receive it and the beleeving Jewes were ready to desert it and by both the name of God and his doctrine was blasphemed Whereupon wee are further to observe that these two last Christian parties namely the Judaizers and Gentilizers agreed in effect For although betweene themselves they were extreamly opposite in many opinions and practises touching Religion Policy and Customes whereby they became bitterly odious one to another yet under this opposition there were many resemblances wherein they agreed 1. Both were Christians for both embraced the fayth of Christ each acknowledged the grace of the Gospel each pretended the truth of it each endeavoured the growth of it and each had a forme of godlinesse 2. Both were erroneous for each labouring to make a compliance betweene the Gospel and that Religion from whence each was converted they both corrupted defiled and leavened the sincerity of the Gospel wherein though both were opposite yet both were in an errour For opposite parties love to make their opinions extreamly opposite i. e. not only contradictory but quite contrary till both become equally erroneous To say in the sense of the Judaizer that works did every way justifie and to say in the sense of the Gentilizer that works did no way justifie were opinions equally erroneous In no case to eat of meat offered unto Idols and in every place to eat meat offered unto Idols were practises equally erroneous And these two opposite erroneous Parties were the two Seminaries of all errors and sects in the Church of Christ for since the first planting of the Gospel unto this very day what errour or what sect did ever trouble and vex the Church which was not a branch either of Judaisme or Gentilisme 3. Both were Contentious for each labouring to maintayne their owne errour and each to obtrude theirs upon the other they did both 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. teach erroneously and corruptly neyther of them consenting to the wholesome words of our Lord Jesus Christ and to the doctrine which is according to godlinesse but doting about questions and strifes of words whereof came envy strife raylings evill surmisings and perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds and destitute of the truth 1. Tim. 6.3 4 5. For their needles Controversies and foolish questions and doubtfull disputations did commonly conclude and end 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. in vaine janglings and vaine bablings having no other profit but the subverting of the hearers Yet in such contentions some of them were so arrogant or proud and yet so ignorant or knowing nothing that 1. Tim. 1.7 they desired to bee teachers of the Law understanding neither what they sayd nor whereof they affirmed i. e. not knowing which was the subject and which the predicat of the question 4. Both were malicious for each transgressing the Rules of Charity whose office is not to behave it selfe unseemely but to beare all things and to endure all things they both walked in the way of scandall giving mutuall offence grieving vexing and wounding each others conscience The Judaizer judged and condemned the Gentilizer for a prophane and wicked sinner and the Gentilizer despised and scorned the Judaizer for a superstitious and weake idiot Whereupon at first they shunned one anothers company each separating themselves and each excommunicating the other from their Assemblies but at last they laboured to extirpate and destroy one another For in after times when the Heathenish persecution against the Christians ceased then these two opposite Christians fell to persecute one another and wheresoever either party prevailed that condemned the other of Heresie and the other exclaimed against that for Tyranny Thus one toward another these two opposite parties were ravening Wolves in sheepes clothing 5. But in respect of the sincere Christian both were the Tares or the children of the wicked one which Sathan the Enemy of Christ sowed among the Wheat in the field of Christ For as a right faith and a holy life is the seede and Wheate of Christ So Errours and Vices in not walking uprightly according to the truth of the Gospel how opposite or contrary so ever they bee one to another are the seed and tares of Sathan which hee soweth to annoy the Wheate of Christ For Tares or rather Juray or Darnell are a vitious graine of a destructive nature annoying cumbring hindring and pulling downe not onely one another but any other Corne among which they grow but especially Wheate So Judaisme and Gentilisme were Errours and Vices sowed by Sathan which annoyed cumbred and hindred not onely one another but also the truth and sincerity of the Gospel Yet when the question was moved for the extirpation or rooting out of the Tares Christ denies it and hee denies it for the Wheates sake Mat. 13.29 Lest while yee gather up the Tares yee roote up also the Wheate with them For the Tares are rooted into the roote of the Wheate both having one common root one and the same Faith one and the same Head Christ Jesus And the Tares themselves of both sides deny it for their owne sakes one against another Yet both parties deny it not at one and the same time but each party denies it then when hee is deprest and feares to bee extirpated And againe both parties also affirme it one against another yet both affirme it not in one and the same place But each party affirmes it there where hee prevailes and hopes to extirpate the other By such turnings and windings of Doctrine the mystery of iniquity worketh affirming and denying the same thing at severall times and varying their tenets as their advantages vary professing in words the Rule of Equity in Doing to others whatsoever they would that others should doe unto them But denying it in workes and doing the quite contrary For they finde by experience that the common capacities upon whom they worke have not judgement enough to discover the mystery of this iniquity but are rather children tossed too and fro and carried about with every winde of Doctrine by the sleight of men and cunning craftinesse whereby they lye in waite to deceive Ephes 4.14 But thou who art a sincere Christian and livest among these Tares growing betweene them and bordering upon both must carry thy selfe towards both according to those Rules of Charity which the Gospel of Christ prescribeth 1. Not to extirpate either for since the planting of the Gospel this was never done neither till the end of the world shall it bee done neither till then must it bee done lest saith Christ While yee extirpate the Tares yee roote up also the Wheate with them and when it is done the deed is not a worke of men but of Angels Mat. 13.40.41 So shall it bee in the end of this World the Sonne of man shall send forth his Angels and they shall gather out of his Kingdome all things that offend and them which doe iniquity True it is that every plant which God hath not planted shall bee rooted
bee justified i. e. freed by the Law of Moses and sometime it is translated by the word freed as Rom. 6.7 Hee that is dead is freed from sinne where the Margin shewes that the Originall word is justified From all those former jurall words thus referred to Justifying it plainely appeares that Justifying is not onely a jurall but also a curiall or court-Court-word Yet not borrowed from a Court criminall or any other Civill Court of Justice or Law where the suite is contentious and the sentence a judgement in which jus dicitur i. e. in which that right which was in being before is declared to bee according to the letter or meaning of the Law as heere in England is done in the Courts of the Kings Bench and of the Common Pleas where the Judges represent the King for his Justice But Justifying in the sense of the Apostle is rather proper to a Court of favour or grace where the suite is voluntary and the sentence is a Decree in which jus fit datur i. e. in which that right which was not in being before is made to bee according to the kindenesse favour goodwill and grace of the Prince wherein the iniquities and rigours of the Law are rectified pardons for offences are granted Patents and Charters for the Rights of Honours Profits and Priviledges are issued as heere in England is done in the Courts of Requests and the Chancery where the persons President represent the King for his Mercy and Grace and therefore are not called Judges as that word is properly signified by Judex But to avoyd the rough sense of the word Judges they are called by other names In effect therefore Justifying is a right Chancery-word whereby not onely our sinnes are cancelled crossed out and blotted but our Patent for blessednesse is granted and sealed But if wee may borrow a little light from the Civill Law or from those Courts wherein Wills and Testaments receive their Debates and Probates wee shall easily perceive that Justification is a Testamentary word Yet not for the letter of it for wee finde it not expresly used in Testaments But for the sence of it which is the very same or very neare with the Testamentary word of Institution Not as Institution is distinguished from Substitution But as it is opposed to Exheridation or disinheriting and signifies indifferently either for the ordaining of an Heire or for the devising of a Legacy In which ample signification Instituting is co-incident or equivalent with Justifying Both words carrying a sense either really the same or rationally consequent each to other For whosoever in a Testament is Instituted as an Heire or a Legatary that person is Justified or made to have a right to that Inheritance or Legacy which is therein conveyed or devised unto him And whosoever in a Testament is Justified unto any Inheritance or Legacy that person is thereto Instituted And the co-incidence or resemblance betweene these two words is the more proper Partly because Justification is a most gratious act proceeding from the meere favour and free grace of God without any previous Petition Motion or Request made by the party Justified As commonly Institutions are made in Wills and Testaments which are or should bee acts of meere favour and grace But chiefely because Justification is also a Testamentary act of God arising from his Will and Testament wherein all Believers are Instituted Heires to the Inheritance of everlasting life i. e. wherein they are Justified Having hitherto shewed the meaning of the word let us now gather nearer toward the nature of the thing to specifie more particularly what Right that is wee are made to have according to the purpose of the Apostle heere in saying that a man is justified Man is jurally a Sinner and ungodly i. e. a Calamitous person who is unto God an Alien and a Stranger who by his birth heere on earth hath no right to the Kingdome of Heaven For if a Native of England by his birth heere can claime no Inheritance in France nor in any other Kingdome on earth much lesse can a Native of earth claime any Inheritance in the Kingdome of Heaven And man is legally and morally a Sinner and ungodly i. e. Hee is unto God a Transgressour an Offendour and a Malefactour and by reason of sinne man is a Bondman and a Captive held a Prisoner in the Grave under Death and under Sathan who hath the Dominion and power of Death for because of sinne man is not onely debarred from Heaven but condemned to that earth from whence hee was taken even the uprightest man on earth can never bee found upright if God enter into judgement with him to take the examination of his life and marke what is done amisse Contrarily God is jurally Just or righteous i. e. hee is a Lord and Owner for hee is the universall and supreame Lord and Owner of all the whole World over all Owners Lords and Kings having the Soveraigne Dominion and Possession both of Heaven and Earth the Sea and all things else for the whole World and all the Creatures thereof are the workes of his hands and every workeman especially if hee worke upon his owne materialls is the Lord and Owner of his owne workes Unto God therefore doe belong not onely the things that may bee no mans and the things that may bee any mans but also the very things that are each mans as the Lands Goods and Chattells which each man possesseth For although God hath given the Earth to the Children of men and some men in respect of others are great Lords and rich Owners Yet all men even the greatest Kings in respect of God are but meane Lords and petty Owners or rather Tenants at will who have but a precarious use of earthly things the supreme seigniory and property whereof doth rest in God who still retaines to himselfe an absolute and full power to dispose of all things at his pleasure by giving and taking them away at his will See and compare Deut. 10.14 and Job 1.21 and Psal 24.1 and Psal 115.16 and Hos 2.8.9 and 1. Cor. 10.26 And God is morally Just or Righteous i. e. Hee is kind free and bounteous for hee is universally and supreamly kind free and bounteous to bestow in abundance his blessings upon all Creatures but chiefely upon man in a surpassing maner above all the rest Hence the Scripture is very serious and copious in setting forth Gods kindenesse for she magnifies it with the Attributes of great kindenesse Joel 2.13 and Jonah 4.2 of loving kindenesse Esay 63.7 and Jer. 31.3 and Hos 2.19 and in the Psalmes above 20. places of mercifull kindenesse Psalm 117.2 and Psalm 119.76 of marvellous kindenesse Psalm 17.7 and Psalm 31.21 and of everlasting kindenesse Esay 54.8 Shee extolls it with the praises of being Gods title that hee is the God of kindenesse Nehem. 9.17 and of being Gods exercise that hee makes it his delight Jer. 9.24 And the kindnesses which God
but are made so by the Will and Testament of God And wee are adopted by his Will Ephes 1.5 Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himselfe according to the good pleasure of his Will i. e. of his Will and Testament whereto the like saying followeth afterward in the same Chapter vers 13. And wee are begotten by his Will James 1.18 Of his owne Will begat hee us with the word of truth i. e. by his owne Will and Testament Thus having premised the Meaning of the word Justified that it signifies the conveying of a present right to man that the Matter of that Right is a right of state or permanent condition wherein man resteth that the quality of that state is a spirituall franchise or alliance to become the friend son and heyre of God that the priviledges incident to that alliance are the future Remission of his sins the Resurrection of his body and Life everlasting that the degree of his right to these priviledges is a right of Institution or a present right to the future possession of them that the Maner how man hath this state is factively by a testamentary act of God We come now to the Means whereby man hath this state or to that fact of man whereby the fact of God is effected or to the Title whereby man receives and enters this state for on mans part there is required an Act as the Meanes or Title for his reception of this state and concerning this Means or Title was all the controversie between Paul and the false teachers of Galatia against whom hee layes downe this Negative that It is not by the works of the Law as it followeth in the next words Text. Not by the workes of the Law The wrong title to the former state The particle By argues a Cause or Meanes The Nature of a Title exemplified in Lysias and in Paul and of speciall consideration 3. Maine heads of the Law 3. Judgements Two other heads of the Law It was Gods Testament and his Covenant Workes meane good workes Man worketh and the Law worketh in Condemning and Justifying conservantly but not procreantly neither doe mans works so The Law hath two senses 1. The History or letter of it which was well understood and so the Promises were terrene the Precepts were childish as their Moralities and much more their Ceremonies The workes were servile 2. The mystery or spirit of it which was not fully understood And so the Promises were heavenly the Precepts were virile and manly The works to be Cordial Liberall and Perfect No works justifie Procreantly to the heavenly promises nor to the earthly The wrong or false title of man to his spirituall right of franchise and alliance with God that hee hath not that state by the works of the Law For in any right whatsoever whether it be a Right of state of power of honour or of profit a man must have a speciall regard to his Title especially in a Right of this moment which is divine and concernes everlasting blessednesse The particle By doth imply a Meanes and thereby doth intimate unto man that unlesse on his part some Meanes be used or some Act done for his reception of this spirituall and divine state the testamentary acts of God in predestinating or instituting him thereto may become ineffectuall as ineffectuall they must needs become unto all who despise refuse or reject that state as manifest it is that too many have done both of Jewes and Gentiles for all testamentary acts doe leave unto the party instituted a liberty to accept or refuse the Legacy therein devised to him because a Testament carrieth not the force of a Law to constrayne and much lesse of fate to necessitate but passeth in the forme of grace to offer and tender the good will of the Testator And the Meanes heere understood is the meanes acquisitive or cause procreant whereby a right is first acquired initiated commenced entred and had which meanes or cause is commonly called a Title For a Title is that cause or formality whereby a mans right is declared or proved to be true and just whereby it is assured unto the party that hath it and is defended against any that shall impugne it or lay a clayme to dispossesse the possessor of it For in case another man should make a doubt of my right whatsoever it be or question me whether I have and hold it justly if thereupon I shall alleadge unto him the Meanes acquisitive or cause procreant whereby I first acquired entred and had that my right as that I had it by my Birth in inheriting it or by my Worke in earning it or by my Money in buying it or by my Acceptance in receiving the gift of it then such meanes or cause being justly approoved is my Title whereby I have that right and whereby I defend my having of it Lysias the Colonell and Governour of the Temple at Jerusalem had a right of freedome to the City of Rome and his title to that state was by his money for saith he Act. 22.28 with a great summe obtayned I this freedome And Paul his prisoner had the same right of freedome to the very same City but Pauls right came not to him by the same title for when Lysias made a doubt of Pauls freedome and questioned him about it Paul in the defence of his right alleadged his title that it was by Birth and sayd I was free borne In mans Justification therefore wee are to consider his title whereby he hath his right of spirituall State in his divine franchise and alliance with God whereby procreantly and acquisitively the reception of that state is initiated commenced or begun in him But that his title is not by Birth was proved before in the Maner how man hath this state namely not natively in being borne in it but factively in being made to have it and that fact on Gods part was Gods testamentary act in Predestinating or devising it unto man It remaineth therefore that mans title on mans part must bee by some act of his owne whereof the Apostle determineth heere that it is not by the works of the Law The Law was the whole body of those orders and rules for life which God by the meanes of Moses inacted in the Wildernesse for the people of Israel contayning three maine heads 1. Promises of divers blessings which God freely conferred upon that Nation as his owne peculiar people 2. Precepts of divers duties which the people on their part were to performe in respect of those promises of which precepts some were Moralities contayning duties naturall whereto the light of nature binds towards God and man as the ten Commandements of the Decalogue and others of their nature others were Ceremonies imposing duties positive which had little ground in nature but only in Gods pleasure of these the principall was Circumcision which though it were long before inacted in the time of Abraham yet
is Gods grace which moveth him to this act of kindnesse in making or passing his promise unto man and because the matter thereof is meerely gratious consisting of those favours benefits and blessings conferred upon man which are not due to man by any Law In the Old Testament Gen. 15. God covenants with Abraham by way of promise that God on his part would bee unto Abraham a shield and an exceeding great reward that he would give him a son and heire of his owne body and Abraham therupon enters covenant with God that hee on his part did beleeve in the Lord i. e. did accept receive and embrace those promises heere was a Covenant of Grace because the ground of it was Gods grace and the matter very gratious In the New Testament Heb. 8.10 God covenants with thee by way of promise that hee on his part will put his Lawes into thy mind and write them in thy heart that he will be a God unto thee and take thee for one of his people that he will teach thee to know him in respect of his greatnes goodnes and kindnes toward thee that he will be mercifull to thy unrighteousnesse not onely to forgive but also to forget thy sins and iniquities If thou on thy part accept these promises by thy faith thou thereby entrest Gods Covenant and the Covenant thou entrest is the Covenant of Grace because the ground of it is Gods grace and the matter of it very gracious Contrarily the Covenant made with God by meanes of a Preceptory faith is the Covenant of workes because the ground thereof is mans duty as he is the worke or creature of God owing all allegiance obedience and observance unto his Lord and Maker and because the matter thereof is laborious consisting of those workes Offices and services which by Gods Law are due from man to God In the Old Testament Gen. 17.1.10 God covenants with Abraham by way of Precept that Abraham on his part should walke before the Lord and be perfect upright or sincere and that every male childe in Abrahams family should be Circumcised here was a Covenant of workes because the ground of it was Abrahams duty and the matter somwhat laborious for workes to be done Againe in the New Testament Mat. 5.3 God covenants with thee by way of Precept that thou on thy part shalt be poore in spirit shalt mourne shalt bee meeke shalt hunger and thirst after righteousnesse shalt bee mercifull shalt be pure in heart shalt be a Peace-maker shalt suffer persecution for righteousnesse sake Heere againe is a Covenant of works because the ground of it is thy duty and the matter somewhat laborious In a word every promise of God is a Covenant of grace every Precept of God a Covenant of workes every judgement of God a Covenant of Curses and every voluntary sin of man is an involuntary Covenant to suffer those curses 2. The second effect is to assure Gods promise The promise of God though in respect of his will on his part it be firme sure and fast yet in respect of any right or benefit thence accruing to thee it is neither firme sure nor fact before thy faith or acceptance of it but by vertue of thy faith or acceptance it is made stable firme and sure Because that promise which Gods will is should be stable firme and sure is by thy faith actually established affirmed and assured for as was shewed before thy faith doth advance and forme Gods promise into a Covenant and a Covenant is an agreement so stable firme and sure that the parties agreed cannot repent revoke recede or goe back And if a Consent of the parties to be married doth make the mariage sure for upon their consent we use to say they are sure together much more doth thy acceptance of Gods promise make thy alliance to him stable firme and sure And this faith doth assure not onely thy present alliance but also the future possession of all those blessings which unto this alliance are appendent and consequent as the Regeneration or sanctification of thy minde the Remission of thy sins the Resurrection of thy body and thy Life everlasting And unto this assurance this faith is quickened and strengthened by the first notion of faith which is a high esteeme of Gods goodnes and greatnes that what the goodnes of his will was pleased to promise that the greatnes of his power is able to performe For this estimatory Faith by giving unto God the glory of his goodnes and greatnes doth nourish and feed up thy promissory faith into an assurance of a strong and full perswasion of Gods performance though unto thy selfe thou seeme never so poore and dead a Creature For notwithstanding all the difficulties and casualties in the world that may seeme to disturb Gods performance notwithstanding thy ignorance in many poynts of Religion that may seeme to hinder it notwithstanding thy sinnes of errour and frailty that may seeme to crosse it notwithstanding thy death and dissolution in the grave that may seeme to bury it Yet after all these God remaines constant firm and sure both willing and able to performe his promise and will actually performe it unto thee And of this assurance thou hast a precedent in Abrahams faith which notwithstanding the deadnesse of his owne body and of Sarahs Wombe was so firme sure and strong that hee was sure of a sonne because he considered not the deadnesse of his body but the goodnesse of Gods will and the greatnesse of his power Rom. 4.19 And being not weake in faith hee considered not his owne body now dead when hee was about 100. yeare old neither yet the deadnesse of Sarahs wombe hee staggered not at the promise of God through unbeliefe but was strong in faith giving glory to God and being fully perswaded that what hee had promised hee was able also to peforme Hence Amen the Hebrew word for faith doth also signifie verity constancy firmenesse and surenesse Because it is the nature of faith to bee true constant firme and sure not onely formally for the quality of it as it is opposed to falshood doubting staggering and wavering but also effectively for the virtue of it because it makes the promises of God to bee stable constant true firme and sure which otherwise and without it will prove frustrate and voyd to bee of no force or effect to him who diffides them And this Assurance of Gods promise is an effect so peculiar to thy faith that not workes but faith is ordained for thy title to this very end and purpose that the promise might bee sure unto thee Rom. 4.16 Therefore it is of faith that it might bee by grace to the end the promise might bee sure to all the seed 3. The third effect is to oblige both parties God at the first was not obliged to make any promise but was altogether free either to make or forbeare it and having made it hee is not obliged to performe
wherein Christ is the Precedent or Patterne according to whose right we are made to have our right in being made co-heires with him 4. Because Christ is the Person who by our faith doth Ministerially justifie us by Confirming unto us Gods last Will and Testament and by performing unto us the promises thereof for of Gods last Will Christ is the whole and sole Executor to publish prove and performe it And not by the workes of the Law Seeing the title whereby we are justified is our faith in Christ therefore all title by the workes of the Law is hereby excluded for where two titles unto any right are incompatible and cannot stand together he that claymeth by the one must necessarily relinquish the other No workes therefore of the Law in what sense soever we take it whether in the literall sense as it was delivered by Moses and understood by the Israelites or in the spirituall sense as it was declared by Christ and is now understood by the faithfull are of that efficacy and vertue to make us a true title whereby to acquire and have a true right and claym unto heavenly blessednesse And consequently seeing the finall cause or end of our faith in Christ is to be justified therefore a further end of our faith in Christ subordinate unto the former is no longer to rest in the literall works of the Law but wholy to relinquish it as an act of God which now unto us is expired and dead for so the Apostle would be here understood as appeareth by his reasoning at the 19. verse next following And seeing God by Christ hath declared and published his new Will and Testament of the Gospel therefore hereby his former Will of the Law though for the time of it very good and usefull is utterly infringed cancelled and voyd For by the works of the Law shall no flesh be justified The particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Greek which is heer rendred For being a Conjunction causall doth playnly shew that the truth of this clause is the cause or reason of that truth which was delivered in some former clause For the principall Doctrine of this whole epistle concernes the title whereby a man is justified which for the clearer evidence thereof the Apostle delivers bipartitely in two severall assertions Whereof the first is a Negative that A man is not justified by the works of the Law and the second an Affirmative that He is justified by the faith of Jesus Christ These being thus proposed his next businesse is to produce arguments or reasons for the confirmation and proofe of these two severall assertions but first he begins with the first which is the Negative that A man is not justified by the workes of the Law And this Negative he proveth in the following verses of this chapter by three severall arguments or reasons whereof the first is contained in this clause For by the workes of the Law shall no flesh be justified No flesh i. e. No living man whose life is mortall For to call man flesh is an Hebraisme to put man in minde of his mortality because seeing hee is framed of flesh and blood which are materialls but weake and fraile therefore hee must needes decay and dye Be justified i. e. bee declared upright No mortall man whose life is tryed by the Law shall by his worke in observance thereof bee found so compleat and perfect as to bee pronounced upright and sinlesse For his workes shall never appeare so cordiall so liberall and so perfect as to have performed an universall and perpetuall obedience to every Precept of the Law in every sense thereof without transgressing any one at any time Formerly it hath beene shewed that the word Justified hath in the Scripture severall senses the Apostle therefore haveing in the former parts of this verse taken this word in a jurall sence for the imputing or conveying of a right interest or claim doth now in this last clause take the same word in a legall sense for declaring or pronouncing upright innocent or sinlesse For when a word doth beare severall senses and the Apostle hath expressed it in some one sense hee loves for the greater elegancy to repeate the same word againe in another sense if the matter will admit it as heere it will and doth for otherwise wee faile of the Apostles intent and lose all the force of his argument If therefore in this last clause of the verse the word Justified bee taken in the very same sense which it carryed in the first clause then is this last clause but a bare repetition of the first and no confirmation of it at all For of this assertion that A man is not justified by the workes of the Law how can this bee a reason or proofe For by the workes of the Law no flesh shall bee justified if in both clauses the word justified carry one and the same sense But if the sense be varied as we have glossed it then will this latter clause bee a pregnant proofe of the former and consequently it will excellently suit with the scope and minde of the Apostle And the Greeke particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which elsewhere is constantly rendred Because doth both require and inforce this sense And that this Proofe or reason may carry the greater authority for the confirmation of his former Negative hee seemes to ground it on a testimony of Scripture and to produce it from Psalm 143.2 Enter not into judgement with thy servant i. e. Doe not arraigne mee before thy Tribunall or Seat of Judgement to try my workes by the rigour of the Law and then to handle mee according to my deserts For in thy sight shall no man living bee justified i. e. Because if thou in thine owne person or before thy selfe shalt take the cognisance of any mans workes to examine them throughly by the rule of thy Law and to give sentence upon him according to his workes no man living can by thy mouth bee declared or pronounced upright or innocent So that Paul hath in a manner explained the sense of Davids saying in adding these words by the workes of the Law The reason therefore whereby the Apostle argues heere seemes to runne thus If a man will bee jurally justified by the workes of the Law i. e. If hee will clayme from God a present right to the future Inheritance of Heaven by the title of his workes then God entring into judgement with him and in the sight or knowledge of God hee must by his workes bee legally justified i. e. Hee must bee declared or pronounced upright and innocent never to have beene an offendor against any Law of God For supposing but not granting that it is an effect or worke of the Law to Justifie a man jurally i. e. To give him a present right to the future Inheritance of Heaven Yet certainely the Law cannot produce this effect but onely in those who by the workes of the Law are legally
is therewith to bee included and the clause following is not to bee co-included The words then seeme to bee an answer to a tacite objection made to Pauls disparagement for very probable it is that his adversaries with intent to disparage him had magnified Peter and the rest of the Apostles as that they were the Disciples of Christ had beene conversant with him and instructed by him when Paul was but a Pharisee To this Paul seemes to answer q. d. Whatsoever or how great soever the Apostles were formerly in times past doth not necessarily inferre my disparity now for things are not alwayes the same that formerly they were in times passed Although then formerly in times past the Apostles were familiar with Christ were instructed by him and ordained by him and all this then when I was a Pharisee though they were Preachers of the Gospel then when I was a persecutor of 〈◊〉 yet all this then makes no matter now either to the truth of the point in question or to argue that now betweene their Doctrine and mine there is any disagreement or betweene their persons and mine any disparity It maketh no matter to mee The Greeke is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. I differ nothing or am nothing different viz. from those who seemed to bee somewhat for unto those former words these heere must bee referred for the construction and sense of both which seemes thus that betweene them and Paul there was no difference or disparity in any thing But then the parenthesis which doth shadow and obscure the sense must bee wholly removed Howsoever the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifie in humane Writers among the Greekes yet in the holy Scriptures it signifies to differ viz. in such a manner that one thing is either better or worse then another and so it is rendred elsewhere in our last English Translation So 1. Cor. 15.41 One Starre 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. differeth from another Starre in glory and so afterward in this Epistle cap. 4.1 The Heire as long as hee is a childe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. differeth nothing from a servant and so the French Translation reades it heere and this sense seemes to bee intended though not rightly expressed in our former English Translation made at Geneva q. d. Whatsoever or how great soever the difference or disparity betweene mee and the chiefe Apostles hath beene heeretofore in times past which I confesse was very remarkeable when they were first Apostles to preach the Gospell and I a Pharisee to persecute it but now since the time that God revealed Christ unto mee and trusted mee with the preaching of him unto the Gentiles there is no difference or disparity at all betweene the greatest of them and mee either in respect of the Doctrine which I preach or of my knowledge in the Gospel or of my dignity in the Apostleship Not that they now are any thing lesse then formerly they were but that I by Gods grace am so much greater that I am now their equall for it hath pleased God so highly to advance mee in the Ministery that now they have no advantage above mee that they in any thing should bee my betters and I their inferiour God accepteth no mans person Or accepteth not the person of man The Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies sometime any single person sometime the face and presence of man but heere and in such like formes of speech it is taken for those outward qualities of man which make nothing to the merit of his cause or to the poynt of the matter in question to argue the truth from any such qualities and therefore the French Translation renders these words thus God accepteth not the outward appearance of man and the Italian thus God hath no regard to the quality of any mans person These words or the like to this sence are somewhat frequent in the New Testament See Act. 10.34 and Rom. 2.11 and Ephes 6.9 and Col. 3.25 And they seeme to bee a speciall attribute unto God in respect of the integrity and equity which hee perpetually useth not onely in the administration of his justice and judgement but also in the distribution of his grace and mercy For God is no way partiall to respect mens dignities or other outward qualities which conduce nothing to the merit of the cause or to the poynt of truth but God is a most just and equall Judge who regards onely the genuine and inward truth And therefore in the debate of true Doctrine no argument is to bee drawne from mens persons Hence Paul would heere infer that betweene him and the rest of the Apostles there was now no difference or disparity either for knowledge or authority in the Gospel notwithstanding those outward qualities in the Apostles that formerly in times past they were the proper Disciples of Christ instructed and ordained by him seeing God regardeth no such qualities For they who seemed to bee somewhat in conference added nothing to mee A reason of his former negation that betweene the chiefe Apostles and him there was no difference or disparity namely because the chiefest of them added no knowledge or power unto him Added nothing The Greeke is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. Discovered nothing or opened no further light or knowledge in the Gospel unto mee as if therein God had revealed any thing to them more then he had to me for to this sense the word was used and rendred before See cap. 1. vers 16. q. d. How great soever the Apostles seemed to whose judgement the difference about Circumcision and the legall Ceremonies were referred or how meane soever I seemed who was sent to require their judgement therein yet in the Gospel I learned from them no manner of knowledge which before was not revealed unto mee For when the question was agitated and determined they altered nothing in my Doctrine as if it had beene any way erroneous they added nothing to my preaching as if in any poynt it had beene defective or insufficient unto salvation An Objection The Apostles in that Synod added severall things as namely these abstinence from fornication from meals offered to Idolls from blood and from things strangled as it plainely appeares Act. 15.29 The Answer These things were not then added unto his Doctrine but his former Doctrine of these things was then confirmed For Paul in his preaching did expresly and constantly forbid fornication as it may appeare in divers passages of his Epistles and particularly required abstinence from things offered unto Idolls See 1. Cor. 8.1.7 and 1. Cor. 10.20 And in generall words hee restrained men from blood and things strangled in all his Doctrines of avoyding scandalls especially in regard of those things which unto the Jewes were abominable as was the eating of blood and things strangled which the Jewes abhorred as much as they did meates offered unto Idols See Rom. 14.13.14 and 1. Cor. 10.23 and 1. Cor. 11.2 VERSE
appeare afterward vers 14. Neither was it dissembled or feigned betweene them to cast a feare upon the believing Jewes in seeing Peter thus reproved as Jerome pretends it but it was serious and reall with intent to reprove not onely the Jewes but Peter also for otherwise Paul should have used one dissimulation wherewith to reprove another seeing the thing it selfe which hee reproved was a dissimulation as afterward it will appeare vers 13. q. d. When I was at Jerusalem Peter reproved not mee either for my Doctrine or for my Conversation but when Peter came to Antioch I reproved him for his Conversation and I condemned a carriage of his not clancularly behinde his back nor generally in tearmes indefinite but particularly and openly even in his presence to his face For I was confident of my authority to reprove him and of my equity in the cause of it which otherwise I should never have done in that manner had I beene conscious to my soule that in poynt of the legall Ceremonies his judgement was contrary to mine For then though his fact had disliked mee I should not have dared to have reproved him openly to his face as knowing that way would availe mee nothing but to make my cause worse and render me odious Because hee was to bee blamed A reason in generall of the former words why hee reproved Peter before his face namely because hee was to bee blamed The Greeke is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. Literally hee was condemned for so elsewhere the word is alwayes rendred in our last English Translation See 1. John 3.20 21. For hee that reproves another man doth give as it were a judgement or sentence against him which the Greekes call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and wee Blaming or Condemning But really the sense is not preteritively that hee was blamed before Paul reproved him but futurely hee was to bee blamed when Paul did actually reprove him then hee was worthy of reproofe and deserved to bee blamed For many time a Greeke participle passive of the preter tense is in imitation of the Hebrewes put for a Noune verball which the Latine sometime expresseth by the future in dus and wee in English thus is or was to bee so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which are saved i. e. which are to bee saved 1. Cor. 1.18 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in them that perish i. e. in them that are to perish 2. Cor. 2.15 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 them that are sanctified i. e. them that are to bee sanctified Heb. 10.14 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. to bee reserved 2. Pet. 2.4 So heere 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hee was blamed is rightly rendred hee was to bee blamed q. d. I reproved Peter because concerning some of the legall Ceremonies his carriage was so various and different from it selfe that although in one respect he was to be commended yet in another he was to be blamed VERSE 12. Text. For before that certaine came from James hee did eate with the Gentiles but when they were come hee withdrew and separated himselfe fearing them which were of the Circumcision Sense Certaine i. e. Believing Jewes who were but weake Christians and observers of the legall Ceremonies Did eate Viz. All manner of meates indifferently With the Gentiles i. e. With the Christian Gentiles after their manner and in their company who made no distinction of meats as did the Jewish Christians Withdrew and separated himselfe Viz. From eating with them after their manner and in their company Fearing them i. e. Fearing to offend or grieve them Reason Of the Circumcision i. e. The believing Jewes who yet were observers of Circumcision A more particular reason why hee reproved Peter expressing the fact for which hee was to bee blamed namely because hee knowing that the legall difference of meates was ceased yet withdrew himselfe from eating indifferently all manner of meats in the company of the Gentiles and after their manner and restrained himselfe only to the Jewish meats Comment Peter eates with the believing Gentiles and afterward withdrew from them fearing to offend the believing Jewes who yet cōceived thēselves bound to the Law FOR before that certaine came from James These were by their birth Jewes who had been bred up in the Jewish Religion but by their faith they were Christians but as it seemes so lately converted that they were yet but weake in the faith and therefore continued observers of the Jewish ceremonies These men came to Antioch from Jerusalem while Peter was at Antioch but whether they came thither as Emissaries sent from James or as voluntaries of their owne accord either as spies or for other businesse it appeares not from Scripture Yet from James they are said to come either authoritatively because they might have some direction or addresse from him or locally because they came from the Church at Jerusalem where James was the President or chiefe Pastor He did eate with the Gentiles He did eate i. e. Peter did freely eare any manner of meates though forbidden by the Law of Moses With the Gentiles with the Christian Gentiles in their company after their maner and of their meates altogether as they did eate who observed not the differences of meats nor other legall ceremonies This action of Peter was very commendable for although the Jewes by their Law esteemed it unlawful to eate of some meates supposing themselves thereby polluted because they were forbidden by the Law of Moses yet unto the Christians of all sorts to whom the Law was now expired it was by the Gospel fully allowable to eate of any meate and particularly unto Peter it was most warrantable by reason of his vision of the great sheet wherein were all maner of meates as Beasts creeping things and Fowles which God had cleansed commanding him to kill and eate See Acts 10.11.12.13 But when they were come hee withdrew and separated himselfe When those Christian Jewes were come from Jerusalem to Antioch Peter who before did there eate with the Christian Gentiles did then privily withdraw and separate himselfe from the company and from the fare of the Christian Gentiles carrying himselfe as a strict observer of the Legall Ceremonies and particularly of the differences of meates This action in Peter was the thing that was blameable and for which hee was by Paul reproved for by this fact Peter might and did very much blemish the truth and sincerity of the Gospel by endangering the liberty therof whilest by his ouermuch indulgence to the Jewes who were the minor part he seemed to betray the liberty of the Gospel and to give occasion of scruple to the Christian Gentiles who were far the major part and far more considerable Fearing them of the circumcision The occasion of Peters fact in withdrawing himselfe from eating with the Christian Gentiles namely because he feared those Christian Jewes of the Circumcision who came from James and were yet but weake Christians and were consequently earnest
the reproof is by way of Interrogation which therefore redounds to the sharper reprehension for in demanding a reason of his action why he being a Jew compelled the Gentiles he seems to tell him that he had no reason at all for his action but rather his action was against all reason Yet the Interrogatory of his reproofe is but one and that one so concise that the language and the argument of it is contained and couched under a marvelous brevity q. d. seeing thou art a Christian Jew and by vertue of thy Christianity hast relinquished Judaisme and hast hitherto lived after the liberty of the Gentiles eating all sorts of meats after their maner for so thou didst eate till certaine Jewes came from James why art thou now become so contrary to thy selfe as to relapse back againe into Judaisme and in one fact to commit three offences for therein thou dissemblest with thine owne soule seeing thou hast declared thy judgement to the contrary and therein thou confirmest the Jewish Christians in their infirmity for by thy fact they will be hardened and therin thou compellest the Gentile-Christians to Judaize for thereto they are forced by the example of thy fact and for feare of thee Why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as doe the Jewes Why some read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. how but it matters not at all what the Interrogation should be for although the words be Interrogatory yet the sense is reprehensory thus certainely thou art too blame in compelling c. Compellest thou The Greeke is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. necessitatest not by way of violence but by way of example whereby thou dost occasion and move them and by thy fact dost impose a kinde of necessity upon them to doe the like or at least that for fear of thee and of thy authority that dare not do otherwise For he is sayd to necessitate or compell who by force of reason or of example doth vehemently perswade or urge a thing to be done for in this sense the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used See afterward cap. 6. vers 12. and Luke 14.23 and Mat. 14.22 and Marc. 6.45 and Act 28.19 and 2 Cor 12.11 The Gentiles to Judaize i. e. The Christian-Gentiles to abstaine from certaine meats after the Jewish manner seeing neither that Ceremony nor any other part of the Law of Moses was ever by God imposed on the Gentiles for that Law to them was never given nor never binding q. d. Why dost thou now contrary to thy declared judgement and to thy former custome force the Gentiles to forsake their liberty and to apply themselves to the Ceremonies and observances of the Jewish Lawes whereto the Gentiles were never obliged this is not onely against all equity but against the liberty of the Gentiles and against the freedome of the Gospel The Law of Moses did not now binde the Jewes for by the accesse of the new Testament the old ceased and was expired much lesse should the Gentiles be compelled to it now being expired seeing formerly while it was in force it never obliged them But so great was the authority of Peter that any notable act of his was in a maner compulsory to prescribe and impose upon others especially when the rest of the Jewish Christians and even Barnabas himselfe followed the example of it Neither could all know that Peter herein dissembled for they might believe that he did it as moved in conscience and that now he corrected that errour whereinto before he somwhat swerved in love and courtesie to the Gentile-Christians Seeing then this fact of Peter might have occasioned great troubles seeing it might have disquieted the consciences of many and have much hindred the liberty of the Gospel therefore Paul had great reason to pluck off the vizard in publicke and to discover before all men the person which Peter had assumed For necessary it is that even great Persons when their example grows to a publick offence should undergoe a publick reproof yea the greater they are and the greater the danger that may arise from their example so much the greater should our care be that their authority which otherwise is to be maintained for the publicke good be not turned to the publicke ruine Hence for our better understanding of the former foure verses and of divers passages in the Acts and Epistles of the Apostles wee may and must observe that in the Church of Christ there then were and still are and ever will bee three sorts of Christians or three severall parties which agreeing all in the faith of Christ differed much among themselves 1. The sincere Christian who was intirely and wholly a Christian believing in Christ and walking in Christ or as from Pauls words in this verse they may bee described who believed uprightly and walked uprightly according to the truth of the Gospel edifying their faith and composing their life according to the Doctrines Precepts and Rules delivered by Christ and his Apostles These laboured for the sincerity and purity of the Gospel to preserve the truth therof clean and free from the admixture leaven of all Religions Opiniōs whatsoever that therunto were alien and forraine These were inoffensive peaceable and quiet giving no scandall to any party who differed from them in judgement or practice not busying their mindes with foolish questions and fruitlesse disputes to no profit but exercising themselves not in the workes of the Law but in the workes of their callings and in the good workes of the Gospel by doing all Offices and Services of Love Charity Equity Mercy Courtesie and Kindenesse towards all men but especially towards the houshold of faith and chiefely one toward another These were the children of the Kingdome the good seede which Christ sowed in the field of the world and they were the Wheate among which his Enemy sowed Tares Of this sort were the Friends Landlords and Companions of Paul to whom and from whom in his Epistles hee sendeth salutes also Aquila and Priscilla and the Church in their house also the houshold of Cloe of Crispus Gaius and Stephanas in the Church of Corinth also the house of Onesiphorus and all those in the Church of Ephesus whom Paul salutes in these words Ephes 6.24 Grace be with all them that love our Lord Jesus Christ in sincerity and also those in the Church of Philippi to whom hee writes thus Phil. 1.9.10 And this I pray that your love may abound yet more and more in knowledge and in all judgement that yee may approve things that are excellent that yee may bee sincere and without offence till the day of Christ 2. The second party of Christians were the Judaizers for by that name Paul seemes to denote them heere by using the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. to judaize or to live as doe the Jewes These in respect of their faith were Christians but by their life they were Jewish for they did believe
against any Law yet by the Law of Nations is made a quasi-transgressour being wholly depersonated and degraded from the common condition of an humane person and depressed into the state as it were of a beast to live as an odious and detestable creature subject to all maner of injuries and excluded from all kind of benefit having no humane right at all No right of inheritance to enjoy any estate no right of authority to beare any office no right of suffrage to make any election no right of assembly to consult of businesse no right of testimony to beare witnesse nor right of Testament to make a Will And by the Law of God the Gibeonites were cursed into an hereditary bondage to be slaves and drudges for ever about the Temple of the Lord Jos 9.23 Now therefore ye are cursed and there shall none of you bee freed from being bondmen and hewers of wood and dramers of water for the house of my God 3. The Distressed who justly according to the secret will of God are afflicted with some permanent misery Of these our Saviour gives us two or three severall short lists one Mat. 11.5 as the Blind the Lame the Leapers the Dease and the Dead Another Luke 4.18 as the Poore the broken-hearted the captive the blinde and the bruised A third Mat. 25.35 as the Hungry the thirsty the stranger the naked the sick and the prisoner All which and the like are by the Lawyers tearmed Personae miserabiles i. e. miserable persons because being in misery they are the proper objects of mercy and pity and because they are the proper subjects of for a Testament ad pias causas i. e. a Will made for charitable and godly uses for the reliefe of miserable and pitious creatures to whom mercy and pity doth properly belong Yet in the eye and judgement of the world these kind of persons are generally censured for trangressours and are indeed quasi-transgressours because they are afflicted with such miseries as are many times made the Judgement of God upon transgressors In this ranke Job was a sinner for hee was miserably afflicted in his goods in his children and in his body as if he had beene a foule transgressour yet really hee was not a transgressour for Job 1.8 the Lord gave him this testimony that There was 〈◊〉 like him in the earth a perfect and an upright man one that feared God and eschewed evill It was therefore the errour of Jobs friends to argue his transgression from his affliction because although transgression be a cause of affliction yet is neyther the perpetuall nor totall nor sole cause therof but there are other good causes besides transgression why God layes affliction upon this or that person though from men those causes be concealed For they flow from the secret will of God and sometimes from his good will Thus was Lazarus a sinner for he was sorely distressed and afflicted being a beggar layd at the rich mans gate full of sores and desiring to be fed with the crammes that fell from the rich mans table moreover the dogs came and licked his sores Luke 16.20 Yet it seemes he was not a transgressour for when he dyed hee was carryed by the Angels into Abrahams bosome And thus was the blinde man a sinner John 9.1 for he was afflicted and distressed being blinde from his birth and withall so poore that hee sate and begged Yet neither he nor his Parents were transgressors for in that point Christ expresly cleeres them all but hee was made a quasi-transgressor or a quasi-sinner that the workes of God should be made manifest in him 4. The Tainted who justly according to the declared Will of God are made Heires to their Fathers misery Who derive from their Father not onely that nature wherein hee was created but also that distresse and misery wherewith hee was afflicted who are necessitated or at least not exempted from that state and condition of misery which by reason of some sinne their Father incurred But either by the curse of God or by the course of nature those forfeits damages and losses which fell upon the Father are made hereditary to descend upon the Children This kinde of Calamity by Attainder is by the Sages of the Common Law called Corruption of blood when a mans Crime is so corrupt and foule that the Attainder or Judgement against it doth corrupt and spoyle not onely the offenders person but his blood i. e. his children and kindred for upon them that Attainder hath three notable effects 1. It debars them from being Heires to his estate for hee forfeits all his Lands and Goods and that forfeit is entailed on his Children 2. It depriveth them from partaking of any dignity which hee had as if hee before hee were noble hee and all his children are thereby made ignoble and base 3. It staineth them so deepely that regularly it cannot bee salved or removed by the ordinary course of grace or mercy but requires some extraordinary remedy as heere in England by authority of Parliament For this Corruption of blood must bee understood in a sense onely Jurall or Judiciall and not in a physicall naturall or carnall sense because the humour of blood which runneth in the veines of an offender and of his children is physically and naturally as incorrupt and as sound after the Attainder as before for upon the humors and spirits the Attainder of it selfe workes no alteration unlesse accidentally in this or that person at the hearing of the Sentence or apprehension of Death In this ranke the children of Ninevy should have beene sinners whereof sixe score thousand that could not discerne betweene their right hand and their left should have beene destroyed in the destruction of the City had not their Parents repented at the preaching of Jonah But the Children of Achan were de facto made such sinners Jos 7.24 For by reason of Achans Sacriledge His Sonnes and his Daughters and his Oxen and his Asses and his Sheepe and his Tent and all that hee had were stoned with stones and afterward burnt with fire So heere the Children of the Gibeonites Jos 9.27 Who for the deceit of their Parents were made hewers of wood and drawers of water for the Congregation and for the Alter of the Lord even unto this day So were the seven sonnes of Saul 2. Sam. 21.9 Who for their Fathers cruelty against the Gibeonites where at the suite of the Gibeonites hanged in the hill before the Lord. And so were also the sonnes of Gehazi if hee had any 2. King 5.27 Who for their Fathers impudency in bribing and lying were made the Heires of his Leprosie for the leprosie of Naaman shall cleave unto Gehazi and unto his seed for ever And in this ranke are all the sonnes of Adam who for his disobedience are made the Heires of his mortality for by his sinne death entred upon him and by him upon all his children for they in him were all tainted Rom.
5.12 By one man sinne entred into the World and Death by sinne and so Death passed upon all men for that or in whom all have sinned i. e. for that in him all dyed for of the word sinned in this place that in effect is the sence Or to speake a little nearer to the letter of the word it will bee thus for that in him all quasi-sinned not actively by transgressing in his transgression but passively by being prejudicated in his Judgement 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for in his one doome all were condemned and all cast into the state of transgressors to suffer misery and death like unto that which was inflicted on him as a judgement for his transgression For for the tense none of the Verbes in that verse are of the Preterperfectense but all are aorists or indefinite and accordingly the two first are rendred indefinitely Sinne entred and Death passed not Sinne hath entred and Death hath and therefore the Translation had beene more sutable if the last Verbe also had not beene rendred preterperfectly all have sinned but indifinitely thus all sinned And for the sense these words In whom all sinned signifie in effect the same thing with these ver 15. Through the offence of one many bee dead or many dyed and with these words vers 16. The judgement was by one to condemnation and with these vers 17. By one mans offence death raigned by one and with these vers 18. By the offence of one judgement came upon all men to condemnation and with these vers 19. By one mans disobedience many were made sinners and with these 1. Cor. 15.22 In Adam all dye All which sayings amount to no more but this That by the sinne of Adam hee and all his children were made mortall as by the sinne of the Gibeonites they and all their Children were made bondslaves and by the sinne of Gehazi hee and all his Children were made lepers For the Judgement given upon Adam for his offence was Banishment from Paradise a Curse upon the ground for his sake a Miserable and painefull Life and at last an everlasting Death And this judgement was not personall onely to determine the effect of it upon Adam onely and passe no further then his person but it was also real and hereditary to him and his Heires for ever First falling upon him and then descending to them For as by his offence his Innocency was corrupted So by this Judgement upon him his Posterity was corrupted or as a common Lawyer would expresse it By his Attainder his blood was corrupted i. e. First none of his Children shall bee Heires to that immortality and blessednesse which hee once enjoyed in Paradise for that was forfeited and extinguished Secondly all his Children shall bee blemished distressed and tainted to inherit that Banishment Malediction Misery and Mortality which hee incurred Thirdly this Corruption shall not bee remedied or salved by any ordinary mercy of God but by the extraordinary Mystery of Jesus Christ Thus the Calamitous who are jurall or quasi-sinners are of foure sorts viz. the oppressed the blemished the distressed and the tainted If wee compare together the three first sort of sinners viz. the Transgressor the Improbous and the Calamitous we may observe 1. That the difference between them is not essentiall and necessary but accidentall and contingent for they are not so opposite and contrary as that when the word is taken in some one sense all the rest should be excluded But they are onely diverse i. e. so different that one sense may be without the other and yet so complyant and consistent that they may all concurre and meet in the same word For the word Sinner doth carry sometime onely one of those senses sometime two and sometime all three and when the senses are plurall sometime they are equall sometime one above the rest is more eminent so that one and the same person may be at the same time a transgressor improbous and calamitous 2. That the Gentiles generally were sinners all these three wayes for they were sinners legally and morally being transgressors and improbous Rom. 1.29 Being filled with all unrighteousnesse fornication wickednesse covetousnesse maliciousnesse full of envy murder debate deceit malignity whisperers backbiters haters of God despitefull proud boasters inventers of evill things disobedient to parents without understanding covenant-breakers without naturall affection implacable unmercifull And they were sinners jurally for they were calamitous blemished with the state of ignorance and of enmity to God Ephes 2.12 Being aliens from the common Wealth of Israel and strangers from the Covenant of promise having no hope and without God in the world 3. That in the sight of God the Jewes generally were as great sinners as the Gentiles both legally and morally in respect of transgressions and improbities For of the Jewes the Apostle testifieth Rom. 3.9 that they were in no wise better then the Gentiles for he had proved both Jewes and Gentiles that they were all under sinne Yet jurally the Jewes were not such sinners nor so calamitous as the Gentiles because they were not such aliens and strangers from God as were the Gentiles but had many jurall rights priviledges and prerogatives as the true Israel and peculiar people of God as was shewed before in the former clause of this verse Yet the Right which the Jew had in God was but a puerile and servile right to be the children of God in the condition of servants in a state of nonage and wardship under the Law From which state Christ came to emancipate and deliver them that hee might advance and invest them into a filiall right of being the sons of God in a perfect plenage and fulnesse of yeares as shall be more fully explicated in this Epistle cap. 4. ver 2.3 Thus men are sinners three severall wayes for most men generally are transgressors and improbous and all men universally are calamitous for in Adams attainder all were tainted Wherefore this last way Man as he is Man is a sinner and this Sinner is the Man who in the next verse shall bee justified by the fayth of Jesus Christ for so it there followeth VERSE 16. Text. Knowing that a man is not justified by the workes of the Law but by the fayth of Jesus Christ even we have beleeved in Jesus Christ that wee might be justified by the fayth of Christ and not by the works of the Law for by the works of the Law shall no flesh be justified Sense A man is justified i. e. Made jurally righteous to have a present right and clayme to the Legacies and future blessings promised and devised in Gods last Will and Testament Not by the works of the Law His title to that right and claime is not by any workes done in observance of the Law nor by any effect or work of the Law in consideration of his works But by the fayth of Jesus Christ i. e. His title to that right and clayme is by his Acceptance
were spoken from Mount Sinai the Israelites could not indure to heare them but entreated that they might heare no more of them See Exod. 20.19 Deut. 18.16 Heb. 12.19 20. And Gods Judgments are his revealed word but these because they come from his wrath and anger are but ill words and farre worse then the former for they are cursed and fearefull words see the Curses of them at large Levit. 26. and Deut. 28. But Gods promise is his revealed word also and this word because it proceeds from his love and kindnes is his good word for so it is called 1 Kings 8.56 There hath not failed one word of all his good promise where for good promise the Hebrew hath good word and Jerem. 29.10 I will visit you and performe my good word unto you i. e. my promise for your returne from captivity If therefore an Assent to the words of Gods precepts and judgements which are hard and ill words be Faith as indeed it is though in effect it prove but a sorrowfull and wofull faith which can justifie no man but may convict all of sin and condemne many to death for it is that faith wherewith the Divels believe and tremble much more an Acceptance of Gods promise which is his good word is faith because Acceptance is more then Assent and more then Consent for it is an act subsequent unto a Consent whereby a Consent is seconded and ratified As plainly appeares in most contracts and particularly in that of Marriage where after the mutuall Consent of the parties to have each other there followes a mutuall Acceptance in taking each other Hence it is manifest that over and besides all other sorts of Faith there are three sorts answerable to the word of Gods Will viz. a promissory a preceptory and a judicatory faith for so let us call them till we finde fitter appellations because the promises precepts and judgements of God are the words of his Will 2. From the Concurrence of faith to a promise The acts about a promise are chiefly three namely the Making the Accepting and the Performing of it unto all which from the first to the last faith must needs concurre in a manner as a Soule wherewith the promise is animated and lives and without which it expires and dyes becomming frustrate and voyd For the Making of a promise is a giving of faith so the best Canonists and Casuists define a promise though we for thy better understanding defined it otherwise And the Performing of a Promise is a keeping of faith which is commonly called Faithfulnes for hence God is called faithfull because when he hath been gracious to give his faith by making a promise he will be faithfull to keep his faith by performing it And therefore the Accepting of a promise which intercedeth between the making and performing is a taking of faith for when the thing given is faith then the thing taken must needs be the same and therefore faith also And if the performance of a promise doth denominate him faithfull who makes it as in all good Writers and in common speech it doth much more doth the Acceptance of the promise denominate him faithfull who takes it because the faith of the taker doth naturally precede the faithfullnesse of the giver as acceptance naturally precedes performance But if Gods Promise have any effect at all and be not frustrated by a refusall that effect in thee must needs bee faith for seeing Gods Promise is a Declaration of his Will to devise unto thee a present right to the future possession of some blessing this Declaration comming from God doth or should worke in thee a ground to hope for that future blessing and a ground of things hoped for is faith as the Apostle notifies it Heb. 11.1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for i. e. a ground for hope is faith And because the blessing is future therefore it is not seene for things future are not seen yet Gods declaration of the futurity thereof doth or should produce in thee an evidence or knowledge of it and an evidence or knowledge of things not seen is faith as the Apostle againe designes it in the former verse 3. From the Examples of Faith In the Old Testament Gen. 15.4.5 God promised unto Abraham a Sonne and Heire of his owne body and a numerous Posterity as the Starres of Heaven i. e. God declared unto Abraham his will to give him a present right to that future blessing and in the verse following Abraham believed in the Lord i. e. Hee accepted of Gods Promise in taking it and this taking was seconded with trusting to it for by his acceptance hee had a good ground to hope for a sonne and an evidence for a sonne not yet seene which ground and evidence is faith or beliefe But the act which caused that ground and evidence was his Acceptance or taking the Promise God by the message of Moses promised unto the Israelites in Egypt a deliverance from their bondage and an entrance into Canaan and Exod. 4.31 the people believed i. e. They accepted of this promise by taking it and their taking caused their trusting to it i. e. Their faith caused their hope of it and to expresse their thankfullnesse for it They bowed their heads and worshipped In the New Testament God by the message of Jesus Christ hath made unto thee most precious promises for hence that Testament is called the Gospel i. e. The good message or word of God as the promise of present freedome or alliance with him to bee his sonne jurally by having a present right of inheritance the promise of present sanctity to regenerate thee with his spirit to bee his Sonne morally by leading a holy life and the promise of future priviledges and blessings to bee his sonne gloriously in the finall state of blessednesse as the future forgivenesse of thy sinnes the future resurrection of thy body and thy future life everlasting for God by Christ hath declared his will to impute unto thee a present right to all these blessings Is now thy will answerable and agreeable to Gods will to correspond and consent to him heerein And further dost thou actually accept of these promises to take God at his word Then thou hast faith and dost believe For although these blessings bee not seene yet by thy accepting the promises of them thou hast a good evidence for them and a good ground for thy hope of them and such evidence and ground is faith and beliefe And though thou dye before thou possesse all these blessings as certainely thou shalt and must either dye or bee changed before thou canst enter the possession of all Yet thou dyest in faith because Heb. 11.13 Thou hast seene them a farre off and wast perswaded of them and hast embraced them for by these reasons the Apostle proves that the Patriarchs dyed in faith though they had not received the promises i. e. Not the possession of the blessings
to give an intire and true definition of Faith because Faith is a thing so indefinite and so generall that it hath no genus which will comprehend it and it is a thing so notable so well known that there are not other words more knowne whereby to expresse and teach the nature of it They therefore who define Faith to bee a Confidence in God are peccant against the nature of a definition two wayes 1. Because Confidence is a word more obscure then Faith and therefore cannot teach the knowledge of it for hee that knowes not what Faith is will never bee made to know it by telling him that it is a Confidence because the word Confidence is more unknowne unto him and leaves him more to seeke then the word Faith doth 2. Because Confidence is a word more narrow for all Confidence is Faith but all Faith is not Confidence seeing Confidence is but one kinde of Faith or rather a degree of it the like defect may bee found in the word Affiance Other definitions of faith commonly exhibited by Divines are either so wide that they will not justifie at all or else so narrow that they will justifie onely under the Gospel Yet because divine faith is an act so acceptable to God and so desirable to bee understood I shall sutably to our present purpose declining all definitions and other significations of the word which in divers learned Writers are sufficiently layd out propose two Notions designes or cases thereof one in generall as it magnifies God the other more particular as it justifies man Both which added together may serve as signes and markes to breed a competent and comfortable knowledge thereof 1. The first notion is this An high esteeme of Gods existence greatnesse and goodnesse is Faith in God For Believing is opposed to Dispising as therefore when wee have a base and low esteem of the weakenesse and badnesse of any person wee are sayd to despise him So contrarily when wee have a rich and high esteeme of that greatnesse and goodnesse which wee conceive in any person then wee have faith in him and when God is the person whom wee so esteeme then wee have faith in God But although such a faith bee acceptable and pleasing unto God because it is agreeable to his will and to the truth that hee should bee esteemed as hee is Yet this kinde of faith is not Justifying to acquire any right unto the believer because it is generall and common to persons justified and to some not justified in whom this faith is onely servile to breed in them feare and trembling Such a faith was in the people of Nineveh for at the preaching of Jonah that within forty dayes Nineveh should bee overthrowne the people Jon. 3.5 believed God i. e. They had such an high esteeme of Gods greatnesse and goodnesse of his power and justice therein included that hee could and would execute the judgement threatned against them and this faith bred in them a feare of God and that feare bred a Fast whereby they declared their Repentance And such a faith is in the Divels Jam. 2.19 The Divels also believe and tremble i. e. They have an high esteeme of the greatnesse of Gods Power and the goodnesse of his Justice that hee can and will execute his vengeance upon them for their Rebellion and this their faith is onely servile for it breeds in them feare and makes them to tremble 2. The second notion of faith is this An acceptance of Gods promise is Faith The difference betweene Gods Promise and his Precept will cleerely teach us the nature of faith and workes and consequently the true difference betweene them The right to a thing and the possession thereof are distinct respects that may bee transferred either joyntly both at once at the same time as is done in a Donation or they may bee transferred severally one after another by conveying the right at one time and respiting the delivery of possession till another as is done in a Promise Gods Promise therefore is his declared Will to impute unto thee a present right to the future possession of some blessing For God in his Promise willeth unto thee two distinct things 1. That thy right to the blessing should bee in present 2. That thy possession of that blessing should bee future And then according heereto hee requires from thee two distinct acts of thy will in corresponding and consenting to his 1. Thy Acceptance or taking of the present right to the blessing 2. An Expectance or trusting to the future possession of it I say God requires thy acceptance because Gods promissory will is not compulsory to will and command thy acceptance by necessitating or binding thee thereto for in so thinking thou destroyest the nature of Gods promise by turning it into a Precept whereof the effect is compulsory and binding But Gods promise is only Invitatory to will and require thy acceptance by calling moving and drawing thee thereto in using all the gratious and proper meanes conducing to that end Yet leaving thee free at thine owne choice either to accept or refuse it A refusall or Rejecting of Gods Promise is Unbeliefe an Acceptance or taking of the present right to the blessing promised is Faith and an Expectance or trusting to the future possession of the blessing is Hope for Faith and Hope are the acts of mans will answerable and agreeable to the will of Gods promise Contrarily Gods Precept is his declared Will to impose upon thee a present bond to the future observance of some duty And herein Gods Will is that thy bond to this duty should be present and thy observance of the duty should be future from thence forward But Gods Preceptory Will is not Invitatory to will and require thy observance or to leave thee free at thine owne choyse either to observe or transgresse it for in thinking so thou destroyest Gods Precept whose nature it is to will and command thy observance by laying upon thee a necessity thereof yet that necessity is not fatall but legall A transgression of Gods Precept is sin an observance thereof is workes and when the workes are cordiall and liberall done heartily and freely with all the heart and all the soule then the workes are Love For workes and love are acts of mans will answerable to the will of Gods Precept and therefore are different from faith and hope which answer to the will of his promise because his promise and his Precept are Wills different and opposite This last notion of faith may be further illustrated from three grounds 1. From the common definition of Faith That faith is an assent to every revealed word of God which kind of faith is so large and wide that it may aswell condemn as justifie yet it will serve to enlighten our notion For Gods Precepts are his revealed word but these because they proceed from his holines and uprightnes are but hard words and so hard that when they