Selected quad for the lemma: heart_n
Text snippets containing the quad
|
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
|
A49339
|
A vindication of the divine authority and inspiration of the writings of the Old and New Testament in answer to a treatise lately translated out of French, entituled, Five letters concerning the inspiration of the Holy Scriptures / by William Lowth ...
|
Lowth, William, 1660-1732.
|
1692
(1692)
|
Wing L3330; ESTC R22996
|
119,092
|
328
|
Ridiculous Petions to their Gods d Pers Sat. 2. Horat. l. 2. Sat. 3. Epist 16. l. 1. And for those places of this Chapter which are more liable to Exception if Mr. N. would have consulted what Learned Commentators have said upon them he would not have thought them so Useless and Trifling as he pretends But our Author himself seems to be at a loss for Objections since he is willing to take Advantage of Agur's modest Confession of his own Ignorance e Prov. 30.2 and concludes from thence that he can be a man of no Authority But I believe Mr. N. is the first that ever thought a man's Modesty a sign that he wanted Wisdom or that Humility made a man Unqualified for Receiving the Influences of God's Spirit Our Author objects nothing against Ecclesiastes and the Canticles but what has been Objected several times before and as often Answered for which reason I shall be more Brief in Refuting him 'T is certain that the Design of Ecclesiastes is to set forth the Vanity of Humane Life which Solomon does by shewing how Empty and Unsatisfactory all those Ends are which men usually propose to themselves as the greatest Happiness this World can afford such as are Knowledge f Eccles. 1. Pleasure g Ch. 2. Honour and Authority h Ch. 3. and 4. and lastly Riches i Ch. 5. and 6. Further he takes notice how men's Ignorance and the Obscurity in which the Great and Weighty Points concerning the Immortality of the Soul a Future State and the Methods of Providence are Involved do occasion a great deal of Misery and Trouble to Mankind Whilst Ill men take advantage of the Difficulties which may be objected against these Truths and from thence conclude that there 's no Providence nor Future Judgment and thereby harden themselves in k Ch. 8. 11 14. ch 9. 3. Wickedness or give themselves up to Sensuality and say Let us eat and drink for to morrow we shall die l Ch. 3. 18 c. And even good men are now and then in a great Perplexity about these things by reason of the Obscurity and Difficulties with which they are beset and begin to doubt and stagger in their Faith m Ch. 1. 13 -8 16 17. If men would therefore view the Scope and Design of the whole Book and not take it by Piece-meal or examine each Sentence apart they might easily see that when the Author proposes Doubts concerning Providence and a Future State he does not speak his own Sense for in several places he plainly asserts God's Ordering and Disposing of all things n Ch. 3. 11 14 -7 13 -9 1 -11 5. and speaks of another Life and a Future Judgment with the greatest Clearness and Assurance of any of the Canonical Writers of the Old Testament o Ch. 3. 17 -11 9 -12 7. 14. And therefore the Design of those other places which seem at first to contradict these is only to shew that the Obscurity of these Great Articles of Faith had often fill'd his own and other good Men's minds with Perplexing thoughts and that the Generality of Men took Incouragement from thence to mind only Sensual Pleasures and make no Conscience of Injuring and Oppressing others So that the uncertainty and Imperfection of Humane Knowledge as to these things was a great Ingredient in the Vanities of Life and one of those sore Travels which God hath given to the Sons of Men to be exercised therewith p Eccles. 1.13 And we may observe that when he mentions the Doubts concerning the Immortality of the Soul he Introduces them with this Preface q c. 3. 18. I said in my Heart 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which may very properly be rendred According to the words or way of speaking used among the Generality of Men and 't is the very same Phrase as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which St. Paul uses r Rom. 3.5 in a like Case where he does not speak his own Sense but sets down an Inference which Wicked Men would be apt to make from what he had said But if any desire further satisfaction concerning this Book or the Song of Solomon I must refer them to that Excellent Commentary which the Reverend and Learned Bishop Patrick has Publish'd upon these two Books where he has with great Clearness explain'd the Sense and Design of them both and particularly as to the Latter has shewed ſ Preface how fitly the Mystical Vnion between Christ and his Church is Represented in it under the Persons of a Bridegroom and Bride that Allegory being agreeable to the Notions of all the Prophetical Writers of the Old Testament who constantly express God's being in Covenant with the Jews by his being Married and a Husband t Ps 45. Is 54 5.-62 4.5 Jer. 3 14.-31.32 Hos 2.2.7.16 Ezek. 16.8 to them and in pursuance of the same Metaphor reprove their Idolatry under the names of Adultery u Is 57.7.8 Jer. 3.1 c. Ezek. 16.15 c. ◠c. 23. Hos c. 1. 2. Fornication and going a Whoring after other Gods and the same Metaphor is alluded to by Christ and his Apostles in the New Testament x Matt. 22.2 Joh 3 28 29. 2 Cor. 1.2 Eph. 5.31 32 Rev. 19 7.-14.4 All which is made out by that Reverend and Excellent Author with so much Learning and Exactness and does so fully Vindicate this Book from the Rash Censures of those who have doubted of its Authority and from the Profane Interpretations which some Wanton Fancies have applied to it that 't would be Unpardonable Presumption for me to think I can add any thing upon this Subject to that Great Man's Judicious and Accomplisht Labours THE CONCLUSION ANd now I have Finish'd my Undertaking and have given a particular Answer to all the Arguments Mr. N. has advanc'd against the Divine Inspiration of the Holy Scriptures I have not to my Knowledge pass'd by any thing which is of Weight in any of the Letters nor dissembled the True Force of any of the Objections contain'd in them And upon the whole matter it appears that the Main Strength of the Book may be Compriz'd in this one Argument viz. That Book can't be of Divine Authority nor Written by God's Direction where there are any Marks of Humane Industry and of Men's making Vse of their Natural Talents of Memory or Invention in the Composure The Falseness of which Assertion I have shewed in several places of the Foregoing Discourse and at present I shall only make this further Remark upon it for a Conclusion of the whole Discourse viz. That at the same Rate of Arguing a Man might prove that God had no Hand in Governing the Ordinary Course of this World by his Providence nor Fitting Men for the Next by his Grace For we see nothing brought to pass in the World without the help of Natural Agents and God requires Men to work out their Salvation with as much
even terms with the Jews without taking the Yoke of the Law upon them he after all this could not be really perswaded in his judgment that he ought not to keep company with the Gentile Converts tho his former prejudices might put some weight into the opposite Scale and make him doubtful and wavering Which might make his fear of displeasing the Jewish Christians and giving them offence work more powerfully upon him and prevail with him to comply with them in this matter and St. Paul expresly assigns his fearing to offend them of the Circumcision q Gal. 2 12. as the cause of this his Behaviour But tho this be not a sufficient Reason why any man should dissemble the Truth yet we may observe from St. James's Advice to St. Paul r Act. 21.20 that the Apostles were very tender of giving any offence to the Jewish Converts who were very ſ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 21 20. numerous and whom they justly look'd upon as the most considerable part of the Church and as it were the Elder Brethren having a precedent Right to the Promises before the Gentiles t Act. 3.26 Rom. 15.27 This may be pleaded for an Excuse in behalf of St. Peter tho still we must confess as St. Paul tells us u Gal. 2.14 that he did not walk uprightly according to the truth of the Gospel in this matter And neither the Apostles themselves nor any in their behalf ever pretended that they were exempt from sin but on the contrary we find them freely own themselves to be men of like Passions with others x Act. 14 15. Jam. 5.17 and that they had this Treasure of the Gospel in earthen vessels y 2 Cor. 4.7 and were of the same make with other men And therefore since as our Author truly says z Fr. p. 260. Eng. p. 75. He alone is indowed with an absolute Infallibility who is incapable of sinning I do freely grant that we are no further assur'd that the Apostles were free from Errour than we find them free from Sin which naturally leads men into it I own likewise that this Instance of St. Peter is a good Argument against the perpetual Inspiration or Infallibility of the Apostles if we mean any more by it than a habitual Knowledge of Divine Truth for I cannot think S. Peter was under the immediate Conduct of the Holy Spirit when he was guilty of this Behaviour But I suppose the Apostles might have such an Assistance as was abundantly sufficient to answer all the Necessities of the Church without being always under the immediate Influence of the Holy Ghost which must make them Impeccable as as well as Infallible And even in this case we have reason to admire God's Providence and Care over his Church for so ordering it that St. Paul should be upon the place to interpose and put a stop to this ill Conduct that might else have been of dangerous Consequence and made a Breach in the Church that would not easily have been made up And humanely speaking 't is not likely that St. Peter who had such a Preeminence in the Church would have yielded to a less Authority than that of St. Paul's From whence too may further appear of what use 't was even for Inspir'd persons to consult with each other and act by common Advice which Point I have explained and proved at large above * P. 88. 5. The next Exception I shall take notice of is this Mr. N. tells us a Fr. p. 258 259. Eng. p. 72 73 74. that the Gift of Wisdom and Knowledge or the Gift of Prophecying which he makes all one with the two former was a Disposition of mind which God sometimes infused into those on whom he bestowed it whereby they became fit to instruct and that it did not consist in an immediate Inspiration of what they were to say His reasons for this are two 1. Because this Gift might be improved by Study and Reading as he proves from 1. Tim. 4.13 14. 2. Because the Apostle gave directions to the Prophets and order'd them to exercise their Gifts by turns to prevent that Confusion which the disorderly Use of their Gifts had brought into the Church b 1 Cor. 14. Now he thinks that if the Spirit had Inspir'd them with what to say he would likewise have given them directions as to the time and place Now methinks he that can confound the Gifts of Wisdom Knowledge and Prophecy which any Man that consults the place where St. Paul reckons up the several Gifts of the Spirit c 1 Cor. 8 9. will see are distinct and takes no notice of the Ambiguity of the word Prophecy which is taken in several Senses in Scripture I say he that confounds things that any one who has studied the places of Scripture which treat of the Gifts of the Spirit must needs know to be very different need not have been so nice as to distinguish between a Disposition of mind infus'd into those upon whom God bestowed it whereby they became fit to Instruct and an Inspiring them with what to say For certainly this Disposition infused into the mind if it mean any thing must mean God's giving Men a clear and distinct apprehension of what they were to teach others and I think this is much the same as Inspiring them with what to say since out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh and words are only the Expressions of our thoughts unless our Author supposes that when God Inspires a Man with what to say he only puts so many words into his mouth without conveying any Idea of the things themselves to his mind But let us proceed to examine his reasons As to the First I see no inconvenience in asserting that God very often increas'd or withheld his Extraordinary Gifts in proportion to the Industry of the Possessors For since the Extraordinary and Ordinary Gifts agree in this that they are both design'd to assist our Natural Faculties not to supersede them and to incourage our Industry not to slacken it I can't see why that Rule of our Saviour's To him that has shall be given and from him that has not i. e. does not improve and make a good use of what he has shall be taken way d Matth. 13.12 may not be applied to the Extraordinary Gifts as well as to the Ordinary and why Men might not hope God would bestow these Gifts upon them in a greater degree as a reward of their Industry and might not have reason to fear he should withdraw them if they took advantage from thence to be negligent And thus much seems to be implied in that advice of St. Paul e 1 Thess 5.19 Not to quench the Spirit viz. that God may be provok'd to take away these Gifts when he sees them abused or Men's sins may render them Unworthy to be the Instruments of the holy Spirit The story of the Ethiopian