Covenant PAg. 42. The next general head by him laid down to prove is That Circumcision is no covenant of grace but of works called a covenant in the flesh Gen. 17.13 but before he comes to his Arguments he opens the meaning of the word everlasting which is to be understood of the ever of the Law especially when it comprehends with it their seed in their generations and this he lays down as a maxim to prove which he brings Lev. 16. Num. 25.13 Exod. 40.15 ch 30.20 21. all which places speak of the Levitical Priesthood either of the line in which it should run or the way by which they were instated into their office by anointing or the manner by which they approacht constantly into the Tabernacle or of the manner of their atonement for the people all which should remain as an everlasting statute in their generations A. That by everlasting we are to understand the ever of the Law onely is no sound maxim for though it be so to be understood in the places quoted because it related to the Priesthood and Tabernacle worship yet if that covenant in Gen. 17. Which Circumcision sealed then upon which God promised the Land of Canaan as a type of heaven remains still as an everlasting covenant then his maxim is broken see therefore that parallel Text Psal 105.6 to Gen. 17. O ye seed of â—braham his servant he is the Lord our God he hath remembred his covenant for ever the word which he commanded to a thousand generations which covenant he made with Abraham and his oath with Isaac and confirmed the same to Jacob for a Law and to Israel for an everlasting covenant saying To thee will I give the Land of Canaan c. From which it appear that the word everlasting is to be understood to a thousand generations i. e. to the worlds end because the giving Israel Canaan was a type of heaven and from Abrahams days to Christ was but forty two Generations Therefore this difference is to be observed that when he speaks of statutes everlasting to be observed in their generations 'T is meant of those Statute Laws that God gave to Israel for worship and so as Mr Patient observes it is to be understood for the ever of the Law But when the Holy Ghost speaks of a covenant everlasting as in Gen. 1â— 15 'T is such a covenant that is to continue so long as the heavens and earth shall continue so Paul calls it Heb. 13.20 The blood of the everlasting covenant And this in Gal. 3.17 was that covenant that Christ confirmed to Abraham and his seed 430 yeers before the Law and called everlasting in that place of Genesis befo e quoted which everlasting covenant â—oâ—k in an everlasting seed and is called a Gospel-preaching to Abraham Gal. 3.8 and by John Rev. 14.6 is also explained to be an eveâ—lasting Gospel from hence also it is that Paul in Heb. 6. when â—e speaks of Gods blessing Abraham and multiplying his seed which he c lls â—he hâ—rs of promise calls it his immutable Counsel as relating to both the covenant and the seed of the covenant Now if there be an everlastingness in the covenant which takes in such a seed as it did to Abraham then must it continue longer then the Law or else there must be a mutability So again if the persons row covenant ng were changed i. e. If God were not the same to believers and their seed now as â—e was tâ—en or if believers should now covenant onely for themselves and leave out their seed then there is a mutation of the covenant therefore David in Psal 102.26 27 28. before quoted speaking of the infant seed of the Church tells us that though the heavens and earth should wax old and perish as a garment which words are quâ—ted by Paul Heb. â— 1 to a Gospel-â—h rch yet that Church sâ—ed should continue so also Psal 103.17 18. from everlasting to everlasting and that by vertue of t at everlasting covenant therefore what feeble maxin s this new Doctor teacheth and how ill he compares Texts we may here see Pag 4â— The next thing he opens is these words I will be thy God and thy seeds God and that two ways the oâ—e b a covenant of Grace the other by a covâ—nant of Works the first absolute the second conditional and so God gave himself to be Abrahams God by a conditional câ—vâ—nant of Works A. That this is strange Divinity that God should be a peoples God by a Covenant of Works since the fall I doubt not but it will appear to sound Ch istians from what hath been already said I shall therefore pass it to come to his confused Arguments some of which I have contracted into form to take the better prospect thereof P. Hâ—s first Argument runs thus That covenant that runs upon conditions is a covenant of Works but so doth Circumcision therefore A. To which I answer The first proposition is denyed and dâ—sproved and it is by him confest that faith and repentance is a condition of the covenant So that by this he affirms pro and con and may as well say plainly that the covenant of grace is a covenant of works because it hath conditions therefore his foundation is too weak and rotten for such a building P. In pag. 45. he would prove the land of Canaan to be given to Abraham and his seed by a covenant of works and so would be their God and then his Argument runs thus If God gâ—ve the Land of Canaan to Abraham and his seed upon the condition of Circumcision and keeping the Law then he gave the land of Canaan by a covenant of works but God gave the land to Abraham upon condition he would circumcise his seed Therefore A. This hath been already cleared that circumcision and keepâ—ng of the law was mans part of the covenant of Grace in which the Church was to walk with God being bound up to visible duties then as it is now and that Canaan was not g ven Israel by works my answer to the preceding head makes clear to which I refer the Readâ—r yea it is directly against these Scriptures before quoted Deut. 9.4 5 6 7 8 ch 10 11 12 13 16. Exod. 3.24 Heb 3.18 ch 4.1 2. ch 11. 8 9 10. yea so to affirm is to put an affront upon God himself and to make him ashamed of that title of being Abrahams God Heb. 11.16 See also the twelve Scripture-considerations before mentioned P. In pag 45 46. he brings several Scriptures to prove that Circumcision bound to the keeping of the Law But not one of all those places by him quoted speaks that they were bound to keep it as a covenant of works but as the Law of Christ and so Israels Gospel in which Justification was conveyed and therefore when we read of the Primitive revoltings from Gospel-Ordinances to Circumcision and the works of the law as the Church at Rome and Galatia
duties inward and outward and all this but one Covenant This Covenant was confirmed First to Abraham as a publique Father Secondly to his seed i. e. all the heirs of promises to the worlds end both Jews and Gentiles 1. By Promise 2. By Oath 3. By seale So that what was promised to Abraham was promised to al his seed and what was sworn and seald to Abraham was sworn and seald to all his seed According to this definition also we shall see a twofold admission into Covenant 1. Into the outward priviledges of the Covenant 2. Into the inward grace of the Covenant Hence also we shall have light to see first how hypocrits and wicked men did then and do now get within the Covenant Secondly how such as are within the Covenant do break it As first hee that contemned or slighted or neglected the token or seale of the Covenant to his seed hath broken the Covenant which being outward they might keep Secondly The breach of any part of the Morall Law was a breach of the Covenant and this also might have been externally kept by all that were externally within the Covenant Thirdly All those typicall Church rites might have been kept and the neglect or breach of any one in the due order or manner required was a breach of the Covenant for neglect of the first Gods wrath was so kindled against Moses that he would have kild him for breach of the second and third Israel was also punisht with death many instances thereof might be given Hence also we shall be led to an answere how the â—ovenant is call'd 1. Old and so vanisht away 2. New and so remaines 3. An administration This being briefly premised I now come to give in the Answer to the place by him quoted Jer. 31.32 which he brings to prove that there are two Covenants but grossely mistaken yet so far as we may goe without breach of faith to the truth of Christ in acknowledging two Covenants shall not deny him friendship as namely First That there hath been two Covenants made with man the one of workes before the fall in which man stood alone without a mediator under which covenant al mankind by nature lies to this day which is also materially the same with that righteous Law Morall given to Israel from mount Sinah though upon other tearmes Secondly The other of Grace made since the fall and tendred to Adam in the promise of Christ since which the Law in any part of it is not given as a covenant of workes but as the Law of Christ put in the hands of a mediator therefore Thirdly It was never intended by God either in giving circumcision to Abraham or the Law to Israel that ever Abrahams seed should enjoy Canaan by the law as a Covenant of works but only as hath been laid down in the Analysis as mans part of the covenant of grace Quest But if that was not a covenant of works given to Israel when God took them by the hand in order to bring them into Canaan what then can be the meaning of that place where the holy Ghost speaks of an old new Covenant tells us the new Covenant which he will make after those days shall not be according to the old c. The clearing of this with a Questian or two more will take in all those scriptures brought to this and therefore I further answer First The Covenant there mentioned is call'd new as the Law of love Iohn 13.34.1 Iohn 2.8 is call'd a new Commandment or Law which yet is not new in it self but the same Command as was given to Israel of old Lev. 19.18 And as the new heavens and new earth are call'd new Re. 21.1 And as the new Creature is call'd new which is not the annihilating the old and creating new but the putting of the old heavens and old earth into a new frame of Government and the old creature into a new state of grace so the new Covenant is the same that brought Israel out of Egypt and contained remission of sins and eternall life in Christ by faith with all the blessings of this life but so call'd new Secondly Because those typicall ceremonies and ordinances which were mans part of the Covenant of grace then and related to his dutie in Gods worship were by Christs coming abolisht and new ordinances under the Gospell establisht in room thereof for the promising part of the Covenant of grace from the beginning hath ever been cloathed with the preceptive Conditional part to bind up man to his dutie and walking close with God in his Ordinances of worship And therefore when Christ was held forth in the first promise immediatly sacrifices were instituted a distinction made betwixt clean and unclean creatures the Law of tithes and first fruits observed blood forbidden familie-duties required all which a diligent reader of Scriptures may easily observe from Adam to Moses before there was a publishing the Law from Sinay and so to Christ Track it from Christ again to the worlds end you have the first abolisht a second instituted and as then so still to bind man to his dutie in walking with God but not as in a distinct Covenant of works but as the terms of grace to which man is bound by the Covenant and thus those typicall ce emonies were as old clothes and are called beggerly Rudiments or Rags in which the promising part was clothed and drest The Apostle in Heb. 10. calls the exhibition of Christ in flesh in offering up his blood by once dying and such manner of institutions as should be written by him to be the new Covenant verse 15.16 and puts it in opposition to the Legall sacrifices verse 4. 5 therefore verse 19 20. the second is called the new and living way consecrated implying that as there is now a way to heaven consecrated by the blood of Christ and therefore new so there was a way to heaven before Christ came consecrated by the blood of Bulls and Goats called old by this then we see in what respect the Covenant is called new and old namely as relating to a new or old Church-state the first given as typicall by Moses to Israel as Christs kingdom the second as substantiall by Christ to the same kingdom but still in the same Covenant of grace for a Church state is given in order to a soules enjoying communion with God in his ordinances which is impossible to be by a Covenant of works since the fall thus then the bringing of Israel into a new Church-state under the Gospell is called a new Covenant which God will make with the house of Israel in those daies This gives us light to answer also that other place Heb. 8.6 7. by Master Patient quoted to prove two Covenants because Christ is called the Mediator of a better Covenant establisht upon better promises for if the first Testament had been faultless there would have been no place sought for the second but finding
Adam to Seth Enos Kenan so to Noah Shem Arphaxad and up to Abraham and then to Isaac Jacob and his twelve sons but so in Judah it continued to Christ see Luke 3. to the end compared with Mat. 1. to 17. where you shall finde a spiritual entail by promise and were it not so what incouragement could it be to believers to be Stoickt in family duties had they not a promise to rest upon as touching family blessings Which place in Luke 3. is so cleer that Mr Patient to evade the strength and dint of Scripture makes this whole line to run in a covenant of works the contrary whereto is already proved that no such covenant is made with man since the fall therefore see these Texts which prove an intail Deut. 4 37. Because he loved thy fathers therefore he chose their seed after them So ch 10.5 the Lord had a delight in thy Fathers to love them and he chose their seed after them even you above all people compared with Rom 11.28 as touching the Election they are beloved for their fathers sake * Dâ—ut 30.19 Therefore â—huse life that both thou and thy seed may live Hence it is that we finde the Parents saith drawn forth to believe their seeds interest in the covenant Thus did Eve in the place before mentioned believe the covenant-state of Sâ—th as soon as born And therefore she calls him another seed instead of Abel The like also we find of Lamech Gen 5.28 29. who concludes that though God would destroy and curse the earth yet upon the birth of Noah he should be a comfort to the Church Thus was David drawn forth to believe That because of that Everlasting Covenant God had made with him he should in time have his house to flourish though yet God made it not to grow Psal 89.29 34 35 compared with 2 Sam. 23.5 The like ground of believing is to reâ—ch to these days and to the worlds end concerning the seed of believers right to the covenant as Psal 102.28 the children of thy servants shall continue and their seed shall be established before thee How long was this seed to continue See ver 26 27 So long as heaven and earth should remain Hence it is that God hath promised to be the God of all the families of Israel Jer. 31.1 Isa 65.23 That they are the seed of the blessed of the Lord and their off spring with them Which blâ—ssedness relates to more then externals as by that 102 Psal appears For the heaven and earth was to be folded up as a garment and to wax old but the seed and off-spring of his children should remain and have greater blessings That place Gen. 1â— 3 Mr Patient doth acknowledge to be Gospel but in such low and general terms that in â—ffâ—ct he denyes it For saith he all Nations that are in Christ are blessed When yet he will not acknowledge that ever any Nation were so blest no not the Jews hemselves but onely a remnant And the reason of hiâ— mistake â—s because he considers not that there is a vâ—sible being in Christ â—s in that plâ—ce Joh. 15 41. Abide in we and I in you he that abideth not in me is cut off as a branch So that he confines the meaning of â—â—e promise in thee and in thy seed to Christ onely contrary to tâ—e due some of the wâ—rds F r by thy seed is also meant believers and so Ch â—st myst â—dly in head members is to be understood Gen 13.5 look towards heaven and tell the stars if thou art able so shall thy seed be Mr Patient I hope w ll not make so many Christs and ch 17.7 I will establish my covenant betwixt me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations so if Abraham had a seed in every generation which were to be a blessing thereto So Gen. 22.17 In blessing I will bless thee and will multiply thy seed and thy seed shall possess the gates of his enemies meaning the conquest of Canaan which could not be in Christ personal because the Land of Canaan was conquered many hundred yeers before he came and since t is destroyd So in thy seed all the Nations of the earth shall be blessed ver 8. i e. in the multiplying of Abrahams seed as the stars they should at last come to be a blessing to all Nations by all which places it is cleer that the word seed which he confines to Christ is meant of all believers to the worlds end and indeed to deny this sense of the place is to deny that Abraham had any Gospel preacht to him as any judicious reader may easily observe for that which the Apostle Rom. 3.18 speaks of Abrahams faith to justification is referred to Gen. 15.5 So shall thy seed be that is as the stars of heaven for multitude which Abraham believing it was imputed to him for righteousness This Exposition therefore being granted the other will appear but lame and maimed 3 The covenant saith Mr Patient is not intailed as circumcision was Answ Though there hath been enough said to satisfie men of reason yet I shall here as in many other places be forced to repeat what before hath been spoken If therefore Circumcision be not a covenant of works then it must be the visible part of the covenant of Grace and then it must run upon entail as Mr Patient here grants Therefore let the Reader observe it hath been already proved The covenant had two parts one for spirituals the other for temporals in giving Israel rest in Canaan and all the good things thereof the first part is proved to be Gospel from Gal. 3.8 and that the second also is Gospel see Heb. 3.18 compared with ch 4.1 2 to whom sware he that they should not enter into his rest but to them that believed not speaking of the rest in Canaan which Israel was cut short of in the wilderness And ch 4 1. Let us therefore fear lest a promise being left us We also fall shâ—rt For unto us is the Gospel preached as well as to them From whence it is cleer that Israel never had rest in Canaan by works but by grace and therefore it follows If Israel did not injoy Canaan by a covenant of works and yet they did injoy it by the covenâ—nt of Circumcision then Circâ—mcision was not of works but of grace so that we see our opposites must be forced to acknowledge the visible part of the covenant of Grace to run upon intail to believers and their seed Thus we have done with this first head and have answered all his material Scriptures which indeed doth also answer the next following or any tâ—ing material in his book and though I have undermined his foundaâ—ion so as that the whole structure is fallen yet because I would separate the stones from the other rubbish I shall therefore come to his next general head CHAP. VIII An answer to the second general head touching the
CALEB'S INHERITANCE IN CANAAN By GRACE not WORKS AN ANSWER To a Book Entituled The Doctrine of Baptism and distinction of the Covenants lately published by Tho. Patient Wherein a review is taken I. Of his four Essentials and they fully answered Ergo II. Dipping proved no Gospel practice from cleer Scripture III. His ten Arguments for dipping refuted IV. The two Covenants answered and Circumcision proved a Covenant of Grace V. His seven Arguments to prove it a Covenant of Works answered VI. His four Arguments to prove it a seale onely to Abraham answered and the contrary proved VII The seven Fundamentals that he pretends to be destroyed by taking Infants into Covenant cleered and the aspersion proved false VIII A Reply to his Answer given to our usual Scriptures For Infant-subjects of the kingdom in all which Infant-baptism is cleered and that Ordinance justifyed By E. W. a Member of the Army in Ireland Joh. 1.46 Can any good thing come out of Nazareth come and see Rev. 16 15. Blessed is he that watcheth and keepeth his Garments lest he walk naked and they see his shame Zach. 13.4 5. And it shall come to pass in that day the Prophets shall be ashamed every one of his vision and he shall say I am no Prophet I am a husband-man For man taught me to keep cattle from my youth London Printed for George Sawbridge at the sign of the Bible upon Ludgate-hill 1656. The Author to the Christian Reader especially such who are his Comrades and Brethren in the Armies of this Commonwealth I Shall tell thee no long story of experience to draw on thy belief to embrace either truth or error nor do I think that an Argument sufficient to perswade men besides their reason and Conscience T is that which Gods word condemns in that boasting Church who to intice and allure others cryed out she was rich and indued with substance and wanted nothing when yet she was poor and miserable and blind and naked He that hath faith in this sense let him have it to himself before God and happy is he that condemns not himself in the things he allows These are boasting days wherein men in false ways under false Ordinances pretend to have much communion with God A day is coming when their works will be manifest whether wrought in God or not when wood hey and stubble will be burnt up the work is already on the wheele and a poor doubting Christian then wil lye neerer Christs heart then fleshly boasters it is not mens pretences to be acquainted with the depths of God that will make them sound Christians such there were in the first times of the Gospel that would be talking of depths but the holy Ghost calls them Satans depths I could heartily wish that the Author of the new Doctrine of baptism had no cause to doubt of the currantness of his coin I mean of his principles for heaven but this I am bold to say that did I pretend to be such a master in the school of experience I should not onely question all my teaching but learning also especially when it comes with such high swelling words against the ways of God and let me tell thee though I have no cause to boast of any thing yet in this I will lay my experience against his rejoyce and boast with much confidence and assurance that those Ordinances which he calls counterfeits and cryes down for error c. and stamps such a black brand of reproach upon throughout his whole book shall stand and triumph as the glorious truths of Jesus Christ in matter of worship when all his mists and fogs shall be dispelled with the son of righteousness The Reasons of my undertaking this task are these which follow 1 First Because I thought men of parts and abilities as they would look upon the piece to be weak feeble and inconsiderate and to deserve no answer so their time was better imployed then to spare it to such a work 2 Secondly Lest any on the other hand out of ignorance should think it unanswerable as I hear many that cry it up who are ready to mis judge that our silence gives consent thereto 3 Thirdly Because most of his Arguments I perceive are such as I have lately seen in pieces long since publisht therefore the answer of him doth answer others of the same strain 4 Fourthly Because the standing for this truth for the interest of Infant Church-seed in the covenant is a sprig of generation work as the holy Ghost witnesseth Gen. 17.9 which yet is opposed by our dissenting friends I have therefore used this Trowel with those in Nehemiah 4. 5 Fiftly And to let good men know there are a few names in Sardis that have not defiled their garments who are apt to think the contrary 6 Sixthly And to give a hand to pull them out that are fallen into Rivers to reclaim their practice by informing their judgements or at least to cause them to make a halt and to go no further in error but remember from whence they are fallen and repent 7 Because the name T. P. is lookt upon as the chief in this moist clymate that bears away the bell and therefore fittest to be answered his name being so well known amongst us as also because though there hath been never so much said yet if it comes not forth as an Answer by name there is but few that will vouchsafe to give it the reading As if the most part of that judgement were resolved to act from implicite Faith or to bolt out the truth and shut out the light that shines in so many choice and learned pieces that are publisht both touching the covenant and baptism I cannot but think there are many censorious spirits who will be ready to smite with a reviling tongue because they are even ready to call the Master of the house Belzebub much more therefore a mean servant It is the common language of the children of Belial in these days that if a man do but speak a word for the Ministery and servants of God imployed in that work of double honor as I am here necessitated to do there goes a Priest-ridden fellow All I shall say to such is to remember what Paul saith of scoffing Ishmael Gal. 4.29 30. The spirit by which his book was penned I shall speak little to it here because occasion will be offered to meet with it so fully in the Answer onely this I will say that from one end to the other I have not met with one Scripture by him quoted but hath been most shamefully abused either in Explication or Application and if that large story of his experience were right vvhich he speaks of in his Epistle it is strange that a man so pretending should not hit the right mark of any one Text. God direct us to understand his Minde and Will that so vve may knovv the truth and hold it fast in erring days vvhen there are so many deceitful
Sacraments although it be but for a day this is lookt upon as a sufficient warrant to make such a person fit for the work and thus the practice thereof shall run in the vein of Discipleship one baptising the other which is expresly against the very nature of the Ordinance and all Scripture examples and presidents Look upon John the Baptist a Prophet a man sent by God the Disciples of Christ all by himself called and Commissioned and so they were to administer baptism in a way of Office to the end of the world and not onely the Apostles but their successors also Pastors Teachers Which are as well given to the Church as the Apostles Prophers Evangelists Eph. 4.11 and do and shall continue so long as the Commission remains till the worlds end had it been given equally alike to all the Church Disciples he would not have singled out persons in Office so Philip an Evangelist called by a voice from Heaven Ananias called by a vision from God Act 9. Obj. But Baptism is an Ordinance that belongs to the Church and it is in their power to give the keys as they shall judge fit Answ The Church can do nothing against the truth but for the truth nothing without the rule If granted that all the males have their votes yet the administration of the keys lies in the Office or Angels power for administration of the Seals Rev. 21.12 Ezek. 44.5 11. Thirdly Consider yet further how shall we know who is enabled to bring down God to the soul and the soul up to God Conversion is an act of Grace and not in the Creatures power and though a Minister may be truly called to the work by God and man yet we know the word may not work for many years but like seed may lie hid in the ground yet must not this man baptize any by this rule though converted by others because the success of his own labour lies hid so as that he is not able to say he hath been instrumental in that kind to the souls of his hearers In pag. 7. He strikes down our Ministry at a blow and indeed opposeth diametrically what before he affirmed That though a Minister do preach so as to convert and bring down God to the soul yet if he be ignorant of this practice of dippping which he calls the true way of dispensing the Ordinance and a fundamental he is no justifiable Minister that in stead of dipping shall sprinkle carnal ignorant Children By which we may see that the foundation of a true Ministry in his sense lies more in the water then in conversion For he denies any true Gospel Ministry but those of his own stamp So that when the Apostle Paul affiâ—ms the truth of his Ministry was evidenced by that Seal the seal of my Apostleship are ye in the Lord 1 Cor. 9.2 This Author would have it run The seal of a justifiable Minister are ye in the water and thus he destroys not onely the present Ministry of Christ in this world but also that of the Apostles themselves For as I shall afterwards prove they were all strangers to this practice of dipping their manner being by pouring water on the subject If Jesus Christ shall then justifie our present Ministry in sealing their labors it is too bold an act for a man of such a feeble practice to condemn them Thus the Reader may see his result on both hands when the Argument is brought against our practice then no man is a lustifiable Minister except he know how to plunge and doth so practice when he comes to shew what a lawful administrator is in his sense then he that can bring down the soul to God so that we may from hence see what a Babel Ministry this man of contradictions would set up in the world If I should here ask the Author of this new Baptism under what Ministry he was converted no doubt but his answer would be very favourable to those whom he here opposeth Remember then your third Doctrine That 't is the disposition of such that have the beginning of saving light to desire more and that from them whom God hath spoken to their souls by Or else you may question whether you have any light at all But because 't is to speak a word for the truth in opposing error let me therefore return him Talion Law 1. He that takes the Covenant of Grace for a Covenant of Works can be no Gospel Minister because ignorant of the Gospel in the fundamentals thereof 2. He that affirms a Believer at one time may be under two Covenants of Works and Grace he is no Minister of the Gospel 3. He that denies the extent of the Covenant of Grace to be as large and compleat under the Gospel as it was under the Law can be no Minister of the Gospel 4. He that is not lawfully Ordained to the work of the Ministry he can be no lawfull Minister because like the false Prophets he runs before sent 5. He that shall by his Doctrine and Practice put greater burthen and yoaks upon the necks of Christians then ever the false Teachers did by Circumcision Acts the 15. he is no warrantable Minister But such a one is this Author of the Doctrine of Baptisms ergo The Minor I shall make appear through this whole discourse given in as an Answer to his Book Lastly as to that contempt and reproach which he casts upon the seed of Believers who are Abrahams children calliâ—g them carnal ignorant as though they were uncapable of any good Let him that rails know that he that casts off Abrahams seed when infants as not fit matter for worship doth keep them out as an unclean thing And so though God hath separated them to a holy use they are made unholy and kept off as execrable and so accursed Which the Lord no doubt foresaw when he gave Abraham that promise Gen. 12. I will curse him that curseth thee I say this this word of the Lord will at last reach such and pull them down if their â—est were built as high as the stars of heaven Therefore hear and fear and do no more so wickedly all ye that hope for the blessing of Abrahams Covenant CHAP. III. His second Essential relating to the manner of Baptisme by Dipping answered THe second Essential he so calls in this Doctrine of Baptismes is the manner thereof by Dipping not sprinkling To prove which though he say the word is rendred to Dip Dous Drown or Plunge in this he speaketh with a hood-wink'd understanding and must shake hands with the Roman Tribe that acts from an implicite faith believing as learned men tels him though yet he can hardly afford them a good word or charitable censure As for the place he brings 2 Kings 5.14 where the Prophet bids Naaman go wash in Jordan seven times and he dipt himself Answer Though washing is sometimes by dipping yet not alwaies yea but seldom A man may properly be
Covenant of Works made with Abraham Isaac and so along as this Author affirms then how came the bond-womans son a type of that Covenant to be exempted from that Covenant of Works and Isaac which wes Sarahs son a type of the Covenant of Grace and a child of Promise to be put under that Covenant It could not be for any outward distinction in outward enjoyments for I shmael had more of the glory of the world then Isaac Gen. 17.21 6. Had the mercy intended Israel related onely to externals in giving them a fruitful Country in blessing their corn wine and oyle the fruit of their bodies their basket and store as Mr. Patient affiâ—ms and this to be enjoyed by a Covenant of Works then as a worthy Divine well observes in somewhat the like case how could Esau have been charged for a prophane person for selling his birth-right For there had been no prophaneâ—ess in that because prophaneness supposeth a contempt or neglect of something spiritual which is therfore to be enjoyed upon a spiritual account and not by works 7 What the Prophet speaks Jer. 31.22 and the Apostle Heb. 8. 9. of Gods taking Israel by the hand to bring them out of Egypt is by the Prophet Hos 11.4 interpreted compared with Mat. 2.15 to be an act of a tender Father who owned Israel as a son for as a father in tender love and respect to his young child takes hâ—m by the hand to teach him to go so did God deal with Israel when a child The like be did to Ephraim ver 3. I taught Ephraim also to go taking him by the hand so when he destroyed Sodom Gen. 19.16 Whilst Lâ—t â—â—gered as being unwilling to leave Sodom the Text saith he laid hâ—ld upon his hand and brought him forth And the reason is given because the Lord was merciful to them So that what God did to his people in this kind is most cleer was from a pure Covenant of Grace and Mercie not by a Covenant of Works 8. What God did to Israel in giving them rest in Canaan was as Canaan was a Type of Heaven Isa 65.9 and of the Churches state under the New-Testament Jer. 3.18 Psal 105.6 For so the promise of Abraham in giving them Canaan is by the Prophet David interpreted to be to a thousand generations which therefore must needs extend to the end of the world For so 't is called a Covenant for ever And had his seed injoyed Canaan from Abrahams days yet from thence to Christ was but forty two generations Mat. 1. So that if Canaan was to be possest as a type of heaven then it was not to be possest by a Covenant of works but by faith so Abraham possest it Heb. 11.8 9 10. By Faith he sojourned in the Land of promise as in a strange Country dwelling in Tabernacles with Isaac and Jacob heirs with him of the same Promise For he looked for a City which had foundations whose builder and maker was God And ver 15 16. he sought a better Country a Country whereof that was but a type Now what promise werâ— Isaac and Jacob heirs of Why that of the Covenant of Grace Gen. 17.8 To thee will I give the Land of Canaan And this the Apostle tellâ— us was possest by Faith as a type of heaven therefore not by a Covenant of Works 9 It further appears by comparing Gen. 17.7 I will be thy God with Heb. 11.16 Whâ—refore God is not ashamed to be called their God for he hath prepared for them a City Where the Apostle thus argues that had the grâ—at proâ—â—se to â—braham been onely of an earthly Canaan which this Author affirms was to be enjoyed by a Covenant of Works God would have been ashamed to be called his God t is evident therefore that for men to affirm such Doctrines as this is to put an affront upon God himself 10. It still further appears that Abrahams seed injoyed Canaan by a Covenant of Grace because what â—oses and Ioshua did who were their câ—nductors was done by faith and tiâ— also applyed to all Israel Heb 11.27 28 â—9 By faith he forsook Egypt by faith he kept the passeover by faith they past through the red Sea So when Joshua led them over Jo dan it was an act of faith yea the very conquest of the enemy there was an act of Faith ver 30. therefore for him to affirm tâ—aâ— fi st Covenant beâ—ore largely opened to be those typical ceremonies and so mans pâ—rt of the Covenant of Grace to be â— Covenant of Works by which they were to live happâ—ly in Canaan is such notâ—rious stuffe that he might blush to name it 11â— Sâ—ch â— doctrine directly opposeth these Scriptures Deut. 9.4.5 6 7 8 speak not thou in thy heart saying for my righteousness the Lo d hath brought me in to possess this Land and ver 5. not for thy righteousâ—ess dost thou possess this Land And ver 6. not for thy righteousness for thou art a stiff-necked peâ—ple and ver 7 fâ—rget not how thou provokedst the Lord to wrath in the wilderness and from the day that ye came out of Egypt even to this day until ye came to this place ye have been rebellious against the Lord and ver 27. he refers back to Abrahams Covenant and makes use of it as an argument to prevail with God in Prayer because he had promised to give them Canaan by grace and not by their works so also ch â—0 11 12 13 16. Exod. 2.24 ch 3.6.8 and ch 6.8 Numb 14.23 12. That rest the Apostle speaks of Heb. 4.1 is meant of a like rest to that of Canaan which Israel was cut short off for want of faith Heb. 3.18 to whom sware he that they should not enter into his rest but to them that believed not this promise of rest is by the Apostle called a pâ—eaching â—he Gospel Heb. 4.2 For unto us was the Gospel preached as well as unto them implying cleerly that what was spoken in that promise of giving Israel rest in Canaan was a preaching the Gospel to them So that as the spiritual part of the Covenant which conveys justification by Faith is by Paul called a Gospel preaching Gal. 3.8 â—o the temporal part of the same Covenant Gen. 17.8 which this â—uthor would fain make a Covenant of works thereby to maintain his errors the same Apostle tells us it was a Gospel preachâ—ng also By what therefore hath been said hitherto t is a shining truth that Abrahams Covenant in all parts thereof relating to spirituals and temporals was a full and compleat Covenant of Grace to which circumcision was annexed as a seal not as a distinct Covenant of works in order to the possessing of Canaan because as hath been proved by these twelve considerations as there hath been no Covenant of works given since the fall so Israel injoyed Canaan by a Covenant of Grace it follows therefore that Circumcision and all those legal Ordinances called the first
For God writ the new covenant in the heart under the Law and yet circumcision was no covenant of works But a figure of what God did within Deut. 30.6 Rom. 2.28 29. by which places we may see Circumcision had the same promises attending it then to believers and their seed as baptism hath now And it may with as much evidence of truth be said that baptism is a covenant of Works because it is administred upon the flesh as Circumcision was then Therefore all his Arguments and Scriptures he hath brought hitherto to prove Circumcision a covenant of works have been ill drawn and worse applyed CHAP. X. Wherein his 3 4 5 and 6 Arguments are answered to prove Circumcision a covenant of Works III. P pag. 58. WE are now come to his third Argument and that is because there is no promise of eternal life in it but only a temporal blessing in the Land of Canaan as protection and provision and the like to prove this he quotes Heb. 8.6 Jer. 11.2 3. Deut. 7.12 13 30 13. A. 1. That Circumcision had no promise of eternal life attending it is false for eternal life was promised in Gods telling Abraham he would be his God it is such a blank that a believer may write what happiness he will in it God could not say more nor a believer desire more 2. It had the promise of the heart-Circumcision in order to prepare a soul for heaven as the places above cited prove Therefore it had the promise also of eternal life 3. If it had not had the promise of eternal happiness but onely an earthly Canaan and protection therein then in vain doth S. Paul say God was not ashamed to be called Abrahams God Heb. 11.16 And in vain also did he with Isaac and Jacob walk as Pilgrims in that land expecting a better Country i. e. a heavenly Heb. 11.8 14 16. 4. As to those Texts he mentions there is not one of them proves that God only promised Abrahams seed prosperity in Canaan though that also was included upon their obedience to Gods covenant which was of Grace not works as hath been before largely proved We see therefore how well he hath distinguisht the Covenants P. IV. His next Argument to prove Circumcision a covenant of works is becaus a man by laying out a little mony might have bought a heathen into this covenant and have interessed him into all the priviledges thereof A. The covenant had two parts one external relating to mans duty in forms of worship The other spiritual relating to communion with God in those forms as hath been often mentioned into the first of these all the persons born in Abrahams house or â—ought with mony were to be admitted and the reason is because all Abrahams family so qualifyed were the visible Church and such a taking into his family was a taking into the Church which also wâ—s a type of the purchase that Christ should pay by his blood For the Gentiles we e to be brought into Church-communion of which that was the first fruits both to them and â—heir seed for doing whereof Gods command did bear him out And this was to be a standing rule to Israel when they came to be a kingdom because the foundation of the kingdom was laid in Abrahams family Therefore 2. When he saith that all so bought were purchac'd into all the priviledges of the covenant it is a gross untruth for justification and salvation were the choice priviledges of that covenant whâ—ch they could not be bought into and in that sense Peters answer to Simon Magus Thy mony perish with thee had been properly applyed though yet in the other consideration what he did was an Ordinance of God V. P. His next Argument is because men out of this covenant might be saved and such as were in it might be damned A. Here is still the same distinction to be noted as before for those that went to hell were never interessed in the spiritual part of the covenant but onely into the external forms of worship the lâ—ke instance we have in the Apostles days Judas Simon Magus with the rest of those hypocrites and Apostates were all interessed in the external part of the covenant and yet went to hell this likewise was the condition of the foolish virgins who because they had lamps lighted thought themselves well enough and there rested in this sense also are the words of Christ to be understood The children of the kingdom shall be cast out I would a little return this Argument to M P. How many dipt Apostates have fallen quite away from all grace and goodness of late yeers both from them and us Surely it cannot be denyed but they were visibly once in the covenant therefore all those Scriptures and examples by him brought in pag. 62 63 64. are by this distinction answered and the false varnish by him put upon them is hereby washt off that so they may be seen in their glory and splendor 2. It also appears that it was the same covenant of Grace that justifyed Lot Job and all Jobs friends that were godly though dwelling in another Country that justifyed Abraham and his seed for though they had not the seal of the covenant because Abraham was the person pitcht upon to whom it should be first administred yet they were worshippers of God in a solemn way of sacrificing the like we may charitably think now that many in the world who have not the same means of Gospel-Ordinances may yet have sincere hearts to God and be as a scattered seed of some gracious predecessors and yet not be within the visible pale of the covenant This also duely considered is a full answer to the rest of those instances of Davids sons and Abrahams sons with the whole lump of Israel of all which many were damned because onely in the visible part of the covenant We may therefore see hitherto what feeble Arguments Mr. Patient brings to prove Circumcision a covenant of works VI. P. His sixth Argument for the ends abovesaid is because this covenant of Circumcision may be broken Gen. 17.14 A. Still the former distinction kept makes the answer easie and plain for such who broke the covenant broke but the external part thereof the other part could not be broken and in this sense also the covenant in Gospel days is broken and as God unchurcht Israel for breach of covenant so he doth still when a Church or people do apostatize from his Ordinances The Apostle tells us so Heb. 3.6 Whose house are we if we hold fast the confidence and rejoycing of the hope firm to the end his meaning is we are his house if we keep to the Ordinances of worship implying That if a people once cast off the Ordinances they have broken the covenant and stand related to Christ no longer as his house I am sure that the extent of this Explication will reach Mr Patient who hath broken the covenant of God by casting
covenant of Grace as those hypocrites had so often mentioned So in their own P. So he quotes Joh. 16. that Christ calls the unbelievers in the national Church of the Jews the world I have chosen you out of the world and their being circumcised freed them not from being justly so called A. The answer is The words are directed to the Disciples as a people that acknowledged Christ exhibited and so were Gospel worshippers And the unbelievers amongst the Anabaptists may as well be called the world if the comparison relates to one that truely believes as the Jews were called the world when Christs words related to his real believing Disciples For the denying of Christ to be the Messias was that which distinguisht because such a denyal led them to keep up a form of worship that did directly oppose the Gospel P. Another Scripture Rom. 4.16 It is of faith that it might be by grace but if the covenant was made to the seed it could not be of faith and so not of grace A. Here is sad work made in his interpretations was it not of Faith to Abraham that it might be by Grace to him and his seed for shame abuse not the Scripture so grosly It was of Faith that it might be by grace to the end the Promise might be sure to all the seed and who this seed was he tells us little children if we may draw it from Isaacs being a child in Isaac shall thy seed be called And because the Gentiles shall know that the word seed reaches them therefore he adds not to that onely which is of the Law c. So that as it was to Abraham by faith that it might be of Grace to his seed So is it now of Faith to a believer that it might be of Grace to his seed So also he quotes Act. 15.4 He put no difference between us and them purifying their hearts by faith A. If God put no difference how durst he do it then P. So Gal. 3.2 4. we are all one in Christ Jesus A. How then can he answer it before God to make us twain For as Abraham and his seed through the Law were in covenant so are believers and their seed now or else we are not all one in Christ but two seeds P. As for that opposition he gives page 99. That a temporal election into a temporal covenant was a type of the spiritual election into a spiritual covenant A. It is a whimsey of his own brain that can never be made good and therefore it shews a giddy spirit after notions P. Again Heb. 11.6 without faith it is impossible to please God therefore none can be in a covenant of Grace but such as believe So Abel A. We please God by Faith now as those worthies in that chap. mentioned did then for therefore the Apostle brings in them for an example so the answer is still the same Look how Abraham our Father pleased God in circumcising his seed as in the covenant in which there was an act of Faith and how the contrary in Moses neglecting the seal displeased God so are believers to please God by sealing their seed and the neglect hereof provokes the wrath of God as it is evident from this example by which we see that if we would please God as Abraham did we must then walk in the steps of Abraham and it is agreeable and not opposite to faith or grace to seal our Infants Thus Christian Reader thou maist see all the Scriptures by himself quoted to maintain his opinions they do like the stars of heaven in their courses fight against this Sisera P. The last place is Rev. 21.8 The fearful and unbelieving shall have their portion in the lake of fire A. Is not this well applyed to the thing in hand or doth he with one blast of his Nostrils turn all children to hell The Lord rebuke him even the Lord. CHAP. XV. The 2 Act. 3.1 Cor. 7.14 vindicated in answer to his last general head Pag. 101 102. WE are now come to his last head to examine the answer he gives to our Scripture Allegations and accordingly to reply The first Scripture he quarrels with is Act. 2.39 The promise is to you and your children and to all that are afar off even as many as the Lord our God shall call P. To which he saith the promise is just to so many as God shall cal and by Promise he opens the remission of sins and gift of the holy Ghost and then he makes this flourish I pray take notice how evident the Text makes against this error That the covenant of Grace should be made with the fleshly line of believers and to confirm the meaning of the word call in his sense he brings Rom. 8.30 and Heb. 9.15 and 1 Pet. 2.9 All which speaks of an effectual Call Rep. We are here to consider to whom the words were spoken 1. namely to the Jews who were troubled in spirit about their condition such who had crucifyed Jesus Christ that had wisht his blood to be upon them and their children Mat. 27.23 The promise is to you and your children this promise cannot be meant of the gifts of the holy Ghost by tongues and miracles for that would have been no solid cure to a wounded conscience as theirs was Judas had such gifts but they could not mâ—ke his conscience whole who was guilty of the same sin 2 This Promise was to relate to them afar off that is the Gentilâ—s it could not be therefore such Gifts for they ceast in that age and the Gentiles afar off never had them though yet the Gentiles did repent and were baptized therefore by this promise called the promise must be meant such a promise which they well knew and were acquainted with and therefore must be that of Abrahams covenant made to him and his seed So the Apostle Gal. 3. To Abraham and his seed were the promises made ver 16. not seeds as of many but as of one i. e. the Jewish seed and Gentile seed make but one seed i e. Christ mystical in his political body 1 Cor. 12.27 So here again the promise is to you and your seed Quest But what was there in Abrahams promise to cure a wounded Conscience For such were the persons mentioned therefore the salve must be suitable A. All good things were in it that related to Grace or Glory I will be thy God what could be said more what promise will cure a wounded Conscience if this will not T is a salve most proper to the ground of their distemper they had crucifyed God the son And this promise tells them he was theirs notwithstanding For the words I will be thy God imply personal promises so the father saith I wiâ—l be thy God and the Son I will be thy God and the Holy Ghost I will be thy God a promise sufficient enough to bear up a sinking world suitable to Gal. 3.14 explained v. 8. before to be in
be sanctifyed in the husband and the husband in the wife a strange word to be used amongst heathens that every marryed couple were sanctifyed one to another so likewise to put the word Holy in opposition to uncleanness of birth is too high a tearm and such a way of speaking as is not to be found in Scripture Adding this likewise that the holy Ghost would have spoken so as not to be guilty of tautology for then the words must have run thus Else were your children bastards and there it would have broken off because the next words had been superfluous but now they are holy so that by this we see what an unseemly unbecoming interpretation he gives and what indignities he puts upon the spirit of God whereas if we look upon the words in that other sense wherein is implyed a federal holiness by Abrahams covenant which ever hath taken in Parent and childe it is a strong Argument inducing to imbrace the Gospel and carries with it a full sail of comfort to godly parents Else were your children unclean but now they are holy Thus also this place stands immoveable notwithstanding any thing he hath said or can say to the contrary If therefore children are holy by vertue of Abrahams covenant then you that are believers get into the fold of Christ that your children may receive the seal of the covenant baptism which is the mark of the flock CHAP. XVI Rom. 11. vindicated from false glossings Pag. 110. THe next place he opens is Rom. 11.16 17. but with what evidence of truth will be seen when it hath undergone the Test If the first fruits be holy the lump is also holy if the root be holy so are the branches P. He grants that by root is meant Abraham but yet in a double capacity Abraham as considered in the covenant of works And so working Abraham is the root of all the natural branches and so legally holy as Abraham was who was the first-fruits and the natural lump was all Israel so holy till that covenant of works was abolisht by the death of Christ and then this covenant being put an end to it must needs be that such branches who were onely natural must be broken off 2 Abraham is to be understood a root considered as believing Abraham in a spiritual covenant and so in this sense holy and thus onely the spiritual branches are said to be holy and by lump also must be understood all the spiritual seed in this spiritual covenant these distinctions duly noted will inlighten the soul to understand the place Rep. These are wild notional distinctions and not to be found in Scripture it hath been already proved that Abraham as a believer had never two covenants made with him nor is there the least word of two covenants in the chapter any farther then that gross mistake of the Romans who were looking after a justification by works as thinking the Law had been given by God to make men righteous legally these distinctions therefore of believing Abraham and working Abraham a spi itual root a carnal root Abraham in a covenant of works Abraham in a covenant of Grace a carnal and spiritual lump instead of inlightening the soul to understand the place rise like a dark smoak out of the pit of error that the truth is not to be seen in them therefore I may say of him as it was said of Reuben Thou art the first-born unstable as water thou shalt not excel the vanity of such stuff will appear by this that follows 1 If Abraham in a covenant of works be the root from whence the natural branches are broken off then the Gentiles that are ingraffed are put into a covenant of works because the Apostle cleers it that such who are ingraffed are put into the same stock from which the other were taken ver 17. and calls it a graffing in amongst them So ver 19. they were broken off that we mâ—ght be ingraffed 2 Then also when God shall re-ingraff the Jews they must be put into Abraham considered in a covenant of works and so the covenant of works must continue till this day because there cannot be an ingr ffiâ—g where there is no stock ver 24. 3 If the covenant of works be made the root or Abraham in that covenant then the casting off the Jews from that covenant could never be called the reconciling of the world because the world could not be reconciled by a covenant of works and that the world was reconciled by that covenant is cleer ver 11. 4 If the covenant of works now be câ—ast since Christs coming as he implyes the Gentiles could not be ingraffed into the spiritual part of the covenant till that was taken away which indeed he having confest in page 114. doth hereby contradict himself in what he hath before affirmed pag. 91. with many other places that Job and Jobs friends were all in the sâ—iritual covenant which was made as well to all nations as the Jews and they had as much benefit thereby as had the Jews 5 If the ingraffing of the Gentiles be to be understood onely of the spiritual lump as he saith then also is that spiritual lump ingâ—affed into a covenant of works from whence the naturâ—l branâ—hes were cut off For none of that spiritual lump of Israel were ever câ—â—â—ff as himself confess th thus we may briefly see what exâ—crable stuff he introduceth by such wild notional d stinctions P. In pag. 15 he explâ—ins Isai â—5 23 They are the seed of the blessed of the Lord and their off spring with them which saitâ— M. 〈◊〉 meâ—nt one y of the righteous off-spring i. e. such as are in the â—piritual covenant A. It is strange that a man should be so wilfully ignorant to gâ—ve a sense of Scripture so directly contrary to the Scope and Anaâ—ysis thereof For by off-spring is to be understood Inâ—ants as wi l aâ—pear by viewing the scope of the place which speaks of the conversion of Israel into that Gospel-state that shall be called the new Heavens and new Earth when they shall be brought to re-inhabit their own land under the Messias and enjoy the fruit of their labours And gives this as the reason why they should rejoyce with God and God with them Because they are the seed of the blessed of the Lord and their off-spring with them As if he had said though you and your off-spring have been discovenanted and cast off from being a people scattered upon the face of the earth yet as you and your off-spring were the seed of the blessed of the L. i. e. of Abr. to whom all blessings were given so you and your off-spring shal be as much ingraffed in all the blessings of Abraham as you were before For they are the seed of the blessed of the Lord and their off-spring with them which place doth fully parallel Rom. 11. when God shall ingraff the Jews again as natural branches into their own Olive-Tree P.