essential branch of a New-Testament-faith 2ly His Intercession Secondly we are to look upon Christ as the procuring cause of all our mercies by his intercessions whereby he reaps the benefit of the purchase of his blood His Blood was the foundation of all his Intercession and his Intercession is as the harvest to that seed-time when he sowed in tears of blood He entred into the holy of holies by his own blood if he had not had that blood with him I conceive there had been no entrance for him there as a Priest but now that he is there entred and entertained as an High-priest for ever and ever liveth to make intercession for us Heb. 7.25 We are to look upon him as the great procuring-cause of all our mercies by his intercessions If when we were enemies we were reconciled unto God by the DEATH of his Son much more being reconciled we shall be saved by his LIFE Rom 5.10 1 John 2.1 My little children these things write I unto you that ye sin not and if any man sin we have an Advocate with the Father Jesus Christ the Righteous and he is the propitiation for our sins HE IS to this very day upon occasion of any failing of the Saints he interposeth to make God propitious to them and not onely to them saith the Apostle not onely for our sins who are the Saints of God but for the sins of the whole world He doth now as he did at his death and first entring into Heaven though not in the same form of offering which was but ONCE make use of his blood with his Father to prevail with him that he may be ready to pardon and receive into favour all that come unto God by him all that are come in upon any of their failings and all that shall come in with unfeigned repentance for their wicked lives past And as I shewed in the former particular of his death and blood that he did not onely procure pardon of sin by it but redeemed us from our vain conversation and purchased heaven it self for us so in this particular I might shew that he doth not onely procure pardon of sins for us by his intercession as our Advocate but every thing else that we stand in need of I am going to my Father saith our Saviour when he was leaving the World and there I will povide Mansions for you and whatsoever ye ask the Fther in my Name I will do it Joh. 14.2 3 13. Thus therefore our Faith if we would have it a right New-Testament Faith must eye Christ in his intercession and whatever we desire of God we must ask it in his Name and then believe that Christ as an Advocate with the Father wil take the care of it So much for the first Head or general Rule of a New-Testament-Faith We are to eye Christ as the great procuring cause of all our mercies 2dly 2 Gospel-faith eies Christ as the great dâ—spenser of all good things to us We are to look upon Christ as the great Dispenser of all our good things to us Our Saviour Christ hath the distribution disposal of all things committed to him as Joseph had in Aegypt The Father judgeth no man but all judgement is committed by the Father to the Son John 5.22 Jesus Christ is not onely represented unto us in the Scripture as standing at the right hand of God Act. 5.55 56. which may signifie his Advocatship and Priestly Office but much oftner as sitting at the right hand of God whch is a sign of his Kingly Office and Authority for this see Heb. 10 11 12 13. where sitting is opposed to standing as Maâ—esty is to Ministring And every Priest STANDETH daily MINISTRING and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices which can never take away sins But this man after he had offered one Sacrisice for sins for ever SATE DOWN at the right hand of God from henceforth expecting till his Enemies be made his footstool Our Saviour obtained of his Father by his death and offering not onely that sinners might be pardoned but that he might have the gift of pardon yea and of repentance too which is as great a gift as pardon it self Acts 5.30 31 32. The God of our fathers raised up Jesus whom ye slew and hanged on a Tree him hath God exalted with his right hand to be a Prince and a Saviour for to give repentance to Israel and sorgiveness of sins and we are his witnesses of these things and so is the Holy Ghost whom God hath given to them that obey him In a word Christ hath all power both in heaven and in earth So our Saviour came and told his Disciples after he was risen Matth. 28.18 19. Jesus came and spake unto them the eleven saying All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth Go ye THEREFORE and teach all Nations This is the form of the Commission which makes an Apostle I have received power therefore go teach they are not the Apostles of God immediately but of Jesus Christ by the will of God 1 Cor. 1.1 2 Cor. 1.1 Eph. 1.1 To instance in the several branches of this power in heaven and earth would be too much for me in this place there is the power of pardoning sins raising the dead judging the world destroying the wicked These with many other I could prove by plain Scripture to be all deposited and be-trusted in the hand of Jesus Christ Now what is the Faith that belongs to Christ as the Dispenser of all good things to us for that is my proper business to enquire after Why even the Faith that we place in God the Father This Christ taught his Disciples when he was about to leave them Joh. 14.1 Let not your heart be troubled ye believe in God believe also in me As much as to say Ye have been used hitherto by your Old-Testament-Faith to believe in God and you have found comfort and support in it and yet you do not see that God you believe in Why so now for my self I am going in deed out of your sight and at this you are troubled but believe in me when I am out of your sight as ye have hitherto beheved in an invisible God and ye shall find the same comfort and support in this Faith as ever ye found from Faith in God None so common a New-Testament phrase as believing in Christ He that believeth in me though he weee dead yet shall he live and whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never dye Joh. 11.25.26 and our Saviour there giveth a very satisfactory reason The difference betwixt faith in Christ and in God the Father which is this I am the resurrection and the life therefore he that believeth on the Son hath life and shall have a resurrection unto lise Our Faith ought to be the same in the person of Christ as it is in God the Father onely with this difference that it must not be terminated in
justified man is a just man in the sight of God To be justified before God or in the sight of God or by God are all one for it is the same phrase 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in both places and the meaning is onely this that God must reckon that man just whosoever is justified according to that in 2 Cor. 10.18 Not he that commendeth himself is approved I may add not he whom all the men on earth or all the Augels in Heaven commend is therefore approved but whom the Lord commendeth This act or state of Justification is variously expressed in the Scripture I shall give just a taste of it The description of â—ustification vâ—ried in the Scripture In Gen. 4.7 It is called God's accepting of us If thou dost well shall thou not be accepted And again Gods having respect unto us in the same chap. v. 4.5 The Lord had respect unto Abel and unto his Offering but unto Cain and his Offering he had not respect Once more Justification is expressed thus To have a Tessimony from God that we please him Heb. 11.6 But I shall keep to my first description because that is especially made use of by the Apostle Paul in his professed Discourses upon this subject viz. That Justification is a mans being reputed just and righteous in the sight of God and indeed the Apostle Paul as a close Disputant keeps to his terms and rallyes all the terms of a sort together which in this business are these three especially 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Just Justice or Rightcousness and Justification Every â—ustified personâ—s reputed a just man by vertue of a Justice or Righteousness that constitutes him so or at least makes him a Subject immediately sit for this Act of Justification to pass upon him For Justification is a legal or judicial Act the Act usually of a Court. Now men in their Courts will not pronounce a man just when he is accused or is brought upon his justification except there be a righteousness appearing in him except there be something sufficient brought in his justification And do we think that God wil transact such a great business more slightly than we are wont to do Why this Justification of a mans person it is done in the sight of God and that I may a little illustrate it it seems to be done in the Court of Heaven before all tht Augels of God for they reâ—oice at the conversion of a Sinner and so at his Justification Luke 12.8 9.15.10 Therefore in the Court of Heaven when one is to be justified the great inquiry that is made is after a Righteousness And the Apostle Paul's Epistles when he treats of this subject ring of nothing so loudly as of a Righteousness No less then thirty several time doth the Apostle make mention of that Word Rightcousness in that one Epistle to the Rom. and and at least twenty of those times it is referred unto Justification therefore Justification must be by a Righteonsness The great Question therefore is this What is the Righteousness which if a man have he is a Subject capable of being justified that is reputed a just man in the sight of God Now the Answer to this Question cannot be made till I have established four preliminary Propositions The first position is this That there are only two kinds of righteousness imaginable by us or rather but two to be found in Scripture they are by the Apostle fairly distinguished each part of the distinction expressed in several synonymaes or words signifying the same thing There is the Righteousness of the Law and the Righteousness of Faith Rom. 10.5.6 The Righteousness of God and our own Righteousness Rom. 10.3 And as Righteousness is thus variously distinguished so is Justification which is the Reward of Righteousness said to be of several kinds according to the several Righteousness which it proceeds upon if the Righteousness be that of the Law by the Works of the Law then is the Reward reckoned of Debt if the Righteousness be that of Faith the Reward is in the nature of a Grace or Gift Rom. 4 4. Now to him that worketh according to the Law the Reward is not reckoned of Grace but of Debt and 〈◊〉 contra to him that believeth and is for the Righteousness of Faith the Reward that is Justification is reckoned of Grace not of Debt Having thus given a distinct account what Justification is how that it is the constituting a man just before God and what ground or reason it proceeds upon viz. Upon a Righteousness found with the person to be justified he hath a Righteousness to plead for him And having given you the onely distinction that there is of Righteousness it is of the Law or Faith however either part of the distinction may be varied in synonymous expressions and so the Justification following upon one of these Righteousnesses viz. That of the Law is of Debt upon the other viz. The Righteousness of Faith is of Grace I shall draw up the terms that belong to either part of the distinction whether of Righteousness or Justification together that so ye may see the Apostle is full of these two and only these two as also that the Scriptures may appear wherein this subject is touched at and so fall upon a fair dispute for the Cause which is this Whether of these two ways must serve us in the present state of things Which way of Righteousness which way of Justification we must betake our selves unto if we would be saved For without Justification no Salvation and Salvation at the day of Judgement will follow onely upon our Justification in this life God will then do that in the face of all the world in acquitting or condemning which now he doth effectually in a more covert and secret manner To draw up therefore these two parties into the field 1. The Law in its party or list of Synonyma's hath these severals The works of the Law 2 Gal. 1.6 The deeds of the Law Rom. 3.20.28 The Law of Works ver 27. By works without any addition of the Law If Abraham were justified by works he hath whereof to glory Rom. 4.2 Here glorying and boasting belong to this Tribe too as a consequent upon Legal-Justification or Law-Justification The Verb used is this To him that worketh I shall not instance in any further Synonyma's belonging to the Law such as this that it is called a fleshly way and flesh Are ye so foolish having begun in the Spirit are ye now made perfect by the flesh I come to give the synonymaes or conjugata that belong to the way of Faith The substantives are these 1. Faith alone Faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness The Faith of God Rom. 3.3 The Law of Faith ver 27. The righteousness of faith Rom. 4.13 Grace 't is of Faith that it might be of Grace Abundance of Grace and the gift of righteousness Rom. 5.17 It
Scriptural in the words and phrases of Scripture which is that the first Covenant the old Covenant or Testament is God's Covenant with the Jews by Moses the new Covenant is that made with the faithful by Christ and what others aim at in that other way of stating the Covenants may be attained without that confusion which they make Having made two as fair Concessions as the objectors can desire A. 2. I come now to the determination of the question or repelling the Objection after I have minded you of a distinction of the Law which I lately gave and it was this That sometimes the Law is taken strictly for the bare command with the threatning annexed to the breach of it and the promise of life upon the strict obeence of it So it is in Gal. 3.10 sometimes it is taken for the whole Old-Testament as Rom. 3.19 where the Psalms of David are made a part of the law sometimes taken for the five Books of Moses as in Luke 24.44 where the Old-Testament is divided into these three parts The Law of Moses the Prophets and the Psalms Now I answer Take the Law in the first sence for a Covenant of Works strictly and so it was not given for a Covenant to the Jews for then it must have come in against the promises or the Covenant of God in Christ that was made before But take it in the second or third sense either for the whole Old-Testament as we call the Writings of the holy men of God till our Saviours time or for the five Books of Moses the dispensation by Moses from the Mount and this I confess was a Covenant to them but then it was a Covenant of Grace and indeed contained in it all the promises that were given before it that traditional Gospel which Abraham and the holy Patriarchs before him were saved by is inserted in the Law of Moses else it had been a vain thing for the Apostle Paul to have undertaken to prove Justification by Faith out of the Old-Testament yea out of the Law of Moses for as a man cannot bring a clean thing out of an unclean so neither can he bring Gospel out of pure Law if therefore the Law of Moses had not been a Covenant of Grace the Apostle could never have proved Justification by faith out of it which yet he doth not onely by strained consequences but as there professedly Abraham believed God saith he and it was imputed to him for righteousness they therefore which are of Faith are blessed and justified with faithful Abraham Galathians 3. ver 6 7 9. which is as fair an Enthymema as can be and every Sophister can supply the Proposition that is wanting St. Paul proves Justification by Faith by two great Arguments out of Genesis the first Book of Moses viz by Abraham's Justification and the Allegory of Hagar and Sarah which I explained and urged before Nay the Apostle makes a great affirmation indeed which is this that even Moses himself the great Law-Covenant Mediator doth in his Writings give a clear distinction of the two Covenants of Works and Grace shews us the tenour of one Covenant and another When he had produced the Allegory of Hagar and Sarah out of Genesis saith he Alas Moses in this Story gives you Allegorically the two Covenants Gal. 4 21. to the 24. But the chief place for proof of what I have said is Rom. 10.5 6. for Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the Law That the man which doth these things shall live by them Lev. 18.5 But the righteousness which is of Faith speaketh on this wise Say not in thine heart who shall ascend up into Heaven c. and so goes on in the words of Moses Deut. 30.12 13 14. Here we see Moses in his Writings delineates and describes the two ways of Works and Grace of the Law and Faith and it is proved out of the same â—oses that the Law is no way to justifie sinners Now I shall but draw out the Apostles Argument which I suppose to be this Moses describes two ways of Justification that by the Law and that by Faith that by the Law Moses tells you is no way for sinners because you must continue in all things or you are accursed therefore certainly he described the way of Faith too that ye might betake your selves unto it for justification and life therefore the Law take it either for the whole Old-Testament or for the Dispensation by Moses and it was a Covenant indeed with the Jews but it was a Covenant of Grace for in it Moses describeth the way of Grace that his Disciples might adhere unto it But here you will object still Well 3 Object if Moses his Dispensation or Covenant which he was the Mediator of was a Covenant of Grace and not of Works for Justification why is it called a killing Letter a Ministration of Death a Ministration of Condemnation as it is 2 Cor 3.6 7 9. Why is the Lord said to find fault with it and so to abrogate it and make a new Covenant Heb. 8 7 8. By this it should seem to be a Covenant of Works for else God would not have found fault with a Covenant of Grace nor abrogated it To this I answer 1. Here observe That this 〈◊〉 no Jewish Argument for they would not acknowledge that their Law is a ministration of death whilest they seek life by it nor yet a ministration of condemnation whilst they seek justification by the righteousness of it but it is a cavil or objection against the Apostle Paul who calls the Law a ministration of death and condemnation and yet acknowledgeth that it was the Jews covenant and that Moses in it describeth the righteousness of Faith 2dly I answer That these two are very consistent it might prove a ministration of death to them and yet be a way of grace and life in it self so is the plainest Gospel in the World a savour of death unto the disobedient and unbelievers that yet is certainly in the great intendment of it a way of grace and life 3dly The Law proved a ministration of death to many of them because they mistook it for a covenant of works though it were not given with that intention they did not see the Grace that was contained in it There was a vail upon their heart and is to this day upon the hearts of many of the Jews their minds were blinded so that the Children of Israel could not stedfastly look to the end of that which is alolished they could not see Christ the end of the Law 2 Cor. 3.13 14 15. 4thly There is thus much indeed to be said concerning the dispensation it self that it was dark and obscure the children of Israel had not onely blinded eyes and a vailed heart but Moses had also a Vail upon his face ver 13. which was one reason they could not see that Grace which was in his Dispensation Moses had a vail over
covenant of Works for these two reasons 1. For that the ceremonial law neither was nor could be a part of the covenant of Works which the moral law both was and is to all that are under a covenant of works 2dly and consequently I therefore kept off from any consideration of the ceremonial law in my discourses about the law its being given by Moses that so I might have my discourse run clear in the business of the covenant of works and draw a line in it from Adams estate in innocency to the very days of the Gospel which with any mixture of discourse about the ceremonial law would have been broken and disturbed VVhereas now you see the law taken strictly for a covenant of works might have justified Adam but could not justifie the children of Israel and therefore though added to the promise given to Abraham and that in the language of a covenant of works yet was never given with design that they should accept it for such unto Justification which appears from this double demonstration as I may call it a priori a posteriori A priori for that before the law was given there was a covenant of Grace which the law could not come in to disannul and a posteriori for that the very same Moses that brought their law from God out of the Mount did not more truly acquaint them with the nature of a legal righteousness then he did with the righteousness of Faith Rom. 10.6 But the righteousness of faith speaketh on this wise Say not in thy heart c. being a text quoted out of the same Moses Deut. 30.11 which make this argument vvherefore should Moses first describe to you a legal righteousness and tell you as appears by clear consequence out of him that ye cannot attain unto that righteousness and then describe unto you the righteousness of faith but for this end that ye might forgo the one cleave to the other And there are infinite places in other Scriptures of the Old-Testament which give their testimony to Christ and the Righteousness of Faith which sufficiently argue that the Old-Testament never went about to establish a way of Justification by the Law And here I think it may be of great use to search into this place of Moses which the Apostle asserts to contain the description of the righteousness which is by faith that so we may find both that it is so and what this righteousness of faith is The place is Deut. 30.11 to 15. quoted and paraphrased by the Apostle Rom. 10.6 7 8 9. An inquiry into the sense of Deut 30 11 12 in Rom. 10.6 But the righteousness which is of Faith speaketh on this wise Say not in thine heart Who shall ascend into Heaven c. clearly referring to Deut. 30.11 12 as any may see in the Margent of their Bibles Now let us go to that place in Deut. and see what Gospel there is in it and how evident it is that there is Gospel in it The words are these For this commandment which I command thee this day it is not hidden from thee neither is it far off it is not in heaven that thou shouldest say who shall go up for us to Heaven and bring it unto us that we may hear it and do it Neither is it beyond the Sea that thou shouldest say Who shall go over the Sea for us and bring it unto us that we may hear it and do it but the Word is nigh unto thee in thy mouth and in thy heart that thou mayest do it This is the whole Paragraph in which the covenant of Grace or the righteousness of Faith is described according to the Apostle Paul But how is the Gospel or righteousness of Faith described here First of all I must separate that which doth not seem to look like Gospel from that which is pure Gospel in this place And here we may observe That the matter of the Gospel spoken of is the law or commandment which he had delivered to them This Commandment which I command thee this day the same which is spoken of as I think there being no visible difference as to matter in Lev. 18.5 the place asserted by the Apostle to contain a legal righteousness it was for matter the law of Moses This Commandment saith he which I command thee this day Again I think it will appear to be meant of the ten commandments because it is added That Commandment which I command thee is not far from thee but is nigh thee even in thy heart and mouth Now the ceremonial law was not written in their heart neither had all the children of Israel nor the generality of them to whom yet this is spoken been taught the law effectually by the Spirit of God so as that should be the sense of these words This Commandment is in thine heart and indeed that is the promise of the new Covenant not of this by Moses but the effect of the Moral law was in their heart for it was in the heart of Heathens If it be objected as perhaps it may by some that the matter of the Commandment which Moses commanded them that day was not likely to be the ten commandments nor that chiefly nor to be the same with that in Lev. 18. because this is in Deuteâ—â—româ— which very word signifies a second Law or a second Edition and giving of the Law and had more Gospel in it then the Law in the first giving of it had I answer 1. by concession That there were indeed two several Covenants which the Lord is said to have made by Moses with the children of Israel Deut. 29.1 These are the words of the Covenant which the Lord commanded Moses to make with the children of Israel in the Land of Moab be ides the Covenant which he made with them in Hoâ—eb which a as a Mountain adjoining to if not a part of Mount Sinat 2. That perhaps in this Deutetonomy or second Covenant by Moses there 〈◊〉 mâ—â—â— promises and more of Gospel then in the first Edition of the Law there was But 3dly This doth not hinder but the commandment mentioned in Deut. â—0 might be chiefly for matter of it the moral Law or ten Commandments 't is true there were promises added to encourage unto the keeping of them and there were also terrible threatnings unto the breaking of them all the twelve tribes being divided into two equal parts the one half placed upon Mount Gerizim to bless the people that were obedient to the Law the other half upon Mount Ebal to curse all that brake it Deut 27.11 12 13 But that commandment for the sake of which these promises and threatnings were added was the Law of the ten words or two tables which were twice given to Moses in Sinai and again repeated in this Covenant in the Land of Moab as we may see in Deut. 5. and the very word Deut. signifies a second Law or a second giving of the Law
external or partial performance of the duties of the Moral Law of which I have made two sorts a lower and an higher and I free both from being necessarily superstitious or that their chief danger should arise from thence And for the first sort I ask Art thou careless of getting divine knowledge in the Scriptures Art thou at no pains with thy heart in Religion Dost thou find no difficulties in it Art not thou put to struglings wrestlings sightings yet expectest thou to get to Heaven Why then thou art one of the common sort that perish by resting upon an outward conformity to the Moral Law Again for the higher but unsincere Moralist Dost thou find a difficulty in Religion Is it ready to break thine heart almost with the trouble that it puts thee to Thou art fain to be constant in duties morning and evening and it may be oftner thou art just between man and man it may be thou bestowest much of thine Estate upon the poor and many other good things thou dost perhaps thou hast some time or other parted with some very beloved sin that was to thee as a right eye or a right hand thou hast found Religion costly and troublesome to thee and now thou expectest when ever thou diest to go to Heaven But stay man art thou humble Dost thou see no imperfections in thy self notwithstanding thy superlative holiness beyond thy neighbours Art not thou made sometimes to confess before the Lord and that with great brokenness of heart that thou art an unprofitable servant Art not thou made to admire at the rich Grace of God that he should take pity on thee when thou wast in thy blood That he should have thoughts of love to thee should send his good Spirit into thine heart to move thee and turn thee to himself c If thou hast experience of none of these things be thou as strict as thou wilt so that hone can accuse thee so strict that thine own Conscience doth not loudly accuse thee I tell thee whether thou be superstitious and ceremonious yea orno for it seldom happens but such an one as thou art is so thou art one of those that are indeed not far from the Kingdom of God but yet not in it nor ever shall be whilest thou continuest so thou art a Legal self-justitiary that restest in an external unsincere obedience to the Law of God I have perfectly done with the Character as it is given to discover predominant Legality Yet here I shal enter two cautions one concerning the Moralist the other concerning the Papist A caution concerning the term Moralist For the term Moralist which I use I fear it may give offence to some ingenuous and worthy persons and therefore I thus explain my self that I do not oppose Moral to Spiritual as if the most spiritual Commands of the Gospel were not Moral or as if the most spiritual Saint were not the highest Morallist or as if Morality were a low Principle I know not but I may reduce all the duties of the Gospel to Morality and I think no sober man wil deny them to be Moral Duties But I make use of it as part of that common distinction made betwixt those two kinds of Laws which Moses delivered of which some were only ceremonial and typical and to last but for a time the other Moral that is to say according to the common understanding of it Perpetual though as to the Etymological signification of the Word Moral signifies as much as that which concerns Manners So Moral Philosophy is opposed to all other Philosophy as Practical is opposed to Speculative and in this signification of the Word Moral all the ceremonial Laws whilst they were in use might have been called Moral but because use swayes Language more then the Etymology of Words I here understand the Word Moral purely in opposition to ceremonial or superstitious so as it signifies those duties that are to be performed by us as having a more substantial goodness in their own nature such as Justice Mercy and Prayer c. Now those men that depend for a righteousness upon the imperfect unsincere performance of these duties I call Legal Morallists of which there are evidently two sorts A caution concerning the Papists an higher and a lower there being another sort of Legallists which I have spoken of namely the ceremonious Legallist Now I shall likewise enter a caution concerning the Papists in whom I have instanced often in the matter of Ceremonies and Superstitions and their placing a confidence in them And to shew that I do not delight to disparage so much as any one man much less an whole party of men but that my onely aim is to make true proof of my assertions I shall to do them right quote an Author of their own whereby it wil appear plainly that some of them at least are sensible of the insufficiency of these things viz. Ceremonious and superstitiou Observances yea conformities unto some duties of the moral Law whilst their conformities do not proceed from an universal Charity The Author is Francis de Sales once Bâ—shop and Prince of Geneva who in his Introduction to a devout life in the very first Chapter hath thâ—se Expressions Every one saith he painteth Devotion according to his own passion and fancy He that is given to fasting thinks himself very devout if he fast often be his his heart never so ful of rancour And not daring to moisten his tongue in Wine or Water for sobriety's sake yet makes no difficulty to drink deep of the blood of his neighbor by slander and calumny Another will account himself sull of Devotion for HUDLING OVER A MULTITUDE OF PRAYERS EVERY MORNING though afterwards he give his tongue a liberty to utter offensive arrogant and reproachful speeches amongst his Neighbours and Family One willingly draws an Alms out of his purse to give to the poor but cannot draw Clemency out of his heart to pardon his Enemies Another forgiveth his Enemies yet cares not to satisfie his Creditors but by constraint All these people are devout in the vote of the vulgar yet indeed they are not so at all And then he gives us an handsome allusion The servants of King Saul saith he sought David in his House but Michol having laid a Statue in his bed and covering it with Davids Apparel made them believe it was David himself sick in bed So many persons cover themselves with certain EXTERNAL ACTIONS BELONGING TO DEVOTION and the World believes them truly devout and SPIRITUAL whereas indeed they are but statues and apparitions of Devotion Now God forbid that I should judge such a man as this if he but follow his own directions to be in a way destructive to his soul when he professeth to aim at true SPIRITUALWORSHIP not contenting himself with EXTERNAL ACTIONS onely in the service of God Though still I must needs say notwithstanding such an Author as this amongst them that I
obedience onely to the Moral Law and I cannot learn wherein else their fault of Legality lay therefore this must be their Legality For it is certain they must vent their Legality in somthing in some way or other and I finding no other great way of theirs but one of these three viz. ceremonies superstitions and external conformity to themoral law which all agree in this general nature of an external and fleshly service such as doth not reach the heart conclude that their way branches it self forth onely into these three particulars Besides I have shewn that there was a continual succession of Legallists from the beginning they all agree in this general of external service therefore this must be the very matter of their Legality And for full proof having shewn what is the form of Legality to wit expecting the reward as of Debt or Merit I have found out this form enlivening and quickening this fleshly matter of the Legallists service and obedience to God Thus I have shewn how the ceremonious Jew with his appointed Ceremonies and invented Superstitions Micah in the Book of Judges and the Legal Jew in the Prophesie of Micah made no doubt but to DESERVE very well the favour of Almighty God The Partial Moralists in Isa â—8 wonder that God should not accept of their fastings and take it very heinously when they had so well deserved it that they should be so unexpectedly slighted dis-regarded So would the Papists and our selves many of us wonder that upon crying Lord Lord open to us after we had been so superstitious and ceremonious in his service on earth we should be shut out of the Kingdom of Heaven I come now to the second Character The second mark or sign of a Legal Spirit by which it may be found out is this That it is proud and impatient in the service of God I shall give Scripture-proof that a Legal Spirit is proud and impatient and Scripture-instances For a sinful creature to think that it can merit is pride in it self yet this I have proved already that the Jews and Galatians and all that practise Legality are for the Doctrine of Merit and they make no doubt but they shall very well deserve the favour of God some by their rich Sacrifices and high Superstitions others by their external obedience to the Commands of the Moral Law Surely saith Micah now God will do me good God I thank thee that I am so much better then other men saith the Pharisee and upon this challengeth his acceptance they take it for granted that God cannot but be well pleased with them This is their pride in its direct and formal act But now what if the Lord shew them some dislike Why there we shall see their pride in its effects impatience anger weariness fullenness I gave one instance of displeasure against God in the former haracter Isa 58.3 4. Wherefore have we fasted say they and thou seest not Wherefore have we afflicted our soul and thou takest no pleasure They seem to take it very ill at God's hands Another instance we have in Cain who when he found that God did not accept him with an answer from heaven as he did Abel he is sullen and dogged and falls into an angry and malicious passion Cain was very wroth and his countenance fell Gen. 4.3 4 and in ver 6. God comes graciously to argue him out of this angry and su len fit And the Lord said unto Cain Why art thou wrath and why is thy countenance fallen If thou dost well shalt thou not be accepted Do but as Abel hath done offer in faith offer thy heart with thy Sacrifice and thou shalt be accepted as he was No but Cain 't is like thought he had done well enough in bringing the fruit of the ground an offering unto the Lord and that he might very well have deserved to be accepted as well as his younger Brother and therefore he continues his wrath and malice and perhaps if he could have had his will at the great God for it was against him that his passion was chiefly stirred he would have discovered the utmost malice against him But because he could not his poor servant and true spiritual Worshipper Abel must rue it and he takes his first opportunity and kills him ver 8. Others again of Cain's gang Legal-Worshippers when they have found that God did not accept them as they thought he might well have done they are quite weary of his service and cry out with those in Malachi chap. 1. ver 13. Ye have said also Behold what a weariness is it And ye have snuffed at it And so Amos 8.5 they cry When will the new Moon be gone and the Sabbath that we may set forth Wheat Will such hypocrites think you pray alwayes Will they alwaies call upon God No where a man doth not sind acceptance he will be at last weary of waiting Now though whosoever comes with faith and love and an hearty-good-will shall be sure to sind acceptance with God yet an hypocrite or a Legal-Worshipper shall never find it and therefore he will be apt ever now and then to grow weary if not quite to cast off the service of God I shall instance in a proud speech of one that was quite weary it was the King of Israel 2 King 6.33 And he said speaking of the Famine in Samaria This evil is of the Lord and why should I wait ouâ— he Lord any longer It seems say Commentators that Elisha had made the King some promise of deliverance from the Famine after a while and the King had waited for the fulfilling it but at last the King seeing the extremity of the Famine upon the woman that eat the flâ—sh of her child he would wait no longer Well and how doth he vent this rage and impatience Why he would take off Elisha's Head Wel and what then Would that cease the Famine No but saith he by his Messenger This evil is of the Lord God deals exceeding hardly and severely with us therefore I le cut off his servants Head A goodly consequence and that which sussiciently argues against whom chiesly his anger was aimed even against the Lord himself Now that this anger impatience and weariness in the service of God is an argument of Legality is clear for that pride is the root of it namely such a pride as by which we think there is very good reason why God should accept of us and no just reason why the Lord should deal thus severely with us which if it doth not contain Legality or opinion of merit in it I despair of making any proof in this business and yet I shall not onely give this proof by way of argument but clear Scripture-proof that this impatiency proceeds from Legality it is in Hab. 2.3 4. Behold the vision is yet for an appointed time but at the end it shal speak and not lye though it tarry wait for it because it will surely
spiritual Saints under the Old-Testament they might truly conclude that their Religion was of an higher strain then either that of the one or of the other * If any will make any abate ment of this observation in the height of it as that the advancement of the least Salnt in the kingdom of Heaven above Iohn the Baptist should be meant of Gospelpriviledges let them do as they see cause and so this observation might wel serve for a Character to them Yet because the Saints of God do not always understand nor are able to make a judgement of their condition and for that I aim onely at such Characters as may be useful to persons for trial of themselves I shal at present let this pass without pressing it any further onely I could wish these multitudes of grovelling creeping complaining Saints were wel chid and awakened for they make Ministers that they cannot preach free Divinity lest they should perhaps grieve them And I verily believe that it hath spoiled many a good Sermon that would have been far more lively both for the conviction of wicked men and the quickening of other good Christians that could have born it and done wel with it meerly the stuffing it with cautions and qualifying many brave expressions lest some of these weak tender Christians should be offended which tenderness in most is rather a delicacy of spirit then the quick sence of a wounded Spirit which indeed must be tenderly dealt with Good men many of them have gotten such effeminate Antinomian Consciences that they cannot bear sound Doctrine many Gospel strains are legal in their apprehension But I must forbear this â—â—nguage lest I have little thanks for not making this a Character I shal onely say before I pass off that methinks when we serve the great God upon terms of Mercy and Grace when he offers us pardon of our sins and the salvation of our souls freely we should be mighty chearful and quick and diligent when we consider our high calling to be the children of God heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ it should mightily quicken and enoble our Spirits Seemeth it a light thing saith David to be a Kings Son-in-Law seeing that I am a poor man and lightly esteemed 1 Sam. 18.23 And certainly it argues a great want of faith hope not to be very much quickned with these considerations but pass on And as I have now avoided making this a Character which I might have made one so I shal endeavour to un-make another that hath been made one by some or at least to unmake it in part They would make this another Character of a legal Spirit A salfe Character of a Legal Spirit That it is selfish and mercenary in the service of God onely works for wages and for the reward but doth nothing out of pure love nobleness and ingenuity I have heard it delivered in a great Assembly as a great observation That self-love hath no more Religion in it than an Horse That is as I understand it so far as a man acts towards God for any good that should accrue to himself so far his Religion is unacceptable Now for the word ONELY I confess I know not what to say to that how that should be a good Spirit that worships and serves God ONELY for the reward But I suppose they that speak undervaluingly of this Principle do mean or at least should mean by the tendency of their Discourses that it is a legal Principle to serve God in hope of the reward or for the reward and that so far as we serve God from this Principle we are legal or at least we miscarry in so doing And indeed to shew that I do not slander a party I have heard several Discourses wherein this hath been hotly argued that it is not a right or at least not a Gospel-Principle to serve God for fear of Hed which is to me all one as to serve him in hope of a reward for to avoid Hell is a negative reward as the enjoying Heaven is a positive Now for my part I think whatever we may account of self-love when it is the onely principle yet that it is a very good principle in other honest company and withall I think that there is no Saint upon earth that doth act towards God meerly upon the principle of self-love which I shall shew by and by But I will say more yet and that is this That I think self-love or acting for the reward and to labour in hope as the Husbandman doth who not onely laboureth in hope but for his hope or for that which he expecteth else he would not have taken that labour I say to act for the reward or in hope of the reward and so likewise that we may avoid Hell needs not so far the association of other Principles to countenance and credit it as if it were not it self a right Gospel-Principle for I think to be encouraged by the reward which the Gospel promiseth on purpose that so we might be encouraged argues a true Gospel-spirit answering the Gospel-motive and so that outward motive from the Word or Promise becomes an inward Principle It were endless to quote the Scriptures that encourage us in holiness by the consideration of glory to come Be thou faithful to the death and I will give thee the Crown of Life Rev. 2.10 One more That which ye have already hold fast till I come and he that overcometh and keepeth my words unto the end to him will I give power over the Nations and he shall rule them with a rod of Iron even as I received of my Father and I will give him the Morning-Star Rev. 2 25 26 27 28 So it is likewise a Gospel-principle to serve God that we may avoid Hell We have both together to get Heaven and avoid Hell made Gospel-motives Heb. 12.28 29 Wherefore we receiving a Kingdom which cannot be moved let us have Grace whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear for our God is a consuming fire And it is the advice of our Saviour Luk. 12.5 To fear God who can cast body and soul into Hell and for that reason I say unto you my friends fear him they are our Saviours Words Luke 12 4 5. Now with whatever fair shews and pretences men may impose these Doctrines upon themselves or others that they must not serve God for fear of Hell nor hope of Heaven I look upon Satan to be the Forger of these devices for if he can get us once out of the fear of Hell and out of the hopes of Heaven hee 'l make no doubt to bring us into what temptations soever he shall intice us with And I would fain know what the other principles are when these are removed upon which we should be constrained or engaged to serve God There is indeed one more lest very considerable but these men that dislike the hope of reward and fear of punishment
lose heaven or be cast into hell methinks it is a piece of self-hatred or at least too high a breach upon that innate principle of self-love which God hath planted in the soul And certainly that instance of love in our Saviour his dying for us which yet was the highest instance in the world of regular love was not of such a kind as this for he did not dye for us to remain accursed but under-went the curse that so he might procure the blessing for his people yea and for himself Hebr. 12.2 Who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross and despised the shame But in the third place not to undertake to censure Saint Paul especially in such an action where if there was an error it was onely in excess of love to men's souls and high nobleness and generosity I may safely adde this that I prosess I cannot see how his action or that of Moses are imitable by us for I know not by what rule we are obliged or so much as permitted to do any such action though some would perswade us that we are obliged to be content to be damned that God may be glorified thus far I shall go with them That it is every ones duty to be so humble as to think that if God cast us into hell he doth us no wrong But I cannot go so far in compliaure with their fantasticall expressions of love and submission to God and designs for his glory as to say that if God may be glorified in my destruction I am content c. Alas What good can my destruction do to God Or what glory can God have in destroying me if I walk sincerely with him and therefore these are but foolish suppositions and idle offers which perhaps some good people may make much-like those in another case of enjoying communion with God they will say If God were in Hell his Presence would make Hell to be Heaven and they had rather be in Hell with God than in Heaven without him People had better shew their love to God and their humility in those actions and duties which he calls them unto then in such suppositions and fantastical expressions and imaginations as these That is the third observation I see not how this action of Moses or St. Paul are imitable by us 4. Neither were they in constant practice by themselves or at least they were not the onely principles which they acted by for Moses I have proved already that he had respect to the recompence of reward and that encouraged him in doing and suffering for God And as for St. Paul we find him pressing towards the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus and exhorting others so to do Phil. 3.14 15. And though I doubt not but St. Paul did preach the Gospel willingly yet he tells us that he did not preach meerly as a free-will-offering to God but there was a necessity upon him he MUST do it Though I preach the Gospel saith he yet I have nothing to glory of as if I had done a thing that I was not bound to do for necessity is Iaid upon me a dispensation is committed to me yea wo is unto me if I preach not the Gospel 1 Cor. 9.11 And so we find in the same chap. ver 24. this advice So run that ye may obtain which argues that the obtaining the prize not onely may be but ought to be in our eyes and ver 27. he tells us of himself that he kept under his body and brought it into subjection lest himself should be a cast-away So that you see besides these high Principles of nobleness ingenuity gratitude which are all good and excellent yet there are other principles that are good and commendable yea Evangelical * When I say they are Evangelical Principles I mean they are either so properly or by way of reduction to confonary with â—vangelical Principles properly so called they are at least allowed if not brought to light onely by the Gospel such as these that it is our duty and that else there is a wo pronounced against us that we may obtain the prize that we may not be cast-aways I shall just give a brief account of the order of principles in a Christians acting for God as I apprehend them to lie and then shew why this of mercenariness cannot be made a Character of a Legal Spirie and then come to give some more true Scripture-Characters The order of principles in every Saints heart in his acting for God The 3. first Now I suppose that the order of Principles in every Saints heart is this 1. He considers himself a Creature and so bound to obey his Creator and since God hath alwayes proposed some reward to the keeping and threatning to the breach of his Law therefore these three principles may go hand in hand together and these are the first Principles that any is to begin with in serving God Now I think there is no exceeding in any one of these Principles a man cannot be too sensible of his obligation as a Creature to serve his Creator a man cannot be too sensible of the greatness of the reward nor of the danger of Hell yet I think every Christian hath somewhat more to move him in his service to God then barely these three Principles as for instance some such as I have named love to God gratitude yea many times nobleness of heart We love God saith the Apostle speaking in the name of all the Saints because he loved us first c. and these further Principles seem to follow in this order from the first that when I am thoroughly convinced that it is my duty to live to God when I consider what danger I avoid in it what good I obtain by it I am engaged to love that God Then Love who takes such care of his Creatures that he would not have them perish nay that he would not have them do their duty for nought here is now another Principle a Principle of Love beyond the three first Principles Again I consider the greatness of the reward the richness of the grace in providing it by the gift of Christ the Fathers giving him and his giving himself the sending the Spirit into our hearts to perswade us and win upon us to accept of this grace all the care that the Lord takes about us and hereby I am yet more and more engaged to love and gratitude Aster that nobleness One may easily be here set all in a flame of love not counting his life dear for such a God for such a Saviour if there be the least spark of Nobleness in one's natural spirit it will enflame the whole soul to do some excellent service for God not as the Legallist doth supposing that hereby he shall oblige God and that perhaps onely in some fantastical service as rich sacrifices or multitudes of superstitious observations but the
but the Jews yet who greater Legallists then they They at Lystra that would have worshipped Paul and Barnabus for gods to day are by to morrow perswaded by some Jews that came down thither from Antioch and Iconium to stone them Acts 14.11.19 They were the Jews who were so zealous for the Law that cryed out against Paul Away with such a fellow from the earth it is not fit that he should live Acts 22.22 Might not he justly therefore as he doth not by way of revenge but of right appellation call them Dogs Phil. 3.2 Beware of dogs beware of evil workers beware of the concision those that yet have their great confidences in the flesh ver 3.4 And as it was then in Abraham's time and in the Apostles days so it is now they that are for Ceremonies and Superstitions or meerly for an external way of serving God cannot endure the true spiritual Worshippers I shall now in a word endeavour to shew how this spirit of persecution proceeds from their Legality not that the Law teacheth them any such thing directly but that the corruption of their spirits incited occasionally from the Law puts them upon it Now I suppose it comes to pass thus that seeing they are in such a way of serving God as brings them in no true peace but puts the most of them into great horrors fears and troubles of spirit as is manifested in the former particular and indeed into a secret hatred of God they cannot vent their hatred against God directly that would be too gross and therefore they find out some pretence or other of venting it against his truest and most faithful servants They 'l accuse them of being too strict that they are the troublers of their Israel as Elijah was accused by Ahab 1 King 18.17 though indeed Elijah there sets the Saddle upon the right Horse as the proverb is when he tells Ahab ver 10. I have not troubled Israel but thou and thy fathers House in that ye have forfaken the Commandments of the Lord and thou hast followed Baalim So was his successor Elisha served by the King of Israel in his time 2 King 6. where is a most pertinent story to this purpose which I havâ— somewhat touched at above There was indeed a sore Famine in Samaria perhaps upon the prayer of Elisha as before there was upon the prayer of Elijah as appears from 1 King 18.1 compared with James 5.17 18. or at least the King of Israel suspected that he was the cause of it and upon this bears him a grudge but yet Elisha promising or giving some hopes at least that there should be a plenty in some very short time as Commentators say the King thinks fit to wait a while which he in the 33. ver calls waiting on the Lord and he waits with some signs of humiliation for it is said ver 30 that at the story of the womans eating her child he rent his cloaths and the people looked and behold he had sackcloath within upon his flesh And he hath some Religious words for those that came to make their complaint to him ver 26.27 Then cryed a woman unto him saying Help my Lord O King And he said If the Lord do not help thee whence shall I help thee Hitherto all things look pretty well but alas this was all but an external religiousness an external humiliation like that of wicked Ahab Seest thou Ahab humbleth himself And therefore this King 's forced patience hath an end and he breaks out into the highest impatience against God and where hath it its chiefest vent Why in persecuting the Prophet Elisha God do so to me saith he and more also if the Head of Elisha the son of Shaphat shall stand on him this day and he senta man from before him to be the Executioner whom Elisha calls the son of a murtherer ver 31 32. Now alas what an absurd and impertinent revenge was this For suppose Elisha had prayed for this punishment of Famine upon the wicked Samaritans what reason had this foolish falsly-religious Wretch to think that there was any sault in Elisha Could he bind up the clouds from raining Or would the Lord have answered a Prayer which had been guilty of cruelty and inhumanity It was God who had sent the Famine not Elisha yea this wicked Prince acknowledged so much This evil is of the Lord saith he ver 33. but here is the my sterie of this iniquity he could not revenge himself upon Heaven and therefore he lets out his rage upon the best man that was upon earth All legal Worshippers have at the bottom of their heart a deep hatred against God and his people In the last place there is in the heart of every Legallist a spirit of envy and emulation They are all sensible more or less at one time or another that they are not acceptable to God and that these Puritans these holy men are and therefore they cannot endure them they envy them for their greatest excellencies and for that they are the favourites of heaven and they cannot endure that seeing they take so much pains as they do in their wrong way as indeed many of them are at great cost and pains in their way they cannot endure that any should be preferred before them Legallists and Spiritual Worshippers are as I may say Rivals for the favour of God Now the spiritual Worshippers take the right way the Legallists take the wrong way to obtain it therefore the first â—â—e received the latter are rejected and cast out What saith the Scriptures Cast out the bond-woman and her son Now there can be no greater â—ud than that which is between Rivals This was the very case bet wixt Cain and Abel which I have several times explained And Cain as I have said had no other quarrel against Abel but for that God accepted of his offering But now whereas a legal spirit is thus wrathful revengeful envious and murtherous the Spirit of the Gospel and of all Saints so far as they are baptized into a Gospel-spirit is a micable peaceable meek gentle and easie to be entreated James 3.17 Hatred variance emulations wrath strife seditions envyings murthers are all fruits of the flesh and of those that are BORN AFTER THE FLESH but the fruit of the spirit is love joy peace LONG-SUFFERING GENTLENESS GOODNESS What excellent virtues are these for humane Society The Legallist he cryes It is not fit to suffer such Wretches to live away with such an Heretick from the earth Now for the Gospel-spirited man he could wish indeed St. Pauls wish in Acts 26.29 I would to God saith he that not onely thou but all that hear me this day were not onely almost but altogether such as I am except these Bonds he doth not wish them his Bonds that was his GOODNESS that last Gospel-virtue mentioned but he wisheth that all his persecutors were of his perswasion so doth every good man else he could not
to explain the great term 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he tells us That 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies any virtue or goodness in a man whatsoever and that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is nothing else but to be approved as a good man or A doer of what is righteous and good and that BECAUSE he doth that which is good and righteous Having made this great observation of which I shall make more use anon I shall proceed with my Character That an affected ignorance of Christ is an infallible Character of a Legal Spirit I have given a Scripture for it viz. Phil. 3.7.8 to the 15. upon which I have so long insisted I shall give now the reason of it which is this For that all pardon of sins which is the greatest thing in Gospel-justification was ever by virtue of the death of Christ All the symbolical and vailed-Gospel of the old Testament pointed though darkly unto Christ The rock in the Wilderness was Christ the Serpent was Christ the Manna was Christ the Scape-Goat was Christ the Paschal Lamb was Christ and in the fulness of time Grace and the Truth of these types came by Jesus Christ Therefore those that are affectedly ignorant of Christ are affectedly ignorant of all that looked like Gospel and so of Gospel-Grace it self nothing can be a plainer argument of Legality then this And indeed we may almost adventure to say That most men so far as they are ignorant of Christ in these days of the Gospel they are affectedly ignorant I deferred this Character till the last because I would first put all those Characters together in which the faith of all the Old-Testament-believers and ours did agree All the Old-Testament Saints were more for spiritual heart-worship than for the externals of Religion they were all in their degree humble and patient they were all in their degree quick lively and vigorous they had all a spirit of adoption in their measure they were all of a sweet meek and kind heart and spirit not of a persecuting principle but I cannot say they all knew Christ in his death resurrection ascension and intercession nay I should lye if I should say it these things are peculiar to faith under the dayes of the Gospel St. Peter and the other Apostles were all ignorant of these things Luke 18. from verse 31. to 35. Now I shall shew briefly the peculiar additionals of a Gospel-faith or rather a New-Testament Faith without which ours cannot be Evangelical enough and so not justifying and saving And without performing this part of my Work I should be guilty of a great absurdity for taking up so many pages in describing the Faith of the Old-Testament Saints or of justifying-faith which was common to us and them and in the mean time to pass by that which is proper to our selves and as necessary as any thing which hath been spoken to I affirm therefore that we are to know and believe in Christ as the PROCURING CAUSE of all our mercies and the DISPENSER of all good things to us These are the two great things which we are to know and believe concerning Christ to which we must add the meditation imitation of our Saviour as a pattern in his Life Death Resurrection and Ascension in all which our Faith hath a great usefulness and necessity and unless our Faith hath a great and very considerable respect unto Christ in all these three particulars we cannot justly put on the name of Christians That old Faith of Abraham and all the Saints of the Old-Testament which St. Paul disputes for and proves they were justified by it hath now a further Name and is called the Christian Faith having taken up that great Object Christ more explicitely and plainly then ever they received it I shall say somewhat but as briefly as I may unto all the three generals wherein our Faith is now necessarily to eye Jesus Christ that it may be of a right Gospel strain 1. We must believe in Christ as the great procuring cause of all our mercies 1. By his blood and offering Therefore a right New-Testament Faith eyes Christ as the procuring-cause of all our mercies and this in two respects viz. by his offering up himself a sacrifice and by his intercessions 1. By his dying for us and offering up himself he hath bought us Ye are bought with a price 1 Cor. 6 20. Thou hast redeemed us unto God by thy blood Rev. 5.9 His blood was the price of our redemption by shedding of this and offering it up to God he became a propitiation for our sins and we our selves are the purchase of this Price Acts 20.28 The Church of God which he hath purchased with his own blood We are purchased and redeemed from the world Gal. 1.4 From our vain Conversation 1 Pet. 1.18 Yea Heaven it self is purchased by his blood for us for I doubt not but that is it which is called the purchased possession Eph. 1.14 Now see if we have not reason nay if there be not absolute necessity if we would be right Christians to know Christ and believe in him as the procuring-cause of all our Mercies and that by his Death and Blood and offering himself He hath by one offering perfected for ever them that are sanctified Heb. 10.14 Now our Faith as it eyes thus the death of Christ is called faith in his blood and Justification follows upon this Faith onely Rom. 3.24 25. Being justified freely by his Grace THROUGH THE REDEMPTION THAT IS IN CHRIST whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation THROUGH FAITH IN HIS BLOOD to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past through the forbearance of God Rom. 5.8 9. But God commendeth his love towards us in that while we were yet sinners Christ dyed for us much more then BEING NOW JUSTIFIED BY HIS BLOOD we shall be saved from wrath to come I shall mention no more Scriptures to prove that Christ is the procuring-cause of all our mercies by his death and blood only I shall describe what this faith in his blood is and I shall express it thus It is a judging the death and offering of Christ either upon the Cross or in the holy of holies into which he entered by his own blood Heb. 9.12 to be the great propitiation of God who without this offering had decreed no◠to pardon sins by which he became propitious and appeased and for it receives all true penitents into his favour that is for the judgement or assent of faith to the dogmatical truth in this matter then for its affiance faith in the blood of Christ it is a not doubting but whilst I have the Gospel-condition of Justification what ever it be this blood will procure my pardon or thus in the way of holiness to rest upon God for pardon for the sake of Christ's blood-shedding and offering it to God Now this faith in the blood of Christ I look upon as an
that even in the dayes of the Gospel other acts of faith justifie besides that by which we have immediate respect to the blood of Christ I shall prove this second Assertion by Argument and Scripture 1. By Argument Certainly in the times of the Old Testament though I verily believe that saith in the death and blood of Christ was not necessary to Justification yet they had something in their faith that did answer our faith in the blood of Christ as perhaps a respect to the mercies of God and Gods readiness to be appeased which readiness in God was manifested by the Sacrifices which he had appointed Now I will argue by analogie If the Jewes had some such like object for their faith as the blood of Christ is to us and yet were not justified only by their fixing upon that object but for other acts of faith as is evident in the instances given then nothing hinders but we may be justified by other acts of our faith as well as that in the blood of Christ I will give another argument to prove my Assertion somewhat like this We are commanded in the Gospel John 5.23 That all men should honour the Son as they honour the Father and wherein did Abraham glorifie God so much as by his strong faith Rom. 4.20 If therefore our duty be to honour Christ by believing as ever any of the ancient Saints honoured God the Father why will not the same faith in the power of Christ justifie as did when it was placed in the power of God which yet I have proved that it did justifie Now for Scriptures c. I shall give several instances of faith in the power of Christ or at least in some attribute and excellency of Christ besides his blood which justified Luke 5.18 19 20. There was a great faith of the paralytick man and his friends that if he could but come to Christ he should be healed and therefore they opened the roof of the house and let him down through the tiling in his Couch and when Jesus saw cheir faith that is of the sick man and those that brought him he said unto him Man thy sins are forgiven thee Here is forgiveness of sins which is Justification upon a faith only to be healed whether it were in the goodness or power of Christ it was not faith in his blood for this man was as ignorant of that mystery sure as the Disciples of Christ were who yet understood little or nothing of it Luke 18.33 34. I shall give but two instances more of this and they are expresly of faith in the power of Christ as doubtless the former instance had much of this faith in it it is in Math. 9.28 29 30. There are two blinde men healed and restored to their sight and that purely upon their faith which great mercy coming in upon their faith was certainly a great token of divine approbation though indeed it be not then said that their sins were forgiven them Now what is the proper object of their faith at this time It is the power of Christ to help them Jesus saith unto them Believe yee that I am able to do this They said unto him Yea Lord then touched he their eyes saying According to your faith so be it unto you and their eyes were opened The last instance is of the Centurion's faith which I must needs say I think as pertinent an instance as either of the two former for his faith is highly approved of Christ I have not found so great faith no not in Israel as in this stranger to Israel and upon it speaks of him and others that are none of the children of the Kingdome that is not natural Jewes that yet shall go to heaven before these that are therefore I doubt not but this was a justifying faith in the Centurion Now let us see the compass of this Faith or wherein it chiefly manifested it self Why it was onely in this that Christ was able to cure his servant of the Palsie nay he thought that diseases were as much under the power of Christ to cure as the Centurions servants were under him to command he could make Diseases come and go as his servants would at his command Mat. 8 from the 5. to the 14. Having given instances of Faith in Christ which justifies besides Faith in his blood I shall give one general proof from a most remarkable Scripture out of the New-Testament for faith as justifying which onely carries in it a dependance upon God and Christ in straits and persecutions and distresses And indeed I must confess the former instances are not of so full proof to my particular though they are of good use because til Christ's death faith in his blood was not so necessary if at all necessary to Justification as afterwards but this place which I shall now give wil be beyond all exception it is Heb. 10.36 37 38. For ye have need of patience for yet a little while and he that shall come will come and will not tarry Now the just shall live by faith and if any man draw back my soul shall have no pleasure in him The Hebrews here were under great persecutions for the profession of the Gospel and they were somewhat inclined to Apostacy which here the Author of this Epistle endeavours to prevent by promises and threatnings 't is but a little while and he that shall come will come and will not tarry 't is not long saith he ere deliverance wil come one way or other either by the coming of Christ to judgement or some temporal deliverance In Habbakkuk it is The Vision is yet for an appointed time though it tarry wait for it And in the mean time saith the Author of this Epistle while the Vision tarries whilst he that is coming tarries wait his coming and endeavour to support your selves by faith for the just shall live by faith that is Faith wil keep him alive in straits The life that I live in the stesh saith Paul I live by the faith of the Son of God And saith Habakkuk Although the Fig-Tree should not blossome neither shall fruit be in the Vine c. when he describes a Famine yet I will rejoice in the Lord I will joy in the God of my salvation Hab. 3.17 18. This could be done onely by such a Faith as the Hebrews are provoked to live by This faith you see therefore by which the just live may be as wel a dependance upon the goodness and providence and power of God to support us in or deliver us out of straits and difficulties as resting upon the blood of Christ and that this living by Faith upon the Power of God and goodness of God here spoken of is an act of justifying-Faith nothing is plainer for that this is the great sentence the Apostle quotes to prove Justification by Faith out of the Old-Testament Rom 1.17 Gal. 3.11 when yet the occasion upon which it is delivered by Habbakkuk ch
spiritual Worship of God by pulling down all the Jewish Ceremonies making Jew and Gentile one and revealing all the mysteries that were concealed in Moses his dispensation nay his very Sacrifice is one of the greatest Mysteries of all by which we are informed of God's performing his threatnings that the threatnings of heaven are not as claps of thunder without a thunder-bolt in them we see God's hatred of sin punishing it so severely in his own Son we see God's love to the world that he would give his Son for the life of it though he gave him up to the death we have in his life a pattern of perfect holiness which is more than all precepts alone and we see in our Saviour an instance of the Resurrection heavenly glory all these things have been of mighty instruction to the Saints of all ages since the death of Christ If this phrase the end of the world should be understood of the end of the Iewish state this will not at all prejudice my ieference from it that Christs death had respect unto the ages before his coming but rather strengthen it will be to all Saints unto the end of the world and therefore I say these other great ends of his coming being considered there is no undecency at all in his coming so early in the end of the world and offering a Sacrifice that should serve for many ages that were then to come It was at the end of the world that he came and therefore might very well serve for those fewer succeeding ages though it had the first respect unto the ages going before In the sixth and last place I shall bring plain Scripture to prove that Christ dyed for the Saints of the ages that were past before his death There are two Scriptures that speak to this purpose the first that I shall name is in that 9th of the Hebrews the chapter out of which I have been arguing ver 15. And for this cause he speaking of Christ is the Mediatour of the New Testament that by means of death for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the First Testament they which are called c. Here it is said that Christ by the means of his death redeemed or expiated the transgressions that were under the First Testament therefore he dyed for the fins of those that lived under the Old Testament But I shall deal so faithfully with my Reader as to acquaint him with another interpretation which is not contemptible that others give of these words and that is this That our Saviour Christ the Mediator of the New Testament or Covenant by his most excellent Offering redeemed and expiated those sins which could not be expiated by any Sacrifices that were appointed under the First Covenant according to that in Acts 13.39 By him speaking of Christ all that believe are justified from all things from which they could not be justified by the Law of Moses There being in Moses no Sacrifices for adulteries thefts murthers c. whereas in the Christian Religion there is pardon for all sorts of sinners by means of the death of Christ if they have but the Gospel-conditions of pardon So that this interpretation makes the place to speak of the kindes of sins and not of the individual or particular sins which were committed under the first Covenant that Christ by the means of his death hath made redemption of those kinde of fins which there was no redemption for under the first Covenant But I have something to ask of those that make this interpretation yet taking it for passable and it is this I would fain know if any of those sins were pardoned under the Old Testament which here are said to be redeemed by Christ for his followers if they say they were not then all that committed any such kinde of sins were damned for ever which was untrue witness David and Manasseh if they were pardoned as they were then either they were expiated by some Sacrifice or they were not if those that own this interpretation say they were not expiated by some Sacrifice and yet pardoned I oppose not to mention that great argument again That they could not be pardoned without expiation in any consistency with the veracity of God in his threatning this seems a strange rarity in the dealings of God with us that under the New Testament no sin is pardoned but what is expiated by the death of Christ and yet under the Old Testament which was certainly a dispensation more severe than ours there the greatest sins should be pardoned without the intervention of any Sacrifice nay what a strange thing was it in their very dispensation that legal uncleannesses such as Leprosie and Issues c. must be purged by sacrifice See Lev. 14 15. chapters yet the greatest sins of all should be pardoned without a sacrifice if therefore those great sins of Murther Adultery Witchcraft Idolatry c. were pardoned by expiation it must be by this death of Christ to ensue in the end of the world for there was no sacrifice so much as appointed for these sins those that were appointed could never reach to the purging and cleansing of the conscience they only purged the flesh from a fleshly uncleanness Heb 9.13 the blood of Christ alone hitherto hath had a virtue in it to cleanse the conscience therefore I conclude that the blood of Christ made expiation even for those individual sins for which there was no expiatory sacrifice appointed under the Old Testament But to let pass that Scripture what will be said to that in Rom. 3.25 26. where we have these words Whom speaking of Christ God hath set forth or fore-ordained as it is in the margin to be a propitiation through faith in his blood to declare his righteousness for the REMISSION OF SINS THAT ARE PAST through the forbearance of God to declare I say AT THIS TIME his righteousness that he might be just and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus Now I suppose there may be this sense contained in these words That God in the dayes of the Gospel hath set forth clearly what that is by which he was alwayes propitiated and atoned for sins even those sins that were fore-past and fore-committed in the dayes of his forbearance and long-suffering that is the darker times of the world which times we have otherwise expressed in Acts 17.30 to be the dayes of ignorance which God winked at they were the dayes of God's forbearance it was and is the blood of Christ by which God alone alwaies was and still is propitiated for sins only then it was not so well known but now God hath declared 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Acts it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that the forepast sins the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as well as these that are committed under the Gospel were all redeemed and expiated by the blood of Christ As for any other sense that is given of