be baptized after Repentance and Faith according to the Commission and that there is no instance to be found of any other teaching that then such should be baptized and no other And for any to introduce another practice it is not only contrary to Christs Commission but contradictious to the Apostles teachings CHAP. III. Wherein believers Baptisme is proved the only Baptisme from the example and practise of the primitive Saints ACTS 2.41 THen they that gladly received his Word were baptized III. From the example of primative Saints Acts 8.12 But when they believed Philip Preaching the things concerning the Kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ they were baptized both Men and Women Verse 37.32 And Philip said if thou believest with all thy Heart thou mayst And he answered and said I believe that Iesus Christ is the Son of God And he commanded the Chariot to stand still and they went down both into the Water both Philip and the Eunuch and he baptized him Acts 18 8. And Crispus the chief Ruler of the Synagogue believed on the Lord with all his House and many of the Corinthians hearing believed and were baptized Acts 22.14 And Ananias said unto Paul the God of our fathers hath chosen thee that thou shouldest know his will and see the just fine shouldst hear the voice of his mouth And now why tarriest thou Arise and be baptized and wash away thy sins calling on the name of the Lord Acts 9.18 And he arosâ— forthwith and was baptiqed Which is also confirmed by the following Testimonies Luther Luther de Sacrament Tom. 3. fol. 168. saith That in times past it was thus that the Sacrament of Baptisme was administred to none except it were to those that acknowledged and confessed their faith and know how to rehearse the same and that it was necessary to be done because the Sacrament was constituted externally to be used that the faith be confest and made known to the Church Bulling Bullinger in his House-book 48. Sermon Baptisme saith he hath no prescribed time by the Lord and therefore it is left to the free choice of the faithfull Those that believed at the Preaching of Peter upon the day of Pentecost as also the Eunuch whom Philip baptized Cornelius the Captain Paul the Apostle at Damascus Lydia the seller of Purple a Woman that feared God the Keeper of the Prison at Philippi and other more as well Women as Men so soon as they tasted the gifts of Christ and believed his Word presently desired to be baptized Mr. Baxter further in his 16. Mr. Bax. Argument against Mr. Blake in the aforesaid 2d Disputation P. 149. saith most significantly If there can be no example given in Scripture of any one that was baptized without the profession of a saving Faith nor any precept for so doing then must we not baptize any without it But the Antecedent is true therefore so is the Consequent In proof whereof he produces the several Scripture examples of Persons that were baptized which saith he might afford us so many several Arguments but I shall put them together viz. First John as I have shewed you required the profession of true Repentance and that his Baptisme was for the remission of sin Secondly when Christ layeth down the Apostolical Commission the Nature and Order of the Apostles work is first to make them Disciples and then to Baptize them into the name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost as before That it was saving Faith that was required of the Jews Jews and professed by them Acts 2.38 is plain in the Text. The Samaritans Samaritans believed and had great Joy and were baptized into the name of Jesus Christ Acts 8.12 whereby it appeareth that it was both the Vnderstanding and Will that were both changed and that they had the profession even of a saving Faith yea even Simon himself 37. v. The Condition upon which the Eunuch Eunuch must be baptized was if he believed with all his Heart which he professed to do and that was the Evidence Philip expected Paul Paul was baptized after true conversion Acts 9.18 The Holy Ghost fell on the Gentiles before they were baptized Acts 10.44 Lydia Lydias Heart was opened before she was baptized and she was one the Apostles judged faithful to the Lord and offered to them the Evidence of her faith Acts 16.30 The example also of the Jaylor Jaylor is very full to the resolution of the Question in hand He first asketh Wrat he shall do to be saved The Apostle answereth him Believe in the Lord Jesus and thou shalt be saved and thy House So that it was a saving saith that is here mentioned He rejoyced and believed with all his House and was baptized the same hour of the night or straight way Crispus Crispus the chief Ruler of the Synagogue believed on the Lord with all his House And many of the Chrinthians hearing Corinth believed and were baptized Acts 18.8 Philip Philip. in Acts 8.37 is determining a Question and giveth this in as the decision If thou believest with all thy Heart thou mayst And to say that this is but de Bone esse meaning that it includes not the Negative otherwise thou mayst not is to make Philip to have deluded and not decided or resolved In a word saith he I know of no one word in Scripture that giveth us the least intimation that ever man was baptized without the profession of a saving Faith Thus Faâ— Mr. Baxter who to save us the labour hath himself you see given such an exact Catalogue of the Examples of the baptized in the Scripture among whom as he so well observes there is not one to be found that answered not Christs Commission and the Apostles Precept in a professed Faith and Repentance But 't is said he mentions only such as were baptized aged That is very true and the reason is because the Scripture affords examples of none other as he confesseth But Secondly By his own grant in the words beforegoing If Philips answer was decisive and not delusive all others are excluded And that none but such as are capable to give some demonstration that they believe with all their Heart ought to be admitted to Baptism CHAP. IV. Wherein believers are proved to be the only subjects of Baptisme IV. From the Spiritual ends of the Ordinance from the Spiritual ends of the Ordinance THe first End or Use we shall ment on is 1. To be a Sign of the Mysteries the Gospeâ— that the Baptized might have that represented in a Sign or Figure and preacht to his Eye in the Ordinance which had been preacht to his Ear and Heart by the Word and Spirit of God respecting the whole Mystery of the Gospel and his Duty and Obligation therein A Sign being as Paraeus observeth some outward thing appearing to the Sense through which some inward thing is at the same time
Eâ—glish Liturgy about 1549 the Form of Worship and Administration of the Sacraments with all their Rites and Ceremonies were held forth in the English Liturgy as it was translated out of the Latin Mass-Book concerning which we have this account from Mr. Fox in his Martyrology p. 1499. That in the Rising in Devonshire upon the translating the Latin Mass-Book into English the King writes after this manner to quiet them viz. The English Service translated out of the Latin Mass-Book As for the Service in the English Tongue perhaps it seemeth to you as New Service when indeed it is no other but the Old the self same words in English which were in Latin saving a few things taken out so fond that it hath been a shame to have heard them in English as all they can judg that list to repeat the truth And if it was good in Latin it remaineth good in English for nothing is altered but to speak with knowledg what was spoken with ignorance c. Wherein the Time Order Manner and Ceremony of Baptizing of Infants is directed and enjoyned with all the Rites appertaining thereto In the said Service-Book in the Rubrick before the Catechism it is said That Children being baptized have all things necess ry for their Salvation and be undoubtedly saved And therefore after Baptism the Priest must say We yeeld thee hearty thanks that it hath pleased thee to regenerate this Infant with thy Holy Spirit And the Child is afterwards to be instructed when he comes to understanding to say That therein he was made a Member of Christ and a Child of God and an Inheritor of the Kingdom of Heaven Just comporting length and breadth with Pope Innocents first Canons In the 27th Article of the Church of England 27. Article of the Chuâ—ch â— England it is said That the Baptizing of young Children is in any wise to be retained in the Church as most agreeable to the Institution of Christ made in Q. Eliz. time 1562. In the Scotch Service-Book Scotch Service-Book imposed in the begining of the late War it is said That as oft as new Water is put into the Font the Priest shall say Sanctifie this Fountain of Baptism Oh thou which art the Sanctifier of all things The Directory Directory in the Parliamenâ—s time leaves out Gossips and signing with the Sign of the Cross changes the Fonts into Basons And the Parliaments Ordinance May 2. 1648. made it Imprisonment to affirm Infants Baptism unlawful and that such should be Baptized again Mr. Marshal informes us out of Phocius p. 3334 That some of the Greek Churches have Laws That whatsoever baptized Person refused to bring their Children and Wives too to be baptized should be Anathamatised and punished also The wicked Decree of Zurick At Zurick as Dr. Featly tells us out of Gassius p. 68. The Senate made an Act That if any presumed to Rebaptize viz. to baptise any that had been baptised in their Infancy That they should be drowned and that at Vienna many for Baptizing such were so tyed together in Chains that they drew the other after him in the River wherein they were all drowned And that at Roplestein the Lords of that place Decreed that such should be burnt with a hot Iron and bear the base Brands of those Lords in whose Lands they had so offended And p. 182. out of Ponton Catalog through Germany Alsatia and Swedeland many Thousands of this Sect who defiled their first Baptisme by a second were baptised the third time in their wn Blood CHAP. III. Wherein the Erroneous Grounds both as to fabulous Traditions and mistaken Scriptures upon which Infants Baptism hath been both formerly and laterly founded is made manifest THe First and Principal Ground that hath been asserted for this practice hath been Ecclesiastical and Apostolical Tradition or however as hath been said the Scripture is so silent in the Case yet the clear full and uninterrupted Tradition of the Church makes up that defect to which the Church of Rome and some others have adhered Though many Protestants since the Reformation have chose to flye to some Consequential Arguments deduced as they suppose from the Scriptures to justifie the same Both which in this Chapter are brought forth and duly weighed in the Ballance of Truth The First we shall examine is the point of Tradition and therein do these two things Shew that it hath primarily been asserted to be the ground thereof Secondly The insufficiency of the Authorities that have been urged to prove the same Tradition the principal ground of Infants Baptism That Tradition hath principally been leaned upon as the main ground of the Practice you have the following Instances Austin Austin tells us That the Custome of our Mother the Church in Baptizing little Infants is not to be despised nor to be judged superfluous nor to be believed at all unless it were an Apostolical Tradition Lib. 10. de Gen. c. 23. And again in his 4th Book against the Donatists 24 Chap. saith That if there be any that do inquire for a Divine Authority for the Baptizing of Children Let them that know what the Universal Church holds nor was instituted in Councils but alwaies retained is most rightly believed to have been delivered by no other than Apostolical Authority Chrysost Chrysostom saith That Infants ought to be baptized as universally received by the Catholick Church to take away Original Sin Mag. Cent. 4. Bellarmine Tom. 1. L. 4. c. 2. saith That the Baptism of Infants is an Apostolical Tradition not written because saith he it is not written in any Apostolical Book though written he saith in the Books of almost all the Antients And which Tradition of the Apostles saith he is of no less Authority with us than the Scriptures In the Council of Trent Council of Trent after they had in the 5th and 7th Sessions made those Canons about Infants-Baptism before mentioned do conclude That their Traditions touching the same should be received Pari Pietatis affectu with the same pious affection with the Holy Scriptures as you have it p. 144. In the Council of Basil Council of Basil in the Oration of the Cardinal of Ragusi It is asserted That in the beginning of this Sacrament of Baptism they only were to be baptized who could by themselves answer Interrogatories concerning their Faith And that it was no where read in the Canon of Scripture that a new-born Infant was baptized who could neither believe with the Heart to Justification nor confess with the Mouth to Salvation Yet nevertheless saith he the Church hath appointed it Eckius Eck us against the Lutherans writes That the Ordinance concerning the Baptism of Children is without Scripture and is found to be only a Custome of the Church And in his Enchiridion calleth it a Commandment and Ordinance of Man and that it is not to be proved out of the Holy Scriptures A great Papist lately in
Institution and Commission viz. MATT. 28.18 19. ANd Iesus spake unto the Disciples saying All Power is given to me in Heaven Earth Go ye therefore and teach all Nations Baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy-Ghost Teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you and lo I am with you alwayes unto the end of the world With Mark 16.16 And he said unto them Go Ye into all the World and Preach the Gospel to every Creature He that believeth and is Baptized shall be saved but he that believeth not shall be damned Where we have have this plain order of Christ laid down First That men should be taught the Doctrine of Faith And Secondly Being so taught they should be Baptized And thirdly That they should in his School or Church whereof they are then made Members be instructed in every thing else they ought to learn Baxter Which Method Mr. Bauter himself doth fully acknowledge in his Book called The Second Disputation of right to Sacraments P. 149 150. in his 16th Argument where he hath these Words viz. This saith he speaking of the Commission of Christ â—o his Disciples is not like some occasional mention of Baptism but it is the very Commission it self of Christ to his Disciples for Preaching and Baptizing and purposely expresseth their several Works in their several places and Orders Their First task is to make Diâ—ciples which are by Mark called Believers The Second work is to Baptize them whereto is annexed the Promise of their Salvation The Third work is â—o teach them all other things which are after to be learned in the School of Christ To contemn this Order saith he is to contemn all Rules of Order for where can we expect to find it if not here I profess my Conscience is fully satisfied from this Text that it is one sort of Faith even saying that must go before Baptisme the Profession whereof the Minister must expect But is it possible that an Ignorant Babe can observe this Order and answer this expectation of which saith he see what is to this purpose before cited by Calvin and Piscator which he also mentions P. 85. viz. Calvin Calvin upon Mat. 3.6 saith Therefore that men may rightly offer themselves to Baptism Confession of sins is required otherwise the whole Action would be nothing else but sport Piscator Piscator upon Mark 1.4 saith It is called the Baptism of Repentance for Remission of sins because John Preached the Remission of sins to the Penitent Believers Which Quotations of Mr. Baxters both here and hereafter fetcht from that his second disputation c. I desire the Reader to take notice I transcribe out of Mr. Tombe's Book called Felâ— de se thâ—t of Mr. Baxter being not not at hand nor easily to be come by in which Book Mr. Tombes very judiciously returns Mr. Baxters 20. Arguments he wrote against Mr. Blake upon himself as naturally opposing Infants Baptism And which I conclude were faithfully recited and would hope convincingly improved because Mr. Baxter hath never contradicted them that I have heard nor given the least reply thereto as his Bookseller informeth Mr. Perk. Mr. Perkins in concurrence herewith upon these words Teaching all Nations Baptizing them saith I explain the terms thus mark first of all it is said Teach them that is Make them my Disciples by calling them to believe and to repent Here we are to consider the Order which God observes in making with men a Covenant in Baptisme First of all he calls them by his Word and commands them to believe and to repent Then in the second place God makes his promise of Mercy and Forgiveness And Thirdly He Seals his promise by Baptisme They that know not nor consider this Order which God used in Covenanting with tâ—em in â—aptisme deal preposterously oversliping the Commandment of Repenting and Believing And this saith he is the cause of so much profaneness in the world Paraeus Paraeus also upon Mat. 3.5 shews That the Order was that Confession as a Testimony of true Repentance goe first and then Baptisme for Remission of sins afterwards But how possible it is for an Ignorant Babe or any but men of Knowledge to answer this Rule and Order in Christs Commission is left to common sence to determine And whether they that assert another Order viz. of Baptizing first and then teaching and expecting Repentance and Faith after which is the case of all Children do not contradict this and hold out thereby a necessity of some other Commission to justifie such a practice CHAP. II. Wherein the Baptizing of Believers is proved to be the only Baptism from the Apostles Doctrine teaching the same ACTS 2.37 II. From the Apostles Doctrine ANd when they heard this they were pricked at the Heart and said unto Peter and the rest of the Apostles Men and Brethren what shall we do Then Peter said unto them Repent and be baptizâ—d every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the Remission of sins and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost Acts 8.36 37. And the Eunuch said See here is Water what doth hinder me to be baptized And Philip said unto him If thou believest with all thy Heart thou mayst Acts 10.42 And he commanded us to preach unto the people to testifie That it is he which was ordained of God to be Judge of quick and dead To him gave all the Prophets witness that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive Remission of sins while Peter spake these words the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the Word c. Then said Peter Can any man forbid Water that these should not be baptized which have received the Holy-Ghost as well as we And he commanded them to be baptized Acts 16.29 And the Keeper of the Prison fell down before Paul and Silas and said Sirs What must I do to be savd and the said Believe on the Lord Iesus Christ and thou shalt be saved and thy House And he accordingly believing in God and his House as it is said v. 34. were baptized he and all his straight way To which may be added the Apostolical Order in laying down the Principles of the Doctrine of Christ viz. First Repentance from dead works Secondly Faith towards God Thirdly ly The Doctrine of Baptismes Heb. 6.12 Bede Bede saith That men were first to be instructed unto the Knowledge of the Truth then to be baptized as Christ hath taught because without Faith it was impossible to please God Magdeb Cent. 8. p. 220. Erasmus Erasmus in his Paraphrase upon 28. Math. observeth That the Apostles were commanded first to teach and then to Baptize The Jews were brought by Ceremonies to the Knowledge of the Truth but Christians must learn first So that doth it not from hence necessarily follow that if the Apostles only taught that persons should
believe with their Hearts to Justification nor confess with their Mouths to Salvation p. 516. This Controversie he managed with much furious Zeal against the Pelagians in the African Councils And so inordinate was he herein that in his 23d Epist to Boniface he holds forth such a certainty of Regeneration by it that he not onely puts Regeneration for Baptism but also makes no Question of the Regeneration of Infants Baptism to cure Diseases though they that brought them did not bring them with that Faith that they might be regenerated but only to procure health to their Bodies a custom it seems they had to bring persons to be baptized for Cure Justifying thereby such a prophane Use thereof as that of Athanasius A School-boy baptized in sport confirmed by a Bishop who baptized a Boy in sport playing the Bishop amongst his School-fellows which was confirmed notwithstanding to be good Baptism by the Bishop of Alexandria And again in his 7th Tom. Lib. 1. c. 27. asserts to the same purpose That all baptized Infants are Believers and that the unbaptized are Unbelievers saying Who knows not that to Infants to believe is to be baptized not to believe is not to be baptized All the foolish ridiculous Ceremonies called the Romish Baptismal Rites before mentioned were owned and practised by Austin and others in this Century with this addition viz. That the Lord's Supper was given to the baptized Infants Lord's Supper given to Infants as Austin in his 107 Epistle saith where he holds a like necessity of their receiving that Sacrament with that of Baptism from Joh. 6.53 wherein he was also so earnest that he boldly saith in vain do we promise Infants Salvation without it Thus far Austin In the next place before we leave this Century The Character of Pope Innocent 1. I think it will not be amiss to give some little account of this Pope Innocenitus our first confirmer and imposer of Infants Baptism of whom it may sâ— truly be said that he was one that changed Times and Laws and that sate himself in the Temple of God as God As we find it recorded by the Magdiburg Cen. 5. page 1228. viz. He set up the Vniversal Bishoprick That he most strenuously laboured for the Universal Bishoprick and Supremacy over all Churches as appears say they in all his Epistles designing to bring the Determiation of all Principal Ecclesiastical Causes into that See especially in his Epistle to Victoricum and Decentium whereby say they it was manifest that the mistery of Iniquity 2 Thes 2. did gradually get Ground and increase Who was say they a great Establisher of humane Traditions Gave Divine honour to the Popedome and who blasphemously attribuâ—ed divine Honour to the Pâ—pedom as appears in that Epistle to Victoricum It was he that made Conâ—irmation a Sacrament made Confirm a Sacrament and confined it only to the Bishops to lay hands on Baptised Infants 1230. It was he also forbad Priests Marriages 1231. Forbad Marriage and Damned the Nunnes if they married That also forbad Marriage to any that by due Divorce put away their Wives that also instituted many of the Jewish and Pagan Laws as appears say they in his Book de Pontiff And it was he that to witness his Supremacy did excommunicate the Emperour Arcadius and the Empress Eudoxia and all his Ecclesiasticks that had their hands in the Banishing of John Chrysostom 662. 663. Excommunicated the Emp. Arcadius c. It was he that first appointed that the Eucharist should be given to Young Children so soon as they were baptised Ordained the Eucharist to Children after Bapt. a Custâ—m that continued several Hundred Years after And as head of the Anti-Christian race was the first sayth Socrates Lib. 7.19 Expelled the Novatians That expell'd the Novations from Rome that famous worthy Church and People Concerning whom we shall conclude with what the Magdiburgs say in their Epistle to this 5. Cent. To Ericus King of Sweden That it might then be understood that Rome that had heretofore Governed the world was now made the very Seat of Antichrist And again that the Spirit of Antichrist did then manâ—festly begin to spread it self by the Bishop of Rome lifting up himself in Supremacy above all other Bâ—shops and Churches And this was that Innocent who was the first great Patron and Imposer of this Innovation and was it not excellent Service think you for Austin to play the Game into the hand of such a vile Wretch CENT VI. The Councel of Gerunden in Spain held about 520. Ordained Gerunden Canon That young Children from their Mothers womb be baptised The Councel of Bracarense 572 and the Council of Vivense ordained the very same Vossus de Bapt. 179. Tee Maris Canon The Councel of Marisconenses held 580. Ordained That the Baptism of Ehildren should be at Easter except necessity hindred Magd. Cent. 6. 613. P. Greg. Dâ—cretal Pope Greg. the Great Lib 3. Ep. 4. ad Boniface-dist 4 de Consec Let all young Children be Baptised as they ought to be according to the Tradition of the Fathers Who gave Instruction to his Legat Austin to give Christendom to Children when he sent him into Britain which you may Read at large in the Book of Martyrs Justinian the Emperor who reigned 530 Ordained The Decree of the Emperor Justinion That Children should be admitted to Baptism and that those that were come to their full growth shal be taught before they be baptised Novel Institute 444. Justinus the Emperor who Reigned 570. Ordained That it séemed him good that when the Samaritans that desire the unspotted Baptism that they for the space of two years together be Instructed in the Faith and the holy Scriptures and that upon their Repentance they be admitted thereto But as concerning the Children which in regard of their years cannot Receive Divine Doctrine they shall without delay be made worthy or pertakers of Baptism That Gossips were appointed to all that were Baptised as saith Paulus Diaconus Lib. 16 in Justiniano And that it was the Custom when the Children of Princes and Potentates were Baptised that Bishops should be the Gossips Magd. Cent. 6. 332. Maxentius Maxentius saith that Children are not only adopted into a State of Sonship but have the Remission of all Sin by Baptism Cent. 6. p. 227. All the forementioned Superstitions of the Romish Baptismal Rites were in use in this Age with this addition Riâ—iculous Ceremoâ—ies That lâ—ghted Tapors were to be put into the hands of the Baptised p. 332. The Temples or Churches Altars and Reliques in their Dedications were Christined by Sprinkling the Water of Conjuration upon them p. 369. The Vncleanness and Murders found in Monastries In this Cent we meet with a dreadful piece of Infants Baptism viz. the Heads of 6000 Infants that had been murdered and buried in a Warren near a Monastry as Testâ—fied by Udulricus to
Children is used in Scripture shall by Children understand Infants must needs believe that in all Israel there were no men but all were Infants and if that had been true it had been the greater wonder they should overcome the Anakims and beat the King of Moab and march so far and discourse so well for they were all called the Children of Israel The fourth thing to be inquired into is Whether Circumcision was a Seal of the new Covenant to the Believers and their Seed To which I answer in the Negative that it was neither a Seal to them Circumcision only a Seal to Abraham not to Believers nor their Seed not much less a Seal to them of the new Covenant It is true it was a Seal Confirmation or Ratification of the faith that Abraham had long before he was Circumcised but so could it not be said of any Infant that had no faith It was a Sign put into the Flesh of the Infant but a Sign and Seal only to Abraham witnessing to him that he not only had a justifying faith but to the truth of the Promises viz. That he should be the father of many Nations Gen. 12.23 2dly The father of the faithful Rom 4.11 Heir of the World Rom. 4.13 That in hi◠all the Families of the Earth should 〈◊〉 blessed viz. in Christ proceeding fro◠him which was no wayes true of any Infant that ever was Circumcised for none had before their Circumcisio◠such a faith that intitled them to such singular Promises the scope in that place in the 4. Rom. being to shew That Abraham himself was not justified by Works no not by Circumcision but by faith which he had long before he was Circumcised and so but a Seal or Confirmation of that faith which he had before and to assure him of the truth of those special Promises made to him and his Seed both Carnal and Spiritual And to which purpose you have both Chrysostome and Theophylact Chrysost and The. as Mr. Lawr. P. 168. viz. It was called a Seal of the Righteousness of Faith because it was given to Abraham as a Seal and Testimony of that Righteousness which he had acquired by faith Now this seems to be the priviledge of Abraham alone and not to be transferred to others as if Circumcision in whom ever it was were a Testimony of Divine Righteousness for as it was the priviledge of Abraham that he should be the Father of all the faithfull as well Circumcised as uncircumcised being already the father of all uncircumcised having faith in Vncircumcision he received first the sign of Circumcision that he might be the father of the Circumcised Now because he had this priviledge in respect of the Righteousness which he had acquired by faith therefore the sign of Circumcision was to him a Seal of the Righteousness of faith But to the rest of the Jews it was a sign that they were Abraham 's Seed but not a Seal of the Righteousness of faith as all the Jews also were not the fathers of many Nations Secondly Much less was Circumcision a Seal of the new Testament as before for nothing is a Seal thereof but the Holy Spirit Eph. 1.13.4.30 Thirdly Neither is Baptisme more then Circumcision called a Seal It i◠called a Figure 1 Pet. 3.21 And 〈◊〉 is a sign as before But a sign and figure proper only to men of understanding representing Spiritual things and Mysteries And not as Circumcision which was a sign not improper for Infants because it left a signal impression in their flesh to be remembred all their days but so cannot Baptisme be to any Infants 5. Circumcision not administred only to believers their seed The fifth thing to be examined it Whether Circumcision was administred to Believers as Believers and to their See◠after them as such to which Baptisme was to Correspond It is answered by no means for it was an Ordinance which by the institution belonged to all the natural Linage and posterity of Abraham good or bad without any such limitation as was put upon Baptisme If thou believest with all thy Heart thou mayst Acts 8. or any such qualification to an Infant capable to receive it that he should have a believing Parent but will you deny Abraham to be a believing Parent and was not he a Father to them all What then he was a publick common Father which reaches not the case in hand for he was no such father to them neither have they any other in his stead therefore the Analogy holds not yet if they had would it avail for that Priviledge would not stand the natural Children of Abraham in any stead to admit them to Baptisme which though they claimed upon that account Mat. 3. John rejects them upon it calling them a Generation of Vipers bidding them bring forth fruits meet for Repentance and which only would give them admittance to the Baptisme of Repentance and that it was not enough to say they had Abraham for their father And to the same purpose doth our Saviour tell Nicodemus a Mr. in Israel that without the new Birth his Birth-priviledge would not avail him in the Gospel-priviledges Joh. 3. and with more severity doth he tell the Jews that however they bore up themselves as the Sons of Abraham yet without believing in Christ who could only make them free 6. Baptism came not in the room place use of Circumcision 1. Not in the room and stead they were Bond-slaves to sin and the Children of the Devil The sixth thing to be searched after is Whether Baptisme did succeed in the Room Place and use of Circumcision To which I answer by no means for the following Reasons 1. Not in the room and stead 1. Because then only Males not Females would be baptized because no other Circumcised but all believing women as well as men were to be baptized Acts 8.12 16.14.15 2. Because then some not all Believers should be baptized because not only women as before were not admitted but all Believers out of Abrahams Family to whom he was a Spiritual father because he was a Believer before he was Circumcised Rom. 4.11 12. Whereas all Believers according to the Commission were to be baptized 3. Because then the Circumcised needed not to have been baptized if they had been already sealed with the new Covenant-seal But Christ himself and all his Apostles and so many of the Churches were Circumcised yet nevertheless were baptized 2. Not to the ends and uses 2. Not to the ends and uses neither as suggested upon the following grounds 1. Because Circumcision was a sign of Christ to come in the flesh and Baptisme that he was already come in the flesh witnessing to his Incarnation Death Burial and Resurrection 2. Circumcision was to be a partition Wall betwixt Jew and Gentile but Baptisme testified the contrary viz. That Barbarian Scythian Bond and Free Jew and Gentile Male or Female were all one in Christ Cornelius the
Gentile must be baptized and have the Spirit given to witness that nothing must be called common or unclean where God had purified the Heart by believing 3. Circumcision initiated the Carnal Seed into the Carnal Church and gave them right to the Carnal Ordinances but Baptisme was to give the Spiritual Seed an orderly entrance into the Spiritual Church and a right to partake of the Spiritual Ordinances 4. Circumcision was to be a Bond and Obligation to keep the whole Law of Moses's but Baptisme witnessed that Moses Law was made void and that only Christ's â—aw was to be kept 5. Circumcision was administred to all Abrahams natural Seed without any profession of Faith Repentance or Regeneration whereas Baptisme to be administred to the Spiritual Seed of Abraham was only upon profession of Faith Repentance and Regeneration and which appears more fully by the following Instances compared 1. Because a Carnal Parent and a fleshly begetting by the the Legal Birth-priviledge gave right to Circumcision whereas a Spiritual begetting by a Spiritual Parent gave only a true right to Baptisme 2. Because a Legal Ecclesiastical Typical Holiness when Land Mountains Houses Birds Beasts and Trees were holy qualified for Circumcision whereas only Evangelical and Personal Holiness was a meet qualification for Baptisme 3. Because Strangers and Servants bought with Money and all ignorant Children of Eight days old yea Trees were capable of Circumcision whereas only men of understanding that were capable to believe with all their Heart and to give an account thereof with their mouths were to be esteemed capable Subjects of Baptisme 6. Circumcision was to be a sign of Temporal Blessings and Benefits to be enjoyed in the Land of Canaan whereas Baptisme was to be a sign as before of many Spiritual benefits viz. Remission of sins Justification Sanctification here and Eternal Salvation hereafter It is granted there are in some things an Analogy betwixt the one and the other both signifying Heart-Circumcision and an initiating into the Church though as a different Church so different Subjects and Church Members upon different grounds and to different ends as before and in a far different manner one to be done in a private House and by a private Hand and the other in some publick place and by the hand of some publick Minister appointed by the Church to administer the same But now because there is some Analogy in some things is there therefore ground to conclude it cometh into the room stead and use thereof by no means for by the same Argument we may as well conclude that it cometh in the room and stead of the Ark Manna Rock c. And from such like Arguments drawn from Analogies what Jewish Rites may not by our wits be introduced to the countenancing the Papists in their High Priesthood National Churches Orders of Priesthood Tythes and all other their innumerable Rites and Ceremonies that without any Institution of Christ or pretence of new Testament-authority they have intrâ—duced or imposed upon the account of Analogy with old Testament Rites and Services Concerning which you have the Lord Brooks in his Treatise of Episcopacy L Brooks P. 100 saying very well viz. That the Analogy which Baptisme now hath with Circumcision in the old Law is a fine ratiâ—nal Argument to illustrate a Point well proved before but I somewhat doubt saith he whether it be proof enough for that which some would prove by it since besides the vast difference in the Ordinance the persons to be Circumcised are stated by a positive Law so express that it leaves no place for Scruple but it is far otherwise in Baptisme where all the designation of Persons fit to be partakers for ought I know is only such as believe for this is the qualification which with exactest search I find the Scripture requires in Persons to be baptized and this it seems to require in all such Persons now how Infants can be properly said to believe I am not yet fully resolved And very full and most excellently you have to this point Dr. Taylor Dr. Tayl p. 228. Who saith That the Argument from Circumcision is invalid upon infinite considerations Figures and Types prove nothing unless a Commandment go along with them or some express to signifie such to be their purpose For the Deluge of Waters and the Ark of Noah were a Figure of Baptisme said Peter and if therefore the Circumstances of one should be drawn to the other we should make Baptisme a Prodigy rather than a Rite the Paschal Lamb was a Type of the Eucharist which succeeds the other as Baptisme doth to Circumcision but because there was in the manducation of the Paschal Lamb no prescription of Sacramental drink shall we thence conclude that the Eucharist is to be administred but in one kind And even in the very Instance of this Argument supposing a Correspondency of Analogy between Circumcision and Baptisme yet there is no Correspondence of Identity for although it were granted that both of them did consign the Covenant of faith yet there is nothing in the Circumstance of Childrens being Circumcised that so concerns that Mystery but that it might very well be given to Children and yet Baptisme only to men of Reason because Circumcision left a Character in the flesh which being imprinted upon Infants did its work to them when they came to age and such a Character was necessary because there was no word added to the Sign but Baptisme imprints nothing that remains on the Body and if it leaves a Character at all it is upon the Soul to which also the word is added which is as much a part of the Sacrament as the Sign it self for both which Reasons it is requisite that the Parties Baptized should be capable of Reason that they may be capable both of the word of the Sacrament and the impress made upon the Spirit since therefore the Reason of this Parity does wholly fail there is nothing left to infer a necessity of complying in this Circumstance of aâ—e any more then in the other Annexes of the Type then the Infants must also precisely be Baptized upon the Eighth day and Females must not be baptized because not Circumcised but it were more proper if we would understand it right to prosecute the Analogy from the Type to the Antitype by way of Letter and Spirit and signification and as Circumcision figures Baptisme so also the adjuncts of the Circumcision shall signifie something Spiritual in the adherences of Baptisme and therefore as Infants were Circumcised so spirial Infants shall be Baptized which is Spiritual Circumcision for therefore Babes had the Ministry of the Type to signifie that we must when we give our names to Christ become Children in malice and then the Type is made compleat c. Thus far the Dr. 7. Whether the not Baptizing Infants makes the priviledge under the Gospel less then under the Law who had then Circumcision 7 Not baptizing of
that Mr. Bunian in his opposing this Principle may well be said Not only not to please God but to be contrary to all men And whose return to Mr. Paul hereupon is so ridiculous that it may not be unworthy your knowledg as witnessing either his egregious Ignorance or Self-condemnation therein which I shall give you in his own words p. 98. who first sets down Mr. P. Question viz. Whether your Principle and Practice is not equally against others as well as us viz. Episcopal Presbyterians and Independants who are also of our side for our practice though they differ with us about the subject of Baptism viz. 1. to Baptize then to Communicate Do you delight to have your hand against every man Bun. Ans B. Answ I own Water-Baptism to be Gods Ordinance but I make no Idol of it Where you call now the Episcopal to side with you and also the Presbyterian c. You will not find them easily persuaded to conclude with you against me they are agaist your manner of Dipping as well as Subject of Water-Baptism neither do you for all you flatter them agree together in all but the Subject Do you allow their Sprinkling Do you allow their Signing with the Cross Why then have you so stoutly an hundred times over condemned these things as Antichristian I am not against every man though by your abusive Language you would set every one against me but am for Union Concord and Communion with Saints as Saints and for that cause I wrote my Book This is that he calls his Answer but let all the world judg whether he hath so much as once taken the least notice of the Question Mr. Paul tells him his Principle and Practice opposes all those named as us viz. Who do own with us as a principle that Baptism should precede Church-Fellowship and therefore in their sence of Baptism which is not in the Question either as to Subject or Circumstance do practise it accordingly not admitting any Unbaptised Person into their Fellowship And the truth whereof if Mr. Bunian doubt besides their Writings I could give him some late instances of grown persons not Sprinkled in Infancy that must not be admitted upon account of their Saintship into Fellowship till they had Water sprinkled or poured upon their faces and that by some that he hath leaned upon as Patrons But what doth he reply to this how doth he acquit himself from this Singularity so differing in Principle and Practice from all They differ from you in the manner as well as the subject I am not against every man but am for Union Concord and Communion with Saints But would any Child that could say any thing for it self have made a more ignorant Return therefore you may judg of the rest by it But to the next 3. That Ignorance absolves from Sins of Omission and Comission A Third Fundamental Mistake is his presumptuous asserting all along That Ignorance doth absolve both from the Sin of Omission and Commission and which not only justifies the neglect of the true but the Exercise of false Worship and not only bears out in rejecting of Christs but the embracing of Antichrists appointments and that not only to give a Dispensation to the parties themselves thus transgressing but to the Congregation also that shall Receive and bear with them A Rule if observed what corrupt Doctrine or Practice might not be introduced thereby And which may pass for as good Doctrine as theirs of old if they could but say Corbon they might be set free from their dutiful Obligation to their Parents 4 By decrying Institutions by crying up Moral Precepts Mark 7.11 A Fourth is That under pretence of crying up Obedience to the X. Commandments or moral Precepts he takes the boldness to decry and trample under foot Christ's instituted Worship as though it were possible to be guilty of false Worship and Idolatry and not violate the first and second Commandment Did not such daring Presumption cost Israel dear in their following the Rebellions Inventions of Jeroboam the Son of Nebat who made Israel to sin and what was that helnous provetation but the perverting the right way of the Lord by changing part of his Instituted Worship A Fifth is 5. That the Churches to whom the Epistles were written were not all baptised His asserting that the Churches in the New Testament to whom the Epistles were written were not all Baptized to the vacating all the holy Exhortations and spiritual Obligations inferred and inforced from the same almost in every Epistle and which he grounds upon his vain Imagination That because it is said Gal. 3.27 As many of you as have been baptised into Christ have put on Christ And Rom. 6.3 Know you not that so many of you as have been baptised into Christ were baptised into his Death implying that the words so many import that some were not Not considering that the Sâ—â—pâ— and the Argument from the words which do necessarily enforce another sense and that such a sense as he would put upon them is altogether groundless and unreasonable as for instance in Gal. 3.27 He tells them that they are all the Children of God baptised into Christ For the Apostle having said vers 26. That they were all the Children of God he in the next words gives the reason of what he had said for they had put on Christ by Baptisme But now if their putting on of Christ in Baptisme was to be esteemed as a proof of their Relation to God as Children as the Apostle you see makes it to be Then that which he gives in by way of Reason and proof that they were all the Children of God by Faith would fall shorâ— of â—his end if only a part of the Members of their Churches had been Baptised and not all And so in like manner in that other Text he presseth a general Duty viz. Mortification and Vivification from a general and universal Practice otherwise those Duties would not in this Amâ—â—ent concern the Unbaptised And by as good Argument may we conclude that because the Apostle commands that as many Servants aâ— are under the yoke should count their own Masters worthy of all honour that the name of God be not blasphemed That some Servants by the same inference might be under the yoke and some not and that some must honour their Masters and some might choose Sixthly By his declaring so often 6. That Baptism is no Church-Ordinance and so positively That Baptisme is not a Church-Ordinance whereby he bears up himself exceedingly in his Notion To which I would say It must either be an Ordinance lest by Christ for the Church to manage and order or to the World for I know no medium But that he left no such holy Appointment to be managed by the ignorant prophane World but to the Church only I thus prove 1. Because he hath committed the Ministry to them to Teach and Convert which must precede Baptisme and qualifie for it 2. That to the Church belongs ordinarily to receive the account of such Conversion that it may be better understood whether the Party desiring Baptisme doth believe with all the heart and that he hath brought forth fruits meet for Repentance before he be baptised with the Baptisme of it 3. That to them belongs the appointing of the Administrators and faithful Witnesses to see it orderly performed otherwise Women Apostates or any as some hold may do it God is a God of Order and not of Confusion And all things are to be done to Edification 4. Because it is an entrance and door into the Visible Church as hath been amply in the foregoing Treatise proved and the foregoing Scriptures evidence and which is so clear saith Mr. Baxter that they must deny Scripture that deny it It is true as Mr. Paul affirms that Persons entered into the Visible Church hereby are by consent admitted into particular Congregations where they may claim their Priviledges due to Baptized Believers being orderly put into the Body and put on Christ by their Baptismal Vow and Covenant for by that publick Declaration of consent is the Marriage and solemn Contract made betwixt Christ and the Believer in Baptisme as before at large And if it be propostrous and wicked for a Man and Woman to cohabite together and to enjoy the Priviledges of a Marriage-state without the passing of that publick Solemnity So it is no less disorderly upon a Spiritual account for any to claim the Priviledges of a Church or be admitted to the same till the passing of this Solemnity by them But 't is not done in the Church No more is Visiting the Sick or anointing with Oyl are they not therefore Church-Ordinances If any desire further Satisfaction upon this Argument they may peruse two Treatises one written by Mr. Allen called Baptismal Abuses discovered Disproving the Lawfulness of Infants and verity of Believers Baptism with the irregularity of mixt Communion Baptised and Unbaptised written 1653. The other by Mr. Lamb called Truth prevailing against the fiercest opposition upon the same subject the same Year both answering Mr. John Goodwin opposing the same And which are done with that Judgment strength of Argument and Authority of Scripture that notwithstanding they have both of them personally declined those Truths so zealously and understandingly pleaded for by them and gone back to that they therein call Humane Tradition Will-Worship and Idolatry fulfilling Dan. 11.35 Pro. 28 4â— Gal. 2.18 1 Pet. 2.21 22. Yet will their Books not only live as a Witness for God and his reproached Truths but as a living Testimony against themselves in their unreasonable and unrighteous Departure from the same without Repentance to all Generations FINIS
any such Leprosie or miraculous Cure nor gave any such Donation or Acknowledgment to the Romish See as you have at large evidenced by the Magdiburg Cent. 4. p. 568. And concerning which Osiander saith Cent. 4. c. 38. Which foolish and impudent Fable is by many Learned Men refuted viz. Marsilius Patavinus Laâ—r Valla Cardinal Casanus and Aeneas Sylvius after Pope Pius the Second The working of the Mystery of Iniquity did as the Magdiburgenses tell us strongly begin to act in many Particulars viz. Not onely in the corrupting the Rites and true form of Baptism but by those superstitious and sumptuous Ceremonies that were used in the Dedication Bapt. of Churches Consecration or Baptizing of Churches viz. either such Idol Temples that were given by the Emperors to Christian Service or such new ones that were now erected as Cent. 4. p. 76 497 499 520. The superstitious Collection and Exposure of the Reliques Reliques of Saints for Adoration p. 499. The inclination to prohibit Marriage Priests Marriage as appeared by the Council of Nice where it was only checkt by the famous Paphnutius p. 1088. The distinction in point of Sanctification Distinction betwixt Lay-men and Clergy began now made betwixt Lay-men and Clergy-men the one reputed Spiritual the other Carnal And it was in this Age as appears by the Decrees of P. Silverster Julius and Sericius Priests appointed to Marry folks that all Marriages must pass the Benediction of a Priest and to be esteemed little less than Sacriledge to omit it of which in the former Centuries no mention is made Magd. Cent. 4. c. 6. p. 482. and for which they quote Gigas and Luitpraud CENT V. This was the Age wherein Infants Baptism did receive its Sanction by the Decrees of Popes and Councils Infants Baptism first enjoyned in the Militan Council and as absolutely necessary was enjoyned and imposed by Anathemas never till then concerning which Dr. Taylor in his Lib. o Prophecy p. 237. gives us a true brief notable account which you may please to receive in his own words And the truth of the business is saith he as there was no command of Scripture to oblige Children to the susception of it so the necessity of Paedobaptism was not determined in the Church till the Canon that was made in the Milevitan Council a Provincial in Africa Never till then I grant saith he it was practised in Africa before that time and they or some of them thought well of it and though that is no argument for us to think so yet none of them did ever pretend it to be necessary none to have been a Precept of the Gospel Austin the first that ever preacht it necessary ☞ St. Austin was the first that ever preach't it to be necessary and it was in his heat and anger against Pelagius who had so warmed and chafed him that made him innovate herein This Milevitan or Militan Council was celebrated by 92 Bishops Anselm the Pop's Legate and Austin presiding in the fifth year of Arcadius and first of Pope Innocentius in the year 402 as Magdiburg Cent. 5. p. 835. The occasion of the Council is exprest to be about the difference that had hapned betwixt Pelagius and Coelestius Austin and others respecting Original sin baptizing of Children c. The Constitutions and Decrees of the said Council are at large exprest by the Magdiburg out of the Book of Decretals and among other Canons made in this Council we find this viz. That it is Our Will The Canon of the Milevitan Council about Infants Baptism That all that affirm that Young Children receive everlasting Life albeit they be not by the Sacrament of Grace or Baptism renewed And that will not that young Children which are new born from their Mothers Womb shall be baptised to the taking away Original Sin That they be Anathematised Which with the rest of the Decrees was transmitted to Rome to Pope Innocentius for his Apostolick confirmation in their large Letters p. 841. P Innocent the first ratifies it And which with a ready mind he performs accordingly by his Decretal Epistle exprest at large p. 845. Afterwards the fifth General Council at Carthage in the year 416 did Decree to the same purpose in these words The Canon of the 5th Council of Carthage We will That whoever denies that little Children by Baptism are freed from Perdition and eternally saved That they be accursed Which was also by Austin and seventy Bishops in their Letter transmitted to the same Pope Innocent for his further ratification Confirmed by Pope Innocent and accordingly received the same in his Decretal Epistle at large p. 822 825. Inscribing their Letters thus The Fathers of the Council to Innocent the Pope and High Priest stiling him Most Holy Father And that Pope Innocentius in these African Councils was the first that ever enjoyned the necessity of this practice is further confirmed to us By Wilfrid Strabo Wilfrid Strabo as before who tells us That Children were baptized according to the Decree of the Council of Carthage for the taking away of original sin which aforetime was not practised Luther Luther saith It was not determined till Pope Innocentius And Grotius Grotius in his Annotations Mat. 19. saith It was not enjoyned till before that Council of Carthage Which Canons of Pope Innocentius were afterwards confirmed by Pope Zosimus his Successor and afterwards by Pope Boniface that succeeded Zosimus as appears in Cod. Can. cap. 110. Aff. cap. 77. de Consecrat distinct The Opinions of the Doctors of this Age in confirmation hereof The Doct. of this Age approving Infants Baptism we find to be as followeth Chrysostome saith Chrysost That Infants ought to be baptized as universally received by the Catholick Church to take away Original Sin And again that which the Holy Church throughout the World unanimously teacheth and practiseth about the baptizing of Children ought not carelesly to be slighted Mag. Cent. 5. p. 375. Austin Austin was as a great Patron so a great Defender of Infants Baptism in his contests both against the Donatists and the Pelagians and the Coelestians whereof you have some Instances In his Sermon De Baptismo Parvulorum against the Pelagians chap. 14. saith That Children should be baptized because of Original Sin and that without which they could never be regenerated or saved Mag. Cent. 5 377 378 379. And in his third Book of Free-Will Cap. 23. saith Infants may be baptized by the Faith of another and that the Faith of the Party that offers and dedicates the Child to Baptism profits the Child therein as the Church he saith wholsomly appoints For if the Faith of the Widow profited to the raising of the dead Child much more may the Faith of another profit the young Child p. 516. And again in his Fourth Book against the Donatists Cap. 23. Infants saith he are to be baptized who can neither
great weakness sinful shortnes therein in any of the many Editions of that Piece which I humbly conceive as well deserved a Recantation as some other things he has judged worthy thereof CENT II. Anselm Anselm asserts that Children should be Baptised and gives these Reasons 1st That the Devil by the faith of the Parent may be cast out of the Children in Baptism as the Woman of Canaan in the 15. Mat. v. 21. had the Devil cast out of her Daughter p. 171. 2ly That they may thereby be freed from Original sin and be rendred Saints and holy ones by Baptism as they are owned to be 1 Cor. 7. p. 171. 3ly That they may die to sin for they that are Baptised into Christ are so being Baptised into his Death which he says is without exception for whosoever is Baptised into Christ is Baptised into his Death Meginhardus Meginhardus saith if little Infants or weak ones be brought to Baptism let them answer for them that bring them and then let hands be laid upon them with holy Chrysme ☜ and so let the Eucharist be Communicated to them p. 168. Ivo saith that the Infants as well as the Adult are to be Baptised because of the Faith of the Sacrament p. 260. The Latins in this age did Rebaptise the Greeks who dssowned their Baptism p. 263. And the Greeks did excommunicate the Latines for renouncing theirs p. 401. To the former Superstitious Rites they added That Salt should be put into the mouth of the Baptized p. 261. And to the Christning of Churches that Salt should also be mixed with the Water of Execration Waldenses witness against Infant Bapt. The Waldenses did appear this Age to witness against the Romish Superstitions and amongst the rest that of the Real Presence in the Eucharist and Baptizing of Infants which you have at large hereafter with the opposition and persecution they met with for the same They were called Bâ—ringarians from Beringarius one of their chief Leaders CENT 12. Peter Lombard Peter Lombard saith That to the baptizing the Adult their proper faith is required but to the baptizing an Infant the faith of others sufficeth Cent. 12. p. 418. And again Children are to be baptized because they are thereby clensed from original sin p. 596. Bernard Bernard saith That without Baptism Children cannot be saved p. 604. And again As Children of old were circumcised without or against their wills for their Salvation so may they now be baptized p. 599. Peter Cluniacenses Peter Cluniacenses writing against Peter Bruis one of the Waldensian Barbes who denied Infants Baptism saith Lib. 1. Ep. 2. They who are not baptized with Christs Baptism cannot be Christians And shall the Children of the Jews be saved with the Sacrament of Circumcision and shall not the Children of Christians be saved with the Sacrament of Baptism p. 599. Heldigard Heldigard saith That as our little Children that are not capable to feed themselves have others to feed them to keep them from temporal death So is it with them in Baptism who being neither capable to believe or profess have spiritual helps provided for them that they may not want that spiritual food that may preserve them from eternal death p. 602. Alexander Alexand. the 3d in his Decretals L. 3. Tit. 40. c. 2. saith They who have any doubt concerning their Baptism may be baptized with these words If thou art baptized I do not baptize thee but if thou beest not I do baptize thee in the Name of c. The former ridiculous Rites were this Age observed with this Addition Bernard saith To the Dedication or right-Christning of Churches there must be Aspersion Inunction Illumination ☞ Benediction Nomination p. 861. And that if the Temple should come to be polluted by the Priests committing Adultery in it The sprinkling it afresh with Holy-Water cleanseth it again Alex. 3. L. 5. Decret When Marriage prohibited The certain times wherein Marriages were prohibited was from Septuagesima to Easter from Râ—gation to Whitsâ—ntide from Advent to Epiphany Which were done by the Edict of Pope Clement as saith Gigas p. 919. The Waldenses were in this Age great Witnesses to the baptizing of Believers Petro Brusians writ against Infants Baptism and as great opposers of Infants Baptism called by the name of Petro-Brusians Apostolici Henerici and for which they were great Sufferers is hereafter p. 844 845 846. CENT 13. Thomas Aquinas Tho. Aqui. saith Children are to be baptized not in their own proper faith but in the faith of the Church p. 419. And again That they may be freed from Original Sin and Condemnation p. 422. Alexander saith Baptism conferrs grace to little ones not only purging them from Original Sin but by the Merits of Christs Suffering the faith of the Surety but by the vertue of the Sacrament p. 426. Bonaventure Bonavent saith If Children dye that are baptized before they come to years of discretion they so receive grace by the faith of another that by Christs merit they shall be saved which he saith is denied by certain cursed Hereticks p. 419. Concurring hereto are several other Doctors of this Age as Hugo p. 544. Gulielmo p. 419. Albert and the Decree of the Neomansian Synod 594. the Synod of Coloniae 938 944. but let these already mentioned suffice Tho. Aquinas saith Though a Priest be the proper Administrator of Baptism yet in case of necessity not only a Deacon but a Lay person yea a Woman nay an Heretick or Pagan may baptise so be it the true form of the Church be observed and intend thereby what the Church intends p. 419. An Exposition of many of their ridiculous Customs Gulielm All the Abominable Rites before-mentioned were in this Age observed with this following Exposition upon them Gulielm saith That the matter of the Sacrament of Confirmation is Oyl-Olive mixed with Balsom and incorporated upon the fire called Chrysm and which can only be done by the hands of a Bishop The form of which Sacrament he saith is this viz. I sign thee with the sign of the Cross confirm thee with the Crysm of Salvation in the name of the Father Son and Holy Spirit Amen And which only a Bishop can administer p. 417. By Exâ—rcism the Devil is blown away Hugo Albertus Albertus saith By blowing in Execration the power of the Devil is expelled and being signed upon the breast and forehead with the sign of the Cross he is driven not only from the heart but more visibly from the outward man And that the Salt is to be put into the mouth the better to endue with spiritual savour and wisdom And that the ears and nose is to be anointed with spittle that grace and discretion from God may be conferred which because the spittle descends from the Head that is thereby signified And that the Breast must be anoynted to prepare the Heart
for God and the Shoulders anointed to be inabled to bear God's burden After Baptism the Neck must be anoynted with Chrisme that the mind may be better disposed for God and holy contemplation which by Chrism is signified being made of shining Oile and healing sovereign Balsome They must be endewed with white Garments to hold forth that Innocency which is received in Baptism as well as the Glory which they are to pertake of at the Resurrection And a burning Taper put into the hand that the Word of God may be a light to his Feet Gulielmus saith That as to the form of Baptism the Virgin Mary A blasphemous addition is to be added to the Father Son and Holy Spirit viz. I Baptize thee in the name of the Omnipotent Father Son and Holy Spirit and the blessed Virgin Mary 419. Thom. saith there are seven Sacraments 7 Sacraments viz. Baptism Confirmation Eucharist Penance Extream-Vnction Order and Matrimony Two whereof viz. Baptism and the Eucharist were instituted by Christ and the other five by the Apostles as Alexander 406. Which seven Sacraments were after confirmed by the Councel of Trent with Anathema to those who should deny them When and by whom Tyths first granted Pope Gregory X. was the first in Anno 1271. granted Tythes to the Churches Those that opposed and witnessed against Infants Baptism and other Popish Superstitions in this Age were the Albigenses and Aumionenses Magdeburg Cent. 13. P. 554 c. CENT 14 15 16 17. That the Baptizing of Infants with all the Rites and Ceremonies still continued especially in the Romish Church we need not question when we read the Canons of the Council of Trent which was called on purpose as to establish their old Superstitions and Idolatries so to suppress the Light and Truth that especially did shine in the Empire In which Council which ended 1564. we have the following Canons The Canons of the Council of Trent about Inf. Bapt. In the 5th Session about Original Sin in the 4th Canon It was Decreed That they who shall deny Baptisme to young Children from their Mothers Womb for the taking away Original Sin Let them be accursed Os 16 Cent. c. 60 380. In the 7th Session about Baptism in the 13 Canon It was Decreed That whosoever puts not young baptised Children amongst the faithful or saith they must be re-baptised at the years of discretion or that it is better to omit their vaptism till then Let them be accursed And in the 14 Canon It was decreed That whosoever shall say that baptised Children when they come to Age ought not to be enjoyned to ratifie the promise made in their name but to be left to their will if they refuse Not compelling them to Christian life but denying them other Ordinances Let them be accursed In the 3 Canons about Confirmation it was Decreed That whosoever said It was an idle Ceremony not a Sacrament properly or that it was formerly used that Children might give an account of their faith 2. That to give vertue to Chrysome was tâ— wrong the Holy Spirit 3. Thaâ— every simple Priest is the ordinary Minister for confirmation and not thâ— Bishop only Let them be accursed Os 16 Cent. pag. 417. And as a standing Rule to justifie themselves in their Determinations they conclude and Decree A blasphemous Decree That their Traditions should bâ— observed Pari Pietatis affectu with the same pious affection with the Holy Scriptures Charl. V. his Interim In that Instrument called the Interim That Decretal of Charles the Fifth made till the Councels Canonâ— could be perfected it was determined That young Children by the faith and confession of the Sureties should be Baptised And that all Ancient Ceremonies that pertained to the Sacrament 〈◊〉 Baptisme should be continued as Exorcisme Chrysme c. Osiander p. 482. Among the many Aâ—â—â—christian oppressions the Princes of Germany exhibited to the Pope from their Convention of Norimberg they complained oâ— that of baptizing Bells wherein they say The Suffragans have invented Baptizing of Bells complained of by the Princes of Germany that no other but only themselves may Baptize Bells for the Lay-people Whereby the simple people upon their affirmation do believe That such Bells so baptized will drive away evil Spirits and Tempests Whereupon a great number of God-fathers are appointed especially such as are rich which at the time of the baptizing holding the Rope wherewithal the Bell is tyed the Suffragan speaking before them as is accustomed in the baptizing of young Children they altogether do answer and give the name to the Bell the Bell having a new name put upon it as is accustomed to be done to the Christians after this they go to sumptuous Feasts whereunto also the Gossips are bidden that thereby they may give the greater reward to the Suffragans their Chaplins and Miâ—â—sters whereby it happeneth oft-times that even in a small Village an hundred Florins are consumed in such Cristenings which is not only superstitious but contrary to Christian Religion a seducing of the simple People and meer Extortion Wherefore such wicked unlawful things are to be abolished Fox's Acts and Monum 990. Pius the Fifth baptized the Duke of Alva 's Standard Standard Baptized and called it Margaret Dr. Morison de Depra Bel. p. 24. The German Protestants about Infants-Baptism Luther August Confessâ—oÌ„ The Lutherans in their Augustan Confession made 1530. do declare That Baptism is necessary to Salvation That Gods Grace is conferred thereby That Children ought to be baptised who by Baptism are dedicated and received into the grace and favour of God condemning the Anabaptists who deny Baptism to Children and who affirm that Children without Baptism may be saved Osiand 16 Cent. p. 153. In the Smalkald Articles 1536. the Lutherans say In the Smalkald Articles Concerning Infants we teach that they are to be baptized For inasmuch as they do belong to the promised Redemption made by Iesus Ehrist the Church ought to baptize and to declare the promise to them Osiand Cent. 16. p. 278. In the Conference betwixt the Calvinists and Lutherans at Mumpelgartens 1529. In the Conference at Mumpelgart It was agreed that Baptisme came in the room of Circumcision and that the Children of the Christians are to be Baptized Osiand Cent. 16. 1020. Though about the Ground of Baptizing them they differed The Lutherans affirming that they had a proper and peculiar Faith to intitle them thereto The Calvinists asserting they had none but ought to be baptized by vertue of the Faith of the Parent in Covenant In the Book of Concord In the Book of Concord 1580. by the Lutherans They agree that the Tenets of the Anabaptists are to be renounced that say Infants are not to be baptized because they have no use of reason Osiand 16 Cent. p. 254. The English Protestants about Infants Baptism In the Reformation begun in Edward the Sixth time In the