note of similitude as is taken for the being of the thing hardnesse of heart as it is sinne so it is a punishment of sinne that is it could not be a punishment of sinne unlesse it were sinne this we grant In the next part the same word as signifieth the manner of being therefore if the first be taken in the same sense for one and the same manner of being wee deny that hardnesse of heart in the same respect is both sinne and the punishment of sinne It is both in respect of the subject and being but not both in the same quality affection and manner of being 3. Hee thus proceedeth All punishments of sinne because they are just stand with the will of God hardnesse of heart being a sinne if it should stand with the will of God then it would follow that sinne should stand with the will of God Contr. 1. If sinne no way stand with the will of God then sinne should not be committed in the world for against his will can nothing be done 2. Here then wee must admit a distinction of Gods will there is his will of approbation and the will of his providence by the first he willeth not sinne but by the second he willeth it to be in the world because he knoweth how to dispose of sinne even unto good Origen hath the like distinction Multa sine voluntate Dei geruntur nihil sine providentia providentia est qua dispensat providet voluntas qua vult vel non vult aliquid Many things are done without Gods will nothing withouâ— his providence providence is that whereby he dispenseth and provideth his will whereby hee willeth or â—illeth any thing The master of the sentences saith Mala fieri bonum est it is good that evill should bee done because thereby Gods power and goodnesse is seene in turning evill unto good lib. 1. distinct 46. quaest If God then did not see how to turne evill unto a good end he would not suffer evill to be done in the world 3. So then retaining the former distinction still hardnesse of heart as it is a sinne God willeth it not but as it is a punishment of sinne it standeth very well with the will and justice of God 4. And further concerning the former testimonies of their owne Writers Pererius would have them to speake of such sinnes which are also punishments of sins in divers subjects as that the doing of it should be a sinne in one and the suffering a punishment in the other as the rebellion of Absolon and railing of Shemei in respect of themselves they were sinne but in regard of David they were a chastisement upon him for his sinne and so they were sent of God But in other things where the sinne and punishment are in one subject as in the hardnesse of heart that distinction hath no place Contra. But Pererius by his leave cannot fasten upon them a sense contrary to their words for thus Cajetan writeth as Melchior Canus citeth him Deâ—â— non est 〈◊〉 peccata ut sic sed quaâ—â—um est 〈◊〉 ipsâ—â— peccatâ—â— vel alterius God is the author of sinne not as it is sinne but as it is a punishment in 〈◊〉 that sinneth or in any other And Canâ—â— thereupon collecteth thus Agnoscit Cajetanus maledictionem Shemei quatenus punalem sibi procedere a Deo Cajetane acknowledgeth that the cursing of Shemei as it was penall to himselfe did proceed from God His meaning then is that even in him that sinneth hardnesse of heart is a punishment of sinne and not only in another Their owne master of sentences also saith as I cited him before Concupiscentia in quantum poena est peccati Deum habet authorem Concupisâ—ence as it is a punishment of sinne hath God the author thereof lib. 2. distinct 32. But concupiscence is a punishment in him that hath it not in another Wherefore notwithstanding these contrary objections because of those places of Scripture alleaged before and the testimonies of other Writers I approve this distinction as sound that hardnes of heart not as it is sinne but as it is inflicted as a punishment of sinne is of God and in this sense God is said to harden the heart as Augustine well concludeth Deus indurabit per justum judicium Pharaoh per liberum arbitrium God did harden Pharaohs heart by his just judgement and Pharaoh by his owne free will de liber arbitr cap. 23. QUEST XVIII How God is said to harden the heart by patience and long suffering ANother way whereby God is said to have hardned Pharaohs heart is by his patience and long suffering because the Lord doth suspend his judgements and not presently punish the wicked whereupon they abusing Gods patience and long suffring are hardned This exposition they ground upon that place of the Apostle Rom. 2.4 Despisest thou the riches of his bountifulnesse and patience and long suffering not knowing that the bountifulnesse of God leadeth thee to repentance But thou after thine hardnesse and heart that cannot repent heapest unto thy selfe wrath against the day of wrath This exposition followeth Origen Non aliter Deum indurare corda hominum nisi patienter eos tolerando that God doth not otherwise harden mens hearts than by patience forbearing them And he maketh it a figurative locution like as a master should say to his servant that abuseth his gentlenesse a lewd servant it is I that have made thee thus because I did not punish thee Likewise Basil Obstinavit Deus Pharaonem per longam patientiam God made Pharaoh obstinate by his long patience So also Hierom Patientia Dei induravit Pharaâ—nem Gods patience did harden Pharaoh And he sheweth it by this similitude as the same Sun hardneth the clay and mollifieth the wax Sic bonitas Dei vasa ira indurat vasa misericordia solvit So the goodnesse of God hardens the vessels of wrath and mollifieth the vessels of mercie To the same purpose also Theodoret quast 12. in Exod. Augustine also after the same manner saith Pharaonem non divina potentia sed divina patientia credenda est Deum indurasse Not the divine power but the divine patience is thought to have hardned Pharaoh This is true which is affirmed by these ancient fathers that men by abusing the patience and long suffering of God are hardned yet this is not all this phrase that God hardned Pharaohs heart sheweth that God hath a further stroke in the hardning of their hearts than by connivence and long suffering toward them QUEST XIX Wherefore the Lord useth patience and long suffering toward the wicked YEt it is most true that God useth great patience and longanimity towards sinners and that for these reasons 1. That thereby Gods goodnesse and mercy may appeare and the great malice and frowardnesse of mans heart that cannot be drawne to repentance by the Lords rich and bountifull mercy 2. By this meanes also Gods judgements appeare to be most just
there formes the capacity and roumth of the Arke within should be much lessened neither should the Arke hold out in every part to be 300. cubits long 50. broad and 30. high according to the description 5. Neither doth Lyranus fitly expound these words in â—ummitate latera non distabant nisi per cubitum that the sides were gathered in together in the top being distant but a cubit his meaning is that in the top or ridge there should bee left a certaine plaine or square of a cubit in breadth which were to no use at all and againe if hee would have the sides gathered into this cubit before they had risen the full height of 30. cubits the Arke should not be so spacious if after the Arke should farre exceed in height the measure prescribed of 30. cubits 5. Some thinke that the Arke was gathered in the top every way like a pyramis taper-wise so that the very top was a cubit in length and the sixt part of a cubit in breadth as Buteo Mercerus But this is not like for then the Arke should not hold his proportion to be 50. cubits high throughout if it should so farre be carried small and narrow toward the top 6. Iunius referreth this prescription of a cubit to the eaves of the Arke which he would have hang over an each side a cubit for better defence from the weather But it is more like that the more principall part namely the cover and roofe of the Arke should be prescribed what fashion to be made of which otherwise shoud bee here omitted than the lesse principall likewise the word which signifieth to consummate or finish better agreeth to the top where the worke is finished Like it is that the eavings hanged over but Moses described not every circumstance and somewhat ought to bee left to Noahs discretion neither can this place be fitly so applyed 6. Wherefore for the body of the Arke Augustine well conjectureth rectis limeis longe laâ—eque porrectam that it was builded upright both in length and breadth and then the cover was so made sloping that the ridge all the length of the Arke was but a cubit higher than the sides or eaves of the Arke which falling or declining to the roofe by the distance of a cubit was sufficient to shed the water for the whole breadth containing but 50. cubits the ridge being just in the midst was equally distant 25. cubits from each side so that the roofe on each side did rise for 25. cubits in breadth one in height which might fully suffice for the fall of the raine 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. Even a carnall minde is flesh 1. Vers. 3. BEcause they are flesh here we learne that not only the body but even the soule of carnall men is called flesh quia se totos carnalibus operibus dant because they give themselves wholy to carnall workes as Chrysostome saith and Gregory caro quippe homo efficitur quando sensui carnis ratio subjugatur man is become flesh when reason is subdued to the carnall sense for two wayes this word flesh is taken in scripture as he well distinguisheth secundum naturam secundum culpam according to nature and according to the corruption of nature 2. Doct. No free will to good by nature 2 Vers. 5. ALL the imaginations of the thoughts of his heart are onely evill continually From this place we conclude 1. That originall concupiscence is properly sinne which is denied by Bellarmine because the imagination of mans heart is only evâ—ll 3. That man hath no free will by nature to any good seeing his thoughts are only evill 3. That there is no good worke so perfect but that it is blemished with mans naturall corruption because it is said their thoughts are continually evill c. all these conclusions are denied by the papists and therefore they have devised two answers to this place 1. That Moses useth here an hyperbolicall speech because mens thoughts were for the most part evill not altogether and onely evill 3. Hee speaketh only of the wicked not of the righteous for Noah is here excepted who is said to be a just and upright man v. 9 This answer Bellarmine and Pererius Contra 1. This generall speech admitteth no exception for by nature mens thoughts are only evill for our Saviour saith that which is borne of the flesh is flesh Iohn 3.6 and in this chapter v. 3. they are said to be flesh all their thoughts then by nature were carnall and fleshly 2. Yea even Noah and other righteous men by nature are altogether corrupt as S. Paul saith we were the children of wrath by nature as well as others Ephes. 2.3 Noah his righteousnesse was by grace not by nature 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. None exactly perfect in this life Vers. 9. WHere Noah is said to bee a just upright or perfect man the Pellagians doe use this and such other places to prove that a man might attaine to an absolute perfection in this life to be without sin But I have shewed before in what sense we are said to be perfect either in respect of the wicked because the righteous are not defiled with such grosse sins or for that they do still increase and goe forward to perfection as also because by faith they are cloathed with the righteousnesse and perfection of Christ so before quest 8. 2. Confut. The capacity of the Arke sufficient to containe all that entred Vers. 12. THe length of the Arke shall bee three hundred cubits Apelles Marcioâ—s scholler cavilled at this that the Arke could not be big enough to containe so many divers kinds of beasts being hardly able to receive foure elephants Origen hom 2. in Genes But this cavill I have answered before quest 14. where I shewed that the Arke was of sufficient capacity even after the measure of the common cubit to hold all that entred into it Others tooke exception at the bignesse of the Arke tantae magnitudinis arcam non potuisse compingi that an Arke of such greatnesse could not be made Augustine lib. 15. de civitat cap. 27. and thus Celsus objected Orig. l. 4. contra Cels. But Augustine answereth 1. that they need not wonder at this seeing such huge cities have been builded and considering it was an hundred yeares in preparing 2. And it need not seeme strange that so many yeares were spent in this worke seeing Pliny writeth that the temple of Diana at Ephesus was 200. yeare in building by the helpe of all Asia 3. It was indeed too huge a vessell to bee governed by the skill of man and therefore Augustine saith Quam nullus in mare mittat conatus hominum sed levet unda cum venerit magisqué divina providentia quam humana prudenâ—ia natantem gubernet It was so made that it could not by mans helpe be set aflote but lift up by the water to bee governed by divine providence not humane
said to harden mans heart divers profitable questions come now in order to be handled for seeing the Lord is here divers times said to harden Pharaohs heart as chap. 4.21 chap. 7.3 chap. 9.12 chap. 10. vers 10. and 20. and 27. chap. 11.10 chap. 14. vers 14. and 8. even nine times in all it seemeth that Moses of purpose useth this significant phrase and doth inculcate it often that we should well weigh and consider it QUEST XIII What the hardnesse of heart is FIrst then it is requisite to be knowne what this hardnesse of heart is 1. It may first be described negatively by the unaptnesse of an hard heart to any thing that is good it is neiâ—her passive active or apprehensive of any good thing not the first nec movetur precibus nec cedit minis It is neither moved by prayers nor giveth way to threats as Bernard saith For the next he saith it is ingratum ad beneficia ad câ—â—silia infidum it is unthankfull for benefits unfaithfull in counsell unshamefast in evill things c. There is no activitie in it to any goodnesse And for the third praeter solas injurias nihil non praeterit it remembreth nothing that is past but wrongs nor hath any forecast for the time to come unlesse it be to seeke revenge 2. It may be described also by the perpetuall companion thereof the blindnesse of the mind for as ignorance blindeth the understanding so hardnesse of heart blindeth the will and affection As the Apostle saith speaking of the Gentiles having their cogitation darkned through the ignorance that is in them because of the hardnesse of their heart Ephes. 4.18 Both these concurred in Pharaoh he shewed his blindnesse in saying I know not Iehovah his hardnesse of heart in adding Neither will I let Israel goe Exod. 5.2 3. The propertie of hardnesse of heart is this that it is not onely a great and grievous sinne but also the punishment of sinne that it is a sinne the Apostle sheweth Heb. 3.12 Take heed brethren lest then be at any time in any of you an evil heart to depart from the living God And that it is a punishment of sinne S. Paul also testifieth Rom. 1.21 Because when they knew God they did not glorifie him as God c. Then it followeth vers 24. God gave them up to their owne hearts lusts c. 4. Now the qualities and inseparable adjuncts of hardnesse of heart are these 1. Blindnesse of the judgement and understanding as Isai. 6.10 Make the heart of this people fat make their eares heavie and shut their eyes lest they see with their eyes heare with their eares and understand with their hearts 2. They are obstinate and wilfull and refuse to be admonished and instructed Who say unto God depart from 〈◊〉 we desire not the knowledge of thy wayes Iob 21.14 3. Such are rejected and cast out of the presence of God and left unto themselves such an onâ— was Saul of whom it is said That the spirit of the Lord departed from Saul and an evill spirit sent of the Lord vexed him 1. Sam. 16.14 4. They delight in doing of evill and make a sport of sinne Prov. 2.14 Which rejoyce in doing of evill and delight in the frowardnesse of the wicked 5. They regard not to doe things honest in the sight of men but contemne and despise all others Prov. 18.3 When the wicked commeth then commeth contempt 6. They are incorrigible and past all hope of amendment Prov. 1.30 They would none of my councell but despised all my correction 7. They are not ashamed of most vile sinnes Ierem. 3.3 Thou hadst a whores forehead thou wouldest not be ashamed 8. When the Lord smiteth them they feele it not neither have they any sense of Gods judgements whom the wise man compareth to those that sleepe in the mast of a ship and as drunken men that are stricken but know it not Prov. 23.24.25 9. They are growne to such an evill custome of sinning that they can doe none other as the Prophet saith can the blackamore change his skinne or the Leopard his spots then may yee also doe good that are accustomed to doe evill Ierem. 13.23 10. So that the sinnes of such seeme to be inexpiable and indeleble as the same Prophet saith that the sinnes of Iudah were written with a penne of iron and with the poâ—nt of a Diamond chap. 17.1 11. They wax daily worse and worse of whom it is said Revel 22.11 Hee that is filthy let him be filthy still 12. And as they increase in sinne so they doe treasure up Gods judgements against themselves and heape unto themselves wrath against the day of wrath Rom. 2.5 QUEST XIV Whether God be the efficient and working cause of hardnesse of heart NOw in the next place concerning the efficient cause of the hardnesse of heart 1. That it cannot be imputed to God as the worker and Author thereof it may appeare by these reasons First the hardnesse of the heart is a great sinne as is proved in the former question but God is no wayes the Author of sinne seeing he neither tempteth or perswadeth unto it for God tempteth no man Iam. 1.13 neither hath commanded it but hath forbidden it by his Law nor yet worketh with them that doe evill for all that God doth is good and so there is none good but God Mark 10.19 Neither doth the Lord approve sinne being done Psal. 8.4 Thou art not a God that lovest wickednesse If then God neither move to sinne nor commends it nor yet assisteth the committers of it or approveth it he is no way the Author of sinne Secondly if God causeth sinne then every man should sinne of necessity and so his punishment should bee unjust being forced to sinne But as Augustine saith Deus nemini per hoc quod falli non potest aut necessitatem aut voluntatem intulit delinquendi God by this that he cannot be deceived hath not brought upon any either a necessity or willingnesse of sinning Thirdly Augustine useth another excellent reason Fieri non potest ut per quem à peccatis surgitur per eum in peccata decidatur It cannot be that by whom men rise from sinne by him they should fall into sinne Fourthly Plato thus reasoneth Deus qui bonus est malorum causa dici non potest c. God that is good cannot be said to be the cause of evill for then hee should be contrary to himselfe Lastly if God any way should be the Author of sinne then it should be no sinne for whatsoever God doth is good Nay not to doe that which the Lord willeth should be sinne Perer. 2. Yet seeing God is said in Scripture to harden the heart which betokeneth an action aâ—d likewise in other termes God is said to give some over to vile affections Rom. 1.26 and to send upon some strange delusions that they should not beleeve the truth 2. Thess. 2.11 and to make
light but made not darkenesse but onely made a separation betweene the light and the darknesse Gen. 14. Whereupon Augustine groundeth this distinction Aliud fecit Deus ordinavit aliud non fecit sed ordinavit God mâ—dâ— sâ—me things and ordered them also some things he made not but ordered as he giveth instance of the darknesse so the workes of darknesse God cannot be said to have made but only he disposeth and ordereth them QUEST XXVII God otherwise hardneth then as a generall mover of the heart THirdly some referre that worke of God which he sheweth in the hardning of the heart to that generall power which he giveth unto the creature in whom all things move live and have their being Act. 17.28 So that the hardning of the heart as it is an action or worke is of God but as it is evill it proceedeth from man So Zuinglius Quatenus est Dei Creatoris opus est crimen non est quantum autem hominis crimen est scelus est As it is of God the Creator it is a worke it is no faule but as it is of man it is a fault it is a sinne The Master of the sentences hath the like saying Actus mali in quantum actus 〈◊〉 boni sunt à Deo authore Evill acts as they are acts are good and proceed of God the Author lib. 2. distinct 35. But this solution doth not take away the doubt for as God is the Creator and so generall worker hee only giveth power to move the heart this moving being the generall action is divided into two parts for there are good motions of the heart and evill the mollifying of the heart and the hardning in the good motions God concurreth two wayes as a generall mover by his creating power and as a particular directer by his regenerating grace but in the other motions he only hath a stroke as a generall mover in the particular action of hardning as it is evill hee concurreth not Therefore according to that generall power the Lord is said only to be a mover not an hardner of the heart Some other way therefore yet must be found out whereby the Lord is said to harden the heart QUEST XXVIII How the Lord is said indeed to harden the heart TO conclude then this question of all these wayes before rehearsed which are ten in all I make choice of these three which may fully satisfie every doubt namely the third in the 17. quest before the fift in the 20. quest and the sixt in the 21. The first is that God is said to harden the heart by leaving it to it selfe and depriving it of his necessary grace as God is said to have given over the unbeleeving Gentiles to their hearts lusts Rom. 1.24 The second that beside this God causeth many things to be done which are not in themselves causes of the hardning of the heart yet the wicked take occasion thereby further to bee indurate and hardned as S. Paul sheweth how the wicked abuse the patience and long suffering of God thereby to be further hardned Thirdly God by his just judgement Cum suum in malum quâ— ipse ultro ruit amplius ad finem usque impellit doth force him to his owne hurt whither hee runneth headlong himselfe even unto the end Iun. Aâ—aâ—ysâ—n 7. cap. Exod. God as a just Judge seeing a mans heart to bee bent upon wickednesse doth as a just Judge inflict upon him the spirituall punishment of induration To this purpose Augustine handling that place Rom. 1. how the Lord gave up the Gentiles to their owne lusts useth this distinction that some things there rehearsed are sinnes and no punishment as the pride and vanity of their mindes vers 21. They were not thankefull but became vaine in their imagination Some a punishment and no sinne as eternall death which they were worthy of vers 31. the rest that came betweene are both sinnes and punishments By this distinction Augustine in another place answereth this objection of the Pelagians God say they should not take such punishment of sinne Vt peccator per vindictam plura committeret That the sinners thereby commit more sinne Augustine answereth to this effect Sic ostendit ista esse peccata ut etiam poenae fint peccatorum he sheweth these so to be sinnes as that they are also punishments of sinnes as the Apostle there saith vers 27. Man with man wrought filthinesse and received to themselves such recompence of their error as was meet So the meaning of Augustine is that God did not send them upon the Gentiles as they were sinnes but they are to be considered as punishments of their sinnes as God hath an hand therein Likewise whereas Iulian the Pelagian objected that Per patientiam divinam sunt non per potentiam desideriis traditi That they were delivered over to their lusts not by the power but by the patience of God Augustine to shew the contrarie giveth instance of that place Ezech. 14.9 When it is said If the Prophet be deceived I have deceived him Patientia an potentia est Is it the patience or the power of God that doth this And concerning the hardning of Pharaohs heart Augustine concludeth thus Deus ejus voluntatem proprio suo vito malam in hoc peccatum judicio suo justo occulto inclinavit God did incline his will being evill by it owne faulâ— into this sinne by his just yet secret judgement If God did incline it he did more than suffer it or minister the occasion only whereby it was inclined Hierome expresseth as much by this similitude Vnus est solis calor secundùm essentias subjacentes alia liquefacit alia indurat liquatur cera induratur lutum there is buâ— one kinde of heate in the Sunne and according to the matter which it worketh upon some things it melteth some things it hardneth the wax is melted the clay hardned Origene also useth the same similitude and applieth it thus Sic indurasse dicitur Deus cor Pharaoniâ— quia cor ejus secundùm ea quae cogitabat luteum limosum erat So God as the Sunne hardneth the clay is said to have hardned Pharaohs heart because his heart according to those things which he thought was earthly and muddy And in another place he bringeth in this Simile Vt eodem opere plâ—viae terra diligenter exculta affert bonos fructus inculta tribulos as by the same worke of the raine the earth being well tilled bringeth forth good fruit and the untilled thistles Like as then the Sun hardneth the clay the raine bringeth forth weedes not of it selfe but by reason of the nature of the thing concurring whereupon it worketh so by the working of God after a most secret and hid manner the hearts of the wicked are hardned but the cause thereof is in themselves And thus much shall suffice of this question see it handled before 2. Doct. chap. 7. and
paschall lambe he maketh a figure of Christ 1. Cor. 5.7 Iun. in Analys 6. Places of morall use 1. Observ. To cut off the occasion of sinne Vers. 16. IN any case yee shall put away leaven the first day out of your houses As they were straightly charged not to eat unleavened bread so they must also avoid the very occasion leâ—t they might trespasse unawares So wee must not only flee from manifest sinnes but beware of every occasion as our Saviour bid his Apostles take heed of the leaven of the Pharisies There is another kind of leaven of corrupt manners as the Apostle sheweth 1. Cor. 5.7 Both these kindes of leavens we must not only forbeare to eat our selves but we must cast them out of our houses wee must both abhorre them in our selves and remove all occasions which any might stumble at Simler and so as the Apostle saith abstaine from all appearance of evill 1. Thess. 5.22 2. Observ. Favour in the lender toward the borrower commeth of God Vers. 36. ANd the Lord gave the people favour As the Egyptians affections were inclined by the Lord to lend or rather to give unto the Israelites what they asked so when a man is driven to borrow of his neighbour if he finde favour in his eyes he is to acknowledge it as a mercie from God if the Lord doe shut up his affection toward him he must thinke that some sinne of his hath made a barre and stopped the way Pellican Thus was the heart of righteous Iob wrought toward the poore If I restrained the poore of their desire or caused the eyes of the widow to faile Iob. 31.27 3. Observ. God can turne mens affections to hatred or favour as it pleaseth him AGaine as it is said in the Psalm 105.25 He turned their heart so that they hated his people like as the Lord so worketh that the patience of his servants is tried by the disfavour and hatred of men so he can turne their affections to love and favour This teacheth us that wee should depend upon God and when we see the countenance of any to be estranged from us that wee pray unto God who hath the ruling of all mens hearts to incline their heart toward us as Iacob prayeth for his sonnes God almighty give you grace in the sight of the man Gen. 43.14 Calvin 4. Observ. We must be as pilgrims and dwellers in tents in this world Vers. 37. THey tooke their journey from Ramesis to Succoth Succoth signifieth tabernacles So they that goe out of the Egypt of this world to the heavenly Canaan must dwell in tabernacles here Pellican We must be as pilgrimes and strangers in this world 1. Pet. 2.11 and the Apostle saith that here we have no abiding City Heb. 13.14 5. Observ. No unbeleevers to be admitted to the Sacraments Vers. 43. NO stranger shall eat thereof That is no uncircumcised person that is a stranger from the faith of Israel so neither are the mysteries or Sacraments of religion to be given unto Infidels or prophane persons Calvin As our Saviour will not have us to cast holy things unto dogs or pearles among swine Matth. 7.2 6. Observ. The Gospell is to be professed not for lucre or honour sake but for love to the truth Vers. 45. AN hired servant shall not eat thereof As they which served the Israelites only for their hire and wages were not true members of Israel and therefore not fit to bee partakers of their mysteries for they joyned themselves unto them rather for a reward than for love of their religion So neither are they true professors of the Gospell which doe professe the same for any love of lucre or preferment rather than of conscience and good will to the truth Pellican Likewise it sheweth that neither is God to be served onely for hope of reward but for love and true filiall affection for as they which obey for feare are servants and not children so they which doe all for hope of reward are hirelings and mercenaries rather than domesticall God therefore is to be served and loved for his owne sake without any other respect CHAP. XIII 1. The Method and Argument IN this Chapter there is a prescription of certaine solemne rites to be observed of the people in remembrance of their deliverance out of Egypt unto verse 17. and a description of their manners of proceeding in their journey to verse 22. In the prescription two things are enjoyned the people the annuall keeping of the Passeover and the consecrating of the first borne which are briefely propounded vers 2. and 3. and afterward more at large declared In the ample declaration 1. The Passeover is prescribed both the place where they should keepe it in the land of Canaan vers 5. the time for seven dayes vers 6. the manner with unleavened bread verse 7. the use which is double in respect of their children to instruct them vers 8. of themselves to be a signe of remembrance unto them vers 9. the perpetuity they must keepe it yeerely 2. Concerning the consecration of the first borne the place is assigned where they shall set them apart when they are come into the land of Canaan vers 11. what they shall set apart all their first borne of man and beast vers 12. with an exception of two kindes of the asse among the uncleane beasts which must be redeemed or killed and the first borne of man which must be simply redeemed vers 13. then the reason of this institution is shewed because the Lord for his peoples sake killed all the first borne in Egypt v. 14 15. Lastly the end of this institution is to call to their remembrance that the Lord brought them out of Egypt vers 16. Then followeth the second part of the Chapter shewing the proceeding and going forward of the Israelites in their journey wherein is declared 1. Which way they went not by the way of the Philistims and why but by the way of the wildernesse vers 17 18. 2. How they went out well appointed vers 18. 3. What they carried with them Iosephs bones vers 19. 4. Whither they removed unto Etham vers 20. 5. How thy were guided both by day and night vers 21.22 2. The divers readings Vers. 3. Out of the house of bondmen I.V.A.P. rather than of bondage G.S.L.B.G. the word is ghabadiâ— of servants though the sense much differ not in either Vers. 5. And it shall be when the Lord hath brought thee I.A.P. C. S. not when the Lord hath brought thee B.G. cum caeter for here vehajah it shall be is wanting Vers. 6. And in the seventh day shall be a feast unto the Lord. A. P. cum caeter not and in the seventh day being an holy day to the Lord. I. as though the meaning should be that they should eat unleavened bread upon the seventh day also for that is said before in that they are commanded seven dayes to eat unleavened bread but the
they are distinctly to be prohibited Lyranus also saith that there is Aliaratio boni utilis alia delectabilis One reason of coveting a profitable good another of a delectable good the coveting of the wife belongeth to one and the coveting of the substance to the other Answ. 1. All this onely proveth a difference and distinction in the severall kindes of concupiscence not a distinction of the severall precepts 2. And thus much may bee inferred that because they are distinct concupiscences therefore they are distinctly to be expressed and so they are but it followeth not that they are to bee distinguished in two precepts 3. And yet these concupiscences are not so distinguished but that they may concurre at one and the same time in the inward desire and motion as one may have a carnall desire to his neighbours wife and have a covetous eye also unto her substance Wherefore this last precept which forbiddeth all manner of coveting is not to bee divided into two precepts but is one whole and entire Commandement consisting of divers particulars The reasons are these 1. Origen thus reasoneth Quod si ita putetur non complebitur decem numerus praeceptorum c. If the two first precepts should be made all one there would not bee ten Commandements ubi jam erit decalogi veritas where then is the truth of the decalogue Homil. 8. in Exod. The reason is this that seeing there must bee ten precepts and there are foure in the first table there can bee but six in the second but if the last be divided into two there will bee more than six in the second and so more than ten in all but if wee make but three in the first there will be but nine in all for Origen taketh this as granted that it is all one precept that maketh mention of coveting 2. Another reason is because that which is here put in the first place Thou shalt not covet thy neighbours house thou shalt not covet thy neighbours wife is put in the second place Deut. 5.21 Thou shalt not covet thy neighbours wife neither shalt thou desire thy neighbours house which inversion of the order sheweth that they are all one precept for otherwise Moses should have confounded the ninth and tenth precept together Vrsin So also Cajetane Varia â—â—â—ctura uxoris domus ex industria facta à Mose c. This mixture of the wife and house Moses maketh of purpose in these two places because they belong to one precept This reason also is urged by Iunius upon this place 3. This precept Moses periodis non distinxit sed uno versiculo comprehendit did not distinguish by periods as the other precepts but comprehendeth it in one verse which sheweth it to be one precept not two Vrsin 4. Another argument is taken from the reason of this Commandement which is added Nor any thing which is his we are forbidden therefore to covet the neighbours wife house or oxe or asse Quia alterius sunt because they belong to another Cajetan Oleaster There being then one common reason serving the whole it sheweth that it is one Commandement not divers 5. Omnes hae species sub uno genere comprehenduntur All these severall kindes of coveting are comprehended under one generall head Thou shalt not covet therefore they are under one precept Galas 6. Pari ratione in sex vel septem praecepta deduci posse videatur c. With as good reason may it be divided into six or seven precepts as into two because so many particular branches of coveting are rehearsed Simler 7. But one of the best reasons that the precept of not coveting is one and not two is taken from that place of Saint Paul Cum de concupiscentia tanquam de uno pracepto dicit When he speaketh of concupiscence as of one precept Rom. 7.7 I had not knowne lust except the Law had said Thou shalt not lust Vrsin Basting QUEST II. What manner of concupiscence is here forbidden and how this precept differeth from the former COncerning the difference betweene this precept and the other Thou shalt not commit adultery thou shalt not steale there are divers opinions 1. Augustine seemeth sometime to bee of opinion that in those Commandements Ipsum opus notatum videtur in extremo autem ipsa concupiscentia The worke only seemeth to be noted but in the last the concupiscence only quaest 71. in Exod. But this is against our blessed Saviours exposition Matth. 5.28 that a man may commit adultery in his heart if hee hath but looked upon a woman to lust after her therefore in the other Commandements not the externall act only is forbidden but the inward purpose also and desire 2. Thomas Aquin thus distinguisheth concupiscence that it may be taken one way as it is actus voluntaetis an act of the will another ut est actus sensualitatis a sensuall or carnall act but here it is onely forbidden in the first sense as it is Consensus voluntatis in opus vel delectationem As it is a consent of the will either to the worke it selfe or in taking delight But when the will hath once assented sinne is brought forth and so it is a breach of the other Commandements as our blessed Saviour sheweth that if a man have but lusted after a woman with a will and desire unto her in his heart he hath committed adultery 3. Some of the Hebrewes thinke that no concupiscence resting inwardly though it have the consent of the will is here forbidden but such as commeth into some externall act beside the perfect act of any sinne as when one soliciteth another mans wife by gifts speeches gesture kissing and dallying though adultery be not committed But the very consent and purpose of the heart though there follow no outward act is sinne as shall afterward be more fully declared as Levit. 19.17 the very hatred of the heart is prohibited though no mischiefe outwardly be committed 4. Some thinke that there is no more forbidden in this Commandement than before but that the Lord thought good to rehearse and declare in plaine words his will for restraining of the inward concupiscence for he knew Aerius stimulandos urgendos homines ne sub umbra obscurioris doctrina latebraâ— quaererent Lest men should seeke some evasion in the obscurity of doctrine that they were specially to be pricked forward and urged Calvin But it is not like that in so compendious an abridgement of the Law that the same things should be twice repeated and Calvin himselfe onely propoundeth this reason hee doth not much insist upon it 5. Therefore that we may apprehend the true difference betweene this precept and the other wee must distinguish betweene these three Pravaâ— cogitationes assensum simplicem certam deliberationem Evill thoughts a simple assent and a setled and certaine deliberation The first evill thoughts if as soone as they rise a man reject them he seemeth not to be guilty though
their usuall food before the floud as it is now as seemeth to thinke Dominicus à Soto a Popish Writer for when as yet the earth and plants were not corrupted by the floud but retained their naturall force and vigour they yeelded more sufficient nourishment so that the eating of flesh was not then so necessary and as the more delicate use of some plants as the use of Wine by Noah was brought in afterward so much flesh of fowles and beasts did grow in request after the floud which was not covered before 5. Wherefore the sounder opinion is that not onely the eating of flesh was permitted before the floud but used not onely among the prophane race but with the faithfull though with greater moderation Our reasons are these 1. Because there is made no new grant neither in this nor in the rest as of multiplying and bearing dominion c. but onely the ancient privileges granted to man confirmed 2. The distinction of cleane beasts which it was lawfull for them to eat and the uncleane whereof they might not eat Levit. 13.8.3 It is evident by the oblation of Abel who offered the first fruit of his sheepe and the faâ— of them but it had beene no praise to Abel to offer the fatlings if he used not to eat of them it had beene all one to God whether to offer leane or fat but herein Abel is commended because he preferred the service of God before his owne private use and therefore Iustinus well collecteth Si anâ—e posuit Abel utilitatisâ—a Deum non dubium quia solitus fit ex labore suo utilitatem percipere If Abel did preferre God before his profit certainly he did reape profit of his labour and to the same purpose he alleageth that saying of the Apostle Who feedeth a flocke and eateth not of the milke thereof 1 Cor. 9.7 and by the same reason also of the flesh thereof 4. In that expresse mention is here first made of eating of flesh it is not as one well resolveth quantum ad usum in respect of the use sed quantum ad necessitatem in regard of the necessity The food of flesh beganne now to be more necessary because the plants and herbs had lost the first naturall vigour and strength QVEST. IIII. Whaâ— the meaning is of eating the flesh with the life or bloud 4. BVt flesh with the life thereof that is the bloud c. 1. This word anima in Hebrew nephesh translated life is taken foure wayes in Scripture first for man as the soule that sinneth shall die Ezek. 18. Secondly for the reasonable soule feare not those that can kill the body but cannot kill the soule Matth. 10. Thirdly it is taken for the inferiour part of the soule that is the affection as thou shalt love the Lord with all thy heart and soule Matth. 22. Fourthly it is taken for the life as a good shepherd will lay downe his life for his sheepe Ioh. 10. and so it is taken in this place for the bloud is the seat and chariot of the life and vitall spirics 2. These words are neither figuratively taken as Eugubinus thinketh for the shedding of mans bloud because he that killeth a man seemeth to devour his flesh for in this sense the words should have no coherence at all with the former verse and where words may be taken in their proper sense without any inconvenience a figure is not to be enforced neither is it all one to eat flesh with the bloud thereof and to eat things strangled as Chrysostome collecteth for the Apstoles distinctly speake of bloud and things strangled Act. 15. Neither is the eating of live flesh here onely prohibited as Cajetanus conjectureth or of hot bloud as Mercer for from this bruitish kinde of food the very nature of man abhorreth and therefore it needed not so especially to be provided for by precept But here generally the eating of the bloud with the flesh is forbidden whether together with the flesh alive or dead or separated from the flesh as to drinke it or to eat it as now the use is in confected meats QVEST. V. Wherefore the eating of bloud was prohibited NOw whereas the eating of bloud was forbidden both before the Law and under the Law Levit. 17. and after the Law in the beginning of the Gospell Act. 15. it shall be profitable to consider the causes of this prohibition First it was forbidden before the Law 1. Not so much for decencie and comelinesse or for that bloud is a grosse and heavy food 2. But either that aforehand by these ceremoniall precepts mens minds might be prepared the better to beare the yoke of the Law which afterward should be promulgated 3. Or rather that by this precept of abstaining from bloud men might be the more terrified from the shedding of mans bloud sic Chrysost. Secondly this law was revived Levit. 17.11 12. whereof two reasons are given one civill because the life of the flesh is the bloud that they should forbeare from all shew of cruelty and so much the more detest the shedding of mans bloud the other religious because I have given the bloud to offer at the Altar the bloud the organ of life is holy unto God the Author of life and therefore they should not pollute or prophane it by devouring thereof Thirdly the Apostles did forbid the eating of things strangled and bloud 1. Not because among the Gentiles suffocated things were held to be the food of evill spirits as Origen writeth for it is not like that the Apostles would ground their decree upon such heathenish fantasies 2. Neither by bloud is homicide forbidden and by things suffocated uncleane as some thinke for the Apostles would not use obscure and mysticall tearmes in their decree and these things were already provided for by law among the Gentiles 3. Neither did the Apostles forbid these things onely to restraine intemperancie for many kinds of food are more delicate and to be defiâ—ed than these 4. But Augustine sheweth the true cause of this prohibition Quâ—dideo fâ—ctum est quia elâ— gere voluerunt Apostoli pro tempore rem facilem c. This was decreed because the Apostles for a while would chuse some easie thing not burdensome to the observers which the Gentiles might observe in common with the Iewes c. Thus Augustine disputing against Faustus This the Apostles did onely for a time lest the beleeving Jewes who could hardly all at once be removed from the legall rites might have beene offended at the libertie of the Gentiles but now this cause being removed and there being no such feare this decree also is expired QVEST. VI. How this prohibition dependeth of the former verse Vers. 5. FOr surely I will require your bloud c. 1. Which words are neither an exposition of the former verse as Eugubinus who by the eating of flesh with the bloud understandeth figuratively the shedding of mans bloud 2. Neither is the
the Prophet expoundeth this place of Gods eternall love and hatred of Iacob and Esau 2. That is the proper sense of the place from the which an argument is framed and a conclusion inferred but out of this spirituall sense concerning everlasting election the Apostle reasoneth and concludeth election to be only of grace not by workes Ergo it is the proper sense 6. Places of Morall observation 1. Observ. The reconciliation of brethren Vers. 9. HIs sonne Isaack and Ismael buried him They which were separated during their fathers life are now united and reconciled in his death which teacheth us that brethren which have beene long at variance should yet when the time of mourning for their father commeth returne in affection Muscul. Not as Esau that intended when his father was dead to execute his malice toward his brother Gen. 27.41 2. Observ. To continue and persevere in prayer Vers. 21. ISaack prayed to the Lord for his wife It seemeth seeing Rebeccah continued barren twenty yeares for Isaack was maried at 40. and was 60. yeares old when Esau and Iacob were borne that Isaack continued many yeares in prayer and waited from moneth to moneth from yeare to yeare till the Lord had condescended to his prayer whereby wee are taught that wee should not give over in our prayers neither limit God to heare us within a time but still patiently expect his gracious pleasure as the Apostle exhorteth that wee should pray continually 1 Thes. 5.17 Mercer 3. Observ. Gods will many times revealed to the weaker sort Vers. 28. ISaack loved Esau c. Rebeccah was better affected toward the chosen seed than Isaack waâ—â— so was Sarahs heart toward Isaack but Abraham loved Ismael whereby wee see that manâ— times God revealeth his will to the more infirme sex and as S. Paul saith chuseth the weake things of 〈◊〉 world to confound the strong 1 Cor. 1.17 Muscul. 4. Observ. Of frugality in meats and drinkes Vers. 29. NOw Iacob sod pottage c. By this we may see how frugall and sparing the diet of those godly Patriarkes was Iacob here contented himselfe with lentill pottage These lentils came from Egypt and was the usuall food in Alexandria for young and old which was commonly vendible in their Tabernes Gell. lib. 17. c. 18. from thence the use of lentils became very common in other countries the Philosopher Taurus used to sup with them and Zeno the Stoike prescribed to his schollers how they should seeth and dresse their lentils with the twelfth part of Coriander seed Athen. lib. 4. The like frugality and parsimony was used in famous countries among the Gentiles The Arcadians lived of akornes the Argives of apples the Athenians of figs the Tyrinthians of peares the Indians of canes the Carmanes of palmes the Sauromatians of millet the Persians nasturtio of cresses These examples ought to make Christians ashamed who use to pamper their bellies and feed their fansies with curious delights and exquisite dainties Perer. S. Paul giveth a rule for this meats for the belly the belly for meats God shall destroy both it and them 1 Cor. 6.13 that therefore men should not bee so carefull to feed and fill their bellies with dainty fare and costly meats seeing they both must fall to corruption 5. Observ. Against prophane persons that sell heaven for earthly pleasures Vers. 33. HE sold his birth-right Esau that for a messe of red pottage did part with his birth-right is a president and patterne of all those which for the momentany pleasures and profit of this life doe sell and lose their hope of eternall life Mercer As that rich glutton Luke 16. which purchased his ease and pleasure in this life with the everlasting paine and torment of his soule afterward for this cause is Esau called a prophane person Heb. 12.16 which for one portion of meat sold his birth-right CHAP. XXVI 1. The Argument or Contents FIrst in this Chapter is shewed the occasion of Isaacks going to Gerar which was by reason of the famine vers 1. And Gods Commandement vers 2 3. with the renewing of the promise made to Abraham 4 5. Secondly this Chapter treateth of Isaacks abode and dwelling in Gerar with such things as there happened 1. The question that arose about his wife vers 7â— to 12. 2. The envy of the Philistims against Isaack because hee prospered and waxed rich vers 13. to 18. 3. The contention betweene Isaacks servants and the Philistims concerning certaine fountaines vers 18. to vers 23. Thirdly there is declared the departure of Isaack from Gerar to dwell in Beersheba and the covenant there made betweene him and Abimelech vers 23. to the end 2. The divers readings v. 3. 18. my word shall be an helpe unto thee C. I will be with thee and blesse thee caeter v. 10. one of my stocke might have slept S. C. one of my people might have lion caet heb shacabh thou mightst have brought upon us ignorance S. this sinne caet v. 11. he that toucheth this mans wife H. this man or his wife caet v. 12. he found barly increased an hundred fold S. he found an hundreth fold caet v. 14. much tillage georgia S. a great family or houshold caet guabudah signifieth both v. 17. in the brooke of Gerar. H.C. in the valley of Gerar. caet nachal signifieth both a valley is more proper because they digged there v. 20 21 22. Heseck Sitâ—ah Rehoboth G.T.P. contention enmity roomth H.S.C.B. v. 25. there Isaacks servants digged a well in the valley of Gerar. S. v. 26. accompanied with his friend C. with Ahuzzah his friend caet v. 28. let the oath be confirmed that was betweene our fathers C. let there be now an oath betweene us caeter v. 33. he called it abundance H. an oath S. he called Shibah caet v. 35. they were rebellious against Isaack and Rebeckah C.B. they offended or were a griefe of minde caet heb bitternesse of Spirit 3. The Explanation of doubtfull questions QVEST. I. Whether this Abimelech were the same with whom Abraham had to deale Vers. 1. ANd there was a famine in the land c. 1. This other famine in Abrahams time was that famine mentioned chap. 12. where Abraham went downe into Aegypt Mercer for chap. 20. when Abraham sojourned in Gerar there is no famine spoken of which Pererius supposeth to have beene the cause of Abrahams going thither 2. This Abimelech might be either the same with whom Abraham had to deale who might bee now not above an hundred yeare old or another King of that name for the Kings of Gerar were called by the name of Abimelech as the Kings of Aegypt Pharaohs Phicol also might be the name of office or the same man might serve the father and sonne Mercer 3. Therefore we need not with Augustine quaest 75. in Genes to thinke this story to have beene done long before and to be set downe by way of recapitulation for it seemeth that Abraham was
Maphâ—â—â—seth lame wee ought not rashly to judge of those which have any infirmity or defect in their body Muscul. It was the Disciples rashnesse for the which they are reproved of Christ to judge the blind-man punished for his or his parents sinne Ioh. 9.2 CHAP. XXXIII 1. The Contents IN this Chapter is set forth first Iacobs meeting of Esau and the manner thereof Secondly their departure each from the other In the first part on Iacobs behalfe wee have his policie in placing of his wives and children in order vers 1 2. his humility in gesture bowing himselfe seven times in speech hee calleth himselfe Esaus servant vers 5. and saith he had seene his face as if he had seene the face of God vers 10. his liberality in forcing his brother Esau to take his present vers 11. In Esau we are to consider his humanity in imbracing Iacob vers 4. his courtesie in offering first to goe with Iacob who excuseth himselfe by the tendernesse of his children and cattell vers 13. then to leave some of his company with him vers 15 16. In Iacobs departure there is expressed his acts domesticall in building an house for himselfe and booths for his cattell first in Succoth then Sechem vers 17 18. politicall or civill in buying a parcell of ground religious in building an Altar vers 20. 2. The divers readings v. 5. Who are these with thee and doe they appertaine unto thee H. who are these with thee cat the children which God hath given me C.H.B. wherewith God hath beene mercifull to me S. which God of his grace hath given G.T.P. chanan signifieth to grant in mercy v. 7. When they had worshipped likewise S.H.C. did their obeysance B. bowed themselves T.P.G. and so doth the Latine translate also vers 6. hebr shacah to bow as Isay 51.23 bow downe that wee may goe over Ioseph being bidden drew neare T. Ioseph drew neare câ—t v. 10. Be favourable to me H. thou shalt blesse me S. thou hast accepted me cater v. 10. As though I had seene the face of a prince C. the face of God cat v. 11. God hath given meâ— all things H. I have all things S.G.C.P. I have of all things T. or enough B. all things heb v. 12. I will beare thee company H. let us goe the right way S. I will goe over against thee C. I will goe before thee T.B.G.P. 〈◊〉 before against v. 13. Kine with young H.S.B.G. giving suckâ— T.P.C. 〈…〉 signifieth both v. 13. If they over-drive them they will die all in one day H. if they over-drive them but 〈◊〉 day they will die cat v. 14. I will follow softly his foot-steps 〈◊〉 I see my children are able H. I will be 〈◊〉 in the way according to the leasure of that which walketh before me and according to the foot of these little ones S. I will lead 〈◊〉 easily according to the pace of the family before me and the pace of the children C. I will 〈◊〉 a guide to drive those things gently that are before me for my comâ—â—ding T. I will drive softly according to the pace of the cattell that is before me and as the children shall indure B.G. according to the foot or 〈◊〉 of the worke or drift that is before me P. heb v. 15. It is not necessary I onely need this one thing that I may finde grace in thy sight my Lord. H. it is enough that I have found favour c. S. let me finde favour in the sight of my Lord. cater v. 17. Iacob went to his tabernacles S. to Succâ—â—h cater v. 18. Iacob came to Salem a City of the Sichâ—â—ites H.S.B. Iacob came safe to the City Sichem cater Salem signifieth both the name of a City and perfect sound v. 29. Of Hemor S. of the sonnes of Hemor cater for an hundred lambs H.S.C. for an hundred peeces of money T.B.G.P. chesitah signifieth money stamped with that marke v. 20. He called upon the mighty God of Israel H.S. he sacrificed upon it before the mighty God of Israel C. he called it the mighty God of Israel B.G. heb he called it the Altar of the mighty God of Israel T. 3. The explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. The order of Iacobs company and the reason thereof Vers. 1. HE divided the children c. Iacob doth dispose his company in order not onely for decency and comelinesse sake but both to move commiseration and pitie in Esau when he saw the mothers with their children as also to this end that if he smote one company with the sword the other might escape and therefore he placeth the dearest unto him Rachel with Ioseph in the last place as furthest from danger Mercer 2. But whereas Ioseph of Rachel is preferred before Iudah of Lâ—â—b it may be answered that â—s yet it was not revealed unto him that the Messiah should come of Iudah and Ioseph also proved a most excellent man Calvin 3. Iacob goeth first himselfe ready to be offered up in sacrifice for the safety of the flocke therein shewing himselfe an example of a good Pastor Calvin QUEST II. To whom Iacob bowed himselfe and wherefore Vers. 3. HE bowed seven times to the ground 1. He adored not or worshipped God in this inclining and bowing of himselfe as some thinke but he bowed himselfe to his brother as the text sheweth Mercer 2. There were divers fashions used in bending and bowing of the body sometime by bowing of the head and inclining of the body sometime by bowing of the knee 1 King 19.18 sometime by kissing the hand as Iob. 31.27 If my mouth did kisse my hand that is if I adore the Sunne when he shined as this use is retained still in salutaâ—ions to kisse the hand sometime they bowed the body to the ground as Nathan did to David 1 King 1.23 and Iacob in this place to Esau Perer. 3. Neither doth Iacob by this meanes betray or give over his birth-right in calling himselfe Esaus servant but he is content to yeeld this temporall service to Esau not doubting but the promise should be fulfilled in his posterity for so indeed the Idumeans did serve the Israelites from Davids time to Ioram an hundred and twenty years but the Israelites never served the Idumeans Mercer QUEST III. Whether Esau were in truth reconciled to Iacob Vers. 4. THen Esau came to meet him 1. Some Hebrewes thinke that Esau did but dissemble his affection at this time 2. But it is more like that Esaus heart was changed by the speciall worke of God some doe gather so because the word vajecabechehu which signified He kissed him is pointed throughout of which sort the Masorites note but fifteene But it is otherwise collected both by the circumstances here used Esau runneth to meet Iacob he embraceth him kisseth him and weepeth as also we reade not of any hatred after this shewed to Iacob but that they were perfectly reconciled and both buried
chapter to Benjamin when hee should have stayed for Iosephs cup yet Ioseph keepeth the same proportion in giving to Benjamin five suits of raiment Gen. 45.22 3. Neither with Ambrose need we make this a type and figure of Pauls excellencie in gifts who was of the tribe of Benjamin before the rest of the Apostles 4. But Ioseph did this to shew his love to Benjamin being his onely brother by the mothers side as Elkanah gave unto Anna his best beloved wife a more worthy portion 1 Sam. 1.5 Iun. Mercer 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. God the disposer of mens hearts Vers. 14. GOd give you mercie in the sight of the man Iacob acknowledgeth that God is the disposer of mens hearts and affections as the Wise man saith The Kings heart is in the hand of the Lord c. he turneth it whethersoever it pleaseth him Prov. 21.1 2. Doct. We must rest in Gods providence and carefully use the meanes Vers. 11. TAke of the best fruits c. Iacob though his trust were in God that he would incline the rulers heart toward his sonnes yet he refuseth not to use all meanes whereby they might insinuate themselves as he adviseth them to take double money with them and to carry a present Wee are therefore so to depend upon Gods providence as that we use all meanes which God hath appointed Calvin Like as though the Lord gave to Paul all the soules in the ship yet by swimming and using the boords and broken peeces of the ship they came to land Act. 27.24 44. 3. Doct. Restitution is to be made where any errour or oversight is committed Vers. 12. LEst it were some oversight Iacob would have the money restored which they found in their sacks mouthes thinking that the seller might forget himselfe Iacobs justice herein sheweth that in buying and selling where any oversight is committed restitution and satisfaction should be made Muscul. Not like as now a dayes the buyer and seller thinke it well gained when they can one deceive another which abuse the Wise man reproveth It is naught it is naught saith the buyer but when he is gone apart he boasteth Prov. 20.4 4. Doct. The creatures of God may be used not onely for necessity but delight Vers. 34. THey were made merry or drunke their fill with him That is they did eat and drinke liberally and plentifully so that it is not onely lawfull to use the creatures of God for necessitie onely but we may goe further to receive them with delight and chearefullnesse so that we 〈◊〉 of surfetting and drunkennesse As we reade of Abraham that made a great feast when Isaack was weaned Gen. 21.8 that is a plentifull and liberall banket As God hath made bread to strengthen man so he hath given wine to cheare his heart Psal. 104.15 But men must take heed lest in exceeding they fall to riot and distemper themselves with supâ—rfluous abundance Philo well observeth that of ancient time they used after their sacrifices to make their feasts and in the Temples that the place and action might put them in minde of sobriety whereupon some derive the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to bee drunke of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 after sacrificing So wee reade that the Elders of Israel did eat bread with Moses father in law before God Exod. 18.12 in that place where they had sacrificed Wee should therefore thinke of God in the middest of our feasts and not be like to those of whom Saint Iude speaketh of Without all feare feeding themselves Iud. 12. 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Monkes despised of the Iewes Vers. 30. HIs afflictions were inflamed The word is camar whereof the Idoll Priests were called chemarim of their blacke garments as of a burnt colour The Jewes give that name to the blacke Monkes Mercer who by their superstitious apparell make themselves ridiculous to the blinde Jewes and by such foolish toyes hinder their conversion to the faith 2. Confut. Against the pride of superstitious Papists Vers. 32. THat was an abomination to the Egyptians The Egyptians being a superstitious people despised the true Church of God and counted them prophane in respect of themselves which the Prophet noteth to be the guise of hypocrites Stand apart come not neare me I am holier than thâ—â— Isay 65.5 Even so the Pseudocatholike Papists despise the professors of the Gospell of Christ counting them heretikes refusing to come into their holy assemblies Calvin 6. Places of morall use 1. Morall To commit our counsell to God Vers. 7. COuld we know certainly that he would say so Iacobs sons in making mention of their father and youngest brother thought to have excused themselves but thereby they came into greater danger whereby we see that God doth many times frustrate our counsels and maketh them to fall out farre otherwise than we imagined Mercer as Peter also intrapped Ananias by the words of his owne mouth Act. 5. therefore we must commit our counsels to God that he would both direct the thoughts of our heart and words of our mouth 2. Morall A bad conscience full of suspition Vers. 18. BEcause of the money in our sacks mouth are we brought Thus a guilty conscience is alwayes suspitious and disquieted upon every occasion as appeareth in these men that are fearfull without cause and interpret every thing against themselves Thus Moses describeth the fearfulnesse of men that are punished for their sinnes The sound of a leafe shaken shall chase them Levit. 27.36 3. Morall We must be carefull to instruct our families Vers. 23. YOur God and the God of your fathers This steward of Iosephs house would never have spoken so reverently of the God of the Hebrewes but that he was so taught of Ioseph who had a great care to instruct his family in the right faith in the middest of that idolatrous nation this was Abrahams commendation Gen. 18.18 and Iacobs practice Gen. 35.4 4. Morall Iustice to be tempered with mercy Vers. 29. GOd be mercifull to thee my sonne Ioseph which hitherto had shewed himselfe severe and rigorous towards his brethren beginneth now to use them kindly whose example teacheth that prudent governours should qualifie and temper justice with mercy and severity with clemencie Grâ—gor as Saint Paul did towards the incestuous young man 2 Corinth 2. CHAP. XLIV 1. The Method or Argument FIrst in this chapter is declared the practice of Ioseph in laying theft to Benjamins charge 1. The device by Ioseph vers 1 2. 2. The execution by his servant in accusing them vers 4. to 6. 3. Their defence and agreement for the punishment vers 9 10. 4. The deprehension of the pretended theft with Benjamin vers 11. to vers 14. Secondly the conventing of them before Ioseph with their submission and Iosephs mitigation of the punishment vers 15. to vers 18. Thirdly Iudah interposeth himselfe and maketh intercession for Benjamin where is set downe 1. The narration both of their first speech had with Ioseph
make them houses Vers. 22. ANd because the Mid-wives feared God and he made them houses c. There are two generall expositions of this place Some doe interpret the word Lahem them of the Mid-wives some of the people of Israel Of the first 1. Some referre it to the Israelites that they provided for the Mid-wives and kept them from Pharaoh but that is not like seeing the Israelites could not at this time defend themselves from Pharaohs rage 2. Some understand it of Pharaoh that he made strong houses for them that all the Hebrew women should come to them to be delivered but that had beene a thing impossible 3. Some referre it to God that he made them houses which is diversly expounded the Hebrewes supposing these Mid-wives to be Iochebed and Miriam by houses understand the Kingdome and Priesthood which was setled afterward in their of-spring for Iochebed was the mother of Aaron and Miriam they say maried to Calâ—b but this is uncertaine Iosephus writeth lib. 3. antiquit that she was the wife of Hur and it is before shewed that Miriam for her age could be none of them David Chimhi understandeth it of their preserving from the rage of Pharaoh Tostatus of their incorporating and graffing into the nation and common-wealth of Israel as Rahab was but it is more like they were Hebrew women as is before also touched and needed no such ingraffing Hierome understandeth it of spirituall houses in heaven so also Rupertus Augustine and Theodoret of giving them riches Pererius of increasing their families for so is the phrase used Sarah saith when she gave Hagar to Abraham I may be builded by her Gen. 16. And this uncertaintie there is in the first exposition 4. Therefore the second is rather to be preferred to understand it of the people that God made them houses that is families and increased them for these reasons 1. Because in the Hebrew there is a masculine pronoune lahem which although some thinke is sometime taken for the feminine as Exod. 2.17 Piscator and elsewhere and Vatablus saith that mem is sometime taken for nun yet it is more properly taken in the native and originall use where there is no necessitie otherwise to enforce it Iun. 2. Because the house and famille is not builded by the woman but by the man Simler 3. This better agreeth to the words going before that the people multiplied vers 20. and the words following if we read them thus And so it was because the Mid-wives feared God and he made them house That Pharaoh charged all his people c. Pharaoh seeing that God by the meanes and occasion of the Mid-wives as the instruments God as the author and chiefe cause increased the people then he cast about another way how to effect this cruell purpose Iun. Simler QUEST XVIII Whether the Mid-wives onely were temporally rewarded NOw what manner of reward it was which the Lord here giveth it may thus be briefly resolved 1. Neither with Gregorie is it to be thought that because of their dissimulation they were onely temporally rewarded for the text saith they feared God and the feare of God is not onely in this life but more rewarded in the life to come 2. Hierome and Rupertus here understand the spirituall and everlasting houses in heaven but the words before v. 20. shew that hereby a temporall blessing is insinuated the Mid-wives prospered the people multiplied 3. Therefore the last resolution is that no doubt the charitie and mercie of these Mid-wives and the feare of God in them was eternally rewarded but the temporall blessing is here onely expressed both in respect of the times because as Hierome saith Aeterna vitae promissio est propria novi testamenti The promise of eternall life is peculiar to the new Testament and in regard of carnall and weake men who are by temporall promises more easily allured so the promises made to Abraham whose saith and obedience were eternally crowned were in shew temporall as in the length of life increase of his posteritie victorie over his enemies as appeareth Gen. 15. ex Perer. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. That God is not the author of evill Vers. 12. THey were grieved or fretted because of the children of Israel But Psal. 105.25 it is said he turned their heart to hate his people The hatred and griefe which the Egyptians conceived against Israel seemeth to be ascribed to God yet farre be it from us to thinke that God is the author of the least sinne much lesse of so great a sinne as to hate the people of God for as God is not tempted with evill so neither tempteth he any man Iam. 1.13 This manner of phrase therefore in Scripture may receive five severall expositions which may all together be received first God is said to turne their heart not effective but permissive not by way of working but permitting or suffering as Theodoret because he gave way to their wicked will corumque insidias â—inimè prohibuerit and hindered not their evill purpose 2. God is said to doe it as he hardened Pharaohs heart subtrahendo gratiam by withholding his grace and leaving them to themselves Cajetan 3. God doth it as an universall cause because in him we move we live and have our being Act. 17. not as a particular agent as Rupertus useth this comparison Quemadmodum sol molle lutum convertit in durum As the Sunne turneth the clay and mire from soft to hard of which changing the Sun is onely the generall cause the proper and next cause is the qualitie of the matter 4. God turneth their heart into hatred occasionaliter by ministring the occasion onely as Aug. Non cor illorum malum faciendo sed populo bene faciendo cor eorum sponte malum convertit in odium Their heart being evill of it selfe he turned to hatred not by making it evill but by doing well unto his people God is said to doe it because he was the author of the welfare of his people whereby the envious Egyptians were provoked to hate them 5. The Lord is said to harden mens hearts ordinative disposative because he knoweth how to rule and dispose of their evill and obdurate hearts and turne it to his glorie as Augustine proceedeth in the same place Quo illorum odio ad exercitationem populi filii ad gloriam nomâ—nâ— suâ— usus est Deus Which their hatred God used both for the exercise of his people and to the glorie of his owne name Ex Perer. 2. Doct. God must rather be obeyed than men Vers. 17. NOtwithstanding the Mid-wives feared God and did not as the King of Egypt commanded This their refusall to obey the Kings wicked charge was both lawfull and commendable The things which belong to Caesar as tribute custome honor feare Rom. 13.7 must willingly and of conscience be yeelded to Caesar Matth. 22.21 But the things which belong to God must not be given to Caesar
sympathies and Antypathies their qualities and operations he can apply and temper the causes together and so is able to worke wonders though not true miracles which are beside the order and course of nature which Satan cannot invert As to put this for an example the small fish which is called Echinus or Remora is able by applying himselfe to the ship to stay it though it bee under saile and have both the sea and winde with it which Plinie sheweth to have beene found by experience how that Antonius his ship at one time and Caius at another were stayed by this fish Now if a Magitian should secretly apply this fish to a ship hee might bee thought to worke a great wonder and yet it should bee naturall The other reason is that beside the knowledge of nature Satan is skilfull of all humane arts and sciences by the benefit whereof even men doe worke wonders as Archimedes was able to stirre a ship with his hand by certaine engines which he had prepared which a great number of men by strength could not doe He also devised such kinde of instruments when Marcellus the Romane Captaine besieged Syracusa whereby they so annoyed their enimies and made such havock and slaughter of the Romanes that Marcellus himselfe said they fought not against men but against the Gods Architas the Pythagorean by Mechanick art made a dove of wood to flie Severinus Boetius made serpentes of brasse to hisse and birdâ— of brasse to sing If men can make such admirable things by art it need not seeme strange if by the power of Satan wonderfull matters are sometime compassed Ex Perer. QUEST XII What things are permitted unto Satan to doe THe next point to be shewed here is what things which seeme to us to be miraculous the Devill may doe by himselfe or his ministers the Magitians First in generall wee are here to consider a twofold action of spirits the one is immediate as they can themselves passe speedily from place to place as Iob. 1. Satan came from compassing the whole earth for if the Sunne being of a bodily substance can compasse the heavens of such a huge circuit many hundred thousand miles about in the space of 24. houres the spirits can doe it with greater agility they have also power to transport bodies from place to place aâ— our Saviour yeelded his body to be transported of Satan to the tempters further confusion The other action is mediate as Satan can transport and bring together the causes of things which being tempered and qualified may bring forth divers naturall effects which are wrought immediatly by those naturall causeâ— yet mediately by Satan which bringeth them together Secondly in particular these things are permitted to Satans power he can transport bodies and carry them from place to place as thâ— Ecclesiasticall stories make mention how Simon Magus was lift up on high in the aire by the 〈◊〉 of Satan but by the prayer of Peter was violently throwne downe so sometime serpents and 〈◊〉 have beene seene flie in the aire Albertus Magnus saith that oxen have rained and fallen out of the aire all which may be wrought by the conveyance of Satan 2. The Devill can suddenly convey things out of ones sight as Apollonius from the presence of Domitian Thus it may be that Gyges if that report be true not by the vertue of a ring but by the power of Satan became invisible 3. They can make images to speake and walke as before wee heard of Apollonius brasen butlers and the image of Memnon so the image of Iuno Moneta being asked if she would remove to Rome answered se velle that she would and the image of fortune being set up said ritè me consecrastis yee have consecrated mee aright Valer. Maxim lib. 1. cap. ultim de simulachris But the Devill cannot give power unto these things being dead to performe any action of life but that hee moveth and speaketh in them as the Angell caused Balaams Asse to speake 4. The Devill can cause divers shapes and formes to appeare as of men Lions and other things in the aire or on the ground as in the life of Antonie the Devill appeared unto him in the shape of terrible beasts 5. And as he can counterfeit the shape of living things so also of other things both naturall as of gold silver meat and artificiall as of pots glasses cuppes for if cunning artificers by their skill can make things so lively as that they can hardly bee discerned from that which they resemble as Plinie writeth of Zeuxis grapes lib. 35. cap. 11. much more can Satan coyne such formes and figures as Philostratus lib. 4. of the life of Appolonius maketh mention how a certaine Lamia pretending marriage to one Menippus a young man shewed him a banquet furnished with all kinde of meat and precious vessels and ornaments which Appolonius discovered to be but imaginarie things and shee confessed her selfe to bee a Lamia 6. The Devill by his subtile nature can so affect the sensitive spirits and imaginary faculty as that they shall represent unto the inward sense the phantasie of some things past or to come and cause them to appeare to the outward sense as wee see that franticke persons imagine many times that they see things which are not and there is no doubt but that the Devill can effect that which a naturall disease worketh 7. Hee can also conforme the fantasies of those that are asleep to represent unto them things which the Devill knoweth shall come to passe and by this meanes to bring credit unto dreames 8. In some things the Devill can interpose himselfe and helpe forward those superstitious meanes which are used to prognosticate as the Augurs by the flying and chirping of birds by looking into the intrals of beasts by casting of lots tooke upon them to divine and the Devill by his mysticall operation concurred with them more strongly to deceive 9. The Devill can stirre up in naturall men the affections of love anger hatred feare and such like as he entred into the heart of Iudas Iohn 13.1 and this he doth two wayes either by propounding such externall objects as helpe to inflame and set on fire such affections and by conforming the inward phantasie to apprehend them Hierome in the life of Hilerius sheweth how a certaine virgin by Magicall enchâ—ntments was so ravished with the love of a young man that shee was mad therewith QUEST XIII How divers wayes Satans power is limited THese things before recited Satan by his spirituall power is able to doe yet with this limitation that his power is restrained of God that he cannot doe what he would but sometime the Lord letteth him loose and permitteth him to worke either for the triall and probation of his faithfull servants as is evident in Iob or for the punishment of the wicked as hee was a lying spirit in the mouthes of Ahabs false Prophets for if Satan had free
the Scripture insinuateth Deut. 11.11 where Moses sheweth a difference betweene the land of Canaan and Egypt where they watered their fields with their feet as a garden that is they conveyed the waters of Nilus by trenches and furrowes to their fields which overflowing their grounds serveth in steed of raine and therefore the Egyptians did more honour Nilus than heaven Perer. QUEST XLIII Whether the Sorcerers did turne the waters into true bloud NOw whether the Sorcerers brought forth true bloud as Moses did though it need bee no question as is before shewed Quest. 21. yet there are divers opinions about it 1. Augustine thinketh that the Sorcerers by the Devils helpe did change the water into very naturall bloud lib. 83. quâ—st 79. But that cannot be for the Devils have no power to change or transforme one substance into another immediatly without naturall meanes and seeing true bloud is not ingendred but in the body and that not immediatly but by certaine degrees and preparations Satan could not in truth doe any such thing 2. Pererius thinketh that this bloud was cunninly conveyed by the Devils helpe from some other place and not made out of the water But this is not likely for it was no small quantity of bloud which seemed to be changed by the Sorcerers out of how many bodies could the Devill draw and sucke so much bloud and if the bloud were brought what came of the water that must bee conveyed away also Beside the text saith that the enchanters did likewise then as Moses turned water into bloud they must to make their worke like turne water also into bloud or seeme to doe it 3. Wherefore I subscribe rather to Iustinus Sanguinem à Magis exhibitum non fuisse verum sed fallacem praestigiosum That the bloud brought forth by the Magicians was not true bloud but deceitfull and counterfeit quaest Orthod 26. Ferus reason is because naturas mutare solius Dei est it only belongeth unto God to change natures Osiander saith Videntur ad breve tempuâ— conversae The waters seemed to be changed by the Sorcerers but for a short time but Moses miracle continued seven dayes which sheweth that it was a true miracle So Ambrose concludeth Si arte sua quis sublimitate astutiae aliam creaturam fingat ad horam sicut finxerunt Iannes Iambres If any by his cunning and deepe deceit can faine another creature for a time as Iannes and Iambres did c. QUEST XLIV How this first plague was stayed HOw this plague ceased is not expressed 1. Philo thinketh that at the supplication of the Egyptians made to Moses and his prayer unto God the waters returned to their first nature But if it had beene so it is not unlike but that Moses could have expressed so much as hee doth in the other plagues that were stayed by that meanes 2. Iosephus writeth that Pharaoh seeing the miserable state of the Egyptians did give leave to the Israelites to depart and so the plague ceased but presently after hee repented him but the Scripture seemeth to be contrary for Pharaohs heart was hardened at the first and not mollified at all neither did this plague enter into his heart vers 23. 3. Therefore it is most like that this plague contined untill the beginning of the second which is the end of the first and so it ceased neither at the entreatie of Pharaoh or the Egyptians or by the prayer of Moses but by the will of God Thostat Perer. QUEST XLV Of the application and use of this first plague FOr the mysticall application of this plague 1. Augustine comparing the ten plagues of Egypt and the ten Commandements together doth referre the first plague to the first Commandement applying it thus The water out of the which commeth the generation of many things signifieth God the beginning of all the turning of this water into bloud is the corrupting of the divine worship by humane and carnall inventions of flesh and bloud 2. But I preferre rather Ferus applications the one propheticall that this plague did portend the bloudy end and destruction of Pharaoh and the Egyptians the other morall that wherein a man sinneth thereby in the justice of God is he punished as Adonibezek by the cutting off his fingers and toes as he had served others Absalon by his haire which hee was proud of so the Egyptians are punished in the water wherein they had destroyed so many innocent babes Pererius 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. Of the institution of the princely and priestly calling Vers. 1. I Have made thee Pharaohs God and Aaron thy brother shall be thy Prophet Here we have the institution of two most necessarie callings among the people of God the princely power in Moses whose commission was to give edicts and lawes and the Ecclesiasticall in Aaron to whom it appertained to interprete and expound the Law as the Prophet saith Aske the Priest concerning the law Borrh. 2. Doct. Of the hardning of the heart how it is said to proceed from God Vers. 3. I Will harden Pharaohs heart Mans heart is hardened two wayes either by it selfe internally or by some externall accident that moveth the inward cause or the instruments thereof the externall agents are either efficients and so the Devill as an efficient and working cause moveth the heart of man unto evill being corrupt of it selfe or they are only disposing and ordering so the Lord is said to harden the heart which he doth three wayes 1. By leaving the will of man being destitute of good to it evill nature and disposition 2. By some occasion given by the Lord which in it selfe is good the heart of the wicked becommeth more obstinate as by the Lords commandement by Moses Pharaoh was more hardened so the Apostle sheweth that some take occasion by the law which is good to bee more evill Rom. 7. like as tender and weake eyes by the brightnesse of the Sunne doe dazle the more and become blinder 3. The Lord seeing the will of obstinate men to be thus hardened and bent upon evill he in his justice also driveth them to that end whither of themselves they runne headlong Iun. Like as the primum mobile in the heavens the utmost sphere carrieth all the other inferiour orbes of the planets about yet every one of them doe keepe their contrary course by the which the eclipses of the Sunne and Moone fall out yet so as by the first overruling motion they are whirled about and brought to their Eclipse which is properly caused notwithstanding by their owne particular motion so there is an overruling power of God that bringeth every thing to the end appointed yet the defects and eclipses of our will doe proceede of our owne corrupt nature See more of this point how the Lord is said to harden the heart chap. 4. quest 19. 3. Doct. That no man sinneth of absolute necessitie Vers. 22. HE did not hearken unto them as the Lord had
chap. 8 quest 12. and confut 1. 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. God overruleth mens affections Vers. 3. THe Lord gave the people favour in the sight of the Egyptians Hereby wee learne that God hath the ruling and turning of mens affections he can worke them either to favour or disfavour Piscat So the Wiseman saith As the rivers of waters the Kings heart is in the hand of the Lord â—e tâ—â—neth it whither soever it pleaseth him Prov 21.1 Like as the husband man maketh furrowes in his ground and draweth the water which way it pleaseth him and as the sternes man in the vessell doth move it which way he listeth so can the Lord order and governe the streames of mens affections 2. Doct. Godly men have their passions and affections Vers. 8. SO he went out from Pharaoh very angry Even wise and godly men have their affections it iâ— not as the Stoikes taught that there is a vacuity and absence of them in wise and perfect men They are not without affections but they rule them by reason and their reason is sanctified by grace The Apostle saith be angry but sinne not Ephes. 4.26 He alloweth to be angry but not to sinne in anger Christ the most perfect man that ever was had his affections as of anger Marke 3.5 He looked round about him â—â—gerly of joy Luk. 10.21 Iesus rejoyced in spirit of sorrow Matth. 26.38 My soule is heavy unto death of love as Ioh. 13.23 The disciple whom Iesus loved 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Against Purgatory BEfore in the third question where it is disputed what Angels God used in bringing the last plague of death of the first borne upon Egypt Pererius sheweth the difference betweene the ministry of the Angels in this life and in the next falling to make mention of purgatory for they cannot doe otherwise for ther lives but upon every occasion broach their owne fansies leaveth it as uncertaine and undiscussed whether the good Angels or the bad should be ministers of purgatory he thinketh not the bad that they should exercise power over them which in their life time did conquere the Devill neither yet will hee have them to be the good It is an unmeet thing saith he that they which shortly should become the fellowes and partakers of the blessed Angels in heaven should bee punished by them Perer. 1. disput in cap. 11. Contra. 1. Let any reasonable man judge whether it be not like that purgatory should be a meere fansie where there is supposed to bee torments and yet no tormentor In that hee thinketh that neither good Angels nor bad are the ministers of those torments I condescend to him who then not Christ I am sure for he hath redeemed them nor yet God himselfe for the Apostle saith Who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods chosen it is God that justifiâ—th who shall condemne Rom. 8.33.34 God hath justified them by faith in Christ and being justified there is nothing further to be laid to their charge If then there be no tormenter in purgatory there is no torment in purgatory and so purgatory fire is quite quenched and put out 2. Beside this uncertainty who should be the tormenters there be other maine points not yet resolved of among them concerning purgatory as of the place where it is of the fire what it is corporall or spirituall of the time how long it shall last whether hundred yeeres or thousands of the greatnesse of the paine whether it exceed all the torments and punishments of this life These articles are not yet defined and determined among them as Bellarmine sheweth lib. de purgat from chap. 6. to chap. 14. Therefore we will leave them to their uncertainties and as they make question of the circumstances of purgatory so we will not onely make question of purgatory it selfe but are most sure that it is but an invention of their owne for all they which dye in the Lord that is in the faith of Christ are pronounced blessed and to rest from their labours and their workes follow them Revel 14.13 Here are three arguments against purgatory They which dye in the faith of Christ are blessed but they which are in hell torments for purgatory they make part of hell are not blessed They doe rest from their labours but they which are in purgatory are in labour and paine Their workes follow them for their reward but they which are tormented â—nd punished are not rewarded Therefore wee acknowledge no other purgatory but in this life a perfect purgation of our sinnes in Christ Heb. 12.3 and an imperfect which is by the fiery probation of affliction as S. Peter calleth it Thinke it not strange concerning the fiery triall which is among you to prove you 1. Pet. 4.12 2. Confut. Against the Manichees which reject the old Testament Vers. 10. BVt the Lord hardned Pharaohs heart Hence the Manichees tooke occasion to utter their blasphemies against the God of the old Testament and to reject the Scriptures themselves of the old Testament as proceeding from a God that was a worker of evill in hardning mens hearts These Augustine confuteth at large hom 88. de tempore shewing how God is said to harden the heart without any touch of sinne for thus he writeth Non Pharaonem Dei violentia sed propria impietas obduravit Not any violence from God but Pharaohs owne impiety did harden him And these words I will harden Pharaohs heart he expoundeth thus Cum abfuerit ei gratis mea obduret illum nequitia sua when my grace is from him then his owne wickednesse shall harden him 2. Then he doth illustrate it by this similitude as the water is frozen till the Sun shine upon it then it resolveth and so soone as the Sunne is departed it is bound with cold againe the Sun is not the cause of the freezing of the water but the coldnesse of the water bindeth it selfe so properly God causeth not the heart to be hardned but by the absence of his grace it is hardned 3. But if the question be asked why the Lord suffereth any to be hardned he maketh this answer Aut illorum iniquitati qui obdurari merentur adscribendum aut ad inscruâ—abilia Dei judicia referendum quae plerunque sunt occulta nunquam autem injusta This must â—â—thâ—r be ascribed to their iniquity which deserve to be hardned or it must be referred to the judgements of God which are often hid but never unjust It sufficeth 〈◊〉 to know and beleeve as the Apostle saith Rom. 9. Is there iniquity with God 3. Confut. Against Pererius that thinketh none in this life to be without hope of grace and repentance NOw further whereas Pererius in the treatise of induration moveth this disputation whether any man can be so hardned in this life as that he become altogether impenitent and incorrigible and without hope of grace and resolveth upon the negative part that none in this life are in such
removed because the text saith That God gave them favour in the sight of the Egyptians neither did the Israelites borrow these things but they simply asked them and the other frankly gave them Pererius thinketh that the Israelites asked these things betweene the ninth and the tenth plague because when there was one plague yet behinde the Lord bad Moses to speake to the people to aske of the Egyptians chap. 11.2 But in that place only it is shewed what the Lord commanded Moses to doe hee spake to the people then to doe it but it was not acted then as likewise in the same place mention is made how the Lord would goe forth at midnight and smite all the first borne which was not done then but afterward 2. Wherefore I rather thinke with Calvin and Iunius that the Israelites asked these things of the Egyptians after the last plague immediatly before their departure the reasons are these 1. The Egyptians seeing their first borne slaine were afraid of their owne lives and therefore in respect thereof they regarded not their substance Tanquam si hoc pretio animas redemissent As if they had redeemed their lives with this price Iun. And as Calvin Hinc clamor ille desperationis index omnes mortui sumus hinc facilitas illa in dando supellectile Hence came that desperate cry wee are all dead men hence that facility in giving their house-hold stuffe 2. That this asking of the Egyptians came after all the plagues it is shewed chap. 3.20 I will smite Egypt with all my wonders c. after that shall he let them goe then it followeth in the next verse I will make this people to be favoured of the Egyptians c. for every man shall aske of his neighbour c. 3. The text saith that they shall put the jewels and raiment upon their sonnes and their daughters that is shall load them with them and lay them upon their shoulders it is like then they were upon going when they made their burthens 4. If they had asked them before it had beene only to borrow them not to have them of gift but it is shewed already that they did not borrow them quest 42. 5. They had no colour to borrow their jewels and costly rayment before for they asked them to set forth the service of God which was upon their going for Pharaoh said Goe serve the Lord as yee have said vers 31. QUEST XLV What kind of favour it was which the Lord gave the Israelites in the sight of the Egyptians Vers. 36. ANd the Lord gave the people favour c. 1. Some thinke that this favour was by reason of some supernaturall grace and amiable quality which was given unto the Israelites whereby the Egyptians were allured unto their love as the booke of Iudith saith was given unto Iudith an extraordinary comelinesse whereby she was commended to all that saw her Iudith chap. 10. 2. Another opinion is that this favour was wrought rather in the hearts of the Egyptians toward the Israelites that the Lord who overruleth mens hearts did incline the affections of the Egyptians toward his people and this is the truer opinion as both may appeare by the use of the same phrase elsewhere as it is said that Ioseph found favour in his masters sight Gen. 39.3 which was not caused so much by Iosephs amiable person as by the working of his masters affection for the reason is there shewed of this favour his master saw that the Lord was with Ioseph so that the cause of this favour was not the externall object of Iosephs person but the internall effect of his masters affection likewise this is evident by the contrary for as it is said He turned their hearts to hate his people Psalm 105.25 so their hearts were turned againe to love and favour his people 3. Yet was it not such favour as Cajetane supposeth that the Egyptians prevented the peoples asking and forced them to aske as he would inferre upon the signification of the word Vajashilum which in hiphil he saith signifieth to cause or compell to aske But neither is the word so taken in hiphil but rather signifieth to lend or give one his asking as Anna using the same word 1. Sam. 1.28 saith shee had given or lent her sonne unto the Lord where hishilti in hiphil cannot be translated Shee had caused the Lord to aske And beside what needed that circumstance for the Egyptians to have forced the Israelites to aske and then to have given them their asking they might at once have given them unasked 4. Neither was this a worke of regeneration of the Egyptians whereby they suddenly of wolves became lambes as Master Calvin very well noteth but it was a speciall worke of Gods power onely at this time thus to sway their affections for they were soone changed againe when they pursued the Israelites with all hostility 5. And although this inclining of the Egyptians hearts and bending of their affections was Gods speciall worke yet it pleased the Lord to use some subordinate meanes to procure it and give occasion thereof as namely these two the one was the great reputation and estimation which Moses was in both with Pharaoh and with his people which reason is yeelded of this favour chap. 11.3 Calvin The other because the Egyptians by the death of their first borne were in such perplexity and feare that they were glad to give them any thing to redeeme their lives Thostatus So it is said in the Psalm 105.38 Egypt was glad at their departure QUEST XLVI Why the Lord enriched his people with the Egyptians substance NOW the reasons wherefore the Lord gave the Israelites such favour and thereby enriched them were these 1. To accomplish the promise made to Abraham Gen. 15.14 That the people should come out with great substance Osiander 2. For the comfort of the Israelites whom the Egyptians before had stripped of that they had and divers wayes oppressed now some amends is made them by possessing the precious jewels of the Egyptians Ferus 3. As also by this meanes the Egyptians were animated to pursue and follow after the Israelites to their owne confusion and destruction Ferus 4. And hereby the Israelites were furnished with many rich ornaments which afterwards served for the adorning and beautifying of the Tabernacle Ferus QUEST XLVII Of which Egyptians they asked and who of the Israelites and what Vers. 35. THey asked of the Egyptians 1. These were not the Egyptians inhabiting out of the land of Goshen as some thinke because it is like if any had inhabited among the Israelites they should have beene exempted from the plagues of Egypt which is not to be thought But this followeth not for such plagues as befell either the persons of the Egyptians or their proper substance might as well be laid upon the Egyptians dwelling among the Israelites as upon others as is shewed before quest 33. in 7 chap. And that these Egyptians of whom the
than Moses by 13. or 14. yeares being then a maid of discretion when Moses was an infant exposed in the river who stood by to see what became of the child and went and called Moses mother to be his nurse Moses then being at this time 80. yeares old Miriam could not be under 90. at the least and then was Caleb but 40. when he was sent to search the land Iosh. 14.7 therefore it is not like that these two were married together especially considering that Caleb had another wife before 2. Againe this Hur was now a grave man and fit for government for to him and Aaron Moses committed the affaires of the Common-wealth when he went up into the mount Exod. 24 14. how then could he be the sonne of Caleb who was but 40. yeare old 3. That Ephrath which was Calebs second wife gave that name unto Bethlehem of whom it was called Bethlehem Ephrata but Miriam dying in the wildernesse never came into the land of Canaan and therefore of her could no place bee named there she was not then that Ephrath that was Calebs wife 4. Now whereas Hur is there said to be the sonne of this Ephrath it might be another of that name for in the Scriptures we finde that divers have had the same name Sic Lyran. Tostat. 2. Iosephus opinion then is more probable that this Hur was rather the husband of Miriam Moses sister and so he was allied unto Moses and Aaron So Procopius QUEST XV. Whether Moses lifted up his hands in prayer Vers. 11. ANd when Moses held up his hand 1. Some thinke that Moses held up his hand by course when the one hand was weary then he held up the other with a staffe in manner of an ensigne or banner Iun. But I rather subscribe here to Oleaster that hand is put in the singular for hands for it followeth afterward vers 12. that Aaron Hur held up his hands on both sides not by turnes but at once 2. Iunius also with whom consenteth Piscator thinketh that Moses did not lift up his hand as shewing the gesture of one that prayed but he lift up the staffe with his hand as a triumphant banner But against this opinion Tostatus objecteth 1. That had beene to no purpose for Moses to hold up the staffe as a signe of victory to the host because the backes of the Israelites were toward him seeing the Amalekites from the South set upon the hindermost part of the campe and then they could not turne them to see the staffe without giving advantage to their enemies 2. There had beene no force in the lifting up the staffe to get the victory therefore the efficacie was in Moses prayers to the which end he lift up his hands as the Apostle exhorteth men to lift up pure hands 1 Tim. 2.8 3. But both these opinions are better joyned in one that both Moses prayed unto God Et manuum elavatio symbolum fuit additum precibus And the lifting up of his hands was a signe added to his prayers Simler And the Chalde Interpreter expresseth the same sense that his hands were stretched out to prayer Vatab. As also the holding up of the staffe betweene his hands was a signe of the victory Moses à ux belli quidam signifer foelicem eventum ipse spondebat baculi vexilâ—â— interim prophetiae munere functus Moses the Captaine of the warre as it were the ensigne bearer did â—ssure them of good successe by the banner of the staffe not neglecting in the meane time his propheticall office Pelarg. 4. And as for the former of Tostatus reasons it cannot certainly be gathered which way the host of Israel was pitched it is no other like but that Moses staffe which he held up was in the sight of the Israelites and to that end he went up to the top of the hill and to this purpose Procopius maketh this fit allusion Populus si cernit manus legislatoris supinas vincit c. If the people see the hands of the Lawgiuer aloft they overcome but if they see them hang downe they are overcome so if one understand the law spiritually he obtaineth victorie but the contrarie falleth out if one follow the literall sense 5. But whereas some make this gesture of Moses holding his hands aloft with the staffe betweene them to be a representation of the signe of the crosse I say with Simlerus Non valde huic sententia innitâ—r ut dubia I doe not much rest upon this sentence as doubtfull QUEST XVI How Moses hands were heavie Vers. 12. MOses hands were heavie 1. The peoples sins did not presse downe Moses hands as Lyranus for then he should not have lift them up at all which is Tostatus reason 2. Neither were his hands feeble through age for 40. yeare after this when Moses was an 120. yeare old Moses was of such a perfect constitution that it is said his naturall strength or vigor was not abated Deut. 34.7 3. Neither yet is this to be imputed to Moses infirmitie of mind as our Saviour saith The spirit is readie but the flesh is weake as though Moses waxed cold in prayer Ferus 4. Nor yet doe I consent to them that thinke Moses still continued his prayers but that this remisnesse was onely in his strength Continuatus labor ab eo perferri non potuit Continuall labour in lifting up of his hands hee could not endure And yet God would have the victorie to follow the lifting up or falling of Moses hands to testifie unto the people that the victorie was onely from God to whom Moses did elevate his hands Simler For if Moses inward strength and zeale had continued all one it is like the same effect would have followed 5. Wherefore I thinke rather with Calvin Iste defectus ex singulari zeli vehementia natus est This defect in Moses proceeded not of any tepiditie or coldnesse in Moses but from the vehemencie of his zeale for while he lift up his hands Intentissime orabat magna animi contentione He prayed vehemently and with great earnestnesse of mind Vatab. The remitting of his hands then shewed an inward abating of his zeale and fervencie which may befall the most perfect men for the gesture of them that pray hath a reciprocall worke upon the affections which first doe bring forth the humble gesture of the bodie and by the same they are againe kindled and inflamed as Augustine hath this excellent saying Gestu corporis ut flexione genâ—â—m extensione manuum seipsum magis excitat homo ad orandum c. By the gesture of the bodie as the bowing of the knee the stretching out of the hands a man doth stirre himselfe up the rather to prayer and these being visibly done the invisible affection of the soule is increased and by this meanes Affectus cordis qui ut ista fierent praecessit quum facta sunt crescit The affection of the heart which went before these
Theodoret. 2. Or as the Priests did specially attend the service of God so the people of Israel should all be as Priests in respect of other nations addicted to the worship of the true God Tostat. So that all other kingdomes were but profane in respect of them 3. Hereby also is signified their principality above other nations as Priests were reverenced and honoured of all and the speciall care which God had of them as they themselves had seene in Egypt how the Priests were reverenced of all and maintained out of the common Treasury Cajetan 4. The Chalde readeth yee shall be Kings and Priests that is they should under the regiment and kingdome of God be as Kings Quia nullum optabilius felicius regnum quam nos Deo subjicere Because there is no more happy kingdome than to subject our selves unto God Calv. for God was their King as the Lord saith to Samuel They have not cast thee off but cast me off that I should not reigne over them Cajet 5. They are also said to be a kingdome of Priests because Christ was to bee borne of that nation both King and Priest Ferus which his spirituall kingdome and priesthood by faith is communicated to his members whom he hath made Kings in subduing sinne and Satan and Priests in offering spirituall sacrifices unto God as S. Peter expoundeth and applieth this place 1. Pet. 2. Cajetan Lippoman 6. Oleaster bringeth foure interpretations of these words 1. That they should be a kingdome governed by Priests for the Lord was angry that the people had cast off the government of Samuel But it was never the Lords meaning that Levi should have the civill government of his people though some of Levi were extraordinarily raised up as Moses Samuel to judge his people because the scepter was promised to Iudah Gen. 49.10 2. The word cohanim may be translated Princes as well as Priests and then the meaning is they should all bee as Princes that is subject to none but unto God But it is not like that two words of like signification should be put together as Kingdome and Princes therefore the other sense of Priests is here more fit 3. They should be a kingdome of Priests that is all of them addicted and devoted to the service of God as if they were all Priests 4. Or they should be an holy people in respect of other nations and in comparison of them as Priests These two last senses are most fit and agreeable to the rest before alleaged QUEST X. By what reasons the Lord perswadeth the people and why Vers. 8. ANd the people answered 1. Thus by these perswasions before propounded the Lord thought good to winne the obedience and hearts of the people for seeing the Lord was to impose upon them a law lex est quoddam onus and the law is a certaine burthen for where a law is set the will of man is limited which man naturally desireth to be left free and therefore it was requisite that the people should be thus prepared to obedience Tostat. quaest 2. 2. The Lord perswadeth them partly with the commemoration of benefits past their deliverance out of Egypt and their protection in the wildernesse which is set forth by an elegant similitude taken from the Eagle which supporteth her young ones with her wings partly with the promise of future blessings that they should be a peculiar people to himselfe Simler 3. Then whereas men naturally partim fastu altitudine turgent partim securitate torpent partly doe swell with pride and haughtinesse partly grow slothfull by security Calvin These perswasions as soveraigne medicines doe meet with both these inconveniences the remembrance of Gods benefits doth serve to abate their pride that they should not ascribe their deliverance to themselves the promise of further blessings would provoke them not to bee idle 4. If the remembrance of these temporall benefits was so effectuall toward them how much more ought wee to remember Quod nos abundantiore gratia liberatos à peccatis nostris portavit Deus homo factus c. That God made man hath deliverd us by more abundant grace from our sinnes and carried us unto mount Sion to the celestiall Ierusalem c. Rupertus QUEST XI Whether the people unfainedly here promise obedience Vers. 8. ALl that the Lord hath commanded will wee doe 1. It seemeth that at this present the people had a good desire and full intent to keepe all the commandements of God for otherwise the Lord would not have commended them thus saying Deut. 5.28 I have heard the voice of the words of this people which they have spoken unto thee they have well said all that they have spoken O that there were such an heart in them to feare me and keepe my commandements alway The Lord would not both for the present have approved their saying and wished a continuance of their disposition if it had not proceeded from a good affection Tostat. quaest 3. Nec eos quicquam simulasse credibile est It is not credible or like that they dissembled at this time Calvin 2. But although this their readinesse to obey were not without the motion of the spirit of God in plaerisque tamen temporariam fuisse promptitudinem c. yet that it was but a temporary promptitude a willingnesse for a time in the most of them their doings which followed declare Simler So their first fault here committed is their frailty and inconstancy Propensus est populus sed fragilis inconstans The people seeme to bee ready yet fraile and inconstant Pellican Caro solet multa promittere nihil praestarâ— The flesh useth to promise much and performe nothing Ferus So that herein appeareth their temerity and rashnesse that promise great things as Peter did Sic facâ—unt qui propriâ—s confidunt viribus As all they doe which trust in their owne strength Lippoman 3. And seeing the people doe of themselves vow obedience to the law they afterward are most justly punished for the transgression of the law quasi vâ—ti rei as breakers of their vow and promise made unto God Gloss. ordinar QUEST XII How the Lord is said to come in the thicke cloud when and in what thicke cloud it was Vers. 9. LOe I come unto thee in a thicke cloud 1. Before the Lord came and appeared in the cloud but not to this end to speake to Moses in the hearing of the people and to give them a law for before the people had promised their obedience the Lord would thrust upon them a law against their willes Tostat. 2. Some thinke that presently the Lord came to Moses in a thicke cloud Intelligendâ—â— absque omni haesitatione est It must be understood without any deferring Cajetan But the cloud came not presently for the Lord thus spake to Moses upon the first or second day the cloud came not before the third day vers 16. Tostat. And when the cloud appeared the Lord talked with
received the Lord to be their God and he had manifested himselfe among them they could not now as in the fight of God admit of any other The case of the Gentiles was otherwise for though they worshipped other Gods yet it was not coram facit Dei quae illis fuit incognita before the face of God which to them was unknowne Calvin And thus much in effect is declared afterward vers 23. Thou shalt not make with me Gods of gold c. Si me in Deum habetis non potestis habere alium If you will have me for your God you cannot have another QUEST V. What reasons ought chiefely to move us to acknowledge the Lord only to be our God HEre may be added the reasons which ought to move us to acknowledge the Lord Creator of heaven and earth to be our God 1. The first is taken from his dignity and excellency and great glory which is due unto him The Lord himselfe saith Isai. 42.8 My glory will I not give unto another This honour therefore is of right due peculiar and proper unto God to be acknowledged to be the only Lord therefore they rob God of his honour that worship any other God 2. The second reason is from the great benefits which we have received of the Lord hee hath created us and redeemed us and given us all things needfull for our bodies and soules 3. Because in baptisme wee have vowed obedience and service unto God and to become his servants and to renounce all other Gods whatsoever 4. The Lord hath froed and redeemed us from the miserable thraldome of sinne and Satan which was more grievous than the captivity of Egypt and Babylon and hath called us to his service whose yoke is easie and his burthen light This is the fourth reason Ex dominii diabolici gravitate From the heavinesse of the Devils thraldome 5. The fift is ex pramii sui muneris immensitate from the infinite greatnesse of his reward who hath not promised unto us an earthly Canaan a land flowing with milke and honey as to the Israelites but the everlasting kingdome of heaven Ex Thoma 2.2 quaest 122. ar 2. ad 3. 2. Doctrines observed out of the first Commandement 1. Doct. Of the particular contents of the first Commandement THe contents of this Commandement which prescribeth the true worship and acknowledgement of God and forbiddeth the contrary are by Moses himselfe the best Interpreter of the law reduced to these three heads To love the Lord thy God with all thy heart with all thy soule with all thy might Deut. 6.5 Monte affectu viribus with our minde our affection our strength In every one of these three shall be briefely shewed the duties which are commanded and the vices forbidden First in the minde and understanding is commanded here the true confession and acknowledgement in our hearts of the only God as our Saviour saith This is life eternall that they know thee to be the only very God and whom thou hast sent Iesus Christ Ioh. 17.3 Against this duty the offences and transgressions are these 1. Ignorance of God which is of two sorts either simple ignorance such as was that of the disciples of Ephesus that did not know whether there were any holy Ghost or no Act. 19.2 or affected and wilfull ignorance as Psal. 14.1 The foole hath said in his heart there is no God Such an one was Pharaoh who said I know not the Lord Such are all Atheists as wicked Diagorâ—â— and Theodorus that denied there was any God and Protagoras with the Machiavellians and Cotta in Cicero with the Academikes which were doubtfull whether there were any God or no. 2. They also offend here which erroniously bring in other Gods As 1. Some doe worship Devils as the Apostle saith That the things which the Gentiles sacrificed they sacrificed to Devils 1. Cor. 10.20 Of this sort are all Conjures Witches Sorcerers that make any compact or contract with the Devill 2. Some among the Heathen worshipped the Sunne Moone and Starres As Ierem. 44. the Idolatrous women in Israel imitating the Gentiles worshipped the Queene of heaven as they called the Moone 3. Some worshipped the elements as the Persians the fire the Egyptians the water 4. Some adored men as Gods under the names of Iupiter Mars Mercury And the Papists have set up their Saints whom they invocate and make their prayers unto and so rob God of his honour imparting the glory of the Creator to the creature 5. Some have worshipped unreasonable creatures As the Egyptians a Calfe an Oxe Vultures Crocodiles the Syrians and Phenicians a Fish the Persians a Dragon 6. They which erre concerning the Trinity whereof see in the end of the 3. doctrine following Secondly God must have our whole heart and entire affection as 1. Our love 2. Feare and reverence 3. Affiance and trust 4. Thankfulnesse 1. God is to be loved above all as our blessed Saviour saith He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me Matth. 10.35 Contrary unto this affection of love are 1. The naturall emnity of the flesh by nature against God as the Apostle saith The wisdome of the flesh is enmity against God Rom. 8.6 2. Selfe love 2. Tim. 3.2 and the love of earthly things Vrsiâ— 2. We must feare God above all Deut. 6.13 Thou shalt feare the Lord thy God and serve him As we are to love God because of his mercy goodnes and bountifulnesse so we feare him for his justice and power in punishing of sinne And this feare bringeth forth reverence worship serving and adoring of God as the Lord saith by the Prophet If I be a father where is mine honour If I bee a master where is my feare Malach. 1.6 God therefore is to be honoured as our father and to be feared as our Lord. Contrary hereunto is 1. Carnall security and casting off the feare of God as it is in the Psal. 10.11 He saith in his heart God hath forgotten he hideth away his face and will never see 2. Prophanesse and irreverence in the presence of God as in Eutyâ—hus that fell asleepe while Paul preached Act. 20. 3. Hypocrisie when men draw neere with their lips but their heart is farre from God Simler 4. Servile feare which differeth from true filiall feare in these three respects 1. In the beginning and cause thereof the Filiall feare proceedeth from the love of God whom the children of God are afraid to offend because he is so gratious and mercifull a Father unto them but the Servile feare ariseth from the consideration of the justice and wrath of God 2. In the object they differ the Filiall feare worketh upon sinne it selfe the Servile upon the punishment of sinne 3. In the fruits and effects the Filiall feare is joyned with assurance and confidence the Servile with despaire Vrsin 4. As these vices are in the defect so curiosity is in the other extreme of excesse when presumptuously
but tbe Sonne and the holy Ghost are of us to be worshipped Ergo the Father Sonne and holy Ghost are that one God Simler So our Saviour saith Yee beleeve in God beleeve also in mee Ioh. 14.1 Christ the Sonne of God is God because he is to be beleeved upon And againe This is life eternall that they know thee to be the only very God and whom thou hast sent Iesus Christ Ioh. 17.3 God the Father then and Christ his Sonne are the only very God And that the Sonne of God is to be worshipped with the Father the Prophet David sheweth Psal. 2. 11 12. Serve Iehovah in feare c. Kisse the Sonne lest he be angry In the former verse whom hee calleth Sonne here he nameth Jehovah So wee reade in the words of the Prophet Agur Prov 30.4 Who hath established all the ends of the world what is his name and what is his Sonnes name if thou canst tell Further that the Spirit of God is also one God with the Father and Sonne to be worshipped and glorified beside plentifull evidence out of the new Testament which shall not need to be inserted here because we are in hand with the law of the old Testament sufficient testimony may be taken from the law and Prophets as Gen. 1.1 The Spirit of God moved upon the waters But God only created the world So likewise the renovation of the heart is onely the worke of God because it is a new creation as David saith Create in me a new heart Psal. 50.10 but this is also the worke of the Spirit Take not thine holy Spirit from me ibid. vers 11. Likewise it is only Gods worke to teach us his will and to bring us to life eternall but this is wrought by the Spirit Psal. 143.10 Teach mee to doe thy will for thou art my God leâ— thy good Spirit lead me unto the land of righteousnesse Ambrose very fitly proveth the Spirit to be God by that place Iudg. 14.5 where it is said That the Spirit of the Lord came upon Sampson But Iud. 16.20 after his lockes were polled it is also said Hee knew not that the Lord was departed from him Hee which came upon him before was the same that departed from him now there called the Spirit of the Lord and here the Lord and Jehovah therefore the holy Spirit is Lord and Jehovah Ambros. lib. 2. de Spirit cap. 2. Damâ—scen doth thus excellently prove the Trinity by this demonstration Vnus Deus non sine Verbâ— est God being but one is never without the Word but this Word hee hath in himselfe begotten of his owne substance not like unto our word which hath no substance but vanisheth in the aire because the condition of our nature is temporall But like as our word proceeding from the mind neque per totum menti idem est c. is neither the same with the mind nor yet altogether divers from it So is the Sonne unto the Father which is his Word the same in substance but divers in subsistence Oportet autem Verbum Spiritum habere nam verbum nostrum nequaquam spiritus est expers But the Word also must have a Spirit for neither is our word without a spirit but here is the difference our spirit is not of the same substance with us but the drawing in of the aire for wee are of a compound nature but the Spirit of the Word is of the same substance with the Word To this effect Damascen lib. 1. de fide orthodox cap. 6.7 And in the same place he useth another demonstration Impossible est Deum destitutum esse nativae foecunditatis c. It is impossible that God should bee destitute of naturall fecundity The Lord therefore must needs beget Sed ex propriâ— substantia generat but he begetteth out of his owne substance and that from all eternity for if the Sonne had not beene from the beginning coexistent with him of whom hee was begotten we shall bring in a change of his substance Nam cùm non esset Pater postea factus est Pater for so when he was yet no Father he afterward should become a Father c. Damascen ibid. Thus out of the first Commandement both the unity of the Godhead and the Trinity is concluded as Bernard thus elegantly inferreth Quid sibi vult iste ut ita loquar â—ine numero numerus si tria quomodo non numerus si unum ubi numerus What meaneth this number without a number if there be three how can there be but a number if one where is the number But here I have what I may number and what I may not number there is one substance and three persons c. Bernard lib. de consideraâ— Thus by the unity of nature the errour of the Gentiles is abolished and by the joyning of the Word and the Spirit to the Father the Jewish opinion is overthrowne Et ex utraque secta nobis accedit utilitas ex Iâ—daica opinione naturae unitas ex Gentilitia sola personarum discretio So by either sect wee receive some profit by the Iewes opinion the unity of nature by the Gentiles the discerning and difference of the persons only Damasc. ibid. Transgressors then of this Commandement concerning the unity of the Deity and Trinity of the persons are 1. They which affirme and hold one God but deny the three persons as the Montanists and Marcellians in times past and the Turkes and Jewes now 2. They which hold not the distinction of three persons only but the division also of substance as the Tritheists The Arrians and Eunomians are of the same sect qui filium Deum confitentur sed conditum asseverant which confesse the Sonne to bee God but yet affirme him to be made So they bring in another God contrary to this precept Thou shalt have no other Gods c. Theodoret. 3. They which brought in a quaternian of persons as Anastasius the Emperour and the Apollinarians 4. They also which affirme the three persons to be but three names given unto God in Scripture and therefore they say that the Father became man and suffered for us which are therefore called Patripassians 3. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. That justifying faith is not contained or commanded in the law 1. BUt although to beleeve in the Trinity be commanded in the first precept to adore and worship the Father Sonne and holy Ghost as the only God yet it followeth not that justifying faith which properly belongeth to the Gospell whereby we apprehend Christ and his merits should be contained and included in the law therefore we mislike that assertion of Bellarmine concurring therein with other Romanists That the Gospell differeth from the law as a perfect thing from an imperfect and that the Gospell is contained and included in the law as the tree in the seed Bellarm. de justif lib. 4. cap. 4. Some Protestants also come somewhat neere this opinion as Marbachius saith that they
q. 5. Soleo meminisse probitatis parentum in perpetuum I use to remember the righteousnesse of the Fathers for ever Lippom. And this is according to the Lords promise to Abraham I will be thy God and the God of thy seed Gen. 17. without any limitation that is for ever QUEST X. How men are said to hate God Vers. 5. OF them that hate me 1. God cannot be said properly to be hated as man is said to hate as when one man hateth another he wisheth he might perish or lose his honour riches or such like but so man hateth not God as if they would have God to perish Tostat. qu. 5. 2. Neither are they said to hate God in respect of his essence which is goodnesse it selfe which no man can hate Quia de ratione boni est ut ametur Because it is of the nature of goodnesse to be loved Thom. 2.2 q. 34. ar 1. in Cor. 3. Neither can God be said to be hated in respect of all his effects for some are naturall effects created by God as to live to move to understand these effects of God no man hateth for then he should hate himselfe 4. But there are two sorts of effects for the which God is hated of the world because he is peccatorum prohibitor poenarum inflictor a prohibiter of sinnes and an inflicter of punishment Thom. ibid. So they which keepe not Gods commandements which hate vertue and love vice are said to hate God as they doe love him which keepe his commandements Tostat. qu. 5. 2. Places of Doctrine out of the second Commandement 1. Doct. Of the particular contents of the second Commandement THe things commanded in this second precept are these 1. Verus Dei cultus the true worship of God Vrsin Quem constat spiritualem esse ut ejus natura respondeat which must be spirituall as answering unto his nature Calvin For God is a Spirit and will be worshipped in Spirit Iohn 4. 2. A rule is prescribed how God will be worshipped according to his will revealed in his word unto the which it is not lawfull to adde any thing nor to take therefrom As the Lord said to Moses According to all that I shall shew thee so shall yee make the forme of the Tabernacle Exod. 25.9 3. God requireth the true devotion and affection of the heart in his worship as the wise man saith My sonne give me thy heart Prov. 23.26 And the Prophet David Mine heart is prepared O God Psalm 56.7 4. All our service and worship of God must be referred to his praise and glorie as the Church prayeth Not unto us O Lord not unto us but unto thy name give the praise Psalm 115.1 These things likewise are forbidden 1. To make any similitude or likenesse of God Isay. 40.18 To whom will yee liken God or what similitude will ye set up unto him Marbach 2. Ne quid de Deo crassum vell terrenum imaginemur Wee must not imagine any grosse or terrene thing of God Calvin As that hee hath a bodie or parts or affections like unto man as the Anthrâ—pomorphites and Homoformians as Rupertus calleth them Grande sibi fingunt simulachrum doe imagine a certaine great image which sitteth in heaven and the feet thereof reach unto the earth because the Scripture saith Heaven is my seate and earth is my footstoole Rupert lib. 3. in Exod. cap. 32. 3. Idolatrie when any divine worship internall or externall is given to any image set up to represent God of what kinde and fashion so ever it be is here especially forbidden as Ezechiel found the Elders of Israel offering incense to the similitude of creeping things and abhominable beasts Ezech. 8.10 Wherein they commit a double errour both in robbing God of his honour giving it unto dumbe creatures and insensible things Againe Se turpiter infra creaturas abjiciunt They doe basely abject themselves to these creatures which the Lord hath given them dominion of Borrh. Here then the Romanists are found to bee transgressors that doe prostrate themselves most basely before Idols as shall be further seene afterward 4. Not onely the adoring of Images but the setting of them up to be a stumbling blocke and occasion of offence to the people is likewise here prohibited therefore Hezekiah when he saw the brasen Serpent to be abused to Idolatrie he brake it in peeces that the occasion of that sinne might be taken out of the way 2 King 18.4 The Lutherans therefore are here overseene that tolerate Images in their Churches which are dangerous to the weake though they be taught by them not to worship them 5. Not onely Idolatrie is here forbidden but all other kinde of superstitious worship devised by man which the Apostle calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 will worship Coloss. 2.23 for we must be contented ritibus sive cereâ—â—â—is à Deo ipso praescriptis with rites and ceremonies prescribed of God himselfe Such were the sacrifices of the old Testament and the Sacraments in the new Piscator Here the Romanists likewise offend which make seven Sacraments whereas Christ hath ordained but two and unto these two they have added many superstitious rites of their owne 6. It is a breach also of this Commandement even to applie things of themselves indifferent so unto the service of God as to make them a necessary part thereof as our Saviour reproveth the Pharisies for washing of their hands often and for washing of cups and tables because they put holinesse therein Mark 6.3 Vrsin 7. Hypocrisie is another transgression here when men externally observe the ceremoniall or morall works of God commanded without faith and true devotion Such the Lord by his Prophet reproveth This people commeth neere unto me with their mouth but they remove their heart farre from me Isai. 29.13 8. Prophanenes is here also prohibited which is a contempt either of the whole outward worship of God or of some part thereof Vrsin as it is written of one of the Popes of Rome that he cast the Sacrament into the fire and some of the Romanists have spoken unreverently of our Communion calling the Communion table an Oyster table 2. Doct. All is to be ascribed to Gods mercie nothing to mans merit Vers. 2. SHewing mercie c. Nothing then is to be ascribed to any merit or desert for all proceedeth from the mercie of God Vrsin The obedience then of the parents and their posteritie is not any meritorious cause to procure the favour of God but hee crowneth their service in mercie as Iakob maketh this holy confession I am not worthie of the least of all the mercies and of all the truth which thou hast shewed unto thy servant Gen. 32.10 3. Doct. True obedience proceedeth from love Vers. 3. OF them that love me and keepe my Commandements Though we are brought first by feare to stand in awe of God and to reverence his law yet our obedience is not acceptable unlesse it proceed of love Oleaster as
certaine place first to the Tabernacle then to the Temple of Salomon but now the worship of God is not tied to any certaine place as at Jerusalem where the Temple was Ioh. 4.21 3. Other Sacraments are instituted in place of the old as Baptisme and the Eucharist therefore the old are abrogated 4. The ceremonies did bind the observers to the keeping of the whole law and the rites thereof he which was circumcised was bound to keepe the whole law Galath 5.3 but we are not bound now to the whole law from which bondage Christ hath freed us Ergo. 5. The ceremonies were a wall of partition and distinction betweene the Jewes and Gentiles but now that distinction is taken away all being one in Christ therefore that wall whereby they were parted and distinguished is removed also Simler 2. As touching the politike and judiciall lawes of Moses neither doe they absolutely â—ind now 1. Many of these lawes were peculiar to the policie of that Common-wealth as the lawes concerning their inheritances and possessions which were not to passe from tribe to tribe and they shewed the fashions and manners of that countrie as in building their houses with flat roofes as Deut. 22.8 Of these positive constitutions there is now no use among other nations 2. The condition of all people is not alike some are more stubborne and obstinate some more civill and tractable and therefore some have need of more strict and severe lawes than others one kinde of politicke law then cannot serve for all nations 3. The Gospell which is perpetuall prescribeth not a certaine forme of government to all nations neither overthroweth their severall policies but in generall commandeth obedience to all higher powers Rom. 13.1 Ergo much lesse the law which was to be changed Simler But the judiciall law is not abrogated Quoad substantiam finem universalem â—quitatem In respect of the substance end and universall equitie which is in punishing of vice and maintaining of peace Bucanus See more hereof quest 4. general cap. 1. 3. The Morall law is not now in force quoad justificationem in respect of justification Rom. 3.28 A man is justified by faith without the works of the law but it bindeth quoad obedientiam In respect of obedience we are bound to keepe all the precepts of the law but yet quoad terrorem modum obedientiae in respect of the terror of the law and manner of obedience which was to be obedient and subject unto it for feare of punishment wee are freed now from it and therefore the Apostle saith The law is not given to a righteous man 1 Tim. 1.9 because they of love rather than feare do yeeld their obedience and so are a law unto themselves Simler But this is a privilege onely of the regenerate As for carnall and unregenerate men they are still under the curse and terror of the law according to that saying Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the booke of the law to doe them Buâ—â—â— 2. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Of the particular contents of this precept THou shalt not covet First the things commanded here are these 1. Originall justice which is an inclination and desire of the minde to performe all duties unto our neighbour Vrsin 2. Diligent care and circumspection even to take heed of the smallest sinnes and to watch over the very thoughts Prov. 3.23 Keepe thy heart with all diligence for thereout commeth life Basting Secondly contrarie unto this precept 1. Is originall corruption which is the generall corruption and depravation of our nature and that evill habit wherein wee are conceived and borne as David saith Behold I was borne in iniquitie and in sinne hath my mother conceived me Psal. 51.5 2. All evill inclinations of the heart whereby it is sollicited to doe any thing against the law of God this evill concupiscent is of two sorts it either hath principium internum the beginning within as is fleshly and carnall desire or externum without by some externall object which are the concupiscence of the eye and pride of life as the Apostle calleth them 1 Ioh. 16. 3. And not onely these kinds of concupiscence but all other phantasies and cogitations of the minde which are contrarie to the law of God are here restrained Basting 2. Doct. Of the severall properties of possessions and goods and the distinction of callings FUrther in that the Lord forbiddeth to covet our neighbours house servant c. wee see the Lord establisheth and confirmeth hereby both the severall rights in possessions lands and other substance which right and propertie the Lord will not have violated so much as in the concupiscence and inward desire As also here it is evident that the difference of callings and distinction of degrees as betweene master and servant standeth with the will of God as our blessed Saviour and his Apostles also every where teach Simler 3. Doct. The difference betweene divine and humane lawes HErein also is set forth an apparent difference betweene the law of God and the lawes of men Lex humana judicat facta dicta divina judicat etiam cogitata Mans law onely judgeth doings and sayings but Gods law judgeth the very thoughts and the reason hereof is because man judgeth onely according to the outward appearance and evidence but the Lord seeth the heart Thomas And the perfection of Divinitie is hereby declared beyond Philosophie which condemneth not the inward lusts and desires of the minde neither holdeth a man for the same whether they bee good or evill to be worthie praise or dispraise But the law of God striketh at the very root of evill actions which is the inward concupiscence and corruption of the heart 4. Doct. Of the concupiscence of the soule and of the flesh IT shall not bee amisse here to insert Chrysostomes distinction of concupiscence As wee have two natures one of the soule the other of the flesh so wee have two wils one of the soule the other of the flesh habemus duas itas duas concupiscentias c. we have also two kinds of anger and two kinds of concupiscence one of the soule the other of the flesh the nature of the flesh cannot bee separated from all these Necesse habet irasci concupiscere c. It cannot chuse but to be angrie to covet because it is sold under sinne but the soule being created according to the justice of God potest non irasci c. cannot bee angrie nor covet therefore when wee are angrie and covet if wee displease ourselves and represse these passions it is manifest that our flesh onely is angrie and coveteth and not the soule Such kinde of passions then here are forbidden wherein the soule consenteth with the flesh To this purpose Chrysost. hom 12. in Matth. 3. Places of controversie 1. Conf. Against the Pelagians that denie concupiscence to be sinne FIrst we are here to deale against the Pelagians
procured three waies One is the ordinarie meanes whereby Satan by externall objects useth to tempt men thereby stirring and provoking their natural lust as David was inflamed at the sight of faire Bathsheba but here needeth no other sorcerie or inchantment than the corrupt inclination of a mans owne affection the devill doth but offer the occasion and shew the object hee draweth not the affection but the corruption of the heart of it selfe is ready to apprehend and lay hold of the object set before it Another way there is whereby the affection is stirred as when the evill spirit entereth and possesseth any with madnesse and phrensie for the time not changing the understanding or will but troubling the vitall spirits and inflaming the blood and so incensing unto lust The third way is when Satan entreth not to disquiet the bodie and trouble the spirits but externally offereth violence transporting and carrying by Gods permission bodies from place to place which is no hard thing for Satan to doe and so hee may bring one to the place where their lover is Tostat. qu. 13.3 But here two things are to be considered 1. That Satan directly cannot worke upon the heart of any in the immediate change or alteration of their affections but hee doth it by meanes either externall in moving by objects or by internall provocation and stirring of carnall lust 2. That he hath not the like power over the servants of God which he exerciseth over carnal men which are his owne vassals he ruleth in the children of disobedience as he listeth as the Apostle saith They are taken of him at his will 2 Tim. 2.26 But the faithfull doe resist him by faith 1 Pet. 5.9 So that his tentations cannot fasten upon them to intangle them further than God shall see it good for the triall of their faith This is made evident by that storie of Iustina the Virgin whom Cyprian then a dissolute young man and given to Art Magicke but afterward a most holy and constant Martyr loved exceedingly and when he was not able to prevaile with her by any allurements hee called for the Devils helpe to bring her unto him who by faith chased the evill spirit away Ex Tostat. qu. 13. QUEST XXXII Whether witches can indeed effect anything and whether they are worthie to bee punished by death NOw further by this sentence of the law which adjudgeth witches worthie of death they are found to be in error which thinke that witchcraft is nothing but nudum phantasma a verie phantasie that sillie women imagine they doe things which indeed they doe not but in their owne conceit and imagination First I will examine the objections which are made in the defence or at the least the excuse of these wicked women and in favour of them for the mitigation of their punishment 1. They say that this law is made de veneficis of such as kill and destroy by secret poisons and noysome herbes it concerneth not witches Answ. 1. Indeed the Septuagint reade 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the Latine translateth maleficos workers of mischiefe but they are both in error for the Hebrew word mecashephah is put in the feminine whereas they both interpret it by the masculine And the word mecashphim is applied to those which worke by evill spirits and have confederacie with them as Exod. 7.10 it is given to the Egyptian Sorcerers and Magicians 2. The practice of poisoning belongeth to the sixth Commandement Thou shalt not kill whereas witchcraft here forbidden is a breach of the first Table Simler 2. These sillie women can effect nothing they imagine they doe many things but it is only in their owne conceit Answ. 1. True it is that they cannot effect what they would for the Lord restraineth the power of the devill by whom they worke as he did when the Sorcerers attempted to bring forth lice and could not Exo. 8. 2. Yet it cannot bee denied but that they effect many strange things by the operation of the devill as the Magicians of Egypt could turne their rods into the similitude of Serpents and water into the likenesse of blood and the witch at Endor could cause the likenesse of Samuel to appeare which was not in deed Samuel but the devill taking upon him his shape So it is no strange thing by the operation of Satan when they take a mans garments and beat them to cause the bodie of the man to feele the smart Simler 3. And if they did no hurt and could effect nothing why was this law ordained against them God gave no superfluous or unnecessarie lawes to his people nor without great reason 4. Though they should effect nothing yet their wicked desire and endevour thereunto is worthie to bee punished 3. Witches many times doe good and heale men of their infirmities and diseases therefore they deserve no such punishment Answ. 1. Indeed in the Civill law such a decree is extant made by Constantine Qui per incantationes intemperiem aeris grandinis evertit puniendus non est c. Hee which by inchantment turneth away the intemperate season of the aire and weather is not to bee punished But it is no marvell that such things were tolerated then when they came newly from Gentilisme wherein such things were not only suffered but honored and rewarded 2. We have a more perfect rule out of the Scriptures that no such unlawfull meanes are to bee used no not to a good end as to procure health or such like for this cause the Prophet reproved the King of Israel having received hurt by a fall because he sent to the god of Ekron for helpe And to this purpose Augustine saith well as he is cited in the Decrees Si aliquando sanare videntur languidos id Deipermissu sit ut homines probentur c. If they seeme sometime to heale the diseased it is done by Gods permission that men might bee thereby proved c. And againe hee saith Laque◠sunt adversarii mederi non possunt They are the deviles snares they cannot heale 4. Object But the meanes which they use are wholesome and medicinable as herbs and oyntments and therefore herein they are not to bee found fault with Answ. 1. For the most part they use such meanes whereof no naturall or apparent reason can be given as to burne the thatch of the house to cut off some part of the beast bewitched and burne it and such like Concerning such things Augustine giveth a good rule Remedia ligaturae qu◠medicorum disciplina condemnat non adhibenda c. Such remedies and ligatures which the skill of Physicke condemneth are not to be used 2. He saith further Ex traditione malorum angelorum sunt Such remedies had their beginning from the tradition of evill angels therefore hee concludeth that Phylacteria sunt animarum vincula Such Phylacteries things applied to or hung about the necke or other parts are but the snares of the soule
kept in a faithfull heart as the Prophet David saith I desired to doe thy good will O my God yea thy law is within my heart Psal. 40.8 Piscator 6. Observ. We must readily obey Gods will as the Angels Vers. 20. THe Cherubims shall stretch their wings on high The Angels have their wings readie spread to shew how serviceable they are at all appointments alwayes in a readinesse to do the will of God to teach us that we also should imitate this cheerfull and readie service of the Angels in our willing and prompt obedience in the earth as we are taught to pray in the Lords prayer Thy will be done in earth as it is in heaven B Babing 7. Observ. To use the creatures of God sobeâ—â—y Vers. 30. THou shalt set upon the table shew-bread Seeing the daily bread which they did eat was made of the same come whereof the shew-bread was which was alwayes in the presence of God it teacheth that we should soberly use the creatures of God as alwayes being in his sight as the Apostle saith Whether yee eat or drinks c. doe all to the glorie of God B. Babing 8. Observ. That nothing can escape Gods sight in whose house there is alwayes light Vers. 37. THou shalt make seven lamps c. to give light There is light in Gods house whatsoever is there done is soone espied nothing can escape Gods sight Ne putes te in domo Dei malè posse conversari occultari c. Thinke not that thou canst live wickedly in Gods house and bee hid Oleaster Therefore Christs eyes are said to be as a flame of fire which pearceth and searcheth all things Revel 1.14 CHAP. XXVI 1. The Method and Argument AS in the former Chapter such things are described as were to bee placed within the Tabernacle so now followeth the description of the Tabernacle it selfe in this Chapter whereof there are two parts the first containeth a declaration how the Tabernacle should be made with every part thereof to vers 31. the second in what order every thing should be disposed in the Tabernacle vers 31. to the end In the first 1. The curtaines are appointed to be made 1. Of what matter and how many v. 1. 2. Of what measure forme and fashion v. 2 3. 3. The things thereunto belonging are described the strings taches with the use of them v. 5 6. 2. The coverings are described first the curtaines of goates haire 1. The number of them vers 7. 2. The measure and scantling vers 8. 3. The necessarie appertenances thereunto the strings and taches vers 10 11. 4. The use vers 12 13. secondly the covering of rammes skinnes thirdly the covering of badgers skinnes is appointed to be made vers 14. 3. The boords are mentioned in the next place which should serve to hold and beare up the Tabernacle which are described first in generall their measure and fashion with tenons vers 16 17. secondly in particular 1. Both for the number of boords with their sockets on the South side vers 18 19. then on the North side vers 20.21 and on the West side vers 22 26. 2. As also for the forme and fashion they must have five bars of every side vers 26 27 28. and both the bars and boords must be covered with gold vers 29. In the second part which sheweth the disposition and order first the manner of disposing of the things belonging to the most holy place is described 1. Concerning the partition consisting of a vaile vers 31. pillars vers 32. and the sockets and hooks vers 32 33. 2. As touching the things to bee placed there the Arke vers 33. with the Mercie-seat vers 34. Secondly in the outward part of the Tabernacle without the vaile 1. The order is set downe how the things there placed should be disposed the table and the candlesticke 2. The vaile is described with the pillars their heads and sockets vers 36 37. 2. The divers readings Vers. 1. Of fine twined linen G. or èxyline â—ombaâ—iâ—e I. Iosephus thinketh they were contexta è 〈◊〉 woven of wooll or cotton better than è byssâ— of silke câ—ter for seeing the curtaines of the outward court were made of the same chap. 27.9 it is like that it was not silke shoâ— Vers. 4. Thou shalt make strings G.I. or loops B. laqueolos A.P. better than aâ—sâ—laâ— claspes L.S. cum cater they are described afterward vers 6. Iuleâ—th loops strings H. Vers. 5. In the edge of the first curtaine on the outside in the coupling I.A.P. better than in the edge of the one curtaine in the selvedge of the coupling B.G. For it is not here expressed with selvedge the word signifieth the extremitie or extreme part that is the further edge of the first curtaine where it was joyned to the second the other Interpreters S.L.G. are further off from the sense Vers. 5. The strings shall hold one curtaine to another I. not the strings shall be one right against another câ—ter See in the end of the 7. qu. more of the best reading here Vers. 24. Shall be as twinnes I. or doâ—ble or couples V.A.P. better than shall be joyned B. G. L. cum caeter tammin H. twinnes as Gen. 38.27 Vers. 28. The middle bar shall be in the middest of the boords going from end to end I. better than the middle bar in the middest of the boords shall goe from end to end B. G. V. cum câ—ter The place of the bar is described not the manner of going thorow which was common to them all Vers. 37. Their hooks of gold uncis I. knops or buttons uncinis B.V.A.P. not heads C.L.S. vaâ—im finiâ—ieth crooked hooks like the letter van See qu. 24. 3. The questions discussed and handled QUEST I. Of the name of the Tabernacle and which part of the Sanctuarie was properly so called Vers. 1. THou shalt make the Tabernacle 1. This word translated Tabernacle in the Hebrew miscaâ— which properly signifieth habâ—taculum an habitation is taken either generally and so it was divided into two parts in clausam apertam into that part which was covered which was properly called the Tabernacle or that which was open where they offered their burnt offerings which could not be made in the covered part because of the fire and smoake ascending or particularly the Tabernacle was taken for the speciall and principall part which was the curtaine made of blew and purple â—ilke Arias Montan. 2. The rest beside this were either apertoria Tabernaculi vel lateâ—a the coverings of the Tabernacle which were three of goates haire rams skins and badgers skins By looking then exactly into the text wee shall finde that the Tabernacle consisted substantially of those ten curtaines first described Cajetan 3. Tostatus giveth this annotation of this word Tabernacle which signifieth an house made ex tabulis of boords But howsoever the Latine word may be so derived the Hebrew word miscan signifieth
and put upon the lap of Aarons eare c. 1. Now followeth the third kinde of sacrifice which was of the kinde of Eucharisticall or peace offerings and in the consecration of Aaron and his sonnes divers sacrifices are used because this calling cater as omnes dignitate anteiret c. did excell all other in dignity Gallas 2. The peace offerings were of two soâ—â—s either to obtaine some blessing as to intreat for peace and prosperity or to give thankes for some blessing received in both these respects it was requisite that Aaron should offer peace offerings in his consecration botheâ— beg of God that he might prosper in the execution of his office as also to shew his thankfulnesse to God who had advanced him to such an high calling Tostat. qu. 10. 3. Yet this offering was not properly of the kind of peace offerings which are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pacifica peace offerings but this was the raâ—◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 milluim of filling or perfection vers 22. quia illia Sacerdotum consecratio perficâ—retur because thereby the consecration of the Priests was perfected Gallas QUEST XXV Why the bloud was put upon the right eare thumbe and toe of Aaron Vers. 20. PVt upon the lap of Aarons eare 1. Not in superiore parte auris in the upper part of Aarons eare as the Chalde but the nether lap Ian. Or soft part of the eare Genevens 2. The eare hand and foot are anointed with the bloud to signifie the purging and sanctifying of all their parts to make them fit for the Priesthood as Isaias tongue was touched with a coale from the Altar and so purified Isai. 6. Tostat. qu. 10. 3. Though the right eare right hand and foot are only named because dexterae partes sunt insigniores the right parts are more excellent yet thereby the consecration of the whole man is signified Simler 4. The â—ongue of the Priest is not here mentioned but the eare which is the sence of doctrine by the which the understanding is informed and without the which the tongue cannot speake for as the Wise-man saith He that heareth speaketh continually Prov. 21.28 And beside the eare is expressed to shadow forth the obedience of Christ in hearing and obeying his Fathers will Simler Calvin also giveth another reason Hîc non attingi dâ—cendi munus sed intercedendi That Christs office of teaching is not here touched but of mediating QUEST XXVI How the bloud was sprinkled upon the Altar round about Vers. 20. ANd shall sprinkle the bloud vpon the Altar round about 1. The Latine Translater here readeth Thou shalt powre the bloud vpon the Altar but the word is zarak to sprinkle First the Altar was sprinkled and then the rest was powred at the foot of the Altar vers 12. for if it had beene all powred there now whence should Moses haue had the bloud which in the next verse is said to be upon the Altar that is in some vessell there standing wherewith he besprinkled Aaron and the rest and their garments 2. Neither is R. Salomon his conjecture probable that the bloud was laid only upon two corners of the Altar not on the same side but one contrarie to the other for this is against the Text which saith that he sprinkled upon the Altar round about then not in two corners onely And beside if the bloud had beene put onely in two corners of the Altar it should haue beene laid not powred or sprinkled but the bloud was not put upon the hornes of the Altar in any peace offering as was used to bee done in sinne offerings Tostat. quaest 11. 3. And whereas the Altar is sprinkled round about wee must not understand this to bee done at the bottome round about upon the pavement but above so that the bloud might run downe to the bottome QUEST XXVII How the bloud and oyle was sprinkled upon their garments without spotting Vers. 21. ANd he shall take of the bloud c. and of the anoynting oyle c. 1. Some may thinke that this sprinkling of the bloud and oyle was done severally one after another But because there is mention made but of one sprinkling it is more like they were tempered and mingled together and so sprinkled Lyran. 2. R. Salomon thinketh that the oile was sprinkled in remembrance of Iacobs anointing the stone in Bethel with oile and the bloud in remembrance of the striking of the bloud of the paschall Lambe upon the doore-posts in Egypt But there was small affinity betweene those ceremonies and the consecration of the Priests Therefore this rather was the reason of it because almost all things in the Law were purified with bloud that the Priests garments might by this meanes be purified and sanctified most of all which they were to use in the sanctifying of others 3. And because the sprinkling of bloud and oile might seeme to be a blemish to the priestly garments some thinke that they were washed afterward But it is not like that that was washed off wherewith the garments were consecrated Some doe bring in here a miracle in that the garments were kept from spots and blemishes notwithstanding the sprinkling of bloud and oile upon them But we are not to admit of unnecessary miracles These spots then were very smaâ—l and so made no notable markes in the garment and if they did it was magis ad honorem quam horrorem c. more for honour than horror seeing thereby the priestly vestures were consecrated Tostat. qu. 11. QUEST XXVIII The mysticall signification of the ram of consecration with the rites thereof THe mysticall signification of this ceremony is this 1. The ram of perfection or consecration signifieth Christ Christus omnes in virtutibus perfectos constituit Christ maketh us perfect in all vertues hee it is that sanctifieth our eares hands and feet and all our parts and members as here the tip of the eare the right thumbe and great toe are touched with bloud Procopius 2. Hereby also is signified the obedience of Christ by dipping the eare in bloud who was obedient to his Father Simler 3. And hereby also the high Priest was put in mind of his duty by the dipping of the eare is signified that the Priest primum oracula Divina auscultare c. should first give eare to the Divine oracles and then teach them unto others Simler By the dipping of the thumbe and toe in bloud omnes actiones vitae c. all the actions of the life are expressed Calvin By the feet also in Scripture are signified the affections this dipping then of the hands and feet doth signifie Omnem actionum externarum internarum sanctificationem the sanctifying of all both externall and internall actions Simler 4. And by this sprinkling of the bloud is signified the sprinkling of Christs bloud by faith upon the hearts of the faithfull hac enim aspergillum illud est c. for this is that sprinkle wherewith our hearts are
for as they washed their feet from soile when they began to minister so it is like they had a care to keepe them cleane during their Ministerie 4. Neither did the Priests onely wash themselves thereat but they also washed their sacrifices the inwards and such other parts which were not to be carried forth into any profane place to be washed Tostatus Lippoman Ribera QUEST XXVI Of the mysticall application of the laver wherein the Priests washed BY this washing of their hands and feet 1. Beda understandeth the lavacre of Baptisme wherein we are first received into Christs Church as the Priests first washed their hands and feet before they entred into the Tabernacle 2. But because Baptisme is ministred once onely whereas the Priests did wash often he rather would have thereby understood ablutionem compunctionis lachrymarum the washing of compunction or contrition and of teares so often as we come before the Lord. 3. And thereby was signified the spirituall washing and cleansing of the soule which the faithfull in the old Testament well understood as David saith Psal. 51.7 Wash me and I shall be whiter than snow and the Prophet Isay alluding unto this rite saith Wash you make you cleane chap. 1.16 Simler 4. And for this cause our Saviour reproved the Pharisies for being addicted so superstitiously unto their outward washings wherein they committed a double fault both in bringing in other kindes of washing than were prescribed in the Law and in being addicted only to the outward ceremony Simler 5. And by the hands our works are signified by the feet the affections that we should both cleanse our hearts and be holy in our workes when we come before the Lord Tostat. qu. 11. 6. And in that the Priests washed their hands and feet Hac ablutione apertam impuritatis confessionem edebant They did by this washing give an evident confession of their impuritie and uncleannesse Gallas 7. The Heathen had such a custome to wash themselves when they sacrificed to their gods as this was a proverb among them Sacra non tractanda illotiâ— manibus That holy things must not be handled with unwasht hands Calvin 8. Therefore like as men doe not sit downe at their owne table but first they wash their hands so wee must not presume to come neere the Lords table with unprepared affections and uncleane hearts Simler Wee must be inwardly washed by the Spirit of grace the water of life whereof our Saviour speaketh Ioh 4.14 Marbach QUEST XXVII The difference betweene Moses laver and Salomons great sea of brasse NOw to finish up this matter concerning the laver these differences may bee observed betweene it and the great brazen sea which Salomon made and other vessels to the like use 1. They differed in the quantitie and large capacitie Salomons was ten cubits wide and five cubits deepe it contained 200. baths 1 Kin. 7.26 being filled after the ordinarie manner but 3000. baths 2 Chro. 4.5 that is if it were filled up to the brim So Cajetanus and Ribera doe well reconcile these places The bath was of the same capacitie for liquid things that the Epha was for dry containing each of them ten pottles or thereabout foure or five gallons And therefore because of the great capacitie it was called a sea But the laver that Moses made was nothing so big for it had not beene portable 2. They were divers in fashion Moses laver stood but upon one foot the other was borne upon twelve oxen And it was cast with knops and flowers and wilde cucumers 1 King 7.24 But this laver is not so appointed to be made it seemeth it was plaine 3. There was also some difference in the number Moses caused but one laver to be made Salomon beside the great molten sea made ten other caldrons or small lavers 2 Chron. 4.6 because in Salomons Temple there was more use of such vessels than in Moses Tabernacle 4. Their uses also were divers Moses laver served both for the Priests to wash thereat and to wash the sacrifices but Salomons great sea served onely for the Priests to wash in the other appertained to the sacrifices 2 Chron. 4.6 QUEST XXVIII Of the spices that went toward the making of the oyntment Vers. 23. TAke unto thee principall spices c. 1. Here are two confections appointed to be made the first of things more liquid and moist and the same to bee tempered with oyle to make an oyntment of to the making whereof in generall were required the principall or head spice or drug which Iunius inclineth to thinke to be the Balme which is the principall among such precious drugs and therefore is called of the Arabians Belsuaim as having dominion or excelling among such things but that there is no quantitie expressed of this as of the rest that follow neither were they yet come to the land of Canaan where great store of Balme was it is therefore the generall name rather of these spices and drugs which are named afterward in particular 2. The first is myrrh which Oleaster taketh for balme but the Hebrew word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 mar sheweth it to be myrrh There is another word tzeri which is taken for balme Ierem. 8.22 There were two kindes of myrrh one which of it selfe distilled out of the tree and therefore it is called mar deror myrrh of libertie that is freely flowing Paguine Oleaster or right myrrh without mixture Iun. Vatab. There was another which came of the cutting of the barke of the tree which was not so good Lyran. The myrrh tree groweth in Arabia five cubits high Strabus writeth that the fume thereof would breed incurable diseases in that countrey nisi fumo storaâ—iâ— occurrerentpunc but that they correct it with the perfume of storax c. But it is not like that if it were so dangerous and offensive that the Lord would have prescribed it to make the holy oyntment of These properties rather it hath it is good to healâ— wounds to dry up rheâ—me to care a stinking and unsavourie breath to cleere the voyce Plin. lib. 12. cap. 8. Pelargus 3. The next is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 kinemon cynamom whereof because there are two kindes one that is verie sweet and pleasant the other of no great smell therefore it is added here sweet cynamom R. Salomon Lyran. It cureth the biting of venomous beasts it helpeth the dimnesse of the sight Dioscorid lib. 1. cap. 13. Pelarg. But whether it be the same cynamom which is in use among us it is doubted it seemeth to be of another sort Simler For our cynamom is rather pleasant to the taste than smell whatsoever it was it is certaine it gave a pleasant smell Pro. 7.17 I have perfumed my bed with myrrh alâ—â—s and cynamom 4. The third kinde is keneh which signifieth a cane it is calamus odâ—ratus sweet calamus which was a kinde of reed or cane of verie sweet savour Genevens It groweth like a shrub
benefit In poenam populi indigni beneficio tabularum c. Hee brake them to be a punishment of the people unworthy of such a benefit Cajetan 4. Beside the equitie thereof appeareth that as they had broken the Covenant on their part so it was fit the monument of Gods Covenant should be broken Tostat. qu. 29. And Moses shewed by this that they by their apostasie tabulas legis rupisse had broken the tables of the Law first Marbach So Chrysostome saith Moses thought it an absurd thing si populo ebrio c. legem afferet if hee should have brought the Law to a drunken and besotted people Theodoret to the same purpose Quia dotalium libeliorum typum tabulae gerebant c. Because the tables were as the libels or bils of dowrie and the spouse before the marriage was solemnized had committed adulterie jure optimo dotalem libellum fregâ—sse existimandus est hee may bee thought by good right to have cancelled the bill of dowrie 5. Testari etiam voluit c. And Moses would hereby testifie unto them how they deserved to be cast off and forsaken Pelarg. And God hereby for the time Per manum Mosis repudiavit populum Did by the hand of Moses cast off his people Calvin 6. And this was done ad majorem terrorem populi for the greater terrour of the people who was more moved with signes than with words as when Samuel declared unto the people their sinne he prayed and there came thunder and lightning that the people by those terrible signes might be the more moved 1 Sam. 12. So Ieremie to shew after a more lively manner the destruction of Jerusalem brake the earthen bottle before their face signifying that the Lord would breake them as a potters vessell Ier. 19.11 Ferus Gallas QUEST LII What the breaking of the tables signified 7. ANd by the breaking of the tables the Lord would have other things signified 1. Fractio tabularum signum fuit evacuationis legalium in adventu Christi The breaking of the tables was a signe of the evacuating of the legall ceremonies in the comming of Christ Lyran. The first Law delivered in mount Sinai continued not Lex nova ei successit the new Law of the new Testament succeeded in place thereof Tostat. qu. 29. 2. It was a signe Regnum Iudaeorum ad Gentes transiturum That the kingdome of the Jewes should be translated to the Gentiles Ferus That the Arke Tables Temple Altar should be dissolved and taken from the Jewes Simler 3. The breaking also of the tables signified that it was impossible for the Law to be kept Donec Christus per Spiritum sanctum c. Untill Christ should renue the same in our hearts by his holy Spirit Marbach Osiander 4. Augustine further maketh this signification of it that as the tables which God made were broken and yet those which Moses prepared did continue So God created man with reason and understanding and freedome of will Sed eas homo confregit cùm Diabolo acquievit se illa gratia indignum reddidit But man brake those tables when he gave place to the Devill and made himselfe unworthy of that grace But now the second tables must be made that is enitatur elaborare ad virtutes man must endevour to labour for vertue c. Ex Gloss. ordinar Seeing man lost the graces of his creation which were given him without his labour he must by his endevour and labour Gods Spirit so working in him seeke for the renovation of grace by faith in Christ. QUEST LIII In what part the tables were broken and what became of the fragments COncerning other circumstances observed in this action of the breaking of the tables 1. That is a ridiculous and unsavourie fable of the Hebrewes that Moses tooke the fragments of those broken tables which they say were made of a precious stone and sold them and became verie rich thereby for this were to lay a grievous imputation of covetousnesse upon Moses which he was not in the least manner touched with 2. Some thinke that Moses tooke those fragments and put them in a chest which was used to be carried before the host Numb 10.35 But the Arke there spoken of was the Arke of the Covenant ibid. vers 33. 3. That also is a light conjecture that the tables were broken about the place where the fourth Commandement concerning the Sabbath was written because that precept onely of the ten was ceremoniall and not to continue for both the tables were broken and not onely the first wherein that Commandement was written QUEST LIV. Why the tables were broken at the bottome of the mount Vers. 19. HE brake them in peeces beneath the mountaine Why the tables were broken in this place at the foot of the mountaine these reasons may be given 1. Because Moses was now come to the bottome of the mountaine before he saw the golden Calfe through the indignation of the fight whereof being moved in zeale he forthwith brake the tables 2. Also the people when they came forth to meet the Lord and to heare his voice were suffered to come so farre to the foot and bottome of the hill chap. 19.17 in the same place therefore where the Law was given unto the people it was convenient that the tables of that Law should bee broken which they had first transgressed and broken themselves Tostat. qu. 30. 3. Beside it may have this mysticall signification that as the Law was given in the mount and broken at the bottome of the mount so if we will know the Law oportet nos altius ascendere we must ascend higher into the mount and mortifie the old man Simlerus QUEST LV. Whether the Calfe were burned to powder in the fire Vers. 20. HE tooke the calfe and burned it in the fire and ground it to powder c. 1. This golden Calfe was more than melted in the fire Deformavit liquefaciens igne He deformed the fashion thereof melting it in the fire As Iunius for if it had beene only melted it would have run into a lump and so have been the more unfit to fall to powder 2. Tostatus thinketh that Moses might apply certaine herbs unto the gold which if they be used in the melting of gold in cineres redigetur it will fall to ashes quest 30. But such conjectures having no ground out of the text are better rejected than received whence should Moses have such herbs here in the barren desart and to what purpose should they bee used seeing the gold not by burning but by stamping and beating was brought to powder 3. Some thinke that by the verie burning it selfe the gold was made powder as Sa. upon this place saith that he saw at Millaine gold in a founders shop burned in the fire to powder So also thinketh Osiander But it is evidently gathered out of the text that beside the burning the gold was beaten to powder yea it was stamped and ground small as dust
men that thinke them to be there written as Thomas before alleaged QUEST LXXXII Whether Moses did well in wishing to be raced out of the booke of life and in what sense he so prayeth NOw then seeing the elect which are once written in the booke of life can never be blotted out and Moses was not ignorant thereof how could he pray so directly against the will of God 1. Some thinke that he might so pray to be raced out not as he was there eternally written according to Gods prescience but in respect of his present state of grace as Lippoman saith that when Moses sinned at the waters of strife delevit eum de libro secundum praesentem justitiam God blotted him out of his booke in respect of his present justice but afterward put him in againe c. But it cannot be so here for seeing none are so blotted out but by their sinne for Moses to desire to be so raced out had beene petere peccare mortaliter to crave to sinne mortally and againe God doth not thus race out any in respect of their unrighteousnesse but they race out themselves 2. Some thinke that Moses thus prayed quia turbatus erat because he was troubled and perplexed and did not consider at that instant whether that were impossible which he desired and they thinke he thus spake ex impetu passionis in the heat of his passion Ex Lyrano And Calvin saith not much unlike Mosem tanta vehementia fuisse abreptum ut loquatur quasi ecstaticus That Moses was carried away with such vehemencie that he spake as a man beside himselfe But Lyranus reason confuteth this answer because tranquillitas mentis tranquillity of minde is required in him that commeth unto God 3. Augustine giveth this exposition Ego sum certus quod non delebis me de libro vitae c. I am sure that thou wilt not blot me out of the booke of life and so Lord let me be as sure that thou wilt not destroy this people Ex Lyran. Tostat. But in that to this part of Moses request the Lord answereth negatively that he will not blot out him but whosoever sinneth Moses spake not so in that sense of his owne confidence and assurance for then the Lord would not therein have contradicted him but rather have given consent unto his speech as approving his confidence or else it would seeme to be an impertinent answer neither of which is to be admitted 4. Rupertus whom Ferus followeth thinketh that Moses speaketh affirmatively in this sense that if so the Lord in mercie would not pardon the peoples sinne but deale rigorously consequitur ut me de libro tuo deleas it must also follow that I be blotted out of the booke of life But this should have shewed Moses to be wavering and doubtfull of his owne salvation whereof the faithfull have such confidence and assurance that though thousands should perish they would make no question of their owne salvation 5. Lyranus giveth this interpretation that Moses thus spake Secundum dispositionem partis inferioris anima According to the disposition of the inferiour part of his minde that is in his affection and desire though it were not so in voluntate rationem superiorem sequente in his will following his judgement the superiour part of his soule as Christ in his desire wished the cup to passe from him yet simpliciter vellet pati simply would suffer and so Moses here simpliciter voluit non deleri simply would not bee blotted out But this example is nothing like 1. For first divers of the ancient Writers prove out of this place the two wils of Christ as Athanasius Humana voluntas propter infirmitatem carnis refugiebat passionem His humane will by reason of the infirmity of the flesh refused to suffer sed divina prompta erat but his divine will was ready c. So also Hierom then in this sense this example fitteth not Moses at all who had not two such wils as Christ had 2. But allowing Christ here to pray as man which is rather to be received for as God he prayeth not but is prayed unto We may further admit that distinction of Peter Lombard that there is Duplex affectus mentis sensus A double affection of the minde and of the sense Christ in the affection of his minde and judgement was willing to suffer but sensualitatis affectu in the affection of his sense he desired the cup to passe but this was a naturall desire in Christ to escape death now in Moses to wish not temporall but eternall death was a supernaturall desire and therefore proceeded not from the sensuall part of his minde but rather out of his most inward feeling and meditation 6. Tostatus thinketh it to be a parabolicall speech Ad signandum intentionem defideriâ— To shew the intention of his desire like unto that of Rachels unto Iacob Give me children or else I dye Gen. 30. and yet Rachel would rather have chosen to live and have no children than to have children and then presently die like as if a man should say Doe this thing for mee or else kill me and yet he had rather that thing should be left undone than himselfe to be killed and after the same manner doth Moses pray here But this were for Moses to speake one thing and meane another And as Hierom well compareth them together Moses spake here with the like affection that S. Paul prayeth to be an anathema and accursed for his brethren sake which the holy Apostle spake with his whole desire calling Christ to witnesse that he lied not As S. Paul is not to be taken there to speake parabolically or figuratively but even from his heart so doth Moses here 7. Borrhaius saith that Moses thus prayeth with a condition Si non vis if thou wilt not pardon Israel then race me out I am vero Moses non velle Deum Israelem in totum perdere fide agnovit Now Moses was sure by faith that God would not wholly destroy Israel But Borrhaius maketh that the conclusion here God will not destroy Israel therefore I cannot bee blotted out c. which Moses useth as an argument to perswade the other Race mee out of thou wilt not c. And beside Moses here prayeth not that the Lord would not wholly destroy the people for that God had granted him before vers 14. but that the Lord would forgive them their sinne and be fully reconciled 8. Iunius understandeth this desire of Moses also to be conditionall but in another sense as this condition he would have supplied Si Deo placebit si videbitur If it shall please God if it shall seeme good unto him which condition the Apostle would have generally understood Iam. 4. So also Marbachius would have the like condition expressed Si possibile fit If it be possible as our Saviour putteth in that condition If it be possible But these instances are not alike in
such like but in these cases the partie was uncleane sometimes onely to the even sometimes for the space of seven daies Levit. 15.13 18. The Priest therefore when any such uncleannesse was upon him could not enter into the Sanctuarie at all the washing of his hands and feet then at the brasen Layer would not serve the turne But though they were free from all other kinds of uncleannesse yet they were to wash their hands and feet alwaies when they went into the Tabernacle 3. The spirituall reason of the washing the hands and feet is this by the hands are understood the workes and operations by feet the affections of the soule Ministers and generally all that approach and draw neere unto God must be both of cleane heart and of cleane waies and workes when they come before God as for the hands the Apostle willeth that everie where men should lift up pure hands and concerning the feet the Preacher saith Take heed unto thy feet when thou entrest into the house of God QUEST X. What cloud this was which covered the Tabernacle Vers. 34. THen the cloud covered the Tabernacle c. 1. This was not another cloud beside that which was called the pillar of the cloud as some thinke but the very same both because of the appearance of it by night as fire as the other seemed as a pillar of fire in the night as also there was the same use of this cloud to direct them in their journeyes as of the pillar Exod. 13.21 Tostat. qu. 10. 2. Some thinke while the people camped about mount Sinai that this cloud vanished away which was the cause why the people desired gods to go before them and that now as soone as the Tabernacle was made it appeared againe But that is not like for chap. 13.22 it is said that the Lord tooke not away the pillar of the cloud by day c. And seeing the Manna did fall every day which was an evident signe of Gods presence among them though the cloud had not been in their sight that had been no cause to move thâ—â— to desire a guide Simler 3. This cloud which before also did direct them now commeth somewhat nearer and sitteth upon the Tabernacle Novae hic gratiae accessio commendatur in certiore symbolo c. this accession of new grace and favour is commended by a more certaine and evident signe Calvin 4. This cloud before rested upon the other Tabernacle which Moses had removed without the campe but now the great Tabernacle being built the Lord doth chuse it as his seat Tostat. qu. 10. QUEST XI How the glorie of the Lord filled the Tabernacle THe glorie of the Lord filled the Tabernacle 1. The Lord giveth here a double testimonie of his presence for the approbation of this worke made by his appointment there was a cloud without and inâ—us splendor gloriae Dei within the brightsome glorie of God Gallass For so the Apostle calleth the shining of Moses face the glorie of his countenance 1. Cor. 3. Oleaster 2. By this was signified both the presence of Christ in his Church because this cloud filled the Tabernacle within and the Lords protection of his Church the cloud covered it without Marbach 3. And as the glorie of the Lord filled the Tabernacle so in Christ who is the true Tabernacle the Godhead dwelleth bodily and essentially Osiander 4. Though the glorie of the Lord filled the earthly Tabernacle yet his glorie remained still in heaven onely the Lord vouchsafed there a visible signe of his presence that they might know him to be neere unto them as often as he was called upon Calvine QUEST XII VVhy it pleased God to make the cloud a signe of his presence IT hath pleased God diversly to use the clouds as symboles and signes of his presence so he set his bow in the clouds as a signe of his favour he went before his people in a cloud Christ was transfigured in the mount in a bright cloud when he ascended a cloud tooke him out of their fight and he shall come againe in the clouds to judge the quicke and the dead 2. First as the cloud engendreth raine doth shelter from the heat of the Sun so Christ by the influence and raine of grace doth comfort his Church and protecteth it in the heat of persecution Simler Secondly as the fiâ—e heateth giveth light and purgeth so Christ by his Spirit worketh all these in his Church comforting illuminating and purifying the same Pelarg. QUEST XIII Why Moses could not enter into the Tabernacle Vers. 35. MOses could not enter into the Tabernacle because the cloud abode there c. 1. Tostatus confuting Lyranus who thinketh that Moses did not enter into the Tabernacle propter reverentiam because of the reverence of the place and not for that the thicke cloud did hinder his â—ight affirmeth the contrarie that Moses rather entred not because of the thicke cloud But seeing that this was a lightsome cloud and therefore is called the glorie of the Lord it was not the thicknes of the cloud that could have been an impediment to Moses he therefore rather forbeareth to enter of reverencâ— as when it was said unto him while the fire burned in the bush come not hither c. Exod. 3. 2. Moses entred into the thicke cloud in mount Sinai but here he cannot enter Pellican maketh this the reason because now Moses representeth the people of the Iewes to whom the glorie of the Lord in the Tâ—bernacle was as a cloud But he as well represented the person of the people when he went up to receive the Law for them therefore that is no reason The cause then is this Moses durst not ascend up unto God into the mount uncalled he waited six daies in the mount and the seventh the Lord called unto him chap. 24 16 at this time therefore it was not lawfull for Moses to come neere being not called or bidden so to doe Gallas 3. And by this meanes the Lord would have his Tabernacle afterward reverenced of all into the which Moses had no entrance at this time for the great glorie of the Lord as for the same cause at the dedication of Salomons Temple the glorie of the Lord so filled the house that the Priests could not stand to minister because of the cloud the glorious light whereof they could not endure And thus the Lord would have his house reverenced because of his presence 4. But the cloud did not alwaies thus fill the house but at this time the Lord did it to sanctifie the Tabernacle with his presence The cloud had three positions or places sometime it was within the Tabernacle then none could enter as heere and Numb 12. when the cloud stood at the doore of the Tabernacle when the Lord called to Aaron and Miriam or it rested upon the Tabernacle then Moses and Aaron might enter but the campe removed not but when the cloud was lift up altogether from the
the heart fat the eares heavy and to shut the eyes Isai. 6.10 all which phrases doe imply an action and operation it is evident that God some wayes concurreth either directly or indirectly negatively or positively by way of working or giving occasion in the hardning of the heart QUEST XV. God otherwise hardeneth then by way of manifestation BUt yet God doth more than by way of manifestation harden the heart as some doe expound it that the Lord hardned Pharaohs heart which interpretation Augustine toucheth quâ—st 18. in Exod. that is by his plagues and judgements declared how hard it was 1. For in this sense God might bee said to commit any other sinnes when he doth manifest them and bring them to light 2. And though this exposition might serve here yet it faileth in other places as Deut. 2. it is said that God hardned the heart of Sehon King of the Amorites and Iosh. 10. that God hardned the hearts of the Canaanites and Rom. 9. God hath mercie on whom he will and whom hee will hee hardneth In these places it cannot be so expounded that God hardned that is declared their hearts to be hard QUEST XVI God hardeneth the heart not only by permission SOme doe expound it by way of permission because those that are hardned God depriveth of his grace and leaveth them to themselves So Damascen Ista non 〈◊〉 Deo agente accipienda sunt sed ut Deo permittente these sayings as God shut up all in unbeleefe and God gave them the spirit of slumber eyes that they should not see are not to be taken as though God did them but permitted them So likewise the ordinarie glosse in 4. Exod. Indurabo cor Pharâ—onis i. indurari permittam I will harden the heart of Pharaoh that is suffer it to be hardned So also Chrysostome Tradidit in reprobum sensum nihil aliud est quam permisit He gave them up to a reprobate sense it is nothing else than that hee permitted it as a Captaine leaving his souldiers in the midst of the battell may be said to deliver them into their enemies hands in Epist ad Roman Cajetane to confirme this interpretation sheweth how sometime in Scripture that is called a precept which is permitted as when Matthew said chap. 19.8 Moses for the hardnesse of your heart suffered you to put away your wives Marke hath Moses for the hardnesse of your heart wrote this precept unto you chap. 10. But although this be most true that God suffereth such to continue in their hardnesse of heart yet this is not all 1. For so the Lord suffereth also other sinnes to be done for there is nothing done in the world nisi omnipotens fieri velit vel sinendo ut fiat vel ipse faciendo unlesse the omnipotent God will have it done either by suffering it to be done or doing it himselfe Then if this were all the Lord might be said as well to steale and such like because he suffereth them to be done 2. Wherefore Augustines judgement is rather here to be received Deum ad indurationem cordis concurrere non modo secundum permissionem vel secundùm patientiam sed etiam secundùm actionem potentiam non sane per quem fiat immediatè duritia ipsius cordis sed per quem multa fiant à quibus peccator vitio suo concipiat duritiam corâ—â—â— That the Lord doth concurre in the hardning of the heart not only by permission or suffering but according to his power and action not by the which immediately the hardnesse of the heart is made but whereby many things are done by the which a sinner by his owne corruption doth conceive the hardnes of heart 3. And concerning the place alleaged out of Marke a precept is not there strictly taken for a commandement but for any order or decree that is written QUEST XVII Whether hardnesse of heart be of God as it is a punishment of sinne SOme doe hold because the induration of the heart is two wayes to be considered as it is a sinne and a punishment of sinne in the first God hath no part but as thereby God punisheth former sinnes so he as a just Judge inflicteth hardnesse of heart as a punishment as the Apostle sheweth Rom. 2.28 As they regarded not to know God so God delivered them up to a reprobate mind And 2. Thess. 2.11 Because they received not the love of the truth God shall send them strong delusions that they should beleeve lies In these places the Apostle sheweth how the Lord punisheth them with blindnesse and hardnesse of heart because of their former sinnes This distinction is approved by Augustine lib. 5. cont Iulianum Isidorus thus concludeth the same point Facit Deus quosdam peccatores sed in quibus talia jam peccata precesserant ut justo judicio ejus mercantur in deterâ—us â—re Therefore God maketh some sinners but in whom such sinnes are found before that by the just judgement of God they deserve to become worse and worse So Cajetane upon these words 2. Sam. 12. Behold I will raise evill upon thee out of thine owne house which was verified in Absolon that rose up against his father thus resolveth Deus non est author peccati ut sic sed ut est poena peccati God is not the author of sinne as it is sinne but as it is the punishment of sinne The same judgement he giveth of Shemei whom David saith the Lord bid curse David that God wrought that Shemei cursed David Non quatenus erat peccatum sed quatenus erat poena peccati Davidis Not as it was sinne but as it was a punishment of the sinne of David So Ioâ—senius Illa Deo tribuuntur non quatenus peccata sunt sed quatenus poena peccati they are ascribed to God noâ— as they are sinnes but as they are the punishment of sinne in chap. 15. Ecclesiastic But Pererius misliking this opinion thus reasoneth against it 1. If God be said to be the Author of the induration of the heart as it is a punishment of sinne then he may aswell be said to be the Author of the other sinnes when as a man falleth into them as a punishment of his former sinnes Contra. As though all such sinnes doe not proceede from the hardnesse of the heart that confirmeth and setleth the sinner in his wickednesse therefore God is not said to be the cause of these sinnes but of the hardnesse of heart which is the cause of those sins Man by continuing in sin hath his heart hardned by the just judgement of God and then out of the hardnesse of his owne heart he bringeth forth other sinnes of himselfe 2. The hardnesse of heart as it is a great and horrible sinne so it is a punishment of former sinnes if God then doe cause it to be a punishment he also causeth it as it is a sinne Contra. In this argument there are ambiguous termes for in the first clause this
any other Priest or Levite to gaze or looke upon it Therefore this is no warrant for the setting up of Images in Churches in the open sight and view of the people who thereby are bewitched and withdrawne from the true spirituall worship Simler Gallas 6. Confut. Against the Iewes that they are cast off for crucifying of Christ. Vers. 22. THere will I appoint with thee or meet thee Chrysostome from hence doth notably convince the Jewes that God hath forsaken them and cast them off because now they have not the Arke nor Propitiatorie seat from whence the Lord used to speake And if the Jewes should hominibus imputare rerum suarum vastationâ—m impute unto men the ruine and destruction of their state hee thus answereth First that men could not have destroyed their Citie Nisi Deus permisisset unlesse the Lord had permitted it to be done Secondly he saith But be it granted that men pulled downe your walles Num ignem ex alto dâ—vehi vetuit homo Did man fâ—â—bid fire to be brought from heaven Num vocem ex propitiatorio audiri solitam inhibuit homo c. Did man forbid that a voice should be heard out of the Propitiatorie Did man take away the declaration of Gods will by the precious stones in the Priests breast-plate and the sacred unction c. An non Deus haec omniae submovit c. Did not God take all these away Thirdly if the Jewes shall answer Quoniam civitate â—aremus caremus istis c. Because we are without a Citie we want these things also c. He addeth further yet after the Temple was destroyed and the Altar broken downe there were Prophets in the captivitie Daniel and Ezechiel say then Quâ—m ob causam nunc non habetis Prophetas What is the cause that now ye have no Prophets Is it not evident by this Quòd Deus vos repulerit that God hath cast your off And why hath he cast you off Ob illum crucifixum impium illud facium because of that impious fact in the crucifying of Christ And whence doth this appeare because before when ye lived wickedly ye obtained many things now cum videamini modestiùs vivere when yee seeme to live more soberly yet ye suffer more grievous punishment noc quicquam eorum contigit habâ—re quae prius habebatis and ye enjoy none of those things which before ye had c. To this purpose Chrysost. 7. Confut. Against the Romanists concerning their niâ—â— orders of Angels NOw further whereas these winged pictures which were made upon the Mercie seat are called Cherâ—bim which is a name indifferently given to the blessed Angels in generall it is evident that it is no speciall order as the Romanists have curiously â—orted the Angels into nine orders whereof the Cherubim Seraphim and Thrones are the three highest And Tostatus one of their owne writers confesseth that in this place Aequaliter Cherubim ad omnes â—eatoâ— spiritus referantur That the Cherubim here equally may be referred to all the blessed Spirits c. And as in this place so in other also the Cherubim and Seraphim are names and titles given to the Angels in generall as Isai. 6. Ezech. 1. and 10. See more hereof elsewhere Synops. Câ—ntur 2. err 1. 8. Confut. Against the superstitious use of candles in Churches Vers. 37. THou shalt make thee seven lamps thereof c. to give light c. The use then of this candlesticke and the lamps thereof was to no other end than to give light in the Sanctuarie which was covered Tostatus addeth further Non solùm lumen candelarum est ad necessitatem toll â—idâ—â—um tenebrarum sed etiam ad honestatem cultum c. The light of candles is not onely for necessitie to remove the darknesse but for more comelinesse and it belongeth unto worship c. Which superstitious conceit is convinced in this place These lamps were ordained onely to give light therefore at noone day when there is no use of candle light to set up tapers and candles is a superfluous and a superstitious use 6. Morall Observations 1 Observ. God must be honoured with our riches Vers. 2. REceive an offering for me of every man c. Whereas God requireth an offering of the people out of their substance it sheweth that our goods are not ours to waste at our willes but God looketh to be honoured with them and to have them employed unto his glorie B. Babingt As the Wise-man saith Prov. 6.8 Honour the Lord with thy riches and with the first fruits of thine increase 2. Observ. We must give unto God with a willing heart WHose heart giveth it freely So also chap. 35.5 Whosoever is of a willing heart let him bâ—ing this offering unto the Lord which sheweth that what is bestowed upon Gods service should be given willingly and cheerefully as it is said in that great offering of David and the people toward the building of the Temple which Salomon made The people offered willingly unto the Lord with a perfit heart 1 Chron. 29.9 and David thus professeth vers 17. I have offered willingly in the uprightnesse of mine heart all these things So the Apostle saith The Lord loveth a cheerefull giver 2 Cor. 9.7 B. Babing 3. Observ. Of the diversitie of gifts which every man must employ accordingly as he hath received Vers. 3. TAke of them gold silver brasse c. This sheweth that in the Church there are diversities of gifts God hath endued some with gold and silver some with brasse all have not the like gifts as the Apostle saith There are diversities of gifts but the same spirit 1 Cor. 12.5 No man therefore can excuse himselfe that he hath nothing to offer if he have neither gold silver nor brasse yet heâ— may bring goats haire B. Babing He that hath neither gold silver nor brasse Osserat vel pilas capraruâ— munere suo defunctus est Let him but offer goats haire and he hath done his dutie Ferus 4. Observ. What desire we should have to the Lords house Vers. 8. THat I may dwell among them Seeing the house of God is the place of Gods habitation and there is his presence it sheweth with what delight and desire wee should come unto Gods house and with what reverence wee should behave our selves there as Iacob said How reverend iâ— this place this is no other but the house of God and the gate of heaven Gen. 28.17 So Chrysostome excellently saith Non est ecclesia tonstrina aut unguentaria tabâ—rna c. sed locus Angelorum regia coeli coelum ipsum c. The Church is no Barbers shop or Apothecaries house but a place of Angels the palace of heaven yea heaven it selfe 5. Observ. Gods law must be laid up in the heart Vers. 16. THou shalt put in the Arke the Testimonie As the tables of the Law were laid up in the Arke so the Law and Word of God must be