earth rule ouer the fish of the sea ouer the foul of the heauen ouer euerie beast that moueth vpon the earth Psal 8.6 Thou hast made him to haue dominion in the works of thine hands thou hast put al things vnder his feete Only man he created for himself the rest for man that by man they might serue god Wherefore when we place creatures in the roome of god we cast our selues out of that degree in which we were placed by god Why god would haue this doctrine of the creation to be deliuered and held in the Church This doctrine of the creation of the world god would for these causes especiallie haue remaine extant in the Church 1. That the glorie of the creation might bee giuen wholy to god and his wisedome power and goodnes therein acknowledged 2. That neither the Sonne nor the holie ghost should be excluded but each should haue their owne parts yeelded them therein according as it is said that all might honor the sonne as they honor the father 3. That as the world was created by the sonne and the holie ghost so also we might knowe that by them mankinde is restored Colossians 1. For by him were all thinges made And hee is the heade of the bodie of the Church for it pleased the father that in him should al fulnes dwell 4. That seeing god created all thinges of nothing we may thinke that he is able to restore them being corrupted and ruinated into their first state againe 2. Cor. 4.6 For god that commanded the light to shine out of darkenes is he which hath shined in our harts to giue the light of the knowledge of the glorie of god in the face of Iesus Christ 5. That we may not referre the original of corruption to god but knowe that it was purchased by the fault of Diuels and men Iohn 8. The Diuel is a lyer and a murtherer from the beginning whē he speaketh a lie he speaketh of his own Rom. 5.12 By one man sin entred into the world death by sin 6. That knowing god as in the creating so also in the maintaining and gouerning of all things not to be tied to second causes and to the order by him setled in nature but that hee may either keepe or alter it wee shoulde with confidence and full persuasion looke for and craue those things which he hath promised yea those things which in respect of second causes seeme vnpossible Rom. 4. He calleth those thinges which are not as if they were 7. That wee should celebrate for euer the knowē goodnes of god wherby he hath created all thinges not for his owne profit or happines for he wanteth nothing but for ours and seeing all other things were created for mans vse we aboue other creatures especiallie being restored from sinne and death to righteousnes and life shoulde acknowledge that we owe thankfulnes vnto god therfore Psal 8.4 What is man that thou art mindfull of him and the sonne of man that thou visitest him Thou hast made him to haue dominion in the works of thine hands 8. That wee knowing god in as much as of nothing and through his meere goodnes hee created all thinges to owe nothing to anie but all his creatures to owe themselues all that they haue to him their creator should confesse that to be most iust whatsoeuer hee shall doe concerning vs and all his creatures Ierem. 45.4 Beholde that which I haue built will I destroie and that which I haue planted will I plucke vp euen this whole land And seekest thou great things for thy selfe seeke them not 9 That we should refer the vse of all thinges to the glorie of God since that we haue receiued al good things from him Rom. 11. Of him and through him and for him are al things 10 That seeing the works of god were therefore created and placed before our eies euen for vs to beholde them we doe not idlie but earnestlie and as much as euerie mans abilitie occasion and vocation permitteth him contemplate and consider them and learning out of them the wisedome power and goodnesse of the Artificer celebrate it both in this life and in the world to come Acts. 17.26 He hath made of one bloud all mankinde to dwell on all the face of the earth and hath assigned the times which were ordeined before the bounds of their habitation that they shoulde seeke the Lord if so be they might haue groaped after him and found him though doubtles he be not far off from euerie one of vs. OF ANGELS AMongst thinges created by GOD the chiefe and principal are those natures which are indued with reasō Angels men For in these hee imprinted the markes and image of his Diuinitie and woulde haue all other thinges to be the matter of his praise but of these he woulde bee knowen and praised and vnto them was his will to impart and communicate his blessednesse and ioy The questions concerning Angels are two the first whereof is what description is set downe in the Scripture of good Angels the other what description is deliuered of bad Angels 1 WHAT GOOD ANGELS ARE. ANgels both good and bad as holie Scripture recordeth 1 Angels spirites or incorporeal substances are spirites by which name here a spirituall person is vnderstood that is a substaunce incorporeall inuisible indiuiduall liuing vnderstanding incommunicable not susteined in another neither the part of an other as Luc. 24. it is taken A spirite hath not fleshe and bones Colos 1.16 All which are in heauen and in earth thinges visible and inuisible Heb. 1.14 They are all ministring spirits 1. King 22.21 There came forth a spirit and stood before the Lord. The Angels themselues are not seene but the bodies or shapes which they take That therefore both in times past there appeared oftentimes good Angels when as the gathering and establishing of the Church the doctrine of god beeing not as yet plainelie deliuered and the prophecies not fulfilled needed more extraordinarie and miraculous reuelations than now and now a daies also not seldome appeare bad Angels this first doth not proue their nature to be visible or corporall For those visible shapes or bodies which may be seene or felt are diuers substances from the incorporeall Essence of spirits being formed either of nothing or of some matter and carried and moued by a spirite for a time for the woorking and performing of certaine actions For both they put them off and lay them away againe and also they take formes of diuers sortes and kinds as the Serpent by whom the Diuel communed with Eue Mens bodies whose feete Abraham washed Gen. 17. A flame in the bush appearing to Moses Exod. 3. A piller of cloude and fier in the desert Horses and Chariots of fier 2. King 2. and 6. The error of the Sadduces And further this verie thing refuteth the opinion of the Sadduces Who Actes 23. said there was neither Angel
of his disease Yet these benefites stretch no further than the commodities of this life and as other thinges which befall vnto the wicked in this life whether good or bad are turned to their destructiō but serue for the defence deliuery of the chosen for whose sakes God oftentimes like as he punisheth the wicked so also enricheth them with his benefits They are the ministers of the Elect by Christ The ministerie then and gard of Angels properly belongeth to the Saintes and chosen vnto whom that beeing lost by sinne is restored by the merite and benefite of Christ For hee is the heade of the Church which consisteth of Angels and men restoring that good will and coniunction which is betweene the members of the same bodie betweene men and Angels and vsing at his good pleasure the ministerie of Angels to safegard and defend his Eph. 1. That hee might gather together in one all thinges which are in heauen and in earth in Christ Psalme 97. and Hebrewes 1. Let all the Angels of god worship him Math. 13. Hee shall send his Angels Heb. 12.22 Ye are come vnto the mount Syon and to the Citie of the liuing god the celestiall Ierusalem and to the companie of innumerable Angels And Gen. 28.12 Iacob sawe a ladder which reached from earth to heauen on which the Lorde stoode and the Angels went vp and downe by it which signified Christ God man the Mediator Iohn 1.51 Ye shall see heauen open and the Angels of god ascending and descending vpon the sonne of man Now god doth manie things by Angels and sometimes by many together which he coulde as wel doe either without them Why God vseth the ministry of Angels beeing able to bring what hee will to passe whithout them or by anie one of them Partlie in fauour and regard of our infirmitie which vnlesse it see it selfe inuironed with many succours defences and instrumentes of his diuine power and bountifulnes falleth presently to doubting of the prouidence safegard and presence of god as it is manifest by the example of Elisaeus seruant 2. Kings 6. and by those consolations and incouragementes which promise vnto the Church the aid of Angels Partly to shewe his power also ouer his Angels who vseth their labour and ministerie as his pleasure Hereof 2. Thes 1. The Angels are called the powers of the lord Iesus when he shal shew himselfe frō heauen that is by whō he exerciseth his power Likewise Ep. 1. Colos 1. They are called principalities might powers dominions created by the sonne of God subiect vnto him being exalted at the right hand of God Because by them he sheweth and exerciseth his principalitie or rule might power and dominion Likewise Psalm 103. 148.1 King 22. Apoc. 19. The host of the Lord and the host of heauen Because both the number of them is huge and great and God ruleth ouer all of them as a Captain ouer his souldiours and doth by them whatsoeuer he will Hereof also are they called Cherubins that is flying or winged because they performe and execute with all readines and celeritie the hostes and commaundementes of god and doe each their owne partes and dueties Wherevpon wee pray Let thy will be done in earth as it is in heauen They are also called gods Psal 8. Heb. 2. Because the nature and Maiestie of god shineth in their strength vertues functions and maruelous woorkes Which is also signified both by the name of Gabriel that is the strength of god by the name of Raphael that is the medicine of god For the same cause also the name of Michael that is who is like god Dan. 10. 12. in the Epistle of Iude and in the Reuelation cap. 12. Is giuen to the son of God and an Angel who is called the Archangel either because the sonne of god is head of the Angels or because god doth according to that measure which seemeth best to him distribute his giftes to the Angels and shewe forth his powerfull operation by them Of euil spirits or Angels THEY which now are euill spirites or Angels although they also were at their creation good and adorned by God with the same holinesse and righteousnes and blessednesse wherewith the rest were yet notwithstanding by their own will that free therefore by their owne fault they auerted themselues from GOD and reuoulted from his loue and from obedience due vnto him so that they left the habitation of God and no longer continued their conformitie with God but euer burne with a horrible hatred of GOD and men and that they maie despite GOD force men to sinne and by force and sleightes attempt to cast all downe head-long into destruction 2. Pet. 2.4 God spared not the Angels that had sinned but cast them downe into hell and deliuered them into chaines of darkenesse to bee kept vnto damnation And Iude. The Angels which kept not their first estate but left their owne habitation hee hath reserued in euerlasting chaines vnder darkenesse vnto the iudgement of the great daie Ioh 8.44 Yee are of your father the Diuel and the lustes of your father yee will doe He was a murtherer from the beginning and abode not in the trueth When he speaketh a lie then speaketh hee of his owne for hee is a lyar and the father thereof 1. Iohn 3.8 Hee that committeth sinne is of the Diuell for the Diuell sinneth from the beginning Iohn 13. Satan entered into Iudas Actes 5. Satan filled Ananias heart that hee shoulde lie vnto the holie Ghost and keepe awaie part of the price of the possession Ephes 2. According to the course of this woorlde and after the Prince that ruleth in the aire the spirite that nowe woorketh in the children of disobedience 2. Thessal 2. it is saide of Antichrist Whose comming is by the woorcking of Satan with all power and signes and lying woonders and in all deceiueablenesse of vnrighteousnesse among them that perishe because they receiued not the loue of the trueth that they might bee saued And therefore hee is called the wicked 1. Iohn 3.12 Caine which was of the wicked Ephes 6.16 That yee maie quench al the fierie dartes of the wicked And euerie where in the Scripture hee is called Satanas that is the aduersarie of god and men 1. Chronic 21.1 And Satan stoode vp against Israel and prouoked Dauid to nomber Israel And he is in like maner called Diabolus Diuel because hee depraueth the woorde of God and is a slanderer of men as in Paradise Iob. 1. 2. And the Dragon or old Serpent Reuel 12. 20. because speaking by a Serpent in Paradise he seduced mankind through his subtilty neither ceaseth he to seduce them stil Gen. 3.2 Cor. 11. Apoc. 12. The great Dragon that olde Serpent called the diuell and satan was cast out which deceiueth all the world Again The accuser of our brethren which accused them before our GOD day and night And Cap. 9. he
where Christ sitteth at the right hand of God Nowe that Heauen is so to be taken in this place is prooued both by the former testimonies and also by that saying of christ Ioh. 14.2 In my fathers house are many dwelling places that is many mansions in which we may dwell and remaine Likewise this of the Apostle Phil. 3.20 Our conuersation is in Heauen Obiect But we conuerse on earth Therefore Heauen is in the earth Auns Our conuersation is in Heauen first in respect of the hope certaintie we haue thereof Secondly in respect of the inchoation or beginning which we haue here of that heauenlie life which is to be consummated in the world to come Into this heaueÌ„ that is into the house of God al the Blessed christ ascended because he ascended far aboue all Heauens Eph. 4.10 He was made higher than the heauens And Steephen witnesseth Act. 7.56 Behold I see the heauens open the son of man standing at the right hand of God Hee saw with his bodily eies endewed from aboue with a new seeing force sharpnesse beyond and through all the visible Heauens Christ in the same humane nature in which he had bin annihilated and humbled Act. 1.11 He was taken vp into Heauen God would therefore haue vs knowe the place whereinto Christ ascended 1 That it might be apparant that Christ is true man and that hee vanished not away but did continue and shall continue for euer true man 2 That we might know whither our cogitations were to be conuerted and where we ought to inuocate and call vpon him and that so Idolatrie might be auoided That we might know our dwelling place into which christ wil bring vs and in which we shal conuerse and dwell with Christ Wherefore Christs ascension is a local true and visible translation or remoouing of Christs bodie from earth into heauen which is aboue all visible heauens to the light that none can attaine vnto to Gods right hande where hee now is and whence hee shall come to iudgement Act. 1.11 Hee shal so come as yee haue seene him goe into heauen 2 Howe Christ ascended into Heauen CHrist ascended into Heauen first not simplie but in respect of his humane nature onely that the very same which was borne of the virgin dead buried and which rose againe Obiect 1 He that euer is in heauen did not ascend into heauen for then he should haue beene some time out of heauen But the Sonne of man euer was in heauen Therefore he did not ascend Auns Hee that euer was in heauen as touching that whereby he was euer there that is his Diuinity did not ascend and so we grant Christ according to his Diuinity not to haue ascended for that was before in Heauen as when Christ was on earth the same did not therefore leaue heauen So when hee is now in Heauen his Diuinitie doth not therefore depart from vs. Obiection 2 That which descended did also ascend His Diuinity did descend Therefore it did also ascend Aunswere The signification of descending is not here proper His diuinitie is said to haue descended that is to haue opened manifested it selfe in a place where before it had not 2 He ascended locally or bodily that is truly going from one place to another He translated his human nature froÌ„ a lower place by a reall most proper translation or remoouing which could not haue bin don if he had bin in body euery where 3 He tooke or lifted vp his humane nature into heauen and by his proper power and vertue entered into the possession of heauenly glory Obiect 3. That which is not in any place is euerie-where Christ is not in any place because he is ascended aboue and beyond the visible heauen beyond which there is not any place Therefore Christ is euerie where Ans First we deny the same to bee euerywhere which is not in any pâ—ace For the highest or fardest heauen iâ— not in any place neither yet is it euery-where But this is spoken of a natural place which is defined to be the superficiall extremitie of a bodie compassing and conteining so any thing within it as it selfe also is compassed conteined within another Secondly then we say that Christ is not in any naturall place but in a place supernaturall which doth contein but is not it selfe conteined and such a supernaturall place is beyond the visible heauen but what manner a thing that supernaturall place is is not learned by the discourse of mans wit and reason but only by a celestiall viewe and beholding which the Angels enioy in heauen But that Christ did ascend locally these places of the Scripture conuince Matth. 16.11 Ye shal not haue me alwaies Ioh. 16.7 If J go not away the comforter will not come vnto you Ioh. 6.62 What then if ye should see the Sonne of man ascend vp where he was before Act. 1.9 While they beheld he was taken vp Likewise He was taken vp into heauen Coloss 3.1 Seeke those thinges which are aboue where Christ sitteth at the right hand of God Of these it followeth that Christs humane nature is finite and doth change place and therefore is not euerie-where For to be euery where and to change place are contradictorie And therefore also his God-head which alone is infinite eternall and euerie-where is not said to chaunge place But here the Vbiquetaries seeke a shift that they may not be hurt by this weapon That which changeth place is not euerie-where Christs body changeth place Therefore that is not euery-where They grant the Maior of this Syllogisme to be true taking the wordes after one manner but here they contend that the words are taken after a diuerse manner As that Christs bodie is euery-where that is after the manner of maiestie or in manner as it is a maiesticall bodie it changeth place in manner of a naturall bodie or as it is a naturall bodie But they escape not a contradiction by this cauil For the diuerse maner which taketh away a contradiction must not fall into the same and be all one with the words themselues for the clearing of which they are brought For so iâ— it made a meere tautologie or speaking of the same thing a begging of that which is in questioÌ„ as if I imitating them should say This aire is light according to the manner of light and it is darcke as touching the manner of darcknesse Againe This man is poore as touching the manner of pouertie and is rich as touching the manner of riches Thus is the same affirmed of the same For the manner of pouerty is nothing else but pouertie and the manner of riches nothing but riches So likewise these manners which they faign and imagin in the Maior proposition are altogether the same with the things which are affirmed That is the same in them is affirmed of the same so these maners are that in which lyeth the coÌ„tradiction For they say Christs bodie is
are receiued of vs namelie earthly externall and visible signs as are bread and wine and besides these also heauenlie internall and inuisible gifts as are the true bodie of Iesus Christ together with al his gifts and benefits and heauenlie treasures Thirdly that in the supper we are made partakers not onlie of the spirit of Christ and his satisfaction iustice vertue and operation but also of the verie substaunce and essence of his true-bodie and bloud which was giuen for vs to death on the crosse and which was shed for vs and are trulie fed with the selfe-same vnto eternal life and that this verie thing christ should teach vs and make knowen vnto vs by this visible receiuing of this bread and wine in his supper Fourthly That the bread and wine are not changed into the flesh and bloud of Christ but remaine true and natural bread and wine that also the bodie and bloud of christ are not shut vp into the bread and wine and therefore the bread and wine are called of christ his bodie and bloud in this sense for that his bodie and bloud are not onlie signified by these and set before our eies but also because as often as we eat and drink this bread and wine in the true and right vse Christ himselfe giueth vs his body and bloud indeed to be the meat and drink of eternal life Fiftly That without the right vse this receiuing of bread and wine is no sacrament neither anie thing but an emptie and vaine ceremonie and spectacle and such as men abuse to their own damnation Sixtly That there is no other true and lawful vse of the supper besides that which Christ himselfe hath instituted and commaunded to be kept namelie this that this bread and this wine be eaten and drunken in remembrance of him and to shew forth his death Seuenthly that Christ in his supper dooth not commaund and require a dissembled and hypocritical remembraunce of him and publishing of his death but such as embraceth his passion and death and all his benefites obtained by these for vs by a true and liuelie faith and with earnest and ardent thankefulnesse and applieth them vnto those which eate and drink as proper vnto them Eightly that Christ will dwell in beleeuers onelie and in them who not through contempt but through necessitie cannot come to the Lords supper yea in al beleeuers eueÌ„ from the beginning of the woorld to all eternitie euen as well and after the same manner as hee will dwell in them who came vnto the Lords Supper They disagree in these pointes FIRST that one part contendeth that these woordes of Christ This is my bodie must be vnderstood as the words sound which yet that part it selfe doth not but the other part that those words must be vnderstoode sacramentallie according to the declaration of Christ and Paul according to the most certaine and vnfallible rule and leuil of the articles of our christian faith SecoÌ„dly that one part wil haue the bodie bloud of christ to be essentiallie Jn or With the bread wine so to be eaten as that together with the bread the wine out of the haÌ„d of the minister it entereth by the mouth of the receiuers into their bodies but the other part wil haue the body of christ which in the first supper sate at the table by the disciples now to be coÌ„tinue not here on earth but aboue in the heauens aboue and without this visible world and heauen vntill hee descend thence againe to iudgement and yet that we notwithstanding here on earth as oft as wee eate this bread with a true faith are so fed with his bodie and made to drink of his bloud that not onlie through his Passion and bloudshed we are cleansed from our sinnes but are also in such sort coupled knit and incorporated into his true essential humane bodie by his spirit dwelling both in him and vs as that we are flesh of his flesh and bone of his bones and are more neerly and firmlie knit and vnited with him than the members of our bodie are vnited with our head and so wee drawe and haue in him and from him euerlasting life Thirdly That one part will haue all whosoeuer come to the Lordes supper and eate and drinke that breade and wine whether they bee beleeuers or vnbeleeuers to eate and drinke corporallie and with their bodilie mouth the flesh and bloud of Christ beleeuers to life and saluation vnbeleeuers to damnation and death the other holdeth that vnbeleeuers abuse indeede the outwarde signs bread and wine to their own damnation but that the faithful onelie can eate and drinke by a true faith and the fore alleaged working of â—he holie Ghost the bodie and bloud of Christ vnto eternal life OF THE KEIES OF THE KINGDOME OF HEAVEN AND OF EXCOMMVNICATION SEEING it hath beene shewed in the treatise next going before who are to bee admitted by the church vnto the Lords Supper very commodiously and fitly shall this doctrine follow concerning the power of the keies wherein besides other things this chiefly is taught How they who are not to be admitted must bee restrained and excluded from the Sacraments least approching vnto them they prophane them The chiefe questions 1 What the power is of the keies giuen vnto the church 2 Vnto whom that power is committed 3 Why the power of the keies is necessarie 4 What that power of the keies committed vnto the church differeth from the ciuil power 5 What order ought to be obserued in exercising the power of the keies 1 WHAT THE POWER OF THE KEIES GIVEN VNTO THE CHVRCH IS THE power of the keies of the kingdome of heauen which CHRIST gaue vnto his church is the office or charge imposed on the church by Christ of denouncing by the preaching of the gospel and church-discipline Gods will and euen of declaring the grace of God and remission of sinnes vnto the penitent that is to them who liue in true faith and repentance but of denouncing vnto the wicked the wrath of God and exclusion or banishment from the kingdome of christ and of casting such out of the church as long as they shall shew themselues in doctrine and life estranged from christ and of receiuing them againe into the church when afterwardes they shall repent Hereby it appeareth that the chiefe and principall parts of this power of the keies giuen vnto the Saints are the preaching of the gospel or ministerie of the word and church-iudgement which is called also spirituall Discipline or iurisdiction And verily necessarilie is Ecclesiasticall Discipline ioined and linked with the ministerie of Gods word Of the ministerie of the word there is no doubt but all the Prophets Christ and the Apostles haue preached Of the iurisdiction of the church likewise it is not to be doubted in as much as Christ himselfe and the Apostle haue both by precepts and practise confirmed and established it Now in both is conteined that power
in vs euen nowe a conformitie with God which shall bee perfected in the life to come And lastly when Christ himselfe is said to be God and to haue a diuine bodie There is not thereby signified a mutation of the diuine nature into the humane or of the humane into the diuine but an vnseparable conioyning of two natures reteining their properties distinct into one person and a glorifiyng of the humane nature which indeede agreeth to a nature ruler and gouernes of all things but yet notwithstanding made created What wee are to learne by the immensitie and incomprehensibilitie of God Incōprehensible or immense 1. He wil haue vs to know that he cannot be cōprehended in the cogitation of any creature so that what things he ascribeth to himself in his word how great soeuer they be thought of vs yet are they alwaies far greater For the power of vnderstanding which reacheth but to finite things cannot cōceiue the forme or perfect patterne of an infinit nature 2. The Deitie cannot be cōprehended or circumscribed in place or space or any limits that is the essence of God is immense or vnmeasurable neither to be extended nor diuided nor multiplied Therefore it is al euery where one the same The 1. reasō hereof is Because an infinit power cannot be cōtained in an essence or nature which is finit limited Reasons to shew that the power and essence of God is euerie where whole one and the same 2. Because the power of god is alwaies euery where therefore his substance also For that cānot be without this yea it is the diuine essence it selfe And that the power or vertue of the diuinity which hath been spread perpetually in infinit maner both before after the creation of the world cannot be any where either in no substāce at al or in any substāce but only in the very substāce it self of god the Philosophers also who cōceiued god to be infinit haue cōfessed Neither yet is it to be thought that the substance of the diuinity is so extended that one part thereof is one where or so multiplied that an other part is another where but that it being infinit is euery where and seeing it cannot bee diuided into partes as beeing immense and most perfect to bee all euerie where and seeing it is but one that it is euerie where the same so that none can pierce into or cōprehend it but it pierceth into cōprehendeth all things Iere. 23. Doe not I fill the heauen the earth saith the Lord 3 Not onely the power but the essence also of the Diuinitie to be infinite doth euen hereby most certainlie appeare Because there is one the same and whole substance of the three persons For the eternall father as he is alwaies so at that time when Christ liued on earth was hee in heauen And the woorde or coeternall Son of the Father was in his bodie on earth yet because there is but one the same essence of the father the sonne both the father was with the Son on earth and the son with the father in heauen as himselfe saith Ioh. 16. The father is with me Ioh. 3. The sonne of man which is in heauen and Iohn 14. I am in the father and the father is in me So the holy ghost was truely present in the likenesse of a Doue and a flame at the Baptism of Christ at Pentecost now dwelleth in vs as in his Temple And yet is alwaies with the father and the Sonne in heauen as the father and the Sonne are with him in all the Saintes which are dispersed through out heauen and earth And hence appeareth the third difference betweene an infinite nature and a finit nature or the third reason which is onely opened in the worde of God whereby the diuine essence is incomprehensible to witte by communication whereas the whole is in such sort common to the three persons of the Diuinity as not only it is in them as in the creatures but also is their very substance yet neuerthelesse remaineth in number one and the same Nowe that it is proper to the Deity alone Infinitie or immensitie proper to God not imparted to anie creature nor imparted or communicated to any creature to bee infinite or immense or to bee euerie where at the same time or to be the same in diuerse places is apparant by these reasons First Because it is impossible that any creature should be or be made equal to the creator as it hath beene often said Lord who is like vnto thee 2. Because god himselfe by this mark distinguisheth and discerneth himselfe from the creatures for in saieng that he is he who filleth heauen earth he signifieth that there is no other such besides him 3. Because christ sheweth his diuinity by this argument in that whē he was in body on earth yet hee affirmeth himselfe to bee in heauen Iohn 3.13 The fourth reason is that the godly Doctors of the auncient Church defended the Diuinitie of the holy Ghost by this selfesame argument as Dydimus in his Treatise of the holy Ghost lib. 1. cap. 1. The holy Ghost himselfe if he were one of the creatures shoulde haue at leastwise a substaunce limited as all thinges which were made For although inuisible creatures are not limited and circumscribed by place yet are they limited by the propertie of their substaunce But the Holie GHOST beeing in manie hath not a limited and finite substance God most perfect in himselfe God is moreouer most perfect in himselfe 1. Because hee onely hath al things which maie be desired vnto perfect felicity and glory so that no way any thing may bee added vnto him to make him more glorious or happy And all the creatures haue but only some parts and degrees of blessinges distributed vnto them conuenient for their nature and place which the Creator assigneth and giueth to euery one 2. Because hee receiueth no part of this most absolute felicitie from anie other but hath al thinges in himselfe and of himselfe and is alone sufficient to himselfe for all thinges and therefore needeth no mans labour or aide or presence but was alike blessed from euerlasting before any creature was as hee is now after the creation of the woorlde But contrariwise al the creatures stand so in neede of the goodnesse and presence of God that without it they cannot onely not any way bee well and in good state but not so much as bee at al the space of one moment 3. Because hee is not for himselfe onely but for the creating also preseruing guiding and furnishing of all and euerie creature so sufficient that he alone doth giue to al of them all good thinges necessarie and meete for them aswell eternall and heauenly as terrene and temporall neither yet for all that dooth the least iot depart either from his power or from his happinesse Now all the creatures not onely cannot at
suffer chaunge from anie inwarde originall or beginning of chaunge For whatsoeuer is so moued or changed that must needs haue partes whereof some must mooue some be moued Now that god should be diuided into parts neither doth his immensity suffer nor his great perfectiō For seing euery part is imperfecter thā the whol in god is nothing which is not most perfect it is impious to imagin any parts in him Wherefore neither by any outwarde nor inward cause is he moued or changed Secōdly whatsoeuer is changed that must needs be changed either to the worse or to the better or into a state equal to the former It is impossible that God should bee made worser for he should so become of perfect vnperfect And to be made better is also vnpossible For so he should haue bin before more vnperfect But neither can he be trāslated into an equall condition and state as thereby to leaue some good which before he had and to receiue some good which before hee had not for thus should he be neither before nor after his change most perfect as wanting some part of those good thinges which belonged vnto him Thirdly That which is infinite neither can be made greater for so it shoulde not haue beene infinite before nor lesser for so it shoulde bee made finite Seeing then both the essence and power and wisedome and all the vertues of God are incomprehensible all things in God immense therefore cannot any of them be either diminished or increased Fourthly For the same cause God doth not transport and remooue himselfe from place to place as creatures seeing by reason of his immensitie whereby he filleth heauen and earth he can neither depart nor be absent from any place Fiftly Seeing he is most wise and therefore from euerlasting hath most well purposed decreed and foreseene all things change of purpose will cannot fal into him And therefore God would haue this in many places of holy scripture inculcated vnto vs that his nature wil is subiect to no mutations as beeing a thing most respecting his glory As Num. 23.19 God is not as mā that he should lie nor as the Son of man that he should repent Hath he said it then shall he not doe it Hath he spoken shall he not accomplish it Psal 33.11 The counsell of the Lorde shall endure for euer And the thoughts of his hart from generation to generation Iam. 1.17 With whome is no variablenesse neither shadowe of change Why God is sayd to repent when yet hee doeth nothing which hee decreed not from euerlasting 1 Obiection But God is said to repent Answere He is said to repent not that he changeth his will but 1 because he earnestly detesteth sinnes and is not delighted with the destruction of men 2 Because by reason of this hatred against sinne this mercie towards repentant sinners he maketh change of things and euents which from euerlasting he decreed as men are wont to doe who repent them of their purpose For among men euery change is an amending of that which disliketh thē Amending riseth vpon repentance Wherfore the name of repētance as also the names of other human affectiōs are said to be attributed to god by an anthropopathie Because the Scripture speaketh of God after the manner of men for our infirmitie that wee vnderstanding those thinges which are in vs to be shadowes of those which are in god may in some sort conceiue something of the nature of god and his wil towardes mankinde Wherefore these formes of speaking doe not signifie any perturbation in God or change or passion like vnto our affections but are vsed to signifie these two things of God First that that is not a fained or dissembled but an earnest eternall vnchangeable nature will in god a shadow and image whereof he would haue the affections and motions created in men to be yet is it without al trouble or hinderance or diminishing of his blessednesse and ioy Secondly that he doth those things which mē are wont to do being stirred vp by those affections which are attributed to God not that he as men being mooued by a present or sodaine affection of the minde doth nowe first take counsel but doth now at the length execute and do those things which he decreed and appointed from all eternity 2 Obiection Gods promises and threatninges conditional and with an exception The promises and threatnings of God oftentimes are not fulfilled Aunswere The promises of God are alwaies to be vnderstood with an exception of the crosse of the Godly and of the punishments and chastisments of such as depart from God and sinne or with a condition of perseuerance in faith and Godlines and also contrarilie his threatninges with an exception of conuersion and praier or with a condition of perseuerance in sinne And these conditions are sometimes expressed as Ier. 18. and 28. where plainly is set downe this rule of vnderstanding Gods promises and threatninges as that God will punish them who depart from him vnto whom he had promised blessinges and will spare those who repent to whom hee had threatned punishment And sometimes they are closely vnderstoode especially in the threatninges and comminations thereby euen to wrest repentaunce and more timely and earnest praiers from vs by which as meanes interposed and comming betweene he hath decreed to saue and deliuer vs. Reply But these conditions are vncertain chaungeable Therefore the wil of god is also changeable Aunswere In respect of the nature will and iudgement of man they are chaungeable but in respect of the counsell and prouidence of God vnchaungeable and most certaine For God hath decreed from euerlasting the means and ends of things as also he hath decreed in whome hee will and in whome hee will not woorke conuersion 3 Obiection He changeth manie his precepts obseruances and woorks as the Mosaicall Lawes and gouernement Answere He changeth them indeede but so as he woulde also from euerlasting that change neither are al thinges appointed of God for perpetuity But he decreed from euerlasting some things to last only for a time Gods vnchangeablenes one of his speciall differences whereby hee is distinguished from all creatures Wherefore bee it to vs out of all controuersie that God is vnchangeable For first this is amongest those especial differences whereby the Creatour will be discerned from all creatures that hee onelie can by no meanes bee changed whereas all other things both are diuerslie changed may at the onlie pleasure of God be changed infinitelie howsoeuer for a while so long as it is his pleasure they are and seeme firme and immutable according as it is said Mat. 24. Heauen and earth shall passe but my word shall not passe Secondly Hence we vnderstand and are assured that al things in the worlde are gouerned by the euerlasting prouidence of god For seeing no mutation happeneth to god it must needes be that all his counsailes were
is set downe at the right hande of the father there is no cause why wee should doubt at all of our saluation he shall keepe it safe for vs and at length most assuredly and certainly bestow it vpon vs. Ioh 10.28 No man shal pluck my sheep out of my hand And cap. 17.24 I will that they which thou hast giuen me be with me euen where I am FROM THENCE SHAL HE COME TO IVDGE THE QVICKE AND THE DEAD IN this Article three common places fal in one and meet together which are diuerse in themselues namely of Christes second comming of the ende of the woorlde and of the last iudgement Of these places we wil speake iointly as which are linked betweene themselues yet so that the chiefe of them is that of the lâ—st iudgement For to little purpose were it for vs to think of christs second comming except we did furder coÌ„sider to what end he should come I beleue in christ who shall come to iudge the quick and the dead that is I beleeue 1. That at the second comming of Christ shall follow the renuing of heauen and earth 2. That the selfesame Christ shall come who for vs was borne suffered and rose againe 3. That he shall come gloriouslie to deliuer his church whereof J am a member 4. That hee shal come to abiect and cast awaie the wicked By these wee receiue great and sound comfort also and consolation For seeing there shal be a renouation or renuing of heauen and earth we haue a confidence and trust that our state also shal be at length other and better than it now is seeing christ shall come wee shall haue a fauourable iudge for he shal come to iudge who hath merited righteousnesse for vs who is our Brother Redeemer Patron and Defender seeing hee shal come gloriousâ—â—e he shal also giue a iust sentence and iudgement and shal bee mighty enough to deliuer vs seeing hee shall come to deliuer his church great cause why we should cheerefully expect him seeing he shall abiect and cast awaie the wicked into euerlasting tormentes let vs suffer patientlie their tyrannie To conclude seeing he shall deliuer the godlie and cast awaie the wicked hee wil also either deliuer or cast away vs and therefore it is necessarie that wee repent and bee thankefull in this life and flie fleshely securitie that we maie bee in the number of them whome hee shall deliuer The chiefe Questions of the last iudgement 1 Whether there shall be any iudgement 2 What that iudgement is 3 Who shal be iudge 4 Whence and whither he shal come to iudge 5 How he shal come 6 Whom he shal iudge 7 What shal be the sentence and execution of this iudgement 8 For what causes this iudgement shal bee 9 When it shal be 10 Why god wil haue vs certaine of the last iudgement 11 Why he would not haue vs certaine of the time 12 Wherefore God differreth that iudgement 13 Whether it is to be wished for 1 WHETHER THERE SHALL BEE ANIE IVDGEMENT THIS Question is necessarie For the Scripture also hath foretold that there shal come in the later times â—ockers who shal account this Article for a fable The last iudgement cannot indeede be demonstrated out of Philosophy but neither is there any thing in Philosophie against it But the whole certainty thereof is grounded on diuine Prophecies or of the doctrine of the church For although the Philosopher perhaps woulde say somewhat as seeing a litle through a mist as That it is not likely that man was born to this miserie yet by reason that man hath lost the knoweledge of the righteousnesse goodnesse truth of God we caÌ„not know out of philosophy that any iudgement shal be muchlesse with what circumstances it shall be The arguments which Philosophy yeeldeth are forcible indeed in themselues but are not made knowen but in diuinity and therefore the argumentes themselues are onely made forcible of strength in diuinity Wherefore we wil draw reasons proofs out of diuinity or the doctrine of the gospel by which it may appear that there is a last iudgement The first proof is drawn from expresse plaine testimonies of sacred Scripture As out of the prophecy of Dan. Likewise out of the prophecy of Enoch alleadged by the Apostle Iude vers 14. 15. Behold the Lord coÌ„meth with thousands of his saints To giue iudgement against all men Moreouer out of the sermons of Christ especiallie in Mat. 24. vers 25. Likewise out of the sermons of the Apostles Acts. 17.31 He hath appointed a daie in the which he wil iudge the world in righteousnes by that man whom he hath appointed 1. Thes 4.16 The lord himselfe shal descend froÌ„ heauen with a shout with the voice of the Archangel with the trumpet of god Neither is the certainty of the last iudgemeÌ„t apparaÌ„t only by these the like plain testimonies of Scripture but is deduced also out of other places by good consequence hence are made those forcible argumeÌ„ts which the Philosophers saw but by a glims The second proofe is drawen from the ende whereunto mankind was created God necessarily obtaineth his end but to this end did he create mankind that man shoulde bee the image of God and the euerlasting temple of God wherein he should be worshipped to whom he would communicate himselfe perfect wisedome righteousnesse and goodnesse and would impart his blessednesse This blessednesse is a part of Gods Image but this the Diuell hath destroied Therefore God shall restore it who is mightier than the Diuell And although the end for which man was created is hindered diuerse waies in this life yet god will at some time obtaine it Wherefore it is not onlie as the Philosophers reason likelie and probable that man was not made for thâ—se miseries but it is also most certaine that the most excellent of all creatures was made to a better ende Wherefore there must needs be at length a change By this argument is confirmed also the happinesse of our bodies According to that of Saint Paul 1. Cor. 6.19 Know you not that your bodie is the temple of the holy ghost which is in you The third proofe is taken from the iustice goodnesse and trueth of God which requireth that it maie go ful well with the good with the euil ful il Philosophy knoweth not that god is so iust good and true that he will haue the righteous to enioy full and perfect blessednesse But this commeth not to passe in this life nay rather it goeth well with the euill and wicked in this life Therefore there must remaine an other life wherein this shall bee The holie Scripture vseth this argument as in Saint Paul 2. Thess 1.6 Jt is a righteous thing with God to recompence tribulation to them that trouble you And Luk. 16.25 Remember that thou in thy life-time receiuedst thy pleasures and likewise Lazarus pains nowe therefore is he comforted and thou art tormented
and to cast away the wicked A threefould consolation therefore haue wee by the second comming and iudgement of Christ 1 From the person 2 From his promise 3 From the finall cause and end The fourth cause why hee commeth iudge is the iustice of God because they haue dealt contumeliously with the sonne of man Zach. 12.10 They shall looke vpon him whom they haue pearced Obiection Christ saith Ioh. 12.47 That he came not to iudge In his first comming he came not to iudge the woorlde but in his second comming he commeth to that end For a man must be iudge 1 Because he must iudge men Therefore he must bee beheld of all But God is inuisible 2 That he may the more confound the wicked his enimies who shal be forced to behold him their iudge whom they haue so much withstood 4 Whence and whither Christ shall come WEE looke for our iudge Christ from heauen For whither the Apostles sawe him ascend from thence shall he come 2. Thess 1.7 The Lord Iesus shal shew himselfe from heauen with his mightie Angels Mat. 26.64 Hereafter shall yee see the Sonne of man sitting at the right hand of the power of God come in the clouds of the Heauen From heauen then where hee sitteth at Gods right hand not out of the aire or the sea or the earth For as yee haue seene him go into heauen so shall hee come Acts. 1.11 shal he descend into the clouds that is he shall descend from heauen visiblie into this region of the aire as he did indeed visibly ascend These thinges are necessarily proposed that the Church may know whence to expect their iudge For as hee wil haue knowen whither he is ascended so also will hee haue it knowen whence hee shall come againe that he might thereby signifie that hee hath not laid away that humane nature which he tooke 5 How Christ shall come to iudgement 1 THE dead shall bee raised and the liuing chaunged 2. The woorlde shall bee dissolued by fier 3. Hee shall come sodainlie to comfort his And hee shall come 1 Truelie visibly and locallie not imaginarilie Matth. 24.30 They shall see the Sonne of man comming in the cloudes of the heauen and so shall know him to be God by his visible maiesty Zach. 12.10 They shall looke vpon him whome they haue pearced 2. Hee shall come furnished and prepared with glorie and diuine maiestie with all the Angels with the voice and trump of the Archangel with diuine power to raise the deade and to separate the godly from the wicked and to cast these into euerlasting tormentes but to glorifie them for euer Matth. 16.27 The sonne of man shal come in the glorie of the Father that is he shal come furnished with a heauenly multitude of Angels and full of maiesty and that not by necessity but by his power and authoritie shewing himselfe to bee lord ouer al creatures and that with such glorie as onely agreeth and is proper vnto the Father Whereupon withall is gathered that christ is not a secondarie god but the second person of the Godhead equal with the Father For God wil not giue his glory to any other 6 Whom Christ shal iudge HE shal iudge all men both quicke and deade and also the wicked Angels Now men are called quicke or dead in respect of the state which goeth before the iudgement As they which shal remaine aliue vntil the daie of iudgement are called the quicke and liuing All the rest except these are called the dead and these at the daie of iudgement shall rise the other which remaine then aliue shall bee chaunged Which chaunge shall bee vnto them insteede of death and so wee shal al appeare before the iudgement seate of Christ Obiection But hee that beleeueth in the Son shall not come into iudgement and so it followeth that al shall not bee iudged Aunswere Hee that beleeueth shall not come into the iudgement of condemnation but shall come into the iudgement of absolution Wherefore we shal be iudged as the woord Iudgement is more largely taken for both condemnation and absolution The Diuels shal not then bee iudged that is condemned but they shal be iudged in respect of the publishing of the iudgement already passed on them as also in respect of the aggrauating of the iudgement The Prince of this worlde saith Christ Iohn 16.11 is alreadie iudged and condemned Therefore he shal not then be iudged Aunswere The Diuel is alreadie iudged but that onely 1. By the decree of God 2. Jn the worde of God 3. Jn his owne conscience 4. As touching the beginning of his condemnation But then he shall bee so iudged hauing the sentence proclaimed publickly on him that he shall not bee able to attempt any thing more against God and the Church 7 What shall bee the Sentence and exequution of iudgement SENTENCE shal be giueÌ„ which also we did touch before in the second Question on the wicked principally according to the Law yet so as it shal bee with the approbation of the Gospel Sentence shal bee giuen on the godly principallie according to the Gospell yet so that the Lawe shal allowe and like of it The Elect shall heare their sentence out of the Gospell according to the merit of Christ apprehended of them by faith the testimonies of which faith shal be good workes The execution of the Sentence giuen shall bee 1. By the vertue and diuine power of Christ For the dead shall bee raised at the hearing of Christes voice the liuing shal be chaunged and their mortal bodies shall be made immortall and shall bee gathered from the fower costes of the worlde 2. By the ministerie of Angels For by them Christ shal gather the godlie and the wicked as by those reapers by whome also he shal separate the godly from the wicked and this not as if hee had neede of the Angels ministery but thereby to shewe himselfe to be Lord of the Angels But this is no impotency or want of power but a part of Christes glorie before whose tribunal al we being so gathered by the Angels seuered â—hal stand 1. The world heauen earth shal bee dissolued by fier at the execution of this iudgemeÌ„t there shal be a change of this present state a purifieng of the creatures but not any consuming of them 4. This change as also the comming iudgement of the Lord shall come sodainely the wicked standing still where they shall saie Peace Peace 5. There shall be a casting of the wicked into euerlasting paines and an aduauncing of the godlie to euerlasting happinesse and glorie For then shal Christ perfectlie glorifie vs and shal take vs vnto himselfe Iohn 14.3 J wil come againe and receiue you vnto my selfe 1. Thessal 4.17 Wee shall bee caught vp with them also in the cloudes to meete the Lord in the aire and so shal wee euer be with the Lorde The wicked shall bee cast apart from the Godlie with the Diuels
This is manifest because in all the promises the same benefits are promised vnto vs which are promised in the sacraments The sacraments are the visible woorde and the sacraments promise the same which doth the word But in the Gospell is deliuered a communion which is wrought by faith That there is the same signification of the sacramentes of both Testaments the Apostle sheweth 1. Cor. 12.13 By one spirite are wee all baptized into one bodie And 1. Cor. 10.2.3 All were baptized vnto Moses in the cloude and in the sea and did all eate the same spiritual meate Obiection There is not the same thing signified of all sacramentes For in baptisme the thing is the washing by the bloud of Christ in the supper the bodie and bloud of Christ Aunswere The thing is not diuers because it is the same to bee washed by the â—â—â—ud of Christ and to drink the bloud of christ But the manner of signifiyng one and the sme thing is diuers that is there is a diuers similitude of one and the same thing signified by the signes or one and the same thing hath a diuers similitude or proportion Therefore as in baptisme so in circumcision likewise and the Passeouer is promised a spiritual thing not a corporal and so also here in the Lords supper 6 The nature of all sacraments is that the signes bee vnderstood corporallie that the things signified must be taken spiritually and that the visible things be not the signified thinges but onelie signes and pledges of them 7 The conceit of a corporal presence of Christ vnder the bread is wholie different and diuers from the formal consideration of a sacrament Therefore it is to be rejected The antecedent is proued because it cannot bee accounted either for the signe or the thing signed It is not the signe or sacrament because it is not obiect vnto the senses And further it hath no proportion or similitude with the thing that is with the spiritual eating Neither can it be said to be the thing signed seeing the scripture no where preacheth of an essentiall transfusion and real commixtion of Christs flesh with our bodies neither can there be anie except wee entertaine the follies and dreames of Eutychians and Schuenkfeldians For the sacraments testifie of those blessings onelie and them onlie doe they seale vnto vs which are conteined in the promise of the Gospel Therefore no place is left for a substantial presence of the bodie in the bread as being altogether fruitles and vnprofitable 8 Sacramentes or signes ought to bee visible so that it deserueth not saith Erasmus to be called a sacrament which is not accomplished by an external signe For to this end and vse are they giuen of god that they may effectuallie shew as it were to our outward senses that which is promised in the word and performed by the holie Ghost in our hearts that they may be visible testimonies pledges of the promise of grace exhibited applied Whence is that saying of Austin A sacrament is a visible woord it is a visible forme of an inuisible grace Therefore no thing or action which is inuisible insensible and not natural can make the nature or appellation of a sacrament And consequentlie they who wil haue christs flesh to be in vnder or with the bread or wil haue the bread to be transubstantiated into his flesh let them shew vs a visible and sensible eating of it in the supper least they seeme to dissent from the auncient fathers 9 There must bee an analogie and proportion betweene the signe or sacrament and the thing signified or the thing of the sacrament fâ—r except the sacraments saith Austin had some similitude of those things whereof they are sacraments they were not verilie anie sacraments Nowe if christs flesh bee also a sacrament and the thing of these sacraments bee inuisible grace what proportion then and similitude shal there be between the two sacraments But seeing there can be none it foloweth that christs flesh may not be called a sacrament as being no lesse the thing it selfe of the sacrament than eternal saluation signified by way of proportion by visible breade as by a signe Wherefore the sacramentall eating which is done naturallie by the mouth dooth not belong vnto the bodie of Christ considered by it selfe in anie Physical or natural respect because vnto this sacramental eating the external signes onelie are obiect in their own nature Saint Austin demaunding how bread is the bodie of Christ and wine his bloud these saith he brethren are therefore called sacramentes because in them one thing is seene and an other thing vnderstood That which is seene hath a corporall forme that which is vnderstood hath a spiritual fruite If then thou wilt vnderstand the bodie of Christ heare the Apostle speaking to the faithful Ye are the bodie of Christ and his members Jf then yee bee the bodie of Christ and his members your mysterie is set on the table c. These are the Argumentes deduced out of the nature of the thing or subiect which is by vnderstanding the speech as the thing doth beare and permit The second sort of arguments which are deduced from the analogie of faith FIRME and strong reasons are drawen from the article which is concerning the truth of Christs humane nature 1 Christ tooke a true humane nature like vnto vs in all things except sinne This nature therefore cannot bee in moe places at one and the same time and therefore neither can it be together in heaueÌ„ in the bread because it is proper vnto the nature of God onely to be at once in diuerse places Christes body is finite as being a true body but it is now in heauen as is proued out of the article of his ascension into heauen Therefore Christs bodie is not in the bread Many abuse this argument omitting the first ground which is altogether true and necessarie For glorification doth not destroie or abolish the nature of his humane nature Handle me and see for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as yee see me haue While they beheld him he was taken vp 3. Jf the true and verie bodie of Christ be infinite it is also inuisible and insensible Therefore that which was seene suffered and wrought on earth was no true bodie but apparent phantastical because it can not agree no not to the Godhead it selfe to bee at one time finite and infinite sensible and insensible and so all those thinges which are spoken of christ in the articles of our Beleefe should not haue beene done indeede but onely should haue seemed and appeared to be done so we should remaine as yet in death 2 There are good arguments also deriued from the article which conteineth the communion of saints with christ 1. Such is the communioâ— of saintes with Christ now as it was of olde shall be hereafter and such also is the communion of those saints which vse the sacrament as of them who are
to haue ascended from a lower place into an higher and to remaine in heauen vntill hee come to iudgement Nowe that some except That Christ dooth descend from heauen as oft as the supper is administred it is already refuted 4 We take not awaie the doctrine of the properties of christs humanitie Answere They altogether take it away For they wil haue his humane nature to be such as is not seene nor felt nor limited in place Reply But christ did put off these infirmities reteined the essential properties Answere But these are verie essential properties which being taken away the verity also and truth of his humane nature is taken awaie Austine saith Take awaie from bodies their spaces and they shall be no where 5 We abolish not the Doctrine concerning the communicating of properties of both natures Aunswere Yea but they endeuour it For they apply those properties of his diuine nature which are affirmed of the whole person in the concrete to both natures J wil be with you to the ende of the world This they vnderstand of both natures which is all one as if when it is said Christ God and man was circumcised one should thus conclude Therefore the godhead of Christ was circumcised as wel as his flesh Replie This onelie wee adde That those Articles belong to them Aunswere After this sort all sectes may shift off all testimonies of Scriptures But they belong hither and that by a double right 1. Because they are written of the bodie of Christ But the body of Christ belongeth to the supper Therefoâ—e these Articles also belong hither For they shew how Christs bodie is to be eaâ—en 2 They belong hither because no Article of faith is at variaunce with another So belongeth hither also the Doctrine of iustification because in the â—upper no other iustice or righteousnes must bee sought for but by the bloud of Christ 6 The manner how we eate it is not to bee defined Answere They commit a double fault in so saying 1. When they denie that the maner is to be defined and so contradict and gain saie the Scripture which defineth it and sheweth that it is spiritual that there is wrought an vnion with Christ by faith through the holy Ghost 2. They themselues define the manner as it clearly appeareth by their writings 7 The saieng of Durandus is true We heare the woords we perceiue the motions we know not the manner we beleeue the presence Aunswere Durandus maketh nought either for you or against vs or for himselfe because he was a Papist And againe if his saying be rightly vnderstoode we may admit it We heare the words This is my bodie not that we eate with our mouth the bodie of Christ in the breade Wee perceiue the motions that is we perceiue the bread to enter into our mouth not the bodie of Christ We know not the maner that is not perfectly to wit after what maner the holy Ghost is eueriewhere whole in Christ and in al the Saints and how he vniteth vs in Christ We beleeue the presence namely such as is the eating and as is the vnion of the members and the head 8 We teach this onelie That the bodie and bloud of christ is trulie substantiallie and naturallie exhibited Aunswere Wee grant that we eat the true bodie of Christ So then is their disputation vaine and friuolous First Because they confesse that wee are made partakers of the true bodie of christ and that wee must not question of the manner For this wee graunt Secondly Because the reasons and refutations which they bring are of no weight or moment Certaine reasons whereby is proued That the bodie of Christ is not present either in or vnder or at the bread of the Lords Supper neither is corporallie eaten Vnder With Jn or At the Bread 1 BEcause hee tooke a true humane nature Whereunto wee ad also that wee cannot eate him otherwise than his disciples did in the first Supper 2. He truely ascended out of earth into heauen 3. Such is our eating of him as his abiding is in vs. 4. All the Saints of the old and new Testament haue the same vnion with Christ 5 Christ onely is able to offer himselfe vnto his Father Now it is necessarie in the vse of the Supper to craue of God remission of sinnes Wherefore if he bee present at the bread we must craue of him and so wee offer the bread But in the New testament it is not lawfull to direct our prayer to any certaine place 6. The blessings which are promised vnto the godly onely are spirituall Vnto these and other fore alleaged reasons commeth the consent of the auncient Fathers Ambrose Athanasius Austine Basil Bede Bertram Chrysostome ClemeÌ„s Alexandrinus the councell of Nice Ciprian Cyrill Denis Gelasius Gregorie the Great Gregorie Nazianzene Hezichius Hierom Hilarie Irenaeus Justine Leo Macharius Origen Procopius Gaza Tertullian and so forth THE SECOND APPENDIX OR ADDITION Arguments whereby the opinion of Vbiquitaries is refelled and the truth of sound doctrine confirmed THE FIRST ARGVMENT THE Marcionites and Manichees imagined that Christ had not a true and solid bodie but onely made shew of the shape of a bodie so that hee seemed onely to haue flesh and bones whereas indeed hee had them not And further that the verie incarnation and al the motions and operations of christ did but only seeme so in outward appearaÌ„ce whereas in the truth of the thing there was no such thing done Now the opinion of Vbiquitie and of the reall communicating of the properties of both natures doth raise againe from Hel that phantasticall dotarie and frensie of those heretiques Therefore it is no lesse to bee abandoned and banished out of the church to Hell than that heresie of the Manichees That this opinion of Vbiquitie doth giue life againe to the former wee proue The Vbiquitaries are of opinion and so teach That all the properties of the Godhead were presently from the verie point of Christs conception reallie effused from the Godhead of the woorde into the humane nature which christ tooke Hence these absurdities will folow 1. Christ shall not be truely borne of the Virgine if as touching the nature of his humanitie he was truely and essentiallie without the wombe of his mother before hee was borne and after hee was borne hee remained no lesse truely and substantiallie as touching his humanitie in that selfe-same wombe than before 2. Christ was not truely weake in his humane nature and subiect to passions if hee were then also as touching the same nature partaker of the Diuine maiestie and omnipotencie 3. Hee was not truely dead if also in the time of his death as touching his soule and bodie hee were essentiallie present euerie where together with his Godhead For the soul being euerie where present could not be really separated in distance of places from the bodie which also should be euerie where present and so neither could the body die but onely
necessities of al men 6 Christ saith Luk. 15.10 That the Angels of God reioice for one sinner that conuerteth Therefore the Angels beholde the hearts of men The same is likewise prooued of the Angels out of Daniel cap. 9. and 10. Therefore the Angels beeing in heauen beholde repentaunce in mens heartes which are on earth Aunswere A cause is ill gathered and concluded of an effect when that effect may come of other causes For it is not necessary that Angels should know those things by the beholding of mens harts which they may know either by effects or by signes tokens or by diuine testimony reuelation For it agreeth not to the Angels onely but vnto all the godly also on earth to reioice for the conuersion of one sinner neither yet do they behold the hearts of men 7 The soule of the rich glutton sawe from hell Abraham and Lazarus being in heauen implored Abrahams help and knew the state of his brethren in this life and Abrahams soule likewise did heare and see the soule of the rich man Therefore the soules of the Saintes in heauen see and heare the state and praiers of them that conuerse here on earth Ans First they do amisse to take that properly which Christ spake allegoricallie and by way of parable in translating his speech from corporall thinges vnto spiritual things not thereby to shewe that these are like vnto them but by applying his speech as might best fit our capacity to aduertise vs of the state of the godlie and wicked after this life For soules haue not either bosomes wherein to receiue one another or eies to lift vp or tonges to be dried with thirst or fingers to dip into water neither doe they vse any mutual parly or conference from hell and heauen Christes purpose therefore is by these figures of words to expresse the thoughts affections tormēts state of the wicked abiding in paines after this life Moreouer were it so that these things had been in such wise done as they are reported against which yet the very words themselues are yet could nought be hence prooued for the beholding of minds neither yet for the knowledge of all external things For neither Abraham nor the glutton is said to haue vnderstoode the secret thoughts and cogitations of each other but to haue knowledge of them by speech And Stephen also being on earth saw Christ being in heauen and Paul heard Christ speaking from heauen neither yet doe al the Saintes see or hear what is done in heauen neither did Stephen and Paul see or heare these things at al times 8 Christ according to his humanity maketh request vnto the Father for vs all and therefore according to his humanitie hee knoweth the desire necessities of them that cal vpon him in all places at al times Wherefore the saints also haue communicated vnto them from God the beholding of harts the hearing of praiers Ans The example is vnlike For the humane vnderstanding and mind of Christ vnderstandeth and knoweth and his bodilie eares and eies also heare and see al things whatsoeuer according to his humane nature he should or would behold either with his minde or with his outward senses by reason of his godhead which sheweth them vnto his humanitie vnited thereunto or also giueth vnto his senses a vertue and force of perceiuing of thinges which are fardest distant Neither yet is the force or wisedome of his humane nature infinite as is the power and wisedome of the God-head neither doth he know by any transfused vertue into him the thoughts of mindes and hearts For of the measure of knowledge conuenient for his manhood it is said Mar. 13.32 Of that day and houre knoweth no man no not the Angels which are in heauen neither the Sonne himselfe saue the Father Of the reueiling of the secrets of men vnto him by his diuinity it is said Mar. 2.8 When Jesus perceiued in his spirit that thus they thought with themselues c. But nowe that all things are reueiled vnto Angels and Saints which are reueiled vnto the humane vnderstanding of Christ by his God-head they will neuer be able to prooue out of the Scripture For Christs humane nature dooth excell and surpasse in wisedome all Angels and men both in respect of the personall vnion thereof because it is vnited to his God-head and also by reason of his Mediatourship which office his humanity beareth executeth together with his diuinity yet so that there is still kept in the administratiō thereof the difference of both natures Wherefore this example of Christ doth not proue that the Saints know al things either by beholding the things themselues or by diuine reuelation from God 9 Jn the diuine essence shine all the Jmages and formes of things But the Angels and Saints departed behold the essence of God Mat. 5 18. Therefore they behold in God al thinges which we doe suffer and thinke Aunswere First the Maior proposition which they put is doubtfull and vncertaine For it is manifest that God knoweth all thinges and doth in his wisedome comprehend the most perfect and perpetuall knowledge of all thinges but whether that vnderstanding of things doth so shine in God that it may bee also beheld of creatures this verilie they haue not as yet prooued out of Scripture Secondly neither is the Minor true namely That the blessed behold the essence of God whereof it is saide No man hath seene God at any time Iohn 1. Lastly albeit there is no doubt but the holy Angels and men in the heauenly life enioy a cleare knowledge an immediate manifestation of God whatsoeuer it is yet wee are not to imagine that they naturally know all things that are in God For then should their wisedome be infinite that is equal vnto Gods wisedome which is absurd and flat against the testimonies of Scripture whereas Angels also are said not to know the day of iudgement Likewise 1. Pet. 1. Jnto which the Angels desire to looke And Ephes 3.10 To the intent that now vnto principalities and powers in heauenly places might be knowen by the Church the manifold wisedome of God They profit therefore and encrease in the knowledge of wisedome and of the counsels of God by the very exequution and contemplation of Gods woorkes Nowe seeing that which they speake of is no naturall but a voluntarie glasse or rather a diuine manifestation or illightening that is the Angels and blessed men haue not this in their own nature to view and see in God his whole wisedome but God according to his good wil and pleasure doth manifest communicate vnto euery one such a part thereof as seemeth good vnto him as it is said No man knoweth the Father but the Sonne Mat. 11.27 and he to whom the Sonne wil reueile him we affirme therefore the inuocation of Saints so long to want a ground and foundation so to be superstitious and idolatrous vntill they shewe out of
wee beleeue that the scriptures were deliuered from heauen be the witnes of the church who seeth not that heerby the autoritie of mans voice is made greater then of the voice of God For he that yeeldeth his testimonie vnto an other so that he is the onely or the chiefe cause why credence is giuen vnto the other out of all doubt greater credite is giuen vnto him then vnto the other who receiueth his testimonie Wherefore it is a speech most vnwoorthy the maiestie of God that the voice of God speaking in his holie booke is not acknowledged except it bee confirmed by the witnesse of men Secondarily 2. Reason Our comfort Faith is groūded on approoued witnes therfore not on mans wheras the doctrine of the Prophets Apostles doth preach of so great matters as the certaine knowledge of thē is so greatly desired of all who are well disposed and the conflictes of doubtfulnes in all mens mindes are so great what full assurance of our faith can there bee what sure consolation against the assaultes of temptations if that that voice on which our confidence relieth bee no otherwise knowen vnto vs to bee indeed the voice of God but because men say so in whom wee see so much ignorance error and vanitie to bee that no man scarcely especially in matters of some weight doth attribute much vnto their woorde except other reasons concurre with it 3 Reason The confutation of our enemies Thirdly the truth of God and christian religion is plainly exposed vnto the mockes and scoffes of the wicked if we going about to stop their mouthes do therefore onely desire that we should be credited that our Religion is from God because our selues say so For if they bee by no other confutation repressed they will with no lesse shew of truth deny it than wee affirme it 4 Reason Witnesses Last of all the scripture it selfe in many places is against this opinion doth chalenge a far higher authoritie vnto it selfe thē which hangeth vpon mens woords For so sayth Christ himselfe Iohn 5. I receiue not the record of man signifieng thereby that his doctrine stood not no not on Iohn Baptists testimonie although yet he did alleadge it but as of lesse account that he might omit nothing by which men might be moued to beleeue Therefore he addeth But I saie these thinges that you may beleeue I haue a greater witnes then the witnes of Iohn And if Christ nowe beeing humbled said these thinges of himselfe then surely shall they be no lesse true of him being in glory and sitting in his throne And 1. Corinth 2. Paul saith My word and my preaching stood not in the entising speech of mans wisedome but in plaine euidence of the spirit and of power that your faith should not be in the wisedome of men but in the power of God If so bee then our faith must not rest no not vpon reasons wisely framed by men much lesse shal it depend on the bare word of men Eph. 2. the Church herselfe is said to bee builded vpon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles If then the confidence and confession of the Church staieth on the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles as on the foundation the certainty of the Scripture cannot hang on the Churches witnes For so should not the Church be vpheld by the testimonie of the Prophets and Apostles but by her owne And 1. Iohn 5. it is said If we receiue the witnes of men the witnes of God is greater If it be greater then the authoritie of it hangeth not on the record of man But wee are to giue more credence vnto God witnessing the Prophets and Apostles writings to bee indeede his voice then vnto the Church affirming the same Now that it is said of the contrary That they are true the Church alone doth witnesse Answere The minor is false That by the Churches Obiection 1 record alone it doth appeare vnto vs that the sacred bookes which wee haue were written by the Prophets and Apostles whose names they beare in their forhead and that euen vnto vs they are come vncorrupt this we grant not For God farre more certainly testifyeth both in the Scripture and in the hartes of his Saints that no fained or forged thing is in these books thē it can be by the Church and all the creatures of the world confirmed They therefore who stand vpon the Churches testimonie alone in this point shew that themselues haue not as yet felt or vnderstood the chiefest testimonies Furthermore they say that the bookes authentike The discerning of bookes Answere The Minor is false 1 The working of the holy Ghost or as they Obiection 2 terme them Canonical of both Testamentes are discerned from the Apocryphall by the Churches iudgement and therefore that the autority of holy canon doth depend on the churches wisedome But that this difference of the bookes is not determined by the churches iudgement but being imprinted into the books themselues by the Spirite of God is onely acknowledged and approoued by the Church this is easily to be vnderstood if the causes of this difference be considered For either in these which are called Apocryphall the force and maiesty of the heauenly spirit doth lesse euidently appeare in the weight and vehemency of woordes and matter then in others of which it is clear that they are the heauenly oracles therefore set downe in writing by diuine instinct that they might be the rule of our faith or it cannot be determined neither out of these books themselues 2 The certainty of authours nor out of others which are canonicall that they were written either by the Prophets or Apostles because either they were not penned by those whom God by certaine testimonies hath warranted vnto vs to be endued with a prophetical spirit or themselues do not shew any certaine authors of them or by their forme of speech or other reasons it may be gathered that they were not left of them whose names they beare Now as touching either this euidence of the spirit or certainty of the authors we builde not our iudgement on the testimonie of the Church but of the bookes themselues And therefore not for the Churches iudgement onely do we iudge some bookes to be canonicall and the foundation and rule of our faith and do therefore accept of the doctrine of other some because they agree with the canonicall but rather for the verie causes of this difference which wee finde in the bookes them-selues Obiection 3 The Church is more ancient than the Scripture 1. Answere The minor is false As for that which some men say that the Church is ancienter then the Scriptures and therefore of greater autoritie it is too trifling For the woord of God is the euerlasting wisedome in God him-selfe Neither was the knowledge of it then first manifested vnto the Church when it was committed to writing but the manifesting of it began together with the
hand than the other 3 Obiection It is said Mat. 12. Euerie sinne and blasphemie shal be forgiuen vnto men but the blasphemie against the holy Ghost shal not be for-giuen to men neither in this worlde nor in the world to come Hence they will gather That some sinnes are for-giuen in this woorlde some in the worlde to come that is in purgatory and some are neuer for-giuen of which these be mortall but the others veniall in their owne nature But first neither heere neither else-where doth Christ teach that some sinnes are forgiuen in the worlde to come Sins are remitted in this world onely For that all other sins are forgiuen not in the woorld to come but in this woorlde both Christ signifieth in this place and the Scripture elsewhere teacheth because it is certaine that sinnes are not remitted but only to those who repent No sinne which may not be remitted except the sin against the holy Ghost But he denieth that the sinne against the holy Ghost is remitted either in this world or in the worlde to come that hee might more significantly expresse the deniall of pardon to it Secondly Whether they say for-giuenesse to bee in this woorld or in the woorlde to come yet this standeth immoueable that it commeth not of the nature or corruption of the sinne but of free mercy for Christs sake And if euery sinne be so grieuous that it could not be purged but by the blood of the Sonne of God then doubtles they do great despite contumelie vnto that blood who so extenuate any sin as to deny that it deserueth eternall punishment vnto which the death of the Sonne of God is equiualent Farther euen by their owne confession There are manie mortal sins which notwithstanding are forgiuen in this life Wherefore either they must make all these to be euen in their own nature venial or they wil neuer proue out of this place that the smalnes of the sin is the cause of forgiuenes 4 Obiection It is said Rom. 1. The wrath of God is reueiled from heauen against al vngodlinesse And 1. Cor. 6. Know yee not that the vnrighteous shall not inherit the kingdome of God Out of these and the like places they gather that seeing they are mortal sinnes which shut men out of the kingdome of God and all sinnes do not so therefore there are some sinnes which in their own nature are not mortall But they conclude more than followeth by force of reason For that some sinnes are venial there is no doubt but that commeth by grace remitting those sinnes which without remission would shut men doubtlesse from the kingdome of God 5 Obiection It is said 1. Cor. 3. If anie mans worke burn Al sinnes shut men out of the kingdom of gods were they not remitted by the grace of God he shal loose but he shall be safe himselfe neuerthelesse yet as it were by fire Therefore say they some sinnes cast men into fire that is into some punishment but not eternall This also we grant not in respect of the nature of sin but in respect of pardō which befalleth to those who hold the foundatiō which is christ For to build on the foundation wood stubble that is to parch the word of god with vnnecessary questiōs humane opinions traditions which oftē are occasions of schisms in the Church often of Idolatry and errours it is not so light a sinne as they deeme it who do it but deserueth eternall malediction except remission be made for the Sonne of God as it is declared in the Reuelation Chapt. 22. 6 Obiection It is said Heb. 5. A high priest taken frō among men is bound to offer for sins as wel for his own part as for the peoples This place sheweth that the sinnes of the priest are not venial by themselues or of their own nature but for the sacrifice of Christ which was signified by the typicall sacrifices therfore it quite clean ouerthroweth the opinion of our aduersaries For if al sins euen of a righteous Priest are in the sight of God so great that they cānot be purged but by the death of the Son of God it necessarily foloweth that they of their own nature deserued euerlasting death 7 Obiection It is said Iam. 1. When lust hath conceiued it bringeth forth sin sin when it is finished bringeth forth death Here say they Iames saith that there is one sin finished when as the wil vpon deliberation consenteth to euil lust Actual sinne is an effect of Originall sinne a cause of death which though purchased by Originall yet is aggrauated by Actuall another not finished when a man sinneth without deliberation to sin finished he ascribeth that it bringeth foorth death We answere that the consequence of this is not of force because that a property which belongeth to diuerse kindes when it is ascribed to one kind it foloweth not thereof that it is to be remooued frō the other For S. Iames distinguisheth the kindes or degrees of sins Original Actual saith that death foloweth after Actual not as if death did not follow after Original but because that Actual is a middle between Originall sin death as a cause of this an effect of that and doth aggrauate death or punishmēt which already was purchased by originall sinne Neither doth he chiefly speak of the degrees of punishmentes but of the cause and originall of them to be sought in the corruption of our own nature 8 Obiect It is said Iam. 3. In manie things we sin al. Hence our aduersaries wil proue that the sins of the iust are venial because they fal either into few sins or into no mortall sins To this as also to most of that which hath gone before we answer that the sins of the iust who by faith retein or receiue righteousnes are venial not of their own nature but by grace Gods iustice is not at variance with his mercie though it iudge the least sinne worthy of eternall death 9 Obiection God is not cruell but mercifull neither light in his loue but constant Wherefore he doth not for euerie light sin iudge a man worthie of eternall punishments But they imagine that the iudgement of God concerning sin is at variance with his mercy which are not at variance but do very well agree For God is in such wise merciful as he is also iust Now the iustice of God requireth that he iudge all euen the least offence and contempt of his maiesty worthy of eternall damnation This iudgement against euery sin the mercy constancy of Gods loue doth not take away but for the shewing and declaring thereof it is sufficient that he reioiceth not at the destruction of them that perrish that for testimony thereof he inuiteth all to repentance forgiueth them who repent their sinnes which by thēselues were worthy of euerlasting death that is he punisheth them causeth satisfaction for them not in
Crosse and of all his benefites Because Christ hath commaunded me and all the faithfull to eate of this breade broken and to to drinke of the cup distributed in remembrance of him with this promise g Mat. 26.27.28 Mar. 14.22.23.24 Luc. 22.16.20 1. Cor. 10.16.17 11.23.24.25 12.13 adioined First that his bodie was as certainly broken and offred for me on the Crosse and his bloud shed for me as I behold with my eies the bread of the Lord broken vnto me and the cup communicated to me and further that my soul is no lesse assuredly fed to euerlasting life with his bodie which was crucified for vs and his bloud which was shedde for vs than I receiue and tast by the mouth of my bodie the bread and wine the signes of the bodie and bloud of our Lord receiued at the hand of the Minister 76 What is it to eate the bodie of Christ crucified and to drinke his bloud that was shed It is not onely to imbrace by an assured confidence of minde the whole passion and death of Christ and thereby to h Ioh. 6.35.40.47.48.50.51.53.54 obtain forgiuenes of sins and euerlasting life but also by the holy Ghost who dwelleth both in Christ and vs so more and more to bee a Ioh. 6.56 vnited to his sacred bodie that though he be in b Act. 3.21 Act. 1.9 c. 1. Cor. 11.26 heauen and we in earth yet neuerthelesse are wee flesh of his flesh and bone of his c Eph. 5.29.30.32 1. Cor. 6.15.17.19 1. Ioh. 3.24 4.13 Ioh. 14 23. bones and as all the members of the bodie are by one soule so are wee also quickened and d Io. 6.56.57.58 Io. 15.1.2.3.4.5.6 Eph. 4.15.16 guided by one and the same spirite 77 Where hath Christ promised that he will as certainely giue his bodie and bloude so to bee eaten and dronken as they eate this breade broken and drinke this cup In the institution of his supper the wordes whereof are these e 1. Cor. 11.23 c. Mat. 26.26 c. Mar. 14.22 c. Luc. 22.19 c. Our Lord Iesus Christ in the night that he was betraied tooke bread And when he had giuen thankes he brake it and said Take eate this is my bodie which is broken for you this doe you in remembrance of me Likewise also he tooke the cup when he had supped and saide f Exod. 24.8 Heb. 9.20 This cup is the Newe Testament in my bloud g Exod. 13.9 this doe as often as yee shall drinke it in remembrance of me For as often as ye shal eat this bread and drinke this cup ye shewe the Lordes death till he come This promise is repeated by Saint Paul when he saith The cup of thankesgiuing wherewith we giue thankes is it not the Communion of the bloud of Christ The bread which we breake is it not the communion of the bodie of Christ h 1. Cor. 10.16.17 For wee that are manie are one bread and one bodie because wee all are partakers of one bread 78 Are then the bread and wine made the verie bodie and bloud of Christ No verily But as the water of baptisme is i Math. 26.29 Mar. 14.24 not turned into the bloud of Christ but is only a sign and pledge of those thinges that are sealed to vs in Baptisme So neither is the bread of the Lords Supper the verie bodie of k 1. Cor. 10.16 c. 11.26 c Christ Although according to the manner of Sacramentes and that i Gen. 17.10 c. Exod. 26.27.43.48 13 9. Act. 7.8 Exo. 24.8 Le. 16.10 17.11 Isa 6.6.7 Tit. 3.5 Act. 22.16 1. Pet. 3.21 1. Cor. 10.1 forme of speaking of them which is vsuall vnto the holy Ghost the bread is called the body of Christ 79 Why then doth Christ call breade his bodie and the cup his bloud or the new Testament in his bloud and Paul also calleth bread and wine the Communion of the bodie and bloude of Christ Christ not without great consideration speaketh so to wit not onely for to teach vs that as the bread and wine sustaine the life of the body so also his crucified body and bloudshed are indeed the meat drinke of our soul whereby it is a Iohn 6.51.55.56 nourished to eternall life but much more that by this visible signe and pledge he may assure vs that wee are as verily partakers of his bodie and bloud through the working of the holy ghost as wee doe b 1. Cor. 10.16.17 perceiue by the mouth of our bodie these holie signes in remembraunce of him and further also that his suffering and obedience is so certainely ours as though we our selues had suffered punishments for our sinnes and had satisfied God 80 What difference is there betweene the Supper of the Lord and the Popish Masse The Supper of the Lord testifieth to vs that we haue perfect forgiuenesse of all our sinnes for that only Sacrifice of Christ which himself once fully c Heb. 7.27 9 12.26.28 10.10.12.14 Iohn 19.30 Mat. 26.28 Luc. 22.19.20 wrought on the Crosse Then also that we by the holie Ghost are graffed into d 1. Cor. 6.17 10.16 12.13 Christ who now according to his humane nature is onely in heauen at the right hand of his e Heb. 1.3 8.1 c. Father and there will be f Ioan. 4.21.22.23 20.17 Luc. 24.52 Act. 7.55.56 Col. 3.1 Phil. 3.10 1. Thes 1.9.10 worshipped of vs. But in the Masse it is denied that the quicke and the dead haue remission of sins for the onely passion of Christ except also Christ bee daily offered for them by their Sacrificers Further also it is taught that Christ is bodilie vnder the formes of breade and wine and therefore is to bee a In canone Missae item de consecrat distin 2. worshipped in them And so the verie foundation of the Masse is nothing else than an vtter denyall of that onelie Sacrifice and passion of Christ Iesus and an accursed Idolatrie 81 Who are to come vnto the Table of the Lord They onely who are trulie sorrowfull that they haue offended GOD by their sinnes and yet trust that those sinnes are pardoned them for Christes sake and what other infirmities they haue that those are couered by his passion and death who also desire more and more to go forward in faith and integritie of life But hypocrites and they who doe not truely repent do eate and b 1. Cor. 10.21 11.28 c. drinke damnation to themselues 82 Are they also to be admitted to this supper who in confession and life declare them-selues to bee Infidels and vngodlie No. For by that meanes the couenaunt of GOD is profaned and the wrath of GOD is c 1. Cor. 11.20.34 Is 1.11 c. 66.3 Ier. 7.21 c. Ps 50.16 c. stirred vp against the whole assemblie Wherefore the Church by the
as long as hee that made it is aliue Christ hath purchased our reconcilement with God for vs with his bloud and hath left it vnto vs euen as Parents at their decease deliuer their goodes vnto their children Obiection The Testament is ratified by the death of the Testator which is good who cannot die Therefore this reconcilement is not ratified or at least wise it may not be called a Testament Aunswere The Minor is to bee denied Because God is saide to haue redeemed the church with his bloud Therefore hee died but he died according to his humanitie Or which commeth to the same Christ is the Testator as hee is both God man but died according to his humanity only Wherefore this reconciliation or Couenaunt may be called a Testament Replie But Christ is the intercessor The same is called an intercession in respect of Christ who by intercession worketh it and a reconciliation in respect of vs who are reconciled and god the Testator Therefore the reconciliation is not of force Aunswere They differ in persons and offices The person of Christ differeth from the person of the father and the holy Ghost in office not in efficacie and power and in respect of him it is an intercession in respect of vs a reconciliation or receiuing into fauour 2 How a Couenaunt may be made betweene god and men THat Couenaunt could not be made without a Mediatour For without Satisfaction and the death of the Mediatour there could not be wrought a reconcilement or anie receiuing into fauour For wee were the enimies of God neither was there an entrance open for vs to god before he was pacified by the merit of our Mediatour Againe Without the Mediatour regenerating vs we should not haue beene able to stand to the conditions and so had the Couenaunt beene made of no force as it hath beene shewed more at large before in the place of the Mediatour in the second question 3 Whether there be but one Couenaunt THere is but one Couenaunt in substaunce and matter There is but one couenaunt in substance two in circumstances two in circumstaunces or administration There is but one in substaunce 1. Because there is but one god one Mediatour of those parties god and men one meane of reconcilement one faith one way of the saluation of all who are saued and haue been saued euen from the beginning of the world vnto the ende Hebr. 13.8 Iesus Christ yesterday and to day the same is also for euer Roman 9.5 Who is ouer all Col. 1.18 And he is the head of the bodie of the church Ephes 2.21 In whom all the building coupled together groweth vnto an holie temple in the Lord. Actes 4.12 Among men there is giuen none other name vnder heauen whereby we must be saued Mat. 11.27 No man knoweth the father but the sonne and he to whom the sonne will reueal him No man commeth to the father but by me Iohn 14.6 I am the way the truth and the life Luc. 10.24 Manie Kings and Prophets haue desired to see that which ye see Iohn 8.56 Abraham reioiced to see my day and he saw it and was glad All therefore as wel vnder the law as vnder the Gospel who were to be saued had respect to the onely mediatour Christ by whom alone they were reconciled to God and saued and therefore there is but one Couenaunt 2. Because the principall conditions whereby we are bound vnto God and God to vs and which are called the substaunce of the Couenaunt are both before and after Christ all the same For in both both in the olde and new Couenaunt or Testament God promiseth remission of sins to beleeuers and repentant sinners In both men are bound to beleeue and repent that is the grounde and foundation of doctrine in both is the same to wit the law and the promise of grace proposed in Christ Nowe the Couenaunt is also of two sortes or there are two Couenants as concerning the circumstances those conditions which are lesse principal which are the formes of administration seruing for the principal conditions that the faithfull may attaine vnto them by the helpe of these A rule here may be obserued The diuersitie of Couenaunts is knowen by the diuersitie of their conditions In all Couenaunts their conditions are euer to be considered which if they be the same then are the Couenaunts also the same if diuers then the Couenaunts also diuers if partly the same and partly diuers then the Couenaunts also are in part the same and in part diuers as in this Couenaunt 1 In what the old and new Couenaunt agree and in what they differ 1. The same autor of both couenaunts 2. The same parties in both reconciled 3. The same mediatour of both THe new Couenaunt agreeth with the old in respect of God in these 1. The same is the Author of both Couenaunts 2. The same parties are ioined in both Couenaunts to wit God and man 3. The same is the mediatour of both Moses in deede is called also the Mediatour of the old Testament but as a type For Christ was also in the old Testament the Mediatour but had adioined vnto him Moses as a type but nowe he is Mediatour without that typicall Mediatour For he is manifested in the flesh is no more couered with types 4 The promise of grace is in both the same to wit remission of sinnes the giuing of the holy Ghost or regeneration 4. The same promise of grace in both life or glorie euerlasting to bee giuen freely by and for Christ the Mediatour to those onely who beleeue For God promiseth grace and mercie to all who beleeue in the Mediatour Gen. 22. In thy seede shall all nations be blessed Gen. 3. Hee shall breake the serpents head Gen. 17. I will bee thy god and the god of thy seede This is the same with the promise which is made to the faithful of the new Couenaunt Hee that beleeueth in the Sonne hath euerlasting life Now here wee speake not in particular of the circumstances of grace but in generall of grace it selfe which was promised Both Couenaunts haue the same corporal promises also but that only in generall Now in respect of men the new agreeth with the old that in both men are bound to faith and new obedience Gen. 17. Walke before me and be thou vpright I will be thy god and the god of thy seede But the Lord cannot be our god except by a true faith we applie the merite of Christ vnto vs for which alone he will receiue vs into fauour and except wee bring forth the fruites of true repentance The new and old Couenaunt therefore agree as concerning the principal conditions of the Couenaunt both in respect of god and in respect of man But they differ in respect of god in these 1. How the old and new Couenaunt differ in respect of God In the promises of corporall benefites For these
mutatiō before that original beginning of the motions mutations of nature For god wil from euerlasting to euerlasting that al should then begin haue their moueing mutation beeing when this beginning was made There is therefore an ambiguity in the word quietnes For we grant the Maior as concerning that quietnesse which signifieth a priuation in the subiect that is taken away by motion But the maior is false if it meane such a quietnesse as is an absolute denial of the being of motion This is takē away not by motion but by the wil of god which alone without second causes any motion beginneth motion 4 Ob. If time be eternal then motion also is eternal for time is the measure of motion Time as it is taken for the measure of motion is not eternal wherby we iudge how long or short al motiō is But time is eternal because euery instant or point of time is the end of that time which went before the beginning of that which followeth Therefore also motion is from euerlasting Auns The appellation of time heere is ambiguous or doubtfull and therefore causeth a double aunswere For if time bee taken onelie for the measure of some motion the Maior is true but if it be takē for the during of any thing the Maior is false as it is manifest in the during of quietnesse which during also is time So also eternity is time without any mutation of the thing which is eternall So the Minor also is true as concerning duration but as concerning the measuring of motion it is false Neither is it furthered by the argument which is adioined concerning an instant For the first instant or moment wherein any motion beginneth may bee also without any precedent motion for otherwise wee shoulde bee faine to say that all euen the shortest motions of all thinges were from euerlasting And that instant is onely the beginning or first point or indiuisible moment wherein time by the will of God beganne to flowe or multiply but it is not the end of any time forepast So the first point in a line hath only line after it not also before it that is it is the beginning of the line not also the end Heauen is not corrupted naturally but by the power of God 5 Obiection Whatsoeuer hath a beginning hath also an ending The celestiall bodies haue no ending Therefore they had no beginning Aunswere The Maior is to bee distinguished Whatsoeuer hath a beginning naturally by motion or alteration of a preexistent subiect hath an ending also and is corrupted to witte naturally by motion The celestial bodies are not corrupted that is naturally for they haue not a matter which is capeable of another forme Therefore they had no beginning that is by naturall motion For by order of nature corruption followeth the generation of one thing out of another Nowe although heauen is not corrupted naturally yet is it corruptible by the absolute power of GOD woorking without anie motion For the omnipotencie of the Creatour is able most freely either to preserue in the same state or to chaunge or to bring to nothing as well those things which he formeth out of other things as which hee produceth out of nothing 6 Obiection God is eternal Heauen is the pallace and seat of god Therefore heauen is eternal Answere It doth not follow For first there are foure termes in this Syllogisme For God is one thing and the pallace and seat of god another thing which is not god In like maner the body is the seat of the soule But it followeth not hereof that the body is a spirituall intelligent immortall essence because the soule is Secondly heauen is the seat of God not properly nor necessarily because God as being an infinite essence is in al thinges and without althings Lib. 1. de Coelo cap. 9. And Aristotle himselfe witnesseth that hee is without heauen Therefore hee can bee though heauen bee not neither needeth he this Tabernacle But hee is saide to dwell in heauen though hee fill all thinges with his essence and power 1. Because hee is aboue all thinges and the Lorde and ruler of all 2. Because hee exhibiteth there his glorie maiestie and grace more clearly and fullie to be beheld and enioied of the blessed Angels and men than heere on earth Against the first aunswere the Vbiquetaries replie in Aristotles behalfe on this manner Heauē is the place of the blessednes of the elect but not god himself or blessednesse The blessednesse of GOD is not without GOD but is GOD himselfe Heauen is the blessednesse of GOD not anie place Therefore heauen is GOD himselfe Answere 1. Not onlie Aristotle but the sacred scripture also doth eueriewhere distinguish heauen from god as the thing made from the maker thereof and also opposeth heauen to earth so that it affirmeth earth to bee below and heauen aboue vs where GOD communicateth himselfe and his blessednesse vnto the elect more clearelie and fullie than on earth Heauen saith GOD himselfe is my seat and earth my footestoole Wherefore although heauen were somewhere taken for heauenly blessednesse yet might it not bee heereof inferred that heauen properlie is not a place wherein the elect enioie and shall for euer enioie that blessednesse For also hell sometimes signifieth hellish pains yet so that it excludeth not the place where the wicked beeing truely seuered from the Godlie shall suffer those paines and tormentes 2. The Minor is false if heauen bee taken for that blessednesse which is GOD himselfe beeing sufficient vnto himselfe in all thinges For heauen is a thing created and finite that blessednesse is increate and immense And if it bee vnderstoode of a created blessednesse which is in vs communicated from GOD there are foure termes in the Syllogisme For the Maior proposition speaketh of an increated blessednesse which is the verie essence of GOD neither is communicated at anie time to anie creature The external respects and relations of God are not the mutation or perfection of God but of the creature 7 Obiection Hee that is Lorde in possession is happier than hee which is Lord onlie in possibilitie But GOD before the creation was onelie in possibilitie Lorde Therefore hee is made happier by the creation But this is absurd Therefore the woorlde was from euerlasting Aunswere He is happier that is Lord in possession true if by the actual dominion and gouernement there arise anie more good vnto him than hee had before But vnto GOD by reason of his exceeding great perfection simplenesse and immutabilitie there coulde or can nothing at all come by his creation and dominion ouer his creatures For the respectes and appellations of Creatour Lorde Sauiour Redeemer Father of mankinde and the like which GOD in time assumeth vnto him doe not appertaine to Gods essence but signifie the beginninges and mutations of creatures that is GOD is termed creatour not of anie newe action or forme that is in
belong those sayings which teach the man Christ to be the onlie begotten Sonne of god Iohn 3.16 So god loued the woorld that he gaue his onelie begotten Sonne Ioh 1.14 We saw the glorie thereof that is of the worde incarnate as the glory of the onelie begotten Sonne of the Father For the onely begotten is he who hath not any brethren of the same generation and nature But Christ as touching his humane nature hath brethren Heb. 2.14 For asmuch as the children were partakers of the flesh and bloode hee also himselfe likewise tooke part with them And a little after He in no sort tooke the Angels but he tooke the seede of Abraham Wherfore in al things it became him to be made like vnto his bretheren And a litle before He that sanctifieth they which are sanctified are all of one that is of the same nature humane Wherefore hee is not ashamed to call them bretheren Wherefore there is in CHRIST another nature according to which hee is the onely begotten Sonne of the Father besides his humanitie according to which both he hath many bretheren and is sprung not of God but of the seede of Dauid Christ is called the onely begotten by nature not in respect of the manner of his generation Obiect The man Iesus is called the onely begotten because he onely was begotten of the Virgin by the Holy Ghost Aunswere It is a misconstring and corrupt interpretation of the word 1. For hee is so the onely begotten that hee is also the proper or naturall sonne Now such a one is saide to be the onely begotten not for the special manner onely of begetting but because he onely was begotten of his substance whose sonne hee is called or because hee onely hath his essence issuing from the substaunce of the Father 2 Because hee the verie same by whom all things were made and are preserued who is in the bosome of the Father euen from the beginning of the world reueiling God vnto the chosen who being sent from heauen into the woorld tooke flesh came in the fleshe c. hee is called the only begotten sonne of the father Ioh. 1.18 1. Ioh. 4.9 Iohn 1.14 We saw the glorie thereof that is of the Worde but not of the man Iesus as hereticks would haue it For there is no other antecedent in that place but the Woord For these words go before The Woorde was made fleshe and dwelt among vs then it followeth and we sawe the glorie thereof If then the Woorde it selfe be called and is the onely begotten then Christ is called the only begotten in this place not in respect of the manner of his generation of the virgin but in respect of his generation from euerlasting of the Father 3 The Words generation of the father is often in scripture discerned and distinguished from christes generation of the virgin The Euangelist as wee see calleth the Woord the only begotten of the Father Of wisedome it is said Prouerb 8.25 that before the mountains that is from the beginning it was formed or as the Chaldee paraphrast interpreteth it begotten but we reade in Matthewe that Iesus who is called Christ was borne of Marie 4 The only begotten is opposed to Angels men But Angels and men are the Sonnes of God either by creation or by adoption or by sanctification after what sort soeuer this be wrought by the holy ghost Therefore Christ must needes bee called the onely begotten for this cause euen for that he is his Son by nature For after this manner he is the Sonne of God onely and truely and simply seuered from other Sonnes Wherefore to this second ranck or classe those places also should be referred which shew that we are the Sonnes of God by adoption by and for that only begotten Sonne For seeing grace is opposed to nature and we are Sonnes by Grace it must needes be that Christ is the Sonne by nature To the third classe belong those testimonies of Scripture God is and is called the sonne which attribute the name of sonne manifestly to the other nature also in christ which subsisted by it selfe before and besides the flesh assumpted and did woorke all thinges And seeing Seruetus others are hereâ—n an vprore as it were and fight for this that onely the man Iesus borne of the Virgine but not God or the God-head is called the Sonne in Scriptures and that therefore before Iesus was borne there was not any Sonne of God subsisting wee are diligently to gather and collect those testimonies wherein the name of Sonne is not attributed to the humane nature only but also to the diuine The third argument therefore is this That which subsisting before the flesh borne of Marie created the woorld and from the first beginning hitherto woorketh the same thinges with the Father the same is a person and that without the flesh and before it But the sonne of god is called that which subsisting before the flesh created the woorld and from the first beginning hitherto worketh the same things with the father Therefore the sonne is a person and subsisting euen without the fleshe and before it that is Christ Iesus borne of Marie hath another nature besides his humane nature in respect whereof Christ euen before his humane nature was truly existed is is called the Sonne of God The Maior of this reason is manifest For that which worketh all woorks and that with the same authoritie liberty and power wherewith the Father doth must needs be a liuing and vnderstanding substance that is a person Nowe the Minor is prooued by testimonies of Scripture For the very same who is before all thinges for whome and by whome all thinges were created and doe consist who dooth all thinges likewise himselfe which the Father dooth is called the beloued sonne of God the first begotten of all creatures by whome god spake vnto vs in the last daies Coloss 1.16 Hebr. 1.1.2 Hebr. 2.10 Iohn 5.19 c. But the fleshe or humanity of CHRST is not before all thinges is not creatresse but created in the last times doth not vpholde or sustaine all thinges with his woord beck and effectuall will but is it selfe sustained and vpheld by the Woorde who did assume and take it Therefore in Christ besides his flesh is another nature which also before the flesh was miraculouslie conceiued in the Virgins wombe was subsisting did woorke and is the Sonne of God Againe John 3.17 God sent not his Sonne into the world to condemne it The Father sent the Sonne into the woorlde but the humanity of the Sonne was borne in the woorlde Therefore he was his Sonne before he was sent into the woorlde Ioh. 5.21 The sonne quickneth whom he wil. Matth. 11.27 No man knoweth the Father but the Sonne and hee to whome the Sonne wil reueile him But in the old Testament before Iesus was borne of the Virgine some were raised from the dead and quickened for there were some from the
beginning of the woorlde who knewe GOD aright Therefore in Iesus the Sonne of Marie is another nature besides his fleshe which is the Sonne of GOD and subsisted from the beginning of the woorlde reueiling GOD vnto men not onely to those of the godly who liued since hee tooke fleshe but to those also who liued before it Againe Iohn 3.13.17.19.31 Iohn 16.28 c. Hee is called the sonne who came from heauen who beeing in earth is in heauen who came into the woorlde not as other men from the earth but from aboue out of heauen from the Father So that then hee was before he came into the woorlde But the fleshe of CHRIST is not of heauen neither came it from heauen Therefore there must needes bee another nature in him in respect whereof hee is the onely begotten Sonne of GOD euen before he tooke fleshe of the Virgine Againe He that was manifested in the flesh is GOD 1. Timot. 3. and therefore another nature from the flesh For God is one thing who is manifested and the flesh another thing wherein hee is manifested The Sonne of God is hee that was manifested in the fleshe 1. Iohn 3.5 For this purpose appeared the Sonne of GOD that hee might take away our sinnes and that hee might loose the woorkes of the Diuell Therefore the Son is God and another nature from the flesh that is the man Iesus is the sonne of God in respect not only of his humanity but also of his diuinity which besides and before the fleshe existed in him and by the assumption of the flesh was made as it were visible and conspicuous Wherefore it followeth also and that necessarily that that was a subsistent and a person For that which is by nature a sonne is also a person But Christes diuinitie or nature which was also before his flesh is the Sonne of God by nature Therefore it is a subsistent and a person in the flesh taken or assumpted and before it To the fourth classe belong those places of Scripture The Word is a person before Iesus borne of the Virgin and he is the sonne which affirme Christ man to be the word incarnate The Argument is this The word is a person which both existed before Iesus was borne and now dwelleth personally in the fleshe taken of the Virgine But that word is the Sonne Therefore the sonne is a person The Maior is proued because those thinges are attributed vnto the Word Ioh. 1.1 Ioh. 1 5. Reu. 19. which only agreeth to a thing subsistent liuing intelligent woorking that is to a person For the Woord was before al creatures with the father God by him were al things made hee was autor of al life and light in men hee was in the world from the beginning and not knowen he hath his own country and nation he came vnto it in his name men beleeue he giueth power to be the sons of god to others by his own autority power he doth assume take flesh is therein manifested seen handled conuerseth and dwelleth amongst men The Minor is proued Because the Word is called the onelie begotten Sonne of GOD Iohn 1.14.18.34 Reuelat 2.18 c. And because the same properties are attributed to the Woorde and the Sonne For the Sonne is in the bosome of the Father reueiling GOD vnto men By him the woorlde was created In him is life hee was sent and came from Heauen into the woorlde Hee tooke the seede of Abraham Likewise the life which is the woorde was with the Father before the incarnation and manifestation of Christ Therefore god was euen then the father of the Word and the Word the sonne of god But seeing the newe Arrians doe maruailouslie depraue by their newe and craftie deuised Sophismes this notable place of Iohn concerning the Woorde subsisting before the fleshe borne of the virgine and creating and preseruing all thinges that thereby they might robbe and despoile the Sonne of GOD of his true and eternal deity it seemed good here to adioine those things which Zacharias Vrsinus some yeares since noted drue out as to be opposed against these corruptions and forgeries briefely indeede and barely after the manner of Logicians yet such as are learned and sound whereby also the like corruptions and wrestings of places of holy Scripture may easily be obserued discerned and refuted IOHN purposing to write the Gospell of Christ in the first entrance proposeth the summe of that Doctrine which he purposed to deliuer and confirme out of the storie and Sermons of Christ And seeing the knowledge of Christ consisteth in his person and office The argument of Iohns gospel hee describeth both and sheweth that Christ is the eternall Sonne and Woorde of God the Father who taking fleshe was made man that he might be made a sacrifice for our sinnes and might make vs through faith in him the Sonnes of God and heires of eternall life This Woorde then whom afterwards he calleth the onely begotten Sonne of the Father he saith nowe to haue beene in the beginning which sheweth his eternity These woords of the holie Euangelist they corrupt and depraue who raise againe Samosatenus blasphemies from the pit of hell expounding this beginning of the beginning of the gospels preaching doone by Christ In the beginning was But contrarie S. Iohn and the Church euen from the Apostles and their scholers time doe vnderstand that beginning of the world wherein all things to haue beene first created by GOD Moses in the first Chapter of Genesis recounteth For Iohn saith that the Worlde was made by him and further that euen then in that beginning hee was God and that the true God creator which is onelie one and was in the beginning of the worlde Replie 1. Beginning dooth not signifie eternitie Therefore wee depraue it who so expound it Aunswere Wee doe not so expound it but that euen then in the beginning of the worlde was the Word and therefore was before the creation of the world and whatsoeuer was before this was from euerlasting And so is the scripture wont to speake Eph. 1.4.1 Pet. 1.20 Pro. 8 22 23. c. where wee may see a large place concerning wisedome whose eternitie is there signified in this that it is saide to haue beene before the creation of the worlde Replie 2. Beginning often signifieth the beginning of the gospels preaching Yee were with me from the beginning I said not to you from the beginning Aunswere This sheweth that somtimes it so signifieth but not alwaies And we are stil to conster it of that beginning which the text sheweth As also in other places Reuel 1.8 I am α ω the beginning and the end the first and the last The woorde The corruptors say The man Iesus Christ is called the Woorde because hee speaketh and teacheth the will of the father Wee say that hee is called indeede the Woorde for this cause because hee declareth God his wil but yet in respect
the true God and eternal life Rom. 9.5 Who is God ouer al blessed for euer Amen Actes 20.28 God hath purchased his Church with his owne bloode Hebr. 1.8 The Scepter of thy kingdome is a Scepter of righteousnesse and verse 10. Thou Lorde in the beginning hast established the earth and the heauens are the workes of thine handes And cap. 3.3 Christ is counted woorthy of more glorie than Moses in asmuch as hee which hath builded the house hath more honor than the house and hee that hath built all thinges is God 10. He is said to haue come downe from heauen yet so that hee remaineth in heauen to come vnto his together with his Father to bee with them vnto the end of the world Therefore he is of an infinite essence euerie where present and working both in heauen and earth But his humane nature is finit Therefore he is God in respect of another nature The Godhead is after another sort communicated vnto Christ than vnto Creatures Now to that which hath bin obiected concerning the communicating of the Deitie vnto others whereby they are called gods we aunswere by distinguishing the diuersitie thereof For vnto others it is communicated by a created similitude of the Deitie either of nature that is by diuine properties created which are not equall with the creatour so are the Angels or of office So Moses is called God and all Magistrates But vnto the Sonne Christ it is communicated by the nature or essence it selfe so that the verie Deity is his substaunce Which wee thus prooue 1. Hee is the only begotten and proper Sonne of God the Sonne of the most High who also is himselfe the most High Luk. 1.32 But hee is the proper Sonne to whome the substaunce of the father is communicated 2. Iohn 5.26 As the father hath life in himselfe so likewise hath he giuen to the Sonne to haue life in himselfe Therefore the Son also is GOD of himselfe liuing and the fountaine of life Wherefore this communicating of the Deitie maketh him equall with God and THE SAME God with the Father so far off is it from prouing the contrarie Reply 1. Power was giuen to him beeing man Iohn 5.27 Therefore it was not giuen him by eternall generation Aunswere It was giuen to the Woorde by generation to man by vnion of the Woorde Replie 2. It was giuen him after his resurrection Aunswere Then was giuen him the full authority and liberty of vsing that power which he had alwaies All thinges were made by it Al thinges made by the Word and without it was made nothing Wee interprete That all creatures were made by him in the beginning and that also by him is gathered out of mankinde and regenerated thorough the woorking of the holie Ghost an euerlasting Church They conster it That by AL things are meant those thinges which are wrought in the newe creation that is in the collection and regeneration of the Church by the gospel which is called the second creation Vnto which our aunswere is 1. by granting this point by graunting I meane not the whole interpretation but onely this point of the creation And if this were the sense yet heereof woulde it also followe that Christ were verie God and by nature God The second creation also which is regeneration proueth Christ God The first reason which wee yeelde heereof is Because to worke the first and second creation by his owne vertue power and operation is the proper work of one the same verie God 1. Cor. 3.6 GOD gaue the encrease So then is neither hee that planteth anie thing neither hee that watereth but god that giueth the increase And in the same Chapter v. 9. Yee are Gods husbandrie and gods building Heb. 3.4 Hee that hath built all things is god And Christ woorketh this new creation not as an instrument but by his owne proper vertue Heb. 3.6 Eph. 1.23 which is his bodie euen the fulnesse of him that filleth all in all thinges Eph. 4.8 Hee ascended vp on high hee gaue giftes vnto men hee ascended farre aboue al heauens that hee might fill all thinges Hee gaue some Apostles and some Prophetes and vers 16. By whom al the bodie receiueth encrease Iohn 10.28 I giue vnto them eternall life Ephes 5.29 Hee sanctifieth the Church and clenseth it by the washing of water through the word The second reason is Because no man can giue the holie ghost but he that is verie god whose proper spirite it is But the second creatioÌ„ is not wrought but by the holy ghost whoÌ„ Christ the worker effectour of this creation sendeth Therefore he is verie god and Lorde The third reason Because the newe creation is the regeneration of the elect to eternall life This beganne euen from Adam albeit it was wrought in regard of the Mediator which was to come And it was wrought by the same Mediatour the Sonne in regarde of whome or for whose sake it was wrought euer since the beginning For CHRIST as by his merit so by his efficacie and vertue is Sauiour not onelie of a part but also of his whole Church and bodie which consisteth of al the elect and sanctified euen from ADAMS time Ephes 4.16 By whome all the bodie receiueth increase Isay 9.6 The euerlasting Father author preseruer propagatour and amplifier of his Church through all ages of the world Mich. 5.2 The ruler that should come forth out of Bethelem was giuen from euerlasting to bee the head and sauiour of the Church Hee shall bee peace euen before hee came out of Bethelem and the sauiour of his Church against the Assyrians and all her enimies Gen. 3.15 The seede of the woman shall bruise the Serpentes head This victorie and conquest ouer the Diuell beganne euen from the beginning of the world Psalm 110. Dauid acknowledgeth the Messias also to bee his LORDE a Priest and a King not onelie that was to come in the flesh but euen nowe present to whome nowe long before GOD had saide Thou art a Priest that is whome he had alreadie ordained to this office liuing woorcking and preseruing the elect 1. Timoth. 2.5 There is one GOD and one Mediatour betweene GOD and Man which is the man Christ I sâ—s Therefore this man is the Mediatour of all from the very beginning he is the Mediator obteining giuing the blessinges which he hath obtained vnto all I giue vnto them eternall life Ephes 1.22 He hath appointed him ouer all things to be the head to the church 1. Pet. 1.11 The spirit of Christ in the Prophetes 1. Pet. 3.19 By the spirite hee went and preached vnto the spirites that nowe are in prison which were in time passed disobedient Ephes 2.20 Yee are built vpon the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets IESVS CHRIST himselfe being the chiefe corner stone Which place is diligentlie to bee obserued For then either Christ is the heade foundation sanctifier and Sauiour of a part of the Church only which
but hee furthermore keepeth and gardeth vs as his owne flocke and proper people whome hee hath purchased with his bloode hee gouerneth vs also and guideth vs by his spirite hee woorcketh in our heartes faith and obedience that wee maie doe things acceptable vnto him and so fenceth vs against all the temptations of the Diuel and the flesh that we may neuer fal from him Therefore he is our Lord after a farre other sort than the Diuels and the reprobates 2 By right of redemption 2 Hee is our Lorde by right of redemption For hee alone paying the raunsome for vs deliuereth vs from the power of the Diuel by his spirit regenerateth vs and causeth vs to beginne to serue him and in this liberty whereunto hee hath brought vs by his merite and power hee also preserueth vs against al both outward and inward enemies euen to the end and being raised from the dead he fully enfreeeth and deliuereth vs from all sin and miserie and endoweth vs with eternal blisse and glorie And seeing hee hath deliuered freed vs it is manifest that we were Seruants and truely so wee were and are by nature Seruantes and bound-slaues of the Diuell from whose tyrannie Christ hath deliuered vs and heereupon nowe are wee the Seruants of Christ because vs who were by nature his enimies and deserued to be destroied of him hee notwithstanding preserued and deliuered For * The reason of this deriuation of the name Seruant could not be expressed in English as it is in latine from whēce our English word commeth Serui which signifieth seruants commeth from Seruando that is saued or preserued serui or seruants were first so named by the Romans from seruando which is in signification preserued bicause whē in the wars they might haue bin slain of their enemies they were preserued But this dominion of Christ ouer vs is speciall that is extendeth it selfe onely to the Church Obiection Jf we bee redeemed from the power of the Diuel therefore a ransome hath bin paid him for our redemption For from whose power wee are redeemed vnto him is the price and ransome due But God gaue not him the raunsome Therefore wee are not redeemed from the power of the Diuel Answer From whose power we are redeemed as hauing bin supreme Lord ouer vs and holding rightly his dominion ouer vs vnto him the price ransome is due But the diuel is no supreme Lord but the executioner of the supreme lord Wee are saide to bee redeemed in respect of god wee are deliuered in respect of the Diuel which is God who alone hath and holdeth by right dominion ouer vs. Wherefore in respect of God Christ redeemed vs for vnto him he hath paid the price But he hath deliuered vs or set vs at liberty in respect of the Diuell For wee are giuen vnto Christ our redeemer to bee his owne neither hath the Diuell nowe anie more right or power ouer vs. And this christs dominion and power ouer vs cost him enough who therefore also hath care of it and preserueth it Of that Dominion we dispute especiallie in this place For the Diuell dooth not acknowledge Christ to bee such a Lorde vnto him as wee confesse him to bee vnto vs because hee hath redeemed vs and because hee guideth vs with his spirite 3 In respect of our preseruation Christ is our Lorde 3 By right of preseruation because he defendeth vs vnto the end keepeth safegardeth vs to eternall life not only by defending our bodies from enimies but our soules also from sins Of this Dominion himselfe speaketh None of them are lost which thou gauest mee No man shal pluck my sheepe out of my hands He keepeth the wicked to destruction and defendeth their bodies only 4 In respect of Gods ordinance 4 In respect of Gods ordinance because the Father ordeined the woord and this person Christ vnto this that by him hee might woorke all thinges in heauen and in earth The Father gaue vs vnto him manifested him vnto vs to bee our Prince King Head hath made him heire of al. Now whereas he is our Lorde after a farre more excellent manner than others we also are far more bound to his allegeance obedience For he is so our lord that he doth indeed with vs what he wil and hath full right and power ouer vs but yet he vseth that his power to our saluation only For wee receiue dailie of this Lord moe and by infinite partes more excellent benefites than doe any other thoroughout the whole world And therefore wee ought alwaies to acknowledge the dominion and power which Christ hath ouer vs. Which acknowledging of his dominiō is 1. A profession of so great a benefit of christ as that he hath vouchsafed to be our lord to set free vs his enimies into this so fruitfull glorious a liberty 2. A confession of our bond duty For christ being so merciful a Lord vnto vs we ought both in word and life to professe our selues as his seruantes to bee bound to faithfull subiection and obedience vnto him in all thinges that he may bee magnified of vs for euer WHICH WAS CONCEIVED BY THE HOLY GHOST BORNE OF THE virgin Mary In the conception three thinges to bee obserued 1 The forming of Christs flesh First christ is said here to haue bin conceiued by the holy ghost Whereby three thinges are signified 1. That the masse of his humane nature was created or formed in the wombe of the Virgin miraculouslie and beside the order of thinges disposed of God in nature by the immediate working operation of the holy Ghost without the seede and substance of man Obiection But we are also formed and made of God Answere We mediately Christ immediately 2 The sanctifieng of his flesh 2. That the Holy Ghost did in the same moment and by the same operation cleanse this masse and from the verie point of the conception sanctifie it that is he caused that originall sinne should not issue into it and that for these causes First that hee might bee a pure sacrifice and a sufficient ransome for our redemption 2. Cor. 5.12 He hath made him to be sinne for vs which knew no sinne that we should be made the righteousnes of god in him Secondly That he might also sanctify vs by his sanctitie and holynesse For if Christ had beene a sinner hee could not haue satisfied for vs but himselfe should haue remained in death Therefore could he not haue bin our sanctifier neither by merit nor by his power and efficacie Heb. 2.11 For he that sanstifieth and they that are sanctified are all of one Heb. 7.26 Such an high Priest it became vs to haue which is holy harmelesse vndefiled separate from sinners Thirdly Iohn was not agreeable vnto the Word the eternall sonne of god to vnite personallie vnto him humane nature being stained defiled where in hee dwelleth as in his owne temple For God
are free from these paines that is hee speaketh of felicity and liberty which is not in Hell Whereupon also it is clear that Christ spake this to the Theefe not of his God-head but of that which suffered which was his soul For the godhead was with the Theefe neither did Christ suffer or was deliuered as touching his God-heade but as touching his soule Lastly Christ descended not into Hell locally as touching his bodie because his body was in the graue neither rose from any other place but from the graue It followeth therefore that this article cannot bee vnderstood of a locall descension into Hell Aunswere 2 Albeit it were true that Christ descended locally into Hell yet hee shoulde not haue descended for this cause which they imagine as namely to deliuer the Fathers Which also is prooued by this reason If Christ descended locally into Hel he descended either to suffer or to deliuer Not to suffer because now all thinges were finished on the Crosse as christ himselfe also hanging on the Crosse said Jt is finished He descended not to deliuer the Fathers 1 Because he did this before in suffering for them on earth 2 Hee did the same by the power and efficacie of his God-heade from the verie beginning of the worlde not by the descension of his soule or bodie into Hel. 3 The Fathers were not in Limbo Therefore they could not be deliuered thence As it is saide Luk. 16.46 Betweene you and vs there is a great gulfe set so that they which would go from hence to you cannot neither can they come from thence to vs. And in the same place Lazarus is said to bee in Abrahams bosome not in Limbo The soules of the iust are in the hand of God 3 Objection Christ indeede did not descend into Hell either to suffer or to deliuer but as some wil to shewe the Diuell and Death his victorie and so to strike a terrour into them Which they say is confirmed by that place of Peter 1. Pet. 3.19 By the which he also went preached vnto the spirits that are in prison which were in time passed disobedient Answere That for this cause Christ descended into Hell is not found in scripture that place of Peter is thus to be vnderstood Christ went that is beeing sent from the beginning of the Father vnto the Church by his spirite that is by his God-head and vnto the spirites that are now in prison that is in Hell hee preached in time passed when as yet they liued were disobedient namely before the flud and in the time of Noah inuiting them to repentance So is also another saieng of Peter to be vnderstood 1. Pet. 4.6 The Gospel was also preached vnto the dead That is vnto those which are now dead or were then dead when Peter wrote this and who then liued when the Gospel was preached vnto them Reply Christ descended into the lowest partes of the earth Ephes 4.9 Therefore to Hell Aunswere Into the lowest partes of the earth that is into the earth which is the lowest part of the world This interpretation is prooued by the scope and drift of the Apostle who maketh in that place an opposition of christs great glory his great humiliation But were it so that these places which some alleage for to establish this opinion were to be vnderstood of a locall descension of Christ into Hell yet would they not make for them but rather for the papists who teach That christ preached vnto the Fathers in Hell and thence deliuered them Now if these testimonies help not the Papists muchlesse wil they helpe them For it is certaine that it cannot be thence prooued that Christ descended into Hell to strike a terrour into Death and the Diuell This opinion indeed is not impious or vngodly is approoued by manie of the Fathers but yet I leaue it because it is not grounded on anie firme reasons and contrarie reasons are at hand easie to be had For 1. Christ himselfe said which testimonies haue now often beene recited This daie shalt thou bee with mee in Paradise Father into thy hands I commend my spirite Againe It is finished 2. Jf hee descended to triumph this Article should bee the beginning of his glorification But it is not likelie that Christ tooke the beginning of his glorification in hell For it is apparent by the opposition of the Article following That christes Descension was the lowest degree of his humiliation And yet I confesse withall that christ stroke a great terrour into the Diuels but that was by his death whereby hee disarmed and vanquished the Diuel sin and death THE THIRD DAY HE ROSE AGAINE FROM THE DEAD I Beleeue that Christ shooke off death from himselfe quickened his deade body reunited his bodie vnto his soule restored vnto himselfe a blessed celestial and glorious life and that by his owne proper power The chiefe Questions of christs resurrection are 1 Whether Christ rose againe 2 How he rose 3 For what cause he rose 4 The fruit of his resurrection 1 WHETHER CHRIST ROSE AGAINE THat Christ rose againe is prooued by the testimonies of Angels weomen Euangelistes Apostles and other Saintes who after his resurrection sawe him felt him and talked with him And wee were to beleeue the Apostles in respect of the authority which they had from heauen although they had not seene him 2 HOW CHRIST ROSE CHRIST rose first by his owne power euen by his Godheade Iohn 2.19 Destroie this temple and in three daies I will raise it vp againe Ioh. 10.18 I haue power to laie downe my soule and haue power to take it vp againe Ioh. 5.21 As the Father raiseth vp the dead and quickeneth them so the Sonne quickeneth whom he will Obiection But the Father raised him Rom. 4.24 Therefore hee raised not himselfe Aunswere The Father raised the Sonne by the Son himselfe not as by an instrument but as by another person of the same essence and power with the Father The Sonne is raised of the Father by himselfe Himselfe hath raised vp himselfe by his spirite Secondlie Iesus Christ true God and man rose according to that nature according to which he suffered namelie according to his humane nature euen the true humane nature and the same in essence and properties and that not deified but glorified al infirmities thereof beeing done away Luk. 24.39 Behold my handes and my feete for it is I my selfe handle me and see me for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as yee see mee haue And truely nothing else coulde rise againe but that which had fallen The same bodie therefore which fell did rise againe which is the greatest comfort vnto vs. For hee must haue been one and the same Mediatour who should merit for vs a communicating and participation of those benefits which we had lost by sin who should restore the same vnto vs and applie them to euerie one Againe except Christes fleshe hadde risen neither shoulde ours rise
be taken awaie the effect likewise is taken awaie The wages of sinne is death Further if he hath abolished death and that by a sufficient satisfaction for our sinnes which satisfaction hee hath shewed and declared by his resurrection to bee sufficient it is certaine that his resurrection is a most certaine testimonie of our resurrection for he hauing perfourmed a sufficient satisfaction for the sinnes of his members the members cannot remaine in death But the resurrection of Christ the Heade is an argument of the perfect satisfaction for the sinnes of his members Therefore Christes resurrection is also an argument of the perfect resurrection of his members 3. As the first Adam receiued blessinge◠for himselfe and all his posteritie and lost the same from all So Christ the second Adam receiued life and al other giftes for himselfe and others and therefore also will communicate eternall life with vs. 4. Seeing the same spirite dwelleth in vs which did in Christ hee shall woorke also the same in vs which in our Head he did For the spirit is alwaies like neither dooth he woorke in the Head and sleepe in the members Therefore seeing Christ hath raised himselfe vp by his spirite for the dead he wil verilie also raise vs vp For if hee raised himselfe vp beeing dead much more shal he bee able beeing aliue to raise vs vp 5. Because Christ is man for execept hee were man we shoulde haue no hope of the resurretion of our flesh For by man came resurrection 1. Cor. 15.21 Obiection 1. Then the wicked shall not rise againe because christes resurrection is neither an argument nor the cause of the resurrection of the wicked but of the godlie onelie Aunswere There be other causes for which the wicked shal rise again euē for the iust iudgement of God whereby he hath appointed them to eternall paines For the same thing maie haue moe effectes and diuerse causes Obiection 2 These are the benefites of his death therefore not of his resurrection Aunswere They are of his death as by it he deserued them of his resurrection in respect of the application of his benefites Hee beeing rich was made poore and beeing poore was made rich againe that he might enrich vs. Obiection 3. The effect is not before the cause The cause of these benefites which is his resurrection was not before the first resurrection therefore neither the effect that is the benefites themselues Aunswere The resurrection was not as touching the accomplishment thereof but in the counsell of God and in efficacie and vertue it was in the olde Testament For then also were men receiued into fauour they were endued with the holie Ghost and receiued the other benefits but for and by the Mediator which was in time appointed to be humbled and glorified The last though not the least fruite of christes resurrection is The consummation and perfecting of all his benefites and the glorifieng of his church For christ did therefore die and is therefore risen and hath therefore perfectlie deliuered vs from sinne that wee may bee ioint-heires with him of his kingdome Coloss 1.18 Hee is the first borne of the dead Rom. 8.17 Wee are the heires of God and heires annexed with Christ He shal conforme vs and make vs like vnto himselfe because we liue by the same spirit whereby he dooth And this spirite is not vnlike himselfe Rom. 8.11 Jf the spirite of him that raised vp Iesus from the dead dwell in you he that raised vp Christ from the deade shall also quicken your mortall bodies because that his spirit dwelleth in you Ioh. 14.3 I wil come againe and receiue you vnto my selfe that where I am there maie yee bee also Now in this we obserue That the whole humiliation of the Mediatour doth not dure for euer For it was enough that hee suffered once but the efficacie and power thereof in preseruing and maintaining the blessings thereby comming endureth for euer Christ therefore rose that is by his owne proper vertue and power brought againe and returned his soule vnto his bodie that both soule and bodie might bee deliuered from al ignominie and infirmitie and be adorned with immortalitie and perfect glorie That is 1. Hee recalled his soule vnto his bodie 2. But both yet beeing now glorified and freed from infirmities 3. By his owne proper power he receiued his soule I beleeue then that Christ is raised from the dead that is that he therefore rose againe from the dead that hee might make vs partakers of his righteousnesse sanctification glorification which hee purchased for vs by his merite Seeing therefore Christ is risen it is manifest that hee is declared to bee the Sonne of God and as touching his humanitie is endowed with that glory which becommeth the nature of the Sonne of God and further that he endueth vs also with his spirite regenerateth vs by the vertue of his spirite and wil at length consummate and perfect the new life begun in vs and make vs compartners of the same his glory felicity and euerlasting life HE ASCENDED INTO HEAVEN CHRISTS Ascension into heauen is a locall true and visible translation and remoouing of Christs bodie into that heauen which is about all visible heauens to that light which is not to be come vnto to the right hand of God where he now is and remaineth and whence he shall returne to iudgement The chiefe Questions of Christs Ascension into heauen 1 Whither or to what place christ ascended 2 How he ascended 3 Wherefore he ascended 4 What is the difference betweene christs Ascension ours 5 What are the fruites of christs Ascension 1 WHITHER CHRIST ASCENDED IESVS Christ man when he was together with his Disciples in Bethania fourty daies after his resurrection after he had often prooued and confirmed his resurrection his true fleshe and humanity vnto his Apostles ascended in their sight into heauen Heauen in Scripture signifieth 1 The aire 2 The Skieye region and celestiall Spheres 3 The place of the blessed which is that space immense most lightsome glorious without and aboue the whole world and the visible heauen where God sheweth himselfe to the blessed Angels and men where is prepared the seat of our blisse with Christ and the Angels God is said to dwel there because there dooth his glorie especially appeare vnto the blessed Angels men It is called the new world paradise the bosome of Abraham This heauen is not euerie where Luk. 16.26 Betweene you and vs there is a great gulfe set so that they which would go from hence to you can not neither can they come from thence to vs. In this third signification is heauen here taken Christ then ascended into Heauen that is was caried vp into the place of the blessed Act. 2.2 The Holie Ghost came from Heauen in the day of Pentecost 2. King 2.11 Elias was taken vp into Heauen 2. Cor. 12.2 Paul maketh mention of the third Heauen Coloss 3.1 Seeke those thinges which are aboue
we be receiued of his Father 3. The Assent of his Father approuing this his Sonnes will and accepting of the value of his sacrifice as a ransome for our sins and as the Father receiueth vs so doth he also Obiection But before christes ascension yea before his comming there was intercession Answ That depended of this that is it was made in respect of this intercession to come as also the whole receiuing into fauour from the beginning of the woorlde For hee our Mediatour made intercession before with this condition that he accomplishing his sacrifice should appeare for euer in the heauenly Sanctuarie Heb. 6.57 Thou art a Priest for euer according to the order of Melchisedech And further that intercession in the olde Testament was not such as it is now in Heauen For nowe hee wil haue vs receiued for his ransome already paied which then was afterwards to be paied The second fruite is our glorification or ascension For seeing Christ our head is ascended we are certaine that wee also shal ascend into heauen as beeing his members Iohn 14.2 I goe to prepare a place for you And though I goe to prepare a place for you J will come againe and receiue you vnto my selfe that where I am there maie ye be also Obiection But Elias and Enoch ascended before christ Therefore christ is not by his ascension the cause of our ascension Aunswere They ascended in respect of Christes ascension which was to come Christes ascension and glorification is the cause and example of our ascension and glorification because except he were glorified wee should not bee glorified For the Father hath decreed to giue vs all thinges by the Messias and hath put all thinges in his hands And how should Christ haue giuen vs a kingdome except himselfe first as beeing the first borne had taken possession thereof But for this cause also he ascended into heauen that hee might there raign Therefore hee wil translate his citizens thither And seeing we are his members and he our head is already ascended and glorified Therefore shall wee also ascend and bee glorified Iohn 12.26 Where J am there shall also my seruaunt bee And Iohn 14.3 J wil receiue you vnto my selfe that where J am there maie yee be also The third fruite is The sending of the holie ghost by whome he gathereth comforteth and defendeth his church to the worldes end Hee was giuen also to the godlie which were vnder the Lawe before Christs ascension and comming But that was 1. Jn respect of this ascension and glorification of christ which was then to come and whereof that sending and powring out of the holie Ghost is not a fruit onely but also a part and so in respect also of this sending which was noâ—e after Christes ascension accomplished the holie Ghost was giuen vnto the godlie in the olde Testament 2. Now after christes glorification it was giuen more aboundantlie as in the daie of Pentecost That which also was foretolde Act. 2.17 And it shal be in the last daies saith god I wil powre out of my spirit vpoÌ„ al flesh Now that christ did not powre out the holie Ghost in such plentie before his ascension that befel only as before was said in respect of the decree of God For God woulde that the holy Ghost should be giuen by the Messias as well man as God wherefore man also was to be glorified who shoulde do this John 16.7 Jt is expedient for you that J goe awaie for if J go not away the comforter wil not come vnto you There are other fruites also of Christes ascension For 1. it is a testimonie that our sinnes are fully pardoned vs who doe beleeue For except he had suffered the punishment for sinnes hee coulde not haue entred into the throne of God For where sinne is there is death also John 16.10 Hee shall reproue the world of righteousnes because J goe to my father 2. Jt is a testimonie that christ is indeede conquerour of death sin and the Diuell 3. Jt is a testimonie that we shal neuer be left destitute of comfort because hee therefore ascended to send the holy Ghost John 16.7 Jf J go not awaie the comforter wil not come Ephes 4.8 When he ascended vp on high hee led captiuitie captiue and gaue giftes vnto men 4. Jt is a testimonie that christ wil for euer defend vs because we know that our head is a glorious head and placed aboue al principalities HE SITTETH AT THE RIGHT HAND OF GOD THE FATHER ALMIGHTY THIS Article differeth from the former 1. Because in this Article is declared the end of his ascension For Christ did therefore ascend into heauen that hee might sit at the right hand of the father 2. Because christ sitteth alwaies at the right hande of the Father but into heauen hee ascended but once 3. Wee shal also ascend into heauen but yet wee shall not sit at the right hand of God The Questions of christs sitting at the right hand of the Father 1 What the right hand of God signifieth 2 What it is to sit at Gods right hand 3 Whether christ did alwaies sit at Gods right hand 4 What are the fruites of christs sitting at the right hand of the Father 1 WHAT THE RIGHT HAND OF GOD SIGNIFIETH THE right hande of God signifieth 1 The omnipotency or exceeding vertue of God Act. 5.31 Him hath God lift vp with his right hand to be a Prince and a Sauiour 2 It signifieth perfect glorie perfect dignitie and full diuine maiestie 2 What it is to sit at Gods right hand TO sitte at Gods right hande is to bee a person equall to God in power and glorie by whom the Father woorketh immediately They commonly define it to bee to raigne in equall power and glorie with the Father That is true indeede of Christ For he doth al thinges likewise as dooth the Father and is indued with the same power with the Father which also he exerciseth But the Sonne hath alwaies so raigned and the same agreeth also to the holy Ghost who yet is not said in the Scripture to sitte neither dooth sit at the right hand of the Father because the Father doth not gouern al thinges especially his church immediatly by the Holie Ghost but by the Sonne Wherefore this definition which is commonly receiued is not sufficient and perfect Some confound his sitting with his Ascension say it is all one But first it is absurd that in so short a confession should bee an idle speaking of the same thing twise 2 This phrase of speech is taken from the custome of kings who haue their assistants assessours 〈◊〉 whom they commit the power of gouernment So christ also is said to sit at the right hand of the Father because the Father will rule and gouerne by him immediatelie all things both in heauen and in earth 3 We also shall ascend neither yet shall we sit at the right hand of God the Father Heb. 1.13 For vnto which
the vnderstanding will and whence the vitall spirites flow So from Christ as the Head flowe downe into vs the giftes and graces of the Holy Ghost 3 Whether Christ did alwaies sit at the right hand of God THIS Question shoulde not bee needefull except mens curiositie had made it such To the explication thereof is required the distinction first of natures then of time Now as coÌ„cerning Christs Diuinitie 1 That alwaies sitteth at the right hand of the Father as sitting signifieth an equal power and honour which Christ hath euen the same with the Father For Christs diuine nature was from euerlasting equal with the Father in honor and power Likewise as To sit at the right hand of the Father signifieth to be the Head of the Church For by the Woorde the Father did from the beginning alwaies preserue the Church as also by him hee created all thinges In this sense Christ was placed by his eternal generation at the right hand of the Father 2 Christ according to his diuinitie also dooth so sitte at the right hand of the Father as he was ordained to this his office from euerlasting 3 He dooth alwaies sit according to his diuinity at the right hande of God in that hee begunne from the verie beginning of the world to execute hath executed this his office And christ according to his diuinity was in this respect after his asceÌ„sion into heauen placed at the fathers right hand in that his diuinity then began to shew it selfe glorious in the body which in the time of his humiliation had hid it selfe froÌ„ being openly manifested declared For in the time of his humiliatioÌ„ which was wheÌ„ christ liued on earth his God-head also had humbled it selfe not by making it selfe weaker but by hiding it selfe onely and not shewing it selfe abroad Therefore thus Christ also according to his diuine nature was placed at his Fathers right hand namelie by laieng downe that humility which he tooke on him for our sake and by shewing foorth that glorie which hee had with his Father before the foundations of the woorlde were laide but had hid the same in the time of his humiliation not by adding any thing vnto it which it had not before neither by making it more bright powerfull neither by manifesting and declaring it before God but vnto men and by vsing fully and freely his right and authoritie which right and authoritie Christes diuinitie had as it were laid downe in the taking vp and assumption of humane nature Therefore he saith Iohn 17.5 Now glorifie mee thou Father with thy owne selfe with the glorie which J had with thee before the world was This glorie he had not with men Therefore he praieth that as hee had it alwaies with the Father so he might manifest it vnto men Wherefore this is not to be taken as if the Word receiued any change or alteration of his God-head but in that sense only which hath been said Now as concerning christes humane nature according to it hee was then first placed at the right hand of the Father when he asceÌ„ded into heauen then he attained to his glorification when he receiued that which before he had not Obiection Hee that sitteth at Gods right hande is euerie where Christ sitteth at Gods right hand Therefore he is euery where Aunswere This reason wee graunt in respect of the communicating of the properties to the person But if it be further concluded that according to the flesh he is euerie where there wil be more in the conclusion than was in the premisses Againe wee denie the consequence of the whole reason because the right hand of God and to sit at the right hande of God is not all one Neither yet is it simply true that hee which sitteth at Gods right hand sitteth euerie where For a part of the sitting at gods right hand is also that visible glorie and maiesty wherewith Christes humane nature was endowed and wherewith Stephen beheld him endued in heauen This is not euerie where but only in that placc where his body is seated and remaineth Obiection Hee ascended into heauen to fill al thinges that is with the presence of his flesh Aunswere It is a fallacy in misconstring the word He ascended to fill all thinges that is with his giftes and graces not with his flesh bones and skinne These are the monsters and dotinges whereby the Diuell carrieth Gods glory into derision Reply That nature which hath receiued omnipotency is euerie where christes humanitie hath receiued omnipotency Therefore it is euerie where Answere That nature which hath receiued omnipotency by a reall transfusion and communication of the properties is euerie where but not that which hath receiued it by personall vnion onely as the humane nature of Christ But yet notwithstanding manie thinges haue beene bestowed by reall transfusion on Christes humanitie to wit other qualities than which hee had on the crosse and in his humiliation Likewise far more and greater giftes than those which are bestowed either on Angels or on men and in respect of those giftes bestowed on him Christ is placed according to his humane nature at the right hand of his father but according to his diuinitie he is placed at the right hand of the Father as he being glorified and taken vp into heauen hath shewed forth the same hath attained vnto the perfection of glory or to the highest degree of glorification as touching his humanity 4 What are the fruites of Christes sitting at the right hand of the Father THE fruites of Christes sitting at the Fathers right hand are all the benefites of the kingdome and Priest-hoode of christ glorified As 1. His intercession for vs. 2. The gathering gouerning and garding of his church by the Worde and spirit 3. His defending of the church against her enemies 4. The abiection and destruction of the churches enemies 5. The glorification of the church The fruites or benefites of the kingdome of christ glorified â—â—e that he ruleth vs by the ministery of the Word and the holy Ghost that hee preserueth his ministery that hee giueth his Church resting places and is forcible by doctrine in conuerting the chosen that hee will at length raise vp from the dead his chosen and elect abolish all their infirmities glorifie them wipe away all teares from them enthronize them in his throne and make them Priests and Kings vnto his Father The fruite of the Priesthoode of Christ glorified is that he appeareth presenteth himselfe and maketh request and intercession for vs in heauen that forcibly so that the father denieth vs nothing through the vertue and force of his intercession Hence ariseth that consolation and comfort Because our Head our flesh and our brother sitteth at the right hand of the father he shall at length glorifie and quicken vs and that both in respect of his brotherly loue as also in regard of his office who is our Head Because also we haue such a High-Priest which
death is The euerlasting death of the wicked and is so called not because the reprobate by once dyeng shall fulfill it but because they shall die perpetuallie and shall feele perpetuall tormentes 2 Who giueth euerlasting life Euerlasting life the worke of all three Persons GOD alone giueth eternall life the Father giueth it by the son the holy ghost Of the Father it is said Ioh. 5.21 As the Father raiseth vp the dead and quickneth them so the son quickneth whom he will In which place the same is affirmed of the son also as in like maner in these folowing Ioh. 14. In him was life Isai 9.6 The Father of eternitie Iohn 10.28 I giue vnto them eternall life that is not by merit onely but also by power and working Of the Holy Ghost likewise it is saide Iohn 3.5 Except a man bee borne of water and the spirit hee can not enter into the kingdome of God Rom. 8.11 Hee that raised vp Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortall bodies by his spirit dwelling in you And this testimonie is to bee obserued for the confirmation of the Godhead of both Obiection But the ministers also giue life according to that of Paul 1. Cor. 4.15 In Christ Iesus J haue begotten you through the Gospel Aunswere Christ and the holy Ghost giue life by their owne power the ministers are onely instruments by whom Christ worketh through thâ— vertue of his spirite Replie But Christ giueth life by a communicated power Therefore not by his proper power Answere He giueth it by a power communicated but communicated from euerlasting as he was begotten from euerlasting Ioh. 5.26 As the Father hath life in himselfe so likewise hath he giuen to the Sonne to haue life in himselfe 3 To whom euerlasting life is giuen EVerlasting life is giuen to all the Elect All the Elect they alone are partakers of euerlasting life and to them onely Joh. 10.28 I giue vnto them eternal life that is to my sheepe who are his elect and chosen Iohn 17.9 I pray for them I pray not for the world but for them which thou hast giuen me for they are thine and verse 12. Those that thou gauest me haue I kept and none of them is lost but the childe of perdition Againe faith and repentaunce are proper vnto the Elect only but these are part of eternal life Therefore eternal life belongeth to the Elect onely Rom. 11.7 The Elect haue obtained it and the rest haue beene hardened Wee must obserue in this place whereas the question is To whom euerlasting life is giuen that it is better to answere That eternal life is giuen to the Elect than to say it is giuen vnto the conuerted * As they are elected so theâ— are but chosen to eternall life as they are conuerted so they are in part admitted vnto it and begin to bâ— put in possession of it For conuersion and faith are the beginning of eternal life And to say Eternal life is giuen to the conuerted were all one as if you woulde say life is giuen to the liuing 4 For what cause euerlasting life is giuen THE impellent or motiue cause of euerlasting life giuen vnto vs is the alone free mercy of God For a good thing doth communicate it selfe and make others partakers of it and his loue towardes mankinde God of his â—ree mercy giueth vs for Christs sake euerlasting life that wee might praise and magnifie the same his mercy for euer And he will that euerlasting life bee giuen vs and himselfe giueth the same vnto vs for the alone intercession and merit of Christ imputed vnto vs by the comming and interposing whereof gods mercy is more illustrated and manifested than without it But no work of man either foreseene in vs or present is the cause of this eternall life whereunto notwithstanding wee are brought by many meanes Before the beginning of eternal life our woorkes merit eternall death after the beginning thereof all our woorkes are effectes thereof and nothing is cause of it selfe The final cause or end for which eternal life is giuen vs is that the mercy of God might be acknowledged and magnified of vs. Eph. 1.6 To the praise of the glorie of his grace wherewith hee hath made vs accepted in his beloued For the same cause God giueth vs eternall life for which hee chose vs. 5 When euerlasting life is giuen Euerlasting life is beguâ— here by conuersion IN this life is giuen the beginning of eternal life and that necessarily For vnto whom life euerlasting is not begunne to be giuen here that is who beginneth not here to feele a part of eternal life to wit faith and conuersion vnto him life euerlasting shal neuer be giuen after this life 2. Corinth 5.2 Therefore we sigh desiring to be clothed with our house which is from heauen Because that if we be clothed we shal not bee found naked It is consuÌ„mated in the worlde to come by glorification The consummation of euerlasting life is after this life for vnto whom euerlasting life is begunne to bee giuen here to them shal it be giuen finished compleate and consummated And of this consuÌ„mation ther are two degrees one when the soule is presently carried into heauen because by the death of the bodie we are freed from all infirmitie the other degree is greater higher and more glorious when in the resurrection of the bodies the soules shall againe be vnited to their bodies because after the resurrection we shal be made glorious and shall see God euen as hee is Iohn 5.24 He that heareth my word and beleeueth in him that sent mee hath euerlasting life and shall not come into condemnation but hath passed from death to life 1. Iohn 3.2 Nowe are wee the Sonnes of GOD but yet it dooth not appeare what wee shall bee and wee knowe that when hee shal appeare we shal bee like him for we shal see him as he is 6 How euerlasting life is giuen vnto vs. EVerlasting life is giuen vnto vs by the holy Ghost God giueth vâ— euerlasting â—iâ—â— by the outwâ— ministerie 〈◊〉 thâ—â—warde miâ— of the spirit and the holy Ghost giueth it vs in this life by the ministerie of the word by the worde he worketh in vs the knowledge of God and his wil This knowledge hath following it a study and desire more and more to know God and to liue according to the prescript of his will It is giuen heere vnto infants so that they haue an inclination to repentaunce and faith But the consummation and accomplishment of euerlasting life shal be giuen vs after this life immediately Now that it is heere giuen vs mediately by the woorde is prooued by plaine testimonies of Scripture John 6.68 Whither shall wee goe say the Disciples Thou hast the words of life 1. Corint 4.15 Jn Christ Jesus J haue begotten you through the gospel Rom. 116. The gospell is the power of
by necessity excluded from it But such a communion of saints with Christ is spirituall as the Apostle doth shew 1. Cor. 6.17 Hee that is ioined vnto the Lorde is one spirit 1. Ioh. 4.13 Hereby know we that we dwel in him and he in vs because he hath giuen vs of his spirit Iohn 15.5 He is the vine we are the branches Ephes 1.22 4.15 5.30.31 He is the Bridegroome and we with the whole Church are his spouse 2 Such is our eating of Christ as is his abiding in vs but this is spirituall For that Christs abiding in vs is spirituall is sufficientlie perceiued by this in that such is his abiding in vs as is his Fathers Jf anie man loue me he will keepe my woord and my Father will loue him and we will come vnto him and will dwell with him But how doth the Father dwell in vs or abide with vs Truely by his spirite Therefore Christ also so abideth with vs or dwelleth in vs. 3 Christ abideth in vs perpetually Therefore that abiding or presence is not corporall because as touching his humane nature he saith Me yee shall not haue alwaies Therefore hee is not eaten of vs corporallie nay hee cannot be eaten of vs corporallie except he be in vs corporally and that also perpetuallie 3 Vnto the former mâ—y be adioined also argumentes taken from the sacrifice and adoration Wheresoeuer Christ is present corporallie whether it be after a visible or inuisible manner there he is to be adored to wit by our mindes and the motions of our bodies coÌ„uerted turned thither But he is not to be adored in the supper Therefore he is not present in the supper corporally That he is not to be adored in the supper is easilie proued For it is neuer granted in the new testament to tie bind inuocation to anie certain place Ioh. 4.21 The houre commeth when yee shal neither in this mountain nor at Ierusalem worship the father Againe Jf christ be so be adored worshipped in the supper by our mindes and motions of bodie conuerted vnto the bread that whole oblation sacrifice should consist in the hands of sacrificing masse-Priests because they offer the Son vnto the Father to obtain remission of sins and so were his crucifieng to be reiterated The third sort of argumentes which are drawen from like places of scripture where namelie the same thing is deliuered in words whereof there is no controuersie 1 COrporall eating is in expresse termes condemned by the holie Ghost Jt is the spirite saith Christ that quickeneth the flesh profiteth nothing By these woordes Christ expressely condemneth the corporal eating of his flesh whether visible or inuisible 2 The bread which we break saith the Apostle is the coÌ„munion of the body of christ But this coÌ„munioÌ„ is spiritual because when the same Apostle opposeth it to the communion of diuels ye caÌ„not saith he drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of diuels yee cannot be partakers of the lords table and of the table of Diuels by these words the Apostle denieth that the wicked can be partakers of the bodie and blood of christ in the supper And therefore there is no corporall eating of the body and bloude of christ in his supper 3 Christ saith that the bread is his bodie Therefore they tie not themselues to the verie woorde who say that christs body is in the bread vnder the bread with the bread 4 The cup is the new testament that is the cup is a signe of the new testament for it cannot bee otherwise meant or taken For the new testament is the seale of the promise or the promise it self but not the thing promised Likewise The cup is the communion of the bloud of christ The bread is the communion of the body of christ But this communion is a spirituall eating and drinking of the body and bloud of christ as is apparaunt by the wordes of the Apostle and the signes of that spiritual eating and drinking are bread and wine 5 In the Euangelist To eat christ which is the liuing bread which descended from heauen Likewise To eat Christs flesh and to drinke his bloud signifieth to beleeue in Christ Therefore in the words of the institutioÌ„ it signifieth the same also because christ doth not here otherwise expound them 6 There are also the like places of scripture vttered sacramentally of other sacramentes which confirme also the truth and meaning of this as Circumcision is the couenant The lamb is the Passeouer The leuitical sacrifices are said to be an expiation or doing away of sinne The bloud of sacrifices is called the bloud of the couenant Baptisme is the washing of the new birth Therefore these woords also This is my bodie are in like sort sacramentally spoken 7 Christ commaundeth his supper to bee celebrated and the bread wine to be eaten drunken in remembrance of him but this remeÌ„brance is chiefly performed by faith not corporally Moreouer that in memorial wherof we doe any thing is not it selfe present because we are not said to remember things that are present 8 By one spirite are we al baptized into one bodie whether we be Iewes or Grecians whether we be bond or free and haue been al made to drinke into one spirite Wherefore after the same maner doe we al eate the same bread Which Paul also manifestly sheweth affirming That al the Fathers did eate the same spirituall foode That eating therefore is not corporall whereby we are made partakers of the body and bloud of christ otherwise before the comming of christ the fathers should not haue beene at al made partakers of christ as hauing not as yet taken flesh Vnto these argumentes drawen out of the sacred Scripture and the ground of our faith may be added testimonies of the fathers and the purer church of al which we will at this present bring only that one notable saying of Macharius the Monke Bread and wine are a correspondent type of his flesh and they who receiue the bread which is shewed eate the flesh of Christ spirituallie AGAINST THE TRANSVBSTANTIATION OF THE PAPISTES NOW it is easy to see what we are to thinke of Transubstantiation euen that it is an impious inuention deuise of the Papists which also we wil shew and proue briefly by diuers reasons 1 Paul calleth expressely that which is taken bread both before after the eating Therefore that which is taken in the supper is not really the body 2 Christ brake bread but hee did not then breake his body Therefore the bread is not really his body 3 The Bread was not giuen for vs But the body of christ was giuen for vs Therefore the bread is not really Christs body 4 Christ willeth vs to take this sacrament and to take bread and wine in remembraunce of him Therefore the bread is called the body of Christ not reallie but in that it is a memorial of his body that is the bread is a remembrauncer
gospel 5 There is then in the Lords supper a double meat and drink one externall visible terrene namely bread and wine and another internall There is also a double eating and receiuing an external and signifieng which is the corporall receiuing of the bread and wine that is which is perfourmed by the handes mouth and senses of the bodie and an internal inuisible and signified which is the fruition of Christes death and a spirituall engraffing into Christes bodie that is which is not perfourmed by the handes and mouth of the bodie but by the spirite and faith Lastly there is a double administer and dispenser of this meat and drinke an externall of the externall which is the minister of the church deliuering vs by his hand bread and wine and an internal of the internal meate which is Christ himselfe feeding vs by his body and bloud 6 Not the body and bloud of Christ but the bread and wine are the signes which serue for confirmation of our faith for the bodie and bloud of Christ are receiued that we may liue for euer But the bread and wine are receiued that wee maie bee confirmed and assured of that heauenlie foode and dailie more and more enioie it 7 Neither is the bread changed into the bodie of Christ nor the wine into the bloud of Christ neither doth the bodie and bloud of Christ succeed in their place they beeing abolished neither is Christs body substantially present in the bread or vnder the bread or where the bread is but in the right vse of the Lords supper the holy Ghost vseth this Symbole as an instrument to stirre vp faith in vs by which he more and more dwelleth in vs engraffeth vs into Christ and maketh vs thorough him to bee iust and righteous and to draw eternal life from him 8 Now when Christ saith This that is this bread is my body and This cup is my bloud the speech is sacramental or metonymical because the name of the thing signified is attributed to the sign it selfe that is it is meant that the bread is the sacrament or signe of his bodie and doth represent him and dooth testifie that Christes bodie is offered for vs on the crosse and is giuen vnto vs to be the foode of eternal life and therefore is the instrument of the holie Ghost to maintaine and encrease this food in vs as Saint Paul saith 1. Corinth 10. The bread is the communion of the bodie of Christ that is it is that thing by which wee are made partakers of christs bodie And elsewhere hee saith We haue been al made to drink into one spirit The same is the meaning also when it is said that the bread is called christes bodie for a similitude which the thing signified hath with the signe namely in that christes body nourisheth the spirituall life as breade dooth the corporall life and for that assured and certaine ioint receiuing of the thing and the signe in the right vse of the sacrament And this is the sacramental vnion of the bread which is shewed by a sacramental kinde of speaking but no such locall coniunction which is by some imagined 9 As therefore the body of christ signifieth both his proper and natural bodie and his sacramental bodie which is the bread of the Eucharist so the eating of Christes body is of two sorts one sacramental of the signe to wit the externall and corporall receiuing of the bread and wine the other reall or spirituall which is the receiuing of christs very body it selfe And to belâ—eue in christ dwelling in vs by faith is by the vertue operatioÌ„ of the holy ghost to be engraffed into his bodie as members to the head branches into the vine and so to bee made partakers of the frutie of the deâ—th and life of christ Whence it is apparant that they are falsly accused who thus teach as if they made either the bare signes onely to be in the Lords Supper or a partâ—cipation of christes death onelie or of his benefits or of the holy Ghost excluding the true reall spirituall communion of the very body of Christ it selfe 10 Now the right vse of the Supper is when the faithfull obserue this rite instituted by Christ in remembraunce of Christ that is to the stirring and raising vp of their faith and thankefulnesse 11 As in this right vse the bodie of Christ is sacramentallie eaten so also without this vse as by vnbeleeuers and hypocrites it is eaten sacramentally indeede but not reallie that is the sacramental Symboles or signes bread and wine are receiued but not the thinges themselues of the sacrament to wit the bodie and bloud of Christ 12 This doctrine of the supper of the Lord is grounded vpon verie manie and those most sound and firme reasons All those places of Scripture confirme it which speake of the Lords supper and Christ calling not anie inuisible thing in the bread but the verie visible and broken bread it selfe his bodie deliuered or broken for vs which whereas it cannot bee meant properlie himselfe addeth an exposition that that bread is truely receiued in remembraunce of him which is as if he had said That the bread is a sacrament of his bodie So likewise he saith the supper is the new testament which is spirituall one and euerlasting And Paul saith it is the communion of the bodie and bloud of Christ because al the faithful are one bodie in christ who cannot stand together with the communion of Diuels Likewise he maketh one and the same engraffing into christes bodie by one spirit to bee both in Baptisme and in the Lords Supper Moreouer the whole doctrine and nature of sacramentes confirme the same all which represent vnto the eies the same spirituall communion of christ to bee receiued by faith which the word or promise of the Gospel declareth vnto the eares Therefore they are called by the names of the thinges signified and in their right vse haue the receiuing of the thinges adioined vnto them The Articles also of our faith confirme it which teach that christs bodie is a true humane bodie not present at once in manie places as being now receiued into heauen and there to remain vntil the Lorde returne to iudgement and further that the communion of Saintes with christ is wrought by the holie Ghost not by anie entraunce of christs bodie into the bodies of men Wherefore this sentence and doctrine is of all the purer antiquitie of the church with most great and manifest consent held and professed 13 The Supper of the Lord differeth from Baptisme 1. Jn the Rite and manner of signifieng because the dipping into the water or washing signifieth a remission and purging out of sinne by the bloud and spirit of Christ and our societie fellowship with christ in his afflictions and glorification But the distributing of the bread and wine signifieth the death of Christ to bee imputed to vs vnto remission of sinnes and our selues engraffed into Christ
to become his members 2. They differ in their speciall vse because Baptisme is the testimonie of our regeneration and of the couenant made betweene vs and God and of our receiuing into the Church But the Lords supper testifieth that wee are euer to bee nourished by Christ remaining in vs and that the couenant made betweene God and vs shall euer be established and ratified vnto vs and that we for euer shall abide in the church and bodie of Christ 3. They differ in the persons to whom they are to be giuen Baptisme is giuen to all those who are to bee accounted for members of the church whether they be of yeares and vnderstanding or infants The Lords Supper is to bee giuen to them onely who are able to vnderstand and celebrate the benefits of christ and to examine themselues 4. They differ in the often celebrating of them Baptisme is to bee receiued but onc◠onely because the couenant of God being once made is alwaies firme and of force to the penitent But the Supper is often to bee receiued because an often renewing and recalling of that couenant to our remembrance is necessarie for our faith 5. They differ in the order which is to bee obserued in vse of them Because Baptisme is to bee giuen before the Supper and the supper may not be giuen vnto any except hee be first baptised 14 They come worthily to the Lords Supper who examin themselues that is are endewed with true faith and repentance They who finde not this in themselues ought neither to come without it least they eate and drink their owne iudgement nor to differ repentance wherewith they should come least they draw vpon themselues hardnes of hart and eternal pains 15 The church ought to admit all those vnto it who professe themselues to embrace the ground and foundation of christian doctrine and to haue a purpose to obey it but those must bee repelled who wil not desist either from their errors and blasphemies or from manifest sinnes against their conscience beeing admonished by the church and conuicted of error 16 The Pope hath corruptlie taken awaie the breaking of the bread from the rite of the supper and bereaued the people of the vse of the cup Corruptly also hath hee deformed the supper of the Lord with adding so manie ceremonies not deliuered by the Apostles into a theatricall or pageant-like Masse that is into a Iewish superstitiō stagelike rounds conueiances But more wicked idolatrous inuentions are these That the Masse is a propitiatory sacrifice wherein christ is offered by the Masse-priests for the quick and dead and is by the force of consecration substantiallie present and abideth so long as those formes of bread and wine remaine vncorrupted and further dooth bestow the grace of God and other benefits vpon them for whom he is offered of whom also he is eaten with the mouth of their body yea though they haue no good inward motion in them and lastly is being treasured and laid vp and carried about vnder those formes to be worshipped Jn respect of these foule monsters it is necessary that the Masse be quite and cleane abolished out of the christian church In summe they are these 1. Transubstantiation 2. Bread-worship 3. Sacrifice 4. Maiming of Christes Supper THE APPENDIX OR ADDITION ADIOINING VNTO THE FORMER TREAtise of the Supper Certaine principal arguments of the Consubstantiaries against the syncere doctrine of the Lordes Supper the Sacramentaries as they cal them together with a refutation of them 1 THE errours of the Sacramentaries say they are that there are but bare signes and Symboles onelie in the supper Answere We teach that the things signified are together with the signes in the right vse exhited and communicated albeit not corporally but in such sort as is agreeable vnto sacramentes 2. The Sacramentaries saie That christ is present onlie according to his power and efficacie Aunswere Wee teach that he is present and vnited with vs by the holy Ghost albeit his bodie bee farre absent from vs like as whole Christ also is present with his ministerie though diuerslie according to the one nature 3. The Sacramentaries say they affirme that an imaginarie figuratiue or spiritual bodie of christ is present not his essentiall bodie Answere Wee neuer spoke of an imaginarie bodie but of the true flesh of Christ which is present with vs although it remaine in heauen Moreouer wee say that wee receiue the bread and the body but both after a maner proper to ech 4. The Sacramentaries saie they affirme that the true bodie of Christ which hung on the crosse and his verie bloud which was shed for vs is distributed but is spirituallie receiued of those onelie who are worthy receiuers as for the vnworthy they receiue nothing besides the bare signes vnto their condemnation Aunswere Al this wee graunt as beeing agreeable vnto the woorde of God the nature of sacraments the analogy of faith the communion of the faithful Certaine arguments of the Consubstantiaries whereby they goe about to ouerthrow our doctrine of the Lords Supper together with the refutations of them 1 THE words of the institution are open and plain This my bodie this is my bloud Answere They alleadge these woordes against them-selues For they saie That the bodie of Christ is receiued reallie in vnder with the bread when christ saith that the very bread is his body Wherefore they doe a double iniury vnto the church first while they thrust vpon the church their owne words for Christs Secondly while they imagine that the church perceiueth not these speeches to be diuerse In the bread is my body and The bread is my bodie They accuse Christ also for a lier for they deny that the bread is his body but that his body is in the bread Let them looke therefore vnto it how they wil aunswere Christ at the last iudgement for this blasphemy and reproch The Papistes also doe more retaine the very words of Christ But these retaine not the woord but follow the sense and meaning We must see therfore which part followeth it Ours shal be prooued in the end Replie Christ addeth an exposition of his minde Which is giuen for you and Which is shed for you Answere First this is a begging of that which is in question For they take as graunted that the bread is properly called the bodie which yet lieth vpon them to prooue For it is a sacramental maner of speaking Secondly we returne their own reason vpon them by inuerting it thus The bodie of Christ properly so called was giuē for vs. But the bread was not giuē for vs Therfore the bread is not the body properly so called Likewise as the bread is the body broken so the breaking of the bread is the breaking of the bodie But the breaking of the bodie is the crucifieng thereof Therefore the breade broken is but sacramentally and by representation the bodie broken 2 They reason from the autor who said
1. Cor. 15.33 forbiddeth 110 What doth God forbid in the eight commaundement Not onely those f 1. Cor. 6 10. thefts g 1. Cor. 5.10 robberies which the magistrate punisheth but by the name of theft he comprehendeth whatsoeuer euil craftes fetches and deuises whereby we seek after other mens goods endeuour by force or with some shewe of right to h Luc. 3.14 1. Thes 4 6. conueie them ouer vnto our selues of which sort are false i Prou. 11.1 16.11 weightes false els vneuen k Ezech. 45.9 c. Deu. 25.13 c. measures deceitfull merchandise couÌ„terfet coine l Psal 15.5 Luc. 6.35 vsurie or any other way or meanes of furthering our estate which God hath forbidden To these we may adde all m 1. Cor. 6.10 couetousnesse and the manifolde waste and n Prou. 5.16 abusing of Gods gifts 111 What are those thinges which God here commaundeth That to my power I help and further the commodities and profit of my neighbour and that I so deale with him as I would o Mat. 7.12 desire to be dealt with my selfe and that I doe my owne woorke painefully faithfully that I p Eph. 4.28 may thereby help others also who are distressed with any neede or calamitie 112 What doth the ninth commandement exact That I beare no false q Prou. 19.5 â— 21.28 witnesse against any man neither r Psal 15.3 falsifie any mans wordes neither backbite or Å¿ Rom. 1.29.30 reproch any man nor t Mat. 7.1 c. Luc. 6.37 condemne any man rashly or vnheard but auoid and u Joh. 8.44 shun with all carefulnesse all kind of lies and deceipts as the a Prou. 12.22 13.5 proper works of the Diuel except I mean to stir vp against mee the most grieuous wrath of god And that in iudgements and other affaires I follow the truth and freely and constantly b 1. Cor. 13.6 Eph. 4.25 professe the matter as it indeede is And moreouer defend and c 1. Pet. 4.8 encrease as much as in me lieth the good name and estimation of others 113 What doth the tenth commandement forbid That our hearts be not at any time moued by the least desire or cogitation against any commaundement of God but that continually and from our heart we detest all sinne and contrarily d Rom. 7.7 c. delight in all righteousnesse 114 But can they who are conuerted vnto God perfectly obserue and keepe these commaundementes No But euen the holiest men as long as they liue haue onely smale beginnings of this e 1.10.1.8 c. Rom. 7.14.15 Eccle. 7.22 obedience yet so that they f Rom. 7.22 Jac. 2.10 begin with an earnest and vnfained desire and endeuour to liue not according to some onely but according to all the commaundements of God 115 Why will God then haue his law to bee so exactly seuerely preached seeing there is no man in this life who is able to keepe it First that al our life-time wee more and more g Joh. 1.9 Psal 22.5 acknowledge the great pronenes of our nature to sin and so much the more greedily h Rom. 7.24 desire remission of sinnes and righteousnesse in Christ Secondly i 1. Cor. 9.24 c. Phi. 3.12.13.14 that wee be doing of this alwaies and alwaies thinking of that and implore and craue of the father the grace of his holy spirit whereby wee may daily more and more bee renewed to the image and likenesse of God vntill at length after wee are departed out of this life wee may ioyfully attaine vnto the perfection which is proposed vnto vs. OF PRAIER 116 Wherefore is praier necessarie for Christians Because it is the cheife part of that a Psal 50.14.15 thankfulnesse which God requireth of vs. And also because God giueth them onely his grace and holy spirit who with vnfained groninges begge them continually of him and b Mat. 7.7.8 Luc. 11.9.13 Mat. 13.12 Psal 50.15 yeelde him thankes for them 117 What is required vnto that praier which shal please God be hearde of him That we aske of the onely true God who hath c Joh. 4.22 c. manifested himselfe in his woorde all thinges which he hath commaunded to be d Rom. 8.26 1. Ioh. 5.14 asked of him with a true affection and desire of our heart and through an inwarde e Ioh. 4.23.24 Psal 145.18 feeling of our neede and miserie f 2. Par. 20.12 cast our selues downe prostrate in the presence of his diuine maiestie and g Psal 2.11 34.19 Is 66.2 builde our selues on this sure foundation that wee though vnworthily yet for Christes sake are certainely h Rom. 10.14 8.15.16 Iac. 1.6 c. heard of god euen as hee hath i Io. 14.13 15.16 16.23 Dan. 9.17.18 Mat. 7.8 Psal 143.1 promised vs in his worde 118 What are those thinges which hee commaundeth vs to aske of him All things k Iac. 1.17 Mat. 6.33 necessary both for soule and body which our Lorde Iesus Christ hath comprised in that prayer which himselfe hath taught vs. 119 What praier is that OVr l Mat. 6.9.10 c. Luc. 11.2 c. Mat. 7.9.10.11 Luc. 11.12.13 Father which art in heauen hallowed be thy name thy kingdome come thy will bee done in earth as it is in heauen Giue vs this day our daily bread And forgiue vs our trespasses as wee forgiue them that trespasse against vs And leade vs not into temptation but deliuer vs from euil For thine is the kingdome the power and glorie for euer and euer AMEN 120 Why doth Christ teach vs to cal God our father That presently in the verie entraunce and beginning of the praier he might stir vp in vs such a reuerence and confidence in god as is meete for the sonnes of god which must bee the ground foundatioÌ„ of our praier to wit that god through Christ is made our father and will much lesse denie vnto vs those thinges which wee aske of him with a true faith than our earthly Parents a Mat. 7.9.10.11 Luc. 11.11 denie vnto vs earthly things 121 Why is that adâ—ed which art in heauen That we b Ier. 23.24 Act. 17.24.25.27 conceiue not basely or teâ—â—enely of gods heauenly maiestie And also that we c Rom. 10.12 looke for and expect from his omnipotencie whatsoeuer things are necessarie for our soule and bodie 122 What is the first petition Hallowed bee thy name that is graunt vs first to d Ioa. 17.3 Jer. 9.23.24 31.33.34 Mat. 16.17 Iac. 1.5 Psal 119.105 know thee aright to worship praise e Psal 119.137.138 Luc. 1.46 c. 68. c. Psal 145.8.9.17 Exod. 34.6.7 Psal 143.1.2.5.10.11.12 Ier. 31.3 32.18.19.40.41 33.11 20. Mat. 19.17 Rom. 3.3.4 11.22.23 2. Tim. 2.19 magnifie thy almightines goodnesse iustice mercie and truth shining in al thy works
inuocation of God who is the father of our Lord Iesus Christ 2. In regard of the tru knowledge of him that we may know him to be our father who through and for his Son the Mediatour hath adopted vs to be his Sons when otherwise we were his enemies I goe vnto my father and to your father and further also for his Sons sake he regenerateth vs by the holy Ghost and endoweth vs with all giftes and graces necessary 3. In regard of reuerence namely that in vs may bee stirred vp and raised true reuerence towardes him that seeing hee is our father wee therefore behaue our selues as becommeth Sons and be affected with such reuerence towards him as it becommeth children to be affected towards their father especially being adopted children and vnworthy of Gods blessinges and benefites 4. In regard of confidence that the same be raised in vs whereby we may be assured that we shal be heard For seeing god is our father euen so louing a father vnto vs that he hath giuen his onlie begotten Son for vs to death how then shal he not giue vs together with him all things necessary to our saluation 5. For a memorial of our creation Now God wil hear those only that so pray because in them he obtaineth the end of his blessings and benefites Obiection Jt is the part of a father to denie nothing vnto his children But God denieth many things to vs. Therefore he is not our father Aunswere It is the part of a father to deny nothing vnto his children that is which is necessary for them Christ willeth vs to call God our Father not my Father 1 Thereby to raise in vs a confidence and full perswasion that wee shall he heard For because the whole church doth with one consent pray vnto him he doth not reiect her but heareth her praiers according to this promise of our Lorde Where two or three are gathered together in my name there am I in the middest of them Obiection But oftentimes thou praiest at home the Church not beeing priuie thereunto Aunswere The Godly and the whole Church pray for themselues and all the members with an affection and desire Loue desire is an habitual qualitie of the soul remaining also when thou sleepest it is not a passion quickly fleeting or passing a way And this also maketh much for the engēdring of cōfidence in vs because as hath been saide God doth not reiect the whole Church 2 To admonish vs of mutual loue wherewith Christians being endued must pray one for another And therefore doth he by this worde in the very proeme entrance of the praier admonish vs of mutual loue wherwith we must be affected towards our neighbor 1 Because there is no true praying without the true loue of our neighbor neither can we be perswaded that God heareth vs. For if wee approch vnto God not accounting the sonnes of God for our breethren neither will hee then account vs for his sonnes 2 Because without the loue of our neighbour there is no true faith without faith there is no true praier For whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne The second part of the proeme is Which art in Heauen that is Heauenly Heauen heere signifieth the habitation of God and the holy Angels and blessed men And God is saide to dwell there because there God is more glorious than in this world doth also there immediatly shew and manifest himselfe Now the Lorde willeth vs to call him our Father which is in Heauen 1 Thereby to shewe the opposition and contrarietie of earthlie fathers and this Father that so we should thinke that God raigneth in Heauenly glory and Maiesty and is a Father not earthly but Heauenly euen he 1 Who sitteth in heauen 2 Who ruleth and gouerneth there by his prouidence the whole world by him created 3 Who is voide of all corruption and change 4 Who also doth there especiallie manifest himselfe before the Angels and doeth there shewe what a Father he is how good and how mightie and rich 2 To raise vp in vs a confidence that God heareth vs for if he be our Father and one that is endued with exceeding goodnesse which he especially manifesteth and declareth in Heauen Then will he also giue vs all thinges necessarie to saluation If this our Father be Lord in Heauen and so omnipotent whereby he is able to helpe vs then is hee able most easilie to giue vs those good things which we aske of him 3 To raise a reuerence of him in vs seeing this our father is so great a Lorde that is heauenly who raigneth euerie-where who is able to cast both bodie and soule into Hell fire let vs then reuerence such a Lorde and approch vnto him with exceeding submission both of minde and bodie 4 That we cal on him in feruencie of spirit 5 That the mind of him that worshippeth be lifted vp to heauenlie things 6 That heauenlie thinges bee desired 7 That the errour of Ethnikes might be met withall who thinke that they may adore and worship God in creatures 8 To admonish vs that wee are not to direct our praiers vnto a certaine place as in the olde Testament Let these things suffice for the first part of Christs praier Now followeth the second part of the praier namely the petition which compriseth six petitions THE FIRST PETITION HALLOWED be thy name This petition is set in the first place because it is the end and scope of all the other petitions or rather because the end of all thinges must be gods glorie Now the end is the first thing which is intended the last thing which is performed and exequuted like as also the end of the other petitions is first to be desired if we will desire the rest aright Mat 6.33 Seeke yee first the kingdome of God and his righteousnesse and all these thinges shall be ministred vnto you We are here to consider 1 What is called the name of God 2 What is Holie 3 What to hallowe or sanctifie 1 The name of God signifieth 1 God himselfe Ps 116.13 J will call vpon the name of the Lorde 2 Gods commandement charge his diuine will and authoritie Mat. 28.19 Baptise them in the name of the Father c. 3 The properties and woorkes of God in which signification the name of God is here taken to wit for his diuine woorkes and all those thinges which may be attributed vnto God 2 Holie signifieth 1 All the properties of God For al the vertues in God are Gods holinesse So the Angels call god Holie Isa 6 3. Holie Holie Holie Lord God of hosts 2 That holinesse which is in creatures that is their conformitie with God which is begunne in the godly and is perfect in the Angels 3 The ordeining or appointing of thinges to holie vses In this sense that is called holy which is destined to some holy vse as the Temple of Hierusalem The word of Hallowing is here taken in
his glory and our saluation We in the meane season must doe our duetie and leaue the euents to God Euerie one hath a double vocation and calling The one is common which compriseth those vertues that are common to all Christians The other is particular which belongeth to euerie ones proper calling Wee aske for both callings and vocations in this petition namely that euerie one as was a little before saide may abide in their proper and common calling committed vnto them and doe their duetie Obiection But the former petition doth desire also that we maie rightlie perfourme our duetie Therefore this petition is superfluous Aunswere In the former wee desire that God will beginne his kingdome in vs by ruling vs by his spirit who regenerateth our will that so hence forward we rightly perfourming our duety may yeeld all obedience to our King as becommeth the subiects of that kingdome But in this petition wee desire that in perfourming rightly and faithfullie our duetie we may execute the vvil of god 2 Wherefore we desire that gods will be done THIS petition is necessarie 1. That the kingdome of god maie come vvhereof vvee spake in the second petition For except god himselfe bring to passe that euerie one in his calling duetie doe diligently his vvill this kingdome cannot be setled florish and be preserued 2. That we maie be in this kingdome For except vve doe the vvill of god vve cannot be citizens of his kingdome And vve are not able of our selues by reason of the corruption of our nature to doe his vvill Therefore vvee must desire of him that vvee may doe it 3 Of whom Gods will is done in Heauen IN Heauen the will of God is doone 1. Of the sonne him selfe who doth all the will of his Father 2. Of the Angels and blessed men Of the Angels the will of God is so done in Heauen as that euerie Angel standeth in the presence of God being readie to doe whatsoeuer God commaundeth They doe both his generall and his speciall will none seaseth vpon that which belongeth to another none is ashamed to serue although we anoy them with the noysome sauour of our sinnes and offend God They are ministring spirites Hebr. 1.14 Nowe Christ addeth heere as in Heauen 1. To prescribe and draw vs a patterne and example of perfection whereunto we must striue 2. That by this desire of perfection we maie be assured that God will giue vs here the beginning and the perfection in the life come Obiection That which is alwaies done shall certainlie come to passe though we desire it not the same is not to be desired The will of God is doone alwaies and shall certainly be doone though we desire it not Therefore it is not to be desired Aunsvvere The Minor of this reason vve denie For it is false 1. As concerning the calling and vocation of euerie man because they that desire not that they may be able in their vocation to doe their duety rightly faithfully and happily the same shal neuer doe it 2. It is false also as concerning gods decrees because god hath decreed many euents but yet so as that hee hath also decreed the meanes of comming thereunto There is also a fallacy in the Maior proposition putting that for a cause which is no cause because we do not therefore desire that gods wil be done as if it should not bee done if we should not desire it but we desire it for other causes namely that all euents may be good and prosperous vnto vs. For euēts shal not be good vnto vs neither tending to our safetie except vve submit them to the vvill of god so that vvee desire that only to be done vvhich he hath decreed vvill haue done Reply The decrees of god are vnchangeable Aunsvver The Decrees of god not only as touching the euents or ends but also as touching the meanes are vnchangeable Hee hath decreed to giue the ende but by the meane vvhich is of this condition that vvee desire it and pray for it Obiection God wil haue our Parentes to die Therefore wee must desire that they maie die Answere I deny the consequent of this reason for vve must subiect our selues to the vvill of god and desire that vvhich hee commaundeth vs to desire So neither doth this follovv The church shall bee subiect vnto the crosse Therefore J wil praie for affliction Neither yet hereof may it be concluded that our vvil disagreeth from gods will because thou desirest vvith that end whereby thou must desire her deliuerie God vvill haue our parents to dy yet vvil he not haue vs to vvish their death god wil haue his church to be vnder the crosse yet he wil not haue vs to desire her crosse but to pray for her deliuery patiētly to beare it if it afflict her In like maner God wil not in this life giue vs perfect deliuerance frō sin yet wil he haue vs to vvish it euery momēt to desire that we may be wholy deliuered frō sin Wherefore some things are to be desired which God wil not doe some things which hee wil doe are not to be desired but patiētly to be suffered But neuerthelesse it belongeth nothing at al vnto vs to search what thinges God hath decreed seeing we haue this prescribed vs for a rule that wee aske desire but with a condition of gods wil. Obiection Vnpossible thinges are not to bee desired for hee that desireth thinges vnpossible desireth in vaine But to desire that Gods wil be done in earth as it is in heauē or that we maie do our duetie like as do the Angels in heauen is to desire a thing vnpossible yea it is to desire that which is contrarie to Gods decree Therefore that is not to be desired seeing God will haue this to be our state in the life to come not in this life Aunswere 1. The Maior is to be distinguished Vnpossible thinges are not to be desired except God will at length graunt them to those that desire them but God will giue the performance of his will to those that desire it and that in this life as concerning the beginning thereof in the life to come as concerning the consummation ful accomplishment Wherfore this consummation is to be desired and the impossibilitie is patiently to bee suffered in this life And the consummation is therefore to bee desired in this life that wee may at length obtaine it because he that dooth not nowe desire it shal doubtles at no time obtaine it It is one thing not to be able to attaine vnto this consummation and another thing not to desire it 2. We denie the Minor wherin is a fallacie putting that for a cause which is no cause For neither doe wee desire that in this life the consummation or perfection of our obedience towards God may bee accomplished but that heere may bee wrought the beginning and continuaunce and encrease thereof and after this
nothing For creation properly so called is a production of a thing out of nothing 2 Obiection Of nothing is made nothing Aunswere This principle and rule is true as concerning that order which was appointed by God in nature now created Further by such an agent as is created it selfe nothing is made of nothing but that which is impossible to a creature is possible to God the creator And it appertaineth to our comfort that God hath created all things of nothing For if he hath created all thinges of nothing he is able also to preserue vs and to hinder the attempts of the wicked yea to bring them to nothing 5 God created the world at a certaine and definite time 5 The world created at a certaine time and euen in the beginning of times not from euerlasting For first all thinges were created of nothing and therefore haue a beginning Secondly it is to bee knowen out of the sacred storie how long the world hath lasted For according to the veritie of the scripture by Luthers account they are from the creation of the world to the Natiuitie of Christ yeares 3960. and so to our time namely to the yeare of Christ 1579. there shall be yeares 5539. According to Melancthons supputation the yeares from the beginning of the world are 5541. For from the beginning of the world vnto Christ he numbreth 3962. yeares According to their supputation of Geneua from the creation of the world vnto Christ are 3942. yeares and sixe moneths There shall bee then to the yeare of Christ 1579. from the Creation of the world 5521. years and sixe moneths According to the supputation of Beroaldus from the creation of the worlde vnto Christ are 3928. yeares and so then shall bee to the yeare of Christ 1579. from the creation of the world 5507. yeares These supputations accorde verie well one with another as concerning the graunde number though in the lesser number some yeares are either wanting or abounding By these foure supputations then of the most learned of our time compared together this at the least shal be apparent that God created not the world before these 5541. yeares past and therefore it was not from euerlasting 6 The world created in a certain time 6 God created not the world in one moment but in the space of sixe daies In the seuenth day god ended all his works Obiect He that liueth for euer saith the sonne of Sirach Eccle. 18.1 made all thinges together Therefore hee made all in one moment Ans He speaketh not of a momēt of time but of the whole number of things as if he should say whatsoeuer are they are all from god by creation But the causes why god created not al in one moment are these 1. Because he would haue the creation of the matter it selfe distinct and manifest from the forming and fashioning of the bodies of the woorlde which consist of it 2. Because hee woulde shewe his power and libertie in producing and bringing forth whatsoeuer effects he could that without naturall causes while hee yeeldeth light to the woorld maketh the earth fruiteful bringeth plants out of it euen before the Sun Moon were made 3. He would this way shew his goodnes and prouidence whereby hee cherisheth his creatures and prouideth for them not yet borne bringing beasts into the earth full of plants and food and men into the world most stored and fraught with al thinges apperteining to the necessitie and delight of life 4. He would by that order and course of creation hold vs not in an idle but diligent consideration of his works which also by the consecration of a sabbaoth he hath consecrated to all mankinde 7 All things of the world created good 7 God created all thinges most wisely verie good that is euerie thing in their kind and degree perfect Gen 1.31 All thinges were verie good Wherefore god was not the cause of sin or deformity but sin came into the world by man Obiect Death is euil Likewise it is said There is no euil which the Lord hath not done Amos. 3.6 Ans 1. God at the first creation made all thinges good the euil both of crime or essence of pain or punishment ensued vpon mans disobedience 2. Death calamities are euil in respect of the creature which suffereth them and in the iudgement of flesh but they are good in respect of god who iustly inflicteth them for sin doth purge out that sin in the godly by chastisements Wherefore after the fall of man god was the author of pains punishments because they are in a respect consideration good but sin he doth not cause but onely permit 3 For what cause god created the world THe endes of the creation of al thinges are some general The ends of the creation of the world 1 The glorie of God some speciall and subordinate 1. The first and chiefe end is the glorie of god For he would haue his goodnes wisedome omnipotencie iustice which his properties he sheweth in the creation of al things be knowen magnified of vs. Prou. 16.4 The Lord made al thinges for himselfe Psal 103.22 Praise the Lord al ye his works Rom. 11.36 Of him through him and for him are al things 2. The manifesting knowledge 2 The knowledge of God contemplation of his diuine wisedome goodnes shining in the very creation of things For that he might bee celebrated magnified for his works he was to create those thinges which should know him should praise magnifie him being knowen and manifested vnto them in his woorkes And to this purpose created he natures both endewed with reason without reason that there might bee both those which shoulde praise him the matter of his praise Psalm 19.1 The heauens declare the glorie of god the firmament sheweth the worke of his hands 3. The administration gouerning of the world 3 His prouidence For therefore he created the world that hee might by his prouidence euer gouerne rule preserue it so might perpetually shew forth his maruelous works which he hath done from the beginning of the world now doth wil do but chiefly that he might administer the Church congregation of elect Angels men Isai 40.26 Lift vp your eies on high behold who hath created these things This third end is subordinat serueth for the secōd end 4. 4 That he might gather a church 5 That all things might serue for man To gather a church of Angels men who shuld agnise magnifie this creator 5. That al other things might serue for the safetie both of the soul bodie of man as also for the life necessity delight of men but especially that they might profit the elect eache thing in their due place might be to them as ministers instruments whereby god blessing increasing them might be lauded praised of them Gen. 1.28 Subdue the
in outward appearance and imagination 4. Hee ascended not truely into heauen but it shall be saide to haue beene onely a vaine and imaginarie and phantasticall spectacle if hee were in his bodie substantiallie there before hee visiblie ascended thither and after he was ascended thither he remained yet in the substantiall presence of the same bodie no lesse truely than before on the earth yea and in the verie bodies also of the faithfull If these thinges so fel out in the truth of the thing it will follow that the same bodie of Christ was indeede at once and together both weake and omnipotent base and glorious subiect to sufferinges and not subiect dead and aliue limited and vnlimited which is horrible to affirme For auoiding therefore of these prodigious and impious absurdities they will except that he was not as touching his body otherwise than limited weak subiect to passions and mortal in the time of his humiliation because he had debased himselfe and would not shew forth that maiestie communicated vnto his bodie before his resurrection Aunswere They interpret amisse that debasing of himselfe of all the glorie and maiestie of his humanity hidden and kept close for a time whereas it is to bee vnderstoode in respect of the diuinitie of the Worde in that hee woulde take the forme of a seruant that is the masse of our nature and become man Moreouer it will folow that christ did shew forth the communicated power and maiesty of his flesh euen then when he was indeed weak and limited or circumscribed in bodie as when shedding teares he raised Lazarus from the dead and when being apprehended by the Iewes hee healed Malchus whom Peter wounded Now what is it else to raise the Marcionites vp againe from hell or in the greatest matter of all others impiously to blaspheme if this bee not THE SECOND ARGVMENT THE blasphemie of Samosatenus Arrius the late Antitrinitaries is this That Christ man is not properlie and by nature God but onlie by an accidental participation of diuine properties maiestie honour power and vertue The Vbiquitaries also maintaine the same consideration of the God-heade of Christ man while they define the personall vnion by his communicating alone of properties whereby the flesh of Christ is made omnipotent and euerie where So that now that man is and is called God not that he is properlie by nature God but because infinit power maiestie and glorie is giuen him from God and all the gifts of the holie Ghost are bestowed on him without measure Now this accidentall bestowing of the Godhead and all the properties doth not make christ to be properlie and by nature God but onelie by diuine grace or God vnproperlie so called Because it is not the verie essential God-head of the Word but a certaine participation thereof in vertue and effâ—cacie And therefore was it obiected by the sounder Fathers vnto the Arrians that they tooke awaie the true and eternall God-head of christ when they made him a God not by nature but by grace by participation onlie of dignitie and maiestie Therefore seeing the Vbiquitaries also equalling our Immanuel with God by participation of properties onlie take awaie his true and eternal God head wee doe disclâ—me and accurse this their doctrine as blasphemous and heretical And that they doe this Brentius in recog p. 20. Andrae Thes 20. disp Tubing and Thes 25. and 26. And Apol. Ing. 26. their owne words and opinions witnesse as Brentius and Iacobus Andraeas and others of them in their writings Whence wee conclude that the Vbiquitaries holde the same opinion with the Arrians and Antitrinitaries of the God-head of Christ manâ— that is that all these esteem him for God not by nature but onely by grace of participation new temporarie created adopted If these thinges bee true Christ shal not bee God and man but a diuine man such as the Vbiquitaries also repute him who as Seruetus Lib. 1. de Trinicate hold this opinion That God can communicate the fulnes of his God-heade giue his diuinitie maiestie power and glorie vnto man But wee execrate and detest the same blasphemie of both THE THIRD ARGVMENT NEstorius taught That the vnion of God the Word with man was wrought by the participation onelie of equality as touching maiesty honour power vertue and operation Neither doth he make the differeÌ„ce of the dwelling of the Word in mans nature which himselfe tooke and in other Saintes to consist in anie other thing than in those giftes and graces bestowed by God on man The selfe same also doe the Vbiquitaries teach because they crie that there is no difference betweene the inhabiting and dwelling of the God-head in Peter and in Christ except it bee taken from the communication of the giftes or properties of the God-heade And they contend that by this means this man which was takeÌ„ by the Word is God because the Word doth nothing without him but al things by him This is nothing els than to make christ man onelie God by an accident Wherefore the doctrine of Vbiquitie is altogether the same with Nestorius heresie Tertullian saith Tertul. lib. de Trinit p. 610. Jf Christ be man onlie how then is he present eueriewhere being called vpon and inuocated seeing this is not the nature of man but of God to be able to be present in al places By this testimony is refuted the Vbiquity of the human nature in Christ Obiect But the vnion of the diuine human nature in Christ is vnseparable Therefore wheresoeuer the diuine nature is there is also the humane nature Aunsw It is true which is said that the vnion is vnseparable The Worde neuer forsaketh the nature once assumed and taken But the Word is not in the humane nature as the soule is included in my bodie Wheresoeuer my bodie is there must my soule needes be neither is my soul at the same time without my bodie But the Worde is not so in Christ man but hee is so vnseparably and personally in the humane nature as that he is together also without the humane nature in all the partes of the world as hee filleth al and in holy men and Angels by his special presence The personall vnion of both natures dooth not euert the general action and woorking of his presence and maiestie neither doth it let or hinder the speciall woorking of his presence because the Word is effectual and worketh forcibly in the regenerate The generall points wherein the churches which professe the Gospell agree or disagree in the controuersie concerning the Lordes Supper They agree in these points FIRST that as wel the Supper of the Lord as Baptisme is a visible pledge and testimonie annexed by Christ himselfe to the promise of grace to this ende chiefly that our faith in this promise might be confirmed and strengthned Secondly that in the true vse of the supper as well as in al other sacraments two things are giuen by god vnto vs