Parliament or generall assembly of wise men if the first foundation was not laid thereon Working upon the feast daies punished by fine 4. Commandement Ll. Hen. 1. c. 10 Before this time no daies for solemne worship of God were acknowledged by the law of the Kingdom but the Lords daies By this all daies celebrated or instituted by the Church for that purpose are defended by the civill power and breach of the holy observation of these daies made inquirable and punished amongst other pleas of the Crown 6 Commandement Breach of the peace bloodshed and man slaughter punished by fine This was the ancient Law of the Saxons and was continued without alteration till about Alfreds time whose zeale against blood caused murder to be punished with death but the Danes bringing in a moderation if it may rightly be so called are now seconded by their kindred the Normans who will not admit of punishment by death Ll. Gulielm cap. 67. partly because being a warlike people bloodshed might seem to ranke it selfe under the Regiment of valour and partly because they owed much to that Title for the possession of all that they had gotten in England And to prevent scandall entring upon the reare opinion stept in that a miserable life was more penall then death and therefore in crimes of the deepest die they would to fine and losse of member Ibid. and which course prevailed most either to stop or inlarge the course of that sinne was left to the disposition of such as intended to make triall But in matters of lesse malignancy the purse rather smarted then the body wherein they proceeded so farre as to punishment of death by violence yet was not the fine to be measured by the judgement of the mercy or rigour of any person Miror 254. Ll. Gulielm c. 8 10 12 13 c. but onely of the Law it selfe which set down in certainty both the nature and quantity of the fine and left that memoriall upon record of a good mind at least to an equitable and just government In all these cases of breach of peace the Kings Court becomes possessed of the right of cognisance and the peace is now called the Kings peace not so much because that it is left onely to his providentiall care to maintaine as because the fines Ll. Gulielm cap. 3. for most of those crimes pertained to the King for otherwise there is a sort of crimes that are contra pacem vicecomitis as will be more cleared hereafter I shall conclude this subject with these three observations First that the Laws in those ancient times of the Normans were so generall as they then made no difference between places or persons Ll. Hen. 1. c. 10. but whether the peace was broken upon holy or common ground or upon a Lay-man or one in orders the Lay power seised upon all The second is the care they had for apprehending of the offenders in this kind If the party slaine were a Norman or Frenchman Ll. Gulielm cap. 53. the Lord of the manslaier was charged to have him forthcomming within a certaine time or to pay the Kings fine of 46 Marks so long as he had wherewith to satisfie and what remained the whole Hundred was charged But if the party slain were of any other people Ll. Gulielm cap. 26. the Hundred was immediately charged with the man-slayer and must bring him to answer within a certaine time or pay the Kings fine The third and last is the care they had to prevent breach of peace for the future First in setling of nightwatches by all Cities Burroughs Castles and Hundreds in such manner as the Sheriffe or chiefe Officers by common councell shall advise for the best safety of the Kingdome Ll. Gulielm c. 56. Ll. Gulielm cap. 46. Ll. H. 1. cap. 8. Secondly in forbidding intertainment of unknown persons above three daies without surety for his good abearance or becomming his pledge for the publique safety nor to let any person passe away without testimony under the ministers and neighbours hand of their good carriage A man committing adultery with a married woman shall forfeit to his Lord the price of his life 7. Commandement This made the crime inquirable at the common law as an offence contra pacem Domini Ll. Gulielm cap. 14. but afterward it was finable to the King and inquirable amongst the pleas of the Crown by the law of Henry the first Ll Hen. 1. c. 10. Force upon a woman to the intent to ravish her is fineable but if a Rape be committed Ll. Gul. c. 19. it shall be punished with losse of member The Crimes and offences against this Commandement were alwaies punished in the Temporall Courts by fine at the least and are still in the Normans time prosecuted in the same way notwithstanding the growing authority of the Canon 8. Commandement Robbery is finable The different Law between the Saxons Angles and Danes now by the Normans is setled in the more mercifull way and in case the delinquent made flight the pledge satisfied the law for him Ll. Gulielm cap. 4. Glanv l. 6. c. 6. Hoveden 9 Commandement Ll. Gulielm c. 57. Ll. Hen. 1. c. 10. But in the latter times of Henry the first the law was again reduced to the punishment of this crime by death and so hath continued There shall be true weights and measures throughout the Kingdome and those shal be sealed And this was the constant Saxon Law Perjury to be punished by fine and as formerly still inquirable amongst the Crown pleas CHAP. LI. The like of Lawes that concerne common interest of Goods IF Cattell be taken by distresse the party that will replery them shall pay for the returne of the Cattell Ll. Gulielm cap. 6. and give security to bring the distresse into the Court if within a yeere and a day it be demanded This Law I take to be intended where the Cattell are taken dammage faisant because nothing shall release the distresse in other cases but obedience to the summons No distresse ad comparendum shall be taken but after three severall summons Ll. Guilelm c. 42. and so many defaults made and in such case distresse shall issue by especiall order from the County court I noted this partly to shew the difference of the Normans from the Saxons in the delay of execution of justice by so much mean processe and partly to shew the difference between the Norman times and these daies wherein mens Cattell lie open to the distresse of every oppressing or extorting Bailiffe or unknown person and no summons made at all whereby many poore mens estates are either undone or they must submit to the unjust demands of their adversary No manner of goods of above foure pence in valew shall be bought unlesse in the presence of foure witnesses of the Town Ll Gulielm cap. 43. And the vendor shall satisfie out of his own
Church-government during these times fol. 146. XVIII Of the Court of Chancery fol. 162. XIX Of the Courts of Crown Plas and Common Law fo 165 XX. Concerning Sheriffs fol. 168. XXI Of Justices and Lawes concerning the Peace fol. 170. XXII Of the Militia during these times fol. 175. XXIII A short survey of the Reignes of Edward the fourth Edward the fifth and Richard the third fol. 181. XXIV Of the Government in relation to the Parliament fol. 187. XXV Of the condition of the Clergie fol. 191. XXVI A short sum of the Reignes of Henry the seventh and Henry the eighth fol. 194. XXVII Of the condition of the Crowne fol. 202. XXVIII Of the condition of the Parliament in these times fol. 223. XXIX Of the power of the Clergy in the Convocation f. 229. XXX Of the power of the Clergy in their ordinary Jurisdiction fol. 232. XXXI Of Judicature fol. 241. XXXII Of the Militia fol. 245. XXXIII Of the Peace fol. 253. XXXIV Of the generall Government of Edward the sixth Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth fol. 259. XXXV Of the Supream power during these times fol. 268. XXXVI Of the power of the Parliament during these times fol. 277. XXXVII Of the Jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall during these last times fol. 283. XXXVIII Of the Militia in these later times fol. 290. XXXIX Of the Peace fol. 297. XL. A summary Conclusion upon the whole matter fol. 300. A PREFACE CONTAINING A Vindication of the Ancient way of the Parliament OF ENGLAND THE more Words the more Faults is a divine Maxime that hath put a stop to the publishing of this second part for some time but observing the ordinary humor still drawing off and passing a harsher censure upon my intentions in my first part then I expected I doe proceede to fulfill my course that if censure will be it may be upon better grounds when the whole matter is before Herein I shall once more minde that I meddle not with the Theologicall right of Kings or other Powers but with the Civill right in fact now in hand And because some mens Pens of late have ranged into a denyall of the Commons ancient right in the Legislative power and others even to adnull the right both of Lords and Commons therein resolving all such power into that one principle of a King Quicquid libet licet so making the breach much wider then at the beginning I shall intend my course against both As touching the Commons right jointly with the Lords it will be the maine end of the whole but as touching the Commons right in competition with the Lords I will first endeavour to remove out of the way what I finde published in a late Tractate concerning that matter and so proceede upon the whole The subject of that Discourse consisteth of three parts one to prove that the ancient Parliaments before the thirteenth Century consisted onely of those whom we now call the House of Lords the other that both the Legislative and Judiciall power of the Parliament rested wholly in them lastly that Knights Citizens and Burgesses of Parliament or the House of Commons were not knowne nor heard of till punier times then these This last will be granted Viz. That these severall titles of Knights Citizens and Burgesses were not known in Parliament till of later times Neverthelesse it will be insisted upon that the Commons were then there The second will be granted but in part Viz. That the Lords had much power in Parliament in point of Jurisdiction but neither the sole nor the whole The first is absolutely denyed neither is the same proved by any one instance or pregnant ground in all that Book and therefore not cleerly demonstrated by Histories and Records beyond contradiction as the Title page of that Book doth hold forth to the World First because not one instance in all that Book is exclusive to the Commons and so the whole Argument of the Discourse will conclude Ab authoritate Negativa which is no argument in humane testimony at all Secondly the greatest number of instances in that Booke are by him supposed to concerne Parliaments or generall Councils of this Nation holden by the Representative thereof whereas indeed they were either but Synodicall Conventions for Church matters whereunto the poore Commons he well knoweth might not come unlesse in danger of the Canons dint or if they did yet had no other worke there then to heare learne and receive Lawes from the Ecclesiasticks And the Lords themselves though present yet under no other notion were they then as Councell to the King whom they could not cast out of their Councell till after Ages though they often endeavoured it Thirdly the Author of that Tractate also well knoweth that Kings usually made Grants and Infeodations by advice of the Lords without the ayde of the Parliament And it is no lesse true that Kings with the Lords did in their severall ages exercise ordinarily Jurisdiction in cases of distributive Justice especially after the Norman entrance For the step was easie from being Commanders in Warr to be Lords in peace but hard to lay downe that power at the foot of Justice which they had usurped in the rude times of the Sword when men labour for life rather then liberty and no lesse difficult to make a difference between their deportment in commanding of Souldiers and governing of Countrey-men till peace by continuance had reduced them to a little more sobriety Nor doth it seeme irrationall that private differences betweene party and party should be determined in a more private way then to trouble the whole Representative of the Kingdome with matters of so meane concernment If then those Councils mentioned by the Author which concerne the Kings Grants and Infeodations and matters of Judicature be taken from the rest of the Presidents brought by him to maintaine the thing aimed at I suppose scarce one stone will be left for a foundation to such a glorying Structure as is pretended in the Title page of that Booke And yet I deny not but where such occasions have befalne the Parliament sitting it hath closed with them as things taken up by the way Fourthly It may be that the Author hath also observed that all the Records of Antiquity passed through if not from the hands of the Clergy onely and they might thinke it sufficient for them to honour their Writings with the great Titles of Men of Dignity in the Church and Common-wealth omitting the Commons as not worthy of mention and yet they might be there then present as it will appeare they were in some of the particular instances ensuing to which we come now in a more punctuall consideration The first of these by his owne words appeare to be a Church-mote or Synod it was in the yeare 673. called by the Arch-Bishop who had no more power to summon a Parliament then the Author himselfe hath And the severall conclusions made therein doe all shew that the people had no worke
may see the great difference between the Prince and the King in one and the same man The most part of those laws were little other then plaisters applied to particular botches of those times wherein the King dealt with a tender hand as if he feared to ulcerate any part and especially the Clergy and therefore delivered the last law in a petitionary way to the Clergy because it concerned the execution of justice in prohibited times and yet bound up all with a salvo to himselfe and his prerogative like a wise King that would neither loose right nor doe wrong nor yet stickle to debate with his subjects now when as his eye was upon a further marke Walsing 46. For Leolin the Prince of VVales had affronted him and though he could not endure affronts yet could he dissemble them for advantage and so he suffered the Parliament to runne its course that he might have done the sooner Otherwise he had a seed of his fathers conceit that laws are not made for Kings as appeared afterward for after he had gotten his army into the field he tooke a fifteenth which was granted to his father and this was inaudito more M. West An 1276. but there was no disputing with power and therefore the subject must be contented rather to score it up against the future then require present pay so dangerous a thing it is for England that Kings should have occasion to gather armies though for never so honourable imployment The Welsh chase is hotly pursued yet it did not rid much way for it cost the English a voyage of nine yeeres travell before they could attaine the shore although it had been often within their view It may be the King found it advantagious for his government to maintaine an Army in the field under the colour of the Welsh warre that he might more bow his subjects to his own bent for during these warres the King made many breathings and tooke time to looke to the husbanding of his own revenue as those Ordinances called Extenta manerii and Officium coronatoris doe witnesse and the Statute of Bigami But the people were not altogether yet tamed for the times being still in warres and they occasioning much waste of treasure put the King to the utmost pitch of good husbandry and one degree beyond the same so as under colour of seising his own he swept up also the priviledges and liberties of his subjects M. West Polyd. virg some authours reciting the complaints of the Church men others of the Laity so as it seemeth the King was no respecter of persons but his own This and others not unlike had almost occasioned another combuston had not the meeting at Glocester setled things for the present by referring the right of franchises to debate in the Eyer and ordering reseisure of such liberties into the subjects hands whereof they had been dispossessed by Quo warranto and Quo jure under colour of the fourth chapter of the Statute of Bigami Neverthelesse however debonaire the King seemed to be the sore between him and his subjects was not fully cured nor did the Lords trust him further then needs must for whether they served in the field or met at councell still they were armed and during this daring of each other were many profitable lawes made whiles neither party durst venture bloodshed in touching too nigh upon the priviledges of each other principally because the affaires in Wales were but laid asleepe and upon reviving might turne the ballance to either side The wars awake againe and therein are consumed nigh five yeeres more of the Kings reigne so as what ever his intent was he could have hitherto little opportunity to effect any thing for the advancement of the prerogative of the Crown at home Nor had he scarcely breathed himselfe and army from the Welsh wars but he found both France and Scotland his enemies at once The King faced onely the first and fought the second which held him work the remainder of his daies at the same time also he arred both the Clergy and Laity at his own home as if providence had given him security for the good behaviour and yet it failed him in the issue and left him to the censure of the world whether his justice was spontaneous or by necessity for as yet he held the grand Charter at parley and therefore was rather eyed then much trusted Albeit he was put upon confidence in the subjects discretion for ayd of him in his continuall undertakings nor did they disclaime him herein however chargable it was for all seem willing he should be imployed any where so as not within the foure Seas It s probable the King knew it and therefore having made a voyage into France he changed the Scene of warre but to the other side as it were of a river in hope his Lords would follow but it would not be this angred him and he them nor would his Clergy allow him any ayd papa inconsulto and therefore he outs them from his protection these and his irregular preparations for warre by summons not onely of his Knights but all other that held Land worth 20 li. per annum Walfing 69. and taxes imposed by an arbitrary way increased rancour into a kind of state scoule little better then a quarrell for appeasing whereof the King granted a consultation upon a prohibition and unto both Clergy and Laity a confirmation of the grand Charter at the long runne and allowed it as the common law of the Kingdome and seconded the same with many succeeding confirmations in the 27 25 Edw. 1. 28 yeeres of his reigne as if he had utterly renounced all thought of a contrary way but the Stat. in his 28th yeere had a sting in the taile that was as ill as his saving of ancient ayd and prisals which was in the Stat. of confirmation of the Charters though it were omitted in this Stat. for the saving was of such a sence as time and occasion would move the Kings heart to make it and thus this Statute became like a Hocus pocus a thing to still the people for the present and serve the Kings turne that he might more freely intend the conquest of the Scots which once done he might if he would try masteries with England But God would not have it so the King in Scotland had power to take but could not overtake and the Scots like birds of the prey had wit enough to fly away and courage enough to return upon advantages and so the King was left to hunt the wind which made him to return He might now expect the applause of his people for his good successe and the terrour of those that had stopped the broad way of his extravigant prerogative and therfore looks bigge rubs up old sores and having his Army yet in the field sends for those Lords that would not follow him in his warres in Flanders all come and submit and as
estate if the sale be not effectuall and in case the vendor have no warrant for such goods by him sold No living Cattell shall be sold but onely in Cities Ll. Gulielm cap. 60. and before three witnesses nor shall any thing forbidden be sold without warranty No faires or markets shall be holden but onely in Cities Ibid. c. 61. Burroughs walled Towns and Castles These Lawes concerning sales and markets were ancient Saxon lawes and tend all to the avoyding of cheating men of their Cattell by surreptitious sale of them made by such as had no right Goods found shall be published by the finder to the neighbourhood Ll. Gulielm cap. 7. and if any makes claime and proofe of them to be his he shall have them giving security to bring them into the Court in case any other shall within a yeere and a day make his claim thereto The children of persons intestate shall equally divide the heritage Ll. Gulielm cap. 36. This is in terminis the Saxon law and therefore concerning it I shall referre to the same formerly recited onely I shall adde hereto the law of Henry the first Ll. Hen. I which may serve as an explanation of the former Any free man may devise his chattels by will and if he die intestate his wife children parents or next kinne shall divide the same for his soules good The first branch whereof was ancient and doubtlesse in continuall use but the iniquity of the Norman rude times was such that the Lords under surmise of arreares or reliefe would seise all the personall estate after the tenants death and so the right of last wils was swallowed up but this restoreth the power of last wils into its place and in case the party died intestate preserveth a kind of nature of descent although they be more personall Nor doth that last clause of the soules good disannull the same although the words may seem to carry away the benefit to some other hand For the whole matter is left to the discretion of such as are next to the intestate CHAP. LII Of Laws that concerne common interest of Lands THe Laws that concerne Lands and peculiarly belonging to the Normans are such as concerne principally the tenure of Lands which if duly considered although savoured somewhat of the King yet little of the Conquerour for generally it must be granted that tenures long before and after this time were as the services ordered according to the will of the giver in which as the King had the greatest share and he the most publique person of all so were his donations ordered chiefly to advance the publique service and in this regard the tenure by Knight service might more principally challenge the Kings regard then the regard of all the great men besides But this was not the soare yea rather it was the beauty and strength of the Kingdome and for which the King deserved an honorable name above most of his progenitors who had not so much land to dispose of as he had and therefore could not advance that service in any proportion equall unto him The sore that caused so many sighes was the incumbrances raised upon this most Noble and free service which through the evill of times by this meanes became the most burthensome and the onely loathed and abhorred service of all the rest I say through the evill of times for it cannot lodge in my thoughts but in the Norman times the incumbrances were nothing so great as of latter ages and that much hath been imputed to the Lawes of the Conquerour which they never deserved as may appeare in these particulars which the Laws of Henry the first have preserved in memory Tenant of the King or other Lord dying 1 Reliefe M. Paris An. 1100 1213 his heire shall pay no other reliefe then what by Law is due That which by Law is due is set down in the laws of William the Conquerour The Reliefe of an Earle Ll. Gulielm cap. 12. 8. Horses sadled and bridled 4. Helmets 4. Cotes of Maile 4. Shields 4. Speares 4. Swords 4. Chasers bridled and sadled 1. Palfray bridled and sadled The Reliefe of a Baron Ibid. c. 23. 4. Horses with Saddles Bridles 2. Helmets 2. Cotes of Maile 2. Sheilds 2. Speares 2. Swords 2. Chasers bridled and sadled 1. Palfray bridled and sadled The Reliefe of a Vavasor to his Lord Ibid. c. 24. His best Horse His Helmet His Cote of Maile His Shield His Speare His Sword Or if he had no Armes then he was to pay s. 100 The reliefe of the Countrey man is the best beast that is in his possession Ll. Gulielm cap. 29. and of him that farmeth his Lands a yeeres rent These are the Reliefes due by law and now setled in goods or armes but afterwards turned into money and its likely that the ill customes in the former times did extort both money and armes or such summes of money as they pleased and by the very words of the law it seemes they had brought it to an arbitrary power to take what they could get and yet all against Law 2. Marriage The Kings tenant shall advise with the King in marriage of his daughter sister neece or kinswoman and his widdow in like manner The sence hereof in short is that these might marry at their own will without paying fine or composition to the Lord and yet must have the liking of the Lord so farre as to declare whether the man intended were his enemy or not and fit to performe Knight service This law was therefore grounded upon the present distresse of affaires wherein the nation was unsetled and common right having established a mutuall trust between Lord and Tenant found out this meanes to preserve the same for if the marriages of those that are related to the Tenant in such manner as may inherit part or all his lands or have joynture therein should be left altogether at the liberty of the Tenant or his widow it must needs follow that the mutuall trust between Lord and Tenant must faile and the publique receive dammage And therefore if this custome were of Norman birth it was begotten bpon a Saxon law and might the rather be owned by the English 3. Dower The widdow of the Kings Tenant having children shall have her dower and portion so long as she keeps unmarried The portion here is in the Latine word maritagium which I take to be the marriage portion given by the husband according to the Saxon custome when as the dower in land was not in use whereof is spoken formerly in that Chapter of dower And the Normans were necessitated to introduce this custome of theirs with themselves partly because it was a priviledge which was their own by birth and it could not be waved without an evident wrong done to the wives of these men who had ventured their lives in that service but principally because it would not consist with
sold delayed or denied It s a comprehensive law and made up of many Saxon laws or rather an inforcement of all laws and a remedy against oppression past present and to come and concerneth first the person then his livelihood as touching the person his life and his liberty his life shall be under the protection of the law and his liberty likewise so as he shall be shut into no place by imprisonment nor out of any place by banishment but shall have liberty of ingresse and egresse His estate both reall and personall shall also be under the protection of the Law and the law also shall be free neither denied nor delayed I thinke it needlesse to shew how this was no new law but a confirmation of the old and reparation added thereto being much impaired by stormy times for the summe of all the foregoing discourse tendeth thereto cap. 32. Merchants shall have free and safe passage and trade without unjust taxes as by ancient custome they ought In time of warre such as are of the enemies Countries shall be secured till it appeare how the English Merchants are used in their Countries That this was an ancient law the words thereof shew besides what may be observed out of the Laws of Aetheldred and other Saxon laws So as it appeareth that not onely the English free men and natives had their liberties asserted by the law but also forrainers if Merchants had the like liberties for their persons and goods concerning trade and maintenance of the same and were hereby enabled to enjoy their own under the protection of the law as the free men had And unto this law the charter of King John added this ensuing It shall be lawfull for every free man to passe freely to and from this Kingdome saving fealty to the King unlesse in time of warre and then also for a short space as may be for the common good excepting prisoners outlaws and those Countrey-men that are in enmity and Merchants who shall be dealt with as aforesaid And it seemeth that this law of free passage out of the Kingdome was not anciently fundamentall but onely grounded upon reason of State although the free men have liberty of free passage within the Kingdome according to that originall law sit pax publica per communes vias and for that cause as I suppose it was wholly omitted in the Charter of Henry the third as was also another law concerning the Jewes which because it left an influence behind it after the Jewes were extinct in this Nation and which continueth even unto this day I shall incert it in this short summe After death of the Jewes debtor no usury shall be payd during the minority of the heire though the debt shall come into the Kings hand And the debt shall be payd saving to the wife her dower and maintenance for the children according to the quantity of the debtors Land and saving the Lords service and in like manner of debts to others The whole doctrine of usury fell under the title of Jewes for it seemeth it was their trade and their proper trade hitherto Concil Brit. 299. It was first that I met with forbidden at a Legatine Councell nigh 300 yeeres before the Normans times but by the Confessors law it was made penall to Christians to the forfeiture of estate and banishing and therefore the Jewes and all their substance were holden to be in nature of the Kings villeines as touching their estate Ibid. 623. Glanvil lib. 7. cap. 16. for they could get nothing but was at his mercy and Kings did suffer them to continue this trade for their own benefit yet they did regulate it as touching infants as by this law of King John and the Statute at Merton doth appeare M. Paris An. 1229. Merton cap. 5. Stat. de Judais An 18 E. 1. but Henry the third did not put it into his Charter as I thinke because it was no liberty of the subjects but rather a prejudice thereto and therefore Edward the first wholly tooke it away by a Statute made in his time and thereby abolished the Jewes Tenants Lands holden of Lands escheated to the King shall hold by the same services as formerly cap. 33. cap. 34. In all alienations of Lands sufficient shall be left for the Lords distresse Prerog Reg. cap. 7. Submitting to the judgement of the learned I conceive that as well in the Saxon times as untill this law any tenant might alien onely part of his lands and reserve the services to the alienor because he could not reserve service upon such alienation unto the Lord paramount other then was formerly due to him without the Lords consent and for the same reason could they not alien the whole tenancy to binde the Lord without his expresse licence saving the opinion in the booke of Assizes 20 ass pl. 17. because no tenant could be inforced upon any Lord least he might be his enemy Neverthelesse it seemeth that de facto tenants did usually alien their whole tenancy and although they could not thereby barre the Lords right yet because the Lord could not in such case have the distresse of his own tenant this law saved so much from alienation as might serve for security of the Lords distresse But tenants were not thus satisfied the Lords would not part with their tenants although the tenants necessity was never so urgent upon them to sell their Lands and therefore at length they prevailed by the Statute of Quia emptores to have power to sell all 18 Edw. 1. Westm 3. ca. 1. saving to the Lords their services formerly due and thus the Lords were necessitated to grant licences of alienation to such as the tenants could provide to buy their lands Nor was this so prejudiciall to the Lords in those daies when the publique quiet was setled as it would have been in former times of warre when as the Lords right was maintained more by might and the ayd of his tenants then by law which then was of little power cap. 35. The 35 Chapter I have formerly mentioned in the Chapter concerning the Clergy cap. 36. No man shall be appealed by a woman for the death of any but her own husband The right of appeale is grounded upon the greatest interest Now because the wives interest seemeth wholy to be swallowed up in her husband therefore she shall have an appeale of the death of him onely and such also was the Law in Glanvils time How far this point of interest shall extend to the degrees of consanguinity the Norman Law formerly hath shewen And against whom appeales did lie the Statute at Westminster tels us viz. not onely against the principall West 1. cap. 14 but also against accessories yet not against them till the principall be attainted And because it was ordinary for men of nought to appeale others in a malicious way Westm 2. ca. 13 it was by another law established