the Senatâ— of Amsterdam notwithstanding the Eloquent Oration which the famouâ— Grotius made in favour of the Remâ—â— strators to encline them to yield unto a Toleration Hereupon the two Patties grew into greater heats and Animosities than ever There is nothing bâ— Writing pro and con for and againâ—â— the Doctrine of Arminius Scand aloâ—â— Libels are cast out against the Magistrates They inveigh outragiously one against another in their Pulpits Each one pretends his doctrine to be the more antient as being more conformable 〈◊〉 the Word of God In private Families in Meetings at Feasts at the Bourse in the Shops you should heâ—â— nothing but discourses of Grace and Predestination Every where disputing every where wrangling From words sometimes they fall to blows and parricular quarrels turn to a kind of civil war Wheresoever one party finds it self the stronger At Amsterdam at Leyden at Utrecht c the other is sure to fare bad enough Nay they go so far as even to levy Souldiers to strengthen their Faction and maintain it where it has got the upper-hand In one word an utter Desolation seems to threaten the whole State and the Union of the United-Provinces is in great danger of being broken by the division of judgements in these points of Controverfie The States General who have the Soveraign Authority in those Provinces applyed themselves in earnest to find some efficacious remedy for so great a mischief which so much Writing so much Disputing so many Conferences could do no good in They had long before judged it necessary to call a National Synod for the final deciding of the business They had caused a Meeting of some Divines and Ministers of every Province for their Opinions and advise in the case Arminius himself who was one of the Company had given his consent with the rest Buâ— it was not then put in execution partly through the cunning shifts of the Aâ—minians partly by the contrivance 〈◊〉 Barnevelt their Protectour and partly by reason of some other affairs 〈…〉 which caused a diversion or rather a suspension of the proceeding at present For when the danger grew greater and the Truce which they had been 〈◊〉 Treaty about with the King of Spain gave them leave to apply themselves more seriously to this business their fell again upon the same design The King of England wrote unto them about it and gave them also his judgement at a publick Audience by his Embassadour that for the setling those troubles and putting an end to those Contests there was but one onely meaâ—â— which the Church had ever madâ—nse of to wit a Nationall Syâ—â—â— which was to be Iudge in the case and 〈◊〉 decide which of the two opinions was morâ— conformable to the Word of God or at leaâ—â— how and in what manner the one orthe other might be tolerated in the Church of God The States of Zealand and those of most of the other Provinces moved for the same The Protestant Princes of Germany and the neighbouring Republicks made the like Remonstrance It was from all parts solemnly declared that it was absolutely necessary for them to refer themselves to the Supreme Authority of that Church of which the two Parties were members Merc. To. 5. 1617. pag. 15 In conclusion the Arminians themselves agreed unto it they were no longer able to withsland that torrent of advise votes which came from all parts to the same effect recommending the Authority of a Synod Upon this the States General put forth a Declaration in which they made a Protestation that they prerended not by the calling a National Synod to derogate from the Rights and Liberties of the Provinces and that their intention was no other but to bring to trial before the Supreme and legal Authority those Points which then were in Contest about matters of Religion that by Judgement therein Peace might be restored to all the Reformed Churches This was done in conformity to the Peâ—ition of the Anti-Remonstrators who demanded a National Synod for the ending of Controversies without pretending for all that Ib. To. 5. p. 35. that new Articles oâ— Faith should be made After this Circular Letters were written to all the Provinces to the eâ— that every one should send unto the Synod six Deputies chosen out of theâ— Ministers and ablest Divines The Wallon Churches had the same invitaâ—on The States did also beseech the King of Great Brittain The Electioâ— Paâ—atine and of Brandebourg the Land grave of Hesse the Cantons of Zurâ—â— of Berne of Bafile and of Schaffoâ—se the Counts of Veteravia the Republicks of Geneva of Bremen and 〈◊〉 Emden to make choice of and depâ—â—â— the ablest Doctors amongst them to be assistant at this Synod which thus became more than National and was begun at Dort a Town of Holland 〈◊〉 the thirteenth of December in the Yea of our Lord 1618. The Protestants of France whâ— were invited among the first would no have failed to have been present as we as those of Geneva But as the King does not permit Ministers of other Countries to come to those Synods which they hold in his Kingdome so does he not also permit that those of his Kingdome go to those of other Nations This notwithstanding did not hinder the Ministers of France from assisting in the best manner they could For not being allowed to go thither in person the chief of them sent their Opinions and that of Monsieur Du Moulin Sess 1434 which was read publickly at the Synod and agrees exactly with the Determination of the said Synod is still to be seen at this day It is further remarkable that the year following all the Protestant Churches of France in a National Synod held at Alez received all those Decrees obliging all the Ministers and Elders deputed for that Assembly to take a solemn Oath and protest in the sight of God that they did admit of and embrase the Doctrine of the Synod of Dort as intirely conformable with the Word of God and that they would maintain the same to the utmost of their power so long as they had breath in their bodies This is what they solemnly swore unto according to the form of the Oath which you may see annexed to the end of this Treatise By which appears that these Gentlemen can now neither in Honour not Conscience refuse submission to the Decisions and Authority of the said Synod 11. Decemb. 1618. In the twenty seventh Session the Remonstrators who were not satisfied with and mistrusted their Judges made solemn Protestation against the Authority of the Synod declaring that they could not acknowledge them for lawful Judges in the case because the greaest part of them consisted of Parties and had already publickly declared against their Doctrine All the Deputies of forreign Churches gave their Opinions in Writing concerning this Protestation The Judgement of the English Divines and all unanimously declared that they judged it null and void most unreasonable and
Communities there are alwayes Courts of Justice which have received full Authority to Judge of Causes and Actions between particular persons When there happens a Sure at Law between two be they of what quality and condition they will even members of the Court it self they are no other than Parties Contesting Plaintiff and Defendant They must also have their Solicitors their Attournies and their Counsil to Plead for them but it is the Judge's business to give Sentence And when Sentence is once given if he who was cast should slight the Decree of the Court and be so bold as to say that he owns it not as legal nor the Court as lawful Judges and that it is He and his Solicitors and Council and those who are his Abettors who constitute a true Court and Seat of Justice I think he would be taken for no better than a Rebel and as Out-law or one that were not in his right wits And those who an hundred years after should dare to say that he had reason to do as he did would be thought to have as little judgement and reason as he Now can it be imagined that God would permit such an irregularity such a fearful disorder in the Government of his Church He has been pleased to give Power and Authority to an Assembly of Pastors who are the Representative of his Church to end all Contests in matters of Faith in such manner as we have already seen It is one this or that may be held or denyed before Judgement given as any one with his Party may think fit But when the Decree is once passed and it comes to be defined by this Church or Representative of the Church what is to be believed concerning the Point controverted he who has lost the cause be he who he will having antecedently to such definition owned that Church to be the True one must not nor cannot now say that it is not the Assembly but that it is he himsef his followers and Disciples who do represent and in reality constitute the True Church He who uses this language and those who take part with him in and at what time soever it does happen can be held for no other than true Schismaticks 8. This is clearly to be seen in the Acts of the Apostles and in the Ecclesiastical History and Protestants themselves will without difficulty grant it as they have already acknowledged it and solemnly professed it in the Synod of Dort The Primitive Church was made up of Jews and Gentile who had received the Holy Gospel It happened as it is recounted in the 15. of the Acts that some of those who had been converted from Judaisme coming to Antioch taught this Doctrine That if those who were of Gentils become Christians were not Circumcised according to the Custome of Moses his Law they could not be saved There fell to be a great Contest and a great disturbance in the Church about the matter St. Paul and St. Barnaby strongly opposing that Opinion and others maintaining it with a great deal of earnestness For the composing the business it was thought fit to send these two Saints and some of those of the contrary perswasion to the Apostles and Priests at Hierusalem to propose unto them the difficulty They failed not in the performance of their charge S. Paul and S. Barnabas relating unto them the favours which it had pleased God to shew to the Gentils by help of their Ministery without the assistance of the Law of Moses and those others especially some of the Pharisees who had been Convertedo urging very hotly Surrexerunt quidam de heresi Pharisaeorum qui crediderunt dicentes quia oportet circuncidi eos c. that it was necessary to oblige them to be Circumcised and to observe the Law of Moses in its full 〈◊〉 Upon this the Apostles assembled a Council at which all those of chiefest note were summoned to be present for the serious examination of the business And having weighed the Reasons on both sides at a large Conference Convenerunt Apostoli Seniores c. Cum autem magna conquisitio fieret c. and St. Peter having first declared himself upon the Point and being seconded by St. Iames with the general consent of the Holy Assembly there passed a Decree which was received by the whole Church in which was defined and declared with the assistance of the Holy Ghost who inspired them for the understanding Scripture that Circumcision was not at all necessary for salvation Visum est Spiritui sancto nobis c. as it had formerly been during the Law of Moses which was now to give place to the Law of Jesus Christ The business being thus concluded this Doctrine became a Point of Faith and those of the Pharisees who remained still obstinate in their opinion and those others who took part with them still pressing for a conformity with the Jews were now indeed true Pharisees in Christianity that is to say people cut of from the True Church however they pretended that she was onely in them and their Party 9. The same may be said of other Councils which have been afterwards held according to the example of that one which is the Model of all the rest Before the Heresie of Arius there was no speech of Consubstantiation That wicked Priest having dared to teach that The Blessed Word though Son of God was not of the same substance with the Father but onely like unto him found many passionate followers of his doctrine even among the Bishops who grounded themselves upon some passages of Holy Writ About which there arose a most desperate Dispute in the Church which caused a general disturbance to the peace thereof For the setling whereof and reaniting mens Spirits in one and the same Doctrine the great Council of Nice was called which did define that The Word was Consubstantial with the Father which was also inserted in the Symbol or Creed When this was done notwithstanding that many Bishops even of those who had assisted at the Council remained still of the Opinion of Arius and had made a strong and numerous Party who stiled themselves the True Church and called Councils amongst themselves they are still held and Protestants generally do even at this day hold them for Hereticks and all those who after so many Ages have followed that Sect are treated with the same stile by them The same is to be said of the Macedonians of the Nestorians Syn. Const Syn. Ephes Sy. Chalced. VI. Synod of the Eutychians of the Monothelites and the like who stand condemned in other Councils For although after their condemnations they protested that they were the True Church slighting the Councils which had Condemned their Opinions yet have they alwayes been accounted Hereticks and are so at this time by Protestants themselves And now if after they had rejected and condemned the Articles of the Arminians in their Synod of Dort those condemned persons should
prove so very intelligible even to the Learneder sort of men There is notwithstanding this difference that as no one of those Fathers in particular is the Rule of her belief so does she not so abselutely determin by her Decrees what is the meaning of such or such a passage of theirs leaving it many times to our discussion as she does that of holy Scripture which she permits not to be call'd in question 4. And from hence we draw a third Conclusion that when in any Province or Kingdome a difficulty does arise in matter of Religion it is very uneffectual and preposto us to undertake to compose it by way of Disputation or Conference Experience has often shewed that such proceedings serve onely to increase the Division and render it endless provoking high spirits and putting them upon a pike of Honour which permits them not to be much moved with any reasons of an Adversary We must come quickly to that fixed and setled Point I mean the Soveraign undeclinable Judgement of the Church in which there are two several times or seasons which are of necessity to be distinguished that which goes before and that which followes after In the first of these writing on both sides so it be without bitterness with a good intent and design to make Truth appear is very lawful And then the Reasons alledged in such Writings the Fathers who happen to be cited pro and con do make as it were Plaintiff and Defendant Counsil and Plea in the Court They are the Bills and Answers The Replyes and Reparties are the difficulties proposed on both sides But what the Church definitively pronounces having taken cognisance of and examined things according to the Rules and proceedings of the Court this becomes a Decree this is Truth this is the fixed Point we must stick to and rely upon whether the Fathers cited did distinctly believe it or no. In the second of these times or seasons in case those whose doctrine stands condemned will not acquiesce and submit to Judgement Princes and Magistrates who are as Protectors of the Canons and Definitions of the Church have a duty incumbent upon them to procure and exact that obedience which is due and to endeavour the quieting and reducing such turbulent spirits by such means as they shall judge most efficacious And in the mean time it shall be lawful for the Learned to Write more vigourously against them and to bring Scripture and Fathers as has been practised by many knowing Controvertists not by way of discussing a matter which is yet within the bounds of incertitude but to make the weakness of Falsity appear and to shew the force of Truth and the conformity of the Judgement of the Church with the Doctrine of Antiquity For all other Persons it is much more to their purpose not to meddle with not hearken to any thing of this kind but to satisfie themselves saying This the Church has desined this I ascept this I will stick close unto In my opinion this is all which ought to be proposed to the Faithful without making them Judges of Controversies is Faith and without giving them occasion to enter into Dispute concerning this place of Scripture and that of Holy Fathers which for the most part are things beyond their reach and capacity Si quid tibi videtur vel ambiguitate pendere vel obscuritate obumbrari Tertull. de praesc c. 14. Curiosity does frequently come in for a part and that serves only to beget troubles and perplexities when they are not able to penetrate to the secret meaning or boâ—tom oâ— such passages or to raise a pâ—esumption in them when they imagin they comprehend the matter and so come to fancy themselves no mean persons searching curiously into every thing with a great deal of hazard and danger to light at length upon something that may give them a check and make them begin to waver for want of understanding Ignorare melius est ne quod non debeas noris Ibid. together with an excess of rashness and boldness It is much better sayes Tertullian to be ignorant in that kind lest by some gross mistake or ill-understanding you come at length unfortunately to know what you had better been ignorant of Fides tua inquit te salvum fecit non exercitatio Scripturarum Fides in regulâ posita est exercitatio autem in curiositate consistit habens gloriam solam de peritiae studio Cedat curiositas Fidei cedat gloria saluti 'T is Faith a Christian is to be saved by not by discussing Texts of Scripture and passages of Holy Fathers For the having faith it suffices to stick to The Rule learning the true sence of Scripture from the Doctrine of the Church But the Spirit of arguing and disculling which I here point at comes very ordinarily from an excesse of curiosity and is onely subservient to vanity for the gaining a little glory by making a vain ostentation of the knowledge one has got by his own industry and study 'T is but reason that Curiosity should give place to Faith and and vain-glory to serious thoughts and care of our Salvation To this end it is necessary we stick close to that Rule to that setled Principle which is the true Science of a Christian I mean we ought to learn of the Church what the Word of God teaches us and what is the meaning thereof Non obstrepant adversus regulam nihil ultra scire omnia scire est Let no mâ—â— oppose this rare Maxime To know nothing more then this is in reality to know all things 5. From what has been now said we may yet draw a fourth Sequel That this general Rule and universal Prindple received and allowed of by all 〈◊〉 such manner as it has been propounded may and ought to be applyed to every particular Point controverted that we may come to have a ready and certain solution thereof For those who first opposed the Doctrine we now make profession of in any Article debated either were at that time of the fame Church with those whom they opposed which Church they owned for the True Church there being as yet no separation made or they were already dismissed from her If they were of the same it is but seeing what that Church by her Representative has declated concerning the matter in debate For we are agred that they were obliged to submit to her Judgement so far as that in case of contempt it could not be lawful to take part with them without falling after their example into open and direct Schism But if they were already divorced from her upon any other ground or for any other precedent cause it is evident from the same reason that they were upon the whole matter already true Schismaticks because either they themselves or their Predecessors having formerly been of that Church they ought not after legal Sentence given to have made a Separation and consequently that it is not lawful
which you give for the holding or renouncing an Article be the true one The first of these you can no more know or be secur'd of then we Aug. cont Ep. Man qu. voc fund unless by means of the Church to whom it is derived by certain Tradition Learn the second then by the same way since there is no other by which you can come to any light thereof This is what Vincentius Lirinensir shews in that excellent Work of his All is not done when we have got the Rule it must also be rightly applyed and according to art For when in the heat of those earnest and tedious contests which do arise about some subject or other every one will confidently affirm that he applies it right and that it is in his sence that Scripture is to be understood who can end the quarrel or who has so much power and authority with the parties as that his Opinion or judgement shall be regarded and bear the sway with them Is it not absolutely necessary that it be some Judge who has received both authority and light from God himself for the performing this office And who can be that Judge but the True Church in which the Parties were before separation and her lawful Representative a Canonical Assembly which alone has full power and Soveraign Authority to say â—uridically It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and us Visum est Spiritui sancto nobis Act. 15. Whatever else you can alledge may as well be alledged by another who may make his advantage of it in as good measure and proportion as your self can possibly do The gift of Understanding the interiour Unction the revelation of the Father the private Spirit and a hundred other pretty inventions which have been and are at this day made use of contain nothing of regular general or certain in them or which an adversary may not affirm he has as much right to challenge as you Who then is able to free us from uncertainties in such encounters as these who can restore us a calm after such a Tempest who will bring back day to us after so dark a night who will bless us with peace after war who can bring such spirits together again into the same Sheep-fold under one and the same Shepherd Can this be done but by the Church of Jesus Christ That Church which is The pillar and ground of 1 Tim. 3.1 Truth That House of God which is built upon a living Rock Mat. 16.18 and when all the powers of Hell shall never shake which most certainly they had done before this had she once erred in defining matters of Faith Finally that Spouse of Jesus Christ which he has endowed and quickened with his own Spirit for the instruction and education of the Children of his Family 7. I know you will approve of this Nay I know it is to her you pretend to resort and make your addresses in your Assemblies or Synods for the cleering your doubts and determining matters of difficulty and differences which often arise among you I ask but this one thing at your hands Do but proceed faithfully and sincerely therein Omnes nos necesse est apud Christi tribunal adstare redentes rationem imprimis ipfius Fidei Tertull. de praescr c. 44. And to this end I beg of you in the Name of that Great God whom we adore and who is to be our Judge demanding of us principally an account of our Faith that returning back to the source of our divisions you will be pleased to reflect that those who first questioned and disputed the Points which made the breach were even in their own judgements of the same Church which before the breach was the only and by necessary consequence the True Church That consequently that Church during the contest had full power to judge according to Rule and Order and to define what was to be believed and that the Parties were bound to submit to her Decrees That those who stood condemned by her Canons having separated themselves from her became Schismaticks as well as Hereticks Because not adhering to the Doctrine of the True Church of which they were members before their condemnation they made a Party against her and withdrew themselves into a society apart which was cut off from Communion with her And that finally all those who follow or take part with them though a thousand years after are no other then disciples and followers of Schismaticks and Hereticks This is the Totall of what in this linde Treatise principally in the matter of the Blessed Sacrament I have endeavoured to evince without conâ—â—ing or Disputing the matter out of such Principles or the necessary consequences drawn from them as we have been perfectly agreed upon 8. Now I beseech you Gentlemen give me leave to tell you with as real a desire of your eternal Salvation as the Prophet Nathan had for that of David when he spoke those moving words to him which pearc'd his heart Tu es ille vir Alas Gentlemen it is you who unfortunately are engaged in the party of those first rebells who forsook the Church to revenge themselves of those Decrees which condemned their Opinions As the Laws both Humane and Divine right reason natural understanding and the order and method which your selves do observe oblige you to acknowledge that they were bound to submit to the Judgement of that Church which themselves owned to be the True one and that they could not separate from her but by evident Schisme so is it certain that you after so many ages which have passed since their Condemnation cannot joyn with them following their Doctrine and proceedings without bearing a part with them in their crime and becoming guilty of their defection Rather quit their company wihose origin your selves condemn Return into the bosom of that Church from which you find the first Authors of that Sect could not in Conscience and natural equity withdraw themselves as they did upon that score onely that the Decree was not in favour of their cause Do not any longer trouble your selves as they do with Disputing pleading and excepting after Sentence is once pass'd Allow me to speak unto you in the language of that worthy Martyr of Christ and great Bishop of Lyons St. Irenaeus Why do you Non opâ—rteâ— adhuc quaerere apud alios veritatem quam facile est aâ— Ecclesiâ sumere cum Apostoli quasi in depositorium dives plenissimè in eam contulerint omnia quae sunt veritatis ut omniâ— quicunque velit sumat ex eâ potum vitae Haec est enim vitae introïtus omnes autem reliqui fures sunt latrones propter quod oportet devitâ—â— quidem ilios quae autâ—m sunt Ecclesiae tum summa diligentia deligere apprehendere vertatis tâ—â—â—tionem â—ren lib. 3. adv haer c. 4 Câ—ucirc mâ—â—sta quaeâ—in flu 〈◊〉 varâ—â—â— haberet iâ—ter se collega um salâ—â unâ—ta 〈…〉 hoc
Prophets This makes it further more manifest that it cannot be said that the Decrees of Synods are onely Rules of Policy which do not reach unto Doctrine and only serve for exterior order which is the utmost limit of their authority For it is most evident that this Assembly at Dort did pretend to regulate iâ— self according to the four first Councils whose example they proposed unto themseles In the mean time these Gentlemen do acknowledge that those Councils did condemn the doctrine of those Arch heretiques whom they gave Sentence against in such manner that it was not lawful to hold it not adhere unto their Party without becoming like unto them Hereticks and Schismaticks It cannot then be doubted but this Synod pretended to the same thing and that by declaring that the Doctrine of the Arminians was full of errors and contrary to the Word of God they intended to say an obligation of renouncing the said Doctrine by subscribing to their Decrees that they might not become guilty of Schisme and Heresie But without any great necessity of reasoning the business it is but hearing how the Synod delivers it self upon this subject For you must know that the Arminians refused to observe the Order which was appointed for the discussion and examination of their Articles Nay they were so bold as to maintain that they could not in Conscience accommodate themselves to that Method which they apprehended to be so prejudicial to the good Cause The Synod thereupon declares Quin potius si conscientiae suae quam debent rationem habereve lint eâ—s ad obtemper andum aequissimis supremarum potestarum mandatis hujúsque Synodi ordini judicio acquiescendum teneri Seff 42. die 29 Decembâ—is that it belongs to them as Judges to prescribe the Order which was to be observed in a Hearing of that nature and not at all to the Parties upon whom Sentence was to pass and that the pretext of Conscience which was laid hold on upon this occasion is no wayes jufâ—ifiable because there being nothing here in concern but the examination of the business their Consciences in this can suffer nothing Then they add these decisive words That if they on the contrary intend to have any regard to their Consciences as they ought in duty they are obliged to obey the Commands of Higher Powers to follow Orders and to acquiesce unto the Judgement of the Synod To this purpose it is that they alledge that passage of the Gospel which commands to esteem him as an Infidel who does not obey the Church It is pretended then that this Synod which represents their Church obliges to another kind of Obedience then meerly Political and that in matters of Faith where there is an obligation to believe under pain of damnation there is a duty incumbent upon Conscience to submit unto her Decrees Eandem pro legitimo causae Judice agnoscerent because as is there expresly determined in the 26. Sess It is The Synod which is Lawful Iudge in this Cause 11. Certainly the Synod had a great deal of reason to speak in that mannen For in so remarkable a Contest as this between two such Parties who were in Dispute of matters of such importance presupposed that they looked upon themselves as the Representative Body of the Church of Christ theâ— could not in reason discover any other Judge but themselves For they saw manifestly in that conjuncture that the Scripture could not be it for so much as the two Parties upholding theâ—â— Opinions by Scripture as it has always happened in all the Conrests which have risen in the Primitive Church the Controversie between them was concerning the true meaning of those passaged which were alledged on both sides Neither these Passages then nor those other which were brought for the explication of these and about which there was as hot a Dispute as about the former could ever end the difference between them because indeed they were the very Subject of the Dispute And consequently they found that there was a necessity of some other Supreme Authority which should give Sentence about the matter in contest and appease those troubles which otherwise must prove endlesse in the same Church This is the very Reason the Synod gives when they cite the Remonstrators to appear Sess 5.16 November Sess 23.7 Decembr Pro certâ ac indubitatâ fidei regulâ adqibiturum and oblige them to submit to their Decrees This is that makes them protest so often and take their solemn Oaths that they will determine things according to the Word of God Which they will make use of as a certain and indubitable Rule in matters of Faith In which proceeding of theirs they shew excellently well that there is a great distinction to be made between him that Judges and the Rule he follows to Judge well by In all the well govern'd Societies of the world there may arise differences yea even such as may by the contesting parties be managed bona fide But for the ending of them it is requisite there be a Court appointed and authorized from the Highest Power to Judge of them and by pronouncing Sentence to give clear notice to the Parties which of them has got the day Behold here â— Judge Behold a Court But this Judge and this Court are not without Lawes and Orders according to which Judgement is to be given Which Laws and Orders are many times the Subject of great Disputes each Party endeavouring to make them appear favourâ—ble to their side which Point is to 〈◊〉 cleared by the Sentence of the Judgâ— Here is the Rule he is to follow It 〈◊〉 not the Law it self the meaning whereof is actually in dispute that is Judge Were it otherwise it were impossible ever to determine any thing For the Law it self cannot explicate nor declare it self for either side but it is He that has received Authority who is to enâ— the strife according to Law the meaning whereof he determines and applyes to the present case The Assembly of Dort knew very well that this was the very state and condition of things in the Church of God which is without doubt the most holy and best ordered Community in the world In this Community notwithstanding there have happened great differences in matters of great importance and where the Contest has also been managed many times with a great deal of good meaning on all sides every one believing they had the Scriptures on their sides Witness S. Hierâ—me and S. Augustine in that difference between St. Peter and St. Paul witness S. Cyprian who was so earnest against the validity of the Baptisme of Hereticks and a thousand others of the same nature It is necessary there be a Judge Synodi mandato morem gerant quo praesentem hanc Synodum pro legitimo causae Judice agnoscere jubentur Sess 25. who has received power and Authority from our Blessed Lord to decide all these differences and that this Judge
have a Rule and a Law which he is to follow in giving Judgement that his Sentence may be just and secure This Rule is the Word of God which rightly applyed renders Judgement highly equitable Now the Synod of Dort acknowledges that an Assembly of lawful Pastors representing the Body of the true Church is this Judge to whom it appertains to judge of the true sence of the Word of God and afterwards to resolve according to this Rule any cause depending 12. I do now earnestly beseech our Brethren of the Reformed Churches to reflect seriously upon these two Propositions I am now about to make The first is That as the Word of God is infallible in it self so certainly the Judgement of him who truely judges according to this Rule is also Infallible and consequently they are obliged to believe that the Church when she Judges according to this Rule or the Word of God does not onely not err but that she also cannot err The second is that they are bound as well as we to believe that the Church of God deciding controversies of Faith does judge according to the true sence of the Word of God because upon the matter it is concerning this very sence that she gives Judgement between the Parties who give it a different sence and who are obligâ— in Conscience to submit to her Judgement under pain of being Schismaticks and Hereticks as their Synod of Dort has positively declared From hence follows by necessary consequence according to their own Principles that they are bound to believe with us that the True Church of Jesus Christ is infallible in the Judgement she judicially pronounces touching matters of Faith 13. I think there can now be no 〈◊〉 but they are obliged according to their own grounds to acknowledge the infallibility of the Church of Christ But I am contented for the present not to press them so far nor to make use of that right which I might justly challange It is sufficient that the Synod which in these Gentlemens opinion represents the True Church is lawful judge in this case as the Synod is self declares obliging them in Confidence to adhere to and obey the Decisions made therein It is not then lawful for them who are of that Church and are at Difference amongst themselves to condeman the Synod of Error then judgement â—s given in order to the clearing Points of Faith confessed among them They have no power to frame a different Judgement from that of the Synod and adhering to it to seporâ—are themselves from communion with the rest They are bound to acknowledge the Authority of the Synod which is lawfull Judge and submit unto it believing that what is there desined 〈◊〉 Truth it self stand this without any necessity of entring upon the question of its Infallibility I demand nothing more for the preseâ—s I will content my 〈◊〉 with what themselves do grant That Church of which the Partins Contesting are members be she fallible or infallible has full Power to Debide differentes and 〈…〉 oblige under the penâ—ry of being Schismaticks And now having as I make my self believe give Monsient Claude all the satisfaction he can in 〈◊〉 require concerning this Point I 〈◊〉 on my course perceably and quietly and make bold to give him notice that 14. Here is that the Prescription that 〈◊〉 Point anâ—â—oisputable Pâ—â—ciple to which a receisary adhfione required when there arise Disputes between Parties for the discovering whether an Opinion be or be not contrary to the true Rule of Faith which is the Word of God and whether we stand bound to believe it as a Point of Faith Were it antecedently distinctly believed as such or no. Disputation will only serve to render the Debate eternal Both Parties will go on challenging the true sence of Scripture and Tradiuon on their sides Books shall be written without number for the asserting of it and that without any hopes or appearance of any end of these learned indeed but redious Contests which prove many times so intricate and confused that every one standing his ground and being strongly and willfully resolved not to yield reproaches his Adversary with affected Obstinacy against known Truth We must then make up to that unquestionable Point in which both Parties meet and which Tertullian so boldly establishes as the principal Rule or Prescription for the ending all differences which may arise about the agreeing or conformity with the Word of God which every one is so ready to challenge to himself This Learned Father having said in his twentieth Chapter A quibus traducem fidei semina doctrinae caeterae deinde Ecclesiae mutuatae sunt quotidie mutuontur ut Ecclesiae fiant Ataque tot ac tantae Ecclesiae una est illa ab Apostolis prima ex qua ommes Quid autem praedicavevint id est quid eis Christus revelaverit hÃc praescriham non alite pâ—obari debere nisi per easdem Ecclesias quas ipsi condiderunt ipsi eis praedicando tam vivâ quâ—d â—iunt voce quà m per epistolas postea de Praes c. 21. that the Apostles who were sent by our Blessed Saviour Founded many Churches in several places and that many others came from these by communication of the same Doctrine and that they all of them together make but one true Catholick and Apostolick Church he adde in the next Chapter that true Prescription is that nothing be received but what he revealed unto his Apostles whom he sent to Preach his Doctrine unto the world But in case there does arise any Contest concerning any particular Point and that we be in some trouble or doubt whether they Preacâ—â—ed it or no and by consequence whether they learned it of their Master or no behold here his solid Rule or Prescription in this great maxime that this is not to be made out or cleared by any other means but by those Churches which they founded either by Preaching or by Writing and which as we lately touched all of them make but one only Church To this Church then it does belong to determine what our Blessed Saviour did reveale in his Holy Word whensoever there is any cause of doubt in such Contests as do arise and what she defines what she declares in the case whatever former times did believe it now to be held as matter of Faith 15. As Protestants do acknowledge this Verity as I have made it appear so do we also most willingly submit unto it and intirely profess that the holy Church is lawful Judge of Controversies and that as Tertullian sayes addresses are to be made to her upon difference of Opinions that we may learn what the Son of God revealed unto his Apostles that is what is the true meaning of Holy Scripture and what Consequences are to be drawn from those Principles We have a very pregnant example of this in that famous Contest which has been for some Ages past between Catholicks concerning the Immaculate Conception