Dutie common to other of inferiour ranke This word feede therefore will helpe them nothing for the Supremacie The word my pulleth downe Peter from Soueraignty For first Peters charge is to seed not his owne but Christs sheepe So then Peter is not a Lord but a Seruant-Shepheard to feede the chiefe Shepheards flocke as Peter himselfe calleth Christ who knew no other chiefe Shepheardship either in himselfe or in any other but in Christ 1. Pet. 5. 3. And wee reade how the flocke is called Gods Act. 20. 28. 1. Pet. 5. 2. but no where Peters As also by Christ himselfe wee are taught that there is but one fold and one Shepheard of that fold to wit but one generall Shepheard and that is he himselfe Ioh. 10. 11 14 16. and not Peter and that by Peters owne acknowledgement in the fore-quoted place 1. Pet. 5. 3. The word Lambes or Sheepe considered with the rest of the words and as it is commonly taken wipes away Peters Supremacie For first the words are not spoken vniuersally Feede all my Lambes as if hee had been charged with all of them For this had beene a charge First which hee could neuer haue performed secondly which he neuer did attempt to performe Now God neuer imposed any impossible charge vpon him and Peter would not haue been found faithlesse But it is spoken indefinitely to feed here and there whom he could and where hee could at any time Therefore hee is not here the vniuersall Bishop Secondly Lambes or Sheepe are not Apostles Prophets Euangelists and Pastors These are neuer so called but in relation to Iesus Christ onely Mat. 26. 31. and neuer in reference to any man But if vnder these Lambes and Sheepe bee comprehended all and euery one of the Church and flocke of Christ then by their account all the Apostles and the rest must bee sheepe and Peter their Shepheard and so a Shepheard ouer shepheards Which vaine conceit without proofe who can giue credit vnto And yet Bellarmine makes a difference betweene Lambes and Sheepe The Lambes forsooth must bee the Laitie and the Sheepe the Apostles when as the words are vsed indifferently Math. 10. 16. Luk. 10. 3. Act. 8. 32. And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Christ though he vse two words yet doth not make any such difference For the two words to feede are applyed also indifferently to either of them So that taking sheepe for the Apostles Peter must not onely rule as they would haue it but also teach the Apostles when Apostles are all immediately from Christ and taught of Christ and by his holy Spirit Galat. 1. 1 12. and needed no instruction from man in the worke of the Ministerie Math. 10. 20. Ioh. 14. 26. and 16. 13. Thus we see there is not the least footing in any word of this Text for Peters Supremacie aboue all other on which yet they settle it But if here Peters Supremacie could bee proued yet what 's this to the Pope He feeds not by preaching Christs Lambes but rules or rather rauages like a roaring Lyon ouer Christs Sheepe hee is like a Lambe but speakes like the Dragon Reuel 13. Lastly that here is no Headship giuen to Peter it appeareth in verse 17. where it is said that vpon Christs third time questioning him he was grieued Now may wee reasonably suppose if Peter had conceiued of Christs words as Popes doe that a Supremacie was therein bestowed vpon him that hee would haue beene grieued Doe men grieue at high preferments offered especially hauing contended for the same as the Apostles had done Who seeth not therefore that Peter perceiued no such glorious preferment nor high Dignitie out of any thing that Christ here spoke as our Aduersaries doe From all this it is cleere that Peter from hence hath no Headship aboue others XX. Proposition That Peter was the onely Vicar of Christ here on Earth Confuted by their owne Bible FOr Vicaradge vnto Christ properly so taken it teacheth vs That Iesus Christ going out of the world promised to substitute in his roome not any Peter nor any man but such a one as could bee euery where with his Church in his bodily absence which was his holy Spirit Ioh. 15. 26. 16. 7. And by this would hee be euer with them Math. 28. 19 20. 18. 20. to remember them of all things Ioh. 14. 26. to guide them Ioh. 16. 13. and to dwell with them Ioh. 14 17. Rom. 8. 9. which a Peter could not doe Secondly it telleth vs that according to this promise when Christ ascended hee sent downe his Spirit Act. 2. by which Gods people are still guided and taught Rom. 8. 1 5 9. 11 14 26. 1. Cor. 2. 10 12. 1. Ioh. 2. 20 27. which beareth witnesse to our spirits that wee are Gods children Rom. 8. 16. Gal. 4. 6. by which wee are sealed to eternall life 2. Cor. 1. 12. Ephes 1. 13. Thirdly it declareth vnto vs that when Christ ascended hee was mindfull of his Church and gaue gifts vnto men Some to Ephes 4. 12. be Apostles some Prophets some Euangelists some Pastors and Teachers but among these no one generall Vicar or Head ouer all If there had beene such a one Paul had as good reason to haue mentioned him as the rest But his Vicar generall was Gods Spirit and no man And note that the Apostle shewes a threefold vse of these afore-named 1. For that they were the consummation of the Saints 2. For the worke of the Ministerie 3. For the edifying of the body of Christ Now if a generall visible Vicar on earth had serued for any of these purposes hee had been giuen of Christ but he needed not and therefore this needlesse gift was not giuen to any As for a supply of Instructers Guides and Lights in the Church Militant wee deny not but Christ hath left many Vicars and doth still send dayly Embassadours to his Church to reconcile vs to God And so our Bishops and other Ministers of the Church by the Keyes of power and knowledge open the way of Heauen to Christian people which they doe in Christs stead and therein are his Vicars or Deputies lawfully called But this Vicaradge is too small a portion for Sir Pope Contraried by Antiquitie Tertul. de violand Virgin The Lord sent the Holy Ghost that mans mediocritie not being capable of all things at one time might by little and little bee directed orderly disposed and brought to perfection by that Vicar his holy Spirit Also in his Booke de praescript hee saith that Christ taken vp into heauen sent the power of his holy Spirit as his Vicar to conduct the faithfull Wee see in these dayes who was held the Vicar of Christ Gainesaid by their owne men Aquinas in Opusc 20. calleth all the Apostles the Vicars of Christ Tolet. in Ioh. 20. 21. saith that Christ instituted his Apostles his Vicars How then was Peter his Vicar for their cannot be a Vicars Vicar If Peter was then the
Vicar of Christ they could not be Vicars too and by these mens testimonie they being Vicars he was not Christs onely Vicar Now then I conclude that if Peter was not the Prince of the Apostles nor the Head of the Church nor Christs onely generall Vicar here on earth then the Pope cannot possibly bee any of these For he claimeth all from Peter as being his onely successor Therefore Peter neuer hauing these from Christ as is fully proued the Pope cannot haue them But if it could be proued that Peter had all these which yet is most false what were that to the Pope by what right could hee claime them when al the Papists in the world are not able by vndeniable arguments to proue 1. That Peter was euer after he was Christs See my Booke The fabulous foundation of the Popedome Disciple personally at Rome 2. That albeit hee had beene at Rome therefore already being an Apostle hee was the Bishop of Rome an inferiour Dignitie 3. That whatsoeuer was giuen to Peter the same was also giuen to the Pope successiuely to the worlds end 4. That the Pope is truely Peters successor both in Doctrine and life 5. That these last Popes for many hundred yeeres are one and the same with the Bishops of Rome in the first three hundred of yeeres for Doctrine and conuersation following Peter therein Till these be proued soundly though Peter had been that which they striue to make him yet is the Pope neuer the better but a proud and an arrogant vsurper of Titles and Authoritie not due to him XXI Proposition That the Publike seruice of the Church ought not to be in a vulgar and knowne Tongue Confuted by their owne Bible 1. Cor. 14. 9. So thou also by a tongue vnlesse thou vtter a manifest Speech how shall that be knowne which is said for thou shalt but speake in the Aire This is a plaine condemning of speaking in a tongue not manifest not vnderstood of the Hearers 2. Cor. 1. 13. We write no other things to you then that you haue read and know They then knew what they read whether priuate or publike Ephes 3. 4. According as thou reading maist vnderstand Reading the Scriptures is a part of the publique Liturgie or seruice 1. Thes 5. 27. I adiure you by the Lord that this Epistle bee read to all the holy Brethren If it had beene in an vnknowne Tongue it had beene in vaine to haue beene read vnto all the brethren and it had been to no purpose thus to adiure them Act. 1. 14. All these were perseuering in one minde in Prayer and with one accord Act. 4. 24. This was Publike Prayer But if they vnderstood not what was prayed how could they bee of one minde and accord S. Paul willeth vs to pray and sing with vnderstanding 1. Cor. 14. 15. and saith plainely that if men blesse that is pray in an vnknowne tongue the vulgar cannot say Amen And hee giueth this Reason because hee knoweth not what thou sayest neither is edified verse 16 17. In their Bible mention is made First of Prayer in the Congregation Act. 12. 12. 4. 24. 13. 3. 16. 13 16. 20. 36. and 21. 5. Secondly of reading the Scriptures Coloss 4. 16. The parts of the publike Seruice of the Church in the Apostles daies 1. Thess 5. 27. Thirdly of preaching Act. 9. 20. 20. 7. Fourthly of singing Math. 26. 30. 1. Cor. 14. Fiftly of administring the holy Sacraments of Baptisme Act. 10. and of the Lords Supper 1. Cor. 10. 11. Let our Aduersaries shew if they be able that these parts of the publike seruice were done in an vnknowne tongue Contraried by Antiquitie Origen cont Cels l. 8. Let euery man make his prayer to God in his natiue Mother tongue Austin Tract in Iohan. 21. Why are these things spoken in the See more in l. 4. â— 10. de doct Christ lib. â—4 c. 16. de Trunt 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 18. â— 4â— Church but to be knowne Why are they pronounced but to bee heard And why are they heard but to be vnderstood And on Gen. l. 12. cap. 8. Noman saith hee is edified by hearing that which he vnderstands not Ambr. in cap. 14. 1. Epist ad Cor. If we come together saith he to edifie the Church those things ought to be spoken which the hearers vnderstand Chrysostom hom 35. in 1. Cor. Hee that speakes in an vnknowne tongue is not onely vnprofitable and a Barbarian to others but euen to himselfe if he vnderstand not In Hom. 18. on 2. Cor. Hee telleth vs that the Priests and the people say the same common prayers and all doe say one thing S. Basil Epist 63. telleth how that in his time when they met together they vsed a knowne language In the purest Churches for the space of eight hundred yeeres Diuine Seruice was neuer performed in an vnknowne tongue And if it were at any time in a tongue not the Mother tongue yet was not that tongue a strange language but such as the hearers vnderstood See for this point Master Perkins Probleme If any desire any more of this let him reade Doctor Fulk on Rhem. Testament 1. Cor. 14. Doctor White his last Book of this point pag. 369. who eiteth Origen Iustin Martyr Tertul. Clemens Alexand. Cyprian Basil Chrysostome Ambrose and Augustine with their owne words against this absurd practice of Papists See also pag. 375. in the Margin 380. Gainesaid by themselues Aeneas Syluius who after was Pope in hist Bohem. cap. 13. faith that when sute was made that the Slauonians newly conuerted to the faith might haue their Church-seruice in their Mother Tongue and there being some stay about it at Rome a voice was heard from Heauen saying That euery spirit should praise the Lord and euery tongue should confesse vnto him So the controuersie is determined by an immediate voice from heauen The Lateran Councell vnder Innocent the third chap. 9. decreed by reason of mingled Nations of diuers tongues in one Citie that meet men should bee prouided to celebrate Diuine seruice and to administer the Sacraments according to the diuersitie of their Rites and languages Lyra on 1. Cor. 14. saith that if the people vnderstood the prayers of the Priest they were better brought vnto God and so answere Amen more deuoutly And Caietan on the same saith it were better for the Churches edification that prayers should bee said in the Mother tongue Many learned Papists as Lyra Thomas Aquinas this Caietan on this 1. Cor. 14. and Erasmus in Declarat ad Cens pag. 153. confesse that in the Primitiue Church and long after the Prayers and Seruice were done in the Mother Tongue See D. Whites last booke pag. 356. mentioning Armenians Abissines Indians Russians Egyptians proued by Papists themselues And Cassander Liturg. cap. 28. sheweth that diuers Nations to this day retaine the ancient custome still Thus we see their owne Bible the ancient Fathers their owne
the least omission But this obedience is impossible to be performed of any in this life for that there is both flesh and Spirit in euery man which two are such aduersaries one to another so as the best men cannot do the things which they would Galat. 5. 17. This inability through this corruption Saint Paul found and confessed to be euen in himselfe Rom. 7. 15 19. Therefore all our obedience being imperfect our workes cannot bee meritorious and cause of saluation Merit requireth perfection and admits not imperfection for cursed is euery one that keepeth not the words of the Law and fulfilleth them not in workes Deut. 27. 26. So far is man from meriting as a malediction is due if hee doe not obey the commandements Deut. 11. 28. V. It teacheth vs that therefore through this our defect good workes are secluded from being the meritorious cause of our saluation 2. Tim. 1. 9. Ephes 2. 8 9. By grace you are saued through faith not of workes that no man glory Rom. 4. 2. If Abraham was iustified by workes hee had to glory but not with God None are cleane before him Iob 25. 4 5 6. 9. 2 3. Rom. 3. 28. 9. 16. Wee account a man to be iustified by faith without the workes of the Law It is not of the willer nor of the runner but of God that sheweth mercy Psal 48. 8 9. Hee shall not In ours Psal 49. 8 9. giue vnto God his reconciliation and the price of the Redemption of his owne soule Therefore good workes though they euer accompanie those that are saued and iustified in Christ as fruits of a liuely faith yet are not the cause of saluation nor doe iustifie vs before God VI. It teacheth that God therefore to make vs accepted gaue vs his Sonne to become all in all for vs. First hee was made vnder the Law to redeeme vs from vnder it Gal. 4. 4 5. Secondly hee was made a curse for vs to redeeme vs from the curse Gal. 3. 43. Thirdly he was wounded for our iniquities and broken for our sinnes Esai 53. 5. by whose stripes we are healed 2. Pet. 2. 24. Fourthly hee himselfe bare our sinnes in his bodie vpon the tree 1. Pet. 2. 24. making Purgatorie for sinnes Heb. 1. 3. and so for vs was made sinne that we might be made the iustice of God in him 2. Cor. 5. 21. and so liue to iustice 1. Pet. 2. 24. Fiftly hereby hee is become our Wisedome Iustice Sanctification and Redemption 1. Cor. 1. 30. that we may glory in him verse 31. for in him the righteousnesse of God through faith is ours Rom. 10. 3. and 3. 22. and so there can be to vs no condemnation being in Christ Therefore hee is our merit and cause of saluation and not our owne workes VII It teacheth that the Apostle hereupon maketh mans blessednesse to consist not in his owne merits and workes but in reputing iustice without workes and in forgiuing and not imputing sinne Rom. 4. 6 7 8. which forgiuing is our keeping of the Law For as Saint Austin in retract lib. 1. cap. 19. saith All the commandements are holden to be kept when that which is not kept is forgiuen And againe All our righteousnesse saith he stands rather in the remission of our sinnes then in any perfection of iustice De ciu Dei lib. 19. cap. 27. Therefore if mans obedience and keeping be in forgiuenesse and his blessednesse stand therein without workes how is it possible to imagine workes to be the meritorious cause of our saluation VIII It teacheth that for all the graces in vs and for all our obedience to him God onely promiseth to be mercifull as in Deut. 7. 9. Thou shalt know that the Lord thy God hee is a strong and a faithfull God keeping his Couenant and mercy to them that loue him and to them that keepe his precepts So in Exo. 20. 6. Doing mercy to them that loue him and keepe his precepts Here both for the inward loue of God and outward obedience is onely promised mercy Now where mercy needeth there can be no merit Rom. 11. 6. IX It teacheth that the godly 1. acknowledge in all humilitie their sinnes Psal 51. 3 4. Esdr 9. 6. Dan. 9. 1. Secondly they vilifie themselues Iob 9. 2 3 30 31. and 42. 6. 1. Cor. 4. 4. and also those things which seeme to be of worth in them We saith the Prophet are become as one vncleane and all our iustices as the cloth of a menstruous woman Esa 64. 6. Thirdly they confesse that if God be strict in iustice none can bee able In ours Psal 130. 3. to indure Psal 129. 3. If thou shalt obserue iniquities O Lord Lord who shall sustaine it Fourthly hereupon they craue that God would not enter into iudgement with them for that so no flesh should bee iustified in his sight Psal 142. 2. Fiftly they In ours Psal 143. 2. therefore appeale from his iustice to his mercy calling and crying for it as in Psal 129. 3. With thee there is propitiation and Psal 130. 3. Psal 51. 1. saying also in Psal 50. 1. Haue mercy on me O God according to thy great mercy giuing a reason Dan. 9. 18. For not in our iustifications doe wee prostrate prayers before thy face but in thy many commiserations And therefore saith Dauid Psal Psal 119. 118. 76. Let thy mercy be done to comfort mee Hee seeketh comfort in mercy and not in merit Did these holy people of God dreame of merit and of the worth of their workes as the proud condemned Pharise did Luk. 18 or rather did they not as the poore Publican did who cryed Lord haue mercy on me a sinner and therefore went away more iustified then the other The godly know if that they should iustifie themselues their owne mouthes would condemne them Iob 9. 20. And all are by Christ Matth. 6. taught in Prayer to fly to God for mercie and to begge forgiuenesse and not to plead merit X. It teacheth that all whatsoeuer God did to Israel his people all was of his mercy Psal 135. The possession of the Psal 136. Land of Canaan was not merited by Gods people Deut. 9. 5. For saith God Not because of thy iustices and equitie of thy heart doest thou enter in to possesse thy lands I doe it not for your sake be it knowne vnto you saith the Lord but for my holy name So in Ezech. 36. 22 32. Now if the type of heauen could not bee merited by either inward grace or outward workes may we think that heauen may be merited when Saint Paul tels vs that it is the gift of God Rom. 6. 23 Gift is free and not purchased XI It teacheth that the passions of this time are not condigne to the glory to come Rom. 8. 18. If persecution and suffering Martyrdome cannot merit condignely the glory in heauen What may wee thinke of other workes whatsoeuer For neither our goods nor goodnesses is
they come in Christs stead 2. Cor. 5. 20. and doe alledge these faithfull promises of God made in generall and apply them to their hearers assuring them that if they beleeue these promises shall be certainly performed Thus Peter applyed the promises Act. 2. 38 39. 3. 25 26. So did S. Paul Act. 13. 26. 16. 31. which assurance made by faithfull Ministers vpon these vndeceiueable promises of God is to bee receiued and beleeued as from Christs owne mouth because they speake not vpon any warrant of their owne but vpon the vndoubted warrant of Christ himselfe Thirdly the Hearers as many as be ordained to eternall life Act. 13. 48. beleeuing doe apprehend and by faith doe apply to themselues these promises so deliuered for that they know that they doe beleeue and truely repent of which their conscience beareth witnesse whose heart is so seasoned with grace and conformed to Gods voice as the same like an Eccho answereth thereto So that when God saith Seeke ye my face the faithfull soule answereth to God Thy face Lord will I seeke Psal 27. 8. When God saith Thou art my people it soundeth backe Thou art the Lord my God Zach. 13. 9. When Christ saith If thou beleeuest al things are possible to him that beleeueth he answereth Lord I beleeue helpe my vnbeliefe Mar. 9. 23. When God requireth his will to be done and his commandements diligently to be kept the gracious soule is moued with desire therto Oh that my wayes were directed to the keeping of thy Statutes Psal 119. 4 5. and shewes it selfe ready Loe I come O God I am content to doe it yea thy Law is within my heart Psal 40. 7 8. Therefore their faith claimeth these promises and concludeth the assurance of the things promised in particular so to themselues as if they in the same promises were personally named Fourthly to this spirit of true Beleeuers the holy Ghost beareth witnesse Rom. 8. 16. and it is true 1. Ioh. 5. 6. that wee are the sonnes of God Rom. 8. 16. and that God hath giuen to vs eternall life 1. Ioh. 5. 11. which true Beleeuers doe know for the Word was written also that this they should know 1. Ioh. 5. 13. Thus we see how a true Beleeuer hath his particular perswasion not from an idle fantasie or vaine conceit but from the vndoubted Word of God and from the faithfull witnesses of Gods Spirit and his owne conscience If our Aduersaries will be yet obstinate and say that these generall promises cannot bee thus particularly applyed I demand foure things First why is it said Rom. 15. 4. Whatsoeuer things were written aforetime were written for our learning that wee through patience and comfort of the Scriptures might haue hope and in Rom. 4. 23 24. That the things written were not written for their sakes onely of whom they were spoken but for vs also if we cannot apply them as spoken to euery one Secondly why haue the Apostles applyed the generall promises to particular persons so as they haue done as before is shewed Act. 3. 26. 16. 31. 13. 26. and why haue they comforted the faithfull in generall with a promise made to one before in particular Ios 1. 9. Heb. 13. 5 And why did Zachary include himselfe in those promises made long before to Abraham as spoken to himselfe and those then liuing Luk. 1. 73 74. if faith might not apply them to a beleeuers owne speciall comfort Thirdly how can the Popish Priests from a generall Scripture Ioh. 20. 23. with such authoritie absolue their particular Penitentiaries And are either those Priests or any of their Penitentiaries named in the Text If vpon so generall words they can be bold to assure their Confitents of pardon of sinnes may not a true Beleeuer vpon the forenamed grounds hee assured particularly of his owne saluation Lastly if there can be no assured application without particular nomination how shall men become obedient to the precepts and commandements of God how shall any bee stirred vp by exhortation how shall any bee terrified by threatnings For in none of these is any man personally named more then in the promises Therefore as in hearing the other we apply them and verily take them without any doubt as spoken to vs in particular to worke obedience and feare so in hearing these promises are we to apply them as spoken to vs by name if we truely beleeue to our heauenly comfort and assurance of life Obiection Secondly they say that Gods Decree whence we fetch the ground of assurance is conditionall If we beleeue If we liue as we ought to liue and perseuer to the end Which perseuerance when God foreseeth in vs doth thereupon elect vs to saluation Answ The Decree is absolute according to the good pleasure of Gods owne will For therefore we beleeue because hee so hath ordained it Act. 13. 48. We walke in good workes because he hath so fore-ordained vs thereto Ephes 2. 10. We are in time called iustified made conformable to Christ adopted for children to bring forth fruit that also the same should remaine and so be at length glorified because he hath predestinated and ordained vs thereto Rom. 8. 30. Ephes 1. 5. Ioh. 15. 16. So as his Decree is the cause of all good to vs and not our obedience and perseuerance the cause of his Decree Obiection Thirdly this Doctrine of the certainty of saluation and that faith cannot faile maketh men secure careless of good works Answ This is a very old obiection but altogether slanderous There is indeed to be granted a kind of security or assurednesse being vnderstood spiritually for it maketh vs secure in God in the infinitenesse of his mercy towards vs through Christ in the vndoubted truth of his promises in the full perfect satisfaction made by Christ and in the vnchangeablenesse of Gods eternall Decree to saue all those which truely beleeue in Christ But this Doctrine maketh them not carnally secure which are vpon solid ground assured of their saluation which is thus manifest First this sauing faith as you haue heard is euer accompanied with other graces which maketh the true Beleeuers neither barren nor vnfruitfull 2. Pet. 1. 5 8. Secondly this precious faith doth not onely claime the promises but humbly attendeth vpon Gods will in vsing such meanes as God hath appointed in the way to Heauen Thirdly it is euident from examples in Scripture of such as were certaine of saluation as Abraham Moses Dauid S. Paul and others that they did not therefore neglect their duties And such with vs as conscionably hold this doctrine doe walke nothing lesse carefully in the wayes of Gods Commandements but doe endeuour to keepe a good conscience towards God and men And what if vaine presumptuous spirits abase this doctrine as they doe other holy and wholesome truths to their condemnation is the Doctrine therefore faulty Shall the abuse of truth make it to be iudged falshood God forbid To conclude this Doctrine of assurance is most comfortable to humbled and afflicted soules as the other is full of slauish feare and very comfortlesse For what can bee more terrour to mans heart in the time of temptation when hee hath fallen by infirmitie suddenly into some grieuous offence as Peter did and being assaulted by Satan to despaire as Iudas did then to be perswaded that Gods Decree dependeth vpon mans perseuerance that the couenāt of Grace made with his soule may be annihilated his promises fallible his power frustrated Christs strength too feeble to vphold him Christs prayers not of force to preuaile for him with Gods the holy Spirit to haue forsaken him the Seale of Gods Couenant broken off the writing cancelled Faith it selfe and the hope of heauen lost for euer This wounded spirit this soule thus perplexed this heart thus affrighted cast into such a deepe gulph of despaire who can but pittie and withall beware of that desperate Doctrine which casteth poore soules into such vnexpressible misery and sorrows of heart On the other side by the Doctrine of assurance of saluation when a poore weake Christian hath beene ouertaken by some violent storme of temptation and commeth to the sight of sin with Dauid cryeth calleth with bitter teares of repentance and faine would finde peace with God againe how comfortable will it be in such a distresse when Satan with his fiery darts assaulteth him to thinke that though he hath failed on his part and so vndone himselfe for euer as much as lyeth in him yet that God is one and the same his Decree vnalterable his Couenant not broken on his part Christ still his Sauiour his prayers prevalent for him the Spirit of God exciting him to prayer with groanes not to be expressed and his faith though shaken yet not lost O how will the meditation hereof comfort such an afflicted spirit turne his heart to seeke after God grieuing with himself that he should displease so gracious a God and after he hath once againe found some comfort to put on a resolution neuer to offend so any more in a holy zeale therefore to auenge himselfe on himselfe bringing downe his flesh in subiection to the Spirit and all this with an earnest loue to God and care to please him euen for that he hath not lost through his fall the assurance of his saluation as iustly he had deserued Thus is this Doctrine a comfort in distresse and an incouragement after a fall to rise againe and in the time of greatest peace neuer any cause of carelesse securitie but rather of spirituall ioy and an incitement to well-doing to expresse all thankefulnesse to God through Christ for the same Euen so Amen FINIS
is the cause of error Mat. 22. 29. Yee doe erre not knowing the Scriptures Error then is from ignorance of the Scriptures The Apostles doubting of Christs resurrection a maine point of Faith without which all is vaine 1. Cor. 15. is ascribed to their ignorance of the Scriptures for as yet saith their Bible they knew not the Scriptures The Israelites erring in heart so continually is ascribed to the want of knowledge in Gods wayes Psal 94 10 11. These alwaies erre in heart and these haue not knowne my Psal 95. wayes Secondly it telleth vs whence otherwise errors proceed from Philosophy vaine fallacie Col. 2. 9. from humane traditions Whence proceed errors Mark 7. 8. from pretended Apostolicall traditions Acts 15. 24. from pretended reuelations of the Spirit a feigned word and forged writings 2. Thes 2. 2. from Satans strange delusions in the Man of sinne and his followers 2. Thes 2. from lying signes and wonders seducing people Reuel 13. 13 14. 2. Thes 2. 9. from doctrines and commandements of men Col. 2. 22. from vnlearnednesse and vnstablenesse of mens owne selues 2. Pet. 2. 16. from false Teachers Act. 20. 29. Iude vers 4. 2. Pet. 2. 2. Tim. 3. 6. from mens giuing heed to Seducers 1. Tim. 4. 1. and such like meanes God giuing men ouer to beleeue lyes because such haue not a loue of the truth 2. Thes 2. 3. Their Bible cleareth Scriptures from being cause of error for it telleth vs that no lie is of the truth 1. Ioh. 2. 21. Now error in diuine matters is a lye the Scriptures are Gods Word inspired by the holy Ghost 2. Tim. 3. 16. Gods Word is truth Ioh. 17. 17. and therefore no error can arise from it and to reason from abuse to hinder the vse is absurd 4. It telleth vs that the holy Scriptures are the Rule of faith and life as before is prooued and therefore cannot be the cause of error 5. It pronounceth the Readers blessed Reu. 3. 3. How can this be if it breed errors in men 6. It telleth vs that by Scripture Christ confuted Satan the false doctrine of Scribes and Pharises the heresie of the Sadduces so did the Apostles the Iewes Act. 17. 2. and 18. 28. Therefore heresies are ouerthrowne by Scripture and get no ground at all from Scripture Contraried by Antiquitie Chrysost Hom. de Lazar. The ignorance of the Scriptures hath bred heresies In Hom. 58. on Iohn The Scriptures doe leade vs to God doe driue away heretickes and doe not suffer vs to goe out of the way Tertullian de resurr telleth vs that heretickes flie the light of the Scriptures Surely hereby its cleere then that this Father did not beleeue that the Scriptures would make heretikes S. Ierome in Esay c. 8. willeth vs in things doubtfull to haue recourse vnto the Scriptures to know the truth otherwise saith he ye shall not haue the light of truth but remaine euer in darknesse of error Therefore Scriptures expell the mist of errors and doe not breed them in the iudgement of Saint Ierome It is witnessed before by Augustine Chrysostome Tertullian Basil Ierome Gregory-Nyssen that the Scriptures are the sound Rule of Faith therefore cannot they be any ground for error Gainesaid by some of their owne Petrus de Aliaco saith The new Testament is the hammer that killeth all heresies the Lanterne that lighteneth vs. Gerson in tract de distinct The sacred Scriptures are the shop wherein is laid vp the royall stampe of spirituall coine if a penny differs from the stampe neuer so little vndoubtedly its counterfeit It is also witnessed before by Gregory Gerson Clemangis Aliacus Durand Mirandula Aquinas Ferus Villa-Vincentius the Canon law and by Bellarmine that the Scriptures are the Rule of Faith how can they then breed error Our Aduersaries haue here no Scripture against vs for indeed the Scripture speaketh for it selfe and not against it selfe But Papists will here say they meane that the Scriptures breed heresies when they are misunderstood or abused or not rightly interpreted Answ If thus they meane in good sooth 1. why blame they the Scriptures when the fault is in men and not in them 2. Why doe not they likewise so accuse all mens writings whose soeuer are not they subiect to be mis-conceiued misunderstood and peruerted 3. Why doe they in this respect feare the Scriptures to breed heresies more in the people then in the Priests Were Arius a Presbyter Macedonius a B. Pelag. a Monke and Eutyches an Abbat they of the Lay-people onely which were the Authors of former heresies or of the Clergie Was Arius was Macedonius was Eutyches Pelagius and other damnable first-broachers of heresies Lay-men No man saith Ierome can frame an heresie but he that is of excellent gifts Gerson and Aeneas Syluius doe De defect viror Eccles 48 Hist Austr 8 52. alleage the same saying of Saint Ierome That there neuer happened any notorious euill in the Church but Priests were the cause thereof Lastly by thus reasoning from the abuse either through ignorance or wilfulnesse in any thing we should disallow euerie thing we should not eate because some gluttonize at meate nor drinke wine nor strong drinke because some thereby become drunke nor weare costly apparell as men of place may because some grow thereby proud nor vse the Arte of Rhetorick because some men abuse it setting their tongues to sale nor Logick for that some peruert it from the right end to iangling Sophistrie Iesus Christ saw how Satan abused Scripture yet he did vse it and exhorted other to search the Scriptures This point of Poperie Christ then knew not nor any of his Apostles VII Proposition That the Scriptures cannot of themselues be knowne to be the Word of God vnlesse the Church doe giue witnesse vnto them that they are so Confuted by their owne Bible 1. IT plainely auoucheth the contrary 1. By teaching that Christs sheepe knew his voice Ioh. 10. 4. 2. That Christ hath promised that such as doe his will shall vnderstand all the doctrine whether it be of God Ioh. 7. 17. 3. That to his Disciples it is giuen to know the Mysteries of the kingdome of heauen Mat. 13. 11. Now the Scriptures inspired of God 2. Tim. 3. 16. are his voice are his doctrine and there are the Mysteries of the Kingdome of heauen euen that great Mysterie opened by the Scriptures Rom. 16. 26. in the Law and Prophets Acts 28. 23. Therefore if Christs sheepe and Disciples can know his Voyce his Doctrine and the Mysteries of the Kingdome of Heauen then they can know the Scriptures to be the Scriptures of God II. It telleth vs by whom and by what we haue this knowledge 1. By the Spirit of God for what things God hath prepared for them that loue him hath he reuealed to vs by his Spirit which we haue receiued that we may know the things that of God are giuen vnto vs 1. Cor. 2. 9. 10 12. Now the Scriptures
whom these words were spoken should teach and the people heare from them should be taken as Christ speaking in them but with condition as they should teach what he charged them to teach For the Apostles had their lesson giuen them to teach whatsoeuer Christ commanded them Mat. 28. 20. And these seuenty were taught what to doe and say Luk. 10. 3 12. which they obseruing Christ was heard in them So the meaning is Hee that heareth you deliuering my message and teaching what I command heareth me as if I were there in very person and he that shall despise you so discharging your duty despiseth mee and him that sent mee euen God himselfe as also Saint Paul speaketh 1. Thes 4. 8. For albeit the Apostles had an vnâ—rring Spirit assisting them in the Ministery Mat. 10. 20. Mar. 13. 11. Iohn 16. 13. of whom these words may bee taken absolutely yet of all other succeeding they are to be vnderstood with the former limitation Else why are we allowed yea charged not to beleeue euery spirit but to trie the spirits 1. Ioh. 4. 1. to trie all things 1. Thes 5 And why are the Bereans who not knowing Pauls Apostolicall function but taking him as a Teacher as other were commended as Bellarmine confesseth l. 1. de Verbo Dei for searching the Scriptures and left as an example for vs to follow Act. 17. 11. if the Teacher were to be credited in euery thing he should speake Mat. 16. 19. Whatsoeuer thou shalt binde in earth shall be bound in heauen c. Answ This is to be done by the Keyes which Christ gaue him as the words before going shew I will giue thee the keyes of the Kingdome of Heauen then followeth whatsoeuer thou shalt binde c. to wit by these keyes of Christ Not then by his owne power and will as himselfe pleaseth but as those keyes doe helpe him to open and shut to bind and loose by and with the authority of these keyes must hee proceede and not otherwise Now let vs see what these keyes be by which hee openeth and shutteth byndeth and looseth forgiueth and retaineth sins These Keyes are these two Christs Word and Christs Spirit Mat 18. 18. Ioh. 20. 23. which I thus proue 1. For that in this Text is a promise of giuing the keyes I will giue the keyes c. Now seeing that here they are not giuen but promised let vs see what Christ gaue to Peter and other the Apostles and we shall finde that he gaue them two things his Word which hee calleth the words of his Father and the Word of reconciliation which he put in them and they receiued Ioh. 17. 8. 2. Cor. 5. 19. and his Spirit Ioh. 20. 22. which they also receiued when he said Receiue ye the holy Ghost breathing on them These are the two things which we finde that he gaue them therefore they are either the keyes or inseparable companions of the keyes 2. Christ in Ioh. 20. 21. saith As my Father hath sent me so I also send you so in Chap. 17. 18. But with these two did his Father send him with his Word Ioh. 7. 16. and 8. 26 28 38. and with his Spirit Luk. 4. 18. Mat. 3. 16. Esay 11. 2. and 42. 1. and 61. 1 2. Therefore these two are the keyes Keyes are by Bellarmines interpretation here taken for great authoritie and power as in Esay 22. 22. in Eliakim shadowing the great power and authoritie in Christ Reuel 3. 7. exercised in his Church But what greater power and authority then his Word and Spirit can there be in Christ his Church whatsoeuer it be it is comprehended in these two Therefore these be the keyes 4. He speakes of keyes as of moe then one linked together so that they are giuen as inseparable and so these two be For the Spirit teacheth the Word of Christ Ioh. 16. 13. and 14. 26. and the Word is with the Spirit Esay 59. 21. these two keyes are tyed together and giuen by Christ 5. The keyes promised here are the keyes of the Kingdome of Heauen In this spirituall Kingdome by these to beare rule by these to bind and loose in earth is so verily and as surely done in heauen For what in this Kingdome here can beare Rule but his Word and his Spirit What truly can bind and loose in heauen but these We may be assured that what the Word and Spirit of God bindeth they are bound indeed and what these loose remit and forgiue they are loosed remitted and forgiuen of God in heauen of no other keyes can we be so assured hereof These then are the keyes here promised to Peter and were giuen to all the Apostles and to the true Church of God This place therefore helpeth nothing our Aduersaries who boast of an vnerring spirit leading the Pope and his Prelates into all truth if they bragge of this key let them shew vs the other the Word of God and the same written now in the Scriptures or else their boasting is in vaine and their binding and loosing of no force Deut. 17. 8. If there arise a matter c. Answ This place is for vs and against them for here iudgement must be giuen not as men thinke out of their own braine but saith the text according to their owne translation Thou See also Ezec. 44. 24. shalt doe whatsoeuer they that are Presidents of the place which our Lord shall choose shall say and teach thee according to his Law now that Law was written 2. Chro. 17. 9. This is it then we desire that the truth of iudgement may be from the written Word of God which this place approueth yet though they produce it and vrge it so often neuerthelesse it speakes not of the necessary points of faith but of controuersies in matters of another nature as the eighth verse plainely sheweth Hag. 2. 12. Thus saith the Lord of hostes Aske the Priests the Law Answ This place is also for vs and against themselues for what were the Priests to be asked what their owne opinion and iudgement No but they were to bee asked the Law that is the Law written and according to which they did answere in vers 13. 4. We teach that Pastors are to bee heard speaking to vs out of the Word written and accordingly as it teacheth them to speake wee must obey with all reuerence 2. Chro. 19. 8 18. Moreouer in Ierusalem did Iehosaphat set of the Leuites c. Answ It is one with that in Deut. 17. 8. and here contrary to the Popish practice the Priests and Leuites were subiect to Iehosaphat the King who had an inspection ouer them and gaue them a charge so 2. Chron. 17. 7 8. 2. Thes 2 15. Stand fast and hold the tradition c. This place is answered fully and at large before in handling the former question Mal. 2. 7. For the lips of the Priest shall keepe knowledge and the Law shall they require of his mouth Answ 1.
Mal. 2. 11. In the second of Machabees we may reade of horrible corruptions in the high Priests Iason got the office by money brought his Country-men to the Heathen rites the Priests were not occupied about the offices of the Altar but the Temple and Sacrifices were neglected 2. Machab. 4. 7 11 14. And when our Sauiour was come he found many sects false Teachers corrupting the truth Matth. 6. and 16. 6 12. and 23. 16 22. was by the outward pretending domineering Church then in Councell condemned and put to death To conclude of the chiefe Rulers in this Church the saying of Steuen that they were stiffe-necked and vncircumcised in heart and eares alwaies resisting the holy Ghost Act. 7. Who can reade these things and thinke yet that the Church cannot erre if withall they would consider how this Church of Israel had the most excellent meanes for direction and confirmation I. They had the written Word and ordinary Teachers the Priests and Leuites daily instructing them Deut. 33. 10. Acts 15. 21. II. They had extraordinary teaching 1. By God himselfe from Heauen Exod. 20. By Vrim and Thummim by Vision and Dreames 2. By Prophets Moses Samuel Eliah Elisha and very many moe 3. By Kings endued with a Propheticall Spirit as Dauid and Salomon 4. At length by Iesus Christ himselfe personally 5. By the twelue Apostles Mat. 10. 6. By the 70. disciples Luk. 10. 1. Neuer such nor so many in any Church since God had a Church III. They had Miracles and wonders in bringing them out of Egypt in the fearefull giuing of the Law in carrying them thorow the Woldernesse in planting them in Canaan and in strange Miracles wrought in Eliah and Elisha's time and in some of the Kings of Iudah Christ confirmed his doctrine and so did the Apostles and Disciples their teaching by Miracles Luk. 10. 17. No Church vnder the Heauen had euer the like IV. They had great mercies and vnheard of deliuerances from their Enemies from Pharaoh and his Host drowned in the Red Sea from the Amalekites discomfited by Moses prayer from the innumerable multitude of Enemies the Kings of Canaan of Midian Philistims Syrians Assyrians from the Host of Sennacherib nine score thousand slaine by an Angell in one night Kings thirtie two besides Benhadad with an infinite Hoste defeated by onely 7000. and odde Ionathan and his Armour-bearer did terrifie an whole Campe Gideon and three hundred men made an innumerable multitude to she away and with a few other of Ephraim did slay of them in one day one hundred and twenty thousand Asa vanquished the Army of the Ethiopians ten hundred thousand besides three hundred Charets Iehosaphat gathered the spoile of his enemies three Kings comming with their Hosts against him whom God set one against another to destroy vtterly one another for his safetie and enriching What shall I speake of Hostes flying for feare without any pursuing of them For other blessings and mercies they are not to be numbred V. They had strange and most terrible punishments vpon them to keep them in the feare of God to make them to know him and to walke in his waies fire from Heauen deuouring vp some the earth swallowing vp quicke other-some the giuing of them often into the hands of Heathen Kings to oppresse them that they might turne from Idolatry yea at length sent them all into captiuitie for 70. yeeres Thus we see for Teachers for Wonders and Miracles for Mercies and Iudgements none euer to be compared to them Papists may fame Legends to parallel these but these are truths hauing witnesse from Gods Word it selfe And yet this Church erred and as Esay saith chap. 48 4 8. was stubborne had a neck as an Iron sinew and her forehead as brasse and was a transgressour from the wombe If the Papists make little account of these reasons as nothing to keepe a Church from erring yet is it much more then their Romish Church can say for her selfe Let them say what they can for the Churches not erring and we will see whether this Church of Israel cannot say the same also Will they pleade 1. A Couenant Israel had so Deut. 29. 10 15. 2 Or a Couenant written in the heart So was it then Ier. 31. 33. Esay 5. 7. 3. Or a Couenant with their Priests So had the Priests then Ier. 33. 20. 4. Or that the Priests lips should preserue knowledge and the people learne of them and they teach the people So the verie same might Israel alledge Mal. 2 7. Deut. 33. 10. Neh. 8. 7 8 9. Leui. 10. 11. Ezech. 44 23. yea and did boast of Ier. 18. 18. 5. Or succession of persons from time to time in the same Chaire or Seate This could she plead to the full from Aaron the first appointed immediatly by God himselfe with his office place seruice ornaments and maintenance his next successor to be also named by God himselfe Num. 20. 28. 6. Or the Continuance of this Couenant to vphold succession This had it in plaine words and therefore was for euer the Priest-hood appointed to him and his seed Num. 25. 12 13. 7. Or the presence of God with them So could and did Israel Mâ—ch 3. 11. 8. Or the name of the Church So they Ier. 7. 4. 9. Or that it is called holy the Ground and Pillar of truth So was Ierusalem the holy Citie Esay 48. 2. the Citie of truth the sanctified Mount Zach. 8. 3. 10. Or that the Word did go out from them to conuert other Nations So could they as they were taught by Esay Chap. 2. 3. of making Proselytes could the Pharises boast Mat. 23. 11. Or the Spirit to be in them to keepe their Teachers from erring Who could thus speake as Israel might Nehe. 9. 20. Esay 6. 3 11. Zach. 7. 12. as Peter witnesseth 2. Pet. 1. 21. 12. Or that they are called the Church and are come from the Apostles Church at Ierusalem So they by Stephen Act 7. 38. also saith Isaiah Esay 48. 1. Heare ye ô House of Iacob which art called by the name of Israel and are come out of the waters of Iudah So could the Scribes and Pharises boast of their Originall Ioh. 8. 33. 13. Or that they are Catholicks and the world spred ouer with them And could not the Iewish Church say so Of their Religion were some of euerie Nation vnder heauen Act. 2. 5 9 10 11. they were dispersed in all the Persian Monarchy Esteâ— 3. 8. Chap. 1. there were many Proselytes made such was the Eunuch of Ethiopia and to make them they trauailed Sea and Land Mat. 23. 14. Or that they haue euer had the holy Scriptures in their custodie So to the Iewes were committed the Oracles of God Rom. 3. 2. 15. Or yâ— the Church now hath many excellent promises What more then Israel had to be their God they to him a peculiar treasure aboue all people a kingdome of Priests an holy Nation Exod. 19. 5 6. to
any thing vnto God Psal 16. 2. XII It teacheth that no man can merit of God by doing that which he ought to doe but rather when wee haue done all things that are commanded to iudge our selues vnprofitable seruants Luk. 17. 10. But whatsoeuer we doe in obedience to God the same we ought to doe and that with all our minde heart soule and strength Matth. 22. and therefore cannot merit by dutie no more then a man can merit by paying his debts This it is which made Saint Paul to say that he had nothing to glory of when he did but his duty 1. Cor. 9. 16. Lastly it is altogether needlesse to conceit of merit For what would we merit Is it pardon of sinne or fauour of God or life euerlasting life and heauen it selfe Then these need not bee merited For first Christ hath by his bloud cleansed vs of all our sinnes 1. Ioh. 1. 7. God through him hath pardoned all offences Col. 2. 13. Ephes 1. 7. Act. 13. 38. and so are wee healed 1. Pet. 2. 24. Secondly Christ hath reconciled vs to God Rom. 5. 10 11. and so haue we peace with him through Christ Rom. 5. 1. Thirdly Christ hath gotten vs full assurance of Heauen by the surest way that may be for it is ours both by purchase Heb. 9. 12. by donation Ioh. 10. 28. and also by inheritance Rom. 8. 17. Gal. 4. 7. and 3. 29. So as our obedience and seruice and works are done not to merit eternall life but rather to expresse our thankefulnesse for those things which he hath done for vs. It is with vs as with a man once very rich and wealthy vnder Simile a great Landlord whose Tenant 1. hath runne himselfe out of all and turned Bankerupt 2. is become infinitely in debt and not able to pay 3. is at last cast into prison there to lye and dye for any meanes possible either by himselfe or any of his friends to set him free Now the sonne of this his great Landlord is so exceeding full of compassion and loue that of meere pitty without any suite or desert of the partie imprisoned First goeth and payeth all the debt to the vtmost farthing satisfying all to the full so freeth him of his imprisonment Secondly then he purchaseth again his Lands and redeemeth them for the poore Tenants vse and benefit as before and maketh them sure to him againe by word and writing sealed and deliuered before witnesses Thirdly he furnisheth him with moneyes to set him on worke and to manage this his estate as long as hee liueth So as he becommeth hereby rich Now what is this man to doe with these his moneys and with honest increase thereof Is he to pay his debts therewith They bee paid already Is he to purchase his Lands againe to redeeme them therewith They are purchased to his hand What is hee then to doe By the Law of gratitude hee is onely to expresse his thankefulnesse by shewing himselfe obliged to him in all seruiceable duties for euer to loue him vnfeinedly feare to offend him at any time and to be euer ready at his command and not like a proud arrogant dotard to endeuour with this his friends moneys to make needlesse payments purchases as if he scorned to be beholding to such a friend as had done already all these things for him This tenant is Adam and his posteritie Application who lost Paradise and all his right of heauen and earth and by his sinnes to God became infinitely indebted and so is cast into the kingdome of darknesse vnrecouerably in respect of any power of any naturall man to redeeme him But Christ Iesus he comes by his death payes his debts by his obedience purchaseth him the right of heauen and earth againe This he assureth him of by his word writing the couenant in his heart then giueth he him his Spirit the seale of that inheritance and so thereupon the comfort of conscience to be witnes thereto Then doth he bestow vpon him manifold gifts and graces to adorne his profession to glorifie Christ and to allure other to his seruice to stop the mouthes of wicked blasphemers to inable him the better to doe Christs seruice and to shew himselfe thankful not to striue vaine-gloriously to make himselfe copurchaser with Christ and that not with any thing of his owne but with Christs owne gifts and graces These former ends we Protestants onely ayme at and doe rest with our Lord and Sauiours purchase most thankefully This latter the proud Pharisaicall Papists striue vnto as if Christs paiment and purchase were insufficient without their helpe and yet without Christs bounty are beggerly wretches This their pride ingratitude and derogation from Christs goodnesse towards them doe deserue damnation Contraried by Antiquitie Austin lib. de gra lib. arbit cap. 9. God bringeth vs to eternall life not for our merits but for his owne mercy Origen ad Rom. lib. 4. cap. 4. I hardly beleeue that there is any worke that may require the reward of debt Because this is lately handled out of the Fathers he that desires any more let him reade Bishop Vshers last booke touching merits who citeth Saint Austin Ambrose Origen Hillary Basil Chrysostome Theodoret Cyril of Alexandria Prosper Ennodius Fulgentius Eusebius Emissen Agapetus Bernard and diuers others moe Reade also Doctor White his last Book against Fisher of this Controuersie pag. 510. Gainsaid by themselues In the Canon of the Masse the Priest makes his prayer thus Receiue vs into the fellowship of thy Saints not weighing our merits but granting vs pardon by Iesus Christ our Lord. Here is renouncing merit and appealing to mercy through Christ Saint Gregory on Psal 7. poenit It is one thing for God to reward men according to their workes and another for the workes themselues and hee alledgeth the Apostles saying The suffering of this life is not worthy of the glory of the life to come Our Aduersaries grant that the children which goe to heauen goe thither without merit by the vertue of the free Adoption by Iesus Christ Now the meanes of saluation in Christ is one and not diuers in respect of the persons saued for one sort to be saued without and another by merits as if Christ were not alike sufficient for both or that there were any other ground of saluation then the free election of grace Ephes 1. 4 5. Rom. 11. 5 6. Act. 13. 48. See the forenamed D. White against the merit of condignitie citing Gregory Arimine Durand Marsilius Waldensis Burgensis Digres 3 5. Sec. 15. Eckius with others Also his Brother D. Whites way of the true Church producing some of these and withall citing Ferus Bellarmine Stella his prayer on Luke chap. 7. and Anselmes prayer taught the people renouncing and plainely denying their owne merits and resting on Christs merits and his blessed death and Passion onely Scriptures obiected answered Matth. 16. 27. Hee shall reward euery man
distinction of veniall and mortall sinnes Prou. 24. 16. A iust man falleth seuentimes and riseth vp againe Ergo Men may commit sinnes veniall and yet remaine iust Answ Here is no proofe that these falls or sinnes are not mortall in themselues For that a iust man sinning remaineth iust is not from the nature of the sinnes which he doth fall into but from the state of adoption and Gods mercy which giueth him grace to repent which is here to bee vnderstood by his rising againe God accepting of him in Christ through whom he is accounted iust and in whom all his sinnes are veniall XXXI Proposition Of keeping Gods Commandements THe question is not of man before his fall for he could then The state of the question keepe them nor of man in corrupt estate for hee cannot keepe them being altogether wicked and euill as before is proued nor of man in state of glory being in all perfection and able perfectly to doe the will of God But the question is of man regenerate in the state of grace as he here liueth going on by Gods assisting grace vnto the perfection in glory Neither is the question here of any kinde of keeping for the regenerate man in diuers respects may bee said to keepe Gods commandements First Imputatiuely in Retract lib. 2. cap. 19. Christ who is our Wisedome Righteousnesse Sanctification and Redemption and through whom we are pardoned To this fitteth that of Saint Austin All the commandements are then reputed done when that is for giuen which is left vndone Secondly in respect of his will God hauing giuen him a will and hearty desire in sinceritie to keepe his commandements and then in his mercy accepting the same will for the deed Thirdly in respect of his endeuour and carefull striuing in all good conscience to frame his life after these commandements so keeping them according to the measure of his grace receiued Fourthly comparatiuely in respect of others who liue loosely without care and conscience of obedience A godly gracious person in respect of such may be said to keepe the commandements Lastly in respect of his integritie of heart to one commandement as well as to another and to all and euery clause of euery commandement at all times without sinister regard according to his knowledge and power of diuine grace giuen to assist him therein Of such kinds of keeping is not the question but it is this That a regenerate man by assistance of Gods grace is able to obserue all and euery commandement of God in euery part at all times in thought word and deed perfectly as God in his Law requireth of him Confuted by their owne Bible 1. IT maketh all to haue sinne in them 1. Ioh. 1. 8 10. If we say Prou. 20. 9. we haue no sinne we deceiue our selues If we say we haue no sinne we make him a lyer Now here in the word wee is vnderstood Saint Iohn the beloued Apostle as well as others So Iames saith In many things we offend Iam. 3. 2. and Where sinne is there is the transgression of the Law 1. Ioh. 3. 4. And they that sinne keepe not perfectly the Law II. It maketh iust men imperfect and offenders against the Law Eccles 7. 21. There is no iust man in the earth that doth good and sinneth not Prou. 24. 16. Seuen times shall the iust fall and rise againe This they themselues expound of sinne that a iust man sinneth oftentimes III. It affordeth vs a world of examples of most excellent men which haue offended and greatly transgressed the Law of God Adam made in perfection iust Noah holy Aaron righteous Iob zealous Dauid Ieremie the Prophet Saint Peter and other the Apostles also when they forsooke Christ IV. It bringeth in Saint Paul who was an Apostle who had beene rapt into the third heauen bewayling himselfe calling himselfe an vnhapppy man because of that sinne which yet remained in him which made him to doe the euill which hee would not and hindred him in doing the good which hee would doe and so repugning the Law of his minde and captiuing him in the Law of sinne which is in his members Rom. 7. 19 24. In like manner Iob cap. 9. 28 31. fearing all his workes for though hee should be washed yet saith he speaking of God Thou shalt dip me in filth and my garments shall abhorre me Lastly it teacheth the forme of the Lords Prayer wherein wee all and euery one are taught to aske dayly forgiuenesse of God which sheweth that wee all trespasse dayly against him Contraried by Antiquitie Ambros in Comment on Gal. 3. The commandements are such as it is vnpossible to keepe them Austin in Confess lib. 9. cap. 13. Woe be to the most commendable life that we can leade if thou Lord setting thy mercie aside shouldest examine it Bernard on Cant. Serm. 50. The commandements neither haue beene fulfilled in this life by any man nor can be And afterwards he saith that the Law exceedeth mans strength and acknowledgeth that God commanded things impossible not to make vs sinners but to humble vs. Gainesaid by their owne selues Doway in Annot. on Prou. 24. 15 16. saith that without imperfections no man liueth Rhemists on Matth. 6. 12. doe acknowledge that euery man though hee be neuer so iust liueth not without veniall sinnes Now hauing proued before that all sinne in its nature is mortall Therefore by this their grant all men sinne mortally when they sinne if that there were not remission through Christ Ferus in Act. 15. The Law is an impossible burthen for it requireth not onely the hand but the heart Secondly it conuinceth vs to bee sinners for wee doe all more against it then for it Aquinas saith in Gal. 3. lect 4. It is impossible to fulfill the whole Law and citeth for it Act. 15. 10. Scriptures obiected answered Phil. 4. 3. I can doe all things through Christ which strengthneth me Answ 1. All things must of necessitie be limited for Paul could not doe all things without exception Secondly they are to bee applyed to the all things which hee before spake of in the former verse that is to bee abased and to abound In all things saith he I am instructed both to be full and to be hungry both to abound and to suffer need Here we see the Apostle limits his all things to these kinde of things Thirdly herein cannot bee included the commandements for that the Apostle should here contradict himselfe For in Rom. 7. 18 19 20. speaking of the Law he professeth his inabilitie to performe that which is good Fourthly let it be granted that here the commandements are included as they would yet perfect obedience will not bee hence included For its one thing to be a doer and another thing to doe all in perfection A man may say hee is to doe and can doe all his Masters businesse Will it therfore follow that he so doth it as no defect euer at any time