quality not circumscribed not visible nor any way sensible that being in heauē he is really and corporally on earth though not in the distance betweene heauen and earth nor in those places where the host is not which is to assigne innumerable bodies to our sauiour Christ and consequently to make him no body which is in esfect as much as to deny he is come in the flesh which is the very doctrine of Antichrist himselfe as Iohn speaketh Euery spirit that confesseth not that Iesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God but this is the spirit of Antichrist of whom we haue 〈◊〉 And in his 2. Epistle Many 〈◊〉 are entred into this world which confesse not that Iesus Christ is come in the flesh he that is such a one is a deceiuer and an Antichrist But Orcam propoundeth this as the doctrine of the schooles that The body of Christ is euery where as God is euery where and that if there were an host that filled all the world the body of christ might be with euery part thereof when it should be consecrated And Holcot treading in the same stepes of the schooles not of the scriptures saith If there had beene a thousand hostes in a thousand places at the same time that christ did hang vpon the crosse christ had beene crucified in a thousand places But it is an vnseparable property of bodies to be locall and contained in place take away space of place and true dimensions from bodies and they are no where as Augustine teacheth Besides hence the fathers concluded the truth of Christs body becavse he might be seene and handled and because he had flesh and bones according to the 〈◊〉 Behold my hāds and my feete for it is I my selfe handle me and see for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me haue But if he be neither seene nor handled in the sacrament nor discerned to haue flesh and bones how shall his humanity be 〈◊〉 and maintained against heretikes impugning the same The 22. reason it taketh away iudgement from the senses and maketh the sacrament of truth to be a sacrament of forgery and falsehood for the senses of seeing of tasting of touching of handling and smelling do iudge bread and wine to be in the sacrament and not mans flesh truely and properly neither can all the senses be 〈◊〉 in their proper obiects as euen the phylosophers themselues do teach and that truely The 23. reason it is an horible act and vnnaturall cruelty for man to eate mans flesh and for man to drinke mans blood and therefore the papists are as humane as the Cyclops Canibals and other barbarous people It is more brutish and barbarous to eate mans flesh then to kill a man and to drink mans blood then to shed it Thus they make christian people eaters of mans flesh and bloode suckers which is beastly and horrible wickednesse The 24. reason the Apostle maketh an opposition between the table of the Lord and the table of deuils saying Ye cannot drinke the cup of the Lord and the cup of deuils ye cannot be partakers of the Lords table and of the table of deuils where he sheweth that to eate the flesh offered to idols is to bee partakers of the idols as the bread which we breake is the participation and communion of the body of the Lord. Hence he concludeth that they should not eate of those thinges which the Gentiles sacrifice to idols because they haue fellowship with the diuils that eate of them euen as they are vnited to Christ which partake of the bread in the supper If then the flesh offered to idols be not transubstantiated why fhold the sacramental bread be turned into the body of christ seeing it sufficeth to make vs partakers of the Lords body to eat of the bread as it was sufficient to make them partakers of the idols to eate of the thinges offered vnto them The 25. reason if the institution of Christ be a sufficient direction vnto the church what to hold in this questiō we shal easily giue this transubstantiation a fall We see in the cases of matrimony that did befall our sauiour bringeth them to the first institution and therby dissolueth the doubts and difficulties that arose saying Frō the beginning it was not so So when any controuersie ariseth about the Lords supper the ordinance of Christ is able to take it vp how great or grieuous soeuer it grow Now there is no sentence no word no sillable no iot no title in the discription of the supper that fauoreth or sauoreth of transubstantiation or signifieth and insinuateth any such matter True it is christ saith This is my body but to be doth not signifie to transubstantiate for then when he saith I am the true vine I am the dore the way and such like he shall be turned and transubstantiated into a natural vine into a materal doore into an high way from whence would follow infinite abuses and absurdities Besides if the word is in the institution fignifie is transubstantiated that is changed from one substance into an 〈◊〉 from bread into flesh from wine into blood then the change shold be made before all the words be vttered so that hence it would follow that it cannot be done by vertue of the words which goeth before the pronouncing of the words Last of al the maintainers of transubstantiation as the builders of babel haue their tongs diuided and their languages confounded they cannot accord together but vary and dissent one from another like the false witnesses that arose against christ First they knew not certainely whether the bread bee turned into his body or come in place thereof the substance departing Secondly some alow not these speaches bread is Christes body or bread is made christs body but wil haue it said christs body is made of bread others condemne this speach also that bread is made christs body Thirdly they know not what is broken whether bread or accidents or nothing others say the true body of christ is broken Fourthly they agree not whether their water in the chalyce mingled with wine be transubstantiated some say it is other say it is not some more sober then the rest are afraid what to say and aske who is able to decide the questiō Others say it is turned into the humors of his body others virknit the knot thus that the water is turned into the wine and then the wine into his blood and therefore are circumspect to giue this cautel that a litle water be mingled being afraid least if more water were put in then the wine the wine should be transubstantiated into water Fiftly they cannot agree with what words their consecratiō is wrought whether accidents be without their subiect whether the accidents norish no lesse then the substance of bread wine likwise what the rats mise do eat how srō whence the worms
O father art in me and I in thee that they also may be one in vs. He ereunto commeth the saying of Paule Ephe 3. Christ dwelleth in our hearts by faith Like wise Act 13. Byhim euery one that beleeueth is iustified that is absolued and discharged And Iohn 3. so many as beleeue in him shall not perish but haue euerlasting life Thus we see our fellowship with christ is from the spirit and by our 〈◊〉 The spirit is the principall worker faith is the meanes and the instrument Neither must this comunction seem vnto vs impossible throgh the great distance and distinction of place We see the sun daily with oureies which though it be scituate in the heauens and seperated from vs in place communicateth his effect and power vnto vs that dwell vppon the earth neither doe we maruell thereat and yet is the sunne but a creature subiect vnto vs and distributed to all the people vnder the whole heauen to serue their vse Shall not Christ then the sonne of righteousnesse make vs truely partakers of his flesh by the vnsearchable power of his spirit and the supernaturall gift of a liuely faith who can as easily ioyne together things farre off as those that are nigh Are not the faithfull seuered in place and scattered through the world ioyned as neerely together as the members are to become one body where of Christ is the head As the Apostle teacheth That which we haue seene heard declare we vnto you that ye may also haue fellowship with vs and that our fellowship also may be with the father with his son Iesus Christ. We see this like wise lively laid out before vs in the estate of 〈◊〉 though the husband and wife be sundred for a time and separated one farre from another yet the band of matrimony doth so ioyne and vnite them that the wife is one flesh with her 〈◊〉 albeit he be a thousand miles distant from her so is it betweene Christ and the faithfull he loued the church and gaue himselfe for it and they are members of his body of his flesh and of his bones which coupling and combining together with Christ is wrought as we haue shewed by the spirit principally by faith instrumentally by both most effectually We need not therfore any carnall and bodily presence of Christ to ioyne vs to him seeing it is truely and certainely perfourmed by these meanes whereby we grow to a perfect man in him For as the Sunne is more comfortable to the world by his refreshing beames and sweete influence being absent then if his naturall body and compasle lay vpon the earth so the flesh of christ being in the glory of his father much more comforteth and refresheth our soules and bodies by his heauenly grace and spirituall influence then 〈◊〉 he were present fleshly before our eyes And as the Sunne not discending from heauen nor leauing his place is not withstanding present with vs in our chambers in our houses in our hands and in our bosomes so christ being in the highest heauens not comming downe nor forsaking his glorious habitation yet neuerthelesse is present with vs in our congregations in our heartes in our praiers in our meditations and in the sacraments But of this we shall haue occasion to speake more in the chapter following and we haue already spoken of it in the former bookes Chap. 10. Of the third inward part of the Lords Supper THe third inward part is the body and blood of christ that is the body of our Lord deliuered vnto death for vs and his blood shed for the remission of sinnes and consequently whole christ This is the chiefest part of this sacrament For the bodie and blood of Christ are thus made and separated to be the liuelie meat of our soules and haue that force and efficacy of 〈◊〉 in our soules which bread and wine haue in our bodies This is the cause why Christ often calleth himselfe the bread of life Ioh. 6. I am that bread of life this is that bread of life vvhich commeth dovvn from heauen that he vvhich eateth of it shold not dye I am that liuing bread if any man eate of this bread he shall liue for euer Thus euery receiuer is giuen to vnderstand that as God doth blesse the bread and Wine in his Supper to preserue strengthen and comfort the body of the receiuer so Christ apprehended and receiued by faith doth nourish vs and preserueth body and soule vnto eternall life Hee died in the flesh that he might quicken vs and he poured out his blood 〈◊〉 hee might clense vs from our sinnes Wherefore whensoeuer as the Lordes ghests we see the bread on the Lordes table we must set our mindes on the body of Christ when we behold the cup of the Lord we must thinke vpon the blood of christ when we looke vpon the bread broken and the Wine poured out we must consider how the body of chirst was pierced punished crushed crucified torne tormented and his blood poured out for our sakes when we feele that by bread our bodies are nourished and strengthned and by the wine our vitall spirits are comforted and refreshed we beleeue that by the body of Christ deliuered to death for vs we are fed to euerlasting life and that by his blood poured out vpon the crosse our consciences are sāctified and we fele his quickning power which doth confirme vs in our communion with him Thus is this part of the supper spiritually to bee applyed thus are the bread and wine made a sacrament to vs and not bare signes thus the memorall of christs death is repeated whichalbeit it were once finished on the crosse and now his passion is past long ago yet to the faithfull in regard of the force it is stil fresh and alwaies present Now it is not without cause and good consideration that Christ would haue the bread first deliuered as a signe of his body and then afterward the wine as a signe of his blood seuerally and apart administred because his body and blood are not represented to vs as his humanity now dwelleth glorious in the heauens but as he was offered vp a sacrifice on the crosse his blood being 〈◊〉 out of his body For to the end it may be nourishment to vs it must be crucified For as corne of it selfe is not fit foode for vs vnlesse it bee threshed winnowed ground and baked for vs so is it touching christ he must suffer be crucified and dy that we may liue by him and raigne with him This is the truth which in this point is to be considered Now let vs lay open the vses which of vs are to be learned Is christ the inward part of the Lordes Supper represented by the bread and wine offered to all but rcceiued onely of such as are faithfull then his body is not inclosed in the bread or in the accidents ofbread nor his blood included in the wine or vnder
the draught because the eares of well disposed persons woulde abhorre that and if we should defend it the Haeretickes and Infidels woulde 〈◊〉 at vs and laugh vs to scorne Againe hee saith euidently The mouse cannot eate it God forbidde we should euer come to that Neuertheles Alexander as bold as blind Bayard in despight of all Heretickes and Infidels aduentureth vpon that opinion If a hogge or a Dogge should eat the whole consecrated hoast I see no cause but the Lords body should go 〈◊〉 into the body of that hog or dog And that we may see the blaspemous school diuinity or 〈◊〉 villany of those 〈◊〉 men hearken once more to Antoninus that beastly Byshop of Florence If a mouse or any other creature or beaste happen to eate the sacrament through negligence of keeping let the keeper be inioyned penance 40. daies and if it be possible let the mouse be taken and burnt and let his ashes be buried neere the altar Heereunto another addeth that the Mouses entrals must be drawne out and the portion of the sacrament that there remaineth if the priest be 〈◊〉 to receiue it must 〈◊〉 belaid vp vntill it may naturally be consumed But the hoast so found in the mouses bowels may in no wise be thrown into the water as a certaine priest sometimes vsed a fly that he sound in the chalice after consecration But if a man had such a feruent zeale saith he that his stomake would serue him to eat the same without horror this were the best course of all as God 〈◊〉 did who is much commended for swallowing and receiuing the host which a leaper had vomited and cast vp And heereunto the goodly and ghostly Canons of the counsell holden at Colen vnder the 〈◊〉 Radulph If there fall any small thing of the bodye or blood vpon the pall of the altar let the stone be cut and burned and the ashes put into the holy place or cast into the fish-poole If any fall vppon the stone or vppon the grounde let the priest licke it vp if a Spider or fly be fallen into it let them be taken out warily and burnt ouer the fish-poole If a man shall vomit it vp again let the peeces be gathered vp and be giuen to a faithfull man to take and eate and let the rest of the vomit be burnt and set neere vnto the altar Can any religious hart repeate or any christian eares abide this loathsome diuinity We will therefore cease to stirre this dunghill any farther for the due reuerence which wee ought to bear to the glorious body of christ Iesus our blessed sauiour But to return back to the former question what shall we say that the beasts eate Bread it cannot be for that they say is gone by consecration Some not so grosse as the former hold they eat the shewes of bread Others say the bread returneth again and thus God must wnrke myracles to feed mise So likewise Innocentius more subtiliy then soundly saith The bread passeth away myraculously when the body commeth and the body passeth and getteth it selfe away when the mouse draweth 〈◊〉 and the bread commeth into his place again so that he holdeth that it 〈◊〉 to be a sacrament so soone as any mouse or beast toucheth it But Guidmundus and Thomas Walden affirme that when mise gnaw the Sacrament there is deceptio visus that is an errour in our fight We simply iudge they be eating and nibling but our sight is deceiued the mise be otherwise occupied And might they not as well say our eie-sight faileth in thinking them to be mise or birds whereas they may peraduenture be angels in their shapes Other hold some new matter is created in place of christs body but I would gladly knowe whether it be by vertue of these words this is my body And touching the Wormes that are ingendred in the 〈◊〉 a 〈◊〉 diuersity is among them Some say they are ingendred of the aire others of the substance of bread and 〈◊〉 of the quality and shewes thereof and so we shall haue substance made of accidentes in despight of all 〈◊〉 and reason Thus they are carried hither and thither vppe and downe too and fro to reconcile matters they knowe not howe and to beleeue thinges they know not what For how shall the people haue a direction and path-way what to followe when their teachers are not setled and perswaded what is the truth Against al these confusions vncertainties contrarieties blasphemies and crossing one another we teach the people what to hold and instruct them to make a diffe between ch body the sacrament of his body The sacrament is corruptible christs body is glorious and free from all corruption the sacrament is beneath christes body is aboue the sacrament is on earth vpon the table the body is in heauen the Sacrament feedeth the body and outwarde man the body of christ feedeth the soule and inward man the sacrament is eaten as well of the wicked as of the godly the body is only eaten of the faithful the sacrament may be eaten to death but the body of christ is euer eaten to saluation Wherefore howsoeuer beastes may touch or eate the substance of the bread which is the outwarde and corruptible element of the sacrament they cannot eat the body of christ which is in heauen and sitteth at the right hande of God the Father which is receiued onely by a liuely faith Fiftly they argue the case whether the shew of breade be a signe of the bodie without the bloode or whether it include the soule humours spirits and the blood it selfe Scotus saith Nonest certum that is It is vncertaine both may be defended but neither can be proued Notwithstanding Thomas of Aquin auoucheth that the blood is in the body the body in the blood by a connecting of them togither which they cal concomit antia or accompanying each other So then whereas Christ said this is my body they vnderstand him to say this is my bodie and my blood Againe when Christ said this is my blood they make his meaning to be this is my bloode and my body This is a new fancie well agreeing and answering to their newe doctrine whereby they are constrained to build vp one idle conceit with another This is a very wonderfull shiste and a marueylous sigure passing all figures whereby one thing is made two and two are made one Lastly to draw to an end where almost no end is they eagerly contend with what wordes their consecration or rather coniuration is wrought Some say christ consecrated when hee blessed Others denying this dispute how many words are precisely required to the forme of consecration Scotus shrowdeth himself vnder his own ignorāce flyeth to it as to a place of refuge saying It is a lawfull ignorance not to know how many wordes are necessarily required in the forme of consecration therefore he which thinketh he knoweth
God as also the grosse errours and palpable heresies maintained by Antichrist and his adherents with sundrie other pointes of doctrine seruing to teach to conuince to correct and to instruct in the sacraments as are seuerally discussed and largely handled in the treatise following all which for special causes and considerations I heere offer vnto your Worship and puplish vnder the shield and shadow of your patronage in respect of your Wor in respect of my selfe and in respect of others of which three somewhat I will say briefly First because it being the summe and substance of 〈◊〉 Sermons deliuered vpon the beginning of the tenth chap. of the former epistle to the Corinthians you vouchsafed to be an hearer thereof For as god hath giuen me my calling where your Wor. haue your dwelling so by your owne presence and good example attending to the work of the ministery as to the word of god you haue countenanced and encouraged many others whose praise is in the church to come into the holy assemblies of the Saints with reuerence and with the affection of Iacoh who feared and said Howe fearefull is this place this is none other but the house of god this is the gate of heauen This is the way to true worship to attēd to his word which he hath magnified aboue all names This is the path that leadeth to true honour to follow the footsteps of vertue as the Heathen 〈◊〉 in one of his Satyres Tota licet veteres exornent undique cerae Atria nobilit as sola est at que vnica virtus This the Gentiles by the diuine spirit and light of nature saw hereunto giueth witnesse the word of god which the prophet declareth to Eli Them that honour me I will honour and they that despise me shal bee despised Vouchsafe therefore now to heare me writing whome before you heard speaking And it is mine earnest desire that all those which were the daily auditors of this doctrine would now afresh examine themselues and take an account of their memories to see what was long agoe forgotten which heere again is newly published Whereby we shall learne how easily good thinges especially such things as accompany saluation doe slip from vs and by the tentations of Satan become fruitlesse Besides the doctrine heer deliuered is after a sort a plant of your owne setting and fruit of your owne labouring so that it acknowledgeth it selfe due of right vnto your selfe flying vnto you as to a sanctuarye and city of refuge and seeking harbour against the barkings and bitings of the malicious and enuyous of whom the wise Phylosopher speaketh Male de te loquuntur bene nesciunt loqui faciunt non quod mereor sed quod solent Quibusdam enim canibus sicinnatum est vt 〈◊〉 pro feritate sed pro consuetudine latrent that is Such speake their pleasure of thee as haue not learned to speakwell they do not what I do deserue but what themselues are wont For this is the property of many curs they baul and barke rather of custome then of any curstnesse Secondly I offer it vnto you to testifie a thankfull hart for your kindnesse and curtesey receiued at your hands not only such as is in the open view of the world and as it were publikely recorded in the minds and memories of many men liuing but such as I haue priuatly enioyed and which without the most heynous and horrible kind of vnthankfulnes I cannot forget or pretermit For albeit he that either denieth or disembleth or requiteth not a benifite be accounted worthily vnthankfull according to the opinion of * the same Seneca Multa sunt genera ingratorum vt furum homicidarum quorum vna culpa est coeterum in partibus variet as magna Ingratus est qui benificium accepisse se negat quod accepit Ingratus est qui dissimulat Ingratus qui non reddit Ingratissimus omnium qui oblitus est Ileaue therefore this testimony to posterity of my remembrance of your manifolde fauours and cannot bury in forgetfulnes either your desire to place me in the charge whereby the mercy of god I yet abide or your worthy trauell and labour to effect it before I did affect it or your approbation of me before others making the way easie to obtaine my purpose finding me out when I sought not after any profit or promotion Thirdly I presume to dedicate these my simple labours to your Worship in respect of others into whose hands they may hereafrer come For albeit this treatise be no great booke for your Woorships selfe who hauing your sences expert and excercised in the thinges of god haue not need to be taught the principles of religion yet shrowding it selfe vnder your countenance and comming foorth vnder the sasegarde of your protection many which otherwise would neuer vouchsafe to look into it shall therby be imboldned and encouraged to read the same whereby god may more and more be glorified his people instructed his trueth and sauing health enlarged and spread abroad We see in these last and worst times of the world wherin iniquity aboundeth and getteth the vpper hand how this present age on the one side surfetteth with the trash and rubbish of folish and filthy writings such as blot not only paper but heauen and earth with their vanity and on the other side scorneth and scoffeth at all treatises of religion and deuotion The very heathen in all their consultations and deliberations * were not woont to prefer profite before pleasure but now such as mask vnder the name of Christians delight rather to read legends of lies then books that may build vs vp in faith and loue so that we may iustly renew the old complaint * of the poet Persius O cur as hominam o quantum est in rebus inane Quis leget haec min'tu istud ais nemo hercule nemo Vel duo velnemo turpe miserabile quare Ne mihi Polydamas et Troiades Labeonem Praetulerint Nugae Accept therefore I most humbly beseech you this small testimony of my dutifull goodwill toward your Woorship rather considering the simple minde and meaning of the giuer then weighing the woorth and value of the guifte especially seeing that I haue giuen it in charge not to come vnto you vncalled nor to interrupt your more necessarye affaires The God of heauen and earth multiply the graces of his spirit vpon you and all yours adding many good and happy daies vnto you and enritching your heart with true pietye which hath the promise of the life present and that life which is to come Thus commending and committing your Wor to God and to the word of his grace which is able to build further and to giue an inheritaunce immortall and incorruptible among all them that are sanctified I most humbly take my leaue of you From Isfield the 12. of Iune An. 1606. Your Worships in all christian duties to be commanded
hath brought vs into his Church by baptisme and made vs as it were of his houshold seruants then as a good father of the family he feedeth vs spiritually with the flesh of his sonne applying vnto vs the merit of his death and passion This sacrament of the body and blood of Christ is declared in the scripture by diuerse names to deliuer the nature thereof vnto vs. Sometimes it is called the communion as 1 Cor 10. The cup of blessing which we blesse is it not the communion of the blood of Christ The bread which wee breake is it not the communion of the body of Christ Sometimes it is called the Lords supper as 1 Cor. 11 20. When ye come together into one place this is not to eate the Lords supper Thirdly sometimes it is called the breaking of bread as Act. 2. 42. They continued in the Apostles doctrine and fellowship and breaking of bread and prayers and Chap. 20 7. The first day of the weeke the disciples being come together to breake bread Paule preached vnto them ready to depart on the morrow Fourthly sometimes it is called the table of the Lord as we see 1 Cor. 10 21. Ye cannot drinke the cup of the Lord and the cup of diuels ye cannot be partakers of the Lords table and of the table of deuils Moreouer we shall nothing offend if we cal it the testament or will of Christ This cup is the new testament in my blood this do as oft as ye drinke it in remembrance of me and our sauiour thus speaketh Math. 26 This is my blood of the new testament that is shed for many for the remission of sinnes These are the chiefe and principal names giuen to this Sacrament in the Scriptures I am not ignorant that the ancient fathers and times succeeding haue giuen vnto it other names and not vnfitly but my purpose being not so much to alle age the councels or doctors of the church as to instruct the simple and vnlearned I wil content my selfe with expounding such termes and titles as are penned in the word of God and pointed out by the spirit of God Now then let vs render the reasons of such names as this Sacrament is entituled withall It is called the communion because we haue a communion fellowship with Christ and he with vs both which are sealed vp the in this Sacrament It is called the Lords supper both because it was instituted by the Lord Iesus at is last supper which circumstance of time the church hath changed because therin is offered to vs a spiritual banket in which the faithful are spiritually fed and nourished It is called the breaking of bread both because this is a necessary action vsed of Christ not to be omitted and because it representeth the crucifieng of christ and tormenting of his body so that we should neuer be present at this significant ceremony but wee must call to remembrance the sorrowes and sufferings of CHRIST now if Christ were thus tormented for vs surely wee ought greatly to bee griped and grieued for our owne sinnes which was also shewed by the sower herbes of the Passeouer Exod. 12 8. It is called the table of the Lord because he doth feede vs at it as this we know is the end and vse of Tables in our houses to set our meates and drinkes vpon them prepared for our nourishment and this is the scope and end of the Lords table onely heere lyeth a plaine and maine difference our Tables serue for bodily nourishment but the Lordes is prepared for the spirituall nourishment of our soules Lastly it may be called the testament or will of Christ because it setteth forth vnto vs asolemne couenant betweene God and vs touching forgiuenesse of sinnes and eternall life which couenant is racified established by the death of the son of god so that heerin we find all things belonging to a full and perfect testament as we shall see after ward Out of these seuerall names and titles thus interpreted arise most aptly and fitly sundry vses which in order as they haue beene propounded wee will consider The first title is the Communion from whence wee deduct these necessary conclusions First of all is the Sacrament of the body and blood of Christ called a communion And so called of our communicating together Then hereby all the faithfull openly testifie that they be all one body coupled together in Christ Iesus we professe him and all his benefits we receiue him we enioy him we reioyce in him God the father doth giue him the holy-ghost doth assure him faith doth receiue him by this hand we are ioyned to him and haue spirituall fellowship with him Wherefore al beleeuers are made one by Christ and this is not an vnion in imagination but in truth and in deed neither by transsusion of the properties of the God-head or manhood into vs but by one and the same spirit dwelling in christ and in all the members of Christ as 1 Cor. 6 He that 〈◊〉 to the Lord is one spirit And the Apostle Iohn testifieth that Christ dwelleth in vs and we in christ by the spirit He that keepeth his commaundements dwelleth in him and he in him and heereby we know that he abideth in vs euen by the spirit which he hath giuen vs so that the spirits of iust and perfect men in heauen and all beleeuers vpon the earth how farre socuer sundred in place hauing one and the same spirit of christ dwelling in them are al one in Christ their head God hath giuen his owne sonne vnto vs freely and fully our faith receiueth CHRIST by beleeuing him and all his gratious benefits to be ours as Ioh. 1 12 As many as receiued him to them he gaue prerogatiue to be the soxnes of God euen to them that beleeue in his name Thus we see we are one with Christ and christ with vs. Secondly as this sacrament being a communion admonisheth that we are all one in Christ so it teaeheth that it is to be receiued of many together in the church not of one alone and therefore it ouerthroweth the priuate Masses of the church of Rome where one partaketh all and the rest of the Church nothing at all There is a flat opposition betweene these two so that the communion cannot be a priuate Masse and priuate masse cannot be a communion That which is ordained and prepared for many deliuered vnto many and receiued of many cannot stand with the Masse where the priest prepareth for himselfe not for the people hee speaketh to himselfe not to the church hee receiueth himselfe alone not with his bretheren all which are directly contrary to the Apostles rule Tary one for another Lastly if it be a communion it teacheth that this is a sacrament of vnity and concord and wee are there by put in mind to avoid discord and dislention For christ neuer communicateth himselfe to
serpēt which was not before and Lots wife was turned into that pillar which was not before But the body of Christ is before their transubstanriation wherupon it follow weth that the bread cannot be changed into his body The 15. reason if Christ did 〈◊〉 the bread into his body when he saud This is my body then in like manner the Apostle did 〈◊〉 the 〈◊〉 of the Corinthians into the body of Christ when 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Now ve are the bodie of christ and members for your 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 can they alleage why 〈◊〉 should be in the one sentence more thē in the other For the whole colledge and company of diuines of Rome and Rhemes and all the multitude of papistes through out the world shall neuer be better able to proue their transubstantiation out of these words This is my body then out of the other 〈◊〉 are the body of Christ. The 16. reason if the bread were turned into the body of Christ and receiued in the mouth it should go farre better with our bodies then with our soules because our bodyes should really receiue the body of Christ but our soules should not being spirits and bodies cannot be mingled and intermedled with spirits Wherefore we cannot beleeue and receiue this real conuersion of one substance into another The 17. reason if the bread be transubstantiated into the body of christ and so receiued by vs then either it is turned into our bodies or vanisheth away into nothing or returneth and departeth back into heauen But it is not turned into our bodily substance for then we should grow bodily and not spiritually carnally not mistically into one person with him neither doth it vanish to nothing for this were horrible blasphemy once to imagine and conceiue of the body of christ neither doth it depart into heauen for he was there before and the heauens containe him to the end of all things Therefore the bread cannot be said to be turned into the body of christ except one of these be granted And thus also we may reason of the wine If it be turned into the blood of Christ it must necessarily passe into our substance or vanish away or returne to the heauens for no fourth way can be imagined But none of these can stand either with diuinity or phylosophy either with faith or reason either with scripture or nature and therfore consequently transubstantiation must fall The 18. reason if the disciples had not vnderstood christ to call the bread his body sacramentally they would haue beene greatly troubled who often doubted of the least things and demaunded the vnderstanding of them As the hearers of Christ Ioh. 6 supposing he had spoken of a carnal manner of eating his flesh were troubled and offended saying How can this man giue vs his flesh to eate And vers 60 This is an heard saying who can heare it Wherefore who seeth not that they would haue marueiled and required farther if they had vnderstood christ to haue changed the bread into his body and the wine into his blood But they doubt not they demand not they maruaile not they murmur not and therfore beleeue not this iugling of transubstantiation or turning of one substance into another And if they beleeued it not how should we receiue it The 19. argument it ouerturneth sundry Articles of our Christian faith Wee beleeue that Christ Iesus was begotten of the father before all worldes and borne in time of the Virgin Mary this the Scripture teacheth this the Creed deliuereth this euery true Christian professeth and beleeueth But if the bread be transubstantiated into the body of Christ and the wine into the blood of christ then his body is made and borne of bread and wine and the priest after the words of consecration may say a little pretty son is borne vnto vs and newly made Againe we beleeue that Christ was crucified and died for our sins that he was buried rose againe ascended and sitteth at the right hand of God the father almighty But if the body of Christ bee made of bread as often as the Eucharist is celebrated then Christ being on the Crosse might be elsewhere then on the Crosse when he died he might be where he suffered nothing lying in the graue he might bee out of the graue yea hee might be in the graue after his resurrection and rising out of the graue wherof notwithstanding the Angels said he is not heere Lastly we beleeue that christ shall come from heauen to iudge the quick and dead and that in the same manner he ascended whom we doubt not but men shall see as Reuel 1. 7. Euery eye shall see him yea euen they which pierced him through But if Christes body be made of bread he shall stare and start out of the pixe and not come from heauen and that in another shape then when he ascended nay thus he shold come daily vnto vs yet no man can see him nor perceiue his cōming Al these deuises ouerthrow foundation of faith sauour of nouelty and bring in heresie against all certaine grounds of true religion The 20. argument if by vertue of Christs words transubftantiation were brought to passe and the true body of christ were really present on the earth then the bread should be changed into whole Christ that is into his body indued with his magnitude quantity quality colour and all his dimensions For Christ said not at his supper this is the substance of my body without accidents but This is my body which is giuen for you and which is broken for you Therefore the body was visible and seene of them all it was felt it had all accidents agreeable thereunto and the substance of Christs body alone without his qualities was not crucified on the Crosse neither yet could be crucified Not withstanding we see not Christs body vpon the earth nor any adioy nt thereof is perceiued or discerned Where are they then Are they in substance of christs body which is in heauen And not in the substance of his body which is on the earth Then they make Christ to haue two distinct bodies for one and the same body cannot haue his properties and dimensions and yet bee without them which necessarily implyeth a contradiction and consequently falsehood especially considering how great a difference they make betweene the body of Christ in heauen and this body that lieth and lurketh vnder the accidents and shewes of bread in their box The 21. reason it destroyeth the nature of a true body it taketh away the defence vsed against heretickes and bringeth in the heresies of Marcion of Eutiches and the Manichics which denied Christ to haue a solid and true humane body held that he had only a phantastical body without any materiall flesh blood or bone in appearance and sight some what but in deed and substance nothing For they teach that his body is in infinite places at once those discontinued voyd of quantity and
part his sonne to his office the minsters deliuering of the bread the fathers giuing of his sonne If then wee drawe neere to the Lords table with faith reuerence and repentance nothing can be more sure certain to vs then the taking receiuing of Christ for when we receiue the bred from the minister we with all receiue the body of christ offered by the hand of God the father Lastly the breaking of the breade pouring out of the wine and deliuering of them both into the handes of the communicants 〈◊〉 these actions of God his chastising of his sonne and breaking him with sorrowes vppon the crosse for our redemption offering him vnto all euen vnto hypocrites and giuing him truely to the faithfull with all the benefits of his passion Indeed the minister giueth the outwarde signes to all receiuers but God giueth and applyeth onely to the faithfull the shedding of Christes blood for their daily increase of their faith and repentance But heere it may be obiected that not a bone of him was broken as it was figured by the passeouer and performed at his passion the verifieng and accomplishment whereof we read Iohn 19. 36. I answere there is a dubble breaking of Christ one corporall whereof the places before do speak the other figuratiuely wherby is vnderstood he was tormented and euen torne with paines as Esa. 53. He was wounded for our transgressions and broken for our iniquities the chastisement of our peace was vppon him and with his stripes we are healed Lo what is ment by the breaking of the bread his soule was tormented his spirit was crushed his hands and feet were pierced he sweat drops of Water and blood and cryed out aloud vpon the crosse My God my god why hast thou for saken me Wherefore let these rights be rightly marked and obserued of vs for our comfort and consolation Let vs when we see the breade broken and wine poured out meditat on the passion of christ howe hee was wounded and torne for our transgressions Although not a bone of his body was broken in pieces yet he was broken with afflictions brused with sorrowes and tormented with bitter anguish of his soule by whose stripes we are healed by whose condemnation we are iustified by whose agonies we are comforted by whose death we are quickned Whosoeuer resteth in the outward works done before his eies neuer attaineth to the substāce of the sacrament Thus much of the first inward part Chap. 9. Of the second inward part of the Lords supper THe second inward part is the holy spirit who assureth vs of the truth of Gods promises As we haue in the word of truth the forgiuenes of sins increase of faith groweth in sanctification a great measure of dying to sin and a greater care to liue in newnes of life promised 〈◊〉 vs so doth the spirit worke these things in the hearts of all the 〈◊〉 This appeareth in many places Rom. 8. rehaue receiued the spirit of adoption whereby we cry Abba father the same spirit beareth witnesse with our spirit that we are the children of God To one is giuen by the spirit the word of wisdome and to 〈◊〉 the word of knowledge by the same spirit to another is giuen faith by the same spirit all these thinges woorketh one and the selfe same spirite distributing to euery man seuerally as hee will So then as wee are weake in faith and slowe to beleeue so we haue the spirit giuen vnto vs to helpe our infirmities and to open our heartes to receiue the promises This truth being cleared the vses offer themselues to be considered And first of all inasmuch as the spirite worketh these things in the harts of all the faithfull from hence we gather that such as neuer finde any chaunge or renewing of the mind or reformation of life after the receiuing of the Sacramentes may iustly suspect themselues whether euer they had faith or not and whether ever they repented or not and therefore ought to vse the means to come by faith and repentance For the worke of the spirit accompanieth the outward worke in the elect of God as also we see in the hearing of faith preached hee must open the hart that is closed vppe before wee can receiue with meekenes the worde that is grafted in vs which is able to saue our soules Indeed euery person present may heare the wordes of institution may see the Wine poured out may eate of that bread and drinke of that cuppe as they may also hear the sound of the voice that commeth vnto them but the whole force effect and power resteth onely in the Spirite of GOD sealinge vppe the truth and substance of those things in the harts of all the children of God Againe seeing these thinges are done and performed by the working of the spirit they are confuted and cōuinced that thinke they cannot be made partakers of the bodye and blood of Christ and be vnited to his flesh vnlesse his body be shut vp vnder the accidentes of bread and shewes of wine and so his flesh be giuen vnto vs carnally that we may eate him with our mouthes and conuey him into our stomackes But we see heere the Holy-ghost is the bonde of this vnion hee worketh in vs faith which pierceth the heauens and layeth hold on Christ. It is saide of Abraham the Father of the faithfull that he reioiced to see the day of Christ he sawe it and was gladde For as we cannot see him with our bodily eies nor hear him with our bodily ears nor touch him with our bodily hands no more can we tast or eat him with our bodily mouths By the hand of faith we reach and apply him by the mouth of faith we receiue and eate him Let vs beleeue in Christ and we haue eaten Christ let vs not prepare our teeth and our belly but a liuely faith working by loue Wherefore albeit the humane nature of Christ goe not out of the highest heauens yet we that liue vpon the earth are partakers of his bodye contained in the heauens and his flesh and blood are communicated to vs as truely and effectually as if he were there on the present with vs. If any say How can this bee can that which is absent from vs be present with vs can heauen be in earth or earth bee in heauen He ere vnto I may moste iustlye aunsweare although this bee a great mistery and marueilous in our eyes yet we must confesse and consider that the Holy-ghost is the author of this vnion and as it were the conduit-pipe of this coniunction who by his diuine power ioyneth togither things that are seuered in place and begetteth faith in vs which is the instrumenr and hande whereby we receiue and applye Christ with all his gifts vnto our selues as Iohn 17. Father I pray thee for such as shall beleeue in mee that they may be one as thou
institution of the Supper and therefore coulde not be referred vnto that which as yet was not so that Christ speaketh of spirituall eating not of carnall by faith not by the mouth whereby wee abide in him and he in vs but many eate the Sacrament of his bodie that haue not him abiding in them not themselues in him Againe without this eating of his 〈◊〉 heere spoken of no man can attain eternal life but manie haue eternall life that neuer are partakers of the Lords Supper Besides how absurd is it for those to imagine that Christ naming bread speaketh of the Sacrament of the altar for they would haue no 〈◊〉 of bread to remain but one lie the figure shew and likenesse of bread so that according to the deuise of their new-found doctrine hee might more 〈◊〉 say I am no breude or I am the sher es of bread then as he doth I am the true bread Moreouer it christ promising to giue bread for the redemption of the world had pointed out the Sacrament of his Supper then he shuld haue giuen his flesh for the saluation of mankind not vpon the crosse but in his last Supper Wherefore then serued his death What neede was there to shed his blood on the crosse Furthermore if these words be referd to his Supper then the svpper maie bee celebrated without materiall breade and Wine without giuing of thankes without blessinge without consecration without breaking and distributing of the bread without pouring our and deliuering of the wine and without remembrance of the death of christ For in this place we haue no mention of these things And shal we imagine that the sacrament is spoken off where neither the matter nor forme nor word of institution nor minister nor externall rite is once remembred Lastly to eate the flesh of Christ and to drinke his bloode is nothing else but to come to Christ and to beleeue in Christ as appeareth in the text I am that bread of life he that commeth to me shall not hunger and he that beleeueth in me shall neuer thirst And speaking of faith hee faith No man can come to me except the father which hath sent me draw him This his truth is so cleere and euident that manye of the aduersaries are driuen to confesse it howsoeuer som of thē seeke to cast mistes before the eies of men that they may not espy it among the which are Sanders and Bellarmine And as we haue shewed before how the Schoolemen and Doctors of the church of Rome are together by the eares in sundry controuersies about the supper so are they about the true interpretation of Ioh. 6. some vnderstanding it of the sacramentall eating some of the spirituall eating and some of both Thirdly they obiect the omnipotency of God that he is able to turne the bread into the body and the Wine into his blood he is able to make it really present in heauen and earth and wheresoeuer Masse is said he is able to make a body to be in many places at once and yet not occupy a place I answer when all other reasons faile they flye to gods omnipotency as vnto a sanctuary and place of refuge But this will not proue a reall presence For albeit God be omnipotent and almighty must he therefore do al things yea offer violence to his owne body to maintaine their absurd and hereticall opinions of the reall presence and of transubstantiation Must his power attend vpon their fansies and dreames Cannot he be omnipotent except their positions and assertions be graunted There is no feare of Gods power albeit we withstand their carnall presence For touching the omnipotency of god we must obserue these two rules and conclusions First gods power is neuer to be opposed and set against his expresse wil plainly and certainly known for God is not contrary to himselfe Now then it is not enough to proue that God can turne bread and wine into the body and blood of Christ vnlesse they proue he will turne them into his flesh and blood We our selues can do many things which we do not and which we will not do so we must know it is with God he could haue added winges to man he might haue made many worlds if it had pleased him Christ of the stones could haue raysed vp children vnto Abraham Christ covld haue praied to his father in his afliction to send him more then 12. legions of angels but how then should the scriptures be fulfilled Wherefore we are not to reason of his power vnlesse wee bee assured of his wil reueiled in his word as we see Christ 〈◊〉 against the Saduces saith Ye are deceiued not knowing the scriptures nor the power of God Where we see he ioyneth the scriptures and the power of God together so 〈◊〉 he is truely said to be omnipotent because he can bring to passe whatsoeuer he will neither can the effect of his will be hindered or resisted Now it is the knowne will of God that christ should haue a true body that he might be a true man with his quantity and dimensions The second rule to be remembred is that in God there is no contradiction that whatsoere necessarily implieth a contradiction is an argument not of power but of weakenesse This the scripture decree this the fathers deliuer this their own schoolmen determine For in God is not yea and nay he abideth faithful he cannot deny himselfe he cannot dye hee cannot lie he cannot deny his word he cannot sin he cannot deceiue he cannot be deceiued These and such like 〈◊〉 cannot do which if he should doe he were not omnipotent For this were a token of impotency not of omnipotency of debility not of ability of want and weakenesse not of strength and power For in euery contradiction there is falsehood and a lie which cannot agree to God who is truth it selfe and therfore hee cannot make affirmation and negation truth and falsehood yea and nay to be true together which things are imposible Yea the popish schoolmen confute this popish fansie of the real presence when they teach that God cannot doe any thing wherein a contradiction is implyed and that all other things he can do and therefore is omnipotent Now who seeth not that herein is a manifest and notable contradiction that christs body is made visible and inuisible together finite and infinite circumscribed and vncircumscribed to haue dimension and to want dimension to be compassed in one certaine place and to be in a great number of Sacramentes in many places to be included in a little bread on earth which is contrary to that nature of a mans true body not to be contained therin as 〈◊〉 in heauen and there hauing the naturall properties of a true body which cannot 〈◊〉 brought within so narrow a compasse as the wafer cake Wherfore the absurd conceit of the reall presence cannot be maintained
beleeuers who vouchsafeth to be their God the god of their seed Hence likewise it appeareth that infants are to be baptized For baptisme succeedeth in place of circumcision the Apostles baptized whole houses Christ calleth infants and sucklings vnto himselfe and 〈◊〉 that to such belongeth the kingdome of Heauen they are Christ sheepe and members of his body Hence we learne that the baptisme of infantes is no vnwritten tradition but a written and diuine institution taught in the Scriptures Consider also heereby the difference betweene baptisme and the Lords Supper and that all are conceiued in originall sinne Acknowledge also a difference between them and the children os Infidels and let parents be incoraged to bring vp their children in the instruction and reformation of the Lord. Hitherto of the outward parts now follow the inward parts which also are four in number First god the father represented by the Mi. wherby our faith is gretly strengthned For whensoeuer the eie seeth the minister 〈◊〉 water on the body faith beholdeth god the father clensing the soule with the precious blood of his sonne Christ. The seconde part is the spirit of God hauing relation to the word and promise of God and therefore whensoeuer wee come to heare the word or to receiue the sacramentes we must craue the assistance of the spirit to open our harts as he opened the hart of Lydia If this in ward teacher be wanting the eare heareth and the hand handleth but the hart is hardned The third in ward part of baptism is Christrepresented by the water This serueth greatly to confirme our faith to consider with our selues when we behold with our bodily eies the water poured vpon the bodie baptizd the blotting out of all our sinnes by the blood of Christ Iesus The 4. inward part is the soul clensed P most liuely and effectualy represented by the body washed For the washing of the body representeth the clensing of the soul. This teacheth that by nature we are corrupt and abhominable so that God must worke in vs both the will and the deede These are the foure in ward parts of baptisme The agreement betweene these outward and inward parts is very euident For as the Minister by the word of institution applyeth Water to the washing of the body so the father through the working of the spirit applyeth the bloode of Christ to the clensing of the soule Thus farre of the parts of Baptisme both the outward and the inward parts now we come to the vses thereof which are principally three First to shew our placing and planting into the blood of Christ to remaine in him for euer This coniunction with Christ is not bodily or naturall but misticall and marueilous in our eyes for we are made one with Christ by the same spirit dwelling in Christ and in all the members of Christ. So then the saints triumphing in heauen and al the beleeuers fighting vpon earth as souldiers in warfar haue one and the same spirit of christ dwelling in them and therfore are one with him Secondly to assure vs of the remission of our fins that we may bee able to stand in the presence of God hauing put on the garments of Christ as Iacob receiued the blessing clad in the garments of his elder brother This ouerthroweth the doctrin or rather doting of the church of Rome which teacheth that baptism abolisheth al sins going before it and leaueth nothing that hath the name or nature of sinne If this were a truth of god not a dreame of men it is not only decent but greatly to be desired to haue baptisme deferred vntil old age nay vnto the hower of death that so we may depart hence in peace with greater assurance of Gods fauor in the pardon of our sins Thirdly to slay the old man and to kil our natural corruption by the power of the death and burial of christ besides to raise vs vp againeto holines and newnes of life by his resurection Hence it is that the Euangelists call it the Sacrament of Repentance admonishing euery one of vs to expresse the strength and power of baptisme as the Prophets of tentimes exhort the lews to circumcise the forskin of their harts and to harden their necks no more So we ought not to content our selus to be baptized in body but must labour to be baptized in soul by a daily proceeding in regeneration by bringing foorth the fruites of sanctification and applying Christ Iesus to our full iustification Thus much of baptisme the honourable badge of our profession and dedication to Christ that dyed vppon the Crosse what it is what are the 〈◊〉 and vses thereof Now wee come to the Sacrament of the body and bloode of CHRIST e which is called by sundrye names in the new testament Sometimes it is called the Communion teaching that we are one body coupled togither in Christ shewing that it is to bee receiued of many togither and admonishing vs of vnity and concorde among our selues Sometimes it is called the Lords Supper hence we see who is the author of it no man no Angell but the Lord Iesus leauing it for a fare-well token of his loue toward vs. We must also come with an earnest desire hungring after Christ that we may be satisfied with his righteousnesse Sometimes it is called the breaking of breade this sheweth that the substance of breaderemayneth after the wordes of consecration that figuratiue speeches are vsed in the Sacrament and that this externall rite of breaking the bread vsed by Christ practised by the Apostles obserued by the pastors of the church ought not to be omitted and ouerpassed Sometimes it is called the table of the Lord this teacheth that christ and his Apostles at the celebration of it vsed a table not an altar that it is a Sacrament not a sacrifice and that we ought to draw neere vnto it with all regard aud reuerence Lastly it is called the new testament or Will of Christ. This title teacheth that there is a double couenant betweene God and man the one old the other new the one of the law the other of the Gospell the firste of Workes the seconde of grace Againe it serueth to condemne the cursed sacriledge of the church of Rome which addeth and detracteth altereth and mangleth this sacrament at her own pleasure and mingleth it with the leauen of her owne inuentions This is a great comfort to all Gods children to consider that all faithfull christians are the heires of Christ to whom he hath promised saluation of their soules and forgiuenesse of their sinnes As we haue seene the seueral names of this sacrament which shew the nature there of vnto vs so now we will set downe what the lords supper is The supper of the lord is the second sacrament wherein by visible receiuing of bread and wine is represented our spirituall
externall and visible which are bread and wine and besides the heauenly internal and inuisible the true body and blood of Iesus Christ together with al his gifts benefits and treasures according to the doctrine of Ireneus Thirdly we agree that in the supper of the lord we are made partakers not onely of the vertue and operation of christ but of the very essence and substance of his true body and blood which was giuen for vs to death vpon the crosse and was shed for vs so that we are most cōfortably nourished with the same vnto eternal life Fourthly we beleeue that the bread wine are not changed or transubstantiated into the flesh and blood of christ but remaine true and natural bread and wine in substance as before so that the bread is called his body and the wine his blood not only because his body and blood are signified by these and set before vs but because so often as we eate and drinke them worthily christ himselfe giueth vs his body blood truely to euerlasting life Lastly we al hold the vse of the supper in both kinds and that without the right vse of the outward signes it is no sacrament vnlesse the bread be eaten and 〈◊〉 wine drunk and therefore we condemne al 〈◊〉 and adoration of the bread al carying it about and lifting it vp by the priest to the people vsed in the Church of Rome The disagreements and diuersities in opinion among vs are in certaine adioynts and in the manner of receiuing for seeing we all reach and confesse the true communication of the true body and the true blood of our Lord Iesus christ the controuersie must needes stand in the manner of communicating and therefore the vnity of the churches is not therby plucked 〈◊〉 The difference standeth in these particulars First one part contendeth that these wordes of christ this is my body must be vnderstood literally and as the words found which yet that side doth not so vnderstand the other part holdeth that they are to be vnderstood sacramentally and figuratiuely according to the declaration of christ the interpretation of Paule and the infallible rules of our christian faith Secondly one part wil haue the body blood of christ essentially and bodily in with and vnder the bread and wine and so to be eaten as that together with the bread and wine they enter into the mouth and body of the receiuers but the other part holdeth that the body of christ which at the first supper sat at table with his disciples doth not now continue with vs vpon the earth but abideth in the heauens and shal remaine there vntil he break the heauens and discend thence to iudgement Lastly one part will haue al communicants that come to the lords table and partake the outward signs whether they come worthily or vnworthily whether they be beleeuers or insidels whether godly or vngodly tó eat the body and drinke the blood of christ corporally and with the mouth of the body so as the beleeuers doe eate him to life and saluation the vnbeleeuers to death and damnation the other side holdeth that the vnbe leeuers abuse the outward signs of bread and wine to their destruction and that only the faithful can eat the body and drinke the blood of christ by a true faith by the working of the holy ghost wherby they are made flesh of his flesh and bone of his bone being more neerely and firmely knit vnto him then the members of our body are vnited to our head and thereby drawing from him life euerlasting These are briefely the pointes of difference faithfuly not partially particularly not confusedly set downe in discussing the truth wherof howsoeuer great bitternes hath 〈◊〉 broken out betweene bretheren as likewise did betweene Paule and Barnabas yet setting the 〈◊〉 of disputation aside they were worthy members of the church zealous defenders of the faith learned teachers of the truth earnest destroiers of heresie and rare examples of golines notwithstanding the infirmities imperfections and intemperate stile of th one part And howsoere this odious mak-bate N. D. boldly auoucheth pag. 46. that these men neuer met 〈◊〉 to compound their controuersies but they haue alwaies departed more disagreeing more enimies theu euer they were before their meeting yet al men know he doth either ignorantly or maliciously conceale the seueral points of their vnion and agreement concluded and subscribed at Marpurge anno 1529. cha 15. which was in this sort credimns 〈◊〉 omnes c. we all beleeue and professe concerning the supper of the Lord Iesus Christ that the vse there of in both kinds according to the inctitution of christ is to be obserued And that the masse is not any such worke wherby one man may obtaine grace for another whether he be dead or aliue Also that the sacrament of the altar is the sacrament of the true body and blood of Iesus Christ. And that the spirituall eating of the same his body and blood is very necessary for euerie christian man Moreouer that the vse of this sacrament euen as the word it selfe is instituted of almighty God to stir vp vnto faith the weake consciences of men by his holy spirit And although it could not hither to be altogether agreed amòg vs whether the true body blood of ch be in the bread and wine corporallie yet neuertheles both parties ought to declare christian charity one toward the other so far as conscience can beare And both parts shal diligently pray vnto god that he by his spirit may vouchsafe to establish vnto vs the true vnderstà ding of that matter A men In this act which was subscribed with the hands of Luther Melanthou Brentius 〈◊〉 Oecolampadius Bucer and others we see they professe christian charity and promise earnestly to pray vnto God to reueile his truth vnto them bring them to be of one hart in the truth and confirme them to discerne of things that differ so 〈◊〉 the enimies of our church haue cause rather to enuy our agreement then to in ueigh against our disagreement It is not the custome of the true church tò delight in contention it is the fashion of the church of Rome to command to compel to enforce to presse to oppresse to ban to throw out cursings and to thunder out excommunations against those that dissent frō thē but our churches not withstanding this variance haue not so proceeded one against another as enemies we curse not but blesse we hate not but loue we parsecure not but pray one for another keeping the groūdwork of faith 〈◊〉 ioyning harts and hands we seeke to repaire the ruine of Syon and pull down the fortresses of the enemies therof Moreouer albeit it were to be presumed in men of iudgment and discretion that such as haue leysure with delight and pleasure to paint out the iars and quarels abroad either are or doubtlesse shoulde be in league and loue at home yet
vp the very body and blood of Christ to god the father for the sinnes of the liuing of the dead we receiue it not but condemne it to the pit of hell from whence it came For Christ offered vp himself but once And if they be priests properly to offer him they must likewise be the murtherers of him forasmuch as when he was offered he was killed Moreouer they make his al-susficient sacrifice to bee vnperfect which notwithstanding maketh vs perfect and themselues to be after a sort mediators betweene god and man and so depriue themselus of the sweet mediation of Christ. Thus much of the gainefull Marchandize of Masses vsed in the church of Rome and of the oblation or rather abhomination thereof These and many other errors are discouered and opened in this Treatise which I commend vnto thee good christian reader desiring thy farther instruction in the truth I know it cannot but grieue thee to hear of contentions and dissentions especially in the matters of God wherein wee should al think and speak one thing Wherefore thou must remember that it cannot be auoided but offences wil com but wo be to him by whom they come The apostle saith There must be euen haeresies among you that they which are among you may be knowne For my part I haue labored to doe no more then to quench the fire which other haue kindled and to plucke vp the weeds which other haue planted The successe of this worke I commit to the Lord the examination and fruit thereof to thee Read it with iudgement Try al things and hold fast that which is good Lay al partialy aside and weigh the doctrine set before thee with the ballance of the Sanctuary The Lord of heauen and earth bring vs all to be of one mind and of one hart in the truth and giue vs the spirit of vnderstanding that we may be able to discerne light from darkenes and truth from errour and that we may not be caried away with euery 〈◊〉 of false doctrine but that we may knowe what is the good and acceptable wil of God and may grow vnto a perfect man in Christ Iesus to whose mercifull direction and protection I commend thee Amen FINIS The Principles of Christian religion set downe in Questions and answers shortly for the remembrance and plainely for the vnderstanding of all persons requisite to be learned and knowne before they be admitted to the Lords Supper Q. What is true religion A. It is the knowledge of gods wil to the end we may serue him in holinesse and righteousnesse Ioh 17 3 Eph 4 23 24. Q. How many parts are there of religion A. Two repentance and faith Mar 1 15 Act. 20 20 21 Q. What is repentance A Repentance is a turning from al sin vnto righteousnes act 3 19 Ezek. 18 21 Q How many things haue we to consider in repentance A Two thinges the parts of it and the meanes whereby to attaine it Esa 1 16 xvii xx Q What are the parts of repentance A Two partes first a for faking of sin with an hatred and sorrow for it Secondly a betaking of ourselues vnto righteousnes with a loue and liking of it 2 Cor. 7 x xi Q What are the meanes to come to repentance A Two meanes first the knowledge of our sins by the law Secondly the consideration of the punishments due to sin Reuel 2 5 Q How many commaundements are there in the law A Ten Exod. 34 28 Deut. 4. xiii x 4 Q 〈◊〉 how many tables are the 〈◊〉 deuided A Into two tables Mar xii 30 xxxi Exod xxxi xviii 34 1 Q What 〈◊〉 the first table concerne A Our duties toward God contained in the 4 first commaundements Math xxii 36 37. 38 Q what is the 〈◊〉 commaundemant A Thou shalt have none other Gods but me Deut 5 7 Exod 20 3 Q what is the summe of this law A We must not account that as God which by nature is no God but haue and chuse the true God onely for our god Mar. 12 29 Q What is the second commaundement A Thou shalt not make to thy selfe any grauen image Exod 20 4 Q What is forbidden and commaunded in this law A We must not worship the true god falsely but worship god as he hath appointed in his word Ioh. 4 24 Iosh 24 15 Esa. 29 13 Q What is the third commaundement A Thou shalt not take the name of the lord thy God in vaine Exod. xx 7 Q What is forbidden and commaunded in this law A We must not bereaue god of the honor due to him but vse his titles word and works with al reuerence Math. 5 33 34 35 36 37 Q What is the fourth commaundement A Remember the Sabbath day to keepe it holy Exod xx 8 Q What is commaunded and forbidden in this law A We must 〈◊〉 the sabbath with the works of the sabbath and not 〈◊〉 it with our owne works Esa. 58 13 Neh 13 xv xvi c. Q What are the workes of the 〈◊〉 A 〈◊〉 as are holy and of present necessity Luk 14 3 4 5 Act. xx 7 Q 〈◊〉 must keepe the Sabbath A 〈◊〉 thy son thy daughter thy man thy maid and thy stranger Exod xx x Q 〈◊〉 of the first table what doth the second table concerne A 〈◊〉 duties toward our neighbors in the sixe last commaundementes Rom. 13 8 9 Q Who is our neighbour A Our neighbor is euery one of our owne flesh yea our enemies Esa 58 7 Luk. x 35 36 37 Math 5 44 Q What is the first commaundement A Honor thy father and thy mother Exod xx 12 Q who is our father and mother A Al superiors set ouer vs of god for our good Rom 13 1 2 Eph. 6 1 2. 3 Q what doth the word honor 〈◊〉 A It 〈◊〉 reuerence obedience and maintenance whether they be worthy or vnworthy that are our superiors Math xxii xxi Q what is the first commaundement A Thou shalt not kil Exod. xx 13 Q what is forbidden and commaunded in this law A We are charged not to hurt our owne life or our neighbors but to preserue and tender it as our owne 1 Ioh. 3 15 Math 5 xxii xxiii 24 Q what is the seuenth commaundement A Thou shalt not commit a dultery Exod 20 14 Q what is required in this law A we must kepe our bodies and soules chast from consenting to vnclean lustes Math 5 8 29 〈◊〉 Col. 3 5 Q what is the eight commaundement A Thou shalt not steale Exod 20 15 Q what is forbidden and commaunded in this law A we must not 〈◊〉 or hurt our neighbors goods but maintaine and preserue them Eph 4 28 1 Thess. 4. 6 Q what is the ninth commaundement A Thou shalt not beare false witnesse against thy neighbor Exod 20. 16 Q what is forbidden and commaunded in this law A we must not diminish or hurt the good name of our neighbor but 〈◊〉 his credit and estimation Exod
23 1 Psal 15 3 Q what is the tenth commaundement A Thou shalt not couet Q what is forbidden and commaunded in this law A The first motions and lustes to sin before consent are forbidden and loue out of a pure heart and a good conscience is required Rom. 7 7 Q 〈◊〉 any man able to 〈◊〉 these commaundementes A No man is able to 〈◊〉 them Rom iii. xxiii i Ioh i 8 Galath iii Q In what estate stand we by meanes of the breach of the law A We are the children of wrath and euerlasting damnation Gal 3 x Q What is the second part of religion A Faith to beleeue whatsoeuer God hath set down in his word the sum whereof is contained in the apostles creed consisting of twelu articles Q what is the first Article A I beleeue in God the father almighty maker of heauen and earth Q what is the second Article A And in Iesus Christ his onely sonne our Lord. Q what is the third Article A which was conceiued by the holy ghost borne of the Virgin Marȳ Q what is the fourth Article A Suffered vnder Pontius Pilate was crucified dead and buried he descended into hell Q what is the 〈◊〉 Article A He rose a gaiue the third day from the dead Q What is the 〈◊〉 article A He ascended into heauen and sitteth on the right hand of god the father almighty Q What is the seuenth article A From thence he shall come to iudge the quicke and the dead Q What is the eight article A I beleeue in the Holi-ghost Q What is the ninth article A I beleeue the holy Catholick church the communion of Saints Q What is the tenth article A I beleeue the forgiuenes of sinnes Q what is the eleuenth article A I beleeue the resurrection of the body Q what is the twelfth article A I beleeue the life euerlasting Q what are the 〈◊〉 points of this Creed A Two concerning God or concerning the church Q what consider you in God A The vnity and the trinity 1 Iohn 5 7. Q what beleeue you of the vnity A I beleeue that in substance there is one only true and almighty God 1 cor 8. 4 Deut. 6 4 Q what beleeue you of the Trinity A I beleeue that in one God there are three distinct persons the father the sonne and the Holyghost Math. 28 19. and 3 16. 17 Q what beleeue you of God the father A I beleeue that he is almightie and therefore hath made all creatures good and gouerneth all things wel Gen. 1 1 Nehem. 9. 6 act 4. 24 Q what beleeue you of the 〈◊〉 A I beleeue that we being borne dead in finnes he came into the world to be a mediatour betweene God and man 1 Tim 2 5 Q what meane you by a mediator A I beleeue that he was sent to reconcile vs to his father and his father vnto vs and so to make peace between God and man Esa 9. 6 Eph 2 16 Q What is required of a mediatour A Two natures Iohn 1 14 Heb. 5. 6 Q what are they A The diuine nature and the human nature Heb 2 16 Q what beleeue you of 〈◊〉 diuine nature A I beleeue that he onely is the naturall sonne of God and therefore God and our Lord Heb. 1 3 Q what beleeue you of his humane nature A I beleeue two things his entrance into the world and the things that followed the same Luke xxiiii xxv xxvi Q what haue we to consider in his entrance into the world A Two things his conception and his birth Q what 〈◊〉 you of his conception A I beleeue he was begotten by the myraculous power and working of the Holi-ghost Luke i 35 Math i. xviii Q what 〈◊〉 you of his birth A I beleeue that he tooke flesh and was borne of a virgine whose name was Mary Math. 1 xx Esa 7 xiiii Q what be the things that followed his entrance and comming into the world A two his fufferings and his glorie Luke xxiii xxv xxvi 46 Q what were his sufferings A Of two sorts in bodie or soule Q what were his sufferings in body A I beleeue that Pontius Pilate the iudge giuing sentence his hands and feet were nailed to a crosse and thereby dying his body was buried in manner as others were and lay for a time vnder the dominion of death Iohn xix xviii 1 cor xv 3 4 Actes xiii xxviii 29 Psal. xxii xvi Q what 〈◊〉 you of his sufferings in soule A I beleeue that he suffered in his soule the fierce wrath of his father kindled for our sinnes to deliuer vs from the curse of the law Luke xxii 44 Gal 3 xiii Q what things are to be considered touching his glory A Three things eyther his glory which is past or present or to come 1 Pet 3. xxi xxii act i. xi Q what beleeue you touching his glorie past A His resurrection and his assention act 1 2 3 Q what beleeue you touching his resurrection A I beleeue that although for a space his bodie laie dead in graue yet after three dayes he raised it vp and gaue it life againe Math 28 6 2 cor 13 4 Ioh x 17. xviii Q what beleeue you of his ascending into heauen A I beleeue that his body being vnited againe to his soule he was personallie taken vp into the heauens after that he had bene conuersant vpon the earth 40 dayes acts 1 9 Q what is his glory present A He sitteth at the right hand of the father Marke 16 19 Q what meane you thereby A I beleeue that his father hath aduanced him into the highest honour and hath committed vnto him the gouernement of all things in heauen and earth Heb. 1 3 Psal. 110. 1 Q what is his glory to come A He shal come from heauen to iudge the quick and the dead Math. 25 31 Act 1 xi Q what meane you thereby A I beleeue that in the end of the worlde all flesh shall appeare before him both of those that haue bene deade from the beginning of the world and of those also that then shall be liuing and that then as an vpright iudge he shall throw the wicked into perpetuall cursednesse and aduance the righteous to euerlasting blessednes Math 25 32 33 1 Thes. 4. 16. 17. Reuel 20. 12 xiii x iii. Q what beleeue you of the Holy-ghost A I beleeue that he is God proceeding from the father and the sonne and 〈◊〉 all the children of God Rom 8 xi Q what beleeue you of the Church A Two things first that there is one holy Catholicke church Secondly that there are 〈◊〉 giuen vnto it Math xvi 18 Q what meane'you by a chruch A The whole company of the faithfull seruants of God which euer wer from the beginning which also be now and shal be to the end of the 〈◊〉 of which number I beleeue that I am one Iohn 10. 16 Q why do you call it holy A because none can be 〈◊〉 to God vnlesse he
not the forgiuenes of 〈◊〉 to the annointing with oyle but to the prayer of faith Acknoledge saith he your faults one to another and pray one for another that ye may be healed for the prayer of a righteous man auaileth much if it be feruent And again The praier of faith shal saue the sick and the lord shal raise him vp and if he haue committed sins they shal be forgiuen him Wher we see that the effect of pardon is ascribed to the force of prayer therfore extream vnction is no sacra and so this greazing houseling annointing is to be abandoned of the people of God What then wil some say do you leaue the sick without al comfort and consolation No we visit the sick among vs and although we do not housse and annoint them with material oyle wee annoint them with the precious oyle of the mercy of god we instruct them how to prepare themselues to leaue the world to depart this mortall life and to strengthen themselues in the assured hope of euerlasting life Wee say dear brother God sendeth his messenger death to summon and arrest you to come into his presence Al the children of Adam are dust and to dust they must return Man that is borne of a woman is of short continuance and full of trouble he shooteth forth like a Flower and is cut downe he vanisheth also as a shadow and continueth not Death is common to all flesh it is appointed to all men once to 〈◊〉 It is the gate throgh which we must enter into heauen If we would liue for euer we must die for the way to liue eternally is 〈◊〉 to die Though the time be vncettaine where or how we shall dy yet nothing so certain as that we must dy we know not how soone This must not seeme strange vnto you for the whole life of a Christian should be nothing but a meditation of death being the end of all flesh we should make account of euery day of our life as if it wer the instant day of our death You must consider that nothing befalleth vs by chance or fortune al things are ruled and guided by the soueraigne prouidence of almighty God all the hairs of our head are numbred not one sparrow falleth to the grounde without the wil of your heauenly father humble your selfe therfore vnder his mighty hand he conecteth euery child whom he loueth My son despise not the chastening of the Lorde neither faint when thou art rebuked of him for whom the L. loueth he chasteneth and he scourgeth euery son whom he receiueth Heerby then God tryeth and proueth your obedience patience and faith as we see in the example of Iob who praised the name of God in all his miseries and if the Lord woulde kill him he would not cease to put his trust in him We exhort them to set their houses in order before they dy thereby to cutte off hatred and contention and to staye quarrels and suites after their departure whereby oftentimes more is spent then was left then to forget the world and the things of the world and wholly to giue themselues to the meditation of the life to come where this corruptible shall put on incorruption and this mortal shal put on imortality according to the exhortation of christ and his Apostles in many places as Mat. 6. Seeke ye first the kingdome of God and his righteousnesse and all thinges shall be ministred vnto you And 1 Cor 7. This I say brethren because the time is snort heereafter that both they which haue Wiues be as though they had none and they which weep as thogh they wept not they that reioyce as tho they reioysed not and they that buy as though they possessed not and they that vse this world as though they vsed it not for the fashion of this world goeth away And the same Apostle Our conuersation is in heauen from whence also we looke for a sauiour euen the Lords Iesus Christ who shall change our vile 〈◊〉 that it may be fashioned like vnto his glorious body according to the working whereby he is able to subdue all things vnto himselfe So 2. Cor 4. c. Therefore we faint not but though our outward man perish yet the inward man is renewed daily For our light affiction which is but for a moment causeth vnto us a farre more excellent and an eternall weight of glorie while we looke not on the things which are seen but on the things which are not 〈◊〉 for the thinges which are seene are temporall but the things which are not seene are eternall For we know that if our earthlie house of this tabernacle be destroyed we haue a building giuen of God that is an house not made with hands but eternall in the heauens for therefore wee sigh desiring to be cloathed with our house which is from heauen because if we be cloathed we shal not be found naked And the wiseman Eccle. 1. Vanitie of vanities saith the Preacher vanitie of vanities all is vanitie I haue considered al the works that are don vnder the sun behold al is vanitie and vexation of spirit So 1. Ioh. 2. Loue not this world neither the things that are in this world If any man loue this worlde the loue of the father is not in him for al that is in this world as the lust of the flesh the lust of the eies and the pride of life is not of the father but is of this world and this world passeth away and the lust thereof but he that fulfilleth the wil of God abideth euer And the same in his reue lations I heard a voice from heauen saying write the dead which die in the Lord are fully blessed euen so saith the spirit for they rest from their labors and their workes follow them They shal hunger no more neither thirst anie more 〈◊〉 shal the Sunne light on them neither anie heat for the lambe which is in the midst of the throne shal gouern them and shal lead them vnto the liuelie fountaines of Waters and God shal wipe awaie al teares from their eies Moreouer we put them in minde to examine themselues and their liues passed how they haue offended God and their brethren and admonish them to make an humble and harty confession of their sinnes to God that that they haue not liued as they ought to doe to be sorry and greeued for the same and to promise ammendement of life if they recouer Thus the faithfull haue done as we see in Dauid Psalm 51. Haue mercie vpon me O God according to thy louing kindnes according to the multitude of thy compassions putte away mine iniquities I know mine iniquities and my sinne is euer before me against thee against thee haue I sinned and done euill in thy sight that thou maiest be iust when thou speakest and pure when thou iudgest Behold I was borne in iniquity and in sinne
hath my mother conceiued mee And psal 38. There is nothing sound in my flesh because of thine anger neither is there rest in my bones because of my sinne for mine iniquities are gone ouer mine head and as a weighty burden they are too heauy for me This practise we see also in Daniell in Nehemia in Ezra in Manasses and in many others We mooue them to labour to be at one with God to be reconciled to their brethren and to remember the poore Especially we stirre them vp to prayer in regard of their present necessities and of the mercifull promises of God resting themselues on the perfect and all-sufficient sacrifice of Christ. Gratious and precious are the promises that God hath made to al that come to the throne of his mercy as p. al. 145. The Lorde is neere to all that call vpon him yea to all that call vpon him in truth he will fulfill the desire of them that feare him he will also heare their cry and wil saue them And psal 50. Call vpon me in the daye of trouble so wil I deliuer thee and thou shalt glorifie me And our sauiour Math 7. Aske and it shall be giuen you seeke and ye shall find knocke and it shal be opened vnto you for whosoeuer asketh receiueth and he that seeketh findeth and to him that knocketh it shal be opened So the Apo. Iames. The praier of faith shal saue the sicke and the Lorde shall raise him vp and if he haue committed sinnes they shall bee forgiuen him acknowledge your faults one to another that ye may be healed for the praier of a righteous man auaileth much if it be feruent Now when they are sufficiently humbled for their sinnes wee moue them to hunger and thirst after the merits of Christ who of God is made vnto vs wisedome righteousnes sanctification and redemption We alledge vnto them these and such like comfortable places of Scripture Come vnto me all ye that are wearie and heauie laden and I will ease yon This is a a true saying and by all meanes woorthy to be receiued that Christ Iesus came into the world to saue sinners of whom I am chiefe These things write I vnto you that ye sinne not if any man sinne we haue an aduocate with the father Iesus Christ the iust whose blood clenseth vs from all sinne he is the 〈◊〉 for our sinnes and not for ours onely but also for the sinnes of the whole world He is euermore about those that are his he maketh their bed in all their sicknesse his left hand vnder their heads and with his right hand he doth imbrace them so that whether they liue they liue vnto the Lord or whether they die they dye vnto the Lord whether they liue or dye they are the Lords This is true happines Furthermore we raise them vp with sweet comforts and consolations of the word of god against alterror and feare of death Death is swallowed vp in victory ô death where is thy sting ô graue where is thy victory The sting of death is sinne and the strength of sinne is the law but thankes be vnto God which hath giuen vs victory through our Lord Iesus Christ. And Rom. 8. Ther is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Iesus which walke not after the flesh but after the spirit I am perswaded that neither death nor life nor Angels principalities powers nor things present nor things to come neither any creature shall be able to separate vs from the loue of God which is in Christ Iesus our Lord. Christ is to vs aduantage whether in life or in death Such as beleeue in him yea though they were dead shall liue Death is to vs as a sleepe and the graue as a bed of rest A crowne of righteousnesse is laid vp for vs which the righteous iudge shall giue vnto vs so that an euill death can neuer follow where a good life hath gone before forasmuch as he cannot possible die ill who hath liued wel Death indeede is a Scorpion or serpent but his sting is pulled out he may wel hisse but he cannot hurt he may wel threaten but he cannot destroy for Christ hath quelled and conquered him Now to put away the griefe and tediousnes of sicknes we wil and wish them to meditate on the things they haue heard and learned by the ministry of the word from time to time in their health to consider with themselues how God sometimes suffereth the wicked to prosper for a time and florish like a greene bay tree and how he punisheth them in the 〈◊〉 wrath and iudgement for them how he blesseth or correcteth his children in this life how he hath prepared eternall torments for the wicked and vnspeakeable glory for the Godly but aboue all the workes of God we teach them deepely to thinke vpon the glorious and gratious work of our redemption wherein the infinite mercy and iustice of God do meete together and kisse each other taking delight and comfort therein withall thanksgiuing Wherefore we perswade them to beare the paines and griefes of sicknes with patience constant perseuerance because all sicknes is Gods hand who being the god of the spirits of al flesh killeth maketh aliue bringeth down to the graue and raiseth vp again There by we are indeed chastened for our sins but they are nothing in comparison of that anguish and agony which Christ suffered for vs neither are they worthy of the exceeding glory which shal be shewed vnto vs. God hath predestinated vs to be like the image of his son so that the deeper we sinke downe in sorrowes the more perfectly we resemble christ it is the great mercy of God we are not vtterly consumed and that his louing kindnes is not at an end toward vs. The sicknes of the body is physick for the soule for the striking of the one is the healing of the other by the Crosse wee must enter the kingdome of heauen and learne to loath the pleasures and profits of this present life If they fall to dispaire and doubting of Gods fauour and loue toward them in Christ we labour to strengthen the weake and bind vp the broken hearted we are ready to leaue ninety and nine in the wildernes and seeke that lost one We bring them to God that hath striken them and made the wound considering that the sonne of man is come To seeke and to saue that which is lost God is mercifull and his mercy endureth for euer hee desireth not the death of a sinner but that hee turne vnto him His mercy is ouer all the workes of his hands it is like the Ocean-sea wher no bottom can be found or founded It is the expresse commaundement of God that we should beleeue in Christ who hath tryumphed gloriously against sinne against Satan against hel against death against damnation against desperation The promises of the
the administration of baptisme and truely performe that which is out-wardly figured and represented Heere heauen was open which for our sinnes was shut against vs heere the spirit descended in the visible forme of a doue vpon Christ to signifie vnto vs that being deliuered from the terrors of sin and iudgement we are at peace with God the voice of the father is heard from heauen saying This is my sonne in whom I am well pleased All these things note out the speciall force and dignity of this Sacrament It is not therefore to bee administred in a corner of the Church with three or foure persons present to witnesse the baptisme the rest of the body of the congregation being departed but in the face and open view thereof forasmuch as God to deliuer it from contempt hath giuen it visible markes of greater honor The Apostle saith 1 Cor. 12 Our vncomelie partes haue more comlinesse on for our comely partes neede it not but God hath tempered the body together and hath giuen more honor to that part which lacked As God hath delt with our bodies so hath he done in this sacrament That which is most subiect to contempt dishonour and disgrace God hath lifted vp with sundry excelent preheminences and prerogatiues as we haue seene in Christs baptisme And albeit there be a difference in the person baptized yet there is none in the substance of the baptisme Seeing then god so highly esteemeth of this ordinance it serueth to conuince to accuse and to condemne their carelesnesse and negligence that refuse to be present at baptisme or if they vouchsafe to bee present for a while departe before the end of the whole action and rushe out of the church before the name of God be praysed and the whole worke finished and concluded with prayer as it was Luk. 3. It came to passe as all the people were baptized and that Iesus was baptized and did pray the heauen was opened And Act. 22 Arise and be baptized and wash away thy sinnes in calling on the name of the Lord. Wherefore we are not to departe before god hath be ene prayed vnto and praysed for his benefits The Apostle chargeth that all things in the church be done in order and comelinesse Now what can be more comely and conuenient then that the Churches begin the exercises of their holy religion together and end them together Forasmuch as nothing is done in the assembly which tendeth not to the edification of the whole body Lastly if in euery true baptisme there be outward and inward parts vnited each to other then the baptisme of lohn and of Christ are in nature and substance all one Contrary to the doctrine of the Trent-councel that teacheth If any shal say that the baptisme of Iohn hath the same force with Christs baptisme let him be accursed Although it be no matter of faith nor greatly necessary in theâ—e daies to despute of Iohns baptisme seeing no man or woman is now baptized the rewith yet we will shew the truth of this point out of the Scriptures that they are al one in substance and effect not of any other kind nature For first Iohn preached the baptisme of repentance to remission of sins they haue therfore the same doctrine the same word the same promise the same repentance the same forgiuenesle of sinnes as they had the same outward element of water And the Apostle teacheth that there is One body one spirit one hopeof the calling one Lord one father one faith and one baptisme 2. The baptisme of Iohn was consecrated and sanctified in the person of christ for christ was baptised with the baptisme of Iohn 3. It may appeare as we wil proue Ch. 4 that Iohn 〈◊〉 in the name of the blessed trinity Fourthly neither Christ nor his Ap. rebaptized any that wer baptized by the ministry of Iohn Apollos did know onely the baptisme of Iohn he is taken instructed farder in the faith and waies of the Lord but we read not that he was baptized again 5 if Iohns baptisme were not the same with our baptisme it would follow that CHRIST was baptized with another baptisme then we are and that our baptisme was not sanctified in the person of CHRIST which taketh away our comfort and consolation that we which are the members of CHRIST haue one and the same baptisme with our head Sixtly if the baptisme of Iohn were not one with the baptisme of Christ heere by the errour of the Anabaptistes should be confirmed for such as were baptized of Iohn should be rebaptized Seuenthly the Apostles themselues should not be truely baptized for they no doubt were baptized of Iohn some of them being first his Disciples otherwise they should be vnbaptized For Christ with his owne hands baptized none as ap peareth Ioh. 4 1 2 and it is not likely that one of them baptized another yea they should baptize other into another baptisme then themselus had receiued Last of all Christ himselfe testi fieth that the baptisme ministred by Iohn pertained to the fulfilling of righteousnesse Math. 3 15 and Luke testifieth that the publicans and people being baptized of him iustified god but the Pharises dispised the counsell of god against themselues were not baptised Wherfore seeing Iohn bpatised with water in the name of the Trinity to remission of sins and that the blessed Trinity was present thereat we conclude his baptisme was the same with ours onely heerin lyeth the difference in the circumstance of time Iohn baptised in christ that should suffer death and rise againe we baptise in the name of Christ already dead and risen againe to life Against this euident truth directly confirmed Bellarmine the Iesuite taketh diuers exceptions and maketh many obiections all which stumbling blocks lying in the way wherat many stumble are to be remoued before we conclude this chapter For he reasoneth thus The baptisme of Iohn was instituted by Iohn himselfe not by Christ he was not the minister onely but the author thereof therefore it was no Sacrament at all especially of the new Testament and consequently not the same with the baptisme of christ I answer we must consider in this reason the base and vile account that the Iesuites make of Iohns baptisme they make it an idle and vaine Ceremony without fruite or force and no Sacrament or seale of heauenly grace Againe if Iohns baptisme were no Sacrament then CHRIST which receiued no other outward Baptisme receiued no Sacrament and we should be baptised with an other 〈◊〉 then Christ was Furthermore shal we heare with patience and hold our peace when these Iesuites or 〈◊〉 Iebusites 〈◊〉 enemies of the people of God belch out their 〈◊〉 and blot Iohns baptisme out of the 〈◊〉 of sacraments and admit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 false and 〈◊〉 Sacraments of 〈◊〉 Penance Orders Matrimony and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lastly what intolerable boldnes or blindenesse is there in these bayards
heer baptized in these pIaces But do we read that any wer excluded And seeing the scripture expresseth al the houshold who shal dare to debar infants Are not they a principall part of the house Besides if the baptisme of children bee not to bee beleeued because it is not named and expressed wee might with as good reason shut out women from the Lords Supper if any were as great an enimie to the communicating of Women as to the baptisinge of Children seeinge wee do not expressely read that they were not admitted to the Lords table in the apostles times Wherfore childrens baptisme is no humaine tradition no apishimitation no ancient corruption of this Sacrament but is grounded on the vnblamable practise of the Apostles which hath the force and strength of a commaundement Thirdly Christ by his owne example aloweth and approueth their baptisme as we see Mar. 10 when the Disciples rebuked those that brought little chilren to Christ that he might touch them he said Suffer little children to come vnto me forbid them not for of such is the kingdome of God verily I say vnto you who soeuer shal not receiue the kingdome of God as a little child he shal not enter therein Wher we are to obserue that he saith not of these onely is the kingdome of heauen but of such like infants which shall be in all ages and times of the church In this act of Christ embracing the infants brought vnto him and sharply rebuking his Disciples thatforbad them we are to consider that he commaundeth children to be brought vnto him and addeth a reason To such belongeth the kingdome of heauen If any obiect It is said he embraced them it is not said he baptized them or if any reply and say that there is no agreement and resemblance betweene baptizing and embracing I answer he layeth his hands vpon them he prayeth for them he commendeth them to his father and saith The kingdome of heauen is theirs All this is a great deale more then to giue them the outward signe For if reason require they should be brought to Christ why should they not bee receiued to baptisme which is a signe of our vnion with Christ If the kingdome of heauen belong to them why should the signe be denied vnto them wherby the doore of entrance into the church is opened Why should we driue them away from Christ whom christ calleth vnto himselfe Neither let any say these children were of yeares and growne vp in age able of themselues to come and repaire to christ For the Euangeliste vseth such words as signifie such young infants as are babes and hang vpon their mothers brestes therefore by comming in this place he meaneth to draw neere or to haue excesse Againe they were such as were brought to Christ by others Luk. 18 15 they were caried in their Armes they walked not on their feet and Christ also tooke them in his owne armes Besides heerto agreeth the practise and custome of the primitiue church for no teacher so profound no docter so learned no writer so ancient which doth not refer the beginning heereof to the precise times of the Apostles Let the Anabaptists and aduersaries of this truth tell vs who was the first author and inuenter of childrens baptisme if they refer it not to Christ who first administred it What was his name if they cancel let them not hide it Let them declare the time when it began Let them shew the place where it was deuised Let them name the child first baptised and in what assembly or church it was If they cannot doe these or any of them let them acknowledge the baptisme of children to bee the ordinaunce of God and not of man warranted both by doctrine of the scripture and practise of the church Moreouer if there were no writer to auouch this ancient truth yet is it in it selfe very right and reasonable For doe we not see and behold daily verie babes and 〈◊〉 oftentimes among men admitted to their inheritance haue they not liuery and season of lande and haue they not the wand or turfe taken in their hands according to the vse of the 〈◊〉 or custome of the Manour of which they holde They knowe not what is done they perceiue nothing what the Lord of the Manour or stewarde speaketh vnto them yet we see among the wisest men in this world this is not thought foolish neither is such an admission called into question but they are afterwarde instructed what they haue done what they haue vndertak n and taken vpon them what seruices and duties they owe what their Lord requireth of them Thus they are admitted in their infancy to a temporal inheritance and possession this they holde to the end of their life and of the validity of such entrance no tenant maketh doubt Why then shoulde it seeme vnreasonable to giue them baptisme the signe of the couenant being born heirs of the promise that after they come to discretion they may make vse of it as the rest of the members of the church They shall understand afterward that which they vnderstand not for the present and yet if it please GOD to take them in mercy to himselfe from the miseries of the worlde before they know the mistery of their baptisme he worketh extraordinatily by wayes best knowne to himselfe the force of their baptisme in their harts and sealeth vp their engrafting into Christ I esus If then children haue the white wande deliuered vnto them to assure them of the inheritance which they holde let none deny vnto them the partakinge of this sacrament wherby they are assured of an eternal inheritance howsoeuer for the present time they are not capable of the knowledge thereof Lastly the priuiledges and prerogatiues of children are no lesse then those of elder yeares For infantes are a parte of the Church of GOD they are the sheep of CHRIST they are the children of the heauenly father they are inheritors of the kingdome of heauen they are redeemed with the blood of CHRIST and engrafted into his body why then should they not beare the marke of CHRIST seeing they are a principall part of his possession If they be a part of the houshold they ought to haue entrance into the house if they belong to the Citty of GOD who shall dare to shut the gates against them Or if they be in the number of the sheepe of Christ who shall presume to keepe them from the sheepe-folde Or if they be sound members of the bodie of christ who shall cut them off as rotten members Wherefore then should they not receiue the seale whereby the promise is confirmed vnto them seeing they haue the promise it selfe of saluation Why shoulde they not be pattakers of the outward signe seeing they are partakers of the thinge signified Why should they be put back from the figure seeing they haue the truth itselfe Why shoulde they not be
Christ Iesus shed his blood for them he dyed for all the children of God he redeemed them whether they be old or young smal or great as Ioh. 11. He must die not for that nation onely but should gather together in one the children of God which are scattered And the same Apostle Reuel 12. saith I saw the dead both great and small stand before God and the bookes were opened and another booke was opened which is the booke of life and the dead were iudged of those things written in those bookes according to their workes Wherefore when children shall come to yeares of discretion and vnderstanding they must heereby be pricked forward to an earnest care and indeuour to walke in the feare of God and to serue him in holynesse and righteousnesse all the daies of their life by whom they were receiued for sonnes and adopted for his children by a solemne pledge of their adoption before they were able through their age to know and acknowledge him for their father Let them giue the first fruites of their life to God let them learne to beare the yoake of obedyence from their youth let them redresse and reforme their waies by taking heede to the word of truth and seeing God hath remembred them in their baptisme let them also remember their creator in the daies of their youth and begin to be wise betimes least death come suddainely and cut them off as the sluggard that for-sloweth the seasons of plowing and reaping wisheth for them in vaine at another time of the yeare Thus we haue shewed the baptisme of children the certaine truth thereof hath beene euidently proued the obiections against this truth aledged haue been susficiently answered and the vses of it to the great comfort of all faithfull parentes and Children haue beene particularly remembred Chap. 8. Of the first inward part of baptisme HItherto we haue handled al the outward parts of baptisme now we are orderly to proceede to the inwarde partes The inward parts of baptisme are such as are represented by the outward Those are foure in number first God the father secondly the spirit thirdly Christ fourthly the soule clensed as we see Math. 28 19. Teach all nations baptizing them in the name of the father of the sonne and of the holy-ghost he that beleeueth and is baptized shall be saued Heer we see these foure inward parts are named and expressed This is also euidently proued Math 3 in the baptisme of Christ where the Trinity of persons was manifested These inward parts do directly and fitly answeare to the outward The father is represented by the Minister the spirit worketh by the worde Christ is sealed by the water and the soule clensed is signified by the body that is washed Now there is a notable agreement a singular vnion and fit proportion betweene these partes where the minister hath relation and reference to the father the word to the spirit the water to Christ and the body dipped to the faithfull clensed For euen as the minister by the word of institution taketh and applyeth the water to the washing of the bodye so God the father through the working of the spirite offereth and applyeth the blood of Christ to the clensing of the faithfull Hauing seene the proportion of the parts between themselues let vs consider of them particularly and in order The first inward part is God the father represented by the minister The minister calling vpon the name of God vseth the water to wash and washeth the party baptized with the element of water which sealeth vp gods incorporating and ingrafting of the baptized into Christ and our spirituall regeneration Hence it is that when Iohn baptized the father was present as president of the worke when loe his voice came from heauen saying This is my beloued sonne in whome I am well pleased Now let vs come to the vses This 〈◊〉 first of all to strengthen our faith in the remission of our fins in imputation of Christs righteousnes in mortification of sinne by the force of Christs death and in sanctification through Christs resurrection Wherefore although the Minister doth nothing touching or towarde the clensing of the soule yet in regard of Gods ordinance and our benefit the ministery of man is somewhat which whosoeuer despiseth doth despise God the author of it For whensoeuer the eye of the body seeth the minister powring on the water and washing the body we must behold by saith god the father offering the blood of his own son to be water of life to our soules And let vs all make this vse of the Churches baptism to the comfort of our own harts so often as we see it administred let vs not rest in it as in a work done to another and nothing concerning our selues but euermore helpe our inward affection by the outwarde action and alwaies as the eye of the body beholdeth the Minister let the eye of the faith be fastned firmely vppon the Father who maketh the Sacramentall rites auaileable which are openly done before vs for our edification Again it teacheth that we must not rest in the outward washing nor in the externall actions of the Minister but euer consider what is offered to our considerations therin and when the father offereth to vs his sonne let vs not refuse him For he that satisfieth himselfe with the outwarde work is as he that catcheth after the shadow and regardeth not the substance or as one that maketh much of the garments but respecteth little the body it self which ought to be had in greatest price and estimation Lastly is God the father an inward part of baptism then we must take heed we giue not that to the Minister which is proper to god the father whereby hee is robbed of the honor and glory due to his great name The Minister may wash the body and clense the flesh but can goe no further he medleth not with sanctification of the conscience from dead workes which is not in the power of mortall man to do so that god giueth the thing and men giue the signe yea while the Minister offereth the one God the father giueth the other Chap. 9 Of the second inward part of Baptisme THe second inwarde part of baptisme is the spirit of God hauing relation to the word and promise of God This appeareth Math 3 11 He baptizeth with the holy-ghost and with fire And verse 16 When Christ was baptized the heauens were opened vnto him and he saw the spirit discending like a doue and lighting vpon him So the apostle 1 Cor 6 saith ye are washed ye are sanctified ye are iustified in the name of the Lord Iesus and by the spirit of our God And chap. 12 of the same Epistle By oke spirit we are all baptized into one body whether we be Iewes or Graecians whether we be bonde or free and haue beene all made to drinke into one spirit And Tit 3.
According to his mercy he saued vs by washing of the new-birth and the renewing of the holy-ghost which he shedde on vs aboundantly through Iesus Christ our sauiour All these testimonies teach vs that the Holy spirit of God is a necessary inward part of this sacrament and that the baptisme of the spirit ioyned to the word giueth force vnto it who worketh in our soules that which water doth in our bodies so that without the spirit it is nothing From hence we learne that it is not the dipping of vs into or the sprinkling of vs with water by the Minister that maketh vs partakers of Christ but it commeth from the vertue of the spirit who in time performeth what is represented by outwarde signes and promised by the worde Againe we learne heereby that the spirit is true God equall with the father and the sonne For who is able to make the worde and Sacramentes auaileable but onely God Seeing then this is the proper worke of the Holy-ghost to open the heart to teach the conscience to seale vppe to the daye of redemption and to helpe our infirmities in heating in praying and receiuing the Sacraments he must needs be acknowledged to bee true God the giuer of these graces So we see that in the forme of the administration of this sacrament the blessed spirit is named and rehearsed and hath his order togither with the father and the sonne This therefore is a principle of our faith to be learned confessed and beleeued Thirdly we are heerby to take heed and beware that we giue not to the word that which is proper to the spirit he ingrafteth vs into Christ he keepeth vs that we fal not from Christ he maketh the word and promise of the institution profitable vnto vs without whome it shoulde be vnto vs as sounding brasse or a tinckeling Cymball Wherefore as GOD the father in mercy maketh the promise so his spirite must assure it to the Consciences of all the faithfull Lastly let vs learne whensoeuer we come to the Worde or sacramentes to craue the gracious assistance of the blessed spirit to guide direct and regenerate vs to eternal life to sanctifie vs and to assure vs of gods endlesse fauour in Christs Iesus as 1 Ioh 5. There be three which beare witnesse in heauen the father the word and the holy spirit and these three are one The Holy-ghost by his grace and vertue worketh in vs steadfastly to beleeue the truth of Gods worde and the gratious promises of saluation as he is the author beginner and begetter of faith in vs so he increaseth it and maketh vs fit to receiue Christ and to apply him with all his gifts vnto our selues and sendeth vs into the full fruition and possession of Christ. He is our comforter to certifie vs of our reconciliation to god and to make vs reioyce vnder the crosse knowing that tribulation bringeth foorth patience and patience experience and experience hope and hope maketh not ashamed because the loue of god is shed abroade in our harts by the holy-ghost which is giuen vnto vs. He is the earnest and seale of our inheritance by whom we are sealed vp to euerlasting life Thus we see that howsoeuer the increase and 〈◊〉 of faith is assigned to the sacramentes yet this grace proceedeth from the holy-ghost who is vnto our faith as marow vnto the bones as moysture vnto the tree and as a comfortable raine vnto the fruites of the earth If this inward maister and teacher be wanting the sacraments can worke no more in our mindes then if the bright Sunne should shine to the blind eies or a loud voice sound in deafe eares or fruitefull corne fall into the barren wildernesse Wherefore least the word of saluation should sound in our eares in vaine and Sacraments ioyned to the word should be present before our eies in vaine the spirit worketh in vs whensoeuer we come vnto them aright he mollifieth the hardnesse of our heartes he frameth vs to new obedience and assureth vs that God offereth to vs his owne sonne for our iustification and saluation For euen as the seede that falleth into a barren soile dyeth and rotteth yet if it be so wen in fruiteful grownd wel tilled manured it bringeth 〈◊〉 good increase with gain aduantage so likewise the word and the sacramentes if they hit vpon an heard neck and fall into a barren heart bcome vnprofitable and vnfruiteful but if the effectual work of the spirit accompanieth the hearing of the one and receiuing of the other they are profitable auaileable and comfortable Thus much of the second part Chap 10. Of the third inward part of Baptisme THe third inward part of baptisme is Christ represented and signified by the water For as the A postle teacheth That the blood of bulles and calues cannot take away sinne so the water in baptisme cannot wash away sinnes It toucheth the body washeth it clenseth and purgeth it but it can proceed no further For this cause the beleeuers are said to be baptized in the name of Christ as Act 2 38. He baptized euery one of you in the name of christ So chap. 19 5 They were baptized in the name of the Lord Iesus Not meaning heerby the forme and manner of baptizing but the fruite foundation and end of baptisme Likewise the Apostle sheweth the same 1 Pet 3 21. Baptisme answering to the figure of the Arke saueth vs by the resurrection of Iesus Christ. There is no more force in outward baptisme to saue the whole vertue and force floweth from the streame of Christs blood as the true materiall cause thereof wherein the power of in ward baptisme doth consist The truth being euident that the pouring out of the blood of CHRIST is one of the inward partes of Baptisme let vs see the vses The vse of this part teacheth diuerse pointes First that the outward washing with water is not the washing away of sins for then whosoeuer were dipped in it should receiue forgiuenesse of sinnes repentance from dead workes and sanctification of the spirit whether he beleeued or not which is otherwise as we see Act. 8 22. Also they should not and could not be Christians and eternally saued which are not outwardly washed but departing this life without baptisme they should perish in the next world without redresse or redemption and so our condicion were worse then the Iewes their condition in times past and the grace of God more restrained vnder the Gospell then it was vnder the law Moyses offering more mercy then Christ himselfe So then the washing with water serueth to ratifie the shedding of Christs blood for the remission of our sinnes and the imputation of his righteousnesse to our instification as 1 Ioh. 1 7. The blood of Iesus Christ his sonne doth clense vs from all sinne So Reuel 1 5. He hath loued vs and washed vs from our sinnes in his blood and
this death Heereunto also commeth that which the Euangelist setteth downe in the conference betweene Christ and Nicodemes Ioh. 3 That which is borne of flesh is flesh and that which is borne of the spirit is spirit marueil not that I said vnto thee ye must be borne againe For this cause are infants baptized because they are conceiued in sinne and borne in iniquity and cannot become spirituall but by a new birth wrought by the spirit which is sealed vp by the water in baptisme Againe this serueth to strengthen our faith when we behold the outward washing pouring out of the water and baptizing of the body it assureth the inward clensing of the soule by the blood of Christ offered to all and receiued of those that are elected to eternall saluation This then is the right and holy vse of baptisme Doest thou feele inwardly in thine heart that through the corruption of thy nature and strength of concupiscence thou art moued tempted and prouoked to commit sinne And doest thou feele thy selfe ready to yeald to Satan and so to fall from God into euill Beginne to haue some holy meditation of that solemne vow which thou madest to God in baptisme when thou didest consecrate and giue vp thy selfe wholly to his seruice and didest renounce obedience to the suggestions of Satan to the allurements of the world and to the corruptions of the flesh For baptisme is the Christian mans ensigne giuen of God to vs that we should fight as it were vnder it against all the enemies of our saluation and ouercome It is the badge and bannerofour captaine that wee shrouding our selues vnder his colours should not cowardly turne our back in the skirmish but coragiously looke the enemy in the face nay tread him vnder our feete for euer Moreouer hast thou through weakenes and infinnity 〈◊〉 once or twice into some sin to the dishonour of thy god to the wounding of thine own conscience to the slander of the gospel or to the scandal offence of thy weak brother haue recourse to thy baptisme as vnto a board after shipwracke as vnto a medicine after sicknesse as vnto a plaister after wounding or as vnto a staffe after falling that thou maiest receiue strength courage and comfort to thy soule For albeit baptisme be once only administred for the reasons before alleged chap 1. of this present booke yet it being once deliuered and receiued testifieth that all our sinnes past present and to come are washed away and shal be forgiuen The fruite or efficacy of the Sacraments is not to be restrained and tyed to the present time of receiuing but extendeth it selfe to the whole course of our life afterward And thus much of the fourth part of baptisme Chap. 12. Of the first vse of baptisme HItherto we haue handled the parts of baptisme both outward and inward now let vs proceed to the vses the last point to be obserued in this Sacrament The vses of baptisme are in number three first to shew our planting ingrafting and incorporating into the body of christ secondly to seale vp the remission and forgiuenesse of all our sinnes thirdly to teach vs to dye vnto sinne and liue vnto righteousnesse and true sanctification These endes appeare euidently by the wordes of the Apostle Rom. 6. Know ye not that al we which haue been baptized into IESVS CHRIST haue beene baptized into his death We are buried then with him by baptisme into his death that like as CHRIST was raised vppe from the dead to the glory of the father so wee also should walke in newnesse of life For if we be planted with him to the similitude of his death euen so shall wee be to the similitude of his resurrection knowing this that our olde Man is crucified with him that the body of sin might be destroyed that henceforth we should not serue sinne In this place the Apostle setteth before vs the former ends of baptisme expressely Touching the first vse he sheweth that by it is signified and sealed our vniting setting and inserting into the body of Christ to remaine in him soreuer as braunches in the vine as 1 Cor 12. By one spirit we are all baptized into one body whether we be bonde or free where he teacheth that by baptisme wee become one body with Christ. And Gal. 3 All ye that are baptized into Christ haue put on Christ. This coniunction with Christ is not bodily or naturall it is not by bāds in the flesh it is not by neernes of blood sor such as we see may be seprated as the father from the son the husband from the wife the brother from the sister but this is wholy mysticall and spirituall aboue reason and aboue sence because it is wrought not by natural waies as by ioynts sinnews arteries ligamentes and such like but by spirituall meanes to wit by the power of the spirit and by vertue of faith he sendeth downe his spirit we send vp our faith First he must send downe his spirit because all goodnes is of him Indeed we loue him but it is because he loued vs first giuing vs the spirit of adoption to cry Abba father Indeed we come vnto Christ to be eased and refreshed as he commandeth but it is because the father draweth vs. Indeed we perseuer in faith and loue but this is because he perseuereth in louing of us Indeed we repent and turn vnto God but this is because he taketh away our stonye hart and giueth vnto vs an hart of flesh Secondly as he putteth his spirit within vs so the faith mounteth vp to the heauens and apprehendeth Christ sitting at the right hand of the father And thus his spirit discending our faith ascending and both of them ioyninge the members to the heade the braunches to the vine vs to Christ being once engrafted wee are neuer sepetated as Ioh. 15. He that abideth in mee and I in him the same bringeth foorth much fruite for without me ye can doe nothing If a man abide not in mee he is cast foorth as a braunch and withereth and men gather them and cast them into the fire and they burne No man can be partaker of Christs benefits to saluation which is not made one with him As a Woman cannot be partaker of the riches and honor of some great man and haue interest in his person except she be ioyned to him in mariage that they become one body and one flesh and as the members cannot draw life from the head except they be ioyned with it so there is no partaking of Christ except thete be an vnion and communion with him as himselfe teacheth vs Ioh. 6. Verily verily I say vnto you except ye eat the flesh of the sonne of man and drinke his blood ye haue no life in you If Christ be present to vs life and all things accompanying saluation are present to vs. If christ be absent from vs death is present wrathlyeth
the malicious man as the Apostle teachech 1 Cor. 11 18 20. When ye come together in the church I heare that there are dissentions among you this is not to eate the Lordes Supper Wherefore in that the people communicate of one and the same bread of one and the same wine it signifieth the vnion and agreement betweene all the faithfull in one body where of Christ Icsns is the head who loued vs decrely and spared not his life for vs. Let vs ioyne our selues together in loue according to the exhortation of the Apostle Rom 15 5 6. The God of patience and consolation giue you that ye 〈◊〉 like minded one toward another according to Christ Iesus that yee with one minde and with one mouth may praise God euen the father of our Lord Iesus Christ. All beleeuers must bee of one heart and minde the Wolfe and the lambe the Lyon and the calfe must dwell together in the kingdome of Christ for all are one in Christ Iesus For the Apostle hauing taught that the cup which we blesse and the bread which we breake are the communion of the body and blood of christ he addeth We that are many are one bread and one body because we are all partakers of one bread and therefore he saith 1 cor 11. When ye come together to eate tary one for another The second title giuen to this Sacrament is the Lords Supper by which name it is nowe most vsually and commonly called both because it was so instituted by Christ after his last Supper and is celebrated in the remembrance of CHRIST Heereby we learne first who is the author of this Sacrament not Peter not Paule not any of the Apostles not any man not any angell but Christ Iesus God and man and therefore it is not called the Supper of the Apostles or of any man but of CHRIST himselfe as the Apostle speaketh of baptisme Was Paule crucified for you Either were yee baptized into the name of Paule I baptized none into mine oxne name Wherefore this title serueth to teach vs and to put vs in minde of the author of this Sacrament Secondly seeing this sacrament is not a common supper but an holy and heauenly banket fully furnished not to fill the body but to feede the soule we must come with an earnest desire and longing after CHRIST hungring and thirsting after his righteousnesse and merites as after our life to bee made pattakers thereof For neuer did the body more stand in neede of corporall foode then doth the soule of this Bread of life which came downe from heauen which the father hath promited to giue vnto vs Lastly it condemneth our English Rhemistes and other romish readers of Popish diuinity that wholly condemne this name and title as vnproper and vnfit for this sacrament and vnderstande the Apostle to speake of the loue-feastes when he speaketh of the Lords Supper Indeed in the Apostles times they vsed to meete to gither in one common place not onely for the hearing of the worde for the receiuing of the Sacraments and for prayer to God but to keep certaine feasts which of their end or vse were called feasts of charity as Iude speaketh But of these the Apostle speaketh not when he named the Lordes Supper For first let them shew vs the place where euer these Loue-feasts are called the Lords Supper and then they may warrant their exposition by some colour otherwise wee cannot receiue their interpretation being of priuate motion Secondly if this title were ment of Loue-feastes to what purpose should the Apostle bring in the institution of the sacrament of the body and blood of Christ and largely handle the doctrin therof Wher as their abuses in their loue-feasts might be reformed and 〈◊〉 without this mention and remembraunce of the supper Thirdly to what end should these solemn feasts and bankets be called the Lordes supper which were not instituted in the honour of Christ but to testifie the mutuall loue of those that were members of the same body hauing God for their mercifull father the church for their tender mother and Christ for their elder brother These might rather be called the supper of men then of the Lorde being feasts of charity not of piety Fourthly the Apostles drift and purpose in this place is to teach that such as norish discention and diuision partake the Lords supper vnworthily and therefore willeth them when they come to communicate with the Lord to shake out of their minds all vncharitable affections as chaffe from good corn that so they may assemble togither with profit and not with hurt Last of al to call this sacrament by the name of the lords supper is vsuall among the ancient fathers of the church grounding themselues from the authority of the scripture and example of the Apostle 〈◊〉 some of their owne Writers call this sacrament and expound the words of saint Paule to the Corinthians If therefore they will rest themselues either in the true interpretation of the scripture or in the exposition of the auncient fathers or in the confession of their owne Writers we cannot doubt but the Apostle meaning the Lords Supper vnderstandeth the sacrament of the bodye and blood of Christ. The next title giuen to this sacrament is the breaking of bread which offereth to our considerations these vses not to be passed ouer First it she weth that the substance of bred remaineth after the words of consecration and is not altered by any strange transubstantiation For when the Apostle saith This is my body which is broken for you properly it cannot be vnderstood of the body of Christ which was not broken but of his crucifying and death by a figuratiue speech taken from the substance of the bread which christ brake to distribute it among his Disciples and to represent effectually his suffering for vs. The accidents of bread cannot be broken as we shal see afterward no more then they can feed and nourish Besides we learne heerby that tropes and figures are vsed in the Sacrament contrary to the opinion and assertion of the church of Rome as wee make plaine by the institution and as we constraine the aduersaries themselues to confesse as when it is said his body was broken where the lyterall sence cannot be retained seeing a bone of him could not be broken Likewise when it is saide the cup is the newe testament the rock was Christ the bread is the communion of the body of christ these and such like cannot be interpreted without a figure Lastly seeing of this one action the whole sacrament hath his denomination as appeareth in many places Act ii 42. and xx 7. and 1 Cor xi xxiiii we must hold that as the Apostles and other Ministers of the church were wont in the administration of the supper to breake the bread so must we follow their example as they also followed the example
except they meane this bread is the body of CHRIST this wine is his blood wherefore bread and wine remaine their nature is not changed and altered Fiftly these wordes This is my body must be vnderstood as the words following This cup is the new testament but the cup is not turned into the new testament nor into the blood of Christ therefore the other wordes must be figuratiuely vnderstood not 〈◊〉 for there is one respect of them both neither can any reason be rendred why a figure should be admitted in the one part rather then in the other The sixt reason Christ is said to giue to his Disciples that which he saide was his body If then this be properly taken we shall thereby make a proper Christ and make him a Monster of two bodies as they also make the church a Monster of two heads For so there must be one body which gaue and another body which was giuen But it is most absurde that he should giue and be giuen hold himselfe and beholden offer and be offered which differeth litle from the heresie of the Helcesaits who held ther were sundry Christs two at the least one dwelling in heauen aboue the other in the world heere beneath so these make Christ to haue a double body visible and inuisible a visible body sitting at the table and an 〈◊〉 body made of the substance of bread which as the papists hold 〈◊〉 giuen to the disciples as likewise they teach of the headship of the church that one head is inuisible to vs m the heauens another visible to vs vpon the earth The 7. reason it destroyeth the nature of a sacrament which standeth of an earthly heauenly part one out ward the other inward one seene the other vnderstood one a signe the other a thing signified of which we haue spoken before book 1. chap 3. But if there be an actuall transubstantiation then the outward part is abolished and disanulled The 8. reason in baptisme the substance of water remaineth though it haue words of consecration and be made a sacrament of our regeneration and therefore in the Lords supper the bread and wine are not changed and don away vtterly The scripture speaketh as highly of the one as of the other The ninth reason if bread be really turned into the body of Christ and the wine into his blood then the body and blood of Christ are really 〈◊〉 for the words are seuerally pronounced first of the bread then of the wine yea the soule of Christ should be separated from his body for the bread is turned onely into his body and not into his soule But his soule his body and his blood are not really separated The 10. reason if the bread be turned into his body indeede by force of a few words vttered by a priest then the priest should be the maker of his maker and so euery Masse-monger should be preferred before Christ as much as the creitor hath 〈◊〉 honnour then the creature the builder then 〈◊〉 house the work-man then the worke But they are not 〈◊〉 to publish it in their owne words and writings that the priest is the creator of his creator He that created you hath giuen you power to create him he that hath created you without your selues is created by you by the meanes of you These are the speeches of their wise-men if they be not ashamed of their owne words The 11. reason the bread in the Sacrament after the words of consecration is subiect to as many changes and chances as it was before the bread may mould putrifie and breede Wormes and was accustomably in many places burned the wine may being immoderately taken make drunken it may wax sharpe and turne into vineger yea both of them may be boyled and made hot both of them may be vomited vp as certaine lepers did both of them may be mingled with rank poyson as a certaine Monk gaue the poysoned host to Henry the 7. a noble Emperour of famous memory which when he had taken he dyed The like may be said of Victor the 3. a Pope of Rome who was poysoned after the same manner in the chalice as the Emperor was in the bread But the precious body and blood of Christ cannot be mingled with poyson but is an excellent counterpoison against the biting of the old Serpent and all infection ofsinne whatsoeuer the body cannot mould or putrifie the blood of Christ cannot become sharp or sowre as the outward signes may therefore the substance of bread and wine remaineth The 12. reason there is something in the sacrament materiall and substantiall which goeth the way of all meates according to that saying of our sauiour Perceiue ye not yet that what soeuer entreth into the mouth goeth into the belly and is cast out into the draught But none of the accidents as shape colour quality tast such like are auoyded because they are altered in the stomacke before they come to the place of auoydance and it were blasphemy to thinke that the body of Christ either entreth into the mouth or goeth downe into the belly or is cast out into the draught howsomany of them haue also maintained this monstrous impiety Therefore the substance of the bread and the wine remaine in their owne nature in the sacrament The 13. 〈◊〉 If there were a miraculous conuersion of the bread and wine it would appeare to the outward senses as Ioh. 6 The multitude saw his Miracles There was neuer Miracle wrought by any bodyly creature but sense iudged it to be so but seeing our eyes see and our tast discerneth that it is bread we cannot imagine there is any miracle The Miracles that Moyses did in Egypt when he turned water into blood and his rod into a Serpent The miracles that Christ did when he turned water into wine the eye saw the tast discerned heere was no deceit no fraud no collusion And thus euery hedge-priest should be a worker of Miracles that onely can read his portuise and say ouer his pater noster with an Aue mary This is an honor that may be chalenged but cannot be granted vnto them The 14 reason if there were any transubstantiation there shold be an actuall conuersion of the bread into the body of Christ but this cannot stand For when one thing is changed into another the matter remainetin the forme is altered but heere they make the forme to abide and the matter to be changed A strange Metamorphosis and fitting the fable of this counterfeit turning Now the matter of 〈◊〉 is not in the body of Christ because it is perfect in it selfe and so glorified that it can receiue no accesse Besides nothing can be conuerted or changed into a thing before being and pre-existing which was really before the change or conuersion as Christ turned the water into that wine which was not before Moses turned his rod into that
the Apostle 1 cor 11. reproouing the abuses crept into this Sacrament and labouring to reduce it to the first institution exhorteth the Corinthians to tarry one for another and if any be hungry that he cannot tarrie he must before hand 〈◊〉 at home that so he may better wait for the rest of the congregation Now he would neuer haue giuen counsell and commandement if it had bin vnlawfull or vngodly to take some little repast and short refreshing before in regarde of the present infirmity and weakenes of the body Lastly he teacheth in another place That the kingdome of heauen is not meat nor drinke but righteousnes and peace and ioy in the holy-ghost To conclude as hee willeth that he which eateth despise not him that eateth not and he which eateth not condemne not him that eateth so must it be in this indifferent practise he that can take it let him take it but let not him that receiueth fasting iudge him that fasteth not and let not him which fasteth not condemne him that receiueth fasting he standeth or falleth to his owne maister Who art thou then that iudgest an other mans seruant Let euery one be perswaded in his owne mind and looke to the warrant of his own worke Let vs follow those things which concerne peace and where with one may edisie another If any list to bee contentious we haue no such custome neither the 〈◊〉 of God And thus much of the communicants of this sacrament and likewise of the rest of the outward parts of the Lords supper Chap. 7 Of the words of 〈◊〉 in the sacrament of the Lords supper ALthough we haue spoken before sufficiently of consecration what it is and how it is wrought to satisfie all such as are sober minded and simple Louers of the truth yet be cause special points are heere to be obserued and that the aduersaries turn the true consecration into a taine magicall incantation to worke a miraculous or rather a monstrous transubstantiation it shall not be amisse to assure and handle this point againe that therby the truth of God may be cleered the ignorant instructed the aduersaties satisfied and consequently their mouthes stopped Consecration is a change or conuerting of the outward elementes into another vse by obseruing the whole institution of Christ which giueth it his effect We confesse a turning and changing not of one substance into another not by abolishing of natures not by close pronouncing of certaine wordes but in the vse and in respect of vs and in regard of the promise of God 〈◊〉 he water which floweth out of the rock in the wildernesse signified the same to the fathers which the Wine 〈◊〉 to vs in the supper Notwithstanding it was a common watering to the beasts of the fielde and to the people of God the cattell dranke thereof as well as the people and therefore there could be made no change there in but in respect of men to whom God gaue his gratious promise which teacheth vs to account of the outward signes otherwise then of common meats and common drinks The stones hammered in the quarrey the timber hewed in the forrest the gold tryed in the furnace were common stuff before they were layd in the building of the Temple and so made holy and sanctified to God and man The sayings and sentences of the heathenish poets were prophane before they had passed through the pen of God and were taken vp by the holy ghost So wee teach of the bread and wine before the institution of christ is vsed and obserued they are common but afterward they are holy We confesse and 〈◊〉 not but say plainely there is a change in the sacramentes the elements which before were ordinary meates now become spiritual in respect of the vse before they serued only to feede the belly now they serue to seale vp the nourishment of our soules The discussing of this question together with the foundation of this consecration and sanctification of the creatures is taken out of 1 Tim. 4. 4. Euery creature of God is good and nothing ought to be refused if it be receiued with thanks giuing for it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer These are the two meanes the word and prayer whereby the elementes are changed though not transubstantiated yet they haue a dignity and preheminence which they had not before they are no more common bread common Wine common meate but a Sacrament of Christes body a warrant of Gods promises an holy Mystery and seale of the couenant between God and vs. The first meanes of this consecration and setting a part of the creatures to our vse is by the word of God If we haue the euident and expresse word to warrant our vse of the creatures of God we may vse them for our necessity and comfort if we haue no word to beare out the practise they are not sanctified vnto vs. The tree of knowledge of good and euil was not sanctified vnto Adam though it were good in it selfe as all creatures are because he had a word of commaundement not to eate of it Of the tree of the knowledge of good and euill thou shalt not eate of it for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt dye the death After the fall and after the flood all creatures were not sanctified some were accounted vncleane all might not be eaten all might not be offered as vnder the law among the beastes onely they were cleane that did chew the cud and diuide the hoofe and among the fishes of the Sea onely such as had skales and finnes were called cleane the rest were vncleane vnto them because the word did not allow but restraine the vse of them So likewise for this Sacrament of the Lords Supper not euery creature is sanctified not a 〈◊〉 not any flesh not any fish not oyle but onely bread and Wine These two are consecrated all the rest are cancelled by the word The second meanes whereby the creatures are sanctified is by prayer For albeit that God by the comming of his sonne into the world hath sanctified all meates and drinkes that nothing of it selfe is vncleane but to him that counteth it vncleane yet something must necessarily be done on our partes otherwise that which is holy we may prophane and that which is good we may turne into euill and therefore the apostle addeth praier which is both a thanksgiuing to the Lord that he hath sanctified and prepared them for vs and likewise a petition that they may bee healthfull for vs and we thankefull for them whereby our foode our apparell and all the succours of this life are sanctified to his glory and our comfort These be the two meanes of consecration if these or any of them be wanting there can be no true consecration If then in the time of the law they should haue eaten swines flesh which indeed part the 〈◊〉 but
the shewes of wine he is not personally locally carnally corporally naturally really substantially and sensually present in the Sacrament The question is not whether the wordes of christ be true for they are knowne confessed and beleeued so that as he is the truth so all his wordes are wordes of truth neither is the question whether the Sacrament bee a bare signe or bare figure we say Christ is truely represented sealed and exhibited neither is the question whether God'bo omnipotent and almighty this is a part of our faith and an Article of christian beleefe neither is the question simplye of the presence of Christ whether he be truely and vndoubtedly present in the Sacrament of his last supper we acknowledge and receiue as much But the whole question is of the meaning and vnderstanding of the words of institution and of the manner of his presence Wee confesse and teach the people committed vnto vs that christs body and blood are truely verilie and indeede giuen vnto vs that we truely eat and drinke them that we are releeued and liue by them that we are made bone of his bone that Christ dwelleth in vs and we in him yet we say not that the substance of bread and wine is abolished or that christs bodie discendeth from heauen or is groslie and corporally present in the sacrament we are taught to lift vp out hearts to heauen where christ sitteth at the right hand of God the father and there to feede vpon him But he ere is the state of the question and controuersie betweene vs. The church of Rome teacheth that after the wordes of consecration the bread and wine are abolished and the body and blood of christ come in place so that they make them corporally 〈◊〉 not onely in the sacrament to bee eaten with the mouth but in the pixe in the Masse and in their solemne processions where is neither eating nor drinking Yet Berengarius in his recantation was taught to saie and forced to subscribe that Christ is in the sacrament sensible or sensually is touched with the singers diuided broken rent with the teeth and not onely the accidents More ouer they make it to be eaten not onely of euill men but of beasts and to fill vp the measure of blasphemy to be cast out into the draught as some of them haue taught and affirmed Thus then the difference standeth betweene vs they hold that christs body and blood are carnally eaten of wicked men without faith of brute Beastes without reason but wee denye that CHRIST is thus present in the Sacrament for his body cannot bee vnder so little a quantity of bread and Wine besides it is impietie to 〈◊〉 that the person of CHRIST or his bodye and bloode can bee truelie receiued of Dogges 〈◊〉 and Mise be chewed with the teeth swallowed downe the throat digested in the stomacke and be cast out into vncleane places This we deny this we doe not beleeue this wee abhorre and detest from the bottom of our hearts What is it then we teach and professe We deny that the body and blood of Christ are carnally contained vnder the shews and shadowes of bread and wine we deny them to be eaten and drunken ofwicked men or vnreasonable creatures we deny that they are truely and properly both in heauen and on the earth in pixes and on the 〈◊〉 These are meate for the mind not for the mouth for faith not for the teeth for our beleefe not for the belly This carnall eating of Christ is confuted and conuinced by many reasons First Christ sate downe at the Table and the Disciples with him afterward he tooke bread gaue thankes brake it gaue it and said This is my body likewise he tooke and gaue the cup and sayd Drinke ye all of this whereby we see when the Apostles receiued the Sacrament Christ sate at the table with his true body but the body which they tooke sate not at the table therefore they tooke the signe of his body Likewise the blood which they receiued was not in the body which sate at the table therefore it vvas not properly Christes blood vvhich was not as yet really and actually shed The same body could not sit at the table not sit at the table the same body could not be in their handes and out of their handes the blood of Christ could not be out of his veines in the cup and in his vines within his body hee could not sit visible at the table and bee inuisible in the mouthes and bellies of the 〈◊〉 Wherefore the reall presence bringeth with it real contradictions which cannot stand together Secondly the end of the Lords supper is to call his death to a continuall remembrance as Luk. 22. Do this in remembrance of me and the Apostle 1 Cor. 11. Ye shew the Lords death vntill he come Now to what end should we neede the remembrance of Christ if he were corporally present in the sacrament if he were taken in the hands if he were holden in the mouth if he were eaten with the 〈◊〉 And to to what purpose should we shevv the Lordes death till he come if he come 〈◊〉 and be present bodily in the sacrament Besides the wisest a nong the Phylosophers teach vs that sence is of thinges present but remembrance is of such thinges as are absent as hope is of such thinges as are to come not seene and this the Apostle teacheth Thirdly Christ receiued a true body withall the naturall properties of an 〈◊〉 body like to vs in all thinges sinne onely exc pted and is therefore called the sonne of 〈◊〉 the sonne of 〈◊〉 the sonne of man our brother partaker of flesh and blood hee is said to haue taken vpon him the seede of Abraham and not the Angels nature to be visible Luk. 24 39 Behold my hands and my feete for it is I my selfe 〈◊〉 me and see for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me haue For if he may be in many places together in some place visible and in some inuisible in some to be handled in others nor to be handled hee can haue no true body of a true man And if this were not a strong reason It is not felt and seene therefore no humaine body the Disciples might haue answered vnto Christ why doest thou bid vs behold thy hands and see thy feete and handle thy body and thereby to try thy humanity seeing thou hast a body which cannot be seene touched or handled Fourthly christ hath left the earth with his bodily presence and is 〈◊〉 vp into he 〈◊〉 farre aboue all principalities and powers and is sit do vne on the right hand of his father as Act. 1. While they beheld he was taken vp And Mar. 16. After the Lord had spoken vnto them he was receiued into heauen and sate at the right hand of God So Act. 3. Whom the heauens must containe vntil
the time that all things are restored Likewise Phil. 3. Our conuersation is in heauen from a hence we looke for a sauior And again Luk 24. 〈◊〉 he blessed them he departed from them and was carried vp into heauen So Ioh. 12. The poor alwaies ye haue with you but me ye shall not haue alwais I am come out from the father and came into the world againe I leaue the vvorld and goe to my father If these thinges be true that Christ is departed from vs if he be no longer among vs if he be taken vp into heauen if he must be contained there vntill the restoring of all thinges if we must looke for a sauiour from heauen to change our vile bodies if hee be carryed vp to his father and haue left the world then he is not now present with vs his body is not in euery altar he doth not lurke and lie vnder the shewes of bread and wine For to be departed from vs and not to be departed from vs to be contained in heauen and not to be contained in heauen to leaue the world and yet to remaine in the world to sit at the right hand of God and to lie hid vnder euery altar cannot stand together any more then to be a man and no man to be christ and not christ to be a sauiour and no sauiour to be God and not God Fiftly christ reproueth the caparnaits because they thought his body was to be eaten infleshly manner with the mouth of the body and shold descend into the stomck which is the way that all other meates do passe when they heard him preach of eating his flesh and drinking his blood they saide This is an heard saying who can heare it They murmured and departed from him because they thought they must eate him with the mouth and teeth chew him and swallow him vp But christ expoundeth himselfe and declareth that 〈◊〉 ment not carnally but spiritually It is the spirit that quickneth the flesh profiteth nothing the words that I speake vnto you are spirit and life that is the flesh of Christ thus eaten thus chewed thus digested bodily carnally and grosly cannot profit but truely and spiritually taken it is meat indeede Now to shew what it is to eate spiritually and to pull off the garment of this similitude that the truth may more plainely appeare by spirituall eating we doe not vnderstand that which is fained standing in a conceit opinion or imagination neither that the body blood of christ are turned into a spirit but we meane by spirituall eating sucha communion participation of christ as is wrought by the powerfull working of the Holi-ghoast inasmuch also as it is attained by faith onelie and pertaineth to a spirituall and eternall life And howsoeuer the benefit of this coniunction reach vnto the body which thereby is mortified and sanctified and afterward shall be glorified yet this fruition of christ is not called corporall but spirituall because this food doth not pertaine to the maintaining of this present life but it is referred to the life which is eternall Now this 〈◊〉 euerlasting is called spirituall 〈◊〉 the bodies themselues shall bee partakers thereof which therefore by the Apostle are called spirituall bodies Thus then standeth the comparison as there is a present life that is bodily so there is another life to be thought vpon which is spirituall and eternall as we are borne to this present life so are we borne againe to life eternall as this bodily life is sustained by bodily meat and drinke so Christ with al his merits and mercies is the food of the spirituall life as the bodye hath his mouth whereby the meat and drinke is receiued and so passeth into the bodye by bodily feeding so the soule hath her mouth namely faith which apprehendeth the most holy nourishment of the body and blood of christ and lastly as the meat by a naturall force is concocted and digested that it may passe and disperse it self into the whole body so the efficacy of the spirit beginning faith in vs doeth so powerfully and mightily worke in our soules that it quickneth vs throgh christ to whom we are nearely vnited Thus we see wee haue no carnall communion with christ nor bodily eating of christ Wherefore let the capernaiticall papists or popipish 〈◊〉 prepare their faith not their teeth their Soules not their bellie to eat the flesh of christ and drink his blood And if they be ashamed of the name of the Capernaites let them also be ashamed of the error of the capernaits but if they cleane to their errour they must bee content to borrowe their name for the name and opinion must go together Sixtly Christ exhorteth the people to beware of false Prophets that come in Sheepes cloathes but indeede haue Wolues harts saying If any shall say vnto you Lo hoere is Christ or there beleeue it not behold he is in the 〈◊〉 go not forth behold he is in the secret places beleeue it not And the Apostle Paule exhorteth Col 3 To seeke those things that are aboue where christ sitteth at the right hand of God But if Christ lurke and ly hid vnder the accidents of breade and Wine then we might beleeue such as say Loe heere is Christ there is Christ he might be pointed out with the finger on euery altar and so often as the Priest lifteth vp his idoll he might say to the people behold heere is Christ whom we haue newly made looke vpon him whom we haue newly fashioned Seuenthly the fathers vnder the lawe did eat the same spirituall meate and drinke the same spirituall drinke that the 〈◊〉 and other Christians did though they had differing signes they had the same christ But they did not eate the flesh of Christ and drinke his bloode bodily for as yet he was not come in the flesh therefore he is not present in his naturall body in our Sacramentes This Paule setteth downe 1 cor 10. They did all eat the same spirituall meat they did all drinke the same spiritual drinke for they dranke of that spiritual rocke that followed them and that rocke was christ Where the Apostles 〈◊〉 is to proue that the Israelites were not inferiour to the Corinthians in respect of the Sacramentes of Gods fauour and therefore had no more to boast of then the Israelites had whereuppon he satith they had the same drinke the same Christ. Now if they did not eat the same in substance which the corinthians did eate then the Israelites were farre inferior to them touching their Sacramentes and so the Apostles reason should be of no force Eightly Christ is in such sort in heauen in his humanity as that he is not on the earth with his bodie and consequently not in the Sactament as we see Math. 9. Can the children of the bride-chamber mourne as long as the bride-groome is with them but the daies will come when the
bridegroome shall be taken from them and then they shal fast But if he were remainning on the earth and contained in the pixe the bridegroome could not nor would not be taken away And the same Euangehst chap. 26. saith Ye haue the poore alwaies with you but me ye shal not haue alwaies Like wise Iohn 13. When Iesus knew that hie houre was come that he should depart out of this world vnto the father heeriseth from supper and chap. 14. I goe to prepare a place for you but I wil come againe if I go away to prepare a place for you I will receiue you vnto my selfe that where I am there may ye be also and verse 28 ye haue heard how I said vnto you I go awaie and will come vnto you And chap. 17. Now I am no more in the world but these are in the world and I come to thee Againe act 1. ye men of Galile why stand re gazing into heauen this Iesus which is taken vp from you into heauen shal so come as ye haue seene him go into heauen If then Christ according to his humane nature be not on earth how can his 〈◊〉 body be on euerie altar how can they eat him with their 〈◊〉 how can they swallow him downe their throat Ninthlie such an eating and 〈◊〉 of the bodie and blood of christ must be holden as is profitable and comfortable to the receiuers for nothing is more 〈◊〉 and fruitfull then these being rightlie receiued 〈◊〉 thereby remission of sinnes assured and eternall glory sealed vp vnto vs. But no fruite to our faith can come vnto vs by this kind of bodilie eating the bodie carnall drinking the blood of christ for wicked men haue as great a portion in this as the godly Nay by their owne doctrin it may be eaten of birds of beasts of Mice of Dogs of hogs of vermine to whom no profit no comfort no benefit can come whereas God woulde haue the flesh of the sonne of man to be eaten of those to whom it shal be auailable to life and saluation I am the liuing bread which came downe from heauen if any man eat of this bread he shall liue for euer and the bread that I will giue is my flesh which I wil giue for the life of the world Tenthly nothing can be more grosse barbarous or inhumane then to deuour mans flesh and to drinke mans blood What doth more transforme men into sauage and 〈◊〉 beasts Nay worse then beastes which deuour not their owne kind what is more contrarie to the purenes holines of Gods law then this The words of the Lord are pure words as the siluer tryed in a furnace of earth fined seuen fold The feare of the Lord is clean the law of God is spirituall holy iust and good And the gospell bringeth saluation to all degrees and teacheth vs that we should deny all vngodlines and worldly Iustes and that we should liue soberly righteously and godly in this present world But what can be more repugnant to godlines sobernes and righteousnes then to teare wirh the teeth and iawes mans flesh and to drink his blood from which the Capernaits abhorred what more crosseth the Religion of Christ the law of god and the light of nature then mā to deuour man and the bowels of one to be in the bowels of another And are not their stomackes strong to digest this meat did not god in the law command to abstain frō eating the blood of beasts and from strangled did not the Apostles for a time renue it amōg the christiās in respect of the weaknes of the Iews because Moses was read in their sinagogue euer saboth day to what 〈◊〉 should this be done if the church had tasted the blood of ch with their mouth or swallowed his body in their bellies And do not the Scythians and al the gentiles that are not vtterly voide of 〈◊〉 abstain from mans blood and 〈◊〉 deuouring his flesh wherefore these men are worse then the Scithians barbariās and Gentiles yea worse then the Canibals Indies that eat their enimies but these deuour ch whom they cal their L. and maist like Actcons houndes to compare one fable with another onely heer ly the differences they deuourd their Lord vnder the shape of a stag or Hart they eat their maist vnder the formes of bread and wine these fastned their mouth vpon their maister because they thoght him absent and not present vnder that shape they openly confesse their maister to be present and yet 〈◊〉 professe to deuour him with their iawes and swallow him in their stomacks wherefore these men are more cruell Eleuenthly if Christ be present in the Sacramant bodily and carnally in what body shall he be present Whether in his glorified body as he is in the heauens or in his mortall body as he was vpon the earth In one of these he must be present necessarily if he be present fleshly Whatsoeuer they answer they are taken onboth hands are stroken downe as with a sword that hath two edges Dare they saie he is thus present in his mortall bodie This cannot be For it is certaine he hath not now a mortall bodie but a glorified bodie this corruptible hath put on in corruption this mortall hath put on immortality and death is swallowed vp in victory This the Apostle confirmeth this the Scripture teacheth this Christian faith beleeueh Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more death hath no more dominion ouer him For in that he dyed he dyed once to sinne but in that he liueth he liueth to God Like wise Heb. 7. 25 This man because he endureth euer hath a priesthood which cannot passe from one to another seeing he euer hueth to make intercession for them And chapter 9. of the same Epistle he is entred into heauen not that he should offer himselfe often but he was once offered to take away the sins of many These testimonies duly considered he cannot be present in a mortal body What then will they be helped to say he is present in his glorified body Then he cannot nowe be present in the sacrament of the supper as he was present to the Apostles sitting at the table with them and preaching vnto them of his death he cannot be present in the same body that he did deliuer to his Disciples in the institution of his last supper For the body of Christ was then mortall and not glorified then he had not suffered death vpon the Crosle he was not risen and ascended into the heauens to sit at the right hand of his father so that they must seeke another place then these wordes of Christ This is my body this is my blood to build their reall presence and transubstantiation for they pointed out his mortall body because his body was not yet glorified when the sacrament was instituted Besides what a uniserable glorified body should this be to be
without many contradictions For if christs body be visible how can it be inuisible If it haue al the properties of a naturalbody how can it be without the properties of a natural body If it be finite how can it be infinite Lastly if it be an inseparable necessary adioynt to a true body to be contained in one certaine place how then can it be true that his body is in ten thousand places without any circumscription So then Gods omnipotency cannot build vp the monstrous worke of the reall presence inasmuch as the body of Christ cannot be brought within the slender compasse of a mathematicall cake without falsehood and destruction of all the properties incident vnto a true and naturall body Lastly as an esfect of Gods omnipotent power they obiect the bread and Wine are turned into the flesh and bloode of Christ appearing bread and Wine still by a wonderfull Myracle which is wrought by the wordes of consecration and by a mighty worke of God This obiection hath beene sufficiently answered already Wee haue proued that euerye Myracle may bee seene and discerned by the outward sence as the Myracles of Moses of the prophets of Christ and the Apostles and therefore the Iewes said vnto Christ Shew vs a miracle teaching that miracles are to be iudged by sight and sense When Moses turned the Waters of the Egyptians into blood the sight perceiued the tast discerned it The Myracles of Christ appeare euidently and were apprehended by the senses of the body Hee turned water into Wine the tast iudged there of the dombe spake the eare heard them speake The Lame walked the deade were raised the eies perceiued the motion all 〈◊〉 and were astonied In like manner if the bread and Wine were chaunged eyther the eye or tast should perceiue it and all the Disciples would be astonied Againe after the Gospell was plentifully confirmed and had taken roote and the Apostles were dead such Myracles ceased as experience teacheth Besides the holy supper is an ordinary Sacrament of the Church but euery miracle is extraordinary or else it is no Myracle so that vnlesse we will turne ordinary into extraordinary and make miracles as common as Sacramentes we must remoue miracles from the supper Furthermore if the real presence were wrought by a miracle euery priest should be a worker of miracles and wonders and an ordinary calling shold alwaies be accompanied with extraordinary gifts But their office of priesthood hath not this gift in their owne iudgement generally giuen vnto it Wherefore miracles being now ceased are not found in the supper Lastly Augustine gathering all the Myracles written in the Scripture yet speaketh not of this nay he not onely omitted it but slatly denyeth any myracle to bee in the Sacrament when he saith It may haue honour or reuerence as an holy thing but cannot be wondered at as a strange or myraculous thing If then it be a Myracle it must be in the number of lying Myracles spoken off by the Apostle so that Transubstantiatyon and the reall presence are reall contraryes or contradictions repugnant to the Scripture to fayth to reason to lerning to sense to natur to Gods ordinance absurd and impossible and therfore of all Gods people to be abhored abiured being a renewing of the old heresie of Eutiches who held that Christs body after his 〈◊〉 was made equall with his diuinity To conclude this vse we do not exclude all presence of Christ out of the Sacrament but distinguish the manner of his presence which we haue shewed to be in the supper truely not grosly effectually not fleshly spiritually not bodily sacramentally not carnally mistically not naturally The former vse was touching knowledge and faith instructing what to hold of the reall presence The next vse is touching our obedience and dutye For is Christ the chiefe substance of this sacrament and his body and blood giuen vs for the foode of our soules a gift farre aboue heauen and earth Then we are bound to hunger after him to desire him with an earnest appetite and desire as wee come to our meate and drinke Hunger is a great thing and we say it maketh men leape ouer a stone wall he that is hunger bitten will eate his owne flesh from his armes In this corporall hunger then are two thinges that pine and pinch men first a paine in the lower part of the belly arising from emptinesse secondly an exceeding appetite to be filled and satisfied such haue killed dressed and deuourd their own childen rather thē they would starue this paine hath beene so great this longing hath beene so extraordinary So must it be with vs in the spirituall hunger after Christ we must be inwardly pained in soule for 〈◊〉 and for the wrath of God kindled for our sinne and then haue an hungring 〈◊〉 and longing appetite that we may possesse Christ and lay hold on him to our saluation Whosoeuer commeth to his ordinary meate without hunger it were better not to eate it ingendreh grosse and euill humours aud bringeth a surfet to the body So whosoeuer desireth not christ with an hungry soule earnestly longing after him and crauing nourishment from him cannot be filled with good thinges The want of this hunger is a cause why so few receiue Christ and profit not by the meanes ordained to that end as the word and sacraments these come to them of custome rather then with conscience and for fashion rather then with faith these men are not fit to be Christes ghuests that hunger not after him Wherefore the prophet 〈◊〉 all such as faint in their soules through hunger and thirst of this foode Ho euery one that thirsteth come to the 〈◊〉 and ye that haue no siluer come buy and eate come I say buy wine and 〈◊〉 without siluer and without money And the Apostle Reuel 22. 17 Let him that is a thirst come and let whosoeuer will take of the water of life freely Likewise the Euangelist Luk 1 53. He filleth the hungry with good things and sendeth the rich empty away But where is the desire of these things Where is the hunger after this heauenly foode Where is the thirst after the waters of life Truely of all gifts this is the greatest yet the greatest number care nothing for christ nor for his gifts As the Israelites in the wildernesse loathed Manna and desired to returne into Egypt such are there among vs no desire no affection no zeale this way they spend their cogitations and indeuoures to gaine honour they thirst after Siluer and Gold they delight in earthly pleasures they couet houses landes and wealth of the world these things they abound in these thinges they make their happinesse and their heauen Such as these there are thousands in the bosome of the Church that hunger more after these transitory things then after heauenly Such are prophane persons as 〈◊〉 who preferred a
receiuing and laying hold vppon Christ and all his benefits Euen as the hand stretched forth layeth hold vpon a thing and pulleth the same vnto it so doth saith apply the sauing promises of the Gospell to the soule as the Apostle teacheth Gal. 3. That the blessing of Abraham might come to the Gentiles through Iesus Christ that wee might receiue the promise of the spirit through faith Where he teacheth that we embrace and receiue the precious promises of saluation and forgiuenesse of our sinnes by faith beleeuinge the same to belong vnto our selues The scripture calleth Christ a redeemer indefinitely Iob calleth him his redeemer particularly Iob 19. I knowe that my redeemer lyueth The Scriptur setteth out the lord as the god of his church Thomas vpon a special feeling of Christs fauor toward him acknowledgeth him to be his Lord and his god Iohn 20 Thou art my Lord and my god The Scripture propoundeth Christ as the Sauiour of his people the blessed virgin taketh this as spoken to her selfe an accounteth him her sauiour Luke 1. My spirit reioyceth in god my sauiour The Scriptur maketh Christ the L. and protector of his church Elizabeth maketh a speciall application thereof calling him her lord Luk. 1 Whence commeth this to me that the mother of my Lord should come vnto me It is an Article of our holy and christian faith to beleeue the forgiuenes of sinnes this must euery one beleeue this must euery one hold this must euery one apply as christ did to the sick man of the Palsey Mathew 9. sonne be of good comfort thy sinnes are forgiuen thee It is the hardest thing in the worlde thus to beleeue whether we respect Christ or our selues It is an easie matter for a man when he neither knoweth nor feeleth the burden of sin to say he hath faith and beleeueth in gods mercy but when Satan shall fift him when his owne hart shall accuse him when sinne shall he heauy vpon his soule when the vnsupportable and vnsufferable anger of God shall presse his conscience to the nethermost hell and the flame thereof consume his bones and turne his moisture into the drought of Summer if then he can stand vpright and build himselfe vpon the rock when the floods come when the winds blow and beat vpon his house and when the ground shaketh vnder his feet this man with boldnesse and confidence may truely say and seale it vppe for an euerlasting truth My sinnes are forgiuen me For if then he can comfort himselfe in his God and apply his gratious mercies to his owne fainting hart and cry out Though the Lorde would kill me yet still I wil trust in him this is the property of a sounde faith against which the strongest gates of hel shal not preuaile This appeareth euidently vnto vs in the example of Abraham who beleeued that of his old weake withered and as it were dead body should spring children like the sande on the sea-shore and like the starres of heauen for multitude and that he should haue a seede in whom himselfe and all the nations of the world should be blessed If hee had consulted with flesh and blood what discourses might a naturall man alledge to 〈◊〉 the crediting of this promise yet hee doubted not hee disputeth not the matter but beleeued that the weake shoulde bee made strong that the barren should be made fruitfull and a ioyfull mother of children that the dead should be made aliue to dwell with a family springing out of his owne body which was to reason as vnlikely and vnpossible as for a dry and dead tree pulled vp by the rootes to bud bear and bring foorth plentifull 〈◊〉 So what can bee more difficult and hard then for vs to beleeue and be perswaded that by the death of Christ we shall haue euerlastinge life by his shame and dishonour we shall haue glory and praise that by his wounds and reproaches we shall haue the curing and healing of our 〈◊〉 that by his agonies and bloody sweate wee shall haue peace and rest by his condemnation we shall haue saluation Is not this after a sort in hell to see heauen in cursing to see blessing in humiliation to see exaltation in death to see life in condemnation to lay holde of saluation in feeling of sin to beleeue the pardon of sinnes lastly in out vnrighteousnes and misery to bee both righteous and accepted to eternall life and in the breach of the lawe to beleeue the fulfilling of the law This is indeede to haue the sauing faith of Gods elect And to say that this is an easie matter or a small thinge is plainely to betray and difcouer that wee never knew what true faith meaneth For this faith let euery one of vs labour that we may specially and particularly apprehend the promises as the Apostle declareth Galatians 2 I am crucified with Christ but I liue yet not I any more but christdiueth in me and in that that I nowe liue in the flesh I liue by the faith in the sonne of God who hath loued mee and giuen himselfe for me And againe I haue fought a good fight I haue finished my course I haue kept the faith hencefoorth is 〈◊〉 vppe for me a crowne of righteousnesse which the Lorde the righteous iudge shall giue vnto me at that day Where wee see a speciall application to himselfe of the benefits of Christ and therefore it is not sufficient to beleeue that Christ came into the world that he was crucified died was buried rose againe from the dead and ascended into heauen for this is a general faith this is the faith of the reprobates yea the Deuils know it and haue as great a part and portion therein as we yet they tremble at the remembrance of their iudgement to come as Iames sheweth Thou beleeuest there is one god thou doest well the deuils also beleeue and tremble There is more required of vs then to beleeue the Histories and doctrine of the scriptures to be true and to make an outward profession of it to vnderstand and assent vnto the couenant of grace made by christ that it is certain and shal be verified in the members of the church we must besides this generall and confused faith apply and appropriate vnto our selues the promises of saluation We must not onely see them a farre off but feele them in our harts We must beleeue not onely that christ is a sauior but that he is our sauior and our redeemer Thus we must euery one of vs for his owne part make proper to himselfe all the riches and graces that are in chist Iesus because in giuing himselfe to vs he giueth al his benefits in that he is God he maketh vs after a sort partakers of the diuine nature being heir of al things in heauen and earth and Lord of the world he maketh al things ours whether life or death whether things
communion with the body and blood of christ Heere God is present and sitteth as president at this table he offereth vnto vs his owne sonne for our iustification and therefore this supper must be reuerently regarded and diligently frequented of vs. In this sacrament we are in like manner to consider the partes and the vses thereof The parts are partly outwarde and partly inwarde The outwarde partes are foure First the Minister who is to take the breade and Wine into his hands after the example of christ to seperate the breade and Wine so taken from their common vse to an holy to breake the breade to poure out the Wine and deliuer them both into the hands of all the people present So then they are not consecrated to be priestes of the new testament but preachers of the gospel and ministers of the sacraments and therefore priuate persons may not take this supper to themselues or deliuer it to others The second part is the word of institution this is my body that is this bread is a signe of my body which shortly shall be crucified for you this cuppe is the new testament in my blood that is this wine in the cup is a true sign of my blood presently to be shed to confirme the new couenant of God touching forgiuenes of sinnes and eternal life These words are not properly but figuratiuely to be vnderstood being sacramentall speeches Thus the Scripture speaketh of Circumcision and of the paschall Lambe The third outward part are bread and wine fit signes to signifie our spirituall nourishment by eating the body and drinking the blod of Christ In Baptisme we haue one onely signe but in this supper we haue two to note out our ful and perfect nourishment by Christ. Nether did christ deliuer the deceiueable shewes of bread and wine or cast a mist before the eyes of his desciples to make them thinke it breade which was no bread or wine which was no wine but he gaue them true breade and the true fruit of the vine as the apostle calleth them after the blessing breaking consecration Hereby falleth to the ground the mystery of transubstantiation the most misshapen monster that euer liued or was deuised It bringeth in a false Christ and turneth him into an idoll it maketh Sacraments without signes it maketh Christ to haue an infinite body who is like to vs in all things sinne onely excepted lastly it confoundeth heauen and earth together Neither let any obiect that Christ hath now a glorified body sitting at the right hand of his father and therefore his body hath a great priuiledge aboue ours to be in diuers places at the same time For first when the holy supper was instituted the body of Christ was not glorified Againe glorification doth not take away the nature of a true body but taketh away the infirmity and weaknes thereof Take away space of place from a body and it remaineth no longer a true body but the essence of it is abolished as Austine hath well determined Againe if Christ deliuered both signes the people ought to receiue vnder both kindes so that they may be iustly called church-robbers who haue taken from the people the vse of the cup and wretched depriuers of christes testament depriuing the right heires of their inheritance and ingrossing into their hands the goods of others They make it of the essence of the Sacrament to vse 〈◊〉 bread and to mingle water with wine which christe neuer ordained or commanded but that which is necessary they esteeme as needlesse and superfluous b thus transgressing the commaundement of God by their owne traditions The fourth outward part are the communicantes whose duty it is to take the breade and wine into their hands to eate the bread and to drinke the wine to the norishment of their bodies He did not bid them to reserue the outward signes to holde them and adore them or call the sacrament their Lord and their God he did not command them to offer thē vp to God the father as a propitiatory sacrifice for the quicke and dead as is vsed in their vnbloody or rather most bloody Masse which hath caused so much innocent blood of the blessed martyrs to be shed who being kild for theword of god and the testimony which they maintaind their souls vnder the altar cry day night with a loud voice vnto the L. holy and true to iudg and auenge their blood on them that dwell on the earth Lastly hereby are ouerthrown the priuat Masses of the church of Rome which now grow to be too common canot stand with the communion of Christe who deliuered the signes of bread and wine to all the disciples that were present they did not stand by and gaze one vpon another but receiued the supper of the Lord 〈◊〉 The outward parts haue bin hitherto handled which being rightly perfourmed there followeth consecration which is a seperation of the outward signes from their ordinarie vse to an holy and spirituall vse that whereas before they serued for the body now they are made instrumentes of grace and seales of the righteousnes by faith The inward parts follow which are foure First god the father who appointed his sonne to performe the gratious work of our redemption and in the fulnes of time sent him into the world who died for our sins and rose againe for our iustification Secondly the Holyghost who assureth vs of the truth of gods promises This sheweth that he is true god equall with the father and the son proceeding from the father and the son This 〈◊〉 such as suppose no partaking of the body and blood of christ except he be giuen vs in a carnall and fleshy manner whereas the spirite worketh faith in our hearts which is the ground of thinges which are hoped for and the euidence of thinges which are not seene The thirde inwarde part of the Lordes Supper is the body and blood of Christ deliuered for vs vnto death This conuinceth such of a spirit of errour who make vnbeleeuers and reprob partakers of Chr. body and blood thus his body should be prophaned and his sauing graces seperated from his person But euen as where Satan dwelleth and possesseth the heart there alwaies raigne the workes of darkenes and damnation so the gifts of Christ accompanying saluation are inseperably ioyned with the person of Christ. This also condemneth the reall presence and carnall eating of Christ which forgeth many Christs and reuiueth the Haeresie of Eutiches it crosseth sundry Articles of the christian faith and maketh faithfull men like the vnfaithfull Barbarians that deuoured mans flesh and drunke his blood True it is christ is truely present in the Sacrament howbeit not carnally and corporally but spiritually and mistically He hath giuen himselfe to be the foode of our soules let vs hunger and thirst after him and lay hold on him to
if we would enter into the infinite dissentions debates diuisions contradictions wranglings hart-burnings grudgings sects and rentings into diuers partesamong the Papists themselues who indeed neither haue vnity in truth nor vnity in falsehood it should be harder to finde an ending then a beginning They could neuer yet be reconciled Their owne schoole men are at deadly feud and defiance one against another Scotus is against Thomas Ockam against Scotus Petrus de Alliaco against Ockam the Nominales against the Reales the Dominicans againste the Franciscans Scotistes against Scotistes Thomistes against thomistes Canonist against canonist sect against sect Order against Order cloyster against cloyster priests against Iesuites and Iesuits against priests repugnant one to another and at ciuill and Domesticall warre amonge themselues proclaiming their owne shame as with the blast of a trumpet and therfore hauing fought so many fields at home they shoulde not reproach vs with matter of dissention We may reply vnto them as one sometimes fitly answeared phillip K. of Macedon intreating a peace amonge the Graecians and yet hauing his wife Olimpias and his son Alexander known to liue at mortall dissention within his owne doores Goe first and conclude a peace in thine owne house at home So should our aduersaries remember that the chiefe procters and protectors of their new religion haue euer contentiously wrangled with others and with themselues and the contentions cannot yet be taken vp I dare confidently auouch and auerre that in the greatest conu ouersies and in the greatest number if not in all which are now multiplyed to many hundred some one or other of their highest Popes chiefest cardinals reuerent Bishoppes famous Doctours learned schoolmen holy fathers other aproued writers among them are slatly and fully on our side ioyne with vs hand in hand and giue testimony directly to our doctrine not in the smallest points but in the greatest not in few but in many yea not the meanest among them but as we haue said the strongest pillars of their church are reuolted to vs are come into our campe haue pitched their tents with vs and some one or moe of them fight our battels in all our doctrins This were easie to be shewed particularly touching the Apochryphall booke touching iustification by imputation touching Images touching praiers in a strange tongue touching the notes of the churche touching the sacraments and such like among which many haue written since the late Trent-counsell Thus while we are in peace the enemies possessed with a spirit of diuision and stricken with giddines by the iust hand of god wound one another and the swords of the Midianites are drawn out against the Midianites Therfore the truth resteth among vs Our enemies being iudges But lest we might peraduenture be thought to offer them wrong whilst insisting vpon general terms we charg them to be diuided among themselues and in their writings to gaul one another I wil presse them with particulars and only stand vpon the matter in hand to wit the sacraments the doctrin whereof I haue plainly opened in these Books Whosoeuer shal read the writers of the Roman church touching the sacraments shal find almost so many mindes as men among them they furiously fight and make daily combats against each other moouing sundry questions which they cannot with al their shifts remoue or determine First of al the schoolmen make a question whether the body of Christ in the Eucharist be eaten with the mouth of the body and passe into the belly or onely by faith Some of them hold he is onely eaten spiritually and receiued by faith as cardinal Cajetan a pillar of their church a peere of the Court of Rome the Popes legate in Germany and Luthers hott aduersarye holdeth this Falsissimnm est corpus christi corporaliter sumi quoniam c It is very false that Christe◠Body is receiued bodily for the diuines teach that he is taken spiritually not by handling but by beleeuing And Bellarmine a man of the same note and of the same coat saith Dicemus christum efse c. We will hold that christ is in the Eucharist truly substantially really not corporally nay contrariwise it may be said to be ther spiritually Others thinke he is taken bodily into the mouth but goes not into the belly This the glosse holds in Gratian quám cito species dentibus atteritur tam citó in coelum rapitur corpus christi that is So soone as the accidents of bread begin to be chewed by the teeth presently Christs body is conueyed into heauen But Durand goeth farther and saith Corpus christs de ore transit ad cor tum desinit corporis presentia remanente spirituali that is The body of Christ passeth srom the mouth to the hart and then the bodily presence ceaseth and the spiritual remaineth Lastly others say it passeth into the belly and remaineth there as long as any shew of the bread abideth Lo what they hold in this one question and they varry being constant in nothing but inconstancy Some of them resist the beginning of inconueniences that may ensue and hold he neuer commeth into the mouth some that he commeth into the mouth but not into the stomack some into the stomack but not into the belly and others sticking at nothing do hold he goeth into the belly And to fil vp the measure of iniquity Antoninus Arch. of Florence writes that the body of Christ may he vomited vpward by the mouth and purged downward by a draught Igitur corpus christi sanguis tam diu manent in ventre stomacho vel 〈◊〉 c. Therfore saith he the body and blood of christ remaine in the belly and stomacke or in vomit and in whatsoeuer course of nature so long as the shewes of bred and wine remaine And if they be vomited or purged before they be altered as sometimes in those that are trobled with the flux euen there is the true body of christ If this be true I would gladly learn of the profoundest doctor and learnedst Iesuit what is to be done to the body of christ thus purged or vomited whether it shall be eaten againe or burned or what they would haue done with it Robert Smith a Martir of blessed memory reasoning with a Popish priest of the real presēce compelled the Doctor by force of reason at length to confesse that c the body of christ being eaten in the sacrament goeth downe into the belly and so is cast into the dr aught saying farther that it was no greater derogation to Christ then to be spit vppon But wisely and worthily did the Martyr reply If the Iews being his sworne enemies did only spit in his face and we being his friends do cast him into the draught which of vs deserue the greater damnation Thus the Doctor was put to present silence O yee Cardinals and Byshops O yee priests and Iesuites are ye not
is deceiued the Greekes vse not the same forme that we do yet we deny not but that they consecrate Thus hee concludeth the whole matter with an Ignoramus Vnto these heads before remembred we might also adde many foolish friuolous and ridiculous questions disputed among them as whether in the sacrament the foote of Christ bee confounded with his face his hand with his head and whether one part be distinguished from another Whether the host falling the body of Christ falleth and whether it be moued to and fro as oft as the host is moued Whethe it be fittest for the host to be eaten after a 〈◊〉 hath vomited it vp or a drunken man in his drunkennes Whether christ leaue heauen to come into the place of bread Whether in comming he passe through the aire Whether he forsake the earth againe so soone as the shewes of bread are touched with the teeth or whether he go downe into the stomacke How long he stayeth in the stomack Whether he tarry and waite his attendance there till the forme of bread be disgested and whether he change himselfe at such time into the foule or body of the communicant or whether he vanish into nothing or else returne to heauen They make a quaere likewise when the sacrament beginneth to be God how long it continueth God when it is god and when it is no god When we may adore and how long we may adore it without danger and so safely cease and leaue off Whether the body of Christ haue dimension of quantities proportion of body and distance of parts one from another as between eie and eie eare and eare head and foote as it is in other naturell bodies Whether christ speake of the Eucharist Ioh. 6. Gabriel Biell Cusanus Caietan Lyra and others deny it but Sanders and Bellarmine hold otherwise go about to confute the former Againe whether the matter of the Sacrament may be bread of any kind of graine and corne or only of wheaten bread Some hold the signe of the Sacrament must onely be made of Wheat as Scotus some of Wheate or barly as Albertus and Thomas de Argentina Others holde consecration rightly to bee made in any vsuall and common bread whatsoeuer it bee as Caietan They cannot agree likewise whether the priest may be saide to be the creator of his creator With a thousand such questions or rather fooleryes they blot Paper wast time and weary the Reader neuer knowne nor heard off in auncient Writers no not 800. yeares after christ which argueth that they neuer dreamed of any carnall presence But not to stand vpon all the the contradictions among them which were without end and without 〈◊〉 wee will come to the m wordes of institution which albeit they be short and easie cleere and euident in themselues yet they haue corrupted them with many glozes and crossed one another in their peruerse interpretations Christ saith of his last Supper when hee had taken blessed and broken the bread This is my body which is broken or giuen for you do this in remembrance of me In like manner he tooke the cup saying This cup is the new testament in my blood this doe as oft as ye drinke it in remembrance of me As if hee should say this bread is a signe or sacrament of my body which is deliuered to death for you and for your saluation Christ tooke nothing but bread he brake that which he tooke he deliuered that which he brake as the Apostle saith The bread which we breake is it not the communion of the body of Christ So touching the other part when he saith This cup hee meaneth this Wine in the cup is a sacrament of the new testament of our reconciliation with God now to bee fulfilled of our communion and participation of Christ with all his benifits This interpretation is agreeable to the circumstances of the text to the proportion of faith and to the exposition of the ancient fathers who call the sacrament a representation a remembrance an image a token a signe a figure and such like But because our aduersaries can abide no figures let vs heare what the Doctours of the Church teach who thought it no heresie to expound the wordes of Christ by a figure Tertullian one of the most auncient saith Christ receiuing the bread and the same being diuided vnto his Disciples made it his body saying This is my body that is to say a figure of my body And Chrysostome If Christ died not whose token signe is this sacrifice Ambrose also hath these words After consecration the body of christ is signisied Adde vnto these the testimony of Augustine who taught the people thus christ at his last supper commended and gaue the figure of his body blood And epist 23. ad Bonifac. The sacramēt of the body of christ is after a sort the body of christ And in another place The Lord doubted not to say this is my body when he gaue a token of his bodie Lastly the Glose vpon the Canons dissenteth not heerin frō the fathers Dicitur corpus christi sed improprie vt sit sensus It is the body of christ but vnproperlie the meaning is it is called Christes body that is it signifieth christs body Gelasius saith in the same māner There remaineth still in the sacra the nature or substance of bread and wine To conclude Augustin saith else where Quod videtis panis est that is the thing that ye see is bread He doth not say it seemeth bread and is none or it is the shew and forme of bread but he speaketh euidently it is indeede bread Now our aduersaries that can abide no tokens no figures no signes no significations in the wordes of the supper are notwithstanding driuen to make so diuerse so doubtfull so many so monstrous so mad and senseles expositions of the word of institution as al the tropes figures metaphors allusions allegories and rhetoricke in the world wil not serue them to salue vp the braunches of their interpretations of these short and few words First they finde in the word bread a whole swarme of figures They say the Sacrament is called Bread sometimes because it was bread before sometimes because an Infidell taketh it to be bread sometimes because the accidents and shewes of bread remaine sometimes because the same accidentes nourish the body by a miracle as if it were bread sometimes because it is that spirituall bread which came from heauen and lastly because the bread sometimes returneth againe after consecration Againe these words lying together he tooke hee blessed he brake going before the words which Christ spake are strangely expounded on this manner he tooke the bread hee blessed that is he turned and changed the bread he brake that is the accidents or shewes of bread and sometimes they vnderstand It seemeth to be broken so that when the Euangelists saith he