second man is the Lord from heaven So though Adam was the first man a living man yet it was not a living soul that proveth that Adam had a quickned Spirit page 12◠But in this you do miserably soobisticate For though the Apostle doth draw a parallel between both the Adams If you do well ponder the Scripture you shall finde that the parallel doth not stand so much between Adam before his fall as between the first Adam the second after the fall 2ly upon good consideration you shall finde that the Apostle in this Scripture doth not speak so much concerning the Spirit of God in the soules of the Saints as concerning the spirituality of their bodies that shall be at the resurrection It is sown in corruption it is raised in incorruption it is sown in dishonour it is raised in glory it is sown a natural body it is raised a spiritual body There is a natural body and there is aspiritual body 1 Cor. 15.43 44. If then you will needs conclude Adam to be a carnal man before his fall because his body was not made a spiritual body by the same reason you must conclude all the Saints that have ever been since the creation of the world to be carnal men and absolutely destitute of the work of the Spirit For the bodies of the Saints are yet carnal and must abide in their incarnality till the resurrection of the dead But whereas you build so strongly upon that expression the first man Adam was made a living soul the last man Adam was made a quickning Spirit verse 45. This doth not prove the first man to have been meerely carnal or absolutely void of the Spirit before his fall For it is not the scope of the Apostle in this Scripture to speak of the excellency of man made after the image of God but onely of the corruptible state of the body as it standeth in immediate relation to that immortal condition which it shall have at the resurrection of the dead And whereas it is said the second man was a quickning Spirit this is meant principally of the divinity of Christ by and thorough which he will raise the dead So then if you will build upon this ground and argue from hence that the first man was a meere carnal man because he was not a quickning Spirit by the same principle you must conclude that all the Saints living are carnal men For of what one of them may it be affirmed that he is a quickning Spirit who by his power and divinity is able to raise the dead But if you will make a right analogy let us compare the things that ought to be compared First let us consider what the first man was before his fall and what the Saints are as renewed by grace Secondly let us compare what the first man might have been if he had eaten of the tree of life and what the Saints shall be at the resurrection of the dead For the first of these if you speak of the Saints as renewed by grace though their bodies be natural they are spiritual in respect of the inward man The same may be said of Adam before his fall though his body was made of the dust yet by grace and special favour he did carry the image of God For the second if you shall affirme that all the bodies of the Saints shall be made immortal and spiritual at the resurrection consider what the body of Adam might have been if he had continued in his obedience and eaten of the tree of life If you would make a right collation between state and stat ethe parallel should runne in these termes But because you stand so strongly upon this expression that the first man is of the earth earthy the second man is the Lord from heaven seeing you will have all this to be applied to Adam before his fall I pray you resolve me this question seeing the Apostle saith as we have born the image of the earthy so shall we bear the image of the heavenly Who are they that bear the image of Adam before his fall I think if you were put to it you could not produce any one instance in all Europe Asia Africa or America that ever stood up after this similitude The scope of the text is onely concerning man after the fall and how the resurrection of the dead doth take away that death which is brought in by the fall In the close of the Chapter you propound this question whether was not Adam to have dyed an eternal death for eating of the forbidden fruit For the clearing of the question let us distinctly set down how the three kinds of death did seize upon Adam and how they come upon all his branches First for spiritual death it is evident that he died this death as soon as he did eat of the forbidden fruit For the temporal death he fell under the reign of it the same day he sinned And for eternal death though according to the truth of the commination Adam and his posterity should have dyed the Lord Christ stepping in did set a stop to the sentence And therefore for the cause of the condemnation of man it is now principally and immediately for the neglect of the grace of God that should lead him to repentance But you adde further I can safely say that if Adam was to have dyed an eternal death and that by the appointment of God then Christ neither would nor could have stept in nay he could not have lifted up his little finger to have helped Adam or his posterity page 125. I answer If God had decreed in his secret purpose that Adam and all his posterity should have dyed the death in such a case Christ neither would nor could have stept in to cross the Decree of God but Sir who is the man that doth maintain that position For my part I take the Decree of God to be one thing and the outward denunciation of judgment to be another For the Decree that cannot be changed but the sentence may recieve alteration according to divers outward circumstances and conditions that may occurre Besides if you should build never so strongly upon the letter of the text we can easily reconcile the truth of the commination in saying that Adam might dy the death the same day he sinned ☞ though the Lord was not pleased presently to inflict death in all its kinds From all which we do conclude if the Lord Christ came to free men from the reign of death Heb. 2.14 15. We may easily gather that Adam brought himself and all his posterity under the dominion of that syrant and so he and all his should have dyed that kind of death if the Lord Christ had not stepped in But you go about to deface this speech in the end of the Chapter for if in case that Christ had not stepped in there had been no recovery this were to exclude all other means and to limit
causes of that being which he had in the beginning and tell us that God saw all that he had made and behold it was very good Gen. 1.32 From whence you draw this Conclusion doubtlesse these words were spoken to take off some future objections or to prevent mens sayings that Adam consisted in creation of two sorts of people one being assigned for heaven the other for hell And lest we should judge that God made any part of him for damnation at that time he assures us that he made all things very good When I read this passage of yours I do call to minde a kinde of torment used in the Primitive times when the persecutors would expose the bodies of Christians to wilde beasts they did sometimes cover and disguise them with the skins of other living creatures So do you here and in other parts of your book with the doctrine of Gods free election When you see that there is such a Majesty in the truth it self that you cannot well oppose it you do draw an ugly visage and forme over it to the end that you may baite and encounter it more easily at your own pleasure The Lords making all good in the beginning doth not infringe the election of some and the non-election of others if these things be rightly construed And therefore whether you consider men in that first state made after the image of God or in that state as fallen in both these I conceive all mankinde to be equal The difference of elect or non-elect is immanent onely in the Decree of God and election doth onely so farre forth begin to be manifest as men living under the meanes come to be called justified sanctified by the Spirit Rom. 8.30 2 Thess 2.13 We have no other way to take notice of election but this onely For that saying of yours that Adam consisted of two sorts of people in creation the one part being assigned for heaven and the other for hell We willingly acknowledge that the number of the elect were known to God before the foundation of the world yet this difference between man and man in the Lords secret intention did make no difference between man and man in the creation or in the fall The nature of all men elect and others was equally good before the fall as it was equally corrupted and depraved after the fall As in the like case Jesse was the father of many sons of which one was designed in the secret counsel of God to rule the Kingdom of Israel As they were the sons of one parent they were all equal made of one blood partakers of the same education though one was specially designed for the Kingdome So in the present case the nature of all men may be equally good before the fall all may have one and the same image of God all may fall in one and the same parent yet God may in a special manner intend to bring some to salvation and to leave others voluntarily to run their own ruine he may have mercie on whom he will have mercie and he may have compassion on whom he will have compassion You do then plainly impose upon us with your sophistrie when you fetch arguments from some temporal acts to overturne the Lords eternal Decrees But this is a passage onely by the way we will go to the next Chapter CHAP. II. Wherein Adams abilities did consist HEre you define ability that it is a fitnesse in the subject commanded every way answerable to performe any action that the Creator is pleased to call the creature to pag. 5. In this I do agree that originally God did proportion the abilities of Adam to the commands that he gave him I do also willingly acknowledge with you that he had first a capassity to receive intelligence secondly directions thirdly abilities in present possession and fourthly time But whereas you say p. 7. that our Lord the Creator afforded all these aforenamed accommodations as a sufficient means for every man to obey his commands In this I beleeve you do not onely equal but go beyond Pelagius himself For you say in effect that man hath as great abilities after the fall as before But lest that any may think that these are the consequences of mine own making and that they are not the true result of your doctrine let him go to the fourteenth chapter of your book and there let him see how you do expedite the question You propound the quere what Adam retained of his forfeiture after his death and here you determine that his power was inwardly as great to keep the commands of God as before You say if in that service of God which Adam had to do he was compleatly furnished by God why should I judge that he would employ him in a more hard service and not aford him sutable accommodations seeing God was as willing that his commands should be obeyed after as he was before the fall For I judge the work that God set Adam about before the fall he had ability to do after the fall if God had given him a command to returne into the garden page 110. Let any man who readeth these words judge in his own heart whether Pelagius himself could have spoken more to the derogation of the free grace of God in Christ then you have done To this if we adde the several passages in your Treatise concerning the improvement of nature and the freedome of infants from original sin and compare all together we shall finde the whole tenour of your doctrine to be manifestly destructive to the Covenant of Grace We will therefore endeavour on the contrary to shew the positive truth And therefore seeing God doth require obedience of man after the fall I do freely assent that he doth give sutable accommodation But how the accommodation doth not consist in the presence of any natural ability but in the promise since the fall there is an ability to obey the Lords commands but that ability is out of man in Christ onely To him they must go to supply all their wants and he must help them to performe all the duties enjoyned If you stand upon the proportion of abilities to commands then say that the ability is in Christ onely to be had and we shall easily agree He of God is made to us wisdome righteousnesse sanctification and redemption 1 Cor. 1.30 In him all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge are hid Col. 2.3 Of his fulnesse have we all received grace for grace John 1.16 It shall never be denied by me nay I will maintain it that now since the fall there is a proportion betwixt the ability and the command but then the ability must be had from Christ onely and the immediate supply of his Spirit In this sence Saint Paul had abilities in a meet temper and correspondence to his duties for he saith I can do all things through Christ that strengtheneth me Phil. 4.11 12 13. And in another place my grace
heaven page 110. I do fully agree with you in this that the employment which God had to do for Adam after the fall was as spiritual as before But then consider the ability does not lie in man but onely in the Lord Christ and in the Word of promise The true Church doth hold and ever hath held that the imployment which God hath now for every true believer is a spiritual imployment Yet they hold it also as a truth of the foundation that Adam lost all ability to spiritual good But here you think you have an unanswerable argument for say you in that service which Adam bad to do if he was compleatly furnished by God why should I judge that he would employ him in a more hard service and not afford him sutable accommodation Had God no other way to give Adam and his posterity sutable accommodation to obey his commands but there must be a necessity in it for him to retain the same abilities after which he had before the fall when you thus endeavour to proportion abilities to commands in a natural way you overthrow the scope of the Gospel and the main sense of the Scriptures which shew that all ability is to be had from Christ God hath tempered salvation and hath so put it into the hands of Christ that all that want abilities should go to him in the sense of their own misery And to this end he hath suffered the first man to fall and to lose all natural abilities that supply and help may be had from Christ onely in the Covenant of grace This is the main scope of the Scriptures And judge you now whether you do not go against the main foundation of the doctrine of Christ when you teach such things as these The Examiners of the late Synods confession of faith in the Chapter of free-will Sect. 2. are in a manner as foule as you For the Synod having laid down this truth concerning Adam in the state of innocency that then he had a power and freedome to will that which was good and pleasing to God but yet mutably the Censors are not contented with this but they seem to plead for the same liberty still in man after the fall These are their words That man in the state of innocency had freedome and power to will and do that which was good seems to us in some sort to hold true still of all men as they are now borne till they have personally and actually sinned If this be so what need is there of a Christ to sanctifie and to regenerate and to take away the sinne of the nature But now we will go along with you You say I judge the work that God set Adam about before the fall he had an ability to do after the fall if God had but given him a command to return into the garden again page 110. By this account then he had an ability to keep the Covenant of works after his fall The Covenant of works was that wherein life was promised to Adam and in him to his posterity upon condition of perfect and personal obedience Will you say then that he had ability to keep this Covenant if God had given him liberty to return into the garden Let us hear what ground you have for this God say you knew well enough that Adam had not lost his understanding nor his memory for he could tell the use of the tree and where it stood that should have cured him of his deadly wound otherwise the Lord would not have made so strong provision to prevent him page 111. True indeed we read that the Lord placed at the East of the garden of Eden Cherubims and a flaming Sword which turned every way to keep the way of the tree of life This Provision in the general sheweth that Adam knew the particular place where the tree of life stood and in general what was the use of the tree yet for all this he might be bereaved of his spititual knowledge Natural men may altogether be destitute of the knowledge of the Spirit yet judge of external objects represented to the senses A Temporary believer who hath lost his feeling may tell the time when the place where and the instrument by whom he was first wrought upon Therefore if we take it as granted that Adam knew the way to the tree of life and the general use of the tree this doth not prove him to retaine the same spirituall and internall knowledge which he had before his fall Let us heare the Inventory of Adams losses as you make the account You tell us that Adam forfeited his body and his limbes and that God would bereave him of all after that nine hundred thirty years were expired And you further adde that God cast him out of that pleasant place of accommodation that neither he nor his posterity had power to do the will of God in the garden any longer page 111 112. This is the total which you bring in of his losses and this is a very short reckoning As for Adams being cast out of the Garden it was a part of his misery to be deprived of that earthly mansion but it is the least part of his losse The principal damage which he met withall was internal in his soul which was more than the losse of a thousand gardens But we go to your next question CHAP. XIII Whether Adam did dye in the same day that he did eat the forbidden fruit TO the clearing of this point you begin with the divers acceptions of the word day And then you come to eavil against the Lords day in these words ☜ This day some affirme that it was the first day of the week but there is little to be shewn for that It is a very private Interpretation because there is no publick manifestation by the Word but that men are willing to strengthen the opinion and practise of a first dayes Sabbath with a reference to the changing of Gods Commands and setting up of their own thoughts page 114 115. By this it is clear what your judgment is concerning the Christian Sabbath but we will briefly clear the point First it is of the Law of nature that a due proportion of time be set apart for the worship of God Also the Lord in his Word by a positive and perpetual Command binding all men in all times hath appointed one day in seven to be kept wholly unto him Exod. 20 8 10 11. Now this from the beginning of the world to the resurrection of Christ was the last day of the week and from the resurrection and so downward it is changed into the first day Upon these grounds therefore if the question be put to us wherefore do you keep one in seven we plead the morality of the Command And if it shall be surther alledged why keep ye the particular first day in memory of the resurrection of the Lord Our ground is the perpetual use of the Church
in the Prophetical Scriptures But the scope of the text is plainly to be taken for a literal ordinary day as we have formerly proved And strange it is that the Lord in the denunciation of judgment should go to the typical and parabolicall expressions used in Daniel and the Revelation and Peters Epistle After this you come to enquire whether Christ by his suffering did not prevent the falling of death upon Adam And you resolve it in the negative For say you either Adam must suffer or the Word of God seeing God had once declared the sentence thou shalt surely dye In case then he should give his Son to prevent the death of Adam there had been a clear contradiction page 119. In the commination there are some things which I do acknowledge to be infallible as the Laws of the Medes and Persians which alter not and therefore to make good the sentence all that are now born into the world after the course of natural generation are borne in the state of spiritual death subject to the miseries of nature and shall inevitably be brought to temporal death at last All these things do hold by vertue of the first sentence yet you must take heed that you go no further because the second man hath all fulnesse of grace to repair the losses brought in by the first By his intervening patience and long-suffering is extended to all the sonnes of men And therefore whatsoever you suggest to the contrary there is indeed and in truth no contradiction between the sentence in the day thou eatest thereof thou shalt dye the death and the delay thereof in a qualified sense In some particulars long-suffering may be extended and yet in others there may be a speedy execution of the sentence But you go on seeing God would not have Adam to come near the tree of life therefore he would not have him to be free from death that way page 119. Neither do we maintain that it was the purpose of God to free Adam in that manner that he should not taste of a temporal death He came under the dominion of that death the same day he sinned and the most holy Saints that are must all dye before they can be raised again to set forth the truth and certainty of the Lords commination Yet for all this at present the stroke was stayed by the Mediators blood and long-suffering was extended to men that salvation might be had by the Covenant of grace As for the tree of life it is most true that God did forbid Adam accesse to that tree not absolutely because he would not have him to recover life but because he had provided another way for the restoring of man by Christ the promised seed He would not come to the most extream and final execution of the sentence because his purpose was to have a posterity upon the earth and a seminary for the Church Further you argue there was a necessity for Adam to dye otherwise Christ could not make him alive page 119. Here you mistake the state of the question we agree that Christ did not dye simply to free man that he should not fall into the dust but only to raise him from the dust again It was necessary to fulfill the truth of the commination that Adam should return to dust but it was not necessary that he should return to dust the very same day It was necessary that he should fall under the reign of death and under a necessity of dying the same day he sinned and this to continue to the resurrection of the just Then this mortal shall put on immortality and this corruptible shall put on incorruption 1 Cor. 15.53 The Apostle also saith when he shall change these vile bodies that they may be made like his glorious body Phil. 3.21 All the bodies of the Saints shall be made like the body of Christ as now it is in glory But how did the bodies of the Saints begin to be vile bodies By vile bodies he doth mean these corruptible tabernacles of the soul lyable to diseases and to all the miseries of nature But when did this vilenesse and misery begin seeing they were not made vile by creation They began to be vile bodies the same day that Adam did sin they have been so ever since and they must continue such unto the resurrection and then the bodies of the Saints shall be made conformable to the bodie of Christ in glory Philip. 3 Vlt. CHAP. XIV Whether Adam did dye a spiritual death yea or no IN the discovery of this point you observe this method First you shew what spiritual life is Secondly you resolve upon the question For your description of spiritual life though you miserably confound the Scriptures we will take it in the best sense for such a life as hath the Spirit for the cause Gal. 4.19 John 6.63 Col. 33. But you erre in your application when you use such an expression as this that Adam had not such a cup of water in all his foure Rivers You say also that he could not savour the voice of the resurrection from the dead for the goodnesse of a Saviour must be resented by those that are lost but Adam knew no such need page 122. Your argument is fallacious because Adam had not spiritual life in the same way as the Saints now have therefore he had no spiritual life at all He might have ability to love Christ as Lord Creator Further you say that the voice of forgivenesse of sinne was a stranger to him Well let this be admitted it doth not prove the point neither Sicknesse it self was a stranger to Adam before his fall will you inferre then that there were no herbs for medicine and that the Lord did not create the herb of the field with a medicinal vertue So in the like case what if remission of sinne and the way of pardon of sinne by Christs blood was a thing hidden from Adam as being not compatible with his condition will you inforce from hence a want of capacity in him to understand the mystery of salvation by Christ or will you affirme from hence that he was a meere carnal man before his fall Take heed that by these and such like positions you do not reflect upon God himself The Apostle saith the carnal mind is enmity against God for it is not subject to the Law of God neither indeed can be Rom. 8. ver 6 7. If you go to the Original of this enmity or non-subjection and say it did proceed from the fall of Adam you do agree with us But if you go higher and stand upon it that Adam was a meere natural man by the condition of his creation then you will lay the blame upon God that set him in such a state of enmity and whither will you go in the issue if you maintain such positions as these But to make good your assertion you argue The first man is of the earth earthy the
much of both here and else-where is only a notion of his own commenting For when God made man in the beginning he made him in a state very good but when he fell he left all his posterity not only in an imperfect but in a sinful condition As for that middle state of deficiency which he imagins I know not where it is to be found unlesse it be in the Atlantis of Plate Besides if animality be only a state of deficiency why doth the Apostle so plainly tell us that the animal man receives not the things of the Spirit they are foolishnesse unto him This cannot be a state of meer imperfection but a state of direct opposition the principles of animality diametrally opposite to the things of the Spirit Michal scoft at Davids dancing before the Ark. Lot seemed to his sons-in-law to be as one that mockt when he told them of the destruction of the City the preaching of the crosse seemed to be very meane matter to the Philosophers and learned Grecians Now shall we say that all these were only in a state of animality or imperfection and no more I think none will easily believe it But in the close of all he hath these words In the state of animality saith he a man cannot go to heaven but neither will that alone carry them to hell and therefore God doth not let a man alone in that state for either God suggests to him that which is spiritual or if he doth not it is because himselfe hath superinduced something that is carnal Rep. We are told here of a state that carries neither to heaven nor to hell and I beleeve if we go to men of ripe years there is no man lives in this estate in all Asia Africa Europe and America Why then doth he trouble us with that which is not Further we do agree that the Lord doth at seasons suggest something that is spiritual to animal men by this they are enabled to see their own misery and to judge themselves Now this doth rather strengthen the force of the argument for if an animal man could purely of himselfe perceive the things of the Spirit what need had he of the suggestion of the Spirit But for that which he addeth that the animal man doth superinduce something that is carnal I think this cannot reasonably be denyed and therefore I do not see but the state of animality and carnality both are equal estates of enmity against God Thus have I been more large in clearing those Scriptures which concerne the maine of the question in others of lesse moment I will be more briefe SECT 3. How God punisheth the Fathers sin upon the children THe end wherefore he is so willing to dispute this point he himselfe doth expresse pag. 40â— Vpon this account alone saith he it must be impossible to be consented unto that God should still under the Gospel after so many generations of vengance and taking punishment for the sinne after the publication of so many mercies and so infinite a graciousnesse that is revealed to mankind in Jesus Christ after so great provisions against sin even the horrible threatnings of damnation still to persevere to punish Adam in his posterity and the posterity for that he never did Rep. In this passage of his he doth shew how much he doth mistake the scope of Scripture for it is the chiefe designe of the holy Ghost to amplifie the sin of Adam and all the evil that comes thereby to the end that all might be humbled and that they might come to Christ as to a Sovereigne remedy to help them in their misery And in very deed whatsoever he thinks to the contrary the Doctrine of the Gospel cannot be so clearly preached without the knowledge of that misery that came by the fall The knowledge of the one doth as it were open a doore to the knowledge of the other Againe in the whole processe of the discourse he is very faliacious Suppose ordinarily God doth not now punish the fathers sin upon the children is this a good argument to prove that the sin of Adam is not rightly imputed to posterity Other Parents comparatively are but private persons and their sins are but the sins of private men but Adam was the root of the nature and his sin was the sin of the whole kind As on the other side the suffering of Christ upon the crosse was not the suffering of a private person but the suffering of the whole humane nature By this the lost sons of men have a doore of grace opened the tender of grace is made to all and the great condemnation is for unbelief Now we will consider what the rules are which he doth lay down First saith he God may and doth very often blesse children to reward the Fathers piety as it is notorious in the famous descent of Abrahams family But the same is not the reason of favours and punishments Answ Here we would entreat him to observe that it is true that for a long descent God did shew kindnesse to the family of Abraham but if he well observe the matter this kindnesse was extended not so much for Abrahams piety as for the Lords own promise and for his truth in keeping the promise Againe whereas he saith There is not the same reason of favours and punishments let him shew why the Jewes are cast away why they have been little better than out-casts of the Covenant now above one thousand five hundred years Questionlesse as God will magnifie his mercy in their call so for many ages together they have stood and do yet stand under the burthen of that heavy curse which they did wish upon themselves his blood be upon us and our children c. Secondly saith he God never imputes the sin to the son or relative formally making him guilty or being angry with the innocent eternally Answ Though we should say the sin of Adam is imputed to all his relatives and that also to their eternal damnation this in the whole were no hard assertion as long as we teach that a second man is provided for eternal salvation We willingly yeild as the case now standeth the great condemnation is for the neglect and the contempt of that salvation mercy and grace that is to be had by Christ If men run out the years of the patience and long-suffering of God if they continue in unbelife and hardnesse of heart if they resist the convictions and operations of the Spirit as they are administred in their respective seasons I think it is but just that they should fall not only under the guilt of their own actual sins but under the eternal damnation also that was brought upon them by the sin of Adam the root of the nature All the hurt of such a position if it be a hurt is more vigorously to drive men to Christ As for infants though they are fallen into all kinds of miserie temporal and eternal by Adams sin what harme
piety and godlinesse On the other side others trusting in their own ability liberty of will and the like they bereave the Lord of that honour that is due to him He sheweth that a middle course is to be taken between these two extreames and that the rocks on either side are to be declined For the clearing of this he sheweth how far a natural man may go in all natural civil ecclesiastical actions and how by the general assistance and concurrence of the Spirit he may do great things in all Physical Mathematical Ethical Oeconomical and Political kinds of learning Only when he cometh to that which is spiritual here he plainly tells us that a man hath no power and to use the words of the Author he hath no ability to offer a sacrifice to God What is then to be done here he tells us that we must have recourse to the freenesse of the promise where all fulnesse is to be had To that end he cites the words of the Prophet Isaiah I will poure water upon him that is thirsty and floods of water upon the dry ground Isa chap. 44.3 And againe Ho every one that thinsteth come ye to the waters of life chap. 55.1 Having cited these and such like passages he comes to close in these words Quae testantur ad percipiendas dei benedictiones nullos admit ti nisi suae paupertatis sensu tabescentes Which testifieth to the receiving of the blessings of God no others are to be admitted but such only which languish with a sence of their own poverty And then he addeth Semper sanè mihi vehementer illud Chrysostomi placuit Fundamentum nostrae Philosophiae esse humilitatem That of Chrisostome hath alwayes pleased me exceedingly Humility to be the foundation of our Philosophy Or rather that of Augnstine even as the Retoricion saith when he was demanded what was the chief thing in the precepts of eloquence answered pronunciation what the second pronunciation what the third pronunciation So if thou mayest ask me concerning the precepts of Christian Religion first second and third alway it would please me to give this answer humility and more he hath to the same purpose I have drawn out the words more at length because the Author himselfe is a chiefe leader in the reformed Churches and because indeed they are the patterne of whole some words By this our Author may understand though Original sin be asserted the natural liberty of the will denyed and the necessity of sinning introduced yet neverthelesse according to the tenour of these principles men may have a sacrifice to offer and exhortations may be of good use Dr. Preston in his Treatise of humiliation pag. 224. doth propound the question who is able to practise according to his knowledge His answer is and I will appeale to any mans experience let him look back to the course of his life and examine himselfe was there any particular action in all thy life from which thou wast so hindred that thou caust say that thou couldst not do it was there any particular sin of which thou couldest say this sin I could not abstaine from And howsoever we may make it a matter of dispute in the Schooles yet the worst man in whom we may think corruption of nature to be most strong when he comes to dye doth not excuse himselfe but acknowledges he is guilty In the next page he propounds the maine objection How can a man he condemned for not believing and turning to God when naturally he hath no power to do these things To this he answers Though a man hath no power to believe and repent yet he is condemned for the neglect of such precedent actions which he had a liberty to do c. Our Divines in the Synod of Dort in the Suffrage of the Britans do distinguish betwixt regeneration and those antecedaneous acts that lead towards regeneration These antecedaneous acts a natural man by the help of the Spirit may do as to see sinne mourne over it judge himselfe for it he may go further he may taste the sweetnesse of the promise and have some beginnings of joyes all which he may fall from many other testimonies may be brought to shew that our Authours by the tenour of their principles do not extinguish the endeavour of man but do rather more truely direct and instruct men to follow the right course I shall stay too long upon this point because I perceive that it is the chief rock of offence that our Author doth stumple at he further sheweth All things else are determined and fixed by the divine providence even all the actions of men but the inward act of the will is left under the command of laws only and under the arrest of threatnings and the invitation of promises Answ It s true that laws threatnings promises are made with special respect to the will But that the inward act of the will should be so under laws that it should not be under the decree of God this Tenet doth exclude the chiefest part of the world from being under the care of God Nay if the matter be well considered here is the very height of the Atheisme of the ancient Philosophers To maintaine the absolutenesse independency and sovereignty of the will of man upon the earth they do deny the providence of God in heaven Cicero upon this reason did deny the infallibility of the prescience of God And our Authour seemeth to me to come too near to this coast In the next words he gives his reason And that this is left for man can no way impede any of the divine decrees because the outward act being over-ruled by the divine providence it is strange that the Schooles will leave nothing to man whereby he may glorifie God Answ If it be supposed that the inward act of the will be under the decree of God as well as the outward action this doth not take away that by and through which we may glorifie God For it is not all kinds of necessity that are contrary to liberty but some onely The necessity of nature the necessities of a bruit instinct and outward compulsion cannot stand with liberty but the necessity of the decree of God the necessity of infallibility the necessity of the creatures dependency can be proved to consist with liberty For God usually brings his decrees to passe by the free act of his creature which work under his decrees and are subservient to those ends that he hath appointed And for the inward motions of the will innumerable examples may be brought to prove that they are under the decrees of God The Kings heart is in the hand of the Lord and he turneth it about as the streams of water Prov. 21.1 God hath put it into their hearts to hate the whore and to burne her flesh with fire Apoc. 17.11 And speaking of the Egyptians he turned their heart to hate his people Psal 105.25 Besides the promise A new heart and