necessary for him to believe it who hath such knowledge of it from the Word of God And because the holy Scriptures do promise everlasting life and salvation to all them which truely believe in Jesus Christ as he is revealed and manifested in them we thereby further argue and conclude thus That such doctrine of the Scripture is not onely necessary but also wholly sufficient unto salvation so that no other singular doctrine besides the holy Scripture is necessary unto salvation Which also the Primitive Church both in its doctrine and universal practice doth abundantly testifie that they held the sacred Scripture to be satisfactory unto salvation even for the most-able and best-learned men and the Five aforesaid Symbols or Fundamental Articles sufficient for all Unlearned Ignorant Christians as we could prove it by many evident testimonies of the Ancient Fathers which having heretofore already been done by many others we thought it superfluous to enlarge our selves therein at this present Whether and how far the Tradition and Doctrine of the Church is necessary Yet next and besides the Scripture we do not decline and reject the Word and Doctrine of the Church not as the principal Ground and rule of our Faith for that is meerly and solely grounded upon this Because the Lord said it but not upon this Because the Church or their teachers said it but as requisite means whereby the Word of God is preached and taught unto us and as a testimony of that what is declared therein Wherein notwithstanding we must exactly distinguish betwixt that what the whole Vniversal Christian Church hath with an unanimous Consent taught and believed out of the Word of God at all times especially in the Primitive times and that what perhaps but one or other Particular Church hath taught in the later times Whatsoever the whole Christian Church especially in the first hundred yeers immediately after the Apostles hath unanimously taught and believed out of the Word of God as necessary unto salvation that same is an Infallible mark and testimony that it is certainly and undoubtedly the true sense and meaning of the Word of God and consequently is necessary for all Christians to believe and receive it Because there is no doubt but the true Primitive Church beside the holy Scripture hath received also from Christ himself and his Apostles the true sense and meaning thereof at least in all necessary Fundamental Points of the Christian doctrine Contrariwise whatsoever the Primitive Church hath not taught that same is an evident signe and testimony that it is not so expresly set down in the holy Scripture that all Christians of necessitie should know and believe it unto salvation because many thousands of the Primitive and best Christians have been saved without such doctrine But this testimony of the Primitive Church of whatsoever it hath taught or not taught is of such a nature that it is not to be understood by all Christians but onely by those who are well versed and have read the Volumes of the Ancient Fathers which even very few of the Teachers and Ministers are able to do Wherefore the greater part of Christians especially when the doctrine and meaning of the Primitive Church is drawn into Controversie ought to fix themselves and adhere closely to the evident testimony of the holy Scripture without which they cannot have any certain ground of their faith and salvation For whatsoever not the Universal onely but one or some Particular Churches have believed and taught especially in the later times whether it were done in their Councils and Synods or else by their publike Confessions or other writings doctrines and witnesses that very same though it is a testimony of the belief and doctrine of the particular Churches yet it cannot oblige other Churches or generally all Christians nor be necessary for all unto salvation neither ground and confirm their faith any further then the certain and indubitable Word of God hath demonstrated unto them and they themselves have received it as consonant and agreeable to Scripture Since it is granted on all sides that the particular Churches may erre in their own particular opinions and that the Christian Faith must not be grounded upon the word of one particular Church but meerly and onely upon the Word of God Neverthelesse the Word and Authority of the particular Churches doth binde at least their fellow-members thus far that they ought not rashly to contradict their doctrine and declarations unlesse it be contradicted by a more evident testimony of Gods Word and by an Unanimous doctrine of the Primitive Church For otherwise this would prove a Presumptuous judging or at least an Unnecessary scandalous contradicting We hope now Why not a certain specifâ—â—â—tion may be made of all the Points of Doctrine that are necessary unto salvation by all these things that are said it doth plainly and manifestly appear What and how far it is necessary and not necessary unto salvation although we do not specifie all points of Doctrine nor precisely determinate what and how much might be necessary and sufficient to every one in particular which is almost impossible to do for these Reasons First because we cannot directly know how far the capacitie of every one or the most unlearned and ignorant Christians and how far Gods mercy may reach and extend above their understanding and therefore ought not rashly to condemn any man in his ignorance to whom peradventure God may shew mercy Secondly because none can obtain a true knowledge and faith in Christ but he must somewhat strive and labour for it that he may encrease and thrive therein Like as we cannot describe and set a certain measure to the height and bignesse of a young childe because yet it must needs daily grow if it be alive and in health till it hath attained his full and perfect age so may we neither circumscribe and limit any Christians knowledge within a certain measure because he ought to grow and augment still in the knowledge faith and doctrine of Christ if he be a true Christian till he is come to a perfect man of stature of the fulnesse of Christ Ephes 4.13 Thirdly because we cannot fail sooner in any thing then when we presume to regulate and measure all other mens capacities by the measure of our own understanding and do imagine that what peradventure we think to be clear and evident in the Word of God that very same must likewise be as clear to all others and therefore as certain and necessary for all which is also the chief and principal reason of all Unseasonable judging in matter of faith yea the source and fountain of all divisions and dissentions in the Church of God Wherefore it is sufficient for our purpose to know in general which no Christian can deny That all and onely that is necessary unto salvation what necessarily belongeth to the saving Faith in Christ which worketh by love and cannot subsist without true repentance
and conversion from sin and without new obedience to Christ Commandments Which all is so plainly and expresly taught in the undoubted Word of God especially in the Five aforementioned principal Points that every Christian may sufficiently understand them unto his salvation and hath been unanimously professed in the Primitive Apostolike Church But whatsoever is not so clearly and expresly taught in the Word of God as a necessary Article of Faith Love and Obedience towards Christ nor hath been understood and taught out of the same in the Primitive Church That very same though it dependeth from it by a necessary consequence and therefore may be true doctrine and agreeable to Scripture yet it cannot be necessary for them who do not understand it as yet and retain onely the Fundamental doctrine it self the saving faith and love towards Christ at least so long till God enlighteneth and bringeth their understanding to a fuller knowledge of the Truth which they in the fear of God ought daily to search into Whereby we do conclude further that We ought also not to judge one another according to the aforesaid rule of the Apostle in these doctrines Especially when the other may produce Motives and reasons to the contrary and such which are taken not from natural reason but from the Word of God and therefore bindeth not onely his understanding but also his conscience that he cannot receive such doctrines for fear of sinning against God and his Word but must at least doubt of them For in such a case we must say Whosoever doubteth if he eateth if he receiveth them is damned by his own conscience And rather according to the Apostle's exhortation in such controversies of doctrines We must receive him that is weak in faith but not to doubtful disputations Who art thou that judgest another mans servant To his own master he standeth or falleth Let us therefore not judge one another any more but judge this rather that no man put a stumbling-block or offence of conscience in his brothers way CHAP. IV. That the Romane Catholike Church hath no ground to Judge and condemn the Protestant Reformed Evangelical Churches as Heretical HAving laid this ground we may easily and as much as is necessary for every ones conscience unto salvation deliver our Judgement and Opinion concerning the Modern differences and dissentions in matters of Religion which among the Christians that make on all sides profession of the written Word of God contained in the Old and New Testament are fomented and aggravated meerly out of an Unseasonable and Uncharitable judging and condemning with such vehemency and bitternesse yea with such great effusion of blood and lamentable devastation of Countreys that never the like was heard of any other Religion in the world At this present I will make but a short Application to the Three principal divided and dissenting Churches Differences betwixt the Romane Catholikes Lutheran and Reformed Churches which are dispersed in the Occidental Christian World thorowout whole Provinces and Kingdoms As first the said Romane Catholikes or Papists so called who besides the holy Scriptures are grounded upon the traditions of the Church and especially upon the Councel of Trent and generally are altogether subjected and depend on the Pope of Rome as being their Supreme Head and Judge in matters of Religion and Conscience as the Churches in Italy Spain and the greater part in France Germany and Poland Then the Protestant Evangelical Lutherans as they themselves will be called who besides the holy Scripture professe Confessionem Agustanam Saxonicam formulam Concordiae as their Symbolical and Universal Books of doctrine not that they ground principally their Faith and Religion upon them but that they hold the doctrine and opinions of them conformable to Scripture and necessary unto Salvation as in Germany especially in high and lowe Saxony some Churches in Swaben Francony Westphaly Hessen c. and without Germany the Churches in Denmark Sweden and Prussia although there is some difference perceived betwixt them because some have not received hitherto as yet the said formulam Saxonicam and some of them have collected their own peculiar Corpora doctrinae Confessions and Books of Doctrine Thirdly those Evangelical Christian Protestants who because they will not be bound and tied to any man's whether it be Luther's Calvin's Zuinglius or any other's Doctrine or Books and therefore not be named by any man's name but have purged and reformed their Doctrine and Religion from the abuses of Popery onely according to the written Word of God are commonly called Reformed by some Papists they are called Biblists or Scripture-men of which name they need not to be ashamed because they are grounded on and refer themselves wholly to the holy Bible as the Churches in England Scotland Helvetia the United Provinces of the Low-Countreys all the reformed Churches in France with some particular Churches in Germany Poland Hungary c. Which though they have collected and framed also their peculiar Confessions yet not with the intent to binde other Christians consciences even to their word but onely to testifie their Unanimous consent and Uniformitie first and principally in the necessary fundamental Points of salvation out of the manifest Word of God then secondarily in the confutation and rejecting of the erroneous By-doctrines especially those of the Popish Churches which have no ground in the Word of God but are è diametro opposite to it by a necessary consequence And withal to decline and refute all sorts of calumnies and slanders of their Adversaries Wherefore also they by a special Confession of theirs do not reject the Confession of others especially that of Augspourg though there be some difference in words remaining much lesse do presume to condemn other Eastern and Western Churches because of some different opinions or Ceremonies if onely they do agree with them in the fundamental points of doctrine and for the rest withhold themselves from condemning others And even for these very same reasons have I hitherto addicted my self to the Confession of these Reformed Churches and am resolved with Gods assistance to persevere in it even unto death not onely because I acknowledge in the controverted Points the doctrine of these Churches I say Their own doctrine which they themselves Vnanimously professe to be consonant and agreeable to Scripture but especially because besides the Indubitable Universal Fundamental Doctrines and necessary Articles of faith which they with one consent receive they do not maintain or impose upon others any other doctrine as necessary unto salvation which in it self and by Gods command is not but impart and permit to every one the due libertie of Conscience and also do neither deny pervert or mutilate any part or articles of the true Gospel of Christ nor introduce any other By-Gospel or By-articles or judge or condemn others for it Whereas other Churches principally the Papists and partly the Lutherans if they do not quite deny any necessary point of true
Christianitie yet do very much transgresse the true limits and rules both of Gods truth and Christian Charitie seeing they Adde many of their Doctrines and impose them upon others as necessary unto salvation or judge and condemn them therein as Hereticks which neverthelesse in themselves and by Gods command are not necessary yea false and not agreeable to Scripture I do not deny but there be some such sort of people found in our Churches which are too too zealous and obstinate in their own opinions and undertake to judge others who will not altogether give their assent to them Which is not sutable to the unanimous Doctrine of our Churches and therefore may not be imputed to the whole Universal Church But that we may well know which of these three divided and dissenting Churches judgeth the other or is judged by them aright or wrong I will first declare but briefly and onely as much as may conduce to the information of the Unlearned Whether the other two the Romane Catholikes and the Lutherans have any sufficient and well-grounded reason to judge and condemn our Reformed Churches as Heretical Then shall I take an opportunitie to shew in the Second Part of this Apostolical Direction Whether and how far our Churches ought to judge and condemn the other Two the Papists and the Lutherans That the Romish Church hath no sufficient ground to judge and condemn our Reformed or Lutherane Churches as far as they agree with us to be heretical we make it good by reasoning thus Because they cannot accuse us or make us believe that our Churches either deny any Article of the Ancient Apostolike Catholike Faith or do introduce and condescend to any false heretical Point But they do condemn us meerly for this because we do not receive some articles of their Modern Doctrine and Religion which they cry up for Vniversal or Catholical and yet either are not necessary unto salvation as they must confesse themselves of the greater part of them or false erroneous and superstitious as we are convinced by the Word of God in our own Consciences For in the first place although they charge and accuse us of all sorts of new Calumnies and slanders of the Papists against the Evangelical Protestants Un-catholike false and partly heretical damnable blasphemous Doctrines As that we make God to be the Author of sin That we do deny all free-will of man even after his regeneration That according to our Doctrine it is impossible even to the believers to keep the commandments of our Saviour That by Faith onely we may be saved and justified though we live never so sinfully That all sins shall be forgiven us if we do but believe that they are forgiven though we do still continue in them That the Justification is wrought meerly by an external imputation without internal renovation and sanctification That Repentance and confession of sins and new obedience and good works are quite unnecessary That we reject all Fasting all Vows and Church-discipline Dignities Orders and Traditions of the Church yea obedience to Magistrates Annihilate the Sacraments or hold them to be but naked bare Signes Blaspheme and despise the Saints in heaven and such-like Points Against which our Churches have always solemnly protested both in their Confessions and Apologies that such was not their faith and opinion but that all these are but meer slanders detractions and mis-constructions Whereupon they have declared themselves with one accord that they would not acknowledge nor hearken to any new doctrine but onely adhere closely to the Ancient doctrine of the primitive Apostolike Church as it is principally grounded upon the sacred Scripture being the main rule of our Faith and as it hath been declared out of the Word of God against all Sects and Heresies with an Unanimous consent of the Primitive Church especially in the General Christian Synods of Nicene Ephesus Chalcedone and Constantinople whose Universal confession of Faith they unanimously maintain of which the Romish Church it self confesseth in the last Council of Trent Concil Trid. sess 3. to be the buckler and shield against all Heresies the Principle whereunto necessarily he must agree that will professe the Christian Faith yea the solid and sole foundation against which the gates of hell shall not prevail Wherefore our Churches cannot justly be charged with any new heretical doctrine because though one of our Divines should defend any new opinion or exposition of the Scripture yet they do not binde themselves to it much lesse enforce it upon others as necessary unto salvation but give way to be examined according to the rule and square of the Word of God When now for all this the Romane Catholikes persist to condemn our Churches as heretical because we will not receive besides such Ancient true Catholike Christian Faith all their modern new-fangled Doctrines and Traditions which they have since added and invented in their Council of Trent and other Popish Councils of late times or in the Decrees of the Popes It behoveth them first to prove and shew firm and certain grounds that those Doctrines of theirs are grounded upon the holy Scripture and the Primitive Church is necessary unto salvation Principal Controversies betwixt the Romane Catholikes and Evangelical Protestants For Example Will they condemn us in our exteriour Service or Worship and Ceremonies because we have no Images of the holy and blessed Trinitie of our Saviour of the Saints deceased nor do adore them That we do not pray and call on the holy Angels and the souls of the Saints in heaven especially the Virgin Mary yea that we do not digg and take their bones or other reliques out of their graves and worship them nor pay Vows or make Pilgrimages to them That we do not buy or purchase the Popes Indulgencies celebrate no Masses for the souls of the dead nor make any distinction of meats on certain days or a general weekly Fast neither admit of any Auricular confession to the Priest of every particular sin That we do not administer the holy Communion under one but both kindes or elements of Bread and Wine both to Lay and Clergie-men nor celebrate any Masses without Communicants neither make use of the rest of Ceremonies which they against the first Institution of Christ have forged for their Sacrifice of Masse especially the adoration of the consecrated hostia in the holy Sacrament That we do not observe their great Feast called Corpus Christi-day and the holy days of the Saints That we perform our whole Publike Service not in the Latine Tongue which is unknown to the Laicks but in the known Mother-tongue nor forbid to any Lay-man the reading of the holy Bible in his Mother-tongue but exhort rather every one in general unto it That we tell not our Prayers to God on Beads by fifties and hundreds use not the sprinkling of the holy water nor wear about us Agnus Dei or such like consecrated reliques That we allow not of the Orders
points of their doctrine and Ceremonies to be ereoneous and false and if not directly yet by a necessary consequence repugnant to the word of God and some Articles of faith Neverthelesse if but they who have not the knowledge yet of such consequence account their owne opinions agreeable to Scripture might not impose them or theirs as necessary Articles of faith but let us enjoy therein our liberty of Conscience If they also would leave to our freedome such Ceremonies of theirs as they themselves will have held as free indifferent things and consequently would tolerate and receive us and our teachers as true Christians or at least as weake brethren in faith though we cannot assent to their owne peculiar opinions as some peaceable Divines amongst them Paulus Eberus David Chytraeus Christopherus Donaver Nicolaus Hemmingius and principally Philippus Melanchton besides many others of his Followers yea whole Congregations and Churches especially in the Kingdom of Poland and great Dutchy of Lithuania a great while since have declared themselves Wee should then have no reason at all yea we were rather to be blamed and should be Schismaticks indeed if we of our owne accord should with-draw and separate our selves from them because of such different opinions and Ceremonies Of whom we yet acknowledge and confesse that for the rest if they doe not make their owne opinions to be necessary fundamentall points they retaine with us the true ground of Christs saving Doctrine and are exempted in their Religion from a publick and manifest Idolatrie And for these reasons have our Churches and Divines at all times most faithfully earnestly and zealously sought to procure and settle a Christian reconcilement and Unitie as formerly in Luthers time in the conference at Marpurg An. 1529 in the Concordia at Wittenberg Anno 1536. and in later years the Palatine and others in their Declarations for Ecclesiasticall peace which also were reassumed in the Conference at Leiprig Anno 1631. As likewise at those present times many eminent Divines beyond Sea in England France and Scotland whose opinions and assistance therein as that Reverend and worthy man Mr. Iohn Duray hath solicited with a singular industry and zeale to a peaceable Unitie and Reconcilement faithfully and sincerely wish advise in their publick Writings such an Unanimitie Uniformitie amongst the Churches in Germany Whence it sufficiently appeareth that we for our part are not inclined to judge and to condemne the Lutherans or to continue in the division and separation from them which hath lasted already above a hundred years Againe it is knowne and manifest on the other side that the Lutherans on their part will hearken and condescend not only to no absolute agreement and reconcilement but also to no Christian and brotherly toleration or moderation in this unhappy Ecclesiasticall difference Because the greater part of their Doctors and Divines upom whom also many Lay-men depend especially the vulgar sort though with indiscretion and defend their zeale maintain their different and controverted opinions not only as agreeable with Scripture but impose them also as necessary grounds and principall Articles of Christian faith without which men may not be counted true Christians nor be saved And so in some manner falsifie therwith the ground-work it self by their owne additionall opinions which they lay for a By-ground of salvation And will not let us effectually injoy our Liberty in such ceremonies which they themselves call adiaphora free indifferent things nor consequently receive us or our teachers as fellow-Christians unlesse wee acknowledge and professe with them the Omnipresence of Christs body the carnall eating thereof in the bread and other such like points of doctrine contained in their formula concordiae much lesse admit us to the Ministery but most vehemently condemne us as the worst Hereticks who doe ovorthrow the foundation and exclude us from the Communion of their Churches yea in many places exclude us from civill society from dignities and offices from Senates from priviledges of the Citie from marriages and from honourable burials Moreover they yet daily and most spightfully pervert calumniate and slander the Doctrine of our Church and continually and most unjustly without the least ground against our owne so often reiterated Declarations charge it with dreadfull and abominable Blasphemies which neither Luther himselfe nor other his Ancient followers ever did and for no other reason but that they might pretend so much more cause for to condemne and reject us What is most reprovable in Lutheran Divines And this is that we finde in the said Lutherans most reprovable and damnable not simply the erroneous Doctrine in it selfe but that they make it a necessary fundamentall Doctrine and of their owne particular Opinions make Articles of Faith and that they therefore so uncharitably and un-Christian like judge and condemne us Why the Reformed must separate themselves from the Lutherans Whereby also every one may evidently see that we therefore have not onely good reason but are of necessity constrained to separate our selves in our Religion from those who will by no means tolerate us nor receive us as Christians least we professe and addict our selves against conscience to such Doctrines and acknowledge them as necessary Articles of saving Faith whereof we have not onely no certaine warrant from the word of God but are convinced in our consciences of their repugnancy to it Wherewith we would give a dangerous scandall and offence first to our own Conscience by denying the knowne Truth of God and then to other fellow Christians as well to the true-Beleevers who with us have the knowledge of the Truth that they might by our example proceed against conscience as to the erring that they might be strengthened and confirmed by our example in their errours And here againe we are not those that separate themselves from them but they are those that Separate and reject us and yet not because of the manifest Word of God as they pretend but because of their owne Opinions Interpretations Inferences Formaâ—ls and Expressions Whereby they put a very dangerous stumbling block and occasion to fall both in our and their owne way yea in the way of the Universall Christian Church and though they proceed not against the ground of Faith yet they are against the ground of CHRISTIAN CHARITIE Especially whereas also the Christian Unitie or brotherly toleration which hath been of our side offered to them at severall times both by word of mouth and in writring not onely hitherto hath been utterly refused by them but also by many mis-interpreted to the worst reviled slandered so that the most pernicious Schism and breach of the Church is but grown thereby more dangerous lamentable Which al we ought to beare yet with a Christian Patience committing it to the Soveraigne and highest Judge and therefore not omit to seeke and maintaine the Unitie of spirit in Faith and love with them that are peaceably affected Some Lutheran Divines are
therefore tumultuously rise when they maintaine and use the like libertie for themselves and them that are of the same confession and Faith Being the Lutheran Divines and confessours have hitherto not as yet attributed to themselves the power and as I hope will never do it to absolve and discharge the Subjects from their Oath of Allegiance towards the Magistrats who have renounced the Obedience of the Popish See and Supremacy as is sufficiently evident by the examples in France and England Besides it would be thought in it selfe an unheard of injustice if Subjects should not suffer their Magistrats to have as much liberty of conscience and Religion as they themselves enjoy under their protection Neverthelesse if the Christian Magistrats might but so much obtaine of the Lutheran Divines and Congregations of their Jurisdiction that they might not calumniate or condemne the Doctrine of our Church but receive us also as fellow-brethren and Christians in our Faith and Confession unto the Ministery of the Word of God and use of the Holy Sacraments in their Assemblies I willingly then confesse that men should not rashly undertake such a particular Reformation in Ceremonies whereby a Division may be occasioned but rather tolerate such defects because of the Ignorant and weake in Faith who do little apprehend and discerne the Discrepancy of the Doctrine and at the alteration of Ceremonies presently imagine a quite new Religion whereas they should insist upon the found information of Doctrine till they at length without offence and division either might be corrected with an unanimous goodly consent or each one enjoy his owne libertie therein To which purpose it conduceth also what Augustine saith of such like alterations Ep. 118. Ipsa mutatio consuetudinis etiam quae adjuvat utilitate novitate perturbat That many times the alteration doth not profit and edifie as much as the Division doth hurt and destroy CHAP. XII Whether or how far we may judge or condemn the persons in matters of Religion BY all this what hitherto hath been declared of judging the matter it self in different and controverted Doctrine and Religion and of Separation and Reformation which ariseth from it We may easily now understand whether and how far we ought to judge the persons For as far as we must discern the matter what is sound and true or false and erroneous Doctrine or Worship So far we can and must also extend our judgement to the persons according to the Word of God which of them teacheth true or false Doctrine to the end that we may know whom and how far we ought to follow lest they become not to us or others a stumbling block or an occasion to fall seeing that that judging of the Doctrine cannot be performed without this judging of the persons who maintain the Doctrine yet so that we ought not instantly to condemn the erring persons because of their errour though it be damnable in it self but rather alwayes hope for their amendment as much as is possible As First Those that maintain ignorantly such an errour which by a necessary consequence is repugnant to the saving fundamental Doctrine and yet stand steadfastly to the fundamental Doctrine it self and build not their salvation even upon such an errour and therefore do not condemn us and our Churches which maintain the very same ground Those I say no doubt notwithstanding their errour they may be saved if they do but labour to testifie also their Faith in Christ by the works of Christian charity and godly conversation And that such an errour which would be damnable unto us that have the knowledge of it if we should receive it against conscience yet is not damnable to them by the grace of God who will judge them according to their Faith and works and not according to their ignorance Secondly Those also which condemn us yet if they do it not out of malice as those false Apostles Gal. 1. and 3. and 4. but out of humane weaknesse and meer ignorance either because they are not truely informed of our Doctrine and Faith or esteem it to be repugnant to the Word of God and the Doctrine of the Primitive Apostolical Church Those I say we ought not to condemn although they condemn us with indiscretion but rather pray for them and hope the best of their salvation as long as they hold fast the ground of Faith and the love of Christ which we presume not without reason the greatest part of them do Thirdly Those likewise who ground and build their salvation upon erroneous and false Doctrine and Religion which in some manner all those are enforced to do who account them for necessary fundamental Doctrine and indeed sufficiently testifie that they do not condemn us meerly out of infirmity but out of an uncharitablenesse and malice and also retain not the true ground of Faith nor the love of Christ Those we may judge by the Word of God as all other men who passe their life in notorious sins and vices without true repentance that they are in a damnable condition which is to say That God could condemn them of right in their blindnesse and malice and shall undoubtedly condemn them unlesse they repent Finally we may proceed also with them after the rule of Christ and the Apostles A man that is an Heretick reject let him be unto thee as an Heathen man and a Publicane Matth. 18. v. 17. after the first and second admonition knowing that he that is such is subverted and sinneth being condemned of himself Yet we ought not therefore utterly to condemn them but rather still pray for them hoping God may convert them yet before their last gasp For although the Apostle saith 1 John 5. vers 16. There is a sin unto death for which we shall not pray Yet he saith not that we shall not pray for the sinner much lesse condemn him unto death we being not able exactly to know nor ought to judge whether he hath committed the sin unto death viz. the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost or in other sins is given over to a hardned and an obdurate unbeleef and impenitency With one word We must absolutely resigne and commit the judgement of eternal damnation to God alone being the onely Law-giver who is able to save and to destroy Jam. 4. v. 12. Who art thou that judgest another mans servant to his own Master he standeth or falleth yea he shall be holden up for God is able to make him stand Rom. 14. v. 4. Which we now may easily apply to our often-mentioned twofold Adversaries God forbid that we should condemn all Roman-Catholicks much lesse all Lutherans in general or even one single and particular man For first concerning the Papists Whether and how far the Papists may be saved in their Religion like as a twofold Doctrine and Religion is maintained amongst them viz. partly the true Primitive Catholick Apostolick Doctrine wherein they with us and we with them do agree partly the new Popish
of Monks and Nunnes but in stead thereof we teach that the revenues of Monasteries ought rather to be converted to the use of miserable poor wretches that are not able to work or employed for the maintenance of Churches and Schools That we give liberty for Marriage both to Ecclesiasticks and Laicks nor use the Confirmation and Extreme unction or the holy Orders for making Ministers in such a manner as it usually is amongst them That we permit no Temporal Jurisdiction or Dominion to our Spiritual Pastors nor will have them submit to a Supreme and Universal Pope neither exempt them from the jurisdiction and judicature of civil Magistrates and such like observations and assertions of their exteriour Worship Will they therefore I say judge and condemn us as hereticks it is fit then to prove first by certain and undeniable Arguments and Warrants and such which we may understand and satisfie our consciences withal that the said Points are necessary to the saving Faith and Obedience of Christ Except they would yeeld and confesse that they do condemn us for unnecessary things But now the Papists themselves will hardly affirm the aforesaid Points the Images the Invocation of the Saints the Indulgences c. to be directly and in themselves necessary unto salvation They commend and extol onely their singular good use and benefit but do not enjoyn their necessity Or in case they would in one or other point as in the Auricular confession Adoration of the consecrated Hostia c. intrude a necessity yet they cannot make it appear so upon any pretence nor ground But we may have evident proofs from the Word of God to the contrary that they are not necessary because they were not used by the Apostles and Primitive Christians Likewise in Points of Controversies and articles of Faith and Doctrine That we have the affiance and assurance to be justified and saved before God not through our own merits and satisfaction but onely through meer mercy and grace by a true and lively faith in the onely perfect Sacrifice of propitiation and merits of our Lord Jesus Christ That also in the whole work of our conversion and salvation we ascribe nothing at all to our own natural strength of free-will but all to the meer grace and assistance of God without which we are able to do nothing that is good how can they then condemn us as hereticks for it whereas they must at length confesse themselves Bellarm. lib. 5. de Justificat cap. 7. Propos 2 3. this to be the safest and surest way not to confide and trust in our own strength works merits but onely in Gods meer grace and mercy and the precious merits of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ If this be the surest way we must certainly and necessarily conclude that our Doctrine in this point is not heretical nor damnable and their Doctrine of own merits and strength not necessary unto salvation but rather that our Doctrine is the surest and safest whereby all honour and praise is denied to man and attributed to God alone and their Doctrine dangerous and pernicious ascribing all honour to man and denying it to God Moreover that we cannot be induced to believe the transformation of the bread or Transubstantiation as they call it in the Supper of the Lord or a true Sacrifice though without blood of the transubstantiated Body and Blood of Christ both for the quick and the dead or the Purgatory They cannot condemn us for unlesse they do convince us first that such Doctrines are necessary unto salvation so that Christs Sacrifice upon the Crosse and the Spiritual eating thereof profiteth us nothing and the Blood of Christ cannot cleanse us from sins except we believe also the Sacrifice of Masse and the Purgatory which neverthelesse I hope they will not assert or never be able to prove since they partly confesse themselves that they could not have been assured in those and such like points onely by the words of our Lord Jesus unlesse the declaration and determination of the Church had given to them satisfaction therein And this is their main Objection Whether such Points of Doctrine though not necessary in themselves are yet necessary for all Christians by reason of the determination of the Church That the afore-mentioned and such like Controversies of their Doctrine and Religion though they be not directly and in themselves necessary unto salvation yet are necessary even for this reason Because they have been thus taught and ordained by the Catholike Church which ought to be believed and obeyed in all things But here we ask first the question What they mean by the Catholike Church If they understand the Universal Christian Church which since the Apostles hath been at all times and in all places dispersed as the word Catholike doth imply it then we confesse as we have already declared it heretofore that whatsoever it teacheth with one accord as necessary unto salvation to be undoubtedly necessary But they themselves will not assert this of most of the aforesaid Points and though they should assert it of some yet can they not prove it neither from the Word of God nor by the true and undoubted Writings of the Ancient Fathers Whereas by this very same ground we can rather make appear the contrary that the most and principal points thereof must be either false and erroneous or at least unnecessary because they have not been taught thus in the Primitive Church Neither hath the Primitive Church ever presumed and taken upon it self such a power as if it might or should teach or ordain some new Doctrine unto salvation and so impose on the Christians a heavier yoke and prescribe them a narrower way to salvation then it hath received from Christ and the Apostles Whereby also consequently is made void whatsoever they object concerning the Vnwritten Word of God being not able to produce any certain ground or warrant that it was received by the Primitive Church Although otherwise we do not absolutely reject the Traditions of the Church which either are grounded upon the Scripture or are counted onely as Useful Ordinances of the Church and not as necessary unto salvation Constat omnem doctrinam quae cum illis Ecclesiis Apostolicis matricibus originalibus fidei conspiret veritati deputandam id sine dubio tenentem quod Ecclesia ab Apostolis Apostoli à Christo Christus à Deo suscepit reliquam verò omnem doctrinam de mendacio praejudicandam Tertull. de Praescr c. 21. Ex ipso ordine manifestatur id esse Dominicum verum quod sit prius traditum id autem extraneum falsum quod posterius immissum Id. 32. Viderint qui Stoicum Platonicum Dialecticum Christianismum protulerunt nobis curiositate non est opus post Jesum Christum nec inquisitione post Evangelium Cùm credimus nihil desideramus ultra credere Hoc enim prius credimus non esse quod ultra
we could punctually explain it and many of our Divines have already abundantly and often spent their studie and labour in it Wherefore we refer to the serious consideration of all Christian and pious hearts Whether men have cause and ground to judge and condemn us as Hereticks We for our part are assured that what hath not been for the first Christians necessary unto salvation in so many hundred yeers without which so many thousand Martyrs and so many millions of Christians are piously departed out of this life that cannot be also necessary for us in these last times and we may live and die as religious Christians without it For we need not any other Faith or Religion besides that wherein the Apostles and the Primitive Christians lived and died We have with them obtained like precious faith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Pet. 1.1 The old Commandment which they had from the beginning 1 Joh. 2.7 The great Salvation which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him Heb. 2.3 The Faith which was once delivered unto tae saints Jude vers 3. And this is the true Catholike What is to be true Catholike or the Universal Christian Faith which hath been at all times especially in the Primitive times and as long as we stand fast to it we are indeed the true Catholike Christians Whereas those that adde thereunto any new Doctrine of Faith and Life as necessary which in the Primitive Church was not in use though they bear and boast of the Catholike name yet they are not true Ancient Catholike Christians but New-Catholikes which are equivalent with Vn-Catholikes And that Church which by its own Command imposeth such Doctrines and Traditions as necessary unto salvation though Christ had not commanded but rather forbidden them by his Apostles and yet will condemn and persecute other Churches doth thereby discover it self not to be a true Christian but rather Anti-Christian Tyrannical Church Which also hath need to stand in fear of the Apostolical curse If any man preach any other Gospel unto you though an Angel from heaven then that the Apostles have preached unto you let him be accursed Gal. 1.8 9 And if any man shall adde unto the Word of God God shall adde unto him the plagues that are written in it and if any man shall take away from the Word of this book God shall take away his part out of the book of Life Rev. 22.18 19. But we hope that all understanding and conscientious men and such as love Truth and Peace amongst the Romane Catholikes will beware of this malediction and taking seriously to heart this Declaration of ours abstain hereafter from presumptuous judging and condemning us as Hereticks much lesse persecute us with Fire and Sword and Losses of our Goods and Honours as hitherto they have done which certainly doth not proceed from the Spirit of Christ but undoubtedly from the Devil who is that Arch-lyer and Murderer Of which the Apostle also doth faithfully warn us and especially the Romane Church lest it might imagine some special priviledges before others Those that are weak in faith receive you but not to doubtful disputations judge not their thoughts Who art thou that judgest another mans servant To his own master he standeth or falleth But if this warning will do no good to them certainly the other shall at length be fulfilled in them Be not high minded but fear For if God spared not the natural branches the City and Church of Jerusalem take heed lest he also spare not thee Behold therefore the goodnesse and severity of God On them which fell severity but towards thee goodnesse if thou continuest in his goodnesse otherwise thou also shalt be cut off Rom. 11.21 22. CHAP. V. That the Lutheranes have no ground to judge the Reformed Churches to be Heretical WHat we have spoken now of the Romish Church concerning its judging and condemning us the same we may partly well say of the Lutherans which indeed together with us have protested against this judging and condemning of Papists in the forenamed points of controversie and yet no lesse although in fewer points from whence also the Evangelical Churches and estates generally all are called Protestants do judge and condemn our Churches or Teachers as hereticks under the most-odious mens names who neverthelesse rely not upon any man but upon the Nature Word and Doctrine of Christ To whom according to the aforesaid Apostolical Rule we may make appear yet more plainly then to the Papists that they have no ground thus to judge and condemn us and the doctrine of our Church and Worship The principal points of Controversies betwixt Lutheranes and Reformed Protestants 1. In Ceremonies For in the first place what concerneth some controversies about Ceremonies both of their and our worshipping of God as that we use not in the holy Baptism the exorcism or conjuring of the devil to come forth out of the infants or young children because we do not hold them either spiritually or corporally possessed by the devil although they naturally are born in Original sin and we have no warrant to cast the devil out of them by such conjuring and therefore do justly abhor from taking therein Gods holy Name in vain That we have no such Images in our Churches which by their own confession are abused in Popery unto Idolatry but rather approve and justifie the taking away of them if it be done by Christian Magistrates in an orderly way after the example of the Kings Hezekiah and Josiah That also in the holy Communion we use not the Hosties or Wafers but ordinary nourishing bread and observe the breaking of it how can they judge us therefore whereas they themselves hold their Exorcism Images Hosties not even absolutely necessary nor the breaking of the bread in it self erroneous but onely to be adïaphora indifferent things Although we for our part do not account them absolutely indifferent matters but in some regard necessary partly because of Gods command partly because of the example of Christ the Apostles and the Primitive Apostolical Church At least for our selves who should sin if we should against our consciences use the Exorcism or the Images or without any urgent cause omit the breaking of the bread Yet since we judge not nor condemn according to the above-mentioned Apostolical Rule those that do not judge the breaking of the bread necessary but give way to their pretended liberty It were fit they also should not condemn us therein but to impart to us so much freedom that we may herein follow the example of Christ which we may do more safely and without any sin as we likewise permit them to omit it and in stead thereof to follow the example of the Papists In like manner that we in our Catechism punctually retain all the Commandments as they are set down Exod. 20. Deut. 5 and do not omit 2. In the Doctrine
principally guilty of the pernicious Schisme and Division betwixt Evangelicall Churches By which also without any further inlargement sufficiently appeareth that the native and genuine cause and fault of the long continued Schism and Division of all the Protestant Evangelicall Churches and consequently of all the miseries and calamities from thence arising principally refideth not in the Reformed but in the Lutherans and especially in their Divines yet not generally in all but onely in those who condemne us as Hereticks and therefore hitherto have refused and stopped without any reasonable ground the reconciliation we sought and offered to them For although they use to pretend for their excuse many damnable doctrines yea many terrible Blasphemies of the reformed Chap. 2. yet partly and most of them consist in such slanders and aspersions which the reformed Churches never professed but rather many times have expresly and unanimously rejected So that those doe but aggravate their fault before God and man who restrain and hinder the Ecclesiasticall peace by false testimonies or by their own Vnreasonable mis-construction of strange words and doctrine from which yet they might be easily diverted if they would but give way to a peaceable Conference Partly they consist of such controverted points of doctrine as have been demonstrated in the fifth Chapter before which cannot afford any sufficient cause for the condemning and excommunicating of the reformed neither for division and separation from them And suppose wee did erre in such points of doctrine yet this would only exempt us from all hereticall damnable errours that wee besides the universall undoubted fundamentall doctrine doe not make any wayes our owne particular opinions to be a by-By-ground as the Lutherans nor impose them on any man as necessary unto salvation except so farre as hee acknowledgeth them himselfe to be agreeable to the word of God and the saving doctrine and that hee is obliged thereunto not by our word but by the word of God Wherefore also Whether the Lutherans may not with a safe conscience have communion fellowship with the religion of the reformed Congregations although we for our part are of necessitie compelled to separate our selves from the Lutherans as long as they condemne and reject us because of their different and controverted opinions yet they cannot pretend any reasonable cause why they must be separated from our Church and Religion and should have no communion with us in it In regard no man on our side is constrained to beleeve or to doe somewhat against his conscience if hee but standeth firme to the Vniversall fundamentall doctrine and doth not disturbe the Church with his owne opinion but laboureth according to the Apostles admonition to prove all things and to hold fast that which is good 1 Thess 5. v. 21.26 To which end also some few yeares agoe it was decreed in a publick Synod of the reformed Churches in France at Charenton Anno 1631. that the Lutherans desiring to participate of the holy Communion with them should not be excluded from it if they did but otherwise behave themselves peaceably and without scandall For those Lutherans who refuse not to take the holy Communion with us doe even testifie thereby that they condemne not our Church and Religion And although they adhere to their opinion of the reall and corporall presence and orall manducation of Christs body yet so that they do not hold them as necessay articles of faith but receive us also in our opinion as fellow-members and Christians If they were generally all thus minded the Ecclesiasticall peace were soone concluded and the way prepared to a totall unitie and reconciliation For in this manner wee should not have any further cause to separate our selves from their Communion and other godly exercises but would be ready for peace and Unitie sake to tolerate the other defects and according to the Apostles exhortation to walke with them as brethren minding the same thing by the same rule whereto we have already attained Phil. 3. v. 15 16. Till God may reveale unto us on both sides even what is remaining Chap. 11. wherein wee disagree But those that will by no meanes condescend unto this shall not with all their Sophistry and arts winde themselves out from bearing before God and man the guiltinesse of the long continued most pernicious Schisme and of all the miseries that may hereafter ensue thereupon Causes of Reformation of the Doctrine and Ceremonies of the Lutherans Now what hath been said of the causes of our Separation that same declareth and sheweth unto us the cause of Reformation in all places where both a generall and particular Reformation was settled For where the whole congregation acknowledgeth with one consent the errour and abuse of the Lutheran Doctrine and Ceremonies in the different and controverted points There no fault can be found with its unanimous and generall Reformation Wherein it may not be hindred though some few private men dissent from the whole Congregation and had rather adhere to their Lutheran Opinion in regard they have the liberty of their Conscience no waies restrained But where the Congregation in any City or Province disagreeth so that a great part of it doth not onely not acknowledge the errour but adhere so closly to their Lutheran opinions concerning Oral manducation and omni-presence of Christs body Exorcisme Images Hosties and such like things that they therefore condemne as Hereticks the other partie which will not allow of them There these since they of necessity must Separate themselves from their condemners are forced also to a particular Reformation of their religion to the end that they for their part might discharge it towards God according to his Word and Ordinance with a safe conscience Especially when the Christian Magistrate whom the worke of Reformation after the example of Kings Asae Josaphat Hiskia Josia chiefly dependeth upon giveth assent to the true-beleeving partie Wherein neither they may be restrained by any Temporall Constitution or Ordinance of their Predecessours who have no dominion over the Consciences of their Posterity nor can tye them to any erroneous Doctrine and Religion which is undeniable amongst Christians on all sides who do not ground or build their Religion upon Temporall Ordinances like the Heathen and Mahumetans but relie only upon the word of God And although such Reformation most commonly cannot be settled without greatly offending the erring partie Yet a more speciall care is to be taken of scandalizing first their owne Conscience then the Conscience of other true-beleevers and lastly the Conscience of the erring least they may be confirmed in their errours then of offending and scandalizing the affections of the erring whereby others are carried away with zeale to their errours though with indiscretion Which zeale neverthelesse I hope shall never prevaile so far with the Lutherans that they against their legall Magistrats who have given them the libertie of their Conscience and Religion without any impediment should
A TREATISE TOUCHING THE Peace of the Church OR AN APOSTOLICAL RULE how to judge aright in Differences which concern Religion JOHN 7. v. 24. Judge not according to the appearance but judge righteous Judgement PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY LONDON Printed for George Thomason and are to be sold at his Shop at the Rose and Crown in Pauls Church-yard 1646. To the Reverend Pious and Learned Assembly of Divines conven'd at Westminster by the Authority of the Parliament for consultation in matters of Religion REVEREND SIRS COnsidering with my self with a charitable and tender commiseration the pestiferous and pernicious Heresies Schisms Divisions and Sects wherewith since the Apostles times the Christian both Eastern and Western Churches were ever continually infested distracted and torn in peeces I make no question but you will confesse that the latter two rents the One between the Christian-Protestants and Roman-Catholicks the Other between us and the Evangelical-Lutherans which in our Predecessours dayes sprung originally in Germany then were dispersed over the face of the Universal-Occidental-Christian-World and at this present are grown to the highest pitch of desolation and devastation of Christendom were fomented with more unchristian and inhuman cruelty bitternesse calumnies slanders oppressions persecutions and effusion of blood then ever you heard or read in Ecclesiastical Histories of any other Religion in the World And consequently acknowledge that such distractions and disorders of the Christian Church proceed from no other ground then from an unseasonable uncharitable rash presumptuous and unjust judging and condemning one another Wherefore we shall do very well exactly to search and inquire which of these three principal divided and dissenting Churches is guilty or innocent of such a prejudicial Schism and Separation to the end that we may know and discern which side to imbrace and give assent unto and which not And that the true undeniable orthodoxal Doctrine and Religion of the true Evangelical Reformed Protestants may not be condemned and rejected by any incompetent Judge as false erroneous heretical and damnable in regard that Spiritual and Ecclesiastical matters are commonly as much obnoxious to ill managing as Civil and Temporal It is by all means expedient and requisite for us to repaire to such a Judge who betwixt us and others may determine and decide the Controversie and Difference by an infallible Sentence from which we cannot appeal And whereas the Papists do attribute such full and absolute determination to the Catholick Church or as they declare it themselves to the Pope as the Supream Head of the Church either himself alone or with assistance of a Councel of Cardinals Bishops and Prelates depending on him and representing the whole Universal Church I am perswaded we with all Christian Protestants cannot nor will submit to any other Judge in matters of Religion but to the Holy Scripture or to the Lord our God himself who in his Sacred Word hath prescribed his Will and Decision to the Christian Church which we onely closely and positively must adhere and stick unto For this Volume of the Holy Scripture I mean not any other Books more or lesse then those that by inspiration of the Holy Ghost were written of the Prophets and Apostles and left to the Primitive Church which from it were spred amongst all Nations and in the middest of darknesse and unfaithful heresies by Gods singular Providence preserved and in their original Tongues conveyed unto us being the indubitable Word of God whose Divine Power Light Vertue and Operation all true Beleevers feel in their hearts and consciences and containing though not the decision of all Theological Questions and Controversies yet all Articles of Faith and Doctrine necessary for every true Christians Salvation It is manifest that the Church or they that have the charge over it whether they be called Popes Cardinals Bishops or Divines and Teachers or general Councels have not any power and jurisdiction to decide determine and wrest the Doctrines to their arbitrary judgement and pleasure but onely a ministerial function to teach and demonstrate by Warrant from the Word of God whether and how they are decided in it neither to force their doubtful and undecided Opinions upon any man sub Anathemate or Excommunication unlesse he should reject the Word of God in any fundamental and necessary Article of Faith or plain Declaration thereof or cry up his own erroneous and controverted opinions interpretations consequences and inferences for the Word of God it self and necessary Articles of Faith to the disturbance and distraction of the Christian Church And this is that the Papists cast continually into the Lutherans and Reformed Protestants teeth That notwithstanding they still refer themselves to the perfect and infallible Rule of the Word of God yet for all this they will be themselves infallible Judges by obstructing and imposing their own particular expositions and inferences on others The Lutherans indeed especially which are called Lutherani rigidi the grosser sort who are so strictly addicted Formulae Concordiae Saxonicae that they bind not onely their Faith and Doctrine unto it but also all others that dissent from them in their particular interpretations and opinions principally in the Point of Consubstantiation and Omnipresence of Christs Body and its oral manducation by excluding them from the Communion of the Christian Church and depriving them of Publick Offices and Dignities as long as they do obstinately persist in their arrogant judging and condemning will have a very hard task to clear themselves of this charge The Vindication of the Protestant Reformed Churches how that they onely depend on the Word of God and not on any mans interpretation and opinion much lesse presume to impose them on others as necessary unto Salvation but impart and permit to every one the due Libertie of Conscience without transgressing the true Limits and Rules of Gods Truth and the Christian Charity hath been of late sufficiently and punctually for the true and better information of them that are misinformed exhibited in high Dutch by D. John Bergius Chaplaine to His Highnesse the Prince Elector of Brandenbourg Author of this Treatise One of the best Learned Divines Germany at this present affordeth a primitive Catholick Christian and down-right Protestant in such a plain and perspicuous way that even the most ignorant and unlearned who are not able to peruse great Volumes may palpably see and perceive the falsehood and slanders that are laid at all Christian Protestants doors And withall since the Reformed Protestant Churches cannot hope for any Ecclesiastical Peace and Unitie both in Church and Common-wealth whilest the vehemency and fiercenesse in judging and condemning of the said Papists and Lutherans is not appeased and mitigated He representeth and declareth to them an Infallible Apostolical Direction and Rule in general what and how far men are bound in conscience to judge and not to judge in matters of Religion and then by way of application How far they ought to judge the Roman-Catholicks and Lutherans
in their Doctrine and Religion or to separate themselves from them or to reform them Which Treatise having been so happy to peruse by the communication of my worthy Friend and Countrey-man Master Jaspar Godeman whom I always in his frequent conversation perceived a singular Well-wisher to an Ecclesiastical Unitie I have immediately betaken my self to the Translation thereof much animated and incouraged by his and divers others good advice accompanied with these two pregnant Motives The One That this subject is the most necessary and profitable of all Theological Controversies and Questions that now adayes are in agitation and may much conduce if not to the advancement of an Universal Peace and Unitie of all Churches which though it was always earnestly desired of men truely zealous and Christians so that Learned Calvin offering his Service therein to that worthy man Doctor Cranmer said It would not grieve him to saile over ten Seas to such a purpose yet proved a work of insuperable difficultie and altogether impossible in mens eyes at least to promote the Christian agreement and reconciliation or mitigation of the distractions of all Kingdoms Principalities and Free-States that have abandoned the Superstitions and pernicious Leaven of the Romish Church For the effecting whereof not onely the Protestant Churches and Divines in Germany have had in former times several Conferences at Marpurg Wittenberg and of late at Leipzig but also at these present times that Famous and Reverend Divine Master John Durey first stirred up by that excellent Instrument Master James Godeman Father of the worthy Gentleman aforementioned One of His Majesty the King of Sweden's Privy Counsellor and President of his Court of Appellations in the Precinct of Prussia and then seconded with hearty wishes tnd prayers of many pious and learned Divines in England France and Scotland hath these fifteen yeers to my knowledge imployed his indefatigable endeavours and singular industry in Germany Sweden Denmark and Low-Countreys and not without hopeful successe having at length prevailed so much with the Lutherans especially in Sweden that they not onely have given over their slanders and calumniations in the Pulpit but also are contented to be called Evangelical Protestants agreeing with us in the mean time in the name and walking by the same Rule so far as they have already attained till God reveal unto them what is remaining The Other Motive is That also this subject would be most seasonable for these tempestuous and turbulent times which the Church and State of England at this present groaneth and laboureth under and which if we will seriously inquire into doth proceed originally from no other cause then uncharitablenesse and acrimony in judging and condemning one another And consequently Reverend Sirs it will be useful and profitable for every one in particular whereby being peradventure carried away with rashnesse and vehemency as naturally all men are inclined and prone unto to judge and condemn others as unfaithful that erre rather out of humane weaknesse and meer ignorance then obstinacy and malice in indifferent matters and in the circumstance much good he may here learn and be advised how to moderate and temperate his passions and affections with more charity and peaceablenesse and stedfastly maintain the benefit of the substance viz. the Universal Christian saving Faith and sincere love and obedience of Christ as the onely fundamental and necessary Doctrine unto Salvation lest in rashly presumptuously and rigorously condemning others he may be inexcusable and condemn himself And contrarywise being either thrust out of the way which the Lord our God hath commanded him to walk in or falsly and contumeliously judged slandered reviled excommunicated and persecuted for the true Orthodoxal Doctrine Faith and Religion by an incompetent Judge on Earth he may know without beleeving and obeying their words and offending thereby both his own and other true beleeving or erring consciences how to appeal first to the Word of God it self and unanimous consent of the Primitive Apostolical Church or to any legal and impartial Ecclesiastical Convocation Synod or Consistory or if he cannot be heard there to the Supream Judge in Heaven himself being the onely Law-giver who is able to save and destroy and in his good time will judge those Judges themselves and pronounce a definitive Sentence against all Heresies Schisms and Divisions and establish an Universal Harmony and Unitie in the Christian Church Whereas now these two Motives have induced me to this slender endeavour without regard to any other interest or respect but that which might be conducible to the advancement of an Ecclesiastical Peace and Unitie amongst Evangelical Protestant Churches lest the Wel-wishers and Furtherers thereof might not be too long debarr'd from the lustre and use of so rare a Jewel I thought fit and expedient to dedicate it to your Patronage as being suteable and adequate to your zeal and piety relying herein upon Sir Edwin Sandys judgement delivered in his Book called A View of the state of Religion in the Western parts of the World pag. 173. where he writeth thus The end of the differences between the Evangelical Protestant Churches will be that their enemies shall laugh when themselves shall have cause to weep unlesse the graciousnesse of God stir up some worthy Princes of renown and reputation on both sides to interpose their Wisdom Industry and Authority for the uniting these Factions or at least for reconciling and composing those differences in some tolerable sort A work of immortal fame and desert and worthy of none but them of whom this wicked base World is not worthy And hoping that this weak attempt of my labour though some of the Vulgar sort will perhaps either carelesly or censoriously entertain it will be neverthelesse as favourably accepted by you as it is affectionately and heartily tendred by REVEREND SIRS Your humble and devoted Servant PHILIP FREHER London the 23th of March 1646. The Contents of this Book are reduced to these twelve Chapters I. Of judging one another in general II. Wherein we ought not to judge one another in matters of Religion III. What is necessary and not necessary unto Salvation IV. That the Roman-Catholick Church hath no ground to judge or condemn the Protestant Reformed Evangelical Churches as Heretical V. That the Lutherans have no ground to judge the Reformed Churches to be Heretical VI. Which is the chief and principal Question in this present difference of Religion and what are the safest means for the settlement of a Christian Vnitie VII That even these are the safest meanes to restrain all Erroneous Sects VIII That in the Reformed Churches no new Doctrine as necessary to Salvation is taught IX Whether and how far we ought or are bound in conscience to judge others in matters of Religion X. Whether or how far Protestant Churches ought or are bound to judge the said Roman-Catholicks in their Doctrine or Religion or to separate themselves from them or to undergo any Reformation XI Whether or how
own good or lastly when we are not contented to judge his sins but even presume to sit down in God's Tribunal pronouncing sentence against his soul and condemn it to hell it self All this presumptuous uncharitable unjust and unprofitable judging is prohibited by Christ and extendeth to all sins in worldly businesses and ordinary temporal affairs viz. to such as are incident to words or works of the Second Table and much more to all sins in matters of God's service and Religion viz. to the words and works of the First Table Again he enjoyneth these Two duties being the chief and most requisite works of charity that we should not judge others but rather excuse them not condemn but rather further and hope for their amendment because without these the other Two duties which consist in Forgiving and Giving cannot be well performed Yea he doth in this order presse the aforesaid duties because by such judging and condemning as he forbiddeth most commonly though unjustly occasion is taken by many to conceive that they are not obliged to any charity at all towards criminous persons nor to forgive them their sins neither to give unto them nor help them in their wants but rather to resist them in every thing and to hate and persecute them to the uttermost Act. 26.9 11. In opposition to which evil apprehension our Lord Christ alleadgeth against such unseasonable judging this notable and familiar place of Scripture Hos 6.2 I desired mercy and not sacrifice and giveth especially this lesson to the Pharisees and Scribes to be learned by them who did transgresse it most of all Matth. 9.11 Go ye and learn what that meaneth I will have mercie and not sacrifice and Matth. 12.7 If ye had known what this meaneth you would not have condemned the guiltlesse Unseasonable and rash Judging a grievous sin And although this be in it self the easiest work of Charity for what is easier for a man then to abstain and withhold himself from judging the right performance whereof is the most difficult and dangerous work in the world and pertaineth properly to God alone yet it is the hardest work by reason of the perversenesse of mans heart and some finde it more difficult then to forgive their neighbours Moreover Unseasonable and tenacious judging is not without reason esteemed to be the most common the most pernicious and yet the most hidden and secret Vice of all sins and corruptions The most common Because we are all generally swayed by a natural proclivity rather to judge and censure other men then our selves And all sorts of men high and lowe of what dignity and degree soever are obnoxious to this Uncharitablenesse The most supreme Magistrates and Rulers of this world Kings and Princes whom God hath ordained to be Judges over other men must give way often to be very injustly judged and censured not onely by their enemies but even by their own servants and subjects Preachers and Ministers of God's Word not onely by their Adversaries but even by their fellow-brethren and Auditors The most godly by the most ungodly The wisest by the most foolish Yea God himself in heaven is oftentimes judged and blamed by fools and mad-men on the earth Psal 51.4 Rom. 3.4 The most pernicious For whilst we reprove others we forget to judge our selves though this be the most necessary and profitable judging yea wherein we judge others we condemn our selves Rom. 2.1 And all sorts of calamities and miseries amongst men all disorders distempers distractions differences and dissentions in every estate in Common-wealths in Christian Churches even in Families if we seriously search thereinto proceed originally from no other ground but from an Unseasonable rash uncharitable and injust judging one another The most secret Because it happeneth not onely in words and works but many times in the very thoughts as in those to whom our Saviour sayeth Wherefore think you evil in your hearts Matth 9.4 And then it comes commonly under the colour and appearance of singular zeal towards Justice truth and the honour of God and withal under pretence of love and charity to pull out the more out of our brother's eye From whence it is that it is not counted for a sin or vice at all but rather passeth for a commendable vertue for a good holy profitable yea sometimes for a necessary work whilst many Imagine that they must judge and condemn lest otherwise they should be judged and condemned by God Especially in matters of Religion Which Unjust judging if it be a dangerous and pernicious Vice in any temporal and worldly matters certainly it must needs be more prejudicial and dangerous in matters of Religion and Faith as being of the greatest moment and importance in regard all differences contentions dissentions slanders all vain and swelling babling all scholastical and profane Controversies all foolish and unprofitable questions and literal disputes which we are admonished so often by the Apostle to avoid In like manner all enmitie hatred envie and bitternesse which arise from them And lastly all Heresies Schisms Sects Separation and the destruction of the Universal Christian Church do originally proceed from nothing more then from such Uncharitable judging and condemning Wherein in these later days more then in former not onely the vulgar and ignorant People but even most of all those that should admonish others Learned Divines have transgressed and thereby given much occasion to this present lamentable devastation and destruction of Christendom and wrought so much already with the greatest part of the Christians by such judging and contentions arising from the same that in stead of true Godlinesse and Christian Charitie which should be the onely scope and fruit of Christian Doctrine at this present the Christian Religion is turned almost into a meer disceptation and debate of words which at length may open a door to the Contempt of all Religion and Universal Atheism as it is already in several places apparently manifest And although amongst these modern contentious Divines some are more exorbitant then other yet none of them shall be able so fully to excuse and vindicate themselves but they will be found to have sometimes transgressed the limits and moderation of Christian Charitie Wherefore we all have great need to repeat and ruminate again on Christ's old Lesson Go ye and learn what that meaneth I will have mercy and not sacrifice To the apprehension and learning of which none can give us better direction then the Apostle Paul who during his ignorance was also such a zealous and vehement judge but afterwards when God had shewed mercy unto him did the more faithfully dehort others from it especially the Romanes in his most excellent Epistle to them thorow the Whole Fourteenth Chapter the chief sum and argument whereof is comprehended in Verse 13. Wherefore let us not judge one another any more but judge this rather that no man put a stumbling-block or occasion to fall in his brothers way In which
all Christians to know and at all times especially in the Primitive Church of the Apostles have been unanimously received taught and believed by all true Christians as the aforementioned Fundamental doctrine of salvation with all that is evidently and undoubtedly depending from it so that no man can reject it without he rejecteth also the Fundamental doctrine it self But some are but Theological Doctrines which are not necessary for all Christians but onely for some to know to whom God hath imparted before others a fuller measure of knowledge and more excellent gifts and charge from whom also he will require more then of others according to the rule of Christ To whomsoever much is given of him shall be much required Luk. 12.48 So that it is sufficient for one to know and to believe onely implicitely in the principal General Articles that what another doth know and believe explicitely in many Special Points which are comprehended therein For the one that he should believe and do that which in it self and directly is necessary unto salvation for the other that which he knoweth to be consequently necessary or to be inseparably annexed thereunto Yea for one it is necessary to believe many Truths whereof he hath good ground and knowledge out of the Word of God which neverthelesse for another who wanteth such knowledge are either not so necessary or not so profitable to believe without ground yet are necessary not to deny or contradict them obstinately out of carnal affections because he cannot but have lesse ground to deny them and rather ought to search the Truth diligently in the fear and worship of God and to be ready to receive and acknowledge it with thankfulnesse when it is demonstrated unto him out of the Word of God Otherwise the Obstinate denying which is incompatible and inconsistent with true faith and love to Christ and his Word and proceedeth meerly from carnal affections whereby the understanding in the knowledge of the Truth is darkened and eclipsed would prove damnable unto him not onely by reason of the errour it self but rather because of his Obstinacie Thirdly and principally we must discern what is necessary or not necessary in regard of the revealed Word 3. In regard of the revealed Word of God being the rule and means whereby we may know what we ought to believe and to do Which Word though properly there is nor ought to be but onely one yet is delivered to the Believers in a Twofold manner by Preaching and Writing From whence we must distinctly consider Whether and how far the written Word of God and whether and how far the preached and ministerial Word or the traditions and doctrines of the Church and their teachers ought to be the rule of our Faith and life But since this is the Point that principally is controverted and debated betwixt the Romane Catholikes and the Evangelical Protestants we intend at this present to lay down the ground-work of that which is undoubtedly agreed on by both Parties As first of all That the Books of the Prophets and Apostles of the Old and New Testament which we on all sides acknowledge and receive for Canonical are the undoubted Word of God and the perfect and infallible rule of our Faith and life and that consequently every thing that is taught in them so clearly and manifestly that every understanding Christian certainly and undoubtedly may know and conceive it must be necessary for all unto salvation so that though they do not know explicitè and particularly all things yet are ready to believe and receive undoubtedly all things assoon at they do apprehend them The Sum of the Articles we must believe unto salvation is briefly collected in the Apostolical Creed into which all Christians are baptized and received as fellow-members of the Christian Church What we must Morally do is exhibited in the Commandments of the First and Second Table concerning the love and duty towards God and our neighbour But what we must Ceremonially and Sacramentally perform is contained in the words of the Institution of the holy Baptism and the blessed Communion or Supper of the Lord being the Two Sacraments of the New Testament ordained by Jesus Christ himself as it is generally and undoubtedly agreed on And lastly what we ought to desire and ask of God is included in the Lords Prayer In which Five Fundamental Points of Christian Religion viz. in tribus Symbolis doctrinalibus credendorum faciendorum petendorum what we ought to believe to do and to ask and in duobus Symbolis Sacramentalibus regenerationis nutritionis spiritualis how we ought to be regenerated and as Children of God in Christ spiritually nourished unto a new and eternal life doth consist the whole Catechism which we for our part think generally necessary for all Christians yet all is to be understood in that sense which is most clearly taught and expressed in the Scripture yea also whatsoever so evidently and necessarily doth depend from the said Fundamental Points that every Understanding Christian though he is not able to conceive the Divine Mysteries by his natural reason may yet certainly and undoubtedly apprehend the doctrine or meaning of the Scripture or the necessary consequence of it Therefore although any Controversie should be raised and moved about these Fundamental Articles which in the Primitive Church had not been sufficiently declared or unanimously taught yet they could not be generally necessary unto salvation for all Christians but onely their unanimous and undoubted meaning Moreover besides that what directly in it self is necessary there are yet many other points of doctrine partly Theological partly Historical and partly Philosophical yea in general whatsoever is clearly taught in the holy Scripture though its consequence and dependence from these Fundamental Articles is not of such necessitie and therefore not directly necessary unto Salvation yet it is necessary for us to believe it because it is thus certainly and clearly revealed in the Word of God For Example That our Lord Jesus Christ suffered under the Emperour Tiberius and under the Governour Pontius Pilate as it is expressed in the Apostles Creed or that the mother of the Lord was called Mary or that our Lord rose from the dead the Third and not the Fourth day c. These are such circumstances in the historie of the Birth and Death of Christ which though directly they are not necessary for us to believe and know unto salvation yet they are necessary for us to believe because they are as clearly and expresly set down in the Word of God as the Articles themselves so that no man that knoweth them may deny or make a scruple of them unlesse he would also deny together the whole Word of God Likewise that in the last times the great Antichrist shall come That at Christs coming to judge the world not all men shall die but the rest be changed which though it is not absolutely necessary unto salvation to know yet it is
as it hath been said many times heretofore Which we may illustrate with one or two Examples As the first Chapter of John which the Primitive Church whose Writings and Doctrines are descended and conveyed to us whereof no doubt but it hath together with the Books of the Scripture received also from the Apostles themselves the true meaning thereof at least in the principal necessary points of which this si one hath Unanimously and Undoubtedly interpreted of the Son of God who was in the beginning of all things as the Substantial Word with the Father If the Modern Socinians interpret it of the beginning of the Gospel and the humane nature of Christ to the end that they may deny the Article of Christs Godhead we rightly reject such Interpretation not onely as not necessary but as false and heretical not that it is onely contrary to our Interpretation but that it is so manifestly repugnant to the words of Saint John that the Primitive Church hath with one consent taught the contrary Insomuch also that none of the Ancient Arrians or Photinians to our and all Modern Socinians knowledge ever thus understood or expounded it But Socinus was the first man as he himself must confesse that spun this Interpretation out of his own head wherein at first his own brethren have partly contradicted him Yet since that time hath he together with his followers preferred it as if it were the undeniable Word of God it self and a most necessary Interpretation before the words of Saint John and the Uniform meaning of the Primitive Church Which may not be done without great presumption nor if it be obstinately urged without damnable Heresie principally in such a deep important and necessary Article of Faith as it is accounted not onely by us but the true Primitive Church and the word of God it self On the other side if they in such profound and incomprehensible Mysterie did adhere positively and closely without mutilation and contention to the words of the Scripture nor added thereunto their own Interpretations and Inferences of their reasoning beyond and against the Articles of Faith we should then have no cause to judge them so sharply though they would not receive or use all our expositions or humane expressions Likewise when Socinus and his followers do wrest and pervert so many manifest places of the Scripture which speak of Christs death that he died for the propitiation satisfaction and remission of our sins to this sense as if he had not appeased Gods wrath against us or which is as much made satisfaction to appease Gods wrath or purchased propitiation and forgivenesse but that he died meerly to this end that he might by his doctrine and example convert us from our sins to God and to pacifie our hearts towards him And account their own Interpretations as worthy and necessary as Gods Word it self So that they grievously slight and revile the Doctrine concerning the reconcilation of Gods wrath against us and the satisfaction for our sins which neverthelesse is so manifestly and evidently taught by so many testimonies of the Scripture that the Universal Christian Church hath professed it with one accord at all times and ever therefore held Jesus Christ for its onely High-Priest Mediatour and Saviour Insomuch that even the greatest Papists though they supply by way of concomitancy the merits of Christ by the Intercession and merits of other Saints and their own merits and satisfaction the daily Sacrifice of Masse Indulgences Purgatory and such like things yet have not denied the propitiation by Christs merits and satisfaction nor any other Sectary as far as we know nor Pelagius himself hath directly opposed it except onely Socinus and perhaps before him Adailerdus Whereas Socinus himself cannot but acknowledge that the Mediatour of the Old Testament Moses hath in some manner appeased by his intercession as Aaron and some other high-Priests by their Sacrifices Gods wrath against his people of Israel and yet will deny such power and vertue of the propitiation for our sins to the most-perfect Obedience Sacrifice and Intercession of our Mediatour and high-Priest Jesus Christ Who seeth not then that they intend arrogantly to prefer their own singular Interpretations before the manifest Word of God and the unanimous consent of the Universal Christian Church and thereby as much as lies in their power shake and subvert the very foundation of our chief consolation in Jesus Christ The Second Objection against the aforesaid Doctrine In the Second place may be objected against the aforesaid ground of Saving Truth and Unitie that neverthelesse the Primitive Christian Church hath condemned many Sects not onely for not receiving the plain words of the Scripture but also for refusing the Interpretations and words of the Church For example The ancient Arrians in the Councell of Nicen and others Chap. 8. for not receiving the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Consubstantial alledging that such a word was not to be found in the Scripture But we Answer to this That they were not condemned even for this bare word but rather because of their peculiar Arrian phrase and expressions and expositions concerning the created Divinitie of Christ Against whom the Orthodoxall and true-beleeving Church did very earnestly insist upon the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which though not in the letter yet it is found in the Scripture more plainly and evidently and more conformably to the unanimous understanding and meaning which the Churches in the first three hundred yeers professed concerning the eternall God-head of Christ not that it was directly necessary unto Salvation but conducible to the confutation of the ambiguous terms and opinions of the Arrians Otherwise there hath been in those times true-beleeving Bishops who though they had rejected the Arrian Heresie concerning the created Divinitie of Christ and yet doubted of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because it was not to be found literally in the Scripture were therefore not condemned but tolerated as weak in Faith This very same we may say of all other ancient Sectaries Macedonius Nestorius Eutiches Pelagius which were at all times condemned for their singular new fangled Interpretations out of the word of God according to the unanimous meaning and doctrine of the Churches in the first three or four hundred yeers CHAP. VIII That in the Reformed Churches no new Doctrin as necessary to Salvation is taught IN the third place it will be objected The Third Objection against the aformentioned Doctrine That we our selves defend many doctrines as necessary unto salvation which yet neither in the Scripture were so plainly expressed nor unanimously taught in the Primitive Church I will give but a touch in some few but principall Instances That we deny the free will in man the merits of good works and the Sacrifice of the Masse Which points were with one consent asserted of all ancient Fathers almost That we teach the Justification ex Solâ fide onely by Faith That we hold the
adhere to the ancient Catholick Apostolick Doctrine So that the principal difference betwixt us and the Papists and the Lutherans doth not properly concern the Doctrine which we for our part maintain as necessary unto salvation but onely the by-Doctrines and additions which they for their part have innovated and besides the Universal undoubted Christian Doctrine will inforce upon us as necessary but we reject either as false and erroneous or at least as unnecessary and doubtful For notwithstanding some new Interpretations of some place of the Scripture or some new opinions in some Controversie may be found amongst our Divines as they are very obvious and ordinary amongst the Papists and Lutheran-Divines yet by such singular Interpretation of some dark places of the Scripture no new Doctrine is introduced but grounded upon more evident Warrants Or though one or other should maintain some new opinions yet they are not pressed by them or by the Universal Church for necessary Doctrines but liberty is given therein for each ones opinion Yea there are some which are not approved of at all but rather rejected and set by Like as not onely we but the Papists themselves do not approve and allow of every thing expressed in the most ancient and principal monuments and writings of the Fathers But in case One or some of ours would cry up and urge their own singular opinions as necessary to salvation With those we should finde even as much fault as with the Papists and Lutherans Quidquid ille quamvis sanctus doctus quamvis Episcopus quamvis Confessor Martyr praeter omnes aut etiam contra omnes senserit id inter proprias occultas privatas opiniunculas à communis publicae as generalis sententiae authoritate secretum sit Vincent Licin commonit 2o. Conclusion of the first Part. BY all this what hitherto hath been declared every understanding and consciencious man may without partiality and passion judge and discern whether there is any lawful ground or reason to judge and condemn us or our Church as heretical because of our Doctrine and Religion Whereas we for our part prescribe not to other men any Doctrine as necessary unto salvation except onely what is so evidently and expresly grounded upon the Word of God that they themselves with us must receive for certain and undoubted or the Primitive Church hath received and taught unanimously nor contrary wise do we deny any Doctrine which is thus necessary Though we cannot acknowledge and receive each particular Interpretation or Inference which either of the different parties accounteth for necessary Now If we may not justly be judged or condemned for the very Doctrine of all our Churches in general much lesse may we be judged then for some different and controverted doctrine or expressions which peradventure have been maintained by particular Teachers and not generally approved by all the Churches or by our selves who are cryed down for Hereticks For it is said By thy words and not by other mens words thou shalt be justified and by thy words thou shalt be condemned Matth. 12. v. 37. Much lesse then for such Doctrines which neither we nor any of ours have ever maintained but are laid to our charge by dreadful slanders or mis-construction and perversion of our words and meaning or by groundlesse vain Scholastick consequences and illations as that we deny Gods Truth Omnipotency Justice and Mercy that we make God to be an Hypocrite a Tyrant Author of sin yea a Divel and more such like unchristian inhumane and very diabolical calumnies which we for our part commit to the Supreme and Soveraign Judge and instead thereof we say with the Apostle to all those that are yet inclinable to Christian Peace and Unitie Let us not judge one another any more what art thou that judgest another mans Servant To his own Master he standeth or falleth There is one Law-giver who is able to save and to destroy who art thou that judgest another James 4. v. 12. And if it be that we shall not rashly judge one another with words how much worse is it then When they from a verbal judging fall at length to a cruell and bloody persecution with fire and sword or other violences against life goods honour and dignities When they not onely excommunicate and cut off from the Christian Church but if possibly could be exclude from mens society and extirpate from the face of the Earth those who onely professe Christ and his Word and will not heark and countenance humane doctrines and traditions This is the blood-thirsty course of Cain and Caiaphas whom God also in his due time will judge accordingly THE SECOND PART CHAP. IX Whether and how far we ought or are bound in conscience to judge others in matters of Religion AGainst all this The fourth objection against the aforesaid doctrine what hitherto we have declared concerning the rash and unseasonable judging and condemning in matters of Religion Many will object that yet we our selves use to judge and condemne others And not only the old Sects rejected by the Primitive Church but also the modern Roman Catholicks and the said Lutherans who never as yet have been heard much lesse judged or condemned in any universall Councell or other legall Ecclesiasticall Consistory and that neverthelesse we judge and condemne them not only with words but rather with deeds in regard we separate our selves from their Churches and Congregations perform our Divine Service in our peculiar Assemblies apart or reform whole Churches in their Doctrine and Ceremonies And that in such a manner that we give thereby a great scandall unto others causing by such separations or reformations at least a Schisme Division and Discord in the Christian Church whereof the Apostle both in the often cited place and else-where hath faithfully warned us Let us not judge one another any more but judge this rather that no man put a stumbling block or an occasion to fall in his brothers way Wherefore having hitherto been informed by the first part of this Apostolicall rule Wherein and why we ought not to judge one another Let us now go on and learn also by the second part whether and how far we ought and are bound in conscience to judge in matters of Religion We also shall easily thereby discern which side of the modern dissenting parts transgresseth or exceedeth therein and which part is guilty of the pernicious Schisme Division and Separation and of the great scandall and other distractions of the modern Christian Church from thence arising And withall whether and which part ought PART II. or is bound in conscience to reforme the other in Doctrine and Religion Chap. 9. The Apostle teacheth us in the said place that we ought principally to judge this That no man put a stumbling block or an occasion to fall in his brothers way Where First is to be observed that this judging he speaketh of is referred rather to the matter to the works
I think it needlesse at this present Seeing it is for the most part agreed on in Thesi or position of it But in Hypothesi or application of it each one favoureth his side best and transferreth the fault and cause of all dissentions and divisions upon his adversary Wherefore for the conclusion thereof we must apply such common and generall Doctrine to the modern differences and controversies and especially to the three dissenting parties afore mentioned without any partiality and passions CHAP. X. Whether or how farre the Protestant Churches ought or are bound to judge the said Roman-Catholicks in their Doctrine and Religion or to separate themselves from them or to undergo any Reformation AMongst all Schismes and Divisions in Churches which ever since the Apostles times arose amongst the Christians we shall hardly find any one which hath been fomented with more vehemency and fiercenesse then that which in our Predecessours dayes sprung originally in Germany and afterwards was spread over all Europe and at this present is divulged witnesse our own eyes to a most lamentable desolation and destruction of Christendom so that some long continuance thereof which is feared will draw at length upon the necks of all Western Churches like punishment and oppressions as formerly the Eastern suffered under the Turks Tartars and other Barbarous Nations unlesse the Lord doth shorten and prevent them by the day of his apparition Wherefore every one hath good reason to be carefull and to search out which side properly is guilty and the cause of such pernicious Schismes that we may know to which to give assent and to which not Whereby it is not imaginable that one side should be only and totally guilty and the other absolutely innocent and guiltlesse For it may well be that there hath been faults on both sides either in the excesse or defect whereby their minds were exasperated and the divisions grown to such a high pitch And the differences and disceptations in Churches are much like the warre or judiciall law-businesse where many times the most just and equitable cause is very ill managed and commonly prolonged and extended to a great inconvenience if not to the utmost ruine of both disagreeing parties But since indifferences in Religion especially when a resolute Schisme and Division is already formed in the Church no Neutrality nor therefore a totall separation from the Christian Church or the settlement of a peculiar Church is admitted but assent is to be given either to one or the other side in the saving Doctrine and Religion though not all its actions may be approved At least thus far must be determined of the guiltinesse and innocency of the different parties to the end that men may know which Church is to be imbraced and which not Which subject fully and punctually to handle and maintain would require a peculiar book in regard that all modern writings whether they concern Divisions and Dissensions or Ecclesiasticall Unity are in some kind directed to this scope But we shall here be constrained only to touch it in a short and compendious way as much as will conduce to our present intention and to declare it briefly by the aforementioned principles And first whether and how farre we have reason to judge their Doctrine and Religion to separate our selves from them or to reform them Then secondly whether therefore by any means we ought to judge and condemn the persons or whole Churches I. Where then first it is to be exactly examined How farre the Protestants are separated from the Romish Church how farre the Protestant Churches have separated themselves from the Roman-Catholicks Seeing they have not withdrawn themselves one from another in al points of Christian Doctrine and Religion but remain still united in many great and weighty Articles which have been unanimously acknowledged of both sides out of the Word of God For both sides professe and receive the whole Vniversall Apostolicall Creed whereunto we are Baptized on all sides Likewise both sides retain the ten Commandements and the Prayer of the Lord And although they omit in their Catechismes the second Commandement concerning Images yet they retain it at least in their Bibles so that we remain undivided at least according to the letter in three most necessary Symboles or Articles of the Universall Christian Religion credendorum faciendorum petendorum what is necessary to beleeve to do and to aske as was mentioned heretofore And notwithstanding they have added many other human Ceremonies and Traditions to the holy Sacraments which Christ himself hath instituted yet we acknowledge that they have thus farre kept the true Baptisme being the most necessary Sacrament that we nor they desire to rebaptize those that were baptized by us and them Moreover they receive and acknowledge with us the whole Sacred Scripture of the Old and New Testament to be the indubitable Word of God whose Interpretation and meaning in many sound Doctrines yea I dare say in the most is unqestioned betwixt us and them Yea likewise in the Symbols of the Primitive Church of the first and principall Councels which we receive on both sides agreeable and warrantable by Scripture and finally in all points of their Doctrine and Religion which are true Vndoubted Ancient Catholick we remain as yet united with them against all other erroneous Sectaries as hath been declared before Wherefore we cannot nor will judge them Hereticks but rather we must judge and determine by those undoubted and undeniable grounds of both sides all other differences in Doctrine that are left And if we only might be tolerated by them without compulsion of Conscience we nor they had then no cause to separate and with-draw our selves one from another And we would sufficiently find in the said articles whatsoever is necessary unto salvation II. Neither do we judge and condemn them in those things which we generally and on all sides acknowledge and receive as free indifferent matters which neither directè or indirectè in the Word of God are commanded nor forbidden to beleeve or to do but rather confesse that men ought herein to conform themselves to each Church and Lawes of the Countrey Customes and Ceremonies lest because of unnecessary things a separation and scandall be caused according to Augustins rule Quod neque contra fidem neque contra bonos more 's injungitur indifferenter est habendum pro eorum inter quos vivitur societate servandum est Epist 118 But in such things which We for our part account for free indifferent matters but they for necessary either out of custome or because of the Tradition of their Church or out of a mis-apprehension of the Word of God as for example in Fasts and Holy daies we ought to judge the matter thus far lest according to the rule of the Apostle we may cast a stumbling block or scandall before them by our liberty and knowledge in their pretended necessity but rather dispense with our exteriour liberty in such
indifferent things because of them that are weak in faith If but they reciprocally permit us the liberty of Conscience that we are not constrained to receive acknowledg them as necessary unto salvation As also contrariwise in those things which We for our part esteem necessary because of Gods Ordinance but they as free indifferent things as for example the Communion under both kinds We must then judge their erroneous opinion thus farre lest we omit and neglect Gods Ordinance against our Conscience for their sake Yet neverthelesse as long as they do not yet acknowledge with us such necessity and Ordinance of God We have no reason therefore to judge their Consciences nor to separate our selves from them in all other points of Doctrine and Religion wherein we agree as yet together If they would but let us enjoy our liberty therein lest we should be constrained to do against our Consciences because of their pretended liberty III. Morover concerning such differences in Doctrine and Religion where both sides account their opinion for absolutly necessary and godly consequently the contrary opinion as repugnant to the word of God and his Ordinance for false and erroneous or even for superstitious and damnable of those we ought and must judge so far that we stedfastly adhere to Gods truth since we have gotten the knowledge thereof out of the word of God and avoid to have any communion with the contrary errours and abuses especially Idolatry and Superstition lest we dangerously wound and offend our own Consciences Yet if they would not presse such Doctrine and worship of theirs which they for themselves hold necessary as necessary upon us against our Consciences who know it to be repugnant to the word of God but at least would tolerate us amongst themselves as erring and weake beleeving Christians If also their Religion and worship were so constituted that we could have a fellowship together for the other points wherein we yet agree without communion of any Superstition and without hypocrisie or denying of Gods truth and without scandall to other weake beleevers We would or should then not utterly separate our selves from their Churches in the remnant of the true Religion because of their errours and abuses which they have added unto it but carry and behave our selves therein according to the example of the true beleevers in Judea who under the idolatrous Kings in Juda forsook not quite the Temple of the Lord though it was polluted with manifold idolatries But performed their godly exercises therein according to the Law Yea after the example of Christ himself and his Disciples who although the House of God was made a den of theevs and defiled with much leaven of the Pharisees and Saduces and although they were aware of their leaven yet neglected not with them to teach and to pray in the Temple and Synogogues as long as they could be tolerated therein Joh. 18. v. 20. Acts 3. v. 1. 5. v. 42. 13. v. 5. 21. v. 27 28. But now at this present the difference and breach betwixt the Romish and Protestant Church is in a quite other case Why we must of necessity separate our selves from the Romish Church so that the Schism and Separation is unavoidable especially for these reasons following First because the Romish Church besides the Doctrine which on both sides is received for Christian and Catholike will not let the Protestants enjoy their liberty in many such Doctrines and forms of worship whereof they themselves must confesse that they are not necessary in themselves unto salvation but inforce those upon them as absolutely necessary because of their Traditions and Ordinances of the Church sub anathemate upon excommunication and pain of damnation And even in such things which we for our part hold not only not necessary but expressely repugnant to the Word of God and partly Superstitious As for example The Communion under one kind contrary to the commandement of Christ Drink ye all of this The Invocation of Saints and adoration of Images repugnant to the Commandement Thou shalt not make to thy self Images Thou shalt not bow down to them nor worship them c. The prohibition for all Priests to marry and commandment for all Christians to abstain from certain meats at certain times which the Apostle calleth Doctrines of Devils 1 Tim. 4 v. 1 2 3. and more such like points which for the most part were specified before in the 4. Chap. Secondly because they have introduced some such Doctrines and Religion as necessary fundamentall Doctrines whereas they cannot shew us any evident and certain warrant from the written Word of God that they are of God but we may produce to the contrary more certain and manifest grounds from the undoubted written Word of God being convinced in our Consciences that they are false erroneous and repugnant to Gods Word and Ordinance or to the very fundamentall Doctrine if not expressely yet by a necessary consequence and also absolutely damnable in themselves especially to them who should entertain them against their Consciences For example That the body of Christ must daily be formed of bread by the Masse-Priest or transubstantiated offered again for the quick and dead and adored under the shape of bread That we must deserve eternal life through our own condign merits make satisfaction for our sins we our selves and yet even be doubtfull of our salvation That all men on earth are subject to the Pope in stead of Christ upon pain of their damnation and must beleeve and receive as the words of Christ himself whatsoever he teacheth and ordaineth by vertue of his Supreme Popish power And such like points which they for their part maintain not only as necessary and sound Doctrines but inforce them upon the whole Christian Church as principall points of most necessary fundamentall saving Doctrine Thirdly because their chief and daily Religion and worship is so qualified that we cannot even have a communion with that which they retain with us out of the Word of God unlesse we would thereby against our consciences make our selves partakers of such erroneous Doctrines and Superstitious abuses especially in the Masse Fourthly and principally because they will not tolerate us who cannot allow against our Consciences and the known Word of God of their un-Catholick by-Doctrines and Ceremonies which they have added to the Ancient Catholick Doctrines nor receive us either as true-beleevers nor as erring weak beleeving fellow members of the Christian Church but utterly condemn and excommunicate us as unfaithfull Hereticks yea in many places persecute us with banishment fire and sword as it is apparently manifest to the whole world so that they have solemnly published and authorized their un-Christian sentence in the Councell of Trent in such a manner that it cannot be recalled and consequently no melioration or reconcilement and agreement on their side can be hoped for as long as they stand to the said Councell By all which I conceive