Scripture were not inspired of God for as God is true so is his Word Ioh. 17. 17. sweetly agreeing with it self and every part with other these Books commend false things as true and approve things evil as right Iudith Chap. 9. v. 2. commends killing the Sichemites against Gen. 49. 6 7. 2 Maccab. 14 42. Razis is commended for killing himself the fact is not only related but commended also in these words nobly manfully and this commendation doth plainly shew that the Author thereof was not inspired of God When the Dâ—natists out of this Book urged that it was lawful for them to kill themselves as Razis did Augustine then was forced to acknowledge That the Authority of this Book was uncertain and questionable and proves it by the judgement of the Jewish Church Christ and the Christians Manifest Fables are told in some of them for true Histories as that of Toby Iudith Bel and the Dragon If any desire a particular confutation of the several Books of the Apocrypha I commend to his reading that learned Treatise of Dr Raynolds de libris Apocryphis who hath so exactly handled this subject that to write of it after him were to write Iliads after Homer or to draw a line after Apelles 5. The most ancient Fathers and Councels which lived the best and first five hundred years after Christ rejected the same Books which we doe Ierome on Matth. 23. saith concerning a Testimony cited out of the Apocrypha Hoc quoniam ex Scriptura nihil habet authoritatis eadem facilitate rejicitur qua profertur Because this hath no authority out of Scripture it may as easily be rejected as it is offered All that the Papists object for these Books in the general is That the third Councel at Carthage the Florentire Councel and that of Trent do approve the said Books to be Canonical as also Augustine and Innocentius To which it may be answered 1. That the Councel of Carthage was but a Provincial Councel and therefore it cannot binde the whole world Moreover in that Councel there are divers things which the Papists will not endure as in the 26 Canon there is a Decree that no Bishop shall be called chief or universal Bishop no not the Bishop of Rome how should the Papists binde us with the authority of that Councel with which they will not binde themselves 2. The Latine Fathers judged these Books fit to be read for example of life and instruction of manners but not for confirmation of faith or establishing any Doctrine 3. These Books are not Proto-canonical truly and properly Canonical inspired by God containing the immediate and unchangeable truth of God sanctified by him and given to the Church to be a perfect rule of sound doctrine and good life but Deutero-canonical or rather Ecclesiastical as they are styled In this sense Augustine and Innocentius are to be taken when they reckon these Books among the Canonicall 4. No Councel hath Authority to define what Books are Canonicall what not seeing Books truely Divine receive Authority from God himself and are to be esteemed of undoubted truth although all the world should bark against them These two Councels are of too late standing to oppose against the other ancient Councels which reject these Books The Councel of Trent was gathered and kept against all Civil and Ecclesiastical Right neither was there any forme of justice observed in it 1. It was not kept in a lawfull place for whereas it was intended against the Protestants and the Germans were the parties accused it ought to have been kept in Germany according to the request exhibited by the Body of the States of Germany assembled at Noremberg this equity was not observed the parties accused being called into Italy 2. In that Councel matters were concluded and the sentence passed the adversary not being heard speak nor so much as present for the Protestants might not be admitted to hearing neither could they obtain to propound their opinion in the Councel much lesse to avouch it by lawfull reasoning Sleidan fol. 29. and yet were condemned against Divine and Humane Law for they both forbid the condemning of any before he have lawfull liberty granted him to plead for himself 3. In that Councel the Accuser and Judge were the same for the Pope did accuse the Protestants of Heresie he did convocate the Councel he by his Delegates was President and Moderator in it and so together was Accuser Judge and Witnesse whereas the Reformation of the Pope was the thing in question Lastly All Councels ought to be free but in this Protestants might not propound their cause nor defend it neither might any thing be proposed but according to the minde of the Legates or otherwise then they approved no man had any voice in the Councel but such as were sworn to the Pope nothing was there determined which was not first concluded of at Rome by the Pope in the Colledge of Cardinals and sent from Rome to Trent whereupon this Proverb arose Spiritum Sanctum Roma per peram mitti Tridentum The holy Ghost came to Trent packt up in a Cloke-bag We hope therefore since the Apocrypha are justly rejected out of the Canon that hereafter they will neither have the honour to be bound with our Bibles nor read in our Churches The Apocrypha was never received by the Church of the Israelites before Christ his coming nor of the Apostolick and Primitive Church for more then three hundred years after as both Eusebius out of Origen and the Councel of Laodicea Can. 59. confirmed afterward by the sixth general Councel of Constantinople sheweth for the Greek Church and St Ierom for the Latine CHAP. VI. Of the Authentical Edition of the Scripture NOw we must enquire which is the Authentical Edition of holy Scriptures it being necessary that this heavenly truth committed to writing should be delivered in some form of words and in some language which may be understood Lawyers from whom the use of the word Authentick seemeth borrowed do call those instruments and writings Authentick which have a certain and just authority in themselves A Book or writing is Authentick either by Divine or humane institution those are by Divine Appointment and Institution authentical which have from God sufficient and absolute Authority to command and approve themselves worthy credit and faith in as much as God himself doth approve them by humane Institution such writings are held authentical which by the opinion and sentence of learned men in their several professions may be esteemed worthy credit and belief for themselves and for the truth in them There is a great diversity of Editions of holy Scripture all cannot be simply and perpetually Authentical in of and for themselves without reference unto another no more then many draughts of the same Lease or Deed or copy of one pardon can be Some amongst many are authentick whence the others are transcribed yea
comforts of this life so farre as comlinesse and necessity will permit that we may be more seriously humbled before God and more fervent in prayer 1 Cor. 7. 5. Ioel 2. 14 15 16. Dan. 9. 1 2 3. 10. 1 2 3. Ezra 8. 21. It hath the name of Fasting from one most sensible part viz. the abstinence from food denominating the whole exercise We must abstain 1. From bodily labours and worldly businesse For the time of the Fast hath the nature of a Sabbath It is called by the Prophet Ioel a solemnity or day of prohibition Ioel 1. 4. 2. 15. wherein men are forbidden to do any work as the Lord expoundeth that word Lev. 23. 36. Deut. 16. 8. 2. Food there must be a total abstinence from meat and drink so farre as our health will permit 2 Sam. 3. 35. Ezra 9. 6. Esth. 4. 16. Ion. 3. 7. Act. 9. 9. 3. From sleep in part David lay upon the ground all night 2 Sam. 12. 26. See Esth. 4. 3. Ioel 1. 13. 4. From costly attire Exod. 33. 5 6. heretofore they wore sackcloth and lay in ashes and used all those actions which might humble them in Gods presence 5. Carnal delights Ioel 2. 16. 1 Cor. 7. 5. 6. The end must be religious to be better fitted for prayer and seeking of God The ends of a Fast are two humiliation and reconciliation as appeareth Levit. 23. 26. to 33. The things in which the Fast must be spent are exercises fitting these ends The means 1. of Humiliation are Natural or Spiritual The Natural are forbearance of food both meat and drink so farre as it may stand with our ability and not hinder ut from praying and good meditations as also of work and labour wherefore it is called sanctifying a Fast Levit. 23. 28. Ioel 1. 14. and all natural delights otherwise lawful Ioel 2. 16. 1 Cor. 7. 5. and lastly of costly attire Ionah 3. 8. To appear in a mean habit is a natural help of abasing our selves but in private Fasting we are bid to anoint our selves Matth. 6. that we may not appear to fast The Spiritual helps are chiefly four 1. Examining our hearts and lives that we may finde out our manifold sins Lam. 3. 40. 2. The aggravation of our sins by considering their hainousnesse in regard of the ill effects and the like 3. Confessing them and judging our selves for them 4. Praying for the Spirit to humble us bemoaning our own hardnesse These are Means for humiliation The Means secondly of Reconciliation are two First To plant in our selves a firm purpose of leaving sinne Isa. 1. 16 18. by considering the necessity profit and difficulty of leaving sinne and Gods promises to help us and by fervent prayers to him to encline our hearts to his testimonies and to strengthen us that sin may not overcome us Secondly To settle our hearts in a stedfast confidence of his mercy in Christ pardoning and accepting us This may be wrought by considering the multitude of Gods mercies the infinitenesse of Christs merits the largenesse of Gods promises and the examples of those whom he hath pardoned and then by crying earnestly to him to strengthen our faith and seal up our adoption to us by his Spirit The usual time of a Fast is a natural day from Even to Even or from Supper to Supper Iudg. 20. 26. 2 Sam. 1. 12. 3. 35. Iosh 7. 6. We reade of a three dayes Fast in Nineveh â—onah 3. 7. and in Esther and her Maids and in Paul Acts 9. 9. and of seven dayes Fast 1 Sam. 12. 16 17 18. and of Daniels Fast abstaining from all pleasant bread and drink and giving himself to prayer and humiliation for three whole weeks Daniel 10. 1 2. And we reade of Fasting alone till Even Iudges 20. 23 26. 21. 2. 2 Samuel 1. 12. 3. 36. Such a Fast may either be kept of many together a whole Congregation publickly or by a few that is a Family or two privately or else by one alone secretly as we may perceive in the former examples In private and solitary Fasting we should carry the matter so that it may be private and we may not appear to Fast. Some think it not therefore convenient for so many to meet in a private Fast as may make the face of a Congregation and that go beyond the number of a usual family or two for this say they is to turn a private duty into a publick The times for Fasting are First When Gods judgements are ready to fall upon us either personal or publick judgements then there is reason for a private or publick Fast so Ezra's Fast was because of the great desolations upon the Church and Esthers because of the bloudy Proclamation to kill all the Jews Secondly When we desire to obtain any publick or particular good so Act. 13. when they desired publick good on the Ministery they fasted and prayed So Hannah for her particular she fasted and prayed for a childe When we undertake any great and dangerous businesse for which we need Gods help See Matth. 4. 2. 17. 21. Act. 13. 24. 14. 23. Thirdly When we are pressed with some speciall sinne 1 Corinth 9. 27. 2 Cor. 12. 8. A man is not bound to an acknowledgement of all his particular sinnes when he comes solemnly to humble himself before God He hath not such clear light to discern sinne not so faithful a memory to retain it nor is not so watchfull to consider his wayes Psal. 19. 12. 40. 12. Eccles. 1. 15. A general repentance sufficeth because he that truly repents of all known sins repents of all sins After some scandalous fals we must be more particular Psal. 51. David chiefly spends his sorrow on that great sin In deep distresse we must search diligently to finde out the sin that provokes God Psal. 32. We should rise early on a Fast 2 Sam. 12. 16. Ioel 1. 13. It is probable that for this cause some lay on the ground others in sackcloth in the night of their Fasts not only to expresse but further their humiliation by keeping them from sleeping overmuch or oversweetly Preaching was used by Gods people at their solemn Fasts to quicken them to prayer Nehem. 9. 3. compared with 8. 8. Ier 36. 5 6. It is not unlawful to fast privately on the Lords-day the service of the ordinary Sabbath is not contrary but helpfull to the exercise of mourning and godly sorrow and when we conceive greatest sorrow for sinne it is not unlawfull to rejoyce in our redemption by Jesus Christ Christ forbad it not on that day it not convenient for a publick Fast since it should be consecrated unto God onely for that purpose We should remember the poor on that day Isa. 58. 17. Quod ventri subtrahitur illud pauperi detur The Popish Fast is a mock Fast worse then the Pharisaical which yet is condemned by Christ. First Fasting is made in
up the Authority of the Law The End of the ninth Book THE TENTH BOOK OF Glorification OF THE General RESURRECTION THE LAST JUDGEMENT AND Everlasting Misery of the wicked and Happiness of the Godly CHAP. I. Of the General Resurrection REsurrection from the dead and eternal judgement are two of the principles of the Apostles Catechism Heb. 6. 1. There shall be a Resurrection of the body In the New Testament the thing is so perspicuous and obvious that it would be too long to rehearse the several places Matth. 22. 32. Iohn 5. 28 29. Acts 17. 31. 24. 16. Revel 20. 12 13. Paul proves it by divers Arguments 1 Cor. 15. Tertullian hath written a famous book of this subject and begins his Book thus Fiducia Christianorum resurrectio mortuorum The confidence of Christians is the resurrection of the dead 2. Of the self-same body the Apostle 1 Cor. 15. 53. speaks by way of demonstration and as it were pointing at his own body This corruption must put on incorruption Credo resurrectionem hujus carnis said the old Christians Iob 19. 25. Non enim resurrectio dici potest nisi anima ad idem corpus redeat quia resurrectio est iterata surrectio ejusdem autem est surgere cadere Aquinas Supplem 3. part Quaest. 78. Artic. 1. 3. It shall be genoral of the good and bad Matth. 22. 31 33. Dan. 12. 2. Iohn 5. 28 29. The wicked rise in virtute Christi Iudicis the godly in virtute Christi capitis the wicked shall arise to death and shame the resurrection of the Saints shall be glorious they shall rise first 1 Cor. 15 2. Every one of them shall have a perfect body without defect or deformity they shall arise in perfect beauty 3. Their body shall be immortal 4. Spiritual and glorious like Christs body Phil. 4. ult Aquinas shews that Subtilitas est proprietas corporis gloriosi Supplem 3. part Quaest. 83. Art 1. and that it is ratione subtilitatis impalpabile Ib. Art 6. Vide ibid. Qu. 84. Art 1. Qu. 85. Art 1 2. The Resurrection may be proved by reason 1. From the power of God he made us of nothing therefore he can raise us out of the dust Facilius est restituere quam constituere Qui potest facere potest reficere saith Tertullian Mat. 22. 29 Phil. 3. 21. 2. His justice the body is partner with the soul in sin or holinesse 3. Christ rose again and he rose as the publick head of the Church Luke 24. 46 47. He rose as the first-fruits 1 Cor. 15. 21. He bought soul and body 1 Cor. 6. 20. He is united to a whole believer Iohn 6. 40. 4. That the glory of God and Christ and the Saints may be manifested The world derides the resurrection of the body the Philosophers could not attain to it but it is the Christians chief consolation Iob 19. 27. Hope and resurrection of the dead are joyned together Act. 23. 6. 24. 14. There are as great things past as to come our bodies may as well be in heaven as Christs body be in the grave Rom. 8. 32. Although the Resurrection shall be by the power of the whole Trinity yet it shall be peculiarly by the voice of Christ the dead shall hear the voice of God and live by an Archangel ministerially The end why Christ shall raise them all is to bring them to judgement The Schoolmen say Omnes resurgent in eadem aetate and urge Ephes. 4. 13. but Christ rose say they in his youthful age about thirty three years but the Fathers interpret that place otherwise The godly then need not fear persecution it toucheth but the body Matth. 10. 28. nor death it self It is but a sleep Act. 7. 60. 2 Thess 4 13. the grave a bed of rest Isa. 57. 2. Those that sleep likely rise so shall thy body be raised up at the last day CHAP. II. Of the Last Iudgement BErnard distinguisheth of a three-fold coming of Christ 1. Ad Homines John 1. 11. 2. In Homines Matth. 28. ult 3. Contra Homines Revel 1. 7. The usual distinction is of his first coming in great humility when he was incarnate and his second coming in Majesty when he shall openly manifest and declare his excellent glory in the sight of all his reasonable creatures Angels and men good and bad The knowledge of the time is reserved to God alone Acts 1. 7. The day is appointed by God the Father and not revealed to any creature saving the humanity of Christ and was not revealed to that it seemeth while he lived in the earth in basenesse Christ shall suddenly descend from heaven with the voice of an Archangel with a mighty shout and with the trump of God and then shall he cause all the Saints to rise and with the living Saints shall cause them to meet him in the clouds and after he shall cause all the sinners to arise also and there publickly shall adjudge all his Saints to his heavenly Kingdom making known and rewarding all their good deeds but shall adjudge all the wicked to eternal damnation making known to all the world all their wicked and ungodly deeds words and thoughts even those which before were most secret which having done he shall then yeeld up the Kingdom to God his Father not ceasing to be lesse glorious himself because he hath shewed the infinite glory of God to which all things are to be referred as their proper end but perpetually enjoying glory and blisse with him in another manner and in no lesse full measure even as a mighty man under some great Prince having conquered some Kingdom against whom his Prince did send him then resigneth the office of Lord General because there is no farther use of it but yet liveth in as much honour in the Kings Court as that military title and function would afford him So our Lord and all his members with him after the last day shall remain for all eternity unspeakably glorious though the manner of administration of things which is now in use by Gods appointment shall be finished and determined that God may be all in all Two things are to be considered 1. That all universally are to be judged 2. That Christ shall be Judge of all For the former there is a two-fold Judgement 1. Particular and private which is given concerning every one immediately after death 2. Universal and publick when all men shall be judged together called the day of Revelation Rom. 2. 5. and of this judgement the Creed speaks when it saith From thence he shall come to judge the quick and dead From thence viz. Heaven He that is Christ Jesus the second person in Trinity Shall come to judge the quick and dead that is all men that ever were or shall be That in the end of the world there shall be a day of Judgement and that all men shall then be judged it appears First From
thing the Lord hath condemned Exod. 20. 23. With me that is beside me God c. that is golden and silver Images or pictures of God Quod si quaeras cur illud facietis repetatur dicam voluisse Deum inculcare maximè ut sibi ab eo delicto caverent ad quod maximè proni erant Voss. in Maim de Idol c. 3. Pontificii totum secundum praeceptum de imaginibus non colendis omittunt in recitatione Decalogi ut patet tum ex officio B. Mariae autoritate Pii 5. reformato tum ex Catechismo Ledesmae quasi dâ— ea re nullum omnino praeceptum dedisset Deus Rivet Tract de Patrum Autoritate c. 5. Vide Pontificiorum crassa prodigiosa dogmata contra singula Decalogi praecepta Mort. Apol. Cath l. 2. c. 13 14 15. Idolatry is a Greek word compounded of an Idol which signifieth any similitude image likenesse form shape or representation exhibited either to the body or minde and Latry which signifieth service Ainsw Arrow against Idol c. 1. The first Commandment bindeth us to have Iehovah the living and true God for our God and none other and forbiddeth generally these four things 1. The having of strange gods and not the true as had the Heathens Act. 14. 11 12 15. 2. The having of strange gods with the true as had the Samaritans 2 King 17. 32. 3. The having of no God at all as foolish Atheists Psal. 14. 1. 4. The not having of the true God aright but in hypocrisie only Isa. 29. 13. Tit. 1. 16. The second Commandment bindeth to the true worship of the true God which is only as himself commandeth and by the means rites and services that he ordaineth John 4. 20. to 24. Deut. 12. 32. 4. 1 2 5 6. Ainsw ibid. See more there and Chap. 2. how fast the sinne of Idolatry cleaveth to all and Chap. 5. of the Idolatry of these times farre exceeding Ieroâ—oams and Chap. 6. a dehortation from this sinne Isa. 40. 18. 25. vers Gal. 4. 8. Idolatry saith Tertullian is principale crimen summus hujus saeculi reatus It is called abomination Deut. 27. 15. 1 Pet. 4. 3. Aquin. 2a 2ae Quaest. 94 Art 3. shews That Idolatry is gravissimum peccatum St Hierom affirmeth that when Jesus being a childe was carried into Egypt for fear of Herod all the Idols of Egypt fell down and all their miracles became mute which the Prophet Isaiah foresaw Chap. 19. 1. The general silence of the Devil in his Oracles throughout the world presently upon Christs incarnation is a thing known and confessed by all men He performed the part of a good Bishop that finding a vail spread in the entrance of a Church door wherein the Image of Christ or of some other Saint was pictured rent it in pieces with these words That it was against the authority of the sacred Scriptures to have any Image of Christ set up in the Church The Theatre of Gods judgements ch 25. Idols in Churches are a scandal to â—ews Turks Idolatry either makes that to be God which is not or God to be that which he is not Robins Ess. observ 11. Rabbi Moses Ben Nachman whom they call Ramban or Gerundensis saith Non est tibi Israel ultio in qua non sit uncia de iniquitate vituli There is no vengeance taken on thee Israel wherein there is not an ounce of the iniquity of the Calf God neither will nor can nor ought to be exprest by any Image He will not Exod. 20. 4. neither can he be represented by any Image Deut. 4. 15. Isa. 40. 12. Neither ought any Image to be made of him His Majesty and glory cannot be represented by any visible form Rom. 1. 22 23. Quin audeam dicere eos qui olim cum cultu Dei idololatriam miscebant ut disertè extat in posterioris Regum capite 17. 29 30 31 32. eos inquam hodie adeo ab omni Idololatria abhorrere ut in hac parte Iudaeos ipsos superare videantur Scaliger de Samaritis l. 7. De emendat Temp. Col. 2. 18. See Ainsw Arrow against Idol ch 5. p. 27 30 31. Deut. 4. * Col. 2. 18. Voluntary religion Superstitio à superstando non quasi Deus verus vero cultu nimium coli possit sed quia ad materiem cultus accedat quod eum corrumpat Voss. de Orig. Progres Idol l. 1. c. 3. Superstitio est cultus indebitus praeter verbum Dei Zanâ—h Superstitiosi vocantur non qui filios suos superstites optant omnes enim optamus sed aut ii qui superstitem memoriam desunctorum colant aut qui parentibus suis superstites colebant imagines corum domi tanquam Deos penates Lactant. Div. Instit. l. 4. de vera sapientia Vide plura ibid. See how great a sinne superstition is in Mr Cawdreys Preface to his Superstitio superstes and in the book it self The Pharisees in Christs dayes were great pretenders to holinesse but they corrupted the worship of God Corruption in worship provokes God 1. To depart from a people Ezek. 8. 3. 2. To destroy them 2 Chron. 7. 20. The divine worship of the Heathens and Papists in the Temples is of so near affinity that Ludovicus Vives confesseth there cannot any difference be shewen unlesse the Papists have changed the names and titles The Popish Purgatory agreeth with the Heathen Purgatory mentioned in Plato and Virgil. The papistical manner of consecrating Churches and Church-yards fully imitateth the Ceremonies of the Pagans when they consecrated their Temples and Temple-courts or yards described by Alexander ab Alexandro Their sprinkling of holy water is mentioned in the sixth Satyre of Iuvenal and Sozomen calleth it a Heathenish Ceremony The whole â—warm of Friers or Monks first began among the Heathen as at large appeareth by learned Hospinian * Papists give a stone or wooden crosse the right hand as they go or ride by some also put off their hats the Crosse is not medium cultus The Papists invocate this sign Per crueis signum fugiat hinc omne malignum per idem signum salvetur quodque benignum Bellarm. do imag c. 19. 20. calleth it Signum sacrum venerabile signum crucis adoramus Vide Aquin. part 3. Quaest. 25. Art 4. See Parker of the Crosse chap. 1. Sect. 10. and elswhere They account it among the most precious reliques and not only the whole but every piece thereof they adore it salute it pray unto it and trust therein for salvation crying O Crux ave spes unica hoc passionis tempore auge ptÌ„is justitiam reisque dona veniam Hail O Crosse our only hope in this time of passion increase thou to the godly righteousnesse and unto sinners give pardon Yea the very sign of this Idol made in the air upon the fore-head or over any other thing is sacred and venerable hath force to drive away Deviis and do many like feats Ainsw
Ioshua Iudges Samuel and the Kings Of the Latines liber Chronicorum q. d. Chronologicum which appellation Luther retains in the Dutch version of the Bible There is nothing certain of the Author of these Books though Esdras be thought to be the Author The first Book consists of twenty nine Chapters and contains a History of two thousand eight hundred and five years viz. from the Creation of the world even to the Kingdom of Salomon The second consists of thirty two Chapters and describes a History from the beginning of the Kingdom of Salomon even to the return out of the Captivity of Babylon The best Expositor on both the Chronicles is Lavater Twelfthly The two Books of Ezra they are counted for one Volume with the Hebrews the Greeks and Latines divide them into two Books and assign the first to Ezra the second to Nehemiah Ezra was so called from the Author which was a Scribe most skild in the Law of God as appears in Chap. 7. v. 1 6 and 11. The best Expositors of it are Iunius and Wolphius Nehemiah It is called by the Latines the second Book of Ezra because the History begun by Ezra is continued in it but usually Nehemiah because it was written by him and also because it contains the re-edifying of the City of Ierusalem caused by Nehemiah It consists of thirteen Chapters and contains a History of fifty five years viz. from the twentieth year of Artaxerxes to the Kingdom of the last Darius The best Expositors of it are Wolphius and Pilkinton The next Book is Esther called in Hebrew Megillath Esther the Volume of Esther Many of the Jews think this Book was written by Mordechai which those words in Chap. 9 20. and 23. seem to favour Isidore saith Ezra is thought to have written Esther but some say it was composed after by another Moses Camius saith it was written by the men of the great Synagogue Philo Iudaeus saith Ioachim a Priest of the Hebrews son of the high-Priest was the composer of it and that he did it at the intreaty of Mordecai the Jew It s remarkable that though the Book of Esther contain most admirable passages of Gods Providence in delivering of his Church yet in this Book alone of all the Books of holy Scripture the name of God is not so much as once mentioned Dr Drakes Chronol The Jews throw the Book of Esther to the ground before they reade it because the name of God is not there as their Rabbins have observed Dr Stoughtons Love sick Spouse It consists of ten Chapters and contains a History of ten or as others will of twenty years concerning the preservation of the Church of the Jewes in Persia by Esther Drusius Serrarius and Merlin have done well on this Book 3. Poetical Books Iob Psalms Proverbs Ecclesiastes Canticles to which some adde the Lamentations Those parts of Scripture which set forth strongest affections are composed in verse as those holy flames of spiritual love between Christ and his Spouse in the Canticles of Salomon The triumphant joy of Deborah after deliverance from Sisera's Army of Moses and Miriam after the destruction of Pharaoh the afflicting sorrows of Hezekiah in his sickness and the Lamentations of Ieremiah for the Captivity of the Jews The Book of Psalms is as it were a throng of all affections love joy sorrow fear hope anger zeal every passion acting a part and wound up in the highest strains by the Spirit of God breathing Poetical eloquence into the heavenly Prophet So the Book of Iob. whose subject is sorrow hath a composure answerable to the matter Passion hath most scope in Verse and is freest when tied up in numbers Iob There is great variety of judgement about the Author and Pen-man of this Book Some say it was one of the Prophets but they know not who Some ascribe it to Salomon some to Elihu many to Moses Hugo Cardinal Suidas and Pineda conceive that Iob himself was the Author of this Book and it is thus proved because when any Book is inscribed by the name of any person and there appears no urgent reason wherefore it could not be written by him such a person is to be thought the Author and not the matter of the Book as is manifest in the Book of Ioshua and those of the greater and lesser Prophets The Arabical speeches with which it abounds note that it was written by some man living near Arabia as Iob did Neither doth it hinder that Iob speaks of himself in the third person for Canonicall Writers are wont to do this out of modesty Numb 12. 3. Iohn 21. 24. It is conceived to be the first piece of Scripture that was written if Moses wrote it it is probable that he wrote it before the deliverance of the people of Israel out of Egypt while he was in Midian The main and principal subject of this Book is contained in Psal. 34. 19. Many are the afflictions of the righteous but the Lord delivereth him out of all We may divide the Book into three parts and so it sets forth 1. Iobs happy condition both in regard of externals and internals in the first five verses 2. Iobs fall his calamity from that to the seventh verse of the fourty second Chapter 3. Iobs restitution or restoring from thence to the end Beza Mercer Pineda Drusius Cocceius have well expounded it The Psalms are called in the Hebrew Sepher Tehillim a Book of Divine Praises in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so called from a musical Instrument used in singing of the Psalms which name the Latines have retained Vide Menochinm Hymns is the general Title for the whole Book of Psalms For though it be translated The Book of Psalms yet every one that knoweth that language knoweth the word is The Book of Hymns Christ with his Disciples sung an Hymn Matth. 26. 30. Mr Cottons Singing of Psalms a Gospel Ordinance c. 5. Psalmi dicti sunt Tehillim ab argumento praecipuo Etsi enim in libro hoc contineantur etiam petitiones necnon precationes hae tamen non adeo sunt frequentes his ipsis variae interspersae sunt laudationes Dei a Iustitia summa à misericordia potentia Dei desumtae It contains sacred Songs to be fitted for every condition both of the Church and Members It is called in the New Testament The Book of Psalms Luk. 20. 42. and 24. 44. Acts 1. 20. No Books in the Old Testament are oftner cited in the New then Isaiah and the Psalms that sixty times this sixty four They are in all an hundred and fifty in Greek an hundred fifty one Augustine and Chrysostom ascribe them all to David as the Author so do Theophylact Ludovicus de Tena Some think that after the Captivity Ezra collected these Psalms dispersed here and there into one Volume There are ten Authors whose names are put in the Titles of the Psalms
for leaving out that Title in our English Bibles for it is well known that that Title is not given by the holy Ghost but by the Scholiast who took it from Eusebius General is a meer English term and of no doubtfull signification Catholick is both Greek and by their saying of double and therefore doubtfull signification The Syriack Interpreter hath this Inscription of these Epistles as Tremellius sheweth Tres Epistolae trium Apostolorum ante quorum oculos Dominus noster se transformavit id est Iacobi Petri Ioannis For the Syrians doe not esteem the second of Peter nor the second and third of Iohn nor the Epistle of Iude Canonical The Apostles Iames Peter Iohn and Iude have publisht seven Epistles as mystical as succinct both short and long short in words long in sense and meaning Iames For the difference which seems to be between Iam. 2. 21 22. and Rom. 4. 2. and 3. 28. most likely this Book was doubted of in ancient times as Eusebius and Ierom witnesse But yet then also publickly allowed in many Churches and ever since received in all out of which for the same cause Luther and other of his followers since him would again reject it Erasmus assents to Luther and Musculus agrees with them both in his Comment upon the fourth of the Romans both they of the Romish and we of the Reformed Church with one consent admit this Epistle for Canonical Vide Polani Syntagma I light upon an old Dutch Testament of Luthers Translation saith Whiâ—akâ—r against Raynolds with his Preface wherein he writeth that Iames his Epistle is not so worthy as are the Epistles of St Peter and Paul but in respect of them a strawen Epistle his censure I mislike and himself I think afterwards seeing these words in a later Edition are left out It is no where found in Luthers Works that he called the Epistle of Iames Inanem stramineam Edmund Campian was convicted of falshood about that in England where when he had objected that he could finde no such thing at any time in the Books he produced Some in the Preface of the German Edition say that Luther wrote that it cannot contend in dignity with the Epistles of Paul and Peter but is strawy if it be compared with them Which judgement of Luther we approve not of and it is hence manifest that it was disliked by him because these words are found in no other Edition from the year 1526. Luthers disciples now hold that it is Canonical and Apostolical and they answer the Arguments of those that are opposite thereto as we may see in the Exposition of that Article concerning the Scripture by that most learned and diligent man Iohn Gerard. Gravitatem ac zelum Apostolicum per omnia prae se fâ—rt saith Walther We may reply against the Papists who often object this opinion of Luthers that Cajetan their Cardinal denieth the Epistle to the Hebrews to be Canonical yea which is farre worse he affirmeth that the Author thereof hath erred not only in words but in the sense and meaning of the Scriptures Nay Cajâ—tan saith Whitaker rejected Iames second of Peter and second and third of Iohn and Iude. It consists of five Chapters Paraeus Laurentius Brochmand and Mr Manton have done best on it First of Peter This Epistle is called in the Title Catholical because it is not written to any one person as that of Paul to Timothy Titus and Philemon noâ— to any one particular Church as those of Paul to the Romans Corinths but to the converted of the Jews dispersed here and there as appears by the inscription It consists of five Chapters Gerhard Laurentius Gomarus and Dr Ames have expounded both these Epistles Bifield hath interpreted part of the first Epistle Second of Peter Some in the Primitive Church doubted of its authority and the Syriack hath it not but the Church generally allowed it and many reasons may perswade that it is Apostolical and was written by Peter 1. Because the Author of it expresly calleth himself Simon Peter the Apostle of Jesus Christ. He wrote it in his old-age to confirm them in the Doctrine which before he had taught them 2. It s inscription is to the same Jews that the former viz. dispersed by the Roman Empire and converted to Christ whose Apostle Peter was 3. It shews an Apostolical spirit 4. It s style and composition is agreeable to the former Epistle 5. The Author of this Epistle witnesseth that he was a spectator of the Transfiguration in the Mount Chap. 1. vers 16. now Peter together with Iames and Iohn were present with Christ. 6. He makes mention of the Former Epistle Chap. 3. v. 1. 7. He cals Paul his dear Brother Chap. 3. v. 15. It consists of three Chapters First of Iohn consists of five Chapters Second and third of Iohn They were also in times past doubted of by some as Erasmus Cajetan but there are good reasons to prove them Canonical 1. Their Author cals himself an Elder so doth Peter 1 Pet. 5. 1. by which name an Ecclesiastical Office is often signified but here age rather now it is manifest that Iohn came to a greater age then the rest of the Apostles 2. The salutation is plainly Apostolical Grace mercy and peace 3. In sentences and words they agree with the first Epistle 4. The Fathers alledge them for Iohns and reckon them among the Canonical Books Each of these Epistles is but a Chapter Iude This Epistle also in times past was questioned by some but that it is Apostolical first the inscription shews the Author expresly cals him a servant of Christ and brother of Iames. 2. The matter it agreeth both for words and sentences with the second of Peter of which it contains as it were a brief summe and recapitulation That the writer of the Epistle doth not call himself an Apostle is of no moment to infringe the authority thereof for the judgement of the writer is free in that case that Title was specially used by Paul and Peter Iames and Iohn quit the same Title yea Paul in his Epistles to the Philippians Thessalonians and Philemon doth not call himself an Apostle and yet those Epistles were never doubted of It is but one Chapter Willet and Mr Perkins have done well on it Revelation It is called according to the Greek Apocalyps and according to the Latine Revelation that is a discovery or manifestation of things which before were hidden and secret for the common good of the Church Eusebius l. 3. c. 17. saith Domitian cast Iohn the Evangelist into a fornace of scalding Oyl but when he saw he came forth unhurt he banished him into the Isle Pathmos where he writ this Revelation This Book describeth the state of the Church from the time of Iohn the last of the Apostles untill Christs coming again and especially the proceedings pride and fall of
it cannot be that there should be many but although there may be many counterpanes of the deed yet there is but one or two principal Deeds so amongst this great variety of Editions one or more ought to be as principal and authentical There is a Question betwixt the Church of Rome and the Reformed Churches about the Authentick Edition of Scripture they say That the Edition of the Bible in Hebrew and Greek is not authentical but rather the Vulgar Latine We hold that the Vulgar Latine is very corrupt and false that the Hebrew for the Old Testament and the Greek for the New iâ— the sincere and authentical writing of God therefore that all things are to be determined by them and that the other versions are so farre to be approved of as they agree with these 〈◊〉 The â—rideâ—tinâ— Councel thus decreeth That in all Sermons Readings Disputations Controversies the Vulgar Latine Translation should be taken for authenâ—â—â—â— before the Hebrew or Greek and that no man should presume upon any ocâ—â—â—on to reject â—â— or to appeal from it When the Councel of Trent saith the Vulâ—â—â— Latine iâ— authentical it compares it with other Latine Translations not with â—he Hebrew Muâ—s de Heb. Edit Author ac ver Vide illum ibid Andradius the chiefest of the Divines at the Councel of Trent thinketh that â—he Councel of Trent did not mean either to condemn the Hebrew truth as he calâ—â—th it or to acquit the Latine Translation from all error when they called it Authenâ—â—cal but only that the Latine hath no such error by which any pestilent opinion in â—aith and manners may be gathered This saith Rainolds against Hart c. 6. p. 202. and Chamier Tom. 1. l. 12. c. 2. The Rhemists in their Preface to the New Testament translated by them prolixly extoll this Latine Edition and contend that it is not onely farre better than all the Latine versions but then the Greek it self which is the Proâ—otype Before we come to defend our own or disprove that opinion of the Papists it is necessary first rightly and fully to state the Question and to premise some things concerning the several Versions and Translations of the Scripture We deny not that part of Daniel and Ezra which was written in the Chaldee Dialect to be Authentical because we know the Lord was pleased that in that language as well as the Hebrew some of his Divine Truth should be originally written 1. For the more credit of the Stories the Lord bringeth forth forraign Nations and their Chronicles for witnesses least any of them should doubt of the truth thereof 2. The Lord would have some part of those Stories come to the knowledge of the Heathen and it was requisite that the Chaldeans should know the sins and impieties of that Nations and the judgements that should befall them to testifie unto all the truth of God therefore in general the alteration of the terrene States and Kingdoms is shadowed forth and published in the Chaldee Tongue that the Gentiles might take knowledge thereof but the particular Histories of the coming of the Messiâ—s of his Office and Kingdom and of the calamities and afflictions which should befall the people of God are set forth in the Hebrew Tongue as more especially concerning them Likewise it pleased God for the better credit of the Story that the History of those things which were said and done in Chaldea should be written in the same Language wherein they were first spoken and therefore the Epistles and Rescripts of the Kings are delivered in the Chaldee speech as taken onâ— of their publick Acts and Records and that the History in Daniel set forth in the Chaâ—dee speech gaining him respect with the Chaldeans might stirre up the Jews to receive Daniel as a Prophet of God whom the Heathens admired If there be any footsteps of the Chaldee and Arabick in Iob as some learned say we do not exclude them from authentick Authority for we say the whole Old Testament for the most part in Hebrew and few parcels in Chaldee are the authentick Edition of the Old Testament The Greek Copies of the New Testament are also from God immediately the very dialect wherein those Prototypes were which the Pens of the Evangelists and Apostles did write For the Gospel of Matthew and the Epistle to the Hebrews being written in Hebrew and Mark in Latine we have refuted that opinion already the Greek Edition of those three Books as well as of all the other of the New Testament is authentical The Versions of the Scripture are either the Chaldee and Greek of the Old Testament the Syriack and Arabick of the new the Latine Italian French and English of both Testaments All the Versions of the sacred Scripture have so farre Divine Authority as they agree with the original Tongue and to say that any Translation is pure and uncorrupt and that the very fountains are muddy is both a foolish and impious blasphemy The tongue and dialect is but an accident and as it were an argument of the Divine truth which remains one and the same in all Idioms therefore the faith of the unlearned depends on God not on men although the Translations by benefit of which they are brought to believe be perfected by the labour of men Gods providence and care of the Church is such that he would never let it be long destitute of a fit Translation which being publisht by learned men and approved of by the Church however it failed in some things yet following the truth constantly in the more principal and necessary things might be sufficient to all for wholsome instruction The Versions differ often much among themselves Arias Montanus differs much from Pagnin a learned Translator and Vatablus from both from all these Luther and from him again the Vulgar Ofiander the LXX varie The Chaldee Edition of the Old Testament is not a Translation done word for word but a Paraphrase and so called the Chaldee Paraphrase by the Jews Targum though some conceive that there is some kinde of distinction to speak accurately between the Chaldee Paraphrase and Targum Targum being a general word signifying an Interpretation or Paraphrase though it usually now by an excellency denoteth the Chaldee Paraphrase There were three Authours of it as it is reported according to the three-fold difference of the Hebrew Books Râ—bbi Achilam or Aquila who is vulgarly called Oâ—â—glos upon the five Books of Moses Rabbi Ionathan the sonne of Uziel upon the former and later Prophets Rabbi Ioseph coecus or as some will a certain Anonymus upon some of the Hagiographa Those Paraphrases of Onkelos and Ionathan are the ancienter and certioris fidei that upon the Hagiographa is farre later and lesse certain it being doubtfull both who was the author and in what age it was made The common opinion concerning Onkelos and Ionathan is that Ionathan wrote a little before Christ the other a
place part whereof consisteth in the Story part in the Allegory So that the whole sense is contained in them both So for the second example of the Tropological There is not a two-fold sense of that place but one general sense that as the mouth of the Ox was not to be muzled so the Minister of the Gospel must be provided for Likewise of the Anagogical kinde It is not one sense to understand the rest of Canaan another the Kingdom of God But there is one whole sense that as they for their Idolatry were deprived of the Land of promise so we should take heed least by our disobedience we lose the hope of the Kingdom of heaven So we conclude that those are not divers senses but one sense diversly applied The literal sense is the only sense of the place because out of that sense only may an argument strongly be framed wherefore seeing Allegories and Tropes do not conclude they are not the senses of the place and Allegories devised beside the sense prove not though they may illustrate It is manifest that is always the sense of the holy Ghost which is drawn from the very words But we are not so certain concerning any mystical sense unlesse when the holy Ghost himself teacheth us as for example it is written Hos. 11. 1. Out of Egypt have I called my Sonne and Exod. 12. 46. Ye shall not break a bone of him It is evident that the first place is understood of the people of Israel the later of the Paschal Lamb. Who durst have applied those things to Christ unlesse the holy Ghost had first done it and declared his minde and meaning to us viz. That Son in the first place doth not only signifie the people of Israel but Christ also and by bone in the later place not only the bone of that Lamb but of Christ also is understood Secondly To whom the chief Authority to expound Scripture is committed It was decreed in the Councel of Trent That Scripture should be expounded as the Church expoundeth it and according to the common and unanimous consent of the Fathers If the Fathers agree not the matter is referred to a generall Councel If there it be not determined we must have recourse to the Pope and his Cardinals We say also that the Church is the Interpreter of Scripture and that this gift of interpreting resides only in the Church but we deny that it belongs to certain men or is tied to a certain place or succession of men The Ministry of judgement the Lord hath given to his Church 1 Cor. 2 15. and 10. 15. 1 Ioh. 4. 1. Act. 15. 16. 2 Cor. 14. 29 31 32. but the Soveraignty of judgement he hath reserved to himself The holy Scripture knows not the ancient Fathers acknowledge not as long as we have the Scripture there needs not any such standing Judge in the Church These three things Mr Down proves in his not consent of Fathers but Scripture the ground of faith p. 261. to 266. The holy Ghost is the Judge and the Scripture is the sentence or definitive Decree We acknowledge no publick Judge except the Scripture and the holy Ghost teaching us in the Scripture He that made the Law should interpret the same 1 Cor. 1. 12. 1 Ioh. 2. 27. Arguments brought by the Papists for their opinion Object 1. They object that place Exod. 18. 13 26. Answ. Moses was a Prophet indued with singular wisdom adorned by God with extraordinary gifts sent immediately by him and commended by Divine Testimonies to the people the Pope is not so He had chiefest Authority from God over all the Israelites but the Pope hath not so over all Christians Moses his Authority was extraordinary no man succeeded in his place Ioshua was a Captain only or Judge in Civil things Aaron only a Priest to administer in things sacred but Moses exercised both functions Object 2. They urge that place Deut. 17. 9. Answ. Here the Civil Magistrate and the Judge are joyned together as vers 12. If it will follow hence that the Pope must be Supreme Judge in all Ecclesiastical matters the Emperor ought to be as well in Civil 2. The Pope doth not hold the same place among Christians that the high-Priest did among the Jews For he was the chiefest having all the rest of the Priests subject to him but the Pope is one amongst all having collegues many Bishops as at first or a few Patriarchs as after Object 3. Eccl. 12. 11. If the chief Pastor in the Old Testament had such authority much more the chief Priest in the New Answ. This one Pastor signifieth neither the High-Priest in the old Law nor the Pope in the new but Jesus Christ the high Shepherd for our souls Object Matth. 6. 19. Christ saith to Peter To thee will I give the Keyes of the Kingdome of Heaven Therefore the Pope hath Authority to expound Scripture Answ. First By the Keyes here is meant Commission to preach the Gospel not Authority of interpreting the Scriptures When the Gospel is preached the Kingdome of Heaven is opened to the Beleevers and shut to the unbeleevers Secondly That Authority of the Keys was not committed to Peter only but to the other Apostles also Mat. 28. 18 19. There is a two-fold Judgement 1. Of Discretion 1 Cor. 10. 15. 2. Of Authority as the Parliament judgeth capital crimes If the Papists understand the word Iudge to signifie Discerning as when we judge of meats by the taste every faithful person ought to pray unto God for grace to judge to discern and to know the true sense of the Scripture But if by judging they understand to pronounce Decrees definitive and infallible Judgements touching the sense of the Scriptures thereby to binde other mens consciences there is no man in the world that hath that power See Moulins Buckler of Faith We have a more compendious way to come to the understanding of the Scripture It were too long when we doubt of any place to stay till we have the general consent of the Pastors of the Church or to expect a general Councel or to go up to Rome But the word of God is amongst us the Scriptures themselves and the Spirit of God opening our hearts do teach us how to understand them And yet we say not as the Papists falsâ—y charge us that we allow every private mans Interpretation of Scripture refusing the judgement of the Pastors of the Church Panoruitan saith The opinion of one godly man ought to be preferred before the Popes if it be grounded upon beâ—ter authority of the Old and New Testament 2 Pet. 1. 20. No prophecy of the Scripture is of any private Interpretation Stapleton saith Iuterpretation is private either Ratione personae when the man is prviate or Ratione medii when it is not taken out of the Context and Circumstances or Ratione finis when it is for a false end Now private Interpretation in regard of
the person if it be publick in regard of the means is not forbidden for it is lawful for one man with Scripture Toti resistere mundo saith the Glosse of the Canon-Law the meaning of this place is That the Prophets were no Interpreters or Messengers of their own mindes but Gods The Catholicks hold saith Chamier meaning still by that Title the Protestants that the Scripture is to be interpreted by private labour and industry viz. of Augustine Ierom Chrysostom but not in a private sense that is in a sense arising from the brain of the Interpreter It is true saith Cartwright against the Rhemists that the Scriptures cannot be expounded of every private spirit nor which is more of any private spirit nor yet of all private spirits together but only of those which are inspired of God viz. the Prophets and Apostles which are here opposed unto private Interpretation And therefore it is evident That the Exposition of the Scripture ought not to be fetched from Ecclesiastical either Fathers or Councels which speak not by Inspiration but from the Scriptures themselves what he meaneth he declareth in the next verse where he sheweth the reason of his saying namely that it must be interpreted as it was written and by as high Authority Seeing therefore it was first spoken by holy men which spake as they were led by the holy Spirit and were inspired of God it followeth that it must be interpreted by the same Authority The Interpretation therefore that is brought out of the Apostles and Prophets is not private although it be avowed by one man only On the other side that Interpretation which is not brought from thence although it have the allowance of whole general Councels is but private This is a principal meaning of our Saviour Christ when he willeth that we should call no man Father or Master in the earth that is in matter of Doctrine we should depend upon the Authority of no man nor of all men in the earth but only upon Christ and upon God Our reasons by which we prove that the chiefest Judgment and Authority of interpreting Scriptures is to be given not to the Church but to the Scriptures themselves and the holy Ghost 1. That which only hath power to beget faith that only hath the chiefest Authority of interpreting Scripture and of determining all Controversies concerning Faith and Religion but the Scriptures onely and the Holy Ghost have this force Rom. 10. 17. The Holy Ghost onely can infuse saving Faith into our hearts which is called by the Schoolmen Infusa Fides The Faith which we have from the Church is acquired and sufficeth not to a certain perswasion 2. The Scriptures cannot be interpreted but by the same Spirit wherewith they were written that Spirit is found no where but in the Scripture whosoever have promises from God to understand the Scripture may interprett it but so have all the faithfull 3. Christ himself makes the Scripture a Judge Iohn 12. 48. and still appealed to it 4. Although the Fathers were men indued of God with excellent gifts and brought no small light to understanding of the Scriptures yet learned men in our dayes may give a right sense of sundry places thereof which the Fathers saw not yea against the which perhaps they consent Hath any man living read all the Fathers Nay have all the men living read them Nay Can they shew them Can they get them I had almost said Can they name them In the Exposition of those words Tu es Petrus super hanc petram almost every one of the Fathers at least the most part of them and the best expound it of Peters faith yet the Papists understand it non de fide sed de persona Petri. Here they disagree themselves from the Fathers Iohn 10. 16. by the title of one Shepheard Augustine Chrysostome Ierome Cyril Theodoret Theophylact Euthimius Rupertus Cyprian and other Fathers agree that Christ is theredesigned but Stapleton saith the Pope is there meant In the Division of the Law they go clean contrary to the greatest part of the Fathers for they divide the Commandments as we do but the Papists make the two first one and the tenth two 2. They have no father to countenance them in this but Augnstine Revet de Authoritate Patrum c. 5 6 7. There were no writings of the Fathers for a time many of them wrote 400 years after Christ but some 500 and 600 years after Christ what rule had they before that time of interpreting Scriptures The Fathers were given too much to allegorizing Cajetane therefore in the Preface of his Commentaries upon the Books of Moses saith That the exposition of the Scripture is not tied by God to the sense of the Fathers therefore he admonisheth his Readers not to take it ill if he sometime dissent from the stream of the Fathers 4. The Doctrine of the Church must be examined by the Scriptures Acts 17. 11. If Pauls doctrine much more may the decrees of the Pope Church Councels be examined by the Scriptures 5. The interpretation of the Scripture is a gift freely given by God for the edification of the Church Rom. 12. 6. 1 Cor. 12. 10. therefore it is not tied to a certain kinde of men but common to the faithful 6. The faithful are commanded diligently to try and examine every doctrine 1 Thess. 5. 21. 1 Iohn 4. 1. which cannot be altogether done without interpretation What means must be used in the interpretation of Scripture The end of the Scripture we heard was to direct the Church to all saving truth The means to be used for the attaining of that end by the Minister is diligent study and humble Prayer by the People attentive reading hearing prayer and meditating First the Teachers must pray earnestly to God for his spirit to inlighen them Mat. 7. 7 8 9. Rom. 15. The Scriptures are understood by that spirit that dictated them Secondly The Pastors and Teachers of the Church must diligently and painfully study the Scriptures giving themselves to read compare place with place Iohn 5. 39. Search the Scriptures it is a metaphor taken from such as search for Gold and Silver Oar in the earth who will search and sift and break every clod to finde out the gold Solomon useth the same metaphor Prov. 2. 4. and to this diligence in searching doth the Apostle exhort Timothy 1 Tim. 4. 13. This diligence of often exprest in Scripture in the Old Testament by the phrase of meditating in the word Iosh. 1. 8. Psal. 1. 2. Thirdly they must labour for a competent knowledge in the original tongues the Hebrew and Greek in which the Scripture was written that so they may consult with the Hebrew Text in the Old and the Greek in the New Testament and see with their own not anothers eyes as Gen. 3. 15. The Papists read it corruptly She shall break here the original soon determines the
is truly and properly eternal therefore Immutable for he is truly eternal who is always the same without beginning change or end 4. If God should change then either he must change for the better and then he was not best and perfect before or for the worse and then he is not best now If he should be changed it must be from some other thing stronger then himself and there is none such Nothing without him can change him because he is omnipotent and nothing within him for there is no ignorance in his minde inconstancy in his will nor impotency in his power Object God doth repent Gen. 6. 6. 1 Sam. 15. 11. 2 Sam. 24. 16. Psal. 135. 14. Ier. 26. 13. 18. 8. to repent imports a change Answ. God is not said properly to repent but after the manner of men not affectivè but effectivè God doth that which men use to do when they repent they forbear to do what they have done and do the contrary change their actions Gods repenting of the evil in those places is a putting on a resolution not to do the evil he had threatned or not to persist in doing that which he had begun to do There is a change in the creature but no change in God either in respect of his nature or decree therefore in other places it is said he doth not repent that is not change or alter his minde God wills a change but changeth not his will The change is in us not God as houses and trees seem to move to them which are in a Ship but the Ship moves and they stand firm One may with the same will continuing immutable saith Aquinas will that now this thing be done and after the contrary but the will should be changed if one began to will what he willed not before Object God promiseth and threatneth some things which come not to pass Answ. Those threatnings and promises were not absolute but conditional and howsoever the condition was uncertain in respect of men yet it was most certain in respect of God His promises are made with condition of faith and obedience Deut. 28. 13. and his threatnings with an exception of conversion and repentance Psal. 7. 2. Object God is reconciled with men with whom he was offended before Answ. The object is changed God is still the same as the Sun which was troublesom to sore eyes is pleasant to them being healed the Sun here is not changed but their eyes Object Why are Prayers or means if God be Immutable why do I pray or hear Answ. God Immutably wills both the end and the means and therefore as he wills thy pardon so he wills thy prayer Object God created the world and so Christ was incarnate and made man now he that was made something he was not before or did make something he made not before seems to be changed He is a man he was not so once he is a Creator he was not so from eternity Answ. Christ did onely assume and take to himself an humane nature he was not changed into it Creation is nothing but Gods will from eternity that the world should exist in time so that the creature hath something now which it had not before but Gods will hath not God is not changed any way though he change his actions according to his good pleasure 1. This is terrible to wicked men God is unchangeable which hath threatned to curse them and bring destruction upon them they must change or else there is no repealing of the curse The wicked hope he will change the godly fear he will change 2. It comforts the godly to whom he hath made many promises Numb 23. 23. Heb. 13. 5. He is constant and will perform them He told Adam That the Seed of the woman should break the Serpents head He was long but sure for it was fulfilled at last His Covenant is everlasting Isa. 55. 3. I am God and change not therefore you are not consumed Mal. 3. 6. we should labor for Gods love it is a free hold and like himself Immutable whom he loves once he loves for ever Gods people shall never fall from Grace never be wholly overcome of Temptations 3. We should imitate Gods Immutability in a gracious way be constant in our love to God and men in our promises and good purposes as the Martyr said Rawlins you left me and Rawlins you finde me we should pray for the establishment of our faith and patience 4. We should admire the glorious nature of God for what an Infinite glorious God must he be which hath had all that happiness and glory from eternity 2. Worship the true God because he is immutable and we shall be so hereafter being made most like to him Psal. 102. 27. 5. It confutes the Eutichians and Ubiquitaries which held That the God-head became flesh Can a Spirit be a body and both visible and invisible CHAP. VI. That GOD is Great in his Nature Works Authority a necessary Essence Independent wholly One. GOd is exceeding Great 1 Kings 8. 42. 2 Sam. 7. 22. Psal. 95. 3. and 96. 4. and 99. 2 3. and 145. 3. Tit. 213. God is great and greatly to be praised and who is so great as our God He is great 1. In his Nature and Essence 2. In his Works 3. In his Authority His name is Great Ier. 10. 6 11. Iosh. 7. 9. his power is Great Psal. 147. 5. his acts are great Psal. 111. 1. his judgements are great Exod. 7. 4. he is great in counsel Ie r. 32. 19. and mighty works Deut. 32. 4. There is a double Greatness 1. Of quantity or bulk and that is an attribute of a body by which it hath very large bodily dimensions as a mountain is a great substance the Sun a great body and this cannot be found in God who is not a body but an Immaterial Essence 2. Of Perfection Worth and vertue and that is abundance of all excellencies and largeness of whatsoever makes to perfection of being and this is in God He is so perfect every way that he stands in need of nothing God is absolutely and simply perfect because he hath all things which are to be desired for the chiefest felicity He is perfect 1. In the highest degree of perfection simply without any respect or comparison 2. He is perfect in all kindes 1 Iohn 1. 5. Iohn saith he is light in which there is no darkness that is Perfect and pure without the least mixture of the contrary the author and cause of all perfections in all the creatures they are all in him but more perfectly and in a perfecter manner God is most absolutely perfect Iob 22. 2. Psal. 16. 2. Matth. 5. 48. The words in Scripture attributed to God which signifie this are 1. Schaddai which is as much as One sufficient to help himself or one that gives nourishment to all other things and
brought to a sense of his sin and to repentance for it Matth. 21. 31. 2. In the life to come because they have sinned against greater means and light they shall receive the greater damnation Matth. 11. 24. Many an hypocrite will 1. Constantly hear and frequent the best Ministry Isa. 58. 2. Ezek 33. 31 32. 2. Will keep a constant course in prayer and that not in ordinary prayer only but even in extraordinary too Luke 18. 12. compare Zach. 7. 5. 8. 19. together 3. Is a strict observer of the Sabbath day Luke 13. 14 15. Iohn 5. 10. 4. Loveth the sincerity of Religion and hateth Popery will-worship and idolatry with all the reliques and monuments of it Rom. 2. 22 23. 5. Goeth a great deal farther in the reformation of his life then the civil man doth 2 Pet. 2. 20. Luke 11. 42. We should labour for a spirit without guile Psal. 2. 2. That spirit is 1. An humble spirit before in and after duty 2. An honest spirit carried equally against all sin 3. A plain spirit Idlenesse Idlenesse is a vice of spending time unprofitably It is vivi hominis sepultura Salomon often condemneth sluggishnesse Prov. 6. 9 10 11. which saying he repeats again Proverbs 24. see Proverbs 20. 13. An idle man is a burden to himself a prey to Satan the devils cushion semper aliquid age ut te diabolus inveniat occupatum A grief to Gods Spirit Ephes. â— 28. 30. Bodily sloth you cannot bear and soul-sloth Christ cannot bear Matthew 25. 26. Sins accompanying idlenesse 1. Inordinate walking 2 Thess. 3. 11 12. 2. Talebearing 1 Tim. 5. 13. Prov. 11. 13. 3. Theft Ephes. 4. 28. 2 Thess. 3. 12. 4. Drunkennesse Amos 6. 1. 5. Filthinesse see 2 Sam. 11. Ezek. 16. 49. Idlenesse is the mother and nurse of lust Quaeritur Aegistus quare sit factus adulter In promptu causa est desidiosus erat Otia si tollas periere cupidinis arcus Ovid. Water standing still will putrifie and breed toads and venemous things so ease will breed diseases The punishments of idlenesse 1. Diseases Cernis at ignavum corrumpunt otia corpus 2. Dulnesse idlenesse is the rust of wit 3. Poverty Prov. 10. 4. 20. 13 19. 6. 10 11. 24. 34. 4. Shame Prov. 10. 5. 6. 6. 12. 11. It is against the order of nature which God set in all his creatures at the first the heavens stand not still but by miracle Adam laboured in Paradise much more since the fall Iob 5. 7. The rust fretteth unused iron and the mothes eat unworn garments This is the sin of great persons who â—â—ve received great mercies from God Cretians idle slow-bellies This sin is condemned 1. Exceedingly in the word by Salomon Prov. Eccles. Isaiah and by Paul and in morall Philosophy 2. It is a mother-sin as was shewed before 3. Produceth many plagues rheums obstructions and other inconveniences as hath been also shewed and exposeth one to great danger A good remedy against idlenesse is diligence in some honest calling Iacob and his sons Moses and David were shepherds 1 Sam. 12. 1 2. Let him that hath an office wait upon it This humbleth the minde profits the estate and makes a man able to do good to himself and others interests a man to the things of this life he that labours not must not eat in all labour there is abundance It fits him for religious duties if it be moderate makes the life cheerfull prevents evil fancies Impenitence Impenitence is a great sin under the Gospel Acts 8. 22. The longer one lies in any sin the more is the heart hardened Ier. 16. 1. Ephes. 4. 18 19. He which hardeneth his heart against many reproofs shall surely perish obstinate impenitent sinners shall be destroyed 1 Sam. 12. 25. Impenitence perfectly conforms one to Satan who is in malo obfirmatus and sins without remorse In malo perseverare diabolicum Reasons 1. Repentance is Gods gift therefore denying of it is Gods curse 2. Hereby the highest favour of God is despised the offering of repentance is a mercy that belongs to the second Covenant obstinacy in sinning is a denying of Gods justice and abusing his mercy 3. So long as one lives in any sin without repentance so long God looks on him as continuing in that sin his minde is not changed 4. Without repentance there is no remission Acts 5. 31. Luke 24. 47. therefore the sin against the holy Ghost is unpardonable Heb. 6. 6. because one cannot repent 5. Final impenitency is a certain evidence of ones reprobation Rom. 2. 5. Heb. 12. 17. 6. Under the Gospel there are the greatest arguments and motives to repentance Matth. 3. 2. Acts 17. 30. Christ himself sent Iohn before him to preach the doctrine of repentance and he himself did also preach it he bad men amend their lives because the Kingdom of God was at hand and his Apostles also preacht the same doctrine of repentance He is a wilfull sinner which either holds in himself a purpose that he will sin or is irresolute and not settled in a firm purpose of not sinning or that purposeth to mend but not till hereafter Injustice Injustice is a sin Every man is to have his own and to be permitted the quiet enjoyment of that wherein he hath interest They execute no judgement Salomon saith in the place of judgement there was iniquity I looked for judgement and behold oppression Isaiah Reasons 1. The excellency of the thing abused judgement is a part of Gods authority It is Gods judgement which you execute saith Iehosaphat therefore it is a foul thing to abuse a thing so sacred and of such high respect 2. The causes of it are covetousness distrust of Gods providence shaking off the fear of God and extinguishing the light of nature denying Gods Lordship over the whole world 3. The effects of it are bad 1. It defiles a mans conscience Iudas cast away the thirty pieces which he came unjustly by 2. It will ruinate his state and family A man shall not rost what he caught in hunting 3. It blemisheth the name and stains a mans reputation The Publicans were in such hatefull esteem among the Jews that they were ranked with the very harlots and most notorious sinners because they cared not what nor from whom they gat 4. Riches deceitfully gotten is vanity tossed to and fro by them which seek death a man shall be damned for unjust gain unlesse repentance and restitution come between The Apostle saith God is an avenger of all which do such things Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the Kingdom of God Intemperance It is an inordinate appetite or immoderate desire and use of meat and drink and this is when a due mean is exceeded either in the costly preparation of them for our selves or others or in the too liberall and excessive use of them so prepared Degrees of intemperance 1. More secret
Joh. 21. 15. Good Scribes Matth. 13. Stewards 1 Cor. 4. 1. Nurses 1 Thess. 2. 7. 2. In Commandments Act. 20. 28. 2 Tim. 4. 1 2. 1. He is to be a good example and pattern unto his people in love faith patience and in every good work 1 Tim. 4. 12. 1 Pet. 5. 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 walk aright Gal. 2. 14. 2. He is to feed the flock diligently and faithfully to divide the Word of truth aright 2 Tim. 2. 15. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 talk aright Matth. 28. 19. Woe to me if I preach not the Gospel Popish Writers call our Ministers in disdain Praedicantici 3. To dispense the Sacraments Go teach and baptize 4. To go before them and take heed to the flock One saith A good Minister should have five properties 1. Be sound in the faith 2. Of an unblameable conversation 1 Tim. 3. 2. Acts 20. 28. 3. Of competent abilities 4. Diligent and painful Verbi Minister es hoc age was Mr. Perkins's Motto 5. Not usurp the Office but be called in an orderly way Ioh. 3. 27. Rom. 10. 14. Ier. 14. 14. Heb. 5. 4. Papists say our Ministry is a nullity the Separatists say it is of the Devil and Antichrist There is first the inward calling of a Minister a work of Gods Spirit inwardly inclining a man to imbrace this Function for the right ends Gods glory and mans salvation Not sufficient inward gifts of minde of knowledge learning and vertue is the inward calling to the Ministry because all these things may befall such a one as ought not to undertake the Ministry at all as a King but should sin grievously against God if he undertake that Function yea all these may befall a woman who may not be a Minister I permit not a woman to exercise authority or to speak in the Church 2. Outward to be appointed to this Office by such who are intrusted with this care Paul left Titus in Crete to ordain Elders that is Ministers The nature of this Call consists in two main things Election and Ordination Thus much for those Superiours which have authority in the Church and their inferiours The superiours and inferiours in Common-wealth follow and those are Magistrates and Subjects The chief duties of the Subject are honour and submission Command 5. Rom. 13. 1. In heart to reverence and outwardly to obey the Magistrate This honour and reverence includes within it a triple act 1. Of the minde in a due estimation and valuing of their place and dignity 2. Of the will in an humble inclination thereof unto them because of their excellency 3. Of the body in outward behaviour and carriage towards them Good Subjects must willingly obey the Supreme and lawful Magistrate Reas. 1. From the Authority put upon him by God he hath intrusted them with a portion of his own Authority and made him Commander in his own stead in obeying him we obey God if he abuse not his authority against him and contrary to his will and the trust reposed in him 2. From the end of Government the common good and the preservation of the welfare and society of the good But 1. This obedience must not be absolute and illimited God onely hath an authority over us it is better to obey God then man 2. So far must obedience be yeelded to their commands as they do not evidently tend to the overthrow and ruine of the common society Subjects are willingly to pay Tribute to a Prince or State David had Tribute Rom. 13. 6 7. Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's Reasons 1. The state of Princes needs such support and supply 2. The fruit profit and benefit of his labours redoundeth to his Subjects 2. The duty of Magistrates 1. That there should be Magistrates 2. What is their duty It is the will of God that some men should rule over others 2 Sam. 23. 3 4. Civil Magistracy is a Divine Institution Dan. 4. lat end Prov. 8. 16. Rom. 13. 1 2. Reasons 1. God hath given some more eminent Titles then others they are called The foundations of the Earth Psal. 82. 5. the pillars and shields of the Earth Pastors Shepherds Saviours the Stay of our Tribes Cyrus my Shepherd Fathers Iob saith I was a Father to the poor 2. Gods appointment By me Kings reign God led Israel by Moses ruled them by Judges and Kings 3. He hath given them authority The judgement is not yours but Gods 4. He gives them ability to rule In the Heavens there are two great lights and they not equal in the Earth there is the Lion among Beasts in the Sea the Leviathan among fishes in the air the Eagle among the Fowls God hath not equalled men in their naturals stature senses in their intellectuals nor graces Government was necessary 1. In innocency God appointed order among Angels 2. In the corrupt estate Societies need it for restraining evil Hab. 1. 14 15. supporting good else shame and fear the curbs of sin will be taken away Man is a sociable creature 3. In the state of grace Tit. 3. 1. Object The Apostle Peter 1 Pet. 2. 13. cals Magistracy a humane Ordinance or Creature Sol. It is Ordinatio Divina secundum substantiam humana secundum modum sinem It is Divine in regard of the chief Authour but humane subjectively or objectively because it is about the society of men and finally because it was instituted for the good of men Magistracy in general is appointed by God but the particular form whether Monarchy Aristocracy or Democracy is a humane Institution Crocius in his Antiweigelius part 2. c. 9. quaest 1. proves that Verè fidelis Magistratum potest gerere and answers the Arguments against Magistrates Evil Magistrates are a scourge to a people A certain holy man they say expostulated on a time with God why he had permitted Phocas being so cruel a man to be Emperour To whom a voice answered That if a worse man could have been found he should have been set over them the wickednesse of the world requiring it 2. The duties of the Magistrate Zanchius saith there are three Offices of a Magistrate 1. To ordain both those things which belong to Religion and the Worship of God and to publick peace honesty and justice 2. To judge impartially or as the Prophets speak to do justice and judgement Magistrates of all men should be just 2 Sam. 23. 3. in regard of their eminent place justice will secure them 3. To punish evil doers with the Sword Rom. 13. 4. Casaubon in his Commentaries upon Polybius reports of one Hiero King of Syracuse that he obtained that large Empire not by right of succession although in times past obtained by his Ancestors nor by violence but from the admiration of his vertue and that he administred that Kingdome after he had got it alwaies with clemency dexterity and faith and lived about 90. yeers integris omnibus