man at the same time in the same sense 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Aristotle taught us be both lame and whole in the legges blinde and seeing deafe and hearing dead and living it may be Antinomians who will have the beleevers Adultery no Adulterie have a way of Logicke of their owne to goe with Libertines who said knowing sinne to be sinne holynesse to be holynesse was a worke of the flesh and of old Adam who through eating the forbidden fruit knoweth good and evill But so you will say If God justifie the ungodly beleeving which is an act of sanctification must goe before justification then are wee sanctified and can doe that which is pleasing to God before we be justified and be in Christ then must we please God as beleevers ere we be in Christ and so exercise acts of the life of grace before we be in the Vine tree and before we be branches ingraffed in Christ for sure to beleeve is an act of the life of Christ in us Answ. If beliefe or faith be an instrument and so a cause in its kind or a condition call it as you will without which Paul in the Epistle to the Romanes and Galathians and Hebrewes c. saith we cannot be justified I see not any inconveniencie of this order 1. The sinner dead in sinne a sonne of wrath 2. A walker after the course of the prince Sathan who ruleth in the children of disobedience 3. The Gospel of free grace is Preached to the dead to the Elect heires of wrath but freely for Christs sake and with an intent on the Lords part of the same circumferance and spheare with the decree of the election to glory though they know not 4. The Law and curses of it preached to them with the Gospel lest they despaire to humble them 5. The sinner Legally humbled slaine in the dead throw Rom. 7.11 with a halâ—e-hope of mercy prepared for Christ though the preparation have no 1. promise of conversion 2. No ground nature or shaddow of merit 3. No necessary connexion with conversion save onely that God may intend the same preparation in an elect for conversion which he intendeth for no conversion in a reprobate 6. The stony heart of meere grace removed in the same moment a new heart put in him Ezech. 36.26 27. Zach. 12.10 Deut. 30.6 Jer. 31.33 or the habit of sanctification infused 7. In the same moment the soule beleeveth in him that justifieth the ungodly 8. In the same moment God for Christs sake of meere grace justifieth the beleeving sinner And every one of these necessarily presupposeth the former Nor can Antinomians free themselves or any with them of the pretended inconveniencie they would put on us to wit that we must beleeve before wee be actually joyned to Christ in justification for they will have us justified and so please God and actually injoy the fruit of election which is justification Rom. 8.29 before we beleeve that is before we feele and to our owne sense know that we are justified Now this feeling and knowledge is an intellectuall act of the life of God and the habit of an infused new heart of regeneration as well as our justifying Faith and so we yet exercise an act of the life of Christ which must bee an act of saving grace actus secundus or a life-operation flowing from the infused habit of sanctification before we be justified in the sense that Scripture speaketh of justification which saith all alongs Wee are justified by faith God justifieth the man that beleeves in him that justifieth the ungodly Now sure the Lord giveth to us faith to beleeve justification before he justifie in the sense that Paul speaketh of justification For the Lord giveth the Spirit of sanctification of grace of adoption of faith c. for all these are vitall and supernaturall acts of the same Spirit to these that have not the Spirit at first to the uncircumcised in heart Deut. 30.6 to the wildernesse and dry ground Esai 44. vers 3. to these who pollute his name among the heathen and have stony and rockie hearts Ezech. 36.21 26. to these that are a dying polluted in their owne bloud Ezech. 16.6 8. to those that are dead in sinnes and trespasses Ephes. 2.1 2 3 4 5. and this the Lord doth for Jesus Christs sake freely Gal. 4.4 5. then before we be actually in Christ by justification and branches in him by order of nature first wee so farre find favour in the Lords eyes or please him or rather he is of free grace pleased with us that he giveth his holy Spirit to us and upon the same ground may we being yet not justified and so in that sense not in Christ by order of nature first beleeve before we be justified nor is it justification that formally united us in this actuall union as branches to the Vine tree but union is a fruit of life as is the joyning of soule and body together and so a fruit of the infused life of God or of the habit of sanctification and thus it followeth not that we beleeve before we be united to Christ as branches to the Vine tree but onely that we beleeve by order of nature before we be justified which the Scripture saith But to returne we are not obliged to M. Saltmarsh who argueth against justification by faith slandering Protestants most ignorantly and the doctrine of Paul as if to bee justified by faith were to bee justified by a faith of our owne framing without the grace of Christ or by faith as a merit and hire that hireth and purchaseth Christ to be ours It is a curious and an unedifying question to search out as Cornewell doth Whether faith be active or passive in receiving Christs imputed righteousnesse though if hee speake of actuall beleeving to call it passive is an unproper speach i. we hold that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 credere to beleeve is not imputed as our righteousnesse which is Socinianisme 2. That for the dignity worth and merit of Faith Christs righteousnes is not imputed to us and therefore neither wee nor Scripture before us saith we are justified for Faith but by Faith 3. That Faith receiving Christ is the free grace of God given to us in the state of sinne They say The begger putteth forth an act or actions both of petitioning for almes and reaching out his hand to receive it and so it is not every way so of free grace as Christs imputed righteousnesse is to us But should we suppose the tongue and speach the arme and the act of stretching it forth to receive the almes the sense of poverty the opinion of the goodnesse of him from whom he seeks almes doth bow the consent and will to seek almes and receive it were bestowed on the begger of the same free grace and compassion of the giver of the almes by which he giveth the almes yee would say almes and stretching out of the hand were both
are freed from the law how not 5 Chap. VI. How the Command of the law layeth an obliging bond on us 5 6 Proven by six arguments Chap. VII How the Law and the Gospel require the same obedience 7 8 Chap. VIII Of the promissory part of the law the differences betweene the two Covenants mistaken by Antinomians are opened 9 10 Chap. IX of the threatening of the Law and the Gospel 10 11 Chap. X. of Gospel-feare 12 Serving for a reward not mercinary ibid. Chap. XI Law-feare and Gospel-faith are consistent 12 13 Antinomians make the Gospell the very spirit of grace 13 14. And remove all Ordinances 14 Chap. XII Antinomians deny remission of sinnes to the Jewes 14 15 Chap. XIII Of the non-age of the Jewes what it was 15 16 Chap. XIV The old man or the flesh to the Antinomians is under the law the new man freed from all law 16 Chap. XV. Antinomians hold that the justified sinne before men and as touching their conversation not before God as touching their conscience 17 Chap. XVI Antinomians take justification to be an extirpation of sinne root and branch 17 Chap. XVII Christ not intrinsically and formally the sinner 18 Chap. XVIII We are not justified till we beleeve 19 20 Antinomians hold that we are united with Christ before we beleeve 20 Chap. XIX Gods love of goodwill and of good likeing a warrantable distinction 20 21 21 Chap. XX. There is a reall change of our state in justification 22 Chap. XXI We mixe not workes and grace in the matter of justification 23 24 Chap. XXII Antinomians deny sin to be in the justified 24 Chap. XXIII Antinomians say to faith there is no sinne 25 Chap XXIV The Reigne of faith not absolute as Antinomians say 25 26 Chap. XXV God seeth sin in the justified 26 27 Chap. XXVI Confession required in the beleever 27 28 Chap. XXVII The law is to be preached to beleevers 28 29 How duties are to be preached 29 Chap. XXVIII Strict and precise walking a Gospel-duty 30 Chap. XXIX God truely angry at the sinnes of beleevers 31 Chap. XXX The justified countable to God for sinne 32 Chap. XXXI God punisheth sinne in beleevers 32 Chap. XXXII beleevers are to mourne for sin 32 33 Chap. XXXIII Antinomians deny that beleevers should crave pardon for sin or have any sense thereof 34 Chap. XXXIV Men boyling in their lusts without any humiliation foregoing are to beleeve say Antinomians 34 35 Chap. XXXV Spirituall poverty mistaken by Antino 35 36 Chap. XXXVI Repentance mistaken by Antinomians 36 Chap. XXXVII How good workes are necessary 37 38 Chap. XXXVIII The Gospell conditional and how 39 40 Chap. XXXIX Antinomian mortification rejected 43 44 Chap. XL. Antinomians the perfectists of the tyme. 43 Chap. XLI We are compleatly saved in this life say Antinomians 44 Chap. XLII Our happinesse in sanctification as well as in justification 45 46 Chap. XLIII Sanctification crushed by Antinomians 46 47 48 Chap. XLIIII All doubtings inconsistent with faith say Antinomians 49 50 Chap. XLV Antinomians Merit-mongers not we 50 51 Chap. XLVI There is grace inherent in us 52 53 Chap. XLVII We are not meere patients in acts of sanctification 53 54 55 Antinomians abet all reasoning câ—nsequences promises 57 58 59 Chap. XLVIII Beleevers cannot sinne against God but against men say Antinomians 60 61 How the justified are not obliged to eschew sinne according to the Antinomian way 61 Townes vaine objections tending to prove that good workes are not the way to salvation 61 62 63 Good workes are not necessary either by a necessity of meanes or of a command of God to Antinomians 62 63 How sanctification fitteth us for heaven 64 65 Chap. XLVI Antinomians free us from any obligation to Evangelick commands and exhortations to duties and say faith is the only thing commanded in the Gospell 65 66 Chap. L. How we are freed from the law in regard of sanctification as of justification 68 Chap. LI. Antinomians ignorant of Jewish law-service and of Gospel-obedience 69 70 Neither the Jewes under the Law nor we under the Gospell could ever buy the love of God ibid. The errour of the Jewes touching righteousnesse and the state of the Jewes confounded by Antinomians 70 71 Chap. LII That we are not freed from outward ordinances 73 74 Chap. LIII The necessity of outward Ordinances 75 76 Chap. LIV. What peace we may fetch from gracious performances 76 77. Peace with God not the same peace from our selves 77 78. What qualified performances can â—ottome peace 77 78 Antinomians reject all experiences 7â— 80 Antinomians condemne all experiences ibid. Chap. LV. How farre inherent qualifications and actions of grace can prove we are in the state of grace 81 82 Meere â—xternall performances prove nothing 62. To eye the actings of the Spirit and overlooke our selves is the surest arguing of a spirituall state 82 Keeping of the Commandements may prove to our owne Spirits that wee are in Christ. 82 83 Supernaturall acts may reciprocally prove one another 8â— Antinomians conspire with Papists to deny all evidences of our certainty of our being in Christ because all acts or qualifications or workes of sanctification may be called in question 86 87 88 Their certitude of faith being no lesse questionable 88 89 Good workes meanes not pillars of our assurance 90 91 Chap. LVI How duties and delight in them take us not off Christ 91 92. How they may be abused 93 Chap. LVII Of liberty purchased by Christ. 93 94 How we are freed from the Law how not 95 96 Magistrates cannot punish ill doers by the Antino way 100 101 Chap LVIII Antinomians teach that beleevers must not walke in their conversation as in the sight of God but must live by faith with God 101 102 Chap. LIX How justification is one indivisible act not successive as sanctification 104. and sins yet are daily pardoned 105 106 Chap. LX How sinnes are remitted before they be committed 106. Chap. LXI How faith justifieth 107. And Saltmarsh's arguments that Christ is not ours by faith 108 109 110. Answered The order of conversion and of justifying the sinner 111 112 Chap. LXII The Antinomians way and method of a sinners comming to Christ confuted 114 115 116 The abuse of preparations to merit Pelagianisme the abandoning of the practise of humiliation and sin sickenesse before we beleeve is presumptuous Antinomianisme 116 117 Chap. LXIII The law and the spirit subordinate not contrary 117 118 Saltmarsh a Familist 118 Chap. LXIV Antinomians differences betweene the law and the gospell confuted 119 120 Law-obedience did not win God to be our God 119 The authority of God a Law-giver and God a Father not contrary 120. The Gospell commandeth not any thing by the Antinomian way 121 122 The Gospel doth both command and perswade 122. Antinomians call obedience to God a miserable yoake ibid. How Law-rigor and Gospell-sweetnesse doe consist 123 Antinomians reject all arguing and logicall inferences of the Holy Ghost
be sweetly handled and ought not to be terrified with examples of Gods wrath but Paul teacheth another thing 2 Tim. 2.3 when he saith The Scripture is profitable to rebuke to correction So Saltmarsh Crisp Den Del Town Randel preach a honey Gospel and a short cut to heaven and exclude all gall and vinegar from the law Let 's not fall to the madnes of Antinomians who remove the law out of the Church as if they were all holy that are in the Church the world loves such teachers and say preach to us pleasant things Antinomians teach that all sinnes are simple taken away and are not to be rebuked and that because they are pardoned and damnation is removed and sin is nothing so Honey-combe c. 3. p. 23. Saltm free grace 140. Towne asser gr 71.72 Beleevers are as cleane from all sinnes as Christ or the glorified Saints pardoned sin is no sin God cannot see adulteries to be sinnes in them 2 Conclusion Luther saith for justification the law is unpossible but it s given to show sin to worke wrath and to make the conscience guilty But lay aside the matter of justification saith he no man can too highly commend good workes commanded of God and Its necessary that Godly teachers presse as diligently the doctrine of good workes as of faith Satan is angry at both and resisteth with all his strength both k Faith onely is not sufficient and yet only faith justifieth for if it be true faith it obtaineth the spirit of love This Spirit fullfilleth the law and obtaineth the kingdome of heaven Except faith be without the least good workes it justifieth not yea it is not faith it is impossible that faith can be without assiduous and great good workes Faith justifieth not as our worke but as a worke of God for the promise is a worke of God not our worke in which we doe or give something to God but in which we receave something from God and that through his mercy Thou holdest in thine hand seeds of divers kinde but I aske not what seeds are conjoyned with these or these seeds but what is the proper vertue of every seed in this case shew plainly what faith it 's alone doth in justification but not with what other vertues it is conjoyned faith it alone apprehendeth the promise beleeveth God promising and puts to its hand and receaveth something that God promiseth this is the proper worke of faith only Love hope patience have objects about the which they worke and other bonds within which they consist for they embrace not the promise but fulfill the commandements So Luther in the matter of justification putteth reproach on good workes just as Paul Phil. 3. maketh all his priviledges and his very workes of righteousnesse that he doth by the grace of Christ dung and losse in the comparison of imputed righteousnesse Workes saith he cannot be taught except yee hurt faith seeing faith and workes in the matter of justification are extreamely contrary so that the doctrine of works must necessarily be a doctrin of Devils and a departure from faith Pernitiosi Doctores sunt qui hodie nescio quibus occasionibus adducti contendunt legem in ecclesiâ non praedicandam Tu legem non doceres ubi verus legis populus est scilicet avari supeâ—bi adulteri usurarii Idololatrae In Antinomorum dogmate erat haec propositio sigâ—is esset adulter tantum ut crederet se habitu rum Deum propitium Sed qualis quaeso Ecclesia in quâ tam horribilis vox sonat faciendum discrimen erat docendum quod adulteri sâ—u peccatores duplices sunt quidam qui agnoscunt adulterium seâ— pâ—ccatum suum alii securè indulgent Quomodo predicatio legis potest as debet ex Ecclesiâ ejici nonne simul excludis timorem Dei maximam partem operum Dei Luth. tom 2. in Ge. Antinomi novi isti prophetae contendunt homines tractandos suaviter nec terrendos irae divinae exâ—mplis sed diversum Paulus dicet 2 Tim. 2.3 Vbi dicet scripturam utilem ad objurgandum ad castigandum Ne in Antinomorum insaniam inâ—idamus qui legem ex Ecclesia tollunt quasi vero in ecclesia ommes siâ—t sancti mundus quidem tales doctores amat sicut apud Hierem. dicunt loquerâ— nobiâ— placentia Antino docent omnia peccata sublata nec arguenda esse nec homines terrendos lege pescatum esseremissum nibil damnationis igitur peccatum est nihil et prorsus sublatum Lex non tantum non est necessaria ad justificationem sed plane inutilis et impossibilis sed data est ut peccatum ostendat iram operetur hoc est conscientiam ream faâ—it Extra causam iustificationis nemo potest bona opera a Deo praecepta satis magnifice praedicare Aeque necessarium est ut pij doctores tam diligenter urgeant doctrinam de bonis operibus quám doctrinam de fide Satan enim utrique sensus est et acerrimé resistit Non sufficit sola fides et tamen sola fides iustificat quia si vera est impetrat spiritum charitatis sic legem implet et regnum Dei consequitur fides nisi sit sine ullis etiam mini mis operibus non iustificat impossibile est fidem esse sine assiduis et magnis operibus Fides justificat non tanquam opus nostrum sed tanquam Dei opus promissio enim non est nostrum opus cum nos Deo facimus aut damus aliquid sed accipimus aliquid a Deo idque tamen per ipsius miserecordiam Texes manu varia semina non autem quero ergo quae cum quibus conjuncta sint sed quae cuiusque propria virtus hic aperâ—e die quid faciat sola fides non cum quibus virtutibus conjuncta fit sola enim fides apprehendit promissionem credit promittenti Deo Deo porrigenti aliquid manum â—â—mâ—vet et id accipit hoc proprium solius fidei opus est charitaâ— â—pes patientia habent alias materias circa quas versaâ—tur habent alios limites intra quos consistant non enim amplectuntur promissionem sed mandata exequuntur Opus non potest doceri nisi laedas fidem cum fides opera in re justificationis extreme adversantur ita a fit ut doctrina operum necessario sit doctrina daemoniorum et discessio a fide Luther speaketh so of Good workes only in the matter of justification But our Antinomians speake so of the whole course of sanctification in order to heaven and as they are the way to the Kingdome not the cause of the crowne as both they follow the person already justified and as they goe before him who is yet to be justified for Crispe saith vol 1. ser. 4 pag. 89. But withall I must tell you that all
this sanctification of life is not a jot the way of that justified person to heaven I perswade my selfe Luther had an eye to Antinomians when he said 〈◊〉 feared after his death that the doctrine of the true office of the law should be obscured Luther to 3. fol. 102 admoneo pietatiâ— amatores praecipue qui aliquando sunt futuri doctores ut diligentèr ex Paulo disâ—â—â—t intelligere verum et proprium usum legis qui ut timeo post tâ—mpora nostra interim obscurabitur et prorsus obruetuâ— to 4.106 timeo quod ista doctrina de vero legis usu nobis extinctiâ—â—bscurabitur 3 Conclusion Luther saith the New man needeth no law it s the flesh the old man the body of sin that is under the Law The law in a Christian ought not to exceed his bounds and ought onely to have dominion over the flesh which is subject to it and remaineth under it but oh law wilt thou invade the conscience and exercise dominion there and accuse the conscience of a justified beleever none terrified of sin and take away the joy of heart thou dost this beyond thy office When I behold Christ I am all holy and pure knowing nothing of the Law as it curseth and condemneth the beleever but if I behold my flesh I finde avarice lust wrath pride feare of death sadnes horror hatred murmuring and impatience against God in so farre as these are present Christ is absent or if he be present he is weakely present here there is need yet of a paedagogoe who should exercise and vex this strong asse the flesh that by this paedagogue sinnes may bee diminished and a way prepared for Christ. Luther Lex in Christiano non debet excedere limites suos sed tantum dominum habere in carnem quae et ei subiecta sit et sub ea maneat hoc ubi fit lex consistit intra suos limites lex si tu vis ascendere in regnum conscientiae et ibi dominari loquitur de conscientia hominis justificati sub tentationibus terrefacta et eam arguere peccati et gaudiâ—m cordis tollere hoc praeter officium tuum facis Si Christum inspicio totus sanctuâ— et purus sum nihil plane sciens de lege Si vero meam carnem inspicio sentio avaritiam libidinem iram superbiam timorem mortis tristitiam pavorem odium murmurationem et impatientiam contra Deum quatenus ista adsunt catenus abest Christus aut si adest infirme adest hic opus est adhuc paedagogo qui fortem asinum carnem exerceat et vexet ut hac paedagogia minuantur peccatâ— et Christo via paretur I grant the Antinomians now as Town Saltmarsh Den and the old Antinomians in Luthers time spoke after the same Grammer and stile and so did the Libertines in Calvins time say non ego pecco sed Aâ—inus meus It s not I that transgresse the law and am under the law but my asse But they have a farre other minde then Luther for the Antinomians as Schlusfelburgius saith cato heriti l 3. p. 53 54. taught that the flesh only and the unrenewed man was under the law but the renewed and justified man was under no law more then if it had beene never given to him and the law was no rule of life and obedience to a beleever Luther cryeth against this as most false and Luther saith those that beleeve in Christ must be daily mortified by daily Law-rebukes and arguenda sunt peccata et proponenda ira dei propter incredulos qui in ecclâ—sia sunt imo etiam propter credentes ne adhaerescenti peccato et innatae imbicillitati indulgeant lex manet inquit ante evangelium et justificationem in justificatione et post justificationem Luther verum tunc amplius non sunt opera legis sed Christi in nobis per fidem operantiâ— et viventis per omnia ideo non possunt sunt Mogis omitti quam ipsa fides nâ—c sunt minus necessaria quam ipsa fides Caeterum opera legalitâ—r perfecta quae verè sunt legis ficta et falsa sunt Good workes saith Luther are not any more the workes of the law compelling under the paine of damnation for he saith in the same place libere et gratis facienda sunt but workes of Christ working in us by faith and every way living in us therefore they can no more be omittted then faith it selfe and are no lesse necessary then faith it selfe Observe this in reading Luthers works that he taketh the law as opposed to justifieing grace and as it may condemne or justifie and so as an instrument of the Covenant of works exacting perfect obedience in a legall sence otherwise neither Luther nor any of our Divines will say good works absolutely perfect and in all things conforme to the Law are necessary to salvation for it is false all beleevers are saved by faith in Christ without any such good workes or perfect legall obedience Then we must hold this to be Luthers minde that if good workes be commanded to the renewed man in the law as well as faith and be as necessary as faith then the renewed part is under the law commanding good workes as well as it is under the command of faith but Luther saith the former Antinomi say nothing sins but the flesh nothing is under the law but the flesh so nothing is under a command and an obleiging rule of law or Gospell to doe good workes and beleeve but the flesh a senselesse untruth For it is the new man by the Spirit of Christ saith Luther from the word of truth that doth good workes and beleeveth So Luther to 4. fol. 499 in Psal. 130. 2 and excellently saith Luther to 1 fol. 436 Christiana lâ—bertas est quando non â—utata legâ— mâ—taâ—tur homines ut lâ—x eadem quae prius libero arbitrio odiosaâ—uit iam defusa per spiritus saâ—ctâ— charitatem cordibus nostris iucunda fiat Hence Luther saith two things that contradicts the Antinomians 1. The Law is not changed when the sinner is changed but that which was hatefull to free will before is the same law but now sweet and pleasant to the heart then if the law be not so much as changed it is not abolished to the beleever it s made of hatefull pleasant 2. That Law that is pleasant to the heart and sweet it is not given to the flesh and unrenewed part but especially to the renewed part 3 The renewed part in the beleever doth either do good workes by the grace of Christ and so keepe the law though unperfectly or not doe good workes at all If the latter be said the renewed part is not renewed but dead and is the very old man which is a contradiction but if thâ— former be said that it is the new man or renewed part that
best workes after we are pardoned and justified though God see it not as a judge therfore to condemne us the sting and condemning guilt of sin not the sinne it self in its nature and being is removed as a Serpent without a sting hath still the being and nature of a Serpent A Lion chained that it cannot devoure is still a Lion so is sin pardoned still sin in the kinde and nature of transgression against a divine Law Luther Haec est justitia infinita omnia peccata in momento absorbens quia impossibile est quod peccatum in Christo haere at qui credit haeret in Christo est que unus cum Christo habens candem justitiam câ—m ipso Luther Impossibile est ut peccet filius Dei quicunque tametsi verum est quod peccat sed quia ignoscitur ei ideo vero etiam peccans non peccat Non videt Deus dubitationem de voluntate ejus diffidentiam alia pâ—ccata quae adhuc habâ—o Donâ—â— enim vivo in carne verè peccatum est in me Luth. Peccatain nobis manent quae Deus maxime odit ideo propter illa oportet nos habere imputationem justitiae Luther Non est dicendum quod baptismus non tollat omnia peccata Verè enim omnia tollit non secundum substantiam sed plurimum secundum substantiam totum secundum vires ejus simul quotidie etiam tollens secundum substantiam ut evacuetur Luther Renatus non peccat peccat peccat in opere eodem propter voluntatem carnis non peccat propter contrariam voluntatem spiritus Quotidie peccat omnis homo sed quotidie poenitet Toto vitae tempore durat peccatum in carne nostrâ adversatur Spiritui sibi adversario Quare omnia opera post justificationem sunt aliud nihil quam paenitentia aut bonum propositum contra peccatum Luther Quotidie Spiritualiter in quolibet Christiano subinde invenitur per vices tempus legis gratiae Luth. Multae horae sunt in quibus cum Deo rixor impatienter ei repugnâ— mihi judicium Dei displicet ipsi vicissim displicet mea impatientia hoc tempus legis est in quo Christianus sub carnem semper est carâ— concupiscit c. Tempus gratiae est cum cor iterum â—â—igitur dicit Quarâ— tristis es anima mea c. Qui istam artem bene nosset ille merito diceretur Theologus Ego mei similes vix tenemus hujus artis prima elementa Luther Imo quo quisque magis pius est hoc plus sentit illam pugnam Ego Monachus statim putabam actum de salâ—te meâ si quando sâ—ntiebam coâ—cupiscentiam carnis tentâ—bam multa confitebar quotidie sed nihil prorsus proficiebam si tum recte intellexissem Pauli sententiam Caro concupiscit adversus Spiritum non usque adeo me aâ—â—lixissem sed ut hodie soleo cogitaâ—â—em Martine tu non carebis probus peccato quia carnem adhuc habes Staupicius dicere solitus millies vovi me probiâ—rem fore â—â—nquam praestiâ—i amplius non vâ—vebe Luther Hoc quod verê peccatum est contra legem lex pro peccato non potest accusare in piis Luth. Peccatum remissum est quod fiduciâ misericordiae contritum est ne damnet ne accuset tamen propter hanc carnem adhuc pullulat militat in carne Cavendum ne illas peccati reliquas extenuemus vilescit enim purgator Luther Manent in nobis reliquiae peccatorum quae quotidianâ remissione opus habent Luther Remissa quidem tecta sunt omnia peccata sed nondum expurgata haeret in nobis tantum libidinis superbiae odii sed occultae etiam maculae dubitatio imputientia Luther In carne nostra etiam cum justificati sumus reliquiae peccati manent ne scilicet sumus otiosâ— sâ—d habeamus exercitia pietatis Peccatum sicut Augustinus loquitur actu manet reactu tamen transit hoc est res ipsa quâ— verè peccatum eâ—t remissa est â Deo tolleratur ea manet in carne reliqua nec dum plane mortua est nisi quòd per Christum caput serpentis contritum est lingua tamen adhuc miâ—at cauda minatur ictum Luth. Quid Inquies an non decalogus praestari debet si autem praestatur an non ea justitia est Respondeo volumus decalogum praestare servare sed cum largâ hoc est verè Evangelicâ dispensatione seu distinctione Quia accipimus tantum primitias Spiritus gemitus Spiritus in corde manent item caro nostra cum suis libidinibus ac concupiscentiis hoc est tota arbor cum fructibus etiam manet haec causa est cur decalogus nunquam plenò praestari possit Luther The infinit justice of God in a moment swalloweth up all sin because it is impossible that sin remaine in Christ and hee that beleeves in Christ remaineth in Christ and is one with Christ having the same righteousnesse with him It is unpossible that a Son of God should sin though it be true that he sin but because his sin is pardoned therefore when he truly sins he sins not Because of saith God seeth not my doubting my unbeleefe my sadnesse of spirit and other sinnes which I have yet in me for so long as I live in the flesh it is truly sinne that is in me but because I am under the shadow of Christs wings I am protected as a chicken under an hen Sins remaine in us which God hateth for them therefore we must have the imputed righteousnesse of Christ. We must not say that baptisme takes not away al our sins for it truly takes them all away not in their essence or nature but in some respect in their nature and wholly in their dominion and it removes them daily in their being and nature through the growth of sanctification that sin at length may be fully exhausted and spent Luther A renewed man sins and sins not hee sins in the same worke in regard of the will of the flesh he sins not because of the contrary will of the spirit Luther every renewed man daily sins and daily repents All our life sin dwells in our flesh and resists the spirit as an adversary therefore all our works after justification are nothing but repentance or a good purpose against sin Luther Every day there is by course spiritually in every Christian a time of the Law and of Grace There bee many houres in which I quarrell with God and impatiently fight against him the wrath and judgement of God displeaseth me and again my impatience displeaseth him this is the time of the Law in which a Christian is under the flesh for the flesh ever lusts against the Spirit and the Spirit
justitiae salutis Res mira mundo inaudita Docere Christianos ut discant ignorare legem utque sic vivant coram Deo quasi penitus nulla lex sit nisi enim ignoraveris legem in corde tuo statueris nullam esse legem iram Dei tantum graciam misericordiam propter Christum non potes salvus fieri E contra in mundo sic urgeri lex opera debent quasi prorsus nulla sit promissio gratia Evangelium est predicatio De Christo quòd remittat peccatum donet gratiam justificet salvet peccatores Quod autem praecepta in Evangelio reperiuntur ista non sunt Evangelium sed expositiones apendices Evangelii Luther meaneth that as the Gospel is distinguished from the Law and containeth the Doctrine of justification by free grace without works so the precepts of good works are not Gospel-precepts but otherwise taking the Gospel in its latitude it confirmeth and establisheth the law and commandeth the same works of sanctification which the Law commandeth 7. Conclusion And whereas Luther calleth the Law a dead letter as the Gospel is a saving word he hath not the same meaning with Antinomians to exclude all outward commands to cry downe the Scriptures and the written Law and Gospel and turne the Gospel in the Spirit and to remove all outward ordinances word Sacraments praying and make faith all our worke and the Spirit of life that is in Christ all our Law as Del and Saltmarsh and other Antinomians doe and as Theologia Germanica doth and other Familists teach for Luther aimeth highly to extoll Scripture as you may read in Luther tom 1.166 to 1.252.531 to 2.22.237.310 to 2. in Genes c. 17. fol. 85. and to 2. in Gen. c. 19.143 I hate my own bookes often I wish they may perish for feare they take the readers and draw them from reading of the Scripture to 3. in Genes f. 45. c. 24. It s a common proverbe Princes letters should be thrice read so farre more Gods letters Vel millies legendae should be a thousand times read and whereas Antinomians and Familists are all for allegories Luther is not so The literall sense of the Scriptures is the whole substance of Christian faith and divinity which only carrieth a man out in tentation Allegories are empty speculations and the froath of Scripture An allegory is a faire whore that cannot but be loved for the present by idle men that are not tempted Only the historicall sense doth rightly and solidly instruct fight defend conquer edifie Luther Literalis sensus scripturae sâ—lus tota est fidei Theologiae Christianae substantia qui in tentatione solus subsistit Luther Allegoriae sunt inanes speculationes tanquam spuma sacrae Scripturae Est allegoria tanquam formosa meritrix quae ita blanditur hominibus ut non possit non amari praesertim ab hominibus otiosis qui sunt sine tentatione Luther Historicus sensus rectè solidè erudit pugnat defendit vincit aedificat And Luther acknowledgeth a literall sense of the Law Luther Spiritualis intelligentia legis est ea quâ scitur lex requirere Spiritum nos carnales convincere literalis ea quâ putatur imò erratur legem posse impleri operibus viribus nostris citra Spiritum gratiae The Spirituall understanding of the Law is that by which the law is known to require the Spirit and to convince us that are carnall and that is the literall meaning of the Law by which men think yea erroneously imagine the law may be fulfilled by works our strength without the Spirit of grace Then to Luther the literall knowledge of the Law or the old letter of the Law is the false sense of the Law that we can be justified by works and Luther never condemneth Law or Gospel because written and in outward commandements as Antinomians doe And againe the law without the Spirit as also the Gospel is literall and legall to Luther Lex litera est sive scribatur sive dicatur sive intelligatur donec ametur The law is a letter either writen spoken or understood till it be loved this is not a work of the teaching Law but of justifying faith converting soules It is true Luther holdeth that all commandements of law and Gospel are then sweet and Christs yoke easie when the Spirit concurreth to make them sweet but neither doth this cry down the Scriptures nor make the Spirit the only obleiging rule as Del Town Saltmarsh Crisp doe Luther Ita dulcescunt praecepta Dei quando non in libris tantum sed in vulneribus dulcissimi salvatoris legenda intelligimus Luther Duplex est lex una Spiritus fidei quâ vivitur Deo victis peccatis impletâque lege altera lex literae operum quâ vivitur peccato nunquam impletâ lege per legem enim suscitatur odium legis sed per fideÌ„ infunditur dilectio legis Luth. tom 4.88 Tu urges servum hoc est scripturam eam non totam sed locos de operibus Ego urgeo dominum Christum qui est Rex Scripturae qui est factus mihi meritum pretium justitiae salutis Then the law without Christ is the letter of bondage and fear Lex literae lex spiritus differunt sicut signum signatum sicut verbum res Ideo obtentâ re jam signo non est opus Itaque neque justo lex est posita habito enim solo signo docemur rem ipsam quaerere Luther So the Commandements of God become sweet when we understand them to be read not onely in books then as written they are sweet but also in the wounds of the most sweet Saviour Luther There is a twofold law one of the Spirit and faith by which we live well to God sin being subdued and the law fulfilled The other the law of the Letter and of works by which we live to sin the law never being fulfilled but with a fained fulfilling For by the law the meere letter of the law without faith or grace is stirred up a hatred of the Law but by faith is infused a love of the law The Law of the letter and the law of the Spirit differ as the signe and the thing signified as the word and the thing the when the thing is obtained there is no need of the signe So there is no law to the just man but having only the signe we are taught to seek the thing it self This expression of Luther with another in the same Tome to wit The justified man ought nâ—t to live holily but hee doth live holily gave occasion to Antinomians to dream but it s but a dream that Luther is theirs as if Luther had been of their minde that the justified is under no commanding power of the law and
come we by faith in Christ come suffering glorified Luther saith tom 1. p. 529. Non facta sed fidem patrum imitemur let us follow not the deeds but the faith of the Fathers Luther burnt offerings were not for justification but a sacrificed Oxe was a witnesse of grace and to speak so a working voyce of thankfulnesse or an handy or manuall gratitude by which the hand powred out thankfulnesse by reall words They beleeved in Christ to come we know he is come and gone to the father to prepare dwelling places for us Luther Abraham saw Christs day in faith and the spirit onely Luther the same Christ the same faith from Abâ—l to the end of the world and did reigne in divers ages of the world Antinomians as Den Crisp Saltmarsh Del deny any heart-Reformation true conversion to God actuall remission of sins and of all sins or free justification by free grace in a Gospel-way to the Jews under Moses as we are justified and saved under the Messiah and make the promises and covenant of grace with Papists and Sâ—â—inians to differ in substance and nature from our Gospel-promises and free covenant as if their law tutory Gal. 4. had varied the way of Justification and salvation to them and to us CHAP. XII Of Christian Liberty and of sense true and false 10 Conclusion Antinomians have not Luther for them in the Doctrine of Christian Liberty Luther Vnusquisque Christianus sciat sâ— per Christum constitutum esse in conscientia dominum legis peccati mortis contra scâ—at quoque hanc servitutem externam corpori suo impositam ut per charitatem serviat pâ—oprio Qui autem aliter intelligunt libertatem c. Luther Omnia sunt libera nobis per fidâ—m omnia serva per charitatem ut simul stet servitus libertatis et libertas servitutis Libertas Evangelii non tollit res corpora debitâ— nominum sed conscientias liberat a vinculis spiritualibus Luther Christianus in conscientia debet esse medicus in externis moribus debet esse asinus Per fidem Christi non sumus liberi ab operibus sed ab opinionibus operum id est a stultâ praesumptione justitiae per opera quesitae Let every Christian know that by Christ he is made in his conscience as he beleeveth in Christ the Lord of law sin death so that these have no power over him On the contrary let him know that this externall servitude is laid on the outward man that by love he is to serve his neighbour Those who otherwise understand Christian liberty as Antinomians who think they owe no obedience to the Law they enjoy the gaine of the Gospel to their owne destruction and are worse Idolators under the name of Christians then they were in Popery All things are free to us by Faith yet all things are under obligation of Law in regard of charity that so the servitude of liberty and the liberty of servitude might stand together The liberty of the Gospel takes not away things bodies nor duties of men but freeth the consciences from spirituall bands of wicked opinions Thâ— Christian in his conscience should be a physitian but without in externall conversation an Asse to beare the burthen of Brethren Luther meaneth in things indifferent that are without the case of scandall as hee exponeth himself Tom. 1 472.528 and clearly To. 1. In Christum credentibus omnia munda indifferentia licita sunt quaecunque vel praecipiuntur vel prohibentur externis ceremoniis c. and Tom. 2.154 155 156 158. Through faith in Christ wee are not free from works but from opinions of works that is from a foolish presumption of righteousnesse to come by works Now by opinion of good works Luther meaneth conscience and the resting of the conscience on good works as our righteousnesse hence so often saith Luther the Law hath nothing to doe with the conscience the Law hath no power over the conscience the Law ought not to reigne over the conscience And so 2. he placeth our Christian liberty not only in freedom from the Judiciall Law Tom. 4 on 1 Pet. 2. Rom. 13. and from the Ceremonies of the Law of Moses Tom. 4. fol. 145. But also from the condemnation of the Morall Law As is clear Luther That Christian liberty which Christ hath purchased is not so easily beleeved as spoken if it could be apprehended by a sure and firme faith no fury nor terror of the world of law sin death and the devill could be so great which would not be swallowed up as a little spark of fire by the great sea Libertas illa quam nobis Christus peperit non tam cito creditur quam nominatur Si certa ac firmâ fide apprehendi posset nullus furor aut terror mundi legis peccati mortis et diaboli tam maguâ— esse posset qui non 〈◊〉 seu scintilla a mari ab ea absorberetur Then Luther evidently thinketh our Christian Liberty is not from duties commanded in the Law but from the terrors accusation and condemning power of the Law after wee have sinned against the Law Luther Verba illa libertas ab ira Dei lege peccato morte c. Dictu facilia sunt sed Magnitu dinem hujus libertatis sentire fructum ejus in certamine in agone conscientiae applicare hoc plus quaÌ„ dici potest difficile est Luther In carne nulla debet esse libertas Debemus enim subjecti esse parentibus Magistratibus in summâ omnium servi esse sed in Spiritu conscientiâ Liberrimi ab omni servitute ibi nulli credimus nulli confidimus nullum timemus nisi solum Christum qui regnat inter medias afflictiones cum gaudio laetitia inter media peccata cum virtute fortitudine These words Liberty from the wrath of God law sin death c. are soon said but to finde the greatnesse of this liberty and the fruite thereof in a conflict and agony of conscience and apply it practically is more hard then can be spoken So he expresly clearely this Liberty in the flesh that is in sinning there ought to be no liberty for we ought to be subject to Parents Magistrates and finally the servants of all but in the spirit and conscience we are most free from all servitude for there we beleeve none trust in none feare none but onely Christ who reignes in the midst of afflictions with joy and gladnesse in the midst of sins with strength and courage It s clear by the flesh Luther cannot mean as Antinomians and Papists with Libertines doe the sensitive part which they call the Asse contradistinguished from the minde will and conscience as if the renewed man in whole sinned not with will affection reason conscience for the reason that Luther giveth is contrary to that for saith
of his Christian walking Saltm ibid. 11 Christs example is no paterne to us because 't is externall and voyd of the spirit 12 The soule may have true union with the Father son and spirit justification and sanctification and the person remain a Hypocrite 13. There is no difference between hypocrites and beleevers in their kinde 14. All graces in the regenerating are fading 15. In the Saints there is no inherent grace but Christ is all So also Saltmarsh Sparkles of Glory p. 254.255.256 16 We are united to Christ and justified without faith yea from eternity So Saltmarsh Sparkles of glory p. 190 191 192. as if the decree of Justification and â—ustification it self were all one and the decree of God to create the world and permit sin and redeem the Elect were all one with the creation of the world permission of siâ— Redemption of the Elect. Yea so that which is from eternity and since God was God and that which falleth out in time must be all one 17 Faith is not a receiving of Christ but a discerning that the man hath received him already Saltmarsh ibid. 18 A man is united to Christ by the work of the Spirit on him without any work of his own he being a meer patient first and last Ibi. 19. A man is never really and effectually Christs till he have such assurance as exludeth all doubting 20 The witnesse of the Spirit is merely immediate without respect to sanctification or acts thereof as signes or concurrence of the word So Saltmarsh Spark of glory p. 274 275 276. 21 He that hath once assurance never doubteth again contrary to Ps. 77. Ps. 88. Ps 32.22 Jona 2.4 22 To question assurance of a spirituall good estate upon the commission of murther or adultery is a token of no true assurance 23 Sanctification can be no evidence of a good estate Saltm Spar. of Glor. 275 276 277 278. 24 I know I am Christs because I beleeve that Christ hath crucified my lusts for me not because I crucifie them my self 25 What tell ye me of graces and duties tell me of Christ as if Christ and duties of sanctification were contrary one to another by this meanes Christ and living to him that on the tree bare our sins Christ and walking worthy of Christ Christ and willing and doing by the grace of Christ must be contrary one to another which is an inverting of the Gospel indeed before the tribunall of Divine Justice a wakened conscience hath peace by being justified by Christ but not by duties or works even wrought by grace 26 I am not better accepted of God because I am holy nor the worse because unholy sure he that hath elected me will save me 27 To be Justified by faith is to be justified by works 28 No comfort no ground of assurance or peace can bee brought from a conditionall gospel or gospel-promiseâ— becâ—use all depenâ—s on our free-will which might say something if Grace did noâ— efficaciously work in us to will and to doe and determine irresistibly the will to choose freely and invincibly that which is good 29 None are to be exhorted to beleeve but such as we know to be the Elect of God and to have the spirit working in them effectually Saltmar sparkles p. 256 257. 30 It is true poverty of spirit to know I have no grace at all 31 A child of God is not to sorrow for sin and trouble of conscience for sinne argues a man to bee under a covenant of works 32 To act by vertue of or in obedience to a command is a Law-worke Saltm Sparkles of glory p. 242 243 244. 33 Wee are not to pray against all sin because it cannot bee avoyded but sin must dwell in us 34 The efficacy of Christs death is to kill all activity of graces in his Members that Christ may bee all in all Saltmarsh Sparkles of glory p. 254 255. 35 All the activity of beleevers is to act sinne 36 The spirit acts most in the Saints when they indeavour least 37 Sanctification rather darkens justification the darker my sanctification is the more evident is my justification 38 A man cannot evidence his justification by his sanctification but hee must needs build upon his sanctification and trust to it 39 Frequencie and length of holy duties argue the partie to bee under a covenant of workes So Saltmarsh saith Spark glory pag 224 225 of prayer as if to bring forth much fruit which is to glorifie our heavenly father Joh. 15. To goe about doing good Act. 10. To bee abundant in the worke of the Lord 1 Cor. 15. To pray continually 1 Thes. 5. savored of the law and had nothing to doe with Gospel-grace 40 It is dangerous to close with Christ on a promise Contrary to Joh. 5.25 26. Joh. 11.25 26. Joh 7.37 Joh 3.16 Math. 11.28 29. Rev. 22.17 Rev. 2.7 Rev. 3.20 41 All doctrines revelations and spirits must bee tryed by Christ rather then by the word 42 It is no way of grace that a Christian support his faith in ill houres with the comforts of former experiences contrary to Psa. 18.6 7 8 Psa 34.8 1 Sam. 17.34 Rom. 5.1 2 3 4. Joh 35 10. 43 The soule need not go out to Christ for fresh supply but is acted by the inhabiting spirit contrary to Christs continuated intercession that we fall not Luk. 22.32 Heb 7.25 1 Joh. 2.1 to the prayers of the Saints who are ready to dye if they be not quickened Psa. 119.25.32.35.36 44 Christ works in the regenerate as in those that are dead and passive in all spirituall acts so that Christ loves prayes beleeves prayses formally in them and they are wholly Christed and Goded â—o Saltmarsh sparkles of glory 254 255 256. 45. A Christian is not bound to pray nor to any spirituall acts but when the spirit exciteth and moveth him thereunto As if the impulsion of the spirit were our binding and obliging rule and not the scripture nor any command of law and gospel yea Saltmarsh goeth so farre on with Swenck H Nic. Joh. Waâ—ldesse and Del in this that hee refuseth Scriptures as not necessary to the perfect ones as is clear to the reader in his late peece called Sparkles of glory p. 289 290. c. p. 315 316. and clearely pa. 245. others say Familists in opposition to Protestants that outward ordinances in the letter are not commanded of Christ 246 247 That the new Covenant or God revealed in his and teaching of his is not by any outward 〈◊〉 or ministery or means So the elect of God may burne all the Bibles and packe away Saltmarsh and all Ministers out of the land but by the inward or unction or anoynting ye are all taught of God no man shall teach his neighbour or brother any more saying know the Lord and all conference and discoveries in letters and speech is but mere witnessing to the Lord and the discoveries of God of what we are taught not any ministerie as formerly
29. nor was Christ for that under any absence of the Spirit 1 Tim. 4.14 15 16. and Revel 1.3 compared with Rev. 2.7 whereas he sayth The Ministery that is to destroy Antichrist is more glorious then Arts and Tongues and this is Jesus Christ himselfe 1. Libertines said the Gospel or Word was the Spirit himselfe Saltmarsh here sayth the Ministry destroying Antichrist is Christ which is most false The Ministery is but 1. an Instrument 2. a created Ordinance Christ is God Man and Mediator 2. The Ministery that destroyeth him is the Word preached as an instrument and Christ the principall cause But the principall cause removes not the Instrument as Familists imagine but the Ministery of Familists shall never do it Whereas former Antinomians made two contrary administrations one under the Law in the old Testament another undâ—r grace or the Gospâ—l in the new Testament Onely John Baptist was pinned in as halfe a Legalist between both Saltmarsh p. 68. after he with the Familists hath made a greater number of spheres and circles of Administrations following the spirit in his fulnesse and variety he foldeth them up in three of Law Gospel and Spirit or of Letter Graces and God or of the First Second and third Heavens After the cut of David Georgâ— who said the first Ministration was the law of death and the letter the second was under Christ and the Apostles but not very spirituall but fleshly literall carnall but the last under David George the true Messiah was spirituall purely spirituall beyond that of Christ and the Apostles and so spirituall that to have conscience or sense of uncleannesse or sinne was a work of the flesh And Saltmarsh saith it is fleshly and literall that a pardoned man should confesse sin p. 69 70 a Christian saith hee passeth throâ—gh severall ages even as Christ was under the Law circumcision Supper of the Lord Baptisme and then hee crucified all that flâ—sh hee walked in under these dispensations and entered unto glory Answ. Then he crucified Baptisme the Lords supper preaching of the Gospel the Ministery the visible Church and every outward letter of conference praying for Saltmarsh now turned Seeker denies all these and hee must have crucifyed all his preaching tongues writing of books 2. What tongue or Science of the Holy Ghost taught Saltmarsh to call the Ordinances of the New Testament flesh or fleshly Ordinances for I doubt he meaneth not that Christ true man dyed for our sins for 185 186. he saith It is a discovery of the highest attainment of Protestants generally that we are born in sin And that the way of salvation was by Jesus Christ the Sonne of God born of a Virgin in the fulnesse of time made under the Law bearing our sinnes crucified dead buried and risen and ascended and entred into glory c. but pag. 190 191. he forsaking this as legall doctrine tels us of a further discovery as to free grace as if the Protestant Doctrine were merits of men not the free grace of God And he setteth downe that of the Antinomians and not a word of Christ God-man crucified and dead for our sins And the confession of Faith made in this Assembly at Westminster yea all the Reformation now is onely in some outward ordinances saith he not any purer or more glorious discoveries of God or the Spirit or Jesus Christ or our union with the Spirit or glory as to spirituall things or Christ risen but as to Christ in the flesh or under the Law of which these Ordinances were a signe And p. 198 199 200 201. which he calleth the last highest and most glorious discoverie of God by love and grace for to the Familists there is no Article of the Protestant faith that savours of truth for to them all our Doctrine is a dead Letter Nor did Christ die for our sins and rise for our righteousnesse but onely the dying of Christ is a meere figure insinuating that he dyed not in our nature as true man but as Gortyn saith the sufferings of every Saint who is the figure and image of Christ is all the Christ crucified the Scripture knows There is nothing in all the books or writings of Familists discovered touching the controversies between Protestants and their Adversaries Papists Arminians Socinians Arrians Antitrinitarians Sabellians Libertines Swenckefeldians Anabaptists c. Concerning Election Reprobation the power of free-will the supremacy of the Pope Idol-worship the consubstantiality of the Son of God Christs manhood his dying satisfaction merit buriall resurrection ascension the last judgement heaven hell the resurrection of the body in all which they are unsound and ought to give a confession of their faith as Anabaptists have done 12 The Jewish Church saith Saltmarsh p 70. or dispensation that was according to Moses and the Letter in which they were led out in carnall and more fleshly courses as in proceeding against the Nations by warre and fighting with all their other legall Rites and Rudiments were a clear figure of the Christian under age or under tutors and Governours and worldly Rudiments Here lawfull Warres and the use of the Sword are made legall rites and figures War saith he with all other legall Rites then Warre is no more lawfull to us under the New Testament then Circumcision and all the Law of Ceremonies Saltmarsh then would no more goe as a Priest to the Campe to preach to the Generall then he would be Circumcised except with H. Nicholas he thought all Moses Law indifferent and that the spirit without scripture led him to be accessorie to unlawfull bloodâ—shed and the spirit is his rule not the word of God 2 If the ceremonies of Moses be the figure of a Christian under Tutors and worldly rudiments such as hearing of the Gospel baptisme prayer confession reading then all these must bee abolished in this life to the Christian and if Christ have crucified all these as fleshly ordinances to Pray heare must be as unlawfull as to be circumcised which Paul saith Gal. 5. is to fall from Christ. See if these men mind God 13 The Disciples of Châ—ist saith p 70 71. according to Johns ministerie were a type and figure of such as are under Tutors as Gal. 4.1 and as carnall and Babes in Christ 1 Cor. 3.1 2. Answ. These under non-age Gal. 4.1 are under the Law of Moses and yet Heirs of the promise The Disciples were under Christs ministerie and beleeved in Christ as come and were blessed in that the Father revealed Christ to them not flesh and blood Matth. 16.16 17. The Baptists ministery and his Doctrine and baptisme were all one with the ministerie and baptisme of Christ and the Apostles as our Divines prove against Papists for both preached Christ the Saviour that taketh away the sins of the World justification by free grace faith repentance to life sanctification c. Corinthians are called carnall not because they prayed and heard and beleeved but because though Babes
or the Spirit which is not the doctrine that Paul and Iohn received from the Lord Gal. 1.8 2 Ioh. v. 10. 1 Cor. 11.23 But Familists will have the Scriptures to beare witnesse to us of and to reveale the Father and the Son but for the holy Spirit he must be revealed without the testimony of Prophets and Apostles though Christ our dying friend hath left us his will in his last testament confirmed by the death of the Testator and forbids us to expect any farther revelation Heb. 1.1.9.16.17.27.28 Rev. 22.12.18.19 Is it not safer to beleeve the Prophets and Apostles upon whose word and doctrine we are builded as living stones and a habitation to God Eph. 2.20 21 22. then to relye upon the word of such seducers as H. Nicholas Del Saltmarsh and the like who come in their owne name and bring neither word nor workes to witnesse their doctrine not so much as Simon Magus and the Antichrist who bring wonders and living miracles to evidence that they are sent from God Familists have no escape but to say that their new discoveries are revealed to them by the Spirit to be contained in the spirituall and allegoricke sense of the Scripture Now undeniably the Scripture hath a literall sense and here it hath a mysticall and spirituall sense and so many senses as the Papists teach So Bellermine de verb. dei l 3. c. 3. Thomas p. 1. art 10. So Cajetanus ibid. Alpâ—onsus a Castro l. 1. adver her Lyra in 2. Reg. 7 Bucanus in Theolog. Scolastic part 2. c. 3. q. 5. 11. The same Gospell-truths in the manner of preaching and delivering of them may be spiritually by some and literally and dryly published by others and nothing is thereby either added or taken away from the substance of truth But duties commanded in the Law are then pressed upon the consciences of the hearers in a legal way when they are forced upon the consciences of the people upon legal motives Law-obligations threatnings of curses sad judgements but they are then spiritually preached when they are pressed upon the hearers in a terrible Law-way but for that end discovered to them that they may be chased into Jesus as to the Gospel-sanctuary and City of refuge to such as runne themselves out of breath to be in the bosome of our Saviour 2. They would be pressed so spiritually as there may bee still a pointing at a pardoning ransome and a healing and curing spirit so that all obedience must be new from new principles of the Mediators grace and upon Gospell motives only not from Hagar and the covenant tending to bondage Nor 3. upon the same necessity and account they were to be performed by vertue of a Covenant of workes What I before said toucheth the question whether the formall and last object of our faith be the word of God or the anointing strength saving grace and eye-salve of the Spirit as some Schoolmen Granado and others affirme the latter but the word is the formall object of faith the saving grace or anointing the efficient by which we are anointed inabled and quickned to beleeve the word now the eye-salve or anointing is not that which we see and beleeve that which we see is the saving Gospel-truths we beleeve Saltmarsh with Familists denying the Scripture to bee the word of God will have the inward supernaturall grace and anointing to be the only obliging rule of faith otherwise saith he it s in vaine to write bookes one against another for we then but set letter to letter argument to argument reason to reason but all in vaine without the Spirit as if Christ in proving the resurrection against Saduces Paul in proving justification by faith without works against such as turn the grace of God into wantonnes had not set letter to letter argument to argument and all in vaine for they remained still blinde yet Christ and Paul convinced and silenced these obstinate wranglers by the word of God without powring the Spirit on them without whose power they remained unconverted and hardened against the truth the formall object is that into which our faith is resolved when we give a reason of our faith as thus for what cause or formall motive doe you see with the eye of faith and believe that Maries son is the Messiah only Saviour ye do answer because so saith the Lord in the Old and N. Testament and that is the true object but yee doe not give an account of your faith when yee answer I beleeve it because I have eyes within inlightned because that is not to answer what is the true object of your faith if any aske you upon what morall grounds goe you to Rome yea give no reason if yee answer I goe to Rome because I have a will and a locomotive power in the nerves and muscicles of my body to move for now you answer by the efficient cause when the question is made of the formall objective cause If any aske why doe you see colours in day-light yee doe not answer because I have eyes and a seeing faculty but to the former you say I goe to Rome for such businesse to the lâ—tter I see colours in day-light because they are seeable and colours cloathed with light before my eyes so 1 Ioh. 5.10 He that beleeveth on the Sonne of God hath the witnessâ— within him that is the beleever hath objectively the the truth stamped in his heart but the anointing by which he was inabled to receive the testimony and truth is not for that the object or the thing beleeved or received but the saving helpe by which wee are strengthened to beleeve and receive the testimony the inward speaking of God to the heart as Augustine saith lib. 11. confess c. 3. sine strepitu syllabarum without noise of words is the saving apprehending of Christ and Gospell-truths but it is not the thing or object savingly apprehended the day-starre in the heart is not the Gospell-truth that wee see and receive but the light of Christ inabling and the Spirit strengthning the soule to beleeve and receive these Gospell-truths for without the day-starre and Spirit no man can see these truths 12. Upon the principles of Antinomians and Familists these and the like Gospell-promises I will give you a new heart and a new spirit Behold I make all things new a bruised reed shall hee not breake Come to me all yee that are weary and heavy laden and I will ease you Him that commeth I will in no wise cast away but will raise him up at the last day Yee that have no mony come buy and eat c. are as literall and legall being written and preached and as carnall for they value them to be but outward ordinances as this Cursed be every one that abides not in all that is written in the Law of God to do it or as the very Law and Covenant of workes which promiseth not any new heart but presseth the Law in its
without the Spirit is a dead letter as well as the Law and if so then to sinne against any meane of conversion must be against the law of God and so this law which commandeth to heare and obey all that God commandeth us must obleige us perpetually 6. Christ saith expresly that he came not to loose any from obedience 〈◊〉 though unperfect to the least jot of the law The 〈◊〉 covenant of works for so the Scripture calleth it is now so farre forth abrogated as that we are freed from the necessity of justification by the Law and the curse of it and thus far goe the Antinomian Arguments and no further Antinomians free us from the Law as its a beame of Christ in substance and matter so as wee are not to seeke the light of one beame now when the Sunne of righteousnesse is risen himselfe though Master Towne be not so strict Hence is it that they offend so much that any glimmering of light should come to us from the letter of Commandements either of Law or Gospel that to search Christ in the Scriptures is not safe and all covenants in the written and preached Word take men off Christ. CHAP. VII How the Law and the Gospel require the same obedience BUt seeing the Law cannot contradict the Gospel and speaketh nothing of a Surety and Mediator and so is negatively diverse from the Gospel yet positively it is not contrary nor denyeth that there ought to be a Mediator for so should there be two contrary wils in God and so it had bin injustice and against a just law that God should send his Sonne to die for sinners It is the same very obedience commanded in the Law as a strict covenant of works to be done by strength from our own nature and for the authority of the Law-giver and the love of God and now enjoyned in a mild covenant of grace from the strength of the grace of Christ and now not onely acteth on us by Legall motives the love of God the authority of the Law-giver which the Gospel excludeth not but upon the love of a free Redeemer and Ransome-payer as it may bee the same debt which a man payeth of his owne proper goods and of the money borrowed from a rich friend 1. Perfect obedience which the Law requireth and imperfect obedience which the Gospel accepteth for it requireth perfection as well as the Law doth are but graduall diffeâ—ences as the same summe of gold though clipped if accepted by the the creditor as full payment the rest which is wanting being pardoned may in grace and value bee as good as the full payment It is the Law that commandeth the love of God under paine of eternall death for the least faile and by way of a covenant of works Now the tenure of a covenant of works is an accident of the Law 2. A new obligation of obedience varieth not the nature of it as it is the same morall obedience that God commanded to the heathen and the Jews but that it was written and preached to Jewes addeth more guiltnesse when they disobey and these same duties that Moses commanded of righteousnesse holynesse and sobriety Exod. 20. doth the grace of the Gospel injoyne Tit. 3.11 and the Apostles command as acts of sanctification and though Moses should not command them by the motives of the grace of Redemption which yet is false except when he presseth the Law as a covenant of works yet Gospel-motives vary not the nature of duties as a Master may command the same duties to his sonne and his servant upon different grounds 3. The Gospel abateth nothing of the height of perfection in commanding what ever the law commandeth in the same perfection for t is as holy pure and spirituall in commanding we be perfect as our heavenly Father and holy as he is holy as the Law is In acceptation of grace the Gospel accepteth lesse then the law but commandeth no lesse therefore the Gospel granteth pardons but no dispensations the Law though it deny not pardons nor forbid them positively yet it granteth neither CHAP. VIII Of the promissorie part of the Law the differences between the two covenants mistaken by Antinomians are opened FOr the promissory part of the Law It promiseth life and reward to no obedience but to perfect and absolute obedience if there be the least defect in the least jot the garland and crowne promised is forfeited so as there is no regâ—ining of it for ever by that bargaine But the Gospel promiseth to the least sincere obedience were it but a cup of cold water to a Disciple a reward of glory Therefore the difference standeth not as Antinomians dreame betweene the covenants chiefely in doing and not doing as if the Gospel or covenant of grace did not also command doing in relation to life eternall yea and with a promise as well as the Law doth but in a farre other way for Godlinesse hath the promises of the life that now is and that which is to come and to the followers of Christ and though they halt in their walking and such as forsake all for Christs name is promised sitting on thrones and a hundreth fold in this life and in the life to come life eternall But the difference is 1. That no obedience is accepted in the Gospel without a Mediator not so in the Law 2. That the Law is given in its strictest bargaine to a holy perfect nature the Gospel to a lamed wounded and dead sinner 3. The Law giveth by way of debt not excluding boasting in some measure not that Adam could merit an infinite crowne by a peece finite-work or could doe beyond obligation more then we but because for holy works by strict covenant without the Mediators grace without pardon the worker might claime his wages humbly yet glorying hee had woon them by natures good deeds and by works and for works not of grace When Paul saith Rom. 4.2 If Abraham hath whereof to glory it s not before God He meaneth not that justification by the works of the Law giveth ground of boasting or glorying in our selves For 1. a conditionall proposition can conclude nothing positively 2. He speaketh of glorying as chap. 3.27 comparatively law-Law-justification is more like glorying then grace for Angels cannot boast Rom. 11.36 â—7 the Gospel giveth of free grace But 4. the â—aw could not accept another mans imputed righteousnesse that is supernaturall and to beleeve this required grace and strength of a higher straine then Adam had it demandeth but â— mans owne personall and perfect righteousnesse and curseth the sinner for the least wrinesse or crookednesse in the first bud or spring of the inclinations or motions 5. The Gospel leaâ—â—th place to repentance which the Law doth not and openeth a doore of hope to a lost sinner and the speciall condition is Faith that a ransome payed by Christ shall buy me a title and
bloud he washeth us 4. Wee behoved to beleeve from eternity for wee are justified by Faith 5. All the justified have a reall union and interest in Christ to live by faith and wait on God in all their troubles by faith but though their be an union of love in Gods minde from eternity betweene the elect and God yet a compleat union betweene us and Christ without the Spirit and without any faith though it be boldly asserted by Familists is against the Scripture for then might wee bee borne againe and not receive Christ by faith contrary to the Scripture and be united to Christ as branches to the Vine-tree and not abide in Christ have Christ dwelling in our heart and not by faith contrary to Paul so might Christ live in us and we eat and drinke him as the true Manna have the Sonne and yet want faith contrary to the Scriptures All which or most of them prove that wee were not justified when Christ dyed on the crosse 6. All that are justified are unseparably sanctified and called â—nd the blessing of justification hath with it the receiving of the promise of the Spirit through faith and peace with God through the Lord Jesus Christ accesse by faith into grace whereby we stand rejoycing in the hope of the glory of God glorying in tribulation patience experience hope but many for whom Christ dyed have none of these till they be justified by Faith the distinction of justification in or before God or to our own sense by faith will not help this for the Scripture no where speaketh of justification but by faith onely the meritorious price of our justification is payed on the Crosse but that is not justification CHAP. XIX Gods love of good will and of good liking a warrantable distinction NOr can wee stand to that Antinomian ground that in Justification there is no change of our state and spirituall condition before God and that God hath the same love to us before and after conversion and that it is a vaine distinction of Gods love of good will called amor 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vel benevolentiae and good liking amor complacentiae because God loveth because he loveth and for no cause in the creature not their most eminent works done by the influence of Gospel-grace But if this distinction bee right taken it hath an evident ground in Scripture We teach that the love of benevolence and good will is the liking free delight and choise of the person to glory and to all the meanes even to share in Christs Mediatory love and the fruits of his death in this love he willeth and ordaineth and layeth up good and happinesse for us expecting no payment at our hand the other love is onely denyed by Antinomians but without ground for this love of complacencie is of things not of persons and when we say God loveth his Saints for their inherent holynesse and delighteth in them for it we meane no other thing then that God loves the sparkles of his owne rarest worke his saving grace so farre as to make it a meanes to fulfill the love and gracious decree of good will of free election not that any new immanent act of love arises towards the person loved that was not in God toward that person from eternity but the truth is God first createth a lovely and love-worthy object and then out of that love that createth being and the lovely object hee goeth on to continue the former act of loving and delighting in that object and rendreth it more lovely Creatures cannot create the object of their love but find it created to their hand and expect to have some perfection added to them in an union of love with that excellent thing they love and they are often deceived and ever their love hath a cause and hire and reward in the thing loved Now when it is said that God loveth all that he hath made then he created his owne lover and his owne love 2. When hee loveth the chaines and bracelets about the neck of his Spouse Cant. 4. He there createth in his Christ a new rare piece liker to himselfe then the works of pure and simple creation this is not pure love but a continuation of his creating good will nor doth the creature engage God to love it but as divine love gave being to these ornaments of grace the inherent holinesse in his Bride so that the same love continueth it selfe in delighting in his owne worke 3. So he is said to love his Bride for or because of her excellency and beauty that he putteth on her and still he loveth his owne in Christ for his owne rare workmanship not that the creature was cause or begetter of that love and he crowneth his own gifts not our merits saith Augustine his owne worke not our worke for we are meere vessels to containe grace as grace and meere patients in this love and so he loveth Christs imputed righteousnesse in us and this righteousnesse imputed is not simply eternall but hath its rise in time If then Antinomians say we make our time-holinesse a cause and condition of eternall love they must remove this objection themselves for imputed righteousnesse which they make the cause of eternall love will stand against them more then against us For wee say both imputed and inherent righteousnesse are meere conditions no causes of eternall love and that not simply but as they are protracted and continued to carry us on to glory yea imputed righteousnesse is no more a cause of eternall love being onely a thing temporary and not eternall à parte ante nor inherent righteousnesse so must all these be expounded The Lord loveth the righteous The Lord loveth truth in the inward parts he taketh pleasure in them that feare him The Lord is ravished with one of his Spouses eyes with one chaine of her necke to him she is all faire and not a spot in her All these include not onely inherent holynesse but imputed righteousnesse and both have their use in time but can never prove that our time excellencie whether imputed or inherent is the cause condition reason merit or ground of the Lords eternall immanent and unchangeable love but the fruits thereof and the condition of its continuance And that our Lord loves us with the same love of complacency that is that he driveth on his chariot paved with love in sweet fruits of free election the same way with the same delight But that when the justified person whores swearers kils the innocent denieth the Lord Jesus as did Peter and David God loveth us as much as when they beleeve pray walke in all holy conversation and that God is not a whit displeased with the Saints for these sinnes because all his displeasure or revenging justice was drowned and swallowed up in Christs sufferings is to us abominable CHAP. XX. There
is a reall change of our state in justification YEa clearely before God there is an excellent change in the state of the Saints from ungodlinesse to justification so as they were not from eternitie nor before they beleeved justified and godly 1. because the Lord saith In time past the Gentiles were no people and obtained no mercie and now are a people and have obtained mercy Jerusalem was once polluluted in her owne bloud and the Lord looked on her so and he washed her and adorned her 2. The Apostle was once to God a blasphemer a persecutor and God saw him so else neither was the Apostle so nor could he speake truth in saying so but he obtanied mercy So in other Scriptures a most reall change is holden forth and that in Gods eye CHAP. XXI We mixe not workes and grace in the matter of Justification WEe utterly deny that Antinomians can make good their charge that we mixe works and the Law in matter of justification with faith and the free grace of God 1. Works done by grace smell of the mired fountaine they spring from they are polluted with sinne now Paul Rom. 3. saith All Jewes and Gentiles have sinned none doth good Psal. 14. Psal. 53. Void of sinne therefore by the Law can no flesh be justified and so the righteousnesse by which we stand before God must be free of sinne and free of a breach deserving a curse which must fall on us if we continue not in all the Law in the most gracious works we can doe yea if not in all that the Law requires to the least jot or tittle we are not justified now with such a Gospel-inherent righteousnesse as no man hath 2. Christ must be a Saviour by halfes and quarters if we divide the righteousnesse of our Saviour betweene faith or works between Christ and our merits Free grace is a jealous thing and admitteth of neither compartner corrivall or fellow with Christ. Paul will have his owne righteousnesse in the plea but dung 3. It quite brangleth the peace of God that issueth from justification that it is a peace that free will createth to my selfe from my owne works and not a peace dipt in satisfactory bloud 4. It taketh much glory from Christ that we weare a garment foreternitie of our spinning better the wedding garment bee begged and all its threeds be of free grace and that full glory be given to the Lambe 5. Law and Gospel Grace and Law-payment must be confounded 6. Christ must die in vaine CHAP. XXII Antinomians deny sinne to be in the justified ANtinomians will have no sinne remaining at all in a justified person and nothing contrary to Gods holy Law And Crispe saith It s close removed as if it had never been All which is true of the Law-guilt and actuall obligation to eternall wrath but of the Essence being or blot of in-dwelling-sinne in us it s most false 1. Pardoned sinne that Christ payed for is so sinne that if wee who are pardoned John and the rest of beleevers who have an Advocate with the Father Jesus Christ the righteous say wee have no sinne wee deceive our selves and the truth is not in us 2. Who even of the justified can say I have made my heart cleane I am pure inherently from my sinne there is not a just man on earth that doth good and sinneth not There is none that doth good not David who is justified by faith no not one 3. The flesh in the regenerate sinnes and lusts against the Spirit and the holy Law of God and the body of sinne though subdued having lost the Kingly dominion as a Tyrant though not the nature and being as Augustine saith of sinne as an underling dwelleth in all the justified but is not imputed 4. What we want of the perfection that God requireth to be in our sanctification and mortification which are but in growing while we are in this life must be sinfull imperfection 5. For we dayly aske of our Father which is in heaven forgivenesse of sinnes which we could not doe except sinne remained in us nor doe wee with Papists say that Christ but covereth but washeth not away our sinnes in his bloud for the guilt obleiging to satisfactory punishment is fully washen away not covered onely CHAP. XXIII Antinomians say to faith there is no sinne WEe judge that unsound which Towne saith To Faith there is no sinne nor any uncleane heart for then should Christ dwelling in the heart by faith and sinning be inconsistent which is known to be contrary to Scripture to the experience weaknesses complaints of the Saints groaning under a body of sinne as captives in bolts and yron fetters 2. And must argue that who ever beleeve are as perfect as Angels in heaven 3. That a justified person beleeveth not onely pardon but the perfection of Angels and that he sinneth not and must be perfectly sanctified if he beleeve a lye to wit that he sinneth not but is perfectly holy and this fancie they build on Luthers words perverted who saith I beleeve that there is a holy Church which is indeed nothing else but I beleeve there is no sinne no malediction no death in the Church Whereas Luther speaketh not of sinne in its in-dwelling blot but of sinne as in point of Law it doth actually curse condemne and inflict the second death in which sense in point of free iustification there is no sinne in the invisible Church of the justified and effectually called Saints Saltmarsh Free grace pag. 154. Thus the Scripture calleth us ungodly and sinners and children of wrath not that we are so but seeme so or not so in Gods account but in the worlds CHAP. XXIV The raigne of Faith not absolute as Antinomians say ANtinomians will have the raigne of faith so absolute that in faiths kingdome of grace there is no sinne which were more then a golden heaven on earth for so 1. Faith were perfectly strong and in the highest pitch of fulnesse of perfection in all the justified 2. If withall the whole morall acts of a justified person should flow from no other spring but this strong faith ever acting us to good But wee cannot yeeld to either Libertines or Antinomians that Faith is so absolute a Prince as that all sin rout and branch not only in its fullest dominion but also in its being and simply indwelling must be banished out of Faiths dominions so as once beleeving we could no more as sinnefull men but must act as beleevers for ever but wee thinke under faiths raigne sinne dwelleth as an underling as of old the Gibeonites dwelt under conquering Joshuah and victorious Israel as hewers of wood and drawers of water Yet these Cananites were said to be spued out of that good land 1. Jure bellâ— by the Law of conquest and of victorious inheritors as sometime they were 2. They make
of grace of justification or of salvation or that the Gospel hath any conditions at all Yea though yee should not beleeve yet God is faithfull and cannot deny himselfe to be your Redeemer So saith Saltmarsh it s not the way of a covenant that the Gospel useth but rather the promise or grace and salvation It is true if we take a condition 1. For an antecedaneous quallification going before Redemption the Gospel is no covenant of grace so as God will neither redeeme us in Christ nor propose a covenant of grace nor transact covenant-waies to be our God while we beleeve So faith is no condition Antinomians ignorant of the doctine of Protestants fancied that of us Nor doth it follow as Crispe and Antinomians say Faith obedience and repentance are not conditions because pardon and justification and salvation goe before them or because by them we purchase not Christ it onely followeth they are not such conditions as are antecedent and purchase Christ which we grant 2. If a condition be taken in Law tearmes for a condition qualification or some thing that issueth from free will without the determining grace of Christ and such a condition as salvation and righteousnesse imputed dependeth on in a proper way of condition so faith is neither strictly a condition of justification nor of righteousnesse or salvation because God of meere grace worketh both the condition faith and the thing conditioned for a condition is properly a qualification or worke to be done by a party by way of contract league and bargaine and done of the parties owne strength as the one side halfe or quarter of a covenant that obleigeth the other party to bestow a favour or reward for the performed condition as Armâ—nians say and neither in this sense doe wee ascribe a condition to men 1. Because Christ as surety undertaketh by promise to fulfill both our part and his owne I will writ my Law in their hearts Christ subscribeth the covenant for me and himselfe and leadeth our trembling hand at the pen and causeth us consent in this notion the Gospel is all promise rather then a covenant or a bargaine and there is neither limbe nor lith nor joynt of the covenant but it s all pure grace both worke and wages Antinomians cannot say that we teach We are redeemed justified saved for faith for works But if a condition be taken Evangelically for a qualification wrought in us by the grace of Christ and without which we are not justified nor saved then to deny the Gospel to be a conditionall covenant is to bely the Gospel For the whole Gospel saith He that beleeveth hath life is freely justified hee that beleeveth not is damned and the wrath of God abideth on him And that repentance and doing of Gods will and new obedience are conditions is evident by Scripture Nor is it a Popish way by works to say We seeke glory and honour and immortality by well doing Workes are not so much conditions of justification as Faith is yet are they conditions required in these that shall be saved And because Christ worketh faith in us it proveth it is not a condition of our owne working but not that it is no Evangelike condition CHAP. XXXIX Of Mortification WEe judge Repentance and Mortification of the old man to be a personall turning from sinne and the abating of the lusts of the old Adam a deading of the heart to the pleasures of sinne a growing in a heavenly disposition to rise with Christ and seeke the things that are above flowing from the death and resurrection of Christ apprehended by faith Antinomians say To repent and to mortifie sinne is to beleeve that Christ repented and mortified sinne for us and obeyed the whole Law for us It is not the not acting of sin nor is it the mortifying clensing and purifying our sinnes out of the sight of God no not by the Spirit of sanctification but it is to purifie out of our owne sight and sense before the world and declaratively these sinnes which the wedding garment hath purified out of the sight of God What is Mortification saith Denne but the apprehension of sinne slaine by the body of Christ What is vivification but our new life the just shall live by Faith I must needs say this is a shorter cut to heaven and a more Hony-Gospel then Christ and his Apostles knew For 1. They command us to mortifie our members which are on earth fornication uncleannesse inordinate affection c. And to forbear lying Antinomians free us from all personall mortifying our selves and put us on an imputative mortification to beleeve that Christ hath satisfied justice for our fornication and that Christ was chast in his owne person and abstained from fornication and lying for us this is to blow away all sanctification and make justification all 2. So may we live in our lusts and beleeve our lusts to be mortified in Christ and they are so and if wee should live slaves of sinnes and sonnes of the Devill and under the dominion of our lusts if we beleeve that Christ hath mortified our lusts our naked act of beleeving without any personall change in our selves maketh us sonnes of God which is nothing else but to turne the grace of God into wantonnesse Antinomians tell us it is but an abusing of grace to wantonnesse to sinne because grace doth abound and he that beleeveth cannot walke still and live according to the flesh if he still lives in his lusts his faith is no faith Answ. It s most true if Faith be taken for the affiance and recumbency of a broken sinner on Christ but the Antinomian faith is a perswasion of a fleshly Pharisie standing on his tiptoes proudly resisting Christ burning in his lusts and beleeving his boyling lusts are pardoned and remitted before ever they were committed and that they are no sinnes 2. Wee grant it is not grace but the abuse of grace that teacheth David Peter to act adultery and deny Christ but if it be the grace of Faith that is to beleeve contrary to sense that Adultery and deniall of Christ are not sinnes because sinnes pardoned are no sinnes then grace it selfe doth teach us to sinne 3. We must be justified by mortification if mortification he the faith or apprehension of our lusts crucified with Christ. 4. When the Holy Ghost biddeth us beleeve repent pray mourne rejoyce in God we have this Gospel-sense of these from Antinomians we doe all this compleatly when wee beleeve that Christ beleeved repented prayed mourned rejoyced in God for us and there is an end for sure the doing of all these came from a Spirit of Faith drawing life and strength out of Christs death and resurrection to doe all these as we draw strength from Christ to mortifie the lusts of the flesh 5. The word expoundeth mortification not to be in relative acts to beleeve Christ mortified
our or his owne lusts for us but in reall and personall acts of obedience to be deadned to to the world Gal. 6.14 To abstaine from fleshly lusts that warre against the soule from fornication uncleanesse inordinate affection evill concupiscence and such sinnes for which the wrath of God commeth on the Children of disobedience to wit on the Gentiles that never heard the Gospel now in reason wrath cannot come on the heathen who never heard of Christ because they beleeve not that he of whom they never heard hath crucified those sinnes for them on the crosse CHAP. XL. Antinomians the perfectists of our time say wee and our works are compleatly perfect ANtinomians ascribe not onely an imputative perfection in that Christs perfect righteousnesse is made ours but also an inherent perfection to the Saints But wee judge our state and persons through Christ to be perfect but our duties and begunne sanctification are not perfect but is so in growing as the Moone as a vessell not full to the brime and banks of the soule it receives quarts and gallons more It s true justification removeth the evill of works as touching all guilt or obligation to eternally revenging justice But as Christs grace addeth to our good works no dignity and perfection of meriting as Papists say so doth it not remove the inherent blot of sinne that cleaveth to our good works so as it should give to these works inherent perfection and remove their sinnefull defects for as sinne dwelleth in our persons after wee are justified though it bee not imputed so doth sinne cleave to our most gracious acts but is not accounted on our score because the surety hath answered our bill and removed the sinnefull imperction from them but hath not made them inherently perfect so as there should remaine nothing in the works of the justified that is contrary to the Law of God But the truth is Antinomians with no face of truth can say that Christ removeth the sinnefull imperfections that adhere to our good works done by the Grace of Christ when we are in the state of justification because if nothing wee doe in the state of justification be sinne since pardoned sinnes to Antinomians are no sinnes and have lost the nature and being of sinne being remitted and pardoned before they be committed these sinnes that cleave to our good works are no sinnes and so the good works must be perfect as the person is perfect 1. Because Antinomians go upon this ground that nothing inherent in the persons not the in-dwelling corruption of nature nor the adherent sins that cleave to our works nor any thing a justified man can doe is sinne or contrary to the Law but that person or works being pardoned both are as perfect as the person and works of Christ. A most blaspemous ground for what we want of perfect sanctification and wee want much in this life so farre are we sinnefully imperfect 2. Paul acknowledgeth his sinnefull imperfection I find a Law in my members rebelling against the Law of my minde not as if I were already perfect 3. In many things we offend all If any man offend not in word the same is a perfect man Hence the man that is perfect sinnes not but there is none in the earth that sinneth not and doth good 4. Wee crave pardon of sinnes as we seeke dayly our dayly bread It s contrary to Christian humility to say wee are perfectly cleane Object God can accept nothing that is unperfect and sinnefull because they are accursed Gal. 3.10 For God is veritie it selfe and will not suffer the losse of the least jot of the righteousnesse the Law requireth But all our best works are polluted with sinne Towne Answ. This proveth with the Papists that God cannot judge us righteous by faith because wee are sinners in our selves 2. God cannot accept sinnefull works as no sinnefull works at all he cannot accept of sinnes as no sinnes and of our good works as not polluted with sinne in themselves his judgement then should not be according to truth true but he can well accept our works though polluted with sinne as pardoned and washen not from their sinnefull imperfections inherent or adherent to them for then they should be intrinsecally perfect and God should judge amisse of them but as washen from their guilt and obligation to eternall wrath so he can well judge them perfect in Christ. 3. Legally cleane so as they shall never actually condemne us and 4. that of meere grace CHAP. XLI Antinomians say we are compleatly saved in this life as in heaven SO we thinke Antinomians faile wickedly with Libertines who say We are as actually saved and as perfectly as the glorified in heaven and not in hope onely or in reall beginning in regard of Christs sitting in heaven and therefore good workes can no more bee the way to heaven saith Towne then my walking in the Citie in which I am already can be my walking to the City But so while we are absent from the Lord in the body even in this life wee should be in heaven whereas the dissolution of our earthly tabernacle the raysing of us up at the last day are betweene us and the full redemption of our bodies And this is that which Libertines and Familists say that all the resurrection of the body and life eternall they know is our union with Christ in this life the Grammar of Hymeneus and Philetus who said the Resurrection was already past 3. We know but in part our love is not perfected in this life 1 Cor. 13.11 12 13. And we are not perfect men in Christ till we meet all in the unity of Faith Ephes. 4.13 3 The generall assembly of all the first borne is not yet convened we need a Temple and Ordinances and a Sunne and a Moone in the other life the Lambe shall be our Temple 4. The other life is such as in it wee can neither marry nor dye but are as the Angels Luk. 22.36 37. Phil. 3.20 21. 1 Cor. 15.40.41 5. Antinomians say this dreaming that we are as cleane of sinne as Christ and so Christed and Goded with Christ as the Libertine Pocquius said Calvin in Opus pag. 463. and Nicholas the Libertine cap. 34. 6. Paul saith Wee are saved by hope and wee hope not for what wee have already Our life is hid with Christ in God 1. He that beleeveth hath life not in the compleat and full fruition yet really in the certaintie of faith and hope 2. In the right claime purchased by Christ. 3. In the beginning first fruits and the degrees of grace tending to glory CHAP. XLII Our happinesse is in sanctification as well as in justification OUr happinesse is not meerely passive as Towne saith and in being justified as if that were all for though our blessednesse be in justification as the cause and fountaine in that sinne
is not imputed to us yet it is in sanctification and acting of holy duties as in the effect in that there is no guile in the Spirit that we are undefiled in our way and are poore in Spirit meeke that wee mourne hunger and thirst for Christ c. 2. We should not oppose Antinomians if they meane nothing but that Christ is the seed floure and Mother-blessing and that our chief blessednesse is in being freely justified in his bloud 2. If their sense be that all blessednesse in acts of Sanctification doe so farre render us blessed as they flow from the free grace of Christ and as we bring forth fruits to God being imped and ingraffed in Christ as a branch of wild Olive is blessed not because it is such a crabbed and fruitlesse branch but because it is ingraffed in the true Olive and partaketh of the sweetnesse life and sappe thereof and from thence bringeth forth fruit but we know Antinomians doe reproch acts of Sanctification as Pharisaicall Poperie 2. That they call so walking selfe-seeking of righteousnesse in our selves which to us is a cursed not a blessed condition and 3. they cannot endure that holy walking should be any thing but a matter of courtesie commanded by no Law nor by any written Gospel-command but a fruit of the immediate acting of the Spirit 4. They censure us for ascribing blessednesse to any acts of Sanctification whereas we say with our Saviour if we know these things happy are we if we doe them they that heare the word of God and doe it are more blessed then the womb that bare Christ and they are blessed who doe his Commandements that keepe judgement that keepe his testimonies that keepe the waies of wisdome that suffer for Christ all which we judge inconsistent with that which Crispe saith that Sanctification is not a jot of the way to heaven CHAP. XXLIII Sanctification crushed by Antinomians ANtinomians while they cleare themselves further then we can see in their writings must be judged grand enemies to Sanctification 1. They confound Sanctification and inherent holynesse which undoubtedly is unperfect and in this life growing more and more into the perfect day with Justification which is perfect for nothing can be added to Christs righteousnesse yea they destroy and utterly cry downe all Sanctification For 1. Towne saith The new birth Joh. 3.3 is our justification or the making of us of unjust just and every true Christian is a fulfiller of the Law It s true in regard of justification but in regard of the inherent new life of grace which is put in us in this life we cannot fulfill the Law except we be justified by regeneration and our owne works done by the grace of Christ which Antinomians will not say therefore all our inherent holynesse to Antinomians must be nothing at all but the imputed righteousnesse of Christ so wee have fulfilled the Law perfectly as Christ hath done and are regenerated though there be no inherent holynesse in us nor any walking with God at all 2. They teach That justification healeth the children of God of the imperfections of Sanctification from before God and that justification alone giveth to our good works both beauty and acceptance so as they are made perfect and free from sinne adherent to or inherent in them and both our persons and works made so compleat that there is no blot of sinne in them nor any in-dwelling of originall corruption that hath the being or essence of sinne Yea M. Eaton saith on these words But now yee are washed c. What can be more plaine then that the time state and condition wherein they were foule and sinnefull was past and gone but the time state and condition wherein they were washed and made righteous to God-ward by justification and also to man-ward by Sanctification was onely present and biding for ever But Eaton Crispe Saltmarsh Denne Towne and all Antinomians contend that there dwelleth no spot of sinne nothing contrary to the holy Law of God in the Saints once justified no more then in Christ himselfe or the glorified in heaven then must our Sanctification be all one with our Justification and as this is perfect so is that and what wonder the Adulteries of the justified their perjuries and lyes committed after their justification be no sinnes nor they more capable of sinning in that case then Iesus Christ for pardoned sinne saith Eaton Honey-combe cap. 7. pag. 139. is not or hath no being before God Antinomians answer Before they be pardoned they are sinnes and their Adulteries are truely then contrary to Gods Law Answ. They were pardoned before they had being or were committed sixteene hundred yeares agoe on the Crosse then were all the elect justified sure all these sixteene hundred yeares the elect could no more sinne before God or doe any acts against a Law then Christ or the glorified Angels not to say that Adulteries of the justified had being before they were committed and had no beeiâ—g when they are committed and have being they have then no being this is to say sinnes are not when they are and have being when they have none at all God must take away common sense and bereave them of reason who detaine the truth of God in unrighteousnesse But if sin be against Sanctification as Fornication is directly yea and a fashioning of our selves according to our former lusts is as contrary to Sanctification by Peters arguing and Pauls as light is to darkenesse and day to night then the Saints Sanctification must be imperfect and farre different from justification and to walke in Sanctification to repent to obey God must be another thing then to beleeve Christ walked for me in Sanctification Christ repented and obeyed for me 3. Sanctification to Antinomians is not our personall walking in holinesse before God because walking in the flesh and sinning Adulteries lying swearing deceiving in justified persons which are opposite to sanctification are not sinnes before God but onely sinnes to our sense and to our reason and experience or to our feeling to our flesh or men-ward or they seeme sinnes to the world but are not to God in his account and in the apprehension of faith which seeth things as they are sinnes at all Now things that seeme to be and appeare so to our unbeliefe and misapprehending sense are not so in themselves so both our sinnes we being once justified and our acts of sanctification upon the same ground must be meere fansies and delusions and if we judge our lies and murthers after we are once justified to be sinnes it is our false apprehension They must then bee lying differences that M. Eaton tendreth betweene justification and sanctification Yea upon this ground the Libertines say if we see graces or sanctification in our selves we are not poore in
spirit and that it is no sinne in a beleever not to see his grace Which is all one as not to know try and prove himselfe whether he be in Christ or no. And so wee may contravene a command of God and not sin and to sin against one of the offices of the Spirit which is to make us know the things that are freely given us of God is no sinâ— And in Calvins time Libertines say to know good or ill was the old Adam to know and want the feeling of grace of holinesse or of sinne was mortification and a dead conscience not to bee moved nor touched with sorrow or feeling of sinne nor to feare it in justified persons is faith and and true mortification so the New England Libertines CHAP. XLIV Antinomians say all doubtings is inconsistent with Faith THe Justified say the Antinomians are to doubt no more freedome and libertie purchased in Christ frees you from all bondage as if you were in heaven and gives assurance without all wavering feare or doubting Wee are not to feare our sinnes nor any thing else Which keepeth good harmony with New Englands Libertines who say that doubting in any sort is inconsistent with true assurance especially after the revelation of the Spirit which some call the broad Sealâ— and to doubt upon the commission of some haynous sinne whether God be my Father argueth the party doubting to bee under a covenant of works No question doubting in justified persons is a sinne Christ rebuketh it Why doubt yee 2. Christ requireth faith without doubting 3. Hee forbiddeth it 4. It s contrary to faith 5. And punished But it is in the truely justified Faith and fainting are almost woven thorow either in the same prayer in David Psal. 31.22 I said in my hast I am cut off from before thine eyes this is great fainting yet there is fire under ashes faith bordering with fainting neverthelesse thou hardst the voice of my supplication So is it with Jonah Ezechiah Iob. Dregges in the bottom when the wine is jumbled appeare in the Prophets complaint an ague of madnesse starts up beside reason and above faith even after Asaph and Jeremiah both had received the broad seale of the revealing Spirit when Faith sickens it dyeth not Will the Lord cast us off for ever and will he be favourable no more is his mercy cleane gone for ever doth his promise faile for evermore And wilt thou be altogether to me as a lyar and as waters that faile 2. This goeth on another false ground that being freed from the curse of the Law wee are freed from all fits of the old agues of the Spirit of bondage and that all trouble of conscience argue a Law-state of works but that old guest upon sense of sinne and apprehension of wrath can make a new plea betweene the soule and Christ and there will arise new stormes of love-jealousies and complaints against the beloved surmises of unbeliefe because sinne dwelleth in the justified 3. Davids bones were broken for sinne and for his sinnes the arrowes of God sticke in his flesh and his moisture is turned into the drought of summer 4. There can be no neerer way to despaire and shake the very foundations of a beleevers faith then comfort him so miserably as say if ever he doubt he is under the Law and under the curse since it argueth the strong man to be cast out when he throweth in fire-brands of doubtings in at the windowes to see if he can regaine his place CHAP. XLV Antinomians not Protestants Merit-mongers ANtinomians say that wee teach the same with Merit-mongers who say the reward is given ex pacto by covenant as due debt because of the fidelity of God and not that our works in strictnesse of justice deserve such a reward to which we answer 1. None of us say the crowne is given either for faith or for good works as if they should determine the Lord to give a reward or lay bands on him for the intrinsecall dignitie and meritorious vertue that Christs merit hath put on our works we utterly deny any such vertue either in our good works considered in their owne nature or as they borrow some perfume of Christs meriting vertue Paul Rom. 3. argueth that none are justified by works because saith hee all have sinned vers 9. both Jew and Gentile every mouth vers 19.20 stopped and all the world is become guilty if then our works were thus perfect that they were void of sinne they should have a power to justifie But Towne asser 77.78 Eaton Honey combâ— cap 16.459.460.461 say Christ giveth perfection to our works and maketh them free of inherent sin this is as much as Papists say Christs bloud conferreth a power of meriting on good works 2. They say we fulfill the Law in Christ when he makes our works perfect and sinnelesse then we also justifie our selves by our good works in Christ. But we know that Antinomians give more then a meriting power to good workes while they make them perfect as Christ and free from sinne as his actions are Why but then should they not justifie us before God if they be perfect and render us before God perfect as M. Towne saith and Eaton saith Justification is meritorious of all the favour and blessings of God Sanctification of it selfe merits nothing at all This is more horrid merit then ever a Papist taught For Justification if it merit all the favor and blessings of God then must it merit the favour of eternall election to glory of effectuall calling of Christs comming in the flesh of free Redemption of the sending of the Gospel of grace to this nation rather then to this whereas all these goe before justification and flow from a more ancient and eternall free grace then Justification even from eternall election and everlasting love 2. But Sanctification saith he of it selfe merits nothing nor doe Merit-mongers say their best works of themselves merit any thing but as dipt in Christs bloud from whose grace they borrow a meriting power and of justice besides a free promise and paction God oweth a crowne of glory to these works say Papists and this meriting power say they though it be borrowed from Christ yet our workes have from the grace of Christ the formall principle of them a meriting power beside before and without all free paction and promise of reward that God maketh to our works and here we part waies with all Merit-mongers and shall never we hope meet But that God hath made a promise of his free grace to reward our works and hath tyed himselfe to himself not to us is cleare For God is not unrighteous to forget your worke saith the Scripture and labour of love and it is a righteous thing with God to recompence tribulation to them that trouble
is to Papists who make justification the expulsion of the habit of sinne and the bringing in of habituall righteousnesse which expelleth all sinne except venials which indeed are no sinnes for sinne pardoned to Antinomians and Papists who are harmonious in this point are no sinnes 2. Nothing be it adultery or parricide or any worke of the flesh committed after justification can bee sinne for it is against no Law by this way and doth not so much as prâ—judge salvation by demerit it onely scandalizeth men but cannot offend God My soule enter thou not into these mens secrets 3. Sinnes against Christian conversation such as the adulteries of the justified are no sinnes before God because all sinnes as sinnes stand in the way as contrary to salvation then aske Antinomians is a justified person obliged to eschew Adulterie they shall answer Yea hee is obliged but how There is a two fold obligation one of Law another of the free Spirit the former is removed the justified man by no Law or Law-obligation is to eschew Adultery as a sinne against God 1. Because hee is freed from the Law and all directing and obliging power of the Law 2. Because it involveth a contradiction that his Adultery should be sin when committed by him and pardoned before it be committed for so it should be sinne and no sinne How then is he obliged to forbeare Adultery Onely by an obligation Physicall and of the Spirit such as we call an obligation of naked courtesie if he forbeare it is an act of love and arbitrary freedome but if hee commit it it is not sinne because it is in him against no Law-obligation no more then an Englishman committing felony against the Lawes in England it is the Antinomians owne comparison or killing a Swan in Thames which is forbidden by the Lawes of England does faile against the Lawes of Spaine So his sin is against love not Law as if the Law commanded not all love and love with all the heart and as if these two were contrary and the Law and the Gospel did involve two contrary and contradictory wills in God and the Lord should be changeable and unconstant in Law and Gospel and his Adultery should bee contrary to men and Christian conversation onely not to God 4. All acts and personall duties of sanctification which we must persue and follow else wee cannot see God are but degrees and parts of the compleat Sanctification that wee hope for in heaven and the path of the just is as the shining light that shineth more and more till the perfect day therefore they must be commanded as the way to salvation and not as arbitrary acts of good conversation before men but I shall here answer M. Townes objections tending to prove that good works are not so much as the way to salvation 1. If good works bee such necessary conditions that without them happinesse is not attainable then 1. though the grace of God doe save as the alone cause yet it doth not freely for what God doth freely it is without all condition or consideration of mans workes or worthynesse Answ. It is good that Towne granteth though good works be commanded in the Gospel yet grace may for all that bee the onely cause of salvation but contradicting himselfe hee saith If good workes be commanded in the Gospel then grace is not the onely cause of salvation but grace and works Law and Gospel must be confounded We say not they are so necessary necessitate medii by necessity of meanes but that any savingly beleeving at the nick of the extremity of his twelfth and last houre God taking away all opportunity of good works is undoubtedly saved but in the worke of that faith there is a seed and supernaturall disposition to good works Now that this mother never bringeth forth the birth hindereth not but good works are necessary to salvation necessitate precepti in regard of Gods commandement but Antinomians deny good works to be necessary by any commandement of God 1. Because to omit them maketh the justifyed partie lyable to no guiltinesse or sinne before God say they Because he is under no Law and where there is no Law there is no transgression nor guilt saith Saltmarsh 2. Wee being justified are under no Commandement so as wee can violate this Commandement be it of Law or of Gospel for it is pardoned before it be committed 3. What God doth freely is without conditon as a meriting cause or as a cause or condition slowing from the strength of our nature without grace Without a perfect condition free of all sinnefull imperfection adhering to it such as the Law required it is true but now the assumption of the objection is false What hee doth freely is without all condition Evangelicke wrought by the strength of grace and mixed with sinnefull infirmities so the major is most false for Faith should not then be a condition of justification good works are so conditions as they be graces also How often said Augustine with Scripture God crowneth his owne free gifts in us not our merits 4. The same way I distinguish the consideration of good works either Legall or Evangelike And 5. Towne doth conjoyne our worthinesse which is none at all with our good works which are something for they are conditions of meere grace Object 2 So saith he Yee make works the causes of salvation Answ. It followeth not that they are con-causes or joynt-causes with Christ but onely conditions just as a mans journeying on foot or horse to a City or a Kingdome to inherit it is the way condition of his entring the City But it is not his Charter or Law-title or right to enjoy the Crowne as his inheritance any effective influence to the title of the Crowne of heaven I dare not ascribe to any works in us or to any but to Christ but undeniably good works are not so much as conditions of justification they follow a man justified but goe not before justification no more then the Apple goeth before the tree or the cisterne before the fountaine nor are they the conditions of the Covenant of grace they are the conditions of covenanted ones not of the covenant Object 3. If salvation depended on condition of our good works or dignity it would be uncertaine and doubtfull Rom. 4.16 Answ. The Apostle Rom. 4.16 clearely is on the theame of Justification by faith and the condition of it which is faith onely 2. Wee say not that salvation dependeth on works as a condition but on the grace of God which worketh every good worke in us freely without hire or money neither works nor free will are our sure free hold of heaven Object 4. Yee confound Law and Gospel and runne on that common error that the Gospel is conditionall remission of sinnes dependeth not on works Answ. It is a new heresie of Antinomians to deny a conditionall Gospel it is all one as to bely
of God to our selves that is the free favour and love of God that is onely grace objectively in God not in us or yet grace inherent We professe before the Lord and his Angels that that is an other Gospel and though an Angel and Paul teach it let him be accursed 2. Let him answer us if any Protestant Divine or if hee himselfe beleeveth his owne penne doth any other but lye when it scribles that the Law-straine and Divinity of the Jewes vnder the Law did worke God down to such an old way as for fasting and praying and other acts of obedience they got some love from God which Christ himselfe had not gotten for them Fasting and praying was never since God had a Church on earth a hire a bribe to free grace nâ—ither Jew nor Gentile could by doing nay not Adam before his fall nor the Elect Angels could ever buy prize or morgage the free love of God 3. Wee conceive the love of God to bee the sole cause fountaine well-head and adaequate reason why the Lord chuseth some to glory rather then others why the Lord sent his Sonne Christ to die even because God extremely and freely loved the lost world and therefore fasting and praying was never the cause of Gods chusing and electing love either to Jew or Gentile either under the Old or New Testament except they say there was another way of election to glory in the Old Testament and another way in the New and that the love of God was at a dearer rate under the Old nor New it was then for hire and for works but wee had not in Esaiahs daies wine and milke without money and price the Market was dearer then it is at a lower rate now But I perceive Antinomians miserably mistaken in confounding the error of the Jewes and the state of the Jewish Church Paul Rom. 4. saith right down Abraham and David payed not a farthing more for justification and freely imputed righteousnesse then we doe and it was the error and sin of men not the state of the Church in its non-age under Tutors nor the dispensation of God that The Jews followed after the law of righteousnesse but obtained not the Law of righteousnsse Wherefore Because they sought it not by faith but as it were by the works of the Law for they stumbled at the stumbling stone Yea being ignorant then it was their pride and error not their state of non-age of Gods righteousnesse and going about to establish their owne righteousnesse have not submitted themselves to the righteousnesse of God It was never lawfull for the Jewes to dreame they could get or earne Gods free love and undeserved grace by fasting and praying and other acts of obedience no more then it was lawfull for them to stumble at and breake their necke upon Christ the stone laid on Sion it was never lawfull for them to goe about to establish their owne righteousnesse and not to submit to the righteousnesse of God this was their sinne But sure it was not their sinne to bee under Tutors and the Pedagogie of the Law for that was Gods holy and innocent dispensation as the Scripture saith And it was not any Legall justification by works But it was 1 in that they were kept 1. under shaddowes elements of the world Ceremonies representing forth Christ to come and 2 God kept them under a greater terror because of Law-transgressions and 3 a sparer measure and dyet of grace then wee have But 1. it was never lawfull for them or us to seeke justification by works and by fasting and prayer 2. The Lord cryed out against Merit and placing all godlinesse in their new Moones and in saying We have fasted and thou seest it not So there was no Legall straine in getting the love of God by fasting praying c. To the Jewes more then to us 3. It was never a Legall straine nor a way approved of God under the Old Testament that they should serve God for hire which the Devill acknowledgeth to be hypocrisie and that they should pray or rather howle like hungry dogs for corne and wine or follow Christ for loaves 4. Nor was the obeying of God for feare of the curses of the Law and plagues rather then out of love to God as a Father a way of the Old Testament-worship approved of God as Towne imagineth it being a sinne for their duty it was to feare him as a Father no lesse then ours to rejoyce in trembling to feare his goodnesse his mercy to esteeme God rather then his gifts their reward their portion their soules love so were they to love and worship him as a Husband to admire and praise him as God and for his essentiall perfection beauty lovelinesse and all mercenary love and service for feare of punishment not out of love and for hire and rewards was damnable then as now Now what was Gods active dispensation in severe punishing of them for an irreverent looke into the Arke and his hiring them with a good and fertile land and many temporall blessings to serve him was another thing and can never prove it was lawfull for them to serve God for hire and in a mercenary way and that it is a Legall and Old Testament way of serving God now under the New Testament to beleeve that godlinesse hath the promises of this life and of that which is to come and that now under the new Testament yea we may looke to the reward of life eternall as a motive to blow wind in our sayles in our journey to heaven though not as the formall object of our desires in serving God for we are onely and ever now and then to serve God for himselfe not for hire 2. If wee speake comparatively a created Crowne of incorruptible glory is to be laboured for rather then trifles and feathers of corruptible clay and that both to us and to these under the Old Testament 4. How Prayer revealeth the love of God I know not Saltmarsh by the next may expound it Christ saith his Father giver the Holy Ghost to those that pray and seek him and he avengeth the bloud of his Saints and he giveth whatever we aske the Father in his name We pray Lord increase our faith is this nothing but Lord reveale the Holy Ghost to us which wee had before And are these prayers that God should give us no new thing but reveale what we had before So then we desire God would reveale the glory of his justice on the enemies of the Church which he had wrought before and reveale the gift of illumination growth of Faith victory against temptations dayly bread destruction of Satans kingdome the propagating of the Gospel deliverance from warre the pestilence insight in the mystery of the Gospel the Spirit of revelation c. All which things we had before
but prayer hearing preaching Sacraments reveale them onely This is no Gospel-divinity 5. Nor was God in a way of reconciliation and peace with the Jewes under the Old Testament rather then pacified except Antinomians say God saw sinne in Jaakob under the old Testament Numb 23.21 He blotted not out their sinnes as a thicke cloud Esai 43.25 and cast not their iniquities in the depth of the Sea Mich. 7.19 20. Nor blessed them with pardon Psal. 32.1 2. but kept an after reckoning of wrath as a non-pardoning as an unpacifyed God toward them which belyeth the Holy Ghost in the Old Testament almost in every page 6. Nor is it true that Christ getteth us the love of God he purchaseth to us all the fruites of Gods free love such as Redemption pardon imputed righteousnesse effectuall calling justification repentance faith perseverance glory But we all maintaine against Papists that Christ given as Mediator Christ dying for us is the fruit of Gods free love and of our election to grace and glory but not the cause or a meane getting to us Gods love Learned Twist and protestant Divines to whom Saltmarsh though he undertakes to write of free grace is but a yesterday novice prove against Papists Dominicans Iesuits that Christ Mediator his bloud is not the Meritorious cause of the free and eternall love of God to man 1. Because nothing in time is or can be the cause of that which is eternall Christ is given in time and dyeth in time as our surety he is an eternall Mediator dying in Gods decree but that cannot make him the cause begetting Gods love to us 2. Gods free love and his grace is the cause why hee giveth his Sonne to dye for us Joh. 3.16 1 Joh. 4.9 then Christ dying cannot bee the cause of Gods love 3. The free love of God should not be free if it had a meritorious cause CHAP. LII That we are not freed from outward Ordinances nor is it Legall to be under them as Antinomians say ANtinomians pick a quarrell against the Law and would have us freed from it because it sanctifieth not and cannot give us grace to obey but by this wee are not under the Gospel because the Gospel of it selfe or any word of grace without the Spirit cannot worke faith or give grace or sanctifie But I know Antinomians thinke that the Spirit freeth us from all outward ordinances from any obligations that an outward command can lay on us whether of Law or Gospel For Saltmarsh teacheth us That the Spirit of Adoption worketh Legally not freely when wee doe things meerely as commanded from the power of an outward Commandement or precept in the word that brings forth but a Legall or at best but a mixt obedience and service of something a finer hypocrisie But if hee meane by a meere outward command the letter onely pressing obedience without the acting of the Spirit or any influence of the life of Christ this is a dead work and cannot come at all meerely from the power of an outward command for the very outward command of the Gospel holdeth forth to the understanding in the very Letter which is a signification of Gods good and holy will the authority of God the love of Christ as this Peter lovest thou mee feed my Lambs and none can out of the conscience of the majestie authority and love of Christ obey this command without the influence of the Spirit of grace so hee refuteth not us for we teach no such thing But Saltmarsh his meaning is that the meere outward Letter of the sweetest Gospel-command or promise such as He that beleeveth in the Sonne hath life and shall never come to judgement him that commeth I will in no sort cast away but will raise him up at the last day c. layeth no obligation of obedience on us at all but the Spirit acting and immediatly moving us effectually to obey layeth on all the obligation and all alongs M. Towne proveth wee are freed from the Law with all its authority offices and effects and are not under the Lawes rule to direct or teach yea nor is it to give us saith Saltmarsh So much as a heame of light nor to command bind or oblige us because the Law saith Towne hath not any sanctifying vertue and power to subdue sinne but we are under grace that is the grace of the Gospel which effectually subdueth sinne and sanctifieth And this is Townes Argument all alongs the Law of works is a meere passive thing and vrge the Law never so earnestly with all its motives and meanes yee can never make me keepe it ergo wee are freed from the Law and clearly then are wee under the commanding power of no outward ordinances because they cannot effectually sanctifie and subdue sinne not the preaching of the Gospel nor the Law nor praying nor hearing nor Sacraments wee are under nothing but grace and that onely actuall such as is the effectuall and irresistible blowing of the Holy Ghost for sure habituall grace in us cannot effectually worke for the subduing of sin So say Libertines of New England We are under no Gospel-exhortations to beleeve and none are to bee exhorted to beleeve but such whom we know to be the elect of God or to have his Spirit in them effectually The reason is outward exhortations oblige none but the Elect and not them all whereas Christ commanded to preach the Gospel to every creature to all Nations So say they We are not to pray against all sinne because the old man must be in us so long as wee live So said the Pelagians of old and A man may not bee exhorted to any duty because he hath no power to doe it All tend to this that to preach the Gospel to sinners and for Saltmarsh to write a booke of free grace is a Legall straine of teaching and not becomming the glory of the New Testament because grace goeth not ever along with teaching litterally 2. We are not under the Gospel or any Gospel-ordinances because of our selves we have no power to obey them this is to make us guilty of no sinne at all because to sinne is to act against an obligation of a Law and when grace acteth not on us we faile against no obligation at all because we can doe no otherwise 3. This is deepe Pelagianisme to say wee cannot sinne if we have not power to eschew sinne and obey God and to make our owne strength or the strength of another without us the measure and binding rule of our obedience CHAP. LIII Necessity of ordinances and of written and preached Scripture to the most perfect FRom this it commeth that Antinomians judge there is no need that a soule once in Christ goe out for new and fresh supply of actuall grace because it is acted by the Spirit inhabitating And Saltmarsh The more any motion or obedience is caused from things
dreameth or that wee labour to draw assurance of a good spirituall estate from outward reformation which saith Towne Protestant Legalists labour for when the heart is naught Antinomians say that all our evidences are dung True they are not evidences of Legall perfect righteousnesse more they prove not Asser. 1. Love to the brethren sincerity and the like that have not grace for their stocke a right fountaine and principle the Spirit for their Father Christ for their Crowne and garland are no evidences at all that wee are in Christ for they rather darken then render justification evident Could wee looke over our selfe and abstract our thoughts from our selfe as if we were nothing and dead and behold the actings of grace and Christs love-raptures and the glancing of love on his members as on bits pieces and little images of a super-excellent transcendently glorious Christ and see these in the Spirit the worker then were surer inference to be made thus then when we eye our selves As beholding the excellencie of a Godhead in Sunne and Moone when we looke above the shaddow-creature and with senses abstracted and the elevation of the Spirit wee see these created excellencies in the deep and boundlesse Sea which hath no shoares nor coasts nor bottome in a vast and great God we are farther from Idolatry then when wee pore on and pine away in the minds restings in this side of an infinit Majestie and so is it here If it be naturall Logick and the light of our owne sparks that make the inference I love the brethren therefore I know I am translated from death to life it s but Moone-light of one halfe sleeping that is suspected to bee day-light but if naturall light by the day-light of saving grace make the inference it is sure arguing As And hereby doe we know that we know him if we keepe his Commandements and we know that we have passed from death to life because we love the brethren 2. All these are equivalent to the same But if we walke in the light as hee is light wee have fellowship one with another and the bloud of Jesus Christ his Sonne clenseth us from all sinnes And He that loveth his brother abideth in the light and there is none occasion of stumbling in him And if yee know that he is righteous yee know that every one that doth righteousnesse is borne of him This is written for our own personall security and knowledge of our owne state as all the Epistle aymeth at this and not so much as we may know one another as is cleare when John sheweth us the scope of his Epistle is to give marks and I nothing doubt but the Holy Ghost aymeth at the discovery of a dead faith and to refute the Antinomians as is cleare These things have I written unto you that beleeve on the name of the Sonne of God that yee may know that yee have eternall life and that yee may beleeve on the name of the Sonne of God So saith he 3. Putting a difference betweene the children of the world and the children of the devill in this the children of God are manifest and the children of the devill whosoever doth not righteousnesse is not of God neither hee that loveth not his brother Then certainely some hath said in Johns daies It is enough to salvation if a man beleeve in Christ he is obliged by no Law nor Commandement that is outward and written to doe righteousnesse John saith such a one is not borne of God And My little children let us not love in word neither in tongue but in deed and in truth and hereby by reall loving of the brethren we know that we are of the truth and shall assure our hearts before him And Whatsoever we aske we receive of him because we keepe his Commandements and doe the things that are pleasing in his sight Now sure this cannot make the keeping of his Commandements and our good works fellow-Mediators with Christ. Then John must argue from the effect to the cause and intimate that its false that some may bee borne of God who keepe not his Commandements as Antinomians say When one that walloweth in fleshly lusts is to beleeve without more adoe in Christ and he is a saved man So saith John Little children let no man deceive you he that doth righteousnesse is righteous as he is righteous he that committeth sinne is of the Devill Then some have deceived themselves and others in saying That doing of righteousnesse was neither condition nor way nor meane to salvation nor any infallible signe of a mans being in the state of grace Now who saith all these this day but the Antinomian Now if Antinomians as they doe say that a discourse by way of a practicall Syllogisme or naturall Logick can produce no Divine but onely a humane Faith And that all Logick is to be abeted the carnall and corrupt discoursings by Logick that exalt themselves against the knowledge of God are to be abeted but that the use of naturall reason not corrupt should be disclaimed is against the tenour of the Old and New Testament in which there bee Lawes Ordinances reasonings practicall Syllogismes to beget faith to cause us slee sinne follow holynesse which no man can say is a humane thing except Antinomians following their old Masters the Libertines who said to lay aside naturall reason discoursing to know neither good nor ill was true mortification and naturall reasoning and knowledge of sinne or righteousnesse sense of ill doing or feare of sinne or judgement are but the tastings of the old Adams forbidden fruit as wee shall heare afterward Asser. 2. Yea we may know our selves to bee in the state of grace by holy walking and acts of beleeving and we may know our holy walking to be true by other acts of holy walking and beleeving so John saith by the loving of the brethren we may know we are in Christ and so that wee beleeve and love God and againe reciprocally By this wee know that we love the children of God when we love God and keep his Commandements for this is the love of God that we keep his Commandements Then the loving of God that may argue that wee beleeve may also evidence our Justification and all dependeth on this as the Spirit joyneth the light and evidence of grace to cause us know our loving of God and translation into Christ by our loving of the children of God and againe our loving of the Children of God by our loving of God 1 Joh. 3.14 1 Joh. 5.2 Asser. 3. One and the same cloud that is the cause of our doubting whether we beleeve or no is not the cause of our doubting whether wee love the brethren or no and so they must furnish different evidences from a misty twylight or evening of desertion from some apprehension of the sinnes of youth often our faith is clowded
of his soule in a filiall recumbencie on God and with adherence to Christ crucified for pardon of sinne which were to abolish the dayly exercise of our faith on Christ crucified 2. God forgiveth sinnes when he removeth the temporall punishment and fatherly rod inflicted for sinne Hence to beare our whoredomes to beare sinnes to beare iniquitie is to beare the punishment of sinnes To beare the indiâ—nation of the Lord because the Church hath sinned Micha 7.8 9. is to beare the temporall punishment for otherwise the Prophet speaketh of a Church in favour with God and freed from eternall wrath The Lord shall beâ— my light Thou shalt bee dâ—mbe because thou beleevest not my word saith Gabriel to Zacharie Luke 1.20 then to remove the temporall sword must bee a forgiving of and a relaxing from the temporall punishment So Nathan saith to David The Lord also hath put away thy sin But how maketh he that good Thou shalt not dye Hee meaneth especially a temporall death as the words following cleare vers 14. Howbeit because by this deed thou hast given great occasion to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme the child also that is borne to thee shall surely dye Ergo his sinne was not fully taken away in regard of the temporall rod for the rod did never depart from his house for it nor doe wee thus adde fuell to purgatory to say with Papists that pardoning of sinne is the taking away of the guilt of sinne when the punishment remaineth for the Papists have a wicked meaning that God doth so forgive sins as he removeth guilt and remembreth not the sin but leaveth the sinner also as good as halfe drowned in it to revenging justice by suffering for these same sinnes satisfactorie punishment both in this life and in purgatorie or the life to come which we think impious for only Christs blood is a satisfaction to revenging justice for sinne 3. The Lords taking away and pardoning of Davids sinne is not the Lords justifying of David because justification is the reall or law-translation in a forensecall way of a sinner an ungodly man an unwashen one from the state of sinne into the state of grace and favour with God for the imputed righteousnes of Christ as is cleare and such were some of you but yee are washed but yee are sanctified but yee are justified so God justifieth the sinner and ungodlie then by justification the person is washed and translated from a state of ungodlines of enmity and received in a court of acceptance and grace reconciliation and attonement in a covenant-state with God for Christs imputed righteousnesse so as this justification is an act of incorporation and ingraffing of a stranger and enemie to be a free Denison and Burgess and free Citizen of the new Ierusalem intituled to all the priviledges and liberties of the brough Now David was not this way pardoned for undeniably he for his person was justified and all his sinnes pardoned that is hee was freed from obligation to eternall wrath and condemnation therefore seeing God justifieth but once as he maketh us heires and Citizens of heaven but once and yet pardoneth sinnes dayly justification and some remitting of sinnes must be of a wide difference CHAP. LX. How sinnes are remitted before they bee committed how not and the Antinomian error in this point BUt then it may bee said doe Antinomians soundly affirme that sins are remitted before they be committed To which I answer taking remission in a good sense not in theirs its true a beleever when he is justified is freed from condemnation for these sinnes that are not yet committed that is he is put in such a condition as he shall never come to condemnation yea not for these sinnes hee shall hereafter commit as when a forfeited Father is relaxed from treason and his lands restored the Pardon extendeth to the heire in the mothers womb and not yet borne yea possibly not begotten but this is neither a justifying of the unborne heire nor a pardoning of the treason nor a relaxing of the punishment in a strict and right downe sense he that is not and is not capable of guiltinesse and treason such as is a child neither begotten nor borne is not capable of pardon But in the Antinomian sense we judge it abominable that sinnes are removed before they bee committed 1. Because Antinomian remission is the destruction of the being of sinne and the extirpation of his nature root and branch for so it cannot be sinne nor can it be against the Law of God nothing is capable of the grace of free pardon neither the sinne or the poore sinner but by the Antinomian way the Adulteries and Murthers of the beleevers when committed are neither against Law nor the Commandement of God for they are freed from all commanding and obliging power of either Law or Gospel so as they cannot sinne or offend God in contravening of either 2. It is against common sense that the being or nature of Adultery can bee removed and made nothing and yet when it is committed it should offend humane society and raise an evill report on the name of God and the Gospel For that which is meere nothing and hath neither being nor nature can neither offend God nor man But neither Law of God nor Gospel doth forbid the Murthers of a beleever but onely of an unbeleever by the Antinomian way 3. Their remission of sinne before the commission thereof chargeth confession of committed sinnes with sinnefull lying craving of pardon with unbeliefe fearing of sinne with distrust sorrow for or feeling of sinne with a worke of Legall bondage and of the old Adam as Libertines did because these committed sinnes are meere fancies against no Law of God CHAP. LXI How Faith justifieth and the Antinomian errour discovered in this point SAltmarsh saith That neither Faith nor Repentance are to be preached the one without the other neither without Christ and yet neither of them as bringing in Christ to the soule but Christ bringing in them But if he charge us with Preaching faith and repentance one from another or both without Christ hee should have proved his charge 2. He badly joyneth them both together For 1. Faith is a condition of justification wee are justified by faith not by repentance 2. We receive Christ by faith He dwelleth in our hearts by Faith We live by faith none of these can be said of Repentance 3. Saltmarsh saith this is to debase faith yea but it is to make swine wallowing in their lusts one with Christ though they beleeve not heare his reasons Object 1. Christ is not ours by any act of our owne but by an infinite act of Gods imputing his righteousnesse Ergo Christ is not ours by faith Answ. Christ is not ours by any act of our owne as by a ransome a meritorious and principall cause True Ergo not by faith as a condition knowing apprehending feeling applying
adoption make us Covenant-breakers Truce-breakers Traitors I thought the Gospel had condemned all these and taught us to live righteously and not to cousen and defraude one another Who now come nighest to the lying Antichrist who can dispense with all Lawes of God For Saltmarsh who calleth Presbyterians Antichristian Legalists because they cannot away with Antinomian Heresies saith To doe or performe what wee have promised and covenanted because we have promised and covenanted is more properly the service of the Old Testament and part of their bondage for wanting the power and fulnesse of the Spirit of adoption then a Gospel-obedience by the free Spirit of adoption I remember Sam. Gortyn and other Familists the deadly persecuting enemies of the faithfull and gracious people in New England deny it lawfull to sweare at all deny Magistracie or any subjection to them deny the Law the Letter of the Law and Gospel all Learning Lybraries Bookes reading and all such externals as Saltmarsh argueth against in this Chapter as savouring of Legall bondage But to keepe Covenants and promises because ye have put your selves under them by a willing ingagment is a fruit of the free Spirit and is not contrary thereunto Gal. 5.12 Ephes. 4.15 Col. 3.8 9. Object 6. Saltmarsh When they come to God in any act of worship or prayer c. as to a Creator rather saith Saltmarsh then a Father and as a God rather then as a God in Christ they put themselves under such an infinite purity as they can neither have accesse with faith nor boldnesse Answ. 1. But Saltmarsh I conceive speaketh of the Spirit of adoption his not working freely but in a Legall way as under the Old Testament bondage by which hee must insinuate that the Saints under the Old Testament in any act of worship or prayer came to God as Creator rather then Father and as God rather then as God in Christ. How then saw they the day of Christ How were they saved by faith purifying the heart And by the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ the way of Jew and Gentiles both And were justified by the imputed righteousnesse of Faith as the Gentiles The 7 th being refuted before I come now to the last which is a strange Character of a servile Spirit When they measure saith he their forgivenesse by their sinne and sanctification and can beleeve no more then they have peace for and that peace upon something of their owne performed and not from beleeving on him who hath performed all God hath not given us the Spirit of feare but of power and of love and of a sound minde 2 Tim. 1.8 or of a minde not corrupted with any of these Answ. 1. To measure forgivenesse by sin that is to thinke our sinnes are too many for Christ to pardon and we too foule for Christ out of free grace to wash is indeed a Spirit of bondage but that is not the Antinomians sense But thus To measure forgivenesse by sinne and sanctification As to argue thus I wallow in the myre with the Sow and goe on with an high hand without remorse and sorrow adding drunkennesse to thirst and drawing iniquity with cart-ropes of vanity void of all sanctification Ergo I have no forgivenesse and am not washt from my old sinnes then truely it is most false and licentious doctrine to say in this sense its Legall to measure forgivenesse by sinne and sanctification for sinne is a measure to sanctification thus but Antinomians will have living after and walking in the flesh and free pardon of sinne to consist together in one 2. It is good to beleeve no more of forgivenesse then wee have sound and well-grounded peace for which floweth from justification as Paul speaketh of peace Rom. 5.1 Being justified by Faith we have peace with God c. But wee make not rotten and false peace or peace of unbeliefe to be of the same circumference and compasse with pardon 3 Peace flowing from justification as the cause we allow and also peace flowing from our spirituall performances done in the strength of Christ and his free grace as from signes and land-marks and evidences So the wearied night-watch hath both comfort or freedome from night-feares and anxities from the appearance of the day-starre and from the rising of the Sunne from the former as a signe from the latter as a cause 4. Nor doth Saltmarsh truely say This peace is from something of our owne and not from something of Christ except he defame all the spirituall performances in the Saints as bastards begotten of pure nature and father them not on Christ. 5. Nor is the act of beleeving lesse ours and so lesse a ground of our peace then our performances done by the grace of Christ except Saltmarsh comply with Libertines who say that the faith that justifieth a beleever is the faith that is and remaineth subjectively in Christ and not the faith that is in the beleever himselfe which is a way to loose us from all Gospel performances and let us live in fleshly licence not in Christian liberty 6. The Spirit of feare that Paul speaks of 2 Tim. 1.8 is that servile mercenary feare in Devils and hirelings not the feare of such as keep covenants and promises and pay their debts and stand to treaties because they thinke just promises and covenants doe bind even beleevers in Christ in the feare of the Lord to performance except they would sinne against the Law of God which Antinomians cannot beleeve If this externall tye be contrary to the free working of a Gospel-Spirit of adoption I confesse all duties of the Law of Nature must be cryed downe by the Gospel and better covenant with Indians and Americans then with Antinomans CHAP. LXIX The dead and bastard faith of Antinomians ANtinomians do obtrude a dead vaine presumption to us in lieu of saving faith 1. We follow Christs own fashion and order of beleeving that sinners sick pained humbled plowed by the terrors and the Law who are onely under such breakings and rentings of preparations should relie on Christ for salvation not for these preparations nor because they are thus prepared but meerly in this order lest they should say Because I am innocent surely his anger shall turne away from me and I have no neede of Christ that same sense Repentance I dare not call it in an Evangelicke sense of sin and pricking of heart and feare of shutting up under an everlasting prison may highten the price of an excellent Saviour Antinomians will Pharises as Pharises obdured undaunted heifers swift Dromedaries traversing their wayes wild Asses used to the wildernesse snuffing up the wind at their pleasure all sinners as such without any order of first breaking the iron sinnow in the neck even while they think they are wholy righteous as Pharises and count sin as knots of strawes to own the blood of propitiation immediately without
deliberation knowledge action from the soule in either supernaturall works of grace or sinne as if the soule were turned in a rock or a stone 5. All the sinnes of beleevers their Adulteries murthers lying cousening must be counted on the Lords score I tremble to speake it upon his honour be it if he will suffer perfect Angels to sinne more then he can suffer Angels and the glorified that stand before the throne to fall or transgresse CHAP. LXXII Glorifying of God in sanctification needfull ANntinomians tell us of a two fold glorifying of God one in the eyes of God primary immediate passive divine by faith in which God glorifieth himselfe in us justifying us Faith being the Creator as it were of a certaine divinitie as Rom. 4.20 Abraham gave glory to God whereas unbeliefe maketh him a lyar There is another glorifying of God that is outward more fleshly and humane secondary mediate in the eyes of men by good works in sanctification in which we are agents and glorifie God by the Spirit by which wee are partakers of the Divine nature 2 Pet. 1.4 and it is done in a grosser manner by declaring God glorified before men by our good works Math. 5. and greatly inclineth to the glorifying of man by this Abraham hath to glory and rejoyce in holy works but not before God Answ. 1. We are not meere passive in beleeving for then should we not be commended for beleeving nor should wee know rely and trust in an all-sufficient Saviour in beleeving on him though there be a passion in beleeving 2. These enemies of Sanctification abase all holy walking and works of sanctification calling holy walking 1. glorifying of God outwardly and before men in a fleshly manner Whereas God seeeth it and acknowledgeth it in his owne sight sincere unfained perfect in its kind with perfection of parts not of degrees they would have all Sanctification finer hypocrisie I know thy works saith Christ to Smyrna and tribulation and poverty but thou art rich That wee might serve him without feare in holinesse and righteousnesse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 before him all the daies of our life And whatsoever yee Servants doe doe it heartily as to the Lord not to men Commending our selves to every mans conscience 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as in the sight of God Abraham walke before mee and bee thou perfect saith the Lord. How many of the good Kings did right in the sight of the Lord It s true our best works are polluted with sinne and in the matter of justification cannot endure the strict Law-censure of the Judge of the world if God narrowly marke iniquity But Antinomians are so at odds with holy walking that they will have all the sincere works of the Saints wrought by the grace of God to bee in their substance before God plaistered hypocrisie and yet in the justified these hypocriticall works are no sinne there being no more sinne in the justified nor any thing contrary to a Law which the Lord can see as a sinne more then in Jesus Christ. So here is holy sanctified and lawfull sinne and an innocent hypocrisie and holy and harmlesse corruption and flesh 3. A declarative glorifying of God in the eyes of men not of God must argue the beleever to be lawlesse and a Libertine before men and that he needeth not before men and in his conversation with wife brother children neighbours in his words promises covenants buying selling works of his calling doe all as in the sight and presence of God for if he walke rightteously in his conversation with men hee is behinde Gods backe the Lord seeth him not if he walke unjustly in fornication uncleannesse cousening lying God seeth not these to be sins 4. Why doe Antinomians exclude from works of sanctification the worke of beleeving Are we not to doe all good works in faith as well as for the glory of God and are we not to eat and drinke in faith Rom. 14. vers 22.23 are they not bastard works that come not from such a root as faith As the fruit is ill if the tree be ill and so we must glorifie God primarily immediatly in the sight of God passively in this declarative and active and secondary glorifying of God 5. The Antinomians exclude a third sort of glorifying God to wit in private when neither God seeth them nor men but they are done in a secret closet as praying praysing meditating and soliloquies of the soule with God almes given in private that men see not nor doe the poore know of it this is neither passive nor active glorifying of God and so the division is lame except Antinomians will have us comming with our secret prayers and almes to the streets and cause a trumpet to be blowne as Pharisees doe 6. The gloryfying of God by men that see our good works incline of it self to no glorifying of man more then Abrahams giving glory to God but onely as we either trust to our good works or vainely conceit we are justified by our good works and then being abused they incline to glorifie men and make us vainely rejoyce and boast in them before God So if Abraham should thinke his act of beleeving were his onely righteousnesse before God his beleeving in God should be as fleshly a glorifying of man as any his works of Sanctification CHAP. LXXIII Sanctification concurs as well as Justification to make Saints THough Sanctification say Antinomians make men Saints declaratively to men-ward yet the true cause that makes them Saints in the sight of God is justification To this wee say 1. Take Sanctification as Eaton and Saltmarsh and Denne say Protestant Divines whom they are pleased to call Legalists doe for such holinesse as they say is in Anchorits Eremits and Monks for externall works done without faith it makes men neither Saints before God nor men but meere faireded hypocrites such a sanctification wee disclaime But take Sanctification for holy walking in the strength of the grace of justification and grace inherent in us so we say Justification and Sanctification ought not to bee separated but both concurre to make us Saints the one as the cause the other as the unseparable effect And most false it is that Eaton saith That Sanctification is so farre from being the cause of making us Saints to God-ward that properly it doth but declare that we are Saints to man-ward for so Antinomians make Sanctification nothing but a poore shaddow like an Yvie bush that is no cause of wine but a meere signe to declare and shew in this there is wine Now sure by Sanctification we are partakers of the Divine nature and the Spouses beauty not onely in regard of imputed righteousnesse but also a holy and sincere walking and blamelesse profession of the truth in a chaine of the Spouses necke and in her personall acts of praying and praysing and the sweet ministery of the Gospel in regard of
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I know I find I see rebellion and sinne in me were words that came from the light of Faith not from lying sense And Faith and a sight of God can discover more corruption to Esaiah Job to Paul to the woman that washed Christs feet with teares then reason can reveale to them 2. Faith doth not stupifie the conscience to blot out all sense of sinne out of it its true the Libertine Pocquius spake in the stile of Eaton◠now we are quickned in the second Adam Christ through seeing sinne in our selves no more because it is dead But the second Adam commeth in the soule with a candle to make us see and know and feele by the light of Faith sinne which was hidden before 3. The Antinomian dead faith is against confession of sin because we must know and beleeve we have sinne if we confesse it this was Gods challenge to a heardned people Yet thou sayest because I am innocent surely his anger shall turne from me Behold I will plead with thee because thou saist I have not sinned This is that which the Lord commandeth onely acknowledge thine iniquity Antinomians say lying sense and corrupt reason knoweth iniquity but Faith is as blind as a Mole and seeth no sinne in the beleever 4 This faith of Antinomians is repugnant to the godly shame confusion and selfe-indignation that the justified man in Scripture beareth against himselfe for sinne The want whereof is the Whores forehead that cannot blush and therefore must Faith see and know sinnes that are the cause of shame 5. This lying faith is to beleeve that Adultery and Lying to come as well as the past sinnes are pardoned and abolished and so that they are no sinnes before ever they bee committed what feare then what holy care what challenges of conscience can be required to an Antinomian lying faith to eschew and feare these sinnes ere they be committed For its the act of lying sense say Antinomians to apprehend them as sinnes then sure they cannot lawfully be apprehended as ills to bee feared and eschewed if it bee a lying apprehension to thinke that that is a snare to my feet which is no snare at all but a boggle to affright a childe it must be a lying apprehension to conceive that a fancied snare to be an evill to bee shunned and declined If the Whore be no Whore the Antinomian needs not eschew the going neere her house for feare the house fall on him as Salomon intimateth Prov. chap. 5. And surely the justified Antinomian may goe on in Adulteries and blouds before he act them and feed his lusts without feare for if he conceive these to be sinnes it is his lying sense and deceiving reason for faith is to beleeve the just contrary that they are no sinnes and so not to bee eschewed as sinnes because an antedated pardon doth no lesse abolish their being and nature before they bee committed in which case they are remitted and so nullities and shaddowes before God then a pardon doth utterly abolish their being when they are committed in the Antinomian way CHAP. XC Antinomians free all converted or non-converted from obligation of obedience or practise of Christian duties ANtinomians cry out against Preaching of duties as a Legall way and destructive to Gospel-preaching of Christ and Faith 1. Because there bee no acts of Sanctification commanded in the Gospel so as the beleever sinneth either in omitting these duties or in doing contrary to them I appeale to all their writings for any such Commands either of Law or Gospel 2. They cry out against Preaching of duties as Legall preaching without any limitation wee cry out as much as they against this Preaching in an unjust way 1. If duties be preached without Christ and not issuing from the grace of Christ. 2. If they bee more Preached then Gospel-grace and free Redemption in Christ. 3. If duties as conditions of the Covenant of Works as parts conditions or causes of our justification are fellow-saviours with Christ be pressed 3. It will be found they free the unconverted from all doing or eschewing of sinne because they can doe nothing out of faith and out of saving principles of grace So Saltmarsh adviseth the troubled in spirit onely to beleeve immediatly everlasting love without any foregoing humiliation desire of the Physitian sense of sinne or setting on any duties Much like the Familists of New England who say that the Spirit acts most in the Saints when they indeavour least as if our doings desire sense of sinne going before conversion did so much the more hinder conversion 2 Nor can our impotency to doe good without the grace of God loose us from an obligation of doing our dutie seeing the omitting of these duties in the substance of their acts is a greater sinne then the doing of them for so the unconverted should not sinne in not giving to the poore because they cannot give it for God nor in abstaining from murther because they cannot abstain out of sonly feare or in not praying because they cannot pray in faith whereas Peter Act. 8. commandeth Simon Magus to pray though being in the gall of bitternesse hee could not pray in faith 3. The converted so should be under no obligation to pray heare beleeve but when the Spirit wrought actually in them to will and to doe for without such an actuall influence they can doe nothing CHAP. XCI How and for whom Christ intercedeth in Heaven ANtinomians hold that Christ advocateth at the right hand of God for the unbeleeving and unconverted elect as well as for beleevers onely Christ intercedeth not say they for the manifestation of the purchased Redemption to the elect not converted It s true the purchased Redemption and bloud-shed of Christ is for the elect as well not converted as converted But Antinomians goe on another ground that sinners are justified and pardoned before they be converted and beleeve But the Scripture knoweth not any intercession of Christ but for applycation of the purchased Redemption 1. Because Christ liveth againe that hee may bestow the blessings of his Testament actually upon his friends Christ confirmeth his owne Testament which no other dead friend doth and the goods of his Testament are peace Joh. 14.27 The sprinkling of the Conscience from dead works to serve the living God Heb. 9.14 15 16 17 18 19 20. As Moses sprinkled the booke and the people the Tabernacle the vessels 19.20 So that Christ as our high priest is entred into heaven as a sprinkler Now he is no sprinkler to the unconverted 2. The thing he prayeth for as intercessor is the not failing of the faith of the Saints and he liveth to save the commers to God through him that is the beleevers and is touched with our infirmities and that we should hold fast our profession and by him as intercessor We have boldnesse
Rise raigne er 50. d Vnsavory speaches er 7. e Rise raigne er 77. f Rise er 70. g Er. 57. h Rise er 43. Libertines say frequencie and delight in holy duties take us off Christ. i Saltmarsh Free gracâ— 84. How we may abâ—se our evidences from walking by looking to much on our owne sanctified acts and â—o little on Christ. a Town asser grace pag. 26. b Gal. 5.1 2 3 4 5. c Gal 5.1 Act. 15.10 d Col. 2.18.19 â—0 Maâ— 15 9. 1 Cor. 7.23 Yee are bought with a price be not the servants of men e Gal. 3 10 11 12 13. f Rom. 1.2 3 4. g Ioh. 8.36 h Rom. 6 1â—.13 14 i 2 Cor. 3.17 k Ioh. 3.34 35 36. l Rom. 7.5 6 7. m Rom. 7 6. Rom. 8.3 n Rom. 7.11.13 o 2 Cor. 3.7 8 9. p Rom. 8.2 3 4. Gal. 5.18 Rom. 8.15 1 Ioh. 4.17.18 q Gal. 3.1.2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13. Luk. 1.74 Rom 8.37 38.39 s Towne asser pa. 8.26 t Math. 11.29 u Luk. 1.74.45 Tit. 2 11.1â— x Gal. 5.13.14 y Ioh 8 24 25 26. Ro. 6. â—6 17. z Psa. 119.45 a Râ—v 1. â— b Rom 12.1 c Epâ—es 6. â— d 1 Pet. 2.12 e Col. 2.6 f 1 Thes. 4. â— 3 g 1 Pet. 1.16 h Towne Asser 143. i Pag. 3. â—4 9 k Town asser pag. 31. l Towne asser pag. 30.31 How we are freed from the Law how noâ— Gattâ—kâ—r Prefat to Gods eye on Israel Martâ—n 〈◊〉 n Saltmarsh Free gracâ— pag. 154. Towâ—e asser 71.72 The place Math. 5.19 I came not to destroy the Law c. opened p Tâ—wne asser 137. q Levit. 19.3 Deut. 4.10 Deut. 5 29. 1 Chrâ— 16.30 2. Câ—ro 6.31 Neâ— 1.11 Psal. 31 1â— Pâ—al 7. â— Psâ—â— 76 1â— Esaâ— 59 19. Ieâ— 10.7 r â—rov 8. â—4 s Eccles. 9.2 Antinomians are ignorant of the Law and of our freedome from it as if the Law should command slavish feare and merâ—â—nary service t Eaton Honey combe pâ— 41 108. â—â—d cap. 3. pâ—g 25. Câ—isp vol. â— â—er u Honey combe pag. 40.108 x pag. 108. y Honey comb cap. â— pag. 77 78 79. z Towne asse 137. It cannot bee 〈◊〉 said that my spirit doth thaâ— vâ—luntarily which the command of the Law bindeth forceth unto pag. 11 12.13.14 a Psal. 73. v. 34.35 36 37.38 b Exod. 6.22 23.24 25 26 27 28. c Iob 1 9. Iob 21.15 Mal 3.14 d Rom. 7.14 e Rom. 7 14. f 1 Pet. 2.10 1 Pet. 2.16 g 1 Pet. 2.14.15 Christ freeth us not from obedience to Superiours as Antinomians insinuate if they would be plaine h Eaton Honey combe cap 3. pag. 25. i Honey combe cap. 7. pag. 138. k Honey combe cap. 4.72 l Râ—n 13.3.4 1 Pet. 2.14 l 2 Chron. 19 6. Magistrates cannot draw the sword of God against 〈◊〉 murthers adulterâ—es are oppressions of beleevers because by the Antinomian way they are not reall but imaginary sins m 1 Iob. 3.15 1 Iob. 2.8 9 10. n Towne assert 39 40. o Saltmarsh Free grace pag. 57. p Deâ—ne Ser. Of the Man of sinne pag. 9.10 11.12 q Eaton Honey combâ— â—ap â— pag. 87. 95. a Towne asser 39.10 b Saltmarsh Free grace pag. 74 â—42 cap. 32. pâ—câ— 2 c Col 3.11 d Col. 3.20 e Towne asser 41.42 f 1 Thess. 5 6 7. â— Gâ—l 5.15 Coloss. 2.6 1 Peâ— 4.2 2 Cor. 1.12 Non ego pecco sed Aâ—inus meus caro mea l Towne asser pag 35. m Eaton Hâ—ney combe caâ— 3. pag. 77. n Honey combe cap. 3 25. n Honey combe cap. 3 25. o Town asser f grace pag. 129.130 p Honey combe cap. 3. pag 2â— q Towne assert pag 40. r Towne asser grace pa. 40. a 1 Ioh. 1.8 b Ephes. 1.7 c Lev. 7. â—8 The souâ—e that eateth shall beare his iniquitiâ— Lev 20 19. Lâ—vit 5.1 17. Levit. 10.17 Levit. 21.16 Ezec. 18.19 20. Ezech 4 4. â—srael shall beare their iniquitie Esaâ— 53. â—1 Christ shall beare their iniquities that is he shall bee punished for their iniquâ—ties Levit 20 20. they shall bâ—â—re their 〈◊〉 they shall dye 〈◊〉 beareth the iniquity of the holy things of the people d 1 Sâ—m 12.13 Sinne is dayly râ—mitted 〈◊〉 tâ—mporalâ— punishment is removed e 1 Cor. 6.11 Taking away or remitting of sinne in some seâ—se a farre other thing then justification a Saltmarsh Free grace pag. 188.189 b Ioh. 11.12 c Ephes. 3.17 d Hab. 2.4 Rom 1.17 Saltmarsh Free grace 1.8 Saltmarshes reasâ—â—s to prove we are not 〈◊〉 by 〈◊〉 answered Saltmarsh Free grace 189. Saltmarsh ibid. 190. Saltmarsh ibid. 190. h Esai 35.6 i Math. 11.5 The order of conversion and â—f the Lords justifying the sinner How the infused habit of sanctification and the habit of faith and the act of beleeving by order of nature goe before justification k Cornwell 5â— It s not mâ—ch up or downe whether Faith be active or passive in justification a Saltmarsh Free grace cap. 34 pag. 144.145 Saltmarsh his Antinomian Method and order of bringing a sinner to Christ. b Câ—ispe vol. 3. ser. 8. pag 260 261.262 c Pag. 263. The abuse of preparations before conversion to merit or no preparation is presumption both condemned the former in Pelagians of the later in Antiominans The Antinomians condemn both the opinion the practise it self of humiliation and all preparations before that we belâ—eve and approve Pharisaicall pride in men before beleeving as selfe-righteousnesse we onely condemne the vaine opinion but opprove the duety it selfe a Saltmarsh Free grace pag. 146 147 We need Law-light to teach us our duty whether Antinomians wiâ—l or no. Saltmarsh sides with Familists b See the Bright Star Rise raigne er 21 And Theologia Germanica a Saltmarsh 143. Towne assert grace 53.54 How can good works be required as necessary conditions toward the attaining of justification salvation and blessednâ—sse since these are possessed before we can doe any good works Towne asser 144 I see little difference between merit and the reward you stand for Law-obedience did not winne God to be our God in the first covenant nor Evangelâ—ek beleeving or acting to be our God in covenant of grace The authority of God as a Law gâ—ver and of God as â— Father nâ—t contrary as Antinomians imagine Towne â—ssert pag 30. Saltmarsh ibid 148. The Gospel commandeth not any thiâ—g by the Antinomian way d Town· asser of grace pag. 140. e Saltmarsh free grace pag. 44. f Honey combe cap. 3 25. That the Gospel both commands and perswades agree friendly together but are not contâ—ary as Antiâ—omians sâ—pâ—ose g Towne asser pa. 40. Libertâ—nes call obedience to God a misâ—rie a yoake and a bondage Wherein Law rigour and Gospel-sweetnesse doe consist h Conference of M Iohn Cotton p. 17. Saltmarsh 155 156. i Saltmarsh Free grace 85. Antinomians reject all inferences and arguing in matters of faith as humane and Legall The Gospel containes precepts as well as patternes to be
followed k Saltmarsh Free grace 170 p 2. c. 37. Though we be regenerate and spirituall 〈◊〉 need we scâ—iptural teaching and the written Scriptures are not given to the flesh onely and the unrenewed part as Antinomians fancie l 1 Tim. 4.14 15. m 2 Tim. 3.14 15 16 17. n 1 Tim. 4.16 o â— Tim. 3 â—7 p Col. 3. â—6 q Rom. 1.6 r Rom. 15.4 s 1 Pet. 1. t 2 Pet. 1.3 u Vers. â— x Luk. 10 39.40.41.42 43. y Ier. 31.34 z 1 Ioh. 2 17. a Thâ—oâ—og Germanica cap. 28. p. 72. b Rise raigne er 4.5 c Town â—sser grace pag. 35. d Saltmarsh Free grace pag. 148.149 Every thing singular and rare in the covenant of grace a Saltmarsh Free grace pag. 15â— 153 Saltmarsh findeth fault with the holy Ghost because he termeth the Gospel a Covenaâ—t b Saltmarsh Freâ— grace 〈◊〉 153.154 a Saltmarsh Free grace 127. There are no conditions in us moving God to be our God but the covenant takes its rise and spring from free grace in God No antecedent condition on mans part in the covenant of works as Antinomians dreame 2. Mistake how the covenant of grace is eternall b Sâ—ltmarsh Free grace pâ—g 123. Crispe Ser. on the Cove c Ephes. 2.1.2 d Tit. 3.3 See 1 Tim. 1 13. 1 Cor. 6 9 10 11. e Honey combe cap. 5.87.95 Saltmarsh Free grace 57 79. Denne Ser. Of the Man of sinne pag. 9.10 11.12 â— Towne asser grace pa. 39.40 f Saltmaâ—sh Free grace 125 126.3 Mistake How the covenant is made with Christ in the Antinomian way of Libertinâ—sme g Saltmarsh Free grace pag. 84. The Antinomians Conversion Saltmarsh Free grace pag. 177.178 b Saltmarsh How meer commands from the Word cannot worke a chaâ—ge How the Law is in the heart by nature c Saltmarsh Free grace 178. Naturall men cannot propose a supernatuend to themselves Pag. 179. How our performances prevaile not or prevaile with God b Iam. 5.16.17 c Mat. 17.21 d Rom. 8.23.24.25 e Saltmarsh Free grace 179. Who looke on Christ in the by f Rise reigne g 1 Thes. 5.17 18. h 1 Cor. 1â— 5â— i 1 Tim. 6. â—7 k Luk. 16.9 Antiominans hold it legal service to be obliged in holy performances to any written rule of the Word but only to the Spirit l Saltmarsh Free grace 180. m Phil. ver 18 n Rom. 1 3â— o 2 Tim. 3.3 p 1 Thes 4 6. q Simplicities deâ—ence against Siâ—ver headed 〈◊〉 p. 22. r Pag. â—3 s Act. 1â— 9 s Act. 1â— 9 t Act. 15. â—1 u Rom. 4.1.2 3 4 5 6 7 8. x Saltmarsh 189. How sin and sanctifâ—catio is a measure of forgivenes and how not and the Antinomian 〈◊〉 thereof What Peace is y Rise raigne er 68. The doctrine of saving faith utterly corrupted by the Antinomians a Ier 2 3â— Antinomians teach presumption in stead of faith b Ier. 31.8 Hosea 8.9 c Ier. 2.23 24. d Ioh. 9.41 e Ioh. 9 2.39.10 Math. 13 14.1â— f Ioh. 5 44. g Saltmarsh Free grace 192. Faith only and no other duty commanded in the Gospel by the Antinomian way Antinomians dissemble in that they say not downe right that the beleever cannot sin and the beleevers lying and whoring is not lying and whoring h Rise raigne unsavo speech er â— i Saltmarsh Free grace p. 185. Antinomians faith is to beleeve the universall Election and Redemption all and every one k Saltmarsh fr. gr 1â—2 Saltmarshâ—s reasons for immediate beleeving without all preparations removed Saltmarsh fr. gr 186. Who invited immediatly to come Esa. 55.1 Saltmarsh 186. Object 6. How Christ calleth not the righteous but sinners to repentance Christ calleth not sinners as sinners nor all sinners to repentance We teach not that men are converted because they are in their apprehension sinners Pag. 187. Onely free grace preparations neither before time nor in time are the cause or condition or reason for which sinners are converted or ordained for conversion Saltmarsh Free grace pa. 192. Doing because Christ hath redeemed and saved not contrary but sweetly subordinate to doing that wee may be possessed in the purchased Redemption a Gâ—lat 6. b Col. 3. â—â— c Ioh. 21.17 d 1 Pet. 5.4 e 2 Ioh. 8. How the way to heaven is sweet and easie yet not so short as â—ntinomians say f Math 7.21 Maâ—h 12 50. g Phil. 3 12 13. h 1 Cor. 9.23 24 25 26. i Lâ—k 13.24 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 k 2 Tim. 4 7. Rev. 2.7.17.26 Rev. 2 12.21 Rev. â— 9 n Hebr. 12 4â— o Mâ—t. 16.24 25. Iâ—m 1.12 p 1 Cor 15.58 q Gal. 6.6.8 Math. 13. ver 4. â—6 Acts 14.22 s Râ—â— 2.9 Act. 20. â—9 t Math. 24â— 2.43 Mâ—â— 1â— 29 u 1 Ioh. 5.3 Saltmarsh 194. x Iam 2.20 y Iam 2 13 14 15. c. 1 Ioh. 3.17 1 Ioh. 2.9 10 11. Rom. 12.1 2 3 4. 1 Thess. 4. â— 2 3 4. Col 3 1 2 3 4 5 c. Ephes 5.1 2 c. Saltmarsh Free grace 19 4. a Eaton Hâ—ney combâ— câ— 8. pag. 163. Towne assert of grace 131. Saltmâ—rsh Free grace pag. â— 6. b Rise raigne er 1.2 c Rise raigne er 7.8.15.18 d Rise raign er 22. e Rise raigne er 2. e Râ—se raigne er 2. f er 11. g Rise raigne e. 36. h Rise raigne unsavory speech er 4. i Ioh. â— 6 k Râ— 6.7 18 l 2 â—or 3.17 m Psal. 119. vers 45 n Rom. 5.2 1 Pet. 1 8. o Pâ—â—l 3.4 Psal. â— 1 Rom. 7. â—2 p Psalm 119 q Psal. 16.7 â— r â—sa 119.30 s Towne asser grace pag. 129. t Saltmâ—rsh Free grace 140. u Honey combe cap. 3. pag. 25. x Towne asser grace pa 39.40 Honey combe cap. 5. pag 87. Denne Ser. Of the Man of sinne pag. 9.10 11. Saltmarsh Free grace p. 74.75.142 a Honey combe ca. 13.394.395.396.397 Our active glorifying of God in acts of sanctification accepted in the sight of God b Revel 2.9 c Luk. 1.74.75 d Col. 3.13 e 2 Cor 4.2 f Psal. 130.3 Psal. 143.2 a Honey combe ca. 1. p. 339.340 341. Sanctification makes Saints as well as justification b Honey combe ca. 1â— 340 Saltmarsh borrowing Eatons words hath the same free grace pa. 62.63 Dennes ser. of the Man of sinne pag. 9.11 c Honey combe 339. d Câ—nt 4.9 e Cant 7. â— 2 â— 3 4 â— f Phil 4.8 g Heb. 13.16 h Psal. 51.10 i Iam. â— 16 1 Ioh 1.9 k Math. 6.11 l Psal. 119.1 m Psal. 12.1 n Psal. 106.3 o Iâ—h 13 77. p Rev. 22.14 q Mat. 14.23 â—4 a Paral I Libertines Familists Antinomians agree in that all deny there should be sense of sinne in belâ—evers Câ—lvin in iâ—struct adv Libâ—rt ca. 8 450 451.452 Si Deâ— sumus veterem hominem in nobis crucifgâ—â—oportere veterem Adamâ—m inteâ—ire Calvin Ibid. 451. Quia hoc Adami peccatum suit commedere de fructu scientiae boni ac mali fic ex liberâ—inorum sententia veterem Aâ—amum mortificare
a H. Nâ—cholas Ep. Sect. 1 b Saltmarsh Free grace pag. 179.180 Nota. How the outward word onely reformes us and how not and how Saltmarsh with his Antinomians are deluded Enthysiasts in speaking against the Scriptures and pleading for their new Spirit A middle way between Papists and Enthysiasts 〈◊〉 to beleeve and obâ—y for the written or preached word as the onely objective cause and warrant Ser pag. 19. Esai 53.1 Mat. 13.14.15 Act. 28.24 25 26. Ioh. 9.39 Ioh. 3.17.18 Ioh. 12.35 36 37 38 39. Now M. Del will have the Spirit to reforme the flesh Esai 53.1 Mat. 13.14.15 Act. 28.24 25 26. Ioh. 9.39 Ioh. 3.17.18 Ioh. 12.35 36 37 38 39. Now M. Del will have the Spirit to reforme the flesh d Del. Ser pa. 19. e Pag. 20 f Libertines speak So Calvin Instruct. adver Libert ca. 10. p. 442. Verbum Dei Spiritum esse asunt p. 443. Vitam etiam nostram Spiritum esse debere They say the Word and we and our life must be changed into the Spirit g Rise raigne pag. 59. art 3. h Calvin Instruct advers Libert ca. 11. pag. 443. Libâ—rtini statum animaruÌ„ nostrarum loco Deum vivere in nobis vegetare corpora nosâ—ra nos sustinere atque omnes vitales actiones efficere quia vivens est tantum Deus qui vere est a Calvin Instruct advers Libert c. 13.14 pag. 445.446.447 b Calv. Ibid. cap. 16. adver Libert pag. 446. Hoc praetextu quod se a Deo regisinant ex eodem principio deduâ—unt perperam fieri si de re aliquâ iudicatur c Calvin Ibid pâ—g 449. d Antonius Pocquius in libello suo impio Qâ—inetiam dicit infirmitaes alij aliorum sustinete nam si detractores simus erimus cum Serâ—ente c. e Ibid. Calvin pag. 46. f Pocquius Scrip. Enim omnia munda mundis qui autem fide purificatus est totus est gratus Deo sed caveat ne infirmo frairâ— ruina sit quia scriptum est ama proximum usque ulciscâ— velu f Bullinger advers Anabapt lib. 2. cap. 1. f Rise raigne er 22. h Rise raigne er 34. Crisp vol. 3. Ser. 1. pa. 42. k M. Archer Comfort for beleevers pâ—g 36. Libertines Antinomians take away prayer feare rebukes and use of meanes because God decreeth all things l Archer p. 36 Comfort for beleevers m Archer p. 38 n Ibid. p. 35. o Ibid. p. 46. p Ib. p. 47.48 q Crispe vol. 3. Ser. 5. p. 178 179 180. a Pocquius in libello apud Calvin 16. pag. 463. b Saltmarsh pag. 84. c Rise raigne er 36. er 35. er 14. a Saltmarsh Free grace pag. 71.72 Antinomian Divinity most carnall b Eaton Honey combe ca. 3. p 25. l. 24.25 c Towne asser 71 7â— d Saltmarsh Free grace â—4 pag 44. Pocquius in libello suo apud Calvin Instruct adv Libert pag. 4â—2 463 Scriptum est Joh. 9 Qui videt peccatum peccatum ei manet veritas non est in ipso deinde preterea dicit qui pâ—ocat in uno peccat in omnibus â—ed cum inspiritis in deum omnia isla non videtis non enim habitat in Deo peccatum Prius non videbant Adam Evah voluntatem suam neque pudebat eos suae humanitatis non videbant peccatum suum sed cum viderant ipsum imputatum est ijs in peccatum prorsus immutatum est in contrarium Quare reliquamus veterem Adam ne cernamus amplius peccata nostra id est animam viventem veniâ—mus ad rem majorem id est ad Spiritum nunc vivificati sumus cum secundo Adam qui est Christus non cernendo amplius peccatum quia est mortuum Wherein our Divinity touching Sanctification agreeeth with Morall Phylosophie in acts of Morall vertue and wherein not 2 Pet. 3.14 Math. 25 20.21.22 f Towne asser pag. 77.78.79 g Saltmarsh â—r gr 140. An account of our Divinity as more Spirituall then that of Antinomâ—ans and Morall Philosophy h Ezec. 36.26 Zâ—câ— 12.10 Esai 44.5 Ier. 31.33 Deut. 30.6 Ezech 11.19 i Rom 7.14 k Rom 1.16 l Esai 53.1 Ioh. 12. â—9 m Hebr. 4.12 a Eaton Honey combe cap. 13. pag. 175 176 c. b Ps. 32.1 â— 5 c Esa 6.7 d Esa. 43.25 e Esa. 44.22 f Exo. 34.7.8 g Eccle. 7.20 h Prov. â—09 i Psal. 130.3 k Psal. 143.2 l Iob â— 1 8. Iob 2. ver 3. m Iob 9.30.31.32 n Rom. 7.1.2.3 o Ver. 17.18.19.20 p Ver. 25. q Rom. 7.14 r Ro. 7.17.18 s Ver. 23.24 t 1 Cor 6.11 u 1 Cor. 11.28 29.30.31.32 x 2 Cor. 11.3 y Ver. 11.12.13.14.15.16.17 18. a 1 Ioh. 1.3.7 b 1 Ioâ— 2.1 c Ver. â—4 d 1 Ioh. 1.8 e Honey combe ca. 3.5 f Saltmâ—râ—h Free grace p. 140. g Towne asser grace pa 71.72.73 h 1 Thesâ— 4. i Rom. 1â— â— k Heb. 13 16 Phil. 4. â—4 18 l Cant. 4.7.8.9 m Honey combe cap. 13. pag. 379.380 o Eaton Honey com cap. 13. pag. 376.377 â—78 p Psal. 1.1 Psal. 16.9 Prov 1.10 Câ— 13.21 Ch. 3.17 Esa â— â—8 ch 13.9 c. 33.4 Sinners in Zionâ—r as â—aid Amâ—s 9.10 〈◊〉 thâ— siâ—ners of my people 〈…〉 Ioh 9.31 God heareth not sinners Iames 4.6 Gâ—l 2.7 â—rde ver 15. q Mat 9.10 Mark 2 15. Luk. 15.1 Luk. 7.37 Behold a woman that was a siâ—ner c. How we are righteous in Christ and yet sinners in our selves and M. Eatons Argument removed as Popish Papâ—sts and Antinoâ—ians are both ignorant of the doctrine of Justification a Honey comb c. 4. p 48. Saltmarsh pag. 142. b Towne asser grace pag. 126.129.130 b Honey comb c. 4. pa 52. c Pag. 50. d Pag. 48.49 e Psal. 51.3 f Esa. 59. â—2 g Rom. 7.18 h Vers 21. i Vers. 23. The light of faith clearely findeth and discerneth sin to be in the beleever k Esa. 6.5 l Iob 42.5 6. m 1 Tim. 1 1â— n Luk. 7.47 o Calvin in opusc advers Libert pag. 464 Nunc vivificati sumus cum secundo Adam qui est Christuâ— non cernendo amplius peccatum quia est mortuum p Ier. 2.35 q Ier. 3.13 r Ezek. 9.6 Ezek. 16.62 Rom. 6.21 2 Cor 7.11 s Ier. 3.2 Esai 3.9 a Saltmarsh Free gra pag. 40 44. b Saltmarsh Free grace pag 16.17 18 18.19 20. c Rise raigne er 36. er 35. a Crispe vol. 3. ser. 5 pag. 176.177 b Crispe vol. 3 Ser. 5. pag. 180. Christs intercession is properly for such as beleeve c Luk. 21.31.32 e Heb. 4.15 d Hâ—b 7.25 f Hebr. 4.14 Heb. 10.20.21 22.23 h 1 Ioh. 1.1.2 a Saltmarsh fr. gr 200.201.202.203 b Saltmarsh free grace pa. 93.94.95 c Rise raigne er 55. d Psal. 18 18. e Esai 3.1 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Fulâ—rum As 〈◊〉 Moâ—tan Scipâ—â— as Iuâ—ius and the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 f Esai 10 20. A faith of dependencie is true faith a Towne asser grace pag. 3. â— Del Serm. pag. 17. b Towne assert pag. 3. c Towne asser pag. 6. d Del Sâ—r. pag. 19. Antinomians make an ignorant and unequall comparison betweene Law and Gospel The Law an instrument of Sanctification Towne assert of grace 138.
in scripture and matters of faith 123 124 Though we be regnerate yet we need scripture-teaching 124 The written scripture not given to the flesh 124 125 Chap LXV The Gospel is a rare Covenant in al things 127 128 Chap. LXVI Antinomians errours touching the Covenant of grace 128 129. In the conditions thereof ibid. The time of it 129 130. And in the parties 130 131 Chap. LXVII Of legall and Gospell-conversion 131 How meere commands worke no change 132 133 Naturall men cannot propose a supernaturall end 134 Obedience at set houres not legall 135 136 Whether Covenants Vowes Promises be legall 136 137. What other things are legall 138 139 Chap. LXIX The dead and bastard faith of Antino 140 141 Faith and nothing commanded but only faith in the Gospell how true 140 141 Of Antinomian faith 143 144 Reason for immediate beleeving without all preparations 143 144 145. Taken off Who immediatly invited 144 145 146 Chap. LXX Faith not the onely worke of the Gospel as Antinomians say 148 149 Doing subordinate to sweet Gospell-attractions 149 The way to heaven not so short as Antinomians dreame 149 150 Chap. LXXI The justified obey not God by necessity of nature as the fire burneth 151 152 Chap. LXXII Glorifying of God in sanctification needfull 153 Of our active and passive glorifying of him 153 154 Chap. LXXIII Sanctification concurres as well as justification to make Saints 155 156 Chap. LXXIV The harmonious compliance of old Libertines Familists and Antinomians 157 158. In seventeene paralels to chap. LXXXVI p. 221 Antinomians with Libertines refute all personall mortification 158 159 Chap. LXXV Libertines Familists and Antinomians free us from all law 161 Chap. LXXVI Libertines and Antinomians deny all scripture 163 164. H. Nicholas maketh two words of God 164 165 Antinomians turne Perfectists with Libertines 166 167 The Fathers of old saved as we 167 Chap. LXXVII Antinomians and Libertines foule opinions touching God and the authour of sin 169 170 171 Chap. LXXVIII Libertines and Antinomians take away all sense or remorse of conscience for sin 172 173 Chap. LXXIX Libertines and Antinomians paralel beleevers with Christ incarnate 173 174 Chap. LXXX To follow sense and naturall inclination as a law is our rule say Libertines and Antinomians 174 175 Antinomians sin according to their owne lying sense and declaratively not truely not really and in the Court of God 175 176 Chap. LXXXI Antinomians plead for liberty to popery and to all Religions 177 178 Chap. LXXXII Libertines and Antinomians doubt of the resurrection and of the life to come 178 179. H. Nicholas and New England Familists teach the same 179 180 181 Chap. LXXXIII Familists Libertines Anabaptists go before Antinomians in denying all externall worship and obedience 181 182 183 Chap. LXXXIV M. Del Saltmarsh and Familists deny all outward Reformation scripture seales and ordinances 187 188 Del denies any worke of the spirit or conversion to God in the Old Testament with Socinians· 188 189. Del a Familist 180 181. Del a Libertine 193 194. He denies all lawes 195. Del a disciple of Muncer an Anabaptist 196 197. How ecclesiasticall reformation is spirituall 198 199 Del a Libertine in removing all the working of second causes 199 200 Dels arguments for onely internall reformation against all the Ministery and Ordinances of the Gospell as Swenckfeldians taught 201 202 Beleevers as spirituall as Angels saith Del What need then of preaching to them 204 205. Outward Reforming no more our duty then to redeeme the World 206 207 Del maketh Gods absolute decrees to destroy all the working of second causes 208 209. Del and Familists deny the scripture and contend for an internall enthysiasticall word 210 211 212 213 The middle way between Papists and Enthysiasts 216 217 218 Chap. LXXXV Libertines and Antinomians come neare to other in making God the author of sin 219 220 Chap. LXXXVI Libertines and Antinomians would have us doe nothing â—ecaâ—se God doth all things 221 Chap LXXXâ—II Antinomians refuted in saying that we make the actings of the Spiâ—it like to the acts of morall Philosophy and the differences between these two 222 223 224 225 Chap. LXXXâ—III That wee are tâ—uly righteous in the sight of God and yet sinners in our seâ—ves proved against Antinomians 225 226 227 228 Chap LXXXIX Antinomians are ignorant of faith to dreame that its faith to beleeve against sense that our sins are no sins 230 231 Chap. XC Antinomians free all converted or non-converted from obligation of obedience 233.234 Chap. XCI How and for whom Christ intercedeth for in heaven 234.235 Chap. XCII Antinomians contend for the faith of assurance and reject the faith of dependence 235 236 Chap. XCIII Antinomians deny the Law to be an instrument at all of our sanctification 236 237 Del with Libertines maketh the word and the Spirit all one 238 239 Errata Pag. 14. line penult for the r. that p. 15. l. 18. d p. 17. l. 5. till he made r. till he be made p. 21. l 17. r. from p. 44. l. ult for 4. r. 5. p. 50. l. 14. for and r. an p. 53. l. 37. for they r. there p 64. l. 3. d. in p. 99. l. 7. r. simply p. 101. l. 33. for none r. now p. 123 l. 4. r. claram p. 135. l. 32. r reatu p. 162. l. 25. a castro p. 194. l. 18. but. r. both p. 223. l. 25. for not be r. not to be p. 235. l. 11 forme to Scriptures and ordinances then r forme to Scriptures and ordinances Then p. 254. l. 5 for is r. as at Troas p. 268. in marg will it r. will have it p. 275. l. 3 r. yeelded 290. in mar r. 1 Cor. p. 307. l. 34. r. contrariety p. 316. l. 33 r. because Errata in the II. Part. Pag. 3. l. 12. who ever will have Christ. r. who ever will have Christ and pay not a penny p. 17. l. 18. r. makes p. 65. for Chap. XLVI r. Chap. XLIX p. 65. l. ult r. calleth p. 72. l. 17. r. giveth p. 83. l. 9. for hath r. have p. 96. l. 5. d. and. p. 159. l. 27. for glorification p. 80. l. 28. d. â—hen r. gloriation p. 199 l. 21. d. is 209. l. ult for them r. him p. 223. l. 15. r. in spicitis 236. l. 16. without was r. was without THE DISCENT OF ANTINOMIANS and FAMILISTS PART I. CHAP. I. The Originall of Antinomians and of other unclean Sects who have taught the same things not unlike to their blasphemies THOUGH out of doubt Antinomians have given signification of the first dawning of that Heresie in Paul the Apostles time Shall wee continue in sin that grace may abound Rom. 6.1 and Is the Law sin God forbid Rom. 7.7 and James his arguing against the dead faith voyd of good works Jam. 2. intimateth they were peeping up in his dayes and John hinteth at some denying signes of Justification Yet their Originall seems to be from the old Katharoi called Puritans who rose
about the year 1115. 1118. who being justified affirmed they were perfect and free of all sin as the glorified in heaven as Saltmarsh Free Grace p. 140. and Mr. Towne Assertion of Grace say p. 69.77 78 79. though Flaccus Illyricus Catolo testi ver l. 15. fol. 1531. say the Papists ascribed this opinion to the Waldenses but most unjustly and Gualterius the Jesuite in his fabulous Chronicle to the Lutherans Tabula Châ—onographica An. 1200. c. 10. or we may say they came from these called Aetiani from Aetius or Eunâ—â—ius the Disciples of Aetius who taught that sin and perseverance in sin could hurt the salvation of none so they were partakers of his faith that he taught so Augustine de Heres tom 6. Heres 54. CHAP. II. Of Libertines IF we come a little lower about the year 1525. arose the Libertines which are a kind of men that come near to the Antinomians and Familists and all of them savour strongly of the Manichaeans Valentinians and Cerdonites Calvin advers lib. c. 2. observeth that Libertines under pretence of Christian Liberty trampled under-foot all godlinesse so doe Antinomians Before them Câ—rdo the Disciple of Heracleon as Epiphanius in Anaceph stood for his two principles one good another evill as Tertull. also saith de praescript He said that Christ suffered imagiâ—â—rily as Tertull. relateth so Familists and finer Antinomians deny the Incarnation and say Every beleever is Christ incarnate and is Godded and Christed with the holy anoynting Cerdo denyed the Resurrection so do Antinomians and Familists Marciâ—n his Disciple taught the like With Manichaeans they are not farre from rejecting all the Old Testament for Antinomians will have no actuall Remission of sin in the Old Testament so saith Denâ—e Doctrine Jâ—h Baptist p. 51.52 Del. serm p. 3 4. no inward conversion of sinners to God no holy Spirit given no Covenant of Grace then as Crispe and Mr. Del say The first man of the Libertines was an unlearned rude fellow Coppinus a Flanders man after him arose one Quintus a Taylor in Piecardiâ— a drunken proud man and to him was joyned one Bertrandus who dyed soone and one Claudinus persevalus But a chiefe man among them was Antonius Pocquius a Priest who still said Masse though Papists shamelesly call them Calvinists these fellows spread their flesâ—ly Heresies in Holland Brabantia and other parts of Low Germany and infected thousands drew away many in France Antonius Pocquius a dissembling hypocrite remained at Geneva for a space desired of Calvin a Testificate that hee might pretend Calvins name but what he could not obtain from Calvin who saw him a phantastick foole he found at Martin Bâ—câ—r who was more simple then Calvin and that Quintinus said to Calvin when he rebuked him for his vaine and new expressions that he understood not his words so do Antinomians and Familists say none but themselves know anything of the Spirit and of the mystery of free grace 2. Libertines revealed none of their secrets but to those of whom they exacted an oath to follow them So doe Familists and Antinomians cautelously keep up their mindes from any they know to be contrary to their way 3. They spake in darke obscure mystick and sublime words not with the Scriptures and so doe Antinomians alledging they are Godded and Christed Moses is not in their conscience they live in Heaven they are neither male nor female they walke by the rule of the new Creature 4. Libertines professed they would speak so ambiguously as their words might cary two senses because Christ preached darke parables to the people Antinomians have not to this day explained in their writings whether the justified can sin or no â—ut in practice they say they may lye whore sweare cousen God seeth no such sinnes in them 5. Nothing was more frequent with Libertines then the Spirit the Spirit Antinomians say to preach duties to rebuke sinne is not a Spirituall straine of Gospell-preaching it 's legall literall Moses-like not Christ-like The chiefe errors of Libertines which I prove to be holden expresly or by undeniable consequences by Antinomians and Familists are these 1. The Scripture is a dead and killing letter the Spirit that quickneth is our rule so say Antinomians 2. The Scripture is to be exponed in an allegoricall and spirituall sense so Antinomians 3. The Evangel is a spirituall doctrine because it comprehendeth Christ who quickneth us the Antinom Del. pag. 19. to prove this citeth the same Text with Libertines John 6. The words that I speake are Life and Spirit 4. d The word is nothing but the Spirit that Christ is the Spirit we are made Spirits Godded with him say Antinomians with Christ and our life should be the Spirit it selfe so Familists and Antinomians teach 5. God is that one Spirit that acteth and worketh all in all creatures especially in Angels and men good or ill and worketh in us all vitall actions of living growing willing understanding in place of our soule so doe New England Antinomians teach 6. Quintinus that hogge saith Calvin called Paul a broken vessell John a foolish young man Peter a denier of his Lord and Mathew an Vsurer We know Antinomians say Peter leaned more to a Covenant of workes Paules doctrine was more for free grace then Peters to Antinomians Moses the Prophets Christ John-Baptist are legalists preach carnally litterally The Old Testament is a dead letter saith Del serm pag. 3.4 under all the outward Religion men he excepteth neither Patriarchs nor Prophets nor Godliest then living were inwardly as corrupt and wicked as very Heathen for all their circumcision in the flesh they were uncircumcised in heart for all their outward washing they were inwardly uncleane So that notwithstanding the outward worship of God the people remained inwardly corrupt filthie and uncleane and without any true Reformation before God till Christ who was God in the flesh came with the Ministration of the Spirit and then indeed was the time of Reformation then the Spirit was not given to Moses David Abraham till Christ came in the flesh more then to Pharoah Nebuchadnezar or other heathen 7. They say with Sadduces that Angels good or ill are nothing but imaginations thoughts and motions of the minde of man as if imaginations were sent to deliver the Saints beare them in their armes pitch their tents about us open prison doores taught us Gods will saw the face of God tempted us to sinne send diseases on us lied teached lies spoke Scripture to Christ as good and ill Angels do They say man was made of a body and opinion in place of a soule that the other enemy the world is nothing and sin an naked opinion 8. They said God was not onely he in whom we live move subsist have a being Act. 17. but there was neither reason nor will in us more then in stones God doth all the wickednesse villanies perjuries incests in