invincibly defended by Abundance of the Orthodox Divines of the Church of England and by none more effectually than by Mr. Baxter in his Book against Crandon long since written and in many other of his works Which if it be possible thou shouldest yet be dissatisfied concerning it thou wilt do well to peruse and which if this I. B. had ever read or but anyone of them and had the wit to understand it he had never made himself so infamous as to publish to the world such filthy stuff nor brought out the worst of those woful arguments for the defence of his doctrine that have been answered a thousand and a thousand times In Page 66. and other places he makes woful work with Mr. F's saying that Christ trod every step before us of the way that leads to Gods Kingdom and cryes therefore he went to heaven by vertue of an imputative Righteousness and by vertue of his own intercession and faith in his own bloud and then Christ must come to God and ask mercy for some great wickedness that he hath committed But here he also discovers a most ill nature and perverse spirit for no man of any candour could otherwise have understood Mr. F. in those words than thus That Christ was an example of all those vertues or graces that qualifie men for the Kingdom of God was he not an example of all those graces that together denominate a man pure in heart can he dare to say he was not Now doth not our Saviour say Blessed are the pure in heart for they shall see God But then faith he what say you to going to heaven by vertue of an imputative Righteousness and of his own intercession and faith in his own bloud I say all these are no other than going thither by Faith in Christ that being faith in his bloud and Righteousness and intercession but those that understand the Christian Religion will tell him that the obtaining of this purity of heart or the graces Christ was an example of is the end of this Faith So much the Apostle intimates in those words purifying their hearts by faith and it is the business of the Design of Christianity to demonstrate this So that 't is most true that whosoever follows Christs example shall see the Kingdome of God but we cannot follow it without faith in his merits faith in his power or in one word without effectual believing the Gospel which takes in the whole of the Christian Faith And whereas he saith that if this doctrine be true Christ must ask God mercy for some great wickedness committed by him how does that follow Christ ask'd God mercy for us and do not we do as he did when we ask it for our selves But then he monstrously foolishly proceeds and saith if this be so then we cannot come to heaven before we be accursed of God we must first make our body and Soul an offering for the sin of others then we must go to heaven for the sake of our own Righteousness And then he insultingly cryes O Sir what will thy gallant generous mind do here This might be a Sad nonplus indeed were Mr. F. a perfect Changling But observe did Mr. F. say that Christ trod no steps but those we must tread is this saying that he trod before us every step which he hath told us leads to the Kingdom of God or that we must go in to the Kingdom of God the same with this that he trode no other but those we must tread Can any man be such a sot as not to discern the wide difference between these two propositions By the way take notice that it is blasphemy to say that Christ was accursed of God in any other sense than this that he suffered such a kind of death as was by the law of Moses pronounced accursed So the Apostle explains his being made a curse Gal. 3. 13. Christ was alwayes Gods beloved Son nor was he ever more a darling of heaven than when he hung upon the Cross. And that the Reader may be truly informed in the Doctrine of Christ's Satisfaction false notions whereof make this I. B. talk most gross things I entreat him to get and carefully peruse the Learned Dr. Stilling fleets Treatise upon that Subject there you will find that Christ did not suffer the very same punishment that is due to sinners but that what he suffered for sinners sakes was as Satisfactory and answered the ends of Government as much as if all mankind had perished And thanks be to God that Doctrine of Christs suffering the very same is now generally exploded But to return observe but these Scriptures and you will then need no more than what hath been said to discern how ridiculously and wretchedly this I. B. talks in several places about the life of Christ. Luke 9. 23. If any man will come after me or be a Christian let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and sollow me 1 Pet. 2. Christ suffered for us leaving us an example that ye should follow his steps who did no sin neither was guile found in his mouth who when he was reviled reviled not again c. 1 John 2. 6. He that saith he abideth in him ought himself also to walk even as he walked V. 29. If ye know that he is Righteous ye know that every one which doth righteousness is born of him 1 John 3. 7. Little Children let no man deceive you he that doth righteousness is righteous even as he is righteous 1 Iohn 4. 17. Herein is our love made perfect that we may have boldness in the day of judgment because as he is or was the Analage of the tense being ordinary so are we in this world Now this I. B. saith p. 106. that our Saviours life in all duties that respected morals was not principally or first to be imitated by us but that the Law even in the preceptive part thereof might be fully and perfectly fulfilled for us Mark 1. he saith in all duties that respected morals what nonsense is this any body may see he does not know what Morals means 2. That our Saviours life in these duties was not principally to be imitated by us he dares not say not at all to be imitated though any body may see that reads his book he would be glad to say so with all his heart But what Scripture doth he bring for this none at all So that if you will not take his word for it he hath nothing to say to you 3. But saith he that the Law even in the preceptive part may be fulfilled for us was Christs principal design in living as he did What proof hath he for this Rom. 10. 5. Christ is the end of the law for righteousness the end saith he not only of the Ceremonial law but of the 10 commandments too but is he the end of both alike then we are no more now obliged to the one than to the other In
light Scratches thou art for Neck or nothing Thou hast a mouth for MACHIAVIL'S money who hath taught such as thy self this rule Fortiter Calumniare c. which because thou hast little kindness for the Language of the Beast take thus in English Slander lustily and something will stick Thou couldst scarcely hope that any one that knows or hath but heard of Mr. F. nay though he should be one of thine own herd can find in his heart to think him such a Monster of men such a Devil incarnate as thou wouldst make him but yet to be sure thou concludest that all that don't think thee so will at least be suspicious that so loud and hideous an out-cry is not made for nothing and that he hath written a too erroneous book if not such a damnably heretical one and therefore that 't is dangerous to read it and hear or converse with the Author of it But we will now consider what foundation is laid in that Treatise of Mr. F's for this Fellow to build so black a charge on and in order thereunto I shall not need to do any thing more than give the Reader a short view of the Sum and Substance of the Doctrinal part of it which I will do for the sake of those that are strangers to it And I promise to do it with all sincerity and impartiality and if I perform not let me be stigmatized by any that shall compare the following account with the Book it self for a man of no Conscience and a most false person The whole Title of the Book is The Design of Christianity or a plain demonstration and improvement of this proposition that the induing men with inward real Righteousness or true Holiness was the Ultimate end of our Saviour's coming into the world and is the great Intendment of his Blessed Gospel The business of the first Chapter is an Explication of the nature of true Holiness wherein after it is said to be by various forms of speech exprest in Scripture such as Godliness Righteousness Conversion and turning from Sin Partaking of a Divine Nature c. and that it is originally seated in the Soul and Spirit and is a Complication of all vertues there are four general and Comprehensive descriptions given of it all which differ only in words not at all in Sense And they all amount to thus much as any one of but a competent understanding will at first sight perceive viz. That true Holiness is such an inward living principle as so far as it prevails causeth the person that is indued with it to behave himself as becomes him that is to avoid and hate whatsoever is any wayes known to be morally evil and to love and prosecute whatsoever is good or to be under the government of all those good practical principles or Laws which are made known either by Revelation that is by the Scriptures of the Old and New Testament or by Nature or the use of Reason When Holiness is called a healthful complexion of Soul c. the purity of the humane nature c. and a divine or Godlike nature c. there is no more said than what is included in this description Next between the third and last description there is a somewhat more express and distinct account of the nature of Holiness but this I shall have occasion hereafter to take notice of In the close of this Chapter it is said that nothing is more natural to the Souls of men as they came out of God's hands than this excellent temper but by their Apostasie from God and sinking into brutish sensuality they sadly dispossessed themselves of it and so became like the beasts which perish but it pleased God in infinite goodness not to give us over so but when we had destroyed our selves in him was our help found and in order thereunto he sent his only begotten Son to us The Second Chapter is spent in proving that the great errand Christ came upon was to put us again into possession of that holiness which we had lost and this is proved by a Climax of seven particulars all which are implyed in these Scriptures which I entreat the Reader to turn to Matt. 3. 1 2. and Luke 1. 16 17. Mal. 3. 1 2 3. Matt. 1. 21. Luke 1. 72 c. Luke 2. 32. Matt. 3. 11 12. Matt. 9. 13. Matt. 5. 17. Acts 3. 26. Acts 5. 31. 1 Iohn 3. 8. Titus 2. 12. 1 Iohn 3. 5. In the third Chapter is shewn that holiness is the only design that is in reference to us of the Christian Precepts and 't is particularly shewn that they require 1. The most extensive holiness that is such as respects God our Neighbour and our selves 2. The most intensive not only negative but positive that is not only such as consists in doing no evil but also in doing good not only holiness of words and actions but likewise of thoughts and affections not only such a holiness as puts upon performing good actions but also such as puts upon performing them in a right manner with right ends or from good principles causing us to do every duty as to the Lord and not as to men to do all to the glory of God c. Lastly this Chapter concludes with the answer of an Objection The Objection is that all sober Christians acknowledge that the Gospel precepts do not require indefective and unspotted holiness or at least that Christ will accept of that which is far short of perfect and therefore he seems not to be so great a friend to it as is asserted The Answer is that 1. The attainment of perfect holiness is in this state impossible to us 2. That Christ will accept of nothing short of sincerity and diligent serious endeavours to abstain from all Sin 3. That no less than our absolutely perfect holiness is designed by Christ though not to be effected in this yet in the other world The Fourth Chapter sheweth that the promises and Threatnings of the Gospel have the promoting of holiness for their only design That the promises have 't is proved from 2 Pet. 1. 4. 2 Cor. 7. 1. Rom. 12. 1. And 't is further shewed that 1. These promises are either limited to holy persons or made use of as motives to holiness as 1 Tim. 4. 8. Matt. 5. 8. v. 3 5 7. Rom. 27. Rev. 3. 21. ch 2. 20. And whereas the promises of pardon and Eternal life are made to believing 't is said that nothing is more evidently declared than that this faith is such as purifieth the heart and is productive of good works 2. 'T is shewed that the Nature of these Promises is such as is alone sufficient to satisfie us that holiness is the design of them This 't is shewed is manifestly true concerning the principal promises which are reduced to 3 heads 1. That of the holy Spirit 2. Of Remission of sin 3. Of Eternal happiness in the enjoyment of God For the first viz. the
as Forty to at least Four hundred But I must have another remark upon this goodly Catalogue namely that I. B. hath very falsly represented and more than so invented Doctrines for Mr. F. which is the part of a marvellously honest man As for instance What think you of his very first namely That the first Principles of Morals those first written in mens hearts are the essential the indispensable and fundamental points of the Gospel For this he cites p. 8. 281 282. But there is no such thing and all that can be gathered thence is but this that these are Fundamentals and in p. 282. there is numbred with Righteousness Charity c. the preferring God and Christ Iesus before all the world and this is set before those too But I. B. hath so worded this as to make the Reader think that Mr. F. hath asserted so horrid a Doctrine as that those are the only Fundamentals of the Gospel But what Mr. F. doth assert I. B. if he be in his wits whatever he thinks will not dare to deny The Second is like the First viz. That these first Principles are to be followed principally as they are made known to us by the dictates of humane nature and that this obedience is the first and best sort of obedience that we Christians can perform Observe 1. That this is non-sence and no where written by Mr. F. he knows not what dictates mean that saith that the first principles are made known by them For they are the dictates of humane nature themselves But 2. observe what is far more unpardonable that the whole is a pure forgery consult the place he refers to p. 8 9 10. The Third That there is such a thing as a soundness of soul and the Purity of the humane nature in the world This he cites p. 6. for but neither there or elsewhere is this asserted otherwise than thus That true holiness is the purity of the humane nature and a sound Complexion of Soul now all that follows hence is that where holiness is there is purity of nature c. that is in what degree soever a man is holy his nature is pure and doth not our Saviour intimate as much when he calls holy men and that on this side heaven too pure in heart Matt. 5. 8. what is the difference between purity of Nature and purity of heart But the vilest thing is this that I. B. would by wording it thus make the Reader believe that Mr. F. denyes the corruption of nature as will be seen anon The very next again is his pure invention viz. That the Law in the first Principles of it is more obliging on the hearts of Christians than is that of coming to God by Christ p. 7 8 9 10. Mr. F. abhors this doctrine nor is there any thing in those or any other pages of his said to tempt any well-minded man to gather so wretched an Inference from it The most that is said concerning going to God by Christ is but this that 't is a duty enjoyned by a divine positive Law not by the law of nature and of all men I hope I. B. won't say it is who like a wofully ignorant Creature so often speaks contemptuously of this Law But because Mr. F. said some pages before that the law of nature is of an eternal and indispensable obligation but not positive laws he fastens on him that wicked Doctrine whereas nothing more so much as seems to follow from thence than that therefore God can dispense with our obedience to his positive laws not that we are less obliged to obey them than the laws of nature while they are in force and I never knew any man in the world that ever questioned this Observe Reader that this that he here so vilely abuseth Mr. F. in he repeats innumerable times over in his Book and 't is one of the Blasphemies he chargeth on him but how dares that man look God in the face that is no more tender of his Brothers reputation as so without any ground to accuse him of the horridest of all wickednesses Again he invents the Tenth Error viz. That Christ's fulfilling the Law for us was by giving more perfect and higher instances of moral duties than were before expresly given p. 17. Doth not this man know that he hath put in these words for us and that Mr. F. did only repeat that of our Saviour I came not to destroy the Law but to fulfil it and then expounded that word fulfil by the word perfect intimating that the Greek hath that signification and adding in the margent that in Rom. 15. 19. and Col. 1. 25. it is rendred to preach fully For another instance of his wicked dealing take Error the 26. That he shall be his Apollo that can give him a sufficient reason why justifying Faith should consist in recumbency and relyance on Christ's merits for the pardon of Sins p. 224. observe here the most palpable knavery of this citation 1. He sets down but one half of the Sentence 2. The half he conceals is the principal mark this is Mr. F's whole saying He shall be my Apollo that can give me a sufficient reason why justifying Faith ought only to consist in recumbency and relyance on Christ's merits for the Pardon of Sin and not also on his power for the mortification of it Is not there a vast difference between this whole Sentence and his clipt one But 3. to make it sound yet more odiously he leaves the word the principal word only out of that part he sets down And he makes Mr. F. say he shall be his Apollo that can give a sufficient reason why justifying faith should consist in relyance on Christ's merits when his saying is should ONLY consist in relyance on Christ's merits And canst thou think this Reader a wicked saying 'T is as wicked as he that hath thus notoriously abused it is honest what but a dear love of sin can make any one have a less value for that grace of God that is through Christ discovered in killing it than for that grace that is expressed in the pardon of it And what but hypocrisie can perswade any man that it is not as necessary a condition to our acceptance with God to trust in Christ's power for the subduing of our lusts as in Christ's merits for the forgiveness of them Another instance of this mans insufferable baseness is to be found in his 28. Citation out of p. 225. The imputation of Christ's Righteousness consisteth in dealing with sincerely Righteous persons as if they were perfectly so There my Gentleman stops with an c. and leaveth out the main business If you consult the place you 'l find this the left-out-part of the Sentence for the sake and upon the account of Christ's Righteousness I do not remember whether he hath it right any where in the body of his Book but if he hath it signifies little for
discoveries of I. B's honesty and ingenuity And who now sees not that the Holy Scriptures themselves cannot be secure from being charged with a great number of impious and blasphemous expressions by this presumptious man should his impudence once rise so high as to deal by them as he hath done by the Sayings of Mr. F. Indeed to serve their own turns of them neither he as I can largely shew nor others like him do stick at so serving the Sacred Oracles and no body can warrant us that they shall never be so fearfully audacious as to make use of the same wicked arts to render them as hateful to the world as they endeavour to make those pious books and men that discover the extreme naughtiness of their Principles and Practices The Apostle hath told us that Evil men and Seducers shall wax worse and worse and if so God alone can tell us where they shall stop If any Reader now expects that I should next proceed to examine the book it self I must tell him I have done enough in all reason to make him perceive without farther assistance how I. B. from the beginning to the end hath bewrayed his ignorance and dishonesty For though he pretends to have confuted effectually the Doctrines he so rageth against this is the Sum of his whole performance 1. Spitting his venome at them all in general 2. Urging wofully silly arguments against several of them 3. Wretchedly misrepresenting many of them putting them into Bears Skins and then rudely baiting them 4. Making Doctrines for Mr. F. which he never dream'â— of Setting up men of Straw and then fighting with them 5. Exclaiming and raving at the most horrible rate against Mr. F's Person 6. Intermixing a many non-sensical and wicked opinions of his own 7. Running over and over innumerable times the very same things Now for the First Fifth Sixth I will give more than a taste of them together in the close of all And as for the Seventh viz. his running over and over the very same things it cannot be expected that I should do any more than desire the Reader if he won't believe me to receive satisfaction from his own eyes So that it may be thought there remains now to shew the Second Third and Fourth but the Third and Fourth I have already shewn sufficiently in too many instances for his credit and a great part of his Pamphlet is founded upon those very inventions and misrepresentations of his that have been discovered and for the Second viz. the arguments he urgeth against several of Mr. F's Doctrines they are so miserably Silly that they deserve not to have one sine bestowed upon them But yet because I will chuse rather to offend on the right than on the left hand I will as briefly as may be shew both how unable and unwilling this poor man is to do Mr. F. right in several other particulars and also answer those arguments whereby he opposeth his main Doctrines After he had begun his Pamphlet with a most obligingly civil Address to his beloved Mr. F. which shall be seen anon he next falls foul upon his Descriptions of Holiness and not to take notice of the failure of sense in his Setting down the Second and Third as not deserving the name of faults in this man he claps in between the Third and Last one of his own devising You farther saith he call it a Principle or habit of Soul originally dictates of humane nature Profound sense believe it But to pass this by too he cites p. 8. for it But what is there said is only this that the Divine Moral laws are either those that were first written in mens hearts and originally dictates of humane nature or necessary conclusions and deductions from them So that Holiness and the Moral laws are with him the same This I will not also charge I. B's dishonesty but on his woful ignorance You see he is so used to talk and scrible non-sense that he cannot easily write sense when prepared to his hand and therefore we may guess how well he understands it Is not this a right goodly Tool to make a Preacher of But who so bold as blind Bayard Next observe that From Mr. F's Descriptions of Holiness by an Healthful Complexion of Soul and the Purity of the humane nature he would make us believe he hath asserted that mens natures since the fall as I have already intimated continue sound and whole and thereupon cryes out that no man by nature hath any soundness in him and sets himself to prove the corruption of nature and a mighty bawling he makes about this But doth not Mr. F. affirm that men by their Apostasie from God and sinking into Brutish sensuality have sadly dispossessed themselves of this most excellent temper and are become like the beasts that perish This he doth presently after his Descriptions of Holiness Nay does he not suppose that this soundness and Purity is lost in making it the design of his Book to demonstrate that it was Christ's grand business to restore it He saith that this Purity and Healthful Complexion are things a great way off from the Spirit of grace and the gracious workings of the Spirit A fine chime But doth not Mr. F. in the very first Page say that the holiness he so describes is a complication of all the vertues whereby he understands what the Gospel doth by vertues viz. the graces of Gods holy Spirit And doth he not say in his Descriptions of Holiness that 't is such a temper of the inward man as causeth men to be actuated by all those good principles that are made known by Revelation that is to obey all the Laws of God and are not all the graces of the Spirit virtually contained in such a temper as causeth men so to do He saith it must be concluded that the Divine Nature Mr. F. talks of is no other than the dictates of humane nature If this Fellow were now at my Elbow I would know of him what the word Dictates means 't is plain that a Goose understands that Phrase as well as he and therefore he infers that non-sense from Mr. F's Descriptions But who sees not that that which is to be concluded from them in this good sense viz. That a Divine Nature doth enable him that is indued with it according to the measure he hath of it to obey not only the dictates of Nature but also whatsoever laws are made known by Divine Revelation I. B. could not but know this if he ever considered those descriptions and if he did not what a sad Creature is he to undertake I won't say to confute but to inveigh against them After he had spent almost another Page again in crying out of the Corruption of nature and bringing Scripture to prove it as if Mr. F. had most plainly denied what he as plainly asserts as words can do it he comes to these words in one of the descriptions keeps