Selected quad for the lemma: heaven_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
heaven_n body_n see_v soul_n 8,246 5 5.1684 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A30248 The true doctrine of justification asserted and vindicated, from the errours of Papists, Arminians, Socinians, and more especially Antinomians in XXX lectures preached at Lawrence-Iury, London / by Anthony Burgess ... Burgess, Anthony, d. 1664. 1651 (1651) Wing B5663; ESTC R21442 243,318 299

There are 6 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

may we expect greater things of God Know then as we sinne daily so there are out-goings of pardon continually and the goodnesse of God doth like the Sunne rejoyce to run his race without any wearinesse Lastly In the Person to whom we pray there is supposed First That God only can forgive sins This is an incommunicable property of God Isa 43.1 and Exod. 34.7 It is there reckoned as one of his prerogatives Hence Matth. 9. this is made an argument of Christs Deity that by his meer command he forgave sin for this power to forgive sin is greater then to create Heaven or Earth or to work the greatest miracles Therefore a power to work miracles hath been vouchsafed to the Apostles but not of forgiving of sin unlesse declaratively onely When therefore our Saviour Matth. 9. asketh which is easier To forgive sin or to say Take up thy bed and walk intending by this miracle to prove that he did also forgive sin it is not spoken as if this later were greater then the former but only the curing of the paralytical man was a more visible sign to confirm the other for when they saw that which he commanded accomplished upon the mans body they might well conclude the other fulfilled in his soul Now when we say God only can forgive sin this is to be extended both to the forgivenesse in Heaven and to that in a mans own conscience for the former it is plain because the injury is done only against him when we sin and for the later it is clear because he is the Father of Spirits and so can command whatsoever peace and security he pleaseth in the conscience We see when Friends and Ministers do pour oil into a wounded soul they feel no benefit or refreshment till God speak to the heart This is notably asserted by Elihu Job 34.29 When he giveth quietnesse who then can make trouble and when he hideth his face who then can behold him O therefore with all humble thankfulnesse acknowledge this great mercy of pardon if thou art made partaker of it If the Lord should work miracles for thee he would not display so much power and mercy as he doth in this forgivenesse of thy sins Secondly It supposeth God doth see and take notice of sinne in us after we have believed For how can God be said to forgive that which he taketh no notice of If forgiving be covering of sinne and a blotting it out then it is seen and open to God and uncancelled till this be done Suppose our Saviour had used these words in this Petition Cover our iniquities as we cover the sins of others would not that expression have necessarily implied That God did see them and look on them till he covered them Certainly Joseph did upon a good ground abstain from sin when he said How can I do this and sinne against God That is who seeth me and beholdeth me in secret and will be angry with me But if God take no notice of my sinne how can I truly awe my self from sinne saying How can I do this evil in Gods eyes How can I provoke him to anger Let the Application then be to importune for this mercy of forgivenesse which makes all other things mercy Health riches learning peace are mercies if with these there be a pardon of all our sins especially be pressed to seek for it from this motive which I shall only mention at this time viz. That pardon of sin is the onely support and help in all miseries and calamities whatsoever This onely can sweeten thy pain thy poverty thy fears of death When the Apostle Rom. 5.1 had spoken of Justification by faith and the peace we have thereby with God inferreth from thence We glory in tribulation Alas there would be little glory if at the same time man be against us and God also So Rom. 8.33 34 37. when the Apostle had gloriously triumphed in this priviledge of Justification and that none could lay any thing to our charge then he concludeth We are more then conquerors Again 1 Pet. 3.16 17 18. exhorting the people of God to be ready to suffer for well-doing giveth this reason For Christ once suffered for sins the just for the unjust c. So that no misery or calamity can be joyfully undergone unlesse the Lord forgive our sins to us In these times of warre while we have been under continual fears of an enemie vvhat could rightly support us but remission of our sins To have men accusing and condemning of us but to have God clearing and absolving this can make an Heaven in the midst of an hell LECTURE XVI MAT. 6.12 And forgive us our debts HAving explained this Petition positively and practically we come to handle those Questions which may make to the clearing of that truth which is contained in the Text. And I shall pitch upon those that are usefull and necessary not on thorny and perplexed God indeed once spake out of the thorny bush but seldom doth truth discover her self in those thickets which the Schoolmen have made The first in order that should be discussed is What remission of sin is Or What is meant when we say God doth forgive sinne But before we can come to that another Doubt must be rouled out of the way and that is What sinne is and what are the proper effects of sinne For a man can never understand what it is to have sinne blotted out or taken away unlesse he be first informed What the nature of sinne is and what effects it hath wrought upon the sinner Of this therefore in the first place And first I shall speak of sinne abstractedly in its own nature Secondly Relatively to the person who sinneth Thirdly The proper effects of it Fourthly The weight or aggravation of every sin Let us begin with the former Sinne in the Scripture hath several names which do in some measure describe the nature of it The Hebrew 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used commonly for sin and it doth in a proper signification wherein it is once used denote an aberration from the mark we shoot at Judg. 20.16 Every one could sling stones at an hairs breadth and not misse and from hence metaphorically is signified the nature of sinne for every mans action is to have an end which end is manifested by the Scripture and when a man reacheth not to this he is said to sinne answerable unto this word in the Greek is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which comes from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to erre from the scope And another word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is going beyond the bounds and limits which are set us Though a learned Critick Dieu doth make 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not to signifie beyond but by as if it did denote a negligent and carelesse passing by the commands of God Another word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which cometh of a word that properly signifieth crookednesse
aggravate their sin under this notion that it was in Gods sight that he especially beheld it and was offended with it and this aggravation the Prophet Nathan doth set home upon David 2 Sam. 12.9 why hast thou despised the commandment of the Lord to do this evil in his sight Now this would be a falshood by the adversaries Doctrine and not fit to be confessed by the justified but rather to be looked upon as robbing God of his glory Let us observe the places Psal 51.4 Against thee thee only have I sinned and done this evil in thy sight Observe that in thy sight Therefore God did see and take notice so as to be displeased with David and of all considerations this did most wound and break his heart so that indeed the Antinomian Doctrine doth properly overthrow that which is the choisest ingredient in godly sorrow viz. because God is angry For what is Davids meaning but this Although men do not know how wicked I was in the matter of Vriah and Bathsheba yet thou doest and although the world would flatter me yet as long as thou art angry I can have no peace Haec regula tenenda est si vero paenitentiae sensu imbui velimus saith Calvin upon the place that is this rule is to be observed when at any time we would be truly affected in a way of repentance This Argument seemeth to be Cogent but see what an answer the Antinomian giveth whereby you may see that true of Tertullian that besides the poëtica and pictoria tertia jam est eaque haeretica licentia besides the boldnesse of Poets and Painters to invent any thing there is a third and that is of Hereticks The Answer is this David doth here judge according to his sense and feeling what he was to finde at Gods hand by the Law so that he doth not speak this according to their divinity in a way of faith but sense and failing and therefore the Author doth compare this with that place Ps 31.22 I said in my hast I am cut off Oh boldnesse Shall David be thought in hast and rashnesse to say Against thee have I sinned and done this evil in thy sight Then all the other verses Have mercy on me Thou delightest in truth may be said by David to be spoken in hast How unpardonable is this error to make that which was a speciall tendernesse of godly sorrow upon David to be a part of his humane weaknesse But saith the Author he speaketh in the Gospel-way afterwards when he saith purge me and I shall be whiter then Snow But in what sense that is true you have already heard when a grosse actuall sin is committed is repented of the sinfull act is quite passed away and gone the guilt by forgivenesse is quite extinct and so as to that respect remission of sin doth make us as white as Snow But it is not thus with original sin whose guilt though removed yet the proper stain of it doth still abide but of this more when we declare what that is which doth denominate a sinner Therefore David doth not here speak contradictions but his soul may be made white by Justification and yet in the committing of new sins God be angry and much offended with him A second Text to this purpose is Psal 90.8 Thou hast set our iniquities before thee our secret sins in the light of thy countenance Where Moses the pen-man of the Psalm speaks in the behalf of the Church then afflicted that God had put their sins before him so that God did not only take notice of them to chastise them but he put them before his eyes How the sin of a justified man may at the same time be covered and yet put before God is to be shewed in answering their Objections And the Text to put the matter out of all doubt addeth in close they are before the light of his countenance which is very emphaticall God as is to be shewed hath in the Scripture a three-fold eye to our purpose the eye of omnisciency which the Antinomian will grant and all agree in the eye of his anger which they deny and an eye of condemnation which the Papist pleads for now we go further then the Antinomian we say God hath an eye of omnisciency and of anger upon the sins of justified persons but not so far as the Papist to say he hath the eye of condemnation upon them You would think this Text stood unmoveable but let us hear how they would shake it First It may be said that these are places in the Old Testament whereas they speak of Beleevers under the New I answer first The chiefest places which they bring for seeing no sin are in the Old Testament Thus God seeth no iniquity in Jacob Though your sins be as scarlet they shall be white as snow Thou art all fair my love Their sins shall be blotted out These places and the like were true in the Old Testament and applied particularly to the godly Jews then living by way of comfort to them as the context plainly evidenceth Secondly As I shewed in the Treatise of the Law there can be no sound reason given why God should see sin in the justified person then and not now For did not God elect them from all eternity Were not they in Christ and their sins laid upon Christ Now these are the great Arguments why God seeth no sin in beleevers as they hold and were not all these as verificable upon the godly in the Old Testament 2. It may be answered that Moses speaks here in the behalf of the whole Church then and there were many among them that were not justified But this is easily taken away 1. The Scripture speaks universally and Moses reckoneth himself in the number with them 2. The calamity was generall and who can say none of the Justified suffered under it and this chaftising of them is that which is called setting of sins before Gods face Lastly Some places of Scripture which they bring and the chiefest ones for seeing no sin in beleevers are universal as this is and spoken of the whole Church thus my Text The iniquity of Judah and Israel shall be sought for and not found so God seeth no iniquity in Jacob that is spoken of the body of them when yet they must acknowledge all were not justified among them I will name one place more in this rank and that is Luke 15.21 Where you have a confession of a penitent son I have sinned against heaven and before thee This penitent was a son and therefore calleth God Father and indeed he could not cease to be a son therefore he doth not say I am not thy son but I am not worthy to be called thy son As for Grotius his observation upon the place Haec fabula declarat quod omnes homines sunt ortu filii Dei sed●e● jure excidunt semet à Deo alienando that
the imperfection being done away by Christ But in their way as God takes no notice of Pauls sinfull motions to be offended at them so neither of all his labourings and sufferings in the Gospel way Lastly If the Spirit of God do only mortifie as to our feeling and not to Gods sight then when the soul departs into glory all that inherent purity must only be declaratively also but in heaven we are made holy perfectly in Gods sight and that without any imputed righteousnesse of Christ though Christ did purchase and obtain that for us Now what the Spirit of God doth finish and consummate upon the souls dissolution he had begun even in this life A third sort of Arguments is from those places which commend repentance humiliation and godly sorrow for sin for if God takes no notice of our sin be not offended at it we may indeed be sorrowfull for sin because of men but not because of God Shall I be sorrowfull because God is offended when he is not offended shall I weep because God is angry when he is not angry If you ask Peter why he weeps bitterly will he not say Because he offended God If you ask the Corinthians why they are so deeply humbled will not they say because by their sins they provoked God to bring temporal calamities upon them so that the poisonous nature of this Doctrine appeareth in nothing more then in this it taketh away all grounds of humiliation and repentance of sin in those that do believe Therefore mark it He that saith there is no sin in the Church of God now which is their express opinion he must likewise say There is no godly sorrow in the Church of God now For what is the reason there can be no godly sorrow in heaven there was none in the state of innocency but because there was no sin there and it must be thus now in the Church of God This error eateth into the vitals of godlinesse therefore beware of it Say I will have no such free grace as shall take away godly sorrow Remember the gracious Promise Zech. 12. where God promiseth a spirit of prayer and mourning for sin as well as to blot out sin he shall not obtain the promise for the later that feeleth not the promise for the former And certainly if this Doctrine were true why did Paul say Though I made you sorry I did not repent We Ministers ought to repent that ever we made you sorry and you are to repent that ever you have been sorrowfull A fourth kinde is from all those places where God is said so to take notice of the sins of justified persons as that he doth grievously afflict them for their transgressions This Argument doth properly and directly overthrow the whole Antinomian assertion but because I have largely proved this already I will not insist on it To make good their assertion that God seeth no sin they are forced also to hold that all the afflictions upon the godly are only trials of their faith preservatives from sin but not correctives for sin But did not God see sin in Moses when for his unbelief he kept him out of Canaan Did not he see sin in David though pardoned grievously chastising him afterwards Did he not see sin in Jonah who would fain have run from Gods face that he might not have seen him Did he not see sin in the Corinthians when many of them were sick and weak for abusing the Ordinances yet many of them were such that therefore were chastened that they might not be condemned of the Lord. There are more arguments but at this time I conclude with an use of exhortation to broken-hearted and contrite sinners again and again to meditate upon the great and glorious expressions which the Scripture useth about forgivenesse of sin Your fears and doubs are so great that only such great remedies can cure you Tell me ye afflicted and wounded for sin is not this the best oyl that can be poured into your sores Tell me ye spiritual Lazarusses that lie at the gate of God daily who is rich in mercy desiring the very crumbs that fall from this table of grace are you thankfull because God provideth food and raiment and not much rather because of a pardon how great is Gods goodnesse he might have removed us out of his sight and he hath done so to our sins he might have thrown us into the bottom of hell and he hath cast our iniquities into the bottom of the sea he might have blotted our names out of the book of life and he hath blotted out our sins from his remembrance LECTURE VIII JEREMIAH 50.20 In those daies and at that time the iniquity of Judah shall be sought for and it shall not be found c A Fifth rank of arguments is from those places of Scripture wherein the people of God in their petitions and supplications doe necessarily imply this truth that God seeth taketh notice and is angry with their sins Now all petitions use to be in a two-fold faith one applicative and fiduciall the other doctrinall and assertive which is the foundation of the former If a Papist pray for the deliverance of any out of purgatory it is a vain prayer because there is not a theologicall verity to ground his prayer upon thus a Socinian cannot truly pray to God in Christ because he hath not a dogmaticall or assenting faith to the truth of Christs divine nature and so cannot have a fiduciall faith in the same Thus it would be with the people of God how can they in their prayers entreat God to turn away his anger from them to hide his face from their sins if he were not indeed angry Now that the petitions of Gods people are for this end will appear by severall places I shall not here mention that petition we are directed to in the Lords prayer viz. forgive us our sins for that is a noble instance and deserveth a single consideration of its self but we have many other instances as Psa 51.9 Hide thy face from my sins It is plain by this praier Gods face and so his eyes were upon Davids sins though justified and that a godly man falling into grievous sins hath them not presently covered from Gods eyes for his meaning by this phrase is that God would not regard them to visit them on him the contrary whereof is Psa 119.15 Let their sin be continually before thee and this is observable that David doth again and again petition for pardon whereby is shewed how difficult a thing it is to obtain the favour of God after we have offended him by our sins Neither let that be replied that this is done by Believers in the Old Testament for Paul bringeth a proof from Psa 32.1 to shew what is the nature of Justification even under the Gospel And that I may once for all this dissolve this objection of theirs I shall handle distinctly this question
do not make to the internal Happinesse of God yet he is pleased with this and commands it of men and threatens to punish where it is denied him and certainly we may not think the Scripture doth aggravate sin●e under this title as an injury to him as that which offends him and is disobedience unto him if so be there were not some Reality Besides the Necessity of Christs death by way of satisfaction doth necessarily argue That sinne is a reall offence and dishonour to him And lastly a sinner as much as lieth in him depriveth God of all his inward happinesse and glory insomuch that if it were possible God would be made lesse happy by our sins It is no thanks to a sinner that he is not but it ariseth from his infinite Perfection that he cannot Let the first Use be To commend Repentance in the necessity of it if ever we would have pardon God hath appointed no other way for thy healing Never perswade thy self of the pardon of sinne where sinne it self hath not been bitter to thee Besides where godly sorrow is there will be earnest prayer and heavenly ascensions of the soul unto God for his pardon Hence Zech. 12. The spirit of Prayer and Mourning is put together and Rom. 8. Prayer and groans unutterable As the fowls of the Heaven were at first created out of the water so do thy heavenly breathings after God arise from thy humbled and broken soul It is presumption to expect pardon for that sinne which hath not either actually or habitually been humbled for by thee If a man should expect health and life yet never eat or drink would you not say he tempted God and was a murderer of himself So if a man hope for pardon and yet never debase or loath himself repenting of his sins will you not ●●y he is a murderer of his soul And be encouraged to it because God hath annexed such a gracious Promise to it He might have filled thee with sorrow here and hereafter It might be with thee as the damned Angels who have neither the grace of repentance nor the mercy of pardon 2. Not to trust in repentance but after all thy humiliations still to depend only upon Christ Though Christ died and was crucified yet he did not lose his strength and efficacy This was represented in that passage of Gods providence That a bone of his was a broken Relie therefore upon Christ wounded for sinne not upon thy own heart that is wounded use this but trust only in Christ Dependance upon Evangelical graces doth evacuate Christ as well as confidence in the Law A man may not only preach the Law and the duties thereof to the prejudice of Christs glory but also the duties and graces of the Gospel If a man relieth upon his repentance and believing he maketh Justification and Salvation to be of works though it be of faith for he makes his faith a work and gives that glory which belongs to Christ to his own repentance LECTURE XX. MAT. 6.12 And forgive us our Debts IT hath already been demonstrated at large How God doth remit or forgive sins We come now to shew What kinde of act forgivenesse of sin is and whether it be antecedent to our faith and repentance Both these Questions have a dependency one upon another and therefore must be handled together The first Doubt is What kinde of act in God forgivenesse of sin is Whether it be an immanent act in-dwelling and abiding in God or transient working some reall effect and change upon the creature Now in handling of this I shall not trouble you with that perplex Question so much vexed by the Schoolmen Whether a transient action be in the Agent or in the Patient but lay down some differences between an immanent action and a transient action only you must take notice that we are in meer darknesse and not able to comprehend how God is said to act or work For on the one side we must not hold that there are any accidents in God or that he can be a subject recipient of such because of his most pure and simple Essence so that whatsoever is in God is God And yet on the other side the Scripture doth represent God doing and working such mercies and judgements as seemeth good to him Only this some conclude of wherein others with some probability dissent that Gods knowledge and will is the cause of all things that are done so that there is not an executive power besides them whereby he doth this or that As we see there is in man though an Artificer wils such a thing to be done yet that is not existent till he hath wrought it but now God worketh all things by a meer command of his will as appeareth Gen. 1. God said Let there be light and there was light Here was Gods will to have it so no executing power distinct from that will Therefore it is a sure truth De Deo etiam vera dicere periculosum est It is dangerous to assert things though true of God and Tunc dignè Deum aestimamus cum inaestimabilem dicimus then do we rightly esteem of him when we judge him above our thoughts or esteem We must not therefore apprehend of God as having a new will to do a thing in time which he had not from eternity as Vorstius and others blaspheme but his will was from all eternity that such a thing be in time accomplished by his wisdome As for example in Creation God did not then begin to have a will to create but he had a will from all eternity that the world should exist in time and thus it is in Justification and Sanctification not that these effects are from eternity but Gods will is And if you ask Why seeing Gods will to create or justifie is from eternity Creation and Justification are not also from eternity The answer is because God is a free Agent and so his will is not a necessary cause of the thing for then it would be immediately as the Sun beams are necessarily as soon as the Sun is but it is a voluntary principle and so maketh the effect to be at the time he prescribeth As if there were an Artificer or Carpenter that could by his meer wi● cause an house to be reared up he might will this to be done in such and such a year long after his will of it to be So God when the world is made when a sinner is justified willed these things from all eternity and when they come to have a being these effects cause an extrinsecal denomination to be attributed to God which was not before as now he is a Creator and was not before now he justifieth and did not before There is no change made in God but the alteration is in the creature But of this more in its time Let us come to give the differences between an immanent action and a transient and then we
bear it And this aggravation of Gods seeing it he mentioneth also vers 4. Against thee only have I sinned and done this evil in thy sight That God did see it and was offended did more trouble him then the eyes of all the world upon him So 2 Sam. 11.27 where this History is related there is this peculiar brand upon Davids sin that what he had done was evil in the eyes of the Lord therefore God did see it and take notice of it so as to be displeased with it This Doctrine is worthy of all diligent examination both because it will be a strong Antidote to keep Gods people from scandalous gross sins as also to inform how far in such sins the people of God make a breach upon their peace with God and claim to the Covenant of Grace And although this Question hath been vexed in some respects with the scratching claws of the Schoolmen yet I shall endeavour not to be so ill a seedsman as to sowe among thorns nor as one of the Ancients alludes Plantare nemus Aristotelicum juxta altare Dei Plant Aristotles dark Grove near Gods Altar And for the clearer proceeding in this great Point I shall consider the Doctrine briefly in the hypothesi as it was Davids case and then in thesi as it may be any believers condition for David take notice of two things First The aggravation of his sin Secondly Of the evil befalling him because of it Davids sin is at large mentioned 2 Sam. 11. where you have several aggravations of this ungodly act First He was a King and so his wickedness was the greater by how much his person was greater Men in place being like the Sun which if in an eclipse causeth much destructive alteration to inferiours Secondly A man advanced by God to special mercies both temporall and spirituall and for him to sinne thus we may cry out What ailest thou O Jordan to runne backward Thirdly The nature of the sin was a very gross one against the light of an Heathens conscience to deflour his neighbours wife Fourthly It was a trespass against his faithful servant Vriah who was venturing his life to preserve David This was horrible ingratitude Fifthly This aggravation God addeth That he had many other wives and for him as Nathan wisely reproved him to go and take the poor mans lamb who had only that this was to become very guilty Sixthly Here was great deliberation and consultation how to cover the matter and to make Vriah the father of it O where is Davids heart that it doth not smite him all this while Seventhly To bring this wretched plot about h● sends Vriah with letters to Joab for his own destruction Doth not David here that which he condemned and prayed against so much in others lie in wait like a Lion to devour the poor innocent Eighthly His sin becomes more hainous in that to colour this he will have Vriah and many other innocent persons set in the fore-front on purpose to be killed and afterwards with most transcendent hypocrisie excuseth it with this The battel fals alike to all So that here is a sinne with many sins complicated in it Ninthly When all this is done David takes Bathsheba to wife delights in her and rejoyceth with her Tenthly To make his sinne out of measure sinful after these horrid sins committed thus against natural light as well as spiritual we finde no remorse of conscience no trouble of heart till Nathan the Prophet come and arouse him But presently upon his Reproof How doth this Mountain melt like wax before the fire And therefore let no man encourage himself with Davids sin unless he finde in himself also Davids Repentance And therefore in the second place take notice what way God takes to break him and how much displeasure of God fell upon him First He hath great terrour and trouble upon him which he expresseth by the most exquisite torment that is viz. Broken bones It was with him as if all his bones were brayed and pounced together Thus fearful is it to fall into the hands of the living God who even to his own people is a consuming fire As the Sunne which useth to dart forth resplendent beams of lustre by grosse and thick clouds is darkned and obscured so David who heretofore rejoyced in God took comfort in his Promises doth now like Dives beg for one drop of comfort and findes a great Gulf between that and him insomuch that it cannot come to him nor he to it Now what are all Davids pleasures all his lustful delights to these wounds of his soul Hath he not bought Repentance at a dear rate Let the godly hear this and tremble and do no such thing Secondly As he found hell thus within him So God was also really displeased his sins were uncancelled till he repented So that Gods displeasure was not only in Davids sense and feeling but in Gods heart also As the earth of his own heart was like iron in respect of the yeelding any fruit of comfort so the Heavens were like brasse God had spoke to his soul to be like the mountains of Gilboa on which no dew of his favour shall fall Therefore he doth not only pray for pardon but plenty and iteration of pardon Multiply to pardon as vers 2. I need pardon again and again I need a plentiful pardon because I have sinned many sins in one sin Now David might justly be more solicitous and fearfull about the pardon of these sins because there was no particular Sacrifice appointed for murder and adultery but an expectation of vengeance either from God or man but this must not be stretched to the Socinian errours as before I have shewed Thirdly He found in himself a loathsomnesse and defiling guilt upon his conscience whereby like Adam he could runne and hide himself that God might not see him Hereupon he prayeth Wash me Cleanse me Purge me O how loathsome and abominable was he in his own eyes if Davids Righteousness be accounted a menstruous cloth or dung by him what debasing and abhorring thoughts must he needs have of his sins He looketh upon himself as the Swine wallowing in mire and the dog licking up his vomit Fourthly He feeleth a spiritual consumption and languish upon him that he cannot exercise any of those graces that he used to do Therefore he prayeth for a principal or voluntary spirit that with delight and strength he may do Gods will David ariseth as Samson when his Hair was cut off thinking to doe such great exploits as he had before but he findes his strength gone Fifthly He discovereth a world of Hypocrisie in his heart and crieth out of that praying for truth in the inward parts He now probably fears himself for an Hypocrite questions whether any truth of grace be in him at all and certainly it might justly amaze and astonish him to consider he could do all that wickedness deliberately in cold bloud without any remorse
way of Justification by faith in Christ ariseth because of our imperfection and sinfulness remaining in us and therefore is justificatio viae not patriae a justification of us in our way not when we come to our home Fourthly Although pardon of sin be compleated at that great day yet this is not to be understood as if Gods pardon of any sin were imperfect and something of sinne did still remain to be done away No those expressions of forgivenes of sin in the Scripture denote such a full and plenary pardon that a sin cannot be more remitted then it is But because we commit new sinnes daily and so need pardon daily Therefore it is that we are not compleatly pardoned till then As also because the perfect pardon we have here shall then solemnly and publikely be declared to all the world These things thus premised I come to shew the grounds or particulars wherein our pardon of sinne is thus compleated And first In our sense and feeling For howsoever God pardon a sinne perfectly yet our faith which receiveth it is weak This Jewell is taken with a trembling and shaking hand Hence it is that we have not full faith and confidence in our spirits We may see this in David though Nathan told him his sinnes were forgiven him yet his faith was not so vigorous and powerfull as wholly to apply this to his own soul and therefore he had much anguish and trouble of heart afterwards But now at the last day all these fears diffidence and darknesse will be quite removed out of our hearts There shall be no more disturbance in our souls then there can be corruption in the highest heavens we shall then have such a gourd as no worm can devour Our souls shall not then know the meaning of sitting in darknesse and wanting Gods favour There will then be no complaints Why hath the Lord forsaken me Well may Gods children be called upon to lift up their heads when such a redemption draweth nigh and well may that day be called the times of refreshment seeing the people of God are so often scorched with the fiery darts of Satan Secondly Pardon of sin will at that day be perfected Because all the effects of pardon will then be accomplished and not so much as any scars remain the wound will be so fully healed Although God doth fully pardon sin yet the effects of this are delaied many chastisements and sad afflictions are to be undergone howsoever death it self and the corruption in the grave must seize upon justified persons now these are the fruit of sin and howsoever the sting of these be taken away yet they are not wholly conquered till that last day Then therefore may we justly say Sin is pardoned when there shall be no more grave no more death no more corruption but all shall be swallowed up in immortality and glory Thirdly Then and not till then may we say remission of sins will be compleated because then shall no more iteration of pardon be Here in this life because the root of corruption abideth in us there are daily pullulant branches of sinnes and so frequent guilt is contracted whereby as we have daily sores so we need daily plaisters It is with originall corruption in us as in that Tree in Dan. 4.14 15. although the branches be cut off yet the stump is still in the earth and that sprouts out too fast by the temptations that are alwaies by it Hence it is that we alwaies pray Forgive us our sins and because of th●se failings the Apostle 2 Cor. 5.20 writeth to and exhorteth the godly Corinthians who were already reconciled to God to be further reconciled to him But then this Petition shall wholly cease then there will be no serpent to sting us nor will the eye of justifying faith to look upon the brazen serpent exalted be necessary any more The Lord will not only wipe away the tear of wordly grief but also of godly sorrow at that time Then and not till then will it be true That God seeth no sin in his children Then will the Church be without wrinkles or any spot within her In this respect it is the Church of God p●aieth so earnestly for the Bridegrooms coming For this it is They look for and hasten in their praiers that day Fourthly At that day will pardon of sin only be compleated if you consider the nature of justification For what is that but an overcoming the accusing adversary and clearing of us against every charge Now this is most eminently and fully done in those last assizes The Syriack word to justifie is also to conquer and overcome because when a man is justified he overcometh all those bils and indictments which were brought in against him now this is manifestly done in the day of judgement when God shall before men and Angels acquit and absolve his people and if the Apostle say in this life Rom. 6.7 of a godly man dead in Christ he is justified from his sins 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in respect of sanctification that sin doth not conquer him but he sinne how much more will this be true at that day when all the guilt and filth of sin shall be totally removed Oh what a glorious conquest will that be over sin hell and the devil when the Judge of the whole world shall pronounce them free from all sinne and command them to enter into his glorious rest Having thus cleared the Doctrine one Question may be briefly touched upon Whether the sins of Gods people shall be manifested at the day of judgement and God for Christs sake then acquit them There are learned men for the affirmative They shall be published and there are learned men for the negative Those that are for the affirmative they say indeed godly mens sins shall not be examined for their ignominy or confusion but only that the goodnesse and grace of God may be made the more illustrious For this they urge these Arguments First Those places of Scripture which speak of the universality of the reall objects and personal Of the reall as when it 's said A man must give an account of every idle word Mat 12.36 2 Cor. 5.10 an account must be made for every thing done in the body For the universality of the object personal 2 Cor. 5. We must all appear before the Tribunall seat Again They urge the opening of the book which shall be at that day and that is nothing but the manifesting of the consciences of men Furtther Many wicked mens sins and godly mens are mingled together and there cannot be a judgement of discussion preceding that of condemnation unlesse godly mens sinnes also be produced In summe They think this conduceth more to the setting up of Gods justice the exaltation of his mercy neither say they will this breed shame to the godly for in heaven they shall remember their sins committed on earth but without any grief