the Government Apostolical and necessary or only Prudential brought in by the Church and not repugnant to the Holy rule or only as the Bishops are impowered and Commissioned under the King being here established I see not how we can without sin refuse a peaceable compliance with it Sect. 56 And I have reason to hope such a compliance in a good measure because those learned Brethren who though in their Proposals to His Majesty they desire that Chancellors Arch-deacons Commissaries c. as such may not pass any censures purely Spiritual yet when they say only as such it may intimate they would not deny them under another notion as Commissioned under His Majesty to do so These Brethren I say add this But for the exercise of Civil Government and this by their words there may seem to include the acts of Government in the Church and ecclesiastical Causes so far as the Censures are not purely Spiritual coercively by Mulcts or corporal penalties by power derived from Your Majesty as Supreme over persons and things ecclesiastical we presume not at all to interpose but shall submit to any that act by Your Majesties Commission Were indeed these Considerations well weighed they would do much to a peaceable obedience Sect. 57 Except Partic. 7 7. I know but one material exception more referring to this charge that The Bishops take too much upon them And that is The matter of Ordination and now the Re-ordination for thus it is excepted The Bishops some of them do assume sole power of Ordination and Jurisdiction to themselves And now it is farther urged as unsufferable that upon their re-establishment they require a Re-ordination of all those who during the late Confusions were ordained only by a Presbytery Sect. 58 In answer to the business of a Superior ordo c. enough is already said But to the matter of Ordination and Re-ordination I say Answ 1 1. The Question is not what some challenge to themselves but how far we may yield in the thing that is challenged without sin If some challenge too much let them answer that but if we may without sin take from their hands that which we can legally have from no others I see not why we should in the least scruple to take it That Their hands are Necessary and that none can be regularly ordained without them is the Judgement of none of the least or lowest in the Church who think the Scripture speaks clearest on their side also For Though Timothy had the (h) 1 Tim. 4 14. Imposition of Hands of the Presbytery yet it is expressly said that he had (i) 2 Tim. 1.6 Pauls too and he not acting as one of them but under a distinct notion as the words if well weighed do more than intimate for whatsoever that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was which was given by that Laying on of Hands whether the extraordinary gifts of the Spirit usually in those dayes by the (k) Act. 8.17 18. Apostles hands or the Gift i. e. Authority of Ministery whether of a Bishop or Evangelist it matters not whatsoever I say the gift was it seems to be conferred (l) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 chiefly by the hands of Paul and referred to the hands of the Presbytery (m) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but as assistants or associates with him But those texts seem to be more express where not only the Deacons were made by (n) Act 6.6 the sole hands of the Apostles but also in the ordaining of Presbyters we read that Barnabas and Paul those Apostles (o) Act. 14.23 did ordain Elders in every Church as they went we read not of any other hands with them St. Paul also layes this charge on Timothy (p) 1 Tim. 5.22 Lay thou hands suddenly on none intimating an act wherein he only was concerned for if there were other Presbyters or a Presbytery at Ephesus and they necessarily to joyn with him in every Ordination why is the charge only given to him why not the same caution urged on them And in that clause (q) T it 1. ◠For this cause left I thee in Creet that Thou shouldest ordain Elders in every City we see Titus infallibly left with authority to do this but we read not of any others appointed with him If any object He was an extraordinary Officer and Evangelist This signifies little for whatever he was he was an Apostolical person and for that time at least seated at that place for the particular Government of that church to perform not an extraordinary but a work of standing use in the Church the administration of an ordinary and perpetual Ordinance And why then in such a work he may not be conceived to act as a settled ordinary Officer I see not This we are sure of That Ordination was not given in those dayes without the hands of an Apostle or an Apostolical person We are not sure that it was not sometimes without the hands of the Presbytery Upon these grounds these learned and conscientious men judge a Necessity of the Episcopal or Apostolical hands though not excluding yet withal not necessarily requiring the hands of other Presbyters Sect. 59 On the other side that The Hands of Bishops are lawful in this work is granted so far by those who urge the greatest necessity of the Presbyterial Ordination yet excude not the Bishop See Jus Divin Minist Evang. 2. part who on their judgements ceaseth not to be at least a Presbyter and the Name of a Bishop doth not with them take away his interest of a Presbyter in Ordination nor nullifie the Orders because his Hands were in them Now then if we may but lawfully take it at the Bishops hands if it be required to be had from them alone though it should be supposed somewhat irregular and we can have it no other way without the violation of the Laws in being suppose they should sin in assuming that only to themselves which should be done joyntly with others yet we should not sin in taking it of them because they unquestionably have a power though possibly not the sole power Sect. 60 2. It is objected only Some Bishops challenge to themselves c. Now the matter is not what some particular men challenge but what the established constitution is It concerns not us to be of the same judgement with every particular Bishop but to obey them in that place where the Laws have set them and in that authority wherein the Constitutions of this Church have invested them Now the Laws of our Church give no such power of sole ordination nor doth any Bishop that I know or have heard practice it The Dean and Prebends were of old I doubt not accounted a standing Presbytery to the Bishop and the (r) Can. 31. Presence of four of these are expressly required to every Ordination viz. The Dean Arch-Deacon and two Prebendaries at least or in the necessary absence of them four other
kept from disobeying And though by submitting to this punishment ordained by the law to those who break it they may have satisfied the Courts of men yet in this case they are not cleared from sin or guilt before God because they were obliged actually to do the duty of the law not only for wrath but for conscience sake The Murderer Thief Felon is hanged the Traytor executed thus the law of man is satisfied as to the penalty but the guilt of sin upon the conscience is not cleared nor the man with God innocent Sect. 10 8. Neither do I doubt of consent in this as a thing equally evident That though a law may not be so good as we could wish or as indeed it should be yet if the matter of it be not evil a sin forbidden by God we are bound in conscience to obey it It is not strange in the world wherein the best men are not perfect to see imperfections in the best lawes and some lawes made which are not so good or convenient as they might be because they are like the men that made them imperfect at the best yet when they are not evil no sin in the matter enjoyned they oblige the conscience to conforme to them It may be possible that we may be able to devise a better law yet God never made particular Subjects judges of what is fit or not fit to be enacted for a law to the Community nor ever gave us power to prescribe a law to our selves nor will he acquit us from sin in disobeying a law which is not evil upon our imaginations that it might be better For we are bound to be [o] Rom. 13.5 subject and to [p] 1 Pet. 2.14 submit as patiently submitting to the Powers punishing us without rebellion or murmuring so especially readily doing what they command us in what we can and may lawfully do [q] Tit. 2.9 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without disputing or gainsaying When I say lawfully do I mean still the matter not being evil for there may be somewhat in the Form or other circumstances of the law which may denominate that an evil law and yet the subjects bound to obey that law though not unto evil Sect. 11 9. I am therefore fully convinced of this also which I think no conscientious understanding Christian will deny That though the making of such a law may be a sin in the law-maker yet when that law is made if it command not sin it is to be obeyed by the subject e. g. if a law be made rashly without that serious consideration of the necessities expediencies and benefit of the people for whom it is made this is sinful in the law-maker who is bound to use all care circumspection and prudence and advice that is possible conveniently to be had again if a law do too much disproportion the offences and penalties laying on a grievous and heavie censure or capital punishment upon a light or trivial offence supposing no ill consequences likely to ensue of an higher nature for this alters the case much and makes the offence great in the circumstances which is inconsiderable in the particular matter or inflicting onely a slight inconsiderable censure on an hainâ—us transgression or capital crime This would be an evil because unequal and unjust law but it is evil only in the form of it and notwithstanding this doth still oblige the subject to obedience because the matter enjoyned is not evil but may be done and the offences punished are really offences and may not be done The formal injustice in the law in the disproportioning of the penalties is only the sin of the law-maker and he alone shall answer it and that only to the Lord above him It is the matter only which concerneth the Subject And the sin of the law-giver can be no plea to justifie the subject in the breach of the Law when it is once made and given for a Law Sect. 12 All these are principles so evident both by Scripture and Reason that all sober Christians I think and all Protestant Divines that I know do agree in them even those who yet scruple in the particular case of the Common Prayer and Rites of the Church of England will I presume subscribe to these general things of the Obligation of Laws made by a just Authority upon the Conscience And I am confident were these things duly considered and seriously weighed there would be much more peace and charity in the Church even among and with those whose judgements do dissent about some particular practices of and laws in the Church Sect. 13 Well then to apply these generals to the particular case in hand about the prescribed Liturgy and the Rites therein ordained 1. There is we all know a Law establishing this made by unquestionable authority An Act of Parliament legally summoned legally chosen justly constituted confirmed by the Royal assent whose only stamp and fiat gives Laws their being and makes them perfect Acts valid and obliging Sect. 14 2. This Law requires the actual use of this Book of all Ministers upon very severe penalties Now though the penalties have their proper use for that purpose to which they are ordained viz. to preserve the Law from contempt of men to preserve the peace of the Church which might otherwise be violated by some who make no Conscience of the duty enjoyned and to prevail with some spirits to do that which otherwise they would not do The fear of wrath being one motive though not the only one and though not the principal but of an inferiour and lower yet not of no consideration Yet the Conscience of duty is the principal thing that should in this case oblige our conformity For being convinced and agreeing upon the fore named principles that the Laws of a just Authority do oblige us in Conscience to yield actual Obedience so that it is not indifferent whether we obey or no we must also be convinced that we are bound to obey this Law nor can be excused of sin if we do not supposing in this we should not break our higher Obligation to the Law of God Sect. 15 3. All the work then which we have now to do is to examine the Liturgy it self and consider what we are required to do whether this be evil or repugnant to the Law of God or no for this case as far as concerns our practice admitteth no other consideration For the Law is made and a Law is granted to have an Obligation upon the Conscience and though it should be supposed there were some sin the Law-giver or inequality in the form of the Law or that it is not so good as it might be or we wish it were and that the things required are not antecedently necessary to be done yet if the things be in themselves lawful to be performed there is without all peradventure an Obligation upon Conscience to perform them Sect. 16 Let us then examine the matter of
space of 1400 yeares the Churches have had their stinted Liturgies There we [i] ibid. c. 4. answ to object 8. find Cyprian Ambrose Chrysostome Augustine all acknowledged to allow some to have devised and composed such Formes There we read of [k] ibid. c. 7. Arg. 6. Petrus Diaconus and others sent from the East to Rome in their book to Fulgentius and other Bishops of Affrica rehearsing a Prayer of Basils Liturgy which they say almost the whole East frequented There we are told [l] ibid ex Clem. l. 8. Constit Apost cap. 16. the Sursum Corda lift up your he arts and the peoples answer We lift them up to the Lord were anciently in use if not even from the Apostles times And though divers passages speak those Liturgies under the name of Basil Chrysostom c. to be of a later date yet that divers things in them were of antient use in the Church and that such particular Actions Passages and Rites as the Deacons [m] ibid. c. 7. answ to obj 3. Oremus Attendamus Let us pray Let us attend c. and then the Reader beginning c. do argue that there was some publick Liturgy Formes and Rites in those early dayes And now having for the necessity of our obedience the command of the Church and State we live in for the warrant of our practice the Word of God and example of the Saints the Church in the Primitive times among whom we find the footsteps of several Liturgies with many of the same particulars as in ours of which more hereafter for which we might preduce a cloud of witnesses I can see no reason why it should be a sin in us more than in them to observe such a practice Sect. 22 Formes in the Reformed Churches Nor is a Forme strange to but approved and used in the Reformed Churches in these later dayes The Bohemian which I reckon the first the French Dutch Geneva these three Presbyterial have one It would be long to site particular testimonies this one Mr. Ball will be instar omnium who not onely (n) Ball ibid. c. 5. answ to obj 7. doth acknowledge it but makes it his plea as a thing notoriously known even to the Separatists They those Separatists know saith he [o] ibid. c. 6. answ to obj 5. that all the Reformed Churches since the light of the Gospel began to shine forth unto the world until this day do allow and maintain the use of a stinted form c. Further if any man [p] Ibid. cap 7. answ 10 cbj 8. saith he desire an instance of their doings let him compare the Prayer which [q] Zepper de polit eccles l. 2. c. 4. Beza constantly used before Calvin opuse P. ec Eccles formulae Bez in Cant. Hom. 1. and after Sermon with the Geneva book of Common Prayer so that here we find the practice even of Geneva it self Obj. If any object these were not exacted of all Ministers at all times nor imposed but every one left free to use them or any other the like Sect. 23 Answ 1. I might return what [q] Ball. Ibid. Mr. Ball doth suppose this true which yet will not be fully proved yet this proves they did both use and allow such a practice though they enacted it not but Sect. 24 2. If they imposed not yet they never threw out a composed Liturgy when they reformed themselves they did not cast away all forms but reformed them and made them better Onely these Churches that of Scotland first then this of England writing after their Copy if that may be called the act of the Church which indeed was not but the actings of some men in it and who had no legal call to do it and I am not alone but many other truly Religious Spirits are of the same mind I shall give instance of one in this case beyond exception it was that well known well approved much respected Mr. Jam's Cranford the elder He in discourse sometime with me in Tunbridge while he lay here upon the account of health to drink our waters did tell me his manner of laying down the use of our Common Prayer That he used it as long as any who were suffered to enjoy their livings and when he laid it by having first vindicated it from the exceptions laid against it he declared That he would not have laid it down had not he been forced by the fury of a faction and if ever it should please God to give the liberty to use it again he would take it up with much more readinesse and joy then he laid it down These were his expressions as near as I can remember in his own words I am sure not at all varying from the sense of what he then spake but this by the way to shew that this was not the act of the Church but however England and Scotland were the only ones that ever I read of any setled Church who threw out an established setled Liturgy and owned none For the other reformed Churches whether they imposed their forms or no it is certain they did both use and allow the use of them Sect. 25 4. Shall I add the judgement of particular men Take one or two infallibly far enough from warping towards the Romish Superstitions In the Church of Geneva we have these two Calvin and Beza the passages cited before prove their judgements to have allowed them and Calvin we find not only for the use but for the binding of the several Ministers to the use of them His words are [r] Quod ad formulam precum valde probo utilla câ—ta exstet a qua pastoribus dis edere in functione non liceat Calv. Ep. 87. As for a form of Prayers I do very much approve of it that it be one certain fixed stated form from which it may not be lawful for the pastors in in their function to depart for our own even non-conformists One shall give testimony for all [s] Ball Tryal of grounds of separat c 7. ansar to obj 8. The Ministers to whom the use of the Common Prayer hath been thought most burthensome have from time to time expressed their liking and approbation of a stinted Liturgy that they like well enough of that councel which forbad vulgar Psalmes in the service of God and those forms of service which are not [t] Conc. Lacâ—ic Can. 59. Conc. Carth. 3. Can. 23. Conc. Milen Can. 12. Conc. Affric Can. 70. antea probata in concilio vel cum prudentioribus collata least happily some things against faith either through ignorance or want of consideration should be composed That they Never sought a razing of the Communion book but a filing it after the pattern of that care which former examples bad set them wherein they thought many things retained that might have been spared They have Evermore condemned voluntary separation from the Congregations and Assemblies or Negligent Frequenting of the publick
but the Holy Scriptures that is as such as Canonical or under the name of Holy Scripture as is to be seen in that Council of Carthage where they allow the reading of others in their proper place and for their proper end and this farther appeares by that of the Council of Hippo which abridging that 3 d of Carthage gives us this account of it (x) Scripturae Canonicae l â—gendae quae sunt praeter quas aliae non legantur Conc. Hippon Can. 36. These are the Holy Scriptures to be read in the Church and besides these let no other be read i. e. no other for such or for Holy Scripture It is the unquestionable prerogative of the Sacred Scriptures to be the prime and supreme rule of Faith and Manners and nothing is to be read as such viz. as the undoubted or immediate rule of either but the Scriptures alone and therefore by those ancient Fathers and Councils they were accounted onely Canonical and none else admitted for Trial of Truth or proof of Doctrine But yet all Apochrypha were not accounted either prophane or impious but there were some called (y) Ecclesiastici à majoribus appellati quia in ecclesia recepti c. Jo. Drus de quaest per epist 107. Ecclesiastical because received and read in the Church among other godly books though not as a rule of Faith yet as instruction in manners hence those books were of old called in a sort Canonical or Deutero-Canonici not equal to the Scriptures but went after them in a secondary place and preferred before others In this sense I take that of St. Austin speaking of the times after Haggai Zechary and Malachy (z) Aug. de civ â—â— Dei lib. 18. c. 36. Quorum supputatio Temporum The supputation of which times saith he is not found in holy Scripture called Canonical but in others which though the Jewes do not yet our Church doth reckon for Canonical i. e. in a secondary place such for in another place he speaks otherwise of them [a] In Apocryphis eist invenitur aliqua veritas tamen propter multa falsa est Canonica authoritas August de civit Dei lib. 15. Cap. 23. In the Apocrypha though there be found some truth yet because of the many falshoods there is no Canonical authority i.e. properly such But by these testimonies it is clear that they were read in the Church though not as the undoubted rule of faith yet as instructions builded thereupon Sect. 18 And that they might be so read we have the concurring judgements of others also of later dayes even in the Reformed Churches yea of some Non-conformists [b] See Balls Trial of Separ Ch. 7. Answ to Object 6. here also He that pleaseth may see c) See Hutton Answ to Reasons chap. 10. gathered to his hand the judgments of (d) Zanth de Relig. c. 1. artâ—â— 4 et 5. Zanchy (e) Hiper lib. 1. Meâ—h Theol. Hiperius (f) Pellic. praefat in Apochryph et praefat in Judith Pellican one highly esteemed by Bucer Zuinglius and Melancthon and the learned in those days and g) Kimedonc de Script verb Dei l. 6. c 90. Kimedoncius a Professor of Divinity at Hidelburgh who have judged these books to have been received next to the Scriptures with great reverence profitably rehearsed fruitful and profitable to the edifieation of the people not Canons of faith but instructions for manners 2. Neither hath our Church received or prescribed them in any other notion a mark of distinction is set upon them they being called no other than Apocrypha and therefore cannot rationally be judged to be prescribed as Canonical especially when the expresse words of our (h) Artic. 6. of the Church of England Articles are The other books as St. Hierom saith the Church doth read for example of life and instruction of manners but doth not apply them to establish any doctrine and these are the third of Esdras and the rest that follow Sect. 19 3. Nor can our reading of them though in that time and place be with reason judged to put an higher authority upon them than the Church hath done which prescribeth them Yea though they are read for instruction and example it followeth not that we are taught to practice every thing or imitate every particular in any example there or to esteem every action good any more than we are to practice or imitate every thing that we read done in the Scriptures The reading of (i) Gen. 9.21 Noahs being drunk (k) Gen. 19.33 35 36. Lots incest (l) Gen. 42.15 Joseph swearing by the life of Pharaoh (m) 2 Sam. 11 4-18 12.9 Davids adultery and murder (n) 1 King 11.5 Solomons idolatry (o) Num. 12.1 Aaron and Miriams sedition (p) Act. 15.39 Paul and Barnabas's angry parting (q) Matth. 26.70 Peters denial and (r) Gal. 2.11 Sect. 20. dissimulation c. is neither an allowance of these infirmities nor a ground to practice the like There are other uses of examples than imitation they are in cautelam as well as in sequelam for caution as well as instruction Nor can there be any more allowance of all the actions lies or fumigations in Tobit or Judith by reading them than there is of those other So that yet here is nothing to conclude it sinful to read these books according to the order prescribed The highest that can be imagined is which yet I dare not determine or may be want of Prudence in requiring them but no shadow of unlawfulnesse in obeying the prescription which is Sect. 21. Except 4. The Absolution Answered but to read these Books not to justifie every thing in them Sect. 22 4. For that other exception taken to that Form of Absolution in the visitation of the sick in these words I absolve thee This I conceive is of very little weight to be stood upon For 1. That such authority is given to the Ministers is and must be granted by all that acknowledge them to have any interest in the power of the Keyes and clearly given to them by Christ in that (s) Joh. 20.23 Whose soever sins ye remit they are remitted From whence if any where we must fetch the ground of our Commission and Ministery and is so expressely signified by the order of our Church in her (t) Form of Order Briests Sect. 23. Ordinations 2. Nor do we without warrant agreeably to our Commission John 20. say By this authority committed to me I absolve thee When it is clear we do not that which is proper to God alone (u) Mar. 2.7 10. and to Jesus Christ as God actually to grant a pardon nor pretend to a power to free from any penalty due from God to sin nor as Judges give the sentence but only as Ministers under Christ and authorized by him declare that sentence and this not absolutely but expressely upon condition of sincere repentance
one Glory of the Sun another of the Moone another of the Stars He that made all things of nothing made them in Order and placed them in Order being made Where Order ſ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is maintained the universe stands fast in its strength is preserved in its beauty This being destroyed there follow Thunders and stormes in the aire Earthquakes in the land Inundations of the Sea Seditions in Cities and houses sicknesses in the bodies sinnes in the soules of men All which are not names of Order and Peace but of Trouble and Confusion Again Order is the security of all that existeth therefore hath God so appointed in his Church that some should be Pastors some Shcep some command others obey one as the Head some as Eyes Hands Feet c. All are of the same Body yet all have not the same Place or Office The Eye goeth not but directeth the Feet see not the Tongue heares not nor doth the Eare speake but all in their own place and Order So in the Church we are one hody all joyned to the Lord by the same spirit yet is there difference in our places Governours distinguished from Subjects and the t 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 guides also among themselves for as much as u 1 Cor. 14.32 the spirit of the Prophets are subject to the Prophets Contend not saith he when Saint Paul tells you God hath set in his Church first Apostles secondarily Prophets then Teachers c. those distinct Orders and offices All must not be Tongue nor all Prophets as he there goes on exactly agreeable to the Apostles x 1 Cor. 12.12 31. Doctrine keep up Order sacred and inviolate in the Church and we preserve our Peace 2. § 19. Being placed in this Order let us be especially carefull of the duties and works of our own place To what purpose is Order if we will observe none To what purpose distinct places and offices if we strictly keep not to the works of those places where we are set Never expect peace while we do 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 y 1 Pet. 4.15 act as an over-busie Bishop in anothers Diocesse and Poly-pragmatically busie our selves in other mens matters offices and places They are noted as disorderly walkers z 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Thes 3.11 who are idle carelesse do nothing of their own works but are over-workers too too busie in things which do not concern them and in works to which they are not called and it will be strange if they be not found evil-workers also The Apostle a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Pet 4.15 puts them together as very near of kin These are the constant Seedsmen of Rebellion and Sedition in the State of Schisme and Contention in the Church This therefore is the strict charge of the Gospel that b 1 Cor. 7.20 24. every one abide in his own place and in doing the works of that place c Phil. 2.12 work out his own salvation He must bear his own d Gal. 6.4 5. burden it will be then his wisedom to employ himself in doing and proving his own works This is the way to quietnesse and peace in the Apostles account who gives this Order in the Church That all men e 1 Thes 4.11 study to be quiet and to do their own businesse 3. § 20 We must conscientiously obey our Superiours in all things where we should not sinne against God This follows upon the former If ORDER be of God as no doubt it is he hath commanded some to Rule some to obey then whilest we are under command a necessity of obedience is laid upon us by the same God It is not our work to examine whether our Governours discharge the duty of their places but to see that we do our own We are not called to examine what power they have in every thing to command nor doth it concern us to enquire whether all these impositions and strict injunctions of such Circumstances Rites or Formes be justly laid upon us by them they shall bear their own burden and if they have not well used their Authority they alone shall be accountable But all that we have to do is to consider how farre we may obey howsoever they may mistake in imposing yet we are to look how farre we may comply with the things when they are imposed When the Gospel hath laid such an indispensible obligation upon us to obey our lawfull Superiours in all lawfull things if we would preserve our peace let us look upon a due obedience as a thing so sacred that no lower matter than sin against the most high God may excuse us from it 4. § 21 Though we may differ in some opinions and private sentiments yet still see that peace be sacred and that with difference of opinions we maintain Love and Charity Particular judgments and the interest of an opinion especially in matters of circumstance are but private things and concern but particular persons But peace and love is the interest of the body it concernes the publick profit and the good yea the very being of the Church for it is not a Church unless united and embodied It is not possible that we should all see with the same eyes or that every thing should have the same relish and savour to every palate that all men should be of the same judgement All are not perfect yet it is not onely possible but a duty that we should all be of one heart f Jer. 32.39 Acts 4.32 Phil. 2.2 and walk in one way and bear the same affections of love one to another Some are weak others strong but let not the strong despise g Rom. 14.3 10. the weak nor the weak judge the strong so shall both together maintain a peaceable Communion There may be variety of Ceremonies and about these variety of opinions yet when love is continued that variety commendeth the unity of faith Faith is the bond that binds Christians in one body and this must be the same can be but one but variety of opinions if without pertinacy and in lower matters may well stand with unity But nothing is so contrary to the Church as schisme and division There were in the antient Churches as great differences in such matters as about Easter Fasting c. and yet they maintained love among themselves Irenaeus sharply reproving Victor for breaking peace by excommunicating the Eastern Churches over which he had no power for the only difference in a circumstance of a day It was the Character of the Christians in those dayes that h Christiani amant paene antequam norunt Tertul. alicubi They loved one another before they knew one another Though they knew not one another by face though they varied in their several Rites yet they loved one another as Christians What Basil the Great saith of i 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Basil apud Greg.
Law of full Authority and this Covenant imposed by those whose Authority as to such a thing is justly questioned and expresly against the Royal Assent which is essential to a Law of England And can it with any shadow of Reason be denied to be lawful to subscribe to that Government which was established of Old and is restored and re-established now by unquestionable and the Soveraign Authority and when we are only required obedience not to condemn all other Forms but only to acknowledge this and this also as good and lawful and agreeable to the Word of God Let but men seriously make these reflections in their unprejudiced thoughts and give an impartial judgment and they will see no worse conditions required of them than they themselves did sometimes put upon their Brethren and nothing required which is in it self evil but what may lawfully be submitted to without sin yea and ought to be submitted to rather than violate the Peace or make a Schism and Division in the Church Sect. 75 2. Having dispatched this matter of Ordination the remaining difficulty is about the matter of Re-ordination The matter of Re-ordination stated and cleared This is accounted a thing unsufferable that those who were ordained and received a Commission to the Evangelical Ministry must now be forced in effect to deny that Ministry so received and take it up again from the hands of the Bishop But In answer to this Scruple I say Sect. 76 1. It will be granted that this is a question that hath not been much disputed and the examples of the practice are rare in the Church There are said to be some Ancient Canons which deny and forbid it And one of those called the Apostles Canons confessedly later than the Apostles whose names they bear decreeth That (a) Si quis Episcopus aut Presbyter aut Diaconus secundam ab aliquâ— ordinationem susceperit deponitor tam ipse qui ipsum ordinarit Can. Ap. 67. Both the Re-ordainer and the Re-ordained shall be deposed I know also there is a common Saw in the Romish Church in that old Fryers verse or thing like a verse Bis (b) B. Baptismus O. Ordo C. Confirmatio BOC non dantur sed (c) E. Eucharistia M. Matrimonium P. Pâ—nitentia U. Unctio extrema EMPV reiterantur The Fathers in the Trent Conventicle anathematizing all that shall deny the indelible character imprinted by those three of their Sacraments Baptism Orders and Confirmation which they deny therefore to be reiterated But what this indelible character is they have not told us nor do we find where the Scriptures mention it nor is it that I know of such reckoning among Protestants But though these deny it yet can any thing hence be an Argument to prove it unlawful to submit to it Those who herein dissent will not think themselves bound in other things to be tyed up either by those Apostolical Canons or those other Councils in the business of Episcopacy and why then obliged in this which they determine with no more Authority And much less are we to be swayed by the Popish decisions who acknowledge neither their Authority nor understand their indelible character especially considering Sect. 77 2. That this is not a thing so strange or new in some Protestant Churches a learned man (d) Humph. of Reordin Sect. 2. p. 22. who it seems hath studied this point for the satisfaction of his own conscience as to his own practice doth furnish us with these two Testimonies for the Books I confess I have not by me to examine one of Chemnitius who saith (e) Chemnit Exam. Conc. Trid. de Charactere Quod Baptismus non sit iterandus de magna re agitur Pactum gratia in illo nobiscum Deus in it Illud vero quod Baptismè proprium est ut se noniterctur ad suos oâ—dines transtulerunt That Baptism is not to be repeated is a thing of weight because in that God enters into a Covenant of grace with us But what is proper to Baptism viz. That it may not be reiterated They i. e. the Trent Fathers for which he blames them have transferred to their own orders too Surely if this denial of iteration of orders be blameable in the Papists as in that learned mans judgment it is it cannot be blamed in us to allow it unless to deny and allow be the same thing The other is Dr. Baldwin that learned Professor at Wittenberg giving his judgment in this case which he putteth thus viz. Whether a man ordained by the Papists may be ordained again by us In his answer he maintains the no necessity but clearly alloweth the lawfulness of it (f) Baldvin de Casib Consc l. 4 c. 6. cas 6. Quod siquis existimet se tranquilliùs suo in nostris Ecclesiis offic o persungi posse si etiam nostris ritibis ad sacro-sanctum ministerium utatur nibil obstat quin ordinationem 〈◊〉 nostris accipere possit nec enim cadem est ratio Ordinationis ac Baptismi qui iterari non potest â—ecenim Sacramentum est Ecclesia illa autem externus tantum ritâ—â— If any man saith he think that he can with more tranquility or freedom perform his office and duty in our Churches if also he use our Rites i. e. enter our way into the Sacred Ministry nothing hindereth but that he may also receive Ordination from ours for there is not the same reason of Ordination as of Baptism which may not be iterated for this is a Sacrament that only an external Rite of the Church Sect. 78 3. That the former Bishops of England were against a Re-ordination is confessed but withal it must be acknowledged that the case with them and among us now is far different The question then was concerning the admission and reception of those who had received Orders in Forraign Churches of the Presbyterian way as the Scottish Dutch or French for several instances may be given of some of them received and admitted into English livings and preferments The question was Whether these being ordained only by Presbyteries the Churches from whence they came having no Bishops they should be re-ordained here before they should be admitted to English livings who had an Episcopacy over them In this case they concluded in the Negative and that charitably and like Christians for in those Churches which had no Bishop an indispensable necessity lieth upon all that will be ordained to receive their orders in the way that is current among them or they must have none And I never heard of any of our Church that did upon that account pronounce their Ordination null or their Ministry void but did acknowledge it though not so regular as they judged it should be yet valid being done (g) Si Orthodoxi Presbyteri ne pereat Ecclesia alios Presbyteros cogantâ—â— ordinare ego non ausim bujusmodi ordinationes pronunciare irritas Daven Determ Quaest 42. If the
now will m Isai 58 5. afflict our souls and keep under our body and bring it into subjection that we may testifie the n Psal 35.13 reality of our sorrow the sincerity of our repentance that we indeed turn to God that we now may with more earnestnesse beg o Gen. 3.8 9 10. and with confidence hope to receive pardon Or 2. When p Jud. 20 26. 1 Sam. 7.6 Dan. 9.3 2 Chron. 20.3 Esth 4.1 16. Joel 1.3 with 2.12 13 14 15 1 King 21.29 2 King 22.19 20. Judgments are upon us or expected or feared to humble our souls and mourn and weep and pray that so we may avert the indignation of God Or 3. When some eminent service is to be performed to which is required an especial assistance when solemn Prayers and Supplications are to be sent up when q Act. 13.3 4. 14.23 Apostles or Preachers to be ordained to the work of the Gospel and sent out to Minister to the Gentiles In these and such cases it is needfull to Fast that we may be as more serious in our Repentance so more fervent in our Prayers more quick and lively in all those holy performances Full stomacks beget heavinesse and security and a filled body is more stupid and dull that the soal cannot so nimbly performe its operations For this end I suppose did r Luk. 2.37 Anna the Prophetesse in the Gospell joyne Fastings to her Prayers that by this meanes she might better fit her soule and compose her spirit for her devotions For this reason among others it is that we find so often Å¿ Mat. 17.21 1 Cor. 7.5 Fasting and Prayer joyned together § 8 2. That the Magistrates and Governors both in Church and State may appoint the set and solemne dayes of such Fasting and Religious exercises I think all sober pious men do as little doubt I need not cite the stated Fasts in the Jewish Church nor those of the Christians in the elder times our own constant practice shewes that we have ever esteemed it lawfull and have obeyed How frequent is it for our Kings and Parliaments upon solemn occasions to appoint dayes of Fasting and Prayer to seeke God whether to remove his Judgments or to blesse some great worke in hand and who ever in his right wits questioned this And this not only upon particular emergent occasions but at constant times stated and fixed for those who may command a Fast at one time may also another and upon the continuance of the occasions continue also the solemnity of the Fast as with us we were for some years enjoyned by Royall Authority and did observe a monethly Fast and if monethly the same by like Authority may be done quarterly or yearly for ever these constant occasions for ever continuing whilest we are in this state of corruption and the Church continues Militant These things are in generall acknowledged in Thesi But § 9 3. When we come to the Hypothesis and a particular case we find a difference in the judgements of men The Lent or Quadrages Fast The main exception is to the Lent or Quadragessimall Fast and it is therefore made one of the desires of the Divines in the conference That there may be nothing in the Liturgy to countenance the Lent as a Religious Fast c. § 10 Now as to the observation of Lent I shall propound but these things 1. That it is a civill constitution is evident Stated and vindicated 1. As a civil Constitution and that it is a thing within the spheare and under the power of the Magisrate and that the Act of 5. Eliz. forbidding the eating of Flesh for a time upon a politick consideration for the breed of cattell the health of mens bodies the encouragement of Fishing and Navigation c. is an wholsome and good Law may not be questioned and that so far we are bound toobey none that I know denieth let us do so much let us obey the Law in this abstinence and for the ground of it though every man do abound in his own sence this matters not our peace will be sufficiently secured If we may obey the Constitution so far as the Law requireth us I know no reason that any sober peaceable man can have to start a new question and find out a scruple to be a plea for disobedience upon a dispute of Religion in that observance 2. § 11 Yet consider it also as the matter of a Religious observation Is this of such a nature 2. As a Religious abâ—â—â—ation how far to be owned so criminall and so unlawfull that it may by no meanes be admitted Consider it well we shall finde no such matter For 1. Can it be criminal Yea is it not laudable for the Church in her Constitutions for us in our practise from temporall and civill occurrents to excit and promote Religious duties Doth not Christ himself take occasion t Jon. 4.7 15. from the water of Jacobs-well to instruct the Samaritan woman and to shew her where is the living water and how she may attain it And from u Joh. 6 per to the Miracles of the loaves take occasion to preach himself the bread from Heaven that feedeth to life eternall and how can it be a sin either in the Governors of our Church upon occasion of a politick Law made for some kind of abstinence to prescribe or in us to obey such a prescription the practice of a religious mortification and by an holy use of this abstinence to prepare our souls for a solemne communicating at the Feast approaching yea why it should not be commendable I confesse my eyes are too dull to discover 2. § 12 Neither doth this clash at all with the Statute which condemneth those who preach or write that any eating of Fish or forbearing of Flesh mentioned there is of any necessity for the saving of the soul of man or is the service of God otherwise than other Politick Laws are or may be c. For Who doth so who saith so The Statute is expresse against the Popish Doctrines and practices and alloweth not the opinion of any worth or holinesse in the opus operatum as the Romanists speak nor putteth any difference upon the account of Religion in Meates or Drinkes or Times perfectly agreeably to the x 1 Cor. 6.12 13. 1 Tim. 4.3 4 5. Heb. 13.9 Col 2.16 20.21 Apostolicall Canon But when by occasion of this politick Law the Church calls upon us to improve it to an holy end and from a civill observance to performe an holy duty where is the sin where is the contrariety who ever taught that there was matter of Religion in eating Fish or Flesh but that we may by sober abstinence learne to practise an holy mortification who ever doubted 3. § 13 If we say it be unlawfull to be observed we must condemne the constant practice of the Christian Church not of latter and corrupter but