circumcision of the flesh was to teach them it being the signe k Gen 17.11 and seal l Rom. 4 11. Col. 2.11 12. of the righteousnesse of faith as baptisme is now And this you may minde also that though the rebellious seed of Abraham according to the flesh were rejected m Esay 2.6.9 yet the strangers that joyned to the Lord were still received n Esay 56.3 4 5 6 7 8. wherefore this is a plain evidence that they stood by the grace and life of God and Christ and circumcision of the heart for the cause why God rejected some of the circumcised seed of Abraham according to the flesh was because they were uncircumcised in heart o Ier. 9.25 26. and therefore the Lord threatned to visite them and did visit them with the uncircumcised in flesh Wherefore it appeareth that without faith and circumcision of the heart they could not stand at all And the Scripture saith that the unbeleeving Jewes were cut off for unbeliefe and that those that stand doe stand by faith and therefore are admonished not to be high minded but fear p Rom. 11.20 and take heed q v 21. and continue in the beautifulnesse of God r v. 22. and that the unbeleeving Jewes also if they abide not in unbeliefe shall be grafted in again Å¿ v. 23. Wherefore it appeareth that as unbeliefe was the cause why the unbeleeving Jewes were cut off from the olive tree whereon they were so unbeliefe was the bar which kept them off for if they abide not in unbeliefe they shall be grafted in again and this proveth that their standing was never to be otherwise but by faith and circumcision of the heart Neither are we to thinke that the giving of the Law at mount Sinai or the ceremonies which the Jewes then had to lead them to Christ or any of Gods Oracles being committed unto them or any persons groundlesse departing from the State doth argue that the constitution of the same Church was as you would have it taken to be Neither did their circumcision of the flesh argue that they stood not by faith and circumcision of the heart no more then the outward baptisme doth now argue that the Saints now stand not by faith and the inward baptisme of the heart and spirit but meerly upon nature and baptisme of the flesh But you should know that as it is not possible to please God now without faith * Heb. 11.6 no more was it then * Psal 50.18 In the time of the Law God abhorred his own Ordinances if they were not done in faith * Isa 1.13 14. And as faith gave Abraham the denomination of Gods friend the righteousnesse of which faith Circumcision was a seal * Rom. 4.11 so none were ever esteemed as the holy people the sonnes and daughters and friends of God but those that were made nigh unto him by the promise of Christ and by faith and circumcision of the heart And you should know that the Jewes had not outward spirituall holinesse visibly imputed unto them meerly because they were the children of Abraham but because Abraham their Father and they his children were the children of God and their childrens children were in Covenant and so they were the children of the promise as Isaack was and blessed with their Father Abraham And this may further appeare unto you because when any of the seed of Abraham according to the flesh did degenerate their rejection was not for or because that they were the children of Abraham but because they had taken upon them the image of Satan and so degenerated from the steps of Abraham and thereby became the children of Belial And as we may say concerning these Hebrews so we may say concerning the Heathens when any of the Gentiles or Heathens became Prosolites their childeren that were at yeares of discretion were not to be circumcised unlesse they were willing to enter into covenant with God and to take upon them the Lords yoake and fight under his banner Howbeit whether they were circumcised or not they were still the Prosolytes children according to the flesh But concerning the infants of the Prosolytes there was no questioning of them they were to be circumcised being in the covenant with their parents and yet not circumcised because they were their childeren by nature but because they were in the same covenant with their holy parents and so they were the childeren of God by his free Grace And the Scripture doth evidently declare that none were to be admitted into the Church of the Jewes but believing Hebrews and Prosolytes and their holy seed By all this it apeareth that the members of the Jewes state had a spirituall holinesse upon them and stood no otherwise but by faith and circumcision of the heart And were not as those who were neither beleeving Jewes nor Prosolytes Aliens from the Common-wealth of Israel without hope without God in the world without Christ and strangers from the covenants of promise But the Church of the Jewes the Lorâ—s peculiar people were made nigh unto God by the blooâ— of Jesus Christ which was then to be shed and is now shed for the remission of their sins and their reconciliation to God the father and his blessed spirit And whereas you say that the state or Church of the Jews is abollished I tell you I am not bound to beleeve that God abollished his Chuâ—ch state whereof David Solomon Hezekias Josias and the holy Prophets and righteous men were members such a Church at the constitution whereof there was no prophane person to be admitted or any root beating gall or wormwood to be suffered but if you thinke that God changed the state in the daies of the Messias his manifestation in the flesh and made it more glorious Even as the Moone is said to be changed when shee hath run her course but remaineth still the same Moone though more glorious then before this I would rather beleeve then that And touching your speech of the abolishing of the other things If you mean an abolishing of all the beggarly rudiments taking away the Elimentish part of some Ordinances and planting other materialls in stead thereof then I grant it But be sure that you stick to this that Christ came not to deceive the Infants of beleeving parents to take away the substance of the Ordinances but rather the yoakes which cleaved thereunto which circumstantiall things he nayled to his Crosse in token that those who rightly and truely enjoyed them before were now benefited without them and were to have through a generall distribution an equall proportionable share and right to whatsoever came in stead thereof Now let us consider that if the infants of beleevers members of the Church of the Jews were not then aliens from the Common wealth of Israel nor without hope nor without God in the world They were not then without Christ neither were they Strangers from the Covenants
This promise of Eternall life was made to Adam and all the members of Gods visible Church then d See Gen. 3. compared with Cap 4.16 Cap. 5. and established with Abraham and his seed in their Generations e Gen. 17.7 and this heavenly and Evangelicall promise is here repeated by Peter f Act. 2.21 and applyed to all beleevers and their seed g Ver. 39. And though wee should be furnished with the externall gifts of the holy Ghâ—st and evidently perceive the devills to be subject unto us through the name of Christ and see Sathan fall downe as lightning from heaven at the sight whereof we might have cause to rejoyce yet wee have more cause of joy that our names are written in the Lambs book of life h Luk. 10.17 18 19 20. This eternall life is a life above all lives and to be desired above all things in the world and the promise of this eternall life Peter applyeth to beleeving men and women and their holy seed And though in the same promise is included divers things which God distributeth unto some of his Saints and not to other some yet the chiefe thing promised is life and salvation through Jesus Christ whereof all Saints are partakers without which all the prophecies and tongues in the world will availe us nothing And though the infants of beleevers be not capable to prophecie or speake with tongues yet I doubt not but they are holy i 1 Cor. 7.14 Jeremiah k Ier. 1.5 and John Baptist were sanctified by the holy Spirit in the wombe l Luke 1.15 and seeing that beleevers have the like precious faith m 2 Pet. 1.1 they have also the like precious priviledges n Rev. 22.14 1 Cor. 12.12 13. Eph. 2.13 3.6.8 Rom 10.12 Whereas you say o Pag. 2. lin 24. So then by this time wee may see what is meant by the promise to wit the gift of the holy Ghost I answer It cannot appeare any thing at all the more for this your exposition neither doth it yet appeare that you understand the meaning of the holy Ghost in this place for if you did I thinke you could distinguish between the externall gifts of the holy Ghost and the promise of eternall life Consider therefore how that Peters application of the promise is a reason which he yeeldeth of his former speech and you saith he shall recâ—ive the gift of the holy Ghost for or because the promise is to you and to your Childrens c. What promise is that Even the promise of salvation and redemption spoken of in Joel 2.32 And it shall come to passe that whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be delivered for in mount Zion and in Jerusalem shall be deliverance as the Lord hath said and in the remnant whom the Lord shall call Compare with this the words of Peter â—ct 2.21.39 and it will evidently appeare that this promise spoken of in Act. 2. ver 39. is the promise of salvation Joel sayth And it shall come to passe that whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be delivered * Ioel 2.32 And Peter rehearsing this promise sayth Act. 2. ver 21. And it shall come to passe that whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved Act. 2.39 Joel in application of the promise sayth For in mount Zion Rom. 10.13 and in Jerusalem shall be deliverance as the Lord hath said and in the remnant whom the Lord shall call Peter in application of the promise sayth to those Converts which were pricked in their hearts and asked counsell of the Apostles what they should doe The promise sayth he is to you and to your Children and to all that are afar off even as many as the Lord our God shall call I beseech you weigh the Sentences He doth not say Whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall prophecie and speak with tongues This is not the medicine which was applyed to heale the wounded-broken-hearted-soules converted at his Sermon But he speaketh of that which is of a higher nature he applyeth a more effectuall and speciall medicine unto them a more singular cordiall Whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved And this is that which the Apostle Paul so much insisteth upon Rom. 10. where in the relation interpretation application and prosecution of his text in Deut. 30.12 13 14. he sheweth wherein the weight of the Saints glory and happines consisteth Rom. 10. ver 6. Rom. 10. ver 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13. The righteousnes of faith sayth he speaketh on this wise Say not in thine heart Who shall aâ—cend into heaven that is to bring Christ downe from above ver 7. Or who shall descend into the deepe that is to bring up Christ againe from the dead ver 8. But what sayth it The word is nigh thee even in thy mouth and in thine heart that is the word of faith which wee preach ver 9. That if thou shalt confesse with thy mouth the Lord Jesus and shalt beleeve in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead thou shalt be saved ver 10. For with the heart man beleeveth unto righteousnes and with the mouth Confession is made unto salvation ver 11. For the Scripture sayth Whosoever beleeveth on him shall not be ashamed 1 Pet. 2.6 7. Isa 28.16 ver 12. For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greeke for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him And in ver 13. he sheweth further wherein this riches consisteth For sayth he whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved In consideration of these things we may safely conclude that the promise mentioned in Act. 2.39 is the same promise mentioned in Joel 2.32 Act. 2.21 Rom. 10.13 Even the promise of eternall life and salvation by Jesus Christ our Lord. But peradventure it will seeme strange unto some that the infants of beleevers should be thought to be in the state of salvation or to have the righteousnes of faith or to be confessors of Jesus Christ or beleevers or invocaters of his name considering that they cannot manifest the same actually in their own persons But wee ought to note that all these things are theirs by imputation it is imputed unto them as if they had done the same in their own persons Wherefore the Lord gave them the signe a Gen. 17.11 and seale b Rom. 4.11 of the righteousnesse of faith which doth really demonstrate unto us that the infants of beleevers have the righteousnes of faith imputatively otherwise the Lord would not have given them such a signe whereby to distinguish them from those who were not in Covenant with him and had not this righteousnes upon them And touching their confession of Christ all the Jewes infants as they grew up to be capable
Psal 103.5 Next you rehearse a question What holinesse it here meant to the Children To which you answer That it is not that holinesse that accompanieth faith and such holinesse onely is available to the admittance into the state of the Gospel and to have right to Baptisme To which I answer that it is to be taken for that holinesse that accompanieth faith and therefore it is available to admit them into the state of the Gospel and giveth them visible right to Baptisme and this may appeare unto you from the Apostles testimony which declareth that if one of the parents be a beleever the children are holy different from those uncleane children whose parents are neither holy nor sanctified to the holy to produce a holy seed and therefore I conclude that we are to account the Infants of beleevers to have that holines upon them which accompanieth faith and giveth them visible right to Baptisme they are to be judged to be of the number of Gods elect as really as those are to be judged who professe faith and manifest obedience in their owne persons And it is further to be minded that visible Saints who make a verball profession and walke holily in outward appearance though we cannot infallibly tell whether they have faith or no they are to be baptized And we are not to dreame that wee can discerne internally in men seeing God only knoweth the heart and no man knoweth the things of a man save the spirit of a man that is in him yet where we see a holy verball profession and a life and conversation annexed thereunto and correspondent therewith outwardly though the inward qualifications be not according to the requiring of the Word yet wee are to judge them to have that internall true holinesse without which no man shall see the Lord and also that the Lord hath admitted them into the fellowship of his Son Jesus and into the state of his Gospel and that they are as lively precious stones as living fruitfull plants and therefore are to be accounted to have as much right to Baptisme as he that manifesteth more holinesse So it is said of Simon magus Acts 8.13 that he also beleeved and was baptized and yet afterwards when he manifested evill fruits Peter said unto him * Ver. 21.22.23 Note though Simon Magus was in the gall of bitternesse and in the bond of iniquitie yet he was sayd before to beleeve and was baptized And now since Peter biddeth him repent c. Which doth plainly shew that Peter knew not then but that he might be saved Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter for thine heart is not right in the sight of God Repent c. for I perceive that thou art in the gall of bitternesse and in the bond of iniquitie And therefore we are to baptize those whom we are to judg to have holines internally though in Gods sight they have it not That is to say Those that have holinesse outwardly are to be admitted into the outward visible state and are to have the outward Baptisme they being to be judged to have the inward graces as the holy children of beleevers have in visibilitie and so are to be esteemed in the judgement of charitie which thinketh no evill But what is the reason why you thinke that the holinesse ascribed by the Apostle to the children of beleevers is not that holines that accompanieth faith Is it because they cannot work Is it so indeed I tell you that the Scripture teacheth us that those that are of the faith though they cannot work the same are the children of Abraham a Gal. 3.7 and that the children of the promise are counted for the seed b Gal. 4.28 and that Isack was a childe of promise in his infancie c Ver. 28 29 30 31. And that faith and works are different things d Rom. 4.2.4 And therefore though the holy children of beleevers cannot work yet the Lord imputeth righteousnesse unto them e Psal 32.1 2. Rom. 4.6 Gen. 17.11 Rom. 4.11 without works And yet we are to minde f Phil. 2.12 that the Lord would not have his people to cease from working and to be idle so long as they are able to worke But when they have neither will skill nor abilitie as many a visible Saint that is in years may want and yet be no Covenant-breaker then the Lord accepteth of them and imputeth his righteousnesse unto them as if they had done all the holy workes which ever were done in the world by any who were imputed righteous God is a wise God and knoweth that his Saints can doe nothing without him nor act further then they have capabilitie therefore in his mercie he exacteth no more Good in his wisdome knew that the Infants of beleevers were capable of passive Ordinances and therefore he instituted the same to be imposed upon them and administred unto them But as for active ordinances which they could not performe nor had naturall capabilitie to doe God did not require it at their hands no more then he did require the Proselytes females to be circumcised who as you say were implyed in the males And this doth in no way eclipse the Glorie of Christs mediatorship but advanceth the free Grace of God and the righteousnesse of Christ far above all the works in the world But to affirme that the infants of beleevers have not the true holines which accompanieth faith is in a manner to darken the Glorious Sunne of Righteousnesse and the light of his Gospel with a meritorious smoake of corrupt doctrine arising out of the bottomlesse pit of sorie mans deceiptfull heart But let us heare what you say further for confirmation of your affirmation True it is that in the time of the Law and state of the Jewes A. R. Pag. 6. lin 5. and old Covenant there were some fiderally and outwardly holy and outwardly uncleane and then all men yea all things in the world were distinguished by this kinde of holinesse So the uncircumcised were then unholy and they of the Circumcision holy and might not accompanie with the other Act. 11.3 And accordingly had they their outward washings and purifications for these their outward pollutions all which were but typicall things and all these and such like distinctions are now abolished with that State and quite taken away out of the world by the comming of Christ and this is evident by Peters vision Act. 10.11 c. expounded by himselfe in the 28. verse where he sayth That God had shewed him that he should not call any man polluted or uncleane Whence it is cleare that now all men in the world are as cleane as the Circumcised and those as polluted in the Gospel-sense as any other for now all are as one and alike in Christ Jesus as may appeare by these Texts Rom. 10.11 Col. 3.11 Gal. 3.28 5.6 And as none then without this legall and outward holinesse ought to
and outward Baptisme to lay hands upon the rest of the holy institutions of God which properly and peculiarly are tyed to the Church And the Proselytes or beleeving Gentiles in the time of the Law before they were circumcised in the flesh they were to be circumcised in their hearts and before they did partake of the Passeover a figure of Christs body they and their holy seed were to be * Exod. 12.48 circumcised in flesh as well as in heart which participation in the Ordinances then was not to be limitted onely to the outward fleshly shadow no more then our partaking of Baptisme or the Lords Supper now ought to be onely limitted to the outward elements of Water Bread and Wine But as for the Infants of beleevers they ought to be judged to have the circumcision of Christ which is of the heart and Spirit as hath been formerly proved and shall be further shewed and therefore it is apparent that they are acceptable and may lawfully have the Ordinance of Baptisme imposed upon them for they being proved to be members of the visible Church of Christ it appeareth that they are to be judged in Christ and new creatures and that therefore the true holinesse accompanieth them And this being so what then will follow but that according to your owne confession they have right to Baptisme Further you say If it be objected that in respect of Justification Pag. 6. lin 3â— it availeth nothing but to Baptisme it may To this you Answer Lin. 37. to Pag. 7. That that which availeth to Justification and salvation doth according to the Rule onely availe to Baptisme for if thou beleevest with all thy heart thou art justified Act. 13.39 and shalt be saved Act. 16.31 and mayest be baptized upon the same and no other grounds Act. 8.37 To which I Answer As is the objection so is your answer without distinction for there is a difference between justification in the sight of God and justification in the sight of men By the Word persons must be justified and by the Word they must be condemned All those persons who are outwardly holy may be justified in the sight and apprehension of men ought to be baptized upon this ground though their heart knowne onely to God be like the heart of Simon Magus not upright in the sight of God But the holy Word of God is our Rule whereby we are to judge both beleevers and their infants now under the Gospel to be in covenant regenerated sanctified and adopted unto God the children of the promise in their infancie as the infants of beleevers were in former time And upon this very ground the Infants of beleevers now may lawfully be baptized as the infants of beleevers who were members of the Church in the time of the Law were lawfully circumcised To the objection * Pag. 7. lin 1 2. That all that were baptized by the Apostles themselves were not saved c. You answer And say * Lin. 3. to lin 15. you doe grant that all baptized by the Apostles were not saved and yet deny the consequence by distinguishing between the rule by which they are to be baptized which is infallible and the judgements of men who are failable and may be deceived in applying this rule but it follows not but that the rule being of God is still as infallible as God himselfe is for all that beleeve shall be saved which is true as God himselfe is true yet all who are judged by beleevers to beleeve doe not beleeve and therefore are not saved This failing then here is not in the rule but in their judgements who are but men and can judge onely in the outward appearance by their f uits yee shall know them Mat. 7.16 And cannot judge as God who onely knoweth the heart 1 Sam. 16.17 Jer 17.10 Ans Though this by construction may be without contradiction yet it may have a little further explanation thus That though the Saints doe judge by the infallible rule concerning persons yet if they alter their judgement according as the persons alter they sinnâ— not in the alteration of their opinion because the infallible rule doth still guide their judgements As for instance The infallible rule doth direct our judgements to looke upon all the members of the visible Church to be in the state of salvation So the Disciples of Christ esteemed highly of Judas as indeed the infallible rule directed them but when once he discovered himselfe not to be that in â—ffâ—ct which before he was in appearance then they were directed by the infallible rule to alter their judgements without faile Further in stead of these words Yet all who are judged by beleevers to beleeve To judge of persons according to the infallible Rule is righteous judgement in which the judgers must lay aside all partialitie doe not beleeve It may be construed thus That all who are rightly judged or ought to be judged by beleevers to beleeve doe not beleeve For there is a difference between what persons do and what they should or ought to doe And persons judging as they ought though their judgement is alterable yet as the Rule is not failable neither is their judgement by it sinfull but righteous holy just and lawfull judgement This being construed thus and so taken I assent thereunto But as for your following inference I abhorre and detest from my very soule Your words are these A. R. * Pag. 7. li. 15. to lin 25. But in the baptizing of infants the case is far otherwise yea quite contrary who will or can faile in judging an infant to be an infant the fayling therefore here is in the Rule it selfe and so the fault and sinne in the appointer of such a deceivable Rule This therefore cannot be of God who is truth it selfe but must be of man For let God be true and every man a lyar And when doth he shew himselfe more vainly to be so then when he goeth about to set his pâ—sts by Gods posts and when he teacheth for doctrines his owne vaine and lying traditions such as this is Ans Groundlesse positions and false inferences there from are frequent with you your words import that in the baptizing of infants because none can faile in judging an infant to be an infant that therefore the layling is in the Rule it selfe and therefore you conclude it cannot be of God but of man a vaine tradition The like might be sayd of the Circumcision of infants in the time of the Law that because they could not faile in their judgements in judging infants to be infants that therefore the circumcision of infants was not of God but of man a vaine tradition and the rule was not infallible But you may know that for beleevers to impose the signe * Gen. 17.11 and seal * Rom. 4.11 of the righteousnesse of faith upon their children in their infanciâ— was good lawfull warrantable *
h Rom. 10.12 unto all that call upon him And though some doe not beleeve it maketh not the faith of God of none effect no more then the infidelitie of some persons then for God was still good unto Israel his faithfull Jewes and Proselytes that were of an upright heart and so he is now Thirdly It is said And the key of the house of David Isa 22. ver 22. will I lay upon his shoulder so he shall open and none shall shut and he shall shut and none shall open And the very same with this is applyed unto Christ Jesus as is mentioned in Rev. 3.7 These things sayth he that is holy he that is true he that hath the key of David that openeth and no man shutteth and shutteth and no man openeth c. Thus through his knowledge this righteous servant is made able to justifie many 53.11 to open to whom he will and to shut out whom he will but he shutteth not out the infants of beleevers for he declared Of such is the kingdome of God Fourthly He sayth I will fasten him as a nayle in a sure place Note here he is said to be fastned as a nayle in a sure place A nayle in a sure place is such a thing upon which other things have dependance so that if the nayle fall all those things fall which are upon it But if the nayle be sure all those things which hang thereon are still upheld by the strength thereof Now the Lord Jesus Christ is this nayle and he is strong and powerfull he is perfect and pure no sinne or brittlenesse was found in him he was capable to beare the burden that was put upon him and able to beare it Yea and much more doth it appeare in that he is fastned as a nayle in a sure * The safenes of holy infants consisteth in the surenes of Jesus Christ Hee is unto them as the sure place is unto him whose choyse burden shall not be taken downe till the time appointed of the Father place his humanitie is in heaven and there it is seated and united with his divinitie and there is his place of rest and abiding he is at the right hand of God bearing us and yet thinketh not himselfe over-burdened he is able to beare and doth beare all his holy vessels both great and small even the off-spring and the issue the vessels of small quantitie so that it is as possible to pluck God out of heaven as to take away his former favours which he hath extended and doth extend towards the faithfull and their seed * Isa 59.21 As for me this is my Covenant which I will make with them saith the Lord the spirit that is upon thee and the words that I have put in thy mouth shall not depart out of Thy mouth nor out of the month of thy seed nor out of the mouth of thy seeds-seed saith the Lord from henceforth and for ever Fifthly It is said And he shall be for a glorious throne unto his fathers house that is a resting place and a place of Judgement * Psal 122.5 Justice Righteousnesse is the girdle of his loynes and faithfulnesse the girdle of his reines * Isa 11.4 And this is Christ Jesus our Lord who doth all things by his own power resteth not upon any humane thing but only upon his own divinitie in whose name we ought to doe all which we doe Mat. 18.20 and he hath promised upon the same to be in the middest of us to ratifie those divine actions which proceed from our sincere affections And as he hath promised the tree of life * Rev. 2.7 and hidden Manna * 17. and morning starre * 28. even his own selfe * 24.16 3.21 unto us so hath he promised to grant us to sit with him in his throne Now he is not sayd to be for a glorious throne unto any but unto his fathers house there is this glorious throne set in the middest of this heavenly Regiment in the middest of his Temple there is Jesus as a throne or seate Revel 4.6.8 yea further in the middest of the throne and round about the throne there are also the foure animalls said to be which are full of eyes before and behinde and rest not neither day nor night crying Holy holy holy Lord God Almightie which was and is and is to come Isa 22. ver 24. Sixthly It is sayd further And they shall hang upon him all the glory of his fathers house Here is a weightie sentence full of substance This glorious throne and holy nayle which is fastned so surely is done for no sleight intent but it is for great purpose namely to beare all the gloâ—ie of his fathers house It is his fathers pleasure to exercise him in bearing our glory which is his glory our brightnesse which is his brightnesse for indeed wee have no comelinesse but from him and we cannot beare our selves but he must beare us wee are the burden and he is our upholder he dependeth upon that which will not faile him and we depend upon him which will not faile us And this Angelicall patron hath taught the Inhabitants of Jerusalem and the house of Judah even his Church to fasten upon him all the glory of his fathers-house It is then an Ordinance from heaven that we shall so do as he hath sayd And this institution therefore being not of man but of God it will stand and it being an injunction laid upon us all that wee must both young and old have dependencie upon this nayle even the Lord Jesus wee must doe so Now if wee take this word shall prophetically it being also a declaration of what should happen though it now be historicall to us wee may still see the fulfilling of it in Mat. 19.13 Mar. 10.13 Luk. 18.15 where the Inhabitants of Jerusalem and the house of Judah brought their children unto Christ and he took them up and bare them in his armes A reall signe of his love unto them indeed And his Saints now doe esteem their Infants blessed in Jesus Christ and doe depend upon him that he will circumcise their hearts and the heart of their seed to love him more and more according to his gracious promise Deut. 30.6 And this is that which this Propheticall and Documentall sentence teacheth us when it sayth They shall hang or cause to relie or depend upon him all the glorie of his fathers house The least glorie must not be left out but all must be brought in and layd upon him He is the object upon whom they must fix their eyes He is the nayle upon which they must fasten them for so is his Command Mar. 10.14 Suffer the little children to come unto me and forbid them not for of such is the kingdome of God As if he should say They are the burden which I must beare because they are part of the
is of force against the infants of beleevers to prove them also not to be in the new Covenant nor to be baptized But this is very weak against such parents Therefore it is of no force against their infants Seeing it is so you may plainly perceive that I have just ground to except against your conclusiō Pag. 4 l. 22 23 that because all the children of beleevers are not saved Therefore the infants of beleevers are not in the Covenant now on foot nor ought to be baptized Such an excuse as this might as well have served informer time for the children of Israel that they might not onely have neglected Circumcision but also all other Ordinances But such arguing bringeth large liberty tending to Athisme destruction and ruination of the foundation of Christian Religion Rom. 3.1 2 3 4. But what saith Paul when he declareth that the Jewes had the Oracles of God committed unto them what if some did not believe shall their unbeliefe make the faith of God of none effect God forbid yea let God be true and every man a lyar c. The Apostasie of Cain could not hurt Adam nor hinder Abel from eternall life For though Cain and his seed perished yet God was still good unto his Church unto Israel to those that were of an upright heart Furthermore for to maintain errour you bring errour false things to prove a falshood like two false witnesses that stand one for another for to prove your own false affirmation that infants are not in the Covenant outwardly nor have that holinesse whereby to be admitted now to the outward ordinance of baptisme as infants were then to Circumcision in the time of the Law and state of the Jews You say That the state or Church of the Jews were under the old Covenant and Law Pag. 4. l. 29. and stood not by faith and circumcision of the heart as this Church of the Gospel doth but stood meerly upon nature and circumcision of the flesh and accordingly had their outward and fiderall holinesse and outward cleansings all which are abolished with that state and no such holinesse or distinction is now between any persons in the world as you say shall be further declared by and by To which I answer That the Church of the Jews were in the old Covenant and Law is true But that they stood not by faith and circumcision of the heart as this Church of the Gospel doth but stood meerly upon nature and circumcision of the flesh is not true for the Church of the Jewes had the new covenant * Mr. Spilsbery granteth the Covenant made with Abraham and the Covenant now to be the same in substance See his treatise pag. 8 line 10. that was confirmed to Abraham * Gen. 17. Gal. 3.16 17. before of God in Christ which covenant the Law which was foure hundred and thirty yeares after could not disanull that it should make the promise of none effect* The Jewes were Gods holy speciall a Deut. 7.6 and peculiar b 26.18.19 people who were not constituted of a visible mixt multitude of prophane persons and holy beleevers and Infidels good and bad together c 29.18 32.9.12 Esay 5.1 2. but were a people called d 41.1 2. 43.1.7 Mat. 12.2.13 and separated e Ps 135.4 148.14 125.2 Deut. 33.29 14.1 2 from other Nations God brought them out of Egypt f Ex. 12.41.42 and baptized them in the cloud and in the sea g 1 Cor. 10.1 2 and went before them by day in a pillar of cloud and by night in a pillar of fire h Ex. 13.21 22 and at the great and victorious deliverance which they had over the Egyptians they beleeved his Words and sang his praise i Ex 15.1 Ps 106.12 then God led them through the wildernesse k Ex. 15.22 and made the bitter waters sweet for them l ver 25. that they might trust in him who healed them m v. 26. and he fed them with Manna which neither they nor their fathers knew to the intent that they might know that man could not live by bread only but by every word of God n Deut. 8.3 and he made the flinty rock a fountain of waters o Ps 114.8 Num. 20.8.11 that they thereby might quench their thirst Yea The Lord came from mount Synay and rose up from Seir unto them he shined forth from mount Paran and he came with ten thousands of his Saints from his right hand went a fiery Law yea he loved the people p Deut 33.2 3 they were therefore to trust stedfastly in God the sword of their excellencie q ver 29. and to look continually for eternall life of him and cleave unto him r 10.20 who was their life and the length of their dayes ſ 30.19 20. whom they were commanded to fear and to love and to serve with all their heart and with all their soule t Deut. 10.12 so the Lord was with them they with him and as he had commanded them so they were still to be a holy people to the Lord their God even as he was holy u Levit. 11.44 19.2 20.7 By all which it appeares that there was a manifest difference put between them and the prophane of the world as is between Christ and Antichrist In brief as their Church was the Church of Christ a See Cant. and the Covenant b Rev. 21.3 which they had c Gal. 3.16 17. the Covenant of Christ so the Commandement d Deut. 30.11.12 13 14. Rom. 10.6 7 8 9 10. or word which was not hid from them was the Gospel which they were not to enquire after as though it were some strange thing afar off or beyond the seas c. for it was nigh unto them in their mouth and in their heart that they might doe it even the Gospel of Christ the same word of faith which Paul preached yea further they had not onely the Gospel of Christ but Christ himselfe his presence in a speciall manner amongst them though he were not then manifested in the flesh Esay 63 9. Wherefore I would have you to consider and revoke those rash speeches that this heavenly society and blessed fraternity stood not by faith but meerly upon nature and circumcision of the flesh It is an infidelious opinion to judge them to be Infidels in the Jewes state whom God did so call and separate which had his Oracles and Ordinances whom he called his holy people his chosen e Deut. 10.15 and peculiar people f Cap. 14.2 his beloved ones g Cap 7.7.8 to whose seed he promised life as to themselves h Cap. 30.19.20 whose hearts he promised to circumcise as also the hearts of their seed i Deut 30.6 as he hath promised to his people in the last dayes which thing
6.5 In death there is no remembrance of God in the grave who shall praise him But the Comforter which would not have beleeving parents mourne 1 Thes 4.13 as those which have no hope hath informed them that he is the Circumciser of their heart and of the heart of their seed * Deut. 30.6 a plain evidence that they love and know him or rather are beloved and knowne of him He that loved them in their life will not forsake them in their death For the dead which die in the Lord are fully blessed yea saith the Spirit for they rest from their labours and their workes doe follow them * Rev. 14.13 But by your words it appeareth that you judge the infants of beleevers and Infidells all alike Yea the Infidell servants which serve beleevers if these your words be true have a greater priviledge then the Infants of beleevers for the servants are capable of instruction in respect of a naturall capabilitie but the Infants are not Now if you will still grant that the Infants of beleevers though they die in their infancie have a greater priviledge then the infants of unbeleevâ—rs then you must also grant that that their priviledge resteth in something else besides the bare publication of the Gospel which they are not in their infancie capable of And you should not have over-topped them so far as to say that because beleeving parents may be a means to bring their children to the knowledge and faith of Jesus Christ that therefore they have no more priviledges then the unbeleeving wife As if this were the greatest priviledge which beleevers infants have which unbeleevers themselves may have Mark 16.15 But you should rather have reasoned thus Beleeving parents may publish the Gospel to their unbeleeving servants unbeleeving wives to all other unbeleevers but they may yea ought to apply it to their infants * See Mar. 16.16 Luk. 1.76 77 78 79. as well as to themselves also to all those whom they are to esteem in the state of salvation he that hath faith thus to do is a Christian he that hath not so much faith but refuseth to apply the Gospel so the Lord be mercifull to his soule by giving him repentance and remission of his sinne All godly parents â—ike faithfull Abraham were to teach their children the way of life both what things were and what things signified Gen. 19.17.19 Josh 4.21.24 and to declare unto them the goodnesse of God in the land of the living yea to hide nothing from them which might be profitable to them or beneficiaâ—l for them But as they grew up to be capable of knowledge the parents were as before mentally so now verbally to apply the promises unto themselves and their children c. Psal 78.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. And surely this is one cause why the Land mourns why the Lord smiteth the earth with cursing Mal. 4.5 6. because the heart of the parents are not linked to their Infants This part of good Elias and John Baptists ministâ—ry doth not worke upon them And how can it worke upon them so long as they continue in their sinnes and so wrap themselves and their off-spring in many mischiefes and miseries and doe not choose life the thing that pleaseth God but refuse it and follow the wayes of the strange woman whose wayes are wayes of death and whose steps reach downe to hell And surely I may well say unto you that those are Physicians of no value who in stead of curing them doe kill them and in stead of preserving them doe poysen harden corrupt and pervert them with such damnable doctrine which so violently possesseth them that they thinke the Infants of beleevers have no priviledge at all in respect of the Covenant of grace no more then the children of Turkes and Heathens who are unholy A dangerous doctrine and to be abhorred detested and witnessed against by those that feare the God of heaven and desire to make a difference between the precious and the vile against all such Mongrell opposites who by speech and writing contrary to the Tenour of the whole Scripture do labour to rank all infants in one condition Thus coupling light and darknesse God and Belial the beleever and the Infidell together But woe unto them may we say as sayth the Prophet Isaiah Isa 10.1 which decreâ— unrighteous decrees and write grievousnesse which they have prescribed Thus drawing * Isa 5.18 iniquitie with the cords of vanitie and sinne as it were with a cart-rope Woe ** Ver. 20. unto them that call evill good and good evill that put darknesse for light and light for darknesse bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter Psal 73.1 Yet surely God is good unto Israel may wee say to those that are pure in heart The Lord hath been mindfull of us He will blesse us He will blesse the house of Israel saith that sweet singer of Israel He will blesse the house of Aaron Psal 115.12 13 14 15. He will blesse those that feare the Lord with small and great The Lord shall increase you more and more you and your children You are blessed of the Lord who hath made the heaven and the earth NExt * See A. R. Pag. 12. lin 40. Pag. 13. li. 1 2. Pag. 13. l. 3. you say The fourth Scripture is That which speakes of Christs commanding little Children to be brought unto him and sayd That of such is the kingdome of God Hence you say therefore some reason The kingdome of God belongeth to little Children why not the Seales I Ans If by these some you mean the people of the Seperation then I say you have not set it downe according to our expression It is too generally laid downe We say the kingdome of heaven belongeth to the Infants of beleevers and we doe not barely question why not the seales But we set it downe affirmatively that the seales doe belong to the infants of beleeving parents But for as much as our poynt is particularly concerning the Baptisme of infants I intend to proceed directly to the matter in hand and answer your trifling objections by the way as I trace you Mat. 28.19 Mat. 16.16 First It is to be minded that Baptisme is one of the priviledges of Christs Church which is his house and kingdome Secondly It is also to be minded that Jesus Christ the eternall Sonne of God and Lord of Glory and of all administrations and giver of every good and perfect gift when he sayth Suffer the little Children to come unto me Mar. 10.14 Mat. 19.14 c. For of such is the kingdome of heaven He doth hereby apply the Gospel unto them I say It is Gospel which he speaketh here Where the kingdome is ther 's the Gospel Get the kingdome thou hast God and Gospel and all And so wee are to understand that with the kingdome the infants of beleevers have the Gospel of the
your selfe in answering them when you say * Pag. 13. lin 10 11 12 13 14. That Examination in respect of the Supper is required onely of men of yeares not of infants who are not able to performe it Further you tell us That if your Author nor memory faile you Children were admitted as well to the Supper as to Baptisme for many yeares in time past and over against in the margent of the page * Page 13. at lin 15. you name Parker on the Crosse Ans Indeed you may suspect your memory if you take your imagination to be your memory And you may expect that your Author can stand you in little stead in opposing the Baptisme of Infants A good object may faile a bad subject and so your Author may faile you especially he being neither an Author nor upholder of your errour which you labour by all meanes to uphold Next you say A. R. Lin. 17 18 19 And why not to the one as well as to the other seeing the same reasons are alike in both and will center into one if fully prosecuted I Answer This is but a begging of the Question I have told you why not to the one as well as to the other Because they are capable of the one in respect of a naturall capabilitie but not of the other And therefore I deny that the reasons are alike in both or will center into one though never so fully prosecuted Wheras you further oppose infants Baptisme saying that * Pag 13. li. 21 22. no Infant is required by God in Scripture to beleeve or to repent or to be baptized by any man c. The Infants of beleevers are not impenitent I Answer That this your speech is ambiguous and abominable and you may know that we stand not for the Baptizing of Infidells or those in whose hearts wee cannot rightly judge the foundation of repentance to be layd For God hath not required such to be baptized no more then he did command such to be circumcised in the time of the Law And you should know that faith is the gift of God so also is repentance and though the Saints of God are not required to manifest their faith and repentance actually so long as they cannot act yet for to say that therefore they have not faith and râ—pâ—ntance or that wee are not to judge them to have the gifts and graces of the Spirit because they cannot act is a meer idle toy and frivolous foppery But if you will say that though the infants of beleevers cannot manifest faith and repentance no more then Isaac could who was a childe of promise in his infancie yet they are to be judged to have faith and repentance notwithstanding Then you will agree with us in this truth But if you will say you deny it and will not assent unto it and that therefore the infants of beleevers ought not to be baptized Then I tell you you have your answer long agoe Christian Infants sayth Mr. Ainsworth * In his Censure upon the Anabaâ—tists Dia â—g pa. 70. lin 19. Have the grace they speakâ—â—f repentance faith regeneration c. Though not actually or by way of declaration to others yet they have through the worke of the Spirit the seed and beginning of faith virtually and by way of inclination so that they aâ—e not wholly destitute of faith regeneration c. though it be a thing hid and unknowne unto us after what manner the Lord worketh these in them Eâ—cles 11.5 Which Mr. Ainsworth doth further prove thus * In the same page lin 27. to page 71. If Infants naturally are some wayes capable of Adams sinne and so of unbeliefe disobedience transgression c. Then Christian Infants supernaturally and by grace are some wayes capable of Christs righteousnesse and so of faith obedience sanctification c. But Infants are capable of the former evills by Adam therefore they are capable of the later good things by Christ That they are capable â—f the former he proved in his treating of originall sinne from divers Scriptures as Psal 51. John 3. Rom. 5. c. The consequence to wit that infants are capable of the later good things by Christ he proveth thus * See his book page 71. lin 8. First Because the first Adam was a figure of the second Adam Christ So that as the sinne of the first Adam his fault disobedience and death for it came on all his Children both by imputation and infection or corruption of nature So the righteousnesse and obedience of Christ cometh on all his Children both by imputation and renewing of nature unto life and salvation as the Apostle compareth them Rom. 5.12.15 16 17 18 19.21 Secondly Because Infants being by Adam sinners Children of wrath c. mâ—st be borne againe of the Spirit or else they cannot see the kingdome of God Joh. 3.3.5 6. But the Christian Infants dying in infancie shall see the kingdome of God and not be damned as the Adversaries grant * The old Anabaptists doe graÌ„t that childreÌ„ dying in their infanciâ— shall see the Kingdom of God But some now that stand against the Baptisme of Infants say They are all in the state of damnation Others that withstand Infants Baptisme say They know not how to judge of them But I say by the Scripture Wee are to judge the infants of beleevers to be in the state of salvation â—nd those of them that die in their infancie are not damned but saved And as for other Infants even the infants of the wicked we have nothing to doe to judge them within but without Therefore by Christs doctrine they are borne againe of the Spirit and so must needs in some measure have repentance faith and holines without which there is no regeneration Againe That Infants have the faith and love of God in them And regeneration in their measure is thus proved They to whom God giveth the signe and seale of righteousnesse by faith and of regeneration they have faith and regeneration for God giveth no lying figne he sealeth no vaine or false Covenants But God gave to Infants Circumcision which was the signe and seale of the righteousnesse of faith and regeneration Gen. 17.12 Rom. 4.11 2.28 29. Colos 2.11 Therefore Infants had and consequently now have faith and regeneration though not in the crop of harvest by declaration yet in the bud and beginnings of all Christian graces They that deny this reason must either make God the Author of a lying signe and seale of the Covenant to Abraham and his Infants or they must hold that infants had those graces then but not now both which are wicked and absurd to affirme Or they must say that Circumcision was not the signe and seale of the righteousnesse of faith and then they openly contradict thâ— Scripture Rom. 4.11 Moreover As the Apostle in Rom. 5. compareth our naturall estate in Adam and our spirituall estate in Christ so may
the uncircumcision declaring that Abraham received not circumcision before hee had this blessednesse wherefore he calleth Circumcision a signe and seale of the righteousnesse of faith which he had before he was circumcised which importeth that all those who were circumcised then according to Gods appointment were in visibilitie blessed before and had this righteousnesse before even as all those who are baptized according to Gods appointment are righteous before and have in visible account the same blessing which those had who were circumcised according to the revealed will of God And he goeth on in the 13 14 15. verses and there telleth us who are the right heires And in the 16th verse he sayth that the promise is sure to all the seed not to that onely which is of the law but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham who is the father of us all And he further sheweth that this promise so shall thy seed be and that Abrahams beleeving Gods promise was imputed unto him for righteousnesse and was not written for his sake alone but for us also to whom it shall be imputed if wee beleeve on God Touching the other Scripture Rom. 9.6 7 8. Isaac was no mocker though he were mocked no persecuter though persecuted in his infancie which you alledge to prove your former position concerning the different constitutions of the Church of the Jewes and of the Church of the Gentiles it maketh nothing for your purpose neither but directly against you for there wee may see that though all are not Israel which are of Israel yet the Word of God taketh effect according to that in Rom. 3.3 Ishmaels mocking of Isaac did not argue that Isaac was also a mocker Isaac remained still a childe of promise though an Infant But if it be true as you would infer that the state was a state of bondmen and that an heire or Lord differed nothing from a servant of sinne and if it were constituted and stood meerly upon nature and circumcision of the flesh and not by faith and circumcision of the heart it argueth that the Word of God is without effect that all were Israel that were of Israel all mockers with Ishmael prophane persons with Esau c. which to thinke is very erronious for the word of God hath taken effect to retaine the holy Infants and cast out visible prophane persons and therefore the state wherein they were was a state of free-men God was well pleased with them and accepted of their sacrifices and promised unto them remission of their sinnes through Jesus Christ who was then to come and is now come Therefore I would have you to banish such evill thoughts out of your minde as if they had a false corrupt or carnall and not a spirituall constitution Againe consider That Church upon whom holy Baptisme was rightly administred was holy and spirituall But holy Baptisme was rightly administred upon the Church of Israel 1 Cor. 10.1 2. Psa 77.16 17 Therefore they were a holy spirituall Church as well as wee But peradventure you will say you mean that in their Apostacie they pleased not God and therefore their Church-state which they were in formerly had a carnall constitution and was not spirituall To which I answer That the like you may say concerning the Churches now which you acknowledge to be spirituall But you should consider that many are called but few are chosen Gods garden may have some plants therein which possibly may degenerate from their kinde and become wilde yet the garden is still the Lords but the husband-men ought when they discover such to weed them out So corruptions began to spring in the Church of Corinth 2 Cor. 7.11 and they cut downe the tender fruits thereof in time And God threatned the members of some of the Churches of Asia 〈◊〉 Rev. 2. 3. to execute judgement upon them if repentance prevented him not As for Coll. 2.11 which you have cited that the Church of Collossia was circumcised with the circumcision made without hands in putting off the body of the sinnes of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ This implyeth not but that the Jewes and Proselytes before Christs coming had circumcision of the flesh as an outward signe unto them that the Lord would circumcise their hearts and the hearts of their seed to love him more and more according to his gracious promise And seeing that the Apostle maketh circumcision heer the same in effect with our Baptisme it plainly argueth that as infants in former time were to receive circumcision so infants now in their infancie are to receive Baptisme the seale of the same covenant Whereas you say That was a state of bond men * Lin. 23. wherein an heire differed nothing from a servant this not of servants * Lin. 28. but of sonnes and free-men I suppose you mean by bond-men those who were bound-servants to Sathan and by free-men those who were set free by Christ In this respect then you have not done well in saying that such a one that was made free in this spirituall respect differed nothing from those who were visibly bond-slaves of Sathan Then it seemes Isaac differed nothing from a mocker nor the Proselytes infants from Heathens and Infidels And if you mean by servants those who are wicked in the Church I say they were to be cast out as they manifested evill fruits for though they were in the house a while and were as children yet they manifesting themselves afterwards to be servants of sinne were no longer to abide but those who are not servants of sinne are now as they were then to abide for ever therein so Ishmael was in covenant with Isaac and was circumcised but when he manifested fruits of unholinesse out he was cast And why was this Gen. 21.9 10. Not because he was Abrahams sonne according to the flesh but because he manifested himselfe afterward to be a servant of sinne and so degenerated from the righteous steps of Abraham Now you ought to know See before in this Treatise pag. 29 30 31 32 33 147 148 149. that the Church of the Jewes was constituted of free-men and there was not one sinner to be suffered in that church but when he was discovered either he must repent or be cut off therefore it plainly argueth that visible wicked persons bond-slaves of Sathan were not to be the matter of that Church in the first constitution they were such who in all outward appearance were not alliens from Gods covenants or promises or strangers to God but were such whom he knew and owned and such whom he would acknowledge as in the kingdome of grace heer so in the kingdome of glory hereafter It may be you thinke thus That if the Church of Israel were constituted of free-men why then were many of them manifested afterwards to be wicked Corah and his company a congregation of Rebels from whom Moses and the rest were commanded to
their seed in their infancie to have such dignitie by vertue of Gods covenant to be circumcised The Gospel of Christ being every jot as glorious as it hath been is also as effectuall and powerfull now to dignifie beleevers and their infants with the ordinance of Baptisme and that by vertue of Gods covenant unto which is annexed Christs institution which is very generall yea more generall then circumcision was of old And surely if the infants of beleevers had that power as to become the children of God in their infancie fellow heires with the Saints in light as Isaac was and all those like him were and to be coe-heires with Jesus Christ of the everlasting inheritance kingdome and glory and that before Christs resurrection Then the infants of beleevers borne after Christs resurrection have the like priviledges But the first is true from the grounds before layd from their right to the covenant their being in the covenant c. and the unchangeablenesse of the Angel of the covenant Therefore the latter that holy infants are still in the covenant is true also And this hath been sufficiently proved before Touching your Exhortation how wee should bewaile the great Apâ—stacie c. I say as the Saints of old did bewaile the great Apostacie of the Israelites both in faith and worship Isa 2.6 who were replenished from the East and were south-sayers like the Philistians and pleased themselves in the children of strangers So wee ought to bewaile this Apostacie of these now Wee have cause to bewaile their ignorance who pretend holinesse to God and make a verball profession drawing neer unto God with their mouthes like the Apostate Israelites when their hearts are far from him pleading for the baptizing of those Infants whose parents are neither of them beleevers causing the holy signe to be administred upon their infants in that idolatrous estate in the partaking whereof they have no right any more then the seed of those Apostates of the Israelites had right to circumcision in former time But yet though the Infants were circumcised in that Idolatrous estate the Prophets worke was to call them to repentance and if they returned the manner of their circumcision being repented of it was as effectuall unto them as if they had received it in an excellent and holy manner So those who are baptized in their infancie in the state of Apostacie at their conversion are not to be baptized againe but to repent of the evill of the manner and not cast away Gods holy institution but still retaine it and make a holy use of it yet they ought not to Idolize it by preferring it before that which is greater Though the Temple Rev. 2.1 2. and the Altar and the worshippers were to be measured yet the Court without was to be cast out and not to be measured because it was given to the Gentiles Againe Whereas you speak of the abrogation of the state of the Jewes I say This hath been answered fully before you should still minde that Jesus Christ came not to undermine or overthrow his kingdome though it was taken out of the hands of the unbeleeving Jewes and given unto another people whom Christ testified would bring forth fruits of it Againe Whereas you speak of the casting off of Israel according to the flesh I answer That none were cast off meerly because they were Israelites according to the flesh and though some were cut off yet others remained on and in that state where the Gentiles by faith were planted and placed as some of the Jewes through unbeliefe were cut off supplanted and displaced So the Ap stle Paul sayth the Jewes some of them not all of them were cut off because of unbeliefe and the beleeving Gentiles grafted in their stead As for those that beleeved their priviledges and prerogatives were still as great and as large both to them and their seed as they were before And the like may be sayd concerning the Proselytes And so your other question is resolved concerning the bringing in of us Gentiles and our seed as acceptable on Gods Altar And whereas you question againe A. R. Whether the parents Jew and Gentile must needs be borne againe of the Spirit and onely by faith become the seed of Abraham and heires according to promise Gal. 3.7.29 Rom. 4.11 12. And shall their children become the same seed by nature I answer The birth of the Spirit is very necessary both to young and old without which they cannot enter into the kingdome of heaven And I would have you to know that I plead not that the children of the faithfull become heires of the promise by nature but by the free grace of God which passeth all understanding which is as sufficient for beleevers and their children now as formerly And these interrogations of yours are answered at large you having mentioned the same things before Againe You say A. R. Pag. 30. lin 2. to lin 10. Neither can any shew any one such promise to any beleever in all the whole world and his seed as was and is to Abraham and his seed who is therefore the father of us all to wit of all beleevers and onely of beleevers Jew and Gentile father and childe c. Rom. 4.16 and therefore it is faith that it might be by grace to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed but the promise is sure onely to beleevers Therefore beleevers onely are the seed of Abraham to whom the promise and ordinance of the new Testament doe properly appertaine To which I answer That this hath been answered before already It hath been proved sufficiently that the same covenant which was made with Abraham and his seed is made to beleevers and their seed it being a perpetuall covenant the heires of it are perpetuall heires even such to whom the promises doe appertaine as well as unto their deare brethren of old who are departed in the same faith and this heavenly order the old Law which was given at Mount Sinai could not disanull And I hope there is no reasonable man but will condescend unto this that all those who were to receive the signe and sâ—ale of the righteousnesse of faith were visibly holy and faithfull but the Infants of beleevers were by Gods appointment to receive the signe and seale of the righteousnesse of faith therefore the Infants of beleevers were then as they are now visibly holy and faithfull And Christian Infants are as capable every way of the seale now as the Infants of the Jewes Gods holy ones were capable of the seale in former time Therefore the Baptisme of the New Testament doth properly appertaine unto such and therefore the administration of Baptisme upon them doth not overthrow the least part of the Gospel of Christ or any thing of his much lesse the whole as you in your following words most falsly speake and therefore the minor of your following argument being so small that there is no
means of their naturall birth or generation after the flesh but by the Spirit of regeneration howbeit it is a certaine truth that the Saints generation doth not hinder regeneration in any of them Generation doth not worke regeneration but generation causeth distinctioÌ„ of persons that what was one in the root is become more in the branches or what was one in such a branch growing on such a roote bringeth forth other branches Abrahams holy action was Levies by imputation See Heb. 7.9 or as it were little sprigges who are in a growing condition or in a way of thriving so long as they are borne up and receive nourishment from the roote And this division or distinction by way of derivation doth not simply make qualities contra-distinct and opposit one to the other or break the conjunction or contraction between them or take away the vertue of the roote from them For Abrahams act of obedience which he did before Levi was an infant was imputed unto Levi afterward which act was an act of obedience even a fruit of faith which cannot be without the Spirit Now when Levi was borne should they have sayd that he was an unregenerated Infant Nay rather it may be thought that they esteemed as well of Levi in his infancie as Eve did of Seth in his infanciâ— when Seth was borne shee did not say God hath sent moâ— a young Heathen or Canite though the seed of Caine was hers by generation but saith shee The Lord hath sent mee another seed in stead of Abel whom Caine slew Marke now shee did not say in stead of Caine or in stead of Caines infants which did indeed spring naturally from Adams loynes but in stead of Abel saith shee Therefore I say it is apparent that though generation did not worke regeneration yet shee beleeved in God and had so much faith 〈…〉 to put a reall difference between Apostates and those who were not Apostated but were spiritually holy And in that it is said that Seth was in stead of Abel it is a plaine Argument that as Abel was in the Covenant and as Abel was a member of the Church so was Seth according to his name so was he set or appointed instead of Abel for the saying imports that he took the roome of Abel as when one plant is removed out of a fruitfull soyle and another planted in stead thereof And seeing God refuseth not the bodies of his Saints but accepteth of them in his gracious Covenant though they are generated persons it plainly argueth that generation doth not hinder regeneration And therefore it appeareth that this your reason concerning generation and regeneration is of no force against the holy Children spoken of in 1 Cor. 7.14 but ratheâ— maketh for them as shall be further made to appeare And all which you have said here doth not prove that the holinesse of children there is not meant of any holines in relation to any Church-Covenant which is the thing for which you brought it The Infants of beleevers are visibly holy in relation to faith and the holy Covenant The unbeleeving yoak-fellowes abiding with their be leâ—ving yoak fellowes are sanctified by them for this end Else were their Children uncleane but now are they holy So sayth the holy Apostle Paul 1 Cor. 7.14 Your children are holy that is to say the children of you beleevers in Covenant with your God they are the children of the Covenant differing from those children that are unholy and out of the Covenant But against this you argue that what is an effect of regeneration is not brought to passe by generation though the parents be holy And I suppose that those Merit-mongers keeping still to their principles may beleeve the contrary I meane such Merit-mongers who against the Gospel of free-grace do labour vehemently to shut out all beleevers infants from the new Jerusalem Rev. 22.14 15. and so doe in their conceptions rank them with dogs and whoremongers without and judge them not to be in the Covenant or regenerated because they have not a naturall capabilitie to discerne apprehend and both actually verbally professe faith in their own persons yea they judge all infants to be visibly in one condition and out of the Covenant in visibilitie without putting any visible distinction between the Infants of the Church and the Infants out of the Church But if that which is an effect of regeneration were to be brought to passe by generation they might with some colour of truth ranke them all in one visible estate considering that they are all generated And then there had been no weight in the Apostles speech concerning this matter But we are to know that the Apostle had good reason for what he sayd The Master of spirits was his instructor whose words are not to be wrested and perverted and so made of none effect but are discreetly to be observed and faithfully obeyed And though some doe despise the Lords vessells of small quantitie even holy infants the young Olive plants of beleeving parents esteeming them unregenerated yet wee are taught to esteeme highly of them and to honour them as the precious Saints whom the most high God hath regenerated and seperated to himselfe as his peculiar treasure who are justified and sanctified and saved by him and therefore ought to be sealed unto him by Baptisme as such holy Infants in the time of the Law were sealed unto him by Circumcision And you your selfe doe grant that to be of the Covenant or Kingdome is the proper effect of regeneration Joh 3.3 without which none can see it much lesse be of it Consider what you say for here you must confesse that seeing all that see the kingdom of God are regenerated either the Infants of beleevers which die in their infancie are regenerated or else that they shall never see the Kingdome of God much lesse be of it But Christ hath testified that the kingdome of heaven consisteth of such and therefore wee may safely conclude that though they die in their infancie yet they shall see the kingdome of God and therefore it appeareth that they are regenerated What will you say now in answer to your argument seeing it maketh not against holy infants but for them Surely you will denie that they have any of the effects of regeneration or else you will denie your owne argument or the Scripture of God which declareth that they are in covenant or else confesse that the infants of beleevers are to be accounted holy persons in covenant with God and heires of his heavenly Kingdome according as the holy Scripture teacheth us one of these you will doe if silence prevent you not Moreover I know not how you take the beeing in the Covenant or Kingdome there is a two-fold beeing therein to wit externall and internall outward and inward visible and invisible as I observed before concerning persons enterance into the Church Act. 8.13 Simon Magus beleeved and was rightly baptized with the
outward Baptisme therefore by consequence he was visibly in the Covenant even outwardly and externally He was an elected Saint so far as men could or were to judg then at that present time though his heart was not upright in the sight of God and therefore he was not of Gods Kingdome nor in the new Covenant in Gods secret account nor regenerated no more then Judas Iscariot though the Apostles themselves esteemed never so highly of him But the Infants of beleevers are visibly in the Covenant And wee are to judge all that are in the Covenant visibly to be elected regenerated sanctified heires of righteousnesse children of God and of his heavenly Kingdome till they appeare unto us either by some visible demonstration of their owne or evident manifestation of others or testification of Gods not to be that which before wee were to judge them to be O minde this well that Secret things belong unto the Lord our God Deut. 29.29 but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our Children for ever Secondly say you * Pag. 5. lin 9. to lin 19. Contradictions cannot be the effect of one and the selfe-same Covenant in one and the selfe-same respect but for one parent to be a beleever that is of the Church when the other parent is not to produce a holy seed that is in the Covenant 1 Cor. 7.14 And for the other parents to be one a Jew and the other a Babylonian the one a member of the Church the other not to produce an unholy seed that is out of the Covenant and to be put away both wife and all borne by her as Ezra 10.3 you say is a contradiction in one and the selfe-same respect Therefore it cannot be the effect of one and the selfe-same Covenant Ans That is a contradiction which is opposed to a contrary thing as light is to darknesse And that is an effect which floweth from a Cause or ground The ground why God gave Abraham the signe and seale of his righteousnesse was Abrahams faith in beleeving Gods Covenant For Abraham had first the Covenant and faith to lay hold upon it and afterward the seale thereof The ground why Abraham did administer Circumcision Gods holy signe and seale of the righteousnesse of his faith was faith in beleeving the firmenesse of Gods promise Rom. 4.11 and the effectuall power and efficacie of the Ordinance of Circumcision which Circumcision had the denomination of the Covenant it self * Gen. 17.10 because it was a signe thereof * Ver. 11. I say Abrahams action of Circumcision was done in faith otherwise it had been sinne unto him * Rom. 14.23 But he added unto his faith this vertue this effect of the New covenant to yeeld obedience unto God in performance of this holy Ordinance upon his infants according to Gods appointment Baptisme being come in the roome of Circumcision though it be more generall yet it hath an equivolence with Circumcision Col. 2.11 12. Wherefore it being not contradictory thereunto but sealing up one and the same Covenant of life As Circumcision was to be administred upon the infants of beleevers in former time so Baptime is to be administred upon the infants of beleevers now Now though every contradiction argueth a difference yet every difference maketh not a contradiction But to restraine or lessen the priviledges of the Saints under the Gospel is not onely to make one Covenant contradictory to another but also the New covenant contradictory to it selfe which is not of a fading nature but of a flourishing nature and hath flourished and doth flourish more under the Gospel then it did under the Law Wherefore if you doe conceive that 1 Cor. 7.14 is of a lesser extent then Ezra 10.3 you are mistaken but if you will say 1 Cor. 7.14 is of a larger extent Wherefore have you brought Ezra 10.3 to unfold it Except it be to prove forcibly hereby against your selfe how that all beleevers infants generally of what Nation soever have greater priviledges now since Christs death then they have had heretofore As for the second part of your Argument considering that it wanteth explanation one way and proofe another way it will not stand you in any stead to prove what you would have it prove to wit that the holinesse spoken of 1 Cor. 7.14 is not a holinesse in relation to any Church-Covenant Indeed if you had set it downe thus That for one parent to be a beleever and the other an unbeleever to produce a holy seed in covenant and the same parents remaining in the same estate without alteration to bring forth an unholy seed and out of the Covenant is a contradiction in one and the selfe-same respect Or thus For one parent to be a beleever and another parent to be an unbeleever to produce a holy seed And for the like parents in the same respects to produce an unholy seed is a contradiction in one and the selfe-same respect If you had reasoned thus and so proved it then you had done somewhat like to your undertakings but in speaking generally of parents in covenant and out of covenant without noting in particular the difference that was between these sanctified unbeleeving wives mentioned in 1 Cor. 7.14 and those unbeleeving wives mentioned in Ezra 10.3 who were not then sanctified to beleevers for that purpose you even loose your selfe But you say it is a contradiction in one and the selfe-same respects and have not explaned nor declared what it is a contradiction of whether of the New covenant or of the old covenant or of both covenants Therefore declare plainly what covenant you thinke this divorcement in Ezra to be an effect of Was it an effect of the New covenant or of the old you may know that neither covenants did allow them to marry those cursed persons You ought also to minde that one Israelite might be divorced from another Israelite in the time of the Law and this precept was granted and written them by Moses Deut. 24.1 for the hardnes of their hearts Mat. 10.5 But this in Ezra 10. was not a bare grant but an absolute command not barely permitted or granted unto them for the hardnesse of their hearts there is more in it then so For those wicked persons in whom they formerly took delight they were forceably to put away it was not left to their libertie whether they would put them away or no but it was an injunction layd upon them under penaltie of Gods curse for they perceived Gods heavie wrath was hanging over their heads ready to seaze upon them unlesse there were some speedy redresse And it evidently appeareth that you have not well read or considered the Scripture for if you had you would soone have seen a great and weightie reason pressing these sonnes of God to put away these daughters of men and those unholy children borne of them for they in uniting themselvs thus unto them had made thēselves
Joh. 1.29 But our chiefe poynt is not here about ceremoniall circumstantiall shadowes for we all grant that the ceremonies of the old law are ceased And to argue that because they were then subject to legall pollution and some of them had it that therefore they had not the inward and spirituall cleannesse is a vaine and groundlesse thing so to thinke for the Good Lord was mercifull unto every one that prepared his heart to seek the Lord the Lord God of his Fathers though he were not cleansed according to the purification of the Sanctuary * 2 Chro. 30.18 19. They had not time to purifie themselves yet they did eat of the Passeover that is though he had not that outward purification which you speak of And their purifications and washings which you mention * Pag. 6. lin 11. they were to teach them the benefit which they had and were to have spiritually by Jesus Christ Their circumcision of the flesh * Gen. 17.10 11. Rom. 4.11 also was to teach them the Circumcision of the heart * Deut. 10.16 all which circumstantiall Ordinances though they are ceased yet we have the substance of them in other Ordinances and that outwardly And further it is to be minded concerning the people of Israel that their conformitie unto the Lawes of God did really demonstrate unto men that they were spiritually holy and so now the conformitie of Gods people to the Lawes of God doth give sufficient demonstration of their holinesse in the sight of men whereby they are to judge them to be communicable persons in a spirituall way And though the uncircumcised were then unholy as you speak * Pag. 6. lin 9. yet they were such uncircumcised who were not to be judged circumcised in their hearts and though persons then were circumcised both in heart and flesh and did yeeld universall obedience to Gods commands See Lev. 14.8 yet through some accident they might have a kinde of ceremoniall defilement and yet retaine their visible holinesse still You should also mind that the people of Israel after the Law was given in Mount Sinai many of them were uncircumcised in flesh * Josh 5.5 yet they were at the time of their uncircumcision a holy peculiar people unto God and none were like unto them * Deut. 7.6 26.18 19. 33.29 and therefore your alledging that there was a difference between the circumcised and the uncircumcised and that the circumcised Israelites might not then companie with the uncircumcised Heathens is of no force against this truth even that the Infants of beleevers have that holinesse which accompanieth faith Some uncircuÌ„cised persons might be accompanied with and some Circumcâ—sed persons might not be accompanied with for though circumcised persons were not to accompany with the uncircumcised yet it was meant of those uncircumcised persons who were aliens from the common-wealth of Israel and strangers from the Covenants of promise and not of those who were then members of the Church of God and therefore it was not meant of all uncircumcised persons for then the parents should not have kept company with their Infants before they were circumcised but were to deliver them to other uncircumcised persons to keep till the eight day wherein they were circumcised And then the uncircumcised beleeving Gentiles were not to be circumcised by the circumcised but by the uncircumcised Which to dreame is meere foolishnesse and therefore it appeareth that your Collections have no footing against holy infants To the poynt then Seeing that the Infants of beleevers though uncircumcised might be accompanied with in the time of their uncircumcision and that by the circumcised It evidently sheweth that there was a great difference between them and the heathen Infants of uncircumcised unbeleevers And seeing the uncircumâ—ised infants of beleevers might be lawfully accompanied with and were different then from unbeleevers it is appareÌ„t that they were holy then though uncircumcised And seeing that beleevers infants though uncircumcised were holy in the time of the Law and distinguished by their holinesse from the Infants of unbeleevers and seeing that Jesus Christ is still one and the same and that the ceremoniall holines is ceased it plainly argueth that when the Apostle Paul â—aketh in 1 Cor. 7.14 of the holy children of beleevers had by a sanctified wife he meaneth such a holines which is not ceased but remaineth permanent and doth visibly demonstrate those persons who have it to have right to Baptisme And as Circumcision did not give faith to the Infants of the Church nor adde the Infants of the Church to the Church no more then any other person but rather confirme them in it So Baptisme now doth not bring regeneration or faith unto such or unto any other persons as many fondly imagine neither doth it adde them to the Church but rather confirme them therein Touching Peters vision which you mention Pag. 6. lin 15. that God shewed him that he should not call any man polluted or uncleane It is good to understand in what sense it is spoken for wee may rightly caâ—l all the visible members of Antichrist polluted let them be what they will be high or low great or small though they have and usurpe the ordinances of God yet they are polluted persons so long as they remaine in that estate even as the Apostates in the time of the Law though they usurped circumcision and other Ordinances yet they were polluted persons and these remaining in that sinfull estate they are not cleane neither legally nor evangelically To your inference * Lin. 8. from Act. 10.13 I answer That in the Gospel sense those that are seperated from Idolatry and those that are Idolaters are not all one in Christ Jesus for how can any be sayd to be in Christ so long as they are visibly out of Christ Wherefore it is to be understood that as the wicked of whatsoever Nation degree or sex they be Rom. 2.8 9. Rev. 22.15 are all one out of Christ so on the contrary the Saints of God of whatsoever Nation degree or sex they be are all one in Christ Rom. 10.11.12.13 Gal. 3.28 5.6 And this sheweth us to put a visible distinction between those who are visibly holy and those that are not But the infantâ— of beleevers are visibly holy as hath been proved before and therefore wee are to judge them in Christ and one with him members of his mysticall body and different from those who are not visibly holy but are out of the Covenant Whereas you say * Pag. 6. li. 25 26 27. that so now none are acceptable or ought to partake of the Gospel worship and ordinances without the Circumcision of Christ which is of the heart and Spirit I answer That one ought to be baptised before they are circumcised or washed spiritually in the heart at least so far as may be discerned by men neither ought any to presume without the inward