of the Kingdom and first here I shall examine what is meant by these words They despised him The meaning of this consists in three branches and they are these 1. They did Male-cogitare think evil of him in their hearts and so came within the compasse of Solomons prohibition Curse not the King in thy thought Eccle. 10.20 A thought of despising the King is Treason as well as a Word and a Word as well as an Action so says the Scripture of the Intention of Bigthan and Teresh Traytors they were and yet they never came to an Insurrexerunt or any Act of Treason Ester 2.21.23 but only to a Voluerunt an Intention they sought or they thought to lay hands upon King Ahasuerus and for this very thought of Treason they were hang'd And as the Law of God so the Law of this Kingdom doth construe a bare purpose against the King a despising thought of the King to be Treason and makes it deadly My prayer therefore is Convert them O God if they will not be Converted confound them O God and let them perish as many as have evil will against the King and do Male-cogitare despise him in their thoughts 2. They did Male-dicere despise the King with their tongues and speak evil of him saying How shall this man save us and this is the second Branch whereby the meaning of this word is explained They despised him i.e. they speak evil of the King and so came within the compasse of Moses's prohibition Thou shalt not speak evil of the Ruler of thy people Deut. 27.16 A Word against the King is Treason as well as a thought or Action Greater Treason then a thought and lesser Treason then an Action And they that Word it against the King if they be of the Clergy they are of Balaams Ordination Numb 23. because they Curse whom God hath blessed and he was killed with the Sword If they be of the Layety they are of Shimei's condition 2 Sam. 16.5 because they revile whom God hath annointed and he was put to death And of late by the Law of this Nation there stood one Pym condemned for saying He would if he could embrue his hands in the blood of King Charles the first and many more in good time may be condemned and executed for saying They will if they can embrue their hands in the blood of King Charles the Second My Prayer again therefore is Convert them O Lord if they will not be converted confound them O God and let them perish as many as speak evill of my Lord the King and do Male-dicere Despise Him with their Tongues 3 They did Male facere Despise the King with their Hands for they brought him no presents and so came within the compasse of King Davids prohibition 1 Sam. 26.9 Thou shalt not stretch forth thy hand against the Lords annointed I know King David there speaks by way of Interrogation Who can stretch forth his hand against the Lords Annointed and be guiltlesse but I know withal that Interrogative Quis Who can is a most triumphant Negative and says Nullus No man can and be guiltlesse or No man ought unless he will bring Guilt upon his own Soul Absolon did was hang'd 2 Sam. 10.9 Robert late Earl of Essex did against Elizabeth our late Queen of England and was beheaded and how many that were in the same Conspiracy were hang'd you may read in that Chronicle My prayer therefore is gain Convert them O Lord Convert them and return them to their Duty of Loyalty to thine Annointed If they will not be converted confound them O Lord confound them and as many as lift up their hands against or withdraw their hands from my Lord the King Amen You see what is meant by these words 1 a. 2 a. They despised him will you now see Why they despised him why it was Because they lookt upon him as a single man How shall this man save us Happily they thought him greater then any of themselves in particular but they thought themselves in a collective or Representative Body greater then him the King and this brings me to the unfolding of the second Question which is Whether the King be singulis major Question 2 greater then single persons but Universis minor lesse then collected Persons or the Body Representative I shall not need to speak of the first Branch of this Question viz. Whether the King be Singulis major Greater then any single Person For it is not denied by any or if by any yet only by such who are more Beasts then Men and live more by Sense then by Reason or Religion or rather have lost both their Sense their Reason and their Religion The enquiry therefore here must be upon the other branch of this Question viz. Whether the King be Universis minor lesse then the Body Representative For this was the thing in agitation in this late wicked Age and affirmed by these wicked men the Children of Belial who did de facto murther King Charles I. of blessed memory and would have done as much upon King Charles II. if they could have fastened upon him at Worcester but God I trust hath preserved him for better times I must at first take leave to tell them That the Ground on which they build is false and meer Sophistry That the assumption and Inference which they build is weak and meer Fallacy For thus they argue The Fountain or Cause of a King is greater then the King but the People Representative is the Fountain and Casue of the King Therefore the People Representative is greater then the King And here I say The Ground is false the Assumption is untrue and the Inference therefore is so too 1. The Ground is taken from an old Axiome Quickquid efficit tale est ma gis tale whatsoever effects a thing is greater then the thing effected This though true Ante effectum productum before the effect produced yet it is often false Post effectus productionem after the production of the effect v. g. The Fountain was once bigger then the River but now the River is bigger then the Fountain A spark of fire was once more Fire then all the Wood in the Chimney but when the Wood becomes one Flame the Wood is more Fire then the Sparke You see the Ground is not ever true and sure I am the Assumption laid upon this Ground-work is never true viz. The People is the Fountain or Cause Efficient of the King For God as I have shewed you before and whether I referr you is the only Efficient of Monarchy Only I add thus much Were it so that the People did make the King yet it would not follow That therefore the People is greater then the King For this Axiome is true only in those Agents in whom the Quality by which they work is Inherent and from whom it cannot be separated But the People if they had Power to make the
KING CHARLES HIS FUNERAL Who was Beheaded by Base and Barbarous hands January 30 1648. AND Interred at WINDSOR February 9 1648. WITH His ANNIVERSARIES Continued untill 1659. By THOMAS SWADLIN D.D. Qui orat exorat Vivat veniat Vincat Carolus Secundus Et sit Carolo Magno Major Amen LONDON Printed by John Clowes for the Author 16â—â— TO THE KINGS Most Exceent MAJESTIE CHARLES II. GREAT SIR THat Your Majestie may vouchsafe to give these Anniversaries a gracious Reception is the Petition to That Your Majestie may be Blest with a Long Life with a quiet Reign with a Faithfull Councel with a Pious Clergie with a Valiant Souldiery with a Loyal People and be preserved from a new Rivalry of Presbytery and Independency is the Petition for Your Majesty By Your Majesties Loyall Subject THOMAS SWADLIN D.D. Anno Dom. 1648. 2 SAM 1.14 How wast thou not afraid to put forth thine hand to destroy the Annointed of the Lord IN qualia tempora reservasti nos Domine O Lord God In what sad times do we live Times wherein sins of the highest size are comitted Sacriledge and Rebellion and not controuled Nay They are countenanced and not checkt Yea to check them and controule them is accounted a greater sin and can expect no greater Reward then an heavy punishment So sad are the Times we live in Sacriledge and Rebellion committed countenanced commanded To discountenance them to discommand them to rebuke them is accounted a greater sin and must expect as great if not a greater punishment But what then Shall we dry our Eys and not weep for them Shall we harden our Hearts and not sigh for them Shall we muzzle our Mouths and not declaime against them This indeed would involve us in the Guilt and â—â—y us liable to a greater punishment Not only to an Hatchet to an Halter to a Rack to a shame to a Torment here but to Fire and Brimstone to stormes and Tempests to Tortures and Devils hereafter A hard choice I confesse But for all that They that have more care of their Bodies then of their Souls They that have more respect to their Posterity then to their Eternity may consent by silence For my part Liberabo animam meam whatsoever becomes of my Body of my Wife of my Children I will if possibly I can deliver mine own Soul not only by not consenting to but also by dissenting from and increpating of those Royal Blood-suckers those Sons of Belial those Regicides and King-Killers not only in the Distillation of mine Eyes to bedew a Royall Coffin not only in the Compunction of my Soul to bewaile the losse of a Royal Person but also in the Objurgation of my Tongue by chiding those who were so Disloyal as not to be afraid to put forth their hands to destroy the Annointed of the Lord. And that you may deliver your Souls too I beseech you Joyn your Tears with mine Joyn your Prayers with mine Joyn your Sorrows with mine until God shall be pleased to establish King Davids seed in King David's Throne to increpate those bloudy Actors in this Expostulation and Disquisition of so bloody an Act How wast thou not afraid c. These words at first view seem to be nothing but an Interogation the asking of a Question and no more But upon a second and better Inspection they will appear an heavy Indignation and resolve themselves into this strong Negative No man may None but a fearlesse i. e. a gracelesse man dare put forth his hand against much lesse destroy the Lords Annointed and offer to our consideration these particulars Division 1. Whether all Kings bad and all be the Lords annointed I resolve it Yes They are 2. Whether such a Person though had may be resisted deposed or murthered I resolve it No He may not 3. How fearful a sin is it to do such an Act Besides what I shall resolve upon this anon I must add Time will discover I begin with the first Whether all Kings bad and all Par. 〈◊〉 be the Lords Annointed Yes I say They are For it was in a Phrensy mood when Ajax took Kings for Upstarts rising and standing of themselves Cowards get victory by God saith he but I will win whether God will or no. And it was in as desperate a sit when Antiochus said The Persons of Kings are of Force or Fortune 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Let him take the Kingdom to whom Fortune or the sword shall give it And a foolish Dream of wise Homer it was when he said That Kings are the spawn of Jupiter nursed and fostered by Jupiter And tâ—eir Speech is as full of Folly and Madness whether Papist or Puritan or him that hath out-stripped them both the Independent who say That the King is the Peoples Creature The People the Kings Creatour The King whosoever he be quâ King is King but Precario by the Peoples Courtesy And those Texts they alleadge for the proof of their Opinions are foolishly if not foully mistaken by them viz. All the People went up to Gilgal and made Saul King there and therefore the King is the Peoples Creature so again 1 Sam. 11.15 2 Reg. 14.21 All the People of Judah took Azariah and made him King for his Father Amaziah and therefore the People are the Kings Creator For in Propriety of Speech The People did then and do now only declare him to be King who was so appointed by God and therefore the Context runs thus Samuel said to the people Come let us go to Gilgal and renew the Kingâ—om there i e. Let us acknowledge and make known him to be King 1 Sam. 11.14 whom the Lord hath chosen as it is in the 24 verse of that chapter Outward Solemnity and Coronation the King hath from the People but Power Right and Authority he hath from God from God immediatly and Dependent upon God only and Independent from the People whether Diffusive or Collective whether Representative or Essenciall Look ye else upon the first Rulers Gods first Church had the Church of the Jewes Who made Moses to be Ruler over Israel God Act. 7.35 Num. 27.16 Judg. 2.16 The People had no hand in it who appointed Joshua over the Congregation of Israel who but God Who raised up the Judges who but the Lord Who appointed yes to come to the word of my Text who annointed Saul to be Captain over Israel who but the Lord 1 Sam. 10.1 Samuel poured on the Oyl but God annointed him That for the first King of Israel SAUL He was appointed to be King and annointed by God And so again for the second King of Israel DAVID Who found him and who annointed him Not the People I assure you not the better sort of them The Elders of the City Bethleem 1 Sam. 16.4 They were astonished when Samuel went upon that errand from God Nor the best sort of the People neither Not the Saints They dream't of no such matter until God
the Law of Nature or the Divine Law not by Popular Pactions or Politick and National Agreements we are bound to obey the King and the Reason is Because the King is the Supream Head i. e properly Universorum of all the People and all this is not obscurely implyed but manifestly expressed and that not by single and yesterday Pamphlets but by sundry old Authentique Histories and Chronicles Would you have it yet plainer Look ye then upon the Oaths ye have taken in the presence of Almighty God The Oath of Allegiance The Oath of Supremacy and your own Parliamentary Protestation In each of these you have sworne to maintain the Kings Soveraignty in all Causes and over all Persons Ecclesiastical and Civil A Soveraignty he hath not onely over singular persons but over all persons and you have sworn to maintain it and as you endeavour it so God will help you But you may fear you may justly fear If you have un-Sworne that or Sworne against that which you have so Solemnly Sworne to maintaine That GOD will not onely not help you but wound you wound you while you live with the Infamy of Rebells and a tormenting Conscience Witnesse Alderman Hoyle Sr. Henry Phane Senior and some more and wound you when you are dead with the Eternity of Fire and all the Torments of Hell From both which Almighty God deliver you for his Son Jesus Christ his sake and from which that you may be delivered I pray God give you grace to acknowledge esteem King Charles II. to be Universis as well as Singulis Major Greater then and over all because They that think lesse of him do despise him and are therefore the Chilâ—ren of Belial as they are and shall be in future Chronicles who thought lesse of King Charles I. and therefore murthered him And so are they that bring him no presents which is my third Consideration and to be handled the next year In the mean time God in mercy c. Anno Dom. 1653. 1 SAM 10.27 They brought him no Presents WEE are by the Grace of God Pars. 3. met here again to remember a sad and mournful day That day on which the best King that ever England had was murthered I chan◠〈◊〉 my Text yet because I am yet to shew you the Privative cond tion of Rebels or Children of Belial from these words They â—â—ought him no Presents And I shaâ—l not spend much time in the Explication of these words Theâ— are obvious enough to the thinnest understanding and thâ—yiâ— end thus much These men these Children of Belial diâ—noâ— contribute to the maintenance of the King They did not â—yd im they did not assist him They ayded him not with Aâ—ms they assisted him not with mony They withheld his Vectiâ—li from him They brought him not his Customes his Crown-Reâ—enues his Subsidies and Poll-monies I shall therefore spend my ensuing Discourse in resolving that Question which doth almost Naturally arise from these last words viz. Whether it be lawful to bear Arms Quest. 3 or contribute for the maintenance of a War against the King This Text resolves it Negatively and says It is not lawful For they who brought the King no presents were therefore Sons of Belial and therefore much more are they the Sons of Belial who fight against or contribute to maintain a War against the King And this I shall endeavour to make good 1. Removendo by removing all Objections that I meet withal which colour this Opinion 2. Movenâ—o by commending to you some choise and pregnant places of Scripture which give the checkmate to this Opinion 3. Propendendo by explaining those places of Scripture by the practises of the Fathers 4. Proponendo by laying before your face some of those fearful Judgements which have befallen some men who have born Arms against their Kings as fearful Examples for them who contribute to the maintenance of such Wars And first for the Objections and the first of any validity I meet with is that of David's taking up Arms against King Saul Object 1 and it is argued thus 1 Sam. 22.1 2. 1 Sam. 24.18 David the Subject took up Arms against Saul the King and was not rebuked for it either by any Divines or Lawyers or States-men Many of his Fellow Subjects to the number of 600. took up Arms with him and very likely many more contributed to the maintenance of that Army nor yet were they reprehended either by any Rules of Divinity Law or Policy and Therefore Subjects may take up Arms and contribute to the maintenance of a Warre against a King if he be an Oppressour of their Properties Liberties or Religion And to this first colourable Objection Answer I Answer thus The Allegation is false For how can it possibly be imagined That David took up Arms against Saul when we find him continually flying from and never fighting with Saul Yea 1 Sam. 24.6 so far was he from fighting with him or taking up Arms against him that when God had delivered Saul into his hands two several times 1 Sam. 26.9 once in the Wildernesse of Engedi and once in the Hill of Hachilah David durst not himself nor would he suffer any man else to stretch forth his hand against King Saul and for this reason 1 Sam. 24.2 Because he was the Lords Annointed Certainly David neither raised nor entertained these 600 men to fight or encounter with or against Saul For what are 600 to so many thousand as Saul had at Command 1 Sam. 26.2 He never went without 3000 men after him David used these 600 only for Spies or Scouts that they might give him Intelligence where Sauls ambushments lay that so he might as is said the better avoid his fury ver 4 Certainly therefore David with his 600 mens is very unlearnedly urged as an Example of Disloyalty Nor will that Addition help it viz. That David was 40000 strong in the days of Saul and likely he would not lye still with that great Army 1 Chr. 1.12 No no They had no such foolish Oath in those Loyal daies as Never stir law It is fit let the King know himself It is high time King Saul were removed from his evil Counsellours Doeg and his fellows For first you cannot but know at least you cannot deny That these 40000 come not to David until Sauls death if you observe the story Ver. 22. For it is said expresly They came to David to help him until it was a great Host like the Host of God And these are the numbers of the Bands Ver. 23. that were ready Armed to the War and come to David to Hebron to turn the Kingdom of Saul unto him according to the Word of the Lord And what made these men come to David at this time It was Sauls death and they knew David was appointed by God to succeed him But secondly admit it for truth That David was 40000 strong in the daâ—es of Saul
French-men ever after in their ordinary sport when they were at Cards and pulled for a Traytor a sort in their Packs as Knaves are in ours would call for a Barnardino de Corte to his perpetual reproach Infamy with the shame whereof and the sting of a guilty Conscience the Rebel was so tormented that he languished continually until he dyed desperatly I have heard of a certain Commander who would often wish he might rot if ever he lift his Hand or drew his Sword against the King Notwithstanding he did both and God answered him in his wish For he rotted within and dyed this was at Worcester A certain Lord likewise I have heard of a Great Ring-leader in a Rebellion yet a great Pretender to Religion and in his Exercises of Devotion would often desire God If the course he took were not right if the cause he mannaged were not just that God would take him away suddainly God heard him and answered him For by the Shot of a Musket he was killed so suddainly that he had not so much time as to say God be merciful unto me and without any sign or symptome of Repentance dyed This was at Liechfield I need not remember you of Pausanias Ariobarzanes Rodolph Duke of Suevia Catcline of Rome Spencers Dudlys and many more of England Not one of them all nor any other Rebel that I have read of but if he lived he lived the scoâ—n of honest men and if he dyed he dyed the shame of his Friends the mirth of his enemies and the example of all God in the shameful and fearful punishments of them telling us That it is not lawful to bear Arms or contribute to maintain a War against the King They that did so against King Charles I. God Almighty look upon them in so much mercy that they may look up to him with so much Repentance that they may be forgiven and their Souls saved whatsoever becomes of their Bodyes and that no man none of us especially may do the like against King Charles II. with the Church I pray From all Sedition and privy conspiracy from all false Doctrine and Heresie from hardnesse of Heart and contempt of thy word and Commandement Good Lord deliver us for Jesus Christ his sake Amen Amen Amen Anno Dom. 1655. 1 REG. 21.19 Hast thou killed and also gotten Possession THat a Rich man that a Good man should be made first a Delinquent and then a Malignant is no news For the Fact can prescribe time out of mind even beyond the memory of Christianity Yet such a Fact may be suspected and called in question whether it be Legal or Illegal since it hath so bad a Founder as Achab and so great a Confounder as God For it was God that sent Elijah the Tishbite to meet Achab King of Israel V. 17.18 with this expostulation Hast thou killed and also gotten Possession But soft Is not this Text corrupted or mistaken for Achab killed not Naboth rather the False Witnesses that testified against him or the false Judges that condemned him or Jesabel that commanded both to be done and him to be stoned Truely they had their Guilt and Punishment yet as if they had been but Accessories Achab is pickt out for the Murtherer because without his Seal to the Letter his Covetousness after the Vineyard Naboth had not been markt out for a Delinquent nor put to death for a Malignant Nor had Achab received this Increpation from God by the hand of Elijah Hast thou killed and also gotten Possession In handling of which words I shall observe 1. Two Persons 2. Two things belonging to each Person The two Persons are 1. The true Malignant Achab. 2. The pretended Malignant Naboth 1. In the pretended Malignant I look upon the two Causes Why he was so pretended 1. He was a Rich man would not part with his Inheritance 2. He was a Good man would not yield to an Arbitrary Government 2. In the True Malignant I look upon the two Causes that so Branded him 1. His Murther Anoccideris Hast thou killed 2. His theft you may call it Plunder or sequestration Ac etiam jure haeriditario possidias and hast thou gotten Possession Of these God willing orderly and first of the first The pretended Malignant Naboth Naboth hath three Significations 1. It signifies Conspicuus visible and so he was a Delinquent and a malignant de Fronte for his honesty 2. It signifies Sessio stable and so he was a Delinquent and a Malignant de pede for his Constancy 3. It signifies Exclusio expelled and so he was a Delinquent and a Malignant de Facto and sequestred both from his livelihood and Life But for a man visibly honest whose Heart and thoughts you may read in his Face and Front without fraud or guile For a man unmoveably constant whose Perseveraâ—ce in honesty keeps company with his Life without halt or Apostacy For a man who will not part with the sincerity of his Intentions nor the Integrety of his Actions for the Frowns of Kings or fear of death For such a man to be made a Delinquent and under sequestration to be made a Malignant and put to Death me thinks is somewhat strange and Illegal It is strange indeed but indeed it is true too de Facto that he was served so though not true de merito that he deserved so It was Illegal too against Law and without president yes against old Lawes and former Presidents But a new Law may come forth by an Ordinance upon a day of Humiliation under a Privy Signet by the subtilty of Jesabel which signifies Covetousness as you may read in this Chapter Jesabel wrote Letters in Achabs name and Sealed them with his Seal and sent the Letters to the Elders and to the Nobles Ver. 8. that were in his City dwelling with Naboth And she wrote in the Letters saying Proclaim a Fast and set Naboth among the Chief of the People Ver. 9. And two wicked men before him Ver. 10. and let them witnesse against him saying Thou didst blasphem God and the King then carry him out and stone him that he may dy And the reason of all this is double 1. Because Naboth was a Rich man and would not part with his Inheritance which is my second Consideration and prima primae So you have it in the 2. and 3 verses Naboth had a Vineyard by the Kings Pallace Achab desires it for a Garden of Hearbs 1 a. 1 ae but he would not part with it because it was the Inheritance of his Fathers In Riches there is a Felicity and an Infelicity Happiness and misery both in Riches Happiness because Wealth gets a man esteem in the World Misery because it gets a man Envy in the World Happiness because it enables a man to do good in the Wâ—â—ld Misery because it tempts a man to do mischief in the World Happiness because a Man may make Friends by the Mammon of Iniquity
Actuall Transgressions But Originally Corruption He was free from because He was conceived by the Holy Ghost and born of the Virgin Mary and Actuall Transgressions he was cleared of not only by the Verdict of St. Peter who tell us from the Holy Ghost He did not sin neither was any guile found in his lips 1 Peter but also by the sentence of Pilate himself who told the Jews who importuned to have him Crucified I have examined him but can find no faults in him And Charles the first King of England John Scotland France and Ireland for whose Commemoration and his 8 Anniversary I chose this Text though he was conceived in sin and questionless guilty of Actual transgressions yet not such Transgressions as made him worthy to be Killed and murthered by the ancient Laws of this Kingdom And that 's a wonder A wonder that King Charles I. should rather with Constantine cover other mens Errors and discover His own A wonder it is P. 146.4 that Charles I. would continue an Angel of Reformation when the Devil of Rebellion was up in Arms against him A wonder it is p. 207.1 that Charles I. would rather suffer himself and his to be destroyed then give way to alter a settled Orthodox Religion A wonder it is p. 186.3 that Charles I. would rather chuse the woe of Vae soli and Solitude then of Vae vobis Hypocritae and Hypocrisie A wonder it is p. 127.28 that Charles I. should chuse rather to be reckoned among the Misfortunate then in the black List of irre ligious and Sacrilegious Princes A Wonder it is p. 165.20 that Charles I. should seek to set up Christs spiritual Kingdom by pulling down his own Temporal Kingdom A Wonder it is p. 135.4 That Charles I. should rather ascribe the setling of Bishops to the wisdom and piety of the Apostle then to the favour of Princes or Ambition of Presbyters A Wonder it is that Charles I. should be so judicious to determine some mens Zeal for Bishops p. 141.8 Lands Houses Revenues set them on work to eat up Episcopacy Root and Branch A Wonder it is p. 103.10 that Charles I. should esteem it his greatest Title and chiefest Glory to be the Defender of the Church both in the true Faith and its just Fruitions and equally abhorr both Sacriledge and Apostacy A wonder it is p. 103.21 that Charles I. should rather chuse to live on the Churches Alms then violently to take the Bread out of Bishops and Ministers mouths A wonder it is p. 104.17 that Charles I. wounld not repair the Breaches of the State by the Ruins of the Church A wonder it is p. 103.6 that Charles I. should rather chuse Pharaohs Divinity and Joseph's true piety then to sell the Priests Lands A wonder it is that Charles I. should esteem the Church above the State and Gods Glory above his own p. 92.13 and the Salvation of his soul above the preservation of his Body Estate and Posterity And yet a greater woâ—der it is That in none of all these nor any thing else neither Judge nor Jury nor Rable could sind any cause in him King Charles I. But now suppose They had found cause of death in him 2a 1ae yet might they desire to have him killed That my 2a 1ae is to tell you and it tells you No It is not awsul for Subjects to desire to have their King killed though â—hey could find cause of Death in him No God forbid we should desire to have Christ the King killed since he came to he killed for us that we might not be killed A most unthankful part this would be and therefore most abominable to requite so much Mercy with so great Injury Yet so unthankful and so abominable were the Jewes They desired to have Christ killed and I would to God some Christians yes and all Christians were not so abominably unthankful But I must tell you so abominable and unthankful are we all that we daily wound him if we do not kill him yes that we daily wound him and kill him Wound him by our Miseries or kill him with our sins we renue his Agony by our consticts or his Passion by our Guilts We never suffer as Christians but He suffers with us we never sin as Beasts or Epicures but we kill him by those sins We have more need to say Blessed be God the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ who gave his Son to be killed on Earth for a time that we might not be killed in Hell for ever and Blessed be God the Holy-ghost who did annoint Jesus to be our Christ and gave him Inauguration to his Crown of Thorns and Blessed though most bloody Function and blessed be our Lord Jesus Christ who gave himself up to death that death might not swallow us up yes rather say we Blessed be the Holy Trinity then to desire that Christ should be killed And God forbid again That we should desire to have that King killed whom I in this Text aim at For it is against the Law against the Law of God against the Gospel of Christ and against the Law of men too 1. Against the Law of God Exod. 27.22 Thou shalt not speak evel of the Ruler of thy people says Moses much lesse mayst thou do evil to him Prov. for says Solomon Against the. King there is no rysing up but to desire his death to desire that he may be killed is both to speak evil of him and do evil to him 2. It is against the Gospel of Christ For Christ himself says Give to Caesar the thing that are Caesar and what things are Caesars St. Paul tells you when he says Be subject to him Give him Honour Rom. 13. Tribute Obedience Take not any thing from him and all this for Conscience sake which argues their little or no Conscience which desire to have him killed for in so doing they take all things from him and St. Peter puts it further home when he says next to Fear God Honour the King which shews and it it as if the Apostle had said They have little or no Fear of God that have so little Honour for their King as to dishonour him by desiring to have him killed or as the Royal Expositor hath it They cannot appear good Christians p. 165.20 that approve not themselves good Subjects Nor can it be safe for a King to tarry amongst those men who shake hands with their Allegiance p. 37.15 under pretence of laying faster hold on their Religion and certainly that is no Religion or a very bad one which allows it lawful for Subjects to desire to have their King Killed But I have spoken at full heretofore That no cause whatsoever in the King though Murther Witâ— hâ—raft Idolatry c. can authorise Subjects to Rebellion from the Law of God from the Gospel of Christ from the Judgement of all
to dye All that can excuse him in this is Joh. 19.7 the Holiness of that time made them say It was unlawfull because they held it unlawfull upon their daies of preparation to sit on life and death and Friday on which our Saviour was condemned was the preparation of their Sabbath But 2. My positive Quare is this They desired Pilate to put him to death because if they had let Christ alone all men would believe him et venient Romani the Romans will come and take away both their Place and Nation This was the causeless cry they made against Christ and the causeless end they pretended in desiring Pilate to kill him and here you may see how just the Judgment of God was We desire you Pilate to kill him for fear the Romans come upon us and destroy us and the killing of Christ was the cause that brought in the Romans upon them so justly did God punish them with that which they pretended most to fear I would the Application were not too visible 1. That gallant and wise Earl of Strafford must be beheaded because he plotted the Alteration of the Fundamentall Laws of this Kingdome and raising of the standing Army 2. The constant and learned Arch-Bishop of Canterbury must be beheaded because he plotted the Alteration of Religion and bringing Popery into this Church 3. King Charles the first that most Wise most pious most Learned Religious Defender of the Faith must be beheaded too because He listened to such evil Counsellors which God hath punish'd with an evil Counsell with the raising continuing of an Army against the Fundamental Lawes of this Kingdome with an Harvest of the Popes besides with the Gleanings of a Medley of many Sects and Schismes Anabaptists Independants Quakers Shakers Brownists the Mother Father of these and many more the Presbyterians to the utter undoing almost of the most glorious Church Christ ever had upon the Earth since the Apostolicall and Primitive time God Almighty in his good time send a Charles the second to restore Vigour to the Fundamentall Lawes Peace to the people and true Religion to the Church through Jesus Christ Amen But what end had the Jewes in killing Christ why that my seconda secondae and last disquisition must informe you and thus it doth it 1. It may be they had Jeroboams end to make Preists of the lowest of the people and it is observable that after they had killed Christ they never had nor to this day have a worthy man for their High Preist 2. It may be they had Jehu's end to make away all the Seed and Blood-Royall and it is observeable again that after they had killed Christ Herod the Son killed James also the Cozen-German of Christ and therefore of the Blood-Royal from David that so none of that Family might ever after inherit the Crown of Judea 3. Or it may be they had Omries end to erect new Statutes contrary to the old Statutes of a new Invention contrary to or diverse from thâ—se of Gods first Institution 4. Or it may be they had Je abels end that when Christ the King was killed they might without controule make honest loyall constant Consciencious men Delinquents and Malignants and plunder them of their â—states and take away their life 5. Or if they had none of these ends and I cannot positively say they had yet questionless their end was that in the Parable This is the Heire come let us kill him and the Inheritance shall be ours He being killed our Glosses and humane Traditions and Inventions shall go for Currant and all the world will be of our Religion and thereout shall we suck no small advantage And this end had some Judaized Scots and English in killing King Charles the first They desired the Deputy or Governour or President Bradshaw to kill him that the Possession of Crown and Soveraignty being of out his hands or podibility to recover them and his Heire and Issue banished he the President by name John Bradshaw might quietly and Conscientiously enjoy the Lord Cottingtons Estate and part of the Earl of St. Albons worth 4000. l. per ann Sr. Thomas Fairfax part of the Duke of Buckinghams Oliver Cromwell part of the said Dukes part of the Marquess of Worcesters with a great deal more who of late upon the third of September this year forfeited his usurped Protectorship with all his ill-gotten wealth and Honours and surrendred his Soul into the hands of God with this Manifesto of his Repentance O Lord how wilt thou deal with me O Lord what Judgements and Torments hast thou prepared for me I dare not say so let them and the Kings enemies perish O Lord and yet I do say How long O Lord how long will it be ere thou returnest King Charles II. with power to recover his Dominions and with Wisdom to settle Peace and Religion in these Kingdoms which we yet wait for patiently and do beg earnestly for his sake whom the Jewes killed Jesus Christ Amen Anno Dom. 1659. ROM 1.32 Who knowing the Judgement of God that they which commit such things are worthy of death not only do the same but have pleasure in them that do them MAny Inditements hath the Apostle brought in against the Gentiles in this Chapter from the 29. verse to this 32. Two and twenty as some have tallied them Others add this to the former and read them Three and twenty 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Fornication the first 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Wickedness was the second 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Covetousnesse was the third 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Maliciousness was the fourth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Envy was the Fifth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Murther was the sixth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Debate was the seventh 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Deceipt was the eighth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Malignity the ninth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Wnispering was the tenth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Backbiting was the eleaventh 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hating of God was the twelfth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Despitefulness was the thirteenth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Pride was the 14th 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Boasting was the fifteenth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Invention of evil things was the sixteenth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Disobedience to Parents was the seventeenth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without Understanding was the eighteenth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Covenant-breaking was the nineteenth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Without Natural affection was the twentieth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Implacability was the one and twentieth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Unmercifulness was the two and twentieth and this I take to be the last of his Inditement And this I have now read unto you howsoever some men account to be a three and twentyeth Inditement yet I take it to be an aggravation of and not an addition to the former Inditements and withal a preoccupation of all excuse For they might say That we have done as you have
moveretur ab avo tuo Maximiniano I was then a Confessor when your Grandfather Maximinian persecuted the Church and if you now raise a Persecution I am ready to endure any thing rather then to betray the Truth I know that whosoever with an envious eye maligneth your Imperial Majesty ctntemneth the Ordinance of God yet I may and do beseech you Take heed of the Arian Heresie No neither these nor any thing else if Justin Martyr Appol ad Anton. pag. 113. Tert. ad Scap. Cypr. contr Demetr Tertullian and Cyprian may have credit given them can justifie Rebellion For they all jumpt in this That the Majesty of Kings and Emperours is ordained of God and therefore their Government not to be reviled much less by force and violence may they be resisted deposed or murthered And now Beloved chuse you whom you will believe these Grandees and Fathers of the Church these Martyrs and Saints of God or those Punies the Jesuit of Rome with the Presbyterian and Independent of England Or if you will have the word of God carry it from all parties why then in a word take it thus 1. Saul was a Tyrant in Davids judgment if those two Psalms were penned in respect of Saul as most Commentators are of opinion In the one it is sayd Ps 54.3 Tyrants that have not God before heir eys seek after my Soul In the other Under the shadow of thy wings shall be my refuge Ps 57.1 until this Tyranny be overpast 2. Saul was an Usurper and that upon the Priests Office and in the highest part of his Office too in the judgment of Samuel 1 Sam. 13.19 For he offered burnt-offerings upon the Altar 3. Saul was a Persecutor and shedder of blood 1 Sam. 22.18 For he slew the High-Priest and 84 inferior Priests upon one day 4. Saul was a Demoniack 1 Sam. 28.8 and possessed with a Devil 5. Saul was a Necromancer and consulted with Witches and yet for all that says David to Abisai 1 Sam. 26.9 Nè perdas Destroy him not and to the Amalekite in my Text who thought he had done God some service and David a great curtesie in belying himselfe to be a Regicide and a spiller of Sauls blood Quommodo non timuisti How wast thou not afraid to put forth thy hand to destroy the Annointed of the Lord But this is Old Testament and not worthy credit with an Army of Saints Take it therefore from the New too from true Saints Nero was a Tyrant a Persecutor a Murtherer as bad as you can imagine him and yet for all that says St. Paul once Let Prayers be made for him and again Let every soul be subject to him 1 Tim. 2.1 Rom. 13.1 For he was the Power St. Paul then spake of Domitian was a Tyrant a persecutor a Murtherer a Blasphemer and almost as bad as Nero and yet says St. Peter Be ye subject unto him 1 Pet. 2.15 For he was the Supreme St. Peter there intended And if for a Nero St. Paul had his prayers and subjection If for a Domitian St. Peter had his Obedience If for a Saul David had his Nè perdas while he lived and his Quomodo non temuisti when he was dead O God! what would that Prophet and these Apostles and all the Primitive Fathers have said if they had lived now Now wherein a King and such a King as was Annointed and Annointed by God with Oyle with his Oyle with his holy Oyle as well in his Person as in his Function and â—â—at above his Fellows too for what Age can parrallel him for his Vertues for his Graces was first resisted then imprisoned then deposed then condemned then murthered And yet who knows for what For with what Vices hath the world branded his repute Did ever his high Diet his strength of Body his Sovereign power warpe him to any luxurious vanity Had he ever any Attorney to his Royal lust No he remains a President and so will till Domes-day of unblemisht chastity and therein out-vied those two great Favourites of God David and Solomon Had he ever any Cateror or Bottleman to pomper up his wanton Palate with choice Wine and curious Viands No he remains a Pattern and so will till Doomes-day of Temperance and sobriety and therein equalled Samuel Had he ever any Zany to magnifie his Mercy or to sell his Justice to reward a Service or to pardon an offence No he remains the example and so will till Doomes-day of Inexorable Justice and of Admirable Mercy and therein he exceeded Ely But something there was and for ought I can yet find This it was King Charles was like to Jesus Christ so like to him that I can find but this difference betwixt them Jesus was Christus Dominus the Lord Christ and Charles was Christus Domini the Lords Christ both in his Graces and in his Crosses 1. For his Graces look upon him in his Patience therein he exceed Job For he never cursed the day of his Birth or desired the day of his Death Notwithstanding the Winnow he under went by Sathan and his Instruments notwithstanding all the Indignities and Affronts were offered him by his vassalls In all which he comes only short of Christ and yet as Christ the King was led like a Lamb to the slaughter and opened not his mouth but only in the behalf of his Disciples saying If ye seek me let these go their way Joh. 18.8 so King Charles offended not in his Lipps by any impatient expression and when the Blood-thirsters urged him to deliver up his Friends into their hands No says he here am I pray let my friends live in peace and safety 2. Look upon him in his Content and therein he vies with St. Paul Philip. In omne conditione In every condition and only comes short of Christ Mat. 8.20 and yet as Christ said The Foxes have holes and the Birds of the Aire have nests but I have not where to lay mine head so said King Charles to his loyal followers Gentlemen go you and take your rest for you have houses and homes to go to and Beds of your own to lodge in but I am deprived of these comforts I must intend my present affairs and return this night from whence I came And this he said at Wrexam in Denbighshire when he had travelled thither from Shrewsbury And to assure you this was no complement look upon the Text as you have it in the 14. chapter of King St. Charles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 at the first verse O God make me content to be overcome when thou wilt have it so 3. Look upon his wisdom and therein he comes near Solomon yet as it is said of one greater then Solomon The Wisdom of God dwelt in him bodily so when the Treaters were last with King Charles it was confest by some Lords and many Divines That such illustrious wisdom as King Charles was
yet this is so far from being an Argument to justisie Rebellion or taking up Arms against the King as that it doth altogether condemn it For notwithstanding so great strength yet David never pursued Saul never sought after Saul never discharged one Canon one Murtherer one Gun against Saul but still fled from him and to put him out of all such Fears jealousies got himself and his Forces out of Sauls Kingdom and begged a place for his habitation of Achish the King of Gath. Let all Rebells follow David in the whole Example and we shall both allow this Quotation and also commend their Imitation yes and pray they may have so many Followers that there may be no Rebel left to lift up an hand against the Lords Annointed The second Objection I meet with of any colourable strength Object 2 For I shall passe all those frivilous ones 1. Of the Peoples rescuing Jonathan from Saul Their whole Act. being nothing but a mediation in the behalf of Jonathan and nothing lesse then a Rebellion against Saul as any man may evidently percieve if he reads the whole Story and so Junius Borrhaus Osiander and Willet himself say and determine of it and Peter Martyr adds That if the People did more then pray if they pressed violently upon Saul in making a mutiny they sinned Liberaverunt says St. Jerome Redimerunt says Tremelius In Reg. c. 14 and so says Gregory Magnus i. e. They delivered they redeemed they freed Jonathan that he dyed not And how did they this Certainly not Fustibus but precibus by Prayers not by Pole-axes For if the did more then pray says Peter Martyr they sinned I forbear likewise 2. The Example of Elisha's shutting the door 2 Reg. 6.32 and holding fast the Messenger that came from King Joram to take away his Head For Elisha had Revelation from God as well of Jorams repentance as of his former and furious Message And 3. Of Jehu who killed this King Joram For this was by special and particular command from God 2 Reg. 9.14.24 and not by any Law of God or Man and extraordinary Oracles may not be our Examples And 4. Of Ahikam For he defended not the Prophet from the Tyranny of King Jehojakim but from the fury of the people Jer. 26.4 Had he had any hand in that tumultuous insurrection with the People he had been a Rebel like the People but being he did what he did by that credit and authority which he had with and under the King he shewed himself both a faithful Magistrate and a Loyal Subject And 5. the withstanding of Uzziah the King by Azariah the Priest For this was by words 2 Chron. 26.17 not by Swords and besides God struck him with Leprosy and so by the Law he was to be removed from the concourse of the people for fear of of Infection And 6. That of Deposing Athelia For She was but an Usurper of the Crown The second Objection I say of any seeming validity is that of Jeroboam 1 Reg. 12. from whence it is argued thus Rehoboam the Son of Solomon refused to ease the People of their burthens and therefore they rebelled against him and set up Jeroboam to be a King over them and this was so far says the Objector from being a sin that the Text says It was from the Lord and Therefore Subjects may in some cases bear Arms lawfully against the King and without sin And this Objection I answer thus The Scripture here sets down Rei gestae veritatem Answ 2 non Facti aequitatem the Truth of a thing done not the Right of a Thing to be done Quia factum legimus non ideó faoi â—ndum credimus says St. Austin sectando enim exemplum violemus praeceptum If we follow the Example of men we may break the Commandement of God Nor can we any more be free from the breach of the 5. Commandement and Disobedience if we rebell against our King upon this Example then we can from the breach of the 8. Commandement Theft if we plunder and rob our Neighbours upon Example of the Israelites spoyling the Egyptians In a word God made Jeroboam King and in that Act punished Solomons Idolatry and Rehoboams folly but notwithstanding This Act of the People in revolting from Rehoboam was Rebellion and so called by God himself in two several places 1 Reg. 12.19 2 Chron. 10.19 And Israel rebelled against the House of David unto this day And Israel rebelled against the House of David unto this day And God punished this Rebellion of theirs so fearfully that he first gave them up to Idolatry and afterwards drave them out into Captivity And I do assure you That there are ten Examples for one to shew Rebels have been first Idolaters and so hated by God and afterwards Slaves and so hated by Man That we may never fall into the one or the other either Idolatry or Captivity Almighty God keep us from Rebellion And whatsoever some People say and make shew of I will make it good That there is not one more Example in Scripture of any colour or worth a straw to dispute much lesse to justifie the taking up of Arms against the King There is one Objection made from the example of our own Object 3 Progenitors Richard the Second was deposed and deposed by Parliament and therefore says the Objector A King of England may be resisted With shame and sorrow I canfess the Factum but without blushing and in truth Answer I deny the Iusâ—um The honest Bishop of Carlile opposed it and howsoever the Rebells of those daies ended that good mans daies in prison for his honesty yet by this very Act of deposing King Richard they brought such miseries and mischiefs such Battails Bloudsheds such Rapines aâ—d Murthers upon this Kingdom that until two Kings viz. One Prince ten Dukes two Marquesses one and twenty Earls seaven and twenty Lords two Viscounts one Lord Prior One Judge one hundred thirty and nine Knights four hundred one twenty Esquires Gentlemen of a vast number and Common Souldiers to the number of an hundred thousand were slain in Civil Wars England never saw happy daies And setting Kings and Princes aside I believe there hath been more lost in a latter Rebellion against King Charles I. That we may yet see and enjoy Peace and Happinesse in our daies God keep us all from bearing Arms against King Charles II. when he shall be enabled by Gods raysing him Friends abroad and converting or consternating the Hearts of His Enemies at home to require his own Amen For it is altogether unlawful as appears Secondly by Scripture 2. Scripture and the first Scripture I offer to your Consideration is that of Moses Exod. 22.28 Speak not evil of the Ruler of thy people And this very place touched St. Paul so far that it brought him to a Peccavi when he had suffered his Tongue to run a little over and be
is that Provokes him Part. 3. It is my third Consideration in revealing that Question wherewith or by what did they Provoke God to Anger Operibus suis so Calvine and Molleras by their works wicked works they were facti suis so Amesius by their Deeds Evil Deeds they were Adinventionibus suis so St. Hierome which our Translation followes by their own Inventions What those Inventions were the former verce tells you they joyn'd themselves to Baal Peer and ate the offerings of the Dead But in that verse verse 28. they are but succinctly set down you may read their Inventions more at large in the book of Numbers They committed VVhoredome verse 2.3 with the Daughters of Moab Cap. 25. They ate the Sacrafice of their Gods i. e. the Dead and they joyn'd themselves to Baal Peer of which I shall give a Compendious and short Paraphrase that you may understand what their sins were and would to God we had not found out worse Inventions our selves 1. Fornicatus est populus They committed VVhordome and an Invention this was and an Invention of their own too For it was against Gods Proscription He proscribed it in his 7th Commandement Non Maechaberis Thou shalt not violate that good order which should be between Person and Person by unruly Lusts by unclean Deeds The Consequences of this sin are commonly a Diseased Body an empty Purse a shamefull name and without Gods great mercy a Damned Soul For Harlots are the high way to the Devill when you look upon them with Delight you begin your Voyage when you chat with them you make haste when you lie with them you are at your journies end In this age it is called a trick of youth But I pray God have mercy upon us and forgive us the sins of our youth and encline our hearts to keep this Law Thou shalt not commit VVhordome least we Provoke God to more VVrath by our Invention 2. The second was Commederunt sacrificia they at the sacrifices of the Dead and they were called the Sacrifice of the dead either because the Gods of the Moabites were dead Gods to whom the Sacrifices were offered so Musculus or else because they were offered for dead men so St. Austen or else They were Oblations devoted to Gods service to God-self by men that were Dead whilst they lived And they ate them i. e. They devoured them by sacriledge and robbed God of them Either of these Expositions is an Agravation of their sin For whereas the Israelites were fed with those Sacrifices which were offered to the True God and thereby put in minde that the Covenant betwixt God and them was as firm and familier as betwixt Man and VVife who eat at the same Table They did hereby divorce themselves from the True God and marry themselves to a false and confirm it by eating the Sacrifices of the Dead A meer Invention This The third was Copulati sunt Baal Peer they joyned themselves to Baal Peer and what was Baal Peer Baal Peer was a false God an Idoll not such a God quem Deus fecit nor so good neither which God made of whom He saies himself Dixi Dij estis I have saied yea are God but a God Psal 82. quem fecit homo which man made of whom the man of God saies they are no Gods but the works of mans hands They call'd him Baal for his honour for Baal signifies a Lord Psal and Peer they call'd him for his Residence for his Abode was upon the Hill or Mountain Peer so Lyranus Others and amongst them Justinianus saies that Baal Peer is Idolum Ignominie by way of contempt the blind God he had eyes but he saw not he saw not his Preists launcing themselves he had ears but he heard not he heard not Elias mocking him nor his own false Prophets crying unto him Others says Baael Peer signifies Deum hortorum the Garden God Whatsoever it signifies sure I am it was a meer Invention this For Gods injunction was Thou shalt have no other Gods but me You see what their Inventions were I wish they were not a Map of ours yes I wish we did not outvy them in Inventions So many are our Inventions that I cannot give you the Tythe of them and in that word Tythe there lyes one of our Inventions 1. Come let us make the Lease of this House for 6. l. per annum Rent but let the Income by another Indenture be 16. l. per annum more A meer Invention this for saies God Bring ye all the Tythes into the Store-House Malac. 3.10 that is one Invention 2. Come and let us goe and play the Good Fellowes and drink an Health or two A meer Invention this for saies God VVoe be to him that is strong to power in strong drink and again in the New Testament Isa Be not overcome with VVine wherein is excess That 's a second Invention 3. Come let us goe and play a Trick of Youth and lie with yonder VVench Exod. 20. a meer Invention this For saies God Thou shalt not commit Fornication Mat. 5. 1 Cor. and again Thou shalt not look upon a VVoman to Lust after her and again Thou shalt not touch a Woman that 's a third Invention 4. Look yonder goes a Reprobate a meer Invention this for God made no man on purpose to Damne him because God selfe saies 1 Tim. 2. He hates nothing that he hath made and St. Paul from God saies God would have all men to be saved that is a fourth Invention 5. A Child of God cannot sin a meer invention this Jac. 1 Joh. 1. For saies St. James In many things we sin all For saies St. John If we say we have no sin we deceive our selves and the truth is not in us That is a fifth Invention 6. Come saies the Merchant let us ingross this Commodity and raise the Rate a meer Invention this For saies God The people shall curse him that with-holds the Corne that 's a sixth Invention 7. Sirrah saies the Shop-keeper to his Apprentice pare that Yard a meer Invention this For saies God Thou shalt not have a short measure Deut. that 's a seventh Invention 8. Christ did not descend into Hell a meer Invention this For saies David of Christ to God Thou shalt not leave my soul in Hell and saies Athanasius VVhosoever beleives not this Psal 16. that Christ went down into Hell without doubt he shall perish everlastingly that 's an eighth Invention 9. No Necessity of Baptizing Infants a Meer Invention this For saies Christ Suffer little Children to come to me Man 10. and saies St. Peter Be Baptised every one of you for the promise is made to you and to our Children Act. 2. and saies the Counsell of Milevitary Placuit ut quicunque parvulos recentes ab ut reteris matrum baptisandos negat Anathemasit whosoever denies Baptisme to Children let him
our Preserver from Sin and Danger from the Sin of Rebellion which was this Day acted to purpose and from the Danger of Rebels which for this Dayes Rebellion will ere long be executed on them to the purpose as our Judge according to the Clearness of our Hearts and Cleanness of our Hands we are then Blessed Spe in Regno Gratiae by Hope in the Kingdom of Grace because we have the Forgiveness of our sins and are thereby assured that therefore we shall be Blessed Re in Regno Gloriae by way of Possession in the Kingdom of Glory because then we hall have Everlasting Life And this is the upshot of all Blessedness And this Blessedness will not be had until we be Dead nor can it be had unless we Dye in the Lord. It is my next Consideration 2 a. 1 ae my Secunda Primae proposed thus Who are Blessed And disposed thus The Dead They are the Subject of this Object The Dead are Bessed and their Qualification is If they Dye in the Lord. By Dead here is not meant St. Pauls Dead which he speaks of to Timothy 1 Tim. 5.16 The wanton Widow who is Dead whiles she lives she is not Blessed because Dead but therefore Cursed because she is Dead whiles she lives For howsoever she drawes in the Life of Nature yet she never breaths out the Breath of Grace And this I prove by those three parts which are the best Indications of a Dead or Living Body The Pultse the Heart the Mouth If a mans Pultse beat If his Heart pants If his Mouth speaks or breaths we are sure he lives but if all these are silent and stir not we conclude He is Dead 1. Now for the Pultse of a wanton Widow the Pultse of her Soul her Conscience If it beat at all yet it beats unevenly and out of tune either too high by Desperation and Presumption or else too low by Security and Supiness And by this we know she is sick For the most part It beats not at all It gives no warning before It starts not at the temptation to sin It gives no Remembrance after It checks not at the Commission of sin and by this we conclude she is Dead And so her Heart too If that pants at all It is after sensual Pleasures and things forbidden like the Harlots in the Proverbs Come and let us take our fill of love Prov. Broken Cisterus that can hold no water It is not after the Fountain of living waters like Davids Come and let us go into the house of the Lord. Psal 3. And so her Mouth too That speaks not the Language of Canaan and such as becometh Saints but the Language of Ashdod and such as becometh Devils By which it appears she is Dead but not Blessed Nor by Dead here is meant those Dead which Christ speaks of Let the Dead bury the Dead i.e. The Deal in sin bury them that are Dead for sin As elsewhere He speaks to the Jews Yee shall dye in your sins And they that are so Dead Dead in their sins while they live or so Dye Dye in their sins when they leave this life They that give sin leave to reign in them while they are here and over them when they depart hence They that obey the commanding power of it now and sink under the Condemning Guilt of it then They are not Blessed though Dead but Cursed Cursed in their finishing of sin because that sin brings forth Death as St. James speaks i.e. Eternal Death Jam. 1. But by Dead here is meant not Universally All but Indefinitely Many Those that Dye in the Lord It is my next Consideration my Tertia Primae And here I shall shew you first What it is to dye in the Lord by way of Doctrine and Explication And secondly How we may dye in the Lord by way of Use and Application And first 3 a. 1 ae What it is to dye in the Lord Why To dye in the Lord or To dye in Christ or To dye in Faith for all these are Synonima is either To suffer Death for Christ like a Martyr or To end our life in firm Faith in Christ as a Confessor The Romanists contend earnestly for the Former and will have the Text to be understood of Martyrs onely and so they take In for Propter To dye In the Lord is To dye For the Lord. Now be it That the Martyrs are here Specially meant yet sure I am That they arc not here onely meant For I do not read Luk. 16. That Abraham was a Martyr yet I read That he was Blessed in Heaven with Glory nor do I read That the Thief upon the Cross died for Christ Luk. 23. yet I read That he was Blessed in Paradice with Christ He whosoever he be that doubts of the Martyrs Blessedness His that dyes for Christ is scarce worthy himself to have any part in Christ It is a thing so little doubted That Saint Augustine sayes Injuria est He does the Martyr wrong that prayes for him For by praying for him he doubts of his Salvation and Christ himself sayes He that looseth his life for my sake shall find it And certainly Mat. If he wrongs the Martyr that prayes for him then he that grieves for him wrongs him much more For he either doubts of his welfare or repines at his happiness To see Clouds in the Clergies face for the departing of our late most reverend Father in God William Laud Arch-bishop of Canterbury To see Furrowes in the faces of the remaining Greenvills Smiths or Boules To see water in the eyes of the surviving Cavendishes Lyndseies or Gardiners To hear Plaints from the Tongues of the being Bourcheris and Yeomans Tompkins and Challoners for the not being of their Fathers Sons Brothers Kindreds and Friends is equally to doubt of their being Martyrs and therefore Blessed as of our Enemies being Rebels and therefore Murtherers which for mine own part I no more doubt of either then of success in the End or mine own Salvation It hath been questioned I know by the Church-men of Rome Whether Souldiers may be Martyrs and their Reason is Quia bonum Reip. licet maximum inter bona humana non potest esse Causa Martyris sed solummodo Divinum Yet I know withal It is resolved by them again Quod bonum humanum officitur Divinum si referatur ad Deum est Causa Martyris Aq. 2.2 q. 124. Ar. 5. ad 3. a Subjects fighting and dying for their King or King fighting and dying for his Subjects did Fight and Dye for God they did it of late For of late Gods and the Churches and the Kings Cause consentred in one The King endeavoured to maintain that Religion and that publicly Service of God which Gods own right hand planted and his blessed Martyrs watered watered with their Blood and therefore blessed because they have so done Etiam dicit Spiritus so sayeth the Spirit blessed are
the Dead which dye in the Lord. Had it been onely to maintain the publick Service of God established by Law even that alone would have made them Martyrs For not a Tittle of it but it was by the Dictate of the Holy Ghost and I should think my self accursed if I were not able to maintain it and would now if it were not beside my Text and Purpose yet blame not my holy Zeal if I do vindicate that saving-Book against the Schismaticks greatest Exceptions And that is in the Office of Marriage That Office consists of Substance and Ceremony The Substance Prayer The Ceremony a Ring Look you upon both and first the first Prayer in that Office It beseeches Almighty God to bless the Couple to be married As Isaac aâ—d Rebecca whence I aâ—gue thus This Prayer was dictated by the Holy Ghost to the Composers of the Common Prayers or made by those Composers without the Dictate of the Holy Ghost But not by them without his Dictate Therefore by his Dictate to them If by them without him then they would have made it according to Humane Reason and so have said bless them O Lord as thou didst bless Abâ—aham and Sarah or as thou didst bless Jacob and Rachel and they had humane Reason for it for Abraham was Gods fiâ—st Friend Jacob was Gods great Favourite But sayes the Holy Ghost Not so nor so but let it be bless them as Isaac and Rebecca and there is no Humane Reason for this but a Divine Reason there is and that is this Abraham had his Hagar in Sarahs time and this Keturah afterwards Jacob had his Leah his Zilhah and his Bilhah but Isaac had none but his Rebecca and therefore sayes the Holy Ghost let it not be Bless them as Abraham and Sarah Bless them as Jacob and Rachel for then people may be apt to think they may have many Wifes at once if not some Concubines but let it be Bless them as thou didst bless Isaac and Rebecca let them know One man should have but one Wife especially at one time Then secondly look upon the Ring The Ring must be round without end and the Ring must be of Gold without mixture so must the Husbands love be to his Wife perpetual and to be terminated onely by Death and withal his Love must be pure and not given or imparted to any other but to his Wife onely Certainly therefore Blessed they which dye in maintaining that Service-book which can without contradiction father the very Ceremonies of it upon the Holy Ghost But add to this Obedience to the King Unity to the Church Liberty to the Subject and many more commanded by God and deny He that can or dare Blessed is William Laud Archbishop for dying for the Churches Unity Blessed are Cavendish Greenvile c. for dying for Obedience and to keep the Kings Crown upon his Head Blessed is King Charles the first for dying for both and to preserve the Subjects Liberties And if they are Blessed why then do any mourn as if they were lost But alas Nature will have her course and on Gods Name let it but let Nature give you bounds to Natures course stillate volo non currere let your Eyes drop Tears like pretious water out of a Still not run like common water out of a spout So said Seneca from Nature Yes Nature hath taught it not onely by Speech but also by Example what else meant that Heathen Priest who so soon as be heard of his Sons Death presently put off his Crown and vented his Sorrow by his Tears but hearing withal That his Son died Valiantly he assumed his Crown again and finished his Sacrifice So you B. hearing your Friends death lay aside your Crowns and melt your selves into Tears but knowing They died for God for the Church for the King for the Countrey for the glory of God for the Unity of the Church for the Honour of the King for the Lawes of the Countrey and that the King himself was Murthered and Martyred for all these Put on your Crowns again and finish your own Christian course with Joy Give not back though you are bur few Fall not back though Gods the Churches the Kings and your Enemies have got the Trophees you know not whether God hath chosen for his Gedeon a Reserve that his own Glory may be the greater and your own blessedness as sure by Dying In the Lord as your Friends that have dyed For the Lord. Their blessedness is not doubted They that dye For the Lord They that seal the Truth of Gods VVord and Religion with their blood Nor Catholique nor Papist call their blessedness into question They that were slain in the late quarrel And certainly their blessedness too your own needs as little doubt who are resolved to dye In the Lord you who lead a holy life and believe in the Lord Jesus and will continue therein to the end They are you are blessed For questionless St. John is blessed though he died in his bed and was but banished as you are as well as St. Peter though he died upon the Cross and was put to Torment as our glorious King and many of our Friends were And it is to you as well as to them to you that are but Confessors as well as to them that were Martyrs that Christ speaks Come ye blessed of my Father possess the Kingdom prepared for you from the beginning Mat. 25.34 But this for my part shall make no quarrel between Rome and England or Amsterdam If they will yield to us in some Substances we will easily yield to them in this Circumstance Let them decline to the killing of Kings and we will soon yield That Martyrs onely are blessed and so by consequence They onely dye in the Lord But with this Proviso That they take not nor understand this word Martyr in the common use of speech secundum vulgus For so it is one that seals his witness to the Gospel with his blood and suffers death for Christ but in the Grammar sence secundum Cleres For so it means but a Witness One that lives and dies in Faith as the Apostle speaks All these Abraham Isaac Jacob and many more died in the Faith i. e. They were all Martyrs Heb. 11.13 or they were all Witnesses to the truth of Christs Religion both in their Life and Death They died in the Lord. And thus you see what it is to dye in the Lord or who may be said to dye in the Lord Now for Application of this Point How may we dye in the Lord Appl. And that I shall tell you plainly and quickly If you would Dye in the Lord you must Live in the Lord Live in him you must by a Faith that purifies your hearts and then Dye in him you may by a Faith that justifies your Souls Live in him you must by the Faith of water to Sanctification Act. 15.9 and then Dye in him you may by