the 22th day of June in this present 9th yeer of his Reign over England upon the humble Sute of the said Thomas to give License Power and Authority to him the said Thomas Sutton to place found and erect an Hospital and Free-school in the House called the late dissolved Charter-House besides Smith field in the County of Middlesex And like License Power and Authority for him the said Thomas Sutton at any time during his life to ordain appoint and place a Master of the said Hospital And that the said Hospital should be called by the name of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esq And where furthermore by the said Letters Patents The Master of the said Hospital for the time being is ordained and appointed to be one of the 16. Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the said Hospital And that the same 16. Governours are by the said Letters Patents incorporate to purchase and take Lands to them and their Successors for ever for the maintainance of the said Hospital by the name of the Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and the onely costs and Charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire as by the said Letters Patents amongst other things more at large may appear By reason whereof there must be a Master made before such time as the said Thomas Sutton can convey the Lands intended by the said Thomas Sutton to be conveied for the maintaiance of the said Hospital unto the said Governours according to the said Letters Patents Now the said Thomas Sutton minding the performance of the said charitable Act hath according to the power given him by the said Letters Patents and by these presents doth place nominate constitute and appoint his Right trusty and Well-Beloved John Hutton Clerk the first and present Master of the said Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire To have and to hold the said Office Room and place of Master of the said Hospital to him the said John Hutton from henceforth during the good will and pleasure of the said Thomas Sutton In witnesse whereof the said Thomas Sutton hath put his Hand and Seal dated the 13th day of June in the yeer of the Reign of our said Sovereign Lord JAMES by the Grace of God King of England France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. And of Scotland the 45th And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Thomas Sutton of all and singular the premises aforesaid in form aforesaid being seized Afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the first day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is of England c. the 9th abovesaid made a certain Indenture between him the said Thomas Sutton of Balsham in the County of Cambridge Esquire of the one part And the Right Reverend Father in God George â—ord Arch Bishop of Canterbury Primate and Metropolitan of all England The Right Honourable Thomas Lord Ellesmere Lord Chancellor of England The Right Honourable Robert Earl of Salisbury Lord High Treasurer of England The Reverend Father in God John Lord Bishop of London The Reverend Father in God Launcelot Lord Bishop of â—lie Edward Coke Knight Lord Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas Thomas Foster Knight one of the Justices of the Common-Pleas Henry Hobert Knight and Baronet the Kings Attorny General that now is John Overal Dean of the Cathedral Church of St. Paul in London George Mountain Dean of the Collegiate Church of Westminster Henry Thursby Esquire one of the Masters of the Chancery Jeffery Nightingale Esquire Richard Sutton Esquire John Law Gentleman Thomas Brown Gentleman and John Hutton Clerk By the name of the Reverend Father in God George Arch Bishop of Canterbury Thomas Lord Ellesmere Lord Chancellor of England Robert Earl of Salisbury Lord High Treasurer of England The Reverend Father in God John Lord Bishop of London The Reverend Father in God Launcelot Lord Bishop of Elie Edward Coke Knight Lord Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas Thomas Foster Knight one of the Justices of the Court of Common-Pleas Henry Hobert Knight and Baronet Attorny General of the Lord the King John Overal Dean of the Cathedral Church of Saint Paul in London George Mountain Dean of the Collegiate Church of Westminster Henry Thursby Esquire one of the Masters of the Court of Chancery Jeffery Nightingale Esquire Richard Sutton Esquire John Law Gentleman Thomas Brown Gentleman and John Hutton Clerk Master of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and at the onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire the first and present Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire of the other part made and within 6. Moneths then next following that is to say the 4th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord JAMES now King of England the 9th abovesaid in the Court of Chancery of the Lord the King that now is at Westminster aforesaid then being in due manner of Record inrolled according to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided And whereof one part sealed with the Seal of the said Thomas Sutton to the Jurors aforesaid was shewed in Evidence bearing date the same day and yeer The Tenor of which Indenture followeth in these words This Indenture made the first day of November in the yeer of our Lord God 1611. and in the yeers of the Reign of our Sovereign Lord JAMES by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. that is to say of England France and Ireland the 9th and of Scotland the 45th Between Thomas Sutton of Balsham in the County of Cambridge Esquire of the one part And the most Reverend Father in God George now Arch Bishop of Canterbury Primate and Metropolitan of all England The Right Honourable Thomas Lord Ellesmere Lord Chancellor of England The Right Honourable Robert Earl of Salisbury Lord High Treasurer of England The Right Reverend Father in God John Lord Bishop of London The Right Reverend Father in God Launcelot Lord Bishop of Elie Sir Edward Coke Knight Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas Sir Thomas Foster Knight one of the Justices of the Court of Common-Pleas Sir Henry Hobart Knight and Baronet Attorny General of our Sovereign Lord the King John Overal Dean of the Cathedral Church of Saint Paul in London
day is given to the aforesaid Edward Coke Kt. the Attorny General of the said Lord the King that now is who c. then here c. At which 15. dayes of Easter before the the said Lord the King that now is in the said Court here that is to say at VVestminster aforesaid come as well the aforesaid Edward Coke Attorny General of the Lord the King that now is who c. in his proper person as the aforesaid Henry Lindley John Hele and VVarwick Hele by their Attorny aforesaid and upon this the aforesaid Henry John and VVarwick by their Attorney aforesaid further pray Leave thereof to Imparl before the said Lord the King that now is in the said Court here that is to say At West aforesaid until the Morrow of the Holy Trinity then next following wheresoever c. And then to Answer c. have it c. And the same day is given to the aforesaid Edward Coke Knight Attorny General of the Lord the King that now is who c. then here c. At which Morrow of Holy Trinity before the Lord the King that now is in the said Court c. that is to say at Westminster aforesaid come as well the aforesaid Edward Coke Knight Attorny General of the Lord the King that now is who c. in his proper person As the aforesaid Henry Lindley John Hele and Warwick Hele by their Attorny aforesaid And upon this The said Henry John and Warwick by their Attorny aforesaid pray further license thereof to imparl before the said Lord the King that now is in the said Court here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid until the Morrow of All Souls then next following wheresoever c. And then to Answer c. And have it c. And the same day is given to Edward Coke Knight Attorny General of the Lord the King that now is who c. then here c. At which Morrow of All Souls before the Lord the King that now is in the said Court here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid come as well Henry Hobert Knight then Attorny General of the said Lord the King who for the said Lord the King that now is prosecutes in his proper person as the aforesaid Henry Lindley John Hele and VVarwick Hele by their Attorny aforesaid Upon which the said Henry Lindley by his Attorny aforesaid prayeth the hearing of the said Writ of Scire Facias above mentioned and it is read unto him c. Which being read and heard The said Henry Lindley saith That neither the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid made ought to be revoked or annulled not the said Manors into the Hands of the said Lord the King ought to be seized Because he saith That there is not any such Record of any such Act of Parliament of the aforesaid King Ednard the 3d. made as in the aforesaid Writ of Scire Facias above thereof is rendred and specified Nor is there any such Record of the aforesaid Charter by the aforesaid late King Edward the 3d. by Authority of the Parliament aforesaid above recited and specified as in the said Writ of Scire Facias above is recited and specified And this the said Henry is ready to aver Wherefore he demands Judgement if the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the Manors aforesaid with their Appurtenances so as before is said made ought to be revoked or annulled or the said Manors with the Appurtenances to be seized into the Hands of the said Lord the King that now is c. And the aforesaid John Hele and VVarwick Hele by their Attorny aforesaid By Protestation That there is not any Record of any such Act of Parliament of the said 11th yeer of Edward late King of England the 3d. nor that there is any such Record of the aforesaid Charter by the foresaid late King Edwâ—rd the 3d. by Authority of Parliament aforesaid as in the said of Writ Scire Facias is mentioned For Plea they say That neither the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid Lady Elizabeth of the aforesaid Manors of VVest Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid made ought to be revoked or annulled or the Manors aforesaid with the Appurtenances be seized into the Hands of the Lord the King thâ—t now is or any of them ought to be seized c. Because they say That the aforesaid late Lady Queen Elizabeth before the making of the Letters Patents aforesaid to the aforesaid Gellio Merick and Henry Lâ—ndley was seized in her demesn as of Fee in the Right of her Crown of England of the aforesaid Manors of VVest Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances in the aforesaid Writ of Scire Facias mentioned and expressed and so thereof being seized The said late Queen Elizabeth by her Letters Patents under the great Seal of England sealed bearing date at Westminster in the yeer of her Reign the 37th and here in Court brought In consideration of the good true faithful and acceptable Service to the aforesaid Lady the Queen by her then well-beloved and faithful Cosen and Counsellor Robert late Earl of Essex of the most Noble Order of the Garter Knight and Master of her Horse before that many times done and performed as for other good causes and considerations the said late Lady the Queen then specially moving As also at the humble request of the said late Earl of Essex of her special grace certain knowledge and meer motion gave and granted the Manors aforesaid with their Appurtenances amongst other to the aforesaid Gellio Merick and Henry Lindley then Esquires and afterwards Knights To have and to hold the said Manors with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Gellio Merick and Henry Lindley their Heirs and Assigns forever And the aforesaid late Lady the Queen by the same her Letters Patents granted for her her Heirs and Successors That the aforesaid Gellio Merick and Henry Lindley their Heirs and Assigns should have and enjoy the aforesaid Manors with the Appurtenances according to the intent of the said late Queen in the said Letters Patents conteined And that the said Letters Patents should be firm valid good sufficient and effectual in Law against the said Lady the Queen her Heirs and Successors as well in all her Courts as elsewhere within the Kingdom of England without any manner of Confirmations Licenses or Tollerations of the said Lady the Queen her Heirs and Successors then forever by the aforesaid Gellio Merick and Henry Lindley or their Heirs or Assigns to be procured or obteined Notwithstanding the Statute in Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th in the 37th yeer of his Reign made Concerning the Dutchy or Cornwall Honour of Newelm otherwise Ewelm as in and by the said Letters Patents
said late Queen after the beginning of her Reign was or then after should be intituled by any Attainder Escheat Conveiance or Assurance whatsoever and in which Letters Patents Grants or Writings no Estate Tail then before made or supposed to be made was recited or from henceforth should be and the Reversion or Remainder thereof expectant in the said Letters Patents Grants or Writings granted or mentioned to be granted or any defect of certainty or ill computing mistaking rating or setting forth of the yeerly value or rate of the premises or yeerly Rents reserved of and for the premises or any parcel thereof mentioned or conteined in the same Letters Patents aforesaid or other Writings or for that that the premises then were or any part thereof valued at a greater or lesser value in the said Letters Patents or Writings than the said Manors Lands Tenements and other premises then were or were in yeerly value or any misnaming or not true naming of Town Hamblet Parish or County where the said Honors Manors Lands Tenements Rents Hereditaments and other the premises and every part thereof or any parcel thereof lay or were or any defect of true naming of the Lands Tenements or Hereditaments or any parcel thereof or of the Nature Kind Quality or Quantity of the aforesaid Possessions or Hereditaments or of any parcel thereof or any default of true naming of any Corporation or any default of Attornment Livery or Seisin or any ill naming of any the late Tenants of the aforesaid Honors Manors lands Tenements and Hereditaments or of any part thereof so sold granted or given or any ill naming of any person or persons Bodies Politick or Corporate who any time before the making of such Letters Patents were or then after should be proprietors of the premises or any any part thereof to the contrary notwithstanding as by the said Act amongst other things it more fully appearh And the said John Hele and Warwick further say That the said late Queen Elizabeth never had any Son And that the aforesaid Gellio Merick and Henry Liâ—dley were at and before the time of the making of the said Leters Patents so as before is said made Subjects of the said late Queen Elizabeth and born at Westminster aforesaid All and singular which The said John Hele and Warwick are ready to aver Whereupon they demand Judgement if the said Letters Patens of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the Manors aforesaid with the Appurtenances so as before is said made ought to be revoked and annulled or the Manors aforesaid with the Appurtenances or any of them ought to be seized into the Hands of the Lord the King that now is c. And the aforesaid Henry Hobert Knight Attorny General of the Lord the King that now is who c. present in Court in his proper person As to the aforesaid Plea of the said Henry Lindley above in form aforesaid pleaded for the said Lord the King saith That the said Henry Lindley ought not be admitted to plead That there is not any such Record of any such Act of Parliament of the aforesaid Lord King Edward the 3d. made Nor that there is any such Record of the aforesaid Charter of the said late King Edward the 3d. by Authority of Parliament made as in the aforesaid Writ of Scire Facias thereof is recited and specified Because he saith That the said Lord King JAMES now King of England saw the Inrollment of the aforesaid Act of Parliament of the said late King Edward the 3d. and of the aforesaid Charter of the said late King Edward the 3d. in the Rolls of the Chancery of the King that now is within his Tower of London in the yeer of the Reign of the aforesaid late King Edward the 3d. the 11th inrolled upon Record there remaining The Tenor of Inrollment of which Act of Parliament and Charter aforesaid the said JAMES now King of England by his Letters Patents under the Great Seal of England sealed here in Court by the aforesaid Attorny General of the Lord the King that now is for the said Lord the King that now is now brings in Court bearing date at Westminster aforesaid the 5th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is of England France and Ireland the 3d. and of Scotland the 39th Exemplified amongst other things Which Exemplification as to the Inrollment of the aforesaid Act of Parliament and Charter aforesaid followeth in these words JAMES by the Grace of God of England Scotland France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. To All to whom these present Letters shall come greeting We have seen the Inrollment of a certain Charter bearing date the 17th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord Edward late King of England the 11th To his well-Beloved and Faithful Edward Earl of Chester his Eldest Son granted in the Rolls of our Chancery within the Tower of London remaining of Record in these words Edward by the Grace of God King of England Lord of Ireland and Duke of Aquitain To the Arch-Bishops Bishops Abbots Priors Earls Barons Justices Sheriffs Provosts Ministers and all Bayliffs and his faithful People Greeting Amongst other the tokens of Honour of our Kingdom we esteemed it the chiefest that the Order of Dignities and Offices of our Kingdom be fortified with the best and strongest Counsels Therefore there being many degrees of Inheritance in our Kingdom where by descent the Inheritance according to the Law of this Kingdom to Co-heirs and Parciners and for want of such issue and such like events the same came to our Hands We therefore desiring to beautifie our Kingdom and in best manner to defend our Kingdom and the holy Church thereof and our Subjects and Kingdoms against the endeavors and Adversaries thereof and considering and looking that Peace between us and Subjects be maintained and to dignifie the Places of honour of our Kingdom And taking into our consideration the person of our well-Beloved and Faithful Edward Earl of Chester our Eldest Son and taken to Honour the same our Son the name and Honour of Duke of Cornwall with the common consent and counsel of the Prelates Earls Barons and others of our Counsel in this present Parliament at Westminster upon Monday next after the Feast of Saint Mathew the Apostle last past being assembled we have given and made him Duke of Cornwall and girt him with a Sword as behoveth And that there may be no doubt hereafter what or how much the same Duke or other Dukes of the same place who for the time shall be in the name of the said Dutchy ought to have Our Will is that all in specialty which to the said Dutchy doth beloug be inserted in this our Charter Therefore for us and our Heirs we have given and granted and by this our Charter confirmed to the same our Son under the name and Honour of Duke of the said Place The
things to the said Castles Burroughs Towns Manors Stannaries and Coinage Lands and Tenements whatsoever and wheresoever belonging or appertaining of us our Heirs forever together with said 24. pound Farm which the aforesaid John de Mere to us yeerly for his whole Life is bound to pay for the said Castle and Manor of Mere granted to him by us to hold for the term of his Life to be taken yeerly by the Hands of the said John de Mere all his Life And also with the aforesaid 1000. Annual Marks to the aforesaid Earl of Salisbury of the profits of the Coinage aforesaid by us so granted after obteined by him or the Heirs Males of his Body begotten seisin of the aforesaid Manor of Tonbridge and Manor of Aldebourn Ambresbury Winterbourn Caneford Hengstreg and Charlton after the decease of the said Earl of Surrey and Johan And the said 200. Marks of Land and Rent of the said Earl of Salisbury and the said Heirs Males of his Body so provided for the like proportion of the said Castles Manors Lands and Tenements with the whole and particulars to the Hands of the said Earl of Salibury or the Heirs Males of his Body lawfully begotten should come as aforesaid And that the aforesaid Castle and Manor of Knaresburgh with its Hamblets and Members and the Honour of Knaresburgh And the Manor of Istelworth with the Appurtenances after the death of our aforesaid Consort The Castle and Manor of Lydeford with the Appurtenances and with the said Chase of Dertmore with the Appurtenances and the Manor of Bradnests with the Appurtenances after the decease of the aforesaid Margaret And the Castle and Manor of Mere with their Appurtenances after the death of the aforesaid John de Mere remain to the said Duke To have and to hold to him and his Heirs Eldest Sons of the Kings of England and Dukes of the same place in the Kingdom by Inheritance to succeeed together with Knights Fees Advowsons of Churches Abbies Priories Hospitals Chapels and with Hundreds Wapentakes Fishings Forrests Chases Parks Woods Warrens Fairs Markets Liberties Free Customs Wards Reliefs Escheats and Services of Tenants as well Free as Villeins and all other things to the said Castles Manors Honours howsoever and wheresoever belonging or appertaining of us likewise and our Heirs for ever aâ— before is said All which Castles Burroughs Towns Manors Honours Stannaries Coinage Farms of Exeter and Wallingford Lands Tenements as above are specified together with Knights Fees Advowsons and all other things abovesaid to the said Dutchy by this our present Charter for us and our Heirs we do annex and unite to the same to remain forever So as from the said Dutchy at no time hereafter they be severed nor to any person or persons then the Dukes of the same place by us or our Heirs they be given or in any wayes granted So that to the aforesaid Duke or other Dukes of the same place they descend And Son or Sons to whom the said Dutchy by colour of the aforesaid our Grants it behoves to belong then not appearing The same Dutchy with the Castles Burroughs Towns and all other things aforesaid to us and our Heirs Kings of England shall revert in our Hands and in the Hands of our Heirs to be kept until such Son or Sons in the said Kingdom of England hereditable successively appear as is said to whom successively the said Dutchy with the Appurtenances for us and our Heirs we grant and will to be delivered to be holden as above is expressed And that the said Duke and his Heirs Eldest Sons Dukes of the said place for ever have Free Warren in all the Demesns of the Lands aforesaid whilest yet the same Lands are not within the Bounds of our Forrests So as none enter into those Lands to hunt in them or to take any thing which to Warren belongeth without the License and Will of the said Duke and the other Dukes of the said place upon payn of forfeiture 10. pound as before is said These being Witnesses The most Reverend Fathers John Archbishop of Canterbury Primate of all England our Chancellor Henry Bishop of Lincoln Richard Bishop of Durham John de Warren Earl of Surrey John de Betto Campo Earl of Warwick Thomas Wake of Lydel John de Mowbray John Darcy of Neuen Steward of our House and others Given by our Hand at Westminster the 17th day of March in the yeer of our Reign the 11th By the King himself and the whole Council in Parliament But we The Tenor of the Charter Record and Act of Parliament aforesaid at the Request of the well-Beloved and Faithful Thomas Stephens Esquire Attorny General of our well-Beloved and most dear Son our Eldest Son Henry Prince and Duke of Cornwall caused to be Exemplified by these presents In Witnesse whereof we made these our Letters Patents Witnesse my self at Westminster the 5th day of March in the yeer of our Reign of England France and Ireland the Third and of Scotland the 39th as by the said Letters Patents of Exemplification aforesaid here in Court brought more fully appeareth And the said Henry Hobert Attorny General of the said Lord the King that now is for the said Lord the King that now is saith and will aver That the aforesaid Act of Parliament aforesaid of the aforesaid late King Edward the 3d. made and the aforesaid Charter by the aforesaid late King Edward the 3d. by authority aforesaid of the Parliament of the same late K. Ed. the 3d. made And the aforesaid Charter by the aforesaid late K. Ed. the 3d. by Authority of Parliament aforesaid made whereof is the Inrolment aforesaid in the aforesaid Exemplification of the Inrollment aforesaid as before is said is made mention are one and the same and not other nor divers Whereupon the said Attorny General of the said Lord the King if that now is for the said Lord the King here demandeth Judgement If the aforesaid Henry Lindley to say that there is not any such Record of such Act of Parliament aforesaid of the aforesaid late King Edward the 3d. Nor that there is any such Record of the aforesaid Charter by the said late King Edward the 3d. by Authority of the Parliament aforesaid in the Writ aforesaid of Scire Facias specified against the said Letters Patents of Exemplification aforesaid here in Court by the said Attorny of the aforesaid Lord the King that now is for the said Lord the King now shewed forth ought to be admitted And further the said Henry Hobert the Attorny General of the said Lord the King that now is for the said Lord the King prayeth that the said Letters Patents of the aforesaid late Queen Eliz. as unto the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances be revoked and annulled and that the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances into the Hands of the said Lord the King that now is to
be taken and seized And the aforesaid Henry Hobert Attorny General of the said Lord the King that now is who c. As to the said Plea of the aforesaid John Hele and Warwick Helc by them above in form aforesaid pleaded for the said Lord the King saith That that Plea and the matter therein conteined is not sufficient in Law to maintain That the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph ought not to be revoked and annulled or that the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances into the hands of the said Lord the King that now is ought not to be seized To which Plea in manner and form aforesaid pleaded The said Attorny General for the said Lord the King needeth not nor by the Law of the Land is bound to Answer And this he is ready to aver Wherefore for want of a sufficient Plea of the said John Hele and Warwick Hele in this behalf The said Attorny General for the said Lord the King demandeth Judgement and that the said Letters Patents of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances made be revoked and annulled And the Manors aforesaid with the Appurtenances be taken and seized into the Hands of the Lord the King c. Upon which the aforesaid Henry Lindley saith That the Plea of the aforesaid Attorny General for the said Lord the King that now is to the Plea of the said Henry Lindley above by Replication pleaded and the matters therein conteined are not sufficient for him the said Henry Lindley to say That there is not any such Record of any such Act of parliament of the aforesaid late King Edward the 3d. made as in the aforesaid Writ of Scire Facias thereof is recited and specified Nor that there is any such Record of the aforesaid Charter by the said late King Edward the 3d. by Authority of the Parliament aforesaid made as in the aforesaid Writ of Scire Facias thereof above is recited and specified to Bar And that the said Henry Lindley to that Plea in manner aforesaid by Replication pleaded needeth not nor by the Law of the Land is bound to rejoyn And this he is ready to aver Wherefore for want of a sufficient Replication in his behalf the said Henry Lindley as at first demandeth Judgement If the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances made ought to be annulled or the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances or any of them ought to be taken seized into the hands of the Lord the King that now is And the aforesaid John Hele and Warwick Hele for themselves say that in as much as they sufficient matter in their plea aforesaid by them above pleaded have alleged that is to say the aforesaid seisin of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the aforesaid Manors of West Tauuton Treloâ—ia and Landalph with the Appurtenances in her demesn as of Fee in the right of her Crown of England and the grant aforesaid by the aforesaid Letters Patents of the said late Queen and the rest of the Matters by them above pleaded which the aforesaid John Hele and Warwick are ready to aveâ— which matter the aforesaid Attorny General of the Lord the King that now is doth not deny nor to the same any waies answereth but the same averment to admit altogether refuseth as at first demand Judgment if the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances made ought to be revoked and annulled or the said Manors with the Appurtenances or any of them in the hands of the said Lord the King that now is ought to be taken or seised And farther for the better information and to more fully inform the said Lord the King that now is and the Court here of the State of the said Lord the King that now is to the aforesaid Dutchy of Cornwall and to other Manors to the said late Dutchy any maner of way belonging or annexed or part or parcel thereof The said John and Warwick say that in the Statute in Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 7th held at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 7th day of November in the first yeer of his Reign made amongst other things ordayned It was enacted and established by authority of Parliament that the said Lord King Henry the 7th should have hold enjoy and possess to him and his Heirs for ever from the 21th day of August then last past the aforesaid Dutchy of Cornwal and all and singular Honors Castles Lordships Manors Lands Tenements Rents Reversions Services Poffessions Advowsons and other Hereditaments with all and singular their members and appurtenances to the aforesaid Dutchy belonging and appertaining or which were belonging annexed reputed or taken parcel of the same any time of the Reigns of Henry the 6th Edward the 4th late Kings of England in as ample and large manner with all liberties Franchises and other things to the same belonging in like manner form and condition as the aforesaid Kings or either of them had held occupied used or enjoyed or had held occupied was used and enjoyed in the same in any time during the said Kings Reigns as in the Statute aforesaid in the yeer of the Reign of the aforesaid late King Henry the 7th the first abovesaid amongst other things it is more fully contained and appeareth By which the said King James now King was and yet is seised of the rest of the Manors Lands and Tenements to the aforesaid Dutchy of Cornwall belonging by the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth not aliened in his demesn as of Fee in the Right of his Crown of England whereupon they pray that the Court here take knowledge and notice of the aforesaid Statute in the yeer of the Reign of the aforesaid late King Henry 7th the first abovesaid made and of the aforesaid Statu te of the said Lord the King that now is to the rest of the Manors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments to the aforesaid Dutchy of Cornwal belonging they would take and accept c. And the aforesaid Henry Hobert Attorny General of the aforesaid Lord the King that now is who c. as to that whereupon the aforesaid Henry Lindley above demurreth in Law in as much as he sufficient matter in Law for the said Lord the King to bar the aforesaid Henry Lindley from saying that there is not any such record of any such Act of Parliament of the aforesaid late King Edward the 3d. made nor any such Record of the aforesaid Charter by the said late King Edward the 3d. by authority of Parliament aforesaid made as in the aforesaid Writ of Scire Facias
thereof it is recited and specified above alleged which matter the aforesaid Henry Lindley doth not deny nor to the same any waies answereth but that averment to admit utterly refuseth the said Attorny General of the said Lord the King that now is for the said Lord the King that now is demandeth Judgment and that the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances made be revoked and annulled and that the said Manors with the Appurtenances into the hands of the Lord the King that now is be taken and seised c. And because the Court of the Lord the King that now is here will avise off and upon the premises before it proceedeth to Judgment thereof day is given as well to the aforesaid Henry Hobert Knight Attorny General of the said Lord the King that now is who c. as to the aforesaid Henry Lindley John Hele and Warwick Hele before the said Lord the King that now is in the said Court here untill in 8. days of St. Hilary next c. wheresoever c. to hear their Judgment thereof because the said Court hereof thereof not yet c. At which day of 8. days of Saint Hillary that is to say at Westminster aforesaid come as well the aforesaid Henry Hobart Knight Attorney General of the said Lord the King that now is who c. in his proper person as the aforesaid Henry Lindley John Hele and Warwick Hele by their Attorny aforesaid and upon this the Attorny General of the Lord the King that now is as at first demandeth Judgment and that the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the appurtenances in form aforesaid made be revoked and annulled and that the said Manors with the Appurtenances into the hands of the Lord the King that now is be taken and seised c. And because the said Court of the Lord the King that now is here will farther avise before that it proceed to Judgment thereof day farther is given as well to the aforesaid Henry Hobert Knight Attorny General of the said Lord the King that now is who c. as to the aforesaid Henry Lindley John Hele and Warwick Hele here untill in 15 days of Easter next c. wheresoever c. to hear their Judgment thereof because the said Court of the Lord the King that now is here thereof not yet c. SCIRE FACIAS Easter Term. 2i Eliz. Râ—t 1. The Record of the Case of Mark Steward vouched in Co. 9th part in Sr. Georege Reynels Case fol. 99. b. MEmorandum that Thomas Bromley Knight Chauncellor of the Queen Monday next after the Morrow of the Ascension of our Lord this Term before the Lady the Queen at Westminster by his own hand delivered here into the Court a certain Record before the Lady the Queen had in her Chancery in these words Pleas before the Lady the Queen at Westminster in the Term of Easter in the yeer of the Reign of Elizabeth by the grace of God Queen of England France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. the 21th Middlesex ss It is manifest that the Lord Philip and the Lady Mary late King and Queen of England Sister of the Lady the Queen that now is for them the Heirs and Successors of the said Lady Queen Mary by the Letters Patents of them the said late King and Queen Philip and Mary made under the great Seal of England bearing date at Westminster the 23th day of September in the 3. and 4th yeer of the said late King Philip and Mary gave and granted to one Mark Steward gen the Office of Sergeant at Arms of them the said late King and Queen Philip and Mary attendant upon her Chauncellor of England for the time being and made ordayned and appointed by the said Letters Patents him the said Mark their Sargeant at Arms to have and enjoy the said Office to the said Mark for the Term of his life and that the said King Philip and Queen Mary for them the Heirs and Successors of the said Queen Mary by the same Letters Patents gave and graunted to the said Mark for the exercising and occupying the said office aforesaid the wages and Fee of 12. pence by the day To have hold and receive yeerly the said wages and Fee of 12. pence to the said Mark for the Term of his life of the Issues and profits of the Hamper of the said late King Philip and Queen Mary by the hands of the Clerk or Keeper of the aforesaid Hamper for the time being yeerly to be paid as by the said Letters Patents amongst other it more fully appeareth By colour of which Letters Patents the said Mark was seised of the Office aforesaid as of Freehold for the term of his life And whereas also it is found by a certain Inquisition Indented taken at VVestminster in the County of Middlesex the 24th day of June in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 19th before Kalph Hurlestone Esquire John Muthal Esquire Francis Folyat Esquire and John Stratham Gent. By virtue of a Commission of the said Lady the Queen that now is to them and to one John Goodman directed by the Oaths of 12. men That the said Mark did not serve in the said Office of Sergeant at Arms according to the effect and Tenor of the aforesaid Letters Patents to him made from the 8th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is unto the first day of February then next past before the Inquisition aforesaid but for all that time absented himself from that Office as by the said Inquisition retorned in the Court of the Chancery of the said Lady the Queen as in the files of Record there remaining it appeareth And now at this day that is to say the 7th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now iâ— the 21th coâ—eth the aforesaid Mark Steward into the Chancery of the said Lady the Queen â—ow is at Westminster by Edward Cockel his Attorny and complaineth that â—y reâ—â—on and colour of the Inquisition aforesaid himself to be unjustly removed from the exercising and holding of his said Office aforesaid Because By Protestation that the said Inquisition is not sufficient in Law to â—â—â—â—ve him the said Mark from the exercising of his Office aforesaid â—o â—â—e shewing of his right in this behalf the said Mark saith that the 〈◊〉 Lady the Queen that now is long after the making of the said Letters Patents that is to say the last day of Nov. in the yeer of her Reign the 〈◊〉 at Westminster in the County oâ— Mâ—ll gave liâ—â—nsâ—â—oth â—said Mark 〈◊〉 hâ—â—self from the exercising his Office during the pleasure of him â—â—â— said Mark until he was commanded by her the said Lady
of his Serjant at Arms Attendant upon his Chancellor of England for the time being and had made Ordained and Constituted by his said Letters Patents him the said Richard his Serjeant at Arms for the term of his life And moreover by his said Letters Patents had given and granted to the aforesaid Richard Hatchman for the exercising and holding the Office aforesaid the Wages and Fee of 12. pence by the day To have hold and receive yeerly the said Wages and Fee of 12. pence by the day for the term of his life from the time of the death of his Serjâ—â—nt at Arms which should next dye of the issues and profits of the Hamper of the Chancery eâ—â—her by the Hands oâ— the Clerk or the Keeper of the said his Hamper for the time being at the Feasts of Saint Michael the Archangel and Easter by equal portions yeerly to be paid with all other Profits Commodities Emoluments Allowances and Advantages to the said Office any wayes anciently due and accustomed as by the said Letters Patents more fully appeareth And because the said Richard Hatchman is now willing to deliver up the aforesaid Letters Patents in our Chancery to be cancelled Which Letters Patents there now are cancelled as we have certain Knowledge to the intent that we would be gratiously pleased to grant to our well Beloved Mark Steward Gentleman other Letters Patents of the premises We therefore taking Consideration of the premises Of our special Grace certain Knowledge and meer Motion have given and granted and by these presents for us the Heirs and Successors of the said Lady the Queen do give and grant to the said Mark Steward the aforesaid Office of our Serjant at Arms Attendant upon our Chancellor of England for the time being And him the said Mark our Serjeant at Arms do make Ordain and Constitute by these presents To have and enjoy the said Office to the said Maâ—k Steward for the term of his life And moreover we have given and granted and by these presents for us the Heirs and Successors of the said Lady the Queen we do give and grant to the aforesaid Mark Steward for the exercising and holding the Office aforesaid the Wages and Fee of 12. pence by the day To have enjoy and perceive yeerly the said Wages and Fee of 12. pence by the day to the aforresaid Mark for the term of his life of the issues and profits of our Hamper of our Chancery by the Hands of the Clerk or Keeper of the said our Hamper and the Heirs of our said Lady the Queen for the time being At the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel and Easter by equal portions yeerly to be paid together with all other Profits Commodities Emoluments Allowances and Advantages to the said Office any wayes anciently due and accustomed c. Although the certain expresse mention of the premises or any of them or of other gifts or grants by us or by any of our Progenitors to the aforesaid Mark Steward before this time made in the premises there is not made or any Statute Act Ordinance Provision or any other thing cause or matter whatsoever in any thing notwithstanding In Witnesse whereof these our Letters we have caused to be made Patents Witnesse our selfs at Westminster the 23th day of September in the yeer of our Reigns the third and 4th By Colour of which Letters Patents the said Mark Steward well and truly to execute the said Office was sworn And further the said Jurors say That the last day of November in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 11th The said Lady the Queen at the humble Petition and request of the Right Honourable â—ord the Earl of Leicester and Robert Huyck Doctor of Physick granted that the said Mark Steward might absent himself from the exercising of his Office of Sergeant at Arms Attendant in his proper person upon her Chancellour of England for the time being during the good pleasure oâ— the said Mark until the said Lady the Queen should command him to serve in his Office aforesaid as by the deposition of the said Robert â—uyck and by a certain Letter under the proper hand writing of the said Earl of â—eicester which we found to be true in these English words following here unto the Court to the Jurors aforesaid in evidence given and shewed it more fully appeareth The Deposition of which Robert Huyck followeth in these words That is to say I was an humble Suter unto her gracious Majesty about ten years past that she would licence Mark Steward Serjeant at Arms Attendant upon the then Lord Keeper to give off his attendance in his own person to the end he might withdraw himself into the Country to play the good husband in his own house so long only as she should permit him and not recall him to his former attendance and the Office should be served otherwise to her Majesties contentation and the Lord Keepers well liking the which my Suâ—e she did very graciously grant me And after that upon the Lord Keepers praising Augustine Steward I commended him to the Queen as one very fit to discharge his brothers absence with his attendance I did sue to my Lord of Leicester and divers other of the Lords to speak in my behalf for the furtherance of the sute so in the end the Queen said I do like well and am right well content that Mark Steward do cease from his Waiting untill We shall Resolve otherwise And if his Brother be found sit he shall serve in his place during the time of his absence which Letter subscribed under the proper hand writing of the said Earl of Leicester followeth in these words To my very good Lords the Lord Chancellor and the Lord Chief Justice of England and to either of them ss After my most hearty commendations to your Lordships This Bearer Mark Steward hath earnestly besought me to advertise your Lordships of my knowledge touching her Majesties leave for the said Stewards not attendance to his Office of Sergeant-ship Wherein this is very true that about Michaelmass as I take it in the 10th year oâ— her Majesties Reign the Court being then at Windsor Mark Steward both himself and his friends for that he had a desire to remain in the County earnestly travelled with me to be his mean for the obtaining of her Majesties good leave and favour that without any prejudice for not attending he might at his pleasure so do and for the supplying of his place which he had to serve about the late Lord Keeper of the Great Seal as Serjeant at Arms he acquainted me with the good liking and contentation my said Lord Keeper had to have a Brother of his to attend in his place To which also I gave my best furtherance afterwards Whereby her Majesty pleased both to grant her favourable License to Mark Steward for his absence and to allow his brother to supply his place who was accordingly
the 18th day of June in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 33 th aforesaid at Buck. aforesaid if by the Law of England this they could do enâ—eoffed the aforesaid John Lambert of the aforesaid Messuage and 6. Acres of pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances To have and to hold unto the said John Lambert his Heirs and Assigns for ever By colour of which the said John Lambert after and before the aforesaid time in which c. that is to say the said 18 th day of June in the year 33 th aforesaid into the Messuage and 6. Acres of pasture aforesaid parcel c. with the appurtenances entred and was and yet is thereof seised in his demesn as of Fee if the Law thereof requireth And the Jurors aforesaid further say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Lady the Queen that now is as before is said seised in her demesn as of Fee in the right of her Crown of England of and in the aforesaid Messuage and 6. Acres of pasture parcel c. if the Law of England this requireth after and before the time in which c. that is to say the 27 th day of May in the year of her Reign the 34th The said Lady the Queen that now is By her Letters Patents under the Great Seal of England sealed to the Jurors aforesaid in Evidence shewed whose date is at Westminster the same day and year in Consideration of the good true faithful and acceptable Service to the said Lady the Queen that now is before that time by her wel-beloved Cosin Thomas Earl of Ormond and Osory done as for divers other causes and considerations the aforesaid Lady the Queen that now is then specially moving as also at the humble Petition c. of the said Earl of her special grace certain knowledge and meer motion Gave and granted for her her Heirs and Successors to her beloved Subjects Edmond Downing and Roger Rant Gent. the Messuage aforesaid and the aâ—oresaid 6. Acres of pasture with the appurtenances in which c. amongst other By the name of all that her late Chauntry called Bartons Chauntry situate and being in the Parish of St Peter in the Town of Buckingham and all Lands Tenements Rents and Hereditaments whatsoever with their appurtenances whatsoever situate lying and being in the said Town of Buck in the aforesaid County of Buck to the said late Chauntry called Bartons Chauntry belonging or apperteining or to the maintenance of a Chaplain or Priest and other uses superstitious in the Church of Saint Peter aforesaid according to the Ordination of John Barton the Elder before then given bequeathed lye limited or appointed To have hold and enjoy to the said Edmond Downing and Roger Raut their Heirs and Assigns to the only and proper behoof and use of the said Edmond and Roger their Heirs and Assigns for ever Yielding and paying to the said Lady the Queen that now is her Heirs and Successors yearly for ever 13. pound and 12. pence of lawful Money of England to the hands of the Receiver general of the County aforesaid for the time being or at the Receipt of the Exchequer of the said Lady the Queen her Heirs and Successors at the Feasts of Saint Michael the Archangel and the Annuntiation of the blessed Mary the Virgin by equal portions every year to be paid for all Rents exactions services demands whatsoever for the same to the said Lady the Queen and her Successors any wayes to be rendred payed or done And the said Lady the Queen that now is by her said Letters Patents for her her Heirs and Successors granted unto the said Edmond Downing and Roger Rant that the said her Letters Patents or the Enrolment of them should be of force form sufficient and effectuall in the Law against the said Lady the Queen that now is her Heirs and Successors as well in all Courts as elsewhere within her Realm of England without any confirmations licences or tollerations by the aforesaid Lady the Queen that now is her Heirs or Successors in after by the said Edmond and Roger their Heirs or Assigns or by any of them to be procured or obteined Notwithstanding the ill naming or ill reciting or non-reciting the aforesaid several Mannors Rectories Messuages Lands Tenements and other all and singular premises or any parcel thereof And no withstanding the not finding of Office and Inquisition of the premises or of any parcel thereof by which the title of the said Lady the Queen that now is ought to be found before the making of her Letters Patents aforesaid and notwithstanding the not reciting or ill reciting of any demise or grant of the premises or of any parcel thereof before then made being of Record or not of Record And notwithstanding any defects of the certain composition or Declaration of the yearly value of the premises or not Declaration of the yearly value of the premises or any part thereof in the said Letters Patents expressed and conteined and notwithstanding other defects in not naming or ill naming any Tenant Farmor or occupier of the Lands Tenements or Hereditaments aforesaid or any part thereof or not rightly naming any Town Hamlet Parish or County in which the premises or any parcel thereof be and also in not naming the premises or any parcel thereof in nature kinde or quality by colour of which said Letters Patents the aforesaid Edmond Downing and Roger Rant were of the aforesaid Messuages and 6 Acres of Land parcel c. with their appurtenances amongst other seised in their demesn as of Fee if the Law this requireth and so thereof being seised if the Law of England this requireth and the aforesaid John Lambert continuing his possessions thereof and as before is said being seised if the Law of England this requireth the said Edmond Downing and Roger Rant by their certain Indenture made the 28 day of July in the year of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 34 aforesaid Between the aforesaid Edmond Downing and Roger Rant of the one part and one Robert Snelling of East-Horsly in the County of Surrey Gentleman and Thomas butler of Grays Inn in the County of Middlesex Gentleman of the other part for a certain summ of good and lawfull mony of England to them before hand by the aforesaid Robert Snelling and Thomas Butler well and truely paid gave granted sold bargayned and confirmed to the aforesaid Robert Snelling and Thomas Butler their heirs and assigns for ever the Messuage aforesaid and the aforesaid 6. Acres of Pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances amongst other to have and to hold to the aforesaid Robert Snelling and Thomas Butler their heirs and assigns â—or ever as by the Indenture aforesaid inrolled in the close roll of the Chancery of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 10. day of December in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that
Lands whereof the aforesaid Christopher the father dyed seised in 3 parts to be divided that is to say of 416 Acres of Lands which to them for their purpart by the death of the aforesaid Christopher Digges their Father by the Custom aforesaid thereof to them due and belonging are and to them of right descended and ought to descend be amoved and that they to their said purparts of the premises together with the Issues and profits thereof and of every parcel thereof from the time of the taking of the Inquisition aforesaid and in the mean time received be restored c. And wheras we by our letters Patents under our Great Seal of England bearing date at Westminster the 7th day of September in the yeer of our Reign the 38th have committed to Margaret Digges the late Wife of the aforesaid Thomas Digges and now the Wife of Thomas Palmer Esquire the Wardshipp of the body and the Mariage of the said Thomas Posthumus Digges To have enjoy and possess the wardshipp and Mariage of the said Thomas Posthumus Digges to the said Margaret her Executors and assigns until the said Margaret her Executors and assigns the effect of the Mariage of the said Thomas Posthumus Digges receive or have or should receive or have By virtue of which the said Thomas Palmer and Margaret as in the right of the said Margaret are of the Wardship aforesaid possessed and because it seemeth expedient to us that the said Thomas Palmer and Margaret be warned before it be further proceeded in the said plea We command you by good and Lawfull men of your Bayliwick you warn the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret that they be here before us in our said Chancery in 16 dayes of Easter next following wheresoever it then shall be to Inform us and our Council wherefore our hands from the aforesaid two parts of the aforesaid Lands called Eastendown and so much of the Demesn Lands of the said Manor of Owtelmestone next adjoyning to the aforesaid Lands called Eastendown as should amount to the third part of the aforesaid Manors Lands and Tenements whereof the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father dyed seised in 4 parts to be divided that is to say of 416 Acres of Land which to the aforesaid Christopher and Edward for their purpart after the death of the Christopher their Father according to the Custom aforesaid thereof to the aforesaid Christopher and Edward are due and belonging and which to them of right descended and ought to descend be amoved and that the said Christopher and Edward to the said purparts of the said premises together with the Issues and profits thereof and each parcel thereof from the time of the taking of the Inquisition aforesaid in the mean time received ought not to be restored according to the said plea and petition of the said Christopher and Edward and farther to do and receive which our Court shall consider in this behalf Witness my self at Westminster the 23th day of January in the yeer of our Reign the 40th And have here the names of them by whom you gave warning and this writ And now at this day that is to say the aforesaid 15. dayes of Easter before the Lady the Queen in her Chancery here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid come the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges by John Rotherham their Attorny of themselves the 4th day against the said Thomas Palmer and Margaret of the Plea aforesaid and George More Knight Sherif of the said County of Sussex before the said Lady the Queen in her said Chancery here sent the said Writ executed and retorned that is to say that he by virtue of the said Writ to him directed the 12th day of April in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 40th abovesaid by John Byrstie Gent. and Thomas Wolfe Gent. good and lawful men of his Balywick gave warning to the said Thomas Palmer and Margaret to be here at this day to in form the said Lady the Queen and her Council as the Writ aforesaid in it importeth and requireth and as by the said Writ to him it was commanded At which day the said Thomas Palmer and Margaret before the aforesaid Lady the Queen in the said Court here at Westminster aforesaid according to the warning aforesaid to them as before is said given come likewise and pray licence with the Queens Council thereof to imparl before the said Lady the Queen in the said Court here until the Morrow of the Holy Trinity then next following c. Wheresoever c. And then to Answer c. And have it c. And the same day is given to the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges then and there c. At which Morrow of the Holy Trinity before the said Lady the Queen in the said Court here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid come aswel the aforesaid Christophâ—r Digges the Son and the said Edward Digges as the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret by their Attornies aforesaid And upon this the said Thomas Palmer and Margaret pray licence further with the Queens Council thereof to iâ—parl before the said Lady the Queen in the said Court here until 8. dayes of St. Michael then next coming c. wheresoever c. and then to Answer c. and have c. And the same day is given to the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges then and there c. At which 8. dayes of St. Michael before the aforesaid Lady the Queen in the said Court here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid came aswel the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges as the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret by their Attornies aforesaid and upon this the said Thomas and Margaret pray the hearing of the Writ aforesaid and it is read unto them c. Which being read and heard The said Thomas and Margaret say That the Hands of the said Lady the Queen from the said two parties of the aforesaid Lands called Eastendown and so much of the Demesn Lands of the aforesaid Manor of Outelmeston next adjoyning to the aforesaid Lands called Eastendown as amount to the third part of the aforesaid Manors Lands and Tenements in 4. parts to be divided nor from any part thereof ought to be amoved nor the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges to the aforesaid purparts of the premises above demanded together with the Issues and Profits of the purparts of the premises in the mean time aforesaid received ought not to be restored Because protesting that the aforesaid Manors and Tenements of which it is supposed the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father to have dyed seized or any part thereof are not of the nature of Gavelkind in the said County of Kent protesting also that the said Christopher Digges the Father by his last Will and Testament did not Will and Devise the Manors and
in which c. the said Walter and the aforesaid Robert who c. demand Judgement and their damages by the occasion of the taking and unjust deteining of the Cattel aforesaid to the said VValter to be adjudged And the aforesaid Nicholas as at first saith That the aforesaid John Bevill was seized of the aforesaid Services by the Hands of the aforesaid Robert Smith the Father as by the Hand of his very Tenant as he above alleged And of this puts himself upon the Country and the aforesaid Walter and the aforesaid Robert Smith the Son who c. likewise Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff that he cause to be here from the day Saint Martin 15. dayes 12. c. by whom c. and who neither c. to Recognize c. Because as well c. Processe against the Jurors to try the issue aforesaid is conteined until 15. of Easter in the 19th yeer of Queen Elizabeth unless the Justices to Assizes in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the Statute c. Upon Monday in the 5th Week of Lent the said 19th yeer first come At which Assizes the Verdict was given as followeth The Jurors say upon their Oath That the within named John Smith the Father held the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances called Newton of the within named John Bevill as of the within written Manor of Keligath by Knights Service within written And that the said John Bevill was seized of the Fealty and Sute of Court only parcel of the Services within written by the Hands of the aforesaid Robert Smith the Father as by the Hands of his very Tenant But whether the aforesaid seisin of Feâ—lty and Sute of Court aforesaid be a good and sufficient sâ—isin of the whole Services within written or not the Jurors are altogether ignorant And pray thereof the advice and diâ—cretion of the Justices aforesaid And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the same Justices That the aforesaid seisin of Fealty and Sute of Court be not a good and sufficient seisin of the whole Services aforesaid Then the Jurors say upon their Oath That the aforesaid John Bevill was not seized of the within written Services by the Hands of the aforesaid Robert Smith the Father as by the Hand of his very Tenant as the said Walter within alleged And then they assess the damages of him the said Walter by occasion of the taking and unjust detaining of the Cattel aforesaid besides his costs and charge by him about his Sute in this behalf expended to 12. pence and for his costs and charges to 40. shillings And if upon the whole matter aforesaid it shall seem to the Justices That the said seisin of Fealty and Sute of Court aforesaid be a good and sufficient seisin of the whole Services within written Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said John Bevill was seized oâ— the Services within written by the Hands of the aforesaid Robert Smith the Father as by the Hands of his very Tenant as the aforesaid Nicholas within alleged And then they assess the damages of the said Nicholas by occasion of the premises besides his costs and charges by him about his Sute in this behalf expended to 12. pence and for his costs and charges to 40. shillings And because the Justices here will avise themselves of upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the parties here until in the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the Justices here thereof not yet c. And so the Plea aforesaid was continued until the Morrow of the Holy Trinity in the 25th yeer of Queen Elizabeth which day Judgement was given as followeth At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Walter Parker by his Attorny aforesaid as the aforesaid Nicholas Francis by William Aylesbury his Attorny And upon this The premises being seen and by the Justices here fully understood It seemeth to the Justices here That the aforesaid seisin of Fealty and Sute of Court aforesaid is a good and sufficient seisin of the whole Services aforesaid Therefore it is granted That the aforesaid William Parker take nothing by his Writ aforesaid but be in mercy for his false clamour And the aforesaid Nicholas Francis thereof go without day and that he have Retorn of his Cattel aforesaid to be kept by him irreplegible for ever c. It is also granted That the aforesaid Nicholas Francis recover against the aforesaid Walter Parker his damages aforesaid to 41. shillings by the Jurors in form aforesaid assessed as also 13. pound to the said Nicholas at his request for his costs and charges aforesaid by the Court here of Encrease adjudged which damages in the whole do amount to 15. pound 1. shilling c. REPLEVIN Trinity Term Anno 7 mo JACOBI Rot. 3661. in Salop. the COMMON-PLEAS Co. 8. part John Talbotts Case IOhn Pendleton was attached by the Writ of the Lady the Queen of second deliverance to answer to John Chapman of a Plea wherefore he took the Cattel of him the said John Chapman and them unjustly deteined against Gages and Pledges c. And whereupon The said John Chapman by Thomas Salter his Attorney complaineth That the aforesaid John Pendleton the second day of September in the yeer of the Lord the King that now is of England c. the 6th at Albrighton in a certain place called Bromly took his Cattel that is to say two Bullocks of the said John Chapman and them unjustly deteined against Gages and Pledges untill c. whereupon he saith that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 20. pound and thereof he bringeth sute c. And the aforesaid Iohn Pendleton by Nicholas Gibbens his Attorny cometh and defendeth the force and injury when c. and as Bayliff of Jo. Talbot Esquire doth well avow the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. and justly c. Because he saith That the place in which it is supposed the taking aforesaid to be done doth contein and at the time of the taking thereof above supposed to be done did contein in it self 3. Acres of Pasture lying in the aforesaid field called Bromley in Albrighton aforesaid and that long before the taking of the Cattel aforesaid supposed to be done One John Chapman Father of the now Plaintiff was seised of the aforesaid 3. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in which c. in his demesn as of Fee and the said 3. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in which c. held of the aforesaid John as of his Manor of Albrighton in the County aforesaid by Fealty and the Service of doing sute at the Court of the said John Talbot of his Manor aforesaid from 3. weeks to 3. weeks at that Manor to be holden As also by the service of rendring after
the proper Hands of diverse of the Lords of his Privy Council sealed That none nor any person w 〈…〉 soever should kill or put to sale any Flesh for Victuals in the time of Lent then next following contrary to the Lawes and Statutes of this Realm And that all Mayors and other Head Officers in Burroughs and Towns Corporate within this Kingdom of England in the beginning of the time of Lent then next coming or before should cause all Victualers Inn Keepers Keepers of Ordinary Tables and Alehouse-keepers within the precinct of their Jurisdiction to be bounden to the Lord the King by Bond that they should not dâ—esse any Flesh for Vâ—ctuals all the said time of Lent then next following And whereas afterwards that is to say the 20th day of February in the 12th yeer aforesaid One John Clement then and yet Mayor of the Burrough of Plymouth aforesaid according to the duty of his Place and in Obedience of the said Ordinance and Command of the said Lord the King sent to all the Victualers Inn-Keepers Keepers of Ordinary Tables and Alehouse-keepers aforesaid within the precinct of the Burough aforesaid that they become bound by their Writing to the use of the said Lord the King according to the Tenor and Exigency of the aforesaid Ordinance and Command of the saâ—d Lord the King the due Execution of the Ordinance aforesaid in that behalf required and endeavored within the Burrough aforesaid The aforesaid James Bagg well knowing the premises and continuing his evil disposition and intent aforesaid At Plymouth aforesaid endeavoured and attempted to hinder and make void the due Execution of the aforesaid Ordinance and Command of the said Lord the King And to that purpose the same 20th day of February at Plymouth aforesaid to diverse Inhabitants of the Burrough aforesaid and other of the Kings leige People then being and having then and there speech with the aforesaid James Bagg of and upon the businesse aforesaid openly and publickly spake and uttered these words following that is to say Master Mayor meaning the said John Clement doth more herein than he need and more than he can well Answer Meaning that the said John Clement in requiring the aforesaid Victualers Inn-Keepers Keepers of Ordinary Tables and Alehouse-Keepers to become bounden to the use of the said Lord the King according to the aforesaid Ordinance and Command of the said Lord the King had done more than was needful and more than he could well Answer By reason of which speech diverse Victualers Inn Keepers Keepers of Ordinary Tables and Alehouse Keepers dwelling within the aforesaid Burrough utterly refused to be bounden to the said Lord the King according to the aforesaid Ordinance and Command of the said Lord the King and farther we certifie that the aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty of the Burrough of Plymouth and their predecessors time whereof the memory of men is not to the contrary had and used to have within the Burrough aforesaid a certain Custom of Wine called Wine-weight otherwise Wine Wite payable by every Taverner selling Wine within the Burrough afores of which Custom of Wine aforesaid the Mayor and Comminalty from the whole time aforesaid quietly and peaceably were possessed of until the aforesaid Ja. Bagg the 29th day of Nov. in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 4th at â—lym afores perfidiously maliciously practised with William Benâ—ly and Thomas Lyde being Taverners and Sellers of Wine within the Burrough aforesaid to them revealing divers secret counsels concerning the common profit of the Burrough aforesaid and them the said William and Thomas then and there perswaded that they no more should pay the aforesaid custom of wine called Wine-weight otherwise Wine-wite nor any summ of money for the same to the aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty which very day the 29th day of November in the 4th yeer aforesaid the aforesaid James Bagg being then one of the 12. Chief Burgesses of common Council of the Burrough aforesaid at Plymouth aforesaid perfidiously and maliciously spake to the said William Bently and Thomas Lyde these words that is to say you need not pay the Money meaning a certain Farm by them the said William and Thomas for the Custom aforesaid before then to â—he aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty payable for the Wine-weight any longer except you list for it is not due unto them By reason of which perfidious and malicious words the aforesaid William Bently and Thomas Lyde utterly refused to pay and yet do refuse and by reason thereof diverse Strifes and Controversies are risen and hereafter are like to arise betwixt the aforesaid William Bently and Thomas Lyde and the aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty for the Custome of Wine aforesaid and the Farm aforesaid to the great damage and prejudice of the aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty And further to the said Lord the King we Certifie that the aforesad James Bagg the first day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 12th and diverse other days and times then before at Plymouth aforesaid persidiously said to diverse Inhabitants of the Burrough aforesaid and to other the leige people of the said Lord the King upon Communication between them and the aforesaid James Bagg then before had of and concerning the liberties and Privileges of the Burrough aforesaid that he the said James Bagg would overthrow and make void the Charter of the Town aforesaid meaning the Charter aforesaid by the aforesaid Late Queen Elizabeth to the aforesaid Mayor and Comminalty as before is said granted And that he the said James the liberties privileges of the Burrough aforesaid would call in question and the same Privileges and Liberties overthrow And further to the Lord the King we Certifie that afterwards that is to say the 17th day of April now last past the aforesaid James Bagg in the said Writ named for the Causes aforesaid by the Mayor and Comminalty of the Burrough aforesaid from the Office of one of the Chief Burgesseâ— and Magistrates of the Burrough aforesaid was amoved c. John â—lement Mayor SCIRE FACIAS Pleas before the Lord the King that now is in his Chancery at Westminster in the County of Middlesex Hillary Term in the yeer of the Lord King JAMES by the Grace of God of England Scotland France and Ireland King the 3d. and of Scotland the 39th fol. 1. The PRINCES Case THE Lord the King that now is sent his Close Writ to the Sheriff of Cornwall directed in these words JAMES by the Grace of God of England Scotland France and Ireland King defender of the Faith c. To the Sheriff of Cornwall greeting Whereas in the Statute in the Parliament of the Lord Edward late King of England the 3d. in the yeer of his Reign the 11th at Westminster in the County of Middlesex holden made amongst other things it was Enacted by Authority of the said Parliament That the Eldest Son of the King
Jurors aforesaid in Evidence shewed bearing date the same day and year For and in consideration of 13000. pound of good and lawful Mony of England by the said Thomas Sutton to the aforesaid Thomas Earl of Suffolk in Hand payed Bargained and Sold All and singular the premises with the Appurtenances being called The late dissolved Charter-House besides Smithfield in the said County of Middlesex whereof c. to the said Thomas Sutton To have and to hold to him and his Heirs for ever to the only use and behoof of the said Thomas his Heirs and Assigns for ever The Tenor of which Indenture followeth in these words This Indenture made the 9th day of May in the 9th year of the Reign of our Soveraign Lord JAMES by the Grace of God King of England France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. and of Scotland the 44th Between the Right Honourable Thomas Earl of Suffolk Lord Chamberlain of the Kings Majesties most Honourable Houshold The Right Honourable Theophilus Lord Howard Son and Heir apparant of the said Earl of Suffolk The Right Honourable Thomas Earl of Arundel and Surrey and the Right Honourable William Lord Howard of Naward in the County of Cumberland of the one part and Thomas Sutton of Balsham in the County of Cambridge Esquire on the other part Witnesseth That the said Right Right Honourable Thomas Earl of Suffolk Theophilus Lord Howard Thomas Earl of Arundel and Surrey and William Lord Howard for and in consideration of the sum of 13000. p. of good and lawful Mony of England to the said Thomas Earl of Suffolk in Hand paid before the ensealing and delivery of these presents by the said Thomas Sutton well and truly satisfied contented and paid whereof and wherewith they and every of them acknowledge themselves fully satisfied contented and paid and thereof and every part and parcel thereof do clearly acquit exonerate and discharge the said Thomas Sutton his Heirs Executors and Administators and every of them by these presents Have granted Aliened Bargained Sold Conveied and Confirmed And by these presents do for them and their Heirs fully clearly and absolutely grant alien bargain fell convey and confirm unto the said Thomas Sutton his Heirs and Assigns for ever All that Capital Messuage or Mansion-house commonly called or known by the name of Howard House otherwise called The late dissolved Charter-Houso besides Smithfied situate and being within the County of Middles with all and singular the Rights Members and Appurtenances thereunto belonging and appertaining And all that Orchard and Garden with the Appurtenances thereunto likewise belonging and appertaining and all that parcel of Land and Ground with the Appurtenances commonly called Pardon Church yard And all those two Messuages or Tenement and two Closes of Land and Ground with the Appurtenances thereunto adjoyning commonly called Welbech situate lying and being in the said County of Middlesex And also all and singular Messuages Houses Edifices Buildings Barns Stables Dove-houses Courts Folds Curtilags Yards Orchards Gardens Shops Sellars Sollers Closes Inclosures Waste Grounds Tithes Oblations Obventions Fruits Profits Alterages Wayes Waters Rents Reversions Services Waises Strayes Goods of Felons Outlaws and Fugitives and all other Franchises Liberties Priviledges Jurisdictions Profits Emoluments Commodities Hereditaments and Appurtenances whatsoever by what name or names soever they be called or known to the said Capital Messuage or Mansion-house called Howard House or the late dissolved Charter-House besides Smith-field and other the before mentioned premises and in every or any of them lying belonging or in any wise appertaining or to or with the same every or any of them usually held occupied or enjoyed or accepted or reputed taken known demised used or letten as part parcel or Member of them or any of them and also the Reversion and Reversions Remainder and Remainders whatsoever of all and singular the premises with the Appurtenances And all Rents and yeerly Profits whatsoever reserved upon any Demise Lease Estate or Grant Demises Leases Estates or Grants heretofore made or granted of the before mentioned premises or any part or parcel thereof And also all the Estate Right Title Interest Use Possession Reversion Remainder Claim and Demand whatsoever of them the said Thomas Earl of Suffolk Theophilus Lord Howard Thomas earl of Arundel and Surrey and of William Lord Howard and of every of them of in or into the said Capital Messuage or Mansion-house called Howard House or the late dissolved Charter-House besides Smith-field and other the before mentioned premises or of in or to every or any part or parcel hereof And further the said Right Honourable Thomas Earl of Suffolk Theophilus Lord Howard Thomas Earl of Arundel and Surrey and VVilliam Lord Howard for the considerations aforesaid Have Granted Bargained Sold and by these presents do grant bargain and sell unto the said Thomas Sutton his Heirs and Assigns for ever All and every the Deeds Charters Evidences Writings Counterpains of Lease and Leases Indentures Exemplifications Letters Patents Transcrips of Fines and Recoveries Terrers Court Rolls Surveis Presentments Boundaries Escripts and Minuments whatsoever touching or in any wise only concerning the said Capital Messuage or Mansion-house called Howard H. or the late dissolved Charter-H besides Smith-f To have to hold the said Houses Buildings Orchards Gardens Closes Inclosures Tenements Hereditaments and all other the premises before or in or by these presents bargained and sold or mentioned intended or meant to be bargained and sold and every part and parcel thereof with their Appurtenances unto the said Thomas Sutton his Heirs and Assigns for ever to the sole only and proper use and behoof of him the said Thomas his Heirs and Assigns for ever more absolutely without any manner of Condition Redemption or Revovation in any wise And the said Thomas Earl of Suffolk his Heirs and the said Capital Messuage or Mansion-house called Howard House or the Charter-House and all and singular other the before mentioned premises with all their and every of their Appurtenances and every part and parcel thereof unto the said Thomas Sutton his Heirs and Assigns for ever in manner and form aforesaid against him the said Thomas Earl of Suffolk and his Heirs and all and every other person or persons claiming by from or under him shall and will warrant and for ever more defend by these presents And the said Theophilus Lord Howard his Heirs the said Capital Messuage or Mansion-house called Howard House or the Charter-House and all and singular other the before mentioned premises and every part thereof with the apputenances unto the said Thomas Sutton his Heirs and Assigns for ever in manner and form aforesaid against him the said Theophilus Lord Howard and his Heirs and all and every other person and persons lawfully claiming by from or under him shall and will warrant and for evermore defend by these presents And the said Thomas Earl of Arundel and Surrey and his Heirs the said Capital Messuage or Mansion-house called Howard House