Selected quad for the lemma: heaven_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
heaven_n earth_n holy_a son_n 6,849 5 4.8446 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A00919 A Catholike confutation of M. Iohn Riders clayme of antiquitie and a caulming comfort against his caueat. In which is demonstrated, by assurances, euen of protestants, that al antiquitie, for al pointes of religion in controuersie, is repugnant to protestancie. Secondly, that protestancie is repugnant particularlie to al articles of beleefe. Thirdly, that puritan plots are pernitious to religion, and state. And lastly, a replye to M. Riders Rescript; with a discouerie of puritan partialitie in his behalfe. By Henry Fitzimon of Dublin in Irland, of the Societie of Iesus, priest.; Catholike confutation of M. John Riders clayme of antiquitie. Fitzsimon, Henry, b. 1566.; Rider, John, 1562-1632. Rescript.; Rider, John, 1562-1632. Friendly caveat to Irelands Catholicks. 1608 (1608) STC 11025; ESTC S102272 591,774 580

There are 6 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

misbeleeue the Father who exclude the Sonn holy Ghost from infinit diuinitie and coequalitie with the Father as doth Melancthon Caluin Beza c. For suche as is the Father suche is the Sonn suche is the holy Ghost Yf he infinit they also must be infinit è contrà Wherof after at the holy Ghost Almightie 10. Of this parcell I haue in the 68. Vide num 68. numbre manifested manyfould principal Protestants resolutly denying the omnipotencie of God Besyd citations out of Caluin in the sayd number seel 2. Instit c. 7. n. 5. 24. lib. 4. c. 17. n. 24. in ps 37. v. 4. Therfor for auoyding superfluitie I referr the reader therto And for more abundant proofe yf Caluin be also perused in the citations of this margent you shal finde him flouting at our doctrin that God is almightie and tearming it blasphemous Here is a pittifull spectacle exhibited toward the first and principal article of our beleefe and euery woord therof Farr hath it bene from my intention or wonte in which protestation I refuse not my greatest enemyes verdict to falsifie or peruert any testimonies alleaged Let it therfor be euery carefull Christians resolution not to slumber in the mayne chaunces of religions purloyning by fayre benedictions out of his hart considering these authours so much offended with this beleefe are the principal founders of protestantcy And consequently that they fayling in the very foundation must lykewyse haue litle soundnes in the rest and deserue wholy to be suspected 2. Article of S. Ihon. Maker of heauen and earthe 11. First it is necessarie for the right beleefe of this Article to confesse that the Sonne and holy Ghost created as much as God the Father they not being distinguished one from another as they are God and consequently their doings are and must be all one in external operations such as is the creation of the world Calu. con Valentin Gentil l. 2. Instit. c. 14. n. 3. Contrary to this Article is Caluin first in saying the name of God peculiarly to belong only to God the Father Secondly in saying that Christ considered according to his person may not be called creator of heauen and earthe Which impiouse paradox being allowed to be true besyd all other absurdities Christ according to his person should not be God or at least-their should not equalitie or God head be beleeued Thirdly in saying in c. r 4. Genes v. 18. Et in c. 6. Ioan. v. 57. Christ our Lord to be but a second king next to God and a second cause of lyfe Yf he had any regard to S. Paul affirming Philip. 2. Christ not to haue thought it any robberie to be equal to God would he haue aduentured to disinherit him in this maner of his coequal Godhead But why should he haue regarded S. Paul when the very deitie of our Sauiour Iesus Christ could not retaine him from this abhominable blasphemie Fourthly in saying that God in heauen is not dutyfully and sincerly serued without synne euen by the angels them selues Calu. in cap. 1. Colos v. 20. Wherby is insinuated contrary to Scripture Apoc. 21. that in the heauenly citie ther is some thing defyled When therfor all belonging to power and gouernement to the Father of wysdom knowledge and doctrin to the Sonne of benignity liberality plentie and sanctification to the holy Ghost is imputed and appropriated the meaning is only to ascribe all good among the three persons not to exclude any good from any one of them as being all three equaly God and consequently not vnequaly fountains of all good as well in particular as in general But more touching this article will follow in treating of Christs ascension to heauen 3. Article of S. Iames. And in Iesus Christ his only Sonne our Lord. Vide num 24. 12. Most Protestants to be against this article appeareth besyd what is sayd in the precedēt article in our 24. n. For some affirme that Christ is not the Messias some that the name of Christ is a filthy name some that he was a deceauer of the world some that he was not God some that he had but a meane measure of Godhead Edward Rogers against the sect of the familie of loue London 1579. some that he was ignorant his discourses absurd him selfe no more God then Socrates Trismegistus c. The same blasphemies are extant in the first and second article of the Famile of loue The same also are implyed by the Proto-Puritan Cartwright saying that he could not be perswaded the Israelits to be so madde Cartwr 2. replic pag. 191. as to beleeue him to be the liuing God whom with their eyes they did behould to be a miserable and simple man These I say demonstrat that Christ for taking our infirmites is distrusted by these compagnions to be the liueing God and our Lord. Secondly those are against this Article who equal them selues in Gods fauoure and right to heauen vnto Iesus Christ Gods only first begotten consubstantial sonne our Lord. Wherof in this examin in the 5. numbre and after somewhat is to be found Thirdly they beleeue not in Iesus Christ our Lord who distrust any part of his doctrin whether it be of the B. Sacrament or otherwyse because they can not conceaue it in their vnderstanding Caluin in cap. 6. cap. 7. Ioannis Caluinists generaly to be such is confessed by Caluin saying VVhen the reason of any thing doth not appeare vnto vs such is our great pryde that we esteeme it nothing Fowerthly contrary to this Article is Caluin saying Vide num 9. pr●●ce● It is foolishnes to thinke that God the Father doth continualy begett his sonne For therby God the Father is made sometyme not to vnderstand which is his begetting and the Sonne is abolished who is not otherwyse actualy Sonne of the Father but by determinating actualy the relation of the Father to him selfe Besyd all other demonstrations of their blasphemies that euery one may know that I charge them not vndeseruedly and hatred against Iesus Christ the Sonne of God mentioned in the forsayd 24. number harden your harts to heare Luther saying Nihil mirum si Arius Iudaeus Mahumetes Luther disp de ●e● thes 18. Tom. 2. Wittemb latin● totus Mundus negent Christum esse Deum It is no merueil yf Arius yf a Iew yf Mahumet and all the world denye Christ to be the Sonn of God It is no meruell in deed that besyd Arius Iewes and Turkes the Lutherans be so perswaded considering Luther thus teaching among them is so principal an Euangelist 4. Article of S. Andrew VVho was conceaued of the holy Ghost borne of the Virgin Mary 13. First they are contrary to this Article Vide Maldonat in cap. 1. Math. who blasphemously affirmed the holy Ghost to haue bene Father to Christ in maner of other Fathers toward their children as appeareth in Maldonat Vide Caluino Turc
ibid. That he was a deceiuer of the worlde ibid. That he was not Gods Sonne ibid. That he was ignorant in his discourses absurde and him selfe no more God then Socrates or Trismegistus ibid. Cartwright that he could not be perswaded the Israelites to be so madd as to beleeue him to be the liuing God whom they saw with their eies to be a miserable and simple man pag. 142. Luther that it is no maruell if a Iew if a Turke if all the world denie Christ to be the Sonne of God pag. 143. Cureus that Christes blood is putrified in earth pag. 144. Rider his Birth Life and Death not a sufficient satisfaction for sinne pag. 145. Caluin that he refused to dischardge the office of a Mediator pag. 145. That at his passion he had no sufficiēcie aboue other men ibid. That in his prayer appeared not a temper at moderation ibid. That he was tormented with doubtfullnes of his conscience ibid. That he was astonished with the feare of the Bottomlesse pitt of horrible destruction ibid. That ouer-whelmed in desperation he ceased to pray to God ibid. this he Luther and Caluin that Christs diuinitie endured death pag. 146. Heshusius Christ our deliuerer not our Redemer pag. 145. Caluin that the humanitie of Christ is not ascended into heauen pag. 149. Celius that his sitting at the right hande of his Father will continue no longer then till the day of iudgment ibid. Caluin they are furiouslie madd who affirme any blood to be lōger conioyned with Christes flesh pag. 201. Socinus that Christ was not an instald Priest till after his death yea after his ascention pag. 232. VVilliam Cowbridge that all that did beleeue in the name of Christ were damned pag. 308. Iohn Teuxsburie that the Iewes of good zeale put Christ to death pag. 309. Slibus that Christ is dead according both to Humanitie and Diuinitie pag. 150. Musculus That the diuine and humaine nature of Christ died both together vpon the Crosse ibid. Molineus that Christes meritts profit vs nothing pag. 144. Caluin that his meritts are not to be opposed to the Iudgments of God pag. 146. That by all his woorkes he deserued not heauen ibid. He that he wanted some perfection of a glorious Resurrection pag. 148. Others Christ neuer to haue risen but yet to remayne dead ibid. Zuinglius that the great Pretor of Luther apparelled in his red hose might as easilie haue issued out of his Sepulcher as Christ did out of his pag. 149. Caluin that Christ had not power to giue vs his bodie and together to be in heauen pag. 123. Christ to be all one with S. Michaell Replye pag. 65. These woordes to be vntrue In God the Sonne who hath redeemed me and all mankinde ibid. BLASPHEMIES Blasphemies against the holie Ghost Melancthon Caluin and Beza exclude the Sonne and the holie Ghost from infinit diuinitie and coequallitie with God the Father pag. 141. Others that the holie Ghost was Father to Christ in maner of other Fathers towards their children pag. 143. Caluin flouteth at the holie Ghost and sayth that nether in the ould Testament nor the new is there any thinge to be founde of his Diuinitie pag. 151. Another that he would returne sooner to his Cloister then beleeue in him pag. 153. Iohn VVessell Foxes Martyr denied the holie Ghost to proceede from the Father and the Sonne pag. 308. Another Iniquitie is not fulfilled by men but by the holie Ghost Replye pag. 41. Puritans that the holie Ghost Baptiseth before Baptisme ibid. pag. 66. The holie Ghost not to teache the Church all truth ibid. VVhom he sanctifieth thoughe he afterwardes sinne yet neuer needeth to repent ibid. BLASPHEMIES Blasphemies against the holie Trinitie Caluin wisheth that the name of Trinitie were buried pag. 140. The prayer O holie Trinitie one God haue mercie vpon vs to be Barbarous ibid. Reiecting out of his prayer bookes Glorie be to the Father and to the Sonne c. ibid. Ochinus one of the Apostles of England in K. Edwardes dayes saith the name of Trinitie to be a Sathanicall name ibid. The familie of Loue reiect the Trinitie and Diuinitie of Christ as papisticall fictions ibid. Luther disclaimeth the forsaid prayer O holie Trinitie c. pag. 140. The Seruetians tearmed the B. Trinitie a three headed Cerberus or hell hounde ibid. A solemne legation of Caluinists into Polonia to haue the mysterie of the Trinitie abolished ibid. A Caluinian Sinod helde forbidding by publick decree Ministers in sermons to mention the name of Trinitie pag. 140. Och nus they of the ould Testament did not beleeue the Trinitie Coequalitie Cōsubstantiallitie Eternitie c. ergo no more ought we pag. 178. Englishe Puritans Glorie be to the Father and to the Sonne c. to be a vaine repetition Replye pag. 65. BOOKES Of the hurt which proceedeth by reading of hereticall Bookes pag. 163. Of the censure of the Puritans touching the Communion Booke of the Protestants pag. 12. Et Reply pag. 88. 89. Bookes sett out by Protestants with these Titles Caluin tending to Iewishnes pag. 272. Another Booke An admonition out of the woorde of God that Caluinists are not Christians but only Iewes pag. ibid. The prohibition of readinge hereticall Bookes by Beda pag. 270. The seuerall changes of the Booke of Common prayer confessed by Doctor Doue Replye pag. 109. CALVIN How impudently Caluin is commended by some Reformers One saith Caluin the chiefest interpreter of Scripture then whom neuer any better or wiser pag. 15. Another the most noble instrument of Gods Church which hath bene since the Apostles times ibid. Another that if in the same houre wherein Caluin should preach S. Paul come from heauen and preach that leauing Paul he would goe heare Caluin ibid. Another Caluin the stone reiected by the bu●lders made vp in the corner head pag. 15. Another Caluin is to be preferred before all the Doctors of the Catholique Church that haue beene from the beginning ibid. Another then which the sunne neuer beh●ld any thinge more holie or more excellent since the Apostles departure pag. 334. Caluins forme of ecclesiasticall Discipline pag. 219. CALVIN In what contrarie colours other Reformers haue pictured Caluin One calleth Caluin a Sacramentall heretique pag. 16. Another Caluin died desperat ibid. Caluin at his death rendred vp his soule into the handes of the Diuels ibid. Caluin died gnawed with wormes issuing out of a filthie sore in his prieuie members ibid. Caluin marked on the showlder for Sodomie pag. 16. Caluin cruell bloodie tirranous treacherous c. ibid. Another Beware Christian Reader beware of the bookes of Caluin and especially in the article of the Trinitie pag. 151. Another that he openeth a gate to Mahumetisme Arianisme ibid. Another Arianisme Mehumetisme and Caluinisme three brethren and sisters and three paire of breeches of one clothe pag. 151. Another who feareth to fall into Arianisme let him beware of Caluinisme ibid. Caluin for his insolencie together with Farrell and Viret
corpus meum which is the proposition whereupon all this disputation and contention dependeth After the same manner a man may prooue the blessed virgin Marie to be Iohn the Euangelists mother Ihon 19.27 and say still notwitstanding any text brought against him as Christ said Ecce mater tua B●hold thy mother say what yee will the words be Christs words therefore they must be true they need no interpretation Christ is not a lyer And if a man aske a confirmation and say how prooue you this proposition of Christ to be true literallie in deed as Christ spake it This is a loose kinde of Logique You bring in for confirmation of the proposition the proposition it selfe and say Ecce mater tua Behold thy mother Th●● when the Catholiques demaund of you to prooue your proposition of Hoc est c●●pus meum whether it must be taken corporallie or spirituallie grammaticallie o● misticallie In Schools it is called Petitio principij then you bring the proposition it selfe and say Hoc est corpus meum to prooue Hoc est corpus meum and so you would prooue idem per idem which is verie childish and a begging of that as graunted which is yet in question betwixt vs and vndetermined VVhether the woords Behould thy mother had one or lyke sence with the woords This is my bodye Fitzimon 49. WE approue our sacrament to be the true body and blood of Christ because he being the Trueth and whose saying as the prophet saith is effected Ioan. 14.6 Dixit facta sunt mandauit creata sunt he spoke and it was done Psal 32.9 he commaunded and they were created because he I say 1. Cor. 11.24 Matt. 26.28 him selfe did affirme it to be his body which was to be deliuered and his blood which was to be shedd and consequently his true body and his true blood which truely and not only figuratiuely were deliuered and shedd These powerfull woords of Christ which your great Melancthon saith Melanct. l. 3. epist Zuing. Oecolamp fol. 132. Mat. 24.35 wil be one day thunder to the misbeleeuers and which woords when heauen and earthe will fayle will remayne are our foundation Yf the blessed Virgin Marie be sayd to be the mother and S. Ihon the sonne it is sayd in such maner as only to giue to vnderstand that he should honoure and cherishe hir as his mother and no otherwyse and so the scripture sheweth he conceaued it as being without any circumstance conioyned to conceaue otherwyse But in the B. Sacrament Christ a whole yeare befor in the sixt of S. Ihon haueing forwarned Ioan. 6.55 c. that he would giue to be eaten his true fleash which should be their meat truely and his true blood which should be their drincke truely at the last supper making his new testament all being very attentiue in solemne maner he tooke blessed and broak bread saying this is my body c. So that it is not an idle proofe or idem per idem to proue it to be Christ corporaly when we shew Christ our omnipotent Lord to haue affirmed it with the former circumstances more to this effect shall follow God willing in our 62. number 50. But you should haue prooued by other places of Scriptures Rider that Hoc est cor●us meum changeth the nature and substance of bread and wine and you should haue proued by the Scriptures Esay 7.10 that the Prophets foreshewed this strange con●eption of Christ to be conceaued of bread as well as they did foreshew his con●eption of the virgin And you should haue prooued by the Scriptures that it is ●ot onelie a Sacrament but a sacrifice not onely Eucharisticall but as well pro●itiatorie and not onelie profitable to the quicke but also to the dead nay not ●nelie for plagues among men but murren and diseases also among beasts Cum ●ultis alijs quae nunc c. Now shew by the Scriptures that Hoc est corpus meum hath such a sence that the simple people may repose themselues more securely vpon your opinion and proofes But till you prooue it which you can neuer doe they must know you haue and doe deceiue them with false expositions against veritie antiquitie au●horitie yea consent of the old Church of Rome VVhether Christs woords doe testifie a change of nature And whether it was prophecied 50. THe nature of bread and wyne must be changed Fitzimon when they are turned into the body and blood of Christ one proofe serueth to proue the one and the other What proueth Eua to be a woman Gen. 2. Exod. 43. Exod. 7.17 Ioan. 2.8 proueth hir not to ●e a bone wherof she was made What proueth Moises rodd turned to a serpent and after into a rodd the riuers of Egipt turned into blood water turned into wyne and all other such alterations proueth thē not to haue bene what thy were befor The prophets did shew this not conception but transubstantiation when they fortould that Christ should be a preest according to the ordre of Melchisedech who sacrificed in bread and wyne wherby was signified Psal 109.4 Hebr. 5.6.20 c. 11.17 Iuel in his reply art 1. saith Iuel the sacrifice of the holy communion I say who sacrificed by confession of VVhitaker as also did Christ according to his being a preest of that ordre and that can not be conceaued of ether of bothe but in bread and wyne For the other cruental sacrifice of his passion was done not actiuely by Christ but only passiuely and that rather according to the ordre of Aaron then of Melchisedech Malach. 1. The prophets did shew this transubstantiation when they fortould that among the Gentiles from east to west there should be a cleane oblation offred to Gods name in euery place c. Which can not be vnderstood of any thanksgiuing or prayses as you imagin such being not peculiar to the Gentils Chrysostom hom in ps 95. but frequent among the Iewes Vpon which woords saith S. Chrysostom Behould how cleerly and playnly he hath interpreted the mystical table which is the vnbloodie Host Yea besyds all other proofs by Scripturs and Fathers which by the mercie of God shal be afforded in our treating of the Masse take this also from your Beza Beza in cap. 22. Luc. u. 20. Regius in 2. par operum resp ad 2. libros E●ky de missa c. 7. Bibl. l. 1. de paschate Israelit pag. 25. 26. Vrbanus Regius Tremelius and Bibliander That befor the coming of Christ the ancient Israelits were commanded to celebrat a figuratiue communion in bread and wyne in token that the Messias would institute no figuratiue but true and substantial communion in the same By which is proued to the full contentment euen of the least indifferent that for whom soeuer Christ offred it may be proffitable be they quick or dead such sacrifice contayning truely and substantialy the same
Caluin affirme yf any Christum opponere velit iudicio Dei Calu. l. 2. Instit. c. 17. n. 1. non sore merito locum quia non reperietur in homine dignitas quae possit Deum promereri would oppose Christ to the iudgement of God there would noe place remayne to any Merit because there is not in man that dignitie to deserue any thing of God Holinshead in the yeare 1579. pap 1195 Behould and be amazed that Christs merit euen of death is impugned and he affirmed to be only man and not God Sixtly they euacuat the passion of Christ who in playne and expresse tearms say For Acts. pag. 468. 487. 1335. Stows in Elizabeth pag. 1195. Calu. con Heshu● pag. 39. Beza in colloq Mompel 1. p. 522. Bucer super Ioan. pag. 34. Muscul in loc theol fol. 363. 367. Zanchius in Miscellan p. 3. 200. 206. Aret. apud Schlusselb l. 1. a. 6. 25. 26. l. 2. fol. 42. theol Cal. Eius sanguinem mortem passionem nihil contulisse ad redemptionem generis humani His blood death and passion to haue nothing auayled to the redemption of mankinde Christus omnibus suis operibus caelum non est promeritus Christ by all his works deserued not heauen Suche were some of Foxes most famous martyrs such are Familists and many English ministers by confession of your Chroniclers Lastly they euacuat Christs passion who affirme his death and passion proffitable only for the predestinat so that other might haue noe benifit therby Such is Caluin Beza Bucer Musculus Zanchius Aretius Wherby followeth that he is not redeemer of all or mediator for all offenders not intending their saluation Sixt Article of S. Thomas He descended into hell the third day he rose againe from the dead 25. First this article is impugned in saying with Carlile it to be a pernitiouse heresie that Christ descended by Beza saying per oscitantiam irrepsisse Carlile in his booke that Christ discended not into hell printed at Lond. 1582. Beza Apol. 2. ad Zantes pag. 385. Vide Caluino Turc p. 567. Zuingl tom 2. fol. 458. Luthapse De Couc PP p. 276. it to haue entred into the creed by inaduertismēt Secondly by making his descension only to haue bene his pangs vpon the cross wher not only his humanitie but ô execrable blasphemie his diuinitie indured payns yea death So saith Luther Christum suum saluatorem se nolle agnoscere si sola humanitas ipsius passa suisset Did cleerly and manifestly professe that he would not acknowledge Christ to be his Sauioure yf only his humanitie had suffred And Caluin secondeth faythfully all such impietie of Luther saying Hie est eius ad inferos descensus quod eam mortem pertulit quae sceleratis ab irato Deo instigitur This is his descēsion to hell that he suffred that death which God in his angre inflicteth vpon the wicked Omnes inquit in anima luisse paenas Caelu in catheches c. de fide Calu. l 2. Instit c. 16. n. 10. in cap. 26.27 Mat. Item ibid. Beza quae Deo vindice a damnatis in inferno expetuntur He suffred all the payns in his soule which by God in reuengement are exacted of the damned Agayne Nihil actum erat si corporea tantum morte fuisset defunctus It had bene of no accompt yf he had dyed only a corporal deathe In which doctrin is contayned besyd Christs death of body a death of his soule yea of his diuinitie and after enduring such death him to haue suffred all punishments of the damned Thirdly this article is impugned by making this descension nothing els but Christs burial in his sepulchre Vide Feuardent in sua Entremanger c. 27. So Zuinglius Oecolampadius Bucer Caluin Musculus Tremel Marot Beza Carlile c. affirme because the common name for hell in hebrue doth signifie some tyme a graue or fosse But elswher Caluin confesseth Vide Caluino Turc pag. 567. that the sayd name more vsualy and proprely doth signifye hell Act. In cap. 32. Deut. c. 16. num Calu. in Annot. in cap. 2. In 1. Reg. c. 2. In num c. 16. In Deut. c. 32. In Psal 6. In Iob. 2.26 In Amos. c. 9. the place and estate of the damned And diuers or the residue as Bucer Oecolampadius and other principal protestants as Peter Vermil otherwyse misnamed Martyr Paul Fage Sebastian Munster Castalio and Flaccus Illyricus do oppose them selues against Beza being most ernest in the former opiniō shewingby manifould texts of scripture the hebrue woord Scheol the greeke woord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the latin woord infernus to signifie an infernal propre place of damned or at least of included by their right vsual and natural signification as much as panis Beza in c. 2. act in c. 11. Math. in c 10. 16. Luc. In Apoc. c. 20. in latin signifyeth bread Yea Beza him selfe confesseth that the greeke and latin woord contayne no lesse but the hebreu woord some tyme signifyeth graue And therfor to auoyd Christs discending to hell therby to maintayne former blasphemies of his suffring the payns of damned on the crosse and to euacuat the deliuerance of the Fathers out of their Limbo wherby also is implyed the doctrin of purgatorie yf it once be graunted ther euer had bene a third place of inclusion for sowls to auoyd I say these blocks in his way he translateth by his owne confession as aforsayd contrary to greeke Beza in c. 2. Act. and latin interpreters and Fathers And in his confession of the faythe printed anno 1564. to frustrat all disputation about the mater he thought cōuenient to omitt wholy this part of this Article And although he be driuen consequently to translat Christi anima not Christs sowle but his carcas not his victorie ouer hell but his victorie ouer the graue which the Englishe bibles of an 1562. 1577. eschued but it an 1579. approued and many other such deprauations cōtrary to sacred scripture yet would he not desist Beza in c. 16. Luc. vntill he had occasion to refute Brencius supposing there is no hell or infernal tormēts but only metaphoricaly And then forgetting him selfe proueth by scripturs and fathers vpon the 16. of Luc. that Christ descended into the earth into the receptacle of those who were long restrayned For euidence of whiche third place of souls besyd heauen and eternal hell In their 2. reply against D. Whitg pag. 7. and in ther. 2. admonition to the parlament pag. 43. out of whiche ther is no redemption the Puritans ernestly reprehended the creed of the Apostles made in english meeter among the psalms wherin is sayd his spirit did after this descend into the lower parts to them that long in darknes were the true loue of ther harts and also egerly inueyed against one of their cheefe martyrs for professing the same beleefe And so forwardly pressed into their angre against this article that
to establish a forme of Beleefe seauen of them excommunicated the other fiue as being the only impediment of their agreement pag. 135. See more in the woord Vnitie BEZA Beza employed his whole life in fulfilling his luste writing his looues and reuenging his corriualls pag. 17. Beza by his owne confession vsed Harlotrie with another mans wife and Sodomie with a boy ibid. The impious Elegie of Theodore Beza pag. 346. Of Bezaes d●ssembling with the Duke of VVitberge and of his boasting thereof that he had singularlie deceaued Ein tronkens bolts the drunken nobles of Almain pag. 231. Beza charged by some with dissimulation answered that it was lawfull to cogge lie dissemble and deceaue to establish their Religion ibid. BIBLE How some Heretiques corrupte the holie Bible other some denie part of it and other some doe wholie reiect it Luther reiecteth all the ould Testament pag. 152. Ochinus reiecteth all the new Testament pag. 152. pag. 177. Curius that he had rather neuer preache then to expound any thinge out of Moses and that Moses belongeth nothinge to vs pag. 152. That Moses belongeth to the Iewes and not to Christians ibid. Zuinglius preferreth the ould Testament before the new pag. 177. The same likewise doth Ochinus 178. The principall drift of Rider and other Reformers vtterly to abolish all Scriptures both new and ould ibid. Iohannes Dietenbergius an Heretique hath collected in Luthers Translation of the Bible 874. Corruptions Reply pag. 47. Esmerus who succeeded Luther and Melancthon 1400. Falsifications ibid. Bishop Tunstall gathered in the only new Testamēt of Tindall 2000. Deprauations ibid. Broughton to the Lor. of the Counsell that the Bibles of England were fowlie corrupted ibid. Doctor Reinolds requireth that there may be a new Translation of the Bible because the former were Corrupt ibid. His Maiestie that now is that he could neuer yet see a Bible well Trāslated in Englishe but the worst of all he thought the Geneua to be ibid. Luther of the ould Testament Non mihi Ecclesiastes sed c. Preacher not to me but to the Iewes preache thy Moses Reply pag. 48. Againe not a title or point of Moses belongeth to vs. ibid. That it is a false opinion that there be four Gospells ibid. And he against all the holie Scriptures in expresse tearmes Nihil est cum Scriptura Bible Buble Babel The Bible Buble Bable together with the Scripture is nothing ibid. The Puritans say The publique Englishe Translations of the Bible causeth millions of millions to reiect the new Testament and to runne to eternall flammes Reply pag. 68. They it peruerteth the text of the oulde Testament in 800. and 8. places ibid. They the Englishe Bibles contayne verie partial vntrue and seditious notes too much sauouring of Traiterous conceits ibid. And finallie that it is inferior to the Turkes Alcaron whereof see more in the woord Scripture BISHOPS Of the hatred of Heretiques against the names of Archbishops Bishops c. pag. 228. Cartwright sayth that Caluin would haue shaken at the name of an Archbishop and haue trembled at the name of a Bishop ibid. The remorse of Melancthon for the deposing of Bishops would to God would to God it lay in me to restore the gouermēt of Bishops pag. 230. Such was afterwardes Caluins remorce saying God doth let vs now see what hurt we haue done that by headlong inconsideration and rashe vehemencie we had so cast off the Pope pag. 230. The complaint of Puritans against their Bishops p. 217. Their watchwoord that they could not be blessed because of the Cleargie ibid. Martin Marprelat that such lawes as maintaine Bishoops are no more esteemable then those which maintaine stewes pag. 223. Bishops to be members not of Christ but of the Diuel and Antechrist Replie pag. 67. All that proude generation must downe c. Bishops Deanes Archdeacons as such be no members of the Church pag. 67. BLASPHEMIES Of diuers most horible and Blasphemous opinions of late Reformers against God the Father against Christ against the holie Ghost and against all the holie Trinitie Blasphemies against God the Father Caluin Peter Martyr Zuinglius and Beza make God the author of sinne which is to transforme God into the Diuel pag. 140. Zuinglius sayth when we commit adultrie or murther it is Gods woorke as the mouer author and inforcer ibid. Caluin the thiefe by Gods impulsion doth kill and is oft constrayned to offend ibid. He tearmeth it blasphemie to say that God is almightie flouteth at this our Doctrin pag. 141. He That God is not serued in heauen without sinne euen by the Angells themselues ibid. He that it is foolishnes to thinke that God the Father doth continually beget his Sonne pag. 143. Others That God the Father hath a spirituall kinde of bodie hauing handes pag. 144. Caluin That sinnes are committed not only by Gods permission but by his will Reply pag. 40. 41. He All sinnes by whom soeuer committed are Gods good and iust woorkes ibid. Item the will of God is contrarie to his commandements ibid. The Diuel lieth by the ordonance of God ibid. God suggesteth dishonest desires with effectuall decreee operation and will ibid. Luther that at the day of Iudgment God will be mistaken and iudge many men vndeserued by pag. 150. Of Selius who affirmed there was no God because he oft blaspheming him yet liued thereby in greater prosperitie pag 86. BLASPHEMIES Blasphemies against Christ Caluin doubteth of the diuinitie of Christ pag. 30. Castalio mistrusteth the Messias to be yet come ibid. Francis Ket Georg Paris and Iohn Lewis executed in England for deniall of Christs Diuinitie ibid. The true beleefe of Christes bodie birth quite abolished by Beza pag. 69. The familie of loue that Christ was no otherwyse borne of the Virgin Marie then he is borne of their flesh pag. 124. They Of his rising the Sepulcher being shutt that the Angell had made the passage and that there was no miracle perceiued therein ibid. Of his entring into his disciples the doores being shutt Caluin saith that he knocked and so obtained entrie ibid. Next that by his diuine vertu he opened them ibid. Bullinger that an Angell had opened them ibid. Aretius that they opened of their owne accord ibid. Peter Martyr that he entred in at the windoe ibid. Simonius that he entred in by the Chinkes of the doore ibid. Thalman that his bodie diuinished like a third and so passed thereat ibid. Others that he entred in at the Tonnell of the chymnie ibid. Beza that the question of his Consubstantiallitie with the Father and the lyke to be but trifles pag. 140. Caluin the name of God to belonge only to God the Father pag. 141. He that Christ considered according to his person may not be called Creator of heauen and earth ibid. He Christ to be but a second kinge next to God pag. 142. Other Protestants that Christ is not the Messias pag. 142. That the name of Christ is a filthie name
name of Monkes pag. 277. OATHES Of the sundrie formes of Oathes of diuers Kinges at the time of their Corronation Reply pag. 112. The new Oath of Alle●gance and the ould Oath of Supremacie to be all one in substance ibid. pag. 113 The new Oath of Alleigance representeth the sl ight practised by Iulian the Apostata against the Christians ibid. pag. 114. ORDERS How contemptibly Heret ques speake of the imposition of handes calling it but a shaking of the elect into the Assemblie pag. 230. 231. See more in the woord Priest PATRICIVS Of S. Patrick and of his wonderfull vertues and holines of life Ep. Ded. par 6. 7. 13. S. Patrick with diuers other captiues being taken by the Irishe men in the warres against the Brittons was carried prisoner by them into Ireland Ep. Ded. par 30. PERSECVTION In the Abbay of Leuxouium in France 900. Monkes were all murthered in one day by pirates Ep. Ded. par 17. An Answere to the Obiection of Reformers touching the Persecution vnder Queene Marie pag. 4. A notable historie of Eusebius concerning the Persecutions of primatiue Christians sutable to this of our times Replye pag. 90. How Master Nigram was miraculouslie concealed in a search in Master Belinges house and how our Ladie appeared vnto him Replye pag. 93. 94. Christians prohibited by publique edict to enter into any common house boothe or markett or to goe abroade out of doores Replye pag. 96. The inscriptions of Dioclesian and Maximilian in marble pillers after their longe and greate persecution of Christians Reply pag. 83. Kinge Boleslaus of Polonia killed the holie Bishop Stanislaus as he was saying Masse Replye pag. 28. His Maiesties that now is Grandmother forced to vse hir conscience in a priuat chamber Replye pag. 97. How Eudoxia wife to the Emperor Arcadius abused the Legatts sent to hir husband in the cause of S. Iohn Chrïsostom Replye pag. 104. And how Valerius by violence brake one of the Bishops thumbes ibid. How the noble Same 's being a verie feruent Christian and abundantly riche hauing vnder him a 100. slaues was by the Emperor condemned to serue as a slaue to the most abiect of all his slaues together with his wife and all his retinewe Replye pag. 105. How Hunerick Kinge gaue the wife of the Lorde Saturus to the verie meanest of all his groomes Replye pag. 105. 106. Of the sundrie sortes of paines inflicted vpon diuers holie Martyrs for the faith of Christ. Replye pag. 116. PIXES How Gorgonia adored Christ inclosed in a Pix vpon the Altar pag. 318. Pixes vsed from the Apostles times ibid. Of a certaine woman who attempting to open a Pix was terrified by fire issuing out thereat ibid. Clebitius a Zuinglian Minister writeth of Heshusius another Reformer that when the siluer Pixes were melted and made away he caused others to be made of wood to reserue his Eucharisticall bread in which he kept so sluttshlie as was not good enough for a Cowheard to put his butter in pag. 199. PLACES That Christ was in fleshe in two places at once in heauen and in earth proued out of the Actes 9. 17. pag. 132. That his ascending into heauen much more proueth then disproueth his being in the Sacrament pag. 131. See more pog 276. Christ neuer so tied to one place that he could not be in another proued by VVestphalus and Melancthon pag. 54. Christ both sate at the table and held him selfe in his owne handes and that according to the leter as saith S. Aug. pag. 57. POPE The vniuersall authoritie of the Pope excellentlie proued by S. Bernard pag. 20. The Bishop of Rome called Pope and Apostolicall Lord of the vniuersall Church pag. 284. Flauianus chosen Pope by miracle pag. 371. The Pope called the Ruler of the house of God The Chiefe of all Priestes The Head of all holie Churches The head of the vniuersall Church pag. 2. POSSIBILITIE Of the Impossibilities imagined by Protestants against the B. Sac. VVhether it be impossible that qualities can be without a subiect pag. 132. VVhether any thinge beyond the condition of a naturall bodie be possible pag. 133. PREISTES How ancient Heretiques termed primitiue Priestes in contempt Romanish and Roman Priestes as Heretiques doe at this day pag. 2. Rider alloweth Priesthood as well to women as to men pag 228. Luther defēdeth that women may Preach Baptize and Consecrate and disputeth against S. Paul commending silence in women pag. 229. PRINCES Of the doctrine of Puritans touching the deposing of Princes Caluin saith that it is a villanous thinge vnwoorthie and wicked that a Christian man who is free should be subiect to other lawes then heauenlie and diuine pag. 218. Beza and Zuinglius that Princes are to be deposed and that the people should be only rulers of them selues pag. 218. Sundrie seditious Pamphletts dispersed by Puritans to this effect ibid. That they haue power to depose and dispose of Princes with the least breath of their mouthes pag. 222. Cartw●ight saith that the Prince submitts his Scepter vnto the Scepter of Christ and lickes the dust of the Churches feete pag. 223. The like is taught by Trauers Knox and others ibid. Of the insolent vauntes of Puritans that they made a Prince of Royall blood to lament his offence openly before the publique assembly pag. 224. That the supereminent authoritie of the Kinge must be confined within the limits of some particular parish Replye pag. 69. That he is to subiect his soueraigne power to the pure and Apostolicall simplic●tie as of an ouer-swayning and all commanding Presbiterie ibid. That his meeke and humble Cleargie haue power to binde their Kinge in chaines and their Princes in linckes of iron and if in case they see cause to proceede against him as against a Tyrant Replye pag. 69. See more in the three woordes Puritan Rebellion and Treason PROMOTORS The Promotors of these dayes like vnto those wh ch were employed in the persecutions against the Primatiue Christians Replye pag. 82. Tertullian saith that they were publique Baudes Iuglers Magitians Cheaters c. ibid. Meliton saith they were impudent and peruerse Sicophants and rauenous Thieues Replye pag. 82. The Lorde Cooke saith the Promotor is both a Beggar and a Knaue Replye pag. 91. Their office I confesse is necessarie and yet it seldome hapneth that an honest man is employed in it ibid. PROTESTANTS Protestants Religion professed but 30 yeare ould pag. 30. Protestants compared to Esops dogge pag. 109. Protestantrie had his originall from a Iew named Iosephus Albo. pag. 272. The Turkish Alcaron printed in Germanie by the direction of Protestants ibid. Aboue 200. seuerall sectes of Protestants pag. 291. VVhence Protestants were first so called pag. 300. How the common cause of Protestants is ingaged vpon Riders successe Replye pag. 59. PVRGATORIE Of Purgatorie Caluin testifieth prayers for the dead to be of aboue 1300. yeares antiquitie Replye pag. 28. See more in the woord Resurrection PVRITANS What Puritans are