conclusions or similitudes to run on four Feet or to say Because all these Communicants being Men and Women are by the Scripture call'd one Body Figurative or Politick Therefore to conclude that they are one Body natural and one Person natural And as no one body natural or one person natural can have a distinct propriety or a right of Action against it self so none of these Communicants Men and Women can have the same against one another Excellent Doctrine for the one Body made of many and Society of the Adamites I shall not here dispute which is the greatest Absurdity of Transubstantiation of Bread into Flesh in the Mass or of the Flesh of a Woman into the Flesh of a Man in Marriage or whether gains most the Priest by the former or the Lawyer by the later Cheat. But this is easily shewn that the Communicants in the later Fantastick Sacrament lose more Temporally then in the former though perhaps the other may Spiritually And in Compliment to the weaker Sex I shall first do them right in shewing the manifold mischeifs thereby ensue to them Wife made a slave incapable of propriety First By the fiction of their being made the Priest one Person with the Husband Whatsoever they have is the Husbands and what the Husband hath is his own they lose all the right of Propriety in their own Goods to the Husband as perfectly as if they had been bought by him for Slaves at a Market though the Husband hath therefore on the Wedding-Day transubstantiated into him a very fine Wife all Silk and Satin Velvet Cloth of Silver Cloth of Gold Pearl and pretious Stones Yet after the firâ—â— Month when the Moon changeth he may sell away St. Paul's Impertinent putting the Money in his pocket and transubstantiate her into a plain Petticoat and Wastcoat to last as long as she lives and when she dies bury her in Woollen and this is all the poor Woman gets by having him before Mr. Parson in his Temple and making him to promise with all my Worldly Goods I thee endow which made a wary old Gentleman as saith the Woman's Lawyer pag. 121. an acquaintant of his lest his Son-in-law though he did not take his Daughter down in her Wedding-shoes should let her after go without stockings and break her heart to see all her old feathers moult and no new spring and enforce her to take new Wings to fly to Heaven before he was willing to spare her therefore he in good earnest bound his Son-in-law in a good sound bond to give his Daughter every year so many Gowns Kirtles pairs of Silk-stockings c. Her Estate forfeited and consumed by her Husband's Vices 2. If her Husband hath mortgaged or fraudulently made away his Estate before marriage if he carelessly after marriage spend it on other Women Drinking Diceing or other viciousness if he is Out-lawed Attainted for Felony Rebellion Treason or taken in Execution for Debt or Surety-ship all her Lands Goods and Portion shall be taken from her during his life which may be longer then hers and she may wear Rags or starve if she can neither work nor beg Rob'd of her Trust in the Testator's Goods as well as her own 3. If she have a great Estate as Executrix her Husband will change the bonds into his own name sell the Leases change the propriety of all the Goods and when he dies leave her not a farthing of the Testator's Goods or her own The Turk is not so turkish to rob his Wife who is a Free-woman or to transubstantiate the propriety of her Goods into his for so 't is said Alchor cap. 4. pag. 49. O ye that believe in God it is not lawful for you to inherit what is your Wives by force and this is not only of their own goods they brought with them but likewise of the gifts of the Husband 's Goods given them by himself for it is further said ibid. Take not violently away what you have given them unless they be surprized in manifest Adultery But amongst Christians Harlots are in better condition then Wives for though the Scripture 1 Cor. 6.16 sayes in the same words of an Harlot as of a Wife Harlot loseth no Propriety Know ye not that he which is joyned to an Harlot is one Body for two saith he shall be one flesh yet never was so absurd Exposition made that the Harlot loseth the propriety of her Goods and Rights to him who lies with her It appears likewise by the Roman forms of Divorce that the married Wives who were Free-women notwithstanding their marriage retained their propriety the words of which form were Res tuas tibi habeto the word tuas shews propriety 4. He may cheat her in all his Promises or Contracts made with her before marriage as a Man promised a Women who knew no Quirks in Law if she would marry him to leave her so much worth after his death and she thereon marries him this promise is extinguished by the marriage and she shall never have benefit of it Compell'd to pay her Husband's Debts 5. He may by this Transubstantiation by many tricks in Law eause others to bring actions without cause against his Wife for his own use and Arrest Out-law and cast her in Goal at his pleasure A. B. and D. his Wife were bound by obligation in forty pounds for payment of twenty he suffer'd a Judgment by default and after suffer'd his Wife to be taken in Execution and put in Prison by his assent whereby the Wife was driven to procure her own friends to pay the Condemnation for her Husband and redeem her from her Turkish Pateroon otherwise she might long enough have lain in Algiers for he would till this was done give no Warrant for any Writ of Error and this was the Case of the good Wife at the Clock in Aldersgate-street and the Judges pittied her but little for as my Manuscript says they only smiled at the unkind and subtile device And this was done 42 Eliz. which shews that the poor Woman married by Priest though they had a Queen Regnant there had little better justice done them than now Made an Out-Law a Villain a pagan an Alien a Person forfeited c. 6. Another mischief is by this Transubstantiation she not only loses the right of propriety as a slave but the right of action as an Out-law disabled to sue for any injury done her and to express the same more full and plainly she by this blessed Sacrament of marriage by a Priest is made a Villain a Pagan an Alien an Excommunicate a Nun of Lisbon an attainted in a Praemunire a non habens personam standi in judicio against her Husband a person convicted forfeited and confiscated to his own use and what is worst of all when he hath robbed and rifled her of all she hath he may exercise his Tartarian Authority and beat her because she hath no more Is this the
Duaren lib. 1. Disp c. 1. Hermann vult lib. 1. discep c. 1. Goed ad l. 9. n. 1.6.7 ff de verb. sign 2. By the Law si vis vocationi fuat testamini igitur em capito appears that after the Defendant had a Copy of the Declaration deliver'd no Capias before Judgment was to issue against him without a Fugam fecit or at least an hiding himself and the word Testamini shews there must be Productio testium Probation by witnesses of the flight or absconding and not a Latitat granted on a meer false Suggestion and Lie or on the Forgery of an Outlawry to destroy that inestimable Right of Liberty from wrongful Imprisonment and more valuable than Life it self 3. By the Law si vindiciam falsam tulit rei si velit is Arbitros tres dato forum Arbitriis fructus duplione damnum deciditor appears That the Plaintiffs were Fined pro falso elamore double the value on a Writ of Enquiry of Damage to a Jury of Three which like Commissioners for examination of Witnesses being equally chosen by the Parties were more able and equal than a numerous Jury of Twelve all chosen by the Sheriff 4. This being granted that by the Ancient Roman and Athenian Laws Oblatio Libelli preceded vocatio in jus and vocatio in jus preceded Contumacy and Probation by Witnesses preceded Sentence of the same and that Plaintiffs were punish'd for false Suggestions it follows there was neither taking of Pledges Distress Attachment Satisdation Exaction of Bail or Arrest in their Original Process nor before Judgment except on Contumacy proved by Witnesses which shews that neither Romans nor Athenians were Authors of beginning Law-Suits with Execution 5. It appears by the Law Aeris confessi rebusque jure judicatis c. That the Pagan Execution it self after Judgment was more Just and Merciful than the Papal and Episcopal is now with us before Judgment for first they were so far from Arresting before Demand and before Judgment that they could not Arrest the Defendant on Hearing and Trial and Judgment pass'd against him without giving him Monition of the Judgment and till Thirty Days Justi dies to provide the Money were expired but now on a bare Bond before Judgment and before so much as a Demand made they cast into the Goal the Husbandman from his Plow the Tradesman from his Shop and the Merchant from the Exchange without giving the least notice Thirty or so much as Three Days to provide the Money whereby they and their Families their Reputation and Trade are oftentimes destroyed not only to the ruin of themselves but great damage of the Publick for the greatest bulk of Trade of the Nation being driven on Money borrowed on Interest if it be intended what is borrowed should be applied to Trade it is impossible that they can pay interest for it to the Creditor if they must keep it at their Chambers for the Creditors to call it in again on an hour's warning or as they now do without any warning at all and imploy it at their Trade they cannot unless they may have at least warning for so small a pittance of Time as Thirty Days which the very Heathen allowed their Debtors to be free from Arrest though Judgment was past against them This abominable Cruelty of beginning Suits with Execution came not therefore from the Heathen but from the pretended Christian Romish Bishops and Clerks All Attachments Distresses Exactions of Pledges Bail and Arrests before Judgment are Executions before Judgment and come from Romish Bishops against whom the Heathen shall rise in Judgment Now that beginning of Suits with Executing by exacting of Pledges before Oblatio Libelli Bail before Flight Judgment before Hearing Distress Attachment and Arrest before Judgment was brought into Great Britain by the Romish Bishops appears by these Reasons 1. Because the Register of Writs that old Romish Idol to which more innocent Causes and Persons have been Sacrificed and Destroyed according to the proportion of the Territory it Commands than to the Turkish Alcoran is in Latine which is the Romish Language in which Register all the Original Process of Summons Attachment and Distringas are composed for Exacting of Pledges and Bail Distress imposing Penalties and Forfeitures Arrest and Imprisonment in Personal Actions and Grand-capes and Petty-capes in real before Oath of Calumny Oblatio Libelli Hearing Probation or Judgment and in Indictments by Inquisition 2. Because all old Formalities of Entries and Pleadings of Instruments and Contracts Publick and Private were Originally in Latine which shews they were formed by Romish Bishops or their Clerks in their own Language conform to their Romish Idol the Register beginning with Execution as particularly appears in all Instruments concerning Feudal Jurisdiction are Clauses and Conventions of Distress Reentry Penalties and Forfeitures horrible unjust before Oath of Calumny Ohlatio Libelli dies justi Hearing Probation Judgment or Judg but the Lord himself in his own Case over his Vassal 3. Because anciently the Romish Bishops have been Chancellors in that Court which is Officina Brevium the Shop of Writs where they are forged and have been likewise chief Judges in the other Courts of the King keeping all their Proceedings in Latine Court-hand and Chancery-hand secret from the understanding of King and People whereby they exercised what Tyranny and Oppression they pleased 4. Because they and other Ecclesiastical Persons as Abbots Priors and the like have Possess'd the Third part of all the Baronies Honors and Mannors in the Land and had they not been stopt by the Statutes of Mortmain might by this time have got all this way therefore of taking Distress Penalties and Forfeitures before Judgment advanced their Interest in Tyranny and made them Arbitrary and absolute Judges in their own Case 5 Because anciently the Romish Bishops have been Outlawries and Excommunicato Capiendos and Judgment of Heresies the Romish Inquisition in Disguise and to the shame of Protestants still claim to be in their Ecclesiastical Courts Judges of Heresie whereby as the Common Law Judges by their Outlawries which are Temporal Excommunicato Capiendos they by their Excommunicato Capiendos which are Spiritual Outlawries have brought in the Romish Inquisition to begin all Suits with Execution before Judgment 6. Because the Greek Bishops first destroyed the Equal Law of the Twelve Tables Si in jus vocet aâ—que eat which is before interpreted Statim eat and made it in jus vocati statim eant aut satisdent which Satisdation included all the Rabble of Distresses Pledges Bail Mainprize Arrests and Imprisoments before Oblatio Libelli Hearing Probation or Judgment which Greek Bishops were the Instruments of that wicked Empress Theodora who foisted into the Laws of Justinian what they pleased concerning Judicial Proceeding touching Marriage Filiation and Succession and all other matters and the Romish Bishops followed them in their wickedness in whatsoever was for their gain and brought the same with themselves and the
he ought to be punish'd in One Hundred Pounds to the King and Imprisonment one Year without Bail and One Hundred Pounds more to the Knight injured thereby or to any other Person who in his default will Sue for the same and is contrary to the two said standing Acts of Parliament of greater consequence than Magna Charta or the Petition of Right themselves for if there is a Protestant Parliament no doubt they will make and we shall not want Protestant Laws but if once there get in a Papist Parliament both Protestant Laws Religion and Protestants themselves will be all destroyed And as the Sheriff Returns Fictions to Courts so do they send Fictions to him and it is hard for him to know when they speak true and when false as if a Venire Facias be sent him to Return 12 Jurors he must Return 24 which is double the number or he shall be Fined for as they write their words in the Venire by halves so do they as it seems their Meaning by halves yet the poor Sheriff is bound to understand them to his Cost then if they send him a Pone per Vadios Salvos plegios the Sheriff must Return no other Plegii to answer their Fiction than his own Fiction of Plegii John Den and Richard Fen or they will teach the Party to have a false Imprisonment against him Suits are removed when the Plaintiff hath been at all the Cost and trouble and is ready for a Trial on meer vexation and to delay on Suggestion or Fiction of a Cause without any Oath of Calumny Attachments and Arrest of Goods and Persons is used in the City without any Oblatio Libelli or Oath of Calumny on meer Fictions and Suggestions City Law 22. but very wrongfully for a Citizen hath as good Right to Magna Charta as he hath to the Charter of the City and under the name of being free of the City doth not lose the liberty of a Subject to be free from Arrest before Judgment Coke Vind. Law 26. says Abuses of Fictions to Arrest before Judgment This brings to my remembrance how a Gentleman was Arrested for 1500 l. the same day that he was to have been Married without any colourable cause of Action spitefully to hinder his Match and was not able to give Bail but the Party being Non-suit the Gentleman notwithstanding could recover as I remember no more than 7 s. 2 d. Cost yet he lost his Monies and indeed himself by it for I know it was the occasion of his utter Undoing and a man that is Cannibally given may devour the Credit of 500 men Arresting them for 5000 l. a piece never declare yet pay no Cost though Party Arrested had better have paid 500 l. and this is so usual that 't is commonly said I 'le bestow a Bill of Middlesex on such a man to stay him in Town that I may have his company into the Countrey when I go down And I my self was informed by a Sea-Captain who was a Sufferer in such an Arrest That there happen'd to be two Merchants in London each of which designed a Voyage to the same Port of Barbary whether he who could arrive first was assured he should to his great gain obtain the Prime of the Market to which purpose they both strove with all diligence possible which should be foremost at the Spring and it happen'd that he who had his Ship first ready had entertained this Captain of my acquaintance to command her for him and all being ready to set Sail the Captain would needs walk into the City to take his parting Cup and Farewell of his Friends where unexpectedly he was Arrested for 5000 l. though not owing a farthing and the same being a Choak-Bail-Sum he knew he should get none to be Surety for him and thereupon sent to his Merchant to inform him how he was boarded before he could get aboard who being much troubled that his Captain was taken by a Land Pyrat repaired to him and understanding from him that he did not owe the Party at whose Suit he was Arrested a farthing and knowing withal that it was done by the Spite of the other Merchant to stop his Ship from getting before him he gave Bail for his Captain and sent him immediately on the Voiage All which Mischiefs happen because there is no Law to compel to give a Copy of the Declaration and Oath of Calumny before Arrest by which all Fictions are prevented All the Judicial Transactions of Fines and Recoveries are Fictions Fictions of Fines and Recoveries so though we have fled from Land to Sea and back again from Sea to Land we know not where to find Rest for the Sole of our Foot from Fictions We are next come to another horrible cause of their Increase which is that no Averment or Probation to the contrary is admitted against the Sheriff or the Clerk nor the Returns or Records how Records which are nothing but the Scribling of Clerks in false Latine and Court-hand for their Fees come to be of higher Authority than the Scripture it self is strange for it was never denied except against Mahomets Alchoran but Averment and contrary Probation might be brought against the false Copying false Translating or false Printing of any word or Clause in the Scripture or it would be very difficult to overthrow Popery What greater reason is there of so many Forgeries of Clerks but that there is no Averment allowed against their Records nor contrary Probation whereby they may for Money insert what Fictions and Falsities they please Estopples are another mischievous cause and the denial of liberty of Travers as bad or worse than the other Turpia quid referam vanae mendacia Linguae I am weary and ashamed to recite so much reflecting so deeply on the Honourable and necessary Profession of the Law Pudet haec opprobria nobis Et dici potuisse non potuisse refelli But all this may be easily taken away of Fictions and Falsities if so small a matter of Form were but alter'd as to give liberty to Traverse all is false and to cause the Plaintiffs and Defendants to give Copies of their Declarations and Pleas and to give their Oath of Calumny to them for I saw it by experience in Scotland which I must acknowledg and testifie to the Honour of their Form of Judicial Proceedings That I could never for the space of Six Years observe the least Fiction in the same which I can attribute to no other cause than the wise and just Act of Parliament concerning the Oath of Calumny Jac. 1. P. 9. C. 125. and the present Practice accordingly which Act being short I have transcribed That Advocates and Fore-speakers in Temporal Courts sall Sweare THrow the consent of the hail Parliament it is Statute and Ordained That Advocates and Fore-speakers in Temporal Courts and alswa the Parties that they plead for gif they be present in all Causes in the beginning or
Moral Law of God of Truth and Equity neither if these Writs were Formed according to the Truth and Equity of the Moral Law of God is it possible a sufficient number should be Formed for Writs are finite and Cases of Equity infinite and not to be put in Writs or written except by God in the Fleshly Tables of the Heart and in the Spiritual Tables of the Soul it self and Conscience It will be asked How could they subsist before H. 6. without a Sub paena and Equity from a Chancellour seeing the Common Law Writs could not supply it and what expedient is there now how Equity may be supplied To which I answer That Equity was then supplied by the Writ of Right and Justicies the Titles of both which Writs signifie Equity and likewise other Writs and the General Issues Formed on them of the Meer Right Not Guilty Null Tort Null dissersint Nihil debet guided the Jury to find according to Right and Equity by the Moral Law of God and not the Ceremonial Law of Man till the Judges to wrest the Power belonging to Jurors into their own hands brought in the Tender of the Demy mark to turn the Issue of meer Right into a Possessary Issue and instead of Truth brought in the Pictions of Colours destroyed the Justicies by Writs of Remover gave way to false Laying of Counties in Transitory Actions changed Venues granted new Trials abated Declarations for Variance from the Bond and not Sueing for what was paid as well as for what was not granting Arrests of Judgment after Verdict and not permitting to demur first to the Law and after to plead to the Fact before Verdict prohibited on the Issue Not Guilty matters of Justification to be given in Evidence admitted Demurs to Evidence admitted special Verdicts caused Juries to be of an even and not of an odd number and the Verdict not to be according to the Plurality of Votes and many other ways they had to weary Juries from giving a Verdict according to Conscience and Equity or when they had so given it to same I conclude therefore to compell men to Commence Suites by Writs in the present Age is to condemn them without Hearing of the Equity and Merits of their Cause and to compell them to revive again those Ancient Writs and trie Equity by Juries hath many great inconveniences before mention'd to be incident to all Writs especially such as are Antiquated and not understood but all these mischiefs are salved by Commencing Suites by a Copy of the Declaration Sworn in stead of a Writ which cannot be Sworn and a Judg Commissionated with Jurisdiction of Fact Law and Equity under Appeal which single Judg in a Court by himself sitting without Vacation as a Chancellour hath Power to do will no doubt be able to dispatch more Causes without troubling any Writs Juries or Councel at the Bar and more justly and under Account in one Year then 't is possible for any Chancellour with Plurality of Offices or Court with Plurality of Judges Juries and Councel at the Bar to do in Seven 6. Men are condemned before Hearing on the Capias Vtlagatum and Excommunicato Capiendo A Satyr on a Papist and a Protestant Imprison'd one on an Outlawry the other on an Excommunicato Capiendo against Imprisonment before Hearing A Papist and a Protestant Who used when they met to Rant About the Altar and the Rail Were both together Clapt in Gaol The first was catch'd by an Outlawry The last whose Conscience did vary From Bishops and their Common Prayer As Felon or a false Betrayer Was therefore Excommunicate And put to beg within a Grate Pap. Brother then quoth the Papist sad Are Protestants too grown so mad To have an Inquisition here Who thus can though no cause appear Forfeit our Goods and Selves at will In Prisons cold to starve and kill Before they Hear us doest not know Amongst our selves it is not so Who by Experience wiser grown Will Inquisition now have none Witness the Rich Venetian And wary Dutch who late began For Liberty against such Lords And Swisse with their two handed Swords For this Proud Aragon Rebell d And Naples Silk-men hardly quell'd And many more abhor'd such Tricks Yet are they all good Catholicks So Holland justly now prevents Imprisonment of Innocents And makes to help the Poor opprest Before a Judgment no Arrest Is this the Charta and of Right Petition for which you fight That every ' Torney and his Clerk Who use to live upon the shark Forge all the Outlawries they please Remedies worse than the Disease And that Poor men may be betray'd First Forge the County where 't is laid They Forge and Antedate the Writs Of Parchment cut in little Bits Then next they Forge the Sheriffs name And Forge Returns upon the same They Proclamations Forge and Feign And Exigends next without pain And all this Knavery you may spie Page Sixth of the Academy Which is their Mother and their Nurse Teachers to Forge and Steal of course Such Clerks deserve hanged to be As Nicholas Clerks upon a Tree And thus though made them to prevent They fool all Acts of Parliament For no Averment must deny The Shrieve or Clerk although they lie Is this the Liberty so proud You use to cry it up aloud And Property you so much Vant That every Papist it doth want What Purgatory can you tell Is worse than this on Earth your Hell Or what Hell is there more worth fearing Than Your Damnation without Hearing He neither shews me Time or Place Nor Witnesses brought Face to Face My Goods are all Confiscated My very Wives and Children's Bed The Bailies Seised without account Of Price to what they did amount Or Witness Writings Boxes Chest And Money too on a Suggest And Lies and Fictions in worse case I am than Felons in this Place Their Goods although the Law is strict Not Forfeit are until Convict But left to feed them Oh the blest Justice is shewn to men distrest By Protestants who only you Say have the Religion true But Christ says Know them by their Works Which shews you worse than Jews or Turks I have not left a Bit of Bread Witness these unfeign'd Tears I shed The Plaintiff asks of me a Sum As at the Dreadful Day of Doom I answer shall and God doth know I do not him a Farthing ow Yet can I not although I try Be brought to answer or deny His Forged Stuff or see the Face Of Judg or Jury on the Place But here to perish am designed And to this Dungeon confined Unless I give what e're he 'l ask This is my miserable Task I think you now turn Witches too The Rogues the mischief who did do To bring me here sure had a Spell What Language 't was I cannot tell 'T was written in a little scrow Half-words and dash't that none might know Or ratâ—er scratch'd it was in Soot With Devils Claw or Cloven Foot Prot.
in the Fees are mention'd Stat. Mal. 2. cap. 2. that is to say 1. To Seal Writs 2. To Seal the Kings Pattents Grants and Commissions 3. Presentations to Churches 4. Pardons to such Malefactors as deserve them which Statute of Malcom 2. cap. 2. follows in these words 1. Item They Ordained to the Chancellar the Fie of the Great Seal that is for ilk Chartour of an Hundreth Pound Land and above that the Fie of the Seal Ten Pounds and to his Clerk for the Writeing twa Markes 2. Item For ane Precept of Suising conform to the Chartour to the Chancellar for the Fie of the Seale ane Mark and to his Clerk twa Shillings 3. Item For ane Letter of Attornay or Protection for the Fie of the Seale Twelve Pennies and to the Clerk for the writeing Thrie Pennies 4. Item For ane Brieve closed with Walx to the Chancellar Sex Pennies and to the Clerk for writeing Thrie Pennies 5. Item For are Letter of Remission given by the King for the Slauchter of a man to the Chancellar 40 Shillings and to his Clerk for the writeing Sex Shillings Aucht Pennies 6. Item For ane Letter of Presentation to ane Kirk or to ane Hospital to the Chancellar 40 Shillings and to his Clerk for writâ—ing Aucht Pennies 7. But that part of the Office of the Chancellour of Scotland which concerns Original Writs is since Reformed and all Writs Abolished except Seven Only Seven Writs left in Scotland which Skene de verb. sign tit Breve recites thus Bot Seven Forms of Brieves all anerlie are now commonly used The First The Brieve of Mortancestrie The Second The Brieve of Tutorie The Third The Brieve of Idiotry The Fourth The Brieve of Terce The Fifth The Brieve of Line or Linâ—ation of Lands and Tenements within Burgh The Sext The Brieve of Division The Seventh The Brieve of Perambulation Quhair of the Three first Brieves are Answer'd and retour'd again to the Chancellary and the uther Four receives na retour'd Answer And in all other Actions instead of Writs by an Act of Parliament of James the Fifth after mention'd the Defendant ought to be served with a Copy of the Declaration to begin the Suit Only one Writ in Wales for Real Actions Writs pull men out of their Houses Beyond Sea In Wales and some parts of the North they Trie all Real Actions by a Quod ei deforcâ—at 8. The mischiefs of Writs are they pull men out of their Houses before Judgment contrary to the Civil Law ff siquis in jus vocatus non ierit l. 21. de Domo sua nemo extrahi debet which is expounded by Bartolus Invitus quis de domo non debet extrahi sed ibi existens potest verbaliter citari contra contumacem fit Missio in possissionem 9. Writs help not for any matter rising beyond Sea unless by Fiction of the place beyond Sea to be in England so honest men are without Remedy and only Liars obtain it No Oath of Calumny can be to a Writ 10. No Oath of Calumny can be given of a Writ whereby it becomes full of Falsities and Fictions but to a Bill in Chancery or Declaration an Oath of Calumny may be given which will purge it from all Falsity and Fiction if no Writ but if there is a Writ false it will compell the Declaration to be false because it will otherwise be abated for Variance from the Writ 11. Writs make Declarations to be of double length and contain two Declarations one a vain repetition of the other for 7. H. 6.47 In every Action on the Case the whole Cause of Action at large ought to be contained in the Writ for it is not sufficient to have a general Writ and special Count whereby the Party is compell'd to Enter and the Defendant to Copy a double Declaration of huge length and often twice as long as a Chancery Bill and Four Judges on Demurs to have each a Copy and of the whole Process to the intolerable Charge of Suitors and Gains of Clerks and Officers of Courts though it be but a trifling Action for Words or the like 12. Writs must pass the hands of Under-Sheriffs who often times will delay and betray them as long as the Party will give them Money 13. The old Writs which are in the Register and all the new which have been coined or joined by Chancellours or Clerks are defective and insufficient to supply Justice in the multitude of Cases which happen 1. Because the greatest part of the Writs of the Register are Antiquated and never used but remain as Forms out of Fashion and matters as unprofitable Lumber 2. All real Actions are thrown aside and the truth is Lawyers are so ignorant how to manage them that like the old â—ion in his Den they draw all their Clients into Chancery whence Vestigâ—a nulla retrorsum 3. The two old Principal Writs of Droit Patent and Novel Disseisin the one to determine the Right the other the Possession no Lawyer now knows in them to join the Mise or arraign the Assise any more than he doth when he talks of Robin Hood to Shoot in his Bow whereby the two chief Writs which dispatcht more Justice than all the rest are utterly lost 4. It is as impossible for a Chancellour and Clerk though they make in their Officina Brevium a Thousand Forms of Writs more than they have to fit with them all that want Right any more than for a Shoe-maker in his Officina Calceorum though he hath a good stock of Shoes ready made to all the Feet with them which want Shoes yea more impossible for the Shoe-maker makes his Shoes of soft yielding Leather his Straps or Buckles open or shut them wider or closer his Shoeing-horn Weesel-skin or Fists draw pull and thump them off and on and many pretty tricks and Instruments he hath to curry shave stretch punch oil water and stand them on the Last to accommodate them for the Foot but a Chancellour makes all his Writs of Iron or Latine and puts in them so many Gravels of Fictions Falsities broken Words Repugnancies Absurdities Nonsense that it kills or creeples any Case to walk from its own Home to Westminster 5. That there is an intolerable defect in Writs to supply Justice to the People appears in this That though all Originals come out of a Court which inâ—itles it self a Court of Conscience and Equity yet there is not one Writ to Remedy a particular Case of either nor any Action on the Case for a Case of Conscience or Equity arising from the Moral Law of God but all fall down and worship the Themis or Great Idol of the Ceremonial Law of Man of Livery and Seisin Fines Recoveries Inrollments Writings Seals Forms of Entries Forms of Pleading Forms of Words Fictions and the like which are not able to give a Right to the least foot of Land or handful of Goods nor any other Law than the
and no Certificate of Bishops hath power to take that right from them 7. Here the wantonness of Widows is forbidden who are for new Husbands as soon as the old is put in his Grave whereby who are Fathers of their Children is made uncertain 8. Here is no false Fathering of Children on those who are within four Seas 9. Here is no punishing Men twice for one offence once by the Temporal Court and then by the Spiritual Court or contrary punishments by contrary Courts one by the Contentious Court and another by the Penitential Court 10. Here is no Auricular Confession of their Wives or Daughters by Priests in Temples or Chambers and defiling thereby of their Families 11. Here is no punishing of Women for bringing forth Children nor the Murders of so many Infants caused thereby as by the Papist Laws is continually done Yet I conclude though the Law of the Turk is far better than that of the Pope and shall rise in Judgment against such as plant his Canons in their Courts in defiance of the Law of God and Nature I think neither a fit Rule to judge Marriage Legitimation or Succession by CHAP. V. Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession not to be judged by Ecclesiastical Laws THE Question is Whether Marriage Legitimation and Succession ought to be judged by Ecclesiastical Laws No English Lawyer can mention my Lord Coke without great honour but how he came so biass'd as to endeavour to set up Papal and Episcopal Laws under the name of Regal appears not Object 1 It is objected by Coke lib. 5.1 part 40. in Cawdryes Case That the Kingdom of England is an absolute Monarchy and if the King cannot Authorize by his Commission or Writ Ecclesiastical Judges to determin and judg those great and important Causes of Matrimony Divorce and general Bastardy by Certificate of the Bishop who is the Ecclesiastical Witness and Judg both of Fact and Law and by the Canon Laws which by use and custom are now our Ecclesiastical Laws Then he is disabled to be supreme Governour of this Realm in all Spiritual things or Causes as well as Temporal according to the Oath of Supremacy due to him And that he could not then cause Justice to be administred to his Subjects in these so great and important causes of Matrimony Divorce and general Bastardy on which depends the strength of mens Descents and Inheritances This I conceive though not in the same words yet in sence and substance to be the weight of my Lord Coke's Argument whereby he would make use of Marriage as one means amongst his many other to set up an Ecclesiastical Law and Judg over the Temporal Freeholds and Inheritances and other Birth-rights of the Subjects To which is answer'd First As to the words Absolute and Supream I suppose he intended no such absolute Monarchy or Supremacy as is not under the Law of God though it be not so express'd in the form of the Oath of Supremacy For though Regum timendorum in proprios greges Ecclesiastical Laws not needful to the King's Supremacy but hurtful Reges in ipsos imperium est Jovis then I think he doth not intend it to be above the Law of the Land seeing the King himself by his Oath is pleased to oblige himself to his People to govern according to that Law where it is not contrary to the Law of God Then as to the pretended want of Power of doing Justice concerning causes of Free-hold and Inheritance depending on marriage except by Ecclesiastical Laws and Judges that is very strange for how was Justice done in the times of Primitive Christianity for many Hundred Years after Christ when neither Bishops or any other Ecclesiastical Judges ever pretended Jurisdiction todetermin Temporal Right or Propriety but left the same to be judged by the Imperial Laws How was Justice done in the time of Henry the Second when the Jurisdiction of all Matrimonial causes remained in the Temporal Courts Richard the First his Son being the first as Matthew Paris writes whom the Clergy got by his publick Edict to give the Jurisdiction of Power and Gifts by reason of Marriage and of all Matrimonial causes to the Bishops Courts and the same Richard likewise gave them Jurisdiction of all breach of Faith Promises and Oaths whereby if much of the Power so rashly granted had not been by him so speedily resumed they had hookt to themselves the whole Jurisdiction from the King's Courts of all Contracts and Conveyances Bonds and Obligations as well as Marriages concerning Temporal Goods and Inheritances And why cannot general as well as special Bastardy be tryed at Common Law And how likewise are all Rights depending on all Marriages made during the late Civil Wars by pretence of any Ordinance of Parliament made by 12. Car. 2. cap. 33. to be tryed by a Jury and the Common Law and not by Certificate of the Bishop or any Ecclesiastical Judg to the advancement and not prejudice of Justice and a far greater expedition and advantage to the same would it be if by the like Act the Jurisdiction of all Marriages and Legitimations as it was in the time of Henry the Second were again restored to the Common-Law-Courts So likewise anciently Bastardy alledged in an Action of Trespass was triable by Jury but now usurped by Bishops as well in personal as real Actions 4. Edw. 4.35 Object 2 Coke lib. 5.1 part in the same case of Cawdry it is further alledged Circumspectè agatis gives no Jurisdiction of Marriage to Bishops That the Statutes of Circumspectè agatis made 13. Eliz. 1. of Articuli Cleri made 9. E. 2. Anno Domini 1315. of 15. E. 3. Cap. 6. of 31. E. 3. Cap. 11. give Jurisdiction of marriage to Bishops To which is answer'd That in the Statute of Circumspectè agatis there is not a word mention'd of marriage but only by it Jurisdiction is given to the Bishops of Fornication and Adultery which is not Marriage but rather Anti-marriage for Marriage is an Ordinance of God Fornication and Adultery are Ordinances of the Devil and whereas before the Jurisdiction of Fornication and Adultery as acknowledged by Coke lib. 5.1 part 488. was in Leets under the name of Letherwit or more properly Lecherwit yet had Leets never Jurisdiction of Marriage or Divorce neither consequently could Bishops have it from them As for Articuli Cleri and the other Statutes there is not a word in them concerning Marriage nor so much as of Fornication and Adultery the Jurisdiction therefore pretended was never given by any Statute Linwood likewise expounds the words of the Statute of Circumspectè agatis which gives Bishops Jurisdiction of all deadly Sins as Fornication and Adultery and the like Non intelligas de omni peccato mortali sed de tali cujus punitio spectat merè ad forum Ecclesiasticum nam si de ratione cujuslibet peccati mortalis cognosceret Ecclesia sic periret temporalis gladii Jurisdictio
cùm vix esset dare causam quin ratione peccati possit deferri ad Ecclesiam Object 3 Stat. Merton gives them no Jurisdiction It 's alledged That it appears by the Statute of Merton that Henry the Third writ in his time to the Bishop to certifie Marriage and Bastardy First It is to be understood therefore that in the time of Pope Alexander the Third Anno Dom. 1160. which was Anno 6. H. 2. in whose time all Matrimonial Causes beonged to the King's Courts This Constitution was made That Children born before Solemnization of Matrimony where Matrimony followed should be as Legitimate to inherit to their Ancestors as those that were born after Matrimony It is likewise further to be known that King John the Father of Henry the Third who made this Statute of Merton following was by the then Pope Innocent Excommunicated King John Excommunicated as likewise at the same time was the Emperor Otho and the whole Kingdom of England Interdicted and so remained for the space of Six Years Three Months and Fourteen Days during all which time there was no Church open for Marriages or Burials but the poorer People were buried like Dogs in Ditches and where they married God knows Through which King John was driven to such distress by his own Bishops and Barons and the French assisting the Pope against him that he was forced before he could get to be released of this Excommunication to pay the Pope vast Sums of Money and to lay down his Crown and Scepter Mantle Sword and Ring the Ensigns of his Royalty at the feet of Pandolphus the Pope's Legat and submit himself to the Mercy and Judgment of the Church Two Days some write Six it was before the Legat restored him to his Crown which he likewise received again on no better Terms then to hold the Kingdom of England and Lordship of Ireland from the See of Rome at the Annual Tribute of a Thousand Marks Silver and the Excommunication was not to be taken off but deferred till further and full satisfaction was made to the Clergy which was not done till Two Years after The Bishops being hereby arrived at so great an height of their Tyrannical Power over this King The Bishops usurped the exercise of Ecclesistical Laws by force over their Kings As that when the King having obtained absolution had gather'd a great Army to have been revenged on the French King the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury told him 't was against his Oath at his Absolution and the King in a great passion reply'd He would not defer the Business for his pleasure seeing Lay-judgment appertained not to him the Arch-Bishop presumed to threaten his native Soveraign that unless he desisted he would Excommunicate him Note therefore That in the time of H. 3. who was the Eldest Son of King John the Bishops continued to assume the Power of Lay-judments as well in Marriages as they did of shutting up of Churches in which they were made from the Pope to whom they had inforced King John to surrender his Crown and not from the King 's Writ as that Statute of Merton shews rather a proud Renunciation and scorn to answer the King 's Writ concerning Marriage then any use permitted by them to the King of the same unless he would as his Father had done lay down again his Crown to them and have Marriage judg'd according to the Law of the Pope for otherwise they tell him plainly They neither will nor can answer his Writ as appears by the Statute it self the words whereof follow 20 H. 3. Cap. 9. To the King 's Writ of Bastardy Whether one being born before Matrimony may Inherit in like manner as he that is born after Matrimony All the Bishops answer'd That they would not nor could not answer to it because it was directly against the common Order of the Church that is meant the Romish Church And all the Bishops instanted the Lords that they would consent that all such as were born afore Matrimony should be Legitimated as well as they who were born within Matrimony as to the succession of Inheritance for so much as the Church accepteth such for Legitimate And all the Earls and Barons answer'd with one voice That they would not change the Laws of the Realm which hitherto have been used and approved Coke 2 part Inst 97. It is said Though the Bishops are Spiritual Persons yet in case of general Bastardy when the King writes to them to certifie who is lawful Heir to any Lands or other Inheritances they ought to certifie according to the Law and Custom of England and not according to the Roman Canons and Constitutions yet if they do make their Certificate according to the Canon Law No remedy against Bishops making Certificates contrary to the King's Laws General Bastardy uâ—urped by Bishops not given them by Law and not the Law of the Land there appears no Remedy unless such a one as is worse then the Disease Sir Galfred le Scrope Cheif Justice saith Before this Statute of Merton the Party pleaded not general Bastardy but that he was born out of Espousals and the Bishop ought to certifie whether he were born before Espousals or not and according to that Certificate to proceed to Judgment according to the Law of the Land And the Prelates answered That they could not nor would not to this Writ answer and therefore ever since special Bastardy viz. that the Defendant c. was born before Espousals hath been Try'd in the King's Courts and general Bastardy in the Bishops Court and herewith agree out old Books and the constant Opinion of the Judges ever since Coke 2 part Inst 99. It being before granted That the Law of England cannot be changed but by an Act of Parliament and Magna Charta being before made and being a Declaration of the ancient Common Law First That no Freeman was to be put out of his Free-hold or Inheritance but per legale Judicium parium and there being no cause of its own Nature more Temporal or more concerning Succession to Temporal Inheritance then Marriage It was contrary to Magna Charta and the Common Law to judg the Fact of it by any other Judges then Juries and the Law of it by any other Judges then those of Temporal Courts and though the Pope and Bishops in those Superstitious times forced the Kings many times as they did King John to yeild his Crown and the Subjects to yeild their Marriages and other Temporal Rights to their Arbitrary and Saleable Sentence for fear of Excommunication yet doth not this any way prove that the Jurisdiction of Marriage was ever granted them by any Law or Act of Parliament or could be without it were contrary to a known Common Law and Act of Parliament which expressly gave the trial of Temporal Rights and Inheritances to a Legale Judicium parium and not to any Ecclesiastical Judges or Laws Now therefore it being clear they had
just cause by Divorce one of another without publishing the cause and if there be no cause amongst the Children by taking away as much of their Portions as the offence deserves and giving the same to the innocent Children and by good instruction reproofs and virtuous example of the Parents which will prevent more offences in Children then Tribunals can ever reform though they have Witnesses So Lycurgus by commanding in his Laws That all Captains of Armies and Priests of Temples should marry and that Husbands themselves should come to their Wives Furtim verecunde and the Children be modestly Educated left Sparta so clean from unchast demeanour that when Geradas an old Spartan was asked by a stranger What was the Punishment of Adultery in Sparta for he could find no Law made by Lycurgus concerning that Crime Oh Friend says he There is no Adulterer with us When he reply'd But what if there should be any Geradas told him He should pay a Bull so big as should be able to stretch his Neck over Taygetus and Drink of Eurotas when the other laughing said There is not such a Bull to be found Neither quoth Geradas Is an Adulterer to be found in Sparta where Riches Luxury and wantoness of Apparel are counted a disgrace and Modesty and Obedience to Magistrates an Honour Where the Seminaries of Vices are not permitted how can Vices grow First Therefore as to Man and Wife as Bodin lib. 1. cap. 3. says Nothing seems more pernicious then to compel the cause of Divorce to be shewn before a Judg for in so doing the honour of one or both Parties is hazarded which would not be if neither of them were compel'd to prove the same before a Judg as Plutarch in Alcib relates That when the Wife of Alcibiades went to complain of him before the Judg he came after her into the Court and took her by force and carried her away home on his Shoulders Ne Secreta Fori Panderet whereat the Judg only smiled The Hebrews likewise used to make their Bills of Divorce without a cause neither is it prohibited by Christ if there were a true cause to put her away by private Bill without publick Tribunal or Judg for such were all the Bills of Moses and no publick Judg required to judg of the Cause but only the Conscience of the Party And Joseph having a just cause of suspicion against Mary his Wife did not bring her before a Judg and is commended for so doing to be a just man as Matth. 1.19 is said Then Joseph her Husband being a just man and not willing to make her a publick Example was minded to put her away privily So doth Plutarch in Aemil. relate of Paulus Aemilius Who according to the Custom of the Romans shewed no cause of putting away his Wife but affirmed her very honest wife and nobly descended and by whom he had also many fair Children but when he was press'd by her Friends to shew the cause why he would then Divorce he shewed them his Shoo which was very handsomely and well made and yet says he None of you know but my self feeleth where it wrings my Foot By which doing the Woman is not dishonour'd but may marry with another suitable to her quality and the same liberty had the Wives to divorce themselves from their Husbands without proving or shewing any cause before a publick Judg. This likewise preserves the repute of the Children who though innocent will likewise perpetually bear the reproach if the dishonour either of their Father or Mother be publish'd before a Judg. And further as to drawing the secret offences of uncleanness of Children especially of Daughters before a Judg who are under the Family Jurisdiction either of Father or Mother or Husband the same is an undoing to those who offend for though they never so much repent and amend yet there can be no repairing of their shame or name when publish'd and the innocent who are the Father and Mother and Husband and the other Children the dishonour can never be taken again from them Seneca therefore who in all other things was a great honourer of the virtue of Augustus yet blames as a great oversight in that wise Emperour that he punished the Adulteries of his Daughter Julia publickly by Banishment Quae potius saith he Principi tacenda quà m vindicanda sunt Secondly It makes every petty difference between Man and Wife irreconcilable and heightens Contention from a small spark by blowing it abroad to so great a flame that it is at last unquenchable for the publishing of many things neither criminous nor sinful may affect some modest Natures with as deep a sence of disgrace as those that are false as much as those that are true and when once published cannot by repentance be again revoked but may cause such hatred between the Parties as will never again admit them to live together Thirdly Where offences are not published they oft times may with honour be forgiven and the Parties reconciled which if publish'd cannot So Antonius Pius forgave the Adultery of Faustina and would not draw it to publick Judgment to prevent his own shame And Ael Spart writes That the Emperour Adrian did the like to his Empress who though he suspected yet put not away but only removed such Courtiers from his Court as he suspected Of the Law compelling Persons Married though mortal Enemies to Cohabitation Another great mischeif is in the Ecclesiastical Laws they compel Cohabitation of Men and Women when they are mortal Enemies and take off Exequenda Matrimonialia Officia and due benevolence when one insidiates for the life of the other of which take Bodin further Fol. 19. but says he If the Cause seem not sufficient to the Judg which he intends the Cause alledged of Divorce to an Ecclesiastical Judg or be not well proved it is therefore meet to inforce the Parties to live together in that Society which is of all other the straightest Test having always the one and the other the object of their grief still before their Eyes Truly says he I am not of that opinion for seeing themselves brought into extream servitude fear and perpetual discord hereof ensue Adulteries and oftentimes Murthers and Poisonings for the most part to men unknown And for this cause free Divorce to both Parties and non-Cohabitation was permitted by the Roman Laws not out of wantonness but out of the greatest necessity and Piety for preservation of those ends for which Marriage was instituted with the least danger and dishonour that might be to either Party wherein they must of necessity suffer if either free Divorce be tolerated or the examination of the causes of the same drawn to publick Tribunals One cause Cato the Censor complains of for which the freedom of Divorce and non-Cohabitation ought to be permitted was because he used to say That all Adulteresses were Poisoners and this likewise appears by Valer. Max. lib. 2. p. 8. where it is thus
Children the same ought to be wholly and intirely performed to such Sons and Daughters in all Successions whether to a Testament or an Intestate And in short that they ought not to be made unlike other Children in Successions whom Nature hath made like Hence it appears that the Civil Law wills the Succession of Children shall be according to the Law of Nature and not according to any Canon Law or Law made by the Priest Natura duce errare nullo modo potest Tul. 1. de leg Cum vero parentibus rediti deinde Magistris traditi sumus tum ita variis imbuimur erroribus ut vanitati veritas opinioni confirmatae natura ipsa cedit 3. Tusc Where nature is our Guide it is impossible to err but when we fall into the hands of Parents and are delivered to Shool-Masters we are then infected with so many Errors that all truth gives place to vanity and Nature it self yields to opinion accustomed To fight against Nature is like Giants to fight against God Cato major Of the Final Causes of Marriage by the Law of God and Nature The Final causes of Marriage which is the Ordinance of God and not of Man are not to fill Priests pockets with money or to satisfie their insatiable Covetousness and Ambition to set their Foot on the Necks of Emperours and Kings in their Legitimations and Successions and thereby to dispose of the Kingdoms of Princes and the Liberty Propriety and Goods of the Subjects at their Arbitrary will and pleasure But the Final causes of Marriage by the Law of God and Nature are three 1. Procreation of Children 2. That Man might have an Help-meet for him there being many necessities especially in time of sickness wherein Man cannot be without the help of a Woman 3. To make his life more pleasant and delightful Tristis sine conjuge lectus As for the first part which is the greatest and chiefest end of Marriage namely procreation of Children without which the World cannot be continued To be the shorter I shall only mention one Poet as follows Providei ille maximus mundi-Parens Cùm tam rapaces cerneret fati minas Vt damna semper sobole repararet nova Excedat agedum rebus humanis Venus Quae supplet ac restituit exhaustum genus Orbis jacebit squalido turpis situ Vacuum sine ullis classibus stabit mare Alesque Coelo deerit silvis fera Solis Aer pervius ventis erit Sen. in Hippol. Fates cruel Threats when the great Parent saw Against his Creatures by as great a Law He then Inacted all those whom it slew Sould by new Births perpetually renew Should Venus lease and should not still restore With fresh Supplies Natures exhausted store On squalid Earth no Beauty would remain No gallant Fleets would dance upon the Main No Deer in Woods no Birds would be in Skie Winds only through sad Air would sighing flie There could be neither King nor Parliament nor People nor Governours nor Governed neither could the Protestant Religion defend it self against Pope or Turk without Marriage for though it be Apocrypha it is truly said Esdras 4.15 Women have born the King and all the People that bear rule by Sea or Land The End of the First Book THE CONTENTS Of the Second Book BY what Judg Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession ought not and ought to be Judged Of the Five Competitors to be Judges of Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession 1. The Bishop 2 The Magistrate 3. The Souldier 4 The Parents 5. The King and Parliament 137 Exceptions against Bishops being Judges in reference to the Legislative ib. Except 1. They assume to be Judges Jure Divino without a Sign of Mission from God which overthrows the Legislative Power of the King and Parliament ib. Of the Sign of Mission required by the Grand Seignior from Sabatai Sevi a counterfeit Jewish Messiah 139 2. They have falsely translated the Scripture in all words relating to Marriage 142 They have falsely translated Ish Isha Zona Kadesh Philiegesh 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Husband Wife Harlot Concubine c. 142 No such as word as Concubine in the whole Original Scripture ib. They have falsely translated the Seventh Commandment Lo Tinaph to be Adultery 145 They have falsely translated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be Fornication ib. They have falsely translated the Tenth Commandment in the words Wife Man-Servant Maid-Servant 146 They have falsely translated Mamzer in the Old and Nothus in the New Testament Bastard Wherein are noted the Errors of Coke Skene and Grotius in following Episcopal and other Popish translations ib. Of the absurdity of Common and Ecclesiastical Lawyers who make the Child born without the Ceremonies of a Priest and Temple no Sib Kin or of Blood to the Father who begot or the Mother who bare him 154 155 Further Reasons shewn that they have falsely translated Mamzer in the Old and Nothus in the New Testament Bastard 156 No such word or thing as Bastard in the whole Original Scripture or amongst the Hebrews Greeks or Romans 3. They have corrupted the Press both as to Scripture and Acts of Parliament and interdict Protestants to Print against or answer Papists 162 A Counterfeit Act of Parliament Printed by Bishops against Protestants and the true supprest 163 Mischiefs which follow the Interdiction of the Press to Protestants 164 165 4. By pretence of giving the King the name of Supremacy they have taken the thing to themselves 167 5. By pretence of giving the King Supremacy by the Ceremonies of the Coronation they take it from him to themselves 169 David Anointed and Crowned by his Parliament and not by the Priest 173 6. They assume in all matters concerning Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession to be above Appeal to the Kings Courts 175 Of the abominable Judgement pass'd by the Common Law Judges in Kennes Case Coke lib. 7.42 whereby they gave away the Supremacy of the King's Courts to Bishops and made them in all causes Matrimonial subject to no Appeal ib. Exceptions against Bishops being Judges in reference to the Judicial Power 180 1. They are prohibited by the example of Christ to Judg Marriage Filiation Aliment or Succession ib. 2. They are totally ignorant of the Fact and were never Educated in the Laws by which they pretend to Judg Marriage 181 3. They Judg by a Chancellour and not in Person 4. They have Plurality of Offices and more than they are able to serve yet will be Judges of Marriage besides ib. 5. They are ambidextrous and amphibious Judges 182 6. They Judg Marriage by pretended Canons and Laws made by Bishops without assent of Parliament ib. 183 7. They take to themselves Fines and Penalties of their own Judgments 184 8. They Licence Dispence and Pardon all Crimes within their pretended Jurisdiction for Money 9. They cannot be known whether Protestants or Papists if Bishops 185 10. They Judg by Fictions and not by Truth 11. They Judg
by Ceremonies and not by Circumstances Of the manifold mischiefs from the Judgment of Marriage by the Ceremonies of a Priest and a Temple 192 1. It compels to enter into an indissoluble Obligation before the Parties can know each other whether they are sit for Marriage or no. 193 2. It give the Bishop the Monopoly of all Women and their Goods 196 3. It gives him the Monopoly of Successions both in private Families and Kingdoms 197 4. It gives him power to Judg of Marriage Filiation and Succession by Fictions ib. 5. It causeth in the Rich Excess and Vanity of Apparel Tilting Turneaments Masking Gluttony Riot and Drunkenness 198 6. It undoeth the Poor in their Marriages 199 7. It causeth Immodesty in Brides wanton Songs and Ceremonies promiscuous Dancing and corruption of Youth 200 8. It exposeth to publick view what God hath commanded to be secret 201 9. It causeth Community of Women Community of Children Fornication Adultery Stews Brothels and the dissemination of most contegious and deadly Diseases amongst the people ib. 10. It hath caused Prostitution of Brides to Priests Lords Guests and others 205 11. It hath caused Consecration of Incest Whores Sodomites to attend the Service of the Priests and the Temples ib. 12. It hath caused the Consecration and Adoration of Priapus Baal Peor Venus Adonis Flora and the first defiling of the Virgin World with Whoredom and Idolatry 207 13. It first destroyed in the World the Omnipresential Worship of God 208 Prayers in Temples and Synagogues except amongst persons agreed prohibited by Christ and why A Poem on the Omnipresential Worship of God and therein of Marriages in Temples 223 15. It caused the bloody Sacrifices of Virgins Children and Indian Wives 229 16. It lays punishments on lawful Child births and destroys Millions of Infants 234 17. It caused the Parisian Massacre wherein were an Hundred Thousand Protestants slain 240 Why the Ottoman Emperors Marry not by a Priest or in a Temple and of the bloody Murders ensued of the Sons of Solyman the Magnificent by his breaking the Custom and his being drawn by Roxolana to Marry her by a Priest 245 12. Bishops proceed to Judgment in the unknown Language of Law Latine 254 13. They Judg for Fees where of the inconveniences following maintenance of Judges and Officers by Fees and not by Satary Exceptions against Bishops being Judges in reference to the Executive Power 1. They begin the Suit with Execution 263 2. They Pledg before Summons Summon before Copy Copy before Oath Punish before Contumacy Judg before Hearing and Arrest before Judgment all which preposteration begins with Execution 268 Of the Inconveniences ensue by Quorums or more Judges than one in a Court 276 A Satyr against the cruel Preposterations above mention'd both in Ecclesiastical and Temporal Courts Of Summons to answer before a Copy given of what is required to be answer'd 286 Of giving a Copy before an Oath of no Calumny 288 Of the multitude of Fictions and Falsities ensue in Chancery and Common Law by neglecting the Oath of no Calumny ib. ad 305 Of Judgment before Hearing Part of a Satyr translated out of Seneca p. 685. on the settish Emperor Claudius who used to Sentence before Hearing 305 An enumeration of divers Forms of Judicial Proceeding wherein People are Condemned before Hearing 1. By repelling men from the Truth and merit of the Cause and compelling them to make their allegations in Formalities and Fictions 306 A Dispute between two famous Judges Fitzherbert and Brook 14 H. 8.25 concerning Truth and Good Sentence and Formality and Fiction in Judicial Proceeding 306 2. By compelling to Original Writs at Common Law and not serving the Party with a Copy of the Declaration without them 312 Mischiefs of Original Writs 313 3. By compelling to the Writ of Subpoena in Chancery and not serving the Party with a Copy of the Bill without it Mischiefs of Writs of Subpoena 4 By the Capias ut lagatum and Excommunicato capiendo A Satyr on a Papist and a Protestant Imprison'd one on an Outlawry the other on an Excommunication against Imprisonment before Hearing and Judgment 329 A Digression concerning the danger of the Three Kingdoms Condemning one another without Hearing by reason of the Non-Union of their three Parliaments in one House Of the Fatal Dangers attending a Non-Union and the inestimable Benefits of the contrary 335 Of matters requisite to perfect an Union An Elegy on the ill effects of Excommunication of Protestants by Protestants causing a Disunion in the late unhappy Civil Wars 343 5. By Excommunication it self The Form of the Jewish Excommunication 345 The Form of the Greek Excommunication against Thieves 347 The Form of the Popes Excommunication against Queen Elizabeth All Forms of Excommunication wicked and Anti-Christian 348 Of the strange Cheats and Superstition in Excommunications 352 Of the damnable mischiefs arise to Christian Princes and States by tollerating Popes or Prelates to Excommunicate without a Sign of Mission from God 362 All Excommunication Curses and Deliveries to Satan by Bishops or Priests without a Sign of Mission from God if Malefice follow ought to be punish'd as Witchcraft if not as a Cheat. 381 A Satyr in defiance of all Excommunication without a Sign of Mission from God 388 An Epode on Protestants Excommunicated by Papists Considerations concerning a True and False Test between Papist and Protestant 6. By Bishops condemning Protestants of Heresie by the Four first General Councils The other Exceptions against Judicial Forms and what was intended concerning the other Competitor-Judges I am enforced to break off abruptly by Disturbances at the Press Lib. II. Of the Judg of Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession CHAP. I. Of the Five Competitors to be Judges of Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession 1. The Bishop 2. The Magistrate 3. The Soldiers 4. The Parents 5. The King and Parliament HAving before shewn unanswerable exceptions against the Ecclesiastical Laws by which Bishops pretend to judg I shall now propose exceptions Declinatory of the Authority and Jurisdiction usurped by them and likewise of their Personal disabilities and incapacities to be Judges of the matters in question all which are 1. In reference to the Legislative 2. The Judicial 3. The Executive or Military Power all usurped or abused by them Exceptions against Bishops being Judges in reference to the Legislative They assume to be Judges Jure Divino without a Sign of Mission from God which overthrows the Legislative Power of King and Parliament For they assume to be Angels and Messengers of God Embassadors of Christ and Successors by his last Will and Testament of the whole Power of Judgment given to the Son yet do they shew no sign of Mission from God no letters of Credence from Christ nor any letters of Probat that they were nominated either Executors or Legatees in any such Testament or in the Testament of any Executor or Apostle of Christ or in the Testament of any Executor of such Executors
there is no such Miracle ensues from Episcopal Unction or Consecration neither do they shew any sign of Mission to Anoint as Samuel did but every man that is born hath a sign of Mission from God to Contract with that Prince under the protection of whose Sword he happens to be born to yield him Subjection for Protection and to concur with the whole Body of the other Subjects to present him with a Symbol or sign of the same with a Crown or Oil as here the men of Israel and Judah do to David 2. David anointed by his Parliament That the Anointing which gave David the Investiture of the Kingdoms was made by the Representative of the People in Parliament and not by the Priest for it is said That all the Tribes and all Israel and all the Elders which were a Senate or Parliament to treat for the People and make a League and Covenant with the King for it was impossible for him otherwise to treat with so great a multitude as all Israel had they not agreed to Elect a fit Representative for them therefore it is said The Elders anointed David and no mention made of the Priest neither had the Priest any Law of Moses to anoint Kings 3. That as there was no Crown sent David from Heaven for his Coronation whereby Pontifical men might pretend to have the disposing so there was no Oil sent thence for â—is Anointing but he received both from the People And surely the Mission of the Oil of Rhemes thence is as great a Fable as of the Crown of Nimrod or of the Image which fell from Jupiter neither did there need any Consecration of either for by the Customs of most Nations Crowns and Unctions were but civil Ceremonies of Honour given to the Parties which received them not only in Elections of Kings but almost in all other Solemnities as Military Triumphs Olympick and other Games yea even in their ordinary Feasts both of Aegyptians Greeks and Romans Habent Vnctae mollia serta Comae Ovid. Which shews both Crowning and Anointing of their Guests with Garlands or Crowns of Flowers and Unction with Oil of the Olive both which materials though more properly made by God than Crowns of Gold and Oils confected and Consecrated yet were esteemed but as civil Ceremonies and were a ministred by Lay-hands without a Priest And of this civil Festival Honour of Anointing used amongst the Jews as well as other Nations Christ is pleased to take notice Luke 7.36 My Head with Oil thou didst not anoint but this Woman hath anointed my Feet with Ointment And though both Coronation and Unction were but civil Ceremonies and of humane Institution where no Miracle testified a Divine yet is David called God's Anointed more truly than if he had been anointed by the Priest seeing God gave the Priest no Mission but yet himself turned the Hearts of the People by the civil signs of Coronation and Unction to acknowledg David for their Sovereign for which he himself giveth thanks and saith Psal 18.47 God subdueth the People under me 4. That David doth not make a League and Covenant with the High Priest but with his Parliament who were the Convention of Elders who anointed him 5. That though there had been long Civil Wars between Judah who followed David and Israel who followed Isbosheth the Son of Saul and Abner his General was dead and Isbosheth was dead and there remained with him Victorious and Veteran Armies yet neither Judah nor Israel anointed him till he had first made with them a League and Covenant 6. From hence may be discover'd the great Mystery of Iniquity whereby Popes have terrified Emperors and Kings as their Vassals to receive Crowns and Unctions from them which hath been only by persuading That none but Bishops could Crown or Anoint them the manifold mischiefs of which to Princes and People are too long here to be recited only whosoever will consider them will find it clear That Bishops who have pretended or may pretend to so dangerous a Tâ—nent as That none but they have Right to make Coronations and Unctions are no fit Judges of Successions to Crowns They assume in the Judgment of all matters concerning Marririage Filiation Aliment and Succession to be above Appeal to the Kings Courts It hath been already shewn that Bishops by assuming a Power Jure Divino without shewing a sign of Mission and by false translating Scripture and by corrupting and interdicting the Press exercise a Power superior or equal to the Legislative from which doth follow That such as are Legislators or assume or exercise such Power ought not to be Judges Delegate 1. Because Legislation Supream and Judgment Delegate are two distinct Offices and ought not to be confounded 2. Because it is Repugnant that a Legislator should be a Delegate to himself for in Presentia Majoris cessat potestas Minoris the lesser Power is lost in the greater 3. If wrong Judgment happen to be given there can be no appeal but to those who did the Wrong whereby they become Judges and Parties and Judg in their own Case 4 A Power Delegate to Judg without Appeal ceases to be a Delegate Power and is greater than the Legislative which Power that it is assumed by the Bishops in all Matrimonial Causes is the thing next to be shewn Of the abominable Judgment passed by the Common Law Judges in Kennes Case Coke lib. 7.42 whereby they gave away the Supremacy of the King's Courts to the Bishop and made them in all Causes Matrimonial subject to no Appeal Mich. 4. Jac. In the Court of Wards between Thomas Robertson and Elizabeth his Wife Plaintiff and Florence Lady Stallenge Defendant The Case was This Christopher Kenne Esq was seized of the Mannor of Kenne in the County of Sommerset holden by Knights Service in Capite and 37. H. 8. de facto married Elizabeth Stowell and had Issue Martha the Mother of Elizabeth one of the now Plaintiffs and after 1. 2. Ph. Mar. in the Court of Audience between the said Christopher Kenne Plaintiff and Elizabeth Stewell Defendant the Judg there gave a Sentence in these words Pretens ' tractat ' contract ' sponsalia Matrimonium quin verius Effigiem matrimonij inter Christopherum Kenne Elizabeth Stowell in Minore sua impubertatis aetate eorundem aut eorum alterius de fact ' habit ' contract ' celebrat ' fuisse esse eosdemque Christopherum Eliz. tam tempore contractus Solemnizationis dict' pretens ' matrimonij quam etiam continuo postea idem matrimonio pretens ' Solemnizationi ejusdem dissensisse contravenisse Reclamasse Reluctasse ac eo praetextu hujusmodi Pretens ' tractat ' sponsalia matrimonium de jure nullum nulla irritum irrita cassum cassa invalidum invalida minus efficax inefficacia fuisse esse viribusque juris caruisse carere carere debere Nec non Antedictos Christopherum Kenne
Eliz Stowell quatenus de factor fuerunt ad invicem matrimonio ut predicitur copulat ' ab invicem Separand ' divorciand ' fore debere pronunciamus decernimus declaramus Eosque Separamus Divorciamus eisdemque Christopher ' Eliz. licentiam Libertatem ad alia vota convolanda concedimus tribuimus impertimur per hanc Sententiam nostram definitivam sive hoc finale nostrum decretum quam sive quod ferimus promulgamus in hiis Scriptis c. And after the Divorce the said Christopher Kenne Espous'd and took to Wife Elizabeth Beckwith And after Anno 5th Eliz. before certain Commissioners Ecclesiastical the said Elizabeth Beckwith Libelled against the said Christopher Kenne That before the Marriage between them contracted he had Married with Elizabeth Stowell on which process was awarded against Elizabeth Stowell pro interesse And upon due examination of the Cause it was Sentenced That the Marriage between the said Christopher Kenne and Elizabeth Beckwith was lawful and Sentenced them ad Exequenda Conjugalta obsequia c. And that the said Christopher Kenne was never lawfully Espoused unto the said Elizabeth Stowell and after the said Elizabeth Beckwith died after whose death the said Christopher took to Wife the said Florence by whom he had Issue one Daughter and called Elizabeth and died And Anno 36th Eliz. it was found by Office in the County of Sommerset by Force of a Mandamus after the death of the said Christopher Kenne that the said Elizabeth Kenne was his Daughter and Heir who was within Age Viz. of the Age of Ten Months The Queen granted her Wardship to Sir Nicholas Stallenge and the said Florence then his Wife on which the said Martha alledged her self to be Daughter and Heir to the said Christopher Kenne and with her Husband Silvester Williams Exhibited their Bill in the Court of Wards against the said Sir Nicholas and Florence alledging That the said Martha was Daughter and Heir of the Body of the said Elizabeth Stowell his lawful Wife and that they the said Christopher and Elizabeth Stowell at the time of their Marriage in Anno 37. H. 8. were both of them above the Age of Consent and that they Cohabited together Nine or Ten Years before the said supposed Divorce during which Cohabitation the said Martha was procreate between them and therefore pray they may have License to Traverse the said Office To which Bill the said Nicholas and Florence put in their answer and the Plaintiff examined divers Witnesses and before Publication Sir Nicholas dies and thereupon the said Silvester and Martha exhibited a Bill of Reviver against the said Florence and after Martha having Issue Elizabeth the Wife of the now Pl. died after whose death the said Thomas Robertson and Elizabeth his Wife bring a new Bill of Reviver to revive the first Sute in which the Witnesses were examined and this Case was refer'd to Fleming and Coke Chief Justices and Tanfeild Chief Baron and Selverton and Williams Justices and Sing and Altham Barons of the Exchequer If it be asked for what reason was such a Sentence given my Lord Coke nor the rest will neither tie the Bishop nor themselves to shew any for he saith The lawfulness of Marriage belonging originally to be tried in the Ecclesiastical Court if the Ecclesiastical Judg that is the Bishop Sentence a Marriage Null We that is the Judges of the King's Courts ought to give Faith that is implicit Faith to their Sentence as they do to our Judgment whether true or false right or wrong reason or no reason and so he saith Where the original cause of Sute concerning Marriage belongs to the Common Law Courts the Ecclesiastical Judg is to give like Faith to them as 22. E. 4. in Corbets Case which was this Sir Robert Corbet had by Elizabeth his Wife two Sons Robert the Elder and Roger the Younger and dies Robert the Elder being under the Age of Fourteen takes to Wife one Matilda and they dwell together tâ—ll full Age Et habuerunt carnalem copulam cogniti reputati pro viro uxore palam And after the said Robert put off the said Matilda having no Issue by her and Married one Lettice in the life of the said Matilda and hath Issue by her Robert and dies Lettice Preached openly that she was the lawful Wife of Robert and her Son a mulier Roger the Son of Sir Robert Corbet sues in the Spiritual Court to Reverse these Espousals between Robert his Brother and Lettice for which Lettice sues a Prohibition In which Case it was Resolved 1. That if Robert and Matilda had had Issue and had been unjustly Divorced and after Robert had Married Lettice and had Issue and died that as long as the unjust Divorce had continued the Issue of Matilda could have had no remedy at Common Law the same gives so great Faith to the Sentence of the Bishop 2. That here Roger might sue at Common Law notwithstanding the second Marriage in regard the same was void being made while the first Wife lived On which may be noted the injustice of the Bishops being above Appeal in Judgment in these particulars 1. Here is a lawful Matirmony Consummate by the Birth of a Child and two Persons thereby indissolubly joined together by the Act and Law of God put asunder by the Bishop and his Papal Law Here is a Dispute from Generation to Generation concerning the Validity of a Marriage and Succession to an Inheritance Against the Marriage is alledged That the same was declared void by a Sentence of Divorce or rather of Nullity given by the Bishop Against it is answered by Elizabeth a Descendent of the said Marriage and the right Heir to the Inheritance that the cause of the said Sentence was false And she offer'd to prove that the said Christopher Kenne and Elizabeth Stowell were both above the Age of Consent to Marriage in Anno 37. H. 8. and were then lawfully Married and Cohabited together Nine or Ten Years and the said Martha was lawfully Procreate between them before the pretended Divorce was made Was there ever Probation more Relevant tender'd was there ever better Reason alledged by a poor Lady to defend her Inheritance On this Hoskins Bacon Dodridge and other Council Argued so long from Term to Term as was enough to spend a good Portion before it was got But alas to no purpose for had this Elizabeth been Queen Elizabeth her self these Judges will give no Relief or Hearing against a Bishops Sentence unless his Lordship will please to Revoke it himself And notwithstanding all Arguments to the contrary it was accordingly resolved by all the Justices and Barons That she must go without her Inheritance and her Mother Martha remain a Bastard till the Bishop who made her so should again unmake her which was in plain English to adjudg there should be no Appeal in any case of Marriage Filiation Aliment or Succession from the Bishops to
the Kings Courts 2. He rests not there but says Iisdem licentiam ad alia vota convolanda concedimus So that here not only Licence may be had for Money to Marry but for the same to leave the old and make a new choice as often as they please And my Lord Coke will have the Common Law to give such Faith that they ought not to question these doings true or false right or wrong which sets all Women and Men to Sale for Money and gave the occasion to Cornelius Agrippa to call all Ecclesiasticks Panders General for their Profit 3. The Common Law Judges give the Bishop the same Supremacy of Power in Matrimonial Causes since the Protestant Religion hath made Marriage no Sacrament as they had in the time of highest Popery and made it a Sacrament though Sublata causa tollitur effectus The same ceasing to be a Sacrament and becoming a mear Temporal Contract the old superstitious Faith of a Sacrament ought not to be given those who are no Judges of Temporal matters 4. It is worth a smile in this Case were it not so wicked to see how hot the Common Lawyers were a while in the scuffle for Supremacy of Marriage But no sooner had the Bishops turn'd the muzzles of the Romish Canons against them and discharged their piece of Conjuring in a strange Language instead of a Sentence but our Worthies of the Law fell flat on their faces and yielded the Royal Fort of the Prerogative and all the Protestant Subjects Laws and Liberties eya Magna Charta it self to the Mercy of the Enemy by so abominable a Judgment that no Appeal lay to the Kings Courts against the Sentence of a Bishop touching Marriage Filiation or Succession true or false right or wrong with cause or without cause a Resolve deserving to be mark'd with a Note of perpetual Infamy and Razed out of all Records On which and other Reasons though in most parts of Christendom the Clergy generally composed one Estate of the Country yet since the Reformation they were excluded from being any part of the Estates and of Holland neither were they allowed any Vote in their Assembly and far less Reason have they in England seeing they have equal Privilege here with the Gentry and all other Lay-free-holders in Election of Knights of the Shire to assume any other Power in the Legislative Temporal or Spiritual either in Person or by any other Representative The like Practice is likewise in Venice though they are Catholicks where before the Council sits the Cryer with a loud Voice commands all Priests out of Doors lest they should discover the State secrets to the Pope and likewise assume the Supremacy of Judgment from the Temporalty to the Spiritualty to produce which effects they are a dangerous ingredient to be mixt in how small a quantity soever in any Supream Council and a little Leven of so active a Fermentation Leveneth the whole Lump A Reason is given by Aeneas Silvius why it was held by more That the Pope was above a Council than a Council above a Pope because Popes gave Bishopricks and Arch-Bishopricks but Councils gave none Which doth not only hold in meer Spiritual Councils but in such Spiritual Councils as are mixt with the Temporalty in which the Spiritualty are always Bribed and Pension'd by the gift of their Offices And this is apparent and needs no further proof And if any of the Temporalty receive the like Bribes and Pensions upon lawful proof thereof made it cannot be denied that neither of them are equal or fit Legislators and much less Judges of the Holy Laws of God of Marriage Filiation and Succession of Subjects and least of all of Kings Exceptions against Bishops being Judges in reference to the Judicial Power 1. They are prohibited by the example of Christ to Judg Marriage Filiation Aliment or Succession We Read Christ was at a Marriage-Feast but it was so poor a one they wanted Wine and 't is likely he would have helped them to none had the man been rich for he might have bought enough for his Money without Miracle But Christ shewed his Bounty to the Poor and the Rich he sent empty away We read likewise he taught the Doctrine of Marriage but it was according to the Moral Law of God and all Ceremonial Laws he Established neither did he or his Apostles ever join any hands by the Ceremonies of a Priest or Temple nor ever spake of any other joining Man and Woman together but by God only as it was from the beginning And as to the point of being a Judg of Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession he utterly refused it though he knew the Fact and the Right far above any Bishop as appears Luke 12.14 And one of the company said unto him Master Speak to my Brother that he divide the Inheritance with me And he said unto him Man Who made me a Judg or a Divider over you To give Judgment in this Case according to Episcopal Doctrine Christ must first have enquired with what Ceremonies the Father and Mother were Married whereby the Marriage must have been first Judged Then Whether these two Brothers were begot before the Ceremonies or after and whether there were Witnesses at the begetting which concerns Filiation Then Whether the Inheritance which according to the Romish Law then Imperial in Judaea included both Lands and moveable Goods were left by a Testate or an Intestate which would have concerned the Aliment and Succession but Christ in a word refused to Judg any of these And those who alledg themselves his Successors ought to follow his Example who if he sent them sent them to teach and not to Judg. For he saith Go teach all Nations but there is not a word of Judging any Nation 2. They are totally ignorant in the Fact and were never Educated in the Laws by which they pretend to Judg Marriage That 't is impossible for them to know the Facts of Marriage or Filiation or to receive any Testimony of the same is already shewn and proved P. 104 105. and indeed the Cook with his white Sleeves who dress'd the Wedding-Dinner and the Tailor who made the Wedding-Cloaths and the Midwife and Gossips who eat the Pie and drunk the Bowl if any Certificate or Judgment were at all necessary as to the Fact of Marriage and Filiation besides that of the Parents were far more credible and fit than the Bishop's who was an Hundred Miles off at the time of getting the Child and of all these doings besides And as to the Law 't is known they were never Educated either in the Civil Canon Common or Statute Laws the knowledg of all which they themselves cannot but acknowledg are necessary to make up an Ecclesiastical Lawyer by which is manifest they are as ignorant of the Law of Marriage and Filiation as they are before proved to be of the Fact With what Face or Conscience can they undertake to be Judges of what they
because in their making there was no Consent of an House of Commons and the House of Commons being but Delegates themselves can not Delegate the Peoples Interest in the Legislative to others for Delegatus non pâ—test delegare it was an Office of Personal Trust reposed in the Persons Elâ—cted to be Members of Parliament to treat with the King and assent to equal Laws in behalf of the People they could not grant over therefore this Office of Trust to Bishops or a Synod or a Council to treat with the King and assent to Laws for the People but every Member of Parliament ought either to refuse to accept of the Election or if he accept to serve in Person All Books of Canons made by Bishops without consent of Parliament void and not by Proxy assign or subdelegate in so great a Trust as to join in making Laws for the Publick Safety and Peace Hence will follow therefore That all Ecclesiastical Canons and Laws of Synods and Councils prohibiting Marriage without Publick Bans or Episcopal Licences and all Canons prohibiting Marriage in time of Advent Septuagesima and Rogation and all Canons prohibiting Marriage within degrees of Consanguinity and Affinity not prohibited by the Moral Law of God and all Canons prohibiting Marriage not made by the Ceremonies of a Priest and Temple and all Canons of the Council of Trent making null and void all Marriages not made before a Priest and two Witnesses are all in themselves utterly void for the House of Commons never assented to their making and all Laws prohibitory of Marriage being before shewn to be contrary to the Moral Law of God and to come from the Devil P. 52. and it being here shewn that they have no consent of Parliament such Books of Canons must in both respects be of necessity null and void as being neither the Laws of God nor Man in England but of the Devil according to which Books of Canons Bishops therefore Judging of Marriage contrary to the Moral Law of God and without any positive Law of Man their Judgment must likewise be void being according to the Law of the Devil and such Persons are no fit Judges who judg according to such Laws 7. They take to themselves the Fines and Penalties of their own Judgments That the Sole and Final Cause why Bishops so eagerly contest for the Jurisdiction of Marriage is Filthy Lucre is shewn before P. 52 53. c. and the same is so great a Pillar of the Kingdom of Anti-Christ that Pope ruin'd where Episcopal Jurisdiction of Marriage is taken away take but away Episcopal Jurisdiction of Maâ—riage the Papal Power is immediately ruin'd in those Provinces wheresoever it is done 1. In regard of the infinite Treasure he heaps hereby which appears before P. 52 53. 2. In regard of the Power he gains hereby over Kings and Princes in assuming to himself the Judgment of Filiations and Successions to Kingdoms 3. By enticing Princes to unlawful Marriages contrary to the Moral Law of God and procuring them to take his Dispensations for thereby such Prince and his Successors will be in great danger as to his Title unless he expose his Interest and Religion to obtain assistance from the See of Rome which made Philip the Second King of Spain who Married Queen Mary so furious to support the Catholick Religion in the Low Countreys by Fire and Sword and to make a Law That none should succeed him in the Government of those Provinces unless he took an Oath to maintain the Catholick Religion there and maintain the Authority of the Church of Rome And this made Queen Mary so cruelly furious against Protestants in England the Title of her Mothers Marriage and her Succession depending on the Popes protection And wheresoever any Prince is promoted by the Popes Canon Laws contrary to the Right of Succession instituted by the Moral Law of God such Prince to defend his Title against the right Heir by the Moral Law of God and his Successors become assured Vassals to the Religion and See of Rome 4. The Pope by procuring and dispensing Marriages of Catholick Ladies with Protestant Princes gains a numerous increase of Catholicks in those Dominions and many times turns the whole Tide to carry Tribute to Tyber But to return to the lesser Rivers the Bishops 't is no small stream of gain flows in to them too by such an unjust Power of Bribing themselves to Injustice by exercising so Arbitrary a Proceeding as to Fine and Commute what they please and putting it in their own Purses which should go to the Publick Treasury 8. They License Dispense and Pardon all Offences against the Law for Money It is to no purpose to make Penal Laws if the Judg hath liberty to License Dispense and Pardon Offences against them and nothing better enables him to do it than to allow a Judg to Fine or Commute and to put the Fine or Commutation Money in his own Purse now the Power of Licensing Dispensing and Pardoning Offences against the Laws of Marriage or any other Law must of necessity so corrupt the Judg as he will protect and increase the Vice he pretends to suppress Hence the Popes Taxa Camerae and the Bishops Courts increase more Fornication and Adultery than aâ—l the loose Women in the Countrey They are therefore no fit Judges of Marriage 9. They cannot be known whether they are Protestants or Papists if Bishops The Laws of Marriage have a very great influence on all Religions and in all Nations but more specially God hath been pleased in England to make the same the chief means and occasion in the time of H. 8. of planting the Protestant it is therefore of very great concern for the Preservation of the same that the Judges of Marriage be Protestants and it cannot be known whether they are so or no if Bishops 1. Because the excess of Riches which the Jurisdiction of Marriage Filtation and Succession especially to Kingdoms carries with it and all other Profits of a Bishoprick joined therewith are so great as may be too much a Temptation to any unless a Saint by Miracle to be of any Religion to obtain them and Christ himself Matth. 19 24. makes this Temptation so difficult to be resisted that he saith It is easier for a Camel to go through the Eye of a Needle than for a rich man to enter into the Kingdom of Heaven yea he makes a Miracle necessary for any to obtain Riches and Heaven together for he saith Verse 26. With men this is impossible but with God all things are possible And Austin in imitation of this confesseth in effect the same difficile imò impossibile est praesentibus futucis bonis frui It is difficult yea impossible to enjoy the good things of this World and of that to come Damasus Bishop of Rome endeâ—vour'd to convert Praetextatus a great Heathen Phâ—losopher to Christianity he answer'd him Make me Bishop of Rome and I will turn
a Publick Treasury might be more equally divided by way of Salary according to the proportion of Skill and Pains The English Judges therefore sent intō Scotland put the foremention'd Statute of Westm 1. cap. 25. to experiment there and turned all Fees into a Publick Treasury to manage which we allowed our Treasurer out of the same Two Hundred Pound per Annum and allowed Salaries to our selves as the State appointed us and to all our Clerks and Officers necessary proportionable to Skill and Pains which Treasury of Fees not only satisfied all the English and Scottish Judges and all the Officers of Justice without any charge or trouble to the State but likewise many Military Officers of the Army and we found by experiment that far more exact Justice was done by Salary than ever any was done by Fees And if the same were practiced here in England it cannot be but the like effect must follow as to Justice but vastly greater as to the increase of the Publick Treasury especially if the number of Judges were reduced to Three who as is after shewn are sufficient to dispatch all matters of Judicature Civil Ecclesiastical and Criminal of the Kingdom Exceptions against Bishops being Judges in reference to the Executive Power They begin the Suit with Execution No Writer of the Forms of Judicial Proceeding except the Bishop was ever so Absurd as to Tolerate much less to Ordain any Law-Suit to be begun with Execution and this is that which makes the Spanish and Romish Inquisitions Romish Inquisition begins with Execution on the Person and the Barbarous Inquisition by Torture of the Civil Law to be so Abhor'd and Abominable that they begin with Execution upon the Person and Arrest him before Judgment Now that not only Arrest before Judgment but Districtio Pignorum or taking of Pledges by distress is likewise Execution appears clearly both by Civil and Common Law As to the first which is Districtio Pignorum or taking Pledges by Distress it is express in the Civil Law C. de Execut. rei Jud. that on a Sentence for Debt or Damage the Judg may order Execution to be done by Distress or taking the Goods moveable of the Defendant as Pledges and if he satisfie not the Plaintiff within the space of Two Months after the Distress is made then the Officer was to sell them and satisfie the Plaintiff As to the Common Law it appears 4. H. 6.17 22. Ass pl. 72. That the Execution after Judgment is in the County Court only by Distress Distress on the Goods is Execution and keeping the same in Pound 'till Judgment be satisfied for they cannot sell the Distress which shews that the Common Law esteemed Distress an Execution after Judgment though it had not the Power to sell the Distress as the Civil Law had That it is an Execution therefore after Judgment both by Civil and Common Law is clear It will be next by some perhaps enquired from whom the Original of this most Anti-Christian Custom came of beginning Suits with Distress and Attachments which differ from Distress in that the one forfeits the Distress 9. H. 7.9 for Nonappearance the other not Capiasses Latitats exaction of Bail Mainprize Outlawries in Civil Actions and Excommunicato Capiendo's in all which the Goods of the Defendant being of greater value than the Debt or Trespass are either seized or detained or what is worse Forfeited and Confiscated or the Person Arrested Imprisoned and sometimes Starved sometimes Poison'd and sometimes Tortured before there is a Copy given him of any Complaint made against him and before the Plaintiff hath so much as taken an Oath of Calumny that he believes his Complaint True and Just and before Hearing Probation of Witnesses and Judgment That this most inhuman and more than Barbarous Proceeding came not from the old Romans though Pagans appears by what Alciat says that not so much as the word Districtus or Districtio which is to be intended before Judgment is to be found amongst any of the Ancient Lawyers and likewise that no such thing as Distress or taking Pledges or exacting Bail caution judicio Sisti Judicatum Solvi or Arrest before Judgment is to be found amongst those which are left of the Laws of the Twelve Tables Yet in them these are express'd after Judgment as appears by the Reliques of the same which follow in these words L. 25. Si in jus vocet atque eat L. 28. Si vis vocationi fuat testamini igitur em capito L. 31. Si vindiciam falsam tulit rei si velit is arbitros tres dato forum Arbitriis fructus duplione Damna Deciditor L. 33. Aeris confessi rebusque jure judicatis triginta dies justi Sunto postidea muus endoiectio esto in jus ducito nei Judicatum facit aut quips endo jure em vindicit secum ducito vincito aut nervo aut compedibus quin Decim pondo ne minore aut si volet majore vincito Si volet suo vivito in suo vivit qui em vinctum habebit libras farris endo dies dato si volet plus dato Wherein though many words are so Antiquated and obscure as no Interpreter can expound them yet so much may be understood from them 1. That their Editio and Oblatio Libelli by giving the Defendant a Coppy of the Libel Bill of Complaint or Declaration preceded their vocatio in Jus Citation and Summons for in the Law Si in jus vocet atque eat the word Atque signifieth Statim presently in which sense it is taken in Leg. filia 20. C. de inof Testam and in Virgil. Atque illum prono rapit alveus amni Now it had been to no purpose when the Defendant had been called to appear before the Judg in Person Statim presently to answer unless the Plaintiff before he had call'd him had made him Oblatio Libelli and given him a Copy of his Bill of Complaint against him and allowed him his dies justi a fit time for him to deliberate and provide for the same Vt veniat paratus ad respondendum Oblatio Libelli precedes Summons when he shall be again called to appear in Person before the Judg and without this if the Judg caused him to appear and cast him into Prison as now Judges do on lying Latitats and false Suggestions all the Poor of the Land who are not able to give Bail and on Forged Outlawries both Poor and Rich without Bail and forced him to answer to Copies of Declarations not deliver'd 'till he had been first cast into close Prison an Hundred Miles from his home where he had neither Meat nor Drink nor Money nor Friends nor Council nor Writings nor Witnesses he had made it impossible for such a Prisoner in Dures to answer otherwise than to grant whatsoever the false Suggesting Plaintiff will Demand of him And that the Obligatio Libelli preceded in jus vocatio agrees Cujac Lib. 10. Obs 10. 11.
to make a Conventional Seizure Entry or Re-entry of or into Goods or Lands Pledged for Debt or Rent or made liable by any Covenant or Clause Irritant to forfeiture for non payment of the same before a Judgment Declaratory of the non payment and of the value of the Goods to be Distrained and Lands Seized for satisfaction of the same is as unjust and wicked as to take a Judicial Distress Pledg or Forfeiture before such Judgment pass'd The Laird of Sauchi Sued one of his Tenants to make him remove from his Tack or Lease the Defendant excepted That he had a Tack it was replied That the Tack was null and void because there was a Clause Irritant contained in it that if the Duty reserved were not paid the Tack should be null and void and that the Duty was not paid to which was duplied by the Defendant that this failure of payment was not yet declared by any Declaratory Sentence of a Judg. The Lords found that there ought to be a Declaratory Sentence of a Judg first Declaratory Sentence of Scotland before any removal of a Tenant ought to be though the Clause Irritant had been that the Tack should be null without any Declaratory Sentence 4th July 1628. 5. That no Bail ought to be Exacted before Contumacy or Judgment First If to Distrain dead Goods and Pledges of Cattle is prohibited before Judgment à Fortiori to Exact for Pledges or Sureties the living Bodies of men is prohibited Secondly It is manifest Christ intended to relieve the oppression of the Poor against the Rich and that none but the Rich are able to give Bail to Tolerate therefore the Rich because they can give Bail on every unjust Suit of theirs to Exact Bail of Poor men before Judgment who are not able to give it fills Prisons and destroys innumerable Innocent Poor and leaves their Blood to cry against those who Tolerate so great an Oppression as to make Necessity Contumacy and Punish the Poor for his Poverty No less abominable is the Practice of Attornies and Clerks with their Writs of Privilege who will command what Bail they please though the Poor man owe them not a farthing and he being once Arrested and not able to give Bail he must therefore Rot or Starve in Gaol or pay whatever the other will ask right or wrong The Chancery Clerks and Officers go a degree beyond these and will take no Bail but four Subsidy men and if they can but Arrest the pretended Debtor will keep him in hold too till he pleads Instanter what they will have to Ruin him These are the Prodigious Reliques of Popish Tyranny left in Protestant Courts of Law and Conscience and translated from Romish Ecclesiastical-Clerks to English Lay-Clerks It were more just these Privileged men had a Privilege granted to Rob on the High-way for there honest men would be able to defend themselves against them but with these two Privileges of theirs one that they will take whomsoever they please Prisoners and the other that they will be Sued no where but in their own Court makes it as difficult to deal with them as Turky Pyrats who will be Tried by none but their Fellows nor Sued any where but in Algier How little necessity there is of this horrible Oppression of Exaction of Pledges No Pledges Bail Outlawries required in Chancery Distresses Bail Penalties Forfeitures and Outlawries before Judgment doth easily appear from this that in the Chancery there is none of all these required and though the Defendants are Richer and the Causes of far greater value than those in Common Law Courts yet do the numerous Plaintiffs rather shun the Common Law Courts and throng thither choosing to Sue there than in the other and certainly if it be truly consider'd these Exactions of Bail and Outlawries and Suprizes of Debtors before warning do but necessitate them to flie from their Creditors and deceive them of what they would be ready to pay on a fair Demand or warning and liberty given to come to a just account with Security This cruel dealing therefore of the Creditor with his Debtor before Judgment tends not to his Profit but very much to his Loss as well as it doth of the Defendant and many times undoes them both 6. That no Arrest ought to be made before a Judgment though there is Contumacy This follows from what hath already been proved That a Plaintiff ought not to be Witness Judg or Executioner thereon in his own Case and therefore not of the Contumacy of his Brother Contumacy but if he is Contumacious the Plaintiff ought by his Witnesses to make Probation of those matters which are necessary to shew a Contumacy as 1. Oblatio Libelli 2. Productio Testium 3. His Refusal to answer and satisfie and thereon obtain a Sentence Declaratory of the Contumacy of the Defendant and a Capias to Arrest him All Arrests therefore before Judgment Pursuivants Tipstaves by Pursuivants Messengers of Arms Tipstaves Maces Sheriffs or any other are Reliques of Popery and contrary to the Law of God and of the Land and indeed are so far from having Right to Arrest before Judgment that they ought not so much as to Summon before an Oblatio Libelli and a Productio Testium 7. That though there is a Judgment yet Christ allows no Imprisonment of a Debtor not able to pay for Disability is no Contumacy and Poverty may more often fall on the Righteous than the Wicked The Scripture makes our Demeanour to the Poor in Prison in this Life of great concernment to our well or evil Being after Death as is said Matth. 25.34 Then shall the King say unto them on his Right hand Come ye Blessed of my Father inherit the Kingdom prepared for you from the Foundation of the World For I was an hungred and ye gave me meat I was thirsty and ye gave me drink I was a stranger and ye took me in Naked and ye cloathed me I was sick and ye visited me I was in Prison and ye came unto me Then shall the Righteous answer him saying Lord when saw we thee an hungred and fed thee or thirsty and gave thee drink When saw we thee a stranger and took thee in or naked and cloathed thee Or when saw we thee sick or in Prison and came unto thee And the King shall answer and say unto them Verily I say unto you In as much as ye have done it unto one of the least of these â—y Brethren ye have done it unto me Then shall he say unto them on the Left hand Depart from me ye Cursed into everlasting Fire prepared for the Devil and his Angels For I was an hungred and ye gave me no meat I was thirsty and ye gave me no drink I was a stranger and ye took me not in naked and ye cloathed me not sick and in Prison and ye visited me not Then shall they also answer him saying Lord when saw
we thee an hungred or a thirst or a stranger or naked or sick or in Prison and did not minister unto thee Then shall he answer them saying Verily I say unto you in as much as ye did it not to one of the least of these ye did it not to me And these shall go away into everlasting punishment but the Righteous into Life Eternal It may be much doubted what account these inferior Judicial Proceedings of Exactions of Pledges and Bail before Summons Outlawries Excommunicato Capiendo's Penalties Forfeitures Confiscations Arrests and Imprisonment before Judgment will be able to give at the Supream Judgment they being all point Blank contrary to the Judicial Precepts of Christ And this Humanity and Mercy to Prisoners that are Poor and unable to pay hath so far prevailed amongst most Nations and with the Civil Law and with the Law of Scotland that in all these Cessio Bonorum if a Prisoner in Execution for Debt makes a Cessio Bonorum that is assigns his whole Estate he hath left by Inventary on Oath to the Creditor he ought to be set at liberty and certainly the Arresting of Debtors without giving warning or time necessary and who are not able to pay before Judgment or detaining them in Prison after Judgment is not only as hath been already said hurtful to the Creditor himself but to the Publick the same being destructive to Trade and likewise to the Peace for Civil Wars and Seditions have been caused both in the Grecian Roman and many other Commonwealths by the Cruel Prosecution and Imprisonments by Creditors of their Debtors and I remember we received often advertisement from our Army in Scotland to desire us to restrain our Letters of Caption from Arrests of Debtors and that we fill'd the opposite Army who were then in Hostility against us with greater Recruits of Debtors who fled from Arrests than they had been ever able of their Power to have done and of Debtors so Potent for the Privilege of Peers to be free from Arrest was then taken away as drew multitudes with them to the Hills who would if secured from Arrest have all stayed quiet Neuters at home 8. That in case of Contumacy of the Debtors Christ allows both to take Pledges Arrest and Imprison him after Judgment 9. That he allows not though after Judgment to detain the Debtor in Prison for Penalties and Forfeitures above the value of the Debt and Damage One single Judg. 10. That he allows on lawful Probation and Judgment Imprisonment to be by one single Judg. For he says in the Singular Number and the Judg deliver thee to the Officer and thou be cast into Prison Verily I say unto thee thou shalt by no means come out thence till thou hast paid the utmost farthing And at that time the Roman Judges both at Rome and in Judaea sate on single Tribunals in Courts by themselves and not with associates Judices delegati à principe fuerunt 12. in Civitate Romana Octo Erant Minores Quatuor Majores quilibet sedebat in suo Praetorio in Basilica glâ—in Rub. in § Rebus in Authent de Judicibus in Collat 6. In the City of Rome there were Twelve Judges Delegates made by the Emperor Eight Lesser and Four Greater and every one of them sate in his several Court in the Palace Hall This Christ seems to allude to Matth. 19.28 When the Son of Man shall sit in the Throne of his Glory ye also shall sit upon Twelve Thrones Judging the Twelve Tribes of Israel In the like manner they placed single Judges in the Provinces as Herod Felix Festus and others were all single Judges within their several Territories of Judaea And these single Judges were not only 1. Judges of Temporals but Spirituals till the Superstition of the Emperors divided the Supream Jurisdiction into Episcopal and Imperiâ—l giving the Supremacy to the Episcopal for before the Emperors the Roman Law was Rex Sacrorum Praeses esto as appears by the Laws of Romuâ—us and Numa of whom one was an Augur and King which was then their highest kind of Prophet and above a Priest and the other a Sacrificer and a King The Senate after the Expolsion of Tarquin took upon themselves to be Praesides Sacrorum and the Emperors after they had overtopt the Senate made themselves High-Priests and Emperors so did Julius Caesar so did Augustus and their Successors till as is before said Superstition again divided the Imperial Jurisdiction But likewise 2. the same Judg was of Civils and Criminals and 3. the same one Judg was of Fact Law and Equity and there was not amongst nor in any Empire in the World that unnecessary and unjust distinction of Chancery Common Law and Juries It is not here objected against the Bishops that they place more Judges than one in their Spiritual Courts or any Court where they can get Jurisdiction we know the contrary and too Ambitious and Subtle they were to draw any such Inconvenience on themselves but they rather studied to lay that Clog of unnecessary Number on the Layity in the Common Law Courts they themselves having usually been sole Judges in the Spiritual Courts concerning Marriage Testaments and Tiths under the name of Judg Spiritual or Ecclesiastical and in the Chancery concerning other Temporal matters under the name of the Judg of Conscience and Equity and in their Inquisitions Criminal concerning matters of Life and Death under the name of the Judg of Heresie have made themselves absolute Monarchs over the Religion Justâ—ce Estates and Lives of the People and Clogg'd them with numerous Judges and Juries that they might not be able to lift an hand or move a Tongue against them in the same manner as the Senate did deceive the People of Rome by multiplying their Tribunes under pretence of favour to them to no other intent but that the Defensors of their Liberty might be more easily divided against themselves and weaker to oppose the Senate I shall only give a touch of the Reasons why more Judges than one ought not to be admitted in any one Court except in a Court of Appeal or in Judges equally Elected by the Parties as Arbitrators and Commissioners for Examination of Witnesses use to be 1. Because as to Election of the Judges it is easier to find one Man of Ability and Integrity fit to be a Judg than Twelve Reasons why more Judges than one ought not to be admitted in one Court 2. The hearing of a multitude of Causes is extream tedious and toilsome where there is therefore a numerous Court they are apt to shift their Collar from the labour and leave all to the President while they either talk with one another more pleasant discourse or let their Wits run a wool-gathering or plainly nod and sleep upon the Bench. 3. Admit they do attend the Cause which they very rarely do except for a Friend or against an Enemy they may vary in their
any Delays by Jeofails Repleaders Arrests of Judgment or Writs of Error another cause was that both Parties and Advocates took the Oath of Calumny that they believed their Allegiance just and true Illud juretur quod lis sibi justa videtur which Oath keeps their Allegiances clean from falsity that I never found so much as one Fiction in all their judicial Proceedings and if the same Oath were but taken here as there I believe there would not one Bill in Chancery or Declaration at Common Law come in for Twenty which now are thrust in by heaps many other causes there are which lessen the labour of a Judg and of the Suitors which for Brevity I omit all which shew the Prudence of that Noble Kingdom where the People enjoy so great Justice with so little Cost and Contention Lastly we could have done more Business than we did had we been set to Act as the Roman Judges every one single without Associates in a Court by himself and how great an Addition to the Publick Treasury as well as advantage to Justice the lessening the number of Judges and turning Fees to Salary will cause is already mention'd A Satyr against the Cruel Preposteration of Ecclesiastical and Temporal Courts in Judicial Proceedings contrary to the Precept of Christ Matth. 18.15 AND will you never learn the skill Which first Subpoena is or Bill Or foremost know with all your wit If Declaration is or writ Or which precede should in your Tale The Capias or Original You which is best who make a pause To Sentence first or hear the Cause With Execution who begin Before a Judgment or a Sin Who grinde and eat the Poor distrest With Tongue and Teeth of Romish Beast For Grace in Anglice's who curse The Rent was bad the Patch is worse Who have no Summons but Surprize Who have no Laws but Treacheries Do you not know there is a Cry Gone up against your Cruelty The Prince himself of Righteousness So foul Oppressions to suppress Descended hath on Earthly Globe And glorious Dy'd his Scarlet Robe In his own blood to keep the Peace And from your Dungeons to release Twelve Trumpets hear 12 Apostles whose Silver sound Doth from the East to West rebound Proclaim'd the Sacred Edict have And Penalty whence none can save Which lest to you should be in vain Ye Adders deaf hear it again If Thee thy Brother or thy Friend Or Enemy hap to offend See thou to warn him do not grudg Twice at the least without a Judg And the last time see thou no less Shew him than thy two Witnesses Or three to make the Fact appear If he shall doubt to him more clear Nor shalt thou him for any thing Unto the Seat of Judgment bring Untill he Litis Contestate Or shew a Contumacious hate That if thou canst thou may'st him prove Thus first at home to win by Love Let every Plaintiff thus his Suit Begin or be for ever mute No form of Strife shall be but this Our express will and pleasure is The Nations Bow and struck with Awe Adore the Justice of the Law And to the dread Tribunal run High as the Clouds bright as the Sun With loud Appeals and further will Upon this Statute draw their Bill Both of Indictment and Complaint And of these Crimes you thus attaint That against this Divinest Act More Fees and greater to exact The furious Plaintiff false or true While hot you bind him to pursue The slow Defendant wrong or right You Bail or Goal to make him fight And Fines on Concords heavy lay To make them your unhappy prey The Debtor travailing to find The Creditor with honest mind Your Outlawries ambush the way And will not suffer him to pay But in your Tolls you take him there And bind him like a filly Dear Or what doth make him as forlorn To death you hunt him with the Horn To make his Skin and Carcass yours You cheat both him and Creditors And while his Plaint each sadly tells You take the Fish and leave the Shells Thus Innocents you lay in Chains Before they know who 't is complains Or what 't is for nor shall they see 't Till all Extortion's paid by Sheet You lay Imbargues and Prizes take Before the War proclaimed you make And Right by Battle try and Wounds Mortal before the Trumpet sounds Your Hell-hounds hunt without a noise Your Snake not rattles but destroys There 's nothing true and nothing Sworn Till Justice is to pieces torn And you who cite not but infest us With your Excessus Manifestus And us torment with great unfitness Dr. Cousins writes in defence of suppressing the names of Witnesses Accusers Excommunication ipso facto without Citation Because you will not name the Witness Your Ipso Facto's make us wonder At Thunderbolts without a Thunder And Bodies Judg in Hell to cast Before the Judgment day is past And deathless Souls make pale and wan Because you Curse before you Ban. No Plea deceives the Judg on high What will you do stand mute or flie All rather or who most repents Burn Popish Forms and Presidents Is it not better then to turn To Flames than you your selves to burn Some way with speed appease his Ire Your pain proclaimed is Hell and Fire Of Summons to answer before a Copy given of what is required to be answer'd This is in Scotland provided for by Act of Parliament and no man is troubled to appear before any Judg to answer before by their Libell'd Summons a Copy is deliver'd to the Person or affixed at the Door of his dwelling House containing all the matters at large to which his answer is required and though the People of England are not yet so happy as to enjoy so great a Privilege on which those invaluable Treasures of their Liberty and Propriety depend yet every Attorny and Clerk of a Court hath it and is free from giving appearance before a Judg or being Arrested till a Copy of the Declaration first deliver'd him and Judgment pass'd against him Attor Ac. 28. The reason why these Lay-Clerks who are Successors in Courts to the old Romish Spiritual Clerk Monopolize this from the whole People only to themselves is Filthy Lucre For first if the Plaintiff were compell'd as he ought to be to make Oblatio Libelli to the Defendant by giving or sending a Copy of his Bill in Chancery or of his Declaration at Common Law to the Defendant at his dwelling House and so likewise the Defendant bound to return his Answer Sealed up directed to be left for the Plaintiff in such Court having Jurisdiction of the Cause as the Plaintiff desired within Fifteen Days after the Service of the Copy at the dwelling House to be by the Officer of the Court deliver'd Sealed to the Attorney of the Plaintiff when he demands the same and the like done on Reply Duply Triply and Quadruply and all Exceptions of Fact or Law Postulations and Motions of
Title of very good if it had been put in Latine might have been more Complementally express'd Optimo had it not been a Danger lest Maximo would have been added whether the Title of very good given to man is always as great a Fiction as the Titles of Sanctus Clemens and Pius given to Popes may be always doubtful in regard Christ himself in Humility refused the Attribute of Good which is a degree under very good Luke 18.19 And Jesus said unto him Why callest thou me good None is good but One that is God but this Title very good is sometimes certain and not doubtful to be a Fiction when it is attributed to the Leudest Person known the Letter begins After my very hearty commendations to your Lordship This when there is a Mortal Feud between the Chancellor and the Lord must be a Fiction Whereas there hath been of late a Bill of Complaint exhibited into the Court of Chancery against you by H. O. Gent. I have thought good to give you notice thereof rather by these my private Letters than by awarding his Majesties Ordinary Process This if no Bill is come in is as great a Fiction and Falsity in a Private Letter as in a Subpoena and it were far fairer dealing with any Noble-man as well as a Poor man if J. O. first took his Oath of Calumny to his Bill and then made him according to the Precept of Christ an Oblatio Libelli and sent him a Copy of his Bill by his own Letter before he troubled him with a Chancellors Subpoena or Letter and made Use of them only on Probation and declaratory Sentence of Contumacy first obtained and after that obtained far fairer dealing it were with J. O. or any Poor man to grant the same Process of Contumacy that a Noble-man shall have against a Poor man and not put him to the extraordinary cost and incertainty of a Chancellors Private Letter to a Noble-man seeing by Law he ought not to receive any Private Letter from him and such Noble-man ought to be punished by the Civil Law de Ambitu and by the Common Law for Maintenance if he send any and this Justice would prevent Fictions both of Poor and Rich and bring forth Righteousness and Truth The Letter goes on and says Wherefore these are to pray your Lordships to give order for the taking out of the Copy of a Bill and for the putting in of your Answer thereunto according to the usual course in such Cases accustom'd at or before Octab. Hill next ensuing By this Prayer here is a Fiction that the old Episcopal Chancellor had an Imperial Authority over the Commons and only Precarious over the Nobles and was a Fiction if he derived his Authority from the King of the weakness of the Royal Power and of a Dishonour to it as if it was not able to do Justice to the Commons against the Nobles as well as to the Nobles against the Commons if a Sheriff at Common Law should Execute his Praecipe quod reddat and his Praecipe quod faciat whereby he is will'd by the King to command those against whom those Writs are directed by writing his humble Letters when he perceives they concerned Noble-men to pray their Lordships to do what he was appointed to command the Law makes him liable to high punishment and why a Chancellor should not be liable to the same who commits the same offence and having the Kings Process to command in his hand will not or dares not administer Equity by the same equal Process to his Majesties Subjects both Poor and Rich appears no reason or rather an higher Quanto Major qui peccat habetur by how much greater the Power of a Chancellor is extending to a Kingdom than of a Sheriff confined to a single Countrey The next in the Letter is Nothing deubting but that your Lordship will have the care and regard which appertaineth but another man may doubt whether he spake Truth or Fiction He concludes well if not in Hypocrisie I leave your Lordship to the most Merciful keeping of the Almighty from Saint A. the 9th of May 1654. Your very loving Friend J. P. Prolixity caused by Fiction The Bill in Chancery for want of the Oath of Calumny is known to be commonly a Pack of Lies from beginning to the end which is full of infinite Mischiefs and destructive to all Justice and makes it of such immense Prolixity for Lies may be infinite but Truths are few and short that it compels the Answer to be longer than it self for every Lie must be Answer'd as well as the Truth and by reason of such Prolixity neither the Chancellor as he ought to do will take the pains to read nor the Councel to be instructed in either but the Truth like a Grain of Mustard-feed thrown into an heap of Tares is lost and impossible to be found and Sentences and Decrees pass'd both Interloquutory and Final without the least Merit of the Cause Started Stated or Debated The Process of the Chancery is almost as mischievous a Fiction as the Outlawry at Common Law which is the Commission of Rebellion that on non-appearance the most Loyal Subject that is may be Feigned Proclaimed and Imprisoned as a Rebel so the Chancellor needs nothing but a Fiction to elude Magna Charta and the Petition of Right and an Hundred Acts of Parliament more if they were made to that purpose to which the Fiction is point blank contrary and destructive and as inconsistent with all the Fundamental Laws of Liberty and Propriety as Darkness with Light yet is there no necessity of it at all for where it is not necessary to take the Defendants Oath but the Plaintiff can prove his Bill by Witnesses full Justice may be done either by Missio in Possessionem where the Action is Real or where it is to stop Suits by the English Injunction or Scotch Suspension and where the Defendants Oath is necessary either for Discovery or Probation on proof made of the Bill and of the Countumacy and Sentence Declaratory a Capias may be awarded against the Defendant as after a Judgment pass'd Fictions of Latitats If we go to the Common Law Process that is as bad infected with Fictions as the Court of Conscience The Latitat is a meer Lie first it supposeth a Bill of Middlesex to precede where there is no such matter then the Defendant is slander'd Latitare discurrere when he lives as openly as any of his Neighbours and never stirs from his home the suggested Latitations are therefore Lies Then it saith De placito Transgr ' Ac etiam for if the Ac etiam be true of Debt then it is false as to Trespass for there can be no Joindure in Action of Debt and Trespass in the same Writ and so the Kings-Bench ought to have no Jurisdiction of Debt notwithstanding this Fiction except on a Writ of Error which is upon the matter confess'd by Coke himself
he be heard in the Cause he sall Swear that the Cause he Trowis is gud and leill that he sall Plead and gif the Principal Party be absent the Advocate sall Swear in the Saule of him after as is conteyned in thir meters Illud juretur quod Lis sibi justa videtur Et si quaeretur verum non insicietur Nil promittetur nec falsa probatio detur Vt Lis tardetur dilatio nulla petetur Of Judgment before Hearing Part of a Satyr translated out of Seneca page 685. on the Sottish Emperour Claudius who used to Sentence before Hearing Deflete virum Quo non alius Potuit citius Discere Causas Vna tantum Parte audita Saepe nutra Quis nunc Judex Toto lites Audiet Anno Tibi jam cedit Sede relicta Qui dat populo Jura Silenti Cretaea tenens Oppida Centum Cedite moestis Pectora palmis O Causidici Venale genus Vosque poetae Lugete novi Vosque in primis Qui concusso Magna parastis Lucra fritillo Weep for the Man All ye who can Then whom none would Or sooner could A Cause right catch Or it dispatch Though part but one He heard or none A Judg alas Is now an Ass He cannot hear In a whole Year Or end a Suit There 's such Dispute To thee give place Minos his Grace Though he hath Men And Ten times Ten Cities in Creete Who do him greete And with his Laws The silent aws Goblins and Ghosts With all their Hosts Oh Saleable Lawyers now Yell And likewise you Ye Poets new And you whose pains For easie Gains Causes to hast The Dice did cast It is further mention'd that when Claudius for this kind of Justice was Arrested in Hell on a Latitat and many complaints were there made against him by those who were injured thereby he desired he might be heard to answer for himself and espying there P. Petronius who had been his Creature while above ground he humbly requested Aeacus who was the Judg that Petronius might be of his Councel and plead his Cause for him Petronius having been used to the Trade while alive very readily Venit Defendit Vim injuriam quando but Aeacus sharply forbid him to speak being clear of opinion that Claudius who had condemned so many before Hearing ought in Justice to suffer the Talio and be himself so condemned he therefore to as many complainants as desired it gave liberty to lay more Arrests and more Bilbo's on him before Judgment and to as many as desired Judgments gave them as many as they would have before Hearing and to Execute as many punishments as they would against which he strugled much to have been heard to answer for himself yet they thrust such a Gag into his mouth that he was enforced to suffer many Judgments to pass against him on a Nihil Dicit Now though a feigned Aeacus is to be derided yet there is a Judg of the World who will not be mocked and though there are many forward enough to condemn Claudius yet may there too many if they will but inspect their own Forms of Judicial Proceeding find themselves guilty of as great if not worse Vices in their Judicatories than he An Enumeration of divers Forms of Judicial Proceeding whereby the People are Condemn'd and Judgment pass'd against them before Hearing The First is When Men are repell'd from shewing the Truth and Merit of their Cause and compellâ—d to make their Allegations in Formalities and Fictions A Dispute between two Judges concerning Formality and Truth in Judicial Proceeding The point of Formality in Judicial Proceedings is very well Disputed by two famous Judges Fitzherbert and Brook 14. H. 8.25 b. Where the Case was this In an Action of Debt brought on an Obligation indorsed with a Condition to perform all Covenants in an Indenture between the Defendant and Plaintiff which Indenture contained Four Covenants One whereof was That a stranger should be Clerk to the Sheriff who was then Plaintiff and also that the stranger should pay at the Profers Seventeen Pounds at such a Feast and Thirty Pounds more at such a Feast and other Covenants which he Recites and saith further That he was a Lay-man and not Letter'd and that the Indenture was read to him concerning no more than the two first Covenants and no other which two he had paid and performed and so damands Judgment Si Actio and says not Et sic non est factum on which Plea the Sergeants demur'd in Law Fitzherbert I conceive this a good Plea for by the Law a man is Compellable to no more than only to shew the matter of his Case in Truth and good Sentence and if the Parties in their shewing cannot agree then to join Issue upon the matter of Fact on which they differ and put it on Trial of the Jury and then the Judg on the Truth of the matter of Fact found shall adjudg what is the Law and here it seems the Defendant hath shewn in Truth and good Sentence for he hath shewn he was a Lay-man and not Letter'd and that only two of the Covenants in the Indenture were read unto him and no more and I think he is only bound to perform what was read to him and so the Obligation to be good for the same and void for the Residue which was not read and I find it adjudged 47. E. 3. where one was bound to an ignorant Lay-man who was not Letter'd in an Hundred Pounds to be paid at several days of payment and at the first day the Obligor made due payment for what was then to be paid and the Obligee made him an Acquittance of the first Sum and in the end of the Acquittance was added a general Release and of this only that part was read to the Obligee which was an Acquittance of the first Sum but the part which mention'd a general Release was not read and this matter was pleaded in an Action of Debt after brought against the Obligor and it made the Acquittance which was read good and the Release which was not read void and so the Deed was adjudged good for part and void for part and it would be a great Mischief if it should be otherwise for in the same Case if the Deed should be void in whole then the Obligor should lose all the Money he paid and if it should be good in the whole then the Obligee should lose his Obligation which were unreasonable that any man should be deceived by his Ignorance of the Fact though he may by his Ignorance of the Law And here the Defendant being bound to perform two of the Conditions in the Indenture which were read to him he cannot plead non est factum for that would be a Lie and contrary to the Truth of his own confession therefore seeing he hath pleaded the Truth in good Order and good Sentence and concludes Judgment Si Actio I think he cannot plead or conclude in any
Free-born Subject Arbitrarily at their pleasure is contrary to the Acts of Parliament both of Magna Charta and the Petition of Right so late in memory which abolish all Imprisonment both of Nobles and Commons without the lawful Judgment of their Peers so likewise is it contrary to all other Fundamental Laws of the Land made for defence of the liberty of the People which is more necessary and more dear than Life as may appear by the Reasons following 1. There is an Act of Parliament made 15. H. 6. cap. 4. That none shall Sue a Subpoena until he find Surety to satisfie the Defendant his Damages if he do not verifie and prove his Bill to be true this Statute had nipt in the Bud the Overflow of all those innumerable Fictions and Falsities which have since followed in the Suggestions of Bills in Chancery for this being made 15. H. 6. there is no mention made in all the Year-Books of any quarrel between the Common-Law-Judges and a Subpoena till 37. H. 6. which is above Twenty Years after so great a Fright had this Act falling from the Supreme Power put amongst the Froggs though now despised as a dead Logg as likewise are all the rest and it is in vain to make more unless the Honour of these is vindicated by the same Authority that made them for Chancellors as if Jura negant sibi nata they were two-great to be bound by Acts of Parliament though they have not the least pretence to colour their Authority against these Three the greatest Acts for Security of the Subjects against false Imprisonments that ever were made in England for there is no Prescription or Custom of any Court can be alledged against an Act of Parliament be it never so old and there is no Pretence to alledg any against the Petition of Right Chancellour hath no Authority to impose a Fine being in so fresh memory and no longer since than 3. Car. 1. they have trampled under soot the Authority of these Supreme Acts and all lawful Judgments on them 1. To lay Fines on the Subject thus Trin. 3. Jac. did Chancellour Egerton impose a Fine on Sir Thomas Themilthorp for not performing his Decree concerning Land of Inheritance and Estreated the same into the Exchequer and upon Process against him the Party appearing pleaded that the Chancellour had no Authority to impose a Fine the Attorney General Petiit advisamentum Curiae concerning the Authority of the Chancellour and on mature advice It was adjudged That he had no Power to Fine in the Case Coke 4th part 84. 2. To Extend according to which pretended Power the said Chancellour Decreed against Waller certain Lands and for not obeying the Decree imposed a Fine and upon Process out of the Court of Chancery extended the Lands that Waller had in Middlesex whereupon Waller brought his Assise in the Court of Common-Pleas where the Opinion of the whole Court agreed in omnibus with the Court of the Exchequer ib. 3. Not only to proceed to Imprison the Subjects on false Suggestions without taking any Surety of the Complainant according to the Statute to verifie his Bill but without so much as taking his Oath of Calumny to his Bill and have further presumed so high as by their Edicts and Orders of Chancery which they have not the least Authority to make to order the Subjects to be Attached and Imprison'd on every Affidavit of any Knight of the Post and no Probation to be admitted to the contrary and if while the Innocent Party is imprison'd being remote from his Home and suffering great Loss and Damage by this his false Imprisonment he shall at length offer to prove the Affidavit false and Knight of the Post perjur'd he shall be discharged but without any Cost for the great Service the Knight of the Post did the Court to Forswear himself against the Prisoner whereby they get some Fees See here a Chancellour in desiance of Three Acts of Parliament without any Sureties without any Oath of Calumny without any Judgment of Peers publisheth in sight of the Sun his abominable Orders to cast into Prison the most Innocent Person on the false Affidavit of every Perjur'd Knight of the Post yea a single Affidavit as appears by the Orders of the Chancellour and Master of the Rolls Printed 1669. Page 67. and yet they pretend Page 65. under the Title of Commitment that they are tender of the Liberty of mens Persons and of their Imprisonments on Affidavits and confess they are often Malitious and made by one mean and ignorant Person yet in the same breath Page 67. as if they soon forgot or understood not what they said in the beginning of their Order they the next leaf conclude That a single Affidavit of such a malitious mean and ignorant Person yea though he is proved afterwards to be Perjured shall be sufficient to Imprison the Innocent Subject and when he again gets out of Gaol if he can let the Innocent Party be indamaged his whole Estate he shall not have a Farthing Cost for the false Imprisonment and observe the depth of the Reason why given by a Chancellour and as the Printed Orders say with advice and assistance of the Master of the Bolls 't is this as appears Page 68. at the top of the leaf viz. IN RESPECT OF THE OATH MADE AGAINST HIM AS AFORESAID that is to say the Oath though false of a Villain Perjured against the Innocent Person for so is the implication of the Order and likewise though they durst not say so in express terms yet so is the implicit Non Obstante notwithstanding any Law of God or Man or Acts of Parliament to the contrary Doth not here a Chancellour assume the Omnipotent Power of the Pope to dispense with the Laws of God and Men and assume a Power of Imprisoning the Subjects above the King and Parliament yea contrary and in contempt of their Laws he doth for the Law of God and Precept of Christ is known to prohibit the Imprisonment of any No Imprisonment ought to be but where the Witnesses and Party are brought Face to Face without two Witnesses at least and without bringing the Witnesses and the Party accused face to face that he may know them and except against their Persons or Testimony if he hath cause which is never done on an Affidavit And the Laws of the Land Magna Charta and Petition of Right utterly prohibit all Imprisonment of the Subject on Affidavits whether they are true or false without bringing the Witnesses and the Party face to face and a Judgment on such Testimony against him by his Peers and if such Evil Precedents be suffer'd to pass without some example of Justice shewn on them all Acts of Parliament which ever have been or shall be for protection of the Liberty of the Subject Forgery Licensed in Chancery thereby to Imprison the Subject falsely will be vain and to no purpose 4. The Chancellour
nane against quhome the Process beis led be received in the Kings Castle or Place or in his Presence nor admitted to Councel or Parliament heard nor answer'd in the Law of Judgment of Fee and Heritage or uther Causes bot ever Eschewed as Cursed unto the time the said Persons cum to amendis and assyith the Party and obteine Absolution in Form of Law And Jac. 6. p. 3. cap. 53. in the Kings Minority an Act was got by the Kirk ' That all Excommunicate Persons not Conforming ' in Forty Days should be denounced Rebels and put to the Horn. The English Commissioners in the said late time of the Troubles had Instructions to take from the then Kirk such Letters of Horning and not to assist any Excommunication with the Temporal Sword which we performed accordingly The King of Spain joined with Tyrone and the Rebels in Ireland against Queen Elizabeth And Don John de Aquila Landing in Ireland with 4000 Spaniards intitled himself Master-General and Captain of the Catholick King in the Wars of God for holding and keeping the Faith in Ireland only on pretence of Excommunication Sextus Quintus the Pope of Rome on the Invasion prepared by Spain against England Anno 1588. sent out his Crusado as if against the Turks and having pass'd Sentence of Excommunication and Deprivation by his Bulls against Queen Elizabeth promising Pardon of Sins Heaven and Eternal Life to all who di'd in the Invasion 1. To grant a Pope or a Bishop Power to Excommunicate Protestant-Subjects is to grant him Power to Excommunicate Protestant-Kings 2. To grant him Power to Excommunicate Protestant-Kings is to grant him Power to Levy Money Raise Soldiers Denounce War and Depose them 3. Of the Dilemma of Danger threatning Princes who seek Security of Goverement from the Excommunication of Popes or Bishops either over a People Religious or Superstitious 4. Of the Impossibility of Security for Princes unless their Subjects are Educated or Instructed to be free from the Superstition of Excommunication and to contemn it 5. Of the Impossibility of obliging Popes or Bishops either by Benefits or Oaths Excommunication is as Proscription made a pretetence of Confiscation without shewing cause The Romans saith Aman. Marcellus proscribed Ptolomy the then King of Cyprus being their Confederate for no fault only they wanted Money in the Treasury who therefore poison'd himself and the Isle became Tributary to the Romans In the like manner do Popes and Bishop fall on the Richest with their Excommunication to fill their empty Purses Pope Gregory the Tenth Commanded Percham Arch-Bishop of Canterbury to pay him Four Thousand Marks within Four Months on pain of Excommunication So Excommunication is a ready way to Levy Money for War Anno 1230. The Pope having Excommunicated the Emperor the Emperor was fain to pay for his Absolution an Hundred and Twenty Thousand Ounces of Gold Plat. Nam Anno 1231. The Emperor for memory of this hard Penny-worth for his Absolution put into a Pool at Helbrand divers Pikes and other Fishes with Brass Rings having Inscriptions of his name and the Year of the Lord one of the Fishes was taken up 267. Years after Ann. Suev Calv. Henry the Second after that Traitor Beckett the then Arch-Bishop of Canterbury had been Slain though not by the Kings Command was enjoined amongst other things this Slavish Penance He walked Three Miles bare-foot on the sharp Stones that he at length had so cut his Feet they marked the ground with Blood every step he went And after this which was worse than Running the Gantilope he Received of the Priests Monks Bishops and Abbots on his naked Flesh so many Jerks with Rods Oh brave Pedants and Pontifical Government for Princes as according to Baronius amounted to at least Fourscore Lashes which doubtless was the Number the Jew administred to the vilest Rogues lest their Brothers should be despised in their Eyes and not heard to have been Exercised in their Eyes and not heard to have been Exercised on the Priests Bishops and Abbots themselves though they kill'd and murder'd many Lay-men without Law or Justice they incur'd only a deprivation and instead of Hanging which they deserved sometimes no more than a suspension Temporary ab Officio In the time of King John Anno 1211. The Pope Excommunicated him and gave the Kingdom of England to the King of France Paris Wend. The Pope Excommunicated Henry the Eighth and gave the Kingdom Primo Occupanti Queen Elizabeth was Excommunicated by Three Popes Pius Quintus Gregory the Thirteenth and Sextus Quintus Anno 1308. The Pope Excommunicateth Andronicus Emperor of the East and setteth up the King of Russia against him Bzou So he dealt alike with the East and Western Emperors Excommunications have brought the Venetians to extreme Straights formerly therefore they are yet no Friends of it Dandalus Duke of Venice was compell'd by Pope Clement the Fifth to Crouch under the Table Chain'd like a Dog before he could obtain Peace for the Venetians The Pope Excommunicated John King of Navar and Granted his Kingdom to the Spaniards Nicephorus Phocas Emperor of the East was Excommunicated by Polyeuchus then Patriarch of Constantinople because he had been God-father to a Child of Theophania Wife to his Predecessor and after his Predecessor's Death Married her Pope Zachary deposed Chilperick the French King and gave the Crown of France to Pepin The two French Kings H. 3. and H. 4. who were Assassinated had great Guards whereby it appears though Princes may secure themselves in Vaults and Caves from Thunderbolts yet can they not against the Bishops of Romes Ignis Fatuus of Excommunication but that to Assault them Per medios ire Satellites Et perrumpere amat saxa potentius Ictu fulmineo Eight Emperors were Excommunicated by Popes who were these Frederick the First Frederick the Second Philip Conrad Otho the Fourth Lewes of Bavaria Henry the Fourth and Henry the Fifth The Emperor Henry the Fourth Fought in Threescore and Two several Battles and had for the most part Victory he was Excommunicated by the Pope and to obtain his Absolution came Three Days together bare-foot to the Gates of the City Canusium where the Pope then was and with much difficulty obtain'd it The Catholick Majesties of Spain cannot secure themselves from Excommunication without Money nor their great Vice-Roys in America for a Rebellion was Raised in Mexico by the Arch-Bishop there Excommunicating the Governors the People by Superstitious Episcopal Education made more afraid of the Counterfeit Power of the Keys than of the true Power of the Sword and will side in Rebellion with the Bishop against the Secular Governor men may talk therefore and believe what they please that the Supremacy of the Temporal Sword is Consistent with the Spiritual of Excommunication but when it comes to Trial amongst a Superstitious People they will be very much deceived and perhaps Ruin'd Bzovius de Pont. Roman 611 612. to maintain the Power That the Popes may depose Kings
better Form And Brudnell agreed with Fitzheabert Brook Ch. Justice I conceive the contrary and that the conclusion is not good And Sir as to what is said that the Law is no other but that a man shall Declare his matter in Truth and good Sentence the Law is more than so for without Formality the same is nothing worth as the Form of Law is a man shall shew his matter without Duplicity of Multiplicity yet may matters more than one be True and in good Sentence but they want Formality and therefore are nothing worth and a Form ought to be used or otherwise all things will be in confusion So in Trespass the Defendant ought to give a colour of Right to the Plaintiff yet the colour is not true nor the Sentence the better but it is the Formality which is required and Formality is the chiefest thing in our Law and though the matter in the present Plea appears in Truth and good Sentence yet here wants Formality for he ought here to have concluded not Judgment Si Actio but Sic non est facium for I conceive in regard only two Convenants of the Indenture were read to him and there were more Covenants not read that the whole Indenture is void and it is Fraud in the Obligee And Pollard agreed with Brook that it was no good Plea and that the whole Indenture was void But to this Fitzherbert and Brudnell might have repli'd that admit the whole Indenture had been all void in Law for the Fraud in part and the Defendant might Rigore Juris Plead it yet Quilibet potest Renunciare juri pro se introducio if the Defendant was more merciful than the Law and his Conscience would not suffer him to use Summum jus but doth assent to perform those Covenants were read to him is it therefore Reason or Conscience that the Plaintiff for his good Nature and Courtesie should return him Evil for Good and put the Burden of all the Covenants on him because he would perform any when he needed perform none if he would have pleaded in a Form against his Conscience and that Truth ought to be prefer'd before Fiction and Formality But I leave the Merits of the Cause to others to Censure and shall only upon the whole Dispute take thâ—se Observations 1. It appears by the Case that there are but Four Judges in the Court and they are divided Two against Two Fitzherbert and Brudnell for Truth against Fiction and Substance against Formality and Block and Pelâ—ard for Fiction against Truth and Formality against Substance whence is shown that there have been and are many good men Judges and other Professors of the Law who with all their their Power Desire and long to remove those Abuses of Fictions Forms and other Irregularities which are Reproaches on the Practicers but should they afflict themselves to death can do nothing if equipoised or overpoised by the other Party therefore they ought not to be imputed to those who are not guilty but the consideration of them ought to be left to the Legislative which hath Power to Redress them when they please with a word and shall give account to God if they neglect the same 2. It may be observed how many Contentions arise about a petty piece of Formality when there is none about the Substance which is acknowledged by Coke himself Com. Lit. 303. whose words are these When I diligently consider the Course of our Books of Years and Terms from the beginning of the Reign of Ed. the Third I observe that more Jangling and Questions arise upon the manner of Pleading and Exceptions to Form than upon the matter it self and infinite Causes lost or delayed for want of good Pleading by which he means Formality hath destroyed infinite good Causes which is a most horrible thing to be Tolerated in any Government 3. The next thing observeable is The great Ignorance of Courâ—s themselves in their own Formalities for they have continued by Coke's confession Jangling and Wrangling about them ever since Edward the Thirds time and are yet never the wiser nor any perfect Form invented or settled by them they are still ever Learning and never come to the knowledg of Truth and so will be to Dooms-day if they are not by God sooner called to Account of their Stewardships and this point of Ignorance in their own Formalities is further confessed by Coke in another place where he saith It were to be wished that Littleton had writ something concerning Pleadings which shews he was but a wisher or woulder at it himself for whom if he had been able it had been far more proper to have writ a perfect Form of Judicial Proceeding than to wish the same had been done by one dead Hundreds of Years before and if he could have had him alive 't is likely he was as much to seck as himself for he could not write any directions concerning it to his own Son though it was a point above all other which he desired he might Learn and in respect of which his Tenures were but Trifles but he is fain to leave it to him as his other Quaeries de Dubiis and a Terra Incognita where he should gâ—t Rich Mines of Gold and Silver if he could light on it in these words And know my Son that it is one of the most Honourable Laudable and Profitable things in our Law to have the Science of well Pleading in Actions Real and Personal and therefore I counsel thee especially to employ thy Courage and Care to learn this Which yet neither he nor any since ever learnt or found out in this Climate neither is it possible for any to do unless those very Forms of Actions and Writs are made only Directive and not Coercive and Liberty given of Commenceing and Disputing Suits on more Solid Foundations of Right than can be laid on any Forms in the World especially on such in which the Courts themselves are Ignorant how to proceed and their so many divided and contrary Opinions in the Expositions of the Law have so intangled the cross Threads of their several Clues of unravell'd Opinions that now no Courts unless they clean break them all to pieces are able ever to get out of their own Labyrinth of Formalities and are most commonly in the pitiful Condition wherein Vigelius Dia. Jur. 477. finds his Judg who is Ignorant of the Forms of Judicial Proceeding At nunc saith he Cum Judex Litiscontestationis adeoque judicandi ratione sit ignarus sedet inter Advocatos Procuratores tanquam Asinus inter simias nescit quando Disputationes in Causa permittendae sunt quando contra sunt inhibendae hinc ne necessarias inhibeat non necessarias permittit Advocatis in infinitum Disputandi Licentiam concedit non Semel sed saepius dilationes Dat easque velex levissima causa But now saith he when a Judg is Ignorant how tostate the Point of the Cause and of the Form of