Selected quad for the lemma: heart_n
Text snippets containing the quad
|
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
|
A36729
|
Reflections on the Council of Trent in three discourses / by H.C. de Luzancy.
|
De Luzancy, H. C. (Hippolyte du Chastelet), d. 1713.
|
1679
(1679)
|
Wing D2419; ESTC R27310
|
76,793
|
222
|
great Truth in these words which the Church has so much admired as to make a Canon of them Verily verily I say unto you he that beleives in me hath everlasting life He therefore who has not everlasting life believes not in Christ but he believes in Christ that has Charity for to beleive in Christ est tendere in ipsum amando is to be enclined to him by Love It is to this the remissions of sins hath bin promised huic remissio peccatorum promittitur But if Love cannot be separated from Christian Faith how can he that wants Charity have Christian Faith that is believe in Christ Faith is therefore the Spring of our love and love the Source of our Works What is it to love God continues that holy Doctor but to be inwardly adherent to him to conceive an ardent desire of seeing him an hatred of sin a distast to the World a Charity for our Neighbor whom he has commanded us to love and so strictly to observe in our Charity the rules he has prescribed us in his Law as never to pervert its order But let it be far from Christians to think our Faith or Love come from us If any beleives saies the Council of Orange he can do any good action quod ad salutem pertinet vitae aeternae by the strength of nature and without being enlightned and inspired by the Holy Ghost who poures into our hearts a suavity which makes us assent to and believe the truth that man haeretico fallitur spiritu not attending to what Christ pronounces in his Gospel Without me ye can do nothing Nor to the words of the Apostle We are not sufficient of our selves to think any thing as of our selves but our sufficiency is of God There are in man saies the same Council many good things which man doth not do but in those he doth there are none but what God doth in him No man saies another Canon has of himself but falshood and sin but if any hath truth and righteousness 't is of him Quem debemus sitire in hac eremo ut ex eo quasi quibusdam guttis irrorati non deficiamus in via Good God! how far are the Canons of Trent from the holiness and humility of these how repugnant to the establisht Doctrine of the Church and the sentiments of the Fathers are the proud and Pelagian principles of the Jesuits XI The Anathema's of the seventh Session being no better grounded are not more to be feared the Council cuts off from the Church which is the Body of Christ those who admit of more or less then seven Sacraments It is evident that such a Principle cannot be proved by the Scripture We must then recur to the unwritten Word Sure so important a truth has bin preserved in the Catholic Church and nothing ought to be more obvious in the writings of the Fathers Nevertheless not a word for twelve whole Ages and that so long uninterrupted silence had never bin broken had not the master of the Sentences and other Scholastics brought it into the World Indeed we find every where in the writings of the Fathers that the Adult must give an account of the Faith they professed at their Baptism and receive the imposition of hands from the Bishop We meet every where with Repentance Penance and Confession of Sins We see every where the power of ordaining Priests so committed to the Bishops by Christ that all Ordinations from other hands were esteemed unlawful and sacrilegious But we find no where all these things to be Sacraments And no man can sufficiently wonder how the Fathers at Trent propose as an Article of Faith grounded upon Tradition a thing they are obliged to confess was never spoken of in the Church for twelve hundred years XII The Vnwritten word doth no more favor the Canon which establishes Transubstantiation then the others and we have from the ancient writings so many places against this Doctrine that we cannot conceive how it came into the World Tertullian writing against Marcion who denied that Christ had a real Body tells him Christ made his Body of the Bread he distributed saying This is my Body that is the figure of my Body Figura Corporis mei but it had never bin a Figure Si veritatis corpus non esset had not the Truth Christ had a real Body Christ saies Theodoret honored the Symbols and signs of the Sacrament with the name of his Body and Blood not changing their nature 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but adding his Grace to their nature S. Jerome is no less positive then Theodoret The Flesh and Blood of Christ saies he are understood two several waies either of that spiritual and divine Flesh of which he saies himself My Flesh is meat indeed and my Blood is drink indeed and Except ye eat the Flesh of the Son of Man and drink his Blood ye have no life in you or my Flesh which was nailed upon the Cross and my Blood which was shed by the Souldiers Spear S. Austin who is justly esteemed the Oracle of the Western Churches adds a pregnant testimony to this Assertion The first heresy saies he in the Disciples of Christ was occasioned by the hardness of his words for when he told them Except ye eat the Flesh of the Son of Man and drink his Blood ye have no life in you they not apprehending him said one to another This is a hard saying who can bear it In saying this is hard they separated themselves from him But he remained with his twelve Disciples and taught them saying It is the spirit that quickneth the flesh profiteth nothing the words I speak unto you they are spirit and they are life Do you understand them in a spiritual manner they are spirit and life do you understand them in a carnal manner they they are no less spirit but not for thee who understandest them not spiritually Spiritually apprehend what I have said Non hoc corpus quod videtur manducaturi estis bibituri sanguinem quem effusuri sunt qui me crucifigent The Sacrament I recommend to you quickneth when it is understood spiritually but the flesh profiteth nothing They answered him according to their apprehension for they understood this flesh as it is used to be sold in a carcass or torn in the shambles Jesus knowing their error said to them What I told you of giving you my Body to eat and my Blood to drink scandalizeth you but what will you say if you see the Son of Man ascending to the place where he was before He resolves here what he had proposed to them he shews them that which they were scandalized by to the end they might apprehend him In this manner they thought he would have given them his Body Ille dixit se ascensurum in coelum utique integrum When you shall see the Son of Man ascending to
ever err In his Letter to Vincent Do not oppose therefore Brother to so many and undoubted places some of the writings of the Bishops either ours or those of Hilary Cyprian and Agrippinus All these writings want the Autority of the Canon and we receive not their testimonies as things which it is not lawful to dissent from if they are dissenting from the Truth Upon the 87. Psalm You read not in the Gospel those whom you name neither do I see those whom I alledge Let us lay aside our Books procedat in medium Codex Dei Finally against Maximinus the Arian who relied upon the Council of Ariminum I ought not saies he to cite you the Nicene Council nor you that of Ariminum as prejudices for our cause Scripturarum autoritatibus non quorumcunque propriis sed utriusque communibus testâ—bus res cum re causa cum causa ratio cum ratione concertet utrique tanti ponderis molibus cedamus Nay 't was not only Bishops that thought so but Lay-men themselves We are taught by the Gospel saies Constantine to the Nicene Fathers the Apostolical Writings and the Oracles of the Prophets what we must know of God let us therefore draw the explication of our doubts from the words divinely inspired VII We intend not hereby to detract from any part of the high esteem every Christian ought to have for the Works of the Fathers We consider them as the Masters of the Church who instructed her not only by the learned productions of their minds but by the purity and good examples of their lives We honor them as Preachers who spake no less by the wounds they received for the defence of Christ then by the words they made use of to make known his Doctrine Nor could we behold without a just resentment a Minister of our Age to abuse their Writings in a Book entitled De vero usu Patrum We acknowledg with the great S. Austin that these holy Men were stabiles in antiquissima robustissima Fide We call with the Primitive Councils our present Faith the Faith of our Fathers But we are not convinced that our respect should endue us to believe them infallible After Gods Word none is of greater weight to us then theirs but we are not bold enough to mingle confound them As a body grows not luminous but as it comes near the Sun to receive its impressions so we do not see in them any certainty of light but as they are conformable to the Scripture which is certainty and light it self And we think we give them all the praises they can expect from us when we say as S. Athanasius did of the Nicene Fathers that their Expositions of the Nicene Faith according to divine Scriptures are sufficient to destroy all Impiety and confirm the belief of Christ VIII But that which is more to be wondred at is that none of the controverted points has ever bin preserved in the Catholic Church as a point of Faith and agreeable to the consent of the Fathers a truth expresly maintained by a learned u Bishop of this Kingdom who successfully challeng'd any of the Roman Communion to a contradiction I would call for no other evidence then the Canon of this very Session § 4. which ordains under pain of Excommunication to admit of those Books as Canonical that had never bin such with the same veneration as those which had bin constantly kept by the Church All Councils Fathers Ages ancient and modern Writers exclaim against that Decree and there is no man tho but commonly read in Ecclesiastical writings that can deny it Notwithstanding the Council doth anathematize those that dissent from its Canons Pope Paul and Pius the IV. exact a dreadful Oath of it and make the People swear upon the Gospel to receive as certain and undoubted that which all the learned of the Church of Rome had lookt upon before as evidently false IX The Decree which consecrates the vulgar Translation is most strange but nothing is like the declaration of the Cardinals who assure us Quod ne vel iota unum repugnat in veteri vulgata Latinae linguae editione tho Pope Clement VIII confesses in the Preface to his Edition many things were purposely omitted which should have bin changed Let it be said with all due respect to their Eminencies that so surprizing assurances shew either deep ignorance or a wonderful unsincerity or the greatest boldness in the World X. The Articles of Justification which establish the merit of our Works in a manner so injurious to the Grace of our Redeemer are no less opposite to the ancient Church That holy Mother constantly instructed her Sons in all times That we are by nature the Children of wrath That God works in us both to will and to do of his good pleasure That we are not sufficient of our selves to think any thing of our selves but our sufficiency is of God She has bin taught by Christ himself Without me ye can do nothing if the Son shall make you free you shall be free indeed and no man can come to me except the Father which has sent me draw him She has bin informed by her Doctors that when God is pleased to Crown in us our merits he Crowns but his gifts that unless he gives us what he commands us his Law instead of a spirit giving life becomes to us a killing Letter She has determined in her Council That no man is free for doing any good thing but by Gods Grace that God expects not our will but prepares it according to what is written in his word that when we fall into any sin we do it of our selves and of our own will but when we do any good Action 't is out of his alone Let any unprejudiced person read the Canons of the Council of Orange where S. Hilary being President Christs Grace triumph't so entirely over all its enemies and compare them with those of Trent he will be amazed at so strange a contrariety But when we are so earnest in throwing down our pretended merits to raise a glorious Trophy to our Faith we intend not to patronize Libertinism and give way to those licentious opinions which are the natural consequences drawn from the Doctrines of some Reformers Faith whereby a man is justified is not barren and like that of the Devil which is of no use but to prolong and foment his disorders It is a Faith which as the Apostles stiles it works by love which makes us look upon Christ as the Foundation and only Source of our Salvation breeds in us an ardent desire of him That love which is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost promts us to put our whole trust in him and to practise by the Soveraign power of his Grace what his Gospell teacheth is required of us S. Austin incomparably expresses this