not for himself or People he cannot die and he deriveth his Power from none but himself But 't is certain that the Lord Christ could not himself without the previous Ordination of the Father confer the prime Dignities of Heaven or of the Church He placed his Safety in the Father's Presence and Help He prayed often and fervently to the Father both for himself and for his Disciples He died and was raised from the dead by the Father After his Resurrection he received of another that great Power which he now injoyeth Matth. 20. 23. To sit on my right Hand and on my left is not mine to give but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared of my Father John 8. 29. He that sent me is with me and the Father hath not left me alone for I always do those things that please him Luke 22. 42. Father if thou be willing remove this Cup from me Heb. 5. 7. Who in the Days of his Flesh offered up Prayers and Supplications with strong Crying and Tears unto him that was able to save him John 17. 20. Neither pray I for these alone but for them also which shall believe in me through their Word Ephes 1. 19 20. According to the mighty working of his Power which he wrought in Christ when he raised him from the dead Matth. 28. 18. Jesus came and spake to them saying All Power is given to me 7. Jesus Christ is in holy Scripture always spoken of as a distinct and different Person from God and described to be the Son of God and the Image of God Rom. 16. 27. To God only wise be Glory through Jesus Christ. Luke 18. 19. Why callest thou me good there is none good save one that is God. 1 Tim. 2. 5. There is one God and one Mediator between God and Men the Man Jesus Christ. John 13. 18. He that believeth not is condemned already because he hath not believed on the Name of the only begotten Son of God. Luke 1. 35. The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee Blessed Mary and the Power of the Highest shall overshadow thee therefore also or and therefore the Holy thing that is born of thee shall be called the Son of God. Col. 1. 15. The Image of the invisible God. ' Tis. say the Socinians as impossible that the Son or Image of the one true God should himself be that one true God as that the Son should be the Father and the Image that very thing whose Image it is which they take to be simply impossible and contradictory to common sense which Religion came not to destroy but to improve Whereas to these arguings 't is objected that these things are in Holy Scripture spoken of Christ according to only his humane Nature or as he is a Man but that he is also God the Son though united to an humane Nature that is to an humane Soul and Body The Socinians reply that there is in Scripture no real Foundation for such a Conceit that 't is inconsistent with almost all the Texts already cited especially those in which the Lord Christ is spoken of as a distinct and different Person from God and that there are many other Considerations and Passages of holy Scripture which no less than demonstrate it to be false As 8. Because so many Texts expresly declare that only the Father is God John 17. 1 2 3. Father this is Life eternal that they know thee the only true God and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent or Jesus Christ thy Messenger 1 Cor. 8. 6. But to us there is but one God the Father of whom are all things and we in him and one Lord or Master i. e. Teacher by whom are all things In the Greek thus One Lord Jesus Christ for whom are all things and we for him See the Note on Heb. 1. 2. in the Fourth Letter Eph. 4. 4 5 6. One Spirit one Lord one God and Father of all who is above all 1 Cor. 15. 24. Then 〈◊〉 the End when he Christ ver 23. shall deliver up the Kingdom to God even the Father Jam. 3. 9. Therewith with the Tongue ver 8. bless we God even the Father Rom. 15. 6. With one Mind and with one Mouth glorify God even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ 9. If Christ were indeed God as well as Man or as Trinitarians speak God the Son incarnate in an humane Nature it had been altogether superfluous to give the Holy Spirit to his said humane Nature as a Director and Guide For what other help could that Nature need which was one Person with as they speak God the Son and in which God the Son did personally dwell Luke 4. 1. Jesus being full of the Holy Ghost departed from Jordan Acts 1. 2. After that he through the Holy Ghost i. e. through direction and motion of the holy Spirit and Inspiration of God had given Commandments unto the Apostles Acts 10. 38. God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost 10. Had the Lord Christ been as Trinitarians speak God the Son joyned to an humane Nature he could not have ascribed his miraculous Works to the Holy Ghost or to the Father dwelling in him but to the Son dwelling in him and united to him Matth. 12. 28. I cast out Devils by the Spirit of God. John 14. 10. The Father that dwelleth in me he doeth the Works John 5. 30. I can do nothing of my self Acts 2. 22. Jesus of Nazareth a Man approved of God among you by Miracles and Wonders and Signs which God did by him in the midst of you 11. Had our Lord been more than a Man the Prophecies of the Old Testament in which he is promised would not describe him barely as the Seed of the Woman the Seed of Abraham a Prophet like unto Moses the Servant and Missionary of God on whom God's Spirit should rest Gen. 3. 5. I will put Enmity between thy Seed and her Seed Her Seed is by all Interpreters understood to be Christ Gen. 22. 18. In thy Seed shall all the Nations of the Earth be blessed This again is universally interpreted of Christ Deut. 18. 18. I will raise them up a Prophet from among their Brethren like unto thee and I will put my Words into his Mouth This is interpreted of our Lord Christ in many Texts of the New Testament as John 1. 45. and Acts 3. 22. and Acts 7. 37. Isai 41. 1. Behold my Servant whom I uphold mine Elect in whom my Soul delighteth I will put my Spirit upon him and he shall bring forth Judgment to the Gentiles This is interpreted of Christ Matth. 12. 17 18. Now that the Holy Ghost or Spirit is only the Power and Inspiration of God at least is not himself God they hold is ascertained by these Considerations 1. The Holy Ghost or Spirit and the Power of God are spoken of as one and the same thing 1 Cor. 2. 4 5. My preaching was not with enticing Words
Interpretation is confirmed by 1 Thess 4. 8. He therefore that despiseth despiseth not Man but God who hath also given unto us his Holy Spirit Here 't is manifest that those who despised the Apostles are said to despise God because God was in them by his Spirit What hinders then but that for the same reason those that lied to the Apostles should be said and understood to lie to God 35. Acts 7. 59. They stoned Stephen calling upon God and saying Lord Jesus receive my Spirit Answ 1. The Word God is not in the Original Greek in no Greek Bible 2. Admitting this Word God to be here rightly understood yet the Greek when rendred Grammatically maketh this sense calling upon God and saying O Lord of Jesus receive my Spirit 3. Admitting the English Translation the meaning here is only this Stephen called upon God and he also said Lord Jesus receive my Spirit because at the same time he saw Jesus in Prophetick Vision standing at the Right Hand of God. He began to have this Vision while he stood before the Council ver 56. and it continued with him to the Moment of his Expiration for his Consolation and Support as is granted by many learned Interpreters of the Orthodox party 36. Acts 9. 14 21. To bind all that call upon thy Name The Words are spoken to the Lord Christ as is made undeniable by ver 17. Is not this he that destroyed them which called on this Nome Christ's Name in Jerusalem Answ 1. The Socinians generally not only grant but earnestly contend that Christ is to be worshipped and prayed to because God hath they say by his â—â—â—â—biting Word or Power given to the Lord Christ a Faculty of knowing all things and an Ability to relieve all our Wants The Polonian Vnitarians were so zealous in this matter that they excommunicated and deposed from their Ministry such of their own Party as denied that Christ might be prayed to and worship't with Divine Worship This had bad Effects therefore the Vnitarians of Transylvania were more moderate they admitted to the Ministers and Professors-Places those that rejected the Invocation and Adoration of Christ but obliged them under their Hands not to speak against worshipping or praying to the Lord Christ in their Sermons or Lectures 2. Those Vnitarians that reject the Invocation of Christ say 1. That the most learned of the Ancients were of their Opinion It appears by St. Austin T. 6. L. 1. de Haeres Num. 43. and by Photias Cod. 117. that Origen denied that the Son was to be adored or prayed to He is saith Origin not the Author but Procurer of the good things bestowed on us 2. Our Lord Christ when he was consulted about the Object and matter of Prayers directed his Disciples to God Luke 11. 1 2. When ye pray say Our Father which art in Heaven 3. It seems clear enough that he forbad the Disciples to pray to himself ordering them at the same time to pray to God in his Name or for his Sake John 16. 23. In that Day i. e. after I am risen have seen you again and being ascended into Heaven have procured for you the Comforter whose Consolations none can take from you So all Interpretters of note ye shall ask me nothing whatsoever ye shall ask the Father in my Name he will give it you 4. To make Christ himself the Object of Prayer is to destroy his Mediatory Office. For if he doth hear our Prayers and can and doth by a Power constantly resident in him relieve our Wants to what purpose is he our Mediator with God. They that make it a Duty to pray to Christ will find it hard to give a good account of those Words Heb. 7. 25. He Christ is able to save unto the uttermost all that come unto God by him i. e. that pray to God in his Name or for his sake seeing he ever liveth to make Intercession for them What can be more evident than that here Christ's saving us from the Evils we either fear or labour under is ascribed not to his own inherent Power but to his Intercession with the Almighty It is farther to be observed that these Gentlemen say that Christ's Mediation and Intercession for us is not to be understood of a verbal or personal Mediation proceeding from a particular Knowledg of our Wants and Prayers but he mediates by his Merits that is by the perfect Obedience and most acceptable Services that he has performed to God. As to the objected Texts To bind all that call upon thy Name And again Is not this he that destroyed them that called on this Name in Jerusalem They answer that the Original Greek may be translated several ways 1. Thus to bind all that are called by thy Name And Is not this he that destroyed them who are called by this Name in Jerusalem that is All that from Christ are called Christians And this seems to be the genuine sense of these Texts 2. Thus To bind all that name thy Name And Is not this he that destroyed them who name this Name in Jerusalem that is that profess the Name of Christ that speak of Christ as their Master and Teacher Agreably to this St. Paul saith 2 Tim. 2. 9. Let all that name the Name of Christ depart from Iniquity 3. Thus as 't is in our English Bibles to bind all that call upon thy Name And Is not this he that destroyed them that called on this Name in Jerusalem For though the first Christians did not pray to the Lord Christ yet they called upon his Name in Prayer they used his Name in their Prayers to God praying for all things in his Name which is a calling upon his Name in the most proper and grammatical sense of these Words and is indeed the only sense of which they are capable when they are used of a Man as Christ was So they 37. Acts 15. 28. It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and to us Answ that is to God's Inspiration in us and therefore to us also See on John 16. 8 13 14. 38. Acts 20. 28. Feed the Church of God which he hath purchased with his own Blood. Answ 1. It appears by the Syriac the Armenian and the most ancient Greek Bibles that the true reading of this Text is Feed the Church of Christ which he hath purchased with his own Blood. 2. Admitting the reading in the vulgar Editions of the Greek yet some great Masters of that Tongue have rendred the Greek Words thus Feed the Church of God which he hath purchased with his own Son's Blood. 3. Admitting the Translation in our English Bibles some learned Men particularly Erasmus have noted that the Blood of Christ is here called the Blood of God because it was the Blood which God gave for the Redemption of the World. So John 1. 36. Behold the Lamb of God that is the Lamb of Sacrifice which God giveth for the Sins of the World. For God so loved the
of Mans Wisdom but in demonstration of the Spirit and of Power that your Faith should not stand in the Wisdom of Men but in the Power of God. Luke 1. 35. The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee Blessed Mary and the Power of the Highest shall overshadow thee Luke 11. 20. I with the Finger of God that is by the Power of God Exod. 8. 19. cast out Devils Mat. 12. 28. I cast out Devils by the Spirit of God. Compare also Luke 24. 49. with Acts 1. 4 5 8. 2. A manifest Distinction is made as between God and Christ so also between God and the Holy Spirit or Power and Inspiration of God so that 't is impossible the Spirit should be God himself Rom. 5. 5. The Love of God is shed abroad in your Hearts by the Ho-Ghost which is given to us 1 Cor. 3. 16. The Grace or Favour of our Lord Jesus Christ the Love of God and the Communion of the Holy Ghost be with you Rom. 8. 27. He the Spirit v. 26. maketh Intercession for the Saints according to the Will of God. They note here that God's Spirit or Inspiration being designed to be a continual Director and Guide to the Faithful it is spoken of in these and some other Texts as a Person by the same Figure of Speech that Charity is described as a Person 1 Cor. 13. 4 5. and Wisdom Prov. 9. 11. and the Law or Commandments of God Psal 119. 24. They note also that in some Texts 't is called the Holy Ghost and Holy Spirit in the same sense that we commonly say the Holy Wisdom Holy Will of God. 3. The Spirit is obtained for us of God by our Prayers therefore it self is not God. Acts 15. 8. God which knoweth the Hearts bare them witness giving them the Holy Spirit as he did to us Luke 11. 13. How much more shall your Heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to them that ask him If we say these Texts are to be understood not of the Person of the Holy Ghost but of his Gifts and Graces the Socinians readily confess it but they say also that if the Holy Spirit were at all a Person much more a God his Gifts and Graces would be bestowed by himself and asked of himself not bestówed by and asked of another Person as 't is manifest and by all confessed they are in these Texts They add there is neither Precept nor Example in all Holy Scripture of Prayer made to the Spirit on this or any other occasion which on the Trinitarian Supposition that the Holy Spirit is a Person and God no less than the Father is very surprizing nay utterly unaccountable 4. If the Holy Spirit and our Lord Christ are Gods or God no less than the Father then God is a Trinity of Persons or three Persons but this is contrary to the whole Scripture which speaks of God as but one Person and speaks of him and to him by singular Pronouns such as I Thou Me Him c. Job 13. 7. Will ye speak wickedly for God Will ye accept his Person Heb. 1. 1. God hath in these last times spoken to us by his Son who being the Brightness of his Glory and the express Image of his Person sat down at the right Hand of the Majesty on high Deut. 6. 4 5. Hear O Israel the Lord our God is one Lord and thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thine Heart In the Hebrew thus O Israel hearken to Jehovah our God Jehovah is one and thou shalt love Jehovah thy God with all thine Heart The Jews by a most ancient Tradition and Custom are obliged to repeat this Verse every Morning and Evening to keep it in perpetual Memory that Jehovah or God is one only not two or three Isa 45. 5. I am the Lord there is no God but Me. Psal 102. 25. O my God of old hast thou laid the Foundation of the Earth Matth. 4. 10. the Lord thy God him only shalt thou serve No Instance say the Socinians can be given in any Language of three Persons whoever spoke of themselves or were spoken to by the singular Pronouns I Thou Me Him Thee c. Such speaking is contrary to Custom Grammar and Sense which are the Laws of Speech therefore the Holy Scriptures always speaking thus of God either he is only one Person or the Scriptures are one continued ungrammatical Soloecism and Impropriety and that in the capital Article of Faith which no reasonable or good Man can or ever will allow For it no way helps the Trinitarians that God according to some Translations says at Gen. 1. 26. Let Vs make Man. Because nothing is so usual in common Speech as for single Persons to speak of themselves indifferently by singular or plural Pronouns thus 2 Cor. 10. 2. I think to be bold against some who think of Vs saith Paul of himself only as if We walked according to the Flesh Briefly they contend that when God speaks of himself in the plural Number or by plural Pronouns which yet some deny he ever does and if he doth 't is not above once or twice in the whole Scripture he speaks according to the Custom of single Persons especially Princes and great Persons in all Nations and Languages but were Almighty God three Persons they could never speak of themselves or be spoken to by the singular Pronouns I Thou Thee Him Me because 't is contrary not only to Grammar which is always to be observed when there is no Custom to the contrary but to the Custom of all Nations which understand to speak intelligibly and sensibly 5. Had the Son or Holy Ghost been God this would not have been omitted in the Apostles Creed This Creed say they which is of next if not equal Authority to any part of Holy Scripture after having declared that God is the Father Almighty and Maker of Heaven and Earth speaks not a Word of the Godhead of the Son or Holy Ghost It describes the Son by all the characters of a Man and by such only it says he was conceived or begotten by the Holy Ghost on Blessed Mary that accordingly he was born of her that he was crucified died and was buried that he rose on the third day and ascended into Heaven all these are the Descriptions of a Man for God cannot be conceived or be born or die no nor ascend into Heaven for he is always there Not content to take no notice that he is God this Creed distinguishes him very plainly from God that is denies him to be God by adding He sits at the right Hand of God. i. e. He is advanced to be next to God and is under the immediate and particular Protection of God. Concerning the Holy Ghost this Creed says no higher thing than it says of the Church I believe in the Holy Ghost and in the Holy Catholick Church For in the Greek the same Preposition in is before both alike and so also is this Creed
recited by St. Cyril and by St. Cyprian ad Numid and by Socrates Hist l. 1. c. 26. If the Compilers of this Creed had believed that either the Son or Spirit is God t is unaccountable that they should take no notice of it in a Greed and such a Creed as was purposely drawn up to represent all the necessary Articles of Religion If a Socinian say they were to draw up a Confession of his Faith he would do it in no other Words but these of the Apostles and on the contrary no Trinitarian after having described the Father by all the usual Characters of God saying he is God Almighty and Maker of Heaven and Earth would fail to mention the Divinity of the Son and Holy Spirit whence we must needs infer that the Apostles believed as the Socinians not as the Trinitarians believe concerning God Christ and the Holy Spirit 6. To conclude Theirs they say is an accountable and a reasonable Faith but that of the Trinitarians is absurd and contrary both to Reason and to it self and therefore not only false but impossible For you say they teach there are three almighty and most wise Persons and yet but one God as if every Almighty and most wise Person were not a God and consequently three such Persons three Gods. You add yet more absurdly that there are three Persons who are severally and each of them true God and yet there is but one true God This is an Error in counting or numbring which when stood in is of all others the most brutal and inexcusable and not to discern it is not to be a Man. But we would not say they trouble our selves at the non-sense of this Doctrine if it did not impose false Gods on us by advancing two to be Gods who are not so and rob also the one true God of the Honour due to him and of which he is jealous This Sir is the Doctrine of the Vnitarians more commonly by others call'd Socinians concerning Almighty God and these their Arguments which I have so related as not to judg or rail of their Persons because however learned and reasonable Men which is their Character among their worst Adversaries may be argued out of their Errors yet few will be swagger'd or chode out of them It remains that I make a brief and fair Deduction of their History from the time that they have been taken notice of in the World. They whom we call Socinians were by the Fathers and first Ages of Christianity called Nazarens by which name St. Paul is accused before Felix Acts 24. 5. They were also in those first times called Ebionites Mineans Artemonites Theodotians Symmachians Paulinists Samosatenians Photinians and Monarchians The Writings of these Ancients are all lost being destroyed by the Arians and Catholicks Notwithstanding they had I find some very considerable Men among them as 1. Theodotian who translated the Old Testament out of the Hebrew into Greek about the Year of our Lord 182. 2. Symmachus who published another Translation from the Hebrew also into Greek in the Year 193. Eusebius assures us both these were Ebionites or Nazarens and their Translations were greatly esteemed and much used in the Greek Churches 3. Paulus of Samosatum Bishop and Patriarch of Antioch a Man not only learned and eloquent but so much esteemed in that Capital City of the East that an Episcopal Council there assembled were not of sufficient Authority with his Citizens to cast him out of St. Peter's Chair 4. Photinus Bishop of Sirmium against whom other Bishops being by Imperial Authority assembled proceeded by Conciliary Acts and Censures of the Church but neither would his City part with him till the Emperour sent an Army to expel him Eusebius Hist l. 5. c. 28. and Theodoret Haer. Fab. l. 2. c. de Artem. say that these Nazarens constantly affirmed that they derived their Doctrine from the Apostles of our Lord and that it was the general Doctrine of the Church till the Popes Victor and Zepherin set themselves to root it up Victor say the Socinians began to persecute the Apostolick Doctrine of one God or what is the same that God is one in the Year 194 but with little Success till that which was afterwards the Doctrine of the Arians grew into general Credit and Accepance For Justin Martyr Origen and other principal Fathers teaching as the Arians afterwards did that the Father is indeed before the Son and Holy Spirit in Time in Dignity and in Power yet that the Word or Son who in the fulness of time took our nature on him was generated or created some time before the World and was the Father's Servant and Minister in making the World and that the Holy Ghost was the Creature of the Son and subservient to him in making all things this Doctrine being advanced by Justin Origen and others of note in the Church and seeming more for the Honour of the Son than the plain and simple Doctrine of the Nazarens by the Help of Persecution prevailed against theirs and became the more current Doctrine of the Church till in the Council of Nice it was condemned and another more popular and so more taking than that as attributing to the Son Eternity and Equality with the Father did generally obtain being supported by Imperial Authority But did Superstition say the Socinians stop here No for there shortly arose another Doctrine that the Son and Holy Spirit are the same God with the Father not only as the Nicene Fathers explained this matter by Unity of Wills and specifical Identity or sameness of Substance but by numerical or true Identity and sameness of Substance and Nature This last has been establish'd by so many terrible penal Laws partly obtained of the Roman Emperours by Catholick Bishops partly made by Popes in the times of their Omnipotence that now not only the Nazaren Faith but the Arian and the Nicene truly so called are no where openly profest in the Territories of Christian Princes and States except in a few Cities of Transilvania and some Churches of the United Netherlands in which Countries Liberty of Conscience makes a part of their Civil Rights and Franchises But in the Turkish and other Mahometan and Pagan Dominions where also the conquered Provinces of Christians have Liberty of Conscience the Nazaren and Arian Churches are very numerous Much of the new Conquests of his present Imperial Majesty in Hungaria Sclavonia and Illyricum are Arian But though the open and avowed Profession of the Unity of God as 't is taught by the Nazarens or Socinians and by the Arians be supprest yet 't is observed that not a few of the most learned and celebrated Writers of the Church whether Catholick or Reformed have certainly been either Arians or Socinians or great Favourers of them though they have used much Caution in so expressing themselves as not to lye too open to Exception Envy or a legal Prosecution 1. D. Erasmus the restorer of Learning hath given
in and by him performed Works not much less wonderful than was the first Creation And the World knew him not Knew not that the Word abiding on Jesus was that very Divine Word which made both the World and all Men. Ver. 11. He came unto his own i. e. To those whom he had made ver 10. He is to be understood of the Word The Word came in the Person of Christ His own received him not i. e. did not own him for what he indeed was the Divine Word 'T is again repeated to brand the Ingratitude and Stupidity of the Jews of that Age. Ver. 12. Them that believe on his Name On his Name is an Hebrew Phrase as much as to say on him i. e. Them that believed on the Word made Flesh or them that received and owned him for what he indeed was even the Divine Word Ver. 14. And the Word was made Flesh Or For the Word was made Flesh i. e. did abide on and inhabit an humane Person the Person of Jesus Christ and so was in Appearance made Flesh or Man for Flesh is the usual Scripture Phrase for Man Gen. 6. 12. Deut. 5. 26. Jer. 12. 12. Jer. 17. 5. Mark 13. 20. And we beheld his Glory i. e. The Glory of the Man on whom the Word did abide and inhabit in him We beheld his Glory in his many Miracles John 2. 11. Also in his Transfiguration 2. Pet. 1. 17. And on many other occasions The Glory as of the only begotten of the Father i. e. A Glory worthy of the only-begotten of the Father Christ is called the only-begotten on several accounts this especially that he only was begotten by the Divine Power on a Woman Luke 1. 35. Ver. 15. John bare Witness of him saying He was before me i. e. Was before me in Dignity being the only-begotten of God. So Erasmus and Beza as well as Grotius Ver. 18. Which is in the Bosom of the Father i. e. Who is most dear to the Father So the Phrase signifies in other Texts Numb 11. 12. Deut. 13. 6. Hath declared him i. e. hath revealed his Mind and Will to Men. Hitherto for the most part Grotius Briefly The Word according to Grotius is not an eternal Son of God but is here the Power and Wisdom of God which Word abiding without measure on the Lord Christ as it is expresly said Heb. 1. 3. Matth. 28. 18. Col. 2. 3. see the Notes on these Texts 't is therefore spoken of as a Person and as one Person with Christ and he with that This notion of the Word will lead a Man through all the Difficulties of this Chapter with far more ease than any other hitherto offered Besides that it is so well founded as has been shown on ver 1. 't is also as easy and obvious and clears the sense as much as can be expected on a Portion of Scripture that is so obscure and dark and which was designedly written after a mysterious and sublime manner 13. John 2. 19 21. Destroy this Temple and in three Days I will raise it up He spake of the Temple of his Body Answ Christ raised his Body by a Power communicated to Him by the Father and accordingly his being raised is always attributed to the Father not to himself Gal. 1. 1. Paul an Apostle by Jesus Christ and God the Father who raised him from the dead See also Eph. 1. 19 20. 1 Thess 1. 9 10. Had our Lord raised himself by his own proper Power his Resurrection could in no respect be ascribed to the Father 14. John 2. 25. He knew what was in Man. Answ The Knowledg which the Lord Christ had or now in his state of Exaltation hath of the Secrets of Mens Hearts is the pure Gift of and Revelation from God and the Divine Word abiding on him Rev. 1. 1. The Revelation of Jesus Christ which God gave to him to shew unto his Servants John 3. 34. God giveth not the Spirit by measure that is sparingly unto him But see also what they say on Rev. 2. 23. 15. John 3. 13. No Man hath ascended up to Heaven but he that came down from Heaven even the Son of Man which is in Heaven Answ 1. Erasmus Beza Camerarius acknowledg that the Greek should be rendred which was in Heaven Neither so are the Words which was in Heaven an idle Repetition of what went before for it is repeated majoris asseverationis causâ for its greater Confirmation The most learned Orthodox Interpreters understand this ascending into and being in Heaven as also the descending only metaphorically and interpret thus No Man hath ascended up to Heaven No Man hath known the Mind of God our Heavenly Father But he that came down from Heaven i. e. but he that is sent to you as the Messenger of Heaven or of God. Even the Son of Man which is in Heaven i. e. even I whose Meditation and Conversation is in Heaven As St. Paul says of himself Phil. 3. 20. Our Conversation is in Heaven So they interpret the whole Passage of the humane Nature I suppose because our Lord considers and speaks of himself here by the Name only of the Son of Man. But the Socinians do generally understand this Text literally and say that 't is here intimated that before our Lord entred upon his Office of Messias he was taken up to Heaven to be instructed in the Mind and Will of God as Moses was into the Mount Exod. 24. 1 2 12. and from thence descended to execute his Office and declare the said Will of God. The same thing they say is also hinted John 6. 38 46 51 62. John 8. 40. 16. John 3. 18. The only begotten Answ See on John 1. 14. 17. John 5. 19. Whatsoever things He the Father doth those also doth the Son. Answ The Son doth them only by the Spirit or Power of the Father inhabiting in him John 5. 30. I can do nothing of my self John 14. 10. The Father that dwelleth in me He doth the Works Matth. 12. 28. I cast out Devils by the Spirit of God. 18. John 5. 23. That all Men should honour the Son even as they honour the Father Answ The meaning only is as we honour God or the Father so we must not forget to honour also the Son of God because to him the Father hath committed the last Judgment of all Men ver 22. An Equality of Honour is no more intended here than an Equality of Perfection in those words Be ye perfect even as your Father which is in Heaven is perfect Matth. 5. 48. For the sense there is as God is truly perfect so do ye endeavour to be perfect with that Perfection of which your finite Natures are capable 19. John 6. 44. I will raise him up at the last Day Answ The Lord Christ shall raise and change our Bodies by the same Divine Word or Power of God communicated to him and abiding on him by which while he was in this