c Amb. n. 37. de Virgin Tull. Epist 69. Aug. Cont. Jul. l. 3. c. 13. Libri non erub sâ—unt your black Comment cannot blush Yet St. Austin said of Julian a Pâ—lagian for asserting an heresie lesse dangerous then yours Puto ipsum libri tui atramentum erubescendo convertitur in minium CHAP. VIII Sheweth against this Commenter that mens soules dye not with their bodies I Must not omit your rare doctrine concerning the soules of dead men You tell us that they are void of all sense of time intervening between the time of our p. 228. 267. death and resurrection though Scriptures speak as if we should wholly live till Christs coming but 't is because thousands of years seem but as one minute to one that sleâ—peth or is dead so long and None are entred into heaven besides Christ c. I perceive you like not the opinion of those Anabaptists who taught the Psychopanychian or sleeping of dead mens soules neither are you arrived to the height of the Jewish Sâ—dduces or heathenish Epicures for they denyed a resurrection which you confesse yet you have chose a fair middle way and with them you believe that our soules dye with our bodies and your confessing of the resurrection is but a reserve by which you re-inforce your doctrine of the Soules mortality for when you perceived that the words of Christ against the Sadduces made also against you when he alledged Matth. 22. 32. Exod. 3. 6. those words I am the God of Abraham to prove that Abraham then lived because Abraham's soul lived for those words were spoken long after Abâ—aham was dead to avoid this you tell us that it proves onely that Abraham must one day be recalled to life so though Abraham's soul was then dead and therefore Abraham was not living yet God is the God of the living that is of the living dead Abraham because some thousands of years after Abraham may be revived you may do well to reform Church-Creeds and adde to The Resurrection of the body the resurrection of the soul which hath been alwayes omitted because the Church thought that onely the body falleth and that the body onely is câ—davâ—r and onely of that there will be a resurrection to the penitent Thief it is said This Luke 23. 43. day shalt thou bâ—wâ—th me in Pâ—â—â—d se this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is not yet come by your doctrine though sixteen hundred years are run out since St. Paul in the narration of his rapture into the third heaven confesseth he 2 Cor. 12. 2. knew not whether he were in the body or out of the body therefore in his opinion posâ—â—bly his soul might be in that heaven whilest his body was on earth and St. Stephen at his Martyâ—dome said Lord Jesus receive Acts 7. 59. my 〈◊〉 if his soul was then to dye I marvel why he would not as well say Lord Jesus receive my body but surely he thought his spirit or soul was not mortal and this is consonant with the doctrine of the best â—ilosophers who proved the soul to be separably existible because they discovered that our soul hath operations which are inoâ—ganical for the intellective faculty useth the body onely as an object but not as an instrument and our most excellently learned Physician and rare Philosopher Doctor Thomas Brown of Norwich hath taught us d Râ—lig Medici paâ—t 1. sect 35. 〈◊〉 l. de Aniâ—â— c. 44. vide 〈◊〉 l. 7. c 52. 〈◊〉 Hesâ—châ—â—m in vita Arisâ—â—ae Epimenidis â— 4â— 46. That in the dissecting of a man no Organ is found proper to the Reasonable Soule and that in the brain of man there is nothing of moment 〈◊〉 then in the Cranie of a â—east And Tertullian telleth a story of one Hermotimus whose soul used to leave hâ—s body for a time and Evagari as his word is to wandâ—r abroad whilest his body lay like a dead corps and to return again till his enemies took advantage and whilest his soul was absent they burnt his body And such another story doth Origen tell of the same Orig. cont Cels l. 3. man whom he cals Clazomenius Now whether this be true or not yet it argues that in the judgment of these profound Philosophers the soul possibly may exist out of the body I perceive that the Judgment of the Church hath but little power to sway you for you snatch at any paradox though heretical that comes in your way Eusebius tells us that this very opinion Euseb hist l. 6. c. 27. of the soules dying with the body and rising again with the body was accounted heretical by the Church and that it was in an open Council confuted by Origen though Origen himself erred on the other side and St. Austin in his catalogue of Heresies calls Aust haer 83. Aug. de Ecclesiast dogm c. 15. n. 72. Basil hom de avar n. 12. Philo. de mundi opificio p. 31. n. 2. this of yours the Arabick heresie and our humane soul is by him called Anima substantiva i. e. a substautivesoul because it can subsist alone and of such men which say their soules are mortal St. B sil saith they have Animam pâ—rcinam a swinish soul and Philo the learned Jew saith that a man is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. a creature mortal and immortal because he hath a mortal body and an immortal soul and this the Church hath taught in all ages and is so delivered Ambr. de fide l. 2. c. 3. n. 22. by St. Ambrose That the soul of man cannot dye The sleeping of dead Saints which you read of in Scripture is meant just as their rising is not of soules but of bodies Many bodies of the Saints which slept arose Matth. 27. 52. But what think you of the soul of Christ did that die with his body No Christian that ever I heard of thought so perhaps neither do you or if you do I care not the same argument which the Apostle drawes from Christs resurrection to prove our resurrection will be as firm to prove the immortality of our soules by the immortality of his soul 1 Cor. 15. 16. If the dead rise not then is not Christ risen So if man's soul be not immortal then was not Christ's soul immortal and if Christ's soul dyed not neither will our soules dye The doctrine of the Soules immortality is so demonstrable by nature that the Ancient Christians symbols or rules of faith did not expresly declare it as an article of faith Christian because even * Si in hoc erro quòd animas hominum immortales credam libeâ—â—èr erro hunc erâ—orem mihi extorqueri nolo aveo patres vestros mortuos videre Cic de Senect heathen Philosophers both confessed and proved it but yet in the later Creeds of the Church the article of Christ's descent was added for no greater cause at first that ever I could learn or discover then this as
â—â—tu i. that he was in the light of God and company of Saints and St. Austin prayed thus for his godly Aug. Confes l. 9. c. 13. Mother deceased Pro peccatis matris mea deprecor te Deus demitâ—e illi debita sua c. i. I beseech thee O God for the sins of my Mother that thou wouldst forgive her and yet immediatly he saith Credo jam feceris quod rogo i I beleeve thou hast alreadâ—y done what I now pray for Notwithstanding the Church did so pray and Epiphanius gives this reason why the names of the dead were Epiph. hae 75. mentioned in the Church-prayers Quia hoc magis fuerit utile quid commodius quod credunt praesentes quòd bi qui decesserunt vivunt non sunt nulli i. What can be more profitable to the living then to be assured that the dead persons commemorated do still live and that they are not annihilated So we see the Church had other reasons which moved them so to commemorate the dead though the deceased received no benefit thereby As 1. To commend unto the living and in their mindes to preserve the wholesom doctrine of our Souls immortality 2. Their prayers did challenge the performance of Gods promises to those deceased who had lived and died in the Lord as is declared Rev. 14. 13. Blessed are the dead that dye in the Lord saith the Spirit 3. For the coâ—solation of the living the Priest declared that the sins of such holy men which had lived and died in the faith of Christ were forgiven 4. The Church gave thanks for their departure to rest as acknowledging the mercy of God by which they were saved and not by their own merits Some Divines think that when St. Paul prayed for Onesiphorus The Lord grant unto him that he may find mercy of the Lord in that day 2 Tim. 1. 18. that Onesiphorus was at that time dead because in the end of the Epistle in the salutations there is no mention of Onesiphorus but of his familie only 2 Tim. 4. 19. And because there is no state or condition of men in this life though never so sinful which excludeth them from the benefit of being prayed for therefore some Expositors have thought that when St. John said There is a sin unto death I do not say he shall pray for it 1 Joh 5. 16. his meaning is that such an one who liveth and dieth in a soul-destroying sin such as shall in this book afterwards be discovered without repentance for such a mans prayers are unprofitable and vaine not excluding others that die in the Lord to be commemorated in the prayers of the living as Onesiphorus before mentioned and in that sense as is before said and this is St. Heromes exposition in his objurgatory Hier 10. 9. Epiad Evang. Epistle to Evangius if it be his own and so also saith the interlineal glosse with Lyra. St. Austin being hard put to it to give an account why the Church prayed for the dead and what benefit the dead had by the prayers of the living by the questions of Dulcitius and Paulinus confesseth most inge Aug. lib. de Cur promortâ— c. 1. nuously that the dead can have no benefit at all by our prayers here except by their good life they were capable of good before their death and again he saith Because the Church knoweth not unto what dead men Aug. ib. c. 17. her prayers are profitable therefore she prayeth pro omnibus regeneratis i. for all the regenerate that none may be omitted CHAP. XV. That the Fathers did not beleeve that Souls departed were insensible as if they were dead or asleep because the Saints departed do pray for the Church Militant as the Fathers thought HAving shewed before what the Church Militant did here below for the Triumphant part above it would now be considered what the Triumphant Church above doth for us that are on earth in the judgement of the Fathers The ancient Church were so far from thinking that our souls died with our bodies that they affirme and verily beleeve that the souls of holy men departed and being in rest did pray for the Church on earth for so St. Hierom tels us the Saints deceased pray for the living Hier. Epist 53. n. 17. for they that had so much charity on earth as to pray even for their enemies and persecutors much more will they now in heaven pray for the Church St. Paul is not lesse charitable after his departure then he was before and so he wished Heliodorâ—â— that if he died before Hier. Eipst 1. n. 1. Hierom to pray for him when he was in heaven so likewise he desireth a Id. Epist 27. n. 7. Principia and b Id. Epist exeg 140. n. 30 Paula to remember him when they are in heaven And St. Ambrose professeth c Amb. de fide Resur n. 30. That he expecteth the intercession of his brother Satyrus deceased for the speedier deliverance out of the miseries of this life and that he hoped the godly Emperour d Id. de Obit Theod. n. 47. Theodosius departed did yet pray to God for his surviving Children and that the dead Emperor e Id. de Obit Valent. n. 46. Gratian did pray for his brother Valentinian Of the same Judgment is St. Chrysostom f Chrys ser de uno Legisl to 6. n. 55. for he doubteth not to affirm that the Martyrs and Prophets Apostles deceased do actually pray for the living and before him St. Cyprian in his life-time contracted with Cornelius g Cyp. l. 1. Epist 1. Qui prior è vita discesserit oret pro sratribus i. That which of them should first dye must pray for the survivers and in an Epistle written to some Martyrs who were very speedily to suffer death for Christ he desireth †Cyp. ad Marty n. 98. Naz. Orat. 24. them to be mindful of him when they were in the honour of Martyrs with the Lord. Greg. Naz. tells us that Athanasius though deceased yet as he was perswaded did still help and assist the Church and that his friend St. Basil deceased and now in heaven yet Naz. Orat. 20. even there poured out prayers for the people And of his reverend old father deceased who had been a long time Bishop of Nazianzum he saith That he doubteth Id. Orat. 19. not but though he were in heaven yet the same Pastoral care which he had on earth remaineth still with him and now that he is approached nearer to God he doth more good for that flock by his prayers in heaven then he could do by his doctrine on earth This is enough to shew what the Fathers thought of the Immortality of the soules of men and the same opinion was so generally received of Christian people in those dayes that as St. Chrysostome reporteth they Chrys Ser. 4. de Laz. n. 42. would commonly boast that they should
vigilant now at all the ports of thy soul and take some antidote of thy precious Christian faith to corroborate thy heart against the danger of most deadly poyson for now the Serpents nest and Pandora's box are to be opened containing multitudes of evils and deadly blasphemies against the Divine Person of thy dear Saviour and his precious death all which I must now present to thy view and for thy more easie discovery I will draw them out in two files The first containeth such blasphemies which deny the Godhead and Divine nature of Jesus Christ The second containeth such blasphemies as deny the Incarnation of God and the Redemption of man by the Passion bloodshed and death of thy Saviour when he offered himself a full sufficient expiatory sacrifice on the altar of the Crosse and also such as deny the merit of his active obedience in fulfilling the Whole Law and performing the Covenant of God in our stead on our behalf and to our benefit and now they advance Blasphemies against the Godhead of Jesus Christ 1. That Christ was by his Resurrection consequently deiâ—ied Chap. 1 vers 2. pag. 3. it seemes the Commenter doth not believe that Christ was God before his death 2. That the Creation of the world cannot be referred to Christ Chap. 1. vers 10 p. 10. That his making of the world was but the restoring of mankind to a new state pag. 3. yet all things were made by him that were made Joh. 1. 3. 3. That Christ had an immense measure of the Holy Ghost Cap. 1. 9. p. 9. If it were immense how is it a measure and if by measure how is it immenâ—e is not this illogical blasphemy the Scripture saith of him God giveth not the Spirit by measure unto him Joh. 3. 34. 4. That Christ had a beginning Cap. 1. 12. p. 13. Yet of Christ it is said His goings forth have been from everlasting Mich. 5. 2. 5. That if the Author of this Epistle to the Hebrewes had taken Christ to be the supream God he had discouâ—sed impertinently C. 1. 10. p. 10. That it is manifest that Christ is not the Supream God C. 5. 5. p. 80. That Christ was a divine man C. 7. 22. p. 136. That Christ was opposed to God Cap. 5. 5. p. 80. That Christ carried himself as a person diverse from God and that he was so the thing it self declares C. 12. 25. p. 320. p 54. 6. That Christ doth not forgive sins of his own authority Cap. 4. 14. pag. 70. That Christ hath not power of himself to save us C. 9. 24. p. 192. Yet Christ saith The Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins Matth 9. 6. and Thou shalt call his Name Jesus for he shall save his people from their sins Mâ—â— 1. 21 7. That the Angels are equal to Christ for duration C. 1. 10. p. 10. The â—ngel are creatures Christ is their Creator and therefore before them and of longer duration à parte anâ—e but if he mean that Angels are equal to him for duration à parte â—â—st onely he hath said nothing to his own purpose for so soules of men yea and devils â—â— all endure for ever but the Son of God is from everlasting to everlasting as is shewed out of Mich. 5. 2. 8. That the Lord Christ was not the first Author of the Gospel but God was the first C. 2. 3. p. 19. If the Law had been published by God himself it had been mâ—re excellent then the Gospel c. C. 2. 2. p. 16. This blasphemy is particularly answered before Cap. 7 9. That the Saints in heaven shall noâ—â—e under Christ but besides him C. 2. 6. p. 23. What! Check by soul yet Philip. 2. 1â— God hath puâ— all things under his feet and gave him to be head over all things to the Church and this Supremacy is there said to be in heavenly places verse 20. and The four and twenty Elders fall down and worship the Lamb Rev. 4. 10. 10. That it appears that faith in Christ is not contained in all faith in God Cap. 11 6. p. 251. That he that believes in Christ doth not believe in him finally but in God by him C. 3. 12. p. 54. He would have you believe there is something greater and better then Christ to believe in Ultimatè Terminativè 11. That Christ must not be compared with that Angel who represented God C. 12. 25. p. 321. Yet Christ even in his humane nature exalted is set far above all Principalities and powers and might and dominion and every name that is named not onely in this world but in that which is to come Ephe. 1. 21. Indeed he is said to be made lower then the Angels to suffer death Heb. 2. 9. lower in the humiliation of his humane nature but of his Divine nature alone and of his humane exalted and so of his whole Person as he is Emmanuel it is said Heb. 1. 6. Let all the Angels of God worship him The total summe of all these is Onely this blasphemy That Christ is not God Blasphemies against the Incarnation of the Son of God and his Work of Redemption 1. That Christ the Son of God cannot be said to be Incarnate more then the Saints are Heb. 2. 14. pag. 31. 2. That the Supream God can no way be a Priest C. 5. 5. p. 80. True if you had added this Except he be Incarnate and assume humane nature 3. The expiatory Offering of Christ for our sins was not performed on earth but in heaven C. 7. 1. p. 116. c. 8. 4. p. 146. c. 9. 12. p. 168. That his offering did not consist in his death but by his entrance into heaven after death C. 9. 7. p. 160. his Priesthood began there C. 9. 14. p. 171. 4. That Christ was not the Author of the New Testament but is called the Testator only because he was the main witnesse C. 9 19. p. 182 183 184. 5. That when it is said Jesus made a surety of a better Testament Heb. 7. 22. it is not meant that Christ became our surety to God and took upon him the payment of our debts But was a surety of Gods promise and dyed to assert the truth of the Covenant C. 7. 22. p. 136 319 348 357. 6. That Eusebius would not have the Son of God who appeared to Abraham to be the most high God Cap. 13. 2. p. 331. 7. That the Nicene Fathers hâ—ld not that the Son is that one most high God who is the Father These are the Articles of Infidelity which are affirmed by this Commenteâ— against which consisting of two Heads as is said I will Gods assistance addresse two Books following in the former whereof The Godhead of Christ shall be declared and in the later the Incarnation of the same Jesus who is the true onely and supream God shall be manifested and thereby the Great and gracious Mystery of man's Redemption by our God so Incarnate
of the Godhead and manhood in the Person of Jesus Christ the communication of the properties of each nature the life and death of Nestorius and how Christ is said to be deified FOr the avoyding of the unpardonable sin before mentioned it will not be sufficient to believe and confess that God is in Jesus as a man in a ship or as God was in the Prophets and is now in holy men who are therefore called the Temples of the living God 2 Cor. 6. 16. or as God is every where who filleth heaven and earth Jer. 23. 24. For though God be in an holy Man yet we cannot say that God and that Man are one Person and though God be in Heaven yet he and Heaven are not one hypostasis or subsistence in one Personall union but as our soul and body united and composed are one Man and one Person so the Godhead and Manhood united in Iesus are one Person one Christ Now these two distinct natures to wit the Godhead and Manhood are in Christ so united that they will be for ever inseparable and they are so entwined one with the other that no action or passion can be said of the man Christ which may not be said of God the rule of Divines is Effâ—ctus hypostaticae unionis est Regula Theolog communicatio idiomatum i. The result or effect of the Personall union is a communication of properties which rule is laid and more plainly expressed by St Austine in these words Vnilas Personae Christi sic Aug. to 6. cont Ser. Arian n. 7. constat ex humana divina natura ut quaelibet earum vocabulum impertial alteri i. The unitie of the Person of Christ doth so consist of the Divine and humane natures that each nature imparteth its appellation mutually to the other so that what is properly belonging to the divine nature is ascribed as done also by the humane nature the same is also thus expressed by Theodoret Communia Persona evadunt quae sunt Theod. Dial. impatib n. 13. P. 398. propria naturarum i. By reason of this hypostaricall union those things which are proper to each nature severally become common to the whole person and hence it is that Christ is called the Son of Man and the Son of God eternall and yet born the on of David and yet the Lord of David of him it is said John 3. 13. He that came down from Heaven even the Son of Man which is in Heauen yet the Manhood did not come from heaven nor was the Manhood at that time in Heaven so again Christ said to the thief Luke 23. 43. To day shalt thou be with me in paradise and yet Christ was not there that day in his body nor by his soul for ought we know but onely by his Godhead which was then in Paradise when his body was on the earth and hence it is that the appellation of God is stamped on the humane and infirm actions and passions of Christ for though he was crucified through weaknesse as it is said 2 Cor. 13. 4. that is as he was man yet because his Divine Nature is for ever inseparable from the humane nature he is truely called Deus crucifixus Hier. ut sup c. 6. Naz. Orat. 51. n. 35. i. God crucified as is shewed before out of Saint Hierome and Nazian saith Si quis crucifixum non adorat anathema sit i. He that doth not worship him that was crucified let him be accursed This great mystery of the hyposiaticall union was prudently discerned by the ancient Fathers Origen saith Judaei Dâ—um crucifixâ—â—unt i. The Jewes crucied Origen hom 5. in Ps 36. Orig. in Luc. hom 38. n. 45. Chrys in synax n. 35. God and the same Father speaking of the tears which Christ shed over Jâ—rusalem calleth them Lacrymas Dei i. the tears of God So St. Chrysostome calleth Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. the crucified God The Prophet Esay prophesying of the birth of Christ Esay 9. 6. Vnto us a child is born immediately addeth his name shall be called The mighty God and the Church used the same language Fulgentius saith Maria Fulg. de grat n. 3. est genetrix Dei quia were propriâ— peperit Deum Verbum i. Mary is the Parent of God for she brought forth truly and properly God the Word St. Hierome saith Virgo Deum puerum peperit i. Mary brought Hier. Ep. 30. n. 8. forth a child that is God So Saint Ambrose speaketh i Ambr. in sym n. 20. Deus natus est ex virgine God was born of a Virgine and Athanasius saith k Atha apol 2. n. 15. n. 22. Deus incarnatus Deus passus est God was incarnate and God suffered This doctrine is so true and necessary that otherwise we could not have been redeemed the denying thereof no doubt is within the compass of the unpardonable blasphemy and the Church accounted such as taught the contrary to be in the number of the most dangerous hereticks as may appear by the story of Nestorius thus in brief This Nestorius was by birth a German and was admitted Soc. l. 7. c. 29. Theod. haer fab l. 4. n. 16. to be a Presbyter or Priest in the Church of Antioch from thence he was preferred to be Patriarch of Constantinople and there he was a sore vexer of the Arians Novatians and Macedonian hereticks and so eager therein that he incensed the Emperour against them using this proud speech O Imperator da mihi Soc. l. 7. c. 29. terram purgatam hâ—reâ—icis ego tibi eoelum vetribuam i. If the Emperour would purge his Empire of hereticks he would assure him of Heaven He was a man very cloquent and so proud thereof that he disdained to reade the ancient Writers and so being ignorant of Catholick Doctrine he fell into this Heresie of dividing or separating the two Natures of Christ and particularly teaching that the Virgin Mary ought not to be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the Parent or Mother of Evag. l. 1. c. 3â— God and because some of his sect would have her called onely ' 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the mother of a man Nestorius desiring to go in a middle way would have her called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. the Mother of Christ but at no hand the Mother of God so his error was in this that he divided and rent and severed the two natures of Christ that which his crucifiers were not permitted to do to his very garments in effect as Vincentius noteth Nestorius duos vult esse Filios Dei duos Christos Vincent Lirin c. 17. n. 53. unum Deum alterum hominem i. Nestorius would have fancied two Sons of God and two Christs whereof one should be God and the other a man and so by denying the unity of his Person he indeed made a quaternity of Persons instead of a Trinitie against the sentence of
find great friends and assistants in the other life because they had many pious friends gone before them one would say My father was a Martyr and another My Grandfather was a Bishop and a third Such and such a holy man was my dear friend on earth therefore we shall find friends in the other world Thus far St. Chrysostome Notwithstanding all this that hath been said of which this Commenter cannot be ignorant yet against all this evidence he denyes the Immortality of the Soul Like another Vrbicus Potentinus an heretick to whom Athanasius thus writeth O Potentine adversus Scripturas Athan. cont Poten n. 30. divinas vel totum mundum tu solus sentis i. Potentinus held an opinion heretical against the holy Scriptures and also against the whole world CHAP. XVI Of the departure of our soules from our bodies and the Conductors or leaders of them to the other world and of the places or mansions of dead mens soules IN the last place it will not be amisse to set down what the Scriptures and the Ancient Fathers have said concerning the departures and mansion-places of dead mens soules which will be also a strong argument against the Epicurean doctrine of this Commentary The Angels in Scripture are called ministring spirits to the heires of salvation Heb. 1. 14. their charge is to keep such in all their wayes Psal 91. 11. therefore as Angels conducted Peter out of prison Act. 12. 7. and Lot out of Sodom Gen. 19. 16. so likewise Angels are imployed no doubt in the conveying and placing and settling departed soules in such mansions as are by God appointed for them for so the Scripture declareth in the Parable of the begger which for substance is indeed but parabolical yet for the Circumstance of the conducters of his soul the persons are really set forth so as is usual in the passage of other mens soules even as the burial of the rich man is mentioned because it was the common custom of other rich men to be buried It is therefore said The begger dyed and was carried by the Angels into Abraham's bosome Luk 16. 22. And of another sort of Angels conducting soules it is said Thou fool this night shall they take â—â—y soul from thee Luk. 12. 20. So of the place or mansion of a blessed soul it is said it was carried into Abraham's bosome and This day shalâ— thou be with me in Paradise Luk. 23. 43. but of the mansion of a reprobate soul it is said that it was placed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. a place secret hidden invisible and of torment this is the summe of what we find in Scripture for the present condition of soules departed untill the last judgment And of the last Judgment it is also said The Angels shall gather his Elect from one end of heaven to the other Matth. 24. 31. In correspondence to these overtures of Scripture the Church-Writers have set down at large their expositions and opinions both for the several sorts of Conductors and also for the distinct mansion-places of the soules of Pious and of Impious Just quaest n. 31. men First Justin Martyr saith Animae hominüm ducuâ—tur ad condigna loca ab angelis ubi servantur usque ad resurrectionem i. The soules of men are conducted by Angels to convenient mansions and there are kept untill the resurrection and we read in the Constitutions of Clemens that the Church in the office of the godly deceased Clem. Const l. 8. c. 47. prayed thus Deus Collocet â—um in regionâ— piorum Angelos placidos ei constitute i. That God would place them in the region of the godly and appoint them gentle Angels and Irenâ—â—s saith Discipulorum animae Iren. l. 5. prope finem abibunt in invisibilem Loâ—um definitum eis à Deo ibi usque ad resurrectionem â—ommorabuntur i. The soules of Christians shall go into a place invisible appointed by God and there abide untill the resurrection St. Hierom Hier. Epist 25. n. 26. saith Moâ—tuos nos Angelorum turba coâ—itatur when we are dead a multitude of Angels accompanieth us And again he saith of the Martyrs soules against Vigilantius Hier. cont Vigil to 2. p. 159. Senatoriae dignitatis sunt ut noâ— inter homicidas teterrimo carcere sed liberâ honestâ—que custodid vecluduntur i. The soules of Martyrs are not committed to dark prisons as men-slayers are but like unto Senaâ—ors they are placed in a free and honourable Custody and this also is the doctrine of St. Chrysosto◠†Chrys hom in laud. Mart. to 1. Martyres in caelum ascendunâ— Angelis comitantibus i. The soules of Martyrs ascend into heaven accompanied with Angels but of the soules of the reprobate he saith Malorum animae Chrys de Laz. Ser. 2. to 5. n. 41. Atha de Virgin n. 24. Basil exhort ad bapt hom n. 14. Macar hom 22. à metuendis virâ—utibus repetuntur sunâ—que doctores viae i. The soâ—les of evil men are taken and conducted by terrible and affâ—ighting powers which also Athanasius calls Inclementes angelos i. Churlish and unkind angels and of them St. Basil saith Veniet angelus tristis animam tuam rapiet ad Tartara i. A sad dâ—smal angel will seize on thy soul and convey it to hell and the same is yet more particularly set forth by Macâ—â—ius of Egypt Cum animapeccatirea è corpore exierit accedunt Chori daemonum sinistâ—i angeli c. animam ad partes suas trahuntâ— when a guilâ—y soul deparieth troops of evil and unhappy angels drag it to their ownquarters These are the Messengers which are sent for mens soules some terrible and feared others of pleasant appearance and desired the slight apprehension of this truth and such Messengers hath occasioned men to fansie and to paint a meager raw-bon'd thing with a dart to be the summoner of mens soules to the other world which of these several â—orts of Angels is true Now whatsoever common or distinct and severall mansions there are for pious soules respectively correspondent to their qualities and demeanures on earth and so likewise for impious soules in their severall degrees as they are in bundles gathered which Lâ—ctantius Lact. de Div. Cult c. 21. n. 25. Aug. de Dulc. quaest n. 89. qu. 2. calls Communis custodia i. e. their common lodge and St. Austin Abdita receptacula i. Secret receptacles and the Scripture calleth them The spirits in prison 1 Pet. 3. 19. yet the Ancient Church did as we do reduce all those mansions to these two appellations of heaven and hell * Ath. de Incarnat n. 23. although there may be several different mansions in hell for the damned as well as we read of the blessed in heaven Joh. 14. 2. In my Fathers house are many mansions CHAP. XVII Of the blasphemies contained in the Commentary against the Godhead of Christ and the Incarnation thereof and his Redemption of man Good Reader be
ago said as much of the Aâ—ian Heresie and very jnstly For Aâ—hanasius said Ariana haeresis est praecursatrix Antcihristi i. The Arian Heresie is the forerunner of Antichrist and in another place he saith it is Anâ—eambulo Antichristi i. the usher of Antichrist And moreover he saith Ariani non Christiani sed Ariani apâ—ellari volunt i. that they desired rather to be called Arians then Christians and again he saith Ariani non sunt pro Christianis aestimandi i. that indeed Orat. 2. cont Arian n. 5. the Aâ—ians are not to be accounted Christians because they opposed Christ in his Godhead which is the onely foundation of Christianity therefore with great reason they are called Antichrists and therefore Saint Ambrose doubted not to affirm Ariani sunt Antichristi à Ambr. de fide l. 2. c. 4. n. 22. 1 John 2. 22. Iohanne designati i. That the Arians are those Antichrists which Saint Iohn pointed at 1 Iohn 2. 22. and St. Hilary writidg against Constantius the Arian Emperour in whose dayes Arianisme so dominered Christus expectâ—tur quia Antichristus obtinuit i. that Hil. cont Const lib. 1. we may now exspect Christs second coming because Antichrist is already come for nothing can be imagined to be more opposite and contrary to Christ Christian Religion then the denying of his Godhead therefore is it most fitly called Antichristianisme As Christ could not have suffered and died for us except he had been Man so his death could not have satisfied the Justice of God nor redeemed us except he had been God and therefore Athanâ—sius saith Quifilium negat quem deprecari Atha to 3. P. 695. potest ut propitiatorem inveniat i. Unto whom shall that wretched man fly for propitiation for his sins who rejecteth the Son of God who is the onely Mediatour This is that confession which the gates of Hell have alwayes laboured to conquer by the power and cruelty of persecutors for what did those tyrants chiefly aim at in all their torments Nisi ut negâ—tur Deus in Christo Optatus lib. 3. n. 84. Nega Deum incende Testamentum i. These were the words of the tormentors Deny Christ to be God burn the Testament and offer incense for if the Godhead of Christ be denied our Religion is no more helpfull to us for salvation then Heathenisme was to them But we confess and firmly believe that Jesus Christ is God the supream God the onely and most high God and that we neither acknowledge nor know any other God and he that denieth this God and this Godhead in Christ falleth into that sin of which it is said it shall never be forgiven For if the Godhead of Christ be denied it must needs be confessed that he was onely a creature and a meer man and if so then he cannot be a Redeemer of us for can any man imagine that the death of one meer man and that but a tempoâ—ary death could satisfie the just wrath of God for the sins of millions and redeem us from an everlasting torment Divines doubt not to affirm that if all the created Angels of Heaven could and for us would suffer death their sufferings would not pay our debts or redeem one soul God as he is most mercifull so is he most exactly just and will have the utmost farthing paid St. Austine saith truely Nâ—c Aug. de consens Evang. c. 14. n. 84. Dei justitia impedit misericordiam nec misericordia justitiam i. Neither doth his justice lessen his mercy nor his mercy his justice And again he saith Iusta est gratia Aug. Exp. in Epist ad Ro. n. 96. Dei gratia justitia i. The grace or mercy of God is just and his justice is gâ—acious That which maketh the blood of Christ to be of sufficient value to redeem the world and to be as St. Peter calls it The precious blood of Christ 1 Pet. 1. 19. is the excellent worth of that person whose blood it is for because Christ is God therefore his blood in Scripture is called Sanguis Dei Acts 20. 28. The blood of God the Lambe could not take away the sinnes of the world except he were the Lamb of God and Agnus-Deus God the Lamb John 1. 29. nor could a crucified man satisfie for our sins except they had crucified the Lord of Glory 1 Cor. 2. 8. nor could our Christian Faith in the death of Christ advantage us except we believe as Tertullian saith Christianorum Tort. cont Marc. lib. 2. n. 41. est Deum mortuum eredâ—re i. The Christian must believe that he that died for him was God And albeit some Heretickes and Heathens scoffed at a crucified God yet the Church never was ashamed of him St. Hier. Ep. 1. n. 1. Hierome saith In judicio gaudens dices Ecce Crucifixus Deus meus i. At the last judgement the Christian with joy shall say See now where my crucified God is Our only help and hope for redemption standeth in the Name of the Lord for although Christ in regard of his humane nature assumed be as David saith Ps 89. 19. One exalted chosen out of the people yet in regard of his Godhead God saith I have laid help upon one that is mighty and that mighty one is Christ for Christ is the mighty God of Jacob Psal 132. 2. CHAP. VII The Commenter having denied the Godhead of Christ doth also denie the work of redemption by him and so Turcizeth and acteth for Antichrist of Antichrists mysticall body OUr Commenter having first resolved to ungod Jesus Christ in the next place he denieth his great woâ—k of Redemption and tells us that Christ dâ—d not become our sureâ—y nor did take upon him the payment of our debts but was onely a surety of Gods promise and died to assert the truth of the Covenant as a witness c p. 136 and that the â—xpiaâ—oriâ— sacrifice for sin was not by him offâ—râ—d on earth P. 116 146. He talketh often of this Covenant but never tells us what it is in his answer it will be expected that he set it forth if he know what it is as is much doubted But in the mean time he hath shewed himself to be a true Porphyrian Logician for as I shewed before if Christ be nor the onely and supream God it must needs follow that he neither hath or possibly could offer a sufficient expiatory sacrifice for our sins because he that on the Cross was sacrificed by the Commenters Creed was no more then a creature for grant him the first blasphemy that Christ is not God and the second blasphemy must needs follow This is a revivall of a very ancient heresie of Cerinthus in plainer words who taught as Irenaeus sheweth Iâ—enaeus l. 1. cap. 25. n. 108. That Christ descended upon Iesus when Iesus was baptized and that before his passion Christ departed from Iesus and left Iesus alone to be crucified Christ was the Divine Nature
Christ hath put down all carnall and sinfull rule authority and power for where the Apostle saith 1 John 3. 9. Hâ— that is bâ—rn of God sinâ—eth not He meaneth that the seed and fountain of sinning is not in his regenerating and Spirituall part by which he is born of God but he is also born of flesh and by that onely he sinneth CHAP. XI Why the unpardonable sinne is rather fastened on the deniers of the Godhead of the Sonne then on them that deny the Godhead of the other Persons BUt why should the denying of the Godhead of the Son be so especially said to be a blasphemy unpardonable when as the denying of the Godhead of the other Persons is also damnable for first Saint Basil saith expresly more then once Qut Spiritum sanctum Crâ—â—turam vocant incidunt inblasphâ—miam Basil epist 387. n. 17. 43. illam irremissiâ—item He that calleth the Holy Ghost a creature falleth â—nto the unpardonable sinne so that Eunomius the Heretâ—cke who said the Spirit was the Creature of the Son was involved in Basil cont Euno n. 20. this blasphemy as well as Arius who said the Son was but a Creature of the Faâ—herâ— and therefore called him Mâ—ttendarium onely an Emissarie of the Father as Ruffinus reporteth and Saint Cyprian calâ—eth the Devill Ruff. in symb apud Cyp. n. 91. who is under the pressure of eternall unpardonableness both Antichristum Antispiritum an Antichrist and an Antispirit intimating as much danger in the one as in the other For we â—earn in Scripture that without holyness no man shall see God Heb 12 14. Therefore how can that man expect the gift of Holyness who denieth the Author of Holyness which iâ— the Holy Ghost Secondly He that denieth the Godhead of the Father is an Atheist for all sorts of Religions which confess 2. a God do also confess a Fatherhood in that God even the Heathens called their Jupiter a Father but how can an Atheist expect salvation from God who denieth that there is any God For answer hereunto it may be said that although the denying of the Godhead of any Person in the Trinity be destructive to salvation yet this sin is rather fastned on the deniers of Christ then the deniers of the other Persons First because the confession of the Father and the holy Spirit is not salvificall without the Confession of Christ for even Heathens confessed both a Fatherhood and a Divine Spirit of God as appeareth by the confession of Neâ—u hadnezar Dan. 4. 9. but the Confession of Christ is alone salvificall because he is not alone as himselfe saith John 8. 16. I am not alone but I and the Father which sent me for the confession of Christ includeth Basil de 〈◊〉 c. 12. the whole Trinity as Saint Basil affirmeth Christi appâ—llatio est professio totius trinitatis deâ—larans Deum Patrem qui unâ—it Filium qui unctus est Spiâ—itum qui est unctio and Saint mbâ—oâ—e affirmeth the same Amb. de 〈◊〉 c. 3. Christus implicat Paâ—rem unguentem Filium unctum Spiritum unctionem i. The appellation of Christ is the profession of the whole Trinity declaring the Father anointing the Son anointed and the Spirit who is the ointment and therefore albeit the form of Baptisme was precisely set down to be in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost yet because the Name Jesus Christ implyeth all these Saint Peter mentioneth onely this name Acts 2. 38. Be baptized everyone of you in the Name of Iesus Christ for remission of sins so doth Saint Paul also Rom. 6. 3. Galatians 3. 27 Secondly the unpardonable sin is fastned on the deniers of the second Person rather then on the deniers of the other Persons because the work of redemption was immediately wrought by the second Person For it was the Person of the Son onely that became a Surety for us and not onely a bare Witness or Testifier as the Commenter affirmeth the Son onely took upon him our nature and therein fulfilled the Law for us and suffered death in our stead for our transgressions he onely was our Surety and Mediatour and he onely was incarnate and died and rose again and carried our flesh into Heaven with him and there still continueth a Mediatour for us not by any verball pleading or intreating for our salvation but by presenting there in the glorious Sanctuary of Heaven that humane body and soul which had actually and perfectly performed the whole Covenant of God and therefore even in the most strict Justice of God shewing that Heaven is due by the said Covenant to all his mysticall Body for which his naturall Body was sacrificed on the Crosse for the expiation of all their sinnes which was prefigured by the High Priests entering into the Sanctum Sanctorum All these dispensations and actions which conduced to our salvation must be ascribed onely to the Person of the Sonne but cannot be said of the Father or of the Holy Ghost For that was the Heresie of the â—oc l. 2. c. 15. Sabellians who were therefore called Patripassiani for these workes are proper to the Sonne alone Filius natus passus resurrâ—xisse ascendâ—sse dicitur non Aug. de Trin. l. 1. c. 5. n. 60. Pater As Augustine saith i. The Father cannot be said to be born or suffer or to rise again or to ascend but onely the Sone Therefore Kisse the Son lest he be angry and ye perish Psalme 2. 12. For the denying of him is the renouncing of salvation CHAP. XII The Godhead of Jesus Christ shewed by Scripture and by the type of the Tabernacle BEcause the apprehension and believing of this great Mystery of God Incarnate is a wonderfull consolation to the Christian and the denying thereof pertinaciously a certain note of eternall perdition therefore the Scripture hath very evidently and frequently declared this weighty truth both by express words and otherwise for the child to be born of a Virgin must be called Emmanuel Esay 7. 14. that is God with us or God incarnate and the same Prophet Esay 9. 6. giveth that childe such Titles as cannot be attributed to any meer creature as The mighty God the everlasting Father the Prince of Peace This Prophets words do so agree with the Evangelicall and Apostolicall Doctrine as the Word was made flâ—sh and the Word was God John 1. and God manifest in the flesh 1 Tim. 3. 16 and of whom as concerning the flâ—sh Christ came who is over all God blessed for evermore Rom. 9. 5. that Saint Jerome called this Prophet Hier. proaem in Isai n. 33. Esay Non solum Prophetam sed Evangelistam Apostolum Not onely a Prophet but an Evangelist and an Apostle for as the Prophet before the incarnation bringeth in God saying I have sworn by my self to me every knee shall bow Esay 45. 23. So the Apostle applieth that saying to Christ being the same
tam vecors est ut ita loquatur Absiste à corpore ut te adorem oec who is so foolish Ath. cont Arian or 5. n. 4. as to say to God lay aside thy Body that I may worship thee or who can shew us his body emptied of his Godhead Therefore albeit we do not adore his Body as the Vtimate and uttermost object of our adoration yet we resuse not to worship our God with his body Concomitant for St. Thomas when he saw Christs body and touched his wounds yet he said My Lord and my God Ioh. 20. 28. The women held him by the feet yet worshipped him Maith 28. 9. The Psalmist saith Exalt the Lord our God and worship at his Footstool Psalme 99. 5. What is meant by his Foostoole St. Chrysostome tells us The earth is his Footstoole Isa 66. 1. Because the Body of Christ was Chrys ser de Trin. n. 57. from Adam and Adam from the earth and this body is united to God therefore our God though in it is to be adored Some men are offended when they see a man worship his God if his face betowards the East or Communion-table suspecting that the worship is done to the Table or to the East though they are told it is done to God onely as also if in time of divine service a man bow his knee to Jesus when that name is named some will say the bowing is done to a sound a word or letters just so the heathens said that the Christians worshipped the Sun because they assembled on the Sunday and because they used to adore God with their faces turned toward the East as Tertullian saith and some also said that Christians worshipped Tert. apol c. 16. n. 4. Bacchus and Ceres that is Bread and Wine because at receiving of the Sacrament they used a reverend adoration of God as we read in St. Austin yet these slanders did not deter the Christians from their Aug. cont Faust l. 20. c. 13. usuall discipline But these Brethren would think as I suppose that themselves were much wronged if a man should tell them that they worship a Chaire a Form or Table because when they pray they kneel before some of these When God appeared to Abraham Abraham bowed himself toward the ground Gen. 18. 2. Will any man say that Abraham worshipped the earth No saith St. Ambrose Non terram sed Iesum nascitu um è terra resurrecturum he worshipped Amb. de Abrah l. 2. n. 13. not the earth but Jesus who afterwards was to be incarnate and to rise again out of the earth The worship of Jesns is the adoration of his divine person in heaven and not of a name or word and this adoration and genuflection is of a higher consequence and greater weight then some Christians are aware of as will appear by that which followes CHAP. XVII That genuflection to our Lord Jesus was apointed onely to be as an acknowledgment of his God-Head Because the great work of mans redemption is founded upon the Godhead of Jesus and that the denying or disbelieving that doctrine is a certain mark and character of unpardonablenesse therefore good Christian Reader consider with thy self what a charitable and prudent care this Church of England had of thy soules health when to keep thee in a perpetuall memorie thereof and a continuall confession of this great and weighty truth she required that when the Lord Iesus shall be mentioned in time of divine service lowly reverenâ—e be done the reason alleadged by that Canon is of the greatest concernment that can Canon 18. be imagined Testifying their due acknowledgment that the Lord Iesus Christ 〈◊〉 and eternall Son of God is the only Saviour of the world in whom alone all the Mercies Graces and promises of God to mankind for this life and the life to come are fully and wholly comprised by which words it is apparent that the principall intent of that Canon was for the acknowledgment of the Lord Jesus to be the true and eternall Son of God and thy redeemer which is that necessary doctrine which I have endeavoured all this while to set forth and this is the very same reason that is alleadged on those Scriptures where the bowing to Jesus Christ is mentioned For when it is said of Christ Rom. 14. 10 11. Every knee shall bow to me the reason followes immediately Every tongue shall confesse to God that is that every one shall acknowledge adoration due to this our God And so again where it is said Phil. 2. 10. At the name of Iesus every knee should bow the reason followes verse 11. That every â—ongue should confesse that I sus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the Father to signifie that therefore bowing to Jesus Christ is required that by it he might be acknowledged to be the Lord and certainly therefore onely did the Church of England require this adoâ—ation adoâ—atâ—on of Jesus to have a perpetuall and solemne confession thereby of his Godhead yet our Commenter will not confesse Jesus to be God though he do confesse that Divine râ—verence is commanded â—o be given to Christ by bowiug c. in the sâ—mâ— manner Page 7. that is due to God himself in this the Commenter doth fully agâ—e with the practice of the old Arians who were therefore blame by Athâ—nâ—sius because they performed religious adoration to Jesus as the Catholick Atha cont Arian Or 1. n. 4. Church did but yet â—hey would not confesse him to be God and so in effect they did serve him whom they thought to be but a creature and therein differed not from Heathens and so St. Basil a gueth both agaâ—â—st the Sahellians and Arians out of the Church Câ—â—ed to â—f the Son and the Holy Ghost be but creatures Cur Basil cont Sabel Ar. ho. 27 n. 17. non dicimus â—redo in Deum in univâ—râ—am creaâ—uram Nam si pium est â—n porâ—ionâ—m creâ—tuâ—ae crâ—dâ—re multò magis in â—â—tam Why do we not say in our Creed I believe in God and the woâ—ld for if the Son be but a part of the world and a câ—â—atuâ—e it is far better to believe in the whole creature thâ—n in one part of it And this also was obseâ—ved in the Arians Amb. de fil divin c. 3. n. 26. by St Ambrose that they did not adore Jesus because they thought him to be God but Virâ—ute praeâ—epti only because they belâ—eved that such an adoration was injoyned Philip. 2. 10. their colour for it was because the honour of genuflection is there said to be given to Iesus by Gâ—d veâ—se 9. and so they would Amb. Hexam l. 6. c. 9. have it due to him onely by gift and not by nature indeed Saint Ambrose saith that the honour of genuflection was the gift of the Father to the on just as the Scâ—ipture saith but Saint Bâ—sil doth fully shew the meaning of that Scripture God
his back parts signifie his later dispensations in assuming our nature of the Virgin Mother his birth his conversation with men his passion death resurrection ascention so that the meaning is that Moses viz. the Mosaical people should in after times see God when God should be incarnate So Athanisius expounds it posteriores Ath. ad Antio quaest 23. n. 28. dei partes carnen intellige quam assum sit ex Virgine per quam conspectus est i by the back-parts of God you must vnderstand his flesh taken of the Virginâ— Marie in which flesh he was seen and this also is the exposition of Origen on Psal 36. hom 4. and Austin giues a reason why the incarnation is callâ—d the after parts of God Propter posteritaâ—em mortalitatis vel Aug. de Trin. l. 2. 17. quia poster ùs â—arnem assumpturus erat i. because his mortal or humane nature was to be assumed long after Moses time and later then his divine nature which had bin from all Eternitie Neither doth this Doctrine by asserting the incarnation of God any way countenance the heresie of the Anthropomorphites who ascribed corporeal lineaments and parts to God and because it is said Esa 66. 1. heaven is my throne and the earth is my footstool they thought the divine nature was a vast body teaching from heaven to earth as Origen relates of them Orig in Gen. ho. 1. and because they read of the hand and arme and eyes of God simple monks as they were they ascribed those parts literally to the divine nature which are spoken of in Scripture but figuratively these were the Andian Enrors as wee read in Epiphanius The odoret Sozomen these men thought a body to be essential to God as if God could not be God except he had a body but wee say the body or humane nature is not essential to God no not to the person of the Son of God but it is an accessarie assumed and not into the essential union with the Son but into personal union with him being now God incarnate for he was God and the Son of God before his incarnation so that although the divine nature in its owne essence or pure Godhead is incorporeal yet the same Godhead now considered in the Person of Christ cannot be said to be without a body for as Theodoret noteth Christus Theod. dial 3. n. 13. significat Deum incorporatum non incorporeum id est Christ signifieth God incarnate and not God incorporeall because the Son of God who is the One and onely true God is now Emmanuel the Godhead and the Manhood in him are inseparably united for ever and in this sence I conceive the first Article of Religion in the Church of England is to be p. Art 1. understood which saith p. God is without Body because albeit God never will be without his assumed Body yet this Body is not of the Essence of God for although the Son of God never had assumed a Body nor ever had been incarnate yet nevertheless he had been and shall be God and the Sonne of God from everlasting to everlasting This I hope is enough concerning the first question of Gods visibility and invisibilitie CHAP. VI. The Second question why the Fathers said that 2 Question onely the Son was seen by the Patriarks and not the Father IT being granted that the Father and the Son are but one onely and the same God allthough distinct in proprieties and Persons it would be inquired why the Fathers before mentioned said that the Son appeared and was seen when the Father did not appear nor was seen for how can one be seen and not the other when both are one Before I enter upon this question I desire the Reader to take notice of two things First that this discourse is intended to be onely concerning such a sight of God as mortall men are capable of in this life because it is not revealed to us how man shall see God in the life to come of which it is said Marth 5. 8 Blessed are the pure in heart for they shall see God and yet also the impure shall see God for every eye shall see him and they also which pierced him Rev. 1. 7. Saint Austine expounding the words Zach. 12. 10. They shall Aug. de Trin lib. 1. c. 13 look upon me whom they pierced saith The wicked shall not see him in thâ— form of God but in the form of a servant because God shall sit in judgement as he is clothed with his humane body that so the judge may be visible to all that shall be judged for even Satan conversed with our God on earth being in his flesh when he tempted him Matt. 4. But the righteous when they once are in the possession of the joyes of Heaven shall see God as he is in his Divine nature which Divines call facialem visionem the beatificall vision seeing God face to face as it is said 1 Cor. 13. 12. and then happily the distinct Person of the Father will be visible to eyes glorified for then the Saints shall be equall to the Angels Luke 20. 36. of whom we shall read Matth. 18. 10. Their Angels do alwayes behold the face of my Father which is in Heaven Secondly that I do not take upon me peremptorily to affirm that the Person of God the Father hath never presented himself in any corporeal or visible shape for how should I know such a Mystery And because I find that Saint Austine saith Nâ—mis temerarium est dicere Aug. de Trin l. 2. c. 17. 18 patrem nunquam visum patâ—ibus credibile est Patrem solitum fuisse apparere mortalibus i. It is too much rashnesse to affirm that the Father was never seen Nay it is credible that he used to appear to the Patriarchs And Atbanasius saith that although God was sometimes seen in the Person of the Son when he was not seen in the Person of the Father yet he saith also that at another time all the three Persons Athan. lib. de Com. essentia n. 24. were seen by Abraham Tres Personae sedebaent apud Abraham i. All the three Persons sate at Abrahams tent For what inconvenience will follow if God shew his presence at the same time both in severall places and also in severall assumed shapes for he that is at all times really present in all places may also manifest his presence where and when and how he pleaseth It is confessed that the Person of the Sonne assumed an humane body and was seen and at the same time the Person of the Holy Ghost descended in the likenesse of a Dove Matthew 3. 17. and then also the voyce of the Person of the Father was heard and again Matthew 17. 5. which Divines say must needs be from the Person of the Father because the Sonne of God is not the Sonne of any other Person but onely of the Father Indeed it is said of
of her for neither of them severally can be called perfect Man and Master Rogers in his notes upon that Article tells us that it was one of the Arrian errours who said That Christ took â—tha de Incarn n. 22. onely flesh of the Virgine but not the Soul and that some Arrians did indeed so say is affirmed by Athanasius Finally if it can clearly appeare that the Sonne of God did indeed take both his flesh and also his humain Soule by Propagation from Man it will be a great consolation to Mankinde that the great God of Heaven and Earth would vouchsafe to be so compleatly near of kindred to us his poore creatures and hereby also a perfect and compleat Incarnation of God will be proved against this Commenter CHAP. XIV The question of the Soules propagation left undetermined by Saint Augustine yet he thought it more probable that our soules are propagated from our Parents I Will not presume good Reader to determine this great question because that I find that the most profound Doctors of the Primitive Church and after very great and diligent discussion yet left it dubitable as may appear by the Epistles which passed mutually between Saint Hierome and Saint Augustine concerning this very question which neither of them would absolutely determine and conclude either for the Soule of Christ or the Souls of other men for that the Originall of the Soule of Christ was surely the same with the Originall of other mens souls since our first Parents and both alike obscure and hard to be understood Onely I will truely relate what hath been thought and said of it especially out of Saint Augustine who saith utrum origo animarum Aug. n. 7. n. 18. n. 44. sit ex uno illo Adam an semper fiant singulae siâ—gulis adhuc nescio adhuc incertum i. whether the souls of all men came from Adam or whether new souls for severall men be dayly created as yet I know not and it is uncertain And again Nunquam ausus sum definitam proferre Id. Epist 175. Id. Epist 120. sententiam i. I never durst venture upon a definitive sentence thereof and concludeth Satius est ortum animae semper quaerere quam invenisse praesumere i. It is safer to be alwayes seeking then to presume that we have found it And a great while after he said Ego adhuc inter utrosque ambigo vincant qui poterant i. Id. de Gen. ad lit l. 10. c. 22. I am still doubtfull between those two opinions prove either who can And although he confesseth in the same book that he would be more willing to acknowledge that Christ had not his soul from Adam yet saith he the other opinion that men receive their souls from their Parents doth preponderate and turn the scale of my judgement The same Father for the probability of propagation of souls from Adam alledgeth many reasons For first writing to Saint Hierome Tell me saith Id Epist 28. he if Soules are doyly created and not transmitted from the Parents wherein have poore Infants sinned and how are they involved in the sins of Adam or their Parents so that they need the Sacrament of remission of sins But secondly If it be said that our soules are indeed derived from the soul of Adam then who can say I have not sinned seeing the Originall soul of Adam sinned Thirdly It was the Argument which Pelagius used If the soul be not propagated as well as the body then onely the bodies of Infants are liable to the punishment for Originall sinne for it may seem very hard measure that so ancient a sinne should be laid to the charge of a soul newly created and but one day old Fourthly when the woman was made out of the body of Man It is not said that God breathed into her nostrils the breath of life as it was said of the man Gen. 2. 7. Perhaps to intimate that her soul was derived with het body from the man Fifthly Saint Augustine confessed that to say that soules are dayly created seeing God finished the Creation the sixth day will seeme a violent speech Sixthly it is said Romans 5. 18. By the offence of Aug. de Gen. ad lit lib. 10. c. 11. one judgement came upon all to condemnation â— Now because onely the soul sinneth for the body is but the souls instrument how can the soul that was not created till so many generations from Adam are passed be said to sin in Adam for what evill hath the soul of a young dying infant committed if his soul were not derived from Adam Lastly he granteth Non absurde â—reditur â—animas è Id. ibid. traduce â—sse â—id est It is no inconvenience to our Christian Faith to say the souls of men are propagated from the first man For it was indeed anciently received by Christians as a Truth long before Saint Augustines time as we finde in Terâ—ullian who saith Tert. de anima c. 27. expresly that Our souls came from Adam and again he saith in the same Book Omnis anima censetur in Adamo donec in Christo recensâ—atur id est Every Id. ib. c. 40. soul is first câ—nsed or inrolled in Adam untill they be new enrolled and accounted in Christ And Saint Hierome avoucheth this to be the opinion Hier. Epist ad Marcel apud Aug. Epist 27 not onely of Terâ—ulliâ—n but also that the greater part of the Western Churches were of the same minde that as our bodies are derived fâ—om the bodies of our Parents so our souls are propagated from their souls Even as millions of Taâ—ers may be tinded or lighted at one burning Taper and as all the Stars of Heaven receive their light from the Sunne yet neither the light of that one Taper or of the Sunne are any thing diminished So although the manner how our souls are propagated be inestable yet De facto that they are propagated is no way incredible For why not the souls of Men as well as the souls of Beasts and why may not the humane soul extend it self into the childe in the wombe as well as it doth inlarge it self in a greater distance into other parts of the body as the body from its birth waxeth bigger from one cubite length of the Infant to foure Cubites at our full growth and this Doctrine of the Soules propâ—gation seemeth to stand with a great deall of equitie in our mercifull and most iust Redeemer that as he would redeem our bodies by his owne body taken from man so to redeem our soules by his soul so taken and propagated from man And this seemeth to be the Opinion of Athanasius Atha de incarnat n. 23. Corpus Chisti pro corpore nostro anima â—jus pro nostra integer homo pro integro homine in Redemptione rependitur id est The Body of Christ was given for our bodies and his Soule for our Soules and his whole Man for
our whole Man in our Redemption Thus having said so much concerning this question I submit the determination thereof to the Judicious Reader onely adding this that if Christ did indeed take not onely his Body but the whole man by traduction from Adam we may most comfortably entertain a more evident and reasonable Argument of the Redemption both of our bodies and soules by him because hereby we may conceive our selves to be joyned and united unto Christ in a more noble tie then onely in our flesh that as he hath communicated his Divine Spirit to Man as is shewed before so our humane Spirit is communicated to him CHAP. XV. That the Spirit of God is communicated to the unregenerate and of the diversitie of the Measures and the graces therof IN the next place I am to shew how the Spirit of God is said to be communicated to men unregenerate as I promised before and this because many men are apt to beleeve that to have the Spirit of God is a grace proper and peculiar only to those that are the the Sanctified holy ones but the contrarie will appeare a none for a man may have Gods Spirit in him yea and divers common gifs and graces of that Spirit and yet remaine unsanctified and void of vertue and holines Aug. de beat vita n. 16. S. Austin saith Omnis homo deum habet nec tâ—mâ—n omnis beatus est i. every man hath God in him and yet every man is not in a state of blessednes so there is in every man a natural goodnes for every creature is good and where goodnes is there is God though this natural bonitie may be mixed with a great deale of moral pravitie and the same Spirit of God worketh in all men but yet to several purposes and with several Naz. Orat. 44. operations and in diverse degrees Spiritas spirat quando vult super quos vult quantum vult i The Spirit bloweth when it will and on whom it will so much as it will and though the Spirit of God be alwayes in man yet men doe not alwayes perceive it Aug. Confes. lib. 9. c. 4. Id. n. 88. or consider it S. Austin confessed Christus miserat spiritum in me Ego nesciebam i Christ had sent his Spirit into me and I knew it not and againe he saith â—git Spiritus Domini per bonos malos per Scientes nescientes ut per Caipham i The Spirit of the Lord worketh by good and bad by men that know it and by men that know it not as it did by Caiphas Men may have the Spirit of God and Operations of that Spirit in them and some graces also of that Spirit and yet those graces possibly shall not be operative so high as to Sanctification neither are they such high graces as divines call Gratum facientes But yet graces they are for grace is but a free gift and therfore is it called grace because it is Gratis data i freely given There may be grace in those persons who are not therby rendered favourable gracious or acceptable in Gods sight for even our natural endowments and temporal blessings and our very Creation rightly considered will appeare to be an act of Gods grace and therfore men do usually give thanks to God for their very Creation This doctrine of the great variety of graces and workings of Gods Spirit is most evidently set forth 1 Cor. 12. There are diversities of gifts and diversities of operations but the same Spirit the same Lord the same God And you may find mention of many graces there which are not saving or sanctifying graces but are Common even to reprobates as knowledge healing prophecie toungs c. Which wee know may be and are found in men not Sanctified even the knowledg and skill of manual arts are the operations of Gods Spirit in man which no divine will say are saving or sanctifying graces as wee read of Bâ—zaleel Ex. 35. 31. That he was filled with the Spirit of God in wisedome and in all manner of workmanship to devise Curious workes and to worke in Gold Silvâ—â— and brass Philosophers use to say If heaven stood still man could not move so much as his litle finger but surely if God were not Primus Motor in us to be as the soule of our soules we could not live or move and though God be in man and operateth in him yet his operations are diversified by divers degrees in some he worketh but weakly and low in others higher and stronger even to produce holines and happines but though the Spirit of God be in every man yet this Spirit is not a Sanctifier in every man as he is not Paracletus i a Comforter in every man this doctrine hath bin taught of old by the ancients Deus in est multiformiter Richard de S. Vict. de Trin. l. 2. c. 23. secundum participationem Gratiae aliis per participationem potentiae aliis vita aliis sapientiae aliis bonitatis aliis beatitudinis imanum suam parcius vel largius extendens i God is in us by distributing his graces in great diversitie some partake of power some of life only others have wisdome others goodnes others blessednes for so doth he open his hand more or less as he pleaseth The Spirit of God in Scripture is often resembled to water because as the same water falling from heaven in raine upon several Creatures produceth in them great diversitie and varietie of effects Aqua in spiâ—is alba in rosis rubra in Cyril Hieroâ— n. 18. hyacinthis purpurea i The same raine in the thorne produceth a white flower on the rose bush a red and on the hyacinth a purple Colour So doth the Spirit produce diversitie of effects in men so againe Aqua in Aug. de Mirab. script l. 1. c. 18. vite vinum â—it in apibus mel in Oliva olâ—um i Water in the vine is made wine in the Olive tree Oyl in bees honie in man blood teares c. And the like illustration is used by Epiphanius Chrysost To shew Epiph. in Ane Chrys ho. 4. Antioch that the same Spirit of the same God in some mea produceth but life or understanding in others it produceth those effects and more also as wisdome judgment counsel in others more also as faith hope charitie fortitude even to martyrdome and to blessednes the effect of Gods Spirit in Samson was seen eminently in his great strength in Solomon it was great wisdome in Moses mâ—eknes in the Prophets foresight all these are gifts of one and the same Spirit though in such great varietie and when the Scripture mentioneth divers Spirits as Esa 11. 2 Rev. 1 4 It meaneth severall gifts and graces of one and the same Spirit wee may observe that Elisha 2 Kings 2. 9. did not pray for two Spirits but duplex Spiritus that the same Spirit of Eliah might be doubled on him that is increased
or heightned in him to greater power and efficacie and whereas David prayed Psal 51. 11. take not thy holie Spâ—rit from me it will not follow that David feared he should be left destitute altogether of the Spirit of God but that it might remaine with him in some degree at least but he prayed for the Continuance and Manifestation of Gods help and assistance by the Spirit in the same manner as before he had it because as Prosper observeth Cessatio auxilii pro absentia accipitur i God Pros ad Dem. n. 59. is said to depart from man when he withholdeth his help albeit God is essentially alwayes present so when he withdraweth one grace yet he may manifest his presence by some other grace for every man hath not every grace of the Spirit S. Hierom in one of his exegetical Epistles upon these words 1 Cor. 15. 28. That God may be all in all saith Adhuc Deus est nisi pars Hier. Epist 147. n. 30. in singulis ut sapientia in Solomone patientia in Job post erit omnia in omnibus cum Sancti omnes virtutes habuerint i In this life God is but a part in men as wisdome in Solomon patience in Job but in the next life God will be all in all for then his Saints shall be induced with all vertues And wheras it is said Joh. 7. 39. The holie Ghost was not yet given Yet wee are sure that it was given before both to the Prophets and also to the Apostles but the meaning is as S. Austin expounds it Non quia nulla datio antea sed quia non talis quae de Aug. de Trin. lib. 4. c. 17. n. 72 Linguis legitur i Not as if there had bin no gift of the Spirit before but because the Spirit was not before given in that kind and manner as it was at the feast of Pente cost and so doth S. Cyril resolve the same doubt Cyril Hieros Cat. 16. Spiritus idem descendebat in Pentecoste qui anteà sed tum Copiosiùs i It was the same Spirit that descended at the Pentecost which came before but now it came more Copiouslie Thus are God and man united he taking our flesh and we receiving his Spirit upon this consideration S. Cyprian saith Cum Corpus â— terra Spiritum possideamus Cyp. de Orat. Dom. n. 82. e caelo Ipsi câ—lum tâ—rra sumus i Man is the union of heaven and earth because our bodies are from the earth but we possesse a Spirit which came from heaven CHAP. XVI That the Spirit of God is given to men nâ—â— sanctified how those are said to be Gods anointed who were not anointed with Oile that our King is Gods anointed somthing concerning the Kings touching and Curing the diseased BUt why should we doubt to affirme that the Spirit of Jesus our only Lord God is communicated even to men unregenerate and that in such men this Spirit doth manifest it's presence in some lower degree by some common graces which doe not sanctifie them in whom they are seeing that we find in Scripture that both heathen and wicked Kings are called Gods anointed for Esa 45. 1. Thus saith the Lord to his anointed to Cyrus yet this Cyrus both lived and died an heathen So King Saul though an Israelite yet a wicked man is called 2 Sam. 1. 14. The Lords anointed Now we know that Vnction doth not alwayes signifie only an External or Ceremonial anointing with Oile but it signifieth also the inward gift and inhabitation of the Spirit of God for wee find that those men are said to be Gods anointed whom we cannot find to have bin externally anointed with Oile for so Christ is said to be anointed Psal 45. 7. Yet not with external Oile so also Abraham Jsaac and Jacob Psal 105. 15. are called Gods anointed yet we find not that they were anointed with Oile but these holie ones are therfore said to be anointed because the Spirit of God was in them which is the true and reall unction wheras external ointment is but the signe therof in like manner because Cyrus an heathen is called Gods anointed and yet was never anointed with Oile it must needs follow that his unction was internal and that he was therfore called Gods anointed because God had put his Spirit into him Iâ—say his Spirit although not working so high as to Sanctification in Cyrus but yet a Spirit of wisdome and kingly fortitude and of skill and knowledg politicall and militarie To enable him to governe which gifts are the effect of Gods Spirit And this is the exposition which the ancients give concerning those forenamed unctions first for Christ Euseb us saith Non apparet Christum unctum fuisse communi oleo sed divino Eus de Dem. lib. 5. c. 2. Spiritu i It can not appeare that Christ was anointed with common Oâ—le Ceremonialie but he was anointed with the divine Spirit and so saith Athanasius Oleum Ath. Orat. 2. Cont. Arian Opt. lib 4. Atha Orat. Cont. Aria n 8. Christi est Spiritus sanctus i The Oile of Christ was the holie Spirit and just so saith Optatus and what this unction of Christ was and wherin it consisted is shewed by the same Athanasius upon those words God of God unitio verbi cum carne vo catur unctâ—o i The union of the Godhead with the manhood was Christ's unction Now for the anointing of meere men and that without any infusion of Oile Eusebius saith Dei Spiritus Eus de Dem. l. 4. c. 15. est dei Oleum i The Oile of God is the Spirit of God and he tels further in the same place that Abraham Isaac and Jacob are called Gods anointed Propter divinum Spiritum cujus participes erant i By reason of Gods Spirit with which those holie patriarks were indued and to the same purpose S. Basil saith Spiritus Basil hom de Bapt. n. 14. sanctus est unctio in nobis i our unction is the holie Spirit which is in us For so it is said also of our Saviour expresly Act. 10. 38. God anointed Iesus of Nazareth with the holie Ghost The appellation of Christ and of Christian is from this unction and we use to say of infants when they are baptized that they are made Christians which signifieth anointed not because of the old Ceremonie of Crisme or anoâ—â—ting with Oile which with us hath bin long agoe disused but as Dionysius formerlie when it was in use gave the reason unction and Christian signifie deificam Spiritus communionem Dionys Areop eccleâ— her c. 2. i The communication of the divine Spirit because wee beleeve that God with the external Sacrament conferreth the inward grace which beleife the ancients did represent by their anointing the baptized with Oile Now if it may app are that by vertue of such an internal Unction of which I spake in Cyrus some unregenerate men have actually exercised and performed
is applied to a Man S. Basil saith Baptismus est similitudo Basil de Bapt. lib. 1. n. 18. Crucis mortis sepulturae râ—surrectionis i Baptisme is the similitude or representarion of the Crosse death burial and resurrection of Christ He that will have two Baptismes doth implie a similitude of two deaths Christ died but once and wee in our Baptisme dyed with him Christ dieth no more nor we by Baptisme can dye any more with him Theophilact so expoundeth Theoph. in loc these words He that will be twide Baptized doth therby make a representation of two Deaths and two Crucifyings of Christ And put him to an open shame Because it is ignominious and a great undervaluing of that one most precious and alsufficient Sacrifice of Christ to Imagine that his once dying is not Satisfactorie to the Justice of God for all our sins both before and after Baptisme Therfore it must needs follow that it is also Ignominious to his said death for any Man to represent or apply two deaths of Christ to himself by two Baptismes for as his once dying is a sufficient redemption so one application of it to our selves by one Baptisme is a sufficient application If therfore by sin we fall away from the benefit of Christs death by suffering sin to live and raigne in us having once died unto sin Sacramentally by Baptisme we must returne to the benefit therof by repentance and mortification of sin and not by a new or second Baptisme For the earth which drinketh in the raine c. vers 7. 8. Here is a second reason alleaged against re Baptization 2. Reason taken from the similitude of the earth with Man for the earth which hath bin watered by raine from Heaven and dressed by the husbandman if it bring forth good fruite answerable to its watering and dressing it is a signe that the blessing from God still continueth on it Even that blessing wherwith it was at the Creation blessed when it was said Gen. 1. 11. Let the earth bring forth grasse and the fruit tree But if after this watering and dressing it beareth only weeds thorns and briers then a new watering will not help it but make it worse by giving a new and fresh aliment whereby those Weeds and Thorns will be increased and grow stronger watering is not a meanes to kill them or to extripate them So that Christian whose soule hath been watered with Baptismall Grace and dressed with holy doctrines of repentance and faith toward God and hath been instructed in the certainty of the resurrection and of Judgment eternall and yet for all this bringeth no fruites of Righteousnesse and Holinesse but contratily aboundeth luxuriantly in all manner of carnall vâ—ces let him not think that these weeds and thorns of his soul can be mortified or killed by a second baptismall watering Which if it should be applyed would rather accumulate higher and increase his sins then diminish them even as rain doth weeds because such a second Baptism will be accounted â—s a second crucifying the Son of God and shaming him by undervaluing his own most precious death so as it is before said and as the Earth being cursed Bâ—ingâ—th forth thorns and thistâ—â—s Gâ—n 3. 18. So that baptized Ambro. in loc One who bringeth forth no better fruit is nigh unto cursing and like unto Thornes his end is to be burnt He saith but nigh unto Cursing not yet altogether accuâ—sed and whose end is to be burnt yet not presently thrown into the fire for as St. Ambrose expounds it Combustio non crit nisi quis in finâ—m permaneâ—t in peccatis suis In this exposition of this Scripture all this while the reader doth not find any imposibility of repencance of renuing or of remission and pardon of the grand blasphemy the impossibility here mentioned â—s only an impossibility of renovation and repâ—ntance by a second baptism If this exposition be admitted it will quit us of a great deal of trouble which some Expositors have occasioned and thereby much perplexed many mens mindes How well or ill other writers of late have expounded this place I take not upon me to censure nor am I so wedded to this as to propose it Magisterially but with submission to my Superiors this may be true though others are not false for the Character which St. Austin setteth on the Mosaicall Scriptures and Aug. confes lib. 12. c. 31. 32. their Expositors may serve for all other Scriptures Cum alius dixâ—rit hoc sensit Moses quod ego et alius dicit imò illud quod ego cur non utrumque dixero sensisse id ibid. utrumque verum est and again he saith Moses sensit quicquid veri hic potuimus invenire et quicquid nondum possumus invenire whatsoever truth may probably be gathered out of a Scripture agreable with the faith and profitable may with humility be submitted unto as if it were the true meaning of that most wise Spirit by whom it was inspired who hath so composed the Scriptures in such a temper as may be sutable to the various senses of men although some see more in them then others have discerned my humble prayer shall be with him Domine nec fallar in Scripturis nec fallam ex eis i Aug. confes l. 11. cap. 2. The Lord grant that I may neither be deceived in the meaning of Scriptures nor by Scriptures deceive others CHAP. VII A review of those words Heb 6. 4. and some doubts cleared â—concerning the former Exposition what moved the Apostle to handle the Doctrine of Baptism and so strictly to forbid Anabaptisme in this Epistle to the Hebrews THe summe of the former Exposition is That if a man fall from baptismall Grace he must nor expect a restoring thereunto by a Second baptisme this place being the chief in Scripture by which Anabaptism or Rebaptization is expresly inhibited though something obscurely It would now be inquired whether this Word Inlightned in this place may not signifie those that are instructed or chatechised onely and not those that are baptised and this because some think that instruction in the Christian doctrine is here principally meant for that the custome of the Church was that in Adulto baptism which was the baptizing of people when they were in yeares of discretion catechising ever went before baptism To this I answer that in the Ancient Church language it cannot appear to me that any were called Illumâ—nati i the Inlightned before they were actually baptized although they were ever so exactly instructed and known to be very learned in Christian Doctrine for we find that many were chosen and compelled to be Bishops before they were baptized as Eusâ—bius Naz. orat 19. 20. Soz. l. 7. c 8. Ruffin hist l 2. c. 11. Soz lib. lâ—b 6. c. 〈◊〉 Bishop of Caesaria in Caâ—padocia who was the Predecessor of St. Basil and after him Nectarâ—us was chosen Bishop of Constantinople by Theoâ—osius
age that their delay was also for carnall respects the danger of delaylaying it the Storie of a Jew-Anabaptist and an example upon an Arian pseudobaptisme the conclusion of this Exposition IF the Ancients accounted paedobaptisme so good and lawfull as is said it may further be demanded why they did so frequently and almost generally defer put off their Baptisme either untill ripe years even to very old age or their death bed and yet we find by many pasâ—ages in the Church Records that men exceedingly feare to die unbaptized and did exceedingly lament for their friends that died without Baptisme Saint Aug. Epist 180. Austine reporteth that in any time of danger or persecution there used to be great confluence of people to the Church requiring Baptisme and this was because they feared to die without it And the sisters of the Emperour Valeminiaâ— us the younger did greatly mourn not so much for the death of the Emperour Amb. de obit Valent. n. 46. as for that he died without Baptisme as Saint Ambrose declared That men did so defer their Baptisme it is most evident and yet not onely ordinary ignorant and common people but also the most considerable prudent honourable and learned men in their dayes the godly Emperor Constantine the first who was the greatest advancer of Christian Religion being also born of Euseb de vita Const l. 1 n. 47. Christian Parents yet he would not be Baptized till his old age when he was 65 yeares old and but a little before his death as Socraâ—es saith so his sonne Constantius Soc. l 1. c. 26 Euseb in vit Const 4. Soz. l. 2. c. 32. the Emperor and Valens and Theodosius the elder a most Godlie Prince these all deferred baptisme untill they thought that their death was neare and of the cleargy besides those before mentioned who were elected Bishops before their baptisme Nazianzen was 30 yeares and Austin was 34 yeares ould before they were baptized to omitt others Rhenanus observeth Rhen. in Tert. de coron mil. annot n. 12. Amb. de paenit l. 2. c. 11. n. 34. that in the primitive Church Soli adulti serè baptizati i. though some infants were baptized yet mostlie they baptized at yeares of discretion and S. Ambros affirmed Si paenitentia non esset Omnes different abluâ—ionis gratiam usque ad senectutem i If it were not for the Second remedie of Repentance no Man would be baptized untill his ould age and death bed Which bed-riddenbaptized are therfore called Clinici and Tertullian understandeth Cyp. lib. 4. Ep. 7. Tert. de Resur n. 20. that passage 1 Cor. 15 29. of Vicarium Baptisma i That the living were baptized in the stead of others that died unbaptized If we shall curiouslie examine why the ancients deferred baptisme so long it will appeare that their reasons mostlie were Carnal and voluptuous for because they beleeved that baptisme was the Sacrament of remitting sins past both Original and actual and also because at the time of baptisme the person to be baptized made a solemne profession of râ—nouncing the world the flesh and the devil that they thought themselves much more obliged to a pure and strickt Christian life after this vow then before and because they were very unwilling to part with their worldly pleasures and lusts therefore they put off their baptismes till the time of ould age when their lusts should leave them S. Austin confessed of himself that when in his youth he Prayed for the grace of Chastitie yet in his heart he did not desire it might be presently given him Aug. Conf. l. â— c. 7. Domine da mihi Chastitatem sed noli modo timebam ne me ciâ—ò audiret malebam expleri quam extingui concupiscâ—utiam i Lord give me Chastitie but give it not yet I was afraid God would grant it too soon for I desired rather to satisfie my lusts then to have them extinguished Against such carnal delayers Nazianzen very gravely Naz. Orat. 40. inveigheth It is absurd saith he to defer baptisme for such voluptuous causes It is the Devil that suggesteth thus Give me thy present time and youthfull dayes let God have thy weake old age Doe not therfore accumulate thy sins that in baptisme a greater number may be remitted On thy death bed the physician will be busie about thee the cryes of thy wise and children will disturb thee the preist labouring to prepare thee for heaven will be quarrelled at by thy kindred which gape for thy estate besides even in thy youth one câ—â—m of bread may suddenly end thy life and if thou shouldest die without the Sacramenâ—al mark of the great shepherd Satan may surprize thy Soule as theeves doe sheep not marked this deferring baptisme doth moreover give a great evidence to the world of thy lusts and that thou desirest still to continue in them he added further If thou hast any infant-Children let them be presently dedicated to God by baptisme least they also be inticed to sin Samuel was promised to God before he was borne and Baptismus puero magnum est â—muletum incantamentum i Baptisme is a preservative and an holie charm against sin thus he and much more and indeed to defer baptisme onlie to prolong our time of loose living what is it but against the Apostles direction therefore to sin that grace may abound S. Austin reporteth of himself That in his youth he Aug. Confes l. 1. c. 11. fell into a dangerous sicknes and therfore desired baptisme but before it could be administred he began to recover so it was deferred hereupon himself confessed Laxata sunt loca peccandi i He was let loose to all manner of sin and when some reproved him others would answer for him sine eum facere quodvult nondum enim Baptizaâ—us est tamen non dicitur sine vulneretur nondum enim sanatus est i Let him alone let him doe what he will for he is not yet Baptized they might as well have said let him be wounded for he is not yet cured Others would delay baptisme under pretence of feare least they should not be able to satisfie and keep the vow which is there to be made when as it was in truth therfore because they were loath to leave their pleasures and lusts for when some had bin persuaded to come to the pabtismal font who were knowne to have put away their wives and taken other women and so lived in adulterie when they were required to put away those women before they could be baptized they have chosen rather to live without baptisme then to put away their concubines and so have returned unbaptized as S. Austin reporteth Aug. de side Op. c. n. 78. Others would say they deferred baptisme until the anniversarie baptismal dayes Easter or Pentecost came and then they would pretend that they would stay longer untill their kindred came or that they were not provided of a gift
remit a temporal affliction unto a sinner truâ—ie penitent no not when he forgiveth the sin as appeareth in David 2 Sam. 12. 13. I have sinned The Lord hath put away thy sin howbeit the Child shal die * Lueretia apud Livium Des 1. l. 1. Ego me Etsi peccato absâ—lvo supplicio non Libâ—ro The reason why temporal afflictions are not alwayes remitted either to true or false penitents upon their Câ—yes is given by S. Hierom. Magnae faelicitatis â—st interdùm Hier. in Ezech. 8. 18. ad praesens misericordiam non mereri ut malis coacti intellâ—gant quid fecerint i It is in some cases a signe of great happines not to obtaine mercie and releasment that men may learne by afflictions how greatly they have sinned So S. Ambrose saith of Amb. Epist l. 3. n. 52. Cyp. cont Demet. n. 75. Naz. Orat. 20. n. 19. the same people of whom the Prophets spake those things Judaeos in potestatâ—m hostium dedit Deus ut a Caelo remedium quaererent i. God delivered his people the Jewes into the hands of their enemies to provoke them to seek help from heaven Cyprian saith â—eus qui beneficiis non intelligitur plagis intelligitur Nazianzen saith Plaga cordaâ—is viris doctrina est i. When men will not listen to God for his benefits sake he will open their understandings with afflictions temporal plagues to wisemen are active sermons If we rightly consider to what end God sendeth or permitteth temporal afflictions to fal both upon penitents and impenitents we shal find it rather a token of his mercy then a signe of his anger we honour a Physician or a surgeon for curing us though it was done by bitter potions or painful searings and cuttings Ama medicum percussorem quia eâ—us plaga est Hier. n 38. mater medicinae i. Because the paine he puts us to proves a medicine God is our physician tribulations are his medicines which he therfore applieth only that they may heale us and howsoever the medicine be sharpe and seeme very evil and penal and for present displease us yet Quae hic puâ—antur mala in Ambr. in symb n. 20. and n. lact n. 17. Caelâ— bona sunt i. On earth that which is thought evil in Heaven is known to be good for it is here taken to be a punishment which indeed was but a medicine Vâ— curat medicus vulnera vulneribus as a Surgeon Pros Epig. n. 33 Aug. Epist 48. cureth a wound by lancing Qui phrenetioum ligaâ— lethargicum excitat ambobus molestus ambos amat i. He that binds a mad man and with a blow rowseth up one falling into a dâ—owsiâ— lethargie angreth both and yet to both doth a freindly office And although these temporal judgments are set forth unto us as signes of Gods anger because they are such things as angrie men wish and bring upon their enemies yet they are indeed arguments of his care over us and used as preventions of worse evils Divina bonitas ideo irascitur in hoc seculo ne Irâ—scatur Prosp in sent 5. n. 33. in futuro i. God sheweth signes of his anger in this world to prevent his anger aeternal in the world to come Men are ready to say or to imagine that God doth not heare or regard the Prayers of men in affliction because he doth not send present deliverance but this is an error in us for God ever heareth yea and granteth the request 's of trulie penitent and faithful soules though not to our phansie and desire yet substantially to our greater benefit Bonus Deus non Aug. Epist 38. tribuit saepe quod volumus it quod maluimus trebuat i though he grant not that particular thing which we expected yet he giveth that which we would rather chose if both were propounded to us And therfore some prudent Christians have bin so far from murmuring at afflictions that they have earnestlie desired Orig. in Psal 37. hom 2. Aag vita l. 3. cap. 29. them of God Domine oro flagella me and noli me resâ—rvare cum illis qui non flagellantur Domine hic seca ure ut in aeâ—ernum parcas i. Lord I pray thee chastice launce and seare me in this life and reserve me not to perish eternallie with them that have their pleasures in this world And for this they have a parterne from a Prophet Jer. 10. 24. O Lord correct me but with judgment not in thine anger This is enough to the question in hand viz. that this Grand sin is not alwayes left to final impenitencie nor is the repentance if it be true of such sinners vaine and fruitless and consequently that this sin is not absolutly unpardonable CHAP. XVI An Exposition of that place 1 John 5. 16. Of the distinction of sins into venial and mortal what is meant by a sin not unto death and a sin unto death that all sins are not Equal THere is yet another doubt to be cleered which seemeth to represent this grand sin as if it were altogether and absolutely unpardonable which is occasioned by those words 1 John 5. 16. If any man see his brother sin a sin which is not unto death he shal aske and he shal give him life for them that sin not unto death There is a sin unto death I dâ—e not say that hee shall pray for it By which words at first sight it may seeme that 1. some sins are deadly or Mortal and others sins not deadly for from these words the Fathers often use to distinguish sins into Venial and Mortal wheras we are well assured that every sin even the very least pâ—ccadillo is in it self Mortal and may bring damnation and yet we doubt not but the greatest Capital sin may by Gods mercy become Vemal and may be pardoned Secondly it may seem by these words that although 2. some sinners may and in Christian Charitie ought to be prayed for yet others without breach of Christian Charitie may be omitted and not prayed for which yet seemeth very rough and harsh seeing we are commanded Mat. 5. 44. both to love our enemies and to pray even for them that persecute us Wherefore for the right understanding of these difficulties it will not be amiss to examine these words diligently by way of an Exposition For surely if any sinner in this life sinne so deadly that we may not pâ—ay for him and if Prayer be absolutely forbidden by these words who will doubt but that such a sinner is absolutely unpardonable and wholy left to desperation now to the words If any man see his brother sinne a sinne which is not unto death In these words the prudent Reader may observe First That the sinne here meant is such a sinne as 1. may be seen perceived and discerned Secondly That it must be discernable whether it 2. be unto death or not unto death Thirdly That because no particular sinne is named
13. 13. and 1 Corinthians 14. 47. The second man is the Lord from Heaven Thus did some of the old Hereticks believe as the l Basil n. 37. Valentinians and m Naz. n. 34. Apollinarius n Aug. to 6. n. 9 the Manichees and o Epiph haer Apelles said that Christ made himselfe a body of the Elements and did not take it from Marie And this they professed in a pretended honour 44. of Christ p Aug. to 6. n. 10. Iusipienti honorificentia as Saint Augustine calleth it id est foolishly thinking thereby to honour Christ and this was also one of the Tenents of the late Anabaptists as we finde in the sixteenth Centurie Now to affirme these things is to gainsay the Doctrine and promise of Redemption by the seed of the woman and the promised seed of Abraham and the sonne of David for Christ is not from their loyns if his body came from Heaven and although a simple well meaning soul should live and die in this errour who hath alwayes adhered to the main principall Doctrine viz. God in Christ and God incaruate believing Vide supra lib. 3. cap. 10. 11. that Christ performed the Law actively for him and also suffered death on the Crosse for him in a body howbeit not in such a body as descended from Adam shall we affirm that such a misbeliever must necessarily perish I answer that I dare not so pronounce because this sinfull and erroneous conceit of the incarnation is at most but one of these sinnes which our Saviour called A word spoken against the Sonne of Man Matthew 12. 32. For it is onely against this humane nature and no blasphemy against his Holy and Divine Spirit or Godhead and of such sinnes he saith It shall be forgiven him viz. If such a sinner with an humble heart make an acknowledgement and general confession of his secret and unknown sinnes wherein this will be included so as is before said with a resolution to decline any thing that he knowes to be sinfull so much as by assistance of Gods Grace he can still holding himself close to the main foundation which the forenamed old Hereticks did not but vented many blasphemies against the Divine Nature and also polluted themselves with many fowle Morall vices I say when Jesus Christ hath said It shall be forgiven how dare any Man presume to say It shall never be forgiven For although the Erroneous conceits of Christs Body comming down from Heaven doe disturb the Order of Gods dispensation and the congruitie of the work of Redemption and correspondence thereof with the words of the Covenant yet it doth not take away and root up the foundation This doth not un-God our Redeemer nor deny utterly the gracious work of Mans Redemption So as this most blasphemous Commentarie hath none which I now together with my weak endeavours in opening the dangerous Doctrines thereof leave and submit to the censure of the learned and to the namelesse Anthor thereof I say of both our Writings as Saint Cyprian did Cyp. lib. 4. Epist 9. to Paptanus In die judicii ante Tribunal Christi utrumque recitabitur To God the Father God the Son God the Holy Ghost three Persons one onely God be ascribed all honour and glory for ever and ever Amen Qualitèr haeretici pro falsae opinione in die judicii puniendi sunt nullus potest scire nisi Judex patiens est Deus quia affectis piae opinionis errant Salvian degub l. 5. p. 163. FINIS THE TABLE Of the Contents of each several CHAPTER THE FIRST BOOK Containing General Animadversions upon the Commentarie and Commenter and the assertion of the Souls Immortalitie Chapter I. CErinthus Artemon Theodotus and Page 1. Natalis Authors and spreaders of the blasphemie of the denying Christ's Godhead The Divine warning of Natalis That after these Paulus Samosatenus and Arius were maintainers of the same Heresie The spreading of it in severall parts of the known world even in our Britain That it was here discovered in Queen Maries dayes And punished by fire in the reign of Queen Elizabeth and of King James That the same is now revived by this Commenter the qualitie of G. M. who negotiated in the Printing and publishing this Commentary Chapter II. That the Commenter though he carefully concealed Page 4 his own name yet caused this his Book to be presented to divers persons of quality That this Commenter is the first that ever published this Heresie in our English Print Three reasons conceived why he concealeth his own name Chapter III. Of the licensing of this Comment the Licensers Page 7 censure of it and an Apologie for him in that he called this Commentarie a Comment and in his letter to an honourable Person declared it to be erroneous The copy of the Letter a parallel passage of Libanius concerning Julian and the Manichees concerning their Founder Manes the ancient practice of burning such hereticall books Chapter IV. The Commenters compliance in unsainting the Page 10 Apostles The reason why the Title of Saint was of old withdrawn from Churches by the decree of a Council That the abuse of images occasioned it and yet that the Title of Saint was not denied to the persons of Holy men Of his condemning Tombes Something concerning Hypocrisie in long hair and short Of the reason of the Nazarites long hair and the hypocrisie of their imitators Chapter V. The Commenters compliance with the old Arians Page 15 The judgement of the Ancients concerning the Authour of the Epistle to the Hebrewes A Vindication of Eusebius concerning the words Homo ousion and Homoi ousion and also of the Nicene Fathers falsly charged by the Commenter as if they favoured his own Heresie How the Father and the Sonne are said to be Opposite and yet both are but one God The Commenters Errour in the Logicall Doctrine of Relatives Chapter VI. That this Commenters principall designe was by Page 16 his pretended Commentarie to darken and extenuate or confute the clear Evidences of this Divine Epistle onely because therein are many great Testimonies of Christ's Godhead That herein he imitateth the practices of the old Hereticks Marcion Valentinus and the Manichees The Commenters misexpounding Hebrewes 1. 6. in allowing Divine Adoration to Christ and yet will not acknowledge him to be more then a creature and in applying the appellation Jehova to one whom he denieth to be the Supream God contrarie to Psalme 83. 18. what prostration signifieth Chapter VII That this Commenter mis-expoundeth Hebrewes Page 21 2. 2 3. That the Gospel is therefore preferred before the Law in that the Gospel was delivered by God himself immediately for it was delivered by Christ himself who is the Supream and onely God whereas the Law was delivered indeed by the same God but mediately by the Ministery of Angels or Creatures A true Exposition of Acts 7. 53. and of Gal. 3. 19. and Exodus 20. 21. Moses and Paul reconciled That