Selected quad for the lemma: heaven_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
heaven_n earth_n name_n power_n 7,326 5 4.8532 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A69685 The Case of the Earl of Argyle, or, An Exact and full account of his trial, escape, and sentence wherein are insert the act of Parliament injoining the test, the confession of faith, the old act of the king's oath to be given at his coronation : with several other old acts, made for establishing the Protestant religion : as also several explications made of the test by the conformed clergy : with the secret councils explanation thereof : together with several papers of objections against the test, all framed and emitted by conformists : with the Bishop of Edinburgh's Vindication of the test, in answer thereunto : as likewise a relation of several matters of fact for better clearing of the said case : whereunto is added an appendix in answer to a late pamphlet called A vindication of His Majestie's government and judicatories in Scotland, especially with relation to the Earl of Argyle's process, in so far as concerns the Earl's trial. Stewart, James, Sir, 1635-1713.; Mackenzie, George, Sir, 1636-1691. Vindication of His Majesties government, and judicatories in Scotland. 1683 (1683) Wing C1066; ESTC R15874 208,604 158

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

eternal and immutable decree of God from quhilk all our salvation springs and depends VIII Of Election FOR that same eternal God and Father who of meer grace elected us in Christ Jesus his son before the foundation of the World was laid appointed him to be our head our brother our pastor and great Bishop of our souls But because that the enmity betwixt the justice of God and our sins was sik that no flesh by it self could or might have attained unto God it behoved that the Son of God should descend unto us and take to himself a bodie of our bodie flesh of our flesh and bone of our bones and so become the Mediator betwixt God and man giving power to so many as believe in him to be the sons of God as himself does witness I passe up to my Father and to your Father to my God and to your God Be quhilk maist haly fraternity whatsoever we have tynt in Adam is restored unto us again And for this cause we are not afraid to call God our Father not sameikle because he has created us quhilk we have common with the reprobate as for that that he has given to us his only Son to be our brother and given unto us grace to acknowledge and imbrace him for our only Mediator as before is said it behoved farther the Messias and Redeemer to be very God and very man because he was to underly the punishment due for our transgressions and to prefent himself in the presence of his Fathers Iudgement as in our person to suffer for our transgression and inobedience by death to overcome him that was author of death But because the onely God-head could not fuffer death neither yet could the onely man-head overcome the samine he joyned both together in one person that the imbecillity of the ane should suffer and be subject to death quilk we had deserved And the infinite and invincible power of the other to wit of the goodhead should triumph and purchase to us life liberty and perpetual victory And so we confess and maist undoubtedly believe IX Of Christs Death Passion and Burial THAT our Lord Iesus offered himself a voluntary Sacrifice unto his Father for us that he suffered contradiction of sinners that he was wounded and plagued for our transgressions that he being the clean innocent Lamb of God was damned in the presence of ane earthly Iudg that we should be absolved before the tribunal seat of our God that he suffered not only the cruel death of the Cross quhilk was accursed by the sentence of God but also that he suffered for a season the wrath of his Father quhilk sinners had deserved But yet we avow that he remained the only well-beloved and blessed Son of his Father even in the midst of his anguish and torment quhilk he suffered in body and soul to make the full satisfaction for the sins of his people After the quhilk we confess and avow that there remains no other Sacrifice for sin quhilk if any affirm we nothing doubt to avow that they are blasphemous against Christs death and the everlasting purgation and satisfaction purchased to us by the same X. Of his Resurrection WE undoubtedly believe that in samiekle as it was impossible that the dolours of death should retain in bondage the Author of life that our LORD JESUS crucified dead and buried who descended into hell did rise again for our justification and destroying him who was the Author of death brought life again to us that were subject to death and to the bondage of the same We know that his Resurrection was confirmed by the testimony of his very enemies by the Resurrection of the dead whose Sepulchres did open and they did rise and appeared to many within the City Jerusalem It was also confirmed by the testimony of his Angels and by the senses and judgments of his Apostles and of others who had conversation and did eat and drink with him after his Resurrection XI Of his Ascension WE nothing doubt but the self-same body quhilk was born of the Virgin was crucifyed dead and buried and quhilk did rise again did ascend into the heavens for the accomplishment of all things where in our names and for our comfort he has received all power in heaven and earth where he sits at the right hand of the Father inaugurate ‑ in his Kingdom Advocate and onely Mediator for us Quhilk Glory Honour and Prerogative he alone among the brethren sall possess till that all his Enemies be made his fotostool as that we undoubtedly believe they sall be in the finall judgement To the execution whereof we certainly beleive that the same our Lord Iesus sall as visibly return as that he was seen to ascend And then we firmly believe that the time of refreshing and restitution of all things sall come in samiekle that they that fra the beginning have suffered violence injury and wrong for righteousness sake sall inherit that blessed immortality promised fra the beginning But contrariwise the stubborn inobedient cruell oppressours filthy persons idolaters and all such sorts of unfaithfull sall be cast into the dungeon of utter darkness where the worm sall not die neither yet their fire sall be extinguished The remembrance of quhilk day and of the judgement to be executed in the same is not onely to us a bridle whereby our carnal lusts are refrained but also such inesteemabe comfort that neither may the threatning of Worldly Princes neither yet the fear of temporal death and present danger move us to renounce and forsake that blessed society which we the members have with our Head and only Mediator Christ Iesus whom we confess and avow to be the Messias promised the only head of his Kirk our just Lawgiver our only high Priest Advocate and Mediator In which Honours and Offices if Manor Angel presume to intrude themselves we utterly detest and abhor them as blasphemous to our Soveraign and Supreme Governour Christ Iesus XII Of Faith in the Holy Ghost THis our Faith and the assurance of the same proceeds not from flesh and blood that is to say from no natural powers within us but is the inspiration of the Holy Ghost Whom we confess God equal with the Father and with the Son who sanctifies us and brings us in all verity by his own operation without whom we should remain for ever enemies to God and ignorant of his Son Christ Jesus For of nature we are so dead so blind and so perverse that neither can we feel when we are pricked see the light when it shines nor assent to the will of God when it is revealed unless the Spirit of the Lord Jesus quicken that which is dead remove the darkness from our minds and bow our stubborn hearts to the obedience of his blessed will And so as we confess that God the Father created us when we were not As his Son our Lord Iesus redeemed us when we were enemies to
to own it Cessante enim materia juramenti cessat ejusdem obligatio radice obligationis sublata tollitur ●●â pullulans inde obligatio according to all Casuists Juramentum sequitur naturam conditionem actus cui adjungitur id est materiae circa quam versatur sicut accessorium sequitur naturam sui principalis accessorium extinguitur cum principale cadit D. Sandersone These who believe Episcopacy to be of Divine Right have no cause to fear that ever the King will alter this specifick form of Church-Government neither inclination nor interest moving him to it The Aphorism so usual with His Majesties Royal Grandfather No Bishop no King cannot but make deep impression on His Majesty and must be considered not only as a sentence full of present truth when it was uttered but a sad prophecy of the Tragical events which after ensued And as the greatest and most politick Underminers of the Monarchy did of late so their successors continue still to make their oblique and first assaults upon it by raising their batteries against the setled Episcopacy 3 If the words of that assertory Act be sedately weighed they will not be found to bear the weight of this Objection for the odds are vast betwixt them a power to order and dispose the external Government and Policy of the Church together with the ordering of the administration of the external Government of the Church which are the words of that Act and the power of altering and changing the specifick and essential Government of the Church the former relating to the Ecclesiastical ordering of Ecclesiastical Persons Matters and Meetings as the Act it self expresly bears The King may and ought to have the ordering and disposing and administration of the external Government of the Church without claiming a power to alter or change the very Species Body and essence of it Nor may we in charity presume that our Gracious King challenges any such power to himself by vertue of that Act assertory nor doth it hinder any to believe Episcopal Government to be institute of God that in the exercise and external administration thereof it is subject to the Orders and Authority of the Prince for the same power may be said to be from Heaven and to be of men under different notions and respects to be from Heaven and of God in respect of the substance of the thing in general and to be of men in respect of the determination of sundry particulars requisite to the lawful and laudable exercise thereof Tho the Ministerial Power be of God yet are the Ministers in executing the Acts proper to their Ministerial Functions regulated and ordered by Ecclesiastical Laws Canons of the Church or Acts of General Assemblies Nor doth the derivation of any power from God necessarily infer the Non-subjection of the persons in whom that power is vested to any others as to the managing and exercise thereof For the power which Fathers have over their Children Husbands over their Wives Masters over their Servants is from Heaven of God and not of Men yet are Parents Husbands Masters in the exercise of their several respective powers subject to the powers Jurisdictions and Laws of the lawful Soveraigns It will prove a very difficult task for any man to find out a clear and satisfying reason of difference in this present case betwixt the Ecclesiastical power Oeconomical why the one because it claimeth to be of Divine Right should be therefore exempted from the Regulation of it in its exercise by humane Laws and not the other which flows from Heaven and is equally of Divine Right with the former 5. In fine All such who have sworn the Oath of Allegiance and Supremacy since the assertory Act was made Anno 1669 can have no pretence to scruple the taking of this Test upon account of any thing contained in the Act of Supremacy already sworn by them in as much as they must be understood to have taken that Oath in the sense of the Lawgivers who framed that Act. Before we come to the Third Classis of Objections it will be necessary to say something for satisfaction of the Doubts of some who apprehend contradictions betwixt some expressions in the Consession of Faith and others in the same Consession and betwixt some assertions therein and others in the Test So that they think by taking this Oath they shall he ensnared to swear to contradictory Propositions Two are instanced that in the Article concerning the Immortality of Souls it is said That the Elect departed this life are delivered from all torment And yet in the same Article it is asserted That neither the Elect nor Reprobate are in such sleep after death that they feel no torment To this seeming contradiction it is answered 1. That this flows from the mistake and error of the Printer alone and not from any fault in the Confession For in that History of the Reformation of the Kirk of Scotland of the foresaid Edition the later part of the Article runs thus So that neither the one nor the other are in such sleep that they feel nothing Which clearly takes off all shadow of Contradiction as well as the error of those against whom that Article seemsto be levelled But finally the Latin Paraphrase of it in the Harmony of Confessions takes off all difficultly For there the words run thus Adeo ut neque hi neque illi ita dormiant ut non sentiant in qua conditione versentur Another seeming contradiction is betwixt the Confession and the Test viz. Art 25. it is said That they who resist the supreme Powers doing that which belongs to their charge resist Gods Ordinance and they who deny to them their aid counsel comfort c while the Prince● and Rulers vigilantly travel in the execution of their Office these deny their help and support to God which words seem to disallow the resisting of the supreme Magistrate only conditionally and in a limited and restricted sense Again the Oath and Test assert That it is unlawful upon any pretence whatsoever to take up arms against the King or these commissionate by him which doth declare the resisting of the Soveraign power to be simply and absolutely unlawful without any restriction or limitation Ans. Here is no Contradiction if the Logical Rules be observed For to resist the Supreme Powers doing that which pertains to their charge is to resist Gods Ordinance and not to resist the Supreme Powers doing that which pertains to their charge is to resist Gods Ordinance were indeed a contradiction but to resist the Supreme Powers doing that which appertains to their charge is to resist Gods Ordinance and to resist the Supreme Powers upon whatsoever pretence is to resist Gods Ordinance imports no manner of contradiction And so of the other proposition To deny aid counsel c. while Princes and Rulers vigilantly travel c. in the execution of their Office and not to deny aid counsel c. while