you that we have now such publick and dangerous Controversies about Royalty Prelacy Conformity c. that it is very unseasonable to make a noise of the Errours and Factions among the Tolerated though they should somewhat increase by advantage of our silence till we see what publick settlement there will be 3. And I confess I have an opinion that accidentally the Books
Dyet and Rest and not to work or eat or sleep till the Spirit moveth them And God maketh use of Reason and Order in things Spiritual as well as in things Natural And the Spirits of the Prophets are subject to the Prophets LXXVI They reprove us for perswading Unconverted Men to Pray because the Prayer of the Wicked is abominable and they ●●ould stay till they have the Spirit of Prayer And is a Tavern or a Whore-house a sitter pl●ce to get that Spirit than on their knees by Prayer when God himself saith To thee shall a●l fl●sh c●me se●k the Lord while he may ●e foun● call upon him w●ile he is near Let the Wick●d ●●●sak his way c. wicked Prayers of wicked men that are but to quiet them in sin are abominable and no prayer of an Impenitent unbeliever hath any promise of certain success But A●ab and Ni●eve and millions of Sinners have found that there are some prayers of the unregenerate that are better than none A●d do they think when we perswade them to Pray that we perswade them to continue Impenitent No it is but perswading them to Turn and Live For praying is a returni●● motion and we say but as Peter Repent and Pray if perhaps the thoughts of thy heart may be forg●●●● thee Not to exhort men to Pray is not to exhort them to desire Grace and true Conversion Common Grace and Natural Self-love have their desires which are not all in vain it s better to be near the Kingdom of God than to be dispisers of it God hath fixed the time of the Lord's day and the undisposed must not say we will not keep it till the Spirit move us As it is a dut● to Relieve the Poor so it is to Pray as soon as God commandeth it and none must say I will not Give or Pray till the Spirit move me but wait for more help of the Spirit in the way of duty LXXVII That because no man can come to Christ too soon therefore no man can too soon believe that he is Elect and Justified though he have no evidence to prove it and though he know not God or Christ or the Spirit or the Gospel LXXVIII That men are bound to Believe that Christ Believed for them and Repented for them and must no more question their Faith and Repentance than they must question Christ as Saltmarsh speaketh as if Christ had had Sin to repent of or a Saviour to save him from it and as if this were no Covenant-Condition required of our selves as necessary to our Justification They may next say Christ that is Holy for them shall be Saved in stead of them LXXIX That to Believe that we are Elect and Justified is fides Divina a Believing the word of God because his Spirit 's witness of it by inspiration is his word LXXX That nothing done by an unregenerate man by common Grace maketh him any fitter to Believe and be Converted that if he were without it because it is sin LXXXI That it is no Grace which is not unresistible and because we cannot Merit it we cannot resist and forfeit it LXXXII That Pardon and Justification being perfect the first Moment of our Faith therefore it is only one momentous Act of Faith only that Justifieth us and no Act of Faith it self Justifieth us after that hour This is held by the more moderate sort who say not that we are Justified before Faith LXXXIII That we must act from L●●● but not ●or Life as if Natural Life were not to be used for Spiritual Life LXXXIV They hold That Sin being all past present and future Pardoned at first we must not ask Pardon any more but only the fuller Belief and Sense of Pardon LXXXV They hold that no Sin or declining of a Justified Person should ever make him doubt of his Justification LXXXVI They hold that the meaning of Rom. 8.28 is That all the sin that an Elect or Justified man committeth shall certainly work for his greater good when the Text speaketh but of Enemies and Sufferings and all the Providences of God As if it were the way of God's Wise and Holy Government so far to encourage men to sin as to assure all that love God beforehand that the more they sin the better it shall be for them whereas he hath filled the Scripture with so many terrible threatnings against Sin and Backsliding And as if ●o ●usti●ied person by sin did ever gnow wor●e than ●efore or love God l●●● or at all disple●se him Or it were for our good to be worse and love God less or displease him or lose a●y me●sures of Grace and Glory 〈◊〉 Title LXXXVII They take Justification in the Great day of Jud●m●●t to be none of our proper Justification by Faith because that was done before but a Decla●●●●●● of ●● As if Justification had but one degree and the word but one sence or any were persect●r Justification than that and a De●isive Sentential Declaration were not the most eminent LXXXVIII Those that confess works of Obedience to Christ to be the Condition of Glorification yet deny it to be a Condition of Justification in Judgment when as to Justifie us in Judgment is to Justifie our right to Impurity and Glory and so the Condition must be the same LXXXIX Though God oft and plainly saith That all men shall be judged according to their works and according to what they have done in the Body good or evil and to judge is either by decisive sentence to Justifie or to Condemn or executively to Reward and Glorify on to Punish yet many that Confess that men shall be so Judged do deny that they shall be so Justified though Justifying be Judging XC Though the word According to their works do plainly signify The Cause to be then decided in order to the sentence of Salvation or Damnation and Christ Mat. 25. and elsewhere hath largely enumerated the parts of the Cause and call it Righteousness and that with a Ca●●al particle and though the Scripture mention our inherent and acted Righteousness in terms of the same signification above Six ●undred times and that as the thing that pleaseth God and that he loveth hateing the contrary telling us that the unrighteous shall not enter into Heaven c. Yet do they feign that all that Godliness which hath the promise of this Life and That to come and which God is said as a Righteous Judge to Reward and Crown is mentioned only as a sign of the Elect and Right●ous and of Faith and not as the Cause to be then decided or as a Rewarded thing And for whom is this s●●n so solemnly produced God knoweth us without Signs His Light in our Consciences will make us know our selves by Internal Per●eption And if it be to confute the Devil and his servants that slander us it is for want of Righteousness and not only for want of si●●s of it that we are accused and it is more than
sig●s that must co●fute them for our Justification And the Judgment is not to be managed as at a human ju●icature by talking it out with every Person but by an universally convincing Light that at once can shew every man in the World his own part●cular case as in it self it is not Sig●s not Ri●ht●ousn●s● that hath the promises of R●w●rd And there is no Righteousness that so far maketh not a man Righteous and so far Justifiable XCI They some of them say that we shall need no Justification against any false Accusation For who should accuse us Christ will not Cons●ience will not and Devils say they will have something else to do And they know that false accusation will be in vain before such a Judge The sum of this is that there will indeed be no day of Judgment and no Justification by decisive Sentence yea and no Salvation for actual Glorification will be a Sentence manifested by Execution which Mr. Laws●n thought was called the Judgment And if no Judgment then no Judge no Reward no Condemnation and no Punishment If any Judgment there must be Persons and a Cause to be tryed and judged 1. The Cause of that day will not be whether Christ be a sufficient Saviour or have made sufficient satisfaction It is not for Christ to judge himself It is not to judge God whether he elected us It is not to judge whether we were of the Seed of Adam or whether we ever sinned Or whether the Law of Innocency condemn us And our sin deserve everlasting Punishment There is no justifying us against any such Accusation It must be all confess'd we were the sinful Children of Adam we deserved Condemnation But the Cause will be 1. Whether we are lyable by Guilt to future Punishment And against this our Pardon justifyeth us 2. And whether we have Right to the Heavenly Inheritance And in this the Gospel-Donation Covenant or Promise justifieth us and both thro' the Merits of the Sacrifice and Righteousness of Christ 3. And the other part of the Cause of that day is whether we have part in Christ and the Merits of his Righteousness In which our Faith and God's Covenant will justifie us 4. And the Question being Whether this Faith be that which had the promise and not a Counterfeit the description of it by its Acts and Part and not only by adventitious Signs must be our justifying Evidence The faith that hath the Promise is essentially Christianity or a Covenant accepting of God the Father Son and Spirit of Christ as our Teacher Priest and King by affiance expressed in assent consent and subjection And all that is essential to this yea the necessary integrality and modification have their parts in being the Cause of the day And as to the Case of Accusation 1. A Virtual Accusation by the Law which we have broken and condemneth us requireth a Justification if there were no more 2. The Glory of Christ's Merits Righteousness and Grace requireth a Justification of us against our real Guilt 3. And is not Satan the Accuser of the Brethren and that before God And did not his Malice so work against Job though God contradicted him It is certain that sentential and apologetical Justification relates to Accusation virtual or actual and Condemnation Who shall condemn us it is God that justifieth us And if we are not justified against false Accusations we shall never be justified against any But we all confess that we are made righteous efficiently by Grace and constitutively by Righteousness in despight of all Satans true accusations and against all our own unworthiness ungodliness antecedently and guilt and that before all Works and Perseverance save a true accepting Faith in Christ But if we shall in judgment be decisively de●lared righteous by that which constituteth us righteous of which no knowing man herein can doubt God judging all things truly as they are then certainly will men by decisive declaration be judged righteous as being pardoned and adopted by the Merits of Christ and qualified by true Faith Repentance and Obedience for that Guift XCII They absurdly hold that to be justif●ed as to the sincerity of our Faith from the charge o● Hypocrisie or unsoundness it is not the Justification of the Person A contradiction that I am ashamed to be long in confuting Is it the Fa● and not the Person that is to be judged Is it not as it is the Perso●s Faith What is it to ●●stifie his Faith but to justifie him to be a true ●elieving Christian and so to be an Heir of the Pr●mise The necess●ry qualif●cation of Faith 〈◊〉 ●t be operative is as truly a part of the condition of the Promises as that Faith be Faith indeed Indeed some sound Divines say That Fait● just●fi●th us as sinn●rs and Works justifi●th our Faith as ●c●us●d Believers But they never meant th●● by justifying our Faith it ●usti●eth not our Persons But that we are at f●rst co●stitut●d just and adopted upon the ●●ndition of a consenti●● covenanting F●ith b●f●re we h●ve time to she● it by outward Works and that we are conti●ue and judged j●stified and intitled ●● Li●e o● condition of our Performance of the Essentials ●f o● Covenant XCIII Th●● hold th●t we are justified ●● the s●me Law or C●v●●●●t of Innocency which condemneth ●● Because ●ay they we have fulfilled it in and by C●●●●t falsly as is aforesaid supposing that C●r●st was either such a Surety as w●● in the same Bond di●j●nctively with the principal or else that the principal man was allowed to do his Duty or ●ear his Suffering by another And so they deny the Gospel-Covenant and Gift which is that indeed which justifieth us by the way of Redemption falsly supposing that the very damning Law doth justi●e us by way of Prevention as innocent as having fulfilled it in Christ XCIV They suppose that Christ will not judge and justifie us ac●ording to any Law by which he governed us but only by declaring his absolute De●ree and Will giving no Reason of his Sentence from the cause of different performance or ●on performance of the Pers●ns j●dged and so that Judgment is no act of Moral Government or of Reward contrary to all the Scripture XCV They falsly suppose that Pa●●● of si● i● no Justification constitutive or sente●ti●l Because say they that doth but save us from Punis●ment but to be Righteous is to be by imputation such as have kept all the Law and so h●ve never sinned But we have no such Righteousness a● they thus feign when the Question is whether we are s●nners We must confess it and ●ot plead that we have no sin But when the Question is whether we are to be condemned Pardon is o●r Righteousness and having the Pardon of all sin original habitual and a●tual of omissi●n and commission we are in st●●●● 〈◊〉 p●●●u●● and if th●● 〈◊〉 enough to intitle u● t● Glory A●option added to it is And so 〈◊〉 Ri●ht is ●●sti●●●d XCVI